ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR
Crl. Misc. Application No.S-333 of 2020.
For hearing of main case.
26-04-2021.
Mr. Hamayoon
Shaikh, advocate for the applicant.
Mr.
Muhammad Ali Dayo, advocate for respondent No.4.
Syed
Sardar Ali Shah Rizvi, DPG for the State.
--------------*******--------------
Irshad
Ali Shah, J;-The applicant by way of instant Crl. Misc. Application has
sought for recalling of order dated 01-06-2020 whereby the private respondents have
been admitted to pre-arrest bail by this Court.
2. The allegation against the private
respondents is that they with rest of the culprits, after having formed an
unlawful assembly and in prosecution of their common object, committed murder
of Abdul Sattar by causing him fire shot injuries, in order to satisfy with him
the matrimonial dispute, for that they were booked and reported upon.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for
the applicant that after grant of pre-arrest bail, the private respondents are issuing
threats of dire consequences to the applicant, which amounts to misusing the
concession of bail. By contending so, he sought for recalling the bail order.
4. Learned DPG for the State and learned
counsel for the private respondents have sought for dismissal of instant Crl.
Misc. Application by contending that the concession of bail has never been
misused by the private respondents.
5. I have considered the above arguments
and have perused the record.
6. The role attributed to the private
respondents in commission of incident was only to the extent of making aerial
firing and they on investigation were found to be innocent by the police, there
is no report from learned trial Court, which may suggest that the private
respondents have misused the concession of bail. In these circumstances, it
would be unjustified to recall the concession of bail already granted to the private
respondents on the basis of self procured allegation of issuing threats of dire
consequences to the applicant.
7. In view of above, the instant Crl.
Misc. Application fails and it is dismissed accordingly.
Judge
Nasim/Steno