ORDER SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHISuit No.1635 of 2016DateOrder with signature of JudgeFor orders on CMA No.10505/16For orders on CMA No.10506/16For orders on CMA No.10507/16For orders on CMA No.10508/1615.07.2016Mr. Nisar Ahmed Metlo, Advocate for the Plaintiff-o-o-o-o-1].Urgency granted.2].Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.3].Learned counsel for the Plaintiff does not press prayer clauses `c` & `d`. Per learned counsel, Respondent No.3 herein had filed a suit under Section 9 of FIO, 2001 for recovery of Rs.65,252,355/- plus cost of funds against the Plaintiff herein and 2 others. The immovable property described in para 1 of the plaint herein is mortgaged with the Defendant No.3 in respect of which suit No.118 of 2011 filed by the Defendant No.3 Financial Institution has already been decreed vide judgment dated 25.11.2015 and decree dated 02.04.2016. The Plaintiff and Respondents No.1&2 herein upon feeling aggrieved by the said judgment & decree passed in Suit No.B-118/2011, nonetheless, has already filed HCA No.17/2016 [Mrs. Anjum Saleem and others (including present Plaintiff) v. First Dawood Investment Bank Ltd and Another] which appeal, as per learned counsel for the Plaintiff herein, is still pending adjudication. Plaintiff in the instant suit, nevertheless, besides seeking cancellation of a registered Power of Attorney dated 30.05.2004 executed by the Plaintiff in favour of her son/Defendant No.1 claims damages. Subject to maintainability of the instant suit, let notice be issued to the Defendants.4].Adjourned.JUDGE PAGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHIAkif RaufJ.Habib-ur-rehman22016-07-15T06:25:00Z2016-07-16T04:40:00Z2016-07-16T04:40:00Z012441396Microsoft Office Word0113falseTitle1IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHIRBSfalse1637falsefalse14.0000