ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Criminal Transfer Application No.60 of 2024

DATE

ORDER WITH SIGNATUREs OF JUDGEs

 

1.      For orders on office objection as at “A”

2.      For hearing of main case

3.      For hearing of M.A. No.8826/2024

-----------------------------------------------------

05.12.2024

           

            Syed Zaeem Haider, advocate for applicant

            Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Awan, Additional Prosecutor General Sindh

            Mr. Muhammad Noonari, Deputy Prosecutor General Sindh

            ------------------------------------

            Applicant/accused Mohan Lal through this transfer application seeks transfer of Case No.1645/2024, arising out of FIR No.598/2023, registered at P.S. Boat Basin, Karachi, for offence under sections 489-F, 420, 506, 34, PPC, pending before learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate-XI, South Karachi. It appears that prior to this, applicant/accused filed Criminal Transfer Application No.55/2024 before learned Sessions Judge, South Karachi, the same was dismissed vide order dated 26.06.2024. Hence, accused approached this Court for same relief.

 

2.         Notice of this transfer application was issued to respondent No.2 as well as Prosecutor General Sindh and comments were called from the trial Judge. Learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate concerned filed comments dated 18.07.2024, in which it is mentioned that the case is fixed for recording the statement of accused. However, learned Judge denied the allegations leveled against him in transfer application.

 

3.         Learned advocate for applicant/accused Mohan Lal submits that learned trial Judge is conducting trial in a hasty manner and the applicant/accused apprehends that he will not get justice. It is further submitted that several applications moved on behalf of accused have been dismissed by the trial Court, without assigning any reason. Lastly, argued that a fair trial is right of accused, case may be transferred to some other Court.

 

4.         Learned Additional Prosecutor General opposed the transfer application and submitted that trial is concluded and the case is fixed for recording the statement of accused since July, 2024. Learned Additional Prosecutor General further argued that allegations leveled against Presiding Officer have been denied and the apprehensions in the mind of applicant/accused are without any material.

 

5.         I have carefully heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the comments filed by learned trial Judge and orders passed by learned Sessions Judge, Karachi South on transfer application. Learned Sessions Judge in the order dated 26.06.2024 has rightly observed that on mere apprehensions, case cannot be transferred from one Presiding Officer to another. Relevant portion of the order is reproduced as under:

“………. Moreover, it is also view of Superior Courts that while exercising jurisdiction to transfer cases from courts, balance had to be struck in order to ensure that cases were not transferred merely on the basis of suppositions, unfounded and conjectural apprehension, justice was to be done without fear or favour, thus, Presiding Officers should equally be protected from frivolous transfer applications in order to achieve transparent even handed justice so that one of the litigants should not be in a position to overawe the Presiding Officer which might ultimately result in tilting scales of justice under fear of malignity. In this respect reliance can be placed upon case of Abdul Raheem versus The State reported in 2012 YLR 2629 [Sindh]. Therefore, I am of the view that there are no sufficient grounds for transfer of case hence, this application is dismissed. Order accordingly.” 

             

6.         In my considered view, allegations against the presiding officers have not been substantiated by cogent material. Mere self-procured mistrust/apprehension in the mind of applicant that he will not get justice at the hands of presiding officer is no ground for transfer of case. Learned trial Judge in his comments has mentioned that case is fixed for statement of accused. Transfer application is without merits, the same is dismissed. However, trial Court is directed to decide the case, expeditiously.

 

                                                                                                                              J U D G E

 

Gulsher/PS