IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH

CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA

Present:

Irshad Ali Shah, J.

Agha Faisal, J.

CP D663of 2021                  :           Muhammad Mithal & others vs.

District Accounts Officer, Larkana &others.

For the Petitioners               :           Mr. Habibullah G. Ghouri, Advocate

Dates of hearing                  :           08.03.2022

Date of announcement      :           08.03.2022

ORDER

Agha Faisal, J.This application seeks review of order dated 19.01.2022, wherein it was observed that the petitioners had separate causes of action and so it would be just and proper for them to file separate petitions for redressal of their individual grievances. 

            It is apparent from paragraph2 of the memorandum of petition that petitioner No.1 is retired employee of Agricultural Engineering Department, petitioner No.2 is retired employee of Revenue Department, petitioner No.3 is retired employee of Police Department, petitioner No.4 is retired employee of Education Department and petitioner No.5 is retired employee of Agricultural Engineering Department. Each of the petitioners has individual sets of grievances and no case was made out before this Court for such grievances to be clubbed and adjudicated together.  Even otherwise the impugned order had caused no harm to the petitioners as the petition had been disposed of by observing that the respective petitioners may prefer their individual petitions in accordance with law.  The petitioners’ counsel had articulated no cavil to the disposal order and the same has also not been denied before us today.

It is clear that the jurisdiction of this Court in review proceedings is limited to the ambit of Section 114 read with Order 47 CPC.  The entire thrust of the arguments advanced by the applicant's counsel was directed towards justifying an admitted discrepancy / re-agitation of issues already considered / addressed and there was absolutely no effort to identify any mistake or error apparent on the face of the record or any other sufficient reason justifying a review of the Order. This Court has duly appraised the contents of the present application and the arguments advanced by the applicant's counsel and is of the considered opinion that no grounds for review have been made out. The applicant has not demonstrated the discovery of any new and important matter which could not have been addressed earlier; has failed to identify any mistake apparent on the face of record; and finally no reason has been advanced to justify the review of the order. It is thus the considered view of this Court that this application is devoid of merit, hence, the same is hereby dismissedin limine.

                                                                   JUDGE

JUDGE