ORDER-SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT LARKANA

Constt. Petition No. S-  985 of 2012. 

Date of hearing

Order with signature of Judge

21.01.2013.

1. For order on office objection.

2. For Katcha Peshi.

Messrs Abdul Razzak Jamali and Abdul Sattar Janvri, Advocates for petitioners.

Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed Shahani, State Counsel.

~~~~

          Statements have been filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 and 9, which are taken on record. Mr. Muhammad Ahmed Khan Pathan, Advocate files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents No.4 to 8.

          Learned counsels appearing for the parties agreed the disposal of the petition that since the petitioners are lawfully wedded, therefore, they should not be harassed or humiliated by the official respondents. However, this does not suggest that if any offence has been committed by the petitioners, the official respondents or any other concerned would be restrained from taking steps in furtherance of the offence that is claimed to have been committed y the petitioners or any of the petitioner.  Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with directions to the official respondents not to cause any harassment to the petitioners and provide protection to their lives and liberty subject to above reservations.

Judge