Report-001. Current Status of Caselaw (Judgments / Orders ) of the sitting Hon'ble Judges
Search Result on selected Judge.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Sindh High Court, Principal Seat, Karachi
Current Status of Caselaw (Judgments / Orders )
Code
S.No.
Citation
Case No.
Case Year
Parties
Bench
Order_Date
A.F.R
Head Notes
Judgement/Order
Apex Court
Apex Status
106157
1
2016 YLR Note 133
Suit 241/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
MRS. ZAREENA (Plaintiff) VS ISLAM UDDIN & OTHERS. (Defendant)
S.B.
24-NOV-15
No
Principle of res judicata as envisaged under Section 11 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, can in appropriate cases be made applicable to the interlocutory orders as well, particularly to forestall the abuse of process of Court, which is apparent from the conduct of the parties.
106497
2
2017 CLC 1783
Suit 378/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1987
Habib Jute Mills Limited (Plaintiff) VS The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and another (Defendant)
S.B.
26-FEB-16
No
Nil.
106161
3
2017 MLD 200
Const. P. 424/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Kamran Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
03-JUN-16
No
Nil.
106727
4
2017 YLR 242, 2017 YLR 424
Const. P. 846/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Abdul Haq and Others (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-APR-16
Yes
Constitutional petition---Claim of petitioner was disputed by respondents and Revenue Authorities---Due process of law---Applicability---Due process of law was of wide import and its applicability varied from case to case in accordance with the set of facts and circumstances---Due process of law was also directly related to the rights, interest and entitlement of a person as recognized by law---Petitioners could not make out a prime facie case of their legal entitlement of possession of suit property---Entries in the revenue record about their alleged claim were under scrutiny before the concerned authorities---Term "due process of law" was not applicable in circumstances---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.
C.P.10-K/2017 Tariq Javed v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Disposed of
106974
5
2017 CLC 1387
Suit 1052/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1988
Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd., (TCP) (Plaintiff) VS Haji Khuda Bux Amir Umar (Pvt) Ltd (Defendant)
S.B.
16-SEP-16
No
Nil.
106735
6
2018 PLC Lab. 36
Const. P. 84/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mst. Samina Pathan (Petitioner) VS National Database and Registration Authority [NADRA] (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAY-16
Yes
Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction.
C.P.2857/2016 National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others v. Samina Pathan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Leave Granted
124273
7
Suit 1318/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
Mrs. Almas Farooqi and another (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Battery Manufacturing Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and others (Defendant)
S.B.
09-MAR-18
No
Nil.
139407
8
Suit 1661/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Dewan Steel Mills and others (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Defendant)
S.B.
02-JUN-17
Yes
Nil.
138156
9
Suit 1461/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1998
A. QUBUBUDDIN KHAN (Plaintiff) VS CHEC MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (Defendant)
S.B.
24-APR-19
Yes
Nil.
115794
10
Suit 74/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1991
Mohammad Sarwar (Plaintiff) VS Government of Sindh and others (Defendant)
S.B.
23-JUN-17
Yes
Suit for recovery of compensation amount--Deceased died in the custody of police officials---Contention of the police was that deceased died due to cardiac arrest---Validity---None of the police officials entered the witness box to defend the claim against them---Written statement filed by the police officials had lost its evidentiary value as contents whereof were never proved in the evidence---Deceased died while he was in the custody of police officials---Plaintiff was to prove the factum of incident only---Burden would shift on the police officials to disprove the causation if they wanted to succeed in the claim against the plaintiff---Present case did fall within the purview of Fatal Accidents Act, 1855---Prosecution in a criminal case was to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of accused but in civil proceedings the matter had to be decided on the basis of preponderance of probabilities---Acquittal of (private) defendants in the criminal case did not have any adverse bearing on the present lis---Police official were liable to compensate the plaintiff by applying the rule of vicarious liability--- Claim of plaintiff with regard to quantum of damages was also unchallenged---Life expectancy of seventy five years in plaintiff's family had been proved---Deceased might also have lived for another fifty years approximately---Claim of awarding damages of Rs.50,00,000/- was justified---Master/employer in the claims with regard to tortuous liabilities would be liable for the wrongful acts of his employees/servants---Provincial Government and Inspector General of Police were liable to compensate the plaintiff besides other defendants---Defendants (Police officials) were liable to pay the damages/compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- together with 10% markup from the date of institution of suit till realization of the amount to the plaintiff and his wife i.e. parent of the deceased jointly and severally. Suit decreed.
118550
11
Execution 153/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2000
Party-1 (Decree Holder) VS Party-2 (Judgment Debtor)
S.B.
13-OCT-17
No
Nil.
116570
12
2017 CLD 1737
Suit 1042/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Khalid Mehmood and others (Plaintiff) VS M/s Multi Plus Corporation Private Limited and others (Defendant)
S.B.
21-JUL-17
Yes
Nil.
118390
13
Const. P. 6915/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-17
No
Nil.
127649
14
Suit 1526/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Creek Marina Private Limited (Plaintiff) VS Guangdong Overseas Construction Group Company Limited and another (Defendant)
S.B.
08-JUN-18
No
Nil.
138873
15
2016 SBLR Sindh 1651
Adm. Suit 287/1990 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1990
Jugolinifa (Plaintiff) VS Sayeed A.Tayyab (Defendant)
S.B.
28-MAR-16
Yes
Rule of 'best evidence' explained; according to which, if a best piece of evidence is not produced by a party or is withheld, then an adverse inference would be drawn against such party, that it deliberately not produced the evidence coupled with some ulterior motive.
Objection can be taken during pendency of case that the Suit has been instituted by a person who was not duly authorized or competent to file the proceeding, as envisaged under Order XXIX, Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, even though no specific Issue was framed in this regard, but, in the evidence the Plaintiff witness was cross-examined on this particular fact and was given an opportunity to produce relevant authorization, under which the suit was instituted, but, he failed to do so. Since defect in filing proceeding was incurable, hence, suit was dismissed.
138574
16
Suit 1306/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
DARUS SALAM C.H.S (Plaintiff) VS KBCA & OTHER (Defendant)
S.B.
07-MAY-19
No
Nil.
140144
17
Suit 1315/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2006
MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS (Defendant)
S.B.
23-AUG-19
Yes
Nil.
148079
18
Const. P. 2178/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Muhammad Asif Khan (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Faisal (Respondent)
D.B.
08-DEC-20
No
147823
19
H.C.A 249/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) VS Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-20
Yes
C.A.76-K/2020 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation v. Pakistan State Oil Company, Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending
144204
20
Suit 394/1997 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1997
MUHAMMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) VS PAK. STEEL MILLS CORP. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
02-MAR-20
Yes
Non-production of Departmental Inquiry Report in the evidence by Defendants has raised adverse presumption against them, as envisaged in Article 129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Loss of consortium; that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries or death caused by a tortfeasor. Well known rules about "foreseeability",causation and but for explained; if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s), then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of Care] that has resulted in causing injury and the "but for" test if simply put, means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant's negligence. Legislative amendments are proposed.
154410
21
Const. P. 1256/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mrs. Farida Mansoor (Petitioner) VS S.B.C.A and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
07-OCT-21
No
149948
22
M.A. 8/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Appellant) VS Jahangir Moghul (Respondent)
D.B.
09-FEB-21
Yes
C.P.445-K/2021 M/s. EFU General Insurace Ltd. v. Jahangir Moghul Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
155727
23
Const. P. 6536/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Muhammad Bilal (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-21
No
155033
24
Const. P. 6377/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Meer Badsha (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-OCT-21
No
155612
25
Const. P. 7697/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Muhammad Shoaib (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-NOV-21
No
155726
26
Const. P. 6989/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Farhan (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-21
No
156593
27
Const. P. 6423/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Mst. Tahira Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-DEC-21
No
156016
28
Const. P. 3091/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Shahid Pervaiz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-21
No
156597
29
Const. P. 5574/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
M/s Messe Incorporation (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-DEC-21
No
162425
30
Const. P. 849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Barkat Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-AUG-21
No
C.P.827/2023 Abdul Aziz v. Mustafa Saeed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending Adjourned
162417
31
Const. P. 319/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Mubashir Qadir Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-AUG-21
No
162258
32
Const. P. 5588/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
M/s IGI Holdings (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-SEP-21
No
162432
33
Const. P. 6734/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mst. Bilqis Bano and Others (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Defence and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-AUG-21
No
166347
34
Const. P. 99/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mst. Syeda Sheerin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-MAY-22
Yes
176360
35
Suit 749/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
DR. NAFEES ZUBAIR (Plaintiff) VS MRS. SAEEDA BANO & ORS (Defendant)
S.B.
22-DEC-22
Yes
189912
36
Suit 777/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
UNITED BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
27-MAY-22
Yes
200326
37
Suit 2195/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Sohrab Khan (Plaintiff) VS Allied Bank of Pakistan Limited (Defendant)
S.B.
26-JUN-23
Yes
102319
38
2016 CLD 2106
Suit 268/1980 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1980
Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) VS V/S Muhammad ASLAM SIDDIQUI & ORS (Respondent)
S.B.
29-JAN-16
No
It is proved that Defendant No.3 was the sole beneficiary of embezzled amount, which landed in her bank account. Therefore, the stance of Defendant No.3 has been rejected that the amount was embezzled by her husband (Defendant No.1) who has since disappeared and the said Defendant No.3 is not a beneficiary. In the circumstances, Article 129 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 squarely applies to the facts of the present case.
Defendant Bank has been also held liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the losses it suffered, as admittedly relationship between Defendant No.2-Bank and Plaintiff is of a fiduciary nature and thus former (Defendant No.2) owed a duty of care to the latter (Plaintiff) that its bank account had to be maintained in a professional and diligent manner. Nature of duty of Defendant No.2 implies exercise of due diligence and by making payment of such a substantial amount on the basis of a Request Letter containing some alternations and that too in the name of Defendant No.3 (the beneficiary of said amount) with which the Plaintiff-the customer of Defendant No.2 had no business relationship, latter (said Defendant No.2) had acted negligently.
152449
39
Suit 390/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2001
CAPT. TARIQ MEHMOOD MALIK. (Appellant) VS P.A.L.P.A. (Appellant)
S.B.
02-AUG-21
Yes
81226
40
2016 YLR 2008, 2017 SBLR Sindh 202
Suit 871/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1987
MUHAMMAD HABIB (Plaintiff) VS HUMAYOON LTD. (Defendant)
S.B.
24-OCT-13
Yes
Nil.
106076
41
Suit 287/1990 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1990
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
28-MAR-16
No
Nil.
103218
42
2016 CLC 1326, 2016 CLD 2106
Suit 749/1989 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1989
Rice Export Corporation of Pakistan (Plaintiff) VS Mohammad Alam (Defendant)
S.B.
01-APR-16
No
In absence of a counter claim, the Defendant being a handling agent of Plaintiff was held liable to render report of the outstanding balance of unaccounted for rice stock lying in go-down, which was in custody of Defendant. Latter status is of bailee of the goods, who is clothe with the same obligations.
Import and applicability of Sections 151 and 161 of the Contract Act [1872] has been discussed vis-??-vis res ipsa loquitur [things speak for themselves]. Defendant has been held liable to compensate Plaintiff for the losses it suffered.
106762
43
2017 CLC 1783
Suit 378/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1987
Habib Jute Mills Limited (Plaintiff) VS The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and another (Defendant)
S.B.
26-FEB-16
No
Claim under Risk Sale is only tenable when there is an enforceable agreement, that is, a contract as defined in subsection (h) of Section 2 of the Contract Act, 1872, exists between the parties, which is subsequently breached by Defendant.
In order to succeed in his claim, the Plaintiff has to show that what measures it took to mitigate its losses before arranging or manufacturing the requisite goods / gunny bags for Defendants, if at all, the Plaintiff was under an impression or understanding that it had been actually awarded the contract. Any prudent businessman or a corporate entity like Plaintiff would have addressed a notice or any other type of communication to the Defendants about the fact that the Plaintiff was about to make preparation or commence production of subject goods / jute bags for supplying them to Defendants within the given time frame.
In response to Plaintiff bid, the Defendant by its correspondence reduced the price of gunny bags with an explicit condition that the communication is without any commitment. It is also an admitted position that other requisite formalities in such type of tender were never completed. For instance, Plaintiff was never issued a letter of intent nor the latter submitted any performance bond, which fact has been acknowledged by Plaintiff
103219
44
Suit 750/1989 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1989
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
01-APR-16
No
Nil.
121453
45
Suit 1482/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1998
Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) VS Deedar Ali Issran (Defendant)
When a Government functionary or statutory body was vested with discretionary powers then same were to be exercised in a structured manner---Discretion was to be exercised in a fair, just and reasonable manner. Suit of Plaintiff was decreed except the claim of damages.
114511
47
2018 PTD 668
Suit 1661/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Dewan Steel Mills and others (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Defendant)
INAMULLAH SHAIKH. (Plaintiff) VS M/S.CITY SECURITIES & OTHER (Defendant)
S.B.
20-FEB-19
No
Nil.
137313
50
Suit 1203/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ehtisham Zubair. (Plaintiff) VS Ashraf Hussain & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
25-JAN-19
No
Nil.
118373
51
Suit 1511/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1999
Pakistan Railwasy Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Plaintiff) VS Mirza Abdul Sattar Baig and others (Defendant)
S.B.
18-SEP-17
No
Nil.
114787
52
2019 PLD Sindh 130, 2017 SBLR Sindh 2034
S.M.A 230/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
In the matter of Letter of Administration of deceased Tahir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Nil (Defendant)
S.B.
02-JUN-17
Yes
Nil.
115010
53
Civil Revision 285/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Muhammad Aabid (Appellant) VS Shamshad Ahmed and Others (Respondent)
S.B.
01-NOV-16
No
Nil.
116569
54
Suit 358/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1985
Ghazanfar Ali and another (Plaintiff) VS Cherat Cement Limited and others (Defendant)
S.B.
28-JUL-17
Yes
NIL
118531
55
S.M.A 202/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
13-OCT-17
No
Nil.
112776
56
Suit 2651/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Zohaib Shakoor (Plaintiff) VS Mahwish Pirzada & another. (Defendant)
S.B.
06-APR-17
Yes
Nil.
145174
57
Suit 1569/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2000
Ali Muhammad & another (Plaintiff) VS Faizullah & another (Defendant)
S.B.
21-MAY-20
Yes
Nil.
138951
58
2016 SBLR Sindh 594
J.M 62/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
M/s. Shahtaj Textile Lmited. (Applicant) VS Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd., & Others. (Respondent)
S.B.
07-DEC-15
Yes
If triable issues are not involved, which required leading and recording of evidence, then it is not mandatory to frame issues and an application under Section 12(2) of C.P.C. can be decided on the basis of available case record and undisputed facts.
Ratable distribution under Section 73 read with Order XXXIV Rule 13 of Civil procedure Code; Bank having a mortgage decree in its favour has a preferential status over a money decree, which is in favour of Plaintiff.
Analysis of the discussion brings forth the conclusion that neither Judgment Debtors nor Bank have actively concealed a fact, or, misrepresented certain facts in such a fraudulent way, which, if not made or committed, would have not resulted in passing of the impugned Compromise Decree. Consequently, element of fraud is not present in instant cases.
By analogy a cardinal principle of administrative law, which, time and again has been enunciated by the courts and later enacted as Section 24A of the General Clauses Act, 1897, inter alia, that an authority should act reasonably, fairly and justly, is also applicable to the financial institutions.
138575
59
Suit 425/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
RIZWAN AHMED (Plaintiff) VS JAMEEL AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
29-JAN-19
No
Nil.
124146
60
Suit 1744/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Hanif Ahmed and another (Plaintiff) VS Sindh Building Control Authority and others (Defendant)
S.B.
15-FEB-18
No
Nil.
114896
61
2018 YLR 1319
Suit 1367/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
Muhammad Iqbal Dawood and another (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Qayoom Hot and another (Defendant)
S.B.
11-MAY-17
Yes
Suit for possession of immovable property and mesne profits---Defendant was inducted by the plaintiffs as care taker to look after the suit land---Defendant/care taker had committed default in payment of money earned from the cultivation to the plaintiffs---Defendant had kept the plaintiffs out of possession of suit property---Plaintiffs were deprived of use and enjoyment of their land---Suit land was leased out to the plaintiffs and period/term of lease had been consumed by the care taker, mesne profits was to be granted to the plaintiffs in circumstances---Care taker was directed to hand over vacant possession of suit land to the plaintiffs free from all encumbrances and claims---Defendant/care-taker should pay mesne profits and contract money to the plaintiffs---Suit was decreed accordingly.
145463
62
Suit 1258/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
DR. ISHAQUE MUHAMMAD SHAH (Plaintiff) VS NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)
S.B.
06-JUL-20
Yes
Nil.
C.P.1580/2021 Dr. Ishaque Muhammad Shah (deceased) through L.Rs v. National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
146777
63
2021 SBLR Sindh Note 571
H.C.A 428/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Data Stee Pipe Industries Pvt Ltd. & another (Respondent)
D.B.
30-SEP-20
Yes
Nil.
146658
64
Const. P. 4177/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s I.S Traders (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-20
No
Nil.
143031
65
S.M.A 47/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Raza Muhammad S/o (Late) Muhammad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent)
S.B.
06-JAN-20
Yes
Petition not maintainable. Dismissed.
149929
66
Suit 493/1993 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1993
Shahimah Sayeed (Plaintiff) VS Base Commander and three others (Defendant)
S.B.
26-FEB-21
Yes
151493
67
Const. P. 2588/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Sundor Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-21
Yes
C.P.3388/2021 Sundar Khan v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
155531
68
Const. P. 262/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Haji Jaffar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
11-NOV-21
No
154939
69
Const. P. 6148/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Fahim Khan Gabol and Others (Petitioner) VS DG SBCA & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
28-OCT-21
No
C.P.1644-K/2021 Fahim Khan Gabol & others v. Director General Sindh Building Control Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending
156289
70
Suit 2364/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
M/s. Wadood Engineering Services (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS The Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
22-NOV-21
Yes
156599
71
Const. P. 5707/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Ghulam Sarwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-21
No
164782
72
Const. P. 2116/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mst. Nighat Naeem (Petitioner) VS K.D.A and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-APR-22
Yes
162463
73
Const. P. 3207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Bawar Tawfiq & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-SEP-21
No
172223
74
Suit 341/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
SHIAKH KHALID SAFDAR (Plaintiff) VS ALI HUSSAIN & OTHER (Defendant)
S.B.
29-SEP-22
Yes
181713
75
Execution First Appeal 20/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/S. METROPOLITAN STEEL CORP. LTD (Decree Holder) VS MEPCO & AN ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)
S.B.
16-FEB-23
Yes
171639
76
Suit 852/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
M/s Visionary Baluchistan Media Corporation (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shahnaz Abid & others. (Defendant)
S.B.
06-SEP-22
No
170495
77
Suit 614/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2003
ZAFAR AHMED. (Plaintiff) VS ASSOCIATES PRESS OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
22-AUG-22
Yes
171637
78
Suit 1228/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Mst. Shahnaz Abid. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Visionary Baluchistan Media Corp. (Pvt) Ltd. (Defendant)
S.B.
06-SEP-22
Yes
185616
79
Suit 1740/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
MUHAMMAD RAMEEZ KHAN & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
06-MAR-23
Yes
186440
80
Suit 41/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Shahid & another. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Zainab & others. (Defendant)
S.B.
28-FEB-23
Yes
189910
81
Suit 229/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Aga Khan Fund For Economic Development S.A. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
11-JAN-23
Yes
208901
82
R.A (Civil Revision) 88/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Haji Gohar Khan Thr. Attorney Aziz Ur Rehman (Applicant) VS Gul Faraz Ahmed Murwat and Others (Respondent)
S.B.
12-JAN-24
No
210007
83
R.A (Civil Revision) 91/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
Hussaini S/o Asghar Ali (Applicant) VS Ali Tayab and others (Respondent)
S.B.
31-JAN-24
No
210112
84
Const. P. 86/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
National Refinery Ltd Thr. Rana Waqar Haider (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Zakir and others (Respondent)
S.B.
01-FEB-24
No
203305
85
Suit 1592/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
MST.SHAMIM AKHTER & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS MST.NAZAR BARI & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
28-SEP-23
Yes
171625
86
Suit 1008/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
WASIM IQBAL (Plaintiff) VS KARWAN E ISLAMI (Respondent)
S.B.
14-NOV-22
Yes
102318
87
2016 PLD Pesh. 367
Suit 1030/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1991
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
07-MAR-16
No
Nil.
147981
88
Suit 462/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Sajid Ali Qureshi (Plaintiff) VS V/S Saleem Dawood. (Defendant)
S.B.
27-OCT-20
Yes
106487
89
2016 YLR 1436
Execution 25/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Askari Bank Ltd. (Decree Holder) VS A.H. International (Pvt) Ltd. & OTHERS (Judgment Debtor)
S.B.
15-JAN-16
No
From facts of the case, when it is obvious that subject property though was transferred in favour of a creditor Bank through a registered deed of conveyance, on the basis of which said Bank filed Objection and resisted Execution proceeding, which is the outcome of a compromise decree between another Bank and the judgment debtor. Admittedly, the above transfer of property took place after passing of the above Decree in favour of another Bank [Decree Holder] that too on the basis of a settlement agreement in which the property in question was also part of subject matter. It is held, that the impugned transfer of property was made in clear violation of Section 23 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, therefore, the transfer/conveyance of property in favour of the creditor bank is void and it is not necessary that the registered conveyance deed should first be adjudged as cancelled in terms of Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, but, in the Execution proceeding of the nature this determination can be made.
Financial Institutions have to streamline their working and banking transactions should have transparency as they [Financial Institutions] have a fiduciary relationship with their customers.
106152
90
2017 PLC CS 80
Const. P. 2105/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mst. Bhalan (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-MAY-16
No
The petition is completely silent about the fact that what steps the petitioner took to get her official service record corrected, while she was in service. This apparent contradiction about date of birth is a pure question of factual controversy and cannot be resolved in a writ jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
Even otherwise, issue at hand does not fall within the ambit of writ jurisdiction as it is barred under Article 212 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as, inter alia, the subject dispute is about an order of retirement from service passed by the departmental authority, as envisaged in Section 2(a) of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1973, and can be otherwise assailed before Service Tribunal in accordance with law.
106494
91
2017 YLR 1174
Const. P. 3379/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Abdul Latif Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-JUL-16
No
An election for the reserved seat in a Municipal Committee without first filling up the vacant general seat in one of its Wards, will be an exercise in futility, as it will adversely affect the subsequent election of Chairman and Vice Chairman of that Municipal Committee. Consequently, in terms of Rule 47 of the Sindh Local Councils (Election) Rules, 2015, relating to electoral college should be complied with.
Thus propriety also demands that a political party which enjoys a majority in a Municipal Committee should at least be given a fair opportunity to elect a chairman and vice chairman of that Municipal Committee
C.P.2292/2016 Sheikh Khalid Hussain v. Abdul Latif Sheikh & others,C.P.1823/2016 Shaikh Khalid Hussain v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Mr. Hamood Mehmood (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shabana Ishaque and others (Defendant)
S.B.
10-NOV-17
No
Suit for specific performance of contract---Ad-interim injunction subject to deposit of balance sale consideration---Object---Non-deposit of balance sale consideration---Effect---Object for giving direction to deposit the balance sale consideration in the Court was to see the bona fides of a purchaser---Injunction in such case was granted so that the corpus of dispute remained intact and ultimately could be transferred to a successful party in litigation---Balance sale consideration was to be invested in some profit bearing scheme enabling the vendor/defendant to get an increased amount as sale consideration---If purchaser/plaintiff was unsuccessful then deposited amount was to be returned back to him with accruals in order to safeguard his interest---Non-deposit of sale consideration would raise adverse presumption against plaintiff that he was not serious in performing his agreed part of contract disentitling him to decree for specific performance---Party seeking remedy of specific performance was to apply to the Court for depositing the balance amount---Any contumacious/ omission in that regard would entail in dismissal of suit or decretal of the same if it was filed by the other side---Plaintiff, in the present case, enjoyed the ad-interim injunctive relief but despite giving ample opportunities and chances to comply with the orders of Court he kept on defying all such directions/orders---One who sought equity must also do equity---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Work Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
01-SEP-18
Yes
Nil.
132909
103
Suit 1774/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Asad Zaheer. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ismail & another. (Defendant)
S.B.
03-OCT-18
No
Nil.
132933
104
2019 SBLR Sindh 395
Suit 534/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
M/s Mehran Associates (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
S.B.
07-MAR-18
No
Nil.
139352
105
Suit 1271/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
HAJI SULEMAN. (Plaintiff) VS HAJI ADAM ALI & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
18-MAR-18
Yes
Nil.
140564
106
Adm. Suit 1/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
M/S. COMMERCIAL BANK INT (Plaintiff) VS M.V. MISKI AN OTHER (Defendant)
S.B.
02-OCT-19
Yes
There cannot be two decisions with regard to same loan transaction / finance facility; that is, one passed in the foreign jurisdiction as above and the other one in the present proceeding. the Judgment given by the Court of Sharjah (UAE) in the Case filed by present Plaintiff against Defendant No.2, can be executed through the present proceeding. Therefore, the Judgment of Sharjah Court in a sum of AED 5723557 (Five Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Seven Dirhams) together with 5% (five percent) of the legal interest, can be executed through the present proceeding.
140824
107
Suit 754/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2002
Abrarul Hassan. (Plaintiff) VS Qazi Muhammad Shakil (Defendant)
S.B.
24-SEP-19
No
154938
108
Const. P. 6439/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Javeria (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-21
No
C.P.4396/2019 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others,C.A.611/2020 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
145056
109
2021 PLD Sindh Note 88
Suit 1498/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Feroze Sajan & others (Plaintiff) VS Farzana Sajan (Defendant)
S.B.
20-APR-20
Yes
Nil.
147871
110
S.M.A 38/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Muhammad Aijaz Khan S/o (Late) Haji Faiz Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Sikandar Begum (Respondent)
S.B.
26-OCT-20
Yes
145718
111
Suit 1213/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2000
SYED ZIANUDDIN (Plaintiff) VS M/S. CONTINENTAL LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
06-JUL-20
Yes
Nil.
146694
112
Const. P. 1101/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s Sun Metal Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
01-OCT-20
No
Nil.
152448
113
Suit 133/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1998
MRS. PARVEEN MEHMOOD. (Plaintiff) VS THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC CO. LT (Defendant)
S.B.
02-AUG-21
Yes
151407
114
Suit -758/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
MIAN NASSER HYATT MAGGO (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
19-MAY-21
Yes
153310
115
Const. P. 6559/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Imtiaz Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-SEP-21
No
155872
116
Const. P. 3779/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS KDA & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-DEC-21
No
156018
117
Const. P. 4631/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Sir Syed Cooperative H.S Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
07-DEC-21
No
155457
118
Const. P. 6099/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Mst. Bass Khatoon and Another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-21
No
156288
119
Const. P. 3902/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Mst. Rukhsana Bano and Ors (Petitioner) VS KMC and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-21
Yes
C.P.55-K/2022 Haji Jaffer Khan v. KMC (Karachi Muncipal Coorporation) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending
154971
120
Const. P. 6329/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Syed Suleman (Petitioner) VS Syed Agha Rafiullah and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
25-OCT-21
No
163513
121
Suit 1979/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Syed Sulaiman Jafri (Plaintiff) VS United Bank Limited & others (Defendant)
S.B.
22-MAR-22
Yes
156740
122
Const. P. 1535/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Khaliq-ur-Rehman & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-JAN-22
Yes
C.P.222/2022 Imam Bux, Honorary Secretary of Madrass Cooperative Housing Society Ltd Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Cooperative Department, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending
162461
123
Const. P. 5849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Shafi Muhammad Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar Gadap Malir and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-SEP-21
No
166686
124
Suit 28/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Isphanyar M. Bhandara.. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Goshi M. Bhandara & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
31-MAR-22
Yes
170492
125
Suit 610/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
UNION FABRICS PRIVATE LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
31-AUG-22
Yes
177799
126
Suit 1205/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
HASAN AHMAD (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ORS (Defendant)
S.B.
11-JAN-23
Yes
172219
127
Suit 1202/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
MRS.TARANUM SABIH (Plaintiff) VS KBCA & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
13-SEP-22
Yes
169871
128
Suit 66/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
MOIN US SAMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) VS MRS.TANVEER QAZI (Defendant)
S.B.
22-AUG-22
Yes
188408
129
Suit 1132/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
NASIR HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) VS MST.SHAHNAWAZ BEGUM & OTHER (Defendant)
S.B.
06-MAR-23
Yes
184759
130
Suit 538/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS (PVT.) LTD (Plaintiff) VS NATIONAL DATABASE AND REGISTRATION AUTH & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sarfaraz Khamisani & others (Plaintiff) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
S.B.
23-AUG-23
No
210114
133
Const. P. 87/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Shakir Mehmood Siddiqui and others (Respondent)
S.B.
01-FEB-24
No
213118
134
Const. P. 1788/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2024
Saadabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-APR-24
Yes
2788
135
2014 CLC 322
Suit 119/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2006
MRS. SHABEENA FARHAT (Appellant) VS V/S M/S HIGHWAY HOUSING PROJECT & ORS (Respondent)
S.B.
02-SEP-19
Yes
Defendant has neither provided basic amenities in the Housing Scheme nor has produced any document, rules / bye-laws or Agreement between the parties hereto, to substantiate its evidence, that it is not the responsibility of Defendant to provide these basic amenities. the subject Housing Project launched by Defendant was not complete at least till the time of giving evidence till September, 2014; thus, the grievance of Plaintiff is of continuing nature, inter alia, in terms of Section 23 of the Limitation Law. This is a further ground in addition to the above, for determining that the present lis is maintainable. Hence, suit partly decreed.
89736
136
2017 CLC 155
Suit 541/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
MST. AMTUL FATIMA & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS SYED TAHIR ALI JAFRI & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
11-DEC-14
No
Nil.
103224
137
Suit 67/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1988
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
22-FEB-16
No
Nil.
103304
138
2016 SBLR Sindh 162
Const. P. 4404/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Syed Dost Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-NOV-15
Yes
* In exceptional circumstances the writ jurisdiction under article 199 of the Constitution can be invoked, despite availability of an alternate remedy.----
* Excessive use of unlawful powers is itself unlawful.----
* Under grab of a pending civil suit, in which even no restraining order is operating and which is ex facie being not pursued, a bona fide purchaser of a property cannot be deprived of its use and enjoyment, as this violates the fundamental rights of a citizen relating to proprietary rights and guaranteed under article 23 and 24 of the Constitution. Caution note attached by the respondent-DHA to the property in question merely on the ground that some civil suit is pending as stated above, is not a proper exercise of discretion vested in Respondent-DHA, in the circumstances, as admittedly Respondent-DHA refused to even process the application for approval of the completion plan issuance of completion certificate of the Subject property on the basis of the impugned caution note it has put in its record.
* A Genuine claimant can invoke section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, by notifying the concerned registrar/ responsible for registration of sale/ conveyance deed (under Registration Act, 1908) about the pendency of litigation in competent Court of Law, inter alia, to protect one
106094
139
2016 CLC 1063
Suit 456/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1988
MUHAMMAD WAJID KHAN. (Plaintiff) VS M/S. ATTOCK CEMENT FAC. PAK. LTD. (Defendant)
S.B.
11-MAR-16
Yes
A remedy available to a person under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, cannot operate as an absolute bar for seeking a remedy under an ordinary civil jurisdiction by filing a suit.
Article 22 and 24 of the Limitation Act, 1908, where under an action to seek compensation for an injury should be instituted within one year, is not applicable in the instant case, for the reason that Plaintiff was made to run from pillar to post for redressal of his grievance but without any success. Plaintiff was lastly operated upon on 15.10.1987 and the suit was filed on 17.11.1987, hence the cause of action and so is the grievance is of continuous nature. Well entrenched principle that if a person has a right to claim compensation for a wrong done to him, he should also have a remedy, has been attracted in the instant case.
The Defendants, who are Employer [Client], Contractor and sub-contractors, respectively, were jointly and severally held liable to pay damages for the negligent acts, which caused the Plaintiff serious injury and partial disability of permanent nature. Damages have been awarded by invoking the principle of composite negligence.
103297
140
2016 SBLR Sindh 594
Execution 39/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Party-1 (Decree Holder) VS Party-2 (Judgment Debtor)
S.B.
23-DEC-15
No
Nil.
119865
141
Suit 1151/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Mrs. Hailey Vincent D'Abreo (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and another (Defendant)
S.B.
27-OCT-17
No
Rent arrears of School building. S.R.P.O does not apply to the Government buildings. Relief of rent arrears and possession of school building was allowed.
112439
142
2018 MLD 1099
Suit 2702/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Ibrahim (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and others (Defendant)
S.B.
17-APR-17
No
Nil.
138015
143
Suit 421/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1991
Rahim Ali Palari & ors. (Plaintiff) VS Govt. of Sindh & ors.. (Defendant)
S.B.
14-MAR-19
Yes
Nil.
137997
144
J.M 7/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: J. M. No. 81 of 2015
2016
Muhammad Iqbal Pirani. (Applicant) VS Khurram Ashraf & Others. (Respondent)
S.B.
25-APR-19
Yes
Nil.
141283
145
Adm. Suit 2/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
HAYS TRADING & SHIPPING (Plaintiff) VS M.V. MISKI (Defendant)
S.B.
23-SEP-19
Yes
Nil.
115028
146
Suit 101/1984 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1984
Karachi Properties Investment Company (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Properties Investment Company (1974) (Private) Limited and others (Defendant)
S.B.
12-JUN-17
No
Nil.
116906
147
2019 CLC 583
Const. P. 1802/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Premier Battery Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water and Sewerage Board and another (Respondent)
D.B.
15-AUG-17
Yes
Petitioner had not participated in bidding process and assailed Public Notice and bidding process without fulfilling any of the conditions mentioned in the Public Notice---Validity---Petitioner had commercial motive that entire process should be started afresh--- Once the procuring authorities started bidding/ tendering process, provisions of Rr. 17(3) & 18 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, would be applicable and such stage was a subsequent one and had not reached---Petitioner did not have any locus standi to assail procurement process, as it did not even participate in first stage of the process by submitting Expression of Interest---Public Notice in question did not violate any of the provisions of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010---Basic information according to R. 73 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, contained about subject project, eligibility of participants, date of purchase of Expression of Interest document and the same could also be down loaded from Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority website and last date of submission also---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
C.P.481-K/2017 Premier Barrtery Industries (Pvt) Ltd v. Karachi Water & Seawerage Board and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
119257
148
Suit 601/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
24-OCT-17
No
Nil.
123072
149
2019 PLC CS 178
Suit 754/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
Mrs. Rukhsana Yahya (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan (Defendant)
S.B.
06-FEB-18
No
Nil.
137310
150
Suit 1037/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
M/S SIDDIQUI FUND TRUST (Plaintiff) VS NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY & ORS (Defendant)
S.B.
07-FEB-19
No
Nil.
114892
151
Suit 2531/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
01-JUN-17
No
Nil.
138573
152
Suit 1079/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
MAKRAN COMM. &ORS (Plaintiff) VS CHINA MOBILE PAK (Defendant)
S.B.
08-MAY-19
No
Nil.
128512
153
Suit 886/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1999
Syed Raza Haider Rizvi (Plaintiff) VS Gordon Shipping Company Ltd. and another (Defendant)
S.B.
02-JUL-18
No
Plaintiff was employee of defendants (employers) who were bound to provide him proper medical treatment---Plea raised by plaintiff was that due to failure of defendants to provide medical treatment, he had suffered permanent physical disability due to injury sustained by him during duty---Validity---Defendants neither produced any document about complete recovery of plaintiff nor had questioned authenticity of documents produced by plaintiff---Expert opinion of doctors further substantiated the fact that till March-1999 plaintiff was not fully recovered from injury which inhibited his pursuit of career---Testimony of plaintiff (employee) and undisputed documentary evidence produced by him weighed in favour of plaintiff as against oral evidence of defendant that complete medical treatment was given to plaintiff---To extent of negligence shown by defendants (employers) in providing incomplete medical treatment of plaintiff stood proved---Suit for damages and compensation was decreed accordingly.
114894
154
Suit 1090/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1991
Sunray Corporation (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Total Parco Marketing Ltd (Defendant)
S.B.
14-OCT-16
Yes
Nil.
118372
155
Suit 889/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1998
Mirza Abdul Sattar Baig (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Railways and others (Defendant)
S.B.
18-SEP-17
No
Nil.
124156
156
Suit 1650/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Mrs. Shamima Alam (Plaintiff) VS Syed Abu Obedah and others (Defendant)
S.B.
01-MAR-18
No
Nil.
138572
157
Suit 1713/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Sharif Ahmed Qureshi (Plaintiff) VS Wing Cdr.(R) Mazhar Mirza and others (Defendant)
S.B.
03-MAY-19
Yes
Nil.
130235
158
Const. P. 1464/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Punhal Khan (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-15
No
Nil.
C.P.22-K/2016 Punhal Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
132916
159
Suit 127/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
SURRIYA ZAHEER (Plaintiff) VS MRS.RUQAYA & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
04-OCT-18
No
Nil.
130736
160
2019 CLD 185
Suit 1625/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s. Fine Enterprises Traders.. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Constellation Co-Op. H.S. Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
15-AUG-18
Yes
Suit by a partner on behalf of firm---Maintainability---Partner was not required to have an authority from other partners before initiating any action by way of a suit---No adverse consequence had been mentioned in the provision of O. XXX, R. 1, C.P.C. if compliance was not made---Partner could neither relinquish a claim of the firm nor withdraw a suit or proceeding without the authorization or endorsement of the other partners of a firm.
140145
161
Suit 1396/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
AURANGZAIB QURESHI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS THE CHAIRMAN P.I.A & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
08-MAR-19
Yes
Nil.
143033
162
S.M.A 315/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Ms. Anam Jawed D/o Syed Jawed Naseer (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent)
S.B.
06-JAN-20
No
Matter throughout remained non-contentious. Petition granted.
144066
163
Suit 1680/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Shahzad Nabi. (Plaintiff) VS Naseer Turabi & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
18-OCT-19
No
Nil.
143030
164
Suit 432/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Muhammad Arif. (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Uzma Jawaid & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
30-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
145030
165
Suit 1847/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Emirates Airline / Emirates Sky Cargo & other (Defendant)
S.B.
06-MAY-20
Yes
Term an act of war or armed conflict as mentioned in Rule 18(2)(c) of the Fourth Schedule of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, also means non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Armed attack at Jinnah International Airport on 08.06.2014 falls within non-international armed conflict (NIAC) or at least it may be categorised as a hybrid phenomena; where repeated acts of terrorism in furtherance of defined objectives translated into a non-international armed conflict.
143032
166
S.M.A 144/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Meer Hussain Buksh Talpur S/o Meer Muhammad Murad (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent)
S.B.
06-JAN-20
No
Petition being non-contentious was granted.
145052
167
Suit 1954/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
RAZAK LATIF & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS ACE SECURITIES (PVT) LTD (Defendant)
S.B.
20-APR-20
Yes
Nil.
146657
168
H.C.A 78/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
Fateh Sports Wear Ltd & Ors (Appellant) VS Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd (Respondent)
D.B.
07-AUG-20
No
Nil.
146660
169
2021 PLD Sindh Note 76
H.C.A 24/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises (Respondent)
D.B.
30-SEP-20
Yes
Nil.
C.P.1054-K/2020 Pakistan State Oil Company Limited v. M/s.Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises,C.A.4-K/2022 Pakistan State Oil Company Limited v. M/s.Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
148078
170
Const. P. 5581/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-DEC-20
No
154722
171
Const. P. 4454/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Tariq Wali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-OCT-21
Yes
150769
172
Const. P. 2186/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Zabardast Khan Mehar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-APR-21
Yes
C.P.4267/2021 Zabardast Khan Mahar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB,Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
153978
173
Suit 1152/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2004
INAYAT MASIH & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS WAQAR AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
27-SEP-21
Yes
149990
174
Suit 436/1993 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1993
SHAHIMAH SAYEED (Plaintiff) VS BASE CDR PAF BASE MASROOR (Defendant)
Const. P. 2587/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Iltaf Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-21
Yes
C.P.3387/2021 Iltaf Hussain and another v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
156017
177
Const. P. 7194/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-21
No
154942
178
Const. P. 3310/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Sohail Haroon (Petitioner) VS Saleem Memon and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
02-NOV-21
No
154937
179
Const. P. 4496/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
20-OCT-21
No
155615
180
Const. P. 8498/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Mst. Uzma (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
25-NOV-21
No
154936
181
Const. P. 321/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Khawaja Qadeer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS S.I.T.E & another (Respondent)
D.B.
28-OCT-21
No
156069
182
Const. P. 5947/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Muhammad Ali Shahzad (Petitioner) VS IIIrd Sr. Civil Judge and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-DEC-21
No
162257
183
Const. P. 4886/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
M/s Amadeus I.T Group S.A (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-SEP-21
No
162427
184
Const. P. 1516/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Asjad Sattar Adv (Petitioner) VS DG SBCA and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-AUG-21
No
210682
185
Const. P. 5604/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
West Wharf Warehouse Co. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-OCT-21
No
C.P.6339/2021 Karachi Port Trust Estate Department, Karachi v. West Wharf Warehouse Company (Pvt) Limited, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
162125
186
Const. P. 2387/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Jason Charles (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-21
No
162467
187
Const. P. 8092/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Barrister Mujtaba Sohail Raja and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-SEP-21
No
166346
188
Const. P. 5895/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Uzma Naz and Ors (Petitioner) VS The D.G Rangers & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
09-MAY-22
Yes
C.P.860-K/2022 The Director General Rangers Sindh through Ashraf Hussain Shah Deputy Superintendent Rangers v. The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Government of Sindh & others,C.P.859-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh & another v. Uzma Naz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending Adjourned after summer vacation,Pending Adjourned after summer vacation
172221
189
Suit 424/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
MADNI AHMED ALI ARFAT SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) VS SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant)
S.B.
03-OCT-22
Yes
189906
190
Suit 1188/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Sadia Siddiqui & another (Plaintiff) VS Adnan Andalaib Siddiqui & others (Defendant)
S.B.
24-OCT-22
Yes
189904
191
Suit 434/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Imtiaz Ahmed & another. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Hussain (Defendant)
S.B.
07-NOV-22
No
212527
192
Const. P. 1168/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Syed Iftikhar Haider Rizvi S/o Syed Mumtaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS VIth ADJ, Karachi Central and others (Respondent)
S.B.
20-MAR-24
Yes
212777
193
Const. P. 485/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Ch. Ghulam Muhuyuddin (Petitioner) VS Sheikh Abid & Co (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
S.B.
03-APR-24
Yes
212912
194
Const. P. 1716/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2024
P&T Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Sect: Coop Department and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-APR-24
Yes
213182
195
Const. P. 1437/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2024
Rana Khawar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-APR-24
No
205646
196
J.M 33/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mrs. Samar Rais. (Applicant) VS Askari Bank Limited & others (Respondent)
S.B.
13-NOV-23
Yes
138872
197
2017 YLR 1551
Suit 13/1972 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1972
PREMIER INSURANCE CO. V/S KARACHI SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING (Plaintiff) VS M/S. FAROOQI & CO., Surridge & Beecheano, ARFIN & CO., Abdul Rauf, Samiuddin Sami, H. A. Rahmani (Defendant)
S.B.
02-MAY-16
No
Marine Insurance Policy is assignable and consequently an Insurance Company after being subrogated, can sue the tortfeasor in its own name, in terms of Sections 130A read with 135A, of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Foreseeability Causation and but for is that if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s) then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of care] that has resulted in causing injury and the but for test if simply put means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant is negligence.
Subject Marine Insurance Policy being a 'time policy' had covered the risk, while the Vessel in question was dry-docked and subsequently damaged.
103220
198
2016 CLC 1326, 2016 SBLR Sindh 967
Suit 796/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1987
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
18-MAR-16
No
No party is allowed to set up a new case in evidence, which is beyond his pleadings.
Defendant was appointed as handling agent of Plaintiff in respect of one of latter's go-downs, inter alia, with an express obligation to submit periodical Reserve Stock Account (RSA), which Defendant failed to submit. Defendant being bailee in terms of Section 161 of Contract Act, 1872, was responsible for delivery of goods as well as keeping a proper account for the same. Defendant held liable for the reported short fall in the rice stock and bardanas (wheat / gunny bags).
Concept of the Best Evidence Rule' vis-??-vis Article 129, Illustration (g) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 has also been discussed; that if a party relying upon a best piece of evidence but withholds it while leading evidence, then it will be presumed that under some sinister motive the best piece of evidence was not produced.
103303
199
Const. P. 2293/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent)
S.B.
26-NOV-15
No
The Petitioner being the landlady has complained that the Lessee/tenant PSO [Respondent] in violation of Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002, particularly 25-12.3, has set up a CNG facility at the existing petrol / service station. Since area of the plot was admittedly more than 1000 square yards, hence the applicable regulation is 25-11.12, where under a CNG facility can be added at an existing petrol station / retail outlet, subject to fulfillment of other requisite formalities, which were complied with.
When an Oil Marketing Company appoints a Franchise in respect of a retail outlet / service station, the status of the said Franchise is that of a dealer, that is, a licensee, as envisaged in the Storage, Distribution and Marketing of Petroleum Rules, 1971. Franchisee is a term in vogue in the international Oil and Gas Industry.
Different agreements entered into between an Oil Marketing Company as a lessee / tenant of a property, with its Franchisee or other person(s), in particular, for NFR [non-fuel retail] business, is subservient to the main lease agreement being a registered document, entered into between an Oil Marketing Company and owner / lessor of a property. Therefore, for such agreements a written no objection is not necessarily required from landlord / lessor, but only from the concerned government functionary.
106275
200
Suit 826/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1987
M/S. MUSTAFA SONS PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) VS PORT QASIM AUTHORITY. (Defendant)
S.B.
15-AUG-16
No
There is a distinction between a routine board resolution that authorizes a person / Officer of a Company to do certain acts, including instituting a legal proceeding and a non-routine resolution as contemplated under Section 164 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (the Ordinance 1984). Similarly, a special resolution passed under Section 172 of the Companies Ordinance 1984, which has been defined in Section 2 sub-section (36) of the Ordinance 1984, is also of distinct nature and different import. For a routine and a procedural resolution as mentioned hereinabove, there is no requirement that the same should be filed with the SECP (Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan).
If a board resolution is passed without giving prior notice to the Directors of the Board then the meeting convened and the resolution passed there at, both are held to be invalid and not in accordance with the Ordinance 1984. Even otherwise, if a Board Meeting is allowed to be held without prior notice to other directors, then it would lead to a chaotic situation and it will be against the basic principle of good corporate governance, which cannot be permitted.
A suit instituted on behalf of a Plaintiff-Company without a valid authorization simply means that the plaint is not existing for all intents and purposes.
140565
201
Adm. Suit 7/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Fair Sea International FZC (Plaintiff) VS MV "MISKI" & Others (Defendant)
S.B.
23-SEP-19
Yes
Plaintiff has incurred and still incurring expenses for supply of necessaries and other products to Defendant No.1 since or about 09.10.2017 and onwards, when the Defendant No.1 (subject Vessel) is berthed at Karachi Port; therefore, only those documents can be considered, which relate to this period and onwards, or, when the subject Vessel entered territorial waters of Pakistan and not before that. Suit of the Plaintiff is partly decreed to the extent of US Dollars-120,710.6 (US Dollars One Lac Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred and Ten only) and Pak Rupees-22,42,497/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lacs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred Ninety Seven only).
126454
202
Suit 1063/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Abdul Rauf & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Amin Lakhani & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
11-SEP-23
Yes
Nil.
112908
203
2018 CLC Note 39
Suit 566/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Tariq Rafi. (Plaintiff) VS Topgen Health Care/T.G. Pharma & Ors. (Defendant)
MRS. ZAIBA KABLY (Plaintiff) VS TARIQ NAZIR BUKHARI (Defendant)
S.B.
02-APR-19
Yes
Nil.
137303
206
Suit 315/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2000
S.M.INAMUL HAQ. (Plaintiff) VS MIRZA AMJAD BAIG & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
28-JAN-19
Yes
Nil.
137307
207
Suit 515/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2006
M/S SOORTY ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ARSHAD SYED (Defendant)
S.B.
06-FEB-19
Yes
Nil.
115648
208
Suit 1663/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
Clariant Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) VS Deputy Commssioner Inland Revenue Service (AEC) and others (Defendant)
S.B.
19-JUN-17
Yes
Nil.
118371
209
Const. P. 3488/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent)
D.B.
21-SEP-17
No
Nil.
C.P.3309/2017 Iqbal Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary, Local Government , Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
135717
210
Suit 1682/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
MAZHAR SAYEED (Plaintiff) VS ATIF MAZHAR & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
23-JAN-19
Yes
Nil.
135933
211
Suit 2501/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Umer Sharif & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Saeed Bakhsh (Pvt) Limited. (Defendant)
S.B.
02-JAN-19
No
Nil.
117028
212
Const. P. 4843/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Maj. Rtd. Tariq Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khalida Jilajni and others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-AUG-17
Yes
Nil.
C.P.528-K/2017 Maj.(Retd) Tariq Lodhi v. Mst: Khalida Jilani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
138471
213
Suit 1767/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Abdul Sattar Shaikh. (Plaintiff) VS Adeel Zahoor Malik & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
30-MAY-19
Yes
Nil.
124293
214
Suit 1142/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2003
Pakistan Battery Mfg. Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and another (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Fahad Farooqi and others (Defendant)
S.B.
09-MAR-18
No
Nil.
138976
215
Suit 771/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
MASJID E ABDEEN TRUST (Plaintiff) VS DUBAI SHOPING MALL (Defendant)
S.B.
23-MAY-19
No
Nil.
139291
216
Suit 5/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
NOMAN ABID CO (Plaintiff) VS NAVEED HAIDER (Defendant)
S.B.
19-JUL-19
Yes
The Plaintiff has already received the amount of disputed cheque, therefore, the present suit was filed with mala fide intention and is not maintainable. Not only this, the overall conduct of the Plaintiff Company, from the time of granting Leave to Defend Application was not of a bona fide litigant. Hence, the present suit is dismissed with costs.
140233
217
Suit 1472/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1998
Abdul Qadir (Plaintiff) VS Mr.Ameer Zadi& Ors (Defendant)
S.B.
16-SEP-19
Yes
Nil.
141562
218
Suit 2227/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Allied Bank Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Qamar Hussain Naqvi & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
18-NOV-19
Yes
Plaint rejected by invoking legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? and Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1908.
Legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? (a personal right of action dies with the person) ??? death extinguishes liability in Tort, is enforceable in Pakistan subject to certain exceptions. First, where a tortfeasor???s estate is benefited by the wrong done, then an action would lie against his representatives, secondly, when already a decree is passed, inter alia, for damages, the legal representatives / heirs of a deceased can continue the litigation, thirdly, if in a service case, the Trial Court has reinstated a petitioner in service, which is overturned by an appellate court and in the intervening period, person dies, his legal heirs can continue the litigation, because if a Higher Forum restores the Order of Trial Court, then the legal heirs would at least be entitled for the service benefits. However, no suit can be filed after the death of a person for his individual acts, against his legal heirs.
147825
219
H.C.A 347/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Naseem Ahmed Malik & others (Appellant) VS Saeed Iqbal & others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-20
Yes
C.P.94-K/2021 Naseem Ahmed Malik & others v. Saeed Iqbal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
147827
220
H.C.A 116/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shahzad Noor Muhammad (Appellant) VS Karachi Gymkhana & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-NOV-20
Yes
147980
221
Suit 1316/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2000
DR. ABDUL RASHID PARACHA (Plaintiff) VS THE DEF. HOUSING AUTHORITY (Defendant)
S.B.
20-JAN-20
Yes
149949
222
2021 CLC 389
H.C.A 422/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Zafar Ali Kayani & others (Appellant) VS Ahmed Saleem Khan & others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-OCT-20
No
151494
223
Const. P. 2589/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Saddique Ali Laghari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-21
Yes
C.P.3389/2021 Saddique Ali Laghari v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
154598
224
Const. P. 771/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2004
Capt. S. M . Asllam (Petitioner) VS Karachi Building Control Authority & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
12-OCT-21
Yes
C.P.1657-K/2021 Captain S.M.Aslam v. Sindh Master Plan Authority Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending
152918
225
J.M 8/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
M/S. GETZ PHARMA (PVT.) LIMITED (Applicant) VS NOVARTIS AG & ANOTHER (Respondent)
S.B.
02-SEP-21
Yes
C.P.5311/2021 M/s Getz Pharma Pvt Limited, Karachi v. Novartis A.G. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 13-Feb-24)
150614
226
Election Appeal 13/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Zunaira Rehman W/o Ali Rehman (Appellant) VS The Election Commission of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
S.B.
05-APR-21
Yes
151947
227
Suit 1778/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Muhammad Iqbal. (Plaintiff) VS Zafar Hussain & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
24-JUN-21
Yes
151356
228
Suit 1657/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
TCB AVIATION (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS SRI LANKAN AIRLINES LTD THR. COUNTRY MANAGER (Defendant)
S.B.
17-MAY-21
Yes
155987
229
Const. P. 4882/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Court of Minister of Cooperation & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
09-DEC-21
Yes
154941
230
Const. P. 5885/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Mst. Bushra Umer and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-OCT-21
No
155423
231
Const. P. 5539/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Mst Aysha Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-21
Yes
C.P.286-K/2022 Mst.Aysha Begum v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Housing & Town Planning & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Pending
154935
232
Const. P. 145/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Goth Wasand Khan Kalmati Baloch Welfare Associatio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-OCT-21
No
155624
233
Const. P. 1893/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-NOV-21
Yes
162429
234
Const. P. 2440/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-AUG-21
No
162462
235
Const. P. 7578/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Abdul Quddus Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
28-SEP-21
No
162466
236
Const. P. 1146/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Irshad (Petitioner) VS SBCA & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-SEP-21
No
209787
237
II.A. 3/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
Nina Industries Limited (Appellant) VS Bhanero Textile Mills (Respondent)
S.B.
24-JAN-24
Yes
202437
238
Suit 58/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
ASGHAR HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) VS ABDUL WAKEEL & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
07-SEP-23
Yes
213473
239
II.A. 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mrs. Raisa Bano and others (Appellant) VS Ms. Tooba Shoaib and others (Respondent)
S.B.
24-JAN-24
Yes
142921
240
Suit 972/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
DR. HASAN FATIMA JAFERY & ORS (Appellant) VS ROYAL SAUDI CONSULATE KARACHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
S.B.
18-DEC-19
Yes
With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights.
3415
241
Suit 1150/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1991
ISLAMIC ESTATES & BUILDERS (Appellant) VS V/S HAJI ALLAH DINO & ORS (Respondent)
S.B.
01-FEB-07
No
Nil.
148654
242
Suit 286/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2003
SYED WAQAR HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) VS MST.ALAM ARA (Defendant)
S.B.
21-DEC-20
Yes
138578
243
Suit 762/1995 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1995
SHAHZAB GOTH RESIDENTS (Plaintiff) VS GOVT. OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
21-MAY-19
Yes
Nil.
112438
244
Suit 541/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
MST. AMTUL FATIMA & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS SYED TAHIR ALI JAFRI & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
20-APR-17
Yes
Judgment debtor raised the plea that entire sale proceeds were received beyond statutory period of two weeks which was in violation of O. XXI, R. 85, C.P.C.---Validity---Time that was consumed in remitting amount from two accounts; one maintained by auction purchaser and other by the Court official on which neither court official nor auction purchaser had control---Such transaction and proceeds were governed by regulations of State Bank of Pakistan---Judicial sale had a sanctity and once sale was confirmed, auction purchaser had interest in proceedings---Application was dismissed in circumstances.
106077
245
Suit 287/1990 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1990
Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant)
S.B.
26-FEB-16
No
Nil.
205644
246
Execution 25/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Askari Bank Ltd. (Decree Holder) VS A.H. International (Pvt) Ltd. & OTHERS (Judgment Debtor)
S.B.
13-NOV-23
Yes
102308
247
2016 CLC 878, 2017 CLC 1387
Suit 176/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1985
Trading Corporation of Pakistan Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Haji Khuda Bux Amir Umer ltd (Defendant)
S.B.
21-JAN-16
No
??? Any shortcoming in compliance of Order 29 Rule 1 is curable, for instance, if a formal Board Resolution is not there, then the Articles of Association and / or internal record [un-rebutted one] like Note Sheets, can be taken into account to determine about the authority of a person instituting a legal proceeding / suit. Articles of Association empower the Board of Directors to institute and defend legal proceedings; Articles 106 and 113, deal with quorum and at least two Directors can pass an effective and valid Board resolution. Since Noting sheet produced in the evidence confirms that Directors of the Plaintiff Corporation had discussed the issue and authorized the filing of instant suit, which was subsequently filed by the person authorized in the above document, the conclusion is that the suit was properly and competently filed. Noting sheet can be taken as Board Resolution by Circulation.
??? If the very suit has been unauthorizedly and incompetently filed, that is, neither any authorization from the Board of Directors exists, nor the Articles of Association provide such authority, then such a defect remains incurable, even by a subsequent ratification.
106760
248
2017 SBLR Sindh 105
Const. P. 4725/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Ubedullah Siddiqi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
30-AUG-16
No
Nil.
122573
249
2018 PLD SC 483
Suit 139/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
Diamond Weld Rods (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Messrs Stal Co GmbH and others (Defendant)
S.B.
29-JAN-18
Yes
Suit for recovery of money and injunction---Freight, payment of---Grievance of plaintiff company against shipping company was that due to local shipping agent, a delay was caused in unloading product from vessel and it resulted in incurring of demurrage and other avoidable expenses/charges---Validity---Document produced by plaintiff as Bill of Lading was though not forged but it did not fulfil requirement of Bill of Lading and same could be considered as such--- Bill of Lading produced by shipping company was genuine as it fulfilled its statutory requirements---Plaintiff was required to pay freight to shipping company as Bill of Lading clearly mentioned that
118370
250
Const. P. 714/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Javed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-SEP-17
No
Nil.
120052
251
2018 YLR 1557
H.C.A 47/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Haroon Zia Malik (Appellant) VS Mst. Fariha Razzak and others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-NOV-17
Yes
Plaintiff was owner of suit property who voluntarily gifted the same to the donee-wife---Trial Court had correctly appraised the evidence while recording his findings---Impugned gift deed was not a forged and fabricated document but same had been signed by the donor---Suit property had been gifted in favour of defendant who was wife of donor at the relevant time---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession which were present in the case---Possession of suit property was already with the donee which till date continued to be with her---If husband had made a gift of anything to his wife or vice-versa then it could not be retracted---Transaction in question was not a financial one but it was gift of which a reciprocal financial obligation was not a consideration---Provisions of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 were not applicable in the matter of gift---Gift did not require a compulsory registration---Donor did not suffer any mental distress at the hand of donee---Impugned judgment did not suffer from any infirmity or illegality---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
C.P.96/2018 Haroon Zia Malik v. Mst. Fariha Razzak and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Dismissed
112440
252
Suit 2702/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Ibrahim (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and others (Defendant)
S.B.
12-APR-17
No
Nil.
137999
253
Suit 1724/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
MST.ZAIBUNISA & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS IQBAL AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
28-JAN-19
Yes
Nil.
116568
254
Suit 752/1984 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1984
Cherat Cement Company Limited (Plaintiff) VS Ghazanfar Ali & two others (Defendant)
S.B.
28-JUL-17
Yes
Nil.
118616
255
Suit 1042/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Khalid Mehmood and others (Plaintiff) VS M/s Multi Plus Corporation Private Limited and others (Defendant)
S.B.
05-OCT-17
Yes
Nil.
140566
256
Adm. Suit 3/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
GLANDER INTERNATIONAL BUNKERING DMCC (Plaintiff) VS M.V. MISKI AND 2 OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
23-SEP-19
Yes
It is an established Rule that pleadings themselves cannot be considered as evidence unless the Plaintiff or Defendant, as the case may be, enters the witness Box and lead the evidence in support of one's claim or defence. Plaintiff has not come forward to testify and discharge the burden of proof about its claim. The reported decision of Hon???ble Supreme Court handed down in the case of Rana Tanveer Khan v. Naseer Khan-2015 SCMR page-1401, is relevant. Since Plaintiff has failed to prove the allegations against the Defendants, thus the Plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. Suit dismissed.
137297
257
Suit 112/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
SAFDAR HUSSAIN BIRLAS & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS MOHSIN ALI (Defendant)
S.B.
29-MAR-19
Yes
Nil.
137306
258
Suit 357/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2007
Muhammad Junaid Makhdumi. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Iqbal & Others (Defendant)
S.B.
19-FEB-19
Yes
Nil.
135932
259
Suit 1022/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
ABID & ORS (Plaintiff) VS K.B.C.A (Defendant)
S.B.
25-JAN-19
No
Nil.
124274
260
Const. P. 1853/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Ahmed Ali Manzoor (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Railways and others (Respondent)
D.B.
06-DEC-17
No
Nil.
114898
261
Adm. Suit 628/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Marhaba Aviation Services Private Limited (Plaintiff) VS Real Air Travel (Defendant)
S.B.
07-FEB-17
No
Nil.
132635
262
Judicial Companies Misc. 47/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Aisha Steel Mills Limited & Others (Applicant) VS Nil (Respondent)
S.B.
25-JUN-18
No
Nil.
112926
263
Suit 595/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
INAM HAFIZ SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. & OTHER (Defendant)
S.B.
19-JUL-17
Yes
Nil.
139312
264
Suit 862/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
PERVAIZ HUSSAIN & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS MIAN KHURRAM RASOOL (Defendant)
S.B.
19-JUL-19
Yes
The Defendant issues / has issued the cheques in favour of Plaintiffs, but the same upon presentation could not be encashed because of closure of account, then this conduct on the part of Defendant is a mala fide one and is done with a dishonest intention to defraud the Plaintiffs. Hence, suit is decreed.
139391
265
Suit 727/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
IQBAL RASHEED (Plaintiff) VS BABAR MIRZA CHUGTAI & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
19-JAN-17
Yes
Nil.
140721
266
Suit 845/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ashraf Hussain Khan. (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Rehman Khan & Others. (Defendant)
S.B.
30-SEP-19
Yes
Cases involving rights of inheritence are at higher pedestal, inter alia, in view of the Sharia Act, 1991.
147872
267
H.C.A 260/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Appellant) VS Haji Jaffar & others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
Yes
150613
268
Election Appeal 12/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Hasnain Ali Chohan S/o Mumtaz Ahmed (Appellant) VS Miftah Ismail Ahmed and others (Respondent)
S.B.
02-APR-21
Yes
154596
269
Const. P. 7173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Sheikh Imran Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The D.G KDA and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-21
No
154614
270
Const. P. 300/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Mian Trust (Petitioner) VS Lyari Expressway And ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-OCT-21
Yes
154408
271
Const. P. 8963/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Faisal Mubeen Jumani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-OCT-21
No
153311
272
Const. P. 4028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Tanvir Jamshed (Petitioner) VS Muhamad Hanif and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-SEP-21
No
155454
273
Const. P. 1115/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-21
No
156049
274
Const. P. 4107/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Perviaz Masih & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-DEC-21
No
162420
275
Const. P. 3906/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) VS Administrator Through CDGK and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-AUG-21
No
174883
276
Suit 1717/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Plaintiff) VS Najam Ahmed & others. (Defendant)
S.B.
08-NOV-22
Yes
212927
277
Const. P. 1199/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mirza Aleem Agha S/o Mirza Ahmed Agha (Petitioner) VS M/s. Modern Motors (Pvt) Ltd and others (Respondent)
S.B.
07-MAR-24
No
187058
278
Suit 223/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
ARY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
14-MAR-23
Yes
208903
279
R.A (Civil Revision) 89/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Aziz ur Rehman S/o Gul Rehman (Applicant) VS Gul Faraz Ahmed Murwat and Others (Respondent)
S.B.
12-JAN-24
No
212529
280
Const. P. 277/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2024
Muhammad Nadeem and Another (Petitioner) VS Sumeira Nadeem Sulemani and Others (Respondent)
S.B.
27-MAR-24
Yes
145055
281
Suit 1347/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2006
ASADULLAH KHAWAJA (Appellant) VS INVESTMENT CORP. OF PAKISTAN (Respondent)
Territorial jurisdiction of Sindh High Court was questioned by Defendant, primarily on the ground that Defendant-Company has been shifted from Karachi to Lahore, therefore, a foreign company / Plaintiff cannot enforce an International Arbitral Award by filing a suit in Sindh High Court. The crucial documentary evidence shows that when the suit proceeding was filed for enforcement of the Award under Section 6 of the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, the Defendant had its registered office in Karachi and even Annual Report of the Company also shows that the Management notice for convening the Annual General Meeting was also to be held at Karachi. Consequently, it has been held, that Sindh High Court has jurisdiction in the matter.
107334
284
Suit 646/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1999
KHAN JAMAL (Plaintiff) VS M/S. LONG LIFE BUILDERS & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
03-OCT-16
No
Nil.
106724
285
Const. P. 2524/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ali Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
22-AUG-16
No
Registered sub-leases in respect of two apartment / units which were non-existent at the time of registration and even till the decision of the instant petition, have been directed to be cancelled by Nazir of Sindh High Court. It is an admitted position that these apartments are to be located at the third floor / story of the building which is not even constructed by the Builder.
Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, cannot be construed so as to include an immoveable property, which is not even existing at the time of registration. Property sought to be registered should be of ascertainable description. Similarly, Section 2, subsection (6) of the Registration Act, 1908, wherein an immoveable property is defined, inter alia, means that an immoveable property should be a tangible one and physically exists.
Different orders passed by this Court in various constitutional petitions, crux of which is that no registration of a residential or a commercial unit of a multistoried building should be done without a completion plan / occupancy certificate, are the decisions in rem, and thus applicable to the present case as well.
One of the main objectives, that can be achieved by looking at the completion plan / occupancy certificate is that it can help in identifying the property sought to be registered and also verify the fact that a multistoried building is Regulations compliant, particularly having structural stability.
Rule 135 of the West Pakistan Registration Rules, 1929, is not applicable to the facts of subject constitutional petition as the illegality of sub-leases in question were floating on surface and no further inquiry was required for ascertaining the validity of these sub-leases in question. Even otherwise a rule cannot be interpreted in such a manner that results in perpetuating illegality rather preventing it.
114606
286
2018 CLC 883
Suit 2489/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s. Al Naseeb Welfare Foundation International (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Latif Memorial Hospital & others (Defendant)
S.B.
30-MAY-17
No
O. VII, R. 11---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Suit for declaration---Rejection of plaint---Cause of action, absence of---Defendant, a Welfare Association was dissolved and plaintiff, a Welfare Foundation, wanted to takeover the assets of the Association---Plea raised by plaintiff was that objectives contained in Memorandum of Association of both the organisations were similar, therefore after dissolution, Association was bound to donate its assets to any such organization---Validity---Held, in absence of any clause under the Memorandum and Articles of Association of defendant Association, that assets would be given/handed over or donated to any specific entity or any agreement between the organizations that was plaintiff and defendant, plaintiff could not as a matter of right claim the assets of dissolved entity should be handed over to plaintiff---Such was an undisputed factual position and in absence of any such document or undertaking by defendant Association, neither any right nor any interest had accrued in favour of plaintiff for bringing an action of such nature---Plaintiff did not have any legal character for instituting suit as no cause of action had accrued for filing the same and it was hit by S.42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Basic features to attract O.VII, R.11, C.P.C. were present---Plaint was rejected in circumstances.
112681
287
Suit 2702/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Ibrahim (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and others (Defendant)
S.B.
08-FEB-17
No
Nil.
114522
288
Suit 1353/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Iqbal Umer (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Gymkhana and others (Defendant)
S.B.
21-SEP-16
No
Nil.
122209
289
Suit 504/1984 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1984
Tewfiq Fikree and others (Plaintiff) VS Umahani Fikree and others (Defendant)
S.B.
18-JAN-18
No
Nil.
123152
290
Election Appeal 3/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Jam Javed Ahmed Khan Dehar (Appellant) VS Haji Muhammad Akbar and 14 others (Respondent)
S.B.
13-FEB-18
Yes
Nil.
137294
291
Suit 209/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
MOHSIN ALI (Plaintiff) VS SAFDAR HUSSAIN BIRLAS (Defendant)
S.B.
29-MAR-19
Yes
Nil.
118611
292
Const. P. 703/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-17
Yes
Nil.
124173
293
Suit 1689/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Mst. Saira Khatoon (Appellant) VS Syed Muhammad Ashraf and others (Respondent)
S.B.
27-FEB-18
Yes
Nil.
116012
294
2018 CLC Note 24
Suit 611/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Qadir and another (Plaintiff) VS Laeeq Ahmed and others (Defendant)
S.B.
07-JUL-17
Yes
Defendant sought rejection of plaint on the ground that plaintiff had concealed material facts---Validity---Object and principle of O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C. was that a frivolous litigation should be laid to rest at the earliest and bona fide parties should be saved from rigors of such a litigation---Subject matter of litigation in question, i.e. the house property was not in dispute and sale consideration was admitted---Communication of offer and acceptance by parties to each other with regard to subject matter and total sale consideration was acknowledged by both the parties---All ingredients of a valid agreement enforceable as a contract existed---Defendants failed to make a case for grant of application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C.---Application was dismissed in circumstances.
124138
295
Suit 1755/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Ahmed Saeed and others (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Education Department and two others (Defendant)
S.B.
06-MAR-18
Yes
Nil.
116992
296
2018 YLR 1053
Suit 327/1966 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1966
Raza Hussain and others (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Khan and others (Defendant)
S.B.
15-AUG-17
Yes
Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Compromise on behalf of defendants---Scope---Transferee of property could not confer upon a transferor a better title than he himself possessed---Defendants had no lawful authority, right or interest at the relevant time in the subject property when they entered into a compromise with the plaintiffs---Neither any appeal was preferred against the partition order nor authenticity or validity of the same was challenged by any of the parties---Possession of suit property was wrongly handed over to the plaintiffs by the Nazir of the Court---Nazir of the Court was directed to take appropriate measures to hand over the possession of suit land to its claimants.
123493
297
Suit 665/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2003
Umar Islam Khan (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Basit and others (Defendant)
M/s State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
D.B.
24-NOV-20
Yes
154934
305
Const. P. 5553/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Syed Iqbal Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Farooq Ahmed and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-21
No
156150
306
Const. P. 4923/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Sindh Games Association (Regd) (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-21
No
155481
307
Const. P. 4770/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Syed Muhammad Tauheed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-21
No
162146
308
W.T.A 938/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: WTA 939 of 2000
2000
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) VS M/s Hashwani Services (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-20
Yes
171635
309
S.M.A 440/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shamsuddin s/o Aboobakar (Petitioner) VS Yasin Hasan (Deceased) (Respondent)
S.B.
12-AUG-22
Yes
176358
310
Suit 379/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
MISS. UZMA AMJAD ALI & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS MRS.SAEEDA BANO & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
22-DEC-22
Yes
199073
311
Suit 1652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
MUHAMMAD AMIN (Plaintiff) VS ASIF YOUNUS & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
08-JUN-23
Yes
210077
312
II.A. 192/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
Sumbul Saud W/o Saud Hasan Khan (Appellant) VS Humaira Mateen Thr. Syed Muhammad Mateen & Others (Respondent)
S.B.
24-JAN-24
No
213287
313
Const. P. 1541/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2024
Accountant General Sindh Employees CHS (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-APR-24
No
3347
314
Suit 972/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2005
DR. HASAN FATIMA JAFERY & ORS (Appellant) VS ROYAL SAUDI CONSULATE KARACHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
S.B.
13-FEB-07
No
Nil.
141285
315
Suit 1640/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
MST. ZUBAIDA KHATOON (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL & OTHERS (Defendant)
S.B.
18-OCT-19
No
Nil.
106147
316
Const. P. 2199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent)
D.B.
03-JUN-16
No
117609
317
Const. P. 7101/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Anwar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and another (Respondent)
D.B.
12-SEP-17
Yes
Nil.
C.P.634-K/2017 Anwar Ahmed and others v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and others,C.P.4383/2017 Clifton Cantonment Board, Karachi v. Anwar Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan
Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
117306
318
Const. P. 2378/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Shahzad Qamer Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-AUG-17
Yes
Nil.
127801
319
Suit 1311/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2004
Shaikh Abdul Jabbar through his Legal Heirs (Plaintiff) VS Irfan Jami Rafique and another (Defendant)
S.B.
08-JUN-18
Yes
Nil.
112662
320
2018 PLD Sindh 327
Suit 750/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Syed Farukh Mazhar (Plaintiff) VS SGS Headquarters and others (Defendant)
S.B.
17-APR-17
Yes
Nil.
116246
321
Adm. Suit 539/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2000
Al-Riaz (Pvt.) Limited and another (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ismail and others (Defendant)
S.B.
14-JUL-17
Yes
Nil.
137995
322
Suit 2322/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Dr. Arifa Farid and others (Plaintiff) VS Mitha Khan and others (Defendant)
S.B.
24-APR-19
Yes
Nil.
138212
323
Suit 620/1994 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1994
ISMAIL MEMORIAL TRUST (Plaintiff) VS KARACH COOP H.S. UNION LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
S.B.
06-MAY-19
Yes
Nil.
122792
324
2018 YLR 2210
Suit 622/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2003
Major Ret. Sheikh Abdul Naeem (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and others (Defendant)
S.B.
23-JAN-18
No
Nil.
116227
325
S.M.A 58/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Mrs. Atteeya Mahmood (Petitioner) (Petitioner) VS Nighat Muzaffar and another (Respondent)
S.B.
12-JUL-17
Yes
Nil.
137356
326
Const. P. 6274/2017 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Bushra Jabeen and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)