IN THE HIGH
COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
Crl. Revision Appln. No.S-55 of 2021
|
DATE
OF HEARING |
ORDER WITH
SIGNATURE OF JUDGE. |
For hearing of main case.
26.09.2024
Mr. Ali Gul
Abbasi, Advocate for applicant.
Mr. Ashoke
Kumar K. Jamba, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7.
Mr. Shafi
Muhammad Maitlo, D.P.G for the State.
Agha Athar
Hussain Pathan, AAG.
***************
Learned counsels in the matter on going through the
impugned order agreed that in case demarcation of the applicants legally entitled
area is made out the controversies in the matter are liable to be resolved. In
this regard as participation of learned AAG was required as such called upon
for assistances who was pleased to waive notice. Learned AAG concedes to the required
demarcation provided the legal entitle of possession is available to the
applicant, irrespective to the Mukhtiarkar’s report favouring the entitlement
otherwise present. Accordingly, it is ordered that the Mukhtiarkar concerned and
Survey Superintendent, Khairpur the concerned officials shall conduct the
exercise to demarcate the legally entitled land of the applicant for which the
required legal charges shall be paid by the applicant, said exercise shall be
concluded within 30 days.
Matter stands disposed of in the above terms.
J U D G E
Ihsan/*