ORDER   SHEET

IN  THE  HIGH  COURT  OF  SINDH, CIRCUIT  COURT,  LARKANA

Constt: Petition.No.D-464 of 2012.

_________________________________________________________________

DATE                                       ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF HON’BLE JUDGE

_________________________________________________________________

Before:

  Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah,

 Mr. Justice Agha Faisal,

01.  For orders on M.A.No.1795/2021.

02.  For orders on M.A.No.274/2020 (151 CPC).

03.  For hearing of main case.

02.02.2022               

                        Petitioner in person.

                        Mr. Abdul Hamid Bhurgri, Addl.A.G Sindh

                       

                        =  *  = * = * = * = * =

                        It is contended by the petitioner that on having qualified the requisite test, he was appointed as Primary School Teacher, subsequently his appointment order was cancelled without formal order and instead of him, was appointed the private respondent, therefore, the respondents be directed to take him back in service with all back benefits by cancelling the appointment order of the private respondent.

                        Learned Addl.A.G Sindh while making reference to comments filed by District Education Officer, Larkana, has sought for dismissal of the instant constitutional petition by contending that the private respondent was appointed as he obtained more marks than the petitioner and at no moment, the petitioner was appointed as Primary School Teacher and the appointment order, if any, in his favour, is fake and bogus.

                        We have considered the above arguments and perused the record.

                        The controversy with regard to the marks obtained by the petitioner and the private respondent and the appointment order of the petitioner as Primary School Teacher having been forged and bogus being factual in its nature could not be resolved by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, the instant constitutional petition being misconceived is dismissed accordingly together with listed applications.

 

                                                                                                       JUDGE

                                                                                 JUDGE