ORDER SHEET
THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT LARKANA
Cr. Misc. Appln. No. S-162 of 2020
|
Date |
Order with signature of Judge |
For hearing of main case.
07-09-2020
Mr. Asif Ali Muhammad Khan Chandio, Advocate for applicant
Mr. Abdul Hakeem Brohi, Advocate for private respondent.
Mr. Aitbar Ali Bullo, Deputy Prosecutor General.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
IRSHAD ALI SHAH, J.- It is alleged that the applicant with rest of the culprit after having formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of their common object, put an attempt to abduct Mst.Zarina and Mst.Asma in order to sell them at Balochistan, for that the present case was registered.
The private respondent was admitted to bail, which the applicant has sought to be cancelled by this Court by way of instant Crl.Misc.Application under section 497 (5) r/w Section 561-A Cr.PC.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the private respondent has been admitted to bail properly and he is misusing the concession of bail by threatening the applicant. By contending so, he sought for cancellation of bail granted to the private respondent.
3. Learned D.P.G for the State and learned counsel for the private respondent have sought for dismissal of instant Crl.Misc.Application by contending that the very case on investigation was recommended by the police to be cancelled under “C” class.
4. I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
5. The applicant and the private respondent once were married with each other and there arose dispute between them which end in shape of divorce. Apparently, there is dispute between them over custody of their daughters. Be that as it may, none was abducted and the very case on investigation was recommended by the police under “C” class. In these circumstances, it would be unjustified to recall the concession of bail in favour of the respondent. Consequently, instant Crl.Misc.Application fails and it is dismissed accordingly.
J U D G E