ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA.
Cr. Bail Appln. NO. S- 547 of 2012.
Dated order with signature of hon’ble Judge.
1. For order on M.A No.2827/2012.
2. For Hearing.
29.01.2013.
Mr. Shahbaz Ali Khan Brohi, advocate for the applicants.
Mr. Abdul Rasheed Soomro, State Counsel.
======
Applicants have preferred this bail application in respect of case registered vide Crime No.123/2012 at P.S New Faujdari U/S 364, 511, 324, 148, 149 PPC.
Brief facts of the prosecution case as narrated are that “Complainant Sajjad Ahmed Kalhoro lodged FIR with Police Station New Foujdari on 19.6.2012 at 1530 hours alleging therein that he resides on the above mentioned address, and their native place village Mehar Pur Kalhoro and there is also house of complainant. There is hen farm of complainant behind his house in village Meharpur which is being looked after by them. On the night of incident complainant and his younger brother Amjad Kalhoro aged about 23/24 years and sister’s son Adil S/O Faqir Mohammad Kalhoro and relative Fateh Mohammad S/O Jan Mohammad Kalhoro were sleeping together in the hen farm, the electric bulbs were burning in the farm. On 19.6.2012 at about 2.30 a.m the complainant and witnesses woke up on the noise, they saw and identified on electric bulbs accused (1) Gulzar S/O Jaro (2) Mohammad Khan S/O Qaim (3)Hussain Bux S/O Sher Mohammad all by caste Brohi R/O Village Meharpur with K.Ks and three unidentified accused whose faces were open if again shown they will identify them, they started beating with lathies to his brother Amjad Kalhoro and on the force of weapons were abducting to him while dragging him, the complainant and PWs raised cries and his brother Amjad resisted with accused persons and then accused Gulzar Brohi fired with his K.K with the intention to murder upon his brother Amjad which hit him on left side arm chest, who raised cries and fell down on the ground. All the accused went out from farm. Complainant and P.Ws then saw that his brother received firearm injury on left side of chest blood was oozing and was seriously injured. Complainant then with the help of PWs took his brother to Civil Hospital Shikarpur for treatment where his brother was under treatment and then complainant went to police station New Foujdari and lodged the report against accused persons.”
It is contended by the learned counsel that no role has been prescribed against the accused Mohammad Khan and Hussain Bux though a specific role if at all revealed from the FIR is against accused Gulzar Brohi who with his K.K, with intention to commit murder, fired which hit the victim Amjad S/O Yar Mohammad Kalhoro on his left side arm chest. It is further contended that incident took place in the odd hours of the night i.e. 2.30 a.m and there is possibility that applicant has not been recognized. It was further argued that on account of making hue and cry the accused left the place of incident after causing injuries to Amjad. Learned counsel submits that in terms of section 364, the offence include the abduction with intention to commit murder and if at all the applicants have come with such intention then there was nothing to prevent the applicants from committing murder as in terms of the FIR the complainant and his brother Amjad were empty handed. Learned counsel submits that in view of facts and circumstances the case of prosecution has become one of further inquiry.
On the other hand, learned State Counsel has supported the impugned order and submitted that in terms of the medical report dated 28.06.2012 one LTP wound of entry measuring 0.75 cm is in diameter and circular in shape was found and second injury is LTP wound of exit measuring 5.5 x 3.00 cm margin irregular in shape.
Such injury in terms of the FIR was apparently caused by accused Gulzar who is stated to have used K.K with intention to commit murder of Amjad. Such report is also silent as far as other injury which allegedly caused by the lathi blows are concerned. The enmity that has been shown between Kalhoro and Brohi community is also vigorously pleaded and such can not be ruled out. As such the applicant has made out a case of further inquiry.
I therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, enlarge the applicants on bail on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.300,000/= each and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.
JUDGE