ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT LARKANA
Crl.B.A.No.S-64 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
For hearing of bail application.
20.04.2020.
Mr. Asif Ali Abdul Razzak Soomro, Advocate for applicant
Mr. Muhammad Noonari, D.P.G for the State.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Irshad Ali Shah-J; It is alleged that the applicant with rest of the culprits in furtherance of their common object, committed Qatl-e-Amd of Waqar Ahmed and then caused disappearance of his dead body in order to save themselves from legal consequences, for that the present case was registered.
2. The applicant on having been refused post-arrest bail by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Jacobabad, has sought for the same from this Court by way of instant application u/s 497 Cr.P.C.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being innocent has been involved in this case falsely by the complainant party in order to satisfy its dispute with him over the matrimonial affairs; the FIR has been lodged with delay of about four days and none indeed has seen the applicant committing the death of the deceased, therefore, his involvement in the alleged incident is calling for further inquiry for the purpose of his release on bail.
4. Learned D.P.G. for the State has opposed to grant of bail to the applicant by contending that the deceased was found seen in the company of the applicant lastly.
5. I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6. The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about four days; the same having not been explained plausibly could not be overlooked. None indeed has seen the applicant committing death of the deceased. The parties are already disputed over the matrimonial affairs. In these circumstances, the involvement of the applicant in the alleged incident obviously is calling for further inquiry.
7. In view of above, the applicant is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.200,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court.
8. The instant application is disposed of accordingly.
J U D G E