ORDER
SHEET
IN THE
HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR
C. P. No. S – 393 of 2018
Date of hearing |
Order with signature
of Judge |
1.
For orders on CMA No.3657/2018
2.
For hearing of main case
3.
For hearing of CMA No.3658/2018
16.11.2018
Mr.
Sajjad Muhammad Zangejo advocate for petitioner.
.................
This
petition is filed against the concurrent findings of the two courts below. The
trial Court decreed the suit for the recovery of dowry articles which order was
maintained by the appellate Court. The appellate Court while going through the
evidence is of the view that nothing substantial was asked from the plaintiff /
respondent. Even the contents of the dowry articles were not denied as apparent
from the cross-examination conducted by the petitioner’s counsel. To the
contrary, the value as suggested by petitioner’s counsel was more than claimed
by the respondent / plaintiff. It is nowhere denied that she has not brought
the articles, the value of which is being claimed here and it is not suggested
that she has taken these articles back while she obtained khula
from the Court. No error apparent on the face of it, has been pointed out.
There is no illegality or irregularity, as such the petition, being
misconceived, is dismissed along with listed applications.
__________________
J U D G E
N.M.