ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Criminal Bail Application No.37 of 2026

[ Adnan Khan son of Abdul Raheem vs The State ]

DATE

ORDER WITH SIGNATUREs OF JUDGEs

 

For orders on office objection as at “A”

For hearing of bail application

-----------------------------------------------------

10.02.2026

            Mr. Javaid Ahmed Rajput, advocate along with applicant

            Ms. Seema Zaidi, Additional Prosecutor General Sindh

            IO/PI Qalandar Bux of PS Mominabad

            -------------------------------------------

 

            Applicant Adnan Khan son of Abdul Raheem seeks pre-arrest bail in FIR No.611/2025, registered at P.S. Mominabad for offence under Section 336, 324, PPC read with Section 302, PPC (added in final challan), after dismissal of his bail plea by learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Karachi West vide order dated 05.11.2025.

 

            It is alleged in the FIR that ASI Faiz Muhammad after obtaining statement complainant under section 154, Cr.PC from the room of burns ward Civil Hospital Karachi on 17.10.2025 at 2330 hours where Mst. Shabina wife of Adnan disclosed that she used to reside at Irani Camp, Near Madina Masjid, Sector 11, Orangi Town, Karachi on rental basis with family, along with first husband, namely, Nadeem and two children one boy and one girl, first husband expired, then she met with Adnan, who offered her to solemnize marriage, however, complainant asked him that she has two children but he ignored and solemnized Nikah. His family does not know about such marriage. On 16.10.2025 at time about 01:30 a.m. Adnan along with his family members came, he was holding one plastic bottle in his hand which contained petrol, his family members, there was a hot talk exchanged, in result whereof Adnan got aggressive, he throw petrol on complainant, burnt her and ran away. On hue and cry, the area people came, the children of the complainant also started to cry, the area people put off the fire and shifted her to the hospital in a critical condition, hence the subject FIR.

 

            Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case due to family dispute; that there is no eye witness of the alleged incident and whole prosecution case rests on the statement of the alleged victim recorded by police on 17.10.2025, hence his case calls for further inquiry in terms of Section 497, Cr.PC.

 

            Learned Additional Prosecutor General Sindh opposed for grant of bail on the ground that applicant is nominated in FIR with specific role of causing murder of his wife Mst. Shabina Adnan and the alleged offence carries capital punishment, hence he is not entitled for grant of bail.

 

            Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Prosecutor General Sindh and perused the material available on record.

 

            Applicant is husband of deceased Mst. Shabina Adnan, aged about 19 years. It is alleged in the FIR that applicant set on fire his wife by sprinkled petrol on her body, she was burnt and was shifted to Civil Hospital and was admitted in Burns Ward in a critical condition where police recorded her statement under section 154, Cr.PC on 18.10.2025 and subsequently on the basis of her statement FIR was registered against the applicant. During treatment she died on 14.11.2025 and FIR of this case was converted into 302, PPC. Applicant is nominated in the FIR with specific role. No mala fide has been established by the applicant to falsely implicate by his own wife. In pre-arrest bail applicant has to establish his case for false implication on the part of the prosecution, as observed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases 2020 SCMR 249 (Gulshan Ali Solangi versus the State) and 2021 SCMR 1305 (Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited versus Sarfaraz Khan Jadoon). I do not see any mala fide on the part of the deceased to falsely implicate him in this case. No case for grant of bail is made out, therefore, instant criminal bail application is dismissed.

The observations made herein above are tentative in nature, the same would not prejudice the case of either party at trial.

 

            The instant criminal bail application is accordingly disposed of.

 

                                                                                                            J U D G E

Gulsher/PS