ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH
AT KARACHI
Criminal Jail Appeal
No. 31 of 2014
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE(S) OF
JUDGE(S)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1)
For
orders on M. A. No.925 of 2014
2) For Katcha Peshi
---------------------
17.02.2014
Mr. Abdullah Rajput,
Assistant Prosecutor General Sindh
---------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant
Muhammad Siddique S/o Muhammad Rafiq
was tried by learned Additional Sessions Judge V, Karachi, West in Session Case
N.513 of 2006 in Crime No.139 of 2006 under Sections 302/34 PPC, Section 11 and
10(3) of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, VII of 1979, registered at P.S. Pakistan
Bazar. After full dressed trial, above named Appellant was found guilty for
offence under section 302 PPC and under Section 10(3) of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood)
Ordinance, VII of 1979. Appellant was convicted under section 302 PPC and
sentenced to death. He was also convicted under Section 10(3) offence of Zina Enforcement of Hudood
Ordinance, 1979, and sentenced to 25 years R.I. Trial Court made reference to
this Court for confirmation of death sentence under Section 374 Cr.PC.
2. Convicted
Appellant sent a memo of Appeal through Superintendent, Central Prison, Karachi,
through his letter No.JB/159, dated 03.01.2014
against the Judgment dated 28.11.2013, detailed above. Appeal was barred by
time. It was fixed in the Court for orders. From the perusal of the aforesaid
Judgment, it transpired that Appellant has been convicted under section 302 PPC
and sentenced to death and he has been convicted under Section 10(3) offence
against Zina (Enforcement of Hudood)
Ordinance, VII of 1979 and sentenced to 25 years R.I.
3. Under Article
203-DD of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973, Revisional and
other jurisdictions have been conferred to the Federal Shariat
Court relating to enforcement of Hudood as under:-
“203-DD.—Revisional
and other Jurisdiction of the Court: (1) The Court may
call for and examine the record of any case decided by any criminal Court under
any law relating to the enforcement of Hudood for the
purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety or
any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed by, and as to the regularity
of any proceedings of, such Court and may, when calling for such record, direct
that the execution of any sentence be suspended and, if the accused is in
confinement, that he be released on bail or on his own bond pending the
examination of the record.
(2) In
any case the record of which has been called for by the Court, the Court may
pass such order as it may deem fit and may enhance the sentence;
Provided that nothing in this Article
shall be deemed to authorize the Court to convert a finding of acquittal into
one of conviction and no order under this Article shall be made to the
prejudice of the accused unless the has had an opportunity of being heard in
his own defence.
(3)
The Court shall have such other
jurisdiction as may be conferred on it by or under any law.
4. The offence
of the Zina is covered by the term “Hudood” as contemplated by Article 203-DD of the
Constitution. Appeal or Revision against any order, final or interim, passed by
any criminal Court under any law with regard to the proceedings connected with
or ancillary to or contributing towards commission of any of the above
mentioned offence shall not be entertained by any Court other than by Federal Shariat Court. Therefore, we hold that Federal Shariat Court has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain the
instant Appeal. Reliance can be placed on the case of Abdul Razzak
Aamir versus Government of Islamic Republic of
Pakistan, reported in PLD 2011 FSC 1. Therefore office is directed to return
the memo of the Appeal and copy of impugned judgment to the Appellant through
concerned Jail Superintendent for presenting the same before the Federal Shariat Court, in accordance with law.
Let a copy of this order be sent to
the trial Court for information.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Gulsher/PA