ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH,

CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.

C.P.No.D-2321 of 2014

C.P.No.D-2339 of 2014

C.P.No.D-2283 of 2014

C.P.No.D-09 of 2015

C.P.No.D-10 of 2015

C.P.No.D-22 of 2015

C.P.No.D-47 of 2015

C.P.No.D-171 of 2015

C.P.No.D-215 of 2015

C.P.No.D-242 of 2015

C.P.No.D-299 of 2015

C.P.No.D-761 of 2015

 

DATE         ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

 

             

28-04-2015.

                        Mr. Muhammad Ali Rind, Advocate of petitioner in

                        C.P.No.D-2321 of 2014

 

                        Mr. Ayaz Hussain Tunio Advocate for petitioner in

                        C.P.No.D-2339 of 2014, C.P.No.D-171 of 2015,

                        C.P.No.D-215 of 2015 & C.P.No.D-299 of 2015

 

                        Mr.  Bhagwandas Bheel, Advocate for petitioner in

                        C.P.No.D-2283 of 2014, CP.No.D-09 of 2015,

                        CP.No.D-10 of 2015 & C.P.No.D-22 of 2015

 

                        Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio, Advocate for petitioner in

                        C.P.No.D-47 of 2015.

 

                        Mr. Muhammad Sachal Awan, Advocate for petitioner in

                        C.P.No.D-242 of 2015

 

                        Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah, Advocate for petitioner in

                        C.P.No.D-761 of 2015, so also for Respondent No.3 in

                        CP.No.D-2339/2014, 09/2015, 10/2015, 22/2015, 171/2015,

                        215/2015, for respondent No.4 in D-2283/2014, D-47/2015

                        For Respondent No.5 in D-158/2015 & 242/2015, for

                        Respondent No.7 in D-2321/2014 and for respondents

                        No.3,8,9 & 13 in C.P.No.D-299 of 2015.

 

                        Mr. Pir Bukhsh Bhurgari Advocate for respondent No.4 in

                        C.P.No.D-171 of 2015.

 

                        Mr. Karamullah Memon, Advocate for respondent No.5 in

                        C.P.No.D-09 of 2015

 

                        Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro, A.A.G Sindh alongwith Mr.

                        Jahangir Memon Assistant Director Industries Hyderabad.

 

                        Mr. Anwer H. Ansari, State counsel in C.P.No.D-242/2015

                        C.P.No.D-299 of 2015

                        ==

 

                        The above constitutional petitions have been filed by the members of different Primary School Teachers Association and they have challenged the illegalities and irregularities of the election as well as violation of their own by-laws committed by the Election Committees. It is the dispute that some of the candidates were declared successful but subsequently their candidature was cancelled and in their place other persons have been declared successful candidates. It is also grievance that some of the accounts of the association was changed and signing mandate was withdrawn by the Treasurer and funds are depositing in some other accounts. It is also stated that in the voter list names of non-members have been included and some actual members have been delisted so they may not caste their votes to the candidates. It is also stated that in some cases non-members of association have been allowed to cast their votes. It is further  stated that in C.P.No.D-2321 of 2014 election schedule in Taluka Tando Ghulam Hyder has been suspended and despite passing restraining orders, the private respondents in violation of status-quo orders held the election and declared their favorites as successful candidate, and same order was passed in the connected petitions whereby the election process stayed but private respondents in that petitions also held the election in violation of interim order of this court.

                        On the contrary learned counsel for private respondents raised plea that in some cases the persons were transferred from one district to another district, despite transferring they were allowed to contest the election and they were also defaulter and voter list was also managed by some of the petitioners. It is further contended that despite passing interim order in C.P.No.D-2339/2014

                       

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                            JUDGE

 

                                                                        JUDGE

 

ars