IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH

CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA

Present:

Irshad Ali Shah, J.

Agha Faisal, J.

CP D101of 2012                  :           Ghulam Asghar Khand & others vs.

District Education Officer Jacobabad & others

For the Petitioners               :           Mr. Asif Ali Abdul Razzak Soomro, Advocate

For the Respondents          :           Mr.Abdul Hamid Bhurgri, Addl A.G. Sindh.

Dates of hearing                  :           22.02.2022

Date of announcement      :           22.02.2022

ORDER

Agha Faisal, J.         The petitioners seek regular appointment with the official respondents, however, the comments relied upon by the respondents demonstrate that while petitioners were once appointed on a contract, such contracts have long since expired.Admittedly, there is no existing relationship between the parties. The august Supreme Court has maintained in Khushal Khan[1] that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to revive, amend or alter contracts; there was no vested right to seek regularization for employees hired on contractual basis unless there was legal and statutory basis for the same; contractual  employees  had  no  automatic  right  to  be regularized unless the same has specifically been provided for in a law; and that the relationship of contractual employees is governed by principles of master and servant. A Division Bench of this Court has held in Anjum Badar[2] that contractual employees had no vested right for regular appointment or to seek regularization of their services, hence, were debarred from invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. It is settled law that contractual employees are devoid of any generic entitlement for regularization[3]. Petitioner's counsel has been unable to identify any specific law conferring any right upon the petitioner to be considered for regularization[4]. It is, thus, our deliberated view that the petitioner has failed to set forth a case for exercise of the discretionary[5] writ jurisdiction of this Court. In view hereof, we are constrained to observe that the petition is misconceived, hence, is hereby dismissed.

                                                                   JUDGE

JUDGE

---

[1]Per Ijaz ul Ahsan J in Khushal Khan Khattak University & Others vs. Jabran Ali Khan & Others reported as 2021 SCMR 977.

[2] Per Nadeem Akhtar J in Anjum Badar vs. Province of Sindh & Others reported as PLD 2021 Sindh 328.

[3] Per Ijaz ul Ahsan J in Govt of KPK vs. Jawad Ali & Others reported as 2021 SCMR 185; Per Mansoor Ali Shah J in Province of Punjab vs. Dr. Javed Iqbal reported as 2021 SCMR 767; Per Ijaz ul Ahsan J in Owais Shams Durrani vs. Vice Chancellor Bacha Khan University reported as 2020 SCMR 2041; Per Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb J in First Womens Bank vs. Muhammad Tayyab reported as 2020 PLC (C.S.) 86.

[4] Per Ijaz ul Ahsan J in Govt of KPK Welfare Board vs. Raheel Ali Gohar & Others  reported as 2020 SCMR 2068;

[5] Per Ijaz Ul Ahsan J. in Syed Iqbal Hussain Shah Gillani vs. PBC & Others reported as 2021 SCMR 425; Muhammad Fiaz Khan vs. Ajmer Khan & Another reported as 2010 SCMR 105.