ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR
C. P No. S- 108 of 2020
Fresh case
1.
For orders on CMA No.2595/2020 (U/A)
2.
For orders on CMA No.2596/2020
(Ex.A)
3.
For hearing of main case
01.06.2020
Mr. Muhammad Qayoom Arain
Advocate for the petitioner
>>>>>>>…<<<<<<<<
Irshad Ali
Shah, J;- It is alleged by the
petitioner that she is doing the business of CCTV Cameras now is being harassed
by the private respondents to be implicated in false cases by managing a false
agreement. By stating so, she sought for protection from such harassment by way
of instant Constitutional Petition.
2. It is
contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner being lady
is being harassed by the private respondents by managing a false agreement;
therefore, she needs to be protected from such harassment by this Court.
3. I have
considered the above arguments and perused the record.
4. If the
petitioner is having a feeling that the private respondents have managed a
false agreement against her then she could challenge such agreement by having a
recourse of law before the Court having jurisdiction, such dispute calling for
its adjudication on merit could not be resolved by this Court in exercise of
its constitutional jurisdiction under the garb of harassment and protection.
5. Instant
Constitutional Petition being misconceived is dismissed in limine together with
the listed applications.
Judge