ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA.
Cr. Bail Appln. No: S-418 of 2012.
Date Order with signature of judge.
For Hearing.
05.11.2012.
Mr. Rafique Ahmed K. Abro, advocate for the applicant/accused.
Mr. Abdul Rasheed Soomro, State Counsel.
========
NAIMATULLAH PHULPOTO,J.:- Applicant/accused Arbab Ali seeks bail in Crime No.31/2012 registered against accused at P.S Abad District Jacobabad on 04.08.2012 U/S 324, 353, 412, 34 PPC.
Brief facts of the prosecution case as disclosed in the FIR are that on 04.08.2012 SHO P.S Abad left P.S vide roznamcha entry No.15 at 0300 hours alongwith subordinate staff for patrolling. While patrolling he received wireless message that one Toyota Corolla XLI car No.GS7985 Model 2003 white colour snatched from the jurisdiction of P.S Shahrah e Faisal Karachi was being brought to the Jacobabad. Such case was registered at Karachi. On such information, nakabandi was held. At about 0400 hours a car white coloured appeared on the road in which two persons were sitting. Police directed the car driver to stop it on which car was stopped. As soon as car was stopped, persons sitting in the car got down and drew out T.T pistols from their folds of shalwars and started firing upon the police party. Police party also fired in self defence which lasted for 10 minutes thereafter it is alleged that accused were arrested in presence of mashirs HC Nizamuddin and PC- Qaimuddin and T.T pistols were recovered from the possession of accused. On inquiry, they disclosed their names as Arbab Ali S/O Lal Mohammad Brohi (present applicant) and Naseer Ahmed S/O Imam Bux Pathan and stated that T.T pistols were without license and car bearing No.GS7985 was snatched by them from Shahrah-e Faisal Karachi. Thereafter, accused were arrested, mashirnama of arrest and recovery was prepared and FIR was lodged on behalf of the State under the above referred sections.
After usual investigation challan was submitted against the applicant under section 324, 353, 412, 34 PPC case was sent to the Court of Sessions Judge, Jacobabad. Bail application on behalf of applicant was moved before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Jacobabad same was rejected vide order dated 17.08.2012. Thereafter applicant has approached to this Court.
Learned counsel for the applicant contended that despite firing with the sophisticated weapons which lasted for 10 minutes none received injury in the incident from either side. It is argued that prosecution story is highly doubtful. All P.Ws are police officials, case has been challaned, there is no question of tampering with prosecution evidence. Applicant is victim of police enmity.
Mr. Abdul Rasheed Soomro, State Counsel conceded to contentions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant and recorded no objection to the grant of bail.
I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant Arbab Ali for the reasons that despite cross firing for sufficient time no one received injury in the incident. All the P.Ws are police officials. Challan has already been submitted and there is no question of tampering with the evidence.
For the above reasons I hold that prima facie case against the applicant/accused Arbab Ali requires further inquiry as contemplated U/S 497(2) Cr.P.C therefore, concession of bail is extended to the applicant/accused on his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.200,000/= and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.
JUDGE