IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

 

 

Crl. Bail Application No.S-908 of 2025

 

    

DATE OF

HEARING

 

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

 

For hearing of post-arrest bail.

 

 

Date of hearing     30.10.2025.

 

 

Mr. Zamir Hussain Talpur, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. Khalil Ahmed Maitlo, D.P.G for State.

                         ********

 

 

                                                O R D E R

 

         

 

          Applicant seeks post-arrest bail in this matter wherein it is alleged that the applicant alongwith other persons deprived the complainant and other persons of their valuables against show of weapons on the road at night time.

 

          Complainant present he relies upon proceeding of the case on part of the learned Deputy Prosecutor General.

 

          Learned counsel for the applicant contends that there is unexplained delay in lodging of the FIR although the Police Station is said to be only Five K.Ms away. He further contends that specific role of the applicant is not available; that the night time incident without any resistance available on part of the persons being deprived is strange element. He further contends that the co-worker is a witness and no document in respect to the goods transport working as alleged has been brought-up. It is also contended that no injury has been reported as no medical certificate has been brought-up. He lastly contended that no recovery has been effected against the applicant and the applicant does not carry any criminal record.

 

          Learned Deputy Prosecutor General however, opposes the bail application contending that the offences against the present applicant are non-bailable and are well covered by the prohibitory element. He further contends that the offence considered to be against the public at large is not liable to be entertained for bail and it is also contended that no enmity has been shown to bring the matter within the ambit of further inquiry.

 

          Having heard the learned counsels and gone through the record. Apparently, the applicant has been named in the FIR which is beyond common sense apart from no recovery having been effected the applicant is not having any criminal record as CRO was called of the applicant in the first round when matter was heard. In the circumstances the applicant is liable to be considered for further inquiry as to the guilt of the offences alleged against him. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed and the applicant namely, Yakoob alias Loto alias Dhando Gopang is admitted to post-arrest bail Crime No.134 of 2025 registered with Police Station, Kumb u/s 397 PPC subject to furnishing his solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.

 

          Needless to mention here that observation as above are tentative in nature and not meant to affect merits of the case before the learned trial Court.

 

Bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.

 

                                                                                      J U D G E

 

Ihsan/PS.