ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SINDH AT KARACHI
C.P. No.D-339 of 2012
ORDER
WITH THE SIGNATURE OF THE JUDGE
1) For
Katcha Peshi.
2) For
hearing of CMA No.1894/2012 (Stay)
----------------------
02.05.2013
Mr. Syed Shafqat Ali Shah Masoomi, Advocate for
Petitioner.
Mr. Syed Mohsin Imam, D.A.G. along with Syed
Israr Ali, Additional Director, FIA.
Mr. Asif Ali Abdul Razzak Soomro, Advocate for
Respondents No.4 to 6, 8, 10 & 11.
Mr. Sher Muhammad Shaikh, Addl: Advocate
General Sindh
Mr. Zafar Ahmad Khan, Addl: Prosecutor General
Sindh
------------------------------------------------
NAIMATULLAH PHULPOTO, J.--- Through this constitution petition, filed
on 02.02.2012, petitioner seeks following reliefs:
(a)
To
direct the respondent No.6 from provincial police officer (IGP) to provide the
foolproof security to the petitioner and his family members, wife/children, as
the petitioner and his family members are in danger at the hands of proposed
accused who are highly influential.
(b)
To
direct the respondent No.2 to register the F.I.R. against the proposed accused
and investigate the matter according to law.
(c)
Ad
interim injunction may be granted to the effect that respondent No.2 may be
restrained not to arrest the petitioner on the basis of illegally and
unlawfully, forcibly signatures obtained on the documents viz. proposals,
agreements, 57 cheques of the HBL account, SITE Branch Hyderabad, the
signatures obtained on those documents forcibly, threat to life, due to torture
during the imprisonment of the petitioner on in central prison Karachi on 17th
August 2010 and during imprisonment signatures were obtained on proposal,
agreements, 57 postdated cheques, and pay orders of 23,66,000/- under pressure
on 26th August 2010 and petitioner was informed if he will not
signed the agreement he shall not be released on bail. Respondent No.2 may be
further directed that in case FIA authorities want to arrest the petitioner
prior permission may be obtained from this Honourable Court.
(d)
Any
other relief which this Honourable Court deem fit and proper in the
circumstances of the case.
(e)
Cost
of the petition may be awarded.
Notice
was issued to the respondents as well as Advocate General Sindh and Prosecutor
General Sindh. Parawise comments have been filed by respondents Nos.4 to 6, 8, 10
and 11, in which it is stated that prior to this C.P. No.D-3133/2010 was filed
for quashment of F.I.R. and it was disposed of vide order dated 17.08.2011. It
is further stated that Petitioner has exhausted all the remedies available to
him under the law upto Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan. It is also stated
that bail has been refused to the petitioner by the trial Court so also by the
High Court and presently the petitioner is absconder. It is prayed that
constitution petition may be dismissed.
Mr.
Shafqat Ali Shah Masoomi, learned Advocate for
petitioner argued that respondent No.2 may be directed to register the F.I.R.
against the proposed accused. He has further submitted that respondent No.2 may
be restrained not to arrest the petitioner. According to learned Advocate for
the petitioner signatures of the petitioner have been obtained by force on 57
cheques of HBL Site Branch Hyderabad.
Mr.
Mohsin Imam, learned D.A.G., assisted by Mr. Asif Ali Soomro, Advocates for
respondents Nos.4 to 6, 8, 10 and 11 argued that petitioner is fugitive from
the law, concession of bail has been refused to him by the trial Court so also
by the High Court, alternate remedy is available to the petitioner to approach
the concerned Sessions Judge/Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, petition is not
maintainable.
We
have carefully heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the
relevant record.
An
Ex-Officio Justice of Peace may issue appropriate directions to the police
authorities concerned on a complaint regarding non-registration of a criminal
case, such alternate and adequate remedy is available to the petitioner, without
exhausting that remedy, the petitioner has filed the instant constitution
petition. No compelling circumstances have been pointed out by the petitioner
to approach this Court directly by invoking the constitutional jurisdiction. The
powers conferred on Sessions Judges as Justice of Peace by virtue of their
offices are vast. Under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of
Pakistan, 1973 merely directions could be issued if at all a case is made
out. Since jurisdiction under section
22-A and 22-B Cr.PC vests both in High Court and Court of Sessions as a rule of
propriety. Where concurrent jurisdiction vests in two Courts than a Court
subordinate to be approached in the first instance where remedy of approaching
Justice of Peace under Section 22-A and 22-B Cr.PC is available and the same
being more efficacious and more speedy remedy. Therefore,
petitioner may avail such alternate remedy instead of approaching this Court by
invoking constitutional jurisdiction. There is no legal force in the contention
of learned counsel for the petitioner that police may be ordered not to arrest
the petitioner in the F.I.R. This court cannot interfere in the investigation.
Police officer should be given freehand to investigate the case with his own wisdom
unless mala fide is shown. It is also pointed out by the learned counsel for
the respondents that petitioner is fugitive from the law and he has been
refused bail by the trial Court and presently he is absconding. It is also well
established law that a fugitive from the law and Courts loses some of the
normal rights guaranteed by the procedure so also substantive law. Despite
directions of the Court petitioner has also chosen to remain absent before this
Court today, it shows that petitioner has not approached this Court with clean
hands. Therefore, constitution petition is without merits and the same is
dismissed, accordingly.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Gulsher/PA