ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH
COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
Crl. Misc. Application No.79 of 2014
DATE |
ORDER
WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE(S) |
1.
For Katcha Peshi.
2.
For orders on M.A. No.2249/2014
3.
For orders on M.A. No.2250/2014
4.
For orders on M.A. No.2251/2014
5.
For orders on M.A. No.2252/2014
6.
For orders on M.A. No.2253/2014
(Objection/Parawise
Reply filed as at Flagged)
(Statement
dated 23.05.2014 A/W annexures filed at flagged)
(Attention
is respectfully invited to the office note dated 09.04.2014)
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
26.01.2015
Mr. Abdul Hafeez Lakho, Advocate for
the complainant.
Mr.
Mohamed Vawda, Advocate holding brief for Mr.Faisal Siddiqi, Advocate for complainant
Mr. Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Advocate.
Mr.
Abdur Rehman, Advocate for Muhammad Haseeb Jamali, Advocate.
Mr.
Amanullah Khan, Advocate for Mr. Muhammad Anwar Tariq, Advocate.
Respondent
M/s Khawaja Shamsul Islam and Khawaja Saiful Islam, Advocates are present in
person.
M/r
Saifullah and Sibtain Mehmood along with Ms. Nasreen Sehto.
- - - - - -
For the reasons to be recorded later on, instant
Crl. Misc. Application is disposed of in view of paragraph 3 of the reply to
Show Cause Notices submitted by the alleged contemnors, who have thrown
themselves at the mercy of the Court and have tendered unconditional apology,
which is accepted subject to conditions which may be imposed while recording
reasons, and consequently, the Show Cause Notice (s) issued to them stand
discharged.
The request of the complainants to send the matter
to the Pakistan Bar Counsel, and for taking action in terms of Section 54 read
with Section 41 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, in view
of acceptance of unconditional apology and discharge of Show Cause Notice(s) by
this Court, is declined. However, it will not prejudice the right of the
complainant(s) to approach the Pakistan Bar Council to initiate appropriate
proceedings in accordance with law against the alleged contemnors in the
instant case, which, if so instituted, may be decided in accordance with law
and on the basis of material and the evidence which may be adduced, without
being influenced with these proceedings for observation which may reflect in
the detailed reasons to be recorded by this Court.
JUDGE
JUDGE JUDGE
JUDGE JUDGE
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH
COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
C.P. No. D-22 of 2016.
DATE |
ORDER
WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE. |
Hearing/Priority
case.
1. For orders on Office Objeciton.
2.
For hearing of Misc No. 94/2016.
3. For hearing of main case.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
22.01.2016
Malik
Altaf Javed, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Saleem Akhtar, A.P.G.
- - - - - -
With the consent of the learned counsel for the
parties, instant petition is disposed of in the following terms:-
Petitioner Abdul Wahab son of Abdul Rahim is
granted protective bail for the period of 10 (Ten) days from today in Crime No.
305/2013 of PS Feroze Abad District East Karachi and Crime No.272/2012 of PS
SITE B Karachi, in order to enable him to surrender before the concerned court
provided he furnishes two solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.200,000/-(Rupees Two Lacs) and
P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court.
This order shall cease to have effect on
31.01.2016 or upon surrender of petitioner before the concerned Court, whichever
is earlier. In the meantime operation of the red-warrants shall remain suspended.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Gohar PS
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH
COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
Cr. Acquittal Appeal No.D-335 of 2012
DATE |
ORDER
WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE. |
Priority
case
1. For orders on Office Objection & reply of
Adv: at flag-A.
2 For orders on CMA No.8844/2012
3. For hearing of case.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
22.01.2016
Ms. Shahida Jatoi, Advocate for
Appellant/ANF.
Mr. Jamal Ahmed S. Mufti, Advocate for
respondent.
- - - - - -
SIP, Attaullah Khan Jadoon, PS ANF Clifton Karachi
has placed on record un-served notice stating therein that due to incomplete
address, notice could not be served on Respondent No.2. Appellant’s counsel to
ensure that complete address is provided to the office so that fresh notice be
issued against the respondent.
Let needful be done within ten days.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Gohar
PS