HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

 

 

C.P No.D-1062 of 2014

 

 

Before

                                                            Mr.Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar

                                                            Mr.Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar

 

 

31-05-2016                Mr.  Irfan Ahmed Memon, advocate for the Petitioner

                                    Mr. Abdul Jabbar Qureshi, A.A.G, for State

*******************************

 

 

O R D E R

 

 

 

MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR---J., The case of the Petitioners is that they were appointed Accountants in (BS-11) in the Sindh Council Unified Grade Service (Accounts Branch), Government of Sindh in the Year 2010. All the Petitioners approached this Court for the relief of upgradation. Learned counsel for the Petitioners pointed out page 127 of Court file which is a copy of judgment passed by this Court in C.P No.D-3483 of 2010. Paragraph-12 of the judgment is reproduced as under:-

 

“12.     Result of the above discussion is that petitioners are held to be entitled to the same treatment as was given to the other accountants vide notification dated January 10, 1983. They shall be entitled to the consequential promotions and benefits in accordance with the rules. Let the entire exercise be completed within two months”

                                   

2.         Learned counsel for the Petitioners argued that the case of the present petitioners is at par to the case of Petitioners of C.P No.D-3484 of 2010 therefore, keeping in view the dictum laid down by the hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hameed Akhtar Niazi V. Secretary Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan, reported in 1996 S.C.M.R 1185 the Petitioners are also entitled to the same relief.

 

3.         The learned A.A.G. after going through the judgment passed by this Court in C.P No.D-3483 of 2010 has no objection if this petition is disposed of in same terms and conditions as the case of present petitioners is identical and at par to the facts and circumstances of aforesaid constitution petition.

 

4.         By consent, this petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to implement the judgment of this Court passed in C.P No.D-3483 of 2010 in the case of Petitioners also and they should be treated alike.

 

J u d g e

 

 

J u d g e

 

 

 

 

 

BrohiPS