ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       C.P No. S- 3553 of 2015

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

For katcha Peshi.

04-12-2017.

            Mr. Sardar Ali Shah Advocate for the petitioner.

            Mr. Noor Hassan Malik Assistant Advocate General.

.-.-.-.-

            After hearing counsel for the parties it is quite apparent from the record that in the past the petitioner was acquitted by the Courts in different criminal trials. At present his grievance is that he has been nominated in F.I.R No. 210/2015 of Police Station ‘B’ Section Khairpur dated 26.08.2015 i.e the time when he lodged the complaint against police officials. He has also referred to bail granting order dated 19.09.2015 in the said case. Today he has filed statement under which he has appended earlier Judgments handed down in earlier FIRs lodged against the same petitioner by police officials. His grievance is that respondent No.7 Agha Aftab Hussain Pathan by misusing his official position is causing immense mental anguish and harassment to the petitioner by implicating him in false criminal cases.

            Though the above contentions have been categorically refuted by learned Assistant Advocate General. It has been brought on record that different FIRs have been lodged against petitioner and his near relatives ; yet after going through the record prima facie I am of the view that this is a case in which D.I.G of Police (Sukkur Range) should probe the matter minutely and if it is found that either Inspector Aftab Hussain Pathan or any other police official is involved in causing harassment to the petitioner or misusing his official position, the disciplinary action against the delinquent official shall be taken . Copy of the enquiry report shall be submitted by D.I.G of Police concerned to this Court through Additional Registrar of this Court within four weeks from today.

            In view of the above, instant petition is disposed of in the above terms.

                                                                                                    JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


 

 

ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       R.A No. 81 of 1992.

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

For regular hearing.

 

04-12-2017.

 

            Mr. David Lawrence Advocate for applicants.

 

            Mr. A.M. Mobeen Khan Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 7.

 

.-.-.-.-

 

            Arguments concluded by learned counsel for the parties. Within three days from today they are at liberty to file synopsis by citing relevant law as well as case law, however, synopsis should not exceed more than three pages.

            Reserved for orders.

                                                                                                    JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


 

 

ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       1st Civil Appeal No. 34 of 2016

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

1.     For orders on office objection at Flag ‘A’.

2.     For orders on CMA 1111/2017 (U/A)

3.     For katcha Peshi.

4.     For orders on CMA 970/2010 (Stay)

 

 

04-12-2017.

 

            Petitioner Mian Sher Muhammad in person.

 

.-.-.-.-

 

            Applicant is present in person but his counsel is not in attendance.  Matter is adjourned for a date to be fixed by office. If on the next date of hearing learned counsel for the petitioner fails to address the Court as to the maintainability of this petition, the matter shall be decided in accordance with law.

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       C.P No. S- 2405/2017

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

5.     For orders on CMA 14838/2017 (U/A)

6.     For katcha Peshi.

 

 

04-12-2017.

 

            Mr. Gulshan Ali Ghumro Advocate for petitioner.

 

.-.-.-.-

 

            After arguing the matter at some length when learned counsel for the petitioner was queried on section 14 of West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964, he states that he will avail his appealable remedy before the competent Court.

            In view of the above present petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

 

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       C.P No. S- 2409/2017

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

7.     For orders on office objection at Flag ‘A’.

8.     For orders on CMA 14832/2017 (U/A)

9.     For orders on CMA 14833/2017 (Ex)

10.  For katcha Peshi.

11.  For orders on CMA 14834/2017

 

 

04-12-2017.

 

            Mr. Mujahid Hussain Phulpoto Advocate for petitioner.

 

.-.-.-.-

 

            The petitioner has assailed the Judgment passed by learned 2nd Additional District Judge Khairpur in 1st Appeal No. 24/2017, inter alia, by enhancing the maintenance awarded by learned Family Court Kingri.

            Issue notice to the respondent No.1 for 22.12.2017.

 

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       C.P No. S- 2410/2017

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

12.  For orders on office objection at Flag ‘A’.

13.  For orders on CMA 14828/2017 (U/A)

14.  For orders on CMA 14829/2017 (Ex)

15.  For katcha Peshi.

 

 

04-12-2017.

 

            Mr. Ayaz Ahmed Bhayo Advocate for petitioner.

 

.-.-.-.-

 

 

1.         Deferred for the time being.

2.         Counsel for petitioner is directed to file order of earlier constitutional petition No. D-1616/2015.

3.         Issue notice to respondents for 11.12.2017. In the meantime police officials are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. However, on the next date if it appears that the present petition is frivolous one then the same shall be dismissed with exemplary costs.

 

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


 

ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       C.P No. S- 2414/2017

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

16.  For orders on CMA 14837/2017 (U/A).

17.  For katcha Peshi.

 

 

04-12-2017.

 

            Petitioner present in person.

 

.-.-.-.-

 

 

            Mr. Fidaullah Qureshi Advocate holds brief for Mr. Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Soomro Advocate for petitioner as the latter is out of station.

            Petitioner who is present in person states that she got married with one Hakim Ali few years back but private respondents who have antagonized with such marriage and are causing harassment to the petitioner as well as her husband.

            To come up on 11.12.2017. Official respondents are directed to ensure that no untoward incident takes place and no harassment is caused to the petitioner. On the next date of hearing, S.H.O of concerned Police Station will ensure the presence of respondent No.5 Manzoor son of Umed Ali in the Court.

 

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


 

ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       R.A No. 121 of 2002

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

For orders on CMA 1134/2017 (U/A).

 (case already fixed on 27.02.2018)

 

04-12-2017.

 

Mr. Amanullah Shaikh Advocate for respondents Nos. 8 and 9.

.-.-.-.-

 

 

            Learned counsel for respondents Nos. 8 and 9 states that the matter is already fixed on 27.02.2018 .He requests for an early date.

            Urgency granted. To come up on 15.01.2018.

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


 

ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       1st Civil Appeal No. 20 of 2017

_____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

1.     For orders on CMA 1135/2017 (U/A).

2.     For orders on statement dated 04.12.2017.

(case already fixed on 21.02.2018)

 

04-12-2017.

 

Mr. Abdul Qadir Khanzada Advocate for appellant.

.-.-.-.-

 

 

            Counsel for the appellant will provide copy of the cheque along with bank advise before the next date. He states urgency in the matter as appellate Court has issued NBWs after decreeing the suit.  Urgency granted.

            To come up on 18.12.2017.

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA. 


 

ORDERSHEET

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR

                                       C.P No. S- 2297 of 2017 _____________________________________________________________         

    DATE                     ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________

 

 

For non-prosecution.

 

 

04-12-2017.

 

Mr. Muhammad Nauman Ghouri Advocate for petitioner.

 

.-.-.-.-

 

            The matter is fixed for non-prosecution. On last date of hearing it was observed that parties to the present petition are already litigating at different forum. This petition is disposed of as the relevant claim herein can also be granted by the Court having proper jurisdiction in the matter; as otherwise it appears that primarily the dispute concerns the financial obligation amongst the parties.

 

 

                                                                                                                JUDGE

Irfan/PA.