ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
Criminal Bail Application No.1000
of 2025
|
DATE |
ORDER WITH
SIGNATUREs OF JUDGEs |
For hearing of bail
application
------------------------------------------
12.05.2025
Ms.
Janipher Stephen Johnson, advocate for applicant
Ms.
Amna Ansari, Additional Prosecutor General Sindh
SIP
Illahi Bux Wafa of PS Clifton Karachi
Complainant
Muzzamil Shah present
------------------------------------
Applicant/accused Rahib son of Hakim Masih seeks
post arrest bail in FIR No.35/2025, registered at P.S. Clifton, Karachi for
offence under Section 397, 34, PPC, who is allegedly involved in the instant
case on the allegation of committing robbery/dacotiy
on gunpoint from the complainant and robbed Rs.30,000/-
containing in his purse and mobile phone containing SIM Card No.0326314832 and
escape away.
2. Learned counsel for applicant argued
that applicant is not nominated in the FIR and nothing incriminating material
has been recovered from his possession. Moreover, complainant has recorded his
no objection for grant of bail. In support of her contention, she relied upon
the case of Tasawar Hussain
versus the State (2021 YLR Note 124).
3. On the other hand, learned Additional
Prosecutor General Sindh has opposed for grant of bail on the ground that alleged
offence is heinous one and there is criminal history of applicant/accused, who
is involved in four other like nature cases.
4. Heard learned counsel for applicant,
learned Additional Prosecutor General Sindh and complainant and carefully
perused the material available on record.
5. From perusal of record it appears that
alleged offence is not compoundable; so far as affidavit sworn by complainant
to the extent of no objection for grant of bail to the applicant is concerned,
it carries no weight. Per learned Additional Prosecutor General Sindh he is
also involved in 4 other criminal cases of like nature. Complainant has rightly
identified the applicant in identification parade during investigation.
Sufficient material is available on record, which connects the applicant in the
commission of alleged offence, therefore, no case of further inquiry in the
case of applicant is made out, as such, instant
criminal bail application is dismissed.
However learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of instant case, expeditiously,
preferably within a period of 3 months.
6. The observations made herein above are
tentative in nature the same would not prejudice the case of either party at
trial.
J U D G E
Gulsher/PS