ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR
Constitution Petition No.S-09 of 2022
Date of hearing |
Order with signature of Judge |
Hearing of cases.
1. For orders on office objection at Flag ‘A’.
2. For orders on CMA 23/2022 (Ex)
3. For hearing of main case.
O R D E R.
07.03.2022.
None
present of the petitioner.
-.-.-.
On the last dates of hearing of hearing,
learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to satisfy the Court about the
maintainability of this petition.
2. Today
petitioner and his counsel are called absent while Mr. Ghulam Abbass
Akhter Advocate files vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.5 which is taken
on record.
3. Learned
counsel for respondent No.5 submits that instant petition is not maintainable
in view of Section 58 of Industrial Relations Act, 2012 which provides that
only an appeal can be preferred to the Commission under sub-section (1) shall
be disposed of by the Full Bench of the Commission of National Industrial
Relations, that Section 59 of the said Act provides that No Court shall entertain any plea as to
the jurisdiction of the Commission of as the legality or propriety of anything
done or purporting to be done by the Commission of any of its Benches, and no
order, decision, judgment or sentence of the Commission shall be called in
question in any manner, whatsoever, in or before any Court or other authority.
4. I have heard learned counsel for
respondent No.5 and have gone through the material available on record.
5. Perusal of record shows that the
grievance application filed by the petitioner before the National Industrial
Relation Commission Bench at Sukkur, was found to be time barred and the same
was dismissed vide order dated 12.11.2021.
Admittedly section 58 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, provides
that only an Appeal preferred to the Commission under sub-section (1) shall be
disposed of by the Full Bench of the Commission of National Industrial
Relations. Section 59 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 further provides
that No Court shall entertain any plea as to the jurisdiction of the Commission
or as the legality or propriety of anything done or purporting to be done by
the Commission of any of its Benches, and no order, decision, judgment or
sentence of the Commission shall be called in question in any manner,
whatsoever, in or before any Court or other authority.
6. In view of the above, the instant
Petition stands dismissed for want of jurisdiction along with pending
applications leaving the petitioner at liberty to approach the competent forum
having jurisdiction, if so advised.
J U D G E
Irfan/P.A
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR
Constitution Petition No.S-08 of 2022
Date of hearing |
Order with signature of Judge |
Hearing of cases.
4. For orders on office objection at Flag ‘A’.
5. For orders on CMA 21/20221 (Ex)
6. For hearing of main case.
O R D E R.
07.03.2022.
None
present of the petitioner.
-.-.-.
On the last dates of hearing of hearing,
learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to satisfy the Court about the
maintainability of this petition.
2. Today
petitioner and his counsel are called absent while Mr. Shakeel Ahmed
Channa Advocate files vakalatnama along with statement on behalf of respondent
No.1 which is taken on record.
3. Learned
counsel for respondent No.1 submits that instant petition is not maintainable
in view of Section 58 of Industrial Relations Act, 2012 which provides that
only an appeal can be preferred to the Commission under sub-section (1) shall
be disposed of by the Full Bench of the Commission of National Industrial
Relations, that Section 59 of the said Act provides that No Court shall entertain any plea as to
the jurisdiction of the Commission of as the legality or propriety of anything
done or purporting to be done by the Commission of any of its Benches, and no
order, decision, judgment or sentence of the Commission shall be called in
question in any manner, whatsoever, in or before any Court or other authority.
4. I have heard learned counsel for
respondent No.1 and have gone through the material available on record.
5. Perusal of record shows that the grievance
application filed by the petitioner before the National Industrial Relation
Commission Bench at Sukkur, was found to be time barred and the same was
dismissed vide order dated 10.12.2021.
Admittedly section 58 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, provides
that only an Appeal preferred to the Commission under sub-section (1) shall be
disposed of by the Full Bench of the Commission of National Industrial
Relations. Section 59 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 further provides
that No Court shall entertain any plea as to the jurisdiction of the Commission
or as the legality or propriety of anything done or purporting to be done by
the Commission of any of its Benches, and no order, decision, judgment or
sentence of the Commission shall be called in question in any manner,
whatsoever, in or before any Court or other authority.
6. In view of the above, the instant
Petition stands dismissed for want of jurisdiction along with pending
applications leaving the petitioner at liberty to approach the competent forum
having jurisdiction, if so advised.
J U D G E
Irfan/P.A