IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH,
BENCH AT SUKKUR.
Cr. Misc. Application No.D-346 of 2020
Constitution Petition No.D –898 of 2020.
Before;
Mr.
Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio,
Mr.
Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Petitioner/Applicant: Through
Mr. Munir Ahmed R.Siyal Director (Legal) FIA.
Respondents. Through
M/s Shakeel Ahmed Ansari and Sikander Ali Junejo, advocates.
The State. Through
Mr. Shafi Muhammad Mahar, DPG for the State.
Mr. A. R Farooq Pirzada, Advocate Amicus-
Curiae.
Date of hearing: 06-04-2021.
Date of decision: 06-04-2021.
J U D G M E N T.
IRSHAD
ALI SHAH, J. The petitioner and the applicant, who are Inspectors at
FIA Crime Circle Sukkur, by preferring Crl. Misc. Application under Section
561-A Cr.P.C and the petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, 1973, individually have mainly sought for direction
against the of Sessions Judges and the Magistrates working under them to take cognizance
of the offences relating to misappropriation of the funds in Benazir Income
Support Program on submission of challan by FIA police.
2. It
is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner and the applicant that as
per Section 177 Cr.P.C every offence ordinary is to be tried by the Court
within local limits whereof, it has taken place, therefore, learned Sessions
Judges and the Magistrates working under them to be directed to take cognizance
of the offence of misappropriation of the funds in Benazir Income Support
Program, on submission of challan submitted by FIA police, if it is committed
within their local limits. In support of his contention, he relied upon letter
No.Gaz/811-Z-14 (II) Cyber Crime dated 31-10-2019 of Registrar High Court of
Sindh and case of Inayat-ur-Rehman and
another Vs. The State (2015 P.Cr.L.J 1487).
5. Learned
DPG for the State did not oppose the above contention. However, it was contended
by learned Amicus-Curiae and learned Counsel for the private respondent that
the Federal Investigation Agency is constituted under special law, therefore
special law in event of conflict has a preference over general law. By contending
so, they were of the opinion that all the cases registered by FIA police, on
account of misappropriation of the funds by public servant in Benazir Income
Support Program are to be tried by Special Court Anti-Corruption (Central) at
Hyderabad, which is constituted under Special Law. In support of their
contention, they relied upon case of Syed
Mushahid Shah and others Vs. Federal Investment Agency (2017 SCMR 1218).
5. We
have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6. As
per mandate contained by section 177 Cr.P.C, every offence is ordinary
to be tried by the Court within local limits whereof, it has taken place. The
word ordinary
used in above said provision is of importance; impliedly it goes to
suggest that there is no absolute bar by trial of the cases by the Courts other
than the one within local limits whereof, it has taken place. In the instant
matter, the investigation of the case is conducted by FIA Police, it is an
agency, which is constituted under special enactment (Act of VIII of 1975),
therefore the cognizance whereof obviously is to be taken by Special Court,
which is constituted under Special Law that in the present case is Special
Court Anti-Corruption (Central) Hyderabad. In these circumstances, it would be
hard to direct the Sessions Judges or the Magistrates working under them to
take cognizance of the schedule offences without specified designation of
powers, only for the reason that such offence has taken place within their local
limits. If such directions are issued by way of judicial order, as is prayed
for, then it would amount to make an encroachment over the function of the executive
authority, which is authorized by law to make investment of the jurisdiction.
7. True,
the Registrar of High Court of Sindh under letter which is relied upon by
learned counsel for the petitioner and the applicant has designated the learned
District & Sessions Judge at Malir Karachi, Hyderabad, Sukkur and 1st
Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate of the said Districts to try the offences
investigated by the Federal Investigation Agency. But such designation is only
to the extent of taking cognizance of the offences which are punishable u/s 44
(1) of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016 at FIA Police
Stations/Cyber Crime Reporting Centers at Karachi, Hyderabad and Sukkur,
respectively and not beyond that. Needles to say that nothing in the said
letter which may suggest that every Sessions Judge in province or Magistrate
working under him are authorized to take cognizance of every offence
investigation whereof is conducted by FIA Police.
8. The
case law which is relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner and the applicant
is on distinguishable facts and circumstances. It was the case relating to
recovery of Pirated Books and there was dispute between Magistrates at Swabi
and Peshawar with regard to their territorial jurisdiction. No such issue is
involved in the instant matter.
9. Based
upon above discussion, the instant Cr. Misc. Application and Petition are disposed
of accordingly, those even otherwise have not been filed by Federal
Investigation Agency itself, but by its officials obviously in its individual
capacity.
10. Above
are the reasons of short order dated 06-04-2021, whereby the instant Cr. Misc.
Application and the Petition were disposed of.
J U D G E
J U D G E
Nasim/Steno