IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
C.P.No.D-4263 of 2013
DATE |
ORDER
WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE. |
1. For hearing of Misc. No. 27157/2013
2. For hearing of main case
19.05.2022
Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Chandio and Mr. Ashok
Kumar advocates for petitioner
Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Asstt.A.G
Syed Nadeem ul Haq advocate for respondent
No.6
Ghulam Akbar Leghari Secretary Education,
Govt. of Sindh
-.-.-.-.-.-.
Petitioner
Mala Kumari filed this Constitution Petition against the respondents and prayed
for the following reliefs:
a)
To
declare that the impugned letter dated 23.07.2013 issued by the Respondent No.4
is without lawful authority and not sustainable under the law, set aside the
same.
b)
To
direct the Respondent No.4 not to change/ disturb the Merit List prepared by
the Respondent No.5 and issue appointment letters strictly in accordance with
the said Merit list.
c)
To
restrain the respondents of Education Department from issuing appointment
letter to the candidate appearing at Sr. No.3 in the Merit list and to keep one
post of JST in UC Sujawal vacant till final disposal of this petition.
d)
To
grant any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the
circumstances of the case.
Notices were issued to the respondents as well as AAG.
This Court vide order dated 26.11.2014 passed the following order:
“26.11.2014
Mr.
Ghulam Sarwar Chandio, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. Abdul Jabbar Qureshi AAG
-o-o-o-o-o-
Learned AAG seeks further time to
file parawise comments. As a last and final chance 02 weeks’ time is allowed
for filing parawise comments with direction that on the next date of hearing
any senior officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary of Education
Department be present before this Court along with relevant record.
Adjourned to 22.12.2014. Till next
date of hearing Respondent No.4 is directed to keep one post of JST in UC
Sujawal District Thatta vacant.”
Today
respondent No.2 appeared and stated that post of JST is lying vacant in UC
Sujawal District Thatta and petitioner qualifies for the same post. Respondent
No.2 is prepared to issue the offer order to the petitioner for the said post.
In
the view of the statement of respondent No.2, this petition stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Wasim
ps