IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
Cr.
Misc. Application No.235 of 2012
|
DATE |
ORDER
WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE. |
1. For Katcha Peshi.
2. For hearing of
M.A.No.5821/2012.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
16.01.2013
Mr. Amer Raza Naqvi Advocate for the
applicant.
Mr. Noor Mohammad Dayo, Senior
Prosecutor NAB.
-.-.-.-.
After
hearing the matter at length, Mr. Amer Raza Naqvi learned counsel appearing for
the applicant contends that in case necessary directions are imparted to the
Trial Court for finally deciding the case within 120 days, he would not press
this application with the addition that the observations made by the Trial
Court in the impugned order should not come in the way of the accused in the
final adjudication.
Mr.
Dayo has no objection to such proposition.
In
the circumstances, we, while dismissing this application, direct the Trial
Court to expeditiously proceed with the trial and to decide the main case
within 120 days and report compliance to the Incharge of the Accountability
Court through MIT. Mr. Dayo ensures that all the witnesses would be produced
before the Trial Court on each and every date of hearing. In case, the trial is
not concluded within the specified period, the applicant would be at liberty to
move such application afresh on the basis of material, which has been reduced
or has been surfaced, however, adjournment sought on
behalf of the applicant/accused would not be added in 120 days.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Wasim ps