ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKUR
Cr. Bail Application No. S – 296 of 2018
DATE ORDER WITH
SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
For hearing of bail
application
17.09.2018
Mr. Mansoor Hussain Maitlo Advocate a/w
Applicant
Mr. Afzal Hussain Talpur,
APG for the State
>>>>>>>…<<<<<<<
Through instant bail application,
the applicant/accused Waseem Raja has sought
pre-arrest bail in Crime No.70/2018 registered at police station Kandiaro, District Naushahro Feroze for offences under Sections 457 and 380 PPC.
The facts as per FIR registered by Liaquat Ali Rind, Principal Baharia
Foundation College, are that one Waseem Raja was
posted as Accountant in the School who used to collect the monthly fees of the
students of the College and keep the same with him in the office and on
01.05.2018 in the morning, he (complainant) calculated the fees of the students
with Waseem Raja at that time Syed Rajib Ali Shah who is posted as Administrator and Zahid Ali Pirzada who is posted
as Assistant in the College the total collected fees on calculation became
Rs.11,37,788/- and that amount was put in the Almirah
lying in the office of Waseem Raja in their presence,
when the college hours were over, Waseem Raja went to
his village and0 at about 12:00 noon, he checked the Amirah
in presence of the abovenamed witnesses, its lock was
broken and the entire amount was missing and have been stolen away, hence on
the next date, they went and approached Waseem Raja
at his village who admitted his guilt and asked the complainant that he would
pay the amount in installments and ultimately refused, hence such FIR was
lodged.
Learned counsel submits that
the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case by
the complainant as none of the eyewitnesses have seen the applicant while
committing such theft of the amount lying in the office Almirah.
He further contends that the alleged incident is said to have taken place on
01.05.2018 which is a public holiday, therefore, on the holiday nobody can enter or attend the
office, therefore, the story setup by the complainant is false, manufacture,
hence the innocent of the present applicant cannot be ruled out. He further
contends that there is inordinate and unexplained delay of 04 days in lodgment
of the FIR, which goes to show that it has been lodged after due deliberations
and consultations, whereas, the story seems to be false as the complainant has
stated in the FIR that they checked the amount in absence of the applicant. He,
therefore, prayed that the interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted may be
confirmed. Learned APG on the other hand opposed the
grant of pre-arrest bail to the applicant/accused.
I have heard the learned
counsel for the applicant/accused, learned APG for
the State and have perused the record. Admittedly the applicant has been
nominated in the FIR, as the lucrative amount of Rs.11,37,788/-
have been stolen from the office Almirah which was in
the possession and custody of the present applicant/accused. Furthermore, the
amount was calculated in presence of the present applicant/accused and it was
kept in the Almirah and it was locked. There is delay
of about 04 days in lodgment of the FIR, which has been properly explained by
the complainant in the FIR, stating that when in presence of the witnesses he
checked the amount which were missing and have been stolen away by the present
applicant, he approached him at District Dadu, where
he admitted his guilt and agreed for return of the amount in installments, but
thereafter he refused, hence the FIR was lodged against him. The nature of the
offence is serious, because the applicant being custodian of the amount which
was lying in his possession duly collected fees of the students of the College,
but he has committed theft, as such he is not entitled
for such extra ordinary concession of pre-arrest. In view of the above, the
applicant failed to make out a case for grant of pre-arrest bail, the interim
order granted to him dated 22.05.2018 is hereby recalled and the bail
application stands dismissed.
Judge
ARBROHI