ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH,

CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.

                                                                             

C.P. No. D- 1395 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1397 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1408 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1413 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1414 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1415 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1417 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1419 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1420 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1421 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1422 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1424 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1425 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1426 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1427 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1428 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1429 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1430 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1431 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1432 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1402 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1404 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1405 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1407 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1410 of 2016

C.P. No. D- 1418 of 2016

 

 

DATE       ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

 

       Present:  Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar

                             Mr. Justice Anwar Hussain

 

Date of hearing 08.06.2016

 

 

Mr. Aijaz Ahmed Chandio, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1395 of 2016

 

Mr. Muhammad Ahmed Khan Pathan, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1397 of 2016

 

Mr. Abdul Jabbar Khaskheli, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1408 & 1410 of 2016

 

Mr. Haji Khan Hingorjo, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1413, 1414 & 1415 of 2016

 

Mr. Amir Bux Kalhoro, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1417 of 2016

 

Mr. Muhammad Hassan Chandio, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1419, 1420, 1404 & 1407 of 2016

 

Mr. Muhammad Yousif Kalhoro, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1421 of 2016

 

Mr. Imamuddin Otho, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1422 of 2016

 

Mr. Roshan Ali Azeem, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1424 of 2016

 

Mr. Poonjo Ruplani, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1425 & 1405 of 2016

 

Mr. Ashok Kumar D. Lohano, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1426 of 2016

 

Mr. Ali Hassan Rajput, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1427 of 2016

 

Mr. Muntazir Mehdi Leghari, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1428 of 2016

 

Mr. Bakhtiar Ahmed Panhwar, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1429 & 1430 of 2016

 

Mr. Mazhar Ali Leghari, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1431 of 2016

 

Mr. Nasrullah Khaskheli, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1432 of 2016

 

Mr. Sikandar Ali Khaskheli, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1402 of 2016

 

 

 

Mr. Syed Shahzad Ali Shah, Advocate for petitioner in C.P. No. D- 1418 of 2016

 

Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro, Addl.A.G.

 

MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, J.- Yesterday We decided 122 Constitutional Petitions filed by different petitioners to claim Exemption under Section of the Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance, 1981. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel as well as learned A.A.G. the said Constitutional Petitions were disposed of in the following terms.

 

(1)                 The petitioners may continue the business activity strictly in accordance with the exemptions provided under Section 5 of the Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance 1981 in a canteen, restaurant or dining car referred to in clauses (a), (b), (c), or (d) of Section 5, protected from public view by means of a curtain or screen or otherwise.   

 

(2)                 In case of any violation or contravention of the Ordinance or the petitioners are found in breach of any provision of Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance 1981,  the competent authority may initiate action in accordance with the provisions of the Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance, 1981.

 

3. Copy of this order may be transmitted to the learned Additional Advocate General, Sindh, Hyderabad and all the Deputy Commissioners of Hyderabad Division, Shaheed Benazirabad Division and Mirpurkhas Division for information and compliance.

 

        Today 26 identical Constitutional Petitions are fixed in which also petitioners want to carry on their hotels / restaurants business in accordance with the Exemption granted under Section 5 of the Ehtram-e-Ramzan Ordinance 1981, therefore, they request that the same order may be passed in their petitions.

        Learned A.A.G. present in court in other matters waives notices of all the petitions and raised no objection.

        Accordingly these Constitutional Petitions are disposed of in the same terms in which CP No. D- 1251 of 2016 and 121 other Constitutional Petitions were disposed of on 7.6.2016.

        Copy of this order may be transmitted to the learned Additional Advocate General, Sindh, Hyderabad and all the Deputy Commissioners of Hyderabad Division, Shaheed Benazirabad Division and Mirpurkhas Division for information and compliance.

 

 

                                                                        Judge

 

                                        Judge