ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA.

Cr. Revision Appln. No:  S-73 of 2011.

Date                          Order with signature of judge.

1. For orders on M.A No. 2297/2011.

2. For Katcha Peshi.        

3. For orders on M.A No.2298/2011.

03.11.2011.

Mr. Mohammad Usif Magsi, advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Naimatullah Bhurgri, State Counsel.

=========

1. Granted.

        2&3.        Heard learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner.  He  submits that the  applicant/petitioner   has been involved in Crime No. 247/2010 of P.S Shahdadkot  which was registered U/S 188, 170 and 171 PPC.  He submits that   the very FIR  U/S 188 PPC  is not sustainable under  the law.   He submits that no Court shall take  cognizable of any offence punishable U/S 188 of PPC except  on the complaint  in writing of the public servant concerned or  some other public servant  to whom he is subordinate.    He submits that all the proceedings have   taken place in violation  of section 195 Cr.P.C.  He has placed  reliance  in a case reported in PLD1996 Peshawar 37.   

                        Contentions raised require consideration. Admit. Notice. Call R&Ps. Adjourned to a date in office.

                        Learned counsel submits that applicant has been awarded punishment R.I for 3  months and fine of Rs.600/= and in default of payment of fine he shall suffer  S.I for further 50 days.   He further submits that the benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C  was also extended to the applicant/petitioner.  He submits that learned appellate Court  dismissed the appeal of the applicant/petitioner  without going  through the law  laid down by the superior Courts  in the cases  falling  under the provision of section 195  Cr.P.C.  He further submits that sentence is short one and due to heavy work load upon  this Court,  this revision application  will take time  for its final hearing. He submits that the sentence of the applicant/ petitioner may be suspended. 

                        Mr. Naimatullah Bhurgri, State Counsel    concedes   for suspension of sentence  of the applicant/petitioner. 

                        Considering the above facts and circumstances    and no objection recorded by  the  learned State Counsel,  sentence of the petitioner is suspended  subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/= with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of  Additional Registrar of this Court.

JUDGE