ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Criminal Bail Application No.3198 of 2025

Criminal Bail Application No.3209 of 2025

DATE

ORDER WITH SIGNATUREs OF JUDGEs

 

1.      For orders on M.A. No.18527/2025

2.      For orders on M.A. No.18528/2025

3.      For hearing of bail application

---------------------------------------------

26.02.2026

Mr. Hasnain Ali Chohan & Ms. Samreen Ali Zaidi, advocate for applicant in B.A. No.3209/2025

Mr. Sharafuddin Kanhar, A.P.G. & Ms. Rukhsana Qassim Mirjat, ADPP

Mr. Muhammad Irfan Ali, advocate for complainant

SIO PI Mir Muhammad Lashari, PS Saeedabad presently at PS Boat Basin

------------------------------------

 

            Applicants Syed Abrar ul Hassan and Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah (in Cr. Bail Application No.3198/2025) and Hassan Naeem and Noman Naeem both sons of Muhammad Naeem (in Cr. B.A. 3209/2025) seek pre-arrest bail in FIR No.499/2025, registered at P.S. Saeedabad for offence under Sections 397, 420, 34, PPC, after rejection of their bail plea by learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Karachi West vide order dated 18.11.2025.

 

            Brief facts of the prosecution case are that complainant approached applicant Syed Abrar for purchase of Suzuki Alto, Model 2020, bearing Registration No.BSA-231 and reached at the given location at Saeedabad, Haroon Bahria Society where Abrar and 3 other persons were available. Car deal was finalized at Rs.2 Million, after checking the car complainant paid Rs.10,60,000/- in cash and balance Rs.940,000/- was transferred to Abrar’s Account No.PK25ABPA0010145799960018. Thereafter, Abrar took out pistol, snatched original registration book and key of said vehicle from complainant, hence the subject FIR.

 

            Learned counsel for applicants in Criminal Bail Application No.3209/2025 submits that applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case; that applicant Noman is owner of vehicle and there is no criminal record of applicants Noman Naeem and Hassan Naeem and, in fact, they both are victims of co-accused Syed Abrar ul Hassan Shah and Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah, who placed advertisement on OLX for sale of aforesaid vehicle without their consent and otherwise they have nothing to do with co-accused Abrar ul Hassan Shah and Zahoor ul Hassan Shah; that case of applicants Noman Naeem and Hassan Naeem requires further inquiry in terms of Sections 497(2), Cr.PC.

 

            Mr. Muhammad Adeem Memon, advocate, was holding brief for Mr. Zakir Husain Bughio, counsel for applicants in Cr. B.A. No.3198/2025, but during arguments, he left the Court premises without any intimation. Applicant Syed Zahoor ul Hassan is present on interim pre-arrest bail but his son co-accused Syed Abrar ul Hassan is called absent. He submits that he is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case due to mala fide intention and ulterior motives.

 

            On the other hand, learned A.P.G., assisted by learned counsel for complainant, opposed for grant of bail on the ground that there is a criminal history of applicants/accused as 10 case have been registered against Syed Zahoor ul Hassan and 5 cases have been registered against applicant/accused Syed Abrar ul Hassan; that complainant of this case has paid Rs.2 Million to applicant/accused Syed Abrar ul Hassan (Cash Amount Rs.10,60,000/- and Rs.940,000/- by way of online transfer to his account). Learned counsel for complainant submits that they have misused the concession of bail and during pendency of instant bail application, they have committed another offence and such FIR bearing No.789/2025 was registered against them at P.S. Preedy, Karachi for offence under Section 489-F, PPC.

 

            Heard learned counsel for the applicants/accused, learned A.P.G., learned counsel for complainant and perused the material available on record.

 

            It appears that there is a gang, comprising of Syed Abrar ul Hassan Shah and Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah, who used to cheat the innocent people through online and usurped their cash and valuables by cheating and committing robbery. Applicant/accused Syed Zahoor ul Hassan is involved in 10 cases and Syed Abrar ul Hassan, who is son of Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah is involved in 5 cases of like nature. During pendency of instant criminal bail application another FIR bearing No.789/2025 was registered against them at P.S. Preedy, Karachi for offence under Section 489-F, PPC and they misused the concession of bail. IO present in Court submits that after getting interim pre-arrest bail in the instant criminal bail application applicants/accused Syed Abrar ul Hassan Shah and Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah have never joined the investigation. This aspect is sufficient to recall their interim pre-arrest bail. However, in my humble view, so far as the case of applicants/accused Hassan Naeem and Noman Naeem, who are owner of the vehicle, is concerned, the complainant has never paid amount to them and there is no criminal record of the applicant, they have joined the investigation and their case requires further enquiry, therefore their case is distinguishable from the case of applicants Syed Abrar ul Hassan Shah and Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah, therefore, interim pre-arrest bail granted to them by this Court vide order dated 20.11.2025 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions.

 

            At this stage, learned A.P.G. submits that applicants/accused Syed Abrar ul Hassan Shah and Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah have never joined the investigation after getting interim pre-arrest bail and the IO needs their custody of both the said accused in order to finalize the investigations and requests that the custody of Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah may be handed over to the IO. Order accordingly.

 

            In view of the above, Criminal Bail Application No.3198/2025 of applicants/accused Syed Abrar ul Hassan Shah and Syed Zahoor ul Hassan Shah, devoid of merits, is hereby dismissed and interim pre-arrest bail granted to them by this Court vide order dated 19.11.2025 is hereby recalled.

 

            The observations made herein above are tentative in nature, the same would not prejudice the case of either party at trial.

 

            Both the captioned criminal bail applications are accordingly disposed of.

 

                                                                                                                        J U D G E

Gusher/PS