ORDERSHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR____.

Cr. Bail Application No. S-354  of 2019

________________________________________________________________   

DATE             ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ________________________________________________________________

 

 

For  hearing of Bail Application.

 

12-07-2019.

Mr. Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro Advocate for applicants / accused along with applicants / accused.

Syed Sardar Ali Shah D.P.G along with complainant Shahnawaz.

 

                                    .-.-.-.-.-

 

                        Applicants / accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail granted to them by this Court vide order dated 25.06.2019. Today this bail application is fixed for confirmation or otherwise.

         

2.                Briefly facts of the prosecution as set out in the aforesaid FIR lodged by complainant Shahnawaz with PS Sorah on 26.05.2019 at 1300 hours are that on the relevant day and time, applicants / accused along with two unknown accused persons duly armed with deadly weapons formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of their common object forcibly entered into the house of complainant and caused injuries to PWs Mst. Abida Khatoon (wife of complainant ), Mst. Zareena (sister-in-law of complainant ) and Mst. Khalida (daughter of complainant ) on their different parts of body on which complainant party raised cries and all accused then ran away from scene of offence, hence above FIR was lodged.

         

3.                It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants /accused that the applicants / accused are innocent and a false case has been registered due to enmity over landed property; that the alleged incident took place on 19.03.2019 whereas FIR has been lodged on 26.05.2019 after the delay of two months and seven days in which no satisfactory explanation has been furnished for such delay as such according to him on this ground false implication of the applicants / accused in this case with due deliberation and consultation cannot be ruled out; that the incident has not taken place as stated in the FIR and the whole story narrated in it is false; that the doctor on medical examination of the injured has opined that the injuries on the persons of injured falls Shujjah-e-Khafifah, Jurh Ghair Jaifah Damihah and other hurts respectively which falls under sections 337-A(i), 337-F(i) and 337-L(ii) PPC for which the punishment is not more than two years thus according to him  the case against the applicants does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C in view of case law reported in PLD 1995 supreme Court 34 in which it has been observed that if the case does not fall within prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C grant of bail is to be considered as rule and refusal is an exception. No exceptional ground has been pointed out or appears in this case to withhold the bail of the applicants / accused.

 

4.                 Mr. Sadam Hussain Leghari Advocate has filed his power on behalf of complainant and submits that although present applicants /accused have committed offence but according to him he has no objection for confirmation of bail if the trial Court is given directions to conclude the trial within 45 working days and in case the accused misuses the bail then trial Court may be given directions to cancel the bail of the applicants / accused.

 

5.                Learned D.P.G has raised no objection on the above proposition.

 

                  

6.                I have heard learned counsel for the parties at a considerable length and have gone through the case papers so made available before me. It appears from the record that alleged incident was taken place on 19.03.2019 whereas FIR was lodged on 26.05.2019 after delay of two months and seven days for which no satisfactory explanation has been furnished, therefore, in my tentative opinion false implication of the applicants /accused in this case with due deliberation and consultation could not be ruled out. As per FIR enmity in between the parties are apparent. The only allegation against the applicants are that they allegedly entered in the house of complainant duly armed with lathi and caused lathi blows to the injured persons which hit on their hands respectively. During medical examination of the injured persons doctor has opined the injuries of the injured persons as Shujjah-e-Khafifah, Ghair Jaifah Damihah and other hurts respectively as such the said injuries falls under sections 337-A(i), 337-F(i) and 337-L(ii) PPC for which punishment is not more than two years. Admittedly the case has been challaned and applicants / accused are no more required for further investigation. It appears that the case of the applicants / accused do not fall under prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C, therefore, in view of case law reported in PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34, the grant of bail in such cases not falling within prohibitory clause is a rule and its refusal is an exception. No exceptional ground has been pointed out or appears in this case to withhold the bail of the applicants / accused.

 

7.                 Under the circumstances applicants / accused have made out their case for confirmation of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, interim order already extended in favour of applicants /accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with directions to the applicants / accused to appear before the trial Court to face trial. In case the applicants / accused misuses the bail the trial Court would be competent to cancel the bail of the applicants / accused without making any reference to this Court.

 

8.       Needless to mention here that observations, if any, made hereinabove are tentative in nature and would not influence the trial court while deciding the case of the applicant/accused on merits.

 

9.            Since it is alleged against the applicants /accused that they have allegedly entered in the house of the complainant, therefore, trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within 45 working days as per law. No unnecessary adjournment shall be granted to either party. Compliance report be submitted to this Court through Additional Registrar of this Court.

                    The bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.

                       

 

 

                                                                           JUDGE

 

                                                           

                                                           

 

 

Irfan/PA.