ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Criminal Bail Application No.441 of 2026

[ Muhammad Noman s/o Qazi Riaz Hussain versus the State ]

DATE

ORDER WITH SIGNATUREs OF JUDGEs

 

For hearing of bail application

-----------------------------------------------------

12.03.2026

Mr. Pervaiz Iqbal Butt, advocate for applicant

Mr. Sharafuddin Kanhar, A.P.G.

SIP/IO Malik Aziz-ur-Rehman of PS Manghopir

-------------------------------------

            Applicant/accused Noman Khan son of Riaz Hussain seeks post arrest bail in FIR No.851/2025, registered at P.S. Manghopir, for offence under Sections 420, 423, 467, 468, 471, 474, 34, PPC, after rejection of his bail plea by learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Karachi West vide order dated 27.01.2026.

 

2.         Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 13.11.2025 present applicant visited Police Station Manghopir and handed over letter dated 11.09.2024, issued by JM-XXVI, Karachi west regarding return of case property Crime under Section 550 Cr.PC i.e. Vehicle No.LWN6828, Model No.1981, whereby SHO was ordered to return the vehicle. Said letter appeared to be suspected, which was dispatched to Court for the purpose of verification through PC Zain Abass to which the Court replied in writing that the said letter is forged. Said Muhammad Noman again came to police station and asked for return of said vehicle, however, he was arrested, his person search was conducted and recovered JM-XV Karachi Central letter, which was taken in possession; on further personal search two rich mobiles TECNO CAMMON40 I Phone-11, Cash Rs.850/-, his original CNIC, Motorcycle No.KPU-1440, which were taken in possession. On inquiry he disclosed that he got prepared these stamps and letters with the help of one Bashir who resides in old Sabzi Mandi. Hence the subject FIR.

 

3.         Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case due to mala fide intentions and ulterior motives; that neither the applicant has produced any letter to the police for release of vehicle nor the vehicle was detained at police station; that there is no record that any entry was made by the police regarding receiving the letter dated 11.09.2024 and the letter was managed by police; that case has been challaned and applicant is no more required for further investigation. He finally prayed for grant of post arrest bail to the accused.

 

4.         On the other hand, learned A.P.G. submits that there is sufficient material available on record to connect him in the alleged offence and he has managed/prepared fake and false documents on order to release the vehicle from police station and the police recovered from his possession another letter of same nature having issued by Judicial Magistrate-XV, Karachi Central; that the alleged offence comes within the ambit of prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.PC; that he is involved in five other criminal cases of kidnapping for ransom, robbery and other heinous offences, hence he is not entitled for grant of post arrest bail.

 

5.         Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.P.G. and perused the material available on record.

 

6.         The allegation against the applicant that he has produced letter dated 11.09.2024 issued by Judicial Magistrate-XXVI, Karachi West for release of Vehicle No.LWN-6828, Model 1981, Hino Maker, Engine No.JOSCUJ11365. On receiving such letter, police got the said letter verified and the learned concerned Court has written letter dated 15.11.2025, contents of the same are reproduced as under:

 

“Whereas, verification in respect of release order regarding the vehicle truck No.LWN-6828, Model 1981, Hino maker, engine No JOSCUJ11365 is required by your office, I have searched the whole record but no any such kind of record is found regarding any application submitted by the applicant namely Bashir Ahmed S/O Muhammad Sharif and no such as order is passed, said document is false and forged. The round seal on the said letter is not similar and it bears the different description.

 

Further in order to ascertain the truth Signature was also verified from the concerned learned judicial magistrate namely Miss Rehana Shar to which the then has clarified that it is not her signature and the signature bears on said letter is fake.

 

In view of above it appears that this document is fake and forged same is managed one. Therefore you are directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law under intimation to this court.”

 

7.         It has come on record that applicant has prepared and produced a fake and false letter, allegedly issued by learned Judicial Magistrate-XXVI, Karachi West. Learned counsel for applicant mainly contended that no such vehicle is seized by police and fake story has been managed by the police. Learned A.P.G. has denied and submits that vehicle is property entered in the book 19 of P.S. Moreover, applicant has criminal record and he is previously involved in heinous offences of kidnapping for ransom, robbery and other offences. Sufficient material is available on record which connects the applicant in the alleged offence, which comes within the ambit of prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.PC. Therefore, no case for grant of post arrest bail is made out and the instant criminal bail application is dismissed.

 

8.         The observations made herein above are tentative in nature and would not prejudice the case of either party at trial.

 

9.         Instant criminal bail application is disposed of in the above terms.

 

                                                                                   J U D G E

Gulsher/PS