ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT
OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
C. P. No. D – 4012 of 2015
C. P. No. D – 3400
of 2016
Date of hearing |
Order
with signature of Judge |
Hearing
of case (priority)
1. For orders on office objection at Flag-A
2. For hearing of CMA No.12831/2015 (I Rule 10)
3. For hearing of CMA No.1436/2015 (S/A)
4. For hearing of main case
03.09.2018
Mr. Mehfooz Ahmed Awan,
Advocate for petitioner in CPD-4012/2015.
Mr. Ali
Raza Baloch, Advocate for petitioner in CPD-3400/2016.
Mr. Khuda Bux
Chohan, Advocate for Sukkur Municipal Corporation.
Mr. Liaquat Ali Shar, Additional
Advocate General Sindh.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
It is claimed that
previously the subject quarter was allotted to Akhtiar
Begum. After her sad demise, the legal heirs including her husband continued to
occupy the same. On 19.10.2015, the allotment of the subject quarter in favour of Akhtiar Begum, wife of
the petitioner was cancelled and it was allotted to one Mukhtiar
Ali Shah on 21.10.2015. Since then the petitioner in the connected petition is
searching for the possession of the subject quarter. It is claimed that the
policy in relation to the occupation of the premised by the legal heirs is
silent. The cancellation of the allotment in favour
of Akhtiar Begum claimed to be without hearing the
petitioner.
Be that as it may,
it is agreed by all counsel in attendance that application of the petitioner,
if any, pending before Sukkur Municipal Corporation be decided within one (01)
week. It is for petitioner to pursue the application pending before Sukkur
Municipal Corporation failing whereof it shall be deemed to be dismissed. In
case the petitioner approaches and pursues the application, the competent authority
may decide it strictly in accordance with law and the policy in vogue. In case
the petitioner remains unsuccessful, it is agreed that on account of failure to
vacate the premises, the officials may use police force for its vacation. The
interested parties such as petitioner in the connected petition No. D-3400/2016
may also be heard and he may pursue such application on his own. No notice is
required to be issued to the petitioners.
Both petitions
along with pending applications stand disposed
of.
J U D G
E
J U D G
E
Abdul Basit