ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

C. P. No. D – 2543 of 2013

Date of hearing

Order with signature of Judge

Hearing of case (priority)

1. For orders on office objections at Flag-A

2. For hearing of CMA No.7912/2013 (S/A)

3. For hearing of main case

(Notice issued to respondents and advocate)

18.09.2018

Mr. Parmanand, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Achar Khan Gabol, Advocate holding brief for Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Korai, Advocate for respondents 1 to 6.

Mr. Muhammad Aslam Jatoi, Assistant Attorney General.

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

Statement along with documents listed therein has been filed by the petitioners’ counsel, and another statement has been filed by respondent No.8, which are taken on record.

It appears that the petitioners are retired employees of PTCL, to whom the land was granted by Board of Revenue. The petitioners have now turned around and intend to challenge the title of PTCL granted by Board of Revenue. The induction of these petitioners was only by way of their right as being employees. Since now they have become retired, they may not enjoy such rights but regulated in terms of policy. Hence, if at all, they intend to challenge any title document, they must first vacate the premises and then they would be at liberty to exercise their right in respect of the land in question as far as title is concerned. The petition as such has no merit, and is dismissed. The respondents, in particular PTCL, are at liberty to act in accordance with law insofar as vacation of the premises is concerned.

The petition is dismissed in the above terms along with the listed application.

J U D G E

Abdul Basit