Caselaw

Top Searched Caselaw (Judgments / Orders ) of all Hon'ble Judges

Top Searched Caselaw (Judgments / Orders ) of the all Hon'ble Judges

Note: The Sorting of following cases is based on the search by public, Litigant.It does not reflect Ranking of Hon'ble Judges.

1) 1682/2009 Suit MAZHAR SAYEED (Plaintiff) V/S ATIF MAZHAR & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

2) 208/2015 Suit Mirza Shakir Baig (Plaintiff) V/S Miss. Iffat Chughtai & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

3) 77/2012 Const. P. Haji Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) V/S Head Master Govt Primary School Bhutta Road Suk (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:ence, it could be safely observed that the pleadings of the plaint do support the proposed amendment sought by the petitioner. In the same way, will not change the nature and complexion of the suit. Had the proposed amendment be not supported by the pleadings in terms of Para 6 as well as in terms of prayer clause A, it could be a possibility that nature and complexion of the suit may have been altered by introduction of these impugned, proposed amendments, but that is not the case here.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 02-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

4) 299/2021 H.C.A Asif Siddik Adam (Appellant) V/S Siddiki Fun Trust & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 549
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Mehreen(ADVO-10600-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Qasim Iqbal(ADVO-19002-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Yaseen Khan Azad(ADVO-2367-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 10-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.936-K/2023 Asif Siddik Adam v. Siddiki Fund Trust through its Trustees & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (-) Salahuddin Panhwar,J

5) 903/2007 Suit Allah Dino Khaskheli (Plaintiff) V/S HBL (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Damages employement HBL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 08-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

6) 252/2021 Cr.Bail Ahmed Ali @ Ali Bhutto and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 911
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

7) 4/2011 H.C.A Salehbhoy through LRs (In person) (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 22-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.41-K/2013 Salehbhoy v. M/s Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Not Reached

8) 615/2014 Const. P. Mst. Zarina Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting

9) 262/2010 Civil Revision Mst. Farasa Aijaz (Applicant) V/S M/s. Qamran Construcation (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-APR-12
Approved for Reporting

10) 830/2013 Suit S. Abdul Mannan Muttaqi (Plaintiff) V/S Defense House Authority & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-APR-14
Approved for Reporting

11) 59/2016 Civil Revision Dr. Bhagwandas & Others (Applicant) V/S Mashooq Ali Jatoi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Citation:2019 CLC Note 58
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

12) 13/2004 Const. P. Pakistan Lawyers Forum (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Supreme Court of Pakistan, Islamabad
Head-Note to be written, Keywords: Constitution of Pakistan, Legal Framework Order, 2002 LFO.
Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal, Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Mr. Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Faqir Muhammad Khokhar
Order Date: 28-FEB-08
Approved for Reporting

13) 46/2006 II.A. Muhammad Aqil (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Amir & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 27 - Relief against subsequent buyer )
Tag Line: The newly developed question in these proceedings while the instant appeal was pending adjudication is the alienation of the property by respondents No.1 and 2 to respondent No.3. It is claimed to have changed hands and respondent No.3 claimed to have acquired rights in the property and very ably represented by the same counsel who represents the respondents No.1 and 2. Its alienation was effected while the interim order was operating. Additionally Mr. Abrar argued issue of lis pendens. Admittedly the notice under section 18 of the Registration Act in terms of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act was not issued. The question of lis pendens would take its effect when proceedings would be initiated in terms of section 18 of the Registration Act, 1908 for its effectiveness and cure as required in terms of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.975/2018 Syed Muhammad Sami-ud-Din v. Muhammad Aqil & others,C.A.976/2018 Muhammad Amir & another v. Muhammad Aqil & another,C.A.32-K/2018 Muhammad Aqil v. Muhammad Amir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending ,Disposed Dismissed

14) 1316/2011 Suit KHAIR MUHAMMAD KHATIAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S LIAQUAT ALI G. KAZI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting

15) 240/2014 Const. P. Sikandar Ali Lashari (Petitioner) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shaukat Ali Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-JUN-15
Approved for Reporting

16) 1630/1998 Suit NOTHERN POLYTHENE LTD (NPL) (Plaintiff) V/S NAT BANK OF PAK & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 MLD 782
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 27-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting

17) 3309/2011 Const. P. M/S Ibrahim Fibres Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Infrastructure fee / cess levied vide Sindh Finance Act, 2017 applicable retrospectively w.e.f. 01.07.1994 is intra vires; all petitions stand dismissed to that effect; however, Insofar as the first four versions of law introduced through Sindh Finance Act, 1994, amended through Sindh Finance Act, 1996, the Sindh Finance (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001, and the Sindh Finance (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2001 are concerned, their applicability on the petitioners who had litigated earlier and were Appellants in Sanofi Aventis(PLD 2009 Karachi 65), has attained finality and is a past and closed transaction, notwithstanding promulgation of its fifth version vide Sindh Finance (Amendment) Ordinance, 2006, further amended by The Sindh Finance (Amendment) Act, 2007 (Sindh Act No: II of 2007, and The Sindh Finance (Amendment) Act, 2009 (Sindh Act No: III of 2009);
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 55
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.869/2021,C.P.L.A.1434-K/2021,C.A.953/2021,C.P.L.A.4321/2021,C.P.L.A.4493/2021,C.P.L.A.1564-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1544-K/2021,C.A.1628/2021,C.A.1637/2021,C.A.1586/2021,C.A.1619/2021,C.P.L.A.6039/2021,C.A.1635/2021,C.A.2049/2022 SCP Status: ,Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied, ,Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.,Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.,Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied,Disposed Leave Granted. Interim Relied, , , , ,Disposed , ,

18) 1761/2020 Const. P. Abu Hashim & another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Judgment in NADRA case passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan whereby the show cause notices issued under Section 18 of NADRA Ordinance, 2000 are quashed. The blocking of CNICs of the petitioners was declared illegal.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 387
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

19) 1022/2011 Suit MST. AZRA PERVEZ & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S SHEIKH ASHFAQ HUSSAIN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

20) 71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting

21) 167/2012 Suit Naseem-ul-Haq (Plaintiff) V/S Raees Aftab Ali Lashari & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 YLR 550
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting

22) 191/2021 Cr.Bail Mujeeb Rehman @ Mujahid (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 584
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

23) 161/2014 Cr.Rev SIP Ahmed Saeed Shaikh and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Bakhsh and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

24) 1019/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Ayaz Khan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 24.07.2020 in the case of Muhammad Ayaz Khan and others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with C.P.No.D-1046/2019), whereby, Members of the Establishment of Sindh High Court and Members of Establishment of the Establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary of Province of Sindh, expressed their grievance against withholding of income tax by the Accountant General Sindh on the amounts paid towards Judicial Allowance and Special Judicial Allowance by treating the same as part of their salary income chargeable to tax under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The Hon'ble bench of Sindh High Court has been pleased to allow both these petitions in the following terms:- "In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered opinion that amount of judicial allowance and special judicial allowance paid to the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as to the Members of the establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary of Province of Sindh falls within the exclusion in terms of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, therefore, not part of their taxable salary income, hence, not chargeable to Tax or deduction under Section 149 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Accordingly, withholding of income tax on the aforesaid amounts is hereby declared to be illegal and without lawful authority. Consequently, both the constitutional petitions are allowed along with listed applications. Respondents are directed not to withhold any amount of income tax from judicial allowance and special judicial allowance of the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as the Members of establishment of sub-ordinate judiciary in Province of Sindh. The amounts already deducted from the salary of the Members of establishment of Sindh High Court as well as to the sub-ordinate judiciary, shall be refunded by the FBR, on their filing refund applications in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of such claims."
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 969
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 24-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.484-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Muhammad Ayaz Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

25) 227/2013 Cr.Bail Waheed Ali & Ors (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Bail (Ocular evidence is corroborated by medical evidence), Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Dismissed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 26-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

26) 1511/2005 Const. P. K.E.S.C Labour Union and others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973 1. A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan has pronounced the judgment today i.e. on 21st January 2021 in the case of K.E.S.C. Labour Union and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the privatization process adopted by the Respondents Nos.2 and 3 i.e. Privatization Commission through its Secretary and Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director in respect of sale/transfer of the shares of KESC for being illegal, irrational and without lawful authority. Whereas, further declaration has been sought to the effect that purported sale and transfer of shareholding and management control in KESC to M/s.Hassan Associates consortium, is void, malafide and opposed to law and public policy. Various other Constitutional and legal grounds were agitated during the course of hearing of above Petitions and after hearing all the learned counsel for the parties, in detail, learned Divisional Bench of this Court through an exhaustive judgment pronounced today has been pleased to dismiss the above Petitions in the following terms: - "62. In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of the case, the aforesaid petitions are disposed of in the following terms:- a) The privatization process adopted by the respondents No.2 & 3 in respect of sale/transfer of the share of KESC does not violate the constitutional mandate, whereas, substantial compliance of the provisions of Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2000 read with Privatization Commission (Modes and Procedures) Rules, 2001, has also been made, therefore, no interference is required by this Court. Accordingly, aforesaid Constitutional Petitions being devoid of any merit, are hereby dismissed along with listed applications. b) That without prejudice to above finding, we hereby declare that the petitioners have failed to establish the malafide on the part of respondents in respect of sale/transfer of the share to KESC through negotiated sale to a private company, which is otherwise permissible in law and as per rules referred to hereinabove, therefore, the allegation of malafide by the petitioners on the part of the respondents stands rebutted, hence petitions are dismissed on this ground also. c) Nothing has been produced by the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of their submission that electricity being an essential service cannot be privatized, therefore, such plea of the petitioners also stands rebutted and the petitions are hereby dismissed on this account also." 2. Before parting with the aforesaid judgment, learned Divisional Bench of this Court has been further pleased to observe that plea of the learned counsel for the petitioners requiring the Court to take cognizance of subsequent events of privatization, issue directions to the Auditor General of Pakistan for conducting scrutiny and audit of the accounts of the K-Electric (KESC), cannot be acceded in these Petitions, as it would amount to granting a relief to the petitioners beyond the pleadings, while changing the complexion of the proceedings, to the disadvantage of the respondents, which is not permissible in law. However, it has been observed that this aspect of the matter can be agitated as a separate cause before the relevant forum/authority/Court of law, by filing appropriate proceedings, however, subject to all just exceptions and in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 427
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 21-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.482-K/2021 KESC Labour Union through its Chairman & another v. Federation of Pakistan Through the Cabinet Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

27) 174/2010 Civil Revision Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (Applicant) V/S M/s. Seaward Surveyors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 MLD 24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 06-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting

28) 1250/2016 Const. P. Dawood Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Saleem & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 23-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

29) 444/2019 Const. P. Aam Loeg Ittehad & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Election Matters
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 12.06.2020 filed by Aam Log Ittehad, through its Secretary General Azhar Jamil and Mr. Wajihuddin Ahmed (former Judge of Hon?ble Supreme Court of Pakistan) in his capacity as Human Rights and Political Activist, challenging the appointment of respondents No.2 to 5, Justice (Retired) Shakeel Ahmed Baloch, former Judge, Balochistan High Court; (ii) Justice (Retired) Irshad Qaiser, former Judge, Peshawar High Court; (iii) Justice (Retired) Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi, former Judge Lahore High Court; & (iv) Abdul Ghaffar, a former bureaucrat, who according to petitioners, have been appointed in violation of Article 207 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, which provides that "a person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court shall not hold any office of profit in the service of Pakistan, not being a judicial or quasi-judicial office or the office of Chief Election Commissioner or of Chairman or member of a law commission or of Chairman or member of the Council of Islamic Ideology, before the expiration of two years after he has ceased to hold that office". This being a case of first impression on the subject constitutional and legal points has been decided through this detailed judgment by Hon?ble Bench in the following terms: "22. We would, therefore, sum up our findings on various constitutional and legal grounds agitated by the petitioners and the objections as to maintainability of instant petition raised by the respondents, in the following terms: (i) Petitioners have the locus standi to file instant constitutional petition in the nature of quo-warranto under Article 199(i)(b)(ii) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 for the reason that any person, who may not be an aggrieved party, can invoke the constitutional jurisdiction of a High Court for issuance of a writ of quo-warranto so that a High Court may examine the validity of an appointment to a public office, on constitutional and legal grounds. In view of our detailed finding as recorded in Para: 9 to 12 hereinabove, the objections raised by the respondents with regard to maintainability of instant petition on various grounds, including: (i) locus standi of petitioners to file instant petition; (ii) mala fide on the part of the petitioners; (iii) latches; and (iv) lack of territorial jurisdiction of this Court, are hereby declared to be without any substance, hence over-ruled. ii) Office of Election Commission of Pakistan is a "quasi-judicial office", therefore, bar of expiration of two years in terms of Article 207(2) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, would not be attracted in the case of appointment of retired judges of Supreme Court and High Court(s). Therefore, a writ of quo-warranto cannot be issued against respondents Nos. 2 to 4 being the retired Judges of different High Courts on the grounds that their appointments have been made before expiration of two years from the date when they ceased to hold office as Judges of High Courts. Accordingly, writ against respondents Nos.2 to 4 is misconceived and not maintainable. iii) As regards issuance of writ of quo-warranto against respondent No.5, a retired bureaucrat, no substantial constitutional or legal ground has been agitated, nor any sufficient material or evidence has been produced in support of the allegations of corruption, therefore, we are not inclined to conduct any inquiry or to make a probe into the allegations levelled against respondent No.5 while exercising constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199(i)(b)(ii) of the Constitution in the instant case. Accordingly, writ against respondent No.5 is not maintainable.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2018
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.479-K/2020 Aam Loeg Itehad & others v. The Election Commission of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

30) 1542/2008 Suit MUHAMMAD BACHAL (Plaintiff) V/S PROV OF SINDH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting

31) 135/2012 Suit Independent Media Corporation Private Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Mr. Ali Azmat & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Defamation Ordinance, 2002. (Application filed by defendant is allowed)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

32) 128/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector Model Customs Hyderabad (Applicant) V/S M/s Khuda Raheem & anothe (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 16-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting

33) 308/2011 Cr.Misc. Yasmin Gul Khanani and another (Applicant) V/S Tariq Mehmood (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 18-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting

34) 160/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. RAO NADEEM @ GOGA S/O HASSAN ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

35) 378/2016 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD BABAR S/O MUHAMMAD SALEEM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 02-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

36) 30/2009 Cr.Rev Haji Muhammad Usman. (Applicant) V/S Abdul Sattar and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting

37) 69/2004 Execution Allied Bank of Pakistan (Decree Holder) V/S Fateh textile Mills ltd & othes (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed
Order Date: 22-DEC-06
Approved for Reporting

38) 2149/2015 Const. P. Abdul Hameed and another (Petitioner) V/S Provicne of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before proper forum)
Tag Line:In our humble opinion, one of the reasons for introducing the doctrine of alternate remedy was to avoid and reduce the number of cases that used to be filed directly before this Court, and at the same time to allow the prescribed lower forum to exercise its jurisdiction freely under the law. Moreover, if a person moves this Court without exhausting the remedy available to him under the law at lower forum, not only would the purpose of establishing that forum be completely defeated, but such person will also lose the remedy and the right of appeal available to him under the law.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

39) 79/2014 Cr.Misc. M/s.Abid S. Zuberi & others (Applicant) V/S M/s.Kh.Shamsul Islam and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 26-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

40) 1699/2010 Suit ABBAS ALI (Plaintiff) V/S ASIF ABBAS & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 01-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting

41) 815/2010 Suit MUHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VI Rule 17)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-16
Approved for Reporting

42) 641/2020 Suit Mr. Shakeel Qadir (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Shumaila Umair (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 514
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

43) 1413/2014 Cr.Bail SHAH JAHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 796
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

44) 2389/2014 Suit Al-Tamash Medical Society (Plaintiff) V/S Dr. Anwar Ye Bin Je & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot , Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:With all humility, the aforesaid dictums are distinguishable as on the face of it in the present case there is no change or conversion of amenity plot to commercial or residential use but throughout the pleadings, nothing has been surfaced that the defendant Nos.1 and 2 or the defendant Nos.8 to 10 are endeavoring to convert the use of land from amenity to commercial or residential use.
Citation:2017 MLD 785
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

45) 309/2019 Const. P. Rashid Ali Noonari (Petitioner) V/S Mst Zoya & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Family matter (Family Court dismissed Conditional dower amount ,DJ allowed .High Court Restored Family Court Order and Sat aside Appellate Court Order .)
Tag Line:1. A supreme court judgment, though later in time, is not binding if it has not considered an earlier view of a bench of co-equal strength; nor has referred the matter for constitution of a larger bench. The earlier view will be the binding precedent till such time it is in the field. 2. Family court has no jurisdiction under clause 9 of Schedule to Section 5 of the Family Court Acts, 1964 in cases of enforcement of clause 18 and 19 of the Nikahnama which are dependent on the happening of or related to KHULA or DIVORCE. It vests in the ordinary courts as settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Mukhtar Hussaid Shah (PLD 2011 SC 260) A supreme court judgment, though later in time, is not binding if it has not considered an earlier view of a bench of co-equal strength; nor has referred the matter for constitution of a larger bench. The earlier view will be the binding precedent till such time it is in the field.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 162
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

46) 3757/2013 Const. P. Yaqoob Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, has pronounced the judgment on 02.07.2020, filed by large number of petitioners, whereby, imposition of Income Support Levy at the rate of 0.5% on the value of Net Moveable Assets, through Income Support Levy Act, 2013, has been challenged for being ultravires to Constitution, as according to petitioners, subject levy did not possess the characteristic of a tax, therefore, could not be introduced through Finance Act 2013, along with Money Bill in terms of Article 73 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The subject levy was also challenged for being violative of the provisions of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, as according to petitioners, Income Support Levy is discriminatory in nature, as it creates unreasonable classification between the same class of persons having Net Moveable Assets exceeding Rs.1.00 Million. The Hon?ble Divisional Bench of this Court, after having examined in detail all the constitutional and legal points involved in these petitions, has been pleased to allow the petitions in the following terms:- (i) The levy imposed through Income Support Levy Act, 2013 alongwith Money Bill, does not possess the characteristics of a tax, as it is not a common burden for raising revenue to be utilized for general public purpose, on the contrary, it is a levy in the nature of fund to be charged and utilized for a specific purpose i.e. ?to provide for financial resources for raising an income support fund for the economically distressed persons and their families?. Accordingly, the Income Support Levy Act, 2013, could not be introduced through Finance Act, 2013, in terms of Article 73 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, the same is hereby declared to be ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. (ii) The levy imposed through Income Support Levy Act, 2013, is hereby declared to be ultravires to the Constitution for being discriminatory, as it creates unreasonable classification within the same class of person i.e. persons having Net Moveable Wealth exceeding Rs.1.00 M (One Million), whereas, its incidence and charge of levy falls un-equally upon the existing taxpayers only, who file or required to file Wealth Statement under Section 116 along with their Income Tax Return under Section 115 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, , however, non-existing taxpayers, who are not required under law, or do not file their Wealth Statement along with Income Tax Return, inspite of having much higher Net Moveable Wealth, exceeding Rs.1.00 M (One Million), have been excluded from the incidence and charge of such levy, which is in clear violation of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic of Pakistan, 1973. (iii) All the Notices and the proceedings, including assessment order(s) passed under Section 5 of the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 after repeal of the Income Support Levy Act, 2013, under clause 10 of the Finance Act, 2014, in the absence of any saving or validation clause to protect or validate the Income Support Levy Act, 2013 are hereby declared to be without jurisdiction and lawful authority.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1013
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1396/2013 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I, Karachi v. Yaqoob Ahmed & others,C.P.1796/2013 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I, Karachi v. Yaqoob Ahmed & others,C.P.L.A.1237-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Yaqoob Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

47) 8551/2017 Const. P. Danish Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1326
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.466-K/2020 M/s. Danish Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary of Law & others,C.A.1324/2020 Danish Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary of Law & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Pending

48) 365/2010 Cr.Acq.A. Nabi Bux S/o Vikio Machhi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting

49) 88/2002 Civil Revision Syed Shahan Shah @ Syed Nasrullah Shah (Applicant) V/S Syed Amanullah Shah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 10
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

50) 223/2008 H.C.A Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Ghani & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.764-K/2011 Abdul Ghani (decd) thr. his L.Rs. & others v. Abdul Rashid (decd) his L.Rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

51) 1285/2010 Const. P. Safdar Ali Sahito (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-OCT-10
Approved for Reporting

52) 447/2008 Const. P. Ali Asghar Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Tyms Education Limited & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 12-APR-12
Approved for Reporting

53) 575/2009 Const. P. Dr.Jalil Qadir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 27-APR-10
Approved for Reporting

54) 1092/2015 Const. P. Sarha Rasheed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anwar Hussain, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 14-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

55) 84/2011 Execution M/s. NIB Bank Ltd (Decree Holder) V/S Apollo Textile Mills Ltd & others (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 430
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-APR-13
Approved for Reporting

56) 84/2023 Const. P. Parvez Ali Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 25-A Right to education)
Tag Line:In a comprehensive judgment, the court issued multiple directives aimed at overhauling the education sector in Sindh to ensure alignment with national and global standards. Key directives issued in the judgment to the concerned quarters include:- ??? Launch awareness programs for education importance. ??? Reopen closed schools with updated codes and staff. ??? Quickly hire merit-based teachers and staff. ??? Form a committee to adjust teacher-student ratios. ??? Swiftly hire non-teaching alongside teaching staff. ??? Recognize and meet the needs of upgraded schools. ??? Promote physical activities in schools. ??? Use budgets efficiently for education projects. ??? Allocate unused funds to school maintenance. ??? Start urgent school repairs and provide necessary facilities. ??? Extend all degrees to four years to meet global standards. ??? Restore Technical Education up to the Metric level. ??? Chief Secretary to monitor progress of these directives. ??? Recruit staff urgently to operationalize closed schools. ??? Make closed schools functional with necessary resources. ??? Ensure school renovations and create accessible paths. ??? Ensure compliance and accountability for these directives. ??? Upgrade schools with digital resources and IT curriculum. ??? Update libraries with internet and digital access. ??? Make education accessible to all and ensure regular attendance. ??? Install solar panels and basic facilities in schools. ??? Prioritize high-quality education for student development
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 49, 2025 SHC SUK 2053
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 25-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

57) 6383/2015 Const. P. Tehseen Muzammil and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:School Fees, Schools who have increased their tuition fees over 5% per annum for the last three years from the date of their respective registration/reregistration, no further enhancement be permitted until their re-registration whereupon enhancement be regulated in strict compliance of Sub-rule 7 (3) of the Rules 2002
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 07-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.869-K/2016 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.11-K/2017 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

58) 1009/2015 Suit M/s. Century Paper & Board Mills Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 1269
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

59) 1724/2009 Suit MST.ZAIBUNISA & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S IQBAL AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Cancellation Sale Deed)
Tag Line:Section 39 of Specific Relief Act. Cancellation of Document. An instrument inherently void not required a formal cancellation under Section 39 of Specif Relief Act. Object of Law is to advance justice and remedy the wrong forthwith, instead of putting a law abiding person through the mill. to enforce orderly behaviour in a society. General Damages awarded for sufferings of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs awarded general damages due to protracted litigation and on account of fraudulent act of Defendants.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

60) 3415/2017 Const. P. Dr. Uzma Shaheen Pirzada (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1100
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.614-K/2017 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2019 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ Early date ],Disposed Disposed of

61) 1254/2015 Suit Mrs Naveen Irfan (Plaintiff) V/S Mst Shama Parveen (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

62) 3/2018 Judicial Companies Misc. Dr. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Others (Applicant) V/S Mohammad Asif & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Forensic Audit of Company / Respondent No. 5 ordered in terms of Section 286 of the Companies Act ordered.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

63) 166/2019 H.C.A Najmul Hassan & ors (Appellant) V/S Romana Qamar & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 516
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1357-K/2020 Najmul Hassan & others v. Romana Qamar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

64) 3/2013 I. A Soofi Rice Mills & Others (Appellant) V/S N.B.P & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2019 CLD 395
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4495/2018 Sofi Rice Mills, Larkana & others v. National Bank of Pakstan thr. its Manager Branch at Rato Dero, Larkana,C.A.318/2020 Sofi Rice Mills, Larkana & others v. National Bank of Pakstan thr. its Manager Branch at Rato Dero, Larkana Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned

65) 42/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Rehmatullah & others (Applicant) V/S Inayatullah Khoso & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2024 CLC 311
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

66) 1141/2009 Const. P. M/S EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 08-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting

67) 81/2011 Cr.J.A Mujahid @ Ghulam Shabir Gahejo (Applicant) V/S he State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 04-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

68) 618/2012 Const. P. Nasrullah Domki (Petitioner) V/S SHO PS Saddar Jacobabad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line:Nasrullah Const.p: Petitions No. S- 618 of 2012.S-65, 74, 79, 134, 164, 226, 284, 337, 697, 814,834, 845, 932 and 1079 of 2015.
Citation:2016 PLD 238
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 14-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

69) 1076/2013 Suit Digri Sugar Mills Limited and others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mian Kamran Elahi and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In a Suit for Declaration, Injunction, Cancellation, Rendition of Accounts and Recovery, Plaintiffs had sought a restraining order against Defendants from presenting postdated cheques given as security pursuant to written agreements between the parties; or to use the same for any criminal proceedings or otherwise. Defendants opposed this application on the ground that section 56 (e) of the Specific Relief Act bars grant of any such permanent injunction; hence, no temporary injunction can be granted. The Court repelled this argument and allowed the injunction application by passing a temporary injunction and restrained the Defendants from using such cheques in any manner pending trial of the Suit.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 83
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

70) 230/2016 S.M.A In the matter of Letter of Administration of deceased Tahir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Nil (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: International Law, Civil Procedure Law (UAE), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 13.), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 44.)
Tag Line:It would be an inconvenience, rather a hardship for the present Petitioner and her siblings to file the proceeding in respect of properties of her deceased father in three different Countries; Pakistan for moveable property, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates for the immoveable properties, particularly, when instant Proceeding is a noncontentious in nature. Proprietary rights are mentioned in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and hence they can neither be ignored nor their significance can be lessened.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 130, 2017 SBLR Sindh 2034
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 02-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

71) 277/2014 Const. P. Pharmatee Pakistan PVT LTD (Petitioner) V/S Bakht Rehman and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

72) 1623/2023 Cr.Bail SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 652
Advocates:Shaikh Muhammad Raza(ADVO-19262-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

73) 544/2025 Const. P. Mst Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 359
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

74) 416/2011 Suit GHULAM NABI SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S PIAC & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLC CS 768
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

75) 69/2011 Cr.Rev Akhtar Pervaiz Qrueshi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 14-APR-12
Approved for Reporting

76) 1136/2014 Const. P. Sarfraz (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Maher, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 17-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

77) 628/2009 Suit ILYAS AHMED (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD MUNIR & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 17-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting

78) 159/2022 Const. P. Sadam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether the private respondents have the requisite length of service to claim promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (BS-18) in the PHED; and, whether the DPC considered the case of the petitioners along with private respondents for promotion under law and policy of the Government of Sindh as introduced in the year 1984 or otherwise
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 287
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1709/2022 Fazal uddin Soomro and others v. Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi ad others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

79) 1761/2008 Suit Mst. Shagufta Noor (Plaintiff) V/S Defendant (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Appointment of commissioner to record evidence)
Citation:2012 CLC 1902
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 06-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting

80) 3693/2011 Adm. Suit Mohammad Khan Jalbani (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

81) 315/2019 Cr.J.A ROSHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2023 SHC HYD 1157
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

82) 855/2021 Suit ISHRAT SWALEH (Plaintiff) V/S MST. FARZANA SHAIKH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section of 151 CPC Defendant No. 2, seeks rejection of the Plaint. suit for Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, an agreement between two or more persons which creates an obligation to do or not to do a particular thing. The Contract Act, 1872 [the Act] defines the term Contract under its section 2 (h) as An agreement enforceable by law. it cannot be revoked/terminated, yet it may be observed that merely the use of the word irrevocable in a power of attorney will not make it so, unless it is clear from the terms that it is an agency coupled with interest of the agent without which it will be only an independent authority lacking the interest as envisaged in Section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872. Insofar as the question of limitation is concerned, Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, provides period of limitation of three years for filing of a suit for specific performance of contract.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 213
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

83) 102/2012 Civil Revision Chaudhry Manzoor Ahmed & another (Plaintiff) V/S Faisal Manzoor & other (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 30-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

84) 1757/2017 Const. P. Ava Ardeshir Cowasjee and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1930
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1899/2019 Anzar Ali Shah & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary School Education & Litreacy Department, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.719-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Ms.AVA Ardeshir Cowasjee Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

85) 2/2021 Const. P. Salman Bari S/o Abdul Bari (Petitioner) V/S Samia Khan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Under Article 199 of Constitution, Petitioner seeks recall of order dated 01.12.2020, whereby non-bailable warrants (NBWs) was issued against the petitioner-- Section 51, CPC-- In the present case, the petitioner has specifically, pleaded that he had already paid a partial payment of Rs.2,71,000/- (Rupees Two Lac and Seventy-One Thousand) to the private respondent vide statement dated 10.11.2020 (available at page 73 of memo of petition) and undertake to pay the remaining amount within a reasonable time as per his financial position-- In the light of the aforesaid legal position of the case and an undertaking of the petitioner, the operation of NBWs issued against him by the learned trial Court is converted into BWs, enabling him to furnish security / appropriate bond equivalent to the remaining amount before the learned trial Court. However, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on the next date of hearing and in case of failure, the order passed by the learned trial Court on 01.12.2020 shall be operative.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 775
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.216-K/2024 Salman Bari v. Samia Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Dismissed as Not Pressed

86) 2694/2019 Const. P. Human Resources Solution (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1308
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

87) 1134/2011 Suit M/S. SADAT BUSINESS GROUP LTD (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 )
Citation:2013 CLD 1451
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

88) 75/2012 H.C.A Shaikh Muhammad Sabir (Appellant) V/S M/s. K.K Builders (Pvt) Ltd., and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 115
Advocates:Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-3719-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI),Munir Uddin(ADVO-10835-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

89) 15/2018 I. A Pak Leather Crafts Limited & others (Appellant) V/S Al-Barak Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1422-K/2018 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited,C.A.24-K/2019 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

90) 909/2024 Cr.Bail SYED FURQAN ALI S/O SYED ASHFAQ ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:To prove the charge against an accused under Section 489-F. P.P.C. all the ingredients of section 489-F, P.P.C. must be proved through cogent evidence and beyond any shadow of a doubt, however, in this case, the complainant claims that he made a Marketing business transaction with the applicant and the applicant issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.15000,000/- and in this regard, and the applicant has pleaded that the subject cheques were issued as a security amount in a business transaction which was not for the encashment as such he made an attempt to stop the payment but the Bank refused to entertain his request due to insufficient funds which are wrong notion on the part of Bank, however this aspect of the case is to be determined by the trial Court under what circumstances, the cheque (s) was/were issued and what was the intention of the person, issuing it. 7. Prima facie, the mere issuance of a cheque(s) and its being dishonored by itself is not an offense, unless and until dishonesty on the part of a payer is proved.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1046
Advocates:Shaneel(ADVO-21109-SBC-KHS),Lubna Ashfaq Abbasi(ADVO-10807-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

91) 470/2006 H.C.A Mst. Halima Tahir & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Naheed Ejaz &Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

92) 1637/2013 Const. P. Dawood Singhar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 28-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

93) 22/2003 Suit.B M/S.AZMAT TRADING CO. (Plaintiff) V/S NDLC IFIC BANK (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

94) 62/2010 H.C.A Muhammad Naved Aslam & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Mst.Aisha Siddiqui & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.166-K/2011 Muhammad Naveed Aslam and others v. Mst. Aisha Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

95) 31/2011 Cr.J.A Dhani Bux s/o Bagh Lakhiar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting

96) 43/2013 Cr.Rev Shahrukh Jatoi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 15-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

97) 196/2010 Const. P. M/S Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd and another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 290
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Moin Azhar Siddiqui(ADVO-3955-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1218/2022 Competition Commission of Pakistan Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad v. M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd Karachi and others,C.A.1402/2024 Competition Commission of Pakistan Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad v. M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, will be heard a/w appeals out of C.P.3562/22 etc.,

98) 1154/2022 Cr.Bail ARSHAD ALI S/O ASGHAR ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 897
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-9955-SBC-KHI),M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),S. Abdul Rawoof(ADVO-9110-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

99) 189/2022 Cr.Rev MUHAMMAD ASIF SOOMRO & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE PRESIDING OFFICER VITH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 760
Advocates:Riaz Akhtar(ADVO-17792-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

100) 819/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Mst Khursheed Lubna & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 YLR 2003
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

101) 1231/2006 Suit Muhammad Ibrahim Hajano (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting

102) 411/2022 Const. P. Gul Mina Afridi D/o Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Rana Abdul Kareem and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 930
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Tamar Victor Lawrence(ADVO-18974-SBC-KHE),Imran Sami(ADVO-19341-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS),Fozia Muneer(ADVO-5018-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

103) 5158/2014 Const. P. Zeeshan Mustafa Lashari and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.69-K/2015 Mir Salman Abro and another v. Zeeshan Mustafa Lashari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

104) 905/2017 Const. P. M/s MCB (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2612/2019 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others,C.A.533/2020 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 4 weeks a/w C.As.1386/2018 etc, Adjourned

105) 279/2007 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Collector of Sales Tax and Fderal Excise (Applicant) V/S M/s. Abbott Laboratorie (Pakitan) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 09-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting

106) 940/2016 Const. P. M/s Al-Zarina Glass (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.920/2018 The Chief Commissioner (IR) Region, Hyderabad v. M/s Al-Zarina Glass Industries and others,C.P.L.A.472-K/2017 The Chief Commissioner (IR) Region, Hyderabad v. M/s Al-Zarina Glass Industries and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed

107) 12/2025 Judicial Companies Misc. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti (Applicant) V/S TRG Pakistan Limited and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Scope of section 286 of Companies Act, powers of Court, applicability of Limitation Act and implication of Securities Act.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1734
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.871-K/2025 The Resource Group International Limited v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti and others,C.P.L.A.872-K/2025 TRG Pakistan Limited v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti & others,C.P.L.A.2543/2025 Greentree Holdings Limited, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda v. Muhammad Ziaullah Khan Chishti thr. attorney and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved,Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved,Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved

108) 25/2014 Execution Saleem Ahmed Mirza (Decree Holder) V/S (Ret) Major Syed Iftikhar Hussain Zaidi & others (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting

109) 878/2014 Const. P. Jaffar Ali (Petitioner) V/S SHO Airport PS Latifabad Hyd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 25-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

110) 1914/2020 Const. P. Amir Akbar Khan (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Applicability of the regime of sections 204 and 91 Cr.P.C. to a Reference under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 16
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 26-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5188/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Amir Akbar Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded

111) 3337/2013 Const. P. Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Director General of Intelligence and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 11-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting

112) 272/2020 Cr.Bail ABDULLAH S/O MEHMOOD RAZA & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail dismissed U/S 9 C After arrest. )
Citation:2021 MLD 267
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

113) 1497/2020 Const. P. Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:PNSC is hereby directed to pay all the post-retirement benefits to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law without fail within fifteen (15) days and to submit compliance report to this Court through MIT-II within seven (07) days thereafter. For future as well as for cases pending for calculation and/or payment of post-retirement benefits, PNSC is further directed to ensure compliance of the directions given by the Honble Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Advocate (supra) and Province of Punjab, through Conservator of Forest, Faisalabad (supra) in letter and spirit The petition is allowed in the above terms with costs.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1417
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-4097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1089-K/2021 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation through its Chairman v. Nasir Kamal & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

114) 1899/2021 Cr.Bail FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 95
Advocates:Chaudry Rizwan ur Rasheed(ADVO-13051-SBC-MLR),Aurangzeb(ADVO-3048-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

115) 323/2009 Cr.Misc. Haji Muhammad Zakria Seth (Applicant) V/S The State & 2 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 25-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting

116) 1458/2011 Suit NAJMUDDIN ZIA & ANOTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S MST. ASMA QAMAR & 3 OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 SBLR Sindh 666
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

117) 8/2019 Execution First Appeal HABIB BANK LIMITED (Appellant) V/S AMIN SOAP AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Compromise and Consent Decree)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 264
Advocates:Ammar Hussain Quazi(ADVO-16149-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Jamshid Malik(ADVO-16711-SBC-KHS),Rehman Aziz Malik(ADVO-8586-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

118) 1544/2013 Suit Kamran Ali Khan and another (Plaintiff) V/S Vaneeza Umeran and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 19-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting

119) 878/2020 Suit Mst. Bushra Hamid & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Farzana Nizam & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Benami Transactions status as a resulting trust under Section 102 of the Sindh Trusts Act, 2020 and whether a claim can be maintained by legal heirs of a person who is contended to be the real owner of a property but who didn't claim the property to being held benami in his lifetime in terms of Article 120 of the Limitation Act,1908 and Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 267
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Tasawar Hussain(ADVO-3243-SBC-KHS),Abdul Qadir(ADVO-20685-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

120) 1/2024 I. A Saturgun (Appellant) V/S Engeer Kumar & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1043
Advocates:Qamar Iqbal(ADVO-9999-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

121) 1072/2015 Suit Delhi Mercantile Muslim Co-operative Housing Society (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting

122) 525/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan Sultan Thr Attorney Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Union Council Cantonment Board & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 449
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

123) 217/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) V/S Amanullah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: LIMITATION (CP dismissed, Execution application is time barred, in rent case, section 48 CPC is applicable . )
Citation:2020 YLR Note 979
Advocates:Eijaz Ali Hakro Associates(Firm-390-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.657-K/2019 Muhammad Usman v. Amanullah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

124) 84/2014 II.A. Pervaiz Iqbal (Appellant) V/S Faisal Akram (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Tag Line:Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 30.08.2017 whereby this appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, the impugned judgments and decrees were set aside and Suit No.563/2010 for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction filed by the respondent against the appellant was dismissed.
Advocates:S. M. Mustafa(ADVO-3851-SBC-KHI),Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(ADVO-6819-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.61-K/2018 Faisal Akram v. Pervaiz Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

125) 6241/2016 Const. P. Anjum Badar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Contract appointments)
Tag Line:petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employees appointed on contract in BS 16 and above can be deemed to have been validly appointed on regular basis, without going through the competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, merely in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the mandatory requirement of competitive process of selection only through the Sindh Public Service Commission for appointments in BS 16 and above, which is the command of the Constitution and specific direction to the Government of Sindh by the Honble Supreme Court, can be waived, relaxed, done away with, exempted and or bypassed in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the petitioners have any vested right for regular appointment, or to claim regularization, or to approach this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction to seek redressal of their grievance relating to regularization ; and, is there any corresponding legal duty cast on the Government of Sindh to appoint them on regular basis ? If no, then can a writ of mandamus to this effect be issued against the Government of Sindh ? --Whether Section 3 of the Act of 2013, to the extent of regularization / appointment in BS 16, 17 and 18 without the mandatory competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, is ultra vires the Constitution and against the law laid down and the direction given by the Honble Supreme Court to the Government of Sindh in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and others V/S Province of Sindh and others, 2015 SCMR 456.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 351
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Rana Khalid Hussain(ADVO-15716-SBC-KHS),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1727-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1728-K/2021 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ],Disposed ,Disposed

126) 636/2012 Suit Mari Gas Company Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 314
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting

127) 191/2018 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner I-R Zone-IV (Applicant) V/S Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Default surcharge and penalty, in relation to the circular debt.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 705
Advocates:Faheem Ali(ADVO-16513-SBC-KHS),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1221-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded

128) 38/2020 I. A Mumtaz Hussain Siddiqui (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Tahir (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1092
Advocates:Tasdeeque Ahmed(ADVO-4526-SBC-KHI),Hyder Raza(ADVO-14554-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

129) 526/2014 Const. P. data not available, hyd case (Petitioner) V/S data not available (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting

130) 466/2021 Const. P. Ajaz-ul-Haque (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Urooj & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 141
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

131) 5220/2017 Const. P. Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Tag line Dispute regarding value of supply of services of labor and manpower under heading 9829.0000; Held, that under Sindh Sales Tax Act 2011 read with Rule 42(E) of Sindh Sales Tax Rules 2011 such value does not include the amount of salary and wages reimbursed by the recipient of the service and tax is payable only on the service charges component.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1041
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1188/2021 Sindh Revnue Board through its Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi v. M/s Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Limited Karachi and another,C.P.L.A.317-K/2021 The Provice of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

132) 9/2020 Const. P. Mst. Shabana (Petitioner) V/S Nadir Ali Magsi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 650
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.522-K/2022 Mst. Shabana v. Nadir Ali Magsi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

133) 1928/2016 Suit Mr. Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Plaintiff) V/S M/s Al-Qasmia Properties & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 685
Advocates:Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHC),Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Shafi(ADVO-2185-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.445/2023 Khawaja Muhammad Awan v. Government of Sindh through its Secretary Home, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

134) 1590/2023 Const. P. Attock Cement Pakistan Ltd and another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: The Constitution (26th Amendment) Act, 2024 (Article 199 & 202A - Constitutional High Court Powers & Constitutional Benches Roster)
Tag Line:High Court Roster Assignments in terms of Article 175 and 202A
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 763
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 02-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.594/2025 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Energy (Power Division), Islamabad v. Attock Cement Pakistan Limited Karachi and others,C.P.L.A.587/2025 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Energy (Power Division), Islamabad v. M/s MIDAS Clothing Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: ,

135) 920/2015 Suit Party-1 (Plaintiff) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

136) 191/2024 Const. P. Arshad Ali Gorar (Petitioner) V/S Mst Uzma & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Custody of a minor on re-marriage of mother.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 460
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

137) 302/2017 Suit FatimaFert Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
Tag Line:Thus, it is unanimous view that an order of suspension of the operation of the judgment and decree or leave granting order would not operate to have a binding effect on other parties; it could operate inter parties since the operation of the judgment and decree was suspended in a particular suit/appeal with reference to particular party.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting

138) 132/2019 Const. P. M/s Millennium Mall Management Co (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Entry No.50 of the Fourth Schedule ), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property including tax on annual rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment), Cantonments Act 1924 (Section-60 to 64)
Tag Line: the power to levy, charge, impose and recover any or all tax(es) separately on immovable property is concerned it is an alien object under cantonment laws in the present frame of the Constitution. The tax on the annual rental value of immovable property is a tax and not a fee or any other genre of levy. The Cantonment Boards have no power to levy tax on immovable property including tax on annual rental value of immovable property. The Presidential Order 13 of 1979 has no effect on the subject after the revival of the Constitution and the 18th Amendment, and the subject law to the extent of provision of section 3 as applied, is no longer protected.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1059
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 06-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.102/2024 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defense, Govt of Pakistan Rawalpindi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company through its Managing Partner, Karachi and others,C.P.L.A.230/2024 Faisal Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Karachi v. M/s Millennium Mall Management Company, through its authorized managing partner and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Next Date: 05-Aug-24), Adjourned (Next Date: 05-Aug-24)

139) 601/2017 Const. P. Kashif Hussain Gaad (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

140) 184/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Ahmed & Others (Applicant) V/S Shahmeer & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 430
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

141) 1211/1996 Suit LT. COL (R) MUHAMMAD WALI KHAN. (Plaintiff) V/S UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

142) 181/2016 H.C.A Adam A. Muchhadda (Appellant) V/S Captain (R) H.A.Rahim (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 10-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.301-K/2017 Adam A. Muchhadda v. Capt. (R) H.A. Rahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

143) 1011/2013 Const. P. REHAN AHMED BIAG (Petitioner) V/S MST. SABEEN NAZ & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

144) 242/2009 Cr.Acctt.A State / Anti Narcotics Force (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Adeel Hussain & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 27-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

145) 158/2010 I.T.R.A Commissioner (Legal) V/S M/S EFU General Insurance Ltd (Applicant) V/S Commissioner (Legal) V/S M/S EFU General Insurance Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 06-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting

146) 83/2023 Const. P. Umar Jamshed S/o Jamshed Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Mishal Jawaid and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Basis for calculating the maintenance to be paid to a Minor.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 53
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh),Zahrah Sehr Vayani(ADVO-15100-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

147) 22/2010 Cr.Appeal Syed Naveed Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting

148) 215/2015 Suit Muhammad Rafiq (Plaintiff) V/S Habib Bank Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1215
Advocates:Faraz Faheem Siddiqui(ADVO-12257-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Jamshid Malik(ADVO-16711-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

149) 838/2012 Suit GLOBAL QUALITY FOODS (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S HARDEE'S FOOD SYSTEMS, INC. Dis (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 169
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 18-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting

150) 415/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Mehdi & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:he subsequent judgment of the Member Board of Revenue dated 20.04.2017 not only ignored the order of his predecessor, but also ignored the fact that the suit, challenging the order of his predecessor, was also dismissed. These orders i.e. order of the Senior Civil Judge and more importantly the order of the Member Board of Revenue is implied res judicata as the subject matter of the appeal is nothing but the land which is defined as UA No.437 and 438. Here, it could safely be added that legally the litigation (s) are meant to decide controversies (issues). Where, the controversy / issue is that of general application and not limited to a party only then any decision thereon by a competent forum shall be binding upon all, including those who even were not before the legal forum / authority. A mere change of name of parties would never be sufficient to open a new round of litigation for the thing which otherwise stood decided by a lawful forum / authority. If this is ignored, there shall be no end to litigations and interested shall keep things hanging merely by substituting parties. An aggrieved however may get such decision reversed by appeal or reviewed, subject to law, but cannot seek another order from same forum / authority on plea of his being not a party to earlier lis. Any departure to such concept, shall result in frustrating the object of res judicata which otherwise has application in all matters, including Revenue jurisdiction.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 27-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

151) 89/2015 Cr.Acq.A. SYED MUHAMMAD AHSAN (Appellant) V/S MUNAWAR ALI NAQVI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Section 8), Criminal Procedure Code (Sub-section 4 of Section 403)
Tag Line:(a) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)- ----Ss. 3, 5 & 7---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 265-H & 417(2A)---Appeal against acquittal--- Appreciation of evidence--- Illegal dispossession---Declaration to title---Proof---Appellant was complainant and was aggrieved of dispossession from subject property by accused persons---Trial Court under S. 265-H(i), Cr.P.C. acquitted accused persons---Validity---Law of land and even Shia Personal Law did not authorize Momineen of any locality to request anyone amongst themselves to unlawfully control or occupy immovable property of an orphanage owned by some registered private institution with intention to dispossess, grab, control or occupy said property and dispossess otherwise lawful occupiers of such property---Accused persons, despite backing of so-called religious scholars and their goodwill in community were conscious of fact that they had no moral authority or legal defense to justify taking over possession of subject property and grab and control of resources of private institution---Accused persons never filed any civil suit to seek declaration of their title in respect of subject property as they knew that their so-called working committee was not even fraudulently registered---High Court set aside judgment of acquittal passed by Trial Court and convicted accused persons under S. 3(2) of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 along with fine---Appeal was allowed accordingly. 2010 YLR 2139; Muhammad Akram and 9 others v. Muhammad Yousuf and another 2009 SCMR 1066; PLD 1989 SC 283; PLD 1971 SC 550; 2012 CLC 793; Shahabuddin v. The State PLD 2010 SC 725; Mumtaz Hussain v. Dr. Nasir Khan and others 2010 SCMR 1254; Shaikh Muhammad Naseem v. Mst. Farida Gul 2016 SCMR 1931 and Mst. Gulshan Bibi and others v. Muhammad Sadiq and others PLD 2016 SC 769 ref. (b) Illegal Dispossession Act (X1 of 2005)--- ----S. 3---Illegal dispossession---Abandoned property---Principle---Even abandoned property is supposed to be in constructive possession of its lawful owner---If at all there is any defect in status of owner to hold, occupy and control subject property of private institution, accused are not supposed to contravene S. 3(1) of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005. (c) Illegal Dispossession Act (X1 of 2005)--- ----Ss. 3 & 5---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 92---Illegal dispossession---Criminal and civil liabilities---Determination---Accused persons cannot contend that complainant has no lawful authority to file legal proceedings in view of S. 92, C.P.C. when raised before a court seized of a criminal case---Proceedings under Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 cannot be regulated by Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Zafar Ahmad and 5 others v. The State and 3 others PLD 2007 Lah. 231 and Bashir Ahmed v. Additional Sessions Judge PLD 2010 SC 661 ref
Citation:2020 YLR Sindh 1
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.161-K/2019,Crl.P.166-K/2019,Crl.P.158-K/2019,Crl.P.L.A.913/2019,Crl.P.L.A.987/2019,Crl.A.403/2019,Crl.A.404/2019,Crl.A.405/2019,Crl.A.406/2019,Crl.A.407/2019 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted( Notice in Crl.MAs for suspension of sentence in all cases for 29.10.2019),Disposed Leave Granted( Notice in Crl.MAs for suspension of sentence in all cases for 29.10.2019),Disposed Leave Granted( Notice in Crl.MAs for suspension of sentence in all cases for 29.10.2019),Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.,Disposed Allowed with direction to Auqaf Department, Govt. of Sindh.

152) 2252/2019 Const. P. Amara Gohar & Others (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Sindh Public Service Commission Act 1989 (Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules, 1990)
Tag Line:Having come to the irresistible conclusion that, when (a) the framers of the Constitution consciously chose to abstain from making provisions for mandatory creation of Public Service Commission; (b) the Chief Minister of Sindh having no powers to appoint Chairman and Members of the Commission under Rule 5(ii)/Schedule-III/Entry(3) of the Sindh Government Rules of Business 1986; (c) the appointments of Chairman and Members of the Commission made under Rule 5(2) and (3) of Sindh Public Service Commission (Appointment of Chairman and Member) Rules 2017 being violative of the Rules of Business and made with utter disregard to the maintenance of political neutrality of the Commission; (d) No right to appeal having been provided to an aggrieved person; (e) Chairman and Members having taken no oath of office; (f) function of Examination of candidates restricted to Testing and then narrowed down to Interviewing under the Sindh Civil Servants (Functions) Rules, 1990 being ulta vires to the provisions of 1989 Act; (g) no Annual Reports as required by Section 9(1) of the Act, 1989 having been made available to the Public; (h) no data having been made available with regards advice refusal of the Commission under Section 8 of the Act, 1989 then how could one expect that any legit and useful fruit could be borne by this skewed and merit-throttling recruiting process; thats why Courts are kept engaged by Commissions Members and operatives constantly on a permanent basis since inception of the Commission in the year 1989 when the said Act was enacted for no Constitutionally compelling reasons in the presence of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974; the Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation and Seniority) Rules, 1975; the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and half a dozen alike laws/rules; and whereas, the Province (to a great extent) had been well served by honest, qualified and motivated civil servants before 1989 when this institution in its present form was born - according to one view, to serve as one window facility to foster whole-sale corruption, has lost every shred of legitimacy and ought to be brought to a nullity in its present form
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 414
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.816-K/2021,C.P.L.A.822-K/2021,C.A.1502/2021,C.A.1508/2021,C.P.L.A.5751/2021,C.P.L.A.5765/2021 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed in 1st week of Dec.2021,Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed in 1st week of Dec.2021,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of

153) 264/2010 H.C.A Asadullah Mirbahar & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Mrs.Ayesha Muzahir & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 08-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting

154) 33/2016 II.A. Muhammad Tariq (Appellant) V/S Afzal Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 03-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

155) 288/2013 Const. P. Syed Sajid Abbas Rizivi (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Naureen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter (Petitioner used delay tactus . CP dismissed with Cost .)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 25-APR-13
Approved for Reporting

156) 263/2016 H.C.A The Collector Model Customs Collectorate & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. Naveena Industries Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 03-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1204/2017,C.A.1200/2017,C.A.1206/2017,C.A.1205/2017,C.A.1201/2017,C.A.1198/2017,C.A.1202/2017,C.A.1242/2017,C.A.1199/2017,C.A.1505/2017,C.A.1255/2017,C.A.1504/2017,C.A.1508/2017,C.A.1512/2017,C.A.1211/2017,C.A.1232/2017,C.A.1236/2017,C.A.1506/2017,C.A.1510/2017,C.A.1514/2017,C.A.1209/2017,C.A.1213/2017,C.A.1233/2017,C.A.1507/2017,C.A.1511/2017,C.A.1515/2017,C.A.1210/2017,C.A.1214/2017,C.A.1231/2017,C.A.1509/2017,C.A.1513/2017,C.A.1503/2017,C.A.1502/2017,C.A.1230/2017,C.A.1234/2017,C.A.1179/2017,C.A.1218/2017,C.A.1216/2017,C.A.1217/2017,C.A.1215/2017,C.A.1208/2017,C.A.1212/2017,C.A.1203/2017,C.A.1207/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed

157) 4614/2022 Const. P. Hakimsons (Impex) (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Levy of tax on deemed income from capital assets in terms of Section 7E of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is valid; within the competence of the Federal Legislature and is not ultra vires to the Constitution.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 53, 2024 PLD Sindh 132
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Solangi(ADVO-15225-SBC-KHS),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Additional Attorney General khi(AAGKhi),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.51-K/2023 Zulfiqar Ali Hakim & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Division Government of Pakistan Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Next Date: 04-Jun-24)

158) 85/2020 Suit Touqeer Ahmed (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Younus Lakhani & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 235
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

159) 136/2019 Civil Revision Zia-Ul-Haque Mugheri. (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Murad Mugheri and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 943
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

160) 359/2006 Suit GHULAM MUJTABA PARACHA (Plaintiff) V/S MOHAMMAD SALEEM (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 11-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting

161) 470/2010 Cr.Acq.A. THE STATE (Appellant) V/S MUSHTAQ AHMED SOLANGI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Abdul Baqi Mahar(ADVO-13425-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ashraf Samoo(ADVO-8176-SBC-KHI),Haseeb-Ur-Rehman(ADVO-4032-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Ashiq Ali(ADVO-15549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

162) 2057/2017 Const. P. Jahan Ara D/o Bahadur Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Hussain Bux(ADVO-13264-SBC-KHE),Qadir Hussain(ADVO-6245-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Wajid Ali(ADVO-171-SBC-JMS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

163) 14/2013 Cr.Bail SYED OBAID AHMED THE STATE (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 27-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

164) 21/2020 Criminal Appeal Sanaullah & Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Appeal (Control of Narcotic 9(C) Appeal allowed On Ground contradictions in the evidence of complainant and mashir, )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 314
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

165) 708/2011 Adm. Suit Mohammad Ibrahim Tunio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting

166) 5842/2022 Const. P. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Super Tax - Section 4C of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.
Citation:2023 PTD 607
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-15940-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.220-K/2023,C.P.L.A.221-K/2023,C.P.L.A.222-K/2023,C.P.L.A.223-K/2023,C.P.L.A.224-K/2023,C.P.L.A.227-K/2023,C.P.L.A.228-K/2023,C.P.L.A.230-K/2023,C.P.L.A.126-K/2023,C.P.L.A.229-K/2023,C.P.L.A.226-K/2023,C.P.L.A.225-K/2023,C.P.L.A.3825/2022 SCP Status: Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Disposed

167) 111/2005 H.C.A Muhammad Sabir Awan (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Author (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLI Rule 27 -Additional Evidence), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed)
Advocates:Nazar Hussain Dhoon(ADVO-2640-SBC-KHI),H. A. Rahmani(ADVO-1408-SBC-KHI),M/S. MUNEER A. MALIK & CO(FIRM-197-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

168) 7077/2016 Const. P. Shahbaz Garment (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2873/2018,C.M.A.8722/2018,C.M.A.8723/2018,C.M.A.8724/2018,C.M.A.8725/2018,C.P.L.A.461-K/2019,C.P.L.A.462-K/2019,C.P.L.A.463-K/2019,C.P.L.A.464-K/2019,C.P.L.A.465-K/2019,C.P.L.A.466-K/2019,C.P.L.A.467-K/2019,C.P.L.A.468-K/2019,C.A.98-K/2019,C.A.99-K/2019,C.A.100-K/2019,C.A.101-K/2019,C.A.65-K/2019,C.A.102-K/2019,C.A.103-K/2019,C.A.104-K/2019,C.A.105-K/2019,C.A.106-K/2019,C.A.107-K/2019,C.A.108-K/2019,C.A.109-K/2019,C.A.110-K/2019,C.A.111-K/2019,C.A.112-K/2019,C.A.113-K/2019,C.A.114-K/2019,C.A.115-K/2019,C.A.117-K/2019,C.A.116-K/2019,C.P.L.A.469-K/2019,C.P.L.A.470-K/2019,C.P.L.A.471-K/2019,C.P.L.A.472-K/2019,C.P.L.A.473-K/2019,C.P.L.A.474-K/2019,C.P.L.A.475-K/2019,C.P.L.A.476-K/2019,C.P.L.A.477-K/2019,C.P.L.A.478-K/2019,C.P.L.A.479-K/2019,C.P.L.A.480-K/2019 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed

169) 424/2020 Cr.Bail Wajid Pahore (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Bail Matters (Post arrest bail Rejected.U/S 377 PPC, as direct evidence available.)
Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1284
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

170) 1068/2003 Suit ASLAM PERVAIZ. (Plaintiff) V/S MST. NASEEM FATIMA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting

171) 699/2019 Const. P. Abdul Jabbar Mahar & Other (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 727
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

172) 4469/2013 Const. P. Prof. Dr. Masood Hameed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Governor of Sind and Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLC CS 1014
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting

173) 31/2009 Cr.Misc. P.C Zulfiqar Ali Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S Shah Muhammad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

174) 1112/2016 Cr.Bail Roshan Ali Solangi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 04-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

175) 35/2021 Criminal Appeal Karimdad Brohi & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Narcotics Appeal.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1214
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

176) 323/2020 Suit Shabbir Ahmed Arif & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Rizwan Riaz & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 334
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

177) 669/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan Zaman S/o Muhammad Zaman (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Bilquees and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Petition of Father dismissed, as well as G&W court and Appellate Court. Minors remain with Grand mother (nani )after death of wife.)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 802
Advocates:Syed Saeed Hasan Zaidi(ADVO-1549HLC-SBC-KHI),Asif Ali(ADVO-4531-SBC-KHI),Kabir Ahmed(ADVO-4213HLC-SBC-KHI),Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.3051/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Aziz ur Rehman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

178) 49/2012 Civil Revision Mumtaz Ali Hulio (Applicant) V/S Azhar Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Pre-emption
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

179) 111/2023 Const. P. Lashkar Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) V/S Mst Azizan Khatoon Maitlo (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 19
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

180) 2121/2019 Suit Mst. Sanobar Rizwan (Plaintiff) V/S Naseera Begum (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Status of an email as Primary Evidence of Secondary Evidence under Article 73 and Article 74 of the Qanun e Shahdat Order, 1984 read with the Electronic Transactions Odinance 2002
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 495
Advocates:SURRIDGE & BEECHENO(FIRM-101-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Junaid Khatri(ADVO-15252-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

181) 451/2016 Const. P. Ghulam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Sindh Tenancy Act 1950 (Peasants Rights (Sindh Tenancy Act 1950)), Sindh Tenancy Act, 1950
Tag Line:Sindh Tenancy Act, 1950
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.652-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari,C.A.7-K/2022 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,

182) 32/2016 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Nawaz and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2022 SHC SUK 137
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.64-K/2022 Rajabuddin v. Muhammad Nawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

183) 37/2014 H.C.A Syed Mumtaz Ali & others (Appellant) V/S Mst.Khatoon Begum (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 07-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting

184) 479/2023 Const. P. Syed Mustafa Ali S/o Syed Abid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Afsheen Fatima and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Family Courts Act, 1964 (Limitation Act, 1908)
Tag Line:Application of Section 29 (2) of the Limitation Act,1908 to the Family Courts Act, 1964 and Family Court Rules 1965.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 81
Advocates:Irum(ADVO-16757-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

185) 789/2018 Suit Mst. Nadia Shakeel & another (Plaintiff) V/S Shagufta Baqar & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:There is no concept of amendment in the disposed of memo of petition for Letter of Administration in respect of ONE identified deceased on subsequent death of another person who was legal heir of the deceased whose petition has been disposed of prior to the death of the other person
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 109
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

186) 941/2013 Suit Ms. Rehana Ahson & Another (Plaintiff) V/S Mr. Zulfiqar Mohammad (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1605
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

187) 247/2023 Const. P. Dua Tauseef Korai (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1208
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

188) 356/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Ramzan & Others (Petitioner) V/S Chuttal Bughio & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:12 (2) of CPC Fraud and misrepresentation
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1503
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

189) 813/2020 Const. P. Usman Hamid Thr. Attorney Muhammad Adnan Hamid (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sundus Wahid and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Jurisdiction is Challenged in G&W Case. Marriage is Solemnized In Karachi ,and Minor born in Karachi, Hence Jurisdiction is Karachi.)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1927
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

190) 5807/2021 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khursheed Jehan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 441
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Mansoor Akhtar(ADVO-16880-SBC-KHC),Zahid Hussain(ADVO-14979-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 28-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

191) 421/2020 Cr.Bail SALEEM KHALID S/O KHALID ABDUL AZIZ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 09-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

192) 15/2018 E.P Tahir Hussain Khoso (Petitioner) V/S Sohrab Khan Sarki & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line: If a history is traced of the judicial pronouncement relating to the question in hand that concerns with the deficiencies in the election petition and deciding its fate, the first judgment that I came across is of S. M. Ayub v. Syed Yusaf Shah and others reported in PLD 1967 Supreme Court 486. It deals with the National and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) Act (VII of 1964). Section 59 of the aforesaid law is somehow peri materia to Sections 142, 143 and 144 of the present enactment of 2017. The Hon'ble Supreme Court maintained that Section 67 does not, in terms, say that the petition shall be dismissed even if there be a partial failure to comply with the provisions of Section 59, ex facie Section 67 of the Act would seem to be designed to cover a case where the petition as a whole made allegations of a vague and indefinite character, without being supported by full particulars of the corrupt or illegal practice alleged. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that unless, therefore, the language of the law is intractable and clearly provides for dismissal of a petition for a technical defect, the Courts should not be astute to ascribe to the legislature a desire to be hypertechnical, so as to smother genuine litigation.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

193) 232/2007 H.C.A Muhammad Saad &others (Appellant) V/S Amna & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 29-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting

194) 4725/2015 Const. P. Mansoor Ashraf (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Eviction of tenant during pendency of Rent Case and Civil Suit)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.662-K/2016 Mst. Fareeda Zafar and others v. Mansoor Ashraf and others,Crl.A.399/2025 Mansoor Ashraf v. Riaz Hussain Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Pending

195) 28/2019 Const. P. Arsalan Aijaz (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sanober & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 YLR 450
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

196) 30/2020 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Fatima Fertilizer Company Limited (Applicant) V/S Commissioner-II SRB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Person liable to tax.
Citation:2021 PTD 484, 2021 TAX 122
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.705/2021 Commissioner-II, Sindh Revenue Board, Karachi v. Fatima Fertilizer Company Limited, Lahore Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

197) 61/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Rehman Dashti (Applicant) V/S Niaz Ahmed Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Allotment of amenity plot. Jurisdiction of Civil Court. Locus Standi of individual from public.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1512
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

198) 500/2006 Suit DELHI MERCANTILE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD (Plaintiff) V/S REGISTRRA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES SINDH & (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting

199) 1109/2013 Cr.Bail ALI BUX QADRI S/O NATHU KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 28-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting

200) 1109/2014 Adm. Suit SIKANDER ALI LASHARI S/O ALI MUHAMMAD LASHARI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 12-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

201) 3015/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 521
Advocates:M/S. ADNAN & CO(FIRM-247-SBC-KHI),Adnan Ahmed(ADVO-3134-SBC-KHI),Additional Attorney General khi(AAGKhi)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

202) 510/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD ABID S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 132
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

203) 34/2005 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Pali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

204) 1708/2023 Const. P. Zahid Hussain & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 18
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1433/2024 Ghulam Murtaza Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.267-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Zahid Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned + Before 3JJs, Adjourned + Before 3JJs

205) 9/2010 I. A M/s.Shaz Packages & Ors. (Appellant) V/S M/s.Bank Alfalah Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

206) 76/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Azizullah Soomro & another (Applicant) V/S Muzafar Hussain Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Recording of additional evidence during the Appellate proceeding.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 273
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

207) 754/2024 Suit Muhammad Faisal & others (Plaintiff) V/S SBCA & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:History and current status of the regulation of Town Planning and Building Control in the Province of Sindh. Whether flats can be constructed on commercial plots? Whether SBCA can by amendment in regulations increase the FAR of an area without a proportionate change in the infrastructure of an area.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2005
Advocates:Muhammad Abdullah(ADVO-8894-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ilyas Warriach(ADVO-6766-SBC-KHI),Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azher Mehmood(ADVO-9556-SBC-KHI),Rehman Aziz Malik(ADVO-8586-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

208) 19/2011 Suit.B The Bank of Punjab (Plaintiff) V/S Dewan Salman Fibre Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 25-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

209) 12/2012 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Rashid Aslam & Arshad Nabi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 25-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

210) 518/2013 Const. P. Amir Aslam Shaikh & ohters (Petitioner) V/S COurt of IV th Rent Controller & ohters (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:the jurisdiction vested in it was not exercised fairly justly and in fact the findings of the learned Rent Controller has completely shut down the plea raised by the petitioners/tenants wherein it is alleged by tenants that in terms of section 18 the default claimed is to be regulated by section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 and despite the fact that 30 days period was provided under section 18 to tender the rent, the tenants/petitioners can still avail the rights guaranteed to them in terms of proviso to section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, provided that they have fulfilled the conditions laid down therein. The judgments relied upon by learned counsel for respondent No.3 are not relevant to the present case. They relate to the issue of interlocutory orders regarding which no appeal lies, however, in the instant case issue is totally different wherein the learned Rent Controller has not performed and exercised the jurisdiction, as required.
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 495
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 11-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.200-K/2013 Muhammad Nadeem v. Aamir Aslam Shaikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

211) 65/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Shabir (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:The comments filed by respondents No.3 and 4 accompanied with the recommendation of the Government of Sindh, Finance Department with reference to Rule 171 of the Sindh Civil Services Rules that there shall be no change in the date of birth which shall lead to the advantage to the Government servant concerned and unless an application in that behalf is made by the Government servant concerned within two (02) years of the date on which his service book was opened under Rule 167 of the Sindh Civil Services Rules. His service book apparently was opened in the year 1988 by Superintendent District Jail, Dadu, and an attempt has been made to alter it in the year 2017 and that too on the basis of irrelevant factor on account of medical certificate which otherwise, never permit such correction. It may well be added that things, if are done, in deviation to specific law and procedure, shall always be considered as nullity hence no benefit could be claimed in consequence thereof.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 11-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

212) 6712/2020 Const. P. M/s Telenor Microfinance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Employees Social Security Act, 2016
Tag Line:Social Security for workers
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1358, 2025 SHC KHI 2028
Advocates:Waheed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-18218-SBC-KHS),Regan(ADVO-18058-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

213) 2171/2018 Suit M/s. Ahsan Engineering Works. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Petroleum Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tender (Tender issue until bid accepted, no vested right )
Tag Line:Public Procurement Rules 2004 - Claim of lowest and /one successful bidder - No vested Right - Recourse to fresh bidding is the only option left - Injunction refused.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

214) 2899/2013 Const. P. UMER FAROOQ (Petitioner) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 894
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 27-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting

215) 2680/2020 Const. P. Pakistan Broadcaster Association (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P.No.D-2680 of 2020 whereby the Court declare that the powers of the PEMRA vested in Section 30 of the PEMRA Ordinance 2002 could not be delegated to the Chairman or any other official of PEMRA by dint of Section 13 of PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 for suspension of Broadcast Media Licenses without framing of Rules. The decision of the Authority conveyed vide minutes of meeting dated 24.04.2020 is also declared null and void. All actions taken by the Chairman pursuant to the delegated powers for suspension of Broadcast Media Licenses are strike down.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 633
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.11/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad v. Pakistan Broadcasters Association Karachi and another,C.P.L.A.5303/2021 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad v. Pakistan Broadcasters Association Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed

216) 677/2015 Suit The Kathiawar Co-operative Housing Society & another (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 08-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

217) 354/2010 Cr.Appeal Heman and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting

218) 1040/2009 Suit NASIR ALI (Plaintiff) V/S SYED QAMAR HUSSAIN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Agreement )
Tag Line:Plaintiff Buyer, within the time prescribed in the contract, made part payment of the Sale Price, whereafter Defendant Seller handed over the first floor of the bungalow on the suit property to Plaintiff. Plaintiff Buyer did not pay the outstanding balance sale price when he found out the suit property was mortgaged. Blamed Defendant Buyer for not executing the sale deed, expressed willingness and readiness to pay and filed suit for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act as well as claimed part performance under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. Interpretation of where time is of the essence, proving readiness and willingness, criterion for curating discretionary relief where the cause of action accrued in 2005 and the case decided in 2023. Suit dismissed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 115
Advocates:Javed Anwar(ADVO-8093-SBC-KHI),Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE),Ali Asghar(ADVO-2854-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Safdar(ADVO-4807-SBC-KHE),Sanjeeda Sultana Zaidi.(ADVO-5092-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

219) 308/2021 Suit M/S. FOREL INTERNATIONAL TRADING & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S WAQAS AHMED JAT & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Suit barred for staying freezing order passed under section 5(5) of the FIA Act, 1974.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 681
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

220) 5113/2021 Const. P. OBS Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 239 ), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 221), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (S.170), Workers" Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971 (section 4(1))
Tag Line:The impugned Circular has only restored the process of Section 170 of Ordinance 2001 for claiming refund only however actions which have already been taken thereunder are not open for a scrutiny at least under Section 221 of Ordinance 2001. For convenience however we may say that impugned Circular has prospective effect only. The adjustments made and allowed on the basis of Circular 4 cannot be subjected to provisions of Section 221 of Ordinance 2001. Applications made under section 170 of Ordinance 2001 for refund has the limitation of three years in terms of Section 170(2) i.e. deemed assessment or when tax was paid whereas deemed assessment itself could be subjected to amendment within five years of such deemed assessment hence the purpose which cannot be achieved under Section 170 is available under other provisions of Ordinance 2001.
Citation:2022 PTD 290
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 17-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.139-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Sanofi-Aventis Pakistan Limited,C.P.L.A.70-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. OBS Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

221) 1574/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD FAISAL @ CHITTA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Bail rejected)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1308
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

222) 147/2009 H.C.A M/S Tee Jays Exclusive (Pvt.) Limited & another (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Naveed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLD 88
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.138-K/2016 M/s Tee Jays Exclusive (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Muhammad Naveed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed (After compliance of the Court Order on 26-06-2024) -- Allowed.

223) 43/2013 Cr.Appeal Jabbar Gopang (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 13-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting

224) 89/2023 Cr.Rev ARY Communication Limited & ors (Applicant) V/S INDEPENDENCE Newspapers Corporation Pvt Ltd & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 346
Advocates:Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHS),Zeeshan Hazoor Bux Kalwar(ADVO-19762-SBC-KHS),Barrister Atta Hussain(ADVO-17486-SBC-KHS),Waqar Hussain(ADVO-17203-SBC-KHS),Omrazia Nadeem(ADVO-20500-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.513/2025 ARY Communication Limited, Karachi and others v. Independent Newspapers Corporation Private Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

225) 1386/2012 Suit MS ROHEELA YASMIN (Plaintiff) V/S MS. NEELOFAR HASSAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:"(a) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)--- ----S. 7---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XX, R. 13-Administration suit- Talaq-e-Bain- Effect--- Contention of plaintiff was that she being wife of deceased was entitled for deferred dower as well as share from his property whereas defendants contended that plaintiff had been divorced by the deceased and she was not legal heir to claim inheritance-Validity-Plaintiff was given Talaq-e-Bain and no question of reconciliation would arise---Such Talaq would become effective the moment same was pronounced-Plaintiff was not entitled for any inheritance however claim of dower amount was debt on the property of deceased which was to be paid first. (b) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)- --S. 7---Divorce--- Effectiveness of--- Scope---Marriage could abe dissolved by husband at his will without intervention of the court-Man who wished to divorce his wife should as soon as might be after pronouncement of Talaq give the Chairman Union Council a notice in writing of his having done so and should supply a copy thereof to the wife---Talaq would not be effective until the expiry of 90 days unless same was revoked earlier expressly or otherwise. (c) Islamic Law--- ---Talaq, Mubarat and Khula-Meaning-- -""Talaq"" was divorce which was pronounced by the husband whereas ""Mubarat"" was Talaq effected by mutual consent of parties and ""Khula"" was dissolution of marriage through court. (d) Islamic Law-- ----Talaq, kinds of-Scope-Talaq would be of three kinds i.e. Talaq-e-Ahsan, Talaq-e-Hassan and Talaq-e-Bain-Talaq-e-Ahsan could be pronounced by single pronouncement during ""Tuhrs"" followed by abstinence from going to wife to establish marital relationship till Iddat period-Talaq-e-Hassan was pronounce-ment of divorce through successive three ""Tuhrs"" without establishing physical relationship with wife in any of the three ""Tuhrs""---Talaq-e-Bain was the divorce by husband through pronouncement made through single ""Tuhr"" either in one sentence or in separate sentences---Talaq-e-Bain was irrevocable divorce whereas Talaq-e-Ahsan would become irrevocable on expiry of Iddat period and Talaq-e-Hassan on third pronouncement irrespective of Iddat period-Talaq-e-Bain would become irrevocable immediately on pronouncement of the same either uttered orally or written down on a piece of paper irrespective of Iddat period-Talaq-e-Bain did not provide any room for any reconciliation-Communication was not material ingredients or prerequisite for validity of Talaq."
Citation:2014 YLR 2315
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-14
Approved for Reporting

226) 1352/2014 Const. P. Tahir Ayub Khan (Petitioner) V/S Ms. Aalia Anwar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 27-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.232-K/2015 Tahir Ayub Khan v. Ms. Alya Anwar and another,C.M.A.986-K/2016 Tahir Ayub Khan v. Ms. Alya Anwar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Allowed

227) 1139/2007 Suit Muhammad Imran (Plaintiff) V/S President KASB Bank Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 07-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting

228) 519/2019 Cr.Bail Ali Sher (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

229) 628/2024 Cr.Bail SANIYAL ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years, broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: - (b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence???
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 41
Advocates:Muhammad Aleem(ADVO-2374-SBC-HYD),Badar Hussain(ADVO-11544-SBC-KHI),Syed Jamil Ahmed Shah Bukhari(ADVO-161-SBC-HYD),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

230) 7407/2021 Const. P. Noorullah Abro (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 893
Advocates:Agha Haris Ahmed Khan(ADVO-17298-SBC-KHS),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 14-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

231) 127/2011 Adm. Suit Mulo Ahmed (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 06-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting

232) 87/2024 Criminal Appeal Ghulam Mustafa @ Lanti Jakhrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Section 311 P.P.C. Honour Killing Conviction.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1122
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.238/2025 Ghulam Mustafa alias Lanti v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

233) 53/2023 M.A. Muhammad Naeem Ikram S/o Ch. Muhammad Ikram (Appellant) V/S Sh. Tahir Rauf and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 766
Advocates:Syed Abid Ali Qadri(ADVO-9235-SBC-KHI),Iftekhar Ahmed(ADVO-4310-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

234) 4053/2016 Const. P. Syed Maqbool Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 14
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting

235) 121/2010 I. A Asif Kudia (Appellant) V/S M/s. KASB Bank Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 10-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting

236) 583/2021 Suit SICPA SA (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1115
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 20-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

237) 109/2017 Civil Revision Shafi Muhammad Khan (Applicant) V/S Abdul Rehman & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 1374
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

238) 1513/2009 Suit M/S.RABBIYA ASSOICATES (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.ZONG CHINA MOBILE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 15-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting

239) 6085/2024 Const. P. Zubair Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 228
Advocates:Israr Ahmed(ADVO-19321-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

240) 1764/2014 Suit Muhammad Hussain & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Faced with the presumptive taxation of imports, supplies, contract, exports etc. under section 80-C and 80-CC of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, where tax payers challenged the constitutionality of presumptive taxation, the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its landmark judgment of Ellahi Cotton Mills (Supra) held that section 80C and 80CC (Section 148 and 153 and 154 in Ordinance 2001) provides for presumptive taxation of income within the category of presumptive tax as under the same the persons covered by them pay a pre-determined amount of presumptive tax in full and final discharge of their tax liability in respect of the transactions on which above tax is levied. If Entry 47 is read in isolation without reference to Entry No.52 one can urge that Entry 47 does not admit the imposition of presumptive tax as the expression tax on income employed therein should be understood as to the working out of the same on the basis of computation as provided in the various provisions of Ordinance. Thus, it can be held that presumptive tax is in fact akin to capacity tax i.e. capacity to earn.
Citation:2016 PTD 622, 2016 SBLR Sindh 1484
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

241) 398/2020 S.M.A Batul Husain Dharamsey d/o Hussain Dharamsey (Petitioner) V/S Nil (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: S.M.A ( power of attorney is not a title document , does not render any ownership its holder in any manner, dismissed .)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 306
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

242) 17/2025 Const. P. Sadaf Gul & Others (Petitioner) V/S Sain Bux & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Right of Fair Trial
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

243) 153/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Jabbar and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Rasool (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 697
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

244) 4942/2022 Const. P. Irfan Hussain Halai & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Levy of CVT on foreign assets through Section 8 of Finance Act, 2022; Held; is not ultra vires and is within the competence of the Parliament under Entry 50 of the Federal Legislative List in 4th Schedule to the Constitution.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 54, 2024 PLD Sindh 453
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan()
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.M.A.1108/2023,C.P.L.A.245-K/2023,C.P.L.A.247-K/2023,C.P.L.A.249-K/2023,C.P.L.A.57/2023,C.P.L.A.5176/2023 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed. stay. Early date, , , , ,

245) 2460/2014 Suit M/s. Amreli Steel (Pvt) Ltd., & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Saeed Ahmed Kazmi & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Abbadul Hussnain(ADVO-6779-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

246) 275/2023 Const. P. Maria Ramesh (aka Mala) (Petitioner) V/S Learned IXth ADJ, Karachi (East) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Difference between Judicial Separation and Divorce and the criteria for obtaining Judicial Separation and Divorce under the Sindh Hindu Marriages Act, 2018 and the obligation of maintenance of a wife in Hinduism
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 869
Advocates:Dr. Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-9924-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting

247) 261/2018 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SIKANDAR ALI LASHARI S/O ALI MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Decision/Judgment in the appeals filed by Sikandar Ali Lashari (District Judge) against the conviction of death penalty decided by A.T.C. on the charge of murder of Aqib Hussain son of District & Sessions Judge.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 28
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.294/2020 Muhammad Irfan Khan @ Faheem v. The State,Crl.P.L.A.592/2020 Sikandar Ali Lashari v. The State thr. PG Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted

248) 173/2009 S.M.A Muhammad Javed .... Petitioner (Petitioner) V/S aaa (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 1
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

249) 19/2013 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Nawab Siraj Ali S/o Imdad Ali Talpur (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment in murder case of Shahzaib
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 13-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.2-K/2018,Crl.A.3-K/2018,Crl.P.724/2019,Crl.A.400/2019 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of+ directions,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

250) 4864/2020 Const. P. Hasan Khursheed Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 329
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3927/2021 Mst. Hira Imam and others v. Hasan Khurshid Hashmi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

251) 164/2024 Cr.Bail Zeeshan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Tag Line:The law on bail is now well settled. In cases where the offense falls outside the non-prohibitory clause of section 497(1) of Cr.P.C., bail is to be granted as a matter of course, and rejection of the same is an exception. Where, however, an offense falls within the prohibitory clause, bail can only be granted if the court concludes that there is no reasonable ground for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offense or where an accused makes out a case of further inquiry into the guilt of the accused or in case the accused is under the age of 16 years or is sick or infirm.
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 1422
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

252) 2847/2012 Const. P. Mst. Zaria Begum (Petitioner) V/S Zafar Iqbal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 510
Advocates:Naeem Akhtar(ADVO-4730HLC-SBC-KHI),Imran(ADVO-11259-SBC-KHI),Asadullah(ADVO-4145-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

253) 1872/2016 Suit Saleem Butt.. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Challenge to the vires of section 230(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on the ground of delegation of excessive legislative power not successful. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. SRO 115(I)/2015 re the conferring of powers and functions on the DG I&I, was within the jurisdiction of the FBR. Effect of striking-down of same SRO by another High Court discussed. The invoking of section 176 does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 676
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

254) 101/2009 Cr.Appeal Khadim Khoso & another (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 04-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

255) 2322/2014 Suit Dr. Arifa Farid and others (Plaintiff) V/S Mitha Khan and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Judgment in rem / personam, Exception to right of hearing
Tag Line:Exception to right of hearing; where the results can and would not have been any different. Dispute between the government departments should not affect bona fide purchasers. Judgment in rem / personam.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

256) 98/2001 Cr.Rev Roshan Ali Dero S/o Ghulam Haider Dero (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

257) 766/2018 Cr.Misc. Khalid Hussain & others (Applicant) V/S Asif Iqbal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 242
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

258) 5162/2020 Const. P. Burshen LPG (Pakistan) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 899
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Amer Raza Naqvi(ADVO-3585-SBC-KHI),Afaq Ahmed(ADVO-4782-SBC-KHI),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Ghazala Rafiq(ADVO-10618-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 20-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

259) 2458/2018 Suit Khawaja Ahad Rahman & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1249
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

260) 2549/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Luqman Khoso and another (Petitioner) V/S Syed Nazar Hussain Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Inherent Powers of the Civil Court.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 69
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.884-K/2025 Hafiz Ahmed Din v. Sayed Nazar Hussain Shah (deceased) through his LRs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

261) 730/2012 Const. P. M/s. Muhammadi Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

262) 1268/2014 Suit Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Fahim (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 25-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

263) 1010/2020 Cr.Bail HASSAN RABBANI S/O TARIQ RABBANI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 602
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

264) 774/2011 Suit Trading Corporation of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s.Abdullah Sugar Mills Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 254
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 18-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting

265) 43/2017 II.A. Mst. Saba and others (Appellant) V/S Mst. Fatima and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: II Appeal (Appeal allowed . Judgment of Appellate Court and Trial Court is Sat aside.)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

266) 6572/2016 Const. P. Sultan Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S M/s Sui Southerm Gas Co. & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Promotion case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

267) 248/2014 H.C.A Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S M/s Friends Corporation Stevedores (Pvt.) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 31-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting

268) 49/2013 II.A. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF (Appellant) V/S ASLAM PARVAIZ & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Appeal allowed with costs throughout.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.26-K/2019 Aslam Pervaiz and others v. Muhammad Ashraf Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

269) 968/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD YAMEEN S/O MUHAMMAD AMIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Tag Line:The question involved in the present proceedings is whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1184
Advocates:Muhammad Iqrar(ADVO-8782-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Daud(ADVO-10638-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Aslam(ADVO-7603-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

270) 2275/2017 Suit M/s. Inbox Business Technologies Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 244
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

271) 263/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous ABDUL GHAFFAR S/O MUHAMMAD SHARIF (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (The court cannot interfere during investigation.)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 374
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

272) 315/2010 Cr.Appeal Adil Sher (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 05-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting

273) 2650/2019 Const. P. Ms. Saba (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:ADJ appointment/retest case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.429-K/2019 Ms. Saba v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

274) 468/2019 Const. P. Abdul Hussain Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Deceased Quota
Citation:2025 PLC CS 916
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

275) 1208/2011 Const. P. M/s.International Business Management (Petitioner) V/S Aziz Ahmed (Late) & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Judgment of Rent Controller &Appellate Court order is Set-aside . One day delay not default being Sunday Last day )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 04-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

276) 304/2016 Cr.Appeal JAHANZEB S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 07-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

277) 203/2002 Suit ADVOCATE GENERAL SINDH (Plaintiff) V/S ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

278) 85/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. ROZEENA RAZZAQ D/O ABDUL RAZZAQ (Applicant) V/S MIRZA MOHSIN ALI JAH & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 821
Advocates:Shujjat Abbas(ADVO-16049-SBC-KHC),Riasat Ali(ADVO-4003-SBC-KHW),Muhammad Hanif Samma(ADVO-4046-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Nasrullah Malik(ADVO-11854-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

279) 193/2020 Const. P. SHAFQAT ALI (Petitioner) V/S MST. IMTAIZ & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Applicability of Sub-Sections 6 and 7 of Section 9 of the Family Courts Act, 1964
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 613
Advocates:Hannan Iqbal(ADVO-17006-SBC-KHS),Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Iqbal(ADVO-3445-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

280) 59/2007 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Digri Sugar Mills Ltd (Applicant) V/S The Additional Collector of Customs & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 PTD 825
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Danish Zuberi(ADVO-6720-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Imran Ali Mithani(ADVO-15070-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

281) 981/2023 Const. P. Irfan Bashir S/o Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Learned XXIIth ADJ, Karachi South and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1480
Advocates:Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Aurangzeb(ADVO-15419-SBC-KHE),Mashooque Ali(ADVO-12414-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2353/2024 Irfan Bashir v. Mst. Shumaila Yaqoob and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

282) 1569/2000 Suit Ali Muhammad & another (Plaintiff) V/S Faizullah & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

283) 28/2018 I. A MCR (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.5-K/2019 Soneri Bank Limited v. MCR (Pvt) Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

284) 232/2004 Civil Revision Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Applicant) V/S Kazi Nisar Ahmed and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 567
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

285) 1461/2016 Suit Mohsin Abbas. (Plaintiff) V/S Air Waves Media (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

286) 41/2016 Election Appeal Tariq Hussain (Appellant) V/S Subhan Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

287) 1119/2016 Const. P. M/s Qasim International Container Terminal Pak Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

288) 74/1991 Suit Mohammad Sarwar (Plaintiff) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Suit for recovery of compensation amount--Deceased died in the custody of police officials---Contention of the police was that deceased died due to cardiac arrest---Validity---None of the police officials entered the witness box to defend the claim against them---Written statement filed by the police officials had lost its evidentiary value as contents whereof were never proved in the evidence---Deceased died while he was in the custody of police officials---Plaintiff was to prove the factum of incident only---Burden would shift on the police officials to disprove the causation if they wanted to succeed in the claim against the plaintiff---Present case did fall within the purview of Fatal Accidents Act, 1855---Prosecution in a criminal case was to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of accused but in civil proceedings the matter had to be decided on the basis of preponderance of probabilities---Acquittal of (private) defendants in the criminal case did not have any adverse bearing on the present lis---Police official were liable to compensate the plaintiff by applying the rule of vicarious liability--- Claim of plaintiff with regard to quantum of damages was also unchallenged---Life expectancy of seventy five years in plaintiff's family had been proved---Deceased might also have lived for another fifty years approximately---Claim of awarding damages of Rs.50,00,000/- was justified---Master/employer in the claims with regard to tortuous liabilities would be liable for the wrongful acts of his employees/servants---Provincial Government and Inspector General of Police were liable to compensate the plaintiff besides other defendants---Defendants (Police officials) were liable to pay the damages/compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- together with 10% markup from the date of institution of suit till realization of the amount to the plaintiff and his wife i.e. parent of the deceased jointly and severally. Suit decreed.
Topic: Fatal Accident (Recovery of Damages)
Tag Line:Custodial death, suit for recovery of compensation amount decreed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

289) 220/2023 Const. P. Faqir Muhammad & another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 843
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

290) 2632/2025 Const. P. Iftikhar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S The State & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1754
Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

291) 2025/2008 Const. P. Syed Jarrar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh &Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Citation:1990 PLD 504, 2000 SCMR 506, 2001 SCMR 683, 2006 SCMR 178, 2007 SCMR 287, 2008 SCMR 105, 2010 SCMR 1925, 2011 SCMR 279, 2015 SCMR 456, 1994 CLC 2214, 2006 CLC 342, 2008 CLC 573, 2014 CLC 965, 2015 PLC 719, 2005 YLR 2423, 1917 OTHER 56, 1957 OTHER 97, 1957 OTHER 311, 2010 OTHER 373
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4266/2018 City Schools (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Cooperation Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

292) 2666/2020 Const. P. Saeed Habib (Petitioner) V/S National Bank of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:NBP--We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-bank. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 599
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.305/2021 Saeed Habib v. National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

293) 2019/2015 Suit A&Z Agro Industries (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others.. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Search of premises under section 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and section 175 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

294) 780/2001 Suit Zafar Mahmood Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Ali Khan and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 13-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting

295) 100/2013 Cr.J.A Abdul Aziz Bhatti (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

296) 4930/2015 Const. P. Musheer Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1278
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.263-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Musheer Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

297) 178/2017 Criminal Appeal BILAWAL S/O RAMZAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Syed Shabeer Hassan Shah(ADVO-11693-SBC-KHI),Mubashir Ahmed Mirza(ADVO-5495-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

298) 143/2016 I.T.R.A ALLIED ENGINEERING & SERVICE LTD (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1415
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.582-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Allied Engineering & Services Ltd Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

299) 5066/2024 Const. P. Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of the competent authority. The regularization of the petitioners shall be considered from the date of their regularization. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Deputy Director Food Faisalabad Division, Faisalabad, etc. vs Muhammad Tauqir Shah and others vide order dated 10.03.2021passed in C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 234
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Saulat Rizvi(ADVO-1835-SBC-HYD),Akhtiar Hussain Soomro(ADVO-12331-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.403-K/2025 Ali Raza Larik & another v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

300) 9/2016 Civil Revision Ashfaque Hussain Lahori (Appellant) V/S Lal Bux Soomro and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 21-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

301) 2415/2016 Suit Saleem Butt (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan and Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Given the mechanism in-built in section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, which includes the providing of reasons in writing to the taxpayer, the power conferred on the Commissioner to call for record under section 177(1) of the Ordinance, does not by itself offend Article 25 of the Constitution. The question then, whether such power has been used unlawfully, is different, and one that may vary with the circumstances of each case. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. The invoking of section 177(1) does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 276
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

302) 2157/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Shaikh. (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment passed by Honble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi in the petitions filed to challenge the Combined Competitive Examination 2003 (CCE-2003) conducted by Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC). The Honble Judges constituted a High Powered Inquiry Commission to probe and submit the report to the competent authority.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 987
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.413-K/2020,C.P.406-K/2020,C.P.407-K/2020,C.P.408-K/2020,C.P.409-K/2020,C.P.410-K/2020,C.P.411-K/2020,C.P.412-K/2020,C.P.L.A.777-K/2022 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

303) 875/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Arif and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Three thousand three hundred and fifty nine petitioners collectively filed these forty eight petitions, requiring this court, in its writ jurisdiction, to judge their individual claims for regularization in Suit Southern Gas Company Limited; premised upon their averment of having rendered contingent / contractual services thereto, though third party companies or otherwise. Petitions dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 463
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 22-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.352/2025,C.A.1376/2021,C.P.L.A.5119/2021,C.P.L.A.1092-K/2022,C.P.L.A.3914/2022,C.A.3991/2022,C.A.4009/2022,C.P.L.A.3556/2024,C.P.L.A.3890/2024 SCP Status: Adjourned. Be fixed before a Larger Bench,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed , Adjourned/Referred to Larger Bench to be fixed within a month., Adjourned/Referred to Larger Bench to be fixed within a month.

304) 29/2021 Cr.Rev MS.RUBINA MIR D/O LATE MIR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 640
Advocates:Spl.Prosecutor Customs(SpPCus),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Firdous Khatoon(ADVO-3796-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.20-K/2025 Aftab Ahmed Qureshi (deceased) through his LRs & others v. Abdul Raheem Muhammad Qazi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next Session)

305) 182/2009 Cr.Misc. Khuda Bux (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting

306) 480/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous FAIZAN BASIQ S/O AGHA NAIER HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S NOORUL ARFEEN QURESHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1707
Advocates:Muhammad Daud(ADVO-10638-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

307) 436/2001 Suit MST.YASMIN PAYAR ALI. (Plaintiff) V/S TRUSTEES OF PORT KARACHI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 591
Advocates:Samsam Ali Khan(ADVO-7110-SBC-KHI),S. Izhar Haider Rizvi(ADVO-1379-SBC-KHI),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

308) 843/2015 Suit Aroma Travel Services (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Faisal Al Abdullah Al Faisal Al Saud & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act 2011)
Citation:2017 YLR 1579
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

309) 120/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Applicant) V/S Shahnawaz and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2021 SHC SUK 473
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.548-K/2021 Shabbir Ahmed & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

310) 210/2017 Cr.Misc. muhammad anwar qureshi (Applicant) V/S muhammad ayoob & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2019 YLR 839
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

311) 1808/2016 Suit Mst. Bilqis Bano & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Defence Housing Authority & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

312) 4497/2018 Const. P. Muntazir Mehdi & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The petitioners who are serving as Deputy Prosecutor Generals in the prosecution department Government of Sindh contend that they are holding the LLM Degree and have claimed LLM degree allowance through this petition based on equality.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 744
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Samiullah Soomro(ADVO-960-SBC-SUK),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 02-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.501-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Muntazir Mehdi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

313) 3548/2017 Const. P. Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

314) 7241/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Baloch and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In view of the foregoing, we find that a five-member Bench of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Gul Taiz Khan Marwat (supra) has decided the question of maintainability of a Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution against the administrative orders passed by an Administrative Committee or the Honorable Chief Justice of High Court. Besides that, all the legal grounds raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioners in the present petition have already been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid decisions as such this Court cannot further dilate upon the issue more.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 656
Advocates:Riaz Ahmed Phulphoto(ADVO-16022-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 31-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

315) 4164/2021 Const. P. Haleem Adil Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 552
Advocates:Muhammad Asif Qureshi(ADVO-10738-SBC-KHI),Faran Sardar(ADVO-19278-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 28-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

316) 47/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Amjad Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

317) 622/2024 Cr.Misc. Mst Muskan & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 595
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

318) 4674/2018 Const. P. Pakistan Services Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:(i) Whether Petitioner-PSL has locus standi to approach this Court as an aggrieved party under Article 199 of the Constitution against the decisions of NIRC? (ii) Whether petitioner-PSL is a Trans-Provincial Organization and falls within the ambit of National Industrial Relations Act, 2012? (iii) Whether or not the registration of industry-wise trade unions by the Registrar, Trade Union NIRC, Islamabad is violative of the mandatory requirement of Section 8 of Act, 2012, based on strength of workforce; and, liable to be canceled, in view of mandate of Section 11 of the IRA-2012? (iv) Whether the registrar of trade unions and/or NIRC is competent to determine the registration of the respondent unions?
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 957
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3497/2021 Pakistan Services Limitd, Islamabad through Director v. Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission, comprising three embers at Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

319) 5608/2014 Const. P. Mansoor ul Haq Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.859-K/2016 Pakistan Automobile Corporation Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: M/o Industries and Production and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

320) 4506/2018 Const. P. Mst. Shabana Noor (Petitioner) V/S D.G Immigration & Passport & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

321) 13/2018 Civil Revision Manzar Alam (Applicant) V/S Malik Muhammad Yamin & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2019 YLR 598
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 01-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

322) 8/2016 H.C.A Haroon (Appellant) V/S Abdul Aziz (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.390-K/2017 Haroon v. Abdul Aziz and another,C.A.67-K/2017 Haroon v. Abdul Aziz and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed

323) 1014/2016 Const. P. Faraz Alamgir (Petitioner) V/S ADJ-VIII Karachi South & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 7, 8 and 25)
Tag Line:The petitioner through the instant constitutional petition has challenged the order passed by the learned Additional District and Session Judge Karachi (South) while dismissing the family Appeal filed by petitioner upheld the order passed by learned Family Judge Karachi (South) in G & W Application; returned the application under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1980, under order VII Rule 10, CPC. Order VII Rule 10 CPC & Provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 and The West Pakistan Family Court Rules, 1965, in the light of guide lines set by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Anne Zahra vs. Tahir Ali Khilji and 2 others(2001 SCMR 2000). And Major Muhammad Khalid Karim Vs. Mst. Saadia Yaqub and others (PLD 2012 SC 66) were discussed. This Constitutional Petition was disposed of directing the learned Family Judge Karachi (South) to rehear the case of the petitioner and decide the question of territorial jurisdiction afresh, inter alia, in the light of Rules framed under the Family Courts Act, 1964.
Citation:2017 YLR 994
Advocates:Mohsin Kadir Shahwani(ADVO-12570-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

324) 20/2009 Civil Revision Mst Rabia Khatoon (Applicant) V/S Abbas Ali and an other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 12-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

325) 646/2024 Cr.Bail TALHA SAMOO S/O GHULAM NABI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception, then, the subordinate Courts should follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by this Court under Article 203 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is binding on all subordinate Courts. My view is supported by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of The State v. Syed Qaim Ali Shah (1992 SCMR 2192) and the famous case of Khan Asfandyar Wali and others v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2001 SC 607).
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 152
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Sajjad Gul(ADVO-8403-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

326) 80/2015 I.T.R.A The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appellant) V/S Tianshi International Pakistan Co (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

327) 2/2018 Cr.J.A Bilawal Dasti (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain M. Sheikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

328) 39/2007 R.A (Civil Revision) Nasim Hayat (Applicant) V/S Mrs.Naseem Akhtar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

329) 2500/2015 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-IV (Applicant) V/S M/s. Hamdam Paper Products (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 632
Advocates:Kafil Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-7764-SBC-KHI),Aqeel Ahmed(ADVO-12466-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 22-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1091-K/2022 Commissioner-IR Zone-IV v. M/s. Hamdam Paper Products (Private) Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

330) 6359/2023 Const. P. Abdul Hameed Tunio (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:This case pertains to the regularization and allotment of 10 acres of land in Deh Mowach, Karachi. The petitioner claims the respondents have failed to issue an NOC despite the required payment and alleges that Respondent No. 11 is unlawfully claiming part of the land. The court emphasizes the need for transparency in land allotments and compliance with the Land Grant Policy 2024, particularly the requirement for open auctions in the disposal of public land.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 871
Advocates:Farhan Ahmed Mangi(ADVO-14154-SBC-KHE),Abdul Jabbar Korai(ADVO-7310-SBC-KHI),Irfan Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8266-SBC-KHI),Khalid Ahmed(ADVO-13659-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mehmood Khan Kayani(ADVO-11156-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

331) 491/2011 Cr.Appeal Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 31-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

332) 108/2007 Cr.Rev Ali Raza (Applicant) V/S Haji Mir Muhammad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting

333) 3962/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Naved Aslam & Others (Petitioner) V/S EDO Revenue & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLC 132
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.413-K/2014 Mst. Aisha Siddiqi v. Muhammad Naveed Aslam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

334) 571/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Mateen Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 1
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 28-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.653-K/2018 Muhammad Mateen Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

335) 916/2015 Const. P. Khawaja Muhammad Salman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Saeed-ud-Din Nasir, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 04-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

336) 3100/2016 Const. P. Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 399
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 29-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3922/2021 Managing Director Pakistan Bait ul Mal, Islamabad v. Surriya Kanwal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

337) 1995/2016 Const. P. M/s Dairy Land (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976
Tag Line:It is also, prima facie, evident that vires of the Act 2016 has not been challenged, but the notification, so issued under such Act, impugned. A challenge to application of notification only without assailing the vires of the Act under which the notification has been issued, legally, cant be made, particularly where things notified are with reference to the Act itself. On this count, too, the instant petition (s) are not tenable in law. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed with no order as to cost.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 620
Advocates:M/S. "ARAIN LAW ASSOCIATES"(FIRM-280-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

338) 1916/2016 Const. P. M/s Continental Biscuit (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Input Tax adjustment denied pursuant to section 8(1)(h) & (i). Held-yes-Petition dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 136
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

339) 3976/2021 Const. P. Faisal Masroor Siddiqi (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 769
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Abdul Hafeez(ADVO-13095-SBC-KHI),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

340) 89/2009 Cr.J.A Abdul Hayee (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 10-AUG-12
Approved for Reporting

341) 62/2015 Suit M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 479, 2018 SBLR Sindh 2022
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

342) 7329/2015 Const. P. Freeway Heights (Petitioner) V/S P.C.A.A and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 515
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 05-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

343) 1533/2013 Cr.Bail ABDUL KABEER KAZI S/O MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting

344) 47/2009 II.A. Ghazi Naseem & Ors (Appellant) V/S Moulana Muhammad Bilal Somayri & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 15-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting

345) 3548/2019 Const. P. M/s Younus Textile Mills (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 602
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

346) 654/2010 I.T.R.A Commissioner (legal) (Applicant) V/S M/s Habib Metropolitan Bank (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 02-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting

347) 578/2025 Const. P. Fahad Junaid s/o Junaid Jalal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:police cannot be bound to record FIR after obtaining permission from the Court
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1965
Advocates:Ahsan Ali(ADVO-51450-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

348) 2324/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD TANVEER KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF KHAN (Applicant) V/S XTH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The only question involved in the present bail matter is whether the bail can be refused in section 471 PPC., which is a bailable offense, whereas Sections 406 & 468 are punishable by up to seven years. In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 737
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

349) 5913/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Asghar Pathan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1070
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

350) 2304/2018 Const. P. Meezan Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Textilers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

351) 599/2009 I.T.R.A M/s. Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 14-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting

352) 64/2011 Const. P. Syed Akbar Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Mst Mehar-U-Nisa and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 29-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

353) 1325/1999 Suit CHINA INT. WATER & ELECTRIC CORP. (Plaintiff) V/S PAK. WATER & POWER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC 188
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

354) 262/2018 Suit Deedar Ali Isran (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Wahid & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Under Order 07 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 of CPC, issues involved and discussed in order are; 1) Specific Performance, 2) Time Bar and 3) Doctrine of res judicata
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 105
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

355) 89/2023 I. A M/s. Farooqui Fisheries & Others (Appellant) V/S Faysal Bank Limited & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance XLVI of 2001 (Section-22- Appeal)
Tag Line:whether the appeal must be filed against the judgment alone without waiting for the decree to be drawn? --OR-- Whether Section-22(1) of the FIO, 2001 provides an independent right of appeal against the judgment in a suit or such right is against a decree in a suit filed under the FIO, 2001? **In view of the above analysis, the judgment rendered in the case of First Pakistan Security (Supra), surfaced as a blend of both per incuriam and sub-silentio; the most appropriate interpretation of Section 22 of 2001 Ordinance is that in the civil jurisdiction an appeal can be filed after passing of a judgment but the process is completed only after filing of decree within limitation and "only" (emphasis applied) on the basis of a judgment a Civil Appeal cannot be maintained under Ordinance 2001. If an appeal is preferred against the judgment only for any urgent cause (as at time it might take some time for Court to draw decree), it must be followed by a decree to be placed and time consumed to obtain decree be excluded as limitation would run from the date of drawing decree.
Citation:2024 CLD 1199, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1599
Advocates:Adil Khan(ADVO-11831-SBC-KHI),Wahaj Ali Khan(ADVO-20055-SBC-KHC),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Abdul Rashid Rajar(ADVO-10878-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 26-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting

356) 3969/2011 Const. P. Mst. Rukhsana (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 20-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting

357) 358/2025 Cr.Bail AZHAR ALI S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 527
Advocates:Khalid Rahim(ADVO-9042-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Kamran Mirza(ADVO-11996-SBC-KHE),Daniyal Muhammad Hussain(ADVO-22224-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

358) 6359/2018 Const. P. Syed Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Naheed Hussain & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 880
Advocates:Khawaja Saif ul Islam.(ADVO-7383-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

359) 1731/2009 Suit JEHANGIR SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) V/S NOMAN ABID INVESTMENT MANAGMENT & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting

360) 33/2019 Judicial Companies Misc. MUHAMMAD YOUSUF AHMED & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S ARTISTIC DENIM MILLS LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Petitioners hold 14.45% shares in respondent Company and are aggrieved by the notice as well as the proceedings of the impugned Meeting dated 19.10.2019 and the resolutions passed thereon, whereby, related party transactions were approved in respect of 2 Companies, which have certain common Directorship. It is their case that they hold more than 10% of the shareholding and are, therefore, qualified to institute present proceedings, under s.136 of the Companies Act, 2017 which according to them has seriously prejudiced their interests. According to them statement of material facts under Section 134(3) of the Act, annexed with the impugned notice of meeting, failed to include the minimum information required under Regulation-5 of the Company (Related Parties Transactions and Maintenance of Related Records) Regulations, 2018, whereas, the meeting was also conducted without following proper procedure and has deprived the Petitioners from exercising their rights. However, the Petitioners have failed to make out a case for indulgence; hence, this petition fails and is accordingly dismissed with pending applications.
Citation:2021 CLD 134
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

361) 275/2020 Const. P. Har Lal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: National Database and Registration Authority Regulations, 2002 (Redesignation of declaration of faith form)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1013
Advocates:Abdullah Nizamani(ADVO-14295-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

362) 168/2011 Civil Revision Asad Khan & another (Applicant) V/S The Taluka Nazim Qasimabad & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 23-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

363) 2798/2014 Const. P. Arham Aziz Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 121
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

364) 3044/2020 Const. P. M/s Textiles Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 889
Advocates:Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.449-K/2022 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

365) 2/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. IMS Health Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Commissioner-II SRB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 , Finance Act, 2014
Tag Line:It is the consideration in money including federal and provincial duties and taxes which constitute value of taxable services which the person provides against the consideration but it excludes the amount of sales tax under the ibid Act. The Tribunal was of the view that the invoices generated on the amount includes the expenses/expenditures plus 10-% service charges and is to be taken as one revenue component for services rendered. The Tribunal is also of the view that in certain cases there is specific rule in Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 providing for valuation of a particular service and providing a certain minimum threshold and also any exemption and exception. However, Tribunal considered that since no rule is available for the category of Business Support Services full value of generated invoices shall be taken as the value of services rendered or provided in terms of provisions of Section 5 ibid. --Primarily value of service charges for the purposes of Act 2011 is governed by the value of service agreed upon between the provider and the recipient as the market itself is so competitive that nothing could defeat the actual amount being declared to be taxed. However, in case such understanding of value of service is doubtful as it does not disclose correct value of service, it was open for the department to have considered the open market price of such service as required to be determined under section 6 of Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 which is not the case here. Two provisos to Section 5 deals the situation of value of service. In a situation where the consideration of value of service is in kind or is partly in kind and partly in money, value of service shall mean open market price2 excluding the amount of sales tax under Act 2011. Similarly in case where service is provided by provider to a recipient who is an associated person and the value is not the actual value of service, then the value of service which is being provided by a provider to a non-associated person shall be counted and in case no consideration is claimed or value is lower than it is being provided by other persons, the value of service shall be of open market. In principle the department has not disputed the value of services rather the department is of the view that reimbursed amount or the amount of maintenance/expenses incurred should be made part of the value of the service.
Citation:2022 PTD 576
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 29-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

366) 405/2012 Const. P. Ali Gohar and another (Petitioner) V/S SSP Kamber Shahdadkot and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 30-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting

367) 357/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Yousif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1623
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

368) 3271/2020 Const. P. Bilqees (Petitioner) V/S The Sect: Wafaqi Mohtasib and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether Wafaqi Mohtasib is competent to absorb any deputationist by appointing her/him by transfer in the Establishment of the Wafaqi Mohtasib, Islamabad?
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 235
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1164/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others,C.A.1349/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed after 3 months,

369) 1170/2021 Const. P. Haroon Sohail (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1061
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

370) 1803/2020 Suit KARAM CERAMICS LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Challenge to the gas tariff issued under the OGRA Ordinance, the definition of Captive Power Plants and the Moratorium on the supply of gas to Captive Power Plants.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 989
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

371) 100/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Taj Muhammad Detho (Applicant) V/S Senior Civil Judge Ratodero and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Rejection of Plaint Principle of Res judicata
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1499
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

372) 82/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Nek Mohammad Khan Sohriyani (Applicant) V/S Mukhtiar Ahmed Sohriyani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2023 SHC LAR 522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

373) 2847/2017 Const. P. Sajjad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:Declare that naming, renaming any street, road, government institute, town, or city after the name of any individual having no positive social, role, courage or exceptional dedication to service in ways that bring special credit to an area, city town is illegal, unlawful against the basic rights of citizens of particular areas, towns, cities and public at large.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

374) 5577/2023 Const. P. SICPA Inks Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Estimate of Advance Tax under Section 147 of Income Tax Ord 2001; such estimate cannot be disputed or challenged by the Commissioner
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 478
Advocates:Ovais Ali(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHS),Jahanzeb Balouch(ADVO-18867-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 23-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

375) 1589/2013 Const. P. Kaleemullah (Petitioner) V/S C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: WAPDA CASES
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 365
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

376) 164/2007 Suit Raees Ghulam Sarwar (Plaintiff) V/S Mansoor Sadiq Zaidi & 4 others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Defamation Ordinance, 2002., Defamation Ordinance, 2002. (Application Dismiss)
Mr. Justice Khalid Ali Z. Qazi
Order Date: 29-MAY-08
Approved for Reporting

377) 5865/2024 Const. P. Mst. Mehwish & Another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the underage issue if any, pending before the competent court of law.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1101
Advocates:Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-669-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Yousif Korai(ADVO-23186-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

378) 38/2020 Cr.Rev Pir Bux Brohi & another (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 857
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

379) 27/2012 II.A. Mst. Tabasum Muneer & another (Appellant) V/S Asghar Hameed & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The impugned judgments and decrees are set aside and the present appeal is allowed with costs throughout. Accordingly, the Suit filed by the appellants is decreed as prayed.
Advocates:Muahmamd Javed(ADVO-8539-SBC-KHI),Ainuddin Khan(ADVO-2221-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting

380) 858/2016 Const. P. Irshad Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

381) 1272/2020 Const. P. Mst. Salma @ Ume-Salma (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh, through Secretary Home Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2021 SHC SUK 366
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

382) 1710/2012 Const. P. Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting

383) 508/2025 Const. P. Syed Momin Hussain Shah (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 2163
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

384) 13/2009 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Waseem Ahmed and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 10-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.80-K/2017 Muhammad Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

385) 99/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. NADEEM NASIR S/O NASIR MEHMOOD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Discrepancies and contradictions)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

386) 966/2022 Const. P. Aijaz Ali Abro (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Pension Benefits Qualifying length of service.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 668
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

387) 64/2024 II.A. Pirshotam (Appellant) V/S Sht. Seeta & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2025 SHC MPK 1215
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

388) 220/2022 II.A. Muhammad Siddique S/o Abdul Salam Shaikh Siddiqui (Appellant) V/S Mst. Feroza Begum (Advocate) and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1012
Advocates:Kalim -ul- Hassan Siddiqui(ADVO-6817-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-23
Approved for Reporting

389) 34/2020 Criminal Appeal Zubair Jakhrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Against Order of Trial Court(A.T.C Upto 7 years)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 470
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 10-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

390) 0/2020 Suit Damen Shipyards Gorinchem B.V. (Plaintiff) V/S The Ministry of Maritime Affairs and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Application for conditional withdrawal of Suit Order 23 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as plaintiff wanted permission to allow prosecution of Constitution Petition filed on the same cause of action after urgency was declined due to current pandemic in this Suit. Plaintiff had filed petition without first withdrawing the Suit, and had instead sought permission post-facto. such conduct cannot be permitted as it amounts to Bench-hunting.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2367
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

391) 7678/2015 Const. P. HBL (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (NIRC-FB) in Appeal No.12(18)/2015-K, whereby order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Commission, at Karachi (NIRC-SB), in Grievance Petition No.4B (187)/2012-K, filed by the private respondent, was allowed with the compensatory cost of Rs.100,000/- while granting salary and all admissible back benefits to him by treating him to be in service from the date of his dismissal from service i.e. 09.09.2003, till reaching the age of superannuation i.e. 12.12.2012; and, he was also declared to be entitled to have pensionary benefits with effect from 12.12.2012 in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-886 of 2011.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 10
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3062/2021 Habib Bank Limited, Karachi v. Full Bench, National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

392) 2442/2015 Suit M/s. ICI Pakistan Limited. (ISSUES) (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Al-Abid Silk Mills Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 621
Advocates:Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHE),Mirza Mahmood Ahmed(ADVO-9818-PBC-LHR),Manzoor ul Haq(ADVO-11805-SBC-KHS),Abdallah Azzaam Naqvi(ADVO-15005-SBC-KHI),Samia Alam Durrani(ADVO-4007HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

393) 117/2011 Suit.B I.G.I. Investment Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S M/S Admore Gas (Pvt) Ltd & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 30-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting

394) 642/2023 Const. P. Fatima Noor (Petitioner) V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Coming to the main case, it is also a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence. This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757).
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 523
Advocates:Muzamil Hussain Jalbani(ADVO-18676-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Wasiq Mirza(ADVO-13772-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

395) 3465/2022 Const. P. Tahir Hussain (Petitioner) V/S DG SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Under Section 16 of the SBC Ordinance, 1979, an adequate remedy through an appeal is available, offering two forums for aggrieved parties. Therefore, without exhausting the remedy of filing an appeal against any illegality or irregularity, filing a constitutional petition directly under Article 199 of the Constitution is neither competent nor maintainable.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 573
Advocates:Irfan Aziz(ADVO-6448-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Abu Bakar Khalil(ADVO-17482-SBC-KHI),Shaikh Muhammad Suleman(ADVO-3950-SBC-KHC),Nancy Dean(ADVO-11449-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 30-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

396) 448/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Imtiaz Hussain Jatoi (Applicant) V/S The State and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 162
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

397) 733/2003 Suit COL. (RETD) MUHAMMAD SHARIF (Plaintiff) V/S SQ. LDR. NOW LT. COL. (RETD) GHULAM FARI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1971
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 29-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

398) 538/2002 Suit Imdad Ali & other (Plaintiff) V/S Professional Builders & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed
Order Date: 07-NOV-08
Approved for Reporting

399) 5482/2017 Const. P. Nestle Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S The F.B.R & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Role of Customs in recovery of income tax and sales tax post clearance of imports.
Citation:2023 PTD 527, 2023 SBLR Sindh 211
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Tasawar Ali Hashmi(ADVO-2778-SBC-KHI),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.70-K/2023 The Directorate of Post Clearance Audit through its Director General Federal Board of Revenue Islamabad v. Nestle Pakistan Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed by majority of 2 jjs.with dissenting note

400) 6768/2020 Const. P. Mohsin Ali Nathani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1201
Advocates:Ammar Ather Saeed(ADVO-13697-SBC-KHC),Naveed Amjad Andrabi(ADVO-1773-PBC-LHR),Anwar Kashif Mumtaz(ADVO-11772-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 04-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

401) 27/2010 Const. P. Nooruddin and 05 others (Petitioner) V/S Federal Land Commissioner and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:The pivotal questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the subject land surrendered under Martial Law Regulation (MLR) 64 of 1959, which was resumed by Deputy Land Commissioner (DLC) Hyderabad vide order dated 17.6.1959, and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners became Qabuli Land? And, whether Civil Suit No.40/1972 filed by respondent No.7 was rightly decreed vide judgment and decree dated 23.10.1974, and its viries, could be called in question in Constitution Petition, in the terms paragraph 19 and 26 of Martial Law Regulation-1972? And, whether the Chief Land Commissioner, Sindh could pass the order after the judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Qazalbash Waqf, to re-determine of holding declaration under MLR/115/72 and LR-II/77 after the surrender of the excess land by the declarant, its resumption by the government; and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners in the year 1959 and 1960?
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 76
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1137/2022 Akhund Ghulam Muhammad through L.Rs and others v. Federal Land Commission, Islamabad through its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice)

402) 4/2012 H.C.A Mirza Afzal Baig (Appellant) V/S Mudabbir Ali Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 CLC 261
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 11-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting

403) 4769/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 649
Advocates:Mansoorul Haque Solangi(ADVO-6746-SBC-KHI),Zubair Ahmed Rajput(ADVO-7308-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-1474-SBC-KHP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.748-K/2025 Shabbir Ali Babar & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary , Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

404) 159/2020 Cr.Rev SYED ALI ZAIDI & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1240
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

405) 83/1995 Adm. Suit Mst. Parveen Shoukat (Petitioner) V/S none (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 07-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

406) 212/2019 Suit M/s. Shan Associates (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt.) Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

407) 2533/2019 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Deceased Son Quota, Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974 (Rule 11-A)
Tag Line:Sindh Government /Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of ASI on the basis of Son/Shaheedquota by issuing Standing Ordersor by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014by relaxing the requisite qualification for appointment in the disciplinary force. The appointment of ASI can only be made through competitive process on merit.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.392-K/2019 Asif Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deprtt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

408) 538/2020 Suit Pakistan Airline Pilots (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Tag Line:The issue involved was that whether the Notification dated 28.4.2020 under the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 has been validly issued and applied on the employees of PIA and whether the Notice dated 30.04.2020 terminating the Working Agreement has been issued validly and whether the proceedings in the Suit should be stayed under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act as there is an arbitration clause. The injunction application has been dismissed; and application under Section 34 has been allowed by staying the proceedings of Suit, as provisions of Section 41 of the Arbitration Act cannot be invoked by a Plaintiff for an interim relief who has filed a Suit for Declaration instead of invoking the provision of the Arbitration Act, and further that the notification for placing the employment of PIA under Essential Services has been validly issued.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2007
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

409) 346/2019 Suit Syed Khaliluddin (Plaintiff) V/S Rafiq Ahmed Qandhari & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

410) 1622/2023 Cr.Bail SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 137
Advocates:Shaikh Muhammad Raza(ADVO-19262-SBC-KHE),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

411) 85/2010 Civil Revision Saffdar Hussain and others (Applicant) V/S Zaffar Ali Arain and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 1877
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

412) 154/2012 Cr.Appeal Noman & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 13-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

413) 66/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Gul Muhammad and others (Applicant) V/S Sardar Khan, thr:his L.Rs.&Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:1. Dismissal of suit in Non-prosecution under Order 9 CPC, upheld till High Court operates as a Bar to a 2nd Suit by the same plaintiff in respect of the same cause of action; notwithstanding, any subsequent Judgment in the Suit of Defendant, either way. No fresh cause of action can accrue.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 613
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.888-K/2022 Sardar Khan deceased through his L.Rs. & others v. Gul Muhammad through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

414) 32/2021 Conf.Case Muhammad Kashif (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 958
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

415) 669/2009 Suit Premier Financial Services (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S The Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1852
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 08-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting

416) 8/2021 J.M M/S. GETZ PHARMA (PVT.) LIMITED (Applicant) V/S NOVARTIS AG & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The Patents Ordinance, 2000. Section 27 of the Patents Ordinance, 2000, has two parts. One is relating to grant of Sealing Order about the main invention and the second part relates to Patent of Addition. There is no concept of automatic stay order, if a proceeding including that of Appeal is pending regarding the grant of patent in respect of the main invention. The Sealing Order under the Patents Ordinance, 2000, was issued after complying of fundamental requirements, coupled with the fact that there is a presumption under Article 129 Clause (e) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, that official acts are regularly performed, then, unless such official act is declared illegal in the main case, the basic ingredients for grant of injunction are not present in favour of Petitioner/Applicant. Injunction refused. Interpretation of statute: expressio unis est exclusio alterius and casus omissus explained.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 458
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5311/2021 M/s Getz Pharma Pvt Limited, Karachi v. Novartis A.G. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

417) 165/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Ali Mardan Shah & Others (Applicant) V/S Mushtaque & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2023 SHC HYD 280
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

418) 19/2017 Judicial Companies Misc. Total Parco Pakistan Limited & another. (Petitioner) V/S Vs (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting

419) 2069/2011 Const. P. Ayaz Ali and others (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Service matters (Deceased quota)
Tag Line:since the delay in appointment cannot be attributed to the petitioner No.1, as such the notification dated 17-07-2009 being adversely affecting the petitioner No.1 cannot be applied retrospectively, as prior to issuance of such Notification; the petitioner No.1 had already acquired a vested right and was entitled to be governed by the Notifications dated 02-09-2002 and 11-03-2008 read with letter dated 13.12.2008 issued by S&GAD. On the basis of these observations, the petitioner No.1 is entitled to be appointed under the deceased quota, after fulfillment of requisite codal formalities as otherwise required under the said policy
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-APR-14
Approved for Reporting

420) 384/2022 H.C.A Mst. Nusrat Fareed (Appellant) V/S Haji Ahmed Mujahid (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Succession Act, 1925 (Tarka and Estate of Deceased)
Tag Line:Estate of a deceased and requirement of Succession Certificate.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 601
Advocates:Sajid Hussain(ADVO-14343-SBC-KHI),S. Abid Hussain Shah(ADVO-3430-SBC-KHS),Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ishaq(ADVO-9362-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

421) 37/2019 II.A. Muhammad Saleem Ghanchi & Another (Appellant) V/S Mst. Hajiani Khatija (since deceased) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 944
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.87-K/2023 Mst. Hajiani Khatija since deceased through her legal heirs: & others v. Muhammad Saleem Ghanchi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

422) 236/2017 Const. P. Tarique Hussain Umrani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 456
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.928-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Dept. and others v. Tarique Hussain Umrani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

423) 3511/2011 Const. P. Nazir Oad (Petitioner) V/S Registrar High Court of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 27-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting

424) 76/2015 Civil Revision Fozia Rahat (Applicant) V/S Masood Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 1 Rule 10 CPC)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. I, R. 10 & O. XLI, R. 20 & S. 96---Suit for declaration---Appeal---Impleadment of party as co-appellant---Amendment of appeal---Effect---Applicants filed application for impleadment in the appeal which application was accepted and they were impleaded as co-appellants---Validity---Party could be impleaded at any stage even in appeal as appeal was continuation of suit---Applicants could be impleaded in appeal if they had bona fide interest in the result of appeal---Applicants were to be allowed to join as respondents in the appeal and not as appellants---If applicants were aggrieved by the order impugned in appeal then they could file an appeal even if they were not party to the suit subject to law of limitation---Applicants, in the present case, were not necessary party in whose absence an effective judgment in appeal could not be delivered by the Appellate Court---Neither there was any order to amend the appeal by the newly added co-appellants nor an appeal could be amended suo motu or at the will of appellants---Amended appeal was to be considered from the date of its presentation---Decree impugned in the appeal was not even binding on the applicants as they were not party to the suit---High Court observed that purpose for filing of application for impleadment was to delay the decision of appeal on merits---Impugned order passed by the Appellate Court was set aside---Appellate Court was directed to decide the appeal on merits within one month---Revision was allowed, in circumstances.
Citation:2019 CLC 1323
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

425) 15/2013 Cr.Acq.A. Mukhtiar Ahmed Siyal (Appellant) V/S Piyaro Siyal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Murder Trial (Discrepancies in evidence of prosecution case)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 01-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.77-K/2019 Noor Uddin v. The State and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

426) 13/2020 R.A (Civil Revision) Sohail Ahmed Ansari (Applicant) V/S Irfan Ahmed Ansari and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1287
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

427) 52/2011 Cr.Rev Abdul Hameed (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 14-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting

428) 14/2018 Cr.Rev Khalid Mehmood (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

429) 44/2024 Criminal Appeal Shafi Muhammad Sarki (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Use of modern devices in the investigation of Narcotics Cases.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1475
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

430) 1595/2006 Const. P. Zaeem Aziz Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A.C. & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Nil...
Citation:2016 PLC CS 272
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 02-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.145-K/2016,C.A.144-K/2016,C.P.L.A.137/2016,C.P.L.A.163-K/2016 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed [ Announced today by Mr.Justice Mushir Alam ],Disposed Allowed [ Announced today by Mr.Justice Mushir Alam ],Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted

431) 114/2011 I. A Muhammad Ismail (Appellant) V/S Dubai Islamic Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 5
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

432) 194/2024 H.C.A Land Mark Associates (Appellant) V/S Abdul Malik & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 92
Advocates:Ishfaq Ahmed(ADVO-18300-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

433) 5107/2021 Const. P. Atlas Honda Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 177), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 214C )
Tag Line:Sectoral benchmark ratios are therefore figures for various business metrics that must be used by the Commissioner to determine taxable income for a taxpayer where a taxpayer has been lawfully selected for audit but is unable to provide the relevant information, sufficient explanation for the record. Sectoral benchmark ratio does not concern with sectoral audit selection. It only empowers the Commissioner on an event when a taxpayer has failed to furnish record or documents including books of accounts or has furnished incomplete record or books of accounts or is unable to provide sufficient explanation regarding defect in relation to the documents or books of accounts on the basis of an independent procedure of Section 177 of Ordinance 2001. It is at this stage when the guidelines of sectoral benchmark ratios, as prescribed by the Board, could be adhered to.
Citation:2022 PTD 866, 2024 SBLR Sindh 409, 2022 PTCL 253
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.680-K/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Atlas Honda Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

434) 162/2019 Criminal Appeal SHAHID WAHAB SIDDIQUI S/O ABDUL WAHAB (Appellant) V/S SYED FARHAJ AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2108
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1250/2021 Muhammad Qasim v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh,Crl.A.324/2023 Muhammad Qasim and others v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

435) 8830/2018 Const. P. Wahid Khursheed Kunwar (Petitioner) V/S EOBI and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 430
Advocates:Zafar Imam(ADVO-7019-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

436) 47/2013 H.C.A Haroon Zia Malik (Appellant) V/S Mst. Fariha Razzak and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Plaintiff was owner of suit property who voluntarily gifted the same to the donee-wife---Trial Court had correctly appraised the evidence while recording his findings---Impugned gift deed was not a forged and fabricated document but same had been signed by the donor---Suit property had been gifted in favour of defendant who was wife of donor at the relevant time---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession which were present in the case---Possession of suit property was already with the donee which till date continued to be with her---If husband had made a gift of anything to his wife or vice-versa then it could not be retracted---Transaction in question was not a financial one but it was gift of which a reciprocal financial obligation was not a consideration---Provisions of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 were not applicable in the matter of gift---Gift did not require a compulsory registration---Donor did not suffer any mental distress at the hand of donee---Impugned judgment did not suffer from any infirmity or illegality---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Topic: H.C.A (Revocation of Gift)
Tag Line:Plaintiff was owner of suit property who voluntarily gifted the same to the donee-wife---Trial Court had correctly appraised the evidence while recording his findings---Impugned gift deed was not a forged and fabricated document but same had been signed by the donor---Suit property had been gifted in favour of defendant who was wife of donor at the relevant time---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession which were present in the case---Possession of suit property was already with the donee which till date continued to be with her---If husband had made a gift of anything to his wife or vice-versa then it could not be retracted---Transaction in question was not a financial one but it was gift of which a reciprocal financial obligation was not a consideration---Provisions of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 were not applicable in the matter of gift---Gift did not require a compulsory registration---Donor did not suffer any mental distress at the hand of donee---Impugned judgment did not suffer from any infirmity or illegality---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 YLR 1557
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 21-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.96/2018 Haroon Zia Malik v. Mst. Fariha Razzak and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

437) 99/2011 J.M M/S. BESROCK (PVT) LTD. (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORP (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 14 of Arbitration Act, 1940)
Citation:2013 CLD 719
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting

438) 804/1996 Suit ABDUL KARIM K. KHAN. (Plaintiff) V/S ABDUL MALIK K. LOKHA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The plaintiff cannot succeed for the restoration of his suit on the weaknesses of defendant Counsel. He had to show why he was prevented from appearing which was to be measured on the touch stone of the sufficient cause independently and not viz-a-viz defendants Counsel appearance or non-appearance.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting

439) 717/2024 Suit M/S CENTURY ROLLER & STONE FLOUR MILLS PVT LTD&ORS (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD ASIF & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Suit Barred under section 69(2) of the Partnership Act.)
Tag Line:Suit barred by section 69(2) of the Partnership Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 784
Advocates:Mian Raza Rabbani(ADVO-3376-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Saalim Salam Ansari(ADVO-3307-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

440) 6847/2019 Const. P. Wazeer Ali Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1347
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

441) 180/2019 Cr.Bail Waheed Dehpal Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Bail Matters (Post arrest bail dismissed, section 20, 21, 24, PECA,FIA Cyber Crime. Accused used Neked Photos )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting

442) 66/2010 Civil Revision Sikandar Ali Bhangwar and another (Applicant) V/S Badaruddin Awan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 14-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1425-K/2018 Sikandar Ali and another v. Badaruddin and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

443) 195/2010 H.C.A Light Metal & Rubber Industries Pvt.,Ltd., & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Sarfraz Quadri (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 841
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.765-K/2011 Light Metal & Rubber Industries (Pvt.)Limited and others v. Sarfaraz Quadri Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

444) 6211/2016 Const. P. M/s Liberty Mills Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 PTD 347
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.423-K/2021 M/s. Liberty Mills Limited & others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finanace & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

445) 5/2017 Spl.H.C.A Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi & another (Appellant) V/S United Bank Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 91
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

446) 5/2022 I. A Prof. Dr. Kheo Ram (Appellant) V/S M/s. Changan Mehran Motors & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:(1) The Consumer Court improperly used its powers under the Code of Civil Procedure, given the matter was a complaint and not a plaint.(2)Consumer Court's Authority under Section 36 of the 2014 Act overlooks proper use of Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C.(3)Meticulous analysis of Section 29 of the Consumer Protection Act of 2014 confirms timeliness of the Appellant's Complaint. (4) The key requirement of establishing consumer status is to invoke the jurisdiction of the Consumer Court.
Citation:2025 CLC 393
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

447) 723/2011 Const. P. Asghar Khan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 CLC 1534
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 12-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting

448) 76/2018 I. A Muhammad Ahmed Siddiqui & another (Appellant) V/S Abdul Abid Advocate & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Pesh. Note 1, 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 77
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 30-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

449) 7/2022 M.A. Samaa TV and others (Appellant) V/S Learned XIth ADJ, Khi (South) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Whether a Suit instituted under the provisions of the Defamation Ordinance, 2002 can be instituted before the High Court in its original jurisdiction and as to whether the lis in respect of Defamation is justicable under the Common Law
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 450
Advocates:Tahmasp Rasheed A. Razvi(ADVO-11140-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 21-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

450) 191/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Umaid Ali & Another. (Applicant) V/S P.O.Sindh & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Jurisdiction of civil Courts is barred in specified cases, excluding questions of title. Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

451) 20/2020 Execution First Appeal M/S. METROPOLITAN STEEL CORP. LTD (Decree Holder) V/S MEPCO & AN ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 605
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

452) 678/2022 Const. P. Mohammad Faraaz Shaikh Thr. Syed Muhammad Shariq (Petitioner) V/S Javeria Shahani and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1125
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

453) 2741/2025 Const. P. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line: placing the name on Passport Control List declared illegal directions issued to remove the name
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1992
Advocates:Amanullah(ADVO-18436-SBC-KHS),Ahsanullah Khan(ADVO-3067-SBC-KHP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

454) 6306/2021 Const. P. Iqbal Hussain Channa (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (Issuance of notice to Special Prosecutor NAB without passing interim order)
Tag Line:Issuance of notice to the Special Prosecutor NAB, by learned Administrative Judge, in such a way and fixing the hearing of the pre-arrest bail on 26.10.2021, without passing interim orders, ex facie amounts to dismissal of the bail before arrest application.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 897
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 21-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

455) 763/2021 Const. P. Ayub Khan (Petitioner) V/S The Dist & Session Judge West and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the appointment of sons of deceased/retired and serving employees of the District and subordinate Courts--whether the Petitioners son is entitled to be appointed on the son quota basis in view of policy decision /directives of the Honble Chief Justice of this Court vide letters dated 03.03.2010, 23.7.2012 & 4.3.2013--In the light of the above rule position, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution on the premise that petitioner failed to point out any administrative decision of the member of the subordinate judiciary; and, merely agitating the claim that his son was not accommodated in the Judicial District was/is no ground to direct the respondent No.1 to appoint his son. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply for the post on merit as and when the vacancy occurs in the office of District & Sessions, Judge Karachi West.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 76
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.544-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The District & Sessions Judge Karachi (West) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

456) 318/2016 Suit Gul Bano. (Plaintiff) V/S Shahnaz Bano & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Mesne Profit)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 439
Advocates:Muhammad Imran Khan(ADVO-8714-SBC-KHI),Uzma Rafiq(ADVO-9637-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

457) 111/2013 Cr.Misc. Mst.Saeeda Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The SSP Larkana and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 03-JUN-13
Approved for Reporting

458) 7111/2018 Const. P. Ahmed Habib ul Islam (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters ( Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973), Service matters (Merger of services in other caders )
Tag Line:It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 454
Advocates:Shazib Masud(ADVO-44528-PBC-LHR),Ali Ashfaq(ADVO-46574-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

459) 85/2019 Cr.J.A Ahsan Marfani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Narcotics 9(c) Case Appeal allowed on ground Material Contradiction between witness and delay sending Parcel .)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 30
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

460) 109/1985 Civil Revision Ali Bux through his legal heirs & others (Applicant) V/S Mst. Bhagbhari through her legal heirs & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

461) 4850/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Shabbir Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Discrepancies in MDCAT Test)
Tag Line:In response to substantiated allegations of paper leakage in the MDCAT 2024, the High Court of Sindh ordered a retake of the exam, emphasizing the necessity of strict security measures to ensure fairness and transparency in educational testing, thereby upholding constitutional rights and maintaining educational integrity.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 667
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 26-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5655/2024 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC), through its President, Islamabad v. Muhammad Shabbir Ahmad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

462) 422/2012 Const. P. Hafizullah & ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4655/2018,C.P.L.A.574/2019,C.A.1125/2019,C.A.1127/2019 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.

463) 47/2021 Cr.Bail Muhammad Siddique & others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2021 SHC SUK 875
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

464) 6107/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Rizwan Dalia and Ors (Petitioner) V/S The Ombudsman and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010
Tag Line:We, in view of the foregoing, are of the opinion that it would be premature to pass such orders as evidence in the matter is yet to be recorded and soon after issuance of the impugned show cause notice the Petitioners/accused have approached this Court and since then no progress has been made in the proceedings pending before the Respondent No.2. The Petitioners are directed to file their reply to the show cause notice, which will be considered on its own merits.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 624
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 07-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.295/2022 Muhammad Rizwan Dalia and others v. Ombudsman (The Protection against harassment of women at the workplace) Sindh, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

465) 5061/2023 Const. P. Arshad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Furqan uddin Usmani and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision )
Tag Line:Scope of Writ Jurisdiction in hearing revisions arising from interlocutory orders passed during trial about civil procedure matters. Petition challenging trial court's order relating to Petitioner/Defendant application to examine witnesses under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC., Exercise of writ jurisdiction against revisional order has to be exercised in rare and exceptional circumstances only when it could be said that the order passed by the revisional Court has been passed without lawful authority, beyond jurisdiction and vested rights were curtailed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 254
Advocates:Syed Mudasser Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-11456-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

466) 10/2008 II.A. Tahir Raza Qadari (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Tanweer Amna (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Whether a Power of Attorney attested by a Magistrate is required to still be proved as to its execution. What is the scope of hearsay evidence. What is the application of the Parol Evidence Rule. The application of Section 215 of the Contract Act, 1872 as between a principal and an agent.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 323
Advocates:Syed Ali Shabbar Rizvi(ADVO-2858-SBC-KHI),Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

467) 613/2019 Cr.Bail ABDUL MAJEED S/O ALLAH DITTA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Granted In Theft of Sui Southern Gas .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

468) 1522/2016 Suit Nirmal Das (Plaintiff) V/S Tekchand (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 YLR 336
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

469) 12/2010 Cr.Acctt.A Peer Deedar Ahmed Sarhandi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Death of appellant during pendency of appeal, proceedings are abated against him. However, appeal was dismissed on merits and fine was ordered to be recovered as land revenue from assets devolving upon the legal heirs of deceased appellant in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1077
Advocates:Ghulam Sarwar Chandio(ADVO-1145-SBC-HYD),Abdul Mujeeb Pirzada(ADVO-80-SBC-SUK),Ch. Munir Ahmed(ADVO-3697-SBC-KHI),Qurban Ali(ADVO-631-SBC-SUK),Syed Khalid Shah(ADVO-3930-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

470) 7470/2017 Const. P. Mst Almas Ismail (Petitioner) V/S Fayyaz Hussain & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 199, 2018 SBLR 1606
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 01-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

471) 190/2018 Civil Revision Muhammad Bachal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

472) 205/2013 Cr.Bail Abdul Sattar Jalbani and another (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.65-K/2015 Abdul Sattar and another v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

473) 14/2007 II.A. Major Inayatullah (Appellant) V/S Major (rtd.) Muhammad Nazir (Respondent No.1) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Order XX, Rule 5, CPC and Order 41, Rule 31, CPC. Article 17(2) of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 Failure of trial court to give findings on each issue separately ??A?A|.. non appreciation of fact by trial court that financial documents must be attested by the two witnesses ??A?A|Held: the sale agreement is not a financial document Appeal dismissed on the point of limitation as well as on merits. (Ashraf Yar Khan)
Mr. Justice Khawaja Naveed Ahmed
Order Date: 01-APR-08
Approved for Reporting

474) 152/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SYED MEHROZ MEHDI ZAIDI S/O SYED HASSAN MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 287
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 19-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

475) 401/2022 Const. P. Rehmatullah Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Ghulam Sarwar Sadhayo & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
Tag Line:Application under Order VII, Rule 10, CPC in rent matter.
Citation:2024 CLC 1158, 2024 SBLR Sindh 263
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

476) 579/2023 Const. P. Faheemuddin Memon & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 223
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.524-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Faheemuddin & others,C.P.L.A.2033/2023 Noor Ahmed Khuharo and others v. Faheemuddin Memon and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,

477) 6382/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Jibran Nasir & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Police case
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) Note 179
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 29-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3871/2023 Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Jibran Nasir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

478) 124/2021 Cr.Bail Talib Hussain Chachar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 678
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

479) 795/2020 Suit Mahnaz Mirza Malik (Plaintiff) V/S Bilal Embroidery & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1469
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

480) 758/2020 Suit Danish Elahi & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mariam Kamran & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:This court sees acts of the plaintiffs aimed to throttle livelihood of the deceaseds legal heirs and put them to the caprice of the Plaintiffs, an act offensive to dignity of human thus the Family Agreement sought to upkeep familys honour in fact is nothing but a sophisticated form of honor killing, tossing the widow (alongside her children) to the dust of injustice. For what has been reduced in the foregoing, I do not see any prima facie case of plaintiffs, neither balance of convenience in their favour, nor they would suffer any irreparable losses as their claim is only for money. The application is hence dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1099
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE),Hamza Hussain Hidayatallah(ADVO-16940-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

481) 30/2011 Cr.Rev Feroz Khan Baloch (Applicant) V/S First Women Bank & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 24-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.38-K/2011 First Women Bank Ltd. v. Feroze Khan Balouch and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

482) 1406/2022 Const. P. Moula Bux Sahito & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 224
Advocates:Mohsin Kadir Shahwani(ADVO-12570-SBC-KHS),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1932/2022 Azeem Qadir and others v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4046/2022 Farzana Perveen v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4047/2022 Humaira Qayum v. Maula Bux Sahito and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed

483) 869/2019 Cr.J.A KHALID AHMED S/O ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Father killed his daughter on the suspicion of being unchaste. No mitigating circumstance in favour of appellant was found for awarding lesser punishment. Death sentence confirmed
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1442
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.312/2021 Khalid Ahmed v. The State,Crl.A.230/2023 Khalid Ahmed v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

484) 4/2017 Const. P. Scherazade Jamali (Petitioner) V/S Hasim Gillani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Family Courts Act, 1964 (section 14(1)(b)), Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, 1997 (sections 105), Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 25), Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (47), Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, 1997 (Section 102 subsection 15 ), Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 9), West Pakistan Family Court Rules, 1965 (Rule 6), Citizenship Act, 1951
Tag Line:The primary object of the Guardian & Ward Court or for that matter appellate Court was to discover as to where the welfare of the ward lies and how such welfare can be effectively achieved and maintained and should not have concerned with the visitation rights of father. --Jurisdiction Issue- The child may be an American national by birth and he may have been permanently residing in Kuwait with parents but he is a dual national. When the respondent/ father surrendered to the jurisdiction of the trial Court by moving an application under section 25 of the Guardian & Wards Act, it was promptly responded and replied by filing written statement and jurisdiction conceded by petitioner. --Once petitioner acquiesced to the jurisdiction, she cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. The question of jurisdiction even if made dependent on ordinary residence of ward, it may not be a pure question of law that can be assailed at any forum or at any time. For that it has to be specifically pleaded so that the facts in this regard be brought to the notice of the Court. It is, thus, not a simple question of law rather a mixed question of law and facts which requires determination through evidence. --Movement or Restriction in Movement of ward-The ward belongs to a family which can afford a better upbringing, education and environment either in Pakistan or anywhere in the world which was restricted and curtailed by restriction in his movement. The Courts below should not have seen welfare only from the angle that the father/respondent must not miss his opportunity to see his child but it must also be seen from the angle as to whether a ward who is capable of studying abroad, in case the opportunities are available to him, should he be deprived of on account of the fact that father must not miss a visiting opportunity? --In any other case it would have been the welfare considering the situation of the ward while being at Karachi and only Pakistani national but the situation here is different as the child is privileged to have access to any educational institution around the world including Pakistan. An educational institute or an environment for which most of the children could only dream for. Every child has its own peculiar circumstances and the welfare demands may vary. The restriction in the movement in the present case appeared to be a tool to settle score with mother/petitioner but it will not serve as the welfare of the child. The father/respondent who had raised serious allegations against the mother/petitioner as he claimed that she is not fit to take care of ward yet is not serious in having the custody of the ward, although none of them stands proved in evidence. There are ways and mechanism to regulate the movement which is not achieved by of restricting the movement.
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 377
Advocates:Kazim Hassan(ADVO-2630-SBC-KHI),Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHE),Sameer Ghazanfar(ADVO-11222-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1034/2018 Hashim Gillani v. Scherazade Jamali & others,C.A.1355/2018 Hashim Gillani v. Scherazade Jamali & others,C.P.L.A.1715/2025 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division), Islamabad and another v. V.T.R. Gases Private Limited, Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed ,

485) 50/2025 Const. P. Mst. Hayat Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Pension of widowed daughter recurring cause of action, laches not involved
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

486) 51/2021 Suit MUHAMMAD FARAZ KASBATI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. SOUTH CITY HOSPITAL (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 644
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

487) 36/2018 I. A Ashraf Ali Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Qamaruddin Shaikh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 534
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3954/2022 Qamaruddin Sheikh v. Ashraf Ali Qureshi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

488) 79/2011 Cr.Tran Bakshoo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting

489) 51/2019 Execution First Appeal MENA ENERGY DMCC (Decree Holder) V/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Execution of Foreign Decree. Judgment when conclusive under section 13 CPC.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1212
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Hashmatullah Alim(ADVO-11063-SBC-KHE),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

490) 421/2020 Const. P. Sohail Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khusboo & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 35
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

491) 4747/2016 Const. P. Rukhsana Yahya (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

492) 571/2009 Cr.Bail Muhammad Hanif S. Kalia and two others (Applicant) V/S State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 06-JUL-09
Approved for Reporting

493) 5128/2020 Const. P. Farkhunda Muslim (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line: A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad has pronounced the judgment on 22nd December 2020 in the case of Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla v. Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue and others (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the issuance of notice under Section 182(2) read with Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, enforcing penalty for not submitting returns regarding Foreign Income and Assets Statement. The plea of the petitioners was that the petitioners have already declared Foreign Income and Assets from all the sources in their wealth statement filed under Section 116 alongwith their return of total income for the Tax Year 2019 under Section 114 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, within the prescribed time limit, by availing e-filing facility via IRIS, whereas, such return was duly accepted, as no notice was issued to the petitioners by the Department in terms of Section 120(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, requiring the petitioners to furnish any short documents in this regard. It was further argued on behalf of the petitioners that omission in filing returns was neither deliberate nor it has any financial implications or involvement of payment of any taxes, etc. therefore, the penalty provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Learned Divisional Bench of this Court by examining all the relevant provisions of law and case-laws has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: - 13. In view of the foregoing discussions, we are of considered opinion that in the absence of prescribed format notified under Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, whereas, nothing has been concealed by petitioners, nor there is any consequence either on income or tax liability of petitioners for non-filing of Foreign Income & Assets Statement along with return of income for Tax Year 2019, the penal provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Particularly, when respondents have failed to establish willful default or mens rea on the part of petitioners. We derive analogical guidance from the Non delegation Doctrine which is well established in jurisprudence and is attracted in the instant circumstances. Issuance of notices under section 182(2) cannot be validated, therefore, impugned notices having no support of lawful authority are hereby declared as illegal, hence, of no legal consequence. For these reasons, the petitions were allowed vide short order announced on 22.12.2020.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1686
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.745/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Farkhunda Muslim,C.A.380/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Farkhunda Muslim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,impugned judgment suspended,Disposed Disposed of

494) 1399/2018 Cr.Bail FAHAD PAREKH S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

495) 1015/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Jehangir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for becoming entitled to be considered for promotion to a higher grade, of course, is not without logic as the officer who is initially inducted to a particular post needs to serve on the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to serve the public in a befitting manner. It is also important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual length of service virtually violates the entire service structure as a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention of the law nor of the equity.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 452
Advocates:Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khan(ADVO-2324-SBC-HYD),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.555-K/2025 Muhammad Saleem Jehangir v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned for a short date.to be fixed before any other bench

496) 348/2014 Suit Syed Shafaat Ali & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Farhat Ali & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Malicious prosecution
Tag Line:Plaintiff filed suit for recovery of damages for Malicious Civil Proceedings and Malicious Prosecution against Defendants. Whereas the Supreme Court of Pakistan had recognised malicious civil proceedings by the 1990s, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has only recently held that a claim in malicious prosecution could also be brought in relation to civil proceedings in Willers v. Joyce, [2016] UK SC44 (reported in 2016 SCMR 1841). Plaintiff was unable to establish through evidence the five (5) elements that form the basis for accepting or rejecting a suit for recovery of damages for malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in the case of Niaz and Others v. Abdul Sattar and Others, PLD 2006 SC 432. In the circumstances, proving the six (6) principles for granting and/or refusing damages with regards to malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in Muhammad Akram v. Mst Farman Bi, 1990 SC 28 is irrelevant. Suit dismissed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 894
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 19-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

497) 272/2013 Cr.J.A Muh (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 30-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.485/2016 Muhammad Ishaq v. The State,Crl.A.489/2020 Muhammad Ishaq v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

498) 750/2016 Suit Syed Farukh Mazhar (Plaintiff) V/S SGS Headquarters and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:Injunction dismissed.
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 327
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

499) 5463/2013 Const. P. Zamir Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) V/S Provice of Sindh and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 942
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting

500) 4461/2017 Const. P. Imtiaz Bibi (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceased???s first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Hon???ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance.
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceaseds first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Honble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 679
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

501) 145/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Liaquat Ali Khoso & another (Applicant) V/S Haq Nawaz Khoso & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2023 SHC LAR 26
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

502) 133/2024 Const. P. Sheeraz Saeed (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Maria Sarwar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 760
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

503) 1957/2018 Const. P. Mst Afsheen (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Protection to Women, children, vulnerable persons in cases of domestic violence.
Tag Line:Protection, Women, children, vulnerable persons, destitute, domestic violence, welfare of minors, mechanism, safe houses, Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013,
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.387-K/2019 Makhdoom Mehmood Rehman v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

504) 362/2015 Suit Wakeel Akhtar (Plaintiff) V/S Shahzad Alam (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:While Article 84 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order provides a mode for proving execution of a document by comparison of signature or hand-writing, that is an additional mode and not a substitute of or an alternate to the mandatory provision of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. The mode of proof by way of Article 84 is not the most desirable of modes in that, the signature and hand-writing of a person may vary with time and age; or a person called upon under sub-Article (2) of Article 84 to give a specimen of his signature or hand-writing may feign the same to defeat the comparison.
Citation:2021 CLC 54
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

505) 286/2003 Suit SYED WAQAR HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) V/S MST.ALAM ARA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 CLC 535
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

506) 510/2020 Cr.Bail Syed Zaman Ali Shah (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Bail Matters
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 622
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

507) 239/2009 H.C.A Muhammad Hanif & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Hameed A.Haroon & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 507
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.895/2020 Muhammad Haneef & another v. Hameed A. Haroon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

508) 2112/2015 Const. P. China Harbour Engineering Company Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2475/2016 Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue and another v. China Harbour Engineering and others,C.P.604-K/2015 Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue and another v. China Harbour Engineering and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted

509) 191/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Pirzada @ Peer (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 27-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

510) 639/2010 Const. P. Abrar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S VIIth A.D.J. South at Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act (XXXV of 1973)--- ----Ss. 41(2)(4) Proviso, 42 & 55---Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, Chap. XII---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss.151 & 153---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Canon of professional conduct and etiquette of advocates---Misconduct---Dispute as to property---Constitutional petition filed for recalling an earlier order of dismissal of petition being not pressed, was not supported by affidavit---Application under Ss.151 & 153, C.P.C. was not filed on behalf of the petitioner by the advocate who also submitted his own affidavit---Validity---Lawyer earns a reputation worthy of some value by demonstrating his sincerity and honest conduct both towards his client and court in administration of justice---Upright lawyer is supposed to be an officer of court fairly assisting court in dispensing justice and not slave of his client nor greedy to serve him against law and facts---Lawyer has to contest cases on merit and merit alone, he was to adhere to standards of duties of lawyer explained in Chapt.XII (Canon of Professional Conduct and Etiquette of Advocates) of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976---Counsel for petitioner, in the present case, filed application in question on his own without any authority from anyone---High Court directed Pakistan Bar Council to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the counsel for professional misconduct by treating contents of order as complaint under S.41(2) of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973---High Court further directed the Tribunal for decision in terms of proviso to S. 41(4) of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973---Court official was directed to seal the property in question and locate respondents to hand over its possession to them after proper verification---Application was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 CLC 664
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 24-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

511) 1519/2011 Const. P. Abdul Ghafar (Applicant) V/S Govt of Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Group Insurance being not part of inheritance (Tarka) and the same is payable to the nominee mentioned therein. Since, it is an admitted position as also supported by all documentary evidence, the present petitioner has been mentioned as nominee in the Nomination Form of State life Insurance Corporation, therefore, petitioner is entitled to amount of group insurance.---Rules 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1963 are interpreted and pensionary benefits were allowed to the petitioner being a nominee.
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Group Insurance being not part of inheritance (Tarka) and the same is payable to the nominee mentioned therein. Since, it is an admitted position as also supported by all documentary evidence, the present petitioner has been mentioned as nominee in the Nomination Form of State life Insurance Corporation, therefore, petitioner is entitled to amount of group insurance.---Rules 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1963 are interpreted and pensionary benefits were allowed to the petitioner being a nominee.
Citation:2017 PLC CS 625
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 13-APR-16
Approved for Reporting

512) 8592/2018 Const. P. Al-Noor Sugar Mills Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 232
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

513) 214/2023 Const. P. Mst Mehwish Janvri (Petitioner) V/S 3rd Additional District Jduge Larkana (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Maintenance of minors and child justice approach.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1456
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

514) 2939/2011 Const. P. Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio & others (Petitioner) V/S Federal Investigation Agency & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 1
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

515) 247/2010 Suit Maula Bux Khatian (Plaintiff) V/S The Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

516) 6550/2020 Const. P. Abdul Raheem @ Manghar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Encroachment on irrigation land.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1274
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

517) 2465/2017 Const. P. Abdul Majeed Sohail (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Mahboob-uz-Zaman Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Judgment of Rent Controller& Order Appellate Court is maintained . C P dismissed .)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

518) 7622/2018 Const. P. Zulfiqar Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1167
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5242/2023,C.P.L.A.5244/2023,C.P.L.A.5304/2021,C.P.L.A.1671-K/2021,C.P.L.A.6600/2021,C.A.352/2022,C.A.349/2022,C.A.347/2022,C.A.355/2022,C.P.L.A.6603/2021,C.P.L.A.2799/2023,C.P.L.A.5222/2023,C.M.A.8564/2023,C.P.L.A.3323/2023,C.P.L.A.5224/2023 SCP Status: Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed , Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Allowed, Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)

519) 1324/2015 Const. P. SSGC-LPG (PVT) LTD (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.525-K/2017 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Sui Southern Gas Company and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

520) 669/2006 Const. P. Ferozeuddin and others (Petitioner) V/S Mazhar Hussain Shah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Mr. Justice Maqbool Ahmed Awan
Order Date: 15-APR-09
Approved for Reporting

521) 71/2010 Execution ARK GARMENT INDUSTRY (Decree Holder) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Execution. )
Tag Line:the Applicant/ Decree Holder under Order IX Rules 9 of C.P.C read with Section of 151 C.P.C the applicant has clearly demonstrated sufficient cause for non-appearance on 27.10.2015 and 18.11.2015. Accordingly, present application is allowed and the order dated 18.11.2015 passed by this Court is recalled and Execution Application is restored to its original position.
Citation:2018 CLC 155
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

522) 1657/2020 Suit TCB AVIATION (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S SRI LANKAN AIRLINES LTD THR. COUNTRY MANAGER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 )
Tag Line:The Court can take further proceeding, inter alia, as provided under Section 3 of the above Act, 2011, that is, invoking Civil Procedure Code. It must be clarified that grant of interim relief is not prohibited under the scheme of Arbitration Act, 2011, inter alia, in view of Section 3 thereof, but, in exceptional circumstances.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 444
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

523) 13/2010 I. A Muhammad Ameen (Appellant) V/S Wali Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

524) 69/2019 Cr.Acctt.A Mehboob Ali Zardari (Appellant) V/S NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2096
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

525) 4596/2021 Const. P. Employers Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015 (Section 4), Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015
Tag Line:Title Minimum Wages under the Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1055
Advocates:M/S. RASHID RAZVI & ASSOCIATES.(FIRM-104-SBC-KHI),Rasheed A. Rizvi(ADVO-2131-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5863/2021,C.P.L.A.5800/2021,C.P.L.A.64/2022,C.P.L.A.1370/2022,C.P.L.A.6605/2021,C.P.L.A.6606/2021 SCP Status: ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed

526) 431/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Majid (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1283
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

527) 129/2017 Suit Premium Textile Mills Ltd., & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Gas price notification struck down
Citation:2025 CLC 332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

528) 4235/2012 Const. P. Mehar Ali Dayo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 01-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.694-K/2013 Mehr Ali Dayo v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

529) 4800/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 193
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 29-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.8-K/2023 Muhammad Akram v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

530) 42/2020 Suit Syed Zain Ul Abideen (Plaintiff) V/S Federal Board of Revenue & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Ouster of jurisdiction to try a civil suit in respect of matters arising under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 2017 and exceptions to such ouster.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 681
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

531) 5256/2023 Const. P. Saleh Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, along with its accompanying Rules, 2020, provides the framework for appeals to the Government of Sindh. Specifically, Section 18(3) stipulates the right to appeal against the Registrar???s orders concerning amendments to the society???s bylaws The Superior Courts??? jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights, as enshrined in Article 199(1)(c), of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, transcends the confines of federal, provincial, or local administrative bodies The jurisdiction of the Special Court for Cooperative Societies is circumscribed by the provisions of Sections 73 and 117, of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, and Rule 53 of the 2020 Rules. It is the prerogative and duty of the Special Court, endowed with the appropriate jurisdiction, to meticulously dissect and evaluate the disputed facts, thereby resolving and delineating the rights of the parties predicated on the evidence tendered. it is settled law that superior courts could not engage in factual controversies as the matters pertaining to factual controversy can only be resolved after thorough inquiry and recording of evidence in a civil court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 06-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

532) 85/2019 II.A. Mst. Naz Bibi (since died) through her LRs (Appellant) V/S Wahid Bux (since died) through his LRs and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:The impugned judgment and decree of the learned appellate Court are maintained to the extent of entitlement of respondent No.1 in respect of the amount of the National Savings Certificates left by the deceased along with profit thereon, however, according to his share as per Shariah ; and, the impugned judgment and decree are set aside to the extent of grant of 50% share to respondent No.1 in the severance grant, gratuity and benevolent fund of the deceased, which shall be paid expeditiously to the legal heirs of the appellant / widow as per the service rules and regulations of the respondent No.2-bank. Needless to say the above payments shall be in addition to the donation by the respondent No.2-bank and the death compensation of the deceased granted to the appellant / widow by the learned appellate Court which, having not been challenged by respondent No.1, has attained finality. This appeal is partly allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs.
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1418
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1520-K/2021 Wahid Bux & others v. Mst.Naz Bibi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

533) 43/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Shaikh Nasir Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 10-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting

534) 32/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Applicant) V/S Mst. Khato & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 53
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

535) 515/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. GUL E RANA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 554
Advocates:Amer Raza Naqvi(ADVO-3585-SBC-KHI),Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.159-K/2023 Mst. Gull-e-Rana v. The State through P.G. Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

536) 73/2015 Const. P. Rafiq Haji Usmani (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

537) 41/2019 M.A. Roshan Ara and others Thr. Yasir Ali Palijo (Appellant) V/S Abdul Karim and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925) --- ----Ss. 372, 373 & 295---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 85 & 128---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Succession certificate, issuance of---Public document---Presumption of truth---Legitimacy of a child---Proof---DNA test, conducting of---Respondents being sisters of deceased filed application for conducting DNA test of minor son of deceased with the contention that he was adopted son and was not entitled for inheritance---Petition for conducting DNA test and objections were dismissed and succession certificate was issued in favour of petitioners---Validity---Documents produced on behalf of petitioners were official which had not been disputed by the respondents---Respondents should have sought declaration and cancellation of said documents before raising objections to the legal status of minor after death of his mother---Legitimacy of a child or his status as son of deceased could not be disproved by any oral evidence as against documentary evidence from official record which was a public document---Civil Court in presence of documentary evidence could not hold that the child was not born from the marriage of the parties---Father, in the present case, had not challenged that deceased was not mother of the minor son---Respondents had failed to challenge or rebut the evidence of official record of National Database and Registration Authority and other evidence before the Trial Court---DNA test could not be a sole proof of paternity of a child---Trial Court had rightly refused request of respondents for conducting DNA test, in circumstances---Respondents had made a frivolous challenge to the paternity of a child to deprive him from inheritances---Appeal was dismissed in, circumstances. 2012 YLR 1752 distinguished. Mst. Laila Qayyum v. Fawad Qayum and others PLD 2019 SC 449; Salman Akram Raja v. Government of Punjab 2013 SCMR 203 and Ghazala Tehsin Zohra v. Ghulam Dastagir Khan PLD 2015 SC 327 rel.
Citation:2020 CLC 1670
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

538) 2316/2021 Suit MUHAMMAD FARHAN WAZIR & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Plaint can be rejected if it is bad for multifariousness.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 782
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

539) 166/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Jacob (Applicant) V/S English Biscuits Manufactures (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2018 CLC 1357
Advocates:M/S. MANSOOR AHMED KHAN & CO.(FIRM-106-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Munshi(ADVO-17280-SBC-KHS),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Aziz A. Munshi(ADVO-1214-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shaiq Usmani(ADVO-2667-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

540) 1358/2017 Const. P. Ismail Ibrahim S/o Ibrahim Jamal (Petitioner) V/S Kashif Muhammad Baig & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.80-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Ismail Ibrahim and others,C.P.1097-K/2018 Kashif Muhammad Baig and others v. Ismail Ibrahim and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted

541) 4106/2019 Const. P. M/s Elite Screener (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 524
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

542) 174/2015 Civil Revision Azizullah and others (Applicant) V/S Zulifqar Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2027
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

543) 86/2019 I. A Sheikh Kashif Imtiaz (Appellant) V/S Faysal Bank Limited & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2209
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1909/2020 Sheikh Kashif Imtiaz v. Faysal Bank Limited, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

544) 200/2003 I.T.C The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) V/S M/S. Dewan Khalid Textile Mills Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 09-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.457/2010 M/s. Dewan Khalid Textile Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed.also short order

545) 6/2006 Adm. Suit Muhammad Hashim and another (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Mujtaba Shah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

546) 6221/2021 Const. P. Asif Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 PLC CS 228
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

547) 4623/2018 Const. P. United Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 929
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azher Mehmood(ADVO-9556-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Nizamani(ADVO-14295-SBC-KHI),Abdul Haleem Siddiqui(ADVO-3062-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.995/2022 M/s United Bank Limited Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Labour and Human Resources Development, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

548) 849/2017 Const. P. Nofil Nawaz Mulkana (Petitioner) V/S Sana Maqbool & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:The proceeding in the nature of summary trial does not mean that process of effecting service will only be a formality. It is but the initial pillar in the procedure to achieve disposal on merit after effecting service. The trial Court Judge should have made efforts and that should be seen to have been done by trial Court in effecting service though nothing is available on record as far as Bailiffs report of refusal is concerned. There is nothing as far as reasoning is concerned as to why service was not effected at the address of Copenhagen and why address of the attorney Umer Al-Hamidi was considered as lawful. What convinced the trial Court to conclude that summons of the instant suit were to be served upon alleged attorney is mystery. The process of substituted service is not to be taken lightly by the trial Court. It is to be exercised only in case when it is required i.e. where the Court is satisfied with the reasons to believe that the defendant is keeping out of way for the purpose of avoiding service or that for any other reason summons cannot be served in the ordinary way the Court shall order for service of summons by: (a) affixing a copy of the summons at some conspicuous part of the house, if any, in which the defendant is known to have last resided or carried on business or personally worked for gain; or (b) any electronic device of communication which may include telegram, telephone, photogram, telex, fax, radio and television or (c) urgent mail service or public courier services or (d) beat of drum in the locality where the defendant reside; or (e) publication in press; or (f) any other manner or mode as it may think fit;
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

549) 4201/2020 Const. P. Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The pivotal question involved in the present proceedings is whether a Civil / Government Servant who is found guilty of misconduct under The Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, and a minor penalty was imposed upon him could be considered for promotion? ---In our view, the promotion to a post depends upon several circumstances. To qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. An employee found guilty of misconduct cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion committee takes the penalties imposed upon the employee into consideration and denies him the promotion, such denial cannot be termed as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal or unjustified. In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee should not be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the DPC, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess every proposal for promotion, on case to case basis. In cases where disciplinary case / criminal prosecution against the Civil / Government servant is not concluded even after the expiry of two years from the date of the meeting of the first DPC which kept its findings in respect of the Government servant the appointing authority may consider the desirability of giving him an ad-hoc promotion--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 38
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.405-K/2021 Shamsuddin Dal v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

550) 6344/2019 Const. P. Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Civil Servant Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 (Group Insurance)
Tag Line:Group insurance to employees of Government of Sindh, the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 and Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Rules, 1980, Boards for administration of the Funds, State life insurance corporation: Khyber Pukhtunkhwa Civil Servant Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation Act 2014, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation (amendment) Act No.V of 2016, judgment of the Peshawar High Court in case of Fida Muhammad Durrani and judgment of Islamabad High Court in case of Muhammad Rehan Khan; advice by Advocate General Sindh to the Government of Sindh with regard to amendment in existing law/rules.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1366
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

551) 6/2007 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE (Appellant) V/S AHSAN BASEER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: NAB, NAB (forfeiture/ confiscation of Properities after abatement )
Tag Line:The properties left by deceased can be inherited by the legal heirs however, it shall be subject to any proceedings as may competently be brought/undertaken by the State for forfeiture/ confiscation within the framework of the relevant law (as discussed) as abatement alone will not restrict such actions.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 923
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

552) 1/2011 II.A. Mst.Hanifa (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:The appellant has attempted to challenge, by filing Civil Appeal No.44/2007, both the preliminary decree dated 10.10.2000 and final decree dated 28.03.2007. The appellate Court, on consideration of the accounts and the reports of the Mukhtiarkar, did not find any illegality or irregularity committed by the Senior Civil Judge while passing final decree. It is also a matter of fact that in her own examination-in-chief, she has stated that at the time of marriage, the age of his father-in-law was about 80 years and that two of her sons Abdul Majeed and Abdul Rahman were jobless. In the pleadings, respondents No.3 and 4 i.e. Mst. Hanifa and her husband Nazeerullah s/o Haji Sultan Muhammad, whose property is under dispute, admitted that his father-in-law / father was an old man and needed care and help in feeding and lodging, which was done by defendant No.3 (appellant), hence when enquired from the counsel Mr. Lawrence that he was on death bed, Mr. Lawrence honestly and categorically conceded. He, however, was of the view that he was in full senses.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.28-K/2019 Mst: Hanifa v. Province of Sindh thr. Revenue Department Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

553) 18/2014 I.T.R.A COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S. UNIVERSAL LEATHER (PRIVATE) LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:S. Asif Ali(ADVO-3123-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.21-K/2018 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Univeral Leather (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.61-K/2019 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Univeral Leather (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed

554) 2970/2021 Suit SHUJABAD AGRO INDUSTRIES (PT.) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Policy-making by the CCI under Article 154(1) is in a different sphere than policy-making by the Federal Government in the exercise of its executive authority under Article 97. The Natural Gas Allocation & Management Policy, 2005 was within the legal competence of the Federal Government and not the CCI. Under the GSAs between the Plaintiffs and the SSGC, the Plaintiffs cannot assert a right to receive gas for industrial use during the months of December, January and February. Article 158 of the Constitution exists as a prerogative of a Provincial Government, and therefore it does not give actionable cause to a person other than the concerned Provincial Government to invoke the same.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 264
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

555) 185/2021 Const. P. Syeda Asia Rizvi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Entitlement of Pension to divorced daughter)
Tag Line:Whether a divorced daughter of a civil servant can claim pensionary benefitsd
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 258
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

556) 318/2002 Cr.Misc. Ali Zahir Jafari (Applicant) V/S The State (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting

557) 2728/2014 Const. P. Advance Telecom (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 462
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 22-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

558) 5773/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Irfan Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SCMR 98
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1444-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others,C.A.86-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

559) 2070/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application . (Father filed for Custody In his fever .Dismissed with direction Settled In Guardian Court.)
Citation:2019 YLR 1507
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

560) 1179/2017 Const. P. Mohammad Anwar (Petitioner) V/S Fed:of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

561) 2/2018 II.A. Muhammad Umar & another (Appellant) V/S Sikandar Ali & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 764
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1077-K/2021 Muhammad Umar & another v. Sikandar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

562) 223/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Imran Ansari (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ali & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 3284
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

563) 551/2017 Suit Muhammad Saeed (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLD 622
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

564) 1126/2013 Suit Hamza Haneef Awan and others. (Plaintiff) V/S Sher Ali Mangal and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 292
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 22-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

565) 879/2000 Const. P. Shell Emplolyees Union (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 27-APR-16
Approved for Reporting

566) 5842/2022 Const. P. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 393
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-15940-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.220-K/2023,C.P.L.A.221-K/2023,C.P.L.A.222-K/2023,C.P.L.A.223-K/2023,C.P.L.A.224-K/2023,C.P.L.A.227-K/2023,C.P.L.A.228-K/2023,C.P.L.A.230-K/2023,C.P.L.A.126-K/2023,C.P.L.A.229-K/2023,C.P.L.A.226-K/2023,C.P.L.A.225-K/2023,C.P.L.A.3825/2022 SCP Status: Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Disposed

567) 8233/2019 Const. P. Sapphire Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Tax credit - A challenge to the vires of section 65B of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, post amendment vide the Finance Act 2019.
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 1007
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

568) 368/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) V/S Silk Bank Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.278-K/2019 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

569) 69/2022 M.A. M/s. Meerut Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Appellant) V/S Shahid Akhtar Qureshi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The Court interpreted the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, and its 2020 amendment, observing that the Act primarily supports broad economic activities in agriculture, not for housing schemes of affluent and influent persons. The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 159, 2025 SHC KHI 2052
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

570) 3852/2018 Const. P. Total Parco Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1394
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4589/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-III, LTU, Lahore v. M/s Total PARCO Pakistan Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

571) 7180/2021 Const. P. Nadeem ur Rehman Baig (Petitioner) V/S The Learned Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 664
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mirza Arshad Baig(ADVO-12760-SBC-KHE),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Latif(ADVO-3023-SBC-KHI),Mirza Moazzam Baig(ADVO-2750-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

572) 4729/2021 Const. P. Wazir Ali Ind Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Federal Excise Duty (Section 46), Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 25)
Tag Line:Since 2010, Commissioner entrusted with the mandate of calling the record as and when required. Now one thing is for sure that this "as and when required" is not meaningless as being consistently followed and maintained throughout. We now need to understand what could be the event or stage when this phrase may come into play and be given some meaning. Eventually when a Commissioner examines the return of a tax payer, he may have some queries which might be tempting to call record as he may not be able to reconcile and/or resolve them through return statement. Those queries must be understood and settled to the satisfaction of the commissioner before he could make up his mind further. Now the audit is nowhere in the scheme when such questions came for consideration after going through the returns while the Commissioner acts under 25(1) of Sales Tax Act, 1990. Surely the record may satisfy the curious mind but queries must be genuine at the time of calling the record which could not have been answered without going through the record required. Therefore, record calling could not be a roving exercise and cannot be a courtesy call either. The phrase "as and when required" had remained part of Section 25 throughout ever since it was introduced. It is not "as and when desired" but "as and when required". Therefore, the reasons in the shape of "mindful queries" must be in existence and disclosed before calling record for the fulfillment of requirement "as and when required". The requirements of 25(1) are neither unfettered nor are so liberal that a hunting expedition would commence. It is the periodical transfiguration of the provisions of Section 25 that led us believe that there has to be an event or occasion when the Commissioner required the record and documents maintained under this Act or any other Act. Even requiring the documents/record for satisfaction of queries must be revealed so that notice may not transform into a hunting time. However, if the mindful queries were not met, he may authorize an officer of the Inland Revenue, on the basis of record obtained under subsection (1) by him, to conduct audit. Now, if the officer of the Inland Revenue subordinate to the Commissioner is under the obligatory command of Commissioner to conduct audit then the Commissioner must disclose the discrepancies he found while forwarding record already obtained by him, for audit be conducted in pursuance of the queries of the Commissioner, which queries must see the daylight so that the officer of the Inland Revenue proceed accordingly. The officer of the Inland Revenue on his own without having knowledge of discrepancies, queries of the Commissioner, cannot start the proceedings of audit which has to be under the authorization. It would only be general audit but not as contemplated under section 25(1) which compelled the commissioner to call record. The authorization thus should contain the reasons and mindful queries required to be processed through the audit which he has passed on to designated officer. Thus, insofar as Section 25 is concerned, we would conclude that for purposes of Section 25(1) Commissioner must frame legitimate mindful queries to the knowledge of a taxpayer after going through the returns which must be either be satisfied after calling the record or otherwise.
Citation:2023 PTD 576
Advocates:Abdul Rahim Lakhani(ADVO-4061-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Atta Mohammad Qureshi(ADVO-584-SBC-NSF)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.315-K/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Wazir Ali Industries Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

573) 8023/2018 Const. P. M/s Abdullah (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

574) 635/2000 Suit Muhammad Aqil (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Khaliq (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 24-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

575) 67/2016 Suit Fashion Knit Industries (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern as Co. Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Pakistan Economic Survey of 2014-15
Tag Line:Impugned Sunday Closure Notices are illegal, unlawful and ultra vires the Constitution
Citation:2017 CLC Note 141
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

576) 49/2013 Cr.Rev Ahsan Mian (Applicant) V/S The Statte (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 23-APR-13
Approved for Reporting

577) 654/2011 Const. P. Sultanul Uloom (Petitioner) V/S Anis-ur-Rehman & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Point of reconstruction coupled with personal need. The petition is allowed, the impugned judgment of the learned appellate Court is set aside and the eviction order passed by the learned Rent Controller is restored.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

578) 1704/2018 Const. P. Al-Razzaq Fibres & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 3)
Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973 A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan has pronounced the judgment on 18th January 2021 in the case of Al-Razzaq Fibres Pvt. Ltd. and others v. The Federation of Pakistan and another (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the vires of the amendment in in subsection (2)(b) of Section 3 and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge" as well as SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(I)/2011 for being ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Divisional Bench of this Court has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: - "11.Accordingly, for the above reasons, instant petitions are allowed in the following terms:- (i) Amendment in Section 3(2)(b) read with Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words " Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge", is ultravires to Constitution, and contrary to law, hence of no legal effect. (ii) SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 issued in terms of and in purported exercise of powers conferred by, the amendment in Section 3(2)(b) and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(1)/2011, is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution, and is of no legal effect. (iii) The respondents are restrained from demanding any duty in terms of SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 from the petitioners. (iv) Provisions of Section 74A, suffice to say, have no relevance to the controversy in hand because it seeks validation of the acts of "Federal Government, and not that of the Board, with the approval of the Federal Minister-in-Charge"."
Citation:2021 PTCL 270
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.610-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I v. Al Razzaq Fibres (Pvt) Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

579) 1463/2016 Cr.Bail Siraj Muhammad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 YLR 99, 2016 OTHER 1559, 2017 SBLR 1433
Advocates:Babur Ishaq(ADVO-11008-SBC-KHE),Inamullah(ADVO-11910-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

580) 4843/2013 Const. P. Maj. Rtd. Tariq Lodhi (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khalida Jilajni and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 21-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.528-K/2017 Maj.(Retd) Tariq Lodhi v. Mst: Khalida Jilani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

581) 303/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Aftab Pervaiz (Applicant) V/S Mst. Naghma Sultan Burney & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 920
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

582) 67/2025 Cr.Bail Shakil Ahmed Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The State (NAB) & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1823
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

583) 871/2024 Cr.Bail SHAHZAD JUNAID S/O ROSHAN ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years , broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: - (b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence???
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 889
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

584) 1010/2007 Const. P. Muhammas Aslam (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A.C. & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 736
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

585) 1364/2020 Const. P. Yasmeen & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 781
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Abdul Nabi(ADVO-13636-SBC-KHS),Pir Riaz Muhammad Shah(ADVO-4269-SBC-KHW),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

586) 6912/2022 Const. P. UBL (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Bank account of customer debited with the forged cheque. Bank held liable to reimburse customer.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 918
Advocates:Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHE),Khalil Ahmed(ADVO-6793-SBC-KHI),Jahanzeb Awan(ADVO-11549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1333-K/2023 United Bank Limited v. Federation Of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

587) 4694/2016 Const. P. Dr. Syed Abbas Haider (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2783/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.

588) 105/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Imtiaz Ahmed & Others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Raheem thr: LRs and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 70
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

589) 725/2025 Const. P. Peer Bux (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Constitutional Petition: Bail granted to the petitioner in a ???narcotic drug??? case under the Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 2024
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1699
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

590) 125/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Nusrat Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 963
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Syed Jamil Ahmed Shah Bukhari(ADVO-161-SBC-HYD),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3874/2024 The Province of Sindh, through its Secretary, Finance Department, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others v. Muhammad Nusrat Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

591) 24/2020 M.A. MUHAMMAD SHAH KAKAR THR ATTORNEY AHMED SHAH (Appellant) V/S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TRIBUNAL AT SINDH & BALOCHIS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: TRADE MARK (Section 5(2) of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 ), TRADE MARK (Section 40 of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001), Custom Act, 1969, Itellectual Property Law (Trade Mark Cases)
Tag Line:SRO 170(I)/2017 dated 17.03.2017 is for "imported goods only" and was not applied to parallel or grey market imports and de-minimis imports. Powers to take action, detention, seizure, confiscation of goods imported into or taken out of Pakistan were/are always available with the customs officials and it is not that SRO 170(i)/2017 that has empowered them, it only set the process to be initiated by custom officials in relation to goods being imported. What was amended by virtue of SRO 768(I)/2014 is also very material. In Section 3CC and 3E of Customs Act, 1969 formation of the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement was redesigned along with its functions, jurisdiction and powers. In the present case Tribunal could only pass order to the extent of trade mark being an infringed one or otherwise and to restrain it from being violated. The Procedural action of custom officials was not questioned independently by respondent. Once the effect of infringement was determined by tribunal the customs officials would definitely have followed it. Color and color scheme also at time claimed to be an inventive one but that is not the case here as no one has claimed livery or color scheme or get up to be a mark of distinction under any intellectual property rights. Both parties are contesting over one mark i.e Tabiat and no one has claimed any exclusive right over livery or dress up of mark. So everything is a disclaimer except "Tabiat". If there are deceptive liveries of common product like rice, with one trade mark "Tabiat" in the absence of a right claimed under the liveries, the buyer would definitely get confuse and jump to some other brand as a natural course. In terms of Section 5(2) of Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 goods even if not meant for a local consumption but only to enter the port for onwards journey, would mean the use of mark within jurisdiction. Unless goods in transit are defined otherwise, only aforesaid meaning is deducible. Construction of our Trade Mark Ordinance, 2001 is also based on same scheme and there is no inconsistency as far as framing of relevant provision trade mark is concerned. The word import or export (exclusively or inclusively) not defined under the law in hand differently that is dealing with goods in transit. The case of the appellant is on better footing since the attempt is made to export the goods from the territory where the mark is registered The word "use" as explained above is also applicable to goods "for export only" and hence Section 5(2) read with section 40 of Trade Mark ordinance 2001 would be interpreted accordingly as use within territory of Pakistan.
Citation:2021 CLD 48
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting

592) 66/2018 Cr.Bail Ameer Khan Awan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

593) 22/2018 I. A Mashooq Ali Rajpar (Appellant) V/S Raja Abdul Hameed & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2168
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1277-K/2020 Mashooq Ali Rajpar v. Raja Abdul Hameed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

594) 200/2019 Suit Agha Steel Industries Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Directorate of Intelligence & Investigation & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tax matters (Conduct of raid u section 175 of I Tax Ord and u/s 38 of Sales Tax Act 1990)
Tag Line:Sales Tax Act & Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 - Power to search premises of a taxpayer under S. 38 of Sales Tax Act and Section 175 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 can only by permitted when "some proceedings" are already pending before the officer.
Citation:2019 PTD 2119
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

595) 160/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. New Era Fabric, Karachi (Applicant) V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-I, CTO, Kar.& Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line: imposition of penalty under section 33 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990; element of mensrea still a requirement unlike section 34 of the Act.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 58
Advocates:S. Ahsan Ali Shah(ADVO-16440-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Taimoor Ahmed(ADVO-15452-SBC-KHI),Yasir Ali(ADVO-21973-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 16-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

596) 614/2003 Suit ZAFAR AHMED. (Plaintiff) V/S ASSOCIATES PRESS OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Recovery of amount/damages)
Tag Line:The Defendants have illegally deprived the Plaintiff from the benefits of enhanced pension since 01.07.2000. Defendants should have considered the service rendered by Plaintiff to the Organization; he has given his prime years of life to Defendants No.1 and in all fairness deserves a fair treatment from Defendant No1.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 29
Advocates:Sardar Sultan Jahangir Khan(ADVO-2028-SBC-KHI),S. Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-3111-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

597) 1096/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Mumtaz (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

598) 2271/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD TAHIR S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Sindh Prohibition, Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and use of Gutka and Manpuri Act, 2019), Criminal After Arrest Bail (Dismissed)
Tag Line:post-arrest bail in FIR No.451/2021 for offences punishable under sections 269, 270 PPC & 8(i) of Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale & Use of Gutka and Manpuri, Act 2019
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 75
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-13389-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Fareed(ADVO-18678-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

599) 64/1992 Civil Revision Province of Sindh and others (Applicant) V/S Rahim Buc,through his L.Rs.and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Limitation. Revisional jurisdiction is corrective and supervisory in nature; hence, Court seized of a revision petition can exercise its suo motu jurisdiction to correct the errors of jurisdiction committed by the courts below and can condone delay Public document within the meaning of Article 85(1) & (4) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, was admissible in evidence in terms of Article 76(f) ibid; hence, even if the same was not produced in original, they can be relied upon as secondary evidence.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 46
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.555/2022 Rahim Bux Khan (deceased) through LRs and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Irrigation and Power Department, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

600) 2268/2017 Const. P. Attaullah Khan Chandio (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion), Service matters (Seniority)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1157
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting

601) 205/2023 I.T.R.A M/S ELAHEE BUKSH & COMPANY PVT. LTD (Applicant) V/S ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Interpreting Section 18(1)(d) r/w Anti-avoidance Sections 108 & 109)
Tag Line:Profit accrued on loan advanced by Associate Company is liable to tax under Section 18(1)(d) read in the light of Chapter VIII of the ITO, 2001, dealing with Anti-avoidance with specific provisions on transactions between Associates and recharacterization. ITRA Dismissed. Division Bench Judgments of this Court and Lahore High Court dealing with loans advanced by the Director of the Taxpayer Company to the company based on fiduciary duty are distinguished.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1460
Advocates:Emad-ul-Hasan(ADVO-5822-SBC-KHI),Irfan Mir Halepota(ADVO-9555-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 05-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1061-K/2024 M/s Elahee Buksh & Company Pvt. Ltd. v. The Additional Commissioner (Audit-III) Inland Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. Relist it before a 3 members bench

602) 1779/1999 Const. P. Abdul Cadir Adam Seedat (Petitioner) V/S Wealth Tax Officer & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney General(),Jawaid Farooqi(ADVO-3964-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

603) 3568/2024 Const. P. Yawar Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:On the subject proposition, primarily, the disciplinary proceedings and criminal proceedings are altogether different and independent of each other and cannot be termed synonymous and interchangeable. The departmental inquiries for misconduct use a lower standard of proof ('balance of probabilities') compared to criminal trials ('proof beyond reasonable doubt'). The forums for adjudication, principles of evidence, and procedure are also separate and distinct. The decision of one forum cannot have a bearing on the decision of the other forum. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the cases of Dr. Sohail Hassan Khan v. Director General (Research), Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Punjab, Lahore and others (2020 SCMR 1708), (2021 SCMR 420), The District Police Officer, Mianwali and others v. Amir Abdul Majid, Province of Punjab v. Khadim Hussain Abbasi (2021 SCMR 1419) and Usman Ghani v. The Chief Post Master, GPO Karachi, and others (2022 SCMR 745). The respondent department's reliance on clause 27.1 (2) (i) of Estacode 2021 to defer proceedings against the petitioner is incorrect based on Supreme Court rulings.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 285
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Mustafa Mamdani(ADVO-16160-SBC-KHE),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Jazib Aftab(ADVO-17490-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

604) 198/2025 Const. P. Mst Shahida Parveen Jumani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Family Pension Right of the widowed daughter. .
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2106
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

605) 51/2005 Cr.Appeal Abdullah Bhutto (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 12-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting

606) 39/2011 Const. P. Darakshan Jahan (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 23-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting

607) 62/2006 Const. P. General Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Shah Zareen & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 11-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting

608) 1172/1997 Suit HAJI MAQBOOL AHMED (Plaintiff) V/S MST. SIKANDAR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 325
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

609) 6/2008 Suit.B Transmission Engineering Industries Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 03-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

610) 82/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Arthur Lawerance Private Limited (Applicant) V/S M/S Actlaw (The Legal Consortium) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----Ss. 115, 6 & 15 & O. VII, R. 10---Revision before High Court---Procedure---Revision, in the present case, was filed before High Court without availing remedy before District Judge---Validity---Power of High Court with regard to the cases decided by any Court subordinate to High Court in which no appeal lay was not subject to any limitation---Revisional power of District Court was dependent on its pecuniary jurisdiction---Revisional power of Court was unfettered when it was exercised by the High Court and/ or District Court suo motu---When such jurisdiction had been invoked then copies of all the proceedings should have been furnished and revision should have been filed within ninety days from the date of order in which no appeal lay---Revisional powers of High Court and District Court were concurrent only when it was exercised by said courts at their own---Pecuniary value of claim of petitioner, in the present case, did not exceed the limits of appellate jurisdiction of District Court---If suit had been dismissed or decreed by the Trial Court on merit then first appeal would lie before District Judge on account of pecuniary value of the decretal amount---When revisional jurisdiction had been invoked against a particular order then it would not be a case of concurrent jurisdiction and mandatory provisions of S.6 read with Ss.15 to 20 of C.P.C. were also be considered---Aggrieved party had no option in the matter of jurisdiction of Court and it should respect each and every word of statute with regard to the jurisdiction---Every suit was to be instituted in the Court of lowest grade---Provisions of Ss.6 & 15 of C.P.C. were to be complied with while filing revision/appeal---Revision/appeal could not be filed in the High Court unless pecuniary value of the subject matter did exceed the appellate jurisdiction of District Court---When case had been filed in a Court which had no jurisdiction on pecuniary ground then plaint/revision should be returned to the party to file it in the Court having both territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction within limitation prescribed for filing the same---Petitioner had consumed more than ninety days time to overcome objection raised by the office---Revision petition could not be presented in the Court of District Judge after expiry of ninety days which was dismissed, in circumstances. Muhammad Din v. Muhammad Amin PLD 1995 Lah. 15 and Mst. Safia Mushtaq v. Wali Muhammad and 18 others 2010 CLC 120 distinguished. Khalid Ahmed and another v. Syed Hassan Shah Bukhari and others 1994 MLD 903; HOECHST Pakistan Limited and others v. Maqbool Ahmed and another 1998 CLC 134 and Shafi-ur-Rehman and 2 others v. Fateh Muhammad PLD 2002 Kar. 511 rel. (b) Appeal--- ----Appeal/revision was a continuation of original suit. (c) Interpretation of statutes--- ----Court could not interpret one section of an Act which might render the other mandatory provision of the said Act meaningless.
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 129
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2380/2019 Arthur Lawrence (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. M/s Actlaw, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

611) 1518/2007 Suit ANSAR ALI (Plaintiff) V/S ALTAF AHMED MEMON & ANOTHER. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

612) 1965/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD UMER S/O SAINDAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Sindh Prohibition, Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and use of Gutka and Manpuri Act, 2019)
Tag Line:In view of the above, the applicant / accused Muhammad Umar son of Saindan is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) and a P.R. bond for the same amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The instant bail application is allowed in the above terms.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1319
Advocates:Muhammad Akbar(ADVO-6812-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

613) 4677/2013 Const. P. Dr. Naeem Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Whether supersession is punishment---in promotion matters to such post could not be made in a mechanical manner and a variety of factors, such as examination of service records, evaluation reports of training institutions, record of disciplinary proceedings, reputation of integrity and efficiency, suitability for handling particular assignment, etc. had to be taken into consideration--- NCA Employees Service Rules 2011, on the aforesaid proposition, the matter has been set at rest by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others v. NESCOM through Chairman Islamabad and others (PLD 2016 SC 377)] therefore, question of declaring the Chapter II of the NCA Employees Service Rules 2011 as ultra vires of Section 9, 11 of the National Command Authority Act 2010 and Articles 4,9,10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 are not apropos at this stage for the reason discussed in the preceding paragraphs.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

614) 3601/2018 Const. P. Pakistan Stock Exchange (Petitioner) V/S Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 (Section 23), Securities Act, 2015 (Section 6), Securities Act, 2015 (Section 7), Stock Exchanges (Corporatization, Demutualization & Integration) Act, 2012 (???Act 2012???), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article- 137)
Tag Line:Stock Exchange is a commercial organization and is engaged in a business of providing services for the trading of securities. As per definition of the term Stock Exchange it is a market place where facilities for trading of securities are provided. The surplus (receipts over expenses) is distributed regularly as dividend amongst the shareholders. Its shareholders taking part in trading activities as brokers derive profit. Even before demutualization the members of stock exchange were entitled to trading on stock exchange and were also provided services as brokers; they have established their offices and solicit business and use their membership for earning income therefore economic and commercial activities were the core activities of the erstwhile members and also the present TRE holders (trading right entitlement). Stock exchanges entertain applications from individuals and corporate entities to issue them such trading certificates for their economic/business activity. The stock exchange lacks the important attribute of lack of commerciality of a members club for application of the doctrine of mutuality
Citation:2024 CLD 580
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza Korai(ADVO-14432-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR),Muhammad Tariq(ADVO-19123-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.775/2022 Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited, Karachi v. Sindh through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

615) 51/2001 Cr.Acctt.A Saeedullah Soomro (Appellant) V/S TheState (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 02-SEP-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.22-K/2011 Saeedullah Soomro v. The State through NAB Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved

616) 3468/2021 Const. P. M/s Kiran Food Products (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Import of betel nuts under Serial No.5 of Part-I and Serial No.155 of Part-III of Appendix B of Import Policy Order, 2020; has to be regulated by Plant Protection Department under the Quarantine Act and the Rules framed thereunder and not by the Customs department.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 198
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

617) 145/2009 Cr.Rev Mrs. Ghazala Parveen (Applicant) V/S Sadiq Daniel & 18 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting

618) 27/2023 Const. P. Mst Sahja & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 838
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

619) 128/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Ghulam Murtaza. (Applicant) V/S Mst. Asma & Another. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Coversion of Civil Revision into Appeal)
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 72
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

620) 836/2012 Suit KHURRAM NASEEMUDDIN (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Permanent Injunction)
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss.42, 54, 56 (d) & (e)---Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 (VIII of 1975), S.5---Suit for declaration and injunction---Criminal investigation---Refusal of injunction---Plaintiff assailed notices issued by Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to Habib Bank Limited in furtherance of inquiry that certain immovable properties of someone had been fraudulently offered by two persons to various banks for obtaining loans against said properties in favour of plaintiffs company---Validity---Defendants were officers of FIA established under Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974 and were fully competent to inquire into fraud committed by different persons in obtaining loans from banking institutions---One of the defendants was posted in commercial banks circle and it was within the purview of his duty to inquire into and investigate complaint registered, numbered and marked to him in terms of S.5 of Federal Investigation Agency Act, 1974---Remedy was quashment, if made out and not simple declaration and decree prohibiting public functionaries from performing their duties within the four corners of law---Suit was dismissed in circumstances. Mian Hamza Shahbaz Sharif v. Federation of Pakistan and others 1999 PCr.LJ 1584; Messrs K.G. Traders and others v. Deputy Collector of Customs and 4 others PLD 1997 Kar. 541; Assistant Director Intelligence and Investigation, Karachi v. Messrs B.R. Herman and others PLD 1992 SC 485; Shahzad Ahmed Corporation v. Federation of Pakistan and others 2005 PTD 23 and 2005 PTD (Trib) 135 distinguished.
Citation:2014 PLD 264
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 21-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting

621) -819/2021 Suit SYED GHULAM SARWAR SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line: As a result of the above discussion, it is hereby held that the instant Suit is barred by limitation, and also under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, and Order VI Rule 4 CPC, and is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. Accordingly, the Suit is liable to be dismissed with costs. Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 08.04.2021 whereby this Suit and the listed applications were dismissed with costs of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only). The amount of costs shall be deposited by the plaintiff with the Nazir of this Court within thirty (30) days, which amount shall be transferred / deposited forthwith by the Nazir in the bank account of Edhi Foundation.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1230
Advocates:Muhammad Ali Shaikh(ADVO-2056-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

622) 2551/2014 Suit M. Najeeb Usman. (Plaintiff) V/S Sharik Affandi. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: PLAINT RETURNED U O 7 RULE 10
Tag Line:In view of what has been discussed above, leave me with no option but to conclude that instant suit is not maintainable before this Court and is liable to be returned for its presentation before the Court within whose local territorial jurisdiction the property is situated. Accordingly, the plaint of the plaintiff be returned; plaintiff is at liberty to file plaint in the Court having jurisdiction. CMA No.8009/2013 is allowed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1026
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Munir Khan(ADVO-13065-SBC-KHI),Raja Qasit Nawaz Khan(ADVO-3457-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

623) 85/2022 Suit M/S TAHIR FOODS PRODUCTS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Power of DG I&I Customs re phytosanitory action under the Pakistan Plant Protection Rules, 2019.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 185
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI),Shamail Sikander(ADVO-18733-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

624) 162/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Alim Shar (Petitioner) V/S Shah Nawaz & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Order XXIII CPC conditional withdrawal of suit.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 783
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

625) 149/2008 H.C.A Mst.Ishrat Jehan & Ors. . (Appellant) V/S Syed Anisur Rehman & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 12-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting

626) 4662/2017 Const. P. M/s Quality Steel Re-Rolling (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:SRO 583(I)/2017 struck down.
Citation:2022 PTD 39
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

627) 68/2014 Cr.Acq.A. Zulfiqar Ali Baloch (Appellant) V/S Parkash & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 08-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

628) 3153/2021 Const. P. Yasir Ali Baloch and Others (Petitioner) V/S Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 482
Advocates:Rajesh Kumar Khagaija(ADVO-51467-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.931-K/2022 The Managing Director, Sindh Technical Education & Vocational Training Authority (STEVTA) v. Yasir Ali Baloch & another,C.P.L.A.1281-K/2022 Yasir Ali Baloch & another v. The Administrative Secretary STEVTA & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed, Adjourned (Notice) to Respondent & DAG

629) 1089/2016 Const. P. MAL Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN through secretary revnue Division (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Extra tax levied in terms of Section 3(5) of the Sales Tax Act 1990 read with SRO 896(I)/2013 dated 4.10.2013 read with Sales Tax General Order No.27 of 2014 dated 18.3.2014 is valid, lawful and not ultra vires
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 608
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 15-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

630) 185/2015 H.C.A Dr. Obaid ur Rehman & Others (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Neelofer Khalid & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.31-K/2019 Mrs. Neelofer Khalid and others v. Dr.Obaid-ur-Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

631) 190/2011 Const. P. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd.,(MOBILINK) (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Stamp duty.
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh 859
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.125-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

632) 60/2017 Cr.Acq.A. THE STATE THROUGH DAG PAKISTAN (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD YOUNUS & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Hassaan Sabir(ADVO-6909-SBC-KHI),Salman Sabir(ADVO-9793-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

633) 5297/2021 Const. P. Mst. Shah Bano and Others (Petitioner) V/S The D.G SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 391
Advocates:Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author)
Order Date: 06-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

634) 22/2010 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A The State (Appellant) V/S Kamran @ Kami & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

635) 6274/2017 Const. P. Bushra Jabeen and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3854/2018,C.P.4573/2018,C.A.1486/2018,C.A.1487/2018,C.P.4475/2018,C.P.4476/2018 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

636) 333/2024 H.C.A Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui (Appellant) V/S Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 537
Advocates:Muhammad Mohsin(ADVO-15408-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-19679-SBC-KHE),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI),Syed Hassan Mujtaba Abidi(ADVO-15596-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.605-K/2025 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation through Director Safari Park v. Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. Minus Mr. M. J. Salahuddin Panhwar sb.

637) 5396/2014 Const. P. Naeem Akhtar Chang (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Deputy Attorney General(),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

638) 29/2020 Criminal Appeal Parvez Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 340
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.51/2024 Parvez Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

639) 43/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous ADELL REHMAN MEMON (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH FIA & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 938
Advocates:Rana Daniyal Akram(ADVO-22478-SBC-KHS),Daniyal Muhammad Hussain(ADVO-22224-SBC-KHC),Mohammad Jibran Nasir(ADVO-13974-SBC-KHE),Barrister Zain-ul-Abidin(ADVO-22640-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.128-K/2025 Syeda Ghanwa Hussaini v. Adeel Rahman Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

640) 202/2017 Cr.Rev N. J. AUTOS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & 02 OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

641) 1449/2008 Cr.Bail AIJAZUL HAQ (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Syed Mohammad Iqbal(ADVO-3496-SBC-KHI),Shamshad Ali(ADVO-19351-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Shamim Jawed(ADVO-12497-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

642) 20/2018 Cr.Appeal Nadir Moosani & others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 25-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

643) 3/2019 Criminal Appeal Dost Muhammad Thebo & Another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Appeal (Control of Narcotic 9(C) Appeal allowed On Ground contradictions in the evidence of complainant and mashir, )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 503
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

644) 460/2018 Criminal Appeal THE STATE / ANF (Appellant) V/S NADEEM BAHADUR (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: LIMITATION (Article 157)
Tag Line:Her reference to Article 157 of the Limitation Act is erroneous as the appellant has not filed an appeal against an order of acquittal. This Revision Application is against conviction in which, according to the appellant, Respondents No.2 and 3 have been awarded lesser punishment. In our humble view, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mst. Fazeelat Bibi (PLD 2013 SC 361) has authoritatively held that ANF can only invoke the jurisdiction of appeal under Section 48(i) of CNS Act, 1997 for challenging the order of Special Court under CNS Act
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2051
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 23-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.199-K/2020 The State/Anti Narcoties Forec v. Nadeem Bahadur,Crl.A.11-K/2021 The State/Anti Narcoties Forec v. Nadeem Bahadur Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned (Next Session)

645) 1311/2004 Suit Shaikh Abdul Jabbar through his Legal Heirs (Plaintiff) V/S Irfan Jami Rafique and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 08-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

646) 8/2008 H.C.A Shafi Muhammad & another (Appellant) V/S Waseem Ahmed Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting

647) 1736/2013 Const. P. Akhlaque Hussain Memon and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether the post of Additional/Assistant Advocate General could be filled amongst District Attorneys as per the Sindh Law Officers (Conditions of Service Rules), 1940 as amended up to date; and, whether between the notification dated 10.5.2016 bearing S.REG:1(22)2015/117 and notification dated 9.4.2018 bearing S.REG.4(07)/2018 which one is to prevail; and, whether the service structure for Deputy District Attorney and District Attorney in Solicitor Department, Government of Sindh needs to be streamlined ?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1271
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1633-K/2021 Amir Ahmed Kehar v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

648) 174/2020 Cr.Bail SAMIULLAH S/O MAHBOOB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2466
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

649) 379/2024 Cr.Bail Muhammad Bilal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 142
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

650) 658/2023 Const. P. Mst. Bushra (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Maintainibility
Tag Line:Additional Registrar OR office staff cannot be directed not to accept any petitions / cases as they are not authorized to decide its maintainability under the applicable Appellate Side Rules of the Court.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 135
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 30-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

651) 1228/2023 Const. P. Abdul Ghaffar S/o Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) V/S Mustafa and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2026 SHC KHI 308
Advocates:Muhammad Naseer(ADVO-14156-SBC-KHC),Iftikhar Jawed Qazi(ADVO-2356-SBC-KHE),Ghulam Abbas Pishori(ADVO-3175-SBC-KHI),Burhanuddin Pishori(ADVO-19001-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-26
Approved for Reporting

652) 68/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) V/S Hyderabad Electronic Supply Co. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 04-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1105/2014 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Hyderabad v. M/s Hyderabad Electric Supply Co. Hyderabad,C.P.46-K/2014 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Hyderabad v. M/s Hyderabad Electric Supply Co. Hyderabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Disposed Leave Granted

653) 1216/2016 Suit Jamshoro Joint Venture Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Co., Limited. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

654) 6863/2019 Const. P. Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases.
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases.
Citation:2023 PLC Lab. Note 78
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

655) 13/2022 H.C.A Muhammmad Sadiq (Appellant) V/S Dawood Jan Muhammad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 845
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-13481-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Shariq A. Razzak(ADVO-15492-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.525-K/2022 Muhammad Sadiq v. Dawood Jan Muhammad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

656) 1331/2008 Const. P. Sardar Nisar (Petitioner) V/S Registrar Coop. Societies & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 04-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.156-K/2011 Sardar Nisar v. Registrar Cooperative Societies and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

657) 881/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Umar Butt and other (Petitioner) V/S S.H.O Steel Town P.S and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 25-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

658) 327/1966 Suit Raza Hussain and others (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Khan and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Compromise on behalf of defendants---Scope---Transferee of property could not confer upon a transferor a better title than he himself possessed---Defendants had no lawful authority, right or interest at the relevant time in the subject property when they entered into a compromise with the plaintiffs---Neither any appeal was preferred against the partition order nor authenticity or validity of the same was challenged by any of the parties---Possession of suit property was wrongly handed over to the plaintiffs by the Nazir of the Court---Nazir of the Court was directed to take appropriate measures to hand over the possession of suit land to its claimants.
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property)
Tag Line:Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell. Directions to the Nazir to handover the possession of suit land to its claimants.
Citation:2018 YLR 1053
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 15-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting

659) 194/2010 Cr.Bail Muhammad Shoaib (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-APR-10
Approved for Reporting

660) 201/2017 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Yaseen (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2020 SHC HYD 372
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

661) 31/2012 Const. P. Mst. Rehana Hafeez (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ali alias Ehsan (through legal heirs) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 22-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting

662) 699/2008 Suit MST. AZKA ASIF W/O SYED ASIF ALI (Plaintiff) V/S CITY DISTRICT GOVT KARACHI CDGK @ OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 695
Advocates:Irfan Hassan(ADVO-9405-SBC-KHI),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS),Thawur Ali Khan(ADVO-2306-SBC-KHI),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Abdul Khalil(ADVO-2205-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

663) 425/2016 H.C.A Asif Seemab Sindhu (Appellant) V/S Administrator, DHA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 MLD 1295
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

664) 411/2012 Const. P. Najaf Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1259
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

665) 488/2006 Const. P. Raza Fecto Tractors (Private) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 438
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 06-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

666) 2941/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ayub Fazlani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 11-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

667) 655/2010 Suit LUCKY CEMENT LTD (Petitioner) V/S HMS BERGBAU AG & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-DEC-10
Approved for Reporting

668) 1899/2009 Const. P. Haji Muhammad Iqbal and others (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Saeed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

669) 4668/2015 Const. P. Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976 (Payment of contribution under EOBI Act 1976)
Tag Line:Petitioner employers sought declaration that demand of contributions by the Federal EOBI under EOBI Act 1976 is illegal as EOBI became federal subject after 18th Amendment and subsequent Sindh EOBI Act 2014; Sindh Province did enact the Act 2014 but could not establish the Institution; CCI resolved EOBI shall remain with Federal Government. Held petitioners cant take benefit of dispute between the Federation and Province; priority must be given to the employees as the Old Age Benefit law is a beneficial law, aimed for the benefit of the employees therefore in case contribution amount is not received by the EOBI ultimately it is the employees who will suffer. Hence these petitions are disposed of in terms that petitioners shall deposit the contributions and other dues according to EOBI Act 1976; all amount deposited with the Nazir shall be returned in favour of the EOBI established under the EOBI Act 1976.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1239
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

670) 192/2023 Const. P. K.M.C (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ (East) and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:KMC is a part of the third tier of Government. Several Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan have already made affirmative observations in support of the proposition in the case of local government and municipal authorities. In such cases, as per CPC and Sindh Civil Court Rules, KMC, as a 'third-tier of Government", may appoint counsels by way of filing a Memo of Appearance instead of Vakalatnama subject to conditions specified under the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013. KMC???s Counsel???s submission, based on a judgment of the Indian Court that the government, at its discretion, may appoint as many government pleaders as it likes, is contrary to Pakistan law based on Judgment of Supreme Court of Pakistan in Rasheed Ahmad v. Federal of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage, Government of Pakistan Islamabad, and Other, PLD 2017 SC 121.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 372
Advocates:Muhammad Mohsin(ADVO-15408-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Azra Muqeem(ADVO-4332-SBC-KHI),Syed Hassan Mujtaba Abidi(ADVO-15596-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

671) 2489/2023 Const. P. Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:KBTPR prohibits regularization of additional floors.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 631
Advocates:Syed Salim Ahmed(ADVO-2360-SBC-KHI),Fahim Ahmed(ADVO-523-SBC-JCB),Usman Farooq(ADVO-16057-SBC-KHE),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 07-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1089-K/2023 Muhammad Mohsin Waheed v. Tanveer Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

672) 2/2017 Cr.Rev Party-1 (Applicant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

673) 45/2014 S.M.A Mst. Mehrunnissa (Petitioner) V/S N.A (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: S.M.A (Nephew of Petition and Nazir of this Court appointed as Guardian.)
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 19-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

674) 1617/2025 Const. P. Mansoorul Haque Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pak.& ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:It is a settled principle that merit-based reinstatement entitles employees to full "back benefits" (retroactive pay), as established by the Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Sharif v. Inspector General of Police (supra). Exceptions arise if reinstatement is due to procedural defects (pending fault determination) or reduced penalties. FR 54 treats periods of full paid absence as duty. The petitioner's counsel argues the 'gainful employment' exception does not apply, as the Respondent failed to prove it, and his pro bono legal work is not "gainful employment." However, given the Supreme Court's previous ruling disallowing the petitioner's back benefits due to insufficient evidence of non-gainful employment, this court cannot contradict that decision. The onus is on the petitioner to present new evidence in the proper forum to substantiate his non-employment during the intervening period. 11. For the reasons stated above, this petition is dismissed with pending application(s), if any.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1785
Advocates:In Person(INP),Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.967-K/2025 Mansoorul Haque Solangi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

675) 3172/2016 Const. P. Cyrus Cowasjee and Ors (Plaintiff) V/S V/S KMC and Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 183
Advocates:M/S. IQBAL KHURRAM LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-231-SBC-KHI),Ch: Arif Majeed(ADVO-6948-SBC-KHI),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.444-K/2022 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation through its Administrator v. Mr. Cyrus Cowasjee & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice to Next Session)

676) 108/2018 Cr.Acctt.A Riaz Hussain Kalhoro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

677) 5176/2013 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Shoaib (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 SBLR Sindh 443
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.121-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Syed Muhammad Sohaib and others,C.P.L.A.599-K/2018 Syed Muhammad Shoaib and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

678) 16/2020 II.A. Khadim Hussain & others (Appellant) V/S Fida Hussain Dero (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2023 SHC HYD 871, 2025 SBLR Sindh 731
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.95-K/2023 Fida Hussain Dero v. Khadim Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned to Next Session

679) 231/2005 I.T.R Major General (R) M. Jalaluddin V/S Asstt:Commissioner of Income Tax (Applicant) V/S Major General (R) M. Jalaluddin V/S Asstt:Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 04-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting

680) 4391/2018 Const. P. Zaheer uddin Mujahid (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.277/2019 Zaheeruddin Mujahid v. Province of Sindh thr. Cooperative Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

681) 394/1997 Suit MUHAMMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S PAK. STEEL MILLS CORP. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Non-production of Departmental Inquiry Report in the evidence by Defendants has raised adverse presumption against them, as envisaged in Article 129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Loss of consortium; that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries or death caused by a tortfeasor. Well known rules about "foreseeability",causation and but for explained; if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s), then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of Care] that has resulted in causing injury and the "but for" test if simply put, means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant's negligence. Legislative amendments are proposed.
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Tag Line:Non-production of Departmental Inquiry Report in the evidence by Defendants has raised adverse presumption against them, as envisaged in Article 129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Loss of consortium; that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries or death caused by a tortfeasor. Well known rules about foreseeability,causation and but for explained; if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s), then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of Care] that has resulted in causing injury and the "but for" test if simply put, means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant's negligence. Legislative amendments are proposed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1429
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

682) 94/2024 Cr.Rev Muhammad Ishaque (Applicant) V/S The State and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1633
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

683) 38/2021 Const. P. Hamid Baig (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saba Khan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

684) 114/2013 Suit.B AL-BARAKA BANK (PAKISTAN) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S ENSHAA HOLDING LTD. & AN OTHER. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

685) 4151/2020 Const. P. M/s Popular Juice Ind Pv Ltd and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1277
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.124-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan thorugh Chairman Federal Board of Revenue & others v. M/s. Popular Juice Industries & others,C.A.3934/2022 Federation of Pakistan thorugh Chairman Federal Board of Revenue & others v. M/s. Popular Juice Industries & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

686) 431/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector Customs Model (Applicant) V/S M/s Ahsan & Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Jurisdiction; Customs Tribunal; cannot set aside or modify a Valuation Ruling while hearing Appeals against order of Collector Appeals; different jurisdictions of the Tribunal under Section 194A of the Customs Act explained
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 346
Advocates:Ghulam Hyder Shaikh(ADVO-10758-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHS),Pervez Iqbal Kasi(ADVO-4320-BBC-OTH),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 10-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

687) 65/2005 Civil Revision Liaquat Ali alias Khabar and others (Applicant) V/S Habibullah and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Concurrent finding of two courts below can be interfered with if the court lacked jurisdiction or a case of misreading and non reading of evidence is made out; a registered sale deed as against a mutation entry will have precedence over it.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 50
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

688) 68/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Naseem Kausar and others Thr. Junaid Safdar (Applicant) V/S Sardar Abdul Rehman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, LIMITATION (Limitation Act 1908)
Tag Line:Reader and even for that matter court had no jurisdiction to extend time for filing leave application against statutory period and that too without any justified reason. By that time the service has already been effected at least by publication on 06.12.2020. In terms of Order XXXVII Rule 3, CPC, the leave to defend application is supposed to have been filed within the period prescribed therein.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 280
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.812-K/2021 Mst.Naseem Kausar & others v. Sardar Abdul Rehman & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

689) 3508/2011 Const. P. SHAHID NABI MALIK (Petitioner) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 CLC 1792
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 07-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1683/2014 Sindh Building Control Authority through the DG Karachi v. Shahid Nabi Malik & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

690) 797/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Askari Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Tara Chand S/o Jasso Mal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 592
Advocates:Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHI),Tariq Hussain(ADVO-5937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.55-K/2022 Tara Chand v. M/s. Askari Bank Ltd, through its Chief Executive Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next hearing: After 3 weeks)

691) 1567/2005 Suit NAUMAN AHMED (Appellant) V/S COL (R) SALMAN AHMED & ORS (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Khalid Pervez(ADVO-5994-SBC-KHI),Seema Wasim(ADVO-3037HLC-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Tariq(ADVO-2510-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Safdar(ADVO-4807-SBC-KHE),Mirza Sarfraz Ahmed(ADVO-4467-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

692) 6544/2020 Const. P. M/s Drive Line Motor Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Othes (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (section 138 of Customs Act, 1969 read with Customs Rules 86 to 89 laid down in SRO 450(I)/2001)
Tag Line:Since section 138 deals with the frustrated cargo and Rule 86 has defined what frustrated cargo would be. It is thus one which will brought into customs station by reason of inadvertence or misdirection or where consignee is untraceable or has dishonoured his commitments and the consignor wishes to have it re-shipped to him. Since the consignee has refused or dishonored his commitments, the consignor immediately acted upon by moving an application for re-export on 17.04.2018 and that is exercised under Rule 88 of the ibid Rules. There was no occasion for the Collector of Customs to have avoided or discarded the application of the consigner for the re-export of the vehicle as it was and is within the definition of frustrated cargo and permission ought to have been followed in terms of Rule 89 on Collector being satisfied which he should under the relevant circumstances of the case as in our view the vehicle came out as a frustrated cargo.
Citation:2022 PTD 363
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 05-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

693) 1472/2016 Const. P. M/s Tufail Chemical (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Sales tax on toll manufacturing is to be paid to FBR/ Federation and not to Province of Sindh
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 145
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.919/2024,C.P.L.A.1854/2023,C.P.L.A.1685/2023,C.A.918/2024 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed

694) 200/2020 Suit M/s Sadiq & Suharwardy (Plaintiff) V/S Ismail Industries Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Rejection of Plaint or transfer to IP tribunal or Continuing hearing by High Court)
Tag Line:These ten trademark suits currently pending in the High Court are disposed of in three different manner following the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Muhammad Multazam Raza v. Muhammad Ayub Khan, 2022 SCMR 979 in paragraph 12 and the enactment of the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2023, on 11.08.2023. The three actions on the part of the High Court depend on the category of trademark dispute: Category A - Suits for infringement currently pending in the High Court and filed prior to 29.12.2015 may be transferred to the IP Tribunal forthwith (Category ???A???). Category B - trademarks suits filed after 29.12.2015, currently pending in the High Court, the Plaint in such suits must be returned (Category ???B???) as High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the same. Finally, in cases involving a Suit connected with a J. Misc. Application involving either Section 73(4) [an application for revocation], Section 80(4) [an application for declaration of invalidity], Section 96(2) [an application for rectification], etc, the High Court may retain jurisdiction and proceed with deciding both Suit and J. Misc.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 433
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 10-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

695) 1000/2020 Cr.Bail Nabi Bux (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 108
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

696) 123/2008 Spl.H.C.A Kalb-e-Haider & Co Pvt Limited (Appellant) V/S National Bank of Pakistan & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 183
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 10-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.191-K/2015 National Bank of Pakistan and another v. M/s Kalb-e-Haider & Company Pvt. Ltd.,C.A.39-K/2016 Kalb-e-Haider Company (Pvt) Ltd. v. National Bank of Pakistan and another,C.M.A.735-K/2018 Kalb-e-Haider Company (Pvt) Ltd. v. National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Allowed - Relist Civil Appeal after Eid-ul-Adha 2018.

697) 12/2013 J.M Karachi Development Company (Applicant) V/S IM Technologies Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLC Note 157
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting

698) 17/2012 I. A First Dawood Investment Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S BankIslami Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 31-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.686-K/2013 First Dawood Investment Bank Ltd. v. Bank Islami Pakistan Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

699) 6115/2023 Const. P. Saad Aqil (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The rights of tenants in Buildings declared as Dangerous by the SBCA under Section 14 of the SBCO, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 682
Advocates:M/S. K. A. WAHAB & CO.(FIRM-119-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Jawed Qazi(ADVO-2356-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

700) 6793/2021 Const. P. Pakistan Post Office C.H.S (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before Civil Court )
Tag Line:The court ruled that land title and possession disputes fall under civil court jurisdiction, not writ jurisdiction per Article 199 of the Constitution, referencing the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 and the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act 2010. The petition was dismissed due to unresolved factual disputes and blocked revenue entries.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1417
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 31-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.625-K/2024 Pakistan Post Office Employees Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

701) 1829/2025 Const. P. Umer Sarfaraz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2026 SHC KHI 1716
Advocates:Aqib Danial(ADVO-18188-SBC-KHC),Mukhtar Ahmed(ADVO-17146-SBC-KHW),Aamir Zaheer(ADVO-59355-PBC-LHR),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza
Order Date: 04-SEP-26
Approved for Reporting

702) 274/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous Sher Bahadur Khan Khattak S/o Amir Azam Khan (Applicant) V/S SSP South & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1797, 2025 SHC KHI 1799
Advocates:Sannia Khalique(ADVO-21260-SBC-KHS),Abdul Baqi(ADVO-11889-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),Abdul Rauf(ADVO-16009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

703) 1085/2013 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Abbas Rizvi & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 145
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.336-K/2014 Muhammad Abbas Rizvi and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.1343/2014 Muhammad Abbas Rizvi and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. (C.A. be fixed on 06.11.14),Disposed Dismissed

704) 1929/2018 Suit Akbar Adamjee. (Plaintiff) V/S Performance Automotive (Pvt) L:td., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Mandatory Injunction granted)
Tag Line:Mandatory Injunction - Order 39 CPC - Specific Performance of an agreement- no settled formula to grant or refuse the same- dependent on facts of the case- mandatory injunction granted.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

705) 1641/2012 Suit SUI SOUTHERN GAS CO. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Attachment before Judgment
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

706) 100/2015 I. A Farhat Fareed Sheikh (Appellant) V/S NIB Bank Limited and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 07-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.26-K/2020 Muslim Commercial Bank (MCB) Limited v. Mst: Farhat Fareed Shaikh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

707) 53/2017 J.M Province of Sindh & others (Applicant) V/S M/s. Pakrock Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

708) 558/2020 Const. P. Meer Hazar Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 829
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

709) 92/2023 H.C.A A & Z Agro Industries Pvt Ltd & Others (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 661
Advocates:Ghazi Khan Khalil(ADVO-18768-SBC-KHE),Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHS),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI),Abdul Hakeem Junejo(ADVO-21088-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 28-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1592/2024 A & Z Agro Industries Pvt Ltd thr. its duly Authorized officer, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others,C.A.845/2024 A & Z Agro Industries Pvt Ltd thr. its duly authorized officer, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,

710) 461/2011 Cr.Bail Rashid (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 13-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting

711) 508/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Siddiq Majid and Others (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Constitutional vs. Regular bench; distribution of jurisdiction.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 634
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Syed Muhammad Nehal Hashmi(ADVO-3490-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

712) 2477/2019 Const. P. Hajj Organizers Association of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting

713) 5229/2015 Const. P. Karachi Tax Bar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether a probationer has the capability and potential to make a satisfactory career in the organization, and whether or not the organization/employer will have any benefit of his services. We are of the view that the period of probation provides equal opportunity to the employer and employee to decide whether they would like to continue with the engagement or not.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 593
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

714) 1461/1998 Suit A. QUBUBUDDIN KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S CHEC MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 15)
Tag Line:if illegallity is separable from the main award, the same can be modified / corrected by invocking section 15 of the Arbiration Act, 1940.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

715) 7596/2017 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali Domki, Advocate (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

716) 83/2011 Civil Revision Manzoor Meeraci & otheres (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Umar Mangsi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

717) 49/2021 I.T.R.A CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (Applicant) V/S THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 236A)
Tag Line:Section 236A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 requires a person, making sale by public auction or auction by a tender of any property or goods (including property or goods confiscated or attached, either belonging to or not belonging to the Government, local Government, any authority, a company, a foreign association declared to be a company under sub-clause (vi) of clause (b) of subsection (2) of section 80, or a foreign contractor or a consultant or a consortium or Collector of Customs or Commissioner Inland Revenue or any other authority, shall collect advance tax, computed on the basis of sale price of such property and at the rate specified in First Schedule, from the person to whom such property or goods are being sold. This provision is as clear as crystal however it is followed by an explanation inserted by Finance Act 2020 for the removal of doubt that the expression of sale of public auction or auction by tender include renewal of license previously sold by public auction or auction by a tender and where payment is received in installments, advance tax is to be collected with each installment. As we observe that there is no necessity of any explanation or any clarification as section 236A is clear in its entirety. Notwithstanding the above, even the explanation of clarificatory nature operates retrospectively as it only provides an assistance in interpreting the provisions correctly in terms of intention of the legislature, subject to however if a contradictory situation is reached by the Court interpreting the basic provisions as against explanation. We are, therefore, of the view that the applicant described as an agent collecting advance tax from the bidders/occupants/lessees/ licensees etc. to whom the premises/property was given either by way of public auction or tender or by any other mode and includes renewal of such document.
Citation:2021 PTD 1867, 2021 PTCL 804
Advocates:Abdul Rahim Lakhani(ADVO-4061-SBC-KHI),Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-13242-SBC-KHS),Atta Mohammad Qureshi(ADVO-584-SBC-NSF)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

718) 3184/2021 Const. P. Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In the light of the above discussion, in our view, a deputationist could not be treated as an aggrieved person, because she has no vested right to remain on a post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period and can be repatriated at any time to her parent department more particularly in the light of aforesaid decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court. Reference is also made to the case of Dr. Shafi-ur-Rehman Afridi V/s CDA, Islamabad through Chairman and others (2010 SCMR 378). Even otherwise she cannot continue to serve on deputation in Sindh Government after her removal from service by the parent department, as discussed supra.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 19
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

719) 3982/2013 Const. P. Syed Qadeer Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan And Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 39
Advocates:Munir Ahmed Malik(ADVO-14377-SBC-KHS),Sami Ahsan(ADVO-6815-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1328/2022 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited through its President, Islamabad and others v. Syed Qadeer Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

720) 22/1999 Civil Revision Ghulam Hyder Mahar (Applicant) V/S Ellahi Bux and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:A Suit for declaration without any title or legal right is not maintainable under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act.. similarly a declaration of lawful possession cannot be maintained under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act. a mere application for allotment of land creates no title
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 531
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

721) 644/1986 Const. P. Karachi Bulk Storage & Terminals (pvt) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Collector Of Courts & Excise & Lands & C (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

722) 1238/2008 Suit ZAFAR HUSSAIN FARIDI (Plaintiff) V/S MRS. SYEDA FARHATUAL AIN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Syed Ashiq Raza(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aslam Khan(ADVO-8086-SBC-KHI),Mirza Saeed Baig(ADVO-1960-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Dhoon(ADVO-3342-SBC-KHI),Abdul Jabbar Lakho(ADVO-4299HLC-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

723) 6249/2022 Const. P. Ayaz Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:NBP, being a statutory corporation, is amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 199 of the Constitution. (ii). Reserving employment for the progeny and widows of deceased employees without subjecting them to open competition is inherently exclusionary and prejudices the rights of other qualified citizens. Moreover, Article 18 of the Constitution reinforces the emphasis on merit-based appointments by guaranteeing every citizen the right to enter any lawful profession.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1376
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Ghulam Muhammad Dars(ADVO-16974-SBC-KHS),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1242-K/2024 Ayaz Ali v. Federation of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to President NBP

724) 6382/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Jibran Nasir & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 165
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3871/2023 Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Jibran Nasir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

725) 4778/2021 Const. P. Pakistan Mobile Communication (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Federal Excise Duty, CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:The impugned enactment is for area which formed part of province i.e. Sindh hence for all intent and purposes Article 142(c) is significant. It emphasized Provincial Assembly to legislate with respect to any matters not enumerated in the Federal Legislative List. The impugned Act whereby Serial No.6A was introduced to the First Schedule forming part of Table-II is introduced through a Money Bill in terms of Article 73 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. No other Entry of Part I of the Federal Legislative List could then be taken into account as this was a money bill which is primarily covered from Entry No.43 to 53 as routed through Article 73 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The federation has already conceded and we are not required to deliberate on the point that for a tax to fall under the said Federal Legislative List it must be covered by Entries No.43 to 53. This, as claimed to be a sales tax/Federal Excise Duty, is apparently covered in terms of Entry 49 to the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Thus, the 18th Amendment excludes the Federation by virtue of the Entry 49 from the competence to legislate on the subject of services rendered in their province on account of SSTA, 2011 w.e.f. 01.07.2011. --It is neither in the competence of the federation to legislate after 18th Amendment nor it relates to federation to invoke Entry No.58 of the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Similarly, Entry No.59, as relied upon by the respondents counsel, that these matters are incidental or ancillary to any matters enumerated in this part, is also inconsequential as this cannot be invoked independently unless a reciprocal entry is found within the competence of federation. One may argue this Entry 59 may have a bridged with Article 151 but we have already discussed non-application of Article 151.
Citation:2022 PTD 266
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6171/2021 Federal Board of Revenue through the Secretary Revenue, Ex-officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad and others v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd, Karachi and another,C.A.3109/2022 Federal Board of Revenue through the Secretary Revenue, Ex- officio Chairman FBR, Islamabad and others v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,

726) 985/2013 Const. P. Mst. Roshan Ara Begum (Petitioner) V/S Executive Officer & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

727) 518/2020 Const. P. Abdul Haleem Chachar & others. (Petitioner) V/S P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:For the reasons noted above, the impugned action of converting the Amenity Plot reserved for playground situated at Sindh Cooperative Housing Society, Sukkur into residential plots by the present as well as previous Management of Sindh Cooperative Housing Society, Sukkur is declared to be against the rights of petitioners of Constitution Petition No.D-518 of 2021 and others and a result of an arbitrary exercise of power, therefore, is set aside. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to restore the amenity Plot reserved for Playground situated at Sindh Cooperative Housing Society, Sukkur to its original position in accordance with the sanctioned plan of this area.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 927
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

728) 71/1994 Const. P. Gul Ahmed Textile Mills (Petitioner) V/S Collector of Customs & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan, Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Constitutional petition is maintainable even if Federation or Province not impleaded as respondent.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 144
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

729) 249/2018 H.C.A Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Arbitration Law
Tag Line:principal of awarding demurrage charges and analysis of Force Majeure clause of COA
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 25
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.76-K/2020 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation v. Pakistan State Oil Company, Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

730) 486/2018 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD KASHIF S/O SHER MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The test for weighing the evidence of identification proceedings is to first assess the system variables, i.e. the precautions taken at the test identification parade, and then to assess the estimator variables i.e. the capacity and ability of the eye-witness to identify the accused in the circumstance of the case. Rel. Mian Sohail Ahmed v. The State (2019 SCMR 956) and The matter of Kanwar Anwaar Ali (PLD 2019 SC 488).
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 318
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.496/2020 Muhammad Kashif and Muhammad Hanif @ Kalia @ Mamoo v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

731) 6546/2016 Const. P. Bheru Lal (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting

732) 2918/2023 Const. P. Naeem ur Rehman Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Local Government Act, 2013 (Section 18, 21, 79 to 81, ), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 ( Article 90, 91, 130, 130(9) and 140A)
Tag Line:*The Federal and Provincial Governments are constitutional constructs whereby they are governed by the provisions set out under the Constitution whereas the Local Government is a statutory construct which operates under the Provincial Government hence since the Local Government system is a statutory construct and operates on the basis of enactments by the Provincial Government, the same can be statutorily amended, which is well within the legislative competence of the Provincial Government.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 480
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 11-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

733) 269/2012 Criminal Appeal Asad Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Appellant Asad Khan dissatisfied with the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi whereby the appellant Asad Khan was convicted for committing Qatl-e-Amd of his wife Mst. Aneela an offence under section 302 PPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.50,000/- Complainant stating therein that about two years back, his daughter Aneela married with Asad . Since the beginning of the marriage, the attitude of in-laws of his daughter was not good Aneela informed him on the telephone that she is coming to him at Qasim Town but till 08:30 P.M, she did not come at Qasim Town and her father made a telephonic call to her maternal Aunt Mst. Bano, who is residing in the neighbor of Aneela and informed her about the arrival of Aneela at Qasim Town .Complainant came to know that his daughter Aneela has been killed by causing her knife and dagger injuries at her house. the strong circumstantial evidence is available to connect the appellant with the commission of offence; that the appellant has admitted his guilt before the Cameraman, which was recorded in CD/USB flashed on TV. e. The admission of the appellant came in media and newspaper. In order to support his contention, the prosecution examined Mst. Aqeela Bano, who has also supported the version of the complainant and further deposed that she went to the house of Anila but was locked. Resultantly, she died in his house and after committing the murder, the appellant locked the door of the house from outside and ran away . All the circumstances, consisting on unnatural death of deceased inside the house with dagger; finding the house locked from outside as well leaving away the house are also making a chain of circumstances against the appellant and in such like eventuality the defence was required to prove otherwise. instant appeal filed by the appellant merits no consideration, which is dismissed
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.432/2019 Asad Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

734) 201/2005 I.T.R M/s State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Tax matters
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1549
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 24-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

735) 4045/2012 Const. P. Taj Rani (Petitioner) V/S National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Deceased Son Quota
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.70-K/2018 Mst: Taj Rani v. The President National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

736) 1779/2020 Const. P. Pakistan Re-Insurance Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Reasons
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 381
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 16-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

737) 998/2019 Cr.Bail SARDAR SAMEER HUSSAIN S/O SARDAR AFSAR HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

738) 20/2015 H.C.A Syed Arif Ali & another (Appellant) V/S Zeenat Hanif Siddiqui & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 1227
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 26-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.366-K/2017 Mrs. Zeenat Hanif Siddiqui v. Syed Arif Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

739) 938/2017 Suit Farrukh Afzal Munif (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Afzal Munif & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 31
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

740) 197/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. TAIMOOR @ TANVEER S/O MUHAMMAD IRSHAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1204
Advocates:Muhammad Imran Meo(ADVO-13761-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

741) 269/2014 H.C.A Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Fahim (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 03-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1440/2016 Muhammad Faheem v. Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan, Karachi,C.M.A.5165/2016 Muhammad Faheem v. Hamdard Laboratories (Waqf) Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Allowed and Parent Case Restored but subject to payment of cost of Rs.50000.

742) 297/2021 Spl.Cr.Rev. HANIF MOOSA S/O MOOSA & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal Trial (Power to summon material witness under section 540 Cr.P.C )
Tag Line:Intent of section 540 CrPC is to ensure a just decision. If that leads to filling of lacuna in evidence, such consequence does not come in the way of exercising the power.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 99
Advocates:Fazal Mahmood Sherwani(ADVO-4347-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Ashiq Ali Anwar(ADVO-2754-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Hussain(ADVO-14665-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

743) 4/2017 Suit Habib Metropolitan Bank (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Dagra Textile (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLD 1256
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 11-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

744) 18/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Yousif Mahar (Applicant) V/S Nizamuddin Dahar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1222
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

745) 88/2011 Cr.Appeal Mitho alias Muhammad Mithal Lakhan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 22-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting

746) 205/2019 II.A. Ms. Qaiser Jehan Begum Thr. Salman Hussain Memon (Appellant) V/S Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:the provisions of Section 42 were misconstrued by Courts below. A plaint could only be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC if it is barred by law. None of the provisions of law was cited by respondents counsel and/or find mention in the orders/judgment of two Courts below whereby a plaint of the suit of the appellant could be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC. The appellant had a cause of action on account of a threat to her property in view of alleged unlawful and illegal construction beingraised on the adjacent plot.
Citation:2022 MLD 308
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.815-K/2021 Amir Nisar v. Qaiser Jehan Begum & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

747) 2188/2012 Const. P. Adam Sugar Mills (Petitioner) V/S Respondent (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Tender (tender process)
Tag Line:Petitioner on payment of outstanding dues in terms of the Award cannot be termed as a defaulter and hence cannot be ousted to participate in the subject tender process.
Citation:2012 CLC 1780, 2012 CLD 1734, 2013 SBLR Sindh 806, 2013 SBLR Sindh 1244
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.236-K/2012 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Adam Sugar Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

748) 360/2016 Cr.Appeal SAIFULLAH S/O BABAR ALI SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 21-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

749) 3913/2020 Const. P. Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:i) Whether the petitioner possesses the required qualifications for the post of police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police as per recruitment Rules-2016 ? And ii) Whether police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police can be recruited on a contract basis and subsequently be regularized in service under the law?
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 102
Advocates:Muhammad Ashraf Samoo(ADVO-8176-SBC-KHI),Qaim Ali(ADVO-11490-SBC-KHI),JAM SHAHID IQBAL(ADVO-53967-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

750) 887/2018 Const. P. Hassan Zada & Ors (Petitioner) V/S FOP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1216
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4119/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others,C.A.1564/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Disposed of

751) 859/2023 Const. P. Junaid Ahmed Khan S/o Kamal Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sassi Hizbullah and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:Family matter; applicability of Rule of exception in exercising Constitutional jurisdiction; held YES; when Appellate Court fails to properly appreciate the case and its responsibility in family matters;
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 599
Advocates:Siddiqa Nausheen(ADVO-17638-SBC-KHE),Fouzia Waheed(ADVO-17118-SBC-KHE),Syed Mukhtar Hussain(ADVO-7962-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh),Marium Badar(ADVO-17333-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 25-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

752) 369/2021 Const. P. Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Petition allowed)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1140
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Yusuf Moulvi(ADVO-4051-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5177/2021 Saadat Ali Yasin v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

753) 53/2013 I. A Meezan Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Mrs Parveen Sabir & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1806
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.595-K/2015 M/s Meezan Bank Ltd. v. Mrs. Parveen Sabir and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

754) 587/2022 Cr.Acq.A. ASIF IBRAHIM KHAN S/O MIR IBRAHIM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 729
Advocates:Barrister Musavir Gajani(ADVO-17167-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ayoub Chaniho(ADVO-15383-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

755) 4965/2023 Const. P. Saleem Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:It is well-settled that while considering the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the merit of all the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored by the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department. 14. In the light of the position explained above, it is concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be considered for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 292
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.421-K/2025 Province of Sindh & others v. Saleem Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

756) 295/2018 Const. P. Pir Bux & another (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

757) 1347/2001 Suit RANA MUHAMMAD SAFDAR (Appellant) V/S V/S MST AHMED BANO BEGUM & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 17-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

758) 1995/2020 Suit XIAMEN GOLDEN DRAGON BUS COMPANY LTD & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S SINDH INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMP. LTD & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1037
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

759) 493/1993 Suit Shahimah Sayeed (Plaintiff) V/S Base Commander and three others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 342
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

760) 74/2022 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 428
Advocates:Farzana(ADVO-9037-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

761) 109/2018 I. A Muhammad Jawed (Appellant) V/S First Women Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLD 254
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

762) 1497/2020 Suit TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Doctrine of indoor management.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 117
Advocates:Ayasha Warsi(ADVO-23473-PBC-LHR),Amna Warsi(ADVO-22352-PBC-LHR),Abraiz Ali Khan(ADVO-15124-SBC-KHS),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui(ADVO-2269-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

763) 665/2003 Suit Umar Islam Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Basit and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Cancellation)
Tag Line:Suit for Declaration and Cancellation decreed. Held that the impugned transaction/transfer in favour of Defendant No. 1 is to be struck down on three grounds. (i) Admittedly no sale price was paid by the Defendant no. 1 to plaintiffs. (ii) Even the mother could not have entered into such type of transaction, if at all it even assumed that deceased mother of plaintiffs did sign the affidavit, though no convincing evidence has been led by Defendant No. 1 with regard to this fact, and (iii) Under section 11 of Contract Act, Plaintiffs No. 2 and 3, being minors at that relevant time, could not have entered into sale transaction with Defendant No. 1, again, even if it assumed that these plaintiffs had signed the documents under challenge; such kind of transaction is held void ab initio.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

764) 2955/2017 Const. P. Syed Faisaluddin (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.556-K/2019 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.44-K/2020 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,

765) 5/2015 II.A. Ali Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Advocates:Eijaz Ali Hakro Associates(Firm-390-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.729-K/2019 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others,C.A.88-K/2022 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

766) 2543/2011 Const. P. Mansur-ul-Haque (Petitioner) V/S Government of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2017 PLC (CS) 1255
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.313-K/2017 Mansoor-ul-Haque v. Govt. of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Defence and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

767) 4026/2012 Const. P. Rashid Latif (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 27-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting

768) 3/2007 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst:Fatima Parveen and another (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Younis and other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:The provisions of Articles 17 and 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO), 1984, concerning the competence and number of witnesses and the procedure for proving attested documents, are procedural in nature and possess retrospective effect. These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even if the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 255, 2026 PLD Sindh 140
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

769) 607/2012 Suit Dr. Dilnawaz Rafi Shaikh and others (Plaintiff) V/S Riyazur-Rahim and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 08-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

770) 629/2025 Const. P. Mst. Sumaira Bibi & another (Petitioner) V/S SHO PS Dokri , Dist. Larkana & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2063
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

771) 206/2008 Const. P. Hussain Developers (Petitioner) V/S Ist Senior Civil Judghe Karachi South (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.89-K/2018 Hussain Developers v. Yousuf Moulvi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

772) 133/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) Shaikh Muhammad Sajid & Another (Applicant) V/S Roohullah & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Civil Revision Application was dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000.00 ; the applicants were directed to deposit the said amount with the Nazir of this Court within thirty (30) days ; and, the Nazir was directed to utilize the same towards the benevolent fund of the employees of this Court.
Advocates:Sameer Ghazanfar(ADVO-11222-SBC-KHI),Abdul Karim Khan Faheem(ADVO-3829-SBC-KHI),M/S. TABASUM GHAZANFAR & COMPANY (LAW FIRM).(FIRM-147-SBC-KHI),Tabasum Ghazanfar(ADVO-2492-SBC-KHI),Javed Haleem(ADVO-9588-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

773) 57/2021 Cr.Rev Muhammad Murad Bhutto (Applicant) V/S Lal Bux Kosh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Offence falling under two different enactments)
Tag Line:The offences committed by the accused persons fall under two different enactments i.e. one under the Pakistan Penal Code and other under the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, therefore, there seems to be no bar in taking cognizance under the provisions of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 626
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

774) 2386/2011 Const. P. Karachi Property Investment (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and ros (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.578-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Culture Deptt: v. Karachi Property Investment Company (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

775) 95/2020 Cr.Rev GHOUS BUX S/O SUFAR KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1606
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

776) 43/2025 Cr.Bail Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 132
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

777) 288/2019 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SALEEM SHAHZAD S/O PARO (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2210
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

778) 22/2017 F.R.A M/s. Pharmacie Plus (Appellant) V/S Abdul Latif & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 966
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 07-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.711-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd.,C.M.A.881-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.25-K/2018 Abdul Latif and another v. M/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Notice in CMA.,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed

779) 182/2017 Cr.Misc. Ch. Azeem Ahmed (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Sanjar Chang District Tando Allahyar & 17 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

780) 424/2006 Suit MRS. SHAMIM BARLAS (Plaintiff) V/S AL HABIB CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY & ANOTHE (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Jurisdiction of Special Court for Cooperative Societies under the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020 and the application of Section 115 of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 917
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Abdul Rauf Khan(ADVO-3788-SBC-KHI),Abdul Qadir Anwer(ADVO-5510-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque @ Sathi M. Ishaq(ADVO-3650-SBC-KHW),Nadir Khan Burdi(ADVO-13227-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

781) 654/2024 Criminal Appeal Umar Farooq S/o Khan Bahadur (Appellant) V/S The State & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1543
Advocates:Sajjad Hussain(ADVO-2122-SBC-KHP),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Babar Hussain Shah(ADVO-17287-SBC-KHS),Basam Ali Dahri(ADVO-17400-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

782) 201/2019 Cr.Rev MST. NAGHMA IMJRAN WD/O IMRAN KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Revision (Revision application is dismissed. The Applicant may move the same before the Sessions Court.)
Tag Line:The Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C. entails that while the High Court can call for and examine the record of proceeding before a Magistrate, either suo moto or in Revision arising from an order of a Sessions Judge, a Revision application against the order of a Magistrate is to filed by the litigant to the Sessions Judge to whom the Magistrate is a Court inferior within the meaning of the Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

783) 324/2024 H.C.A M/s. ARY Communication Limited (Appellant) V/S Federal Board of Revenue and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line: Section 227 of the ITO 2001; plaint rejected; Suit barred in law; Appeal dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 344
Advocates:Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 13-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

784) 472/2021 Cr.Bail Allah Ditto Bhutto (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2021 SHC SUK 1295
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

785) 3482/2011 Const. P. M/s.Blessed Textile (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting

786) 575/2008 Const. P. Naseeruddin & another (Petitioner) V/S Syed Daulat Ali & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 10-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting

787) 589/2011 Cr.Bail Badshah alias Muhammad Saleh (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting

788) 3310/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Asad ul Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the petitioners are seeking regularization of their services against the quota reserved for deceased civil servants as provided under the Prime Ministers Assistance Package for the Families of Government Employees, on the premise that their parents were serving in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on different posts, who passed away during their service.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 287
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

789) 586/2024 Cr.Bail Jongal Khan @ Babal Korejo and Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Case calling for further inquiry, pre-arrest bail granted
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 525
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

790) 213/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyd. (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Sabir S/o Muhammad Yousaf & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Clause 89(i) of section 156(1))
Tag Line:Burden of proof under section 187 Customs Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 914
Advocates:Zulifiqar Ali Arain(ADVO-1899-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 05-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

791) 4967/2018 Const. P. Orix Leasing Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 353
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

792) 4669/2022 Const. P. Salman Zafar Siddiqui & Others (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Pension funds and like trusts are entitled for exemption from Tax under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, without registration under the Sindh Trusts Act, 2020
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 2063
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Tajammul Hussain Lodhi(ADVO-10103-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

793) 788/2012 Suit MRS.RIFFAT SIRAJ MUNIR (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.MOOMAL PRODUCTIONS PVT LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 662
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

794) 1479/2020 Const. P. Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 420
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.450-K/2022 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

795) 84/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Pir Syed Mashooque Mohiuddin & others (Applicant) V/S Ali Raza Chandio & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Article 30 of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Admission of facts.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1350
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

796) 3251/2024 Const. P. Mst Sarwat Ghazi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Pension Rights of Divorced Daughter
Citation:2025 SBLR Sindh 1198
Advocates:Ghulam Hasnain(ADVO-12328-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.718-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Sindh secretariat, Karachi & others v. Mst. Sarwat Ghazi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Notice to Respondent)

797) 2455/2023 Cr.Bail IMRAN ALI JATOI S/O ADAM KHAN JATOI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 837
Advocates:Jamila Kausar(ADVO-10826-SBC-KHI),Allah Ditta(ADVO-14195-SBC-KHE),Kher Muhammad(ADVO-9957-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

798) 32/2020 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S MAHVASH & JAHANGIR SIDDIQUE FOUNDATION (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Section 177(6A) of the Income Tax Ordinance
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1203
Advocates:Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 25-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

799) 491/2023 Const. P. Nadeem Masih S/o Boota Masih (Petitioner) V/S DJ/Civil Appellate Court, Malir Khi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Disputed question of title in undeclared Katchi Abadi leading to a dispute of title before the Rent Controller
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1066
Advocates:Ghulam Rasool Shaikh(ADVO-54051-SBC-KHE),Amanullah(ADVO-6388-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

800) 149/2010 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs (Appellant) V/S Water & Power Development Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 535
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.70-K/2014 Collector of Customs Karachi v. M/s Water & Power Development Authority, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

801) 2951/2018 Const. P. Abdul Latif Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3658/2018 Abdul Latif Barohi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

802) 1218/2017 Cr.Misc. Mst. Zuriat W/o Sheeral Khan (Applicant) V/S Kouro Khan @ Kouro and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Re-investigation of Case (Magistrate Joined the Let of accused U/S 302 PPC and Granted Bail .In Petition Sataside about Bail . )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting

803) 3662/2011 Const. P. Ali Raza (Petitioner) V/S M. Shoaib and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 21-APR-14
Approved for Reporting

804) 3073/2012 Const. P. Saleem Khokhar (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1574
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.190-K/2020 Peter Qadir v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Social Welfare & Women Development Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

805) 4329/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 605
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.240-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio and others,C.A.928/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio and others,C.P.877-K/2021 Muhammad Faisal & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

806) 31/2016 F.R.A Dr.Muhammad Hassan (Appellant) V/S Additional Controller of Rents & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 (entire trial in the name 18 of Section 19(8) of the CRRA, 1963 was a malafide attempt to deprive to applicant .FRA allowed.)
Tag Line:(a) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----S.3---Rent Controller---Jurisdiction---Government building---Neither any other Court nor parties can confer jurisdiction on a Court / Tribunal when it is expressly barred by Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963. (b) Jurisdiction--- ----Question of---Principle---Whenever question of jurisdiction of a Court is raised by any party it has to be decided first by the Court as preliminary issue. A.M Qureshi v. Government of Sindh and others 1991 SCMR 1103 rel. (c) Jurisdiction--- ----Interim order, passing of--- Principle--- Court having no jurisdiction to adjudicate on dispute between parties on merit, cannot even pass interim order and then penalize parties for its non-compliance. (d) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----Ss.3, 17, 19(8) & 24--- Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 10-A & 23---Eviction of tenant---Property rights---Rent Controller, jurisdiction of---Petitioners were having lease agreements in their favour executed by Federal Government and the Government sought their eviction from Rent Controller on the plea of raising commercial buildings---Validity---Tenants had perpetual right in demised shops under the agreements with Federal Government and whenever the government decided to launch any commercial project by demolishing the property in question, the rights of tenants under existing agreement were to be protected and no effort should be made to wriggle out of the contractual obligations except in accordance with law---Tenants were to be properly informed with relevant material details of any proposed action---Landlord had filed cases in the Court of Additional Rent Controller despite the fact that he had no jurisdiction and then tried to subvert entire trial in the name of S. 19(8) of Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963 which was a mala fide attempt to deprive tenants from their Constitutionally guaranteed lawful right in demised shops---High Court in exercise of appellate jurisdiction set aside eviction orders passed by Rent Controller---Appeal was allowed in circumstances. Suo moto Case No.04 of 2010 PLD 2012 SC 553; Inaam-ul-Haq v. Muhammad Ali Shaheen and another 2013 CLC 904; Sh. Riaz-ul-Haq and another v. Federation of Pakistan through Minisry of Law and others PLD 2013 SC 501; Zulfiqar Ahmed khan v. Station Commander, Station Headquarters, Karachi and another 2010 CLC 354 and Ghulam Mustafa Bughio v. Additional Controller of Rents, Clifton and others" 2006 SCMR 145 ref. M.H Mussadaq v. Muhammad Zafar Iqbal 2004 SCMR 1453; Khawaja Muhammad Mughees v. Mrs. Sughra Dadi 2001 SCMR 2020; Asif Najma Ansaizi v. Mrs. Mariam Mirza and another 2014 MLD 1304; Arif Lakhani v. Irfan Nazar and another 2014 CLC 1756; Uzma Construction Co. v. Navid H. Malik 2015 SCMR 642; Muhammad Saqib v. S.M Mushtaq 2015 YLR 723; Mian Muhammad Lateef v. Mst. Nasima Warsi through L.R 2009 CLC 279; Najma Aziz Sethi v. Muhammad Azeem Butt 2008 MLD 42; Dawood Khan through Attorney v. Sheraz Ahmed 2009 YLR 1238; Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan v. Station Commander, Station Headquarters, Karachi an another 2010 CLC 354; M.K. Muhammad and another v. Muhammad Abu Bakar 1993 SCMR 200; Mrs. Ghazala Iftikhar v. Controller/Additional Controller of Rents and another 2012 YLR 74 and Abdul Latif and another v. Messrs Parmacie Plus 2019 SCMR 627 distinguished.
Citation:2020 CLC 1720
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

807) 49/2011 II.A. Zaka Uddin (Appellant) V/S M/s. S. Ashrafi Abbasi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2018 MLD 1408
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Khan(ADVO-3399-SBC-KHS),Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Khurshid Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-2251-SBC-KHE),Fiaz Ahmed Abro(ADVO-7997-SBC-MLR),Abdul Aziz Khan(ADVO-9-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

808) 37/2013 Criminal Appeal Zakir Ali Gondal (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2021 SHC SUK 11
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

809) 203/2024 Const. P. Zafar Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 14, 2025 MLD 14
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

810) 79/2017 Const. P. Qadir Bux @ Ghulam Shabir (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2019 YLR 1844
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

811) 151/2017 Const. P. Sahoo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2428
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

812) 19/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) V/S Senior Superintendent of Police (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 70
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

813) 319/2021 Cr.Bail Majid Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:For the above reasons, the applicant Majid Ali has made out a case for post-arrest bail in FIR No.42 of 2021, registered with Police Station Darri, District Larkana, for offenses punishable under sections 452, 376, and 511 P.P.C. Accordingly, the applicant is admited to post arrest bail; he shall be released in the aforesaid crime subject to furnishing his bail bond in the sum of Rs.50, 000/- (Fifty Thousand Ruprees) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 247
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

814) 63/2000 Civil Revision Sachedino Kalwar (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Order VII, Rule 11. (Section 161(B) of Land Revenue Act)
Tag Line:Applicant first chose to contest the matter before the Revenue authority by filing its objections and attending hearings, and then once the order was passed, filed a Suit challenging the same. When an order is an appealable order in terms of s.161 ibid, which has not been availed, then the very maintainability of the Suit under section 9 CPC is big question mark; and impliedly bars jurisdiction of the Civil Court in such matters where the jurisdiction to adjudicate exclusively vested with the revenue Courts. . Admittedly, the Applicant failed to avail the statutory remedied of appeal and revision before the Commissioner and the Board of Revenue respectively against the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 39
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

815) 729/2009 Suit ABDUL WADOOD (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD IQBAL & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Malicious prosecution
Tag Line:(a) Malicious prosecution--- ----Suit for malicious prosecution, recovery of damages and compensation---F.I.R. was registered by defendants against the plaintiffs---Trial Court acquitted the plaintiffs in connection with the F.I.R. under S. 245(1), Cr.P.C on the basis that prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt---Plaintiffs instituted present suit with the contention that they had been maliciously prosecuted by the defendants by registration of an F.I.R.---Validity---Plaintiffs were acquitted by the Trial Court on account of the fact that prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt---Judgment of Trial Court was silent with regard to the "malice" of the defendants and also with regard to the "falsehood" of the F.I.R.---Plaintiffs had failed to establish that there was "no reasonable and probable cause" for their prosecution---Plaintiffs had also not proved claimed special or general damages----Simple affidavit in evidence had been filed by plaintiffs without support of any documentary evidence claiming professional fee, travelling charges, business loss, mental torture/discomfort, damages on account of loss of reputation and defamation in public---Suit for malicious prosecution was dismissed accordingly.
Citation:2013 MLD 584
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Solangi(ADVO-9977-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ikram Siddiqui(ADVO-2713-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting

816) 1672/2014 Cr.Bail Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

817) 2110/2009 Const. P. Muhammad Tariq Qasmi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:EJECTMENT AND RECOVERY OF POSSESSION
Citation:2019 PLC CS 594
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

818) 197/2020 Cr.Rev NOMAN S/O MUHAMMAD AKRAM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 175
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Ghulam Mustafa(ADVO-16267-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Shahid(ADVO-14140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

819) 101/2015 Adm. Suit Muhammad Saeed (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Baqir Bukhari (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 24-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

820) 191/2023 Cr.Acq.A. AZIZ DAMJI S/O NAZAR ALI (Appellant) V/S RANA SHAHID JAMIL & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1987, 2025 SHC KHI 2043
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Aziz(ADVO-14070-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

821) 51/2007 I. A S.Muhammad Ali Jafri (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khilji Arif Hussain
Order Date: 15-APR-09
Approved for Reporting

822) 26/2021 I. A Mst. Bibi Saira and others (Appellant) V/S P.O.Sindh and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 MLD 1729
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

823) 7114/2016 Const. P. Asifa Jawed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 326
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

824) 100/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Mohammad Zaheer (Applicant) V/S District Judge, Tando Allahyar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 485
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.428-K/2021 Muhammad Zaheer v. Shoukat Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

825) 4292/2021 Const. P. M/s Outdoorsman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Import Policy Order 2020, Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950
Tag Line:We do not find any necessity of an independent license from the federal government in presence of Import Policy Order, 2016 w.e.f. 14.6.2018 followed by Import Policy Order, 2020. The Import Policy Order, 2016 in terms of the subject in hand was amended by virtue of SRO No.772(1)/2018 on 14.6.2018 which provides that the individual license holders or arms dealership license holders [as issued by Home Department, Province of Sindh] are allowed to import arms and ammunition. It was clarified by Federal Government, Ministry of Commerce & Textile vide letter dated 06.09.2019 that the import of arms and ammunition does not require any import authorization from the Commerce Division Islamabad after issuance of SRO No.772(I)/2018 dated 14-06-2018. For convenience and ready reference, text of [i]. Letter dated 06.09.2019, [ii]. Section 6(1) and [iii]. Entry No.62 Part I of Appendix B of IPO, 2020 ---Section 4 of ibid Act 2013 is related to the license for the manufacture/sale of arms and ammunition which is not the case here. Section 5 deals with the import, export and transportation which for all intent and purposes means import and export within the province of Sindh and we, while read it down, do not find it to be ultra vires to the Constitution. It primarily concerns with the person who is brining into and taking out of Sindh or any of its districts, arms, ammunition or military stores of a firearm or convert an imitation firearm into a firearm unless a license has been issued in accordance with the provisions and rules thereunder. Similarly, in section 9&10 the words import and export are in relation to brining into and taking out of the province of Sindh and any of its districts and it does not mean import of any arms and ammunition from outside the country which is an independent subject of the federal government hence, we read down these provisions to be within frame of Sindh Arms Act, 2013 and are not ultra vires the Constitution.
Citation:2022 PTD 539
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 06-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.245-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Home Department Government of Sindh & others v. M/s. Outdoorsman & others,C.P.L.A.246-K/2022 Federal Board of Revenue & others v. M/s. Outdoorsman & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: ,

826) 3954/2015 Const. P. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.887-K/2018 Syed Ishitiaque Ahmed Hashmi v. Province of Sindh thr. its Director General and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

827) 127/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf Khan (Petitioner) V/S Ministry of Interior & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 361
Advocates:Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

828) 3902/2014 Const. P. Mst. Rukhsana Bano and Ors (Petitioner) V/S KMC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 140
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.55-K/2022 Haji Jaffer Khan v. KMC (Karachi Muncipal Coorporation) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

829) 2703/2016 Const. P. Nadar Shah & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 31-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

830) 73/2021 Const. P. Sher Ali (Petitioner) V/S Syed Hamid Ali and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 942
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

831) 433/2000 Suit MRS. SHABINA AZIZ (Plaintiff) V/S STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XIII Rule 4 CPC)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XVI, R. 1(2)---Limitation Act (IX of 1908) S.3---Summoning and attendance of witnesses---Object, scope and nature of O.XVI R.1, C.P.C.---List of witnesses, non-filing of---Provisions of O.XVI, R.1, C.P.C. were mandatory---Use of the word "shall" in O.XVI, R.1(1), C.P.C. was re-emphasized with a prohibition that the party "shall not" be permitted to call witnesses other than those in the said list except with the permission of the court on showing "good cause" for the omission of said witnesses from the list---Time limit was an essential requirement of O.XVI, R.1, C.P.C. for seeking any relief with respect to summoning and attendance of court witnesses---Limitation of seven days was imposed so that the other side should be well aware of possible evidence expected in the case to meet it in rebuttal---Such limitation, if was allowed to be flouted with impunity, then the parties would keep on surprising each other by introducing witnesses and documents in evidence---After seven days from the time of framing of issues, upon failure to file list of witnesses, a statutory right was accrued in favour of opposite party which was; that even if evidence was available with a party such evidence shall not be used by the party having such evidence in their possession---Said right was analogized to the right of parties under S.3 of the Limitation Act, 1908---Rights survived but the remedy was extinguished---Evidence may be available but its effect was barred seven days after framing of issues by the court---Not only the "good cause" had to be shown by the delinquent party for calling a witness through the court but at the same time the applicant was required to explain the delay in disclosing the name of the witness---Failure of party to explain such delay would disentitle such party from getting relief and it would be against the spirit of the law to causally condone the time limit given in O.XVI, R.1, C.P.C. in the name of doing justice on merit. Muhammad Umar Mirza v. Waris Iqbal and others 1990 SCMR 964; 2008 YLR 1871 and 2008 CLC 1334 rel. (b) Administration of Justice--- ----Submission of irrelevant case-law by counsel appearing in court---Complaint of overwork in the judiciary was one of the basic obstacles in the administration of justice and it was not for the courts alone to administer justice and ensure that justice was not denied on account of inordinate delay in the disposal of cases---Each and every lawyer appearing in court had an equal responsibility to ensure that they should not consume the time of the court out of proportion to the issue in hand on the date of hearing---Very valuable time of the court can be consumed in the reading of case-law submitted by counsel and if such case-law was not relevant, it was one of the major contributing factor in the delay of administration of justice----Counsel were expected to be brief and to the point to help save time of the courts which in turn would utilized by the courts in disposal of other cases particularly the old cases.
Citation:2014 CLC 420
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting

832) 169/2020 Const. P. Fajjar Din (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:This Constitutional Petition has been filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorari/ mandamus to call for the records relating to the Compulsory Retirement Order dated 01.11.2012 and Appellate Order dated 30.10.2017 passed by the respondent-Airport Security Force (hereinafter referred to as `ASF'), and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to reinstate services of the petitioner as an Inspector (ASF).
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1005
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.760-K/2021 Mr. Fajjar Din v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Refer to Const. Bench)

833) 6966/2016 Const. P. Forte Pakistan (Private) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Azam Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 13-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

834) 3055/2016 Const. P. Maqsood Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Since respondent No 3 has crossed the age of 60 years and left his position from KPT, no further action is required. However, it is made clear that he is not entitled to a second pension from KPT due to his illegal deputation and subsequent absorption in KPT in the intervening period without the approval of the competent authority as discussed in the preceding paragraphs---Before parting with this order, it may be observed that even on moral ground, the illegalities committed by the management of KPT and respondent No.3, being a retired naval forces personnel and a patriot, was expected to act honestly in the best interest of the country. However, he chose not only to get himself illegally absorbed in KPT, but also claimed and received pension from their different services causing heavy loss to the national exchequer.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 761
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1325/2021 CDR (R) Khalid Munir v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

835) 1892/2018 Const. P. Faheem Ali Gambheer (Petitioner) V/S P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line: Mst. Faryal Talpur and Giyanoo Mal seek review/recall order of this Court c whereby their Membership was ordered to be suspended on account of their failure to curb the dog bite cases in their Constituencies. The Chief Secretary Sindh and Secretary Local Govt. Department Government of Sindh are directed to pay compensation in the shape of Diyat, Arsh or Daman amount (as the case may be) in terms of amount specified through latest Notification issued by Government of Pakistan to the bereaved families of the deceased of dog bite cases so also to the seriously injured victims and victims of the Dog bite cases within 15 days time after claim of the legal heirs of deceased and injured persons. It is made clear that the deceased and seriously injured of Rato Dero and Jamshoro shall also be compensated at the first instance. petitions stand disposed of.
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 420
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3707/2020 Noor Hassan and others v. Fahim Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

836) 176/2008 Civil Revision Jai Kumar (Applicant) V/S Partab Rai & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

837) 318/2017 H.C.A Raja Saqib Khan (Appellant) V/S Raja Sabri Khan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Benami Filing Appeal without Decree Administration Inheritance Property
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1790, 2025 SHC KHI 1792
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.626/2025 Raja Sabri Khan v. Raja Saqib Khan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

838) 1016/2013 Const. P. Nadeem Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

839) 378/2022 H.C.A Mrs. Seema Tariq Khan & Another (Appellant) V/S Najamul Sehr Soomro & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: H.C.A
Tag Line:High Court Appeal not maintainable under Section 3 of Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, against an order dismissing a Review Application. Order 47 Rule 7 CPC is applicable
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 929
Advocates:Mansoor-ul-Arfin(ADVO-157-SBC-KHI),Anwar Muhammad(ADVO-3569-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zubair Hashmi(ADVO-12273-SBC-KHS),Syed Adeel Mahmood Shah(ADVO-19981-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 08-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.186-K/2024 Mrs. Seema Tariq Khan and another v. Najmul Sehar Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Notice + Stay.

840) 3998/2021 Const. P. Lal Muhammad Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021 (Bail under section 7)
Tag Line:In the view of above legal position, it is observed that superior Court can entertain application for pre-arrest bail and grant relief to the accused in appropriate cases where accused could inter alia establish that he was prevented from approaching the lower Court concerned in the first instance. An accused normally can approach in the first instance the Court of Sessions/NAB Courts (now in view of the National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021) for bail before arrest as propriety so demands but depending on the compelling circumstances, an accused can approach the High Court directly by invoking its concurrent jurisdiction. In the present case, no compelling circumstances have been pointed out
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 491
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Muhammad Shafi(ADVO-2185-SBC-KHC),Abbas Rasheed Razvi(ADVO-14822-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 27-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

841) 1171/2012 Cr.Bail ALI ASGHAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 25-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting

842) 142/2022 Cr.Rev FAISAL SARDAR S/O SARDAR ALI KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 207
Advocates:Zahoor Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10377-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nizar(ADVO-10921-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Israr Ahmed(ADVO-19321-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

843) 752/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Akhtar Khan (Petitioner) V/S Registrar High Court of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 894
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

844) 272/2022 Const. P. Mir Muhammad Raza (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sehar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1152
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

845) 455/1990 I.T.R Sindh Club Karachi (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.293-K/2016 Commissioner Inland Tax v. M/s Sindh Club Karachi,C.A.2504/2016 Commissioner Income Tax/Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Sindh Club Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of

846) 33/2007 Judicial Companies Misc. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. (Applicant) V/S Beema Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Winding up petition
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2486/2019 Beema Pakistan Company Ltd, Karachi v. The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

847) 173/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Irfan S/o Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saima and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 808
Advocates:Farooq Rasheed(ADVO-365-BBC-QTA-QTA),Muhammad Sakhi @ Ghazali(ADVO-6788-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

848) 192/2017 Cr.Rev MOHSIN ABBASS S/O ABDUL REHMAN S (Applicant) V/S QADIR KHAN MANDOKHAIL & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 200, 203, 435 & 439---Private complaint, dismissal of---Revision against order of Judicial Magistrate---Maintainability---Procedure---Held, order having been passed under S.203, Cr.P.C., whereby direct complaint had been dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate without framing a charge and trial, it could not be treated as acquittal of the accused/respondents---Order under S.203 Cr.P.C, being an order passed by a court inferior to the Court of Session, the propriety demanded that the same should first be examined by the Sessions Judge for the purpose of satisfying itself to the correctness, legality or propriety of the said order passed by the Magistrate who was covered by the explanation given at the bottom of S.435, Cr.P.C.---Revision before the High Court being without exhausting the remedy available to the applicant was not maintainable---Matter was sent to the Sessions Judge for a just and fair decision on the grievance of the applicant---Revision application was thus disposed of accordingly.
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 94
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

849) 125/2016 Cr.Appeal Naeem @ Gunda Dahar (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

850) 234/2007 Suit BASIRAT DAD KHAN LODHI & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S FARHAT DAD KHAN LODHI & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Defendant is bonafide Purchaser for Value whose interest is to be protected. Suit dismissed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 140
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-23
Approved for Reporting

851) 6948/2019 Const. P. Anis Haroon and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:i) Whether the post of Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations is to be filled amongst the career foreign service officers or eminent personalities from business, media, law, and other areas on a contract basis ; ii) Whether the Prime Minister of Pakistan is the competent authority under Rule 15(1)(g)(h) of the Rules of Business, 1973 or the Federal Cabinet under Article 90 of the Constitution of Pakistan to make such appointment ; and, iii) Whether appointments on a contract basis are prohibited under or contrary to Section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and the Policy unless the conditions specified therein are satisfied?
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 307
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

852) 240/2017 Const. P. Mazhar Ali Langah (Petitioner) V/S Asad Ali Khoso & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Territorial jurisdiction of Family Court is governed by Rule 6 of the Family Court Rules 1965, not by provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act 1890.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 1113
Advocates:Ali Azhar Tunio(ADVO-3234-SBC-KHI),Abdul Ghani Bijarani(ADVO-71-SBC-KSH)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

853) 1224/2023 Const. P. Allah Dino & Others through Their Attorney (Petitioner) V/S Mst Qamar-u-Nisa & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 637
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

854) 764/2024 Cr.Bail SUBASH S/O JAYRAM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Accused specifically nominated in the FIR with specific role)
Tag Line:Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case, who challaned the present applicant along with others, these two versions require thorough probe by the trial Court. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant as recorded above, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail in crime No. 145 of 2024 of PS Steel Town subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 86
Advocates:Shafique Ahmed(ADVO-52507-SBC-KHS),Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHS),Javed Ahmed Rajput(ADVO-4482-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

855) 71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-NOV-10
Approved for Reporting

856) 238/2024 Civil Revision Ali Asghar Shah & Jumman Shah (Applicant) V/S Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 2461, 2025 SHC HYD 2546
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

857) 137/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Alam and Others. (Applicant) V/S District officer community and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Order XXI Rule 103 CPC
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 713
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

858) 26/2024 M.A. Shreemati Sarswati Devi Wd/o Khemchand (Late) (Appellant) V/S Public at Large and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 374
Advocates:Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHI),Anand Kumar(ADVO-8271-SBC-KHI),Sadaf Gul Memon(ADVO-16750-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

859) 5472/2017 Const. P. Shahid Iqbal Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.573-K/2018 Shahid Iqbal Shaikh v. The Govt. of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

860) 136/2014 Cr.Appeal Basar & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 13-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

861) 389/2012 Const. P. Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.673-K/2018 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others,C.A.49-K/2019 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

862) 89/2013 Suit.B Bank Al-Falah Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Gulistan Spinning Mills Limited and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

863) 62/2023 H.C.A Ghulam Ali P. Allana (Appellant) V/S LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES SUISSE SA & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Concept of Till Further Order), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXXVIII Rule 5)
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 242
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Salman Hamid(ADVO-3747-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 05-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

864) 68/2015 Const. P. Sherbaz Khan Rind And ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.881-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Sherbaz Khan Rind and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

865) 994/2020 Const. P. M/s. Guidance Schooling System Thr. M. Ashraf (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Seema Mohsin and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Rent matter-- In view of the above, no illegality is found to have been committed by both courts below. Writ of certiorari against the order passed in rent jurisdiction can be exercised only if the order is beyond the jurisdiction or patently illegal, which is not the present case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications with no order as to costs.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 93
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

866) 4729/2018 Const. P. Advance Telecom (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 914
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.851-K/2020 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s.Advance Telecom,C.A.31/2025 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s.Advance Telecom Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. (Orders dated 13.01.2025 and 16.01.2025 have been declared non est and Crl.O.P.1/2025 was order to be fixed along with the appeals arising out of CPLA No.836-K/2020 etc),Pending

867) 162/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Rafiq. (Petitioner) V/S Officer Incharge National Database & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

868) 594/2019 Cr.J.A ALI SHAH S/O ZAREEN KHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 268
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Sara Malkani(ADVO-15404-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

869) 1535/2019 Const. P. Khaliq-ur-Rehman & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 550
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.222/2022 Imam Bux, Honorary Secretary of Madrass Cooperative Housing Society Ltd Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Cooperative Department, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

870) 37/2021 F.R.A Fazal Mehmood Thr. Attorney Mansoor Malik (Appellant) V/S Faisal Imran (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 401
Advocates:Muhammad Zahid Kabeer(ADVO-10594-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

871) 1499/2017 Suit Faisal Mehmood (Plaintiff) V/S PIA Corporation Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 08-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

872) 415/2022 H.C.A Muhammad Hussain (Appellant) V/S Imtiaz Ahmed & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 673
Advocates:Mehmood Anwar Hussain Baloch(ADVO-2976-SBC-KHS),Feroze(ADVO-6910-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting

873) 12/2010 Const. P. Safdar Ali Sahito (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 01-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

874) 415/2024 Const. P. Asim Farooq S/o Muhammad Farooq (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shaista Choudhry (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Issue of Jurisdiction in G&W matters.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 617
Advocates:Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

875) 817/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Naheed (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2436
Advocates:Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-18219-SBC-KHE),Fahad Akbar(ADVO-23800-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Farhan(ADVO-14016-SBC-KHC),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4913/2025 National Bank of Pakistan, through President, Karachi and another v. Naheed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

876) 241/2017 S.M.A Barbara Helena Philomina through attorney Debbie (Petitioner) V/S Marina Caroline Bond - Deceased (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

877) 16/2021 Cr.J.A Mehar Ali Solangi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Appellant expired. Appeal allowed, on the ground FIR lodged delay after 3 Years.)
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 345
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

878) 163/2018 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. Mehran Associates (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 124
Advocates:Fahmida Khanam(ADVO-7414-SBC-KHC),Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHC),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Ahmed Khan(ADVO-6852-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting

879) 34/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Ruqiya Qureshi and Others (Applicant) V/S Akhtiar Ali Sangi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Section 44 Transfer of Property Act. (Joint Possession of Dwelling House)
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 448
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

880) 3532/2020 Const. P. China Power Hub Generation Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 885
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.546-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue Z-III v. China Power Hub Generation Copmpany (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

881) 56/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Wahid (Applicant) V/S Punhoon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2330
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

882) 4287/2020 Const. P. Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Promotion (department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin)
Tag Line:Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 852
Advocates:G.N Qureshi(ADVO-7228-SBC-KHS),Asif Ali(ADVO-20048-SBC-KHS),Waheed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-18218-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 20-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

883) 2681/2025 Const. P. Rayan Technology (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Freezing of Bank Accounts by the FIA is set-aside.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1968, 2025 SHC KHI 1982, 2025 SHC KHI 1983
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

884) 2013/2015 Suit M/s. A.F Ferguson & Co., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: In all these Suits the claim of the Plaintiffs was to the effect that in terms of Section 92 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 there is no compulsion or restriction that it is only the firm which can file its return and pay taxes on the income, as at the same time, the partners of the firm are also qualified to file their return and pay the tax accordingly and in that situation the firm would not be liable to pay any tax on the income on which the partners have already paid the tax. According to the Plaintiffs, Section 92 does not prohibit the partners from paying tax on their income as against the same by the firm. Their further case was that the inverse of what is provided in Section 92 is permitted as not being prohibited or restricted; however, the contention of the Plaintiffs is held to be misconceived as this would defeat the intention of the legislature and would rather amount to do legislation in favour of the Plaintiffs. The law as it stands today provides a clear mechanism and the principle of taxation which has to be applied on the firm, whereas, nothing could be read into the said provision . It is settled law that the function of the Courts is only to expound and not to the legislate. In view of such position, all Suits have been dismissed by holding that the firm i.e. the Plaintiff No. 1 in all these Suits was required to file its return and pay the tax accordingly; and not the partners individually in respect of the income received from the association of persons or the firm; and once the tax is paid by the firm, then the partners are not required to pay any tax on such income.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

885) 5009/2019 Const. P. Sheikh Muhammad Ashgar (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB (426, Cr.P.C. Application is dismissed, crimes are heinous as they are crimes of corruption and cannot be condoned .)
Citation:2021 YLR 188
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

886) 667/2020 Const. P. Prof. Dr. Jan Muhammad Memon & another (Petitioner) V/S P. O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Service Matter; Quo Warranto 1. Appointment of an ad hoc appointee / Professor as Principal of a Medical College challenged; Held No 2. Exercise of Discretion in such matter; guidelines
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 621
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 08-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

887) 82/2018 I. A Mrs. Asma Hassan & another (Appellant) V/S Askari Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Tag Line:As a consequence hereof the Limitation Application has become infructous and is disposed-of.
Citation:2020 CLC 1068, 2019 SBLR Sindh 2030
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.436-K/2019 Mrs Asma Hassan and another v. Askari Bank Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

888) 1862/2016 Const. P. M/S Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Petitioner) V/S M/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) ltd & (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Ousting the petitioner from availing their remedy which they could have before the executing Court amounts to a denial of fair trial. I am in agreement that such a compromise ought to have been recognized by executing Court, however whether tenant can still make an attempt to have it recognized or otherwise, the jurisdiction vest with the executing Court to be exercised first and I refrain from passing on my observation as it may prejudice the case of parties
Citation:2018 YLR 2337
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.69-K/2018 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. and others,C.P.60-K/2018 Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

889) 715/1996 Const. P. MST ANILA ABRAR (Petitioner) V/S GOVT. OF SINDH AND OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Citizenship Act, 1951
Tag Line:i-Section 10(2) of the Citizen Act gives a preferential treatment to the spouse of Pakistani man vis-??-vis a Pakistani woman and thus infringes constitutional guarantees ii-The object is foreign spouses and not just foreign wives and thus making of 10(2) and reading it now may vary with constitutional demands. The intent of the said provision is not to encourage or facilitate women to marry Pakistani men. The concept which now emerged through international jurisprudence is to enable Pakistanis married to foreigners to be able to live together and acquire nationality for their spouses and live a family life in Pakistan and the Act of 1951 should now be read and tamed accordingly. Restricting the benefit of Section 10(2) to Pakistani men only is a clear discrimination to Pakistani women. 45. The doctrine of reading in is used by Courts to extend the scope to avoid and limit the discriminatory language having head-on conflict with a constitutional provision. The doctrine of ???reading in??? involves adding words to a statutory provision to bring it in conformity with constitutional provisions. iii- The application of "reading in" is required to cater section 10(2) of the Citizenship Act to save it from offending Article 25 of the Constitution that is wherever reference is made to ???woman??? and ???she??? therein; the words "or man" and "or he" be read. This adjustment shall not have any effect on the operability of the statute.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1135
Advocates:Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 05-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

890) 38/2022 Cr.Rev Muzaffar Ali Soomro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1373
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

891) 431/2011 Suit PSO (Plaintiff) V/S PROV.OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Property Tax on property of KPT is payable and is not exempt, whereas, the Plaintiff / Tenant pursuant to lease Agreement is liable to pay the same.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 869
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

892) 184/2018 Const. P. Ghulam Qadir Thebo (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Promotion (petitioner has been superseded HPSB in its meeting held , discussed supra on account of a bad reputation. CP dismissed.)
Tag Line:In our view, to qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. This is the minimum expectation to ensure a clean and efficient administration and to protect the public interest. An employee found not fit for promotion cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his / her case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his / her entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion denies him / her promotion, such denial would not be illegal or unjustified under the service jurisprudence.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 596
Advocates:S. Mahmood Alam Rizvi(ADVO-3351-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Obaid -ur- Rehman Khan(ADVO-12008-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.550-K/2022 Ghulam Qadir Thebo v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan through Secretary, Establisment Division, Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded

893) 7176/2022 Const. P. Imran Qadeer (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Tax matters
Tag Line:(FTO)Federal Tax Ombudsman; jurisdiction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against FBR's employees without any notice; HELD No;
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 445
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 12-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

894) 3/2016 II.A. Mian Hassanullah,thr: LRs. (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Sadiq and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 655
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1338-K/2023 Mian Hassanullah since deceased through his L.Rs. and another v. Abdul Razzak & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

895) 1074/2018 Const. P. Mst. Parveen Ara (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Hanif & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 15 )
Tag Line:Evidence available does not fulfill the requirement of Section 15-A of the SRPO as it has to be proved independently that the premises was re-let. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to prove its contention through evidence that it was a misuse of section 15 of the SRPO whereby the eviction of the petitioner was acquired through a mala fide attempt.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1159
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.580-K/2021 Mst.Parveen Ara v. Muhammad Hanif & others,C.P.L.A.1475-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Amir Asim Steel Re-Rolling Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & others,C.A.47-K/2021 Mst.Parveen Ara v. Muhammad Hanif & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Allowed

896) 722/2018 Cr.Bail Jumoon S/o Muhammad ALi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

897) 362/2012 Suit M/S. DALDA FOODS (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

898) 469/2024 Const. P. Aijaz Ali Chandio & Others (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shamul Chandio & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Laws regulating "Adoption of Children"
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 778, 2025 SHC LAR 1796, 2025 SHC LAR 1798
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3120/2025 Aijaz Ali and others v. Mst. Shamul and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

899) 644/2005 Suit MUHAMMAD KASHIF (Plaintiff) V/S FURQAN KARIM & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 83
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

900) 1725/2023 Const. P. M/s Al- Abbas Fabrics & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1018
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 09-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1103-K/2023 M/s. Al Abbas Fabrics (Pvt.) Ltd. & others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Energy, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

901) 787/2019 Criminal Appeal Akhtar Meen S/o Khayal Jan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1221
Advocates:Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-4091-SBC-KHW),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.90-K/2021 Sheeraz Gul Thebo v. Akhtar Meen Afridi,Crl.P.91-K/2021 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh v. Akhtar Meen Afridi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned

902) 4371/2020 Const. P. Syed Ghulam Mohiuddin and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-4371 of 2020 filed by Syed Ghulam Mohiuddin against Government of Sindh (vehicle number plats petition). The petition has been dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 821
Advocates:Sarosh Jameel(ADVO-18157-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(ADVO-11058-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 29-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1464-K/2021 Syed Ghulam Mohiuddin & another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned Next Session

903) 2719/2011 Const. P. Dilip Kumar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting

904) 286/2003 Suit SYED WAQAR HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) V/S MST.ALAM ARA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 406
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

905) 1961/2018 Const. P. Fahmeed Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S Ist. Addl:D.J Sanghar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:The Appellate Court is burdened with more responsibility if a judgment is being set-aside then in case where the judgment is being upheld by him, as he could agree with the reasons assigned by the trial court. But when the judgment and decree is being set-aside then the strong reasons are required to be provided by the Appellate Court.
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 377
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

906) 186/2016 Spl.Cr.Misc MUMTAZUDDIN S/O MOINUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

907) 1376/2024 Cr.Bail IMTIAZ S/O MEHBOOB ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Tag Line:Primarily, to constitute an offense under the aforesaid Section, the prosecution is not only required to prove the possession but also to establish the knowledge about the property to be stolen. In the present case, the prosecution has presented the case to the extent that the subject vehicles were stolen and involved in the subject FIRs under Section 381-A PPC and came into possession of the applicants, which were later on recovered from their possession, be that as it may, if the aforesaid section is supposed to be applied, the maximum punishment provided under the statute for the offense is seven years however under Section 411 PPC is three years, which provides dishonestly receiving stolen property and the same does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C. It is settled law that grant of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory clause is a rule and refusal is an exception. The liberty of a person is a precious right which cannot be taken away without exceptional foundations. So far as the applicability of sections 381-A PPC and 411 PPC, the trial Court has to determine, if the prosecution brings any cogent material to connect the applicant with the alleged crime, as the issue of confession before police and subsequent recovery has already been discussed in the preceding paragraph.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1015
Advocates:Rameez Raja(ADVO-20204-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

908) 154/2008 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S China National Water Resourcess Hydropower Eng. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 03-NOV-09
Approved for Reporting

909) 48/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Faisal and Others (Applicant) V/S Jan Muhammad Pathan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 71
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

910) 3257/2010 Const. P. Hafiz Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) V/S Fed.of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Progressing further on the subject issue, we have noticed that the (Amendment) Act, 2016, and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others supra came on 21st January 2016, which clarified the status of NCAES Rules, 2011 of National Command Authority. Therefore, there is no further discussion on the aforesaid proposition required on our part. It is well settled that the Government and control organization fall within the ambit of "person" within the meaning of Article 199(1)(a)(ii) read with Article 199 (5) of the Constitution and if their actions or orders are violative of the statute creating those bodies or of rules/regulations framed under a statute, the same could be interfered with by the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. It is also well settled that when the service issues of the employees of such organizations/authorities are non-statutory then its enforcement has been restricted by the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company v Syed Salahuddin (2022 SCMR 991).
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 608
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.59-K/2011 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.489-K/2025 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed, Adjourned

911) 566/2013 Suit Tariq Rafi. (Plaintiff) V/S Topgen Health Care/T.G. Pharma & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC Note 39
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 27-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

912) 2054/2019 Const. P. Natho (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 SBLR Sindh Note 266
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

913) 31/2021 Const. P. Irfan Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench of N.I.R.C & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 612
Advocates:Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Nadeem Ahmed Farooqi(ADVO-6272-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 02-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.721-K/2022 Irfan Ali Khan v. M/s. Habib Bank Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

914) 17/2012 H.C.A Syed Jaffar Abbas (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLD 209
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 10-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.137-K/2014 Syed Jaffar Abbas v. Habib Bank Limited,C.A.4-K/2015 Syed Jaffar Abbas v. Habib Bank Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of

915) 1/2017 Service Appeal Mian Fayyaz Rabbani (Appellant) V/S The Chief Jutice H.S.C through Registrar (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

916) 5381/2021 Const. P. Power Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 406
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

917) 771/2024 Const. P. Teerath (Petitioner) V/S Beena D/o Somji (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Tag Line:The learned trial Court was duly empowered to appreciate the evidence and no case has been set forth to apprehend that the same was not done. Just because the view of one party did not prevail does not vitiate the process. The entire matter was open to the appellate Court, but not approached at the first instance for deliberation whether to differ with the judgment rendered by the learned trial Court or otherwise. The counsel remained unable to demonstrate any apparent infirmity about the appreciation of evidence that does not merit any consideration by this Court. Even otherwise such an exercise is not amenable for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. On the aforesaid proposition we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court reported as 2011 SCMR 1990; 2001 SCMR 574 and PLD 2001 Supreme Court 415.
Citation:2024 SHC MPK 341
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

918) 173/2015 Const. P. Imran Ali & another (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4088/2019 Imran Ali Talpur & another v. Government of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

919) 5663/2021 Const. P. Mir Karam Ali Magsi and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether a person is legally qualified for appointment or promotion to a particular post and grade is relatable to the factum whether he possesses the requisite qualifications for consideration, whereas the question of fitness pertains to the competency of the person concerned, which is to be decided by the competent authority.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 279
Advocates:Ghulam Shabbir Babar(ADVO-10219-SBC-KHI),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Sikandar Ali(ADVO-14953-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

920) 2421/2014 Suit Hameeda Iqbal & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Majeed & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 655
Advocates:Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-12115-SBC-KHI),Zahid Hussain(ADVO-4065-SBC-KHI),Hameed Siddiqui(ADVO-3991-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

921) 1476/2013 Cr.Bail ABBASS ALI S/O ABDUL KHALIQ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PCr.LJ 1791
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

922) 217/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) V/S Haresh Kumar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVII Rule 3 CPC)
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

923) 100/2024 Spl. Cr. A. Waqar @ Vicky Gadegi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 573
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

924) 116/2020 H.C.A Shahzad Noor Muhammad (Appellant) V/S Karachi Gymkhana & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, H.C.A
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 343
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

925) 1474/2019 Const. P. Altaf Ali Buriro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Remissions to convict-Lifer
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2717
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4796/2025 Mehboob Ali v. Altaf Ali Buriro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned Relist 3 Member bench

926) 2323/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Sultan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

927) 88/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Gul Hassan (Applicant) V/S Wazeer Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 539, 2026 CLC 1370
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

928) 1809/2024 Cr.Bail HASSAN ALAM S/O NOOR LAM & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1115
Advocates:Muhammad Umar(ADVO-23239-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

929) 3026/2016 Const. P. Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Petition dismiss)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

930) 618/2025 Cr.Bail Asad Ali S/o Yousuf Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 708, 2025 SHC KHI 709
Advocates:Syed Qaim Ali Shah(ADVO-18879-SBC-KHS),Aijaz Hyder(ADVO-22207-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

931) 123/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Shahid Khan & another (Applicant) V/S Mst. Sofia Bano & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2023 SHC HYD 999
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

932) 1492/2011 Suit MAHMOODA TAPAL & ANOTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 28
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

933) 689/2021 Cr.Misc. Pir Shoaib Ahmed Qureshi and others (Applicant) V/S SHO PS Khadhar SBA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1170
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

934) 550/2022 Const. P. Mst. Kiran Yazdani D/o Syed Ather Yazdani (Petitioner) V/S The XXth Civil Judge/JM, Khi South and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:When an appeal lies against an order on temporary custody passed under section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 875
Advocates:Shazia Aziz(ADVO-10080-SBC-KHE),Nazia Siddiqui(ADVO-10687-SBC-KHI),Hassaan Sabir(ADVO-6909-SBC-KHI),Shafqat Zaman(ADVO-11-3116-KBC-HAZ),Sana Abid(ADVO-20018-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

935) 1357/2017 Const. P. Shrimati Aashi (Petitioner) V/S Bhesham Lal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Family matter
Tag Line:This Proviso is primarily is in consideration of the fact that Muslim women who file their respective suits for dissolution of marriages and dower amount shall also be in a position to avail the jurisdiction of local limits where the (wife) ordinarily resides but that doesnt exclude the jurisdiction of the above two situations i.e. (a) and (b).
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

936) 297/2015 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Muhammad Owais (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 23-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

937) 3560/2016 Const. P. Rasool Bux Soho (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 10-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.768/2018 Rasool Bux Soho v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

938) 852/2019 Const. P. Naeem Sadiq and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:CBC janitorial staff-- minimum wage
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 384
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

939) 30/1994 R.A (Civil Revision) Faiz Muhammad and others (Applicant) V/S Army Welfare Turst and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:1. A simple suit for declaration under section 42 of the Specific Relief Act regarding possession without claiming title to property is incompetent 2. Khasra Girdawari is not a title document nor can be relied upon to claim title or possession.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 830
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

940) 426/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. United Refrigeration Industires Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Director D I&I-FBR (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 874
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.830-K/2021 Director, Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) v. United Refrigeration Industries Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

941) 4965/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan Nadeem & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Model Custom Collectorate and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Search and seizure.
Citation:2021 PTD 764
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3606/2020 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Revenue, FBR, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Hassan Nadeem and others,C.A.4123/2022 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Revenue, FBR, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Hassan Nadeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

942) 2308/2020 Const. P. Zubair Javed (Petitioner) V/S Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Sindh Provincial Assembly Secretariat (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1975)
Tag Line:A person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of service are protected under the constitutional protection.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 262
Advocates:Ghulam Sarwar Chandio(ADVO-1145-SBC-HYD),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

943) 2608/2021 Const. P. Abdullah Soomro (Petitioner) V/S UBL & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 710
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Mughal(ADVO-2678-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mahmood Abdul Ghani(ADVO-4801-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.330/2023 United Bank Limited through its President, Karachi and others v. Abdullah Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

944) 8/2016 Election Appeal Haji Arz Mohammad Brohi (Appellant) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Citation:2019 YLR 2098
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

945) 104/2015 H.C.A M/s. Nina Industries Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. E.F.U. Genral Insurance Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1133
Advocates:Naved Ahmed(ADVO-8552-SBC-KHI),Mujahid Bhatti(ADVO-7589-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

946) 151/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Abdul Haq @ Mulla and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 12-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

947) 20/2017 Const. P. Mrs. Humaira Imran. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 467
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

948) 52/2009 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) V/S Ameenuddin Since Deceased Through his Legal Heirs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 115 & O. VII, R. 11---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.9---Suit for possession of immovable property---Revision---Competency---Phrase "no appeal lies" in S.115, C.P.C."---Scope---Plaint was rejected by Trial Court but Appellate Court converted the suit for declaration and permanent injunction into a suit for recovery of possession---Validity---Law had specifically barred an appeal against the dismissal of suit under S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Revision against the impugned appellate order was not maintainable as appeal had been barred by law---Revisional Court could not find any jurisdictional defect in the order passed by the appellate court when appeal was barred by law---Revision would lie when no appeal lay---Phrase "no appeal lies" in S.115, C. P. C could not be equated with the phrase "no appeal shall lie" used in S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Right and entitlement of the parties could not be determined in the suit under S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Lawful claimant could file a civil suit for his title and recovery of possession thereof---Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2017 CLC 1406
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 03-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

949) 30/2018 Cr.Acctt.A HAROON PUNJWANI S/O SULEMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: NAB (Conviction Set aside, Land which sold by accused, not decided to be used any purpose, no loss Government. )
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 996
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1337/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Haroon Punjwani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

950) 104/2019 Criminal Miscelleneous SHOUKAT ALI KHATIAN & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE IST ADJ, KARACHI SOUTH & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 22-A, 22-B & 154---Order of ex-officio Justice of Peace to register FIR---Scope---Application under S.22-A, Cr.P.C. was allowed by the Justice of Peace and SHO was directed to register the case in accordance with law---Validity---Station House Officer had no authority to refuse to record the statement of complainant in the relevant register irrespective of its authenticity/ correctness or falsity of such statement---High Court was not supposed to comment on the possible outcome of the inquiry and investigation which was to be conducted by SHO after recording statement of respondent---Whatever was the stance of the applicants, it should first be brought to the notice of SHO to falsify the statement of respondent, if any, incorporated in the FIR---If the statement of respondent after inquiry and investigation found to be false, the SHO could prosecute respondent under S. 182, P.P.C.---Criminal miscellaneous application was dismissed accordingly. Brig. (Retd.) Imtiaz Ahmad v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Interior Division, Islamabad and 2 others 1994 SCMR 2142 ref. Muhammad Bashir v. Station House Officer, Okara Cantt. and others PLD 2007 SC 539 and Younas Abbas and others v. Additional Sessions Judge Chakwal and others PLD 2016 SC 581 rel.
Citation:2020 YLR Note 21
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

951) 7319/2018 Const. P. Mst. Shamim Naqvi (Petitioner) V/S P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.401-K/2019 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others,C.A.21-K/2020 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of

952) 8125/2018 Const. P. Pakistan Minerals Developement Corporation (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Mines and Minerals, CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:Petitioner, Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources. In respect of an area of 3818.81 acres at Lakhra, District Jamshoro, for which a mining-lease was granted to the Petitioner for mining coal for a period of thirty[30] years. These renewal applications remained pending with the Respondent No.2, and though in the meantime both the mining-leases of the Petitioner expired in April 2015, the date of such expiry stood extended .Respondent No.2 had granted mining-permits to SLCMC without waiting for a decision on the Petitioners appeals pending under Rule 71 of the SMC Rules. Mr. Jawad Dero, the learned AAG Sindh, and Mr. Jaffar Raza, learned counsel for SLCMC had objected to the maintainability of these fresh petitions on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions for the same relief were still pending. we agree with Barrister Zameer Ghumro that these petitions cannot be held to be not-maintainable merely on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions are also pending. Appellate Authority manifests that the refusal to renew the Petitioner mining-leases was only for the reason that the Petitioner was Federal Government entity and the Government of Sindh had already made up its mind to award a mining concession in the same area to the SLCMC, a company wholly owned by the Government of Sindh. Having found no reason to interfere in the discretion exercised by the Respondent No.2 The petitions succeed for prayer clause 3 in terms that the impugned Notifications dated 09-07-2018 granting mining permits to SLCMC (Respondent No.3) having been granted in contravention of Rule 68 of the SMC Rules, the same are without lawful authority and are therefore set-aside judgment shall be dispatched by the office to o be placed in C.P. No. D-7643/2018 pending before this Court at Karachi The petitions stand disposed off.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2795/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others,C.P.L.A.443-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Energy Department, Govt. of Sindh and another v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation and another,C.A.1539/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of

953) 1952/2014 Const. P. Syed Ali Ammar Jafry and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.424-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited and another v. Syed Ali Ammaar Jafrey and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

954) 631/2010 Const. P. Tahir Ashraf Durrani & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S FIA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 728
Advocates:Nayyar Ziauddin(ADVO-4179-SBC-KHI),Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Kaukab S. Ahmed(ADVO-10589-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Ilyas Khan(ADVO-1410-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

955) 50/2025 R.A (Civil Revision) Ali Sher Oghai & others (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Rejection of plaint. Adjudication of fishing rights of fishermen in public waters.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1290
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

956) 31/2020 Cr.J.A Abdul Majeed Gaincho (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal ( convicted and sentenced under Section 9 (c), CNS Act, is Sat aside, on delay sanding Parcel and not in Safe Custody. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 419
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

957) 908/2019 Const. P. Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Matloob Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Razia Khatoon and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 05-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

958) 18/2021 II.A. Asif Baig S/o Siddique Baig (Appellant) V/S Mst. Salma Begum and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Right to file Second Appeal under section 100 CPC
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1061
Advocates:Khalid Mumtaz(ADVO-4861-SBC-KHI),Khalid Pervez(ADVO-5994-SBC-KHI),Roomi Iqbal(ADVO-9621-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

959) 876/2007 Suit Mustafa H. Jivanjee (Plaintiff) V/S The Director General Karachi Development Authority (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 06-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

960) 4430/2014 Const. P. High Court Bar Association Hyderabad (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti
Order Date: 03-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

961) 1/2014 Cr.Appeal Mushtaq Ali (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 08-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.220/2019 Rafiullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

962) 4035/2019 Const. P. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 258
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 31-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3921/2021 The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and another v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.L.A.757-K/2021 The Chairman (FBR) v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

963) 1886/2006 Const. P. Iftikhar Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S C.D.G.K. &Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 27-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.166-K/2010 City District Govt. & others v. Iftikhar A.Soomro & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

964) 167/2020 H.C.A Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Sadan General Trading LLC & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:(i). Discussion on Section 74 of Contract Act. (ii). maxim "ubi jus ibi remedium" Meaning `where there is right, there is a remedy.
Citation:2025 CLC 525
Advocates:Muhammad Aamir Khosa(ADVO-15884-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ghulam Muhammad Dars(ADVO-16974-SBC-KHS),Muneer Iqbal(ADVO-17705-SBC-KHE),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.66/2025 Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Limited Karachi v. Sadan General Trading LLC through its Local Agent KZK Industrial & Commercial Co. Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

965) 319/2023 Suit MAXCO (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:Justice demands that rights in the physical world and the digital/virtual world should be the same and at par with each other. Yet currently, SECP appears to be maintaining two different sets of standards for qualifications/remarks. It is clear that the Registrar of Companies, SECP is not empowered to publish qualifications/remarks on its dashboard and/or its digital platform for banks relating to the Plaintiff Company that ???Currently Company is under DISPUTE CASES??? as the same is contrary to law and SECP???s regulations framed under the Companies Act, 2017. Consequently, SECP is directed to immediately remove the said remarks from its dashboard/digital portal accessed by banks or other entities and replace such qualifications/remarks with any of the qualifications/remarks that may be assigned to the Plaintiff Company under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 593
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 23-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

966) 920/2017 Suit Mst. Hajani Sherbano (Plaintiff) V/S Qazi Muhammad Fareed & Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 24-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

967) 2/2022 M.A. Mckinsey & Company Pakistan (Private) Limited (Appellant) V/S Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:It is nobody's case that holding company has discharged such obligations, if at all it is under such duty. It is not stated that the holding company has disclosed such data in the consolidated financial statements of the group and presented as those of single enterprise and that such would be within domain of SECP, so that the purpose of non-disclosure of the remuneration of CEO or director of the relevant company whose shares are being held, would be inconsequential.
Citation:2023 CLD 530
Advocates:Shahbakht Pirzada(ADVO-14752-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.577-K/2023 McKinsey & Company Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

968) 1767/2014 Suit Abdul Sattar Shaikh. (Plaintiff) V/S Adeel Zahoor Malik & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Violation of proprietary right being a fundamental right should be remedied forthwith. Failure to examine both attesting witnesses of a Sale Agreement, which is a disputed document, is fatal to the case of Defendant, who is basing his claim on the Sale Agreement. Sufficient evidence is brought on record justifying grant of mesne profits. No Village / Goth can exist in a developed Scheme-36. The Passport entries and presumption of genuineness as envisaged in Articles-90, 92 and 129 (e) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, is attracted. Hence, Plaintiff is entitled to mesne profits. The conclusive evidence about the wrongful / illegal possession of Defendants No.1 and 2 of the suit plot does not require an inquiry as mentioned in Order XX, Rule 12, Sub Rule 1 (b). Suit Decreed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

969) 6183/2015 Const. P. Mazhar Ali Magsi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.803-K/2023 Samira Mahamadi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

970) 6142/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Ahmed Manna (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1388
Advocates:Jawaid Farooqi(ADVO-3964-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

971) 163/2013 Adm. Suit Muhammad Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 18-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting

972) 219/2021 Cr.Rev NIAZ AHMED S/O SHER JANG & ORS (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD AIJAZ & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 817
Advocates:Shamshad Ali(ADVO-19351-SBC-KHS),Amjad Hussain(ADVO-14302-SBC-KHE),Bahadur Khan Khattak(ADVO-4351HLC-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.66-K/2024 Niaz Ahmed and another v. Mohammad Aijaz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

973) 39/2016 Election Appeal Mohib Ali (Appellant) V/S Returning Officer and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 28-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

974) 6779/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Salman (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 82
Advocates:Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

975) 7/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Regus Executive Center Karachi.(Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Assistant Commissioner (Unit-04) Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:Sales tax on renting of property and Business support services; Defined
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 61
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid Khan Mahar(ADVO-15076-SBC-KHS),Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHE),Shamshad Ahmed Narejo(ADVO-2185-SBC-HYD),Daniyal Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-19877-SBC-KHS),Jahanzeb Awan(ADVO-11549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 17-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

976) 256/2012 Criminal Miscelleneous Muhammad Aslam Khan @ Niazi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

977) 858/2008 Suit MST.BASHIRA BIBI (Plaintiff) V/S FED.OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 554
Advocates:Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

978) 836/2019 Const. P. Sardar Muhammad Bux Mahar Thr. Tasawar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saman Muhammad Mahar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 7, 8 and 25)
Tag Line:The natural guardians/mother and father of minors are not required to seek declaration of their guardianship through the Court. The Court under Section 7 of the Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 is not empowered to decide title of guardian about custody of the ward.
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 1079
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

979) 955/2021 Const. P. Mst. Shawana Hussain D/o Iftikhar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Shahzaib and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1311
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil(ADVO-3154-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Hafiz(ADVO-8755-SBC-KHI),Rahat Fazal(ADVO-5355-SBC-KHE),Arif Dawood(ADVO-8711-SBC-KHI),Muzammil Iqbal(ADVO-9075-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.179-K/2024 Shahzaib v. Mst. Shawana Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to Appellate Court.

980) 4/2021 Cr.Acctt.A SULTAN QAMAR SIDDIQUI S/O QAMAR UL HASSAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:NAB Matter - Appeal against conviction
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1120
Advocates:Munwar Ali(ADVO-2050-SBC-KHP),Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),S. Mahmood Alam Rizvi(ADVO-3351-SBC-KHI),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Obaid -ur- Rehman Khan(ADVO-12008-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1339/2021 Sultan Qamar Siddiqui v. The State through Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

981) 48/2018 Cr.Rev Nasrullah Khoso (Applicant) V/S Sessions Judge Kandhkot & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2023 SHC LAR 558
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

982) 28/2006 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A The State (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Saleem (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 31-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

983) 204/2025 Const. P. M/S International Credit Information Lt & another (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Wahab Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 3561
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-25
Approved for Reporting

984) 937/2025 Const. P. Syed Sahir Hasan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Resolution to give effect to Article 202-A )
Tag Line: bail in cases of Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 2024 is to be heard by a Constitutional Bench formed under Article 202A(3) of the Constitution and not a Regular Bench
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 507
Advocates:Allah Dino(ADVO-23693-SBC-KHS),Habibullah(ADVO-18059-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Manzar Bashir(ADVO-13572-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

985) 29/2011 Civil Revision Haji Abdul Rasool Tunio (Applicant) V/S S.D.O Hesco Wapda and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 18-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

986) 2502/2015 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector, Model Customs Collectorate (Applicant) V/S The Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench-I & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Mazhar Ali Khan(ADVO-12976-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Rafique(ADVO-9220-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

987) 971/2022 Suit M/S INSAF & BROTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Rules 31, 32 SPPRA, 2010. Section 10 CPC.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 115
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Asad Ashfaq Tola(ADVO-17101-SBC-KHS),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI),Bilal Ahmed Khan(ADVO-19578-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

988) 700/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S Aurangzaib & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Release of tampered / smuggled vehicle carrying smuggled items.
Citation:2021 PTD 1026
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1658-K/2021 Aurangzaib v. Director General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

989) 5458/2020 Const. P. Haji Adam Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021 (Bail under section 7)
Tag Line: In the view of above legal position, it is observed that superior Court can entertain application for pre-arrest bail and grant relief to the accused in appropriate cases where accused could inter alia establish that he was prevented from approaching the lower Court concerned in the first instance. An accused normally can approach in the first instance the Court of Sessions/NAB Courts (now in view of the National Accountability (Second Amendment) Ordinance XXIII, 2021) for bail before arrest as propriety so demands but depending on the compelling circumstances, an accused can approach the High Court directly by invoking its concurrent jurisdiction. In the present case, no compelling circumstances have been pointed out.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 525
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Shoaib Ali Khatian(ADVO-17922-SBC-KHS),Rasheed A. Rizvi(ADVO-2131-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shafi(ADVO-2185-SBC-KHC),Abbas Rasheed Razvi(ADVO-14822-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

990) 2272/2021 Suit PAKISTAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction), Competition Act, 2010 (section 24(1), (5) & (6) read with section 28(1))
Tag Line:Chairman's right to cast second vote Challenged by plaintiffs. **There should not have been a situation of even number of member of commission in a quasi-judicial proceeding, however, in the current situation the event of an equality of votes reached and hence the Chairman/Chairperson and/or any other member already rendered opinion, cannot be saddled with additional responsibility to cast a vote to untie knot as it would destroy the balance of each independent judicial mind being applied to a triable question under adjudication.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 66, 2023 CLD 265
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

991) 55/2013 I. A Homepack Freight International & another (Appellant) V/S Saudi Pak Leasing Company Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 82
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

992) 8/2016 M.A. M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Jahangir Moghul (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line: As per Section 118 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000, a claim is to be settled within ninety days, subject to certain conditions contained in the above provision. Consequently, finding of learned Tribunal, even on this issue, does not justify any interference.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 684
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.445-K/2021 M/s. EFU General Insurace Ltd. v. Jahangir Moghul Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

993) 1724/2024 Const. P. Mir Mazhar Talpur (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2025 SHC MPK 575, 2026 CLC 40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

994) 750/2009 Const. P. M/S Dewan Cement Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan thr Sec Ministry of Finance and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-JUN-10
Approved for Reporting

995) 756/2017 Const. P. S.M Kaleem Makki (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service
Tag Line:It is the general principle of jurisprudence that the law takes its effect from the date of promulgation and interpretation of the said law cannot be subjected to the doctrine of retrospective effects unless expressed specifically in the judgment, therefore, Mustafa Impexs case is to be applied prospectively, in general. It is the existence of law at the relevant time that counts, which may have been interpreted at a later date. Since the deficiency in the appointment notification as far as Provincial Cabinet is concerned, is not questioned no challenge could be thrown. The principle we derive from the conclusion of the aforesaid three judgments is that Mustafa Impex only invalidates those actions retrospectively which were impugned in that lis and not all others, so by virtue of aforesaid principle the notification for the appointment of the petitioner is saved whereas it set a mechanism for future course i.e. issuance of impugned notification.
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) Note 11
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 28-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.724-K/2019 Province of Sindh and others v. S.M Kaleem Makki,C.P.L.A.41-K/2020 S.M Kaleem Makki v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

996) 13/2011 II.A. Mst. Sughra Begum & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Akbari Begum & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Partition)
Tag Line:Islamic Law--- ----Inheritance---Nephew being son of pre-deceased brother could not claim inheritance even as vested inheritance as his father was not alive at the time of opening of succession---Daughter being sole legal heirs was entitled to half of the estate of the deceased as sharer and the remaining half which was to be treated as residue would also devolve on her---Both the courts below had passed judgments and decrees in violation of law of inheritance---Impugned judgments and decrees being contrary to law were set aside and suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed---Second appeal was allowed in circumstances.
Citation:2016 PLD 232
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.41-K/2016 Mst. Akbari Begum and others v. Mst. Sughra Begum and others,C.P.585-K/2015 Mst. Akbari Begum and others v. Mst. Sughra Begum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted (Refixed after two months)

997) 2067/2016 Suit M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Through this Suit all Plaintiffs had sought exemption on the packing material imported by them for the manufacture of pharmaceutical products in terms of entry No. 105 of the 6th Schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990; however, the said entry only caters for raw material and not for packing material therefore, the Suits of the Plaintiffs have been dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

998) 694/2019 Cr.Bail Atta Muhammad Janwari (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Granted, 22 days delay in Lodging FIR, Recovered article not identified before Magistrate, Already enmity exists. )
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 1221
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting

999) 99/2018 I. A Ayub Raza (Appellant) V/S M/S. Bank Al-Falah Limited & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1000) 4849/2016 Const. P. Rafique Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 28-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2129/2017 Rafique Ahmed v. The NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad,C.P.L.A.4706/2017 Rafique Ahmed v. The NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

1001) 236/2009 H.C.A Member(LU) Board Revenue & Ors. (Appellant) V/S K.P.T. Officer Coop.Housing Socy & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (Article 172), Colonization of Government Land (Sindh) Act, 1912, Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:The compromise entered into between the parties is one which is beyond mechanism and mandate which enabled the Government of Sindh to have transferred the land in question and the learned single Judge ought to have considered aforesaid aspects before allowing the compromise application as prayed. I
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2191/2013 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. The Member (Land Utilization) BOR, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1002) 96/2017 Cr.Appeal Ghulam Muhammad Mazari and Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 01-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

1003) 63/2018 First Appeal Against Order Asif Munawwar S/o Munawwar Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Bank Islami Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 885
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-23
Approved for Reporting

1004) 344/2015 Const. P. M/s. Haider Industries and others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Regulatory Duty
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Saeed-ud-Din Nasir, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah
Order Date: 28-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1005) 2377/2012 Const. P. Bank Alfalah Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Banking Law, Criminal Procedure Code, General Clauses Act, 1897 (Section 24A)
Tag Line:petitioner is precluded from raising such contention in the generalized form, more importantly as we have already observed it is not the kind of investigation that would be governed by any of the above enactment since it involves a question of granting auto loan on the basis of bogus document such as Auto loan agreement, ID Card of individuals who never applied for such loan. It is mainly related to their officers concerned and it is to be seen whether any public exchequer, cess was involved and/or misappropriated including but not limited to the offence that has already been registered.
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Zaheeruddin Mujahid(ADVO-4421-SBC-KHI),Sami ur Rehman(ADVO-11815-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting

1006) 436/1993 Suit SHAHIMAH SAYEED (Plaintiff) V/S BASE CDR PAF BASE MASROOR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 378
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1007) 49/2021 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Ganj Bibi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1235
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

1008) 2406/2014 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed & other (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 CLC 2044
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1009) 4193/2022 Const. P. Mst. Farzana (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 900
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Qadir Hussain(ADVO-6245-SBC-KHE),Faiz Ahmed(ADVO-15410-SBC-KHI),Moiz Ahmed(ADVO-13395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

1010) 20/2010 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. The State (Appellant) V/S Wakeeluddin (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

1011) 1084/2015 Suit Engro Elengy Terminal (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 26-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

1012) 883/2022 Const. P. Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui and Others (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line:Article 140A of the Constitution. Local Government Elections cannot be delayed for want of any amendment in the Sindh Local Government Act 2013
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 642
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE),Farkhanda Jabeen(ADVO-4122-SBC-KHI),Pooja Kalpana(ADVO-8787-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.841-K/2022 Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui & others v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1013) 1375/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 1493
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.410-K/2019 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy/Irrigation Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1014) 2819/2016 Const. P. Faysal Bank Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Banking Mohtasib of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 822, 2020 CLD 548, 2019 SBLR Sindh 1966
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.538/2020 M/s Faysal Bank Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.489-K/2019 M/s Faysal Bank Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 4 weeks a/w C.As.1386/2018 etc

1015) 410/2017 Cr.Appeal SHABBIR AHMED S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1016) 2717/2024 Cr.Bail SYED SARIM AHMED BURNEY (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 489
Advocates:Mamoon Ahmed Khan Shirwany(ADVO-11042-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1017) 1000/2014 Suit Mst. Ghazala Ishrat (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Sarwat Hussain & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 03-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

1018) 195/2018 Criminal Appeal SHIRMATI JAAMI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 191
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1019) 2358/2015 Const. P. ORI-TECH, OILS PRIVATE LIMITED (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue, Regional Tax Office-I, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Excise, Sale Tax Rules, 2006, Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:The petitioner through the present constitutional petition sought declaration that the petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing process through Toll Manufacturer and thus eligible to be registered as Manufacturer with the Tax Authorities. It was considered that the petitioner being manufacturer of its products owns the proprietary rights over its brand name and fixes the retail price and sell the finished product, hence the petitioner is engaged in the taxable supply being manufacturer. Provisions and definition clauses of the Sales Tax Act 1990, Federal Excise Act 2005 & Sales Tax Registration Rules 2006 were examined. Section 2 (17) was examined and it was considered that manufacturer is a person who engages, whether exclusively or not, in the production or manufacture of goods whether or not the raw material of which the goods are produced or manufactured are owned by him and shall include a person any person, firm or company which owns, holds, claims or uses any patent, proprietary, or other right to goods being manufactured, whether in his or its name, or on his or its behalf, as the case may be, whether or not such person, firm or company sells, distributes, consigns or otherwise disposes of the goods. It was also observed that there appears no provision in sales tax act, which could exclude a person who does not possess its own facility of manufacturing and get his products manufactured from toll manufacturing from claiming himself as manufacturer. The Federal Excise General Order No.2 of 2008 dated 06.10.2008, was taken into consideration and it was observed that both vendor and the principal fall in purview of the definition of manufacturer. Hence, it was decided that the petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing of its products through Toll manufacturing arrangement and thus eligible to be registered as Manufacturer with Tax authority. The Petition was allowed.
Citation:2017 PLD Sindh 1497
Advocates:Emad-ul-Hasan(ADVO-5822-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.407-K/2017 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s ORI Tech Oil (Pvt) Ltd.,C.P.572-K/2015 Muhammad Mashooque v. Faiz Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

1020) 47/2012 Judicial Companies Misc. Muhammad Younus & another (Applicant) V/S Venu Gurdas Advani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

1021) 5895/2017 Const. P. Uzma Naz and Ors (Petitioner) V/S The D.G Rangers & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 300
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.860-K/2022 The Director General Rangers Sindh through Ashraf Hussain Shah Deputy Superintendent Rangers v. The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Government of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.859-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh & another v. Uzma Naz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned after summer vacation, Adjourned after summer vacation

1022) 326/2017 Const. P. Azizullah Khan Afridi (Petitioner) V/S The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 170
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 29-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

1023) 2116/2019 Const. P. Mst. Nighat Naeem (Petitioner) V/S K.D.A and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 56
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1024) 234/2023 Cr.Bail Ghulam Sarwar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2023 SHC HYD 334
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

1025) 1501/2011 Const. P. Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed Govt. & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 13-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting

1026) 201/2012 Const. P. Mr. Abdul Rashid. (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Autority & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

1027) 2805/2022 Const. P. Ansar Ahmed Gorar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Contempt ), Service matters (Employees' Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976)
Tag Line:whether the impugned notification is, in conformity with the judgments passed by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Crl. Org. Petition No.89/2011, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and Gul Hassan Jatoi; and, whether IGP Sindh is competent to issue the impugned notification under Section 12 of the Police Act, 1861, or it is for the Government of Sindh to order the repatriation of the petitioners to the ICT Police, Baluchistan Police and Pakistan Railways Police; and, whether police establishment is indivisible one force; and inter se transfer and subsequent absorption from the Federal Capital Police, Railways Police or Baluchistan Police to Sindh Police is permissible under Rule 1.5 of Police Rules, 1934; and, whether the repatriation of the petitioners to ICT Police, Baluchistan Police, and Pakistan Railways after rendering service for a considerable period in Sindh Police, attracts the principle of locus poenitentia and the same are within the principles laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 426
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2266/2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1028) 3147/2025 Const. P. Sindh Public Service Commission & Another (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:NAB, Inquiry Quashed Matter falling outside the ambit of NAO, 1999
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2047
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

1029) 595/2025 Const. P. Gul Sher Jalbani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Transfer and posting of employees constitutes internal administrative management. It is well established in service jurisprudence that no employee can claim transfer or posting as a matter of right. Petition dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1210
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1030) 3478/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Akbar and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 381
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

1031) 119/2006 Suit MRS. SHABEENA FARHAT (Appellant) V/S V/S M/S HIGHWAY HOUSING PROJECT & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Defendant has neither provided basic amenities in the Housing Scheme nor has produced any document, rules / bye-laws or Agreement between the parties hereto, to substantiate its evidence, that it is not the responsibility of Defendant to provide these basic amenities. the subject Housing Project launched by Defendant was not complete at least till the time of giving evidence till September, 2014; thus, the grievance of Plaintiff is of continuing nature, inter alia, in terms of Section 23 of the Limitation Law. This is a further ground in addition to the above, for determining that the present lis is maintainable. Hence, suit partly decreed.
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property)
Tag Line:Defendant has neither provided basic amenities in the Housing Scheme nor has produced any document, rules / bye-laws or Agreement between the parties hereto, to substantiate its evidence, that it is not the responsibility of Defendant to provide these basic amenities. the subject Housing Project launched by Defendant was not complete at least till the time of giving evidence till September, 2014; thus, the grievance of Plaintiff is of continuing nature, inter alia, in terms of Section 23 of the Limitation Law. This is a further ground in addition to the above, for determining that the present lis is maintainable. Hence, suit partly decreed.
Citation:2014 CLC 322
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 02-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

1032) 1592/2010 Suit MST.SHAMIM AKHTER & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S MST.NAZAR BARI & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Territorial Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, not applicable retrospectively. Legal Heirs of pre-deceased son will not inherit. Suit not maintainable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1015
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting

1033) 11/2016 II.A. Abdul Aziz (Appellant) V/S Abdul Kareem & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Specific Relief Act, (Section 27 - Relief against subsequent buyer )
Tag Line:Sale deed of appellant as being enjoyed by appellant cannot be set-aside automatically as the defence of the appellant is protected being buyer without notice of any dispute. As stated above it has to be proved independently through impartial evidence failing whereof the aforesaid provisions of law would protect the title of appellant. Section 27(b) is for enforcing performance against those who acquired title with knowledge of previous agreement/contracts, whereas section 41 of Transfer of Property Act protect title for those who acquired title without knowledge of previous litigation. Since it is a case of cancellation of sale deed I am of the view that section 41 of Transfer of Property Act is more appropriate for its application
Citation:2023 YLR 104
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

1034) 3408/2013 Const. P. Zafar Iqbal Zahid and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 882
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 05-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.554-K/2018,C.P.L.A.555-K/2018,C.P.L.A.559-K/2018,C.P.L.A.562-K/2018,C.P.L.A.560-K/2018,C.P.L.A.553-K/2018,C.P.L.A.557-K/2018,C.P.L.A.558-K/2018,C.P.L.A.556-K/2018,C.P.L.A.561-K/2018 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

1035) 322/2023 Const. P. Nida Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Hameed & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Articles 49 & 104 of Limitation Act.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 694
Advocates:Irfan Bashir Bhutta(ADVO-14755-SBC-KHI),Arjumand Saeed(ADVO-6780-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.285-K/2024 Abdul Hameed v. Nida Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

1036) 1447/2006 Suit Syed Amjad Mahboob (Plaintiff) V/S Raja Mumtaz Hussain Arif & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-APR-14
Approved for Reporting

1037) 3387/2023 Const. P. Mst. Sumera Amir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Preventive detention under the MPO Ordinance, 1960.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 976
Advocates:Jowhar Abid(ADVO-7364-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 01-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1038) 3026/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) V/S E.O.B.I (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976 (Pensionary Benefits )
Tag Line:VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain.
Citation:2023 PLC Lab. 41
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

1039) 173/2018 H.C.A Mst. Suriya Iqbal Chishti & others (Appellant) V/S Mst. Rubina Majidullah & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 211
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1040) 5466/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Hujjan Ujjan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 343
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1041) 144/2009 Cr.Rev Mrs. Ghazala Parveen (Applicant) V/S Sadiq Daniel & 18 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting

1042) 179/2015 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Arsalan alias Sohrab (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 25-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

1043) 1465/2024 Const. P. National Accountability Bureau (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Request of the National Accountability Bureau for 25 % share amount of misappropriation recovered by NAB is denied.
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1166
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2022/2025 National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Communication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1044) 60/2014 First Appeal Against Order Arif Oasman (Appellant) V/S Habib Bnk Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

1045) 692/2022 Const. P. Nawal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 420
Advocates:Muhammad Adnan Abdullah(ADVO-15915-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Wasiq Mirza(ADVO-13772-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Aaquib Rajpar(ADVO-7212-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

1046) 379/2019 Suit Muhammad Ayub Khan Sanjrani (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contract employee)
Tag Line:Service Matter - Non Renewal of Contract of Employment - held - No vested right to get it renewed even against the Government - Injunction refused.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUN-19
Approved for Reporting

1047) 10/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Arslan Habib Buriro (Applicant) V/S Rustam Ali Tunio (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Civil Revision
Tag Line:After the recording of evidence, the trial court was operating in the second stage of the summary suit and had to dig deeper into the evidence to decide the suit. The evidence brought on record required greater scrutiny, and the threshold of the burden of proof was on a higher pedestal based on the general principles of the law of evidence. Yet the trial court decided against the applicant/defendant on the assumption that the production of the cheque was sufficient and/or no further proof was required as the cheque was a negotiable instrument. This may be one of the considerations in deciding an application for leave to defend, but it was not proper for the trial court to overlook the circumstantial evidence produced by the applicant-defendant-Arslan Buriro and available in the suit file surrounding the alleged loan and the cheque issuance. Revision against the Execution allowed.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 969
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

1048) 23/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. AMIR RAHMEEM S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM BONERI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal, Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal (uphold sentences In Section 397 PPC , though witness not Identified accused, but arrested just incident with property .)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 477
Advocates:Shamim Alam(ADVO-17880-SBC-KHE),Samiullah(ADVO-13723-SBC-KHW),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Raqab Ali(ADVO-18289-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1049) 270/2012 Cr.Appeal Lalio & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 11-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting

1050) 354/2016 H.C.A Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Punjab Trading Agency (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Trading Corporation of Pakistan Matter
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 623
Advocates:M/S. KHALID DAWOOD POTA & CO.(FIRM-112-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Khalid Daudpota(ADVO-356-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS),Junaid Khalid Daudpota(ADVO-13056-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1051) 1660/2023 Const. P. Ashique Ali Chijjan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 353
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1052) 193/2022 II.A. Zulfiqar Ahmed S/o Muhammad Yaqoob (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Nadeem and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Scope of the second appeal is narrow, allowing exercise only on specific grounds. In a claim for damages for malicious prosecution, the burden of proof lies on the claimant; claimant must establish that the prosecution was without reasonable and probable cause and motivated by malice. The court held that acquittal through the benefit of doubt constitutes an honorable acquittal; the importance of curbing false accusations and frivolous litigation by means of civil suits for malicious prosecution; the rejection of the plaint should not have been done summarily without providing an opportunity to prove the allegations through evidence. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded back to the trial court for a fresh decision after recording evidence.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 293
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

1053) 4970/2017 Const. P. Sapphire Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Section 5A ITO 2001 struck down.
Citation:2021 PTD 971
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.926-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Saphire Textile Mills Ltd.,C.A.3387/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Saphire Textile Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, transfered to Islamabad.,

1054) 94/2021 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Commissioner inland revenue legal (Applicant) V/S M/s filters pakistan pvt. ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 11(2))
Tag Line:Section 6 is pari materia to provisions for recovery of sale tax in respect of goods imported into Pakistan and time and manner shall be similar to that of recovery made under Customs Act, 1969. For the instant matter, for determining tax liability for the period 2011-12 limitation would perish by 30 June, 2017. Show cause notice was issued on 21.08.2017, after requisite period. Hence, any notice that was issued belatedly i.e. beyond the statutory requirement would have no bearing. --The consequential point that arises is whether a timeframe prescribed under Section 11(5) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for issuance of show-cause notice and after the expiry of timeframe prescribed, could be extended and/or resurrected a time barred cause under SRO 394(I)/2001 dated 21.05.2009 read with Section 74 of the Act, 1990.
Citation:2022 PTD 345, 2022 PTCL 415
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Solangi(ADVO-15225-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

1055) 19/2000 Civil Revision Abdul Baqi & others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Salam & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VI Rule 17)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1056) 4598/2021 Const. P. NBP Officers Welfare Association and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 373
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Khan(ADVO-2922-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.790/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi and another v. NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through Senior Vice President others,C.P.L.A.1177/2023 NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through its Vice President and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending

1057) 214/2022 Cr.Rev SALMAN IQBAL THROUGH ATTORNEY ZAINUL ABIDEEN (Applicant) V/S INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER PVT LTD & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 332
Advocates:Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHS),Barrister Atta Hussain(ADVO-17486-SBC-KHS),Omrazia Nadeem(ADVO-20500-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.498/2025 Salman Iqbal v. Independent Newspapers Corporation Private Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1058) 62/2010 H.C.A Muhammad Naved Aslam & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Mst.Aisha Siddiqui & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.166-K/2011 Muhammad Naveed Aslam and others v. Mst. Aisha Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1059) 91/2023 Criminal Appeal UMAIR QADEER S/O QADEER AHMED (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD NASIR & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal Trial (Quantum of punishment)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1139
Advocates:Shahid Nawaz(ADVO-9974-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

1060) 850/2020 Suit Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Selection for audit under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act and section 46 of the Federal Excise Act requires the giving of reasons.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 213
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Faheem Bhayo(ADVO-2534-SBC-HYD),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

1061) 30/2022 Cr.J.A Muhammad Rafique @ Laloo Chandio (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2023 SHC LAR 500
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

1062) 5503/2019 Const. P. Abdul Ahad Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 403
Advocates:M.S. Bukhari(ADVO-17093-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.793-K/2022 Abdul Ahad Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC

1063) 2651/2016 Suit Zohaib Shakoor (Plaintiff) V/S Mahwish Pirzada & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Injunction Granted. )
Tag Line:With these observations, the third basic ingredient of suffering irreparable loss is not difficult to decide. The forecasting done by Plaintiff while entering into the subject agreement and making investment in relation to that is bound to be frustrated and jeopardized if the injunctive relief is refused. Hence, Plaintiff cannot be compensated in monetary terms; whereas, the Defendants will not suffer any loss as they will be getting their agreed payments, rather now the enhanced payments as per Plaintiff Statement dated 30.01.2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 06-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

1064) 289/2024 H.C.A Perwaiz Ahmed Shaikh and Others (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Tahir and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Sec.18 and TMO, 2021, S.80(4) - High Court Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:In a J. Misc. filed in High Court under Section 84(3) and 14(4) read with Section 116 of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001, which was instituted prior to the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2023, enacted on 16.08.2023, which forum should hear the lis: the High Court or under Section 18 of IPOP, 2012, the IP Tribunal, alone?
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 604
Advocates:Syed Zaeem Hyder Musavi(ADVO-15365-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1065) 61/2024 H.C.A Furqan Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Contempt Proceeding
Tag Line:The judgments are not immune from criticism but the institutions and personalities of those who authored judgments/orders cannot be subjected to such scandalous, abusive, contemptuous intent and offensive language to settle score against judicial pronouncements and specially to make it part of pleadings/grounds in support of their appeal in an attempt to assail judgments/orders
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 822
Advocates:Saad Fayaz(ADVO-15882-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Asif Malik(ADVO-8425-SBC-KHI),Rehan Kayani(ADVO-12724-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 17-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.144-K/2025 Nasir Javed & another v. Furqan Ahmed Sheikh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1066) 211/2018 Cr.Appeal MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD MUKHTIAR (Appellant) V/S TH STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

1067) 8261/2019 Const. P. Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Repatriation from the post of Additional Deputy Commissioner-I, Hyderabad to his parent department i.e. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. vide Notification dated 12.2.2016 issued by Chief Secretary--whether the petitioner was qualified to be inducted from Sui Southern Gas Company in Sindh Government on deputation for three years' And, whether the Chief Minister, Sindh was competent to nominate the petitioner as Assistant Commissioner in Ex-PCS cadre under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964? and, whether his repatriation to his parent department is in accord with the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court?--It is well-settled law that a deputationist does not have any vested right to remain on the post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period. He can be repatriated to his parent department at any time. The Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafiur Rehman Afridi v. CDA, 2010 SCMR 378, has settled the issue on the aforesaid proposition. Therefore, no further deliberation is required by us--In our view, since the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters is still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1466
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

1068) 438/2020 Const. P. Dheraj @ Wanio (Petitioner) V/S Sht. Surma & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1440
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

1069) 18/2021 Judicial Companies Misc. N.P waterproof Industries Pvt ltd & others (Applicant) V/S N.P spinning Mills limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:Though this is not in dispute but the arguments put forward by learned counsel for petitioners is that by virtue of being a Muslim, shares automatically devolve upon the legal heirs of deceased shareholder. This perhaps may be a case under Muhammaden Law where rights are being acquired in respect of movable and immovable assets under general law, but in case where an entity is created by a special law, it is to be dealt with within that frame of special law. No provision of this special Act would take away any of their right under the general law but it laid down a procedure of its own because the entity is the creation of company law. The successor who intends to take advantage of any of its shareholding left by deceased has to go through a process prescribed by company law and that is Section 78 of the Companies Act, 2017
Citation:2023 CLD 33
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umer Soomro(ADVO-8070-SBC-KHI),M/S. RIAA BARKER GILLETTE(FIRM-174-SBC-KHI),M/S. ISMAT LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-257-SBC-KHI),Mayhar Kazi(ADVO-14135-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

1070) 46/2015 Cr.J.A Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz Kalhoro & anothe (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal dismissed, Conviction Maintained, witnesses are relatives no ground to discard evidence. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(A.T.C Death)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1011
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.94/2021 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State,Crl.A.178/2023 Abdul Hafeez @ Mumtaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Partly Allowed , Death to Life Imprisionment and conviction under ATA set aside

1071) 45/2022 Suit.B THE BANK OF PUNJAB (Plaintiff) V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (section 9(2))
Tag Line:Condonation Application to allow Defendant Customer to file leave to defend application in Banking Suit allowed. Summons were defective, as Plaintiff Bank did not include the registered address of the Defendant Company in the title of the Plaint. Plaintiff relied on Musharaka Agreement which mentioned the previously registered address. Subsequently, Defendant Company notified the change of registered address to PSX, SECP and updated its website page. Defendant Customer did not notify Plaintiff Bank. Order 29 CPC mandatory. Registered Post Acknowledgment and Delivery Report of summons were not available. Bailiff, on his own volition, reached the registered address of Defendant Company. Publication of Summons alleged by Defendant was not in its knowledge. In the circumstances and based on case law, Defendant Condonation Application allowed and Leave to Defend taken on record with the same to be decided in accordance with law, including Plaintiff's right to file replication, if so desired.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1042
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Bin Maaz(ADVO-13125-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Mahmood Ali(ADVO-17058-SBC-KHS),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 21-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1072) 1661/2015 Suit Dewan Steel Mills and others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti Dumping Law
Tag Line:Ant- Dumping Case: Concept of dumping explained. Section 31 Anti Dumping Act, 2015, explained. NTC not required to first give an independent decision or determination before delivering its preliminary determination. Concession of parties cannot confer jurisdiction on a Court. Suit barred in view of Section 70 of the Anti Dumping Act, 2015. Confidentiality issue to be considered by Appellate Forum. Information and database about prices of a product obtained from Customs Department, not confidential, unless otherwise barred by any statute or rule. Decisions of National Tariff Commission should not be resulting in creating directly or indirectly any monopoly or cartel of any business. Claim of confidentiality should be decided on the touchstone of Article 19A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and Freedom of Information Ordinance, 2002. Role of National Tariff Commission is very significant vis-a-vis CPEC. NTC to ensure that local industry is not destroyed. Time enlarged for filing Appeal before the Appellate Authority. Case referred to National Tariff Commission.
Citation:2018 PTD 668
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 02-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

1073) 462/2022 Criminal Miscelleneous JAMAL SHAIKH S/O BILAL SHAIKH (Applicant) V/S IIIRD ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 312
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20773-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1074) 4546/2012 Const. P. Ayaz Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Railways & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLC CS 226
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 18-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.7-K/2017 Pakistan Railways thr. Chairman and others v. Ayaz Ahmed Memon and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

1075) 5812/2015 Const. P. Shahrukh Shakeel Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.7-K/2017,C.P.950-K/2016,C.P.865-K/2016,C.A.13-K/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

1076) 5330/2019 Const. P. Mujahid Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
i) Whether the petitioner was non-suited by this Court vide judgment dated 30.3.2018 in earlier round of litigation and the same view was affirmed by the Honorable Supreme Court in Civil Petition No457-k of 2018, vide order dated 19.4.2018, therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings? ii) Whether Rule 12 of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1974 was amended vide Notification dated 14.9.2018 issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh, whereby relaxation up to maximum of fifteen (15) Years in the upper age limit to all the applicants applying for the vacancies in all the Departments of Government of Sindh were done away against the posts to be filled through Combined Competitive Examination by the Sindh Public Service Commission?
Topic: Service matters (age relaxation)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

1077) 180/2022 Const. P. Rana Muddasir Ali Rajput Through Attorney (Petitioner) V/S Additional District Judge Moro & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:It is settled principle of law that articles given in the dowry by the parents of the bride are not gift for a husband or his family but are entrusted of the bride to her personal use and benefit. Petition is disposed of.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1584
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1078) 29/2020 Judicial Companies Misc. Amir Bux Channa & Another through Attorney (Applicant) V/S Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Limited. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Isra University Act, 1997
Tag Line:1. A post to which a person is nominated is not a tenured post. His nomination can be withdrawn at any time by the nominating authority, although it has to be seen whether nominating authority is constituted legally. 2. This principle of reading down is applied when a provision is capable of more than one interpretation and one or more of those interpretations would render the other provisions either redundant or illusory or in conflict with main frame of the Statute. In such cases, Courts will read down the provision in a manner that saves the provision . 3.since the induction of the council members has been successfully disputed by petitioners; hence I am of the view that the audit of the foundation is also inevitable. 4. Claim of rent by foundation is neither illegal nor illogical, however one may argue on the quantum and an arbitrary way of fixing the rent. This should have been done without any influence and coercion from either side.
Citation:2023 CLD 691
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

1079) 2150/2020 Const. P. M/s Heal The World (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 189
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1804/2022 M/s Heal the World through its Chief Executive, Karachi v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Food Security, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

1080) 6431/2019 Const. P. Irshad Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance.
Tag Line:Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to submit before this Court on the next date hearing a list of all such employees of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh who were absorbed / appointed at any post and are still holding such post, and also the notification of repatriation of respondent No.7 to his parent department. Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 131
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.279-K/2020 Ghulam Ali v. Irshad Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1081) 141/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996, Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act, 1991, Civil Servants Act, 1973, Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:Subsection 2 of Section 36 of Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act, 1996 enabled an employer, with the consent of the transferred employee, to award appropriate compensation in lieu of whatever benefits they could have gained at the end of their tenure. These employees were given service benefits, which were not even matured at the time the employees opted VSS, hence it cannot be said that any guarantee or secured right was arbitrarily snatched by the employer. These employees could have continued to serve without opting VSS. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract (for any prompt gain) in bargain with their post retirement or pensionary benefits.
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 895
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 19-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

1082) 6377/2014 Const. P. Continental Biscuit Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Cantonments Act 1924
Tag Line:The case of the petitioner precisely is that respondent No.2 (Cantonment Board Hyderabad) under the Cantonment Act, 1924, does not have the authority or power to charge any advertisement fee. Provisions of Cantonment Act 1924, Constitution of Pakistan 1973 were discussed. Sections 60 to 63 of the Cantonment Act 1924, were examined and it was observed that Cantonment may levy tax but such a power has a precondition, however in the said provisions the word fee is not appearing. It was remarked that when a parent statue [the Governing Law] does not empower the levy of fee, then levy of such a fee through a delegated legislation in the shape of Bye laws is not permissible. Moreover, Section 282(23) of the Cantonment Act, 1924 only empowers the Board to frame bye-laws to regulate the items mentioned in the relevant statutory provision/enabling enactment and does not empower them to levy a fee. It was further observed that the terms 'fee' and 'tax' are two distinct terms. Tax is a compulsory exaction of money by public authority for public purposes enforceable by law and is not payment for services rendered whereas fee may be generally defined to be a charge for a special service rendered to individuals by some governmental agency or a Local Council under the principle of quid pro quo. It was opined that the imposition of advertisement fee by the respondents without adhering to the preconditions and without providing any corresponding service or facility and issuance of the recovery notices by the contractors were illegal and without jurisdiction. And the proceeding pending before the learned Cantonment Magistrate was quashed. The petition was accepted.
Citation:2017 PTD 1803, 2017 YLR 2155
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.279-K/2017 Cantonment Board Hyderabad, Sindh v. Continental Biscuits Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1083) 1481/2022 Suit All Pakistan Restaurant Association (APRA) & ors (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 670
Advocates:Rajesh Kumar Khagaija(ADVO-51467-SBC-KHS),Sandeep Kumar(ADVO-18347-SBC-KHS),M.S. Bukhari(ADVO-17093-SBC-KHI),Imran Ahmed Khan Abro(ADVO-12720-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

1084) 72/2010 Cr.Appeal Bacha Mir and Karamat Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 20-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting

1085) 252/2009 Const. P. Filters Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Board of Revenue & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 26-JUL-10
Approved for Reporting

1086) 1660/2015 Suit Askari Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Hafiz Ghulam Murtaza (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:???Factory??? let without machinery, eviction lies before Rent Controller. Suit entertained for recovery of arrears of rent.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 751
Advocates:Muhammad Ilyas Warriach(ADVO-6766-SBC-KHI),Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-15164-SBC-KHI),Amanullah Khan(ADVO-1997-SBC-KHI),Irfanullah Khan(ADVO-4688-SBC-KHI),Lubna Aman(ADVO-6915-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

1087) 755/2020 Const. P. Karim Bux Tanwri & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Group Insurance Policy matures only on death; petitioners who are alive; retired and have crossed the age of 65 years are not entitled for refund or return of contribution made by them during service.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 594
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

1088) 233/2007 Suit TRUSTEES OF PORT OF KARACHI. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S FATIMA SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

1089) 3141/2015 Adm. Suit Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 15-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting

1090) 421/1991 Suit Rahim Ali Palari & ors. (Plaintiff) V/S Govt. of Sindh & ors.. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Tag Line:Suit under Fatal Accident Act is independent of proceeding under Motor Vehicle Ordinance, 1965 and Criminal Proceeding (If any). Res Ipsa Loquitor applies to fatal accident cases. If accident / incident disputed then onus on Defendant to disprove negligence. Defendant to disprove causation of death. Criteria for awarding damages. Deprivation of the association of a family member (loss of consortium). Tort Law as a Tool for enforcing good governance. Computing income of deceased when no evidence of employment.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

1091) 1414/2014 Const. P. Ahemd Kaleem Usmani and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 565
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

1092) 8152/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Shahzad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1093) 1377/2024 Cr.Bail Ali Nawaz (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 19
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1094) 1482/1998 Suit Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) V/S Deedar Ali Issran (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Cancellation of Sale Deed)
Tag Line:Sale Deed registered in favour of defendants are valid documents and have been entered by the authorized Attorney (having registered sub-irrevocable general power of attorney which is in pursuance of earlier registered irrevocable general power of attorney given by the legal heirs to one of legal heirs) of the plaintiffs. Suit dismissed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 29-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting

1095) 2259/2020 Const. P. Nisar Ahmed Tarar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 973
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

1096) 33/2004 I. A Fed.of Pak.thr:Secretary Communication & another (Appellant) V/S Haji Abdul Latif Bughio and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:1. Maintainability of appeal under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 against an order passed on an application under section 12(2) CPC; Held No 2. Election of Forum for seeking remedy. Once a party has selected a legal forum for seeking any relief, then it cannot abate such proceedings in between and seek any other remedy for the same relief. Once that remedy was elected, then, by implication of the doctrine of election, the other remedy by was barred.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 216
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1817/2022 Chairman National Highway Authority, Islamabad through Project Director, Moro v. Haji Abdul Latif through its L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

1097) 1753/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Iqbal (Applicant) V/S Mst.Zahida and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 15-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting

1098) 4504/2023 Const. P. Zia uddin Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2217
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

1099) 1169/2021 Const. P. Mazher Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 233
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.423-K/2022 Mazhar Ahmed & another v. Province of Sindh Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs through Law Ssecretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1100) 77/2013 II.A. ABDUL RASHID (Appellant) V/S MAQBOOL AHMED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.65-K/2018 Abdul Rasheed v. Maqbool Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1101) 735/2001 Suit KPT Officers Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1102) 1622/2014 Cr.Bail Sabir Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Rejected U/S 302 PPC With Direction .)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 19-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1103) 84/2012 Cr.Appeal Abdul Qadir (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 09-JUN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.37-K/2014 The State (ANF) v. Abdul Qadir,Crl.P.L.A.90-K/2014 The State (ANF) v. Abdul Qadir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted

1104) 341/2009 Suit SHIAKH KHALID SAFDAR (Plaintiff) V/S ALI HUSSAIN & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 441
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1105) 38/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Junaid Ahmed Siddiqui (Applicant) V/S M.Yaqoob Khan Niazi & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XX, R.5, O.XIV, Rr.1, 2 & O.XLI, R.31---Suit for cancellation of lease and possession---Recording evidence of the parties after framing of issues---Dismissal of suit while deciding issue of maintainability without touching any other issues---Scope---Plaintiff filed suit for cancellation of lease and possession wherein issues were framed and evidence was recorded---Trial Court dismissed the suit while giving findings on issue of maintainability while treating it preliminary issue without deciding issues of facts which was upheld by the Appellate Court---Validity---Purpose of conferring power on the Court to first decide the case or any part thereof only on the issue of law was to save the time of Courts and litigants---Court for deciding a case on the issue of law should form a conscious opinion in the light of pleadings of the parties and give notice to the parties that in its opinion the case mighty be disposed of on the issues of law and it should try those issues first---Trial Court, in the present case, had neither consciously framed issue of law nor expressed its intent to dispose of the case on the issue of law---Even settlement of issues of facts had not been postponed and evidence of both the parties had been recorded---Once Court had consumed time in recording evidence then efforts were to be made to decide the case both on law points as well as on merit---Trial Court after completing trial should have passed judgment on all the issues, in circumstances---Courts below had failed to appreciate the pleadings of the parties in correct perspective---Plaintiff had prayed for recovery of possession of suit property on the basis of registered title document and his suit was simple suit for recovery of possession under S.8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Plaintiff had not sought any declaration as to his entitlement to any legal character---Even defendant had not raised any legal objection with regard to bar to the present suit in terms of S.42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Dispute between the parties was with regard to entitlement to possession specific suit plot on the basis of title documents---Question of title of the plaintiff and/or defendant could have automatically been determined had the Court decided the issues of facts with regard to entitlement of possession of suit land---Provisions of Ss.42 & 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 were not complementing each other and were independent provisions of law and dealt with different kinds of grievances---Any person who had been deprived of his immovable property by any unscrupulous person could sue the said illegal occupant and recover its possession without seeking a declaration of his entitlement to his legal character---Findings recorded by the Courts below treating issue of maintainability as preliminary and dismissing the suit were not sustainable, in circumstances---Impugned judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below were set aside---Matter was remanded to the Trial Court for decision afresh while giving findings on each and every issue---Revision was allowed, in circumstances. Syed Iftikar-ud-Din Haider Gardezi and 9 others v. Central Bank of India Ltd., Lahore 1996 SCMR 669; Sh. Abdul Kabeer v. Mian Abdul Wahid and others 1968 SCMR 464; Sultan Mehmood Shah through L.Rs. v. Muhammad Din and 2 others 2005 SCMR 1872; Muhammad Aslam v. Mst. Ferozi and others PLD 2001 SC 213 and Cantonment Board through Executive Officer, Cantt. Board, Rawalpindi v. Ikhlaq Ahmed and others 2014 SCMR 161 distinguished. Hafiz Muhammad Siddique Anwar v. Faisalabad Development Authority and others 2007 SCMR 1126 and Taj Wali Shah v. Bakhti Zaman 2019 SCMR 84 rel. (b) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss.42 & 8---Provisions of Ss.42 & 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 were independent provisions of law and dealt with different kinds of grievances---Principles.
Citation:2020 MLD 1693
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 18-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

1106) 171/2018 H.C.A Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4612/2018 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others,C.P.L.A.518-K/2019 Mst: Sajida Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.883/2020 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islambad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

1107) 3679/2014 Const. P. Province Of Sindh and ors (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PLC CS 179
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.482-K/2015 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Dr. Bashir Ahmed and others,C.A.33-K/2016 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Dr. Bashir Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1108) 73/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Ghulam Safdar Brohi (Applicant) V/S Mukhtiar Ali Chandio & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Suit for malicious prosecution where acquittal on benefit of doubt.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 1192
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

1109) 183/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Silver Surgical Complex (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Commissioner I-R Zone-IV (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Rules, 2006 (Rule 25), Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 10), Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 8(2))
Tag Line:Supplies involving exempt and taxable purchase cannot be treated in a generalized way. Applicant while having input tax adjustment of the above period forgot to apply rule 25(3) of the ibid rules 2006 which does not permit the adjustment of input tax in its entirety when they deal with both taxable and exempt supplies. --Learned counsel for the applicant has argued to the extent of claiming refund in terms of section 10 of the Sales Tax Act. The scheme of Section 10 caters for an event other than applicants case. In terms of the facts and circumstances of the case where input adjustment is claimed on both exempt and taxable supplies as is the case of applicant before lower forums, we have to apply an unambiguous provision that deals the event and i.e. 8(2) of the ibid Act which directly deals with the input tax in respect of the supplies involving both exempt and taxable supplies.
Citation:2021 PTD 2020
Advocates:Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Aminuddin Ansari(ADVO-3574-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

1110) 132/2020 Cr.Acq.A. Abdul Qayoom (Appellant) V/S Raja Khoso (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1392
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 05-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

1111) 3531/2020 Const. P. Faisal Manzoor Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 640
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

1112) 490/1998 Cr.Bail Muhammad Umar @Umro (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Cancellation (Bail granted by High Court ,Accused Jumped From trial Court . Sessions Court Competent to Cancel bail. ial Court ,)
Mr. Mohammad Sadiq Laghari
Order Date: 01-JAN-98
Approved for Reporting

1113) 457/2021 Const. P. M/S Rafique Ahmed & Co (Petitioner) V/S The Registrar of Trade Union Govt Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Sind Industrial Relations Act, 2013. Maintainability of petition by Employer against order of Registrar Trade Union passed under section 9(10). Held Yes.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 442
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 23-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5602/2021 Fauji Fertilzer Company Mazdoor Union through its President / General Secretary, Ghotki and others v. M/s Rafique Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1114) 1316/2000 Suit DR. ABDUL RASHID PARACHA (Plaintiff) V/S THE DEF. HOUSING AUTHORITY (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2153
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting

1115) 155/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. NAZEER AHMED S/O SARDAR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Non-identification of accusd at the time of evidence)
Tag Line:PW Muhammad Akeel at the time of recording his evidence has not identified the present appellant to be a same person who was identified by him at the time of identification parade as such in our view such identification of the accused has no such legal value to maintain conviction of accused in a case of capital punishment without any other corroboration.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 205
Advocates:Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Asadullah Shah(ADVO-9203-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

1116) 6554/2019 Const. P. Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) V/S PM & DC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was by virtue of Article 89(2)(a)(ii) of the Constitution, i.e., by a resolution of the Senate disapproving the same and not by way of any repealing enactment. Therefore, the effect of repeal contained in sections 6, 6-A and section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which otherwise apply only when a repeal is by way of a repealing enactment, were neither triggered nor would those serve as an aid in construing the effect of repeal under a Constitutional provision such as Article 89. In other words, on the repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, nothing contained in the General Clauses Act, 1897 would come to save the Amending Admission Regulations that had been made under the repealed Ordinance. In view of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council v. Muhammad Fahad Malik (supra), Article 264 of the Constitution also did not have the effect of saving or giving permanency to the Amended Admission Regulations when the effect of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was only temporary as it was never accorded approval by the Parliament. Therefore, on 29-08-2019, when the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was repealed by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, the Amended Admission Regulations also stood repealed and the Original Admission Regulations were revived. (b) It will be seen that while the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 repeals all previous Regulations, but that is subject to sub-section (7) which provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process. The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 1962 by the PMC Ordinance, 2019, the former being a permanent statute under the 1973 Constitution, is not a repeal by virtue of Article 89 of the Constitution, but a repeal by a repealing statute, albeit a temporary one, and one which has been expressly made subject to section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which in turn provides that the repeal shall not revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the repeal takes effect. We have already discussed above that on 29-08-2019 the Amended Admission Regulations had ceased and the Original Admission Regulations had revived. Therefore, when sub-section (7) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process, those can only be the Original Admission Regulations.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4221/2019 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others,C.A.610/2020 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1117) 84/2016 Const. P. Mst. Samina Pathan (Petitioner) V/S National Database and Registration Authority [NADRA] (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction.
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction.
Citation:2018 PLC Lab. 36
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 17-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2857/2016 National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others v. Samina Pathan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted

1118) 6954/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa Mahesar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 415
Advocates:Irfan Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-1741-SBC-HYD),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5458/2021 Ghulam Mustafa Mahesar and another v. Province of Sindh through Law Secretary, Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1119) 793/2023 Const. P. Mst. Shamsa Kanwal and Another (Petitioner) V/S Amjad Hussain and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Dowry articles are personal belongings of wife that is to be returned to her.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 6
Advocates:Mahmood Baig(ADVO-4572-SBC-KHC),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1120) 656/2019 Const. P. Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1349
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

1121) 209/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Alman and others (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1122) 1409/2009 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) V/S The Collector of Customs (Preventive) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 25-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

1123) 2337/2007 Const. P. Zahid Saeed (Petitioner) V/S CDGK & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 10-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

1124) 4037/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Viqar Unisa Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 584
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1043-K/2025 Viqar Unisa Begum v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary, Local Government & HTP Department, Government of Sindh , Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

1125) 1264/2007 Suit MUHAMMAD AYUB GABOL (Plaintiff) V/S THE PROV OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

1126) 147/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Ahmed and another (Applicant) V/S Rehmat Ali deceased through his L.Rs. and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 305
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

1127) 207/2019 Criminal Appeal Riazullah and another (Appellant) V/S VS The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Criminal Appeal (Death Sentenced Converted to life Imprisonment , Evidence in Shape of Medical and Confessional Statement before Judicial Magistrate, )
Citation:2020 YLR 115
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.613/2020 Riazullah S/o Rafiullah Khan and another v. The State through Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

1128) 441/2016 Const. P. Sohail (Petitioner) V/S Kamran Siddiqui (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 12-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

1129) 4658/2018 Const. P. Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, has pronounced the judgment on 06.08.2020 in the case of Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd. and others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with connected petitions), wherein, the Hon'ble bench of Sindh High Court has been pleased to dispose of all the petitions in the following terms:- " (i) The impugned sub-section (2) of Section 221-A of the Customs Act, 1969, as added vide Finance Act, 2018, is ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as through impugned amendment the legislature has attempted to validate constitutional defect while making amendment in sub-section (3) of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1969, and issuance of SRO 1035(I)/2017 dated 16.10.2017, through Finance Act, 2017, however, without making the required constitutional amendment. (ii) The Regulatory Duty charged and collected pursuant to amendment in sub-section (3) of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1969, and issuance of SRO 1035(I)/2017, through Finance Act, 2017, has already been declared by the Divisional Bench of this Court in the case of Premier Systems (Pvt) Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2018 PTD 861), as illegal and unconstitutional in the light of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mustafa Impex, Karachi & others vs. The Government of Pakistan & others, (PLD 2016 SC 808), therefore, in the absence of any constitutional amendment, cannot be validated through subsequent amendment in law, while giving it retrospective effect in respect of past and closed transaction, therefore, no Regulatory Duty can be charged, collected or recovered for the period starting from the date of commencement of Finance Act, 2017 till the date of commencement of Finance Act, 2018. .
Citation:2021 PTD 232, 2021 PTCL 178
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 06-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.836-K/2020 Federation of Pakistan through Revenue Division & others v. Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.16/2025 Federation of Pakistan through Revenue Division & others v. Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. (Orders dated 13.01.2025 and 16.01.2025 have been declared non est and Crl.O.P.1/2025 was order to be fixed along with the appeals arising out of CPLA No.836-K/2020 etc),Pending

1130) 5539/2017 Const. P. Mst Aysha Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Bonafide purchaser for value without notice Rule will apply where purchasers are not equally at fault with their predecessors. Property purchased on the basis of official record and transactions spreading over many years and did not change hands in quick succession showing undue haste, hence 5th owner cannot be penalized. Responsible officials of KDA to be dealt with strictly, DG KDA directed to hold enquiry and fix responsibility on officials involved in committing illegality and fraud, whether in service or retired, alive or dead, should be mentioned in the Inquiry Report. An alternate plot of same value and utility be allotted to the petitioner. Cost of Rs.100,000/- is imposed on respondent KDA payable to the petitioner.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 371
Advocates:Syeda Raffat Bano(ADVO-3570-SBC-KHI),Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Aziza Parveen(ADVO-7065-SBC-KHC),M/S. BADAR ALAM & COMPANY(FIRM-261-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 17-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.286-K/2022 Mst.Aysha Begum v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Housing & Town Planning & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1131) 8/2006 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Dr. Muhammad Saleem (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 16-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

1132) 233/2019 II.A. Muhammad Asghar S/o Allah Ditta (Appellant) V/S Mst. Tahira Parveen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Forged document (Partnership deed)
Tag Line:I would not hesitate that preparation of forged document itself is an offence but production thereof in Court proceedings with a view to prejudice the right and entitlement of a rightful person makes the act rather grave hence the Courts must take appropriate actions whenever such act surfaces because such actions not only result in delaying the object of timely justice but also encouraging such ill actions.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1423
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.741/2021 Muhammad Asghar v. Mst. Tahira Parveen and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

1133) 4940/2021 Const. P. Zeba Ilyas (Petitioner) V/S Nazim e Ala and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Doctrine of merger )
Tag Line:Where a matter is not decided on merits, but is disposed of in some other manner, such as for non-prosecution, the doctrine of merger would not apply.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 245
Advocates:Muhammad Mohsin(ADVO-15408-SBC-KHS),Abdul Wajid Wyne(ADVO-2246-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

1134) 862/2011 Suit PERVAIZ HUSSAIN & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S MIAN KHURRAM RASOOL (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The Defendant issues / has issued the cheques in favour of Plaintiffs, but the same upon presentation could not be encashed because of closure of account, then this conduct on the part of Defendant is a mala fide one and is done with a dishonest intention to defraud the Plaintiffs. Hence, suit is decreed.
Tag Line:The Defendant issues / has issued the cheques in favour of Plaintiffs, but the same upon presentation could not be encashed because of closure of account, then this conduct on the part of Defendant is a mala fide one and is done with a dishonest intention to defraud the Plaintiffs. Hence, suit is decreed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 19-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

1135) 1018/2021 Const. P. Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Promotion (department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin)
Tag Line:the decision of PSB-II for promoting the private respondent No.8 in BPS-19 against future vacancy in absence of ACRs is/was an erroneous decision--ACRs--it is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if the promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, the competent authority, and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1270
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1136) 704/2019 Suit Pakistan Airline Pilots Association (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airlines & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Rejection of Plaint
Topic: Merger
Tag Line:Order VII rule 11 CPC - Rejection of Plaint sought - Suit barred in law under Order 2 Rule 2 - Application dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

1137) 755/2020 Const. P. Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1714
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

1138) 1192/2022 Suit ZIAUDDIN AHMED & CO. (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S KARACHI SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING WORKS LTD & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Bank guarantee. Rule of non-interference and the rule of strict compliance.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 537
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1139) 7072/2018 Const. P. Badar ul Haq Kandhro (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Council for Work & Housing Research & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 502
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Irfan Ali(ADVO-14257-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aslam(ADVO-4546-SBC-KHI),Inayatullah Morio(ADVO-376-SBC-LAR),Kamran Khan(ADVO-13655-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

1140) 88/2017 I. A Mohammad Shahid Murtaza (Appellant) V/S Warid Telcom Pvt Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 433
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

1141) 3698/2021 Const. P. Nadeemuddin Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The short question is whether compulsory retirement of the petitioner on the aforesaid grounds would be a valid exercise of the powers; and, whether such a purpose could be termed to be in the public interest?
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 927
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Nasima Mangrio(ADVO-10697-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

1142) 510/2010 Cr.J.A Rehmatullah & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting

1143) 1222/2013 Suit Forte Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:-The contract in question contains specific terms in relation to any default of the plaintiff including but not limited to late delivery of the goods. It is also an admitted fact that on account of late deliveries of certain goods, in pursuance of such clauses relating to late deliveries the defendant No.1 had already deducted liquidated damages from the subject bills/invoice. Hence, once such late delivery charges have been recovered/deducted, the encashment of subject guarantee in relation to same issue is a debatable issue. It amounts to collecting liquidated damages twice over the same alleged default and can be termed as vexing the plaintiff twice which is also hit by Section 74 of the Contract Act. Therefore, any attempt to collect further amount on the basis of same default would tantamount to be in violation of Section 74 of the Contract Act which prima facie prohibits compensation/penalty in excess of any amount stipulated in the contract itself. --Insofar as second contention, which relates to complying with the terms and conditions of new obligations of the documents dated 09.10.2012 and performance guarantee dated 21.12.2010 is concerned, it only covers the obligation as contained in the purchase order dated 08.12.2010 and 13.12.2010 and any other subsequent amendment, novation, additional obligation, that may arise in relation to the project shall not be covered by the terms thereof. The ultimate paragraph of this performance guarantee is in support of above observation. Such recourse is deducible out of section 128 of the Contract Act, which allows the guarantee obligation to be limited by way of contract.
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 1735
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

1144) 219/2017 H.C.A Karachi Metropolitan Corporationi & another (Appellant) V/S M/s. Zafar Memorial Education Society (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1145) 89/2022 Const. P. Sikandar Ali & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Service matters. No vested right concept in promotion policy. Government can amend the same, if deemed appropriate.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 775
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 14-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1700/2022 Sikandar Ali and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and Literacy Department Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1146) 568/2009 Cr.Bail Anwar Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 09-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting

1147) 1472/1998 Suit Abdul Qadir (Plaintiff) V/S Mr.Ameer Zadi& Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

1148) 8679/2018 Const. P. Nawab Brothers Steel Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Payment of fixed sales tax under Rule 58H of Special Procedure Rules does not entitles a taxpayer to claim exemption of sales tax at import stage
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 397
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20773-SBC-KHE),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1149) 513/2019 Const. P. Muhammasd Rashid Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.440-K/2019 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Interior and others,C.A.3044/2022 National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Syed Arshad Wahab and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed

1150) 913/2020 Const. P. Ali Muhammad and another (Petitioner) V/S Mukaram Khan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Petition allowed, female minor custody handed over to mother and father has right to meet minors and approach G&W Court . )
Tag Line:Habeas Corpus--custody of minors--In view of the statement of the parties, the petitioners are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs. 200,000/- before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose and in the meanwhile petitioners shall not take away the custody of minors out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights in the intervening period subject to tentative payment of maintenance of the minors @ Rs.3000/- per month for each minor and maintenance at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month for petitioner-mother till final adjudication by the learned trial Court. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 637
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

1151) 2438/2017 Const. P. Syed Ali Abbas Rizvi Thr. Nisar Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S The Addl. Controller of Rents Clifton & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (an interlocutory order and it does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or error, Petition dismissed.)
Tag Line:The petition is dismissed with costs as the impugned order is an interlocutory order and it does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or error, this petition, being misconceived and malafide, is not maintainable. The learned Rent Controller is directed to decide the subject rent case within forty five (45) days from receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law and in view of consent order dated 24.08.2010 passed by this Court in C.P. No.S-597/2010 and the judgment delivered by this Court on 10.04.2009 in FRA No.38/2008, and to report compliance within seven (07) days thereafter to this Court through MIT-II.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 11-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

1152) 1211/2023 Cr.Bail ALLAH DITTA S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 667
Advocates:Farzana(ADVO-1221-SBC-LRK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Raham Ali(ADVO-12316-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

1153) 1217/2020 Const. P. D.G Khan Cement Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7))
Tag Line:In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 464
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

1154) 648/2020 Suit Muhammad Idrees Abbasi (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Akbar Khan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12(2))
Tag Line:Section 12(2) CPC provides a bar where plaintiff is precluded by rule from instituting a further suit in respect of any particular cause of action and shall not be entitled to institute a suit in respect of such cause of action in any court to which this code applies.
Citation:2022 CLC 1322
Advocates:Sher Ali Rizvi(ADVO-2829-SBC-KHI),Gul Muhammad Khaskheli(ADVO-75-SBC-MTY)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

1155) 100/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s.P & G International Lahore (Appellant) V/S Assistant Collector of Customs & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 14-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

1156) 81/2016 Cr.J.A Juma Khan Brohi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1157) 1653/2019 Const. P. Irshad Ahmed Gopang (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: NAB (Bail before arrest dismissed, committed crime, made bogus voucher of material and at site physical existence. )
Citation:2020 YLR 2001
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1158) 1650/2020 Const. P. Gas & Oil PakistanLtd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PTD 104
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1347-K/2020 Gas & Oil Pakistan Limited v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1159) 58/2017 Civil Revision Attique Rehman Soomro (Applicant) V/S Khadim Hussain Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1160) 345/2018 H.C.A M/s. Adamjee Insurance Co. Limited (Appellant) V/S M/s. Trustees of the Karachi Port & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 756
Advocates:ORR. DIGNAM & CO.(FIRM-109-SBC-KHI),Sajid Zahid(ADVO-2109-SBC-KHI),M. Sarfaraz Sulehry(ADVO-1929-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.500-K/2022 M/s. Adamjee Insurance Co.Ltd. v. M/s. Trustees of the Karachi Port & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

1161) 1878/2018 Suit Abdul Qudus Alvi. (Plaintiff) V/S The Ned University of Eng. & Tec. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1162) 12/2020 M.A. Awais Aziz (Appellant) V/S Learned Presiding Officer Hyderabad & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 01-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1163) 319/2022 Cr.Bail NADEEM S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1187
Advocates:Aamir Jamil(ADVO-12902-SBC-KHE),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1164) 4048/2012 Const. P. M/s. Dalda Foods(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (Labour Law)
Tag Line:We find that the private respondents were deprived of their due process rights. They were not confronted with the material based on which their services were verbally terminated. Even otherwise, the process followed by the petitioners was sketchy, one-sided, non-transparent, and not supported even by the law. We, therefore, find that both the Learned SLC and SLAT were justified in passing the impugned orders and recorded valid and cogent reasons for doing so, therefore, no ground existed for re-evaluation of the evidence, thus, we maintain the consolidated order dated 22.10.2011 passed by the Sindh Labour Court (SLC) in grievance Applications of the private respondents and common order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal (SLAT) in Appeal No. KAR-273/2011, Appeal Nos. KAR-445/2011 to KAR 496/2011 and KAR-498/2011 to KAR-603/2011.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1065
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6488/2021 M/s Dalda Foods (Pvt) Limited v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.5640/2021 M/s Haq Engineering & Packing Service (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: ,

1165) 235/2010 Cr.J.A Muhammad Iqbal Makrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 23-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.315/2013 Muhammad Iqbal v. The State,J.P.220/2013 Muhammad Iqbal v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Leave Granted

1166) 557/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Umer Zahid Malik & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Tampered motor vehicles.
Citation:2022 PTD 1112
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1167) 6261/2020 Const. P. SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Enforcement of Guideline passed by Supreme Court )
Tag Line:M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC"), has sought enforcement of the guidelines provided by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order dated 11.03.2020 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.4450/2019 (M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. Karachi v. The Registrar Trade Unions, C/o National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad, and others), to the Registrar, National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), for conducting the referendum with respect of determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC as provided under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012--we direct the Deputy Registrar NIRC to announce the result of the referendum for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC. However, it is made clear that, if any of the parties in the proceedings is aggrieved by the outcome of the result of the referendum, they are at liberty to avail and exhaust their respective remedies in accordance with law.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1135
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

1168) 71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-SEP-11
Approved for Reporting

1169) 390/2017 Criminal Appeal REHMATULLAH REHAN S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD ZIAUDDIN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 500 & 501---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss.200 & 201---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Defamation---Private complaint---Accused-appellant was convicted and sentenced to fine on the basis of moving false complaints and publishing pamphlets with defamatory words against the respondents---Complainant produced two witnesses including his brother in support of his claim---Record showed that Trial Court, after recording statement of accused under S. 342, Cr.P.C. and hearing final arguments, without assigning any reason, instead announcing order on merit, restarted the trial and issued process for evidence to the Additional Collector as court witness---Trial Court, after recording statement of court witness, recorded statement of accused under Ss.342 & 340(2), Cr.P.C. second time---Accused, after second statement under S.342, Cr.P.C. had examined himself on oath and had produced documents showing character of the complainant---Record showed that Trial Court failed to appreciate that even complainant's own brother had not supported him---Trial Court misinterpreted the evidence with reference to the burden of proof in criminal cases---Record did not show that the complainant had by way of rejoinder affidavit denied the contents of counter affidavit of officials containing the allegation of blackmailing and harassment by the complainant and, therefore, it ought to have been accepted as admitted document about a truth---Trial court failed to appreciate that the complainant was not aggrieved by derogatory remarks on oath against him---If such remarks did not cause any defamation to the complainant then how a letter written to any government functionary, which had not been conveyed to the complainant, would have caused any injury to the complainant---Trial Court clearly favoured the complainant when he convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay fine of Rs. 100,000/- as punishment and further ordered that fine be paid to the complainant---Trial Court had no authority to handover the amount of fine to the complainant---Amount of fine imposed as punishment had to be deposited by court through its ministerial office in the government treasury---Circumstances established that complainant failed to prove his claim---Appeal was allowed and accused was acquitted by setting aside the conviction and sentence recorded by the Trial Court. (b) Criminal trial--- ----Burden of proof---Scope---Burden is never shifted on accused unless the prosecution evidence is found to have proved the commission of offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Citation:2020 MLD 905
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.14-K/2019 Muhammad Zia-ud-Din v. Rehmatullah Rehan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1170) 2076/2010 Const. P. Abdul Hameed Pathan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 29-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.38-K/2018 Abdul Hameed Pathan v. Fedeation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1171) 102/2013 Cr.Appeal Abdul Qadir alilas Fauji (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 17-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

1172) 90/2007 Const. P. Nizar Noor Ali & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Ameer Ali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Controller is restored.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

1173) 133/1998 Suit MRS. PARVEEN MEHMOOD. (Plaintiff) V/S THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC CO. LT (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Recovery of amount/damages)
Tag Line:The delay in filing the claim in not of few days but it is of eleven months regarding which the Plaintiff had not led any positive evidence to justify that why the above delay beyond prescribed period should be condoned, or, the said delay in filing this Lis, is not hit by Rule 29.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 799
Advocates:SURRIDGE & BEECHENO(FIRM-101-SBC-KHI),Khalid Rehman(),Malik Muhammad Riaz(ADVO-6493-SBC-KHI),Sohail Mazaffar(ADVO-2086-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

1174) 303/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous GHULAM SHABBIR KUBBAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Cognizance on police report)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 556
Advocates:Imtiaz Ali Shah(ADVO-16001-SBC-KHS),Nasrullah Korai(ADVO-11200-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.106-K/2023 Ghulam Shabbir Kubar v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

1175) 13/2018 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S MSC SWITZERLAND GENEVA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Implication of double taxation treaties upon super tax.
Citation:2021 PTD 885
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.672-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Legal v. M/s. MSC Switzerland Geneva Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1176) 144/2014 Civil Revision Mst. Parveen Raza Jadun through her legal heirs (Applicant) V/S Bashir Ahmed Chandio and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
(i). In direct benami claim requires a higher standard of proof; (ii) every transaction between family members cannot be recognized as benami; (iii). Claimant not challenged the purchase of property by father in favour of his son, during the life time of the father, then claim of Plaintiff (sister) is meritless.
Tag Line:(i). In direct benami claim requires a higher standard of proof; (ii) every transaction between family members cannot be recognized as benami; (iii). Claimant not challenged the purchase of property by father in favour of his son, during the life time of the father, then claim of Plaintiff (sister) is meritless.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 12-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

1177) 2652/2017 Suit Al-Hassan Tech E Eng SVC (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act 1940 - Award)
Citation:2021 CLC Note 666
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

1178) 707/2023 Const. P. Raja Rafique Ahmed Gilal (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Service matters (Repatriation)
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 481
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 19-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

1179) 95/2023 Criminal Appeal FAHEEM S/O RAHEEM BUX (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 672
Advocates:Abdul Qudoos(ADVO-1878-SBC-LRK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Wazeer Hussain Khoso(ADVO-7864-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

1180) 2431/2017 Suit M/s. Deluxe Interiors (Plaintiff) V/S The Sindh Industrial Estates (SITE) and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 YLR 2091, 2018 SBLR 1310
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 19-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1181) 49/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Khalique Rind (Applicant) V/S Raees Ali Akbar Shabrani and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 616
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

1182) 8/2013 M.A. Muhammad Ameen (Appellant) V/S Wali Khan and an Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

1183) 5143/2020 Const. P. Dr. Tariq Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 1304
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.639-K/2022 Dr.Tariq Ahmed Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1184) 81/2011 I. A Province of Sindh and Others (Appellant) V/S Khairuddin and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 194
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.13-K/2023 Khairuddin& another v. Government of Sindh through Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

1185) 1928/2020 Const. P. Shahzad Sher Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Maintainability of Petition)
Tag Line:Where employment rules are non-statutory, the relationship of an employee and his employer is to be governed by the principle of master and servant.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 368
Advocates:Syed Khurram Nizam(ADVO-6426-SBC-KHI),Hasan Khurshid Hashmi(ADVO-11313-SBC-KHI),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

1186) 6796/2021 Const. P. Advans Pakistan Microfinance Bank Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 910
Advocates:Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2797/2022 Advans Pakistan Microfinance Bank Limited Karachi and another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Interior, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1187) 107/2011 Criminal Appeal Lal Bux @ Laloo Bangulani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Appeal (Accused acquitted under Section 345(6) Cr.P.C by Way of Compromise, In Murder Case. )
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 602
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1188) 1261/2020 Const. P. Shamshad Ali and another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Amenity Plot
Tag Line:It is well-settled that conversion of an amenity plot into any other purpose is illegal and encroachment thereon cannot be allowed under any circumstances. This view is fortified by the following authorities of Honble Supreme Court and cases decided by learned Division Benches of this Court, laying down the principles regarding illegal conversion and use of amenity plots/public properties for other purposes, rights of public in respect of amenity plots/public properties and duties of authorities concerned for maintaining the status of amenity plots/public properties
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1408
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1189) 138/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Waqar Rahim & another (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Revenue Court cannot cancel the entries incorporated in record of rights pursuant to a registered document.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1592
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1190) 47/2021 Spl. Cr. A. THE STATE / ANF (Applicant) V/S AGHA MEHMOOD UL HASSAN HARAVI & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, overrides Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1977.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 761
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.198-K/2022 The State / Director General Anti-Narcotics Force Sindh v. Agha Mehmood Ul Hassan Haravi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1191) 1150/2011 Adm. Suit A.KHALID ANSARI (Plaintiff) V/S INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER CORPORATION & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 15-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

1192) 14/2021 I.T.R.A TRI-PACK FILMS LTD. (Applicant) V/S COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:s. 221 ITO; ambit of rectification.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 562
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Hashmatullah Alim(ADVO-11063-SBC-KHE),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1649-K/2021 Tri-Pack Films Limited v. Commissioner Inland Revenue & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1193) 49/2012 H.C.A Port Services (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) V/S Port Qasim Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 MLD 506
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1665/2014 Port Qasim Authority, Karachi v. M/s. Port Services (Pvt) Ltd. Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time a/w application for condonation of delay and stay

1194) 6198/2014 Const. P. K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting

1195) 204/2019 Cr.Rev ADEEL BAQAI S/O AJMAL HUSSAIN & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S HASSAN ASAD & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 827
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.110-K/2024 Adeel Baqai and another v. Hassan Asad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1196) 865/2025 Cr.Bail FAQIR ZAINUL ABDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1836
Advocates:Mudassir Hussain(ADVO-20327-SBC-KHE),Govinda(ADVO-20050-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Tasneem Sultana(Author)
Order Date: 25-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

1197) 1009/2023 Suit M/S. PAKISTAN NATIONAL BUILDING MATERIAL D.C.F. (Plaintiff) V/S AQSA SULEMAN BAWANY & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The rights of a Sub-Lessee to seek an injunction to prevent construction being raised by the Lessee
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1007
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

1198) 924/2009 Const. P. Baber Qayyum Raja (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 06-NOV-09
Approved for Reporting

1199) 108/2014 Cr.J.A Riaz Khan and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 27-APR-16
Approved for Reporting

1200) 850/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Preventive) (Applicant) V/S Falak Jan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (SRO 577(I)/2006)
Tag Line:Exemption is a privilege being enjoyed by diplomats and other dignitaries. If we trace history of last 50 years (though there were earlier SROs also), we come across initial SRO 53(I)/70 issued in exercise of powers available under Section 19 of Customs Act for all articles of household and personal effects including motor vehicles for the personal use by the ruler of any of the Gulf Sheikhdoms including vehicles imported by the UAE dignitaries which includes use and donations to welfare projects in Pakistan with conditions, such as articles will not be sold without prior consent of Central Board of Revenue, as it then was. It was persons specified SRO as it contained list of all such dignitaries with a table attached. Vehicle was imported in 2002 when SRO 506(I)/88 was active. It restricted the sale without prior permission of Federal Government, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to be routed through a formal application. In other event, no such vehicle could have been sold within two years of its importation to anyone other than Department of Investment Promotion or diplomatic representatives or mission of foreign government, except when the diplomatic representative by whom it was imported is transferred within two years of its importation and it has been used by him for not less than one year. So nothing beneficial could be achieved by respondent through said SRO
Citation:2022 PTD 512
Advocates:Zakir Hussain Khaskhali(ADVO-419-SBC-KHP),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 06-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.273/2022 Falak Jan v. The Collector of Customs Model Collectorate of Customs (Preventive) Custom House Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1201) 138/2012 Cr.Appeal Mst Tabish (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

1202) 46/2020 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD ANWER JOKHIO & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1755
Advocates:Ashiq Muhammad(ADVO-3498-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting

1203) 7042/2018 Const. P. M/s Karachi Golf Club (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Doctrine of Mutuality.
Citation:2021 PTD Sindh 558, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2102, 2022 TAX 203
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.538-K/2021 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Karachi Golf Club (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.4076/2022 The Province of Sindh & others v. M/s. Karachi Golf Club (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed

1204) 916/2018 Const. P. Sub-Engineer / Staff Welfare Association (Petitioner) V/S GOS & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

1205) 136/2010 Civil Revision Jan Muhammad and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Nabi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 06-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

1206) 370/2014 Const. P. Mst Bibi Naz Bibi (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1067
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting

1207) 4058/2022 Const. P. Al-Ghazi Tractors Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Petition dismissed as not maintainable. No cause of action accrued; a mere challenge to vires of Rules will not confer jurisdiction
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 314
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2034/2024 Al Ghazi Tractor Limited, Karachi v. Pakistan, through the Secretary Revenue, and Ex-Officio Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, FBR House, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 19-Jun-25)

1208) 1704/2019 Cr.Bail RAHIM S/O SHOUKAT (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 02-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

1209) 5048/2016 Const. P. Azher Jawaid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 229
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 13-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.6-K/2017 Azhar Jawaid v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.19-K/2017 Azhar Jawaid v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted with Notice to Respondents.

1210) 4980/2015 Const. P. Ameen Steel (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 107
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

1211) 199/2015 S.M.A Sheikh Haroon Buksh S/o Shaikh Buksh Elahi (Plaintiff) V/S Shaikh Tahir Buksh & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Succession Act
Tag Line:Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)--- ----Ss. 295 & 278---Chief Court (Sindh) Rules (OS), Chap. XXII, R.413---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XX, R.13 & S.114---Succession---Procedure in contentious cases---Decree in administration suit---Nature of order under S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925---Conversion of proceedings under Succession Act, 1925 to a suit of administration under O. XX, R.13, C.P.C.---Petitioner sought review of order passed by High Court under S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925, whereby in view of contentious nature of succession proceedings, application seeking issuance of letters of administration were converted into a civil suit--- Contention of applicant inter alia was that impugned order, which converted proceedings into suit for administration and stated that the preliminary decree be passed was contrary to law; and the suit should be regular suit and not a suit for administration---Validity---Impugned order identified the parties and identified as to who should be the plaintiff and defendant and mentioned that the suit would be in the form of a suit for administration of the properties of the deceased and therefore all ingredients of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 and O.XX, C.P.C. were fully adhered to---When parties were legal heirs of the deceased and were contesting with regard to share in property left by the deceased, in such situation any one of the legal heirs could file a suit for administration of properties or file an application under S.278 of the Succession Act, 1925 for grant of "letter of administration" and in terms of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 in the case where there was contention, then proceedings were supposed to be converted as nearly as they could be, into a "regular suit" according to provisions of the C.P.C.---Court in the impugned order exercised powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction and once an order was passed, the court also had power to take further steps to minimize delay in disposal of dispute and the court was under a statutory obligation to pass an order for preliminary decree---Use of the word "shall" in O.XX, R.13, C.P.C. was of mandatory nature, and the C.P.C. did not envisage any other form a suit except for a suit for administration of properties under O.XX, C.P.C.---No error on the face of record was found in the impugned order---Review application was rejected, in circumstances.
Citation:2017 PLD 563
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

1212) 261/2007 Suit SM SHOAIB BAGHPATI (Plaintiff) V/S UMER GUL AND OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 01-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

1213) 172/2019 Suit Furqan & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Roshan Ara & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1566
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting

1214) 1382/2025 Const. P. Dost Ali Solangi (Petitioner) V/S DIG Shaheed Benazir Abad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2223
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 08-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

1215) 104/2001 Cr.Rev Muhammad Akram S/o Muhammad Salim (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 15-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting

1216) 2820/2014 Const. P. Syed Mansoor Ali (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PLD Sindh 41
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-JUL-14
Approved for Reporting

1217) 452/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Naeemuddin & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:The overlap between the jurisdiction of this Court on its Original Civil Side and under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 and the manner in which a Court should act in terms of the judicial propriety as clarified by the Supreme Court of Pakistan where both jurisdictions are invoked.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1349
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1218) 276/2018 I.T.R.A DR. ZAFAR SAJJAD (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 959
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1281-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1487-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1095-K/2021,C.A.3928/2022,C.A.3789/2022,C.A.3622/2022 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Fix in Islamabad.,Disposed Leave Granted, Fix in Islamabad.,Disposed Leave Granted, Fix in Islamabad.,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

1219) 440/2020 S.M.A Shamsuddin s/o Aboobakar (Petitioner) V/S Yasin Hasan (Deceased) (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 704
Advocates:Saleem uz Zaman(ADVO-6427-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 12-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

1220) 156/2024 Const. P. Islam Khalti & Others (Petitioner) V/S Manik Khan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Fraud and Misrepresentation
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 628
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1221) 204/2015 Criminal Appeal AIJAZ NAWAZ @ BABA S/O SARFRAZ NAWAZ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 25-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.301/2019 Aijaz Nawaz @ Baba v. The State,Crl.A.65/2023 Aijaz Nawaz @ Baba v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

1222) 217/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Ramada Industries (Pvt) Ltd., Karachi (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner I. R. Zone-VI, CTO, Kar. &another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line: input tax claim cannot be denied if subsequently the supplier has been suspended or blacklisted Section 21(3) and Section 8(1)(ca) interpreted
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 466
Advocates:Muhammad Din Qazi(ADVO-17782-SBC-KHS),Ghazi Khan Khalil(ADVO-18768-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Faheem Bhayo(ADVO-2534-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

1223) 3183/2018 Const. P. Dr. Fateh Muhammad Burfat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2151
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1224) 1502/2008 Adm. Suit Mr. Nazar Akbar, Advocate for the Plaintiff. (Plaintiff) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 01-OCT-10
Approved for Reporting

1225) 533/2016 Suit Zain Khan. (Plaintiff) V/S Taj Roshan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

1226) 22/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Enforcement) (Applicant) V/S M/s. Ara Detergents & Chemicals FZE & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Scope of Tribunals power under section 194A Customs Act, 1969.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 464
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 26-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2051/2022 The Collector of Customs (Enforcement), Karachi v. M/s Ara Detergents & Chemicals FZE, Sharjah, UAE Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1227) 2/2012 Cr.Ref Ali AKbar & 2 Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 16-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

1228) 100/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Moosa (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 687
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

1229) 4496/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Chairman EOBI and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976 (Pensionary Benefits )
Tag Line:With regard to length of service, counsel for the EOBI contends that the petitioner remained employee of the respondent for a period of four years, therefore, he is not entitled for any benefit. Needless to mention that decision/termination was challenged by the petitioner in referred grievance application which was allowed, hence, it cannot be said that length of service of the petitioner was only four years. That service would be treated as upto the age of superannuation.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 725
Advocates:Syed Jaffar Ali Rizvi(ADVO-15659-SBC-KHS),S. Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-3111-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1230) 2/2018 Adm. Suit HAYS TRADING & SHIPPING (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. MISKI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Admiralty
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

1231) 3/2018 Insolvency Abdul Ahad Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Lubna Qaiser (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Insolvency petition dismissed
Citation:2021 CLC 297
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

1232) 41/2019 Suit Shahid & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Zainab & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:no Inheritable Property. Plaint Rejected.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1193
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

1233) 60/2012 H.C.A Karachi Electric Supply Co (Appellant) V/S Karachi Water & Sewerage Board & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 14-APR-14
Approved for Reporting

1234) 5842/2022 Const. P. Shell Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Section 4C Income Tax Ordinance 2001
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 667
Advocates:Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-15940-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.220-K/2023,C.P.L.A.221-K/2023,C.P.L.A.222-K/2023,C.P.L.A.223-K/2023,C.P.L.A.224-K/2023,C.P.L.A.227-K/2023,C.P.L.A.228-K/2023,C.P.L.A.230-K/2023,C.P.L.A.126-K/2023,C.P.L.A.229-K/2023,C.P.L.A.226-K/2023,C.P.L.A.225-K/2023,C.P.L.A.3825/2022 SCP Status: Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25), Adjourned (Next Date: 10-Nov-25),Disposed

1235) 1991/2011 Const. P. Sui Southern Gas Company (Petitioner) V/S Darya khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 11-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1094/2021 M/s Al - Hamd Edible Oil Industries Pvt Ltd Thatha v. The Province of Sindh through the Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1236) 240/1971 Suit AMIR ALI (Plaintiff) V/S GUL SHAKER & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Administration Suits (Property left by Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Fatima Jinnah and Shireen Jinnah)
Tag Line:Report has been furnished by the Nazir today which shows that a total sum of Rs. 73,32,51,903/- is available with the Nazir. A proposal is made that these sums be used as seed funds by the new Trust for building Girls Medical College/Hospital at the said premises. Learned AAG states that the Government of Sindh would like to participate in such a noble initiative and he has no objection if the property be used solely for the purpose of construction of building and operation of Medical College/Hospital exclusively for girls with residential facilities therein, with regard to the sums deposited by the Provincial Government, learned AAG seeks time to get a nod from the concerned authority as if this fund could be used as token of good gesture or whether Sindh Government wishes these sums to be returned.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

1237) 20/2019 I. A M/S Mohammad Bux Abro & Ors (Appellant) V/S M/S Askri Bank Ltd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 947
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

1238) 115/2012 Suit MEDIA MAX (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S MEDIA MAX (PVT) LTD. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 555
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-JUN-13
Approved for Reporting

1239) 1179/2014 Cr.Bail Muhammad Nizam alias Waja (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 22-AUG-14
Approved for Reporting

1240) 226/2005 H.C.A State Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Naeem and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 11-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.146-K/2019 State Bank of Pakistan v. Muhammad Naeem & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1241) 1567/2022 Const. P. M/s Aziz Tabba Foundation (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Contribution under the Employees Old Age Benefit Act 1976 (EOBI Act)
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 564
Advocates:Faiz Mehmood Khan Durani(ADVO-4955-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Samia Alam Durrani(ADVO-4007HLC-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Muhammad(ADVO-15728-SBC-KHE),Ubedullah(ADVO-10657-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

1242) 871/2014 Suit Muhammad Irfan Gazi. (Plaintiff) V/S IZO SPA & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Zaheeruddin Mujahid(ADVO-4421-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nouman Jamali(ADVO-10431-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1243) 2/2015 J.M Province of Sindh & Others (Applicant) V/S Bilqees & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 1920
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 09-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting

1244) 1141/2019 Cr.Bail Kashif Dars S/o Muhammad Usman Dars (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters ( under Section 498 Cr.P.C r/w Section 561-A Cr.P.C), Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:a) S.498, 561-A Cr.P.C--- Scope: Application of proper procedure; S.498, 561-A Cr.P.C--- Order under S.497(5) Cr.P.C passed by the District & Sessions Judge cancelling the bail of accused charged under Cyber Crime was assailed before High Court---The Court observed that the proceedings filed were half criminal bail application and half criminal Miscellaneous Application. It was further observed that surprisingly the Counsel who was protecting the liberty of his client was unaware of the law and nature of proceedings. As the proceeding under both the provision are distinguished in nature, in fact Deputy Registrar Judicial had to check that whether the instant application under Section 498 Cr.P.C was in the prescribed format for such an application or not. And if it was not the Deputy Registrar should have raised objection to bring it in the proper form. b) Supreme Court.16, 20, 21, PECA 2016 r/w 49, 420, 109 PPC (Prevention of Electric Crimes Act) --- S.497(5) Cr.P.COrder: In fact in Cyber Crime the accused cannot allege malafide in associating/ connecting him in the crime. The complainant was not aware of the applicant. He had only noticed certain fake pages on internet and Facebook carrying objectionable. FIA by using scientific technics reached to the accused through cell phone number which has been used to the Facebook carrying offensive material. Held--- Since the complainant party was never aware of the person behind this misuse of internet, it cannot be said that complainant had malafidely named the accused and arrested or associated with the offence. The Cell phone was in use of Accused and sufficient documentary evidence appeared against him connecting him with commission of offence. Application dismissed.
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 259
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 16-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.171-K/2019 Kashif Dars v. The State and others,Crl.A.397/2019 Kashif Dars v. The State and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

1245) 3893/2016 Const. P. Shabana Haider (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:The right of withdrawal of the resignation was available as long as the resignation was not accepted. This gained strength when sub-clause (v) is read along with this proposition. It provides that in case an employee withdraws the resignation before its acceptance, the resignation shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. This is not the case here. The resignation was accepted on 08.02.2016 whereas the request for withdrawal of the resignation was made on 26.02.2016, on the imaginary ground that 30 days' notice period was yet to expire. In this context we may observe that notice period has nothing to do with the acceptance of resignation. On acceptance of resignation all that is essential for an employee is to complete the notice period i.e. to serve the Commission in case the employee had opted to give one month notice. The employee could have opted to pay salary in lieu thereof but that is not the case here.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 69
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Raja Qasit Nawaz Khan(ADVO-3457-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 21-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

1246) 1914/2015 Const. P. Wali Muhammad Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 205
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

1247) 2507/2019 Const. P. M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Ghafoor Shaikhson (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:the Sindh Consumer Protection Act, 2014
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1138
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

1248) 22/2015 Cr.Bail Mst Moona (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 19-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

1249) 1026/2017 Const. P. Aurangzeb and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Upgradation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

1250) 3150/2016 Const. P. M/s Jubilee Life Insurance (Petitioner) V/S V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 22-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.37-K/2018 M/s Jubilee Life Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1251) 1278/2014 Cr.Bail Azhar Ali Khwaja & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Bail admitted)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 01-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting

1252) 927/2024 Cr.Bail ALI RAZA S/O MUHAMMAD CHAND (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line: In the instant case, prima facie the abductee has given two versions of the incident, one before the Police after her recovery and secondly before the Magistrate on 13.01.2024 voluntarily after 8 days from the date of registration of F.I.R, though the alleged offense took place on 16.12.2023 alleging therein that her brother in law Faizan had abducted her and committed the alleged crime but she failed to disclose the name of the present applicant though the applicant was already arrested in the FIR on 07.01.2024 and her statement was recorded on 13.01.2024, however, the statement does not transpire the name of the applicant, which makes the case of the applicant that of further inquiry. On the aforesaid proposition, I seek guidance from the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ehsan Ullah vs. The State (2012 SCMR 1137) wherein it has been held by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:- ???This shows that in the present case the prosecution itself has two versions vis-??-vis the petitioner, first of the complainant party according to which the petitioner was present at the spot and had resorted to firing and second of the investigating agency according to which the petitioner was not present at the spot and he was abetting his co-accused from behind the scene. All these considerations surely render the case against the petitioner one of further inquiry into his guilt.???
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 572
Advocates:Sakhiullah(ADVO-4762-SBC-KHI),Shah Muhammad Maitlo(ADVO-15724-SBC-KH1-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Bilal Rashid (ADVO-16235-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1253) 102/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Muhammad Sharif (Prop. of M/s.MSN Enterprises,Kar) (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-III, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Discrepancy in Income Tax and Sales Tax Return; must be reconciled by taxpayer
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 233
Advocates:Furqan Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-17092-SBC-KHE),Shams Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-9489-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 06-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.905-K/2024 Muhammad Sharif v. The Commissioner Inland Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1254) 921/2014 Suit Ansar Hussain Siddiqui & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Abrar Hussain Siddiqui & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Whether territorial jurisdiction of a court in a suit for administration would be determined on the basis of the location of the property or on the basis of the place where the deceased was domiciled at the time of his demise.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1293
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mumtaz(ADVO-4861-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Saleem Khan(ADVO-2583HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

1255) 599/2022 Const. P. Miss Seema Sanam (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:The petitioner was appointed on daily wage basis and is seeking regularisation. However, in the absence of any statutory backing, regularisation can not be granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1352, 2025 SHC SUK 1356, 2025 SHC SUK 1358
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1256) 7097/2018 Const. P. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealer Assoication and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 851
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

1257) 6084/2017 Const. P. Reliance Petrochem Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 1
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 30-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1258) 993/2016 Cr.Bail DR. ASIM HUSSAIN S/O TAJAMUL HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PCr.LJ 631
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 11-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

1259) 170/2010 Civil Revision Raja Abdul Hameed,thr:L.Rs. (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ahsan Nawaz & anor (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 815
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

1260) 5635/2022 Const. P. Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Article 474 (b) of Civil Service Regulations)
Tag Line:The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1008
Advocates:Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-14353-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2126/2023 Trustees of the Karachi Port, through its Board of Trustees, KPT, Karachi v. Mazhar Ali Jatoi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned.to be fixed before 3 member bench

1261) 642/2003 Suit M/S.SILVER FLOUR MIOLLS. (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 YLR Note 258
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

1262) 49/2018 H.C.A Syed Hamid Mir & another (Appellant) V/S Board of Revenue Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1229
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1263) 792/2013 Const. P. Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:contract employees
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1406
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

1264) 418/2020 Const. P. Hina Batool D/o. Manzoor Hussain & another (Petitioner) V/S Mr. Syed Asad Abbas S/o. Syed MazharHasan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:equitable maintenance of children from two wives father residing abroad is under obligation to maintain minor children in Pakistan under same standards he was maintaining his siblings from other wife
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3339
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 24-NOV-25
Approved for Reporting

1265) 23/2011 Adm. Suit Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 405
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

1266) 214/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) V/S Sazzuddin & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.364-K/2019 Muhammad Ishaque v. Sazzuddin and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1267) 4425/2021 Const. P. M/s Medisure Laboratories Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 563
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHC),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Mamoon Nawaz Chaudhry(ADVO-11348-SBC-KHE),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

1268) 638/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Junaid Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1344
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1269) 3400/2012 Const. P. Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Son Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

1270) 786/2011 Suit MUHAMMAD MANSOOR (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD RASHID (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 20-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1271) 31/2019 M.A. Muhammad Yameen Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Arshad (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:In the light of decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee vs. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) and order passed by the learned Tribunal in the matter, I am of the considered view that the official respondents are under legal obligation to comply the directives of the Honourable Supreme Court passed in the cases of removal of illegal encroachment of amenity plots / public properties from its occupants
Citation:2021 CLC 19
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4146/2019 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others,C.A.228/2023 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

1272) 10/2023 Cr.J.A Muhammad Irfan Saeed Rajput (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 304
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1273) 4284/2015 Const. P. K-Electric and Ors (Petitioner) V/S M/s Naveena Export and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: LIMITATION (Conversion of revision into Appeal)
Tag Line:It is imperative for the proper working of any system of justice that in a context such as the one at hand a party aggrieved by an order passed by a judicial forum be required to assail that order in a timely manner through appropriate proceedings, as prescribed. As such, a party cannot be allowed to escape the consequence of its own indolence and failure to avail a prescribed remedy so as to adopt a course of action other than that envisaged under the law, and then retrace its steps while seeking to circumvent limitation through recourse to the plea that the order sought to be questioned is void.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 315
Advocates:Khalil Ahmed(ADVO-6793-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1274) 86/2014 II.A. Mst. Nargis Ehsan Malik & Others (Appellant) V/S Arshad Mehmood Mir & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1-K/2019 Mst: Nargis Ehsan Malik thr. her L.Rs and others v. Arshad Mehmood Mir,C.P.L.A.425-K/2019 Mst: Nargis Ehsan Malik thr. her L.Rs and others v. Arshad Mehmood Mir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Adjourned [ Appeal converted into Civil Petition),Disposed Disposed of

1275) 100/2013 Const. P. Nafees Fatima (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.357-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. and another v. Nafees Fatima and others,C.P.L.A.365-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust and another v. Nafees Fatima and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

1276) 68/2016 Execution First Appeal JAWAID SARWAR (Decree Holder) V/S RANA MUNIR & ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Decree for specific performance entails possession. Privity of contract. Compromise decree when executable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 424
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-23
Approved for Reporting

1277) 506/2021 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD SHAFI S/O FAIZULLAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997
Tag Line:It is observed that mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict accused. The prosecution is under a bounden responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially included production of the witness, tasked with the responsibility of transmitting the samples to the office of Chemical Examiner.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 304
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Rashid Khan(ADVO-4194-SBC-KHI),Shaikh Ikram Aziz(ADVO-4129-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1278) 185/2017 Civil Revision Muhammad Yousuf (Applicant) V/S Masood Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1205
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

1279) 280/2022 Const. P. Yasir Kalwar S/o Abdul Wahab Kalwar (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Farzeen and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1025
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

1280) 625/2025 Const. P. Hafeezullah Lashari (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1972
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

1281) 1244/2006 Const. P. Mustafa F. Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 04-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting

1282) 3491/2013 Const. P. Lal Badshah And Ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman K.P.T And Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Cost of Living Allowance (CLA) )
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1231
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.211-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.P.L.A.212-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.A.46-K/2022 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of

1283) 519/2024 H.C.A Frequency Allocation Board (Appellant) V/S Southern Networks Limited and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 533
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1284) 697/2019 Cr.Bail Mumtaz Ali Mirani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2020 MLD 1841
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting

1285) 1299/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Rafique Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to reconsider the case of promotion of the petitioner in BPS-20, within three months, in the light of dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Dr. Muhammad Arif, 2017 SCMR 969; and, his earlier supersession as recorded hereinabove will not come in his way, while considering his case for promotion in next rank with his batchmates, provided he is still in NAB service.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1562
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Addl. Deputy Prosecutor General NAB khi(AddlDyProsNAB),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1286) 145/2011 Cr.Rev Dr. Khalid Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Mst. Roshan Ara and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 04-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1287) 952/2018 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali Rajpar & Brothers (Petitioner) V/S POS & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 936
Advocates:Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan()
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 25-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3667/2019 Ghulam Ali v. Federation of Pakistan to be served thr. Secretary Interior Ministry, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1288) 3473/2025 Const. P. Saifuddin & others (Petitioner) V/S KMC & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Authority of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation to deal with amenity plots and in particular plots that are parks, the application of Regulation 18-4.1 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002 and Article 52 A of the Karachi Development Authority Order, 1957
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2181
Advocates:Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1152-K/2025,C.P.L.A.4842/2025,C.P.L.A.1172-K/2025,C.P.L.A.4843/2025 SCP Status: , , ,

1289) 1007/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Mehboob (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Ehtram-e-Ramazan Ordinance, 1981
Tag Line:The prohibitions contained in Sections 3 and 4 and the punishments provided therein for their contravention clearly show that the persons who do not fall within the exemptions provided in Section 5 or who knowingly and willfully show disrespect for the persons fasting and/or for the holy month of Ramazan, are to be dealt with strictly and punished under Sections 3 and 4, as the case may be. Another important aspect is that no person should be allowed to take advantage of the exemptions provided in Section 5 or to exploit the same if he is not entitled to the same.Since the hotels and restaurants of the petitioners are admittedly not situated within the premises of any of the places enumerated in Section 5 of the Ordinance, they are not certainly entitled to seek exemption under the said Section, and as such all these petitions are liable to be dismissed.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 28-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1290) 4377/2012 Const. P. Dr. Itrat Malik (Petitioner) V/S State Life Insurance Co-opration & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Dismissal-Termination)
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 1861
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2849/2018 State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Dr. Itrat Malik Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1291) 1357/2021 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD HUMAYUN QADRI S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Applicant Muhammad Humayun Qadri has earlier been admitted to ad-interim pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order dated 14.7.2021. Now the matter is fixed for confirmation of pre-arrest bail or otherwise
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1297
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1292) 33/2022 II.A. Ghulam Akhtar & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 490
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

1293) 8569/2018 Const. P. International Brands Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Inter-corporate dividends
Citation:2024 PTD 49
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2087/2023 International Brands Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Ex Officio Chairman FBR Constitutional Avenue, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

1294) 555/2012 Cr.Bail Hazoor Bux Brohi and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-13
Approved for Reporting

1295) 1054/2018 Const. P. Ishrat Ali Lohar (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD 47, 2018 SBLR 1367
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

1296) 328/2018 H.C.A Farrukh Afzal Munif (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Afzal Munif & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 97
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1297) 1575/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Akram Thr. M Anwer Khan (Petitioner) V/S Shri Mahant Baboo Lalgir Mahraj & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters), Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (FRA Remanding Order Set aside and declared null & void. )
Tag Line:Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--- ----Ss. 15, 18, 20 & 21---Ejectment of tenant---Change of ownership on the basis of decree of the Court---Denial of relationship of landlord and tenant by the tenant---Default in payment of rent---Expression "or by such other mode" in S. 18 of the Ordinance---Scope---Dispute of title or ownership---Determination of---Procedure---Landlord became owner of demised premises through decree of the Court and tenant was intimated with regard to change of ownership and was requested for payment of rent to the new landlord---Tenant denied the relationship of landlord and tenant---Eviction petition was allowed by the Rent Controller on the ground of default in payment of rent---Appellate Court remanded the matter to the Rent Controller with the direction to decide the same afresh after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties and directed the civil Court to amend the decree passed in the civil suit---Contention of tenant was that decree of the Court did not create any title---Validity---Tenants were in possession on the demised premises as tenants and they were not claiming ownership---Notice for change of ownership of demised premises had been received by the tenants---Tenants were bound to tender rent to the new owner of the demised premises within 30 days from the moment they had received the intimation of transfer of ownership by sale, gift, inheritance "or by such other mode"---Notice from new owner to the tenant for change of ownership was enough---Tenants on receiving the said notice refused to tender rent to the new owner on the ground that the decree of Court did not create any title---Decree of Court could also be one of the "such other mode" for transfer of ownership of demised premises---Decree of Court was against previous landlord/owners who were party to the suit in which same was passed---Tenant had no right to question the title of landlord---Tenants on receiving notice of change of ownership were supposed to protect their right as tenant in the demised premises in their possession by tendering rent to the person who had sent them the notice---Tenants had failed to tender rent to the new owner of demised premises---Courts while exercising authority under the law had no jurisdiction to decide or even comment on the title/ownership of the property in possession of tenant---If issue of relationship of landlord and tenant was complex then it should be left for the Civil Court to decide the same---Appellate authority in the present case had remanded the matter to the Rent Controller with the direction to decide the issue of relationship between the tenant and new landlord by re-examining the issue of ownership/title of demised premises already decided by the Civil Court---Judgment of Civil Court could not be examined by the Rent Controller---Appellate Court had exercised powers not vested in it and order for modification/preparation of fresh decree and remand of the case was perverse and void---Impugned order passed by the Appellate Court was set aide and order for preparation of fresh decree and remand of rent case were declared null and void---Tenants were directed by the High Court to vacate the demised premises within thirty days---Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. Messrs Habib Bank Limited v. Sultan Ahmed and another 2001 SCMR 679 and Allahditta and others v. Member (Federal) Board of Revenue 2018 SCMR 1177 rel.
Citation:2019 CLC Note 25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 20-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.95-K/2019 Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB) thr. Administrator v. Shri Mahant Baboo Lalgir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

1298) 116/1998 Civil Revision Yousuf (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Anwar (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 203
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1299) 1768/2016 Suit H. Nizam Diin & Sons (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers HOusing Authority & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:CMA filed by defendant No.1 under Order VII, Rule 11, C.P.C. for rejection of the plaint Sections 42 and 56 of the Specific Relief Act , the Easement Act, 1882 and Transfer of Property Act are discussed. Plain is rejected.
Citation:2018 MLD 802
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

1300) 5333/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Umair & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:It is a general principle of law that in the absence of statutory rules of service a writ petition, in service matters, ought not to be entertained
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 2250
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1301) 971/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD IMRAN S/O NAWABUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence falling under prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C )
Tag Line:To invoke the provisions of section 364-A, it is incumbent upon the court to first see whether there was kidnapping within the meaning of section 361 PPC which envisages the co-existence of three elements contained therein namely (i) The minor was taken or enticed away by the kidnapper. (ii) The minor was out of the keeping of the lawful guardian (iii) The keeping of the minor was without the consent of the guardian. Once kidnapping is established, the question under section 364-A would be as to whether the appellant intended to murder the victim or subject her to grievous hurt or lust. 9. The words 'take' and 'entices away' used in section 361 PPC are key words to the offense of kidnapping implying some action on the part of the kidnapper to take or entice away the kidnapee followed by keeping the kidnapee out of the lawful guardianship of the guardian without his consent. The expression "taking" and "enticing" call for some positive steps taken by the accused to remove the girl from the custody of her guardian. Neither Section 361 PPC nor Section 363 PPC would have any application if the girl of her own accord the word 'kidnapping' connotes stealing away a child without the permission of a person under whose custody or care the child is'.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 995
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-10943-SBC-KHC),Imran Khan(ADVO-12660-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1302) 494/2019 Const. P. Custom Public School Thr. Akbar Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Aftab Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Section 21 of SRPO 1979
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1303) 13/2008 Const. P. Abdul Ghafoor Pathan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sakina and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Oral Rent Agreement
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1124
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1304) 2305/2020 Const. P. Aisha Steel Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1616
Advocates:Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.2694/2020 K-Electric Limited thr. its Chief Executive Officer, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Energy & thr. Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others,C.A.1022/2020 K-Electric Limited thr. its Chief Executive Officer, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Energy & thr. Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted and be fixed on 4.12.2020 (Friday),Disposed Allowed

1305) 163/2021 Criminal Appeal LOUNG & OTHERS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1839
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

1306) 4538/2016 Const. P. Riaz Ahmed Bhutto and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.428-K/2017 Riaz Ahmed and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1307) 5/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Shahzad & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Confiscation of vehicle under Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, 1969.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 183
Advocates:Zia -ul- Hasan(ADVO-9389-SBC-KHI),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Iqbal Masih Khurram (Iqbal M. Khurram)(ADVO-4370-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.690-K/2022 Shahzad v. The Collector of Customs & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1308) 2695/2017 Const. P. Syed Muhammad S/o Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) V/S Noorullah & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:-The petitioner while making such statement of alleged purchase has not realized the burden he took over. There is a marked difference in the probative value of entering into possession for the first time as tenant, and continuing in possession with claim of change in its nomenclature. Where occupant claiming his continuous possession as other than original character, it is expected that some trustworthy evidence in furtherance of his subsequently claimed character would be shown, failing whereof his admitted character would concur (Reliance2). -This PT-1 was then followed by another PT-1, which is claimed by the respondent No.1. This PT-1 then followed by notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. While recovering taxes in terms of the gross annual rental value, as assessed by authority under ibid Act, constructive possession of the respondent No.1 had been identified and regulated. It may not constitute the ownership but it does authorize the one who was found in constructive possession, to regulate his possession as required under the law. This was thus a jura possession recognized by Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act and rules framed thereunder of 1958. Thus having constructive jura possession with reference to property in question, an authoritative recognition in the shape of PT-1 was issued. -This PT-1 would enable the respondent No.1 to deal with his possession as deem fit and proper under the law. It is not in dispute that respondent No.1 was and is responsible for payment of annual gross rental value and it is not in dispute that in terms of Section 14 of Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958, the tax recoverable from any person on account of any building or land, if found in arrears, it shall be lawful for the proscribed authority to serve upon any person paying rent in respect of that building or land or any part thereof to the person from whom the arrears are due, a notice for the recovery of such taxes may be issued to the tenants or one from whom such taxes are required in terms of PT-1. It also enables the authority that if a person willfully fails or neglects to comply with the notice, the authority may after giving him an opportunity of being heard proceed against him as it could have proceeded under the provisions of this act against the defaulter of the tax. -Thus, in my view this PT-1 authorizes respondent No.1 to deal with this property as deem fit and proper and a lawful notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was issued to the petitioner to apprise him about the current situation as to the change of PT-1 and authority of new landlord.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 460
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.573-K/2021 Syed Muhammad v. Noorullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of [ Four months time granted ]

1309) 416/2019 Const. P. Majid Hussain Khokhar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:PCSIR
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 907
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.801-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Majid Hussain Khokhar,C.P.L.A.810-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Tariq Mateen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

1310) 239/2016 H.C.A Allah Dino Khaskheli (Appellant) V/S Zakir Mehmood & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A (reinstatement in service)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 999
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.14-K/2019 Allah Dino Khaskheli v. Zakir Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1311) 1/2019 I. A M/s. Moin and Sons Electronics (Appellant) V/S M/s. SME Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1418
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3495/2020 M/s Moin & Sons Electronics, Karachi v. SME Bank Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1312) 2217/2019 Const. P. Dilbar Khan Nizamani (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Chairman UC Nazim case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1313) 20/2011 M.A. Pakistan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers? Association (Appellant) V/S The Controller of Patents and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 30-NOV-16
Approved for Reporting

1314) 866/2017 Suit Hajj Organizaers Association of Pakistan & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 MLD 1616
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

1315) 150/2025 I. A Habib Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Syed Mansoor Ahmed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3247
Advocates:Muhammad Nazir Tanoli(ADVO-5564-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Ahmad Rajput(ADVO-4689-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-25
Approved for Reporting

1316) 198/2011 I.T.R.A Pakistan Mercantile Exchange (Applicant) V/S Comm, Inland Revenue Zon-1 (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PTD 1463, 2020 TAX 436
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1317) 107/1987 Suit Allwin Engineering Industries Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Karachi Electric Supply Corporation (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi
Order Date: 14-MAR-06
Approved for Reporting

1318) 370/2005 Suit MANZOOR AHMED SHAHZAD (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD SHAKIR SHAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

1319) 15/2020 I. A Anwar Ahmed Ansari (Appellant) V/S Pak Libya Holding Co. (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 332
Advocates:Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),Rozina(ADVO-13373-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Saleem Mangrio(ADVO-4620-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

1320) 304/2015 Cr.Appeal MUHAMMAD ASIM S/O MUHAMMAD RIAZ (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 06-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

1321) 1372/2018 Const. P. Indus Motors Co. Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25D)
Tag Line:Transactional value of Goods; addition of Royalty in such Value under Section 25(2) (d) & (e) of the Customs Act 1969 ; HELD; No
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1074
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1255-K/2023 The Chief Collector of Customs, (South) and another v. M/s Indus Motor Company Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1322) 1006/2010 Const. P. Mst. Shahnaz Parveen (Petitioner) V/S 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 28-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting

1323) 2785/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Mohammad Khoso (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 YLR 1028
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 21-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.433/2024 Chairman National Highway Authority thr. its Authorized officer, Karachi v. Ghulam Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1324) 399/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Pacific Oil Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:No Reference Application is maintainable under section 196 of the customs act against an order dismissing a Rectification Application
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 260
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHC),Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(ADVO-11058-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1325) 8633/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Ali Bhatia (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973. A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 09.10.2020 in the case of Ghulam Ali Bhatia & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with connected petitions), whereby, the petitioners have expressed their grievance against impugned amendment in SRO 583/2017 dated 01.07.2017, for being discriminatory, as according to petitioners, the concession and reduction in payment of duty and taxes to the Ship Breaking Industry in respect of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap is violative of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, whereas, a declaration has been sought to the effect that petitioners, who are the importers and manufacturers of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap, may be given the similar concession/reduction in tax liability as according to the petitioners, they fall within the same class of persons. The aforesaid petitions have been dismissed by the Divisional Bench of this Court while holding that petitioners, who are importers of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap are covered under PCT Heading 7204.4910, whereas, ship (vessel) imported by the Ship Breaking Industry are covered under PCT Heading 8909.0000, hence cannot be treated at par. It has been further held that through impugned amendment, reduction of tax liability has been granted as an incentive for the revival of ship breaking industry pursuant to policy decision, whereas, there seems no legal impropriety in the impugned amendment. No additional liability or burden has been created through impugned amendment, in violation of constitutional provisions or the law, therefore, the allegation of discrimination amongst the same class of person is otherwise misconceived. Reliance has been placed in the case of Messrs Elahi Cotton Mills Ltd. and others vs. Federation of Pakistan and others (PLD 1997 SC 582), wherein, it has been held as under:- "(vi) That the tests of the vice of discrimination in a taxing law are less rigorous. If there is equality and uniformity within each group founded on intelligible differentia having a rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved by the law, the Constitutional mandate that a law should not be discriminatory is fulfilled."
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 309
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1482-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Legal) v. Ghulam Ali Bhatia Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1326) 1073/2009 Const. P. Aziz ur Rehman Chaudhry. (Petitioner) V/S PIAC (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 10-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.276-K/2013 Pakistan International Airline Corporation (PIAC) v. Aziz-ur-Rehman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed

1327) 123/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Moula Bux Chachar (Appellant) V/S Khan Mohammad alias Khoso (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 427
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 05-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

1328) 584/2021 Suit DEEPAK KUMAR & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 500
Advocates:Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

1329) 7029/2021 Const. P. Salman Talibuddin (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 514
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-23
Approved for Reporting

1330) 479/2023 Const. P. Akifowa and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Electricity Act, 1910
Tag Line:Petition against determination of NEPRA in respect of Electricity dues and other charges not maintainable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 688
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 11-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1331) 316/2019 I.T.R.A DR. IMDADULLAH MEMON (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

1332) 340/2022 Criminal Appeal ABDUL MAJEED S/O AHMED & 12 OTHERS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 983
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

1333) 46/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) ZAFAR IQBAL (Applicant) V/S MST. QAISER JEHAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Inverse bona fide purchaser.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 472
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1334) 4268/2013 Const. P. Bilal International (Petitioner) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 465
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

1335) 1513/2024 Const. P. M/s C.A.A (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Alternate Dispute Resolution in Tax matters; Section 134A of the Income Tax Ordinance mandatory for State Owned Enterprise after Tax amendment Laws Act, 2024
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 226
Advocates:Ammar Ather Saeed(ADVO-13697-SBC-KHC),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Anwar Kashif Mumtaz(ADVO-11772-SBC-KHI),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.555-K/2024 M/s Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority Karachi. v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary of Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1336) 727/2008 Suit BAYER AG and Bayer Health Care AG (Plaintiff) V/S Bayhealth Care (Private) Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 27-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

1337) 980/2022 Const. P. Faraz Arif Thr. Attorney Muhammad Rizwan Arif (Petitioner) V/S The Honble Court of 7th ADJ, Khi South & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 416
Advocates:Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Altaf(ADVO-12600-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

1338) 135/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Sami Kehar (Applicant) V/S Amanullah Dasti & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Suit for Specific Performance of Contract: Oral Agreements: Detailed Proof Required in Legal ClaimsDiscussion: Proving an oral agreement to sell requires the plaintiff to specify the date, time, place, and witnesses, outline all terms, and explain the lack of written documentation. Inconsistent witness testimonies and missing details can undermine the claim's credibility, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence and precise articulation.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 842, 2025 CLC 1083
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 27-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

1339) 113/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Bahadur & others (Applicant) V/S Qaimuddin Golo & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 3122
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

1340) 1/2018 E.P Nida Khuhro (Petitioner) V/S Moazam Ali Khan Abbasi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Election Matters
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.188/2019 Nida Khuhro v. Moazzam Ali Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed

1341) 1/2025 Cr.Rev Jeendal Shah (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2025 SHC MPK 412
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1342) 1327/2017 Const. P. Irfan Victor (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Khalida (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

1343) 7/2016 Election Appeal Muhammad Ameen and another (Appellant) V/S Jawaid Ali and 5 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting

1344) 279/2015 Const. P. Kamran Bhutto (Petitioner) V/S Mst Farsa Manzoor & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Family matter (Khulla Granted, Dower articles is right of wife to back . Judgment upheld . CP dismissed. )
Citation:2018 CLC 84
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 20-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1345) 273/2019 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 98
Advocates:Mujahid Ali Thebo(ADVO-14980-SBC-KHI),Dilber Ijaz(ADVO-10718-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Naeem(ADVO-11341-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

1346) 1498/2015 Suit Feroze Sajan & others (Plaintiff) V/S Farzana Sajan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 88
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

1347) 1048/2017 Cr.Misc. Majid @ Dado Mirani & other (Applicant) V/S The State & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1348) 213/2018 Cr.Rev BASHIR AHMED BADAL S/O ABDUL MAJEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI),Syed Imtiaz Ali Shah(ADVO-12898-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.878-K/2022 Roshanuddin thr. his L.Rs. v. Manzoor Illahi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1349) 85/2011 II.A. Gul-e Nasreen (Applicant) V/S Maj. Lala Rukh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Administration of justice--- ----Courts to act in accordance with law and decide the cases on the basis of legally admissible evidence on record---Decisions had to be in consonance with entire evidence---Evidence led by the parties should be discussed in support of reasoning in arriving at a particular findings---Judgments passed by the courts below being not in accordance with law and evidence on record by High Court were set aside. [Paras. 14 & 15 of the judgment] [Case-law referred] (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 100---Second appeal---Scope---Second appeal would be competent if findings on facts were result of mis-reading, non-reading of evidence or same were perverse. [Para. 13 of the judgment]
Citation:2017 CLC Note 211
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 29-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2084/2016 Hafiz Muhammad Iqbal v. Gul-e-Nasreen & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Partly Allowed

1350) 63/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. Hafeezullah alias Hafiz Khan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 04-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

1351) 5850/2018 Const. P. Zeeshan Usman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of.
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 187
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1754/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others,C.A.936/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.,Disposed Allowed

1352) 1021/2014 Suit Muhammad Ali Zubair. (Plaintiff) V/S Sabira Khatoon & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property -Suit Dismissed )
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 12---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXIII, R. 3 & O. VII, R. 11---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Compromise---Cause of action---Power-of-attorney---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Executant of power of attorney died prior to the execution of agreement to sell---Effect---Agreement was not validly entered into by and between the parties after the death of principal---Said agreement to sell was not enforceable at law even if contesting parties were ready and willing to abide by its terms---Sub-attorney who claimed to have entered into an agreement of sell with the attorney had not invited objections on entering into agreement of sale of suit property---Even (present) plaintiff after entering into agreement of sale with the sub-attorney had not issued any public notice in newspapers for inviting any objection from public-at-large for transfer of title of suit property---Had such effort been made, legal heirs of the deceased executant of power-of-attorney could have warned the plaintiff before making any further payment of suit property---Search certificate of suit property was not obtained from the office of Sub-Registrar of the properties concerned---Defendant had already breached promise with the plaintiff---Broken promise by the compromising parties could not be endorsed by the court---Application for compromise of suit was liable to be dismissed---No cause of action existed for filing of suit against the defendant---Cause of action shown in the plaint was a false and collusive statement of plaintiff and defendant---Plaintiff had attempted to obtain a compromise decree from the court---Defendant had never refused to perform her part of contract---When cause of action had ceased to exist, provisions of O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C. would attract and plaint was liable to be rejected---Suit for specific performance was liable to be rejected once defendant had conceded that he was ready and willing to perform his part of contract---Nazir of the court could not be allowed to perform part of contract under circumstances---Suit had become infructuous and plaint was liable to be rejected---Both the suit and compromise application were dismissed with cost of Rs. 100,000/- to be jointly and severally borne by the plaintiff and defendant---Said cost should be paid within specified period and if the same was not paid, Nazir of the court should take step for recovery of cost including attachment of movable and immovable properties of plaintiff and defendant---Member Inspection Team of High Court was directed to examine the record and if any criminal case was made out, he should initiate or cause to initiate criminal proceedings against plaintiff and defendant in accordance with law. Diamond Rubber Mills v. Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd. and 2 others 1989 CLC 1989 rel. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R. 11---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Jurisdiction of civil court to exercise its authority to adjudicate between the parties would co-exist with the "cause of action" to settle the grievance of plaintiff against the defendant on his/her denial to accept/acknowledge certain rights of plaintiff---No suit could be filed without a "cause of action" and if at all such suit was filed, plaint should be rejected for want of cause of action---If cause of action had ceased to continue after filing of suit, nothing was left for the court to exercise its authority.
Citation:2017 YLR 138
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 12-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

1353) 4000/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Javed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (service general )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1354) 5575/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950
Tag Line:Afghan Transit goods for which Bills of Lading have been issued are also protected under Para 4 of Import Policy Order 2022.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 372
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 31-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1355) 6218/2020 Const. P. Dr. Faraz Ahmed Wajidi (Petitioner) V/S Chancellor DOW University (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: The DOW University of Health Sciences Act, 2004 (Dow Employees (Service) Statute, 2007)
Tag Line:The caption petition has raised substantial questions of law involving interpretation of the certain provisions of The DOW University of Health Sciences Act, 2004 (`Act-2004`) and the Dow Employees (Service) Statute, 2007, and the principles governing the Writ of Quo Warranto as well as the power of the syndicate/competent authority of respondent-University to make a contractual appointment under the Act-2004 as amended up-to-date and Service Statute 2007--In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee of respondent-university ought not to be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the competent authority, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess the candidature of a candidate for regular appointment or on contract basis, on case to case basis. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2014 SCMR 157). In the instant case, prima-facie, the competent authority has assessed the candidature of the private respondents and appointed them in the respondent-university, which does not require interference at our end.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 716
Advocates:Abdul Sattar Pirzada(ADVO-13903-SBC-KHI),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Fareeda Mangrio(ADVO-11275-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1356) 63/2007 Suit.B NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Plaintiff) V/S RAJA TRADERS & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Under the parameters of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 the defendant is entitled for a relief if question of law and fact is being established. Article 10-A of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan no doubt provides an opportunity of fair trial but it does not amount to a trial of a suit where neither any question of law nor a fact was established. Article 10-A of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan also provides for the determination of a civil right and the obligation. Once the due process as required in terms of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 is adopted and the defendant is before the Court for redressal of his grievance, all he has to do is to establish the question of fact and law for determination of civil right and obligation, which is to be determined by the Court. In terms of Section 10(3) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 the application for leave to defend is supposed to be in the form of written statement which shall be containing summary of substantial question of law as well as fact in respect of which in the opinion of defendant, evidence needs to be recorded..
Citation:2016 CLD 1938
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

1357) 4954/2022 Const. P. Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaaf (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 577
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

1358) 408/2011 Const. P. Saleem Shehzada (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 2077, 2020 CLD 894
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3164/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Authority thr. its Assistant Director, Karachi v. Saleem Shehzada & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1359) 176/2017 Civil Revision Raja Khan (Applicant) V/S Shah Nawaz & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1360) 10/2012 M.A. M/s. Recorder Television Newwork (Pvt Ltd) (Applicant) V/S The Pakistan Electronis Media Regulatory Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 23-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1594/2013 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad v. M/s Recorder Television Netwrok (Pvt) Ltd,C.A.1413/2013 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, (PEMRA) Islamabad v. M/s Recorder Television Netwrok (Pvt) Ltd. Thr. Chief Secy. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

1361) 218/2009 Const. P. Muhammad Idrees Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Kashif Khan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 02-JUN-09
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.728-K/2009 Muhammad Idrees Qureshi v. Muhammad Kashif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

1362) 2327/2021 Cr.Bail RIAZ AHMED DAHIRI S/O HAJI NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:From the above discourse, primarily, the pre-arrest bail is extraordinary relief and can be granted only in exceptional circumstances, if there is mala fide of the complainant and police in lodging the FIR. Prima facie, there is no mala fide of the complainant to lodge the FIR of the incident against the applicant. Previous conviction of the applicant in a criminal case as discussed supra, disentitle him for extraordinary relief as provided under Section 498 Cr.P.C. Also, there is nothing placed on record by the applicant, which could show that the applicant has been acquitted from the aforesaid case by the learned appellate Court.
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1826
Advocates:Siraj Ahmed Mangi(ADVO-21906-SBC-KHS),Nadeem Ahmed Mangi(ADVO-11894-SBC-KHI),Hazoor Bux(ADVO-1899-SBC-SUK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.6-K/2022 Riaz Ahmed Dahri v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1363) 5/2022 Spl. Cr. A. THE DIR. GEN I& IR KHI & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Money laundering and predicate offences.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 114
Advocates:Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHC),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.64-K/2025 The Director DG I&I- Sales Tax House Karachi & another v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

1364) 731/2021 Const. P. MCB Bank Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Zahid Ali and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Whether the Payment of Wages in respect of trans provincial entities would fall with the legislative competence of the federation or of a province
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 127
Advocates:Shoukat Ali(ADVO-10357-SBC-KHI),Javed Asghar(ADVO-4324-SBC-KHS),Imdad Ali Saheto(ADVO-16074-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 29-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1365) 951/2012 Cr.Bail Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Murder Bail (Ocular evidence is corroborated by medical evidence), Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Confirmed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 26-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

1366) 843/2015 Suit Aroma Travel Services (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Faisal Al Abdullah Al Faisal Al Saud & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 414
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 30-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

1367) 1102/2017 Const. P. Vicky Kumar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4380/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1609/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

1368) 173/2020 Cr.Bail SAMIULLAH S/O MAHBOOB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 438
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

1369) 6549/2020 Const. P. Dr. Habibur Rehman Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 348
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.484-K/2022 The Director General Military Land & Cantonment & another v. Habib Rehman Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1370) 1227/2009 Const. P. Evacuee Trust Property Larkana/Sukkur (Petitioner) V/S Mohib Ahmed Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2024 SHC LAR 1119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 10-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1422/2024 Evacuee Trust Property Board through Assistant Administrator Larkana / Sukkur v. Mohib Ahmed Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1371) 3032/2013 Const. P. Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 21-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.437-K/2015 Ali Ahmed v. National Accountability Bureau Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1372) 13/2025 Criminal Appeal Aftab Ahmed Rashid & Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1838
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

1373) 558/2018 Suit Abdul Majid & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mrs. Nida Irfan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 05-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

1374) 1713/2008 Suit MUHAMMAD AYAZ S/O MUHAMMAD HANEEF (Plaintiff) V/S MILITARY ESTATE OFFICE (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1375) 2249/2016 Suit Indus Motor Co., Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Audit of Taxpayers under Section 25 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 and Section 45 and 46 of the Federal Excise Act 2005.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

1376) 385/2016 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S MEHMOOD TRADERS KHI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 548
Advocates:Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1377) 284/2018 H.C.A Famous Brands (Private) Limited (Appellant) V/S Samsonite IP Holdings S.A.R.L & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), TRADE MARK
Tag Line:By moving an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant does not surrender to the jurisdiction of the Court. The jurisdiction is conferred by law based on facts. A litigant may be right or wrong in asserting that the Court had no jurisdiction or that the suit is barred by law. But, this act of litigant would neither confer and/or bestow nor take away any jurisdiction which in fact is conferred by law. Actions of parties prior to litigation leads to constitution of a cause to initiate proceedings in Court of competent jurisdiction. - If the two applications were not moved simultaneously and would have been filed one after the other, will a litigant still be debarred from filing the other application such as Order VII Rule 10 CPC.A simple answer to this proposition is No as rejection of plaint has its own reasons whereas return of plaint has its own. In an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant has only to show that it does not disclose a cause of action; the relief claimed is undervalued or is not properly valued and that the suit appears to be barred by law. None of these rational is available while entertaining an application under order VII rule 10 CPC, which is for return of plaint on numerous counts including but not limited to pecuniary jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. Courts when plaint is presented are required to see whether they are bestowed with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction whereas under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Courts are required to see whether it is barred by law. The Court had to apply law to decide the issue of jurisdiction; it is the law that confers or takes away the jurisdiction of the Court and not based on moving of application under the aforesaid provision of law. Another proposition is that while entertaining and hearing application under order VII rule 11 CPC Court is empowered to return the plaint if the circumstances so warrants as required under the law. -Section 86(3) of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 provides that owner of the trademark which is entitled to protection under the Paris Convention as a well-known trademark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Pakistan of a trademark which, or the essential part of which, is identical or deceptively similar to the well-known trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services, where the use is likely to cause confusion or where such use cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the well-known trademark. - At the very outset there is nothing in the instant case which could attract Section 81 of Trademark Ordinance, 2001. The proprietor of the mark never gave up their right or it has not been demonstrated that for continuous period of five years from the date of alleged registration (in favour of user) in the use of registered mark in Pakistan, the proprietor was aware of it and that the proprietor ceased to be entitled on the basis of that earlier trademark or other rights. The engagement of the appellant with the respondent itself is enough to understand that there was no case of acquiescence at all. In fact the appellant conceded when they assumed the role of a distributor. -The appellate Court normally avoid interfering in the orders of the interlocutory nature involving exercise of discretion as the appellate Court cannot substitute its own discretion unless when the discretion has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, perversely or where the Court has ignored certain principles regulating grant or refusal of injunction. The appellate Court is not required to reassess the material to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the trial Court/learned Single Judge on the consideration that another view is possible.
Citation:2021 CLD 1008
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4034/2021 Famous Brands (Private) Limited, Lahore v. Samsonite IP Holdings S.a.r.l., Luxembourg through its Attorney Abdul Rasheed, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1378) 6135/2023 Const. P. Abdullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service
Tag Line:Nomination in FIR; quashment or compromise; disentitled for fresh appointment in Police Department
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1467
Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1379) 282/2017 Criminal Miscelleneous Mst. Nazi (Applicant) V/S The State & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

1380) 2890/2020 Const. P. M/s Micro Innovations & Technologies Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 276
Advocates:M/S. AWAN LAW CHAMBERS(FIRM-299-SBC-KHI),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

1381) 32/2012 Cr.Acq.A. Nisar Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) V/S PC Umed Ali Jakhrani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Scope of Referee Judge in Cr. Appeals. Death in police custody. Appraisal of evidence should not be unrealistic. Applicability of section 302(c) PPC.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 581
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.131-K/2023 PC Umeed Ali & others v. Nisar Ahmed & another,Crl.M.Appeal.1-K/2023 Umed Ali & others v. The Deputy Registrar Supreme Court Pakistan Karachi. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Disposed Disposed of

1382) 6280/2024 Const. P. M/s Fazlee Sons (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:Exemption from audit under Clause 105A of part-4 of 2nd Schedule. Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1
Advocates:Muhammad Taimoor Ahmed(ADVO-15452-SBC-KHI),Yasir Ali(ADVO-21973-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 20-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

1383) 4/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Jan Muhammad Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S Late Qamaruddin & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2353
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

1384) 579/2014 Suit Mr. Asif Mannan & others (Plaintiff) V/S Mr. Suleman Lallani & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Plaintiffs being minority shareholders in Defendant No.9 (Company in question) are primarily aggrieved with payment of Rs.430.944 Million to Defendant No.8 as advisory fee and its post facto approval from shareholders, and since admittedly the quantum of Plaintiffs shareholding is less than what is required to maintain a Company petition under the then Companies Ordinance 1984, and even under the Companies Act, 2017, instant Suit has been filed under the Ordinary Civil jurisdiction of this Court by relying upon the exception to the rule settled in the case of [Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189]. Their case is that the alleged transaction has caused a tremendous loss to the Company in question and as a consequence thereof, the shareholders have lost substantial amount of their money, and therefore, the present Suit in the form of a derivative action is competent. However, Plaintiffs have not been able to convince this Court that their case as set-up for the purposes of interim relief, (at least), would fall within the exception to rule laid down in Foss v Harbottle; rather, on facts it is covered by the said judgment; hence, the applications filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs at Serial No. 1, 3 & 4 (CMA Nos.4651/2014, 588/2015 and 13510/2015) are hereby dismissed.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1563
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

1385) 295/2020 Cr.Misc. Mst. Fouzia @ Waziran (Applicant) V/S SSP District Jamshoro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application . (Mother filed Petition for Custody of her Sons aged 10, 8, years .Petition dismissed with direction to approach G&W Court . )
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

1386) 72/2014 II.A. Amanullah (Appellant) V/S Inamullah and Shahid Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 20-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

1387) 466/2023 Suit CYNERGYICO PK LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S TRAFIGURA PTE LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Recognition & Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements & Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011 (Section 7 and Article V(2) New York Convention)
Tag Line:Plaintiff (Award-Debtor) filed suit against Defendant (Award-Creditor) for declaration and mandatory injunction. pleading grounds of public policy under Article V(2) of the New York Convention read with Sections 6 and 7 of the REA, 2011. The pro-enforcement bias of the NY Convention discussed in the CNAN Group SpA case reported in PLD 2014 Sindh 349 in respect of Article V(1) is equally applicable to the Foreign Arbitral Award under challenge in this lis by Plaintiff. There has to be an action initiated by the Award-Creditor, first, in whose favor the Award has been made before the Award-Debtor raises a challenge in the domestic court. The suit is dismissed as not maintainable under Article V (2) of the New York Convention. Office is directed to draw up a decree in terms of the Judgment.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 374
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

1388) 1975/2022 Const. P. Taj Munawar & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1017
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 08-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

1389) 309/2024 Suit OWAIS SALAM (Plaintiff) V/S THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Locus Standi to maintain a suit as against illegal construction, Whether notice period in Section 20 A of the SBCO, 1979 is mandatory; Jurisdiction of the Special Courts constituted under Section 18 A of the SBCO, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 343
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

1390) 304/2020 Suit Husein Industries Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. A bank guarantee is an independent contract between the surety (bank) and the creditor (beneficiary of the guarantee), and as such the bank guarantee is to be construed on its own terms independent of the underlying contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, and irrespective of claims pending interse the creditor and principal debtor. Rel: National Construction Ltd. v. Aiwan-e-Iqbal Authority (PLD 1994 SC 311); and Shipyard K. Damen International v. Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works Ltd. (PLD 2003 SC 191). 2. Mobilization Guarantees are generally not subject to a restraining order even if there is a dispute between the parties to the underlying contract. However, in cases of guarantees other than Mobilization Guarantees, the Court have granted or refused injunction to restrain encashment depending upon the literal words used in the guarantee. Rel: National Grid Company v. Government of Pakistan (1999 SCMR 2367); and Shipyard K. Damen International ibid.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1285
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1391) 21/2018 H.C.A Government of Sindh (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Hailey Vincent D Abreo & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 246
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1895/2023 Mrs. Hailey Vincent D'Abreo and others v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1392) 183/2019 Const. P. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealers Association & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Unadjudicated recovery of default surcharge via a third party.
Citation:2021 PTD 713
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.521-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealers Association & others,C.A.742/2022 The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi v. Sindh Petroleum & CNG Dealers Association & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

1393) 13/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. IFTIKHAR ALI S/O MUHAMMAD DIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 247
Advocates:Mohammad Akbar Khan(ADVO-2642-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

1394) 427/2013 Const. P. Shahid Ansari & others (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 06-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting

1395) 562/2014 Suit Abdul Razzak Khamosh (Plaintiff) V/S The Province of Sindh and others, (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting

1396) 83/2015 Suit Nawab Brothers Steel Mills Ltd., & another. . (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Customs Act 1969)
Tag Line:Customs Act (IV of 1969)--- ----Ss.18(3), 30, 79, 104 & 131---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2---Notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Suit for declaration and injunction---Interim injunction, grant of---Rate of duty---Determination---Principle---Plaintiffs imported goods from foreign supplier under contract executed prior to issuance of Notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Plea raised by plaintiffs was that authorities be restrained from applying/deducting regulatory duty in terms of notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Validity---Manner and method of date of determination of rate of duty on goods imported into Pakistan were subject to Ss.79 & 104 of Customs Act, 1969, and date of determination of rate of duty on goods exported was subject to provisions of S.131 of Customs Act, 1969---Imposition and collection of regulatory duty on "import" and "export" was different and distinct and no analogy could be drawn for interpreting the provision of one section of the statute with the other section in the same statute by referring to case-law dealing with one particular levy---Provisions of notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015, were applicable on shipments of plaintiffs in terms of S.30 of Customs Act, 1969, irrespective of the fact that plaintiffs had entered into contract for purchase of consignments with foreign suppliers and opened letter of credits prior to 14-1-2015---High Court declined to grant interim injunction against applicability of notification S.R.O. 18(I)/2015, dated 14-1-2015---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2015 PTD 1308
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 27-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

1397) 2342/2013 Const. P. Imran Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 25-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1515/2013 Federal Board of Revenue thr. Chairman, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Law, Islamabad & others,C.P.L.A.1848/2013 Federal Board of Revenue thr. Chairman, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Law, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted

1398) 1477/2024 Cr.Bail Mst. Yasmeen W/o Zulfiqar Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:According to the case of the prosecution, 560 grams of Heroin was recovered from the applicant, not only because the quantity of 60 grams exceeds the upper limit of 500 grams to bring the case within the prohibition contained in section 497(1) Cr. P.C. The Supreme Court in such circumstances granted post-arrest bail to the lady accused, keeping in view the (II) Proviso of Section 497 Cr. P.C. in the case of Mst. Kainat Bibi v. The State (2022 SCMR 609). The Supreme Court also in the case of Ateebur Rehman v. The State (2016 SCMR 1424), which involved the recovery of 1014 grams of heroin, and Ayaz Khan and another v. The State (2020 SCMR 350), which involved the recovery of 1100 grams of heroin, granted bail in both cases. In the present case, the guilt or innocence of the applicants is yet to be determined by the trial Court. The prosecution has not placed any material to establish that the applicant is a previous convict, mere involved in the same and similar offenses in the past cannot be a ground to refuse bail as this case can be decided on merit, therefore past record cannot be cited as precedent to refuse bail on this point.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1047
Advocates:Ahmed Hussain(ADVO-207-SBC-THT),Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-18376-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1399) 210/2024 I.T.R.A LIBERTY POWER TECH LIMITED (Applicant) V/S COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:Rectification; section 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance,2001, guidelines as to error apparent on record;
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 492
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Barrister Dr. Huma Sodher(ADVO-8700-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 29-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

1400) 5613/2021 Const. P. Aftab Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 833
Advocates:Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

1401) 91/2017 Cr.J.A Sikander Ali Lashari (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 11-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1402) 1926/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The D. G. Customs Valuation, Karachi & another (Applicant) V/S M/s. A.A. Tyre , Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Jurisdiction of Customs Tribunal explained; Appeal against an order of Revision under Section 25D of the Customs Act, 1969; acceptance of declared values as true transactional value, by whom, guidelines
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 368
Advocates:Amjad Hayat(ADVO-53613-SBC-KHS),Zafar Hussain(ADVO-15545-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 04-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1403) 4485/2020 Const. P. Ashfaq Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 465
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

1404) 115/2016 Cr.Appeal Ali Dino alias Pehlwan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 31-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

1405) 4363/2022 Const. P. Shahab Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Validity of Regulation No. 3-2.14.3 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in the context Section 6 and 7D of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 975
Advocates:Muhammad Riaz(ADVO-11621-SBC-KHI),Tarik Ali(ADVO-4931-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Akram Tariq(ADVO-14630-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1406) 3804/2020 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Karim Channa (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:7. The question involved in the present proceedings is whether Temporary and officiating service rendered by the petitioner on retenairship as Medical Officer with effect from 1992 till his purported regularization firstly in 2008 and secondly in 2012 shall count for pension.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 729
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 31-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1006/2022 Civil Aviation Authority, through Director General CAA, Karachi and another v. Dr. Abdul Karim Channa and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1407) 1315/2006 Suit MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 23-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

1408) 6/2000 Civil Revision Executive Engineer Highways and others (Applicant) V/S Nazir Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 896
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

1409) 2535/2010 Const. P. National Gases Limited (Petitioner) V/S Ministry of Railways & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 2552
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 12-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

1410) 1675/2016 Suit Naved Alam Zubairi.. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 30-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

1411) 703/2007 Suit MRS. BILQUIS MOHSIN BUTT & OTHERS. (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD BUTT & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XX, R. 13---Administration suit---Limitation---Scope---Suit for administration was only a formality to determine the mode of distribution of the estate of the deceased amongst the legal heirs according to the Shariah---Court would act only as an administrator in such suit for a limited purpose---Plaintiff was required to satisfy the court in a suit for administration and partition, his status as legal heir of the deceased and proprietary rights of the deceased in the estate at the time of opening of succession---Question of limitation in case of joint family properties did not arise---In the present case, none of the properties mentioned in the schedule were part of the estate of the deceased---Plaintiff could not seek administration and partition of the disputed properties---Suit was dismissed in circumstances. Pattoki Sugar Mills Limited through Chief Executive v. WAPDA through Chairman and 4 others 2007 CLD 659 and Anjum Rashid and others v. Shahzad and others 2007 CLC 1414 and Ghulam Ali and 2 others v. Mst. Ghulam Sarwar Naqvi PLD 1990 SC 1 rel. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XX, R. 13---Administration suit---Limitation---Question of limitation in case of joint family properties did not arise. (c) Company--- ----Limited company was a juristic person and a legal entity separate from its share-holder and any change in the shareholding of a company did not mean change in the title of assets of the company or premises occupied thereby---Properties of a company could not be inherited by the legal heirs of one of its Directors or even ordinary shareholders of the company---Legal heirs of a deceased director or shareholder of a company could claim inheritance only to the extent of shareholding of the deceased Director or shareholder in the company and not in the assets of the company as estate of the deceased. (d) Islamic law--- ----Succession---Classes of legal heirs---Classes of legal heirs of deceased (in Sunni Hanfi Law of Succession) were sharer, residuaries and uterine (distant kindred). (e) Islamic Law--- ----Distribution of the estate of deceased---Procedure. Muhammadan Law paras 61 and 63 quoted. (f) Islamic law--- ----Succession---Succession to the estate of a Muslim would open immediately, he had passed away and title would pass to the legal heirs automatically to the extent of their respective shares ordained by Shariah without any interference by the State functionaries. (g) Islamic law--- ---- Inheritance---Grand-children whose father or mother had survived their grand-father had no locus standi to claim inheritance in the estate of the deceased grand-father---Once father/mother of grand-children had died (true legal heirs of grand-father) they could file a suit for administration of the estate left by their deceased parents and if there was any undistributed property from the estate of their grand-father, continued to be in existence, they could include "share" of their deceased parents in the said estate of their own deceased father or mother but they could not reopen the issue of inheritance from the entire estate of their grand-parents---Grand-children could not claim as matter of their own right any share in the estate of their grand-father.
Citation:2015 CLC 1333
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 30-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

1412) 277/2012 Const. P. Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ahmed Ramzani (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 06-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting

1413) 6222/2023 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:firstly section 10 of the Civil Servant Act 1973 provides that every civil servant shall be liable to serve within and outside Pakistan under the Federal Government or any Provincial Government, whereas Rule 20-A of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1973 provides appointment of deputation
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1070
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Sajad Ali Solangi(ADVO-18123-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.552-K/2024 Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1414) 77/2008 M.A. Smithkline Beecham P.L.C. (Appellant) V/S The Registrar of Trade Marks and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 02-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

1415) 437/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Waqas Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Vth. Rent Cotrollar Hyd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 281
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1416) 5/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Sher Khan Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S Deputy Assistant Manager NADRA, Kashmore & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:If the date mentioned on the Primary School Certificate was to be believed by the Applicant/Plaintiff when he applied for CNIC and furnished his information on Form A submitted to NADRA, he would be underage at the time of issuance of his CNIC (less than 18 years). Further, the Applicant/Plaintiff filed the same claim twice, first in 2015 and then again in 2020. Each application to NADRA does not constitute a fresh cause of action. Revision dismissed.
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 583
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

1417) 58/2014 Suit Aamir Haider Butt. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Engage Human Resources & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 521
Advocates:Umar Farooq Khan(ADVO-1914-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1418) 972/2005 Suit DR. HASAN FATIMA JAFERY & ORS (Appellant) V/S ROYAL SAUDI CONSULATE KARACHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights.
Topic: The State Immunity Ordinance, 1981, Diplomatic and Consular Privileges Act, 1972
Tag Line:With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

1419) 3/2025 Cr.Acctt.A ZAKARIA MOTIWALA S/O MOOSA MOTIWALA (Appellant) V/S THE NAB THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN (Hq) Islamabad (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3387
Advocates:Ghulam Farooq(ADVO-23096-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Nouman Jamali(ADVO-10431-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

1420) 504/1985 Suit TEWFIQ FIKREE & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S V/S USMANI FIKREE & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting

1421) 363/2016 Const. P. Orangzeb Samo (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

1422) 3075/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) V/S Chief Naval Staff and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect?
Topic: Service matters (Bar of Jurisdiction )
Tag Line:Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect?
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1274
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1423) 6686/2014 Const. P. Engr. Daroo Khan Achakzai & Another (Petitioner) V/S Regulator of Trade Organisations & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLD 598
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 18-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1424) 13/2013 First Appeal Against Order Hassan Abbass (Appellant) V/S Ist Additional District & Session Judge (Central) at Karachi. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R. 11---West Pakistan (Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Karachi) Ordinance (III of 1962), Ss.27 & 29---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42---Suit for declaration---Correction of father's name was sought by plaintiff---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Name of maternal grandfather was mistakenly mentioned in the school record as name of father of plaintiff and same had been disclosed by him which was also supported by affidavit of his mother---Record maintained by the Education Board was incorrect and father of plaintiff and that of his mother could not be one and the same---Trial Court was bound to reconcile the record of Education Board with that of the correct name of father of plaintiff in view of available record---Education Board had not applied mind to the request made by the plaintiff through a proper application wherein ingredients of plaint and circumstances mentioned in the same had been brought to the notice of Education Board but same had been declined without assigning a cogent reason---Education Board had not mentioned the rules before the Trial Court which restrained them from making correction in the record---Section 27 of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Ordinance, 1962 did not mean that Education Board was a final authority and order passed by the same was not subject to review by the courts---Section 29 of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Ordinance, 1962 stipulated that no suit for damages or other legal proceedings should be instituted against Government and any member of Education Board or Committee---No decision or order of Education Board was under challenge nor plaintiff had claimed any damages against controlling authority or member of Education Board in the present suit---Present was a suit for correction in the relevant record of Education Board---Education Board was bound to make necessary correction once there was a satisfactory proof of mistake on the record---Refusal of Education Board to rectify the mistake in the certificate issued by Board was without any lawful jurisdiction---Impugned order passed by the Education Board was without reasoning and same was not a speaking order---Trial Court had rejected the plaint without proper trial which was contrary to the requirement of law---Orders passed by the Trial Court and Appellate Court were set aside and case was remanded for decision on merits after recording of evidence in accordance with law. (b) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)--- ----S. 5---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Suit for declaration---Appeal---Non-disclosure of dismissal of appeal by the counsel to the appellant---Professional misconduct of counsel---Condonation of delay---Scope---Application was supported with a complaint against the counsel who had been representing the appellant before the Trial Court and first Appellate Court---Details of professional misconduct of counsel had been given in the affidavit with regard to the fact that he (counsel) did not disclose about the dismissal of appeal---Circumstances were not within the control of appellant to file present appeal in time who had accounted for the delay---Application for condonation of delay was accepted in circumstances.
Citation:2014 YLR 2042
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting

1425) 3830/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Measum (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 702
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1475/2015 Collector of Customs and others v. Muhammad Measum,C.P.L.A.361-K/2014 Collector of Customs and others v. Muhammad Measum Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted & Notice to Respondents for 30.12.2015

1426) 918/2023 Cr.Bail Anwar Ali Chakrani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 MLD 1848
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1427) 1955/2014 Suit Mst. Humaira Aslam. (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Rahim Rafi & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Muhammad Yaseen Khan Azad(ADVO-2367-SBC-KHI),Syed Iftikhar ul Hasan(ADVO-5840-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Younis Khan(ADVO-6864-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting

1428) 139/2017 Const. P. Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) V/S C.A.A (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service
Citation:2023 PLC (CS) 1133
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed

1429) 303/2016 Spl.Cr.A.T.A. Manzoor Elahi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 06-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

1430) 4245/2018 Const. P. M/s Saba International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Courts refrain from deciding constitutional questions if a case can be resolved on other, narrow grounds
Citation:2026 PTD 464, 2025 SBLR Sindh 555
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHS),Sohail Mazaffar(ADVO-2086-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Hussain(ADVO-14665-SBC-KHI),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

1431) 216/2020 H.C.A Riffat Humayun (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 768
Advocates:Muhammad Asghar(ADVO-14586-SBC-KHI),Syed Shahid Hussain(ADVO-6814-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1432) 5282/2021 Const. P. Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The Sect: College Education Dept: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 375
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1433) 7142/2017 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali Magsi (Petitioner) V/S I.G Police and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

1434) 5025/2020 Const. P. Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla (Petitioner) V/S Deputy Commissioner I.R and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973 A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad has pronounced the judgment on 22nd December 2020 in the case of Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla v. Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue and others (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the issuance of notice under Section 182(2) read with Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, enforcing penalty for not submitting returns regarding Foreign Income and Assets Statement. The plea of the petitioners was that the petitioners have already declared Foreign Income and Assets from all the sources in their wealth statement filed under Section 116 alongwith their return of total income for the Tax Year 2019 under Section 114 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, within the prescribed time limit, by availing e-filing facility via IRIS, whereas, such return was duly accepted, as no notice was issued to the petitioners by the Department in terms of Section 120(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, requiring the petitioners to furnish any short documents in this regard. It was further argued on behalf of the petitioners that omission in filing returns was neither deliberate nor it has any financial implications or involvement of payment of any taxes, etc. therefore, the penalty provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Learned Divisional Bench of this Court by examining all the relevant provisions of law and case-laws has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: - "13. In view of the foregoing discussions, we are of considered opinion that in the absence of prescribed format notified under Section 116A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, whereas, nothing has been concealed by petitioners, nor there is any consequence either on income or tax liability of petitioners for non-filing of Foreign Income & Assets Statement along with return of income for Tax Year 2019, the penal provisions of Section 182 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be invoked. Particularly, when respondents have failed to establish willful default or mens rea on the part of petitioners. We derive analogical guidance from the Non delegation Doctrine which is well established in jurisprudence and is attracted in the instant circumstances. Issuance of notices under section 182(2) cannot be validated, therefore, impugned notices having no support of lawful authority are hereby declared as illegal, hence, of no legal consequence. For these reasons, the petitions were allowed vide short order announced on 22.12.2020.
Citation:2021 PTD 335
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.742/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla,C.A.377/2022 Commissioner Inland Revenue AEOI, Karachi and others v. Aameer Mustaaly Karachiwalla Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,impugned judgment suspended,Disposed Disposed of

1435) 47/1997 Civil Revision Shabbir Khan & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Haji Abdul Latif Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision, Case remanded. )
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----Ss. 151, 96, 10 & 11 & O. XLI, R. 27---Appeal---Inherent powers under S.151, C.P.C. exercised by the Appellate Court---Scope---Respondent moved an application under S.151, C.P.C. claiming res judicata against the suit---Appellate Court remanded the case while exercising powers under S.151, C.P.C.---Validity---Respondent raised a factual issue before the Appellate Court through application under S.151, C.P.C. which was not raised before the Trial Court---Powers of civil court under S.151, C.P.C. had certain restrictions in application of the same could not be equated with the powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction---Provisions of Civil Procedure Code which empowered courts of original civil jurisdiction while dealing with civil suits like provisions of Ss.10 & 11, C.P.C. were not available to the appellate court while exercising authority in terms of S.96, C.P.C.---Appellate Court had not given reference to the findings of the Trial Court while deciding the appeal and had exercised the powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction which were not vested in it---Exercise of power under S.151, C.P.C. by the Appellate Court was improper and uncalled for---Trial Court had not discussed the issue of res judicata in its judgment---Issue which was not taken up and decided by the Trial Court was not supposed to be examined by the Appellate Court---Issue of res judicata ought to have been raised first before the Trial Court for its decision and not at the appellate stage for the first time--Question of res judicata was a question of fact and parties had to first allege it and then prove it through evidence---Appellate Court was not supposed to examine a new/fresh defence (plea of res judicata) at appellate stage---If appeal was time barred then Appellate Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the same and remand the suit---Appellate Court had exercised the jurisdiction not vested in it---Impugned judgment and decree were set aside and appeal was remanded for decision afresh---Appellate Court was directed to first examine the question of limitation for filing the appeal before proceeding further in the matter---Revision was disposed of in circumstances. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 11---Res judicata---Power of appellate Court---Scope---Question of res judicata was a question of fact and parties had to first allege it and then prove it through evidence---Appellate Court was not supposed to examine a new/fresh defence (plea of res judicata) at appellate stage. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 151---Inherent power---Scope---Civil court was not supposed to resort to the inherent powers in presence of a specific provision available in C.P.C. to deal with a particular situation. (d) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 115---Revisional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---High Court had suo motu power to examine the correctness, legality and propriety of an order passed by the subordinate court at any time and if subordinate court had improperly exercised its jurisdiction and/ or exercised jurisdiction not vested in it then High Court could set aside the said order.
Citation:2016 CLC 1790
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 29-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

1436) 402/2007 Suit Yousuf Dada (Plaintiff) V/S M.C.B.Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Shahid Anwar Bajwa(ADVO-3644-SBC-KHI),Umar Hayat Sandhu(ADVO-2841-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting

1437) 28/2010 Cr.Bail Adeel (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Granted In Police Encounter , In Effective firing U/S 324,353 PPC.)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting

1438) 222/2013 Cr.J.A Shah Bali and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 31-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1439) 8/2009 H.C.A Al-Ahmed Pvt.,Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Anjuman Falah-o-Behbood Hazara Mughal Goth & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 12 (2) CPC. It further appears that the same counsel who had filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent moved the application under Section 12(2) CPC on behalf of the respondent through a stranger, claiming himself to be the President of respondent No.1 without producing any evidence regarding his authorization in this regard. From perusal of the application under Section 12(2) it further appears that no new facts or the instance of alleged fraud and misrepresentation by the appellant/plaintiff has been pointed out. Similarly, perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned Single Judge in chamber appears to have re-examined the entire judgment and decree and on the same set of facts appears to have given a different opinion from the one already given in the impugned judgment and decree dated 14.03.2006 and 20.04.2006 respectively. Scope and the application of Section 12(2) CPC is very limited and could only be attracted in cases where the judgment and decree has been obtained by misrepresentation or by playing fraud on the Court by a party. Though an application under Section 12(2) CPC can be filed by a stranger to the proceeding but such applicant has to show that he is an aggrieved party and the impugned order/judgment has been obtained by misrepresentation and fraud. In the instant case, it was found that the respondent/applicant has miserably failed to discharge such burden. Accordingly the appeal was allowed and the order passed by the Single Judge was set aside.
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 19-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

1440) 1107/2014 Suit Work Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 01-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

1441) 4/2024 Cr.J.A Sher Muhammad (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1413
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.108-K/2025 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh, Karachi v. Sher Muhammad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

1442) 459/2006 I.T.R.A First Women Bank Ltd (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 10-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting

1443) 3758/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S NAB And ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 04-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1444) 612/2013 Cr.Bail Muhammad Aslam (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (dishonor of cheque section 489F)
Tag Line:The contents under Section 489-F for the perusal as reproduced as also the contents of the FIR clearly manifest the dishonesty. For reaching the conclusion as to whether offence under Section 489-F is bail out or not the applicants attitude towards the cheques need not to be further established as he has failed to inform the concerned Manager of the Bank regarding the alleged misappropriation of cheque which was allegedly stolen. The applicant has not been able to this fact satisfactorily as to why this information was not given to the Manager. It also creates an impression that before issuing cheque to the complainant he might have managed to lodge this non-cognizance report to save his skin from future dispute. With these reasons I am clear in my mind that the applicant is not entitled for concession of bail and this bail application is dismissed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-13
Approved for Reporting

1445) 847/2020 Const. P. Khalid Ali Dars & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 20
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

1446) 1347/2006 Suit ASADULLAH KHAWAJA (Appellant) V/S INVESTMENT CORP. OF PAKISTAN (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 146
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 20-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

1447) 3974/2021 Const. P. Syed Atif Salman Hashmi and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 682
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHC),Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 09-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1448) 7382/2019 Const. P. Akhtar Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:issuance of offer/appointment orders to the post of Gavi Vaccinators (BPS-6) in the Health Department on the plea that they have already been declared successful candidates based on marks they obtained in the competitive process --i) Whether the recruitment process for the post of vaccinator (BPS-6) was flawed under the law? ii) Whether the Selection Committee was lawfully constituted; and, the Provincial Minister was competent to reduce the passing marks and facilitate private respondents/beneficiaries for appointment to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)? iii) Whether some of the private respondents/beneficiaries on the recommendation of the two-member Selection Committee were lawfully appointed as vaccinators in BPS-6? iv) Whether the petitioners can claim a right to be appointed through the two-member Selection Committee to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)?--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 177
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3111/2021 Ghayasuddin Shahani and others v. Akhtar Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1449) 189/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. ARREY MASIH @ ERIC S/O BABU MASIH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1242
Advocates:Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Tariq(ADVO-8862-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

1450) 2802/2024 Const. P. Pakistan Federal Union of Journalist (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 (Code of Conduct - 2015 - Court Reporters)
Tag Line:PEMRA's impugned directive was declared illegal and out of sync with PEMRA laws. Exercise of judicial restraint. Where two options are available to the Constitutional Court one on constitutional ground and the other ground of statutory construction, Court may opt for the latter option. Petition allowed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1004
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.472/2025 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its representative, PEMRA, Islamabad v. Pakistan Federal, Union of Journalists (PFUJ), through its Secretary General, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1451) 888/2021 Const. P. Prof: Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The Government of Sindh is directed to expedite the process by ensuring reconstituting of Search Committee within two months from the receipt of this order and shall also complete the process of interview of all the candidates afresh for the appointment for the post of Vice-Chancellor, University of Karachi, at the earliest. Meanwhile, the Search Committee (after reconstitution) shall send the copies of the original academic certificates/degrees/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for verification. The Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is directed to look into the academic qualification certificates/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents and after ascertaining genuineness or otherwise submit the report to the Search Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh in a sealed envelope within one month for further proceedings.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 445
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.392-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1452) 2/2011 Cr.Ref The State (Appellant) V/S Arz Muhammad and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 28-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

1453) 4529/2015 Const. P. Institute of Chartered Accountants and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 74
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),ORR. DIGNAM & CO.(FIRM-109-SBC-KHI),Sajid Zahid(ADVO-2109-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.42-K/2023 The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan v. Federation of Pakistan Ministry of Finance Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

1454) 391/2011 Cr.Misc. Syed Jawaid Haider Qazmi (Applicant) V/S S.I. Muhammad Zaffaran and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 12-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting

1455) 762/1995 Suit SHAHZAB GOTH RESIDENTS (Plaintiff) V/S GOVT. OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1456) 6629/2018 Const. P. Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

1457) 733/2017 Const. P. Faqirullah (Petitioner) V/S D.G Pakistan Public and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 720
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.947-K/2018 Faqirullah v. The Director General Pakistan Public Works Department, Ibd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1458) 5798/2014 Const. P. Anwery Begum (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 572
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

1459) 3/2010 Cr.J.A Roshan Buriro & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 30-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.437/2018 Roshan & Sikandar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1460) 3/2018 E.P Saifullah Abro (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:ection 55(3) of the RoPA, 1976 to the extent of verification and signing of the schedule or annexure is peri materia to Section 144(4) of the Elections Act, 2017, however, this relevant provision is to be adjudged and tested along with the rules framed under the Elections Act, 2017. Previously, there were no such rules except (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1977 which catered the process of election (pre-election process). Rule 140 offers that every petition shall be processed by the Tribunal and in case the petition is found deficient of laid down procedure, the petitioner shall be informed accordingly, indicating the deficiency/ies in the petition, directing him to fulfill the same within seven (07) days of the receipt of communication from the Tribunal, failing which the petition is liable to be dismissed by the Tribunal. The moot question thus is whether Rule 140 has any application to Sections 142, 143 and 144 of the Elections Act, 2017.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

1461) 770/2021 Cr.Bail Mashooque Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Bail Matters (Pre arrest bail dismissed In Section 324, 506/2, 337-A (i), 337-F (ii), 3374- H (ii), 504 & 35 PPC.)
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1324
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

1462) 327/2012 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Younus (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Zafar Ali Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:The trial Court appears to have passed the order summarily without touching the legal aspect as enshrined in aforesaid two cited cases and as described u/s 179 Cr.P.C.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting

1463) 5430/2020 Const. P. Imad Samad (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 PTD 2063
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

1464) 19/2018 E.P Jam Saifullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

1465) 3319/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Ayub (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 27-APR-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1685/2012 N.A.D.R.A. thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Muhammad Ayub & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1466) 144/2019 Cr.J.A ABDUL REHMAN S/O DEEN MUHAMMAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1920
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 02-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.A.176/2021 The State v. Abdul Rehman,J.P.600/2022 1. Basheer @ Bashoo 2. Wazir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned s (-) Mr. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, J,Pending

1467) 82/2007 H.C.A The Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Zahir Shah & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 CLC 1862, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1625
Advocates:Nasima Mangrio(ADVO-10697-SBC-KHE),Mushtaq Ahmed A. Memon(ADVO-1988-SBC-KHS),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),QAMAR ABBAS & CO.(FIRM-124-SBC-KHI),Faheem Shah(ADVO-14407-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 30-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4473/2024 Trustees of the Post of Karachi through its Chairperson, Karachi v. Muhammad Zahir Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1468) 1353/2012 Const. P. Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mst.Zeenat Ismail & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

1469) 101/2012 Spl.Cr.Bail Muhammad Saleem Khan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting

1470) 310/2005 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Islam (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 16-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1471) 2396/2012 Const. P. Mir Muhammad Raza Talpur (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar
Order Date: 17-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1374/2017,C.A.1380/2017,C.P.L.A.108-K/2017,C.P.L.A.290/2017 SCP Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

1472) 51/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) V/S MCR (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 13-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting

1473) 275/2019 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S SIEMENS PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 755
Advocates:Shahid Ali(ADVO-12507-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.23-K/2021 Commissiner Inland Revenue Legal v. M/s. Siemens Pakistan Engineering Company Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

1474) 162/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Ms. Nausheen Leghari & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1387
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Rukhsana Ahmad(ADVO-4278-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1081-K/2021 M/s. The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Ms Nausheen Leghari & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1475) 40/2009 I. A Karim Dad Khushk (Appellant) V/S United Bank Ltd., (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

1476) 183/2020 Const. P. Ali Bux Chohan & Another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line: Petitions seek execution and/or implementation of orders passed by the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal, Sukkur. we have noticed with concern that the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal is passing orders and is disposing of the complaints apparently in a slipshod manner inasmuch as on the one hand, certain directions are given to carry out demarcation and survey of the property, only then an order for removal of the encroachment has to be passed. Both directions at the same time and final disposal of a complaint are unwarranted as it creates further complications. The above provision clearly provides that the Tribunal is the final authority to determine all disputes, whereas, it has to conclusively determine the rights of the parties to a dispute. In view of hereinabove facts and circumstances of this case, both these Petitions are dismissed as not maintainable.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 1350
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 04-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

1477) 210/2019 Const. P. Atam Mal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1478) 101/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs Model (Applicant) V/S M/s.Kapron Overseas Supplies Co,Ltd.,, (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting

1479) 6221/2015 Const. P. Rab Nawaz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 5
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.675-K/2017 Rab Nawaz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1480) 213/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Muhammad Hasan Nadeem & others (Applicant) V/S Collector of Custom (Adjudication-I) & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 478
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Saad Fayaz(ADVO-15882-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-APR-23
Approved for Reporting

1481) 1193/2009 Cr.Bail Salman Quershi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 497(2); Pakistan Penal Code 1860, S.365-A/34. Abduction for ransom; Bail, grant of; Case of further inquiry; Accused was neither nominated in the F.I.R. nor direct role of alleged offence had been assigned in the challan; Neither complainant, alleged abductee or the prosecution witnesses had identified accused in connection with the alleged crime nor any active role had been assigned, excepting that the car alleged to be used for the crime----Prosecution had not produced any incriminating evidence against accused connecting him with the crime and he appeared to have been involved on the basis of suspicion---Prosecution case which was not free from doubt, required further inquiry into the guilt of the accused---Accused was admitted to bail, in circumA?stances.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 04-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting

1482) 259/2019 H.C.A M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Entry 105 to the 6th Schedule to the Sales Tax Act 1990), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XLI Rule 31 )
Tag Line:Interpretation of fiscal exemptions. --Entry 105 extends a benefit in respect of raw materials for the basic manufacture of pharmaceutical active ingredients and for manufacture of pharmaceutical products. The claim of the appellants / petitioners admittedly does not fall into the prior category and no case has been set forth before us to interfere in the findings of the learned Single Judge, whereby it has been determined that the said claim did not fall within the latter category either. It is observed that while there appears to be no cavil to consider packaging / packing material chargeable to tax per the Act, no case has been made out to consider exemption for the same within the parlance of Entry 105.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 407
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.550/2022 M/s Getz Pharma (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1483) 18/2022 I. A National Bank of Pakistan Ltd (Appellant) V/S M/s. Saudi Pak Ind.&Agri. Invest. Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Section 128 of the Contract Act, 1872 provides that the liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor unless otherwise specified in the contract. In essence, the guarantor's responsibility is equal to that of the principal debtor. This means that if the principal debtor defaults or fails to repay their debt, the guarantor is equally liable to fulfil the obligations.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 408
Advocates:Abdul Qayyum Khan Abbasi(ADVO-7342-SBC-KHI),Naheed Aziz(ADVO-4465-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

1484) 1189/2021 Suit Captain Adnan Andalib Siddiqui & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mrs. Shahnaz Hyder & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:The other undisputed but crucial fact is that since decades both Plaintiffs and their families are residing in the Suit Property, although the lease is in the name of Claimant. It is to be determined through a proper trial that whether the Suit Property was given to the Claimant as her exclusive Property or the same was the compensation given to the Family of Deceased
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 306
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

1485) 1089/2016 Const. P. MAL Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN through secretary revnue Division (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

1486) 104/2018 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S PAKISTAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1016
Advocates:S. Mohsin Imam Wasti(ADVO-4357-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1487) 183/2009 Suit Syed Ali Athar (Plaintiff) V/S City District Government Karachi & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

1488) 4646/2017 Const. P. Z.A Quraishi and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same.
Topic: Service matters (restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension)
Tag Line:Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 70
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1489) 30/2019 Cr.J.A Duro @ Dur Muhammad Tart Jatoi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 462
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.508/2020 Duro @ Dur Mohammad v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

1490) 420/2023 Const. P. Junaid Iqbal S/o Jawaid Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Hanfia Alamgir Jama Masjid Trust and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 916
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Khan(ADVO-8525-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 29-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

1491) 102/2019 Criminal Appeal Abdul Rehman @ Suleman @ Siloo Magsi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Appeal (Conviction sentenced in Section 365-B P.P.C, on the ground Contradiction in evidence, delay in lodging FIR, and Material witnesses not examined. )
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 700
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1492) 720/2023 Cr.Bail SHAHID MEHMOOD S/O SHAIKH SALAHUDDIDN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 338
Advocates:Muhammad Nadeem Khan(ADVO-8525-SBC-KHI),Allah Wadhayo(ADVO-18409-SBC-KHE),Imdad Ali Saheto(ADVO-16074-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

1493) 15/2012 H.C.A Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S Adnan Faisal & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 235, 2019 CLD 242
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

1494) 184/2013 Civil Revision Syed Murshad Ali (Applicant) V/S Syed Amjad Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 31-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.174-K/2014 Syed Amjad Ali and another v. Syed Murshad Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1495) 6008/2017 Const. P. M/s Hascol Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 873
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.88-K/2021 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Hascol Petroleum Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1496) 156/2023 II.A. Amjad S/o Akbar Ai (Appellant) V/S Khuda Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 131
Advocates:Nasir Ahmed(ADVO-9370-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Ashraf Baig(ADVO-4642-SBC-KHI),Saadat Hassan(ADVO-9057-SBC-KHI),Imran Aziz(ADVO-17771-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

1497) 37/2003 I. A Mst: Kanwal (Appellant) V/S Dr.Muhammad Suhail (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 589
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1498) 74/2024 Const. P. Tarique Mubeen Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 487
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1499) 2925/2011 Const. P. Sardar Amin Farooqi and ors (Petitioner) V/S Director I & I FBR and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 08-DEC-11
Approved for Reporting

1500) 372/2020 Criminal Miscelleneous NOMAN AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1352
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Haris Rashid Khan(ADVO-13980-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Bilal Rashid (ADVO-16235-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

1501) 989/2018 Suit Reliance Petrochemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S F.B.R., & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:After repeal of proviso to section 40B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the posting order passed thereunder by the Commissioner is not saved under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 394
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

1502) 2531/2019 Const. P. M/s GUINAULT SA PA ORLEAN SOLOGNE (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 692
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.85-K/2020 M/s Guinault SA.PA Orleans Sologne v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1503) 14/2021 Conf.Case REF. MADE BY SPL. COURT II CNS KARACHI (Appellant) V/S NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & 2 ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 ((No legal bar or restriction has been imposed to consider statement of official witnesses))
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained unshattered during the cross-examination. Even otherwise, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C. during recovery proceedings.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 387
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1504) 273/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous MST. SEEMA D/O LATE NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S WAJID ALI SHAH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Applicant filed this Crl, Msic. Application, impugned the order dated 06.04.2021 passed by learned 6th A.D.J Karachi South whereby her Cr. Rev. Application No.23/2021 filed against order dated 09.02.2021 of 7th Judicial Magistrate Karachi South in Cr. Case No.1794/2017, was dismissed. The respondent lodged FIR against her ex-wife on the ground of committing fraud and cheating in obtaining Pakistani passport for her personal gain by showing her wrong date of birth. It has been held that the present petitioner was/is not said to be a civil servant or employed in some institution where the date of birth was/is material for some advantage or gains. I am conscious that for such a civil servant/employee the alteration/change in the date of birth has been discouraged but for ordinary person the same was/is not strictly prohibited because an ordinary person normally was/is not likely to take any advantage/benefit with change of such date of birth unless otherwise, so is proved/established. Cr. MA was allowed. Cr.Misc. Appln. No.319/2020; Cr.Rev. No.135/2020 and CP No.S-445/2020 was referred in support of above as well PLD 1959 Lahore 566 and 2020 SCMR 316.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1173
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Syed Nadeem Haider(ADVO-13415-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 29-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1003/2021 Wajid Ali Shah v. Mst. Seema and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1505) 317/2010 Civil Revision Esso (Applicant) V/S Zahid Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 249
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1506) 646/2014 Const. P. Engro Foods Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:"Industrial Relations. Challenge to registration of trade union re trans-provincial establishment".
Citation:2022 SHC HYD 767
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

1507) 10/2017 M.A. Aurora Broadcasting Services (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) V/S PEMRA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 574, 2019 SBLR Sindh 856
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

1508) 906/2011 Suit Pakistan Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) (Plaintiff) V/S M/S CCI - AG, AN IMI Company and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 MLD 82
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting

1509) 263/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Zaman (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1885
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

1510) 3707/2021 Const. P. Mst. Shereen Javed (Petitioner) V/S The State Thru Governor and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 669
Advocates:Mahmood -ul- Hasan(ADVO-8162-SBC-KHS),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1511) 147/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Shafi Nagori (died thr LRs) Thr Waqar (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ayoub and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Proprietary rights.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 245
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Waseem Iqbal(ADVO-15948-SBC-MLR),Syed Ehsan Raza(ADVO-4790-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

1512) 2314/2021 Const. P. Danish Azhar (Petitioner) V/S The Consumer Protection Court & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 252
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Qureshi(ADVO-16008-SBC-KHS),Ishrat Zahid Alvi(ADVO-6918-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 03-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.702-K/2022 Waheed Anwar Abro v. Danish Azhar & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1513) 699/2019 Const. P. Abdul Jabbar Mahar & Other (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Utilization of Social Welfare Funds)
Tag Line:Royalty of Oil, Gas and Coal
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 344
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1514) 1642/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf and another (Petitioner) V/S Faisal Cantonment Board and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 08-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

1515) 378/2024 Const. P. Syed Raheel Ahmed S/o Syed Tanzeem Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Syeda Zona Naqvi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Bridal gifts given by a husband are the absolute property of a wife and cannot be taken away from her. A bride can always recover the articles of bridal gifts, ???WARI??? and presents given to her by a bridegroom or his family at the time of the marriage.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 803
Advocates:Quaiser Jamil Ahmed Malik(ADVO-3103-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.473-K/2024 Syed Raheel Ahmed v. Mst. Syeda Zona Naqvi and others,C.P.L.A.1713/2025 Chairman, Union Council No.18 Malguzar Taluka Kandhkot, District Kashmore and another v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government, Sindh Local Government Board Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed , Adjourned

1516) 1079/2022 Const. P. M/s Zam Zam LPG (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 546
Advocates:Ellahi Bukhsh(ADVO-17033-SBC-KHS),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Ghazala Rafiq(ADVO-10618-SBC-KHI),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 04-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1097-K/2023 Saulat Sikandar v. Muhammad Tariq & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1517) 2868/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2580
Advocates:Muhammad Hussain Raza(ADVO-19925-SBC-KHC),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 29-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

1518) 40/2014 Spl.Cr.Bail THE STATE (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting

1519) 43/2016 M.A. M/s. Idara-e-Noor-e-Haq through Sec. (Appellant) V/S Public at Large (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)--- ----Ss. 272, 269, 299, 300 & 384---Appeal---Probate, grant of---Ownerless property---Application for grant of probate under S.272 Succession Act, 1925, was filed by appellant but Trial Court dismissed the application---Validity---Once it was found that none was available to claim ownership of immovable property in question in his own right or by way of inheritance, such property should be treated as an ownerless property---Once Court was satisfied that the property was rendered ownerless, it was the duty of Court to protect it from being misappropriated or wasted or damaged---Court could appoint Curator under S.195 of Succession Act, 1925, to takeover possession of the property pending final determination of fate of proceedings---Court could have also taken prompt action under S.269 of Succession Act, 1925, for protection of such property---Jurisdiction of High Court under S.300 of Succession Act, 1925, was concurrent with District Judge in exercise of power under Succession Act, 1925---High Court appointed its official as a Curator to protect the property in question and directed him to take over the possession immediately---High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by Trial Court---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. 1993 CLC 1552 ref.
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh Note 563
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1520) 32/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) SHAMIM AKHTER & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE CHAIRMAN EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 14 of Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975)
Tag Line:Through this Civil Revision Application the applicants have challenged the order passed by Vth Additional District and Session Judge Karachi (South) in Civil Appeal, upholding the Judgment and Decree passed by VIIIth Senior Civil Judge Karachi (South) in Civil Suit; dismissing the suit of the Applicants. Provisions of Pakistan Administration of Evacuee Property Act 1957, Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975 in the light of the judgments pronounced by the Honble Supreme Court in the cases of Evacuee Trust Property Board v Mst. Zakia Begum and others (1992 SCMR 1313), Evacuee Trust Property Board v. Mst. Sakina Bibi and others (2007 SCMR 262) and Evacuee Trust Property Board, through Deputy/Assistant Administrator, Evacuee Trust Property, Peshawar v. Ali Bahadur (2011 PSC 22), were discussed. No infirmity or material irregularity was found in the impugned judgments of the courts below, which could warrant interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court, Revision Application was dismissed.
Citation:2017 YLR 851
Advocates:Shab Alam(ADVO-12148-SBC-KHI),Shahid Iqbal Rana(ADVO-7703-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

1521) 2108/2016 Suit The City Schools (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLC 4
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 05-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

1522) 19/2016 Judicial Companies Misc. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Dadabhoy Insurance Co. Ltd (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 CLD 993
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1523) 464/2003 Const. P. Samiur Rehman and another (Petitioner) V/S IInd ADJ South Karachi and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 03-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.145-K/2017 M/s State Life Insurance Corporation Pakistan v. Sami-ur-Rehman and others,C.A.78-K/2017 M/s State Life Insurance Corporation Pakistan v. Sami-ur-Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

1524) 309/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Learnd Family Judge Tando Adam & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Family matter (Decree of dissolution Marriage In Section 10(2) Up held . CP dismissed.)
Citation:2022 CLC 1447
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

1525) 91/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Sukhio Khan Gadehi (Applicant) V/S Ali Nawaz Dahar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2024 MLD 656
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1526) 8/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. AMJAD ALI @ ZAKIR @ SAJID (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 783
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 19-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.504/2023 Amjad Ali @ Zakir @ Sajid v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1527) 922/2019 Const. P. Omer Bin Mehmood S/o Mehmood Bin Kafil (Petitioner) V/S Court of IIIrd ADJ, Khi South and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Criteria for determining a father unfit to be a Guardian of a minor
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 324
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI),Arshad Mohsin Tayebaly(ADVO-3740-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1528) 183/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous GHULAM MUSTAFA S/O ABDUL KARIM & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 99
Advocates:Aamir Jamil(ADVO-12902-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1529) 61/2021 Cr.Tran HAJI MIR HASSAN KHAN BHURGARI (Appellant) V/S MUKHTIAR AHMED @ GUDO & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1090
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.155-K/2021 Haji Mir Massan Khan Bhurgari v. Mukhtiar Ahmed @ Gudo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1530) 6131/2017 Const. P. Dr. Moomal and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman SPSC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

1531) 3930/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Service Regulations
Tag Line:The pivotal question involved in the listed application is whether Civil / Government / public servant is entitled to have the protection of the previous service rendered as Adhoc temporary/contingent basis in the organization for fixation and counting of the previous service for pension.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 772
Advocates:Moula Bux Khatian(ADVO-13552-SBC-KHI),Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-14353-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Tanveer Aftab(ADVO-17883-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.77/2022 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another,C.P.L.A.5919/2021 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

1532) 1177/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Gul Sher & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 106
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

1533) 2659/2018 Const. P. Khalid Hameed Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

1534) 1176/1997 Suit S.M. YOUSUF (Plaintiff) V/S THE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),S. Irtaza Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-2043-SBC-KHI),S. Faiq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-2514-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 23-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

1535) 2011/2019 Const. P. Mst. Anwar and another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

1536) 954/2016 Const. P. Ms. Rehana Parveen (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 1794, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.354-K/2017 Ms. Rehana Parveen v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1537) 216/2021 Cr.Bail Asghar Gahejo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 60
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

1538) 17/2016 Cr.Rev SANA-UR-REHMAN S/O ZAKA-UR-REHMAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 454
Advocates:Jamshed Iqbal(ADVO-10830-SBC-KHI),Mahmood -ul- Hasan(ADVO-8162-SBC-KHS),Mahmood Akhtar Qureshi(ADVO-3582-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

1539) 111/1999 Civil Revision Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) V/S Mian Sajjad Ahmed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

1540) 778/2021 Suit FAUJI OIL TERMINAL & DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S PORT QASIM AUTHORITY & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Injunction application dismissed
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 656
Advocates:Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-13137-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

1541) 5666/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Farooq Legharii (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 139
Advocates:Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

1542) 1317/2014 Const. P. Farida Azam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Section 64-A of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925. The proceedings of Arbitration and that of the Appellate forum, under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, are to be executed as a decree of Civil Court, hence, the same cannot be overturned or interfered with by exercising administrative revisional jurisdiction, under Section 64-A of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, by the Provincial Government. Proceeding declared coram non judice and impugned Order quashed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 229
Advocates:Khalid Rahim(ADVO-9042-SBC-KHE),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Rajendar Kumar(ADVO-9912-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1543) 17/2013 Cr.J.A Farooque Mahar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.614/2018 Farooq v. The State,Crl.A.364/2022 Farooq v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

1544) 1360/2015 Const. P. Adil Rashid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,

1545) 7286/2019 Const. P. Abdul Rauf (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 2063, 2020 SBLR Sindh 1633
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.226-K/2020 Abdul Rauf Nizamani v. Election Commission of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1546) 125/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Manzoor Hussain Arain (Applicant) V/S Ali Murad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 35
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 04-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting

1547) 226/2025 Const. P. Nisar Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Nasreen Akhter & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2026 SHC MPK 2
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-25
Approved for Reporting

1548) 817/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam Tunio (Petitioner) V/S XEN SCARP Larkana (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:No judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court is robed, crowned and sceptered as a King to do whatever suits his whim and caprice.
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 442
Advocates:Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(ADVO-545-SBC-LRK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1549) 2628/2022 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali Panhwar & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:No regularisation of project employees can be ordered by the Court in absence of any law, rules or policy to that effect
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1354
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 04-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3909/2024 Mumtaz Ali Panhwar and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1550) 797/2025 Const. P. Syed Amjad Shah and another (Petitioner) V/S The State and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1648
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1551) 122/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Mst. Rizwana Hakro (Appellant) V/S The State & 7 others (Opponent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 564
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1552) 3/2012 Civil Revision Adnan Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Capital Development Authority (Respondent)
Islamabad High Court, Islamabad
Accommodation Allocation Rules, 2002 Section 2 (b) (g) (e) and Section 15 (b) (1) (2) read with Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 Civil Procedure Code, 1908.--- Petitioner claiming entitlement of residence being successor in interest after retirement of his father.--- Validity.--- Post filled on daily wages work-charge basis or hired from contingencies or ad-hoc basis are excluded for allotment of the accommodation.--- After expiry of six months period of his fathers death, the petitioner becomes trespasser as per rule 2 (p).--- Civil revision application having no merits to succeed, as such dismissed. (Paras 12, 13, 14, 15 & 17) A, B, C, D & E
Mr. Justice Noor-Ul-Haq N. Qureshi
Order Date: 31-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting

1553) 1578/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

1554) -758/2021 Suit MIAN NASSER HYATT MAGGO (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 424
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

1555) 1826/2019 Const. P. Syed Muzaffar Ali Jaffro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (transfer and posting)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

1556) 27/2025 Cr.Bail Mst, Zahida (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 200
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

1557) 424/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Sindh Revenue Board (Applicant) V/S M/s Meesam Construction Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 20-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

1558) 2933/2014 Const. P. M/s Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Doctrine of Election
Citation:2021 PTD 835
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3231/2020 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1559) 333/2016 H.C.A Delhi Mercantile Muslim Cooperative Housing Society Limited Karachi (Appellant) V/S Alamgir Welfare Trust International and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 1167
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 10-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

1560) 157/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Nihal Khan & Others (Applicant) V/S Province Of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 241
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

1561) 1847/2016 Suit M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Emirates Airline / Emirates Sky Cargo & other (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Term an act of war or armed conflict as mentioned in Rule 18(2)(c) of the Fourth Schedule of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, also means non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Armed attack at Jinnah International Airport on 08.06.2014 falls within non-international armed conflict (NIAC) or at least it may be categorised as a hybrid phenomena; where repeated acts of terrorism in furtherance of defined objectives translated into a non-international armed conflict.
Topic: International Law
Tag Line:Term an act of war or armed conflict as mentioned in Rule 18(2)(c) of the Fourth Schedule of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, also means non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Armed attack at Jinnah International Airport on 08.06.2014 falls within non-international armed conflict (NIAC) or at least it may be categorised as a hybrid phenomena; where repeated acts of terrorism in furtherance of defined objectives translated into a non-international armed conflict.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1835
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

1562) 974/2014 Const. P. Haji Gul Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

1563) 219/2019 Criminal Appeal ANANTKUMAR PARSHOTAM (Appellant) V/S MEM. OF MANAGING COMT. NARAYAN TEMPLE TRUST & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Under section 8-A of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, an order that is appealable to the High Court does not include an order dismissing the complaint. However, the appeal can be converted to a criminal revision. 2. In order to constitute an offence under the Illegal Dispossession Act, the complaint must disclose actus reas and mens rea, and if the facts that constitute an offence under section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act are not disclosed through the complaint or documents with it, then the Court can dismiss the complaint straight away. Rel: Waqar Ali v. The State (PLD 2011 SC 181).
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ Note 38
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1564) 6309/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Naeem Akhtar Khan (Petitioner) V/S NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:we queried from the learned counsel for the Petitioner as to how this Petition is maintainable in its form against the National Command Authority (NCA) under the National Command Authority (Amendment) Act, 2016; besides that SUPARCO, comes under the definition of NCA as provided under clause (A) of Section 2 of the NCA Act, 2010.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1438
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

1565) 769/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous NOMAN MARWAT S/O KAISAF KHAN (Applicant) V/S IVTH ADJ KHI MALIR & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In principle, the offense under section 489-F PPC is punishable with imprisonment of three years, thus, does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr. P.C; and, the grounds for cancellation of bail are altogether different from the grant of bail; and once pre-arrest bail is confirmed, the exceptional and extraordinary grounds, as well as strong reasons, are required to recall the bail order granted earlier to the accused. The principles enunciated, governing for grant of bail and cancellation whereof has been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme court in the case of Sharif Khan V/S The State and another, 2021 SCMR 87
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 952
Advocates:Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1566) 1150/2011 Suit Mr. Khalid Ansari (Plaintiff) V/S Independent Newspapers Corporation (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 2 R.2)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 15-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

1567) 3083/2015 Const. P. Pir Bux Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 343
Advocates:Aziz Ur Rehman Akhund(ADVO-11615-SBC-KHI),Munawar Ali Issani(ADVO-2125-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

1568) 7528/2018 Const. P. Shahnawaz and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 PLC CS 447
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Hameedullah Dahri(ADVO-2292-SBC-HYD),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.517-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

1569) 122/2010 Civil Revision Muhammad Naeem & Others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Muhammad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Tag Line: it is a case of material irregularities and illegalities, as the evidence is totally contrary and against the claim of respondent whose suit was decreed. Hence the suit of the plaintiff/respondent No.1 stands dismissed. However, this would not give a license to the applicants as far as their claim is concerned and the revenue authorities are at liberty to act in accordance with law.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1179-K/2018 Ghulam Muhammad v. Muhammad Naeem and others,C.A.15-K/2020 Ghulam Muhammad v. Muhammad Naeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed and Remanded

1570) 151/2021 Const. P. Munawar Ali Narejo (Petitioner) V/S Judge Anti-Terrorism Shikarpur and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1153
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

1571) 222/1993 R.A (Civil Revision) Delhi Mercantile Muslim Co.Operative Hou (Applicant) V/S M.Jawaid & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Conversion of plot void ab initio ??? MLO 34.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 332
Advocates:Mohammad Zia Qureshi(ADVO-4028-SBC-KHI),Mansoor Ali Ghanghro(ADVO-12030-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zubair Qureshi(ADVO-2946-SBC-KHI),Mohammad Ali Ghanghro(ADVO-20942-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1572) 335/2023 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Masood (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 193
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1573) 6683/2018 Const. P. P.T.C.L (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLD Sindh 733
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1574) 17/2013 Cr.Appeal Sadam Hussain (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 30-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.312/2018 Sadam Hussain v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted

1575) 229/2014 Cr.Appeal Faiz Ahmed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 15-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1576) 69/2004 Execution Allied Bank of Pakistan (Decree Holder) V/S Fateh textile Mills ltd & othes (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting

1577) 4769/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Drawing an analogy from the present situation and, more importantly, guided by the principles established by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Dr. Naveeda Tufail and 72 others v. Government of Punjab and others (2003 SCMR 291) and Shahzad Shahmir and others v Government of Sindh & others (2021 SCMR 824). The Dr. Naveeda Tufail case shows that the Federal Government regularized ad hoc employees through the Public Service Commission. While the Petitioners, as provincial contract employees, cannot automatically claim this, Article 25 of the Constitution calls for equal treatment. In Naveeda Tufail, the Supreme Court recognized a legitimate expectation of regularization for Punjab's ad hoc lecturers due to continuous ad hoc appointments. The Supreme Court directed the Punjab government to regularize them via the Punjab Public Service Commission, following the Federal model with some concessions, ensuring separate consideration from direct recruits and non-retention of unsuitable candidates. This case highlights the need for fairness and the Public Service Commission's role in regularization.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 637
Advocates:Mansoorul Haque Solangi(ADVO-6746-SBC-KHI),Zubair Ahmed Rajput(ADVO-7308-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-1474-SBC-KHP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.748-K/2025 Shabbir Ali Babar & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary , Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

1578) 32/2023 Const. P. Mst. Kishwar Aijaz Thr. Attorney Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Family Judge/J,M. XXVII, Karachi (East) and Anothe (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 634
Advocates:Nisar Ahmed Khan(ADVO-17724-SBC-KHE),Chand Bibi(ADVO-18900-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

1579) 1083/2019 Cr.Bail ARIF BALOCH S/O YAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Plea of alibi can be considered at the stage of bail. Rel: Zaigham Ashraf v. The State (2016 SCMR 18).
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

1580) 2865/2013 Const. P. Rashid Latif (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 27-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting

1581) 1584/2019 Const. P. Mst, Saabi (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2023 SBLR Sindh 98
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1582) 1344/2021 Cr.Bail AZIZ UR REHMAN @ BABUL S/O ALI AHMED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Consequently, the pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant on 14.07.2021 is hereby recalled and this bail application is dismissed with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously within two (02) months strictly in accordance with law. Let this order be communicated to the trial Court for compliance.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 44
Advocates:Dr. Raana Khan(ADVO-4571-SBC-KHI),Abdul Rauf Malik(ADVO-15553-SBC-KHI),Amna Usman(ADVO-17283-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 25-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

1583) 149/2024 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Adam Sugar Mills Limited, Karachi (Applicant) V/S The Appellate Tribunal I.R. of Pak. and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Section 8(1)(h) of Sales Tax Act, 1990. input tax adjustment not admissible on material used for construction by a registered person
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1258
Advocates:Ajazuddin Qureshi(ADVO-9652-SBC-KHE),Arif Ali(ADVO-18846-SBC-KHS),Imran Iqbal Khan(ADVO-9206-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 02-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1063-K/2024 M/s Adam Sugar Mills Limited v. Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1584) 11/2023 Cr.Rev AYESHA MIRZA D/O SALIM MIRZA (Applicant) V/S FIA THROUGH DIR GEN. & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 161
Advocates:Wahaj Ali Khan(ADVO-20055-SBC-KHC),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Abdul Rashid Rajar(ADVO-10878-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.718/2023 Ayesha Mirza v. Federal Investigation Agency through its Director General Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1585) 1111/2017 Suit Dr. Sulleman and another (Plaintiff) V/S Higher Education of Commission of Pakistan and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 14-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

1586) 2603/2015 Suit Novartis Pharma Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: DRAP ACT
Tag Line: The drugs are being considered as essential commodities. These are always subject to regulations and unbridled ways of dealing with the prices and allowing market forces to set the prices cannot be granted. This could not be taken as violative of Article 18 or 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan. These are reasonable restrictions and are being protected under the Constitution as often it happens the cartels are formed to manipulate the situation of these essential commodities and hence are always subjected to reasonable restrictions. However, in Suit No.1217 of 2016 in which Mr. Anwar Mansoor Khan learned advocate is appearing wherein Policy itself has been challenged I would dispose of the injunction application in the following terms and keep the lis pending as an issue in relation to the vires of subject policy had not been framed. Any finding here would not influence the trial of this suit.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 19-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

1587) 133/2018 Suit Mrs. Wieb Rosemarie Dakhan & another (Plaintiff) V/S Shahnawaz Dakhan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1792
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1588) 26/2021 II.A. M/S Arif Builders & another (Appellant) V/S Allah Bux Unar Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 170
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

1589) 182/2024 M.A. CSM Pakistan (Guarantee) Limited (Appellant) V/S Kresta Corp (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:For the foregoing reasons the instant appeal is allowed. The Impugned Order dated 31.08.2024 is set aside with no order as to cost. The learned Tribunal shall decide the case without being influenced by the findings in the Impugned Order, after recording of evidence of both parties.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 455
Advocates:Ali & Associates(FIRM-379-SBC-KHI),Kazim Raza Abbasi(ADVO-12253-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1590) 1171/2011 Suit ZULFIQAR SHAKOOR (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. QUETTA TOWN CO-OPY (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 31-OCT-12
Approved for Reporting

1591) 868/2019 Const. P. Muzammil Mumtaz Meo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Legislation on manufacture sale and use of gutka, mainpuri and mawa etc
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4922/2019 Raja Haider Ali and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secretary, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.M.A.4542/2020 Raja Haider Ali and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secretary, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed

1592) 1/2017 M.A. (HESCO) Hyderabad (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Tanveer & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 189
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

1593) 747/2020 Const. P. Syed Sibt-e-Hussain Shah (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Promotion matters; fitness of employee; petition is maintainable; Once major penalty has been set-aside, then promotion cannot be denied on the same charges.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 876
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 27-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1594) 234/2009 Cr.Misc. Kamran Ellahi (Applicant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 18-AUG-10
Approved for Reporting

1595) 666/2019 Cr.Acq.A. SHAHID S/O NASEEMUDDIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

1596) 46/2023 Cr.Appeal Kareem Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 886
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

1597) 123/2013 R.A (Civil Revision) SAEED RIZVI (Applicant) V/S THE COLLECTOR EXCISE & TAXATION & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Gift Document is invalid. The Islamic Law will have overriding effect on the principle of res judicata.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3519
Advocates:Farhatullah(ADVO-4356HLC-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-25
Approved for Reporting

1598) 5661/2024 Const. P. Sindh Club (Petitioner) V/S Syed Muhammad Taqi Naqvi and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:Estoppel.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 202
Advocates:Muhammad Ali(ADVO-7350-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Hussain Khan(ADVO-16596-SBC-KHI),Shuja Uddin(ADVO-11034-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 17-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1599) 764/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Pariyal (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Zahida Parveen & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Family Matter
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 976
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1600) 26/2024 I. A Syed Ayaz Haider (Appellant) V/S National Bank of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Discussion on Order 21 Rule 89 CPC.
Citation:2024 CLD 1373, 2024 YLR 2773
Advocates:Muhammad Salim Thepdawal(ADVO-3099-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Taimoor Ahmed(ADVO-15452-SBC-KHI),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 08-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.908-K/2024 Syed Ayaz Haider v. National Bank of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1601) 126/2025 Cr.Bail Ali Dost Jhangwani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Case calling for further inquiry, pre-arrest bail granted
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 582
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 21-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1602) 740/2018 Const. P. DR. Mazhar Ali Hisbani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sind & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Promotion (Deferred on ground not finalized earlier, the disciplinary/departmental proceedings . )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

1603) 210/2022 H.C.A Haji Ibrahim & Others (Appellant) V/S Abdul Qadir Lakhani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:1). Before granting a mandatory interlocutory injunction the Court had to feel a high degree of assurance that at the trial it would appear that the injunction had been rightly granted. 2).Similarly, a mandatory injunction ought not to be granted on an interlocutory application in the absence of special circumstances and then only in clear cases either where the court thought that the matter ought to be decided at once or where the injunction was directed at a simple and summary act which could be easily remedied or where the defendant had attempted to steal a march on the plaintiff. Moreover, before granting a mandatory interlocutory injunction the Court had to feel a high degree of assurance that at the trial it would appear that the injunction had been rightly granted.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 11
Advocates:Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI),Rehan Kayani(ADVO-12724-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 18-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting

1604) 184/2013 R.A (Civil Revision) SYED MURSHAD ALI (Applicant) V/S SYED AMJAD ALI & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 06.03.2014, whereby the impugned judgment was set aside, and this Civil Revision Application was allowed with costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) payable by respondents 1 and 2 each to the applicant.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.520-K/2018 Syed Sarfaraz Ali v. Syed Murshid Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1605) 594/2010 Cr.Misc. M/s. Pirbhulal Goklani and Azizullah Shaikh, Advocates for the Applicant. (Applicant) V/S Syed Meeral Shah, D.P.G for the State. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-MAY-11
Approved for Reporting

1606) 628/2010 Suit Mst. Shahida Begum (Plaintiff) V/S Ume-Aiman and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Fasih-uz-Zaman Abbasi(ADVO-7446-SBC-KHI),Sana Akram Minhas(ADVO-4195-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Y. Mandviwala(ADVO-3668-SBC-KHI),Agha Zafar Ahmed(ADVO-9944-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting

1607) 4387/2014 Const. P. Pakistan Tibbi Pharmaceuticals Manufacturers (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: DRAP ACT, Sindh Food Authority Act, 2016, CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
Tag Line:The petitions arise under and in relation to the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 (DRAP Act). petitioners contend, the DRAP Act cannot, does not and should not apply to various products as manufactured, sold, used or imported by them, including Unani medicines, prescriptions and preparations, We start with the first set of questions, which relate to the constitutionality of the DRAP Act as enacted under Article 144. This Article originally had two clauses, of which the second was omitted by the 8th Amendment in 1985. two changes made by the 18th Amendment, one was necessitated by the omission of the Concurrent List, and need not detain us. The other, which will require some comment, was that originally Article 144 applied only if two or more Provincial Assemblies passed the necessary resolutions. The present Constitution of course had two Legislative Lists on its commencement. The competences listed in the Federal List were exclusive to the Federation, those on the Concurrent List were common, and those which were not enumerated were exclusive to the Provinces. VThat ability of course is one of the defining characteristics of federal legislative power, since in respect of matters that lie in the Federal domain by right Parliament can make laws for the whole of Pakistan or any part thereof. It would be unduly restrictive of the purpose and intent behind Article 144 if Parliament, while making the law for which it has been given power cannot include therein provisions that relate to matters in the Federal domain as of right. Secondly, a provincial law made subsequent to the law made by the Federation under Article 144 may override or impliedly repeal the latter. This follows directly from the express provision that the Provincial Assemblies may amend or repeal the law made by Parliament. The 1976 Act, in like manner, fractured and receded. It became provincial legislation and hence territorially bound. It now so operates in this and all other Provinces. It must be kept in mind that this position has remained unaltered, and is unaffected by the enactment of the DRAP Act under Article 144. Whatever may be the relationship of, and interaction between, the two laws, the 1976 Act does not now transcend or cross provincial boundaries in the manner of the DRAP Act. It is therefore our conclusion that in the present case, the scope of the legislative competence entrusted to Parliament in terms of Article 144 is governed by the terms of the resolution passed by the Punjab Assembly. Within 30 days of announcement of judgment the Authority under the DRAP Act shall issue proper guidelines, Simultaneously with posting the guidelines on its website, the Authority shall issue notice to each petitioner in the petitions to which this para applies. Interim orders made in any petition to which this para applies shall continue but will lapse 30 days from the date on which the guidelines are posted as above or the date on which the determination is made, whichever is later. following petitions are dismissed: CP D-4387/2014 and CP D-1684/2017. e following petitions are disposed off in terms of para 50 herein above: CP Nos. D- 6532/2014, 2623/2016, 6262/2016, 6263/2016, 6264/2016, 6265/2016, 6310/2016, 6820/2016, 7134/2016, 7135/2016, 1135/2017, 1921/2017, 2329/2017, 424/2017, 4421/2017, 5237/2017 and 5892/2017.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1608) 1094/2020 Const. P. Suresh Kumar Hindu (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
Tag Line:Precise facts are that Petitioners have challenged the Wheat Release Policy 2020-21 dated 14th October 2020 (said Policy), on the ground that Clause (xii) whereof is violative of the Food Stuffs (Control) Act, 1958, and the Food-grains (Licensing Control) Order, 1957, and consequently, be set aside and Flour Mills of Petitioners be given wheat as per the uniform Policy. The legal team of Respondents has stated that it is purely an executive matter regarding which no petition of the nature is maintainable. Crux of the rule laid down in these decisions is that ordinarily under Article 199 of the Constitution, High Court cannot interfere in the policy matters of the Executive, except if it is violative of law or is product of mala fide; whereas, the mala fide is also explained, inter alia, that unless an un rebuttable material is on record with regard to a specific plea of mala fide and not a vague one, the decision or action complained of, cannot be annulled or declared illegal This principle has been evolved through judicial pronouncements and opinions of jurists, the crux of which is that punishment must fit the crime. When on the record there is no evidence that Petitioners / Flour Mills have entered into plea bargain with NAB, then Clause (xii) cannot be stretched to include Petitioners / Flour Mills, and such an action of Respondents is hit by this doctrine of proportionality also and is unreasonable and discriminatory. Petitions are accepted only to the extent, that the Clause (xii) of the Wheat Policy is not applicable to the present Petitioners / Flour Mills and they are entitled to get their respective share / quota of wheat in accordance with the present Wheat Policy 202021 like other Flour Mills established and operating in the Province of Sindh.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 481
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 17-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1609) 293/2020 Cr.Bail Muhammad Yaseen (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 353
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

1610) 1579/2020 Const. P. Indus Motor Co. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Primacy of charging section.
Citation:2021 PTD 460
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.410-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Indus Motors Company Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1611) 725/2015 Suit Mazhar Ali. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Pak Avenue Owners/Occup. Welf. Ass. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Fatal Accident , Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Tag Line:The undisputed record and the evidence adduced by the parties, concludes that Defendants and particularly Defendant No.1 was responsible for causing the death of the deceased Mazhar Ali, because despite collecting enormous amounts towards maintenance charges each month from different offices/Units in the said Building, the elevators / lifts were not maintained properly. Negligence rather callousness of Defendant No.1 in particular, is also proved from the undisputed fact that no remedial measures were taken even after another incident preceding the one of the present lis, in which a person was injured due to fault in one of the lifts (in the said Building).
Citation:2020 MLD 257
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

1612) 1168/2024 Const. P. Mst. Wajiha Fatima and another (Petitioner) V/S Syed Badar Abbas Jafri and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1382
Advocates:Syed Rashid Rizvi(ADVO-20800-SBC-KHE),Ahmed Dawood(ADVO-9332-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1026-K/2025 Syed Badar Abbas Jafri v. Mst. Wajiha Fatima & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1613) 143/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Arif Hussain S/o (Late) Ghulam Hussain (Applicant) V/S Mst. Rukhsana Bano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 335
Advocates:Muhammad Aamir Khosa(ADVO-15884-SBC-KHS),Ahrar Jawaid(ADVO-20791-SBC-KHE),Muneer Iqbal(ADVO-17705-SBC-KHE),Sikandar Khan(ADVO-3828-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

1614) 326/2022 Const. P. M/s. SINDHLAB (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In view of the forgoing reasons the instant petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. However, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appeal under the above-mentioned Section at the appropriate forum and the time spent by the Petitioner in the instant petition shall be excluded for the purposes of computing limitation.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 182
Advocates:Mohammad Humayun(ADVO-3047-SBC-KHS),Ghulam Asghar Pathan(ADVO-13987-SBC-KHC),Syed Shayan Ahmed(ADVO-16453-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Jawad Akbar Sarwana(ADVO-7174-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 14-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1615) 336/2024 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & Another (Appellant) V/S Premium Textile Mills Ltd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: OGRA Ordinance 2002 (Sec.8 - Notification - Mustafa Impex)
Tag Line:What are the exceptional situations when the principles of Mustafa Impex disapply - Discussed in the context of OGRA Ordinance, 2002
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 4
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1017/2025 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division), Islamabad and another v. Premium Textile Mills Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1616) 2418/2014 Suit Muhammad Raza & others (Plaintiff) V/S Nasir Khan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1617) 239/2017 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. KASHIF SOHAIL S/O GRIFFIN ALMAS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 18-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1618) 0/2018 Execution Tariq Gul (Decree Holder) V/S Zarar-ul-Yamin Khan (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XXXVII, Rr. 1 & 2---Suit for recovery of money disposed of on compromise---Execution petition---Competence---Compromise between the parties was to be treated as a fresh agreement---Aggrieved party in case of any breach of compromise was required to file a fresh suit---Execution petition for enforcement of compromise was not competent---Parties might avail remedy under the law for implementation of compromise agreement---Execution petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2019 CLC 566
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

1619) 74/2015 S.M.A Mr Afia Baig w/o. Mirza Fawad Baig V/S (Petitioner) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Succession Act
Tag Line:(a) Counsel and client--- ----Affidavit by advocate---Scope---Lawyer is not supposed to take place of his client when seeking any substantial relief which the client wanted from the Court---Lawyer cannot swear affidavit of facts relating to circumstances of his client in which need for an order from Court of law was felt for the client even on the advice of lawyer---Such facts and circumstances can only be in the personal knowledge of the client when neither application nor affidavit in support of application is signed by client. (b) Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)--- ----Ss. 273 & 372---Chief Court Rules (O.S.), Rr. 340, 376, 377 & 399---Letters of Administration and succession certificate---Amended petition---Seeking of surety---Object---Necessary ingredients---Widow of deceased owner of property in question died during pendency of petition and applicant did not file proper amended petition---Validity---On the death of widow of deceased owner, in amended petition for the share inherited by her, amended petition must disclose her legal heirs---Once all codel formalities were honestly completed and petition of letter of administration was granted, it would be duty of petitioner to administer properties of both deceased parents as per law which could include first mutation in the name of respective legal heirs and then it would be the choice of new owners by way of inheritance to deal with their respective individual shares in joint properties the way they could wish to, but in accordance with law---Grant of letter of Administration was always subject to the Rules---Purpose of obtaining sureties by Court in terms of Rr. 399 & 340 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.) was to ensure that petitioner would administer properties of deceased in accordance with law and honestly.
Citation:2017 MLD 460
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 14-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

1620) 730/2019 Const. P. Mst. Shakeela (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Arif Abbasi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2482
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

1621) 77/2007 Civil Revision Farida Gul Agha & others (Appellant) V/S Saeeda Bano Ahmed & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Islamic law--- ----Gift---Revocation of---Death of donor and donee---Effect---Suit was filed for cancellation of gift deed after the death of donee/beneficiary---Trial Court dismissed the suit but Appellate Court decreed the same---Validity---Donor being mother of donee was related to the donee within the prohibited degree---Donor could not revoke the gift after the death of donee even through court---Appellate Court had failed to appreciate that first burden of proof was on the plaintiff and unless it was discharged by evidence consistent with the pleadings the defendant could not be required to prove anything from his pleadings---Evidence of the parties had not been discussed by the Appellate Court and suit had been decreed---Findings recorded by the Appellate Court were contrary to evidence---Donor had already transferred suit property by way of gift by handing over possession and original title document to the donee---Requirements of Islamic Law had been complied with in the present case---No further act/action was required on the part of donor and donee---Actual physical dispossession of the donor from the suit property was not required in the present case---Cause of action had died/buried with the death of donor as gift might be revoked by donor but not by his legal heirs after his/her death---Suit filed by the donor had abated by her death---Proceedings after the death of donee were coram non judice---Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court were set aside and those of Trial Court were restored---Revision was allowed in circumstances. Mulla's Muhammadan Law para. 167 ref. (b) Islamic law--- ----Revocation of gift after death of donee---Scope---Donor could not revoke the gift after the death of donee even through court. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 96---Appellate Court---Duty of---Appellate court was not supposed to write a fresh judgment of its own without commenting and explaining the circumstances for forming an opinion contrary to the opinion/reasoning of the Trial Court---Appellate court unless found the judgment of Trial Court suffering from improper treatment of evidence such as wrongly placing the burden of proof on the parties in deciding the issues between them or finding it in conflict with some law on the subject could not reverse finding of Trial Court---Appellate court had to meet the reasoning of the Trial Court in the first instance and thereafter reappraise the evidence on record while reversing the findings of Trial Court. Ch. Muhammad Shafi v. Shamim Khanum 2007 SCMR 838 rel. (d) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Art. 117---Burden of proof---Whoever approaches the Court of law to give judgment as to his legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts in the plaint, must prove that those facts exist.
Citation:2016 YLR 2087
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1412/2016 Tariq Ahmed (decd.) thr: L.Rs & others v. Farida Gul Agha (decd.) thr. L.Rs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1622) 10/2023 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUZAMIL S/O ZAKIR HUSSAIN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 904
Advocates:Muhammad Nooruddin(ADVO-1341-SBC-SUK),Muhammad Khan(ADVO-10244-SBC-KHC),Naimatullah Shah(ADVO-13664-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
Order Date: 09-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1623) 265/2006 Const. P. Evacuee Trust Property Board. (Petitioner) V/S Wahabiddomn and Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 412
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.712-K/2022 Evacuee Trust Property Board Government of Pakistan v. Wahabuddin & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1624) 74/2008 M.A. Smith Kline Beecham PLC (Appellant) V/S Registrar of Trade Mark (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 40
Advocates:IRFAN & IRFAN ADVOCATES.(FIRM-125-SBC-KHI),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 01-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1625) 419/2021 Const. P. Basheer Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 632
Advocates:Soofia Saeed(ADVO-3712-SBC-KHI),Abdul Samad Memon(ADVO-9460-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5397/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar,C.A.2856/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed

1626) 1/2009 M.A. Nishat Raffiq & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Securities & Exchange Commission (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Shaikh Jawaid Mir(ADVO-5446-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 28-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1627) 20/2019 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. MUHAMMAD ALI S/O ASHIQ ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal Trial ( Discrepancies and contradictions )
Tag Line:It seems that most of the grounds which persuaded learned Division Bench to acquit the said accused, are common in nature and they are also applicable to the case of present appellant. For instance, (i) violation of the provisions of Section 103 Cr. P.C., as discussed in paras 20, 21 and 22 of the judgment; (ii) non-production of arrival and departure entries by police officials, as discussed in para 23 of the judgment; (iii) extension of benefit of doubt to the accused as discussed in paras 24, 25, 26 and 30 of the judgment and (iv) although there being cross-firing during alleged police encounter, no injury/scratch was caused to the police officials or the complainant party.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1301
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Mir Wali(ADVO-15230-SBC-KHI),Samiullah Soomro(ADVO-960-SBC-SUK),Zakir Hussain Bughio(ADVO-11959-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

1628) 7450/2018 Const. P. Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:I. Whether respondent No.4 can hold the charge for the post of Director I.T. in BPS-18 under the law? II. Whether respondent No.4s case falls within the ambit of Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013?
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1943
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.594-K/2021 Mst.Tabassum Abbasi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1629) 270/2012 Cr.Bail Mumtaz Ali Lashari (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail before arrest Granted In Section under Sections 379, 462-B, 462-C, 427, PPC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 16-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting

1630) 2839/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1631) 12/2020 Cr.Acctt.A ANWAR AI S/O RAJAB ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAIN NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:NAB matter - Appeal against conviction
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 240
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1296/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Anwar Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1632) 74/2018 II.A. Brig (Rtd) Raja M. Saleem Khan (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Nabeela Azam (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The learned counsel for the Appellant has failed to identity any substantial error in the Impugned Judgement. In light of what has been held above no case for interference in the Impugned Judgment(s) and decree(s) is made out. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 394
Advocates:Khawaja Naveed Ahmed(ADVO-2102-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Islam Leghari(ADVO-2613-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Faisal Khan(ADVO-14117-SBC-KHI),Salman Javed Mirza(ADVO-19988-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1633) 76/2007 Civil Revision Allah Bux and others (Applicant) V/S Govt.of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: PROPERTY
Tag Line:There is no cavil to the proposition that the entries were neither substantiated before trial Court nor before appellate Court and there was no reason to have relied upon those entries which have no basis as far as title is concerned and the appeal was rightly allowed and consequently the suit was dismissed. Similarly, taking into consideration the contentions of the learned State counsel regarding maintainability of suit, such being a question which is apparent on the face of it such as defect which is not curable and since it is legal, can be raised at any stage including revisional and appellate stage. There is no cavil to the proposition that Government functionaries / authorities are to be sued as required in terms of Article 174 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 as well as Section 79 CPC. In these proceedings, the Provincial of Sindh was sued through Deputy Commissioner which is not in consonance with the judgment of (1) Haji Abdul Aziz and (2) Government of Balochistan (supra) which provides a mechanism of suing the Government through Province of Sindh and through concerned Secretary to the Government. Commissioner under the hierarchy does not represent the Province in the manner as highlighted in the plaint and as such the objection raised by the learned State Counsel also goes on to prove that the suit at the very inception should have been buried as the legal mandatory formalities in terms of Section 79 CPC and Article 174 of the Constitution have not been complied.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1463-K/2018 Allah Bux & others v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1634) 184/2023 Cr.Bail MST. DANIA BIBI D/O MALIK MUKHTIAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1231
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

1635) 33/2014 Spl.Cr.Bail MUMTZUDDIN S/O MOINUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting

1636) 456/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S M/s. S.M. Traders (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Import into Export Processing Zones; Section 79 & 32 read with Section 156(1) of the Customs Act, 1969 are applicable
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 232
Advocates:Salman Aziz(ADVO-14423-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Younus Rao(ADVO-16208-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1637) 2/2021 Adm. Suit Tenedos Denizcilik ve Tie Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S M.T MAKHAMBET & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Resjudicata , Admiralty
Tag Line:--Section 11 CPC is universal doctrine so it does not matter if the judgment is of a foreign Court or of a Court beyond the territorial limits of this Court. The subject claim is a tried and adjudicated issue (within competent jurisdiction) and hence it is being applied for enforcing res- judicata. There is no legislation enacted contrary to the acceptance of such rule except as provided in Section 11 CPC. --The explanation provides that a former suit is one which has been decided prior, irrespective of its filing date. Explanation II provides that for the purpose of Section 11 competence of Court shall be determined irrespective of any provision as to right of appeal from the decision of such Court5 . Explanation III provides that matter referred to must in the former suit have been alleged by one party and either denied or admitted expressly or impliedly by the other. Explanation IV provides that any matter which might or ought to have been made ground of defence or attack in such former suit shall be deemed to have been a matter directly or substantially in issue in such suit and under Explanation V any relief claimed in the plaint, which is not expressly granted by the decree, shall for the purposes of this section be deemed to have been refused. The remaining explanation VI is not relevant for the purposes of issue in hand.
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 378
Advocates:Ishrat Zahid Alvi(ADVO-6918-SBC-KHI),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

1638) 3/2017 Election Appeal Jam Javed Ahmed Khan Dehar (Appellant) V/S Haji Muhammad Akbar and 14 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 13-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1639) 40/2021 Const. P. Munawar Ali Sagar & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:A) The site "Karoonjhar Hills" is not available for excavation of any nature whatsoever except excavation for discovering historical monuments and that too after following international guidelines and archeological department B) Mines & Mineral Department do not enjoy the jurisdiction over it since it is protected heritage and not available as a site for mining/excavation; C) Entire range Karoonjhar Hills in ???one monument??? under the law and cannot be divided into pieces and portions and to make some part of it (range) available for any prohibited excavation. Its importance lies in preserving the entire range and not permitting mineral excavation in between as it would not only destroy the beauty but at the conclusion of mining process would destroy the existing topography
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 428
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 16-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3964/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh Secretariat, Karachi v. Munawar Ali Sagar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Notice

1640) 5196/2017 Const. P. SESSI United Staff Union sindh (CBA) & ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Sindh Employees Social Security Institution--vacant posts in SESSI were required to be filled through the competitive process--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the appointment in the public office can only be made through the competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise as discussed supra. It is well-settled law that appointments in public office are to be made strictly under applicable rules and regulations without any discrimination and in a transparent manner. Thus, all appointments in the public institution must be based on a process that is substantially and tangibly fair and within the parameters of its applicable rules, regulations, and bylaws. However, if the candidate has applied based on such admissible quota under the law he can be accommodated subject to his qualification for the post under the dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan on the subject issue--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1091
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1641) 304/2010 I.T.R.A Commissioner (Legal) (Applicant) V/S M/s E.N, I Pakistan (M) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 20-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting

1642) 3/2012 Conf.Case The State (Appellant) V/S Danial alias Dani (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 17-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting

1643) 461/2011 Cr.Bail Muhammad Arshad (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 18-JAN-12
Approved for Reporting

1644) 4116/2014 Const. P. Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PTD 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 06-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

1645) 4900/2014 Const. P. M/s Ahsan and Co. (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

1646) 428/2012 Suit MANZAR MASOOD (Plaintiff) V/S BANK ISLMI PAKISTAN LTD (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Murtaza Wahab(ADVO-13085-SBC-KHI),M/S. AHMED NIAZI & CO(FIRM-298-SBC-KHI),Mehar Khan(ADVO-14209-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Niazi(ADVO-10916-SBC-KHI),Fida Muhammad(ADVO-3004-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 03-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

1647) 3463/2017 Const. P. Karam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Refusal to issue appointment orders due to criminal cases against petitioners. Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants act, 1973: appointment criteria and moral turpitude. Impact of acquittal on eligibility for civil service appointment. Malicious implication and false accusations not ground for disqualification. Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as a legally recognized conviction.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 133, 2025 SBLR Sindh 2469
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.517-K/2025 Province of Sindh though Secretary Police Department Sindh & others v. Karam Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Notice) (Next Hearing: Month of December-2025). Repeat Notices to unserved Respondents.

1648) 5/2022 J.M SHAHID IQBAL DAR & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S PUBLIC AT LARGE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Rectification of a trust deed; per section 31 of the Specific Relief Act 1877.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1016
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Nida Faisal Ghani(ADVO-17766-SBC-KHS),Mahmood Abdul Ghani(ADVO-4801-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

1649) 3328/2012 Const. P. National Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Auditor GEneral of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 211
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Mansoor-ul-Arfin(ADVO-157-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

1650) 4/2020 Suit.B Nisar Mustafa Shaikh & Others (Plaintiff) V/S Sajid Ahmed Kalhoro (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Suit for Recovery (Appeal against Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C, is Allowed, Plaint was rejected on t he ground Affidavit of minor not attached.)
Citation:2020 SHC LAR 1508
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1651) 28/2020 I.T.R.A M/S. TELENOR MICRO FINANCE BANK LTD. (Applicant) V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 473
Advocates:Furqan Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-17092-SBC-KHE),Aminuddin Ansari(ADVO-3574-SBC-KHI),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Shams Mohiuddin Ansari(ADVO-9489-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

1652) 6339/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Habeen Fatani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:ECL Matter.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 652
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1653) 4/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. SARDAR S/O MIR HASSAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Minor Contradictions can be ignored)
Tag Line:Where some minor contradictions may be available which are not sufficient to create any serious doubt the same can be ignored which always are available in each and every case.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 780
Advocates:S. Ahsan Ali Shah(ADVO-16440-SBC-KHS),Imran(ADVO-12874-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

1654) 165/2016 H.C.A Dr. Farzana (Appellant) V/S Syed Shahrukh Abbas (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 10-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting

1655) 32/2020 Const. P. Bashir Ahmed Phulpoto & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 1609
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 23-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

1656) 512/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S Abdul Razzaq and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Smuggled goods are liable to outright confiscation and cannot be released on payment of redemption fine under Section 181 of the Customs Act, 1969
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 440
Advocates:Asim Muneer Bajwa(ADVO-3939-SBC-KHI),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Azad Khan(ADVO-6962-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.439-K/2023 Abdul Razzak v. The Collector of Custom & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1657) 52/2017 II.A. Ali Asghar (Appellant) V/S Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

1658) 549/2008 Suit MOBEEN RAZA and another (Appellant) V/S M/S. ALLOO & MINOCHER DINSHAW (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 42---Suit for negative declaration seeking only the disentitlement of defendants in suit property---Maintainability---Interpretation of S.42, Specific Relief Act, 1877---Plaintiff sought declaration to the effect that the defendants had no interest in the suit property and were not entitled to sell or dispose of, the same---Question before the High Court was whether plaintiffs could seek such negative declaration in relation to the disentitlement of the defendants without claiming in ownership , interest or legal character for themselves in relation to the suit property ---Held, that plaintiffs had not sought relief in respect of property in question for themselves, nor any legal character had been attributed to suit property, hence no entitlement in terms of S.42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 was available to the plaintiffs---Plaintiffs had sought declaration to the effect that defendants had no locus standi or right in relation to the suit property; however such prayer would not entitle the plaintiffs to file suit for declaration when they were not claiming any interest, title or legal character in the property, and especially when defendants had established their interest in the property by placing a registered sale deed---Suit for negative declaration was only maintainable in certain exceptional cases---When a plaintiff demonstrated some interest in the property to which some legal sanctity could be attached only then plaintiffs could seek some legal character in terms of S.42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877---Suit for declaration, in the present case, sought declaration to the disentitlement of the defendants, and was not maintainable---Suit was dismissed, accordingly.
Citation:2016 CLC Note 10
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

1659) 1754/2023 Const. P. Gulab Sahito (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1302
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.201-K/2025 Province of Sindh & others v. Gulab Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1660) 265/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Salman Khan Baloch (Adv) (Petitioner) V/S Syed Mustafa Kamal & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-265 of 2020 (writ of quo warranto) filed by Mohammad Salman Khan Baloch against Syed Mustafa Kamal, Ex City Nazim (Mayor) of Karachi for his disqualification. The petition has been dismissed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 528
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

1661) 41/2020 Criminal Appeal Zaheer s/o Haji Qasim Lakho (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Appeal (Control of Narcotic 9(C) Appeal allowed On Ground contradictions in the evidence of complainant and mashir, )
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1141
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1082/2020 Zaffarullah v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1662) 151/2016 Cr.Rev Muhammad Javed (Applicant) V/S VIIIth Addl Session Judge Hyd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 PCr.LJ 1522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 14-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1663) 432/2015 Suit Muhammad Arif. (Plaintiff) V/S Mrs. Uzma Jawaid & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Transfer of Property)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

1664) 1546/2021 Const. P. Mst. Bilquees Khalid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (S.68)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 845
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

1665) 608/2015 Const. P. Mst Yasmeen Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Ayaz Pathan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 08-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

1666) 3981/2018 Const. P. Saeed Babar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Tag Line:Seniority in service, cadre, or post to which an official is promoted is to take effect from the date of regular promotion to that service, cadre, or post and not from the date of any ad-hoc induction
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 28
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1667) 323/1998 H.C.A Muhammad Amin & another (Appellant) V/S Mst. Abida (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Farrukh Usman(ADVO-12432-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

1668) 6/2005 I. A Asad Ali Khan (Appellant) V/S The Conservator Forest and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:1. In a Reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act it is the obligation of the person claiming compensation to prove his ownership beyond any doubt. 2. A Reference under section 18 of the Act is different from a Reference under Section 30 ibid and cannot be converted from one to the other by the Referee Court;
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 110
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

1669) 203/2017 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S MAPAK EDIBLE OIL (PVT) LIMITED (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1670) 3657/2017 Const. P. Ehsan Ali Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

1671) 5812/2015 Const. P. Shahrukh Shakeel Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:School Fees Judgement
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 07-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.7-K/2017,C.P.950-K/2016,C.P.865-K/2016,C.A.13-K/2017 SCP Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

1672) 1817/2019 Const. P. Marie Stopes Society (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Signing of MoU by NGO
Tag Line:The application of an organization for signing MoU cannot be rejected merely on the account of dubious activities. Every Citizen / person has an inalienable right to enjoy the protection of law and be treated as such. The acquiescence is specie of estoppel but there can be no estoppel against the law. Every decision / order / judgment passed by any forum, department or Court should be passed after application of mind with reasoning.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 573
Advocates:Dr. Atif ud Din(ADVO-12716-SBC-KHE),Deputy Attorney General(),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 28-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1001/2022 Federation of Pakistan through the Federal Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Revenue Economic Affairs, Statistics & Privatization, Islamabad v. Marie Stopes Society through its authorized officer, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1673) 202/2014 Cr.Appeal Aadil (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 07-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.483/2015 Aadil v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1674) 860/2024 Const. P. Arfeen International (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Indenters are liable to be registered under the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 219
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 13-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

1675) 6145/2018 Const. P. M/s Korea Marine Transport Co. Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 14A)
Tag Line:Custom Act (Section 14A). Vires challenged - Matter already decided by a DB Judgment in the case of Qasim International Container Terminal V/s. Fed. of Pakistan (CP No.D-4867/2013).
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 962
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.563-K/2021 M/s. Korea Marine Transport Co. Ltd. & another v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1676) 3049/2023 Const. P. Popular International Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 70
Advocates:Abdul Ghaffar Khan(ADVO-4250-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 06-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

1677) 64/2013 Execution NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Decree Holder) V/S SULTAN ALI AKHANI (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:"Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) --- ----S. 47 & O. XXI, R. 23-A---Arbitration Act (X of 1940), S. 14---Application for making award as rule of court---Consent decree---Execution petition---Objections---Contention of decree holders was that objections to execution petition could not be considered unless judgment debtor had deposited the decretal amount or furnished security in lieu thereof---Validity---Validity of decree could only be challenged before the Executing Court if the same was void or had been passed by the court having no jurisdiction---Provisions of O.XXI, R.23-A, C.P.C. were mandatory and objections to the execution by a judgment debtor could not be considered unless judgment debtor had deposited the decretal amount or furnished security in lieu thereof---Executing Court could not go beyond the decree---Judgment debtor could not escape from his obligation under the decree---Requirement of notice and hearing were duly complied with at the time of trial---Executing Court could not be burdened with re-trial---Compromise decree was in fact a contract, breach of which might give rise to fresh cause of action to decree holder---Decree was neither void nor it had been passed by a Court having no jurisdiction---Objections to execution application taken by the judgment debtor were over-ruled, in circumstances."
Citation:2015 CLC 1278
Advocates:S. Afsar Ali Abidi(ADVO-1715-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Khalid Anwar(ADVO-1477-SBC-KHI),Farhatullah(ADVO-4356HLC-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

1678) 1126/2013 Cr.Bail ASIM RIZWAN S/O YOUNUS RIZWAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 SBLR Sindh 785
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

1679) 5262/2013 Const. P. M/s Inland Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Mehdi Khan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Salary)
Citation:2019 PLC Lab. 182
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1680) 2135/2021 Const. P. Noman Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Sindh Education Foundation --we conclude that there is no illegality, infirmity, or material irregularity in the impugned letters dated 06.02.2020 & 30.11.2020 issued by the respondent-SEF. Besides, the issue of continue in service, since he is facing the NAB reference based on moral turpitude, thus we cannot order the competent authority to continue his service.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 847
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

1681) 110/2009 Cr.J.A Inayatullah Mugheri (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 09-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.449/2015 Inayatullah Mugheri v. The State,Crl.A.154/2018 Inayatullah Mugheri v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

1682) 4929/2013 Const. P. Nadeem Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 SBLR Sindh 263
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting

1683) 860/2014 Const. P. PTCL (Petitioner) V/S Prov of sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 PLC 13
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 15-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1684) 1039/2018 Suit Pakistan National Shipping Corporation & others (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Coniston Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed)
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act. Section 42 and 56. Anti-Injunction Suit concept - can only be granted in rare exceptional cases- grant of such an Injunction amounts to transgressing norms of Judicial restraint.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 56, 2020 CLC 454
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 25-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1685) 1077/2020 Suit Akhlaq Hashmi (Plaintiff) V/S Mst. Bakht Bibi & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Suit and listed applications were dismissed with costs of Rs.50,000.00 (Rupees fifty thousand only) to be paid by the plaintiff to defendants 1 to 31 within thirty (30) days. The amount of Rs.7,000,000.00 (Rupees seven million only) received by the said defendants from the plaintiff shall be returned by them to him within thirty (30) days.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 226
Advocates:M. Umer Farooq Khokhar(ADVO-38951-PBC-LHR),Farooq Hashmat Abbasi(ADVO-4616-SBC-KHC),Qamar Iqbal(ADVO-9999-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aijaz Khan(ADVO-3564-SBC-KHI),Nasrullah Malik(ADVO-11854-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

1686) 1569/2000 Suit Ali Muhammad & another (Plaintiff) V/S Faizullah & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 32
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

1687) 3130/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Adnan (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Finance (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 27-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.12-K/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Adnan Qureshi,C.A.1192/2019 The Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Finance Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and another v. Muhammad Adnan Qureshi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after Summer vacation,Disposed

1688) 151/2006 H.C.A Karachi Pipe Mills Ltd. & others (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 03-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting

1689) 94/2018 I. A Saeed Akhtar & others (Appellant) V/S M. C. B. Pakistan Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 902
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 22-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1105-K/2022 Saeed Akhtar & others v. M/s. Muslim Commercial Bank Pakistan Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

1690) 121/2013 II.A. MAULANA SHABBIR AHMED (Appellant) V/S MUHAMMAD SHARIF MUGHAL & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1453/2018 Mualana Shabbir Ahmed Usmani v. Muhammad Sharif Mughal and another,C.P.L.A.981-K/2018 Mualana Shabbir Ahmed Usmani v. Muhammad Sharif Mughal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Leave Granted

1691) 1292/2022 Suit ARY COMMUNICATIONS LTD (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Tag Line:Reasonable restriction imposed by law, by no stretch of imagination means to condemn a person/entity without any justification and without hearing3. According to (RSF) Reporters without borders Pakistan press, since beginning is oscillated between civil societys demand for greater press freedom and the political and executive/establishment elites constant reassertion of extensive control over the media. This has to be streamlined within frame of law not by dictations
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 50
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

1692) 6555/2016 Const. P. Maj (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Contract employee)
Citation:2019 SCMR 984
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 12-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.514-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.26-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed

1693) 3727/2024 Const. P. Javed Ali Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1218
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.976-K/2025 Javed Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through Petroleum Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1694) 67/2010 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s United Exports Company V/S Regional Tx office through CommissionerEnforcement (Applicant) V/S M/s United Exports Company V/S Regional Tx office through CommissionerEnforcement (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 15-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

1695) 4233/2024 Const. P. Abdul Monem (Petitioner) V/S Vice Chief of the Air Staff and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953. Section 20 a valid Provision. Due Process not followed Dismissal Order set-aside. Principles of Policy in the Constitution, 1973.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2791
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Umar Farooq(ADVO-18521-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

1696) 12/2020 I. A Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Aalam & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:The encroachment of amenity plot cannot be allowed to sustain under the law, which aspect, the official respondents have to look into and restore its position in accordance with law. The encroachment of an amenity plot to another use is treated as an abuse of discretion and therefore is unlawful for the simple reason that the paramount object of modern city planning is to ensure maximum comforts for the residents of the city by providing maximum facilities and that a public functionary entrusted with the work to achieve the above object cannot act in a manner, which may defeat the above objective and deviation from the planned scheme will naturally result in discomfort and inconvenience to others.
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1766
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

1697) 7615/2022 Const. P. Jamia Masjid Al Siddiq (Regd) Trust & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 845
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

1698) 2991/2013 Const. P. Ali Asghar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 682
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.441-K/2017 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others,C.A.62-K/2018 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

1699) 1512/2009 Suit MOBIN RAFIQUE & OTHER (Plaintiff) V/S RASHID AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The reasons that I have highlighted the occasions and circumstances ibid where a Receiver could be appointed is because I have gone through the entire affidavit filed in support of the application for appointment of Receiver and in none of the paragraphs the apprehension that the property would be wasted or it is in danger of being wasted was shown. The affidavit discloses that both the business concerns were in control, custody and possession of the defendants No.1 to 3 since the death of father i.e. 2005. It is also mentioned that the profits and income received from these business concerns were being collected and consumed and retained by defendants No.1 to 3 without sharing the same with the plaintiffs or other legal heirs. It has also been disclosed that the defendants are trying to sell the property in question, of course they mean the movable property (as immovable property is on rent) and they urged that they are entitled for their share out of the business income. However, they have not disclosed a single ground whereby this Court could exercise and invoke powers to appoint Receiver. Admittedly the business was being run by defendants No.1, 2 and 3 since 2005 and for reasons mentioned above it is sufficient to hold that the solvent grounds which could attract the provisions of Order XL rule 1 CPC are not available though apparently it seems that the plaintiffs rights and interests as far as their share in the business is concerned is being denied but certainly this alone is not sufficient to invoke the powers under Order XL rule 1 CPC which is a very harsh remedy which is to be used sparingly. The plaintiffs here alleges only exclusion and not waste or malversation. Even apprehension of mismanagement or misappropriation alone would not be sufficient to call for appointment of a Receiver, which is not the case of the plaintiffs
Citation:2012 PLD Sindh 449, 2012 SBLR 1411
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting

1700) 3502/2021 Const. P. Syed Babar Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:We do not agree with the statement of the learned counsel for the Petitioner on the aforesaid assertions for the simple reason that compulsory retirement from service is a major penalty under service jurisprudence and falls within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of the civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1111
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

1701) 8/2008 I.T.R.A M/S. Raja Weavig Mills Ltd (Applicant) V/S The Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 09-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting

1702) 13/2012 Cr.Acctt.A Muhammad Akbar Zardari & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 396
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1703) 4535/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Jamil Khan (Petitioner) V/S SESSI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Employees??? Social Security Institution Service Regulations, 1976
Tag Line:Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 141
Advocates:Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2745/2022 Muhammad Jamil Khan v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1704) 117/2023 H.C.A Uzair Saboor (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT, 2012
Tag Line:To regulate the products described in the DRAP Act, 2012, the respondent No.2 only wants that they may be enlisted with it so that they may regulate it as being an alternative medicine/therapeutic goods. While appellants would make an application for enlistment, it would certainly be without prejudice to above understanding and notwithstanding their stance, a proper scrutiny would still be undertaken by DRAP to adjudge it as a product/drug etc, to be enlisted within frame of law (act and rules), which order will then be conclusive, subject to a challenge within DRAP Act, 2012.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 497
Advocates:Shah Nawaz Sahito(ADVO-8545-SBC-KHI),Hafeez Ullah(ADVO-18295-SBC-KHE),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3662/2024 Uzair Saboor v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy M/o. National Regulation & Service, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1705) 288/2018 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. M/s. Al-Meezan Poultry Feeds (Applicant) V/S The Collector of Customs (Adj-I) & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1334
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.638-K/2021 The Collector of Customs Model Customs Collectorate v. M/s. Al-Meezan Poultry Feeds Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1706) 2863/2014 Const. P. Pir Kaleemullah and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 11-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.643-K/2018 Pir Kalimullah and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Cheif Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1707) 1080/2020 Const. P. M/s U & I Garments Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 13
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 03-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

1708) 509/2014 Const. P. Arif Khan and 31 others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.412-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Arif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1709) 25/2015 Execution First Appeal M/s. S.K. Enterprises (Decree Holder) V/S Dadabhoy Multi-purpose Coperative Housing Soceity (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 15-JUN-16
Approved for Reporting

1710) 254/2024 Const. P. Zeeshan Razzak Thr. Attorney Muhammad Zaid (Petitioner) V/S Cantonment Board Clifton and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1853
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

1711) 673/2015 Cr.Bail Adil (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1712) 1243/2018 Const. P. Patient Welfare Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 83
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.925-K/2021 Patient Welfare Society v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Health Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1713) 34/2012 Cr.Rev Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) V/S Sageer Ahmed and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Revision (acquitted the appellants from all the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 08-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting

1714) 877/2007 Suit M/S. NISAR AHMED JAPANWALA (Plaintiff) V/S THE C.D.G.K. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 06-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

1715) 5430/2020 Const. P. Imad Samad (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (SRO 833(I)/2018 Section 19), Import Policy , Rules of Business, 1973 (Schedule-II), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 19), Import Policy Order 2020, Rules of Business, 1973, Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950
Tag Line:- Import of vintage cars on the strength of SRO No.833(I)/2018 dated 03.07.2018 followed by a decision in the case of Moin Jamal Abbasi in CP No.D-4124 of 2019 reported as 2020 PTD 660. --Full Bench was constituted to consider the question arising out of litigation:- Whether the subject SRO No.833(I)/2018 issued in terms of Section 19 of Customs Act, 1969 can also be treated as SRO issued by the Ministry of Commerce in terms of Section 3 of the Import & Export Control Act, 1950, permitting import of vintage cars which are otherwise not importable as being old and used in terms of the Import Policy Order of both 2016 and 2020.
Citation:2021 PTD 2063
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Qazi Umair Ali(ADVO-17282-SBC-KHS),Shahab Imam(ADVO-19121-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1716) 2/2010 I. A Khadim Hussain & others (Appellant) V/S Gul Hassan Tiwano & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting

1717) 1432/2022 Suit SYED ABBAS RAZA (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 910
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

1718) 11/2024 M.A. Unitied Bank Limted (Appellant) V/S Dr. Farooque Adil Abbasi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Jurisdiction of consumer protection court in ATM card service disputes and appropriate compensation for delays.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 376
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1719) 198/2011 Civil Revision Abdul Majeed Kalhoro (Applicant) V/S Amjad Ali Arain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 775
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

1720) 86/2021 Cr.J.A Farooq Ahmed Korai (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

1721) 233/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Province of Sindh & others (Applicant) V/S Allah Dino Khuwaja & other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 3345
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 20-NOV-25
Approved for Reporting

1722) 5890/2018 Const. P. Ashiq Hussain Chaudhary & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (section 117), Cantonments Act 1924, Cantonments Act 1924 (section 179), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 181), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 108), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 116)
Tag Line:If at all any alteration is inevitable or the open spaces that vests with the Cantonment Board now is required, the powers and jurisdictions vests with the Board with whose consultation the desired object could be materialized and not otherwise.
Citation:2021 CLC 1437
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1026/2021 The Officer In-Charge Army Housing Directorate, Karachi v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Defense, Rawalpindi Cantt and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

1723) 2220/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Nadeem Akber (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether the recruitment rules have been notified or gazetted--whether the competent authority is empowered under the Rules, 1974, to appoint civil servants from different departments of Government of Sindh to the Inspection and Registration of Private Institutions, School Education, and Literacy Department Cadre
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 404
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Danish Rashid(ADVO-13031-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2287/2022 Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo v. Muhammad Nadeem Akber and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1724) 4962/2019 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Abro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:discrimination in service safeguarded under article 27 of the Constitution discrimination in service safeguarded under article 27 of the Constitution Petitioners be given equal treatment as given to readers of Federal Service Tribuna
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1703
Advocates:Syed Jamal Uddin Bukhari(ADVO-14803-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Syed Haider Imam(ADVO-8703-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4025/2025 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Islamabad v. Altaf Hussain Abro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1725) 4634/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Idrees and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:1. Extraneous considerations keep officials of SBCA away from illegal construction being raised by the persons. 2. If exemplary punishments are awarded to these officials, issue of illegal construction can be controlled.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 883
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1726) 746/2022 Const. P. Umeed Ali (Petitioner) V/S Deputy Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Service matters (Deceased quota)
Tag Line:It is crystal clear that the respondentrevenue department/Government of Sindh has to make recruitment to every post applied by the candidates under the law as discussed supra as well as based on invalidated or incapacitated/minority/differently-abled and deceased quota reserved for those employees by issuing appointment order by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974.
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 71
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 02-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

1727) 473/2021 Criminal Appeal SANA RIZWAN W/O RIZWAN AHMED & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1172
Advocates:Nawabuddin Shar(ADVO-17728-SBC-KHE),Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Mirza Sarfraz Ahmed(ADVO-4467-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

1728) 207/2017 I.T.R.A Citi Bank NA Karachi (Applicant) V/S The Commission Inland Revenue (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

1729) 2231/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Dawood Wagan (Petitioner) V/S The province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Amenity Plot (Allowed), Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial)
Tag Line:In the light of foregoing, we have reached the conclusion that the amenity plots cannot be converted into either commercial or residential purposes and no encroachment can be allowed on the amenity plot as discussed supra. The report of learned Commissioner is very clear in its terms that no any amenity plot was found in existence in the housing scheme during the inspection, except one open plot of about 1200 sq.ft and a mosque about 2400 sq. ft. in Kehkashan Housing Scheme and Midland Bungalow adjacent with plot No.38 and 39, therefore, the objections raised by the learned counsel for the Respondents 8 & 9 on the site inspection report are of no consequence in view of the orders passed by this Court and Honble Supreme Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

1730) 1042/2017 Suit Khalid Mehmood and others (Plaintiff) V/S M/s Multi Plus Corporation Private Limited and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLD 1737
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 21-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting

1731) 7988/2018 Const. P. Nadeem Mumtaz Baig (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Food Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 478
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

1732) 1396/2010 Suit AURANGZAIB QURESHI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S THE CHAIRMAN P.I.A & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

1733) 81/2025 R.A (Civil Revision) M/s. Sami Trading (Applicant) V/S Sardar Abdul Rehman & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2575
Advocates:Muhammad Ali(ADVO-23293-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Nadeem(ADVO-12381-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

1734) 329/2020 Suit Danish Akhtar & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Directorate of Estate Projects & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 YLR 64
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting

1735) 1151/2020 Const. P. Shamal Media Service Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Actions without ratification or validation of law will be of no legal consequences and those with validation and ratification of laws may be sustained and deemed validly enacted.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 371
Advocates:Kashif Hanif(ADVO-8551-SBC-KHI),Attorney Gen. Pakistan(),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

1736) 190/2017 Const. P. A-One Laboratories and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

1737) 562/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs (West), Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Seminar (Pvt) Ltd., Sialkot (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Invoice retrieved from consignment; assessment on such higher invoice; held YES; Section 25A(2) of the Customs Act, 1969
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 107
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 23-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

1738) 3022/2022 Const. P. Eric Ghori & another (Petitioner) V/S Learned Consumer Judge Hyd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Sindh Consumer Protection Act 2014 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 637
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

1739) 47/2017 M.A. M/s. Labbaik Pvt Ltd (Appellant) V/S PEMRA & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Tag Line:hese folds, as unfolded, could only reveal contravention on the part of the Ministry of Interior and not on the part of appellant. Security clearance no doubt is inevitable but under the present set of facts Council of Complaints would not come in picture. Rule 7(d) of Rules 2009 without any ambiguity provides a right to PEMRA to ascertain the credibility and track record of the management and the majority shareholding and management control and so also in terms of Rule 7(e) read with Rule 9(5) of 2009 Rules at inception, whereas 30(d) caters for subsequent change. It however does not include the scope of Council of Complaints in terms of Section 30(d) of the Ordinance 2002 as prima facie it relates to issues between Ministry of Interior and PEMRA.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1506/2017 PEMRA thr. Secretary to Authority, Islamabad v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd. and others,C.A.1568/2017 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) thr. Secretary to Authority v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd and others,C.P.1689/2017 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) thr. Secretary to Authority v. M/s Labbaik (Pvt.) Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of as having been Fructified,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded

1740) 664/2026 Const. P. Zia ul Hassan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:OFFENCE FALLING OUTSIDE THE NAB JURISDICTION INVESTIGATION QUASHED
Citation:2026 SHC KHI 551, 2026 SHC KHI 559
Advocates:Habib Ur Rahman Jiskani(ADVO-15384-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date:
Approved for Reporting

1741) 3606/2010 Const. P. Khayabane Saddi Rizwan Abbasi Resident Trust & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1742) 560/2025 Const. P. Reva Chand & others (Petitioner) V/S Bheem Raj & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2025 SHC MPK 2354
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

1743) 644/2015 Cr.Bail Abdul Basit (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 24-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1744) 152/2023 Criminal Appeal Asadullah & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Murder Trial (Value of further statement in the eyes of law )
Tag Line:Life Imprisonment
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 747
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.42-K/2024 Mehboob Ali v. Ashique Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1745) 852/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Osaka Electronic & Industries Co. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1105
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1746) 56/1987 Civil Revision Lt Col.(RTD) Nasim Ahmed & Others (Applicant) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 CLC 88, 2018 SBLR 2168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

1747) 110/2017 Cr.Rev SYED NASEEM AHMED S/O SYED AMEER MIAN (Applicant) V/S MST. REHANA TAJ WD/O ZAHEER UDDIN & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

1748) 35/2021 J.M MST GUL NASREEN (Applicant) V/S MRS TASNEEM & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 288
Advocates:Zahid Hussain(ADVO-4065-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

1749) 2395/2011 Const. P. M/S State Life Ins. Corp. (Petitioner) V/S Shahid Khan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 25-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1027-K/2016 M/s State Life Insurance v. Shahid Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1750) 998/2023 Const. P. Mst. Shaheen Gul (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1084
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 19-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

1751) 3519/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Faizan Amjad (Petitioner) V/S The Secretary, Board of Secondary Education Karachi, & 03 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 YLR 397
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 28-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

1752) 54/2010 II.A. Zafar Aziz Osmani (Appellant) V/S Lt. Col.(R) M. Yousuf Satti & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 SBLR Sindh 896
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.4212/2018 Muhammad Gulistan Khan v. Zafar Aziz Osmani & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

1753) 5674/2020 Const. P. M/s Spectrum Enterprises (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (section 81)
Tag Line:Sub-section 2 of Section 81 caters for a situation when the goods are allowed to be cleared or delivered on the basis of provisional determination, the amount of duty, taxes and charges correctly payable to those goods shall be determined within six months from the date of provisional determination. The time is further extendable provided the officer concerned may in the circumstances of exceptional nature and after recording such situation extends period of final determination, which shall in no case exceeds ninety days.2 Proviso to sub-section 2 provides the calculating mechanism of the period prescribed in subsection 2 of Section 81. Sub-section 3 of Section 81 provides the mechanism on completion of final determination. The amount already paid or guaranteed shall be adjusted against the amount payable on the basis of final determination and difference between the two amounts shall be paid forthwith to or by the importer as the case may be. --Indeed the Explanation in a statute/enactment does form an integral part to the extent of explaining and elaborating meaning of the word in the section3 and the purpose is to explain, clarify, add or subtract something by clarification 4, however, the word provisional assessment is neither used in sub-section 1 nor in sub-section 2. It is sub-section 1 which secured differential amount on provisional determination and not provisional assessment 5. If the interpretation of respondent is accepted then customs would never bother to determine it finally and would enjoy benefit of not doing anything after provisional release. We may observe that the respondent conceded that the cause of delay in final determination is not attributable to the importer.
Citation:2022 PTD 732, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2391
Advocates:Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Syed Asif Ali(ADVO-10999-SBC-MLR),Muhabbat Hussain Awan(ADVO-13542-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 02-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1606-K/2021 Federal of Pakistan & others v. M/s Spectrum Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1754) 1797/2022 Suit THE HUB POWER COMPANY LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S CHINA POWER HUB GENERATION COMPANY (PVT) LTD & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:I- Despite different designations there are in fact `legal similarities` attached to both the documents i.e. standard letter of credit and standby letter of credit, if compared. There may be some differences in the banking practice but are functionally similar and makes no material difference when it comes to execution and implementation. The SBLC thus has evolved as one of the kind of letter of credit and forms on independent guarantee such as performance bond/surety ship guarantee. II- While in every instance where there is a fraud there would have been a lack of bonafides as well, however, to its contrast it does not mean that in every instance where beneficiary of credit lacks bonafides there is necessarily a fraud behind it. One may be compelled to or had no choice, despite having knowledge. III- The concept of unconscionability runs the same way i.e. the concept of unconscionability involves unfairness as distinct from dishonesty or fraud or conduct of a kind so reprehensible or lacking in good faith that the court of conscience either restrain the party or refuse to assist the party. Mere breaches of contract by a party would not by themselves be unconscionable. Thus unfairness is also excluded for the concept of unconscionability to prevail.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 421, 2023 CLD 1220
Advocates:KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Choudhary Atif Rafiq(ADVO-11896-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

1755) 10/2012 J.M Mrs.Syma Mahnaz Vayani & others (Petitioner) V/S Molasses Export Company Pvt. Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: J.Ms/12(2) C.P.C (winding up petition is dismissed, unless the shares are transferred no assets of the respondent???s company shall be disposed of)
Citation:2013 SBLR Sindh 1276
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 31-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting

1756) 449/2007 Const. P. Mst. Dadli (Petitioner) V/S The Federation of Pakistan and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 27-OCT-10
Approved for Reporting

1757) 71/2011 Cr.Rev Shabir Khoso and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 64
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

1758) 1494/2008 Suit M/S.CENTURY INSURANCE CO.LTD (Plaintiff) V/S THE ASSITANT COLELCTOR (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005.
Tag Line:Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 197
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

1759) 670/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam Kalhoro (Petitioner) V/S District & Sessions Judge Larkana & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2024 SHC LAR 54
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 10-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1760) 1407/2013 Const. P. Dr. Moiinuddin Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Federal Secretary, Water and Power, Govt. of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 23-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1761) 23/2008 Execution Bankers Equity Limited & others (Decree Holder) V/S M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd. (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Banking Court while executing a decree passed under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 is entitled to adopt any procedure deemed appropriate by it to effect sale of mortgaged properties in execution of a decree. Judicial sanctity in disposing of the mortgaged property through Court auction is required to be reaffirmed. Such sanctity could only be disturbed if there is a material irregularity which leads to fraud to cause loss to any one which is not the attribution. Mere allegation that the property worth more than it was evaluated is not sufficient. Every judgment debtor, if allowed to plead the value of his property there can hardly be any auction which could be conducted. There was nothing to prevent the judgment debtor during these ten years since decree was passed in 2006 to bring a buyer of its choice who could offer a price as it (judgment debtor) desires. The Court while considering the objections of the judgment debtor has also to weigh and consider the miseries and pain undertaken by the decree holder. It is within the domain and propagative of the banking Court to adopt any of the procedure it deems fit and proper and hence this question is not of any material importance that the bid is substantially low as compared to the reserved price or forced sale price.
Citation:2017 CLD 1148
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

1762) 500/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Sauleh (Petitioner) V/S D.G NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge
Order Date: 14-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting

1763) 1913/2017 Const. P. Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Environment Law (Cutting of Trees), Sindh Local Government Act
Tag Line:Cutting of Trees (Environment): Green Belt with trees is a 'Public Trust' resource. Environmental Human Rights are in fact fundamental human rights. Plea of National Security is also justiciable. "Rational Basis Test" explained. Balance is to be struck between the policies relating to security and civil liberties. State Institutions are subject to the accountability. Judiciary in a Muslim Polity is clothed with greater obligation. Only concern council can direct the cutting of dangerous trees under paragraph 55 of Part II-Schedule II of SLGA 2013.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 697
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1764) 192/2006 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Collector of Sales Tax & Federal Excise (Applicant) V/S M/s. Hilton Pharma (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Admissibility of input tax under Section 7 on supplies which were taxable at the relevant time; held; Yes.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 183
Advocates:Abdul Rahim Lakhani(ADVO-4061-SBC-KHI),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 21-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting

1765) 426/2022 H.C.A Prof. Dr. Amir Bux Channa & Another (Appellant) V/S Isra Islamic Foundation (Guarantee) Ltd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Companies matters
Tag Line:No High Court Appeal is maintainable under Section 6(14) of the Companies Act, 2017 against a final order of a Company Judge
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 926
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

1766) 1826/2017 Suit The Stillman (Plaintiff) V/S S. M. Anees (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 815
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1767) 185/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst.Manzooran and Others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Irfan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1428
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 22-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1768) 5920/2015 Const. P. Kainat Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1627
Advocates:Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

1769) 7/2017 I. A United Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Rafiq (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Citation:2020 CLD 129
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

1770) 253/2018 Const. P. Arshad Rasool (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saniya & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2019 YLR 700
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1771) 1614/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD ZAFEER SIDDIQUI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 563
Advocates:Abdul Qayyum Khan Abbasi(ADVO-7342-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

1772) 1608/2015 Const. P. Nizamuddin Kolachi V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Petitioner) V/S V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
whether the Petitioner can challenge his show cause notice, non- inclusion of his name in Upper School Course in a Constitution Petition
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-19
Approved for Reporting

1773) 2365/2021 Cr.Bail BASHEER AHMED S/O ABDUL WADOOD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.665/2021 of PS Ittehad Town, Karachi registered under Section 23(i) A of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1098
Advocates:Aamir Haroon(ADVO-19016-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1774) 39/2007 Civil Revision Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 22-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

1775) 171/2010 Civil Revision Abdul Haleem and an other (Applicant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer and an other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

1776) 690/2022 Const. P. Nazar Muhammad Jamali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 827
Advocates:Mohammad Arif(ADVO-4057-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Faizan(ADVO-16322-SBC-KHE),Deputy Attorney General(),Muddasir Iqbal(ADVO-12980-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1777) 307/2019 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Hassan Narejo & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 2163
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 28-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

1778) 142/2012 Suit DOLLAR INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD. & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S KAMRAN AKHLAQ (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 405
Advocates:Muhammad Azeem(ADVO-8715-SBC-KHI),Kazim Raza Abbasi(ADVO-12253-SBC-KHI),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1779) 171/2023 Const. P. M/S Shahbaz Flour & Rice Mills (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Sindh Food stuffs (Control) Act, 1958 (Additional Punishment by Authority)
Tag Line:Punishment in addition to what has been prescribed by law is unconstitutional
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1202
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3001/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others v. M/s Shahbaz Flour & Rice Mills through its Lessee Mr. Ghulam Ali Kamboh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (-) Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi,J

1780) 4335/2018 Const. P. Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Doctrine of Constructive Res-judicata)
Tag Line:we are of the view that this Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot interfere in the findings recorded by the competent authority of respondent-PTCL vide decision dated 25.07.2017 as we do not see any illegality, infirmity or material irregularity in its decision warranting interference of this Court.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 638
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi(ADVO-12809-SBC-KHE),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed

1781) 235/2017 H.C.A Saeeduddin Qureshi & others (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Bushra Qureshi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.867-K/2018 Saeeduddin Qureshi and others v. Mrs. Bushra Qureshi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1782) 291/2017 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Orient Electronics (Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Govt. of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 23-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1783) 197/2015 Const. P. Interman Trading FZE (Petitioner) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLC 1
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 06-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

1784) 7558/2021 Const. P. M/s Abid Nisar International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 615
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Abbas(ADVO-13908-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.769-K/2022 M/s. Abida Nisar International v. Collector of Customs & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1785) 2707/2019 Const. P. Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to award him incentive of timescale i.e. BPS-17 to BPS-19, from the date of his entitlement; and, other ancillary benefits, to bring him at par with the employees of other departments of Government of Sindh--whether the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of the timescale from BPS-17 to BPS-19 under the law or otherwise.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 992
Advocates:Soofia Saeed(ADVO-3712-SBC-KHI),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

1786) 145/2018 H.C.A Cantonment Board Clifton (Appellant) V/S Nadim Ahmed Ansari (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (Section 273-Notice of Suits)
Tag Line:Section 273 of the Cantonments Act requiring a notice to be given to CBC before filing a suit against CBC is not unfettered and unqualified. A suit for either declaration or injunctions, etc., are well-regulated under the said provision so long as the civil action is in pursuance of the Act. NAA Consulting Engineers had filed a suit against CBC for compensation for services rendered to CBC which was not in pursuance to the Act. Those civil actions beyond the Act's parameters could not be eclipsed by the bar on suits under Section 273. In the circumstances, Section 273 was not applicable. The In-house Counsel of CBC stepped into the witness box. kept responding to questions put to him in the cross-examination, claiming a lack of awareness of NAA's documents exhibited, including his own documents. In the circumstances, he accepted NAA Consulting Engineers claim against CBC. Appeal allowed and Judgment and Decree confirmed.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1000
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Rehmat -un- Nissa(ADVO-9852-SBC-KHI),Aman Aftab(ADVO-18333-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.6-K/2024 Cantonment Board Clifton through CEO v. Nadeem Ahmad Ansari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1787) 230/1993 Const. P. Faiz Mohammad Palari (Petitioner) V/S Member (L.U.) B.O.R. & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 19-SEP-11
Approved for Reporting

1788) 701/2007 Suit UMAR GUL AGA & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S S.M.SHOIB BAGHPATI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Muhammad Salim Thepdawal(ADVO-3099-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Idrees Sukhera(ADVO-4696-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shahid Qadeer(ADVO-7509-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting

1789) 1505/2000 Suit MST. SAFIA BEGUM. (Plaintiff) V/S D.M.C. KARACHI (SOUTH) & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Advocates:Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin(ADVO-3032-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-16
Approved for Reporting

1790) 8/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Additional Collectof of Customs (Applicant) V/S K. S. Sulemanji Esmailji & Sons (Private) Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 1276
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 22-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.799/2015 Additional Collector of Customs v. M/s K.S. Sulemanji Esmailji & Sons (Pvt) Ltd.,C.P.182-K/2015 Additional Collector of Customs v. M/s K.S. Sulemanji Esmailji & Sons (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted

1791) 25/2012 II.A. Sikandar Ali (Appellant) V/S Abdullah & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Delay in payment of Court Fee)
Tag Line:(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ---O. XXIII, R. 1(3) & 0. II, R.2---Withdrawal of suit---Fresh suit, institution of---Scope---Suit was decreed by the Trial Court but same was dismissed by the Appellate Court being barred under O.II, R.2, C.P.C.---Validity---Plaintiff was precluded from filing another suit after withdrawl of earlier suit on same "cause of action", on same "subject matter" and against the same defendant without permission to institute a fresh one-Provisions of O.XXIII, R.1(3) and O.II, R.2, C.P.C. were complementary to each other to control the litigation after litigation between the same parties on the same subject matter. Ghulam Nabi and others v. Seth Muhammad Yakoob and others PLD 1983 SC 344; Muhammad Suleman v. Ehsan Ali PLD 1983 Kar. 537; State Life Insurance of Pakistan v. Mst. Zainab Khatoon and others PLD 1987 SC AJ&K 5; Manzoor Hussain v. Rasool Bukhsh 1991 CLC 640; Qazi Shamas-ur-Rehman and another v. Mst. Chaman Dasta and others 2004 SCMR 1798 and Siddique Khan and 2 others v. Abdul Shakur Khan and another PLD 1984 SC 289 ref. Muhammad Suleman v. Ehsan Ali PLD 1983 Kar. 537; State Life Insurance of Pakistan v. Mst. Zainab Khatoon and others PLD 1987 SC AJ&K 5; Manzoor Hussain v. Rasool Bukhsh 1991 CLC 640; Qazi Shamas-ur-Rehman and another v. Mst. Chaman Dasta and others 2004 SCMR 1798 and Siddique Khan and 2 others v. Abdul Shakur Khan and another PLD 1984 SC 289 rel. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 99---Appeal---Court fee, non-payment of---Effect---Ministerial staff of court was bound to point out non-payment of court fee and if such had been done then appellant could pay the same to avoid dismissal of appeal on account of non-payment of court fee---If such objection had been raised by the Appellate Court only then appellant could have been penalized---Jurisdiction of Appellate Court was not disputed to entertain the appeal, therefore order passed thereon was not affected adversely on account of non-payment of court fee---Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court were protected by the provision of S.99, C.P.C. despite the fact that no court fee on the appeal was paid---Appellate Court had no power to set aside the judgment and decree on the ground of error or irregularity which had not affected the merits of the case or jurisdiction of the court---Non??payment of court fee was mere irregularity which could be corrected at any time and such irregularity had not rendered the impugned order void or without jurisdiction---Appellant (respondent) had not refused to pay the court fee and High Court could not non-suit him on the ground of filing first appeal without court fee---No punitive action could be taken against the appellant (respondent) without recourse to the provision of O. VII, R.11, C.P.C.---High Court could call upon the appellant (respondent) to pay the court fee---Appellant (respondent) was directed to deposit/pay the requisite court fee in the High Court within a specified period to rectify the irregularity occurred on account of non-payment of court fee before the first Appellate Court.
Citation:2015 PLD 155
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 09-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

1792) 829/2018 Const. P. Rasheed Ahmed @ Abdul Rasheed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line: In pursuance of the report submitted by Mukhtiarkar (Revenue) Ghotki, one Muhammad Umar was found to have occupied the subject piece of 00-09 ghuntas to which these petitioners do not claim. They only claim that this piece of land, which is claimed by respondent No.4, is part and parcel of the village and as such the villagers have right over the land. This is not a public interest litigation as the petitioners were defendants in the suit and contested on their own right as being in occupation. The petitioners have not been able to show any right or title over the land in question. The orders, which they have impugned, may have been passed beyond jurisdiction but the approach of the petitioners is mala fide and the hands are tainted. They have not approached the Court with clean hands. Muhammad Umar, who was found to be in possession, was claimed to be the brother of the petitioners and this fact was not denied, and he has not been made party in these proceedings purposely. This is not difficult to ascertain as to why he has not been arrayed as one of the petitioners.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 17-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.714-K/2018 M/s Sessi United Staff Union Sindh (CBA) and another v. The Registrar Trade Unions and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1793) 129/2017 H.C.A Nooruddin & others (Appellant) V/S M/s. S.I.T.E. Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Question of Local/territorial jurisdiction under section 21 ), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Tag Line:So Section 21 CPC has its own comprehensive jurisprudence which could overview the original court`s proceedings. The ibid section is primarily for appellate/revisional court where an appeal is preferred apparently by the appellant defending the suit but one must not be misled by such language. The language is couched in such a way that for appellant, who defended the suit, some restrictions were imposed, before enabling the appellate court to take cognizance. It has, however, provided a legal frame for the trial court considering the nature of jurisdiction being objected. **Lack of territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction becomes a mere irregularity at a later stage, if not taken at the earliest which does not make a decree nullity and in fact if taken belatedly and successfully may lead to a failure of justice. ***The two jurisdictions of the appellate court have been established to have acted lawfully i.e. (i). In the first instance where on account of procedural illegality or irregularity, identified above for [a] & [b] kinds of jurisdiction not by way of inherent lack of jurisdiction, a litigant plaintiff is ousted and (ii). In a case of lack of inherent jurisdiction, the court continue to proceed with the matter which may have resulted in the failure of justice. For both these limbs, the appellate jurisdiction is available
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1416
Advocates:Shahid Ali(ADVO-9536-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Zamir Khan(ADVO-3889-SBC-KHI),Mushtaq Ahmed A. Memon(ADVO-1988-SBC-KHS),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 11-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1794) 1662/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Uris and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1795) 292/2016 Criminal Appeal BILAL HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD HANAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha
Order Date: 10-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1796) 569/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Rasoom Bhagat (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting

1797) 846/2015 Const. P. CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Bar of Jurisdiction )
Citation:2019 CLC 1444
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-APR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Cancelled Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed.

1798) 966/2009 Const. P. Wali Muhammad Khoso & another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973. Article 19 --- freedom of expression --- Article 19 does not give constitutional protection to a defamatory utterance nor the right to exercise freedom of speech and expression is exempted from the liability of libel and slander --- legal relief against such an abuse --- appropriate remedy under the ordinary law is always available to person aggrieved --- petitioners have failed to refer to any specific statement that has been aired and published by Respondents No.4 to 8 in their respective programmes --- petition dismissed in limine.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 31-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting

1799) 1918/2015 Suit Mrs. Gulnar & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S K.M.C., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

1800) 4789/2020 Const. P. Khizar Hayat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether the petitioner can challenge the show cause notice issued against him and his suspension order in a Constitution Petition?--We are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, a final decision against the petitioner has yet to be taken by the respondent- Police Department and he has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the said proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 364
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

1801) 4449/2021 Const. P. Pakistan Stock Brokers Association (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Stock Exchange Ltd and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Securities Act, 2015 (PSX Regulations Futures Eligibity Criteria)
Tag Line:When SECP introduced an amendment to the Futures Eligibility Criteria (FEC) of the PSX Regulations proposed by PSX, it could not have directed PSX to proceed straightaway to publish the amended Regulations in the Official Gazette without subjecting SECP's amendments to the process mandated by the Legislature, i.e. to have such amended Regulations placed before the public. Hence, the amended Regulations pertaining to the Futures Market (both DFC & CSF) are declared illegal. Even otherwise, SECP's proposed Criteria 4(i) of the FEC providing that even if a company obtains a stay order against an inquiry/investigation of the Commission, such stay order will not make the securities of such company on the Futures Market eligible to trade inspite of the Court's stay order is held to be unconstitutional. Petition allowed.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 499
Advocates:Jam Asif Mehmood Lar(ADVO-10595-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Raja Qasit Nawaz Khan(ADVO-3457-SBC-KHE),Gohar Mehmood(ADVO-15953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

1802) 24/2019 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. M/s. Attari Traders (Applicant) V/S Appellate Tribunal SRB Karachi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 (doctrine of the exhaustion of rights after first sale)
Tag Line:The foregoing position of law makes it clear in our minds that the nature of transaction of sale/purchase of goods between the manufacturer and the applicant established through the agreement/appointment letter aims to propel a service performed by the applicant which could rightly fall under the head of supply chain management/ distribution (including delivery) service, hence attracts the provisions of the 2011 Act, and the Tribunal did not misinterpreted or misapplied the relevant tariff heading 9845.0000 to the case of the applicant. Resultantly Question Nos. I and II are answered in Affirmative and the Question No. III is answered in Negative.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1425
Advocates:Shahid Iqbal Rana(ADVO-27398-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1803) 1290/2010 Suit SYED HABIB HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) V/S SYED HUSSAIN KHURSHEED BILGRAMI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Proof of possession of gifted property. Elements of Benami.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 690
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

1804) 1100/2023 Suit M/S AA QUALITY BUILDERS (Plaintiff) V/S CHINA HEBEI RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CHGL) & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Amendment of Pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 to amend plaint to make it maintainable.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 520
Advocates:Sufiyan Zaman(ADVO-15548-SBC-KHS),Atir Aqeel Ansari(ADVO-21844-SBC-KHS),Aman Aftab(ADVO-18333-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ajmal Khan(ADVO-10273-SBC-KHI),Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1805) 97/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous SYED USMAN HABIB (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2589
Advocates:Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 26-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

1806) 357/2012 Cr.Bail Khuda Bukhsh and 4 others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting

1807) 4291/2015 Const. P. Syeda Sakina Riaz (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2018 SCMR 1272
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 13-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1189/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.P.L.A.343-K/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted. Relist after 3 months

1808) 5058/2019 Const. P. M/s Liberty Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Arshad Hussain(ADVO-12906-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 16-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

1809) 1636/2024 Const. P. Ali Ahmed Turabi Advocate (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:10. In the instant matter, petitioner is not an aggrieved person. No action of Government was either proposed for him or against him. None of his legal right, whatsoever, has been violated. The amendment to Section 2(c) of the Decoration Act, 1975, appears constitutionally valid. The broadened definition of "gallantry" aligns with constitutional provisions and established legal principles, supported by definitions from renowned dictionaries. Judicial precedents emphasize the presumption of constitutionality, the burden of proof on petitioners, and the judiciary's role in enforcing existing rights rather than creating new ones. Additionally, the petitioner lacks locus standi and hasn't demonstrated a violation of legal rights. Therefore, the petition challenging the constitutionality of the amendment is not found maintainable. 11. In view of the above facts and observations made by the Honorable Supreme Court as well as High Court in various cases, instant petition is bereft of any merit stands dismissed in limine. Above are the reasons of our short order dated 02.04.2024.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1321
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

1810) 45/2012 Cr.Appeal Saeed Ahmed Solangi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1811) 265/2024 Const. P. Suraj Cotton Mills Ltd and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 414
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),KHALID ANWER & CO. ( A. K. BROHI ).(FIRM-157-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Hashmatullah Alim(ADVO-11063-SBC-KHE),Laiq Ahmed(ADVO-15955-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 27-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3410/2024 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited, Karachi v. Suraj Cotton Mills Ltd, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1812) 1789/2022 Suit ARIF HASSAN ALI HASHWANI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S SADRUDDIN HASHWANI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:If a litigant is entitled to more than one relief in respect of same cause of action, as indeed, in the instant case, he has to sue for all or he may sue for any of the relief he may opt but the leftover would count as an omission to sue. Since provisions of Order II rule 2 CPC are penal in nature it would preclude a litigant to sue for a portion of claim or remedy so ignored or omitted. The plaintiffs have ignored and omitted to sue for all the claims and reliefs to which they were entitled with regard to a cause of action that is "breach of trust" and hence are precluded to have a next round of litigation on the original cause of action. Plaintiff can only ignore any of the matured relief at the risk of treating them as relinquished or ignored one
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 75
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

1813) 240/2005 Const. P. M/S Fahad Construction Co (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

1814) 3292/2012 Const. P. Asif Abbasi V/S NED University & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S Asif Abbasi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.632-K/2018 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi,C.A.135-K/2019 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed

1815) 4612/2018 Const. P. M/S Saiban International (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 07-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

1816) 4666/2013 Const. P. Afaq A. Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Chief Secretary and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1817) 92/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Azhar Ali Khan and Others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ali and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 789
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting

1818) 2352/2012 Const. P. Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) V/S Special Judge Customs & Taxation & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 42
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting

1819) 317/2018 H.C.A Mussawar Ali (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: H.C.A (Maintainability of the Suit)
Citation:2019 CLC 1670
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1820) 2165/2012 Const. P. M/s. Naushero Feroz-I CNG Station (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 2198, 2019 SBLR 346
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1119-K/2018 M/s Naushehro Feroze-1, CNG Station v. Federation of Pakistan thr Secy: M/o Petroleum and Natural Resoures and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1821) 3977/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Azhar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 288
Advocates:Shahenshah Hussain(ADVO-315-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.280-K/2022 Muhammad Azhar v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Law & Justice & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1822) 2999/2021 Suit CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OFFICERS ASSOC. & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:it is inconceivable that under the ibid repealed Ordinances, which were never in fact acted upon, plaintiffs could exert for the transfer of the employees/officers of the two divisions to their respective authorities. The law that stood prior to the repeal of the ordinances under consideration revived and the two authorities are now deemed to be working under the common umbrella of Ordinance 1982 as were earlier.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 232
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

1823) 145/2023 Suit JDW Sugar Mills Limited & others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Injunction Granted. ), Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950
Tag Line:Now this debate is not concluding here to benefit any party to whom quota was allocated or would be allocated following above understanding of policy, but the end beneficiary is the federal government as the policy ensured prompt foreign exchange in about 45 days of opening of Letter of Credit. We need to understand that the subject matter is of such a magnitude that it requires immediate and conclusive attention of Court. Cane commissioner misunderstood when he applied his wisdom without following the limitations that they are under. Federal government is also equally responsible in not assisting this Court and clarifying the intent of policy to the cane commissioner as adjudged above. Politics should not invade policy matter meant for public interest in a way that fundamental and secured legal rights of citizen would get prejudiced. This case seems to be one of those, unfortunately. Thus, not being an ordinary situation I not only inclined to grant injunction restraining cane commissioner to act in such manner and distribute quota arbitrarily, but would expect prompt makeup for the losses by adhering to the above conclusion drawn by this Court, as far as sugar mills quota is concerned i.e. distribution on performance based i.e. sugar crushed and/or sugar produced which is the only justified formula provided by federal government when policy was made and applied. Since it is time bound issue and since sugar has its best use if consumed in two years' time, it is expected that cane commissioner would respond and submit reallocation within two weeks from date of this order
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 348, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1355
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

1824) 35/2013 H.C.A Karachi Fisheries Harbour Authority (Appellant) V/S Hussain PVT Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 MLD 1037
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 21-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

1825) 882/2003 Const. P. Tanveer Hidayatullah Hashmi and another (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Fozia Naheed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 15-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting

1826) 1836/2018 Const. P. Shoukat Hayat Awan (Petitioner) V/S A.I.G and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1827) 5370/2024 Const. P. Abid Khan and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Khalid v. National Accountability Bureau (2017 SCMR 1340) has provided certain guidelines which need to be adhered to by the F.I.A. while probing the cases against the Housing Societies. 6. This Court, while exercising discretionary power under Article 199, of the Constitution is not an appellate court. Especially when alternative remedies exist under specific statutes and rules, and when the Court???s discretionary powers remain unaffected. However, in the present case question is whether F.I.A. has jurisdiction in Provincial employee cases in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of F.I.A. Vs Syed Hamid Ali Shah
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1100
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5367/2024 Abid Khan and others v. The Federation of Pakistan through its Interior Secretary, Ministry of Interior Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1828) 3993/2011 Const. P. M/S Akhter Textile Industries Ltd. (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal at Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLC Lab. 319
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 13-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting

1829) 1444/2019 Cr.Bail SYED MUHAMMAD WAQAR HAIDER NAQVI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 08-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

1830) 1480/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Saleh & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

1831) 126/2021 Criminal Appeal ISLAM SHAH S/O SYED KAMAL SHAH & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Tag Line:It is observed that the mere heinousness of the charge and recovery of a huge quantity of the alleged contraband is no ground to convict the accused. The prosecution is under a bounden responsibility to drive home the charge by proving each limb of its case that essentially included the production of the witness tasked with the responsibility of keeping the narcotic in safe custody and safely transmitting the samples to the office of the Chemical Examiner. Failure to do so is fatal to the prosecution case.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 805
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor Coastguard(ADVO-SpPCostG-KHI),Mir Hidayatullah Khan(ADVO-535-SBC-SGR),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE),Raheel Uddin(ADVO-9576-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

1832) 38/2020 Const. P. Administrator Evacuee Trust property & Others (Petitioner) V/S Pardeep Kumar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 895
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 24-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

1833) 78/2022 Const. P. Mazhar ALi Rajper (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:1. The Court directs the Sindh Government to fully implement the Sindh Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2018, by creating a PWD Fund and launching a Special Employment Exchange and Portal in every district. 2. All public and private bodies must identify and register eligible PWDs, report their total workforce and PWD representation within two months, and fill the five-percent quota.3. Where qualified PWD candidates cannot be placed, establishments must remit the equivalent salary into the PWD Fund. 4. Merit-based standards for competitive positions remain unchanged, ensuring fairness alongside affirmative action.
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2032, 2025 SHC SUK 2034, 2025 SHC SUK 2035, 2025 SHC SUK 2036, 2025 SHC SUK 2037
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

1834) 92/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. WAQAS AZAM S/O MUHAMMAD AZAM (Appellant) V/S THE TATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Conviction under Section 21-L of the Anti Terrorism Act, 1997. Set-aside. Cannot be maintained on the basis of a mere statement recorded before framing of the Charge.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 251
Advocates:Anjli(ADVO-17350-SBC-KHS),Mohamamd Riaz Abbasi(ADVO-4521-SBC-KHI),Zahoor Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10377-SBC-KHI),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting

1835) 127/2009 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & another (Appellant) V/S Naya Daur Motors (Pvt) Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLD 312
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.121-K/2014 Collector of Customs v. M/s Naya Daur Motor Pvt. Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1836) 1202/2005 Suit MRS.TARANUM SABIH (Plaintiff) V/S KBCA & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 673
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

1837) 11/2010 Suit MST.ZARINA (Plaintiff) V/S ZAKAULLAH KHAN & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 216
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-21540-SBC-KHS),Deedam Gul Pathani(ADVO-21643-SBC-KHS),Amir Maqsood(ADVO-6412-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Janan(ADVO-3463-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1838) 39/2010 II.A. M/s. Habib Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. State Life Insurance Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 10-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

1839) 3/2019 Suit Amsons Textile Mills (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:res judicata in suit after decision in constitution petition.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 388
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

1840) 842/2020 Const. P. Adeela Saeed Sheikh D/o Hafiz Muhammad Saeed Sheik (Petitioner) V/S Saad Mahmood Sherani and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Mother filed 491 CRPC dismissed By ADJ ,High Court Sat aside and Ordered to hand over custody to mother .)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1363
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

1841) 10/1994 I.T.C M/S.Cotton Export Coproation of Pakistan (Applicant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance 1979
Tag Line:Subsidy paid by the Government for offsetting losses incurred by Cotton Export Corporation is income; hence, taxable.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1078
Advocates:Faheem Ali(ADVO-16513-SBC-KHS),Iqbal Salman Pasha(ADVO-3176-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Altaf(ADVO-7751-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Iqbal Naim Pasha(ADVO-594-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Taseer Khan(ADVO-6931-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 28-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4865/2024 M/s Cotton Export Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. The Commissioner of Income Tax Companies III, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of. Referred to ADR

1842) 229/2022 Cr.Misc. DR. SHEHZAD NASIM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 729
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-23
Approved for Reporting

1843) 264/2011 Cr.Misc. Hussain Bux Dal and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Khan Ghumro and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:the sufficient material was not available before the Judicial Magistrate as well as before the revisional Court to handover the custody of the buffaloes to the respondents only on the basis of the enquiry report by disregarding the fact that these respondents did not bother to make hue and cry for about one and a half year and all of a sudden when these buffaloes were recovered or discovered, they lodged F.I.R to take advantage. It is yet to be determined as to how they got such information and who gave them such information of these buffaloes being seized. This needs further expert enquiry and investigation.
Citation:2015 PCr.LJ 813
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 29-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting

1844) 1114/2011 Suit Imtiaz Ali Effendi (Plaintiff) V/S Ali MUhammad Effendi and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 26-FEB-16
Approved for Reporting

1845) 5839/2015 Const. P. Arshad Noor Khan (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 360
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

1846) 212/2019 Criminal Appeal Parvaiz (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
1200 grams of charas appeal allowed
Tag Line:1200 grams of charas appeal allowed
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1966
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

1847) 787/2020 Const. P. Dr. Mubeenuddin & others (Petitioner) V/S Khurram Shahzad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1435
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

1848) 1711/2020 Suit Fazal Mehmood (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:stay application Application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 Application under Section 39 Rule 4 R/w section 151 CPC filed by Defendant No. 9 and 10
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 186
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1849) 938/2018 Suit Shan Foods (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Sales Tax Act 1990 - Schedule VI - Exemption of Sales Tax on -Iodised Salt - held - Yes: Injunction granted - Suit decreed.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1850) 111/2004 H.C.A Muhammad Aslam V/S M/s.Colony Sarhad Textile Mills Ltd (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Aslam V/S M/s.Colony Sarhad Textile Mills Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 24-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.158-K/2011 Muhammad Aslam v. M/s Colony Sarhad Textile Mills limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1851) 54/2010 I. A Province of Sindh & Ors (Appellant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:(a) Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894)--- ----S. 18---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.79---Land acquisition---Reference to court, rejection of---Appeal---Limitation---Void order---Reference to court was rejected on the ground that beneficiary of acquisition had no right to file a reference or appeal---Validity---Referee Court refused to entertain the reference filed by the beneficiary of the award under the misconception of law---Impugned order was without jurisdiction---Jurisdiction vested in the Referee Court had not been exercised properly---Reference was maintainable in circumstances---Bar of limitation was not applicable to the appeal as impugned order was void ab initio and nullity---Beneficiary of acquisition could file a reference or appeal if he was a party before the Referee Court---Reference was not hit by S.79, C.P.C.---Case was remanded to the Referee Court for deciding the same in accordance with law within a specified period---Appeal was allowed in circumstances. BP Pakistan Exploration and Production v. Sher Ali Khawaja PLD 2008 SC 400 and Water and Power Development Authority v. Ghulam Shabbir 2009 SCMR 1051 ref. Land Acquisition Collector v. Muhammad Nawaz PLD 2010 SC 745; Land Acquisition Collector v. Sarfaraz Khan PLD 2001 SC 514; and Sherbano v. Kamil Muhammad Khan PLD 2012 Sindh 293 rel. (b) Limitation--- ----No limitation would run against the void order.
Citation:2016 CLC 1047
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 28-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1852) 4397/2024 Const. P. Shamsher Khan & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2632
Advocates:Yawer Farooqui(ADVO-3590-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhabat Ali(ADVO-20630-SBC-KHS),Asad Ali(ADVO-15949-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

1853) 2591/2016 Const. P. Dr. Zubeda Altaf (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 24-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting

1854) 4290/2014 Const. P. Faizan Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S D.G NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 10-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting

1855) 223/2014 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Nawaz Jhatiyal (Applicant) V/S SHO PS Nasirabad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 30-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1856) 1150/2014 Const. P. MEHMOOD ALI (Petitioner) V/S MST. SAIMA KANWAL & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (Family Laws)
Tag Line:(a) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)--- ----Ss. 10, 12, 14(2)(b) & 17---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Suit for dissolution of marriage and recovery of dower---Appeal---Limitation---Condonation of delay---Pre-trial proceedings---Scope---Payment of dower amount---Stage of determination---Powers of Family Court---Scope---Petitioner/ wife filed suit against respondent/husband, in which Family Court, on failure of reconciliation in pre-trial stage, while granting Khula, also settled issue of payment of dower on oath taken by the wife that she had not received dower amount---Husband challenged order of Family Court to the extent of settlement as to payment of dower amount contending that the Court had no jurisdiction to settle the issue regarding payment of dower amount in pre-trial proceedings---Wife challenged maintainability of constitutional petition contending that dower amount settled between parties was rupees fifty thousand and after settlement of issue of dower amount by Family Court, the order regarding dower amount was to be challenged through appeal in terms of S.14(2)(b) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964---Validity---Powers of Family Court in terms of Ss.10(2) & 10(3) read with S.17 of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 were not limited to any particular stage of proceedings for settlement of any "ascertained issue" between the parties---Mere use of word "pre-trial" would not mean trial had not started---Court had jurisdiction to decide the issue of dower amount at pre-trial stage---Dower amount was admittedly rupees fifty thousand and husband in his written statement had specifically stated to have the same paid to the wife in shape of ornaments and claimed the same to be in her possession---Order as to dower amount was appealable in terms of S.14(2)(b) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964---Husband had challenged the impugned order through constitutional petition under bona fide belief that the order passed in pre-trial was in nature of preliminary decree and the same was not appealable---Constitutional petition had been filed within a period in which husband could have assailed the impugned order through appeal---Husband in approaching court through constitutional jurisdiction could not be termed mala fide---Court in such like situation, could convert petition into appeal or revision, or appeal into petition, subject to limitation---Constitutional petition was not maintainable---Husband was allowed to file appeal within fifteen days and time consumed in constitutional proceedings was condoned---Constitutional petition was disposed off accordingly.
Citation:2015 CLC 1306
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 24-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

1857) 1317/2021 Cr.Bail INTEKHAB ALAM QURESHI S/O MUHAMMAD YOUNUS QURESHI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:seeking pre-arrest bail in F.I.R No. 432 of 2021, for an offense under section 489-F P.P.C at Liaquatabad Police Station, Karachi
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 504
Advocates:Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Khan Jalbani(ADVO-17147-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Sharif Buriro(ADVO-17608-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1858) 638/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Bilal Metals (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Frustrated cargo; section 138 of the Customs Act; Customs Tribunal has no jurisdiction in such cases.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 227
Advocates:Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Khalilullah Jakhro(ADVO-19697-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 13-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

1859) 90/2004 Suit MRS.ANJUM ARA (Plaintiff) V/S SHABBIR A.HALAI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2050
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

1860) 1233/2020 Const. P. Inayat Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 862
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 03-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1861) 2194/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Anwer and others (Petitioner) V/S Fouji Foundation Model School & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2085
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

1862) 3299/2016 Const. P. Bacho Leghari (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 24-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

1863) 3028/2014 Const. P. Digicom Trading (Pvt) Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PTD 648
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 29-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1864) 3216/2021 Const. P. Badar Expro Solution (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1106
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Zayna Nazir Khan(ADVO-18780-SBC-KHS),Javeed Akhtar Rind(ADVO-9495-SBC-KHI),Syed Abrar Ahmed Bukhari(ADVO-3063-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

1865) 47/2011 Cr.J.A Ghulam Sarwar Maitlo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.634/2018 Ghulam Sarwar Maitlo v. The State,Crl.A.331/2022 Ghulam Sarwar Maitlo v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Partly Allowed

1866) 4326/2012 Const. P. P.T.C.L (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

1867) 45/2019 J.M Al-Habib Coop: Housing Society Ltd (Applicant) V/S Mrs. Shamim Barlas & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Where the plaintiff/applicant establishes fraud, the defendant benefitting from the fraud and opposing the application of section 18, Limitation Act, must show that the plaintiff had clear and definite prior knowledge of the facts constituting the particular fraud and not merely clues or hints of the fraud, failing which limitation will run only from the date of actual knowledge of the fraud.
Citation:2021 YLR 141
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

1868) 78/2017 I. A Mohammad Moazam Khan (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Iqbal & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1869) 966/2008 I.T.R.A M/s. Dewan Farooque Motors (Ltd.) (Applicant) V/S Comm. of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 28-MAR-11
Approved for Reporting

1870) 4/2018 Adm. Suit SELAT MARINE SERVICES CO. LLC (Plaintiff) V/S M.V. BOFORS & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Admiralty (Attachment before Judgment in Admiralty law)
Tag Line:Admiralty Jurisdiction - Mode of action in Rem and in personam - Arrrest of Ship and Sister ship - what is an "offending ship" - Arrest of Vessel under Rule 731 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S) read with Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC.
Citation:2019 PLD Sindh 533
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

1871) 4972/2023 Const. P. Shamim Ahmed & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 25-A)
Tag Line: No interim relief or provisional release can be granted by this Court when assessment has been made on Valuation Ruling under Section 25A of the Customs Act
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1134
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 31-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1407/2024 Shamim Ahmed and another v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary (Revenue)/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR House, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned. Early date

1872) 1202/2021 Const. P. Aftab Alam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:SESSI
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 609
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.586-K/2021 Sindh Employees Social Security Institution v. Aftab Alam & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1873) 1066/2015 Cr.Bail Abdul Wajid alias Wajid Pathan (Applicant) V/S The (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 15-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

1874) 6/2019 Cr.Acctt.A Faisal (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 19-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

1875) 754/2016 Cr.Bail SHERAZ S/O ALI BHAI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 02-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

1876) 1228/2023 Const. P. Bisman Noreen (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 557
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.790-K/2023 Bisma Noreen v. MInistry of Interior Government of Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1877) 923/2023 Cr.Bail Bilal Ghori (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 646
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1878) 1409/2001 Suit TRADING CORP. OF PAK. PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. COX & KING AGENTS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

1879) 613/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PLC CS 797
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 25-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3796/2021 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited through its M.D., Karachi and others v. Salma Memon and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1880) 612/2023 Spl.Cr.Misc USMAN BAJWA S/O JAWED A. BAJWA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE &ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Separate trials of special offences by Special Courts does not attract bar of double jeopardy.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 778
Advocates:Spl.Prosecutor Customs(SpPCus),Muhammad Sarfraz Ali Metlo(ADVO-11638-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Ashiq Ali Anwar(ADVO-2754-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1364/2024 Usman Bajwa v. The State through D.A.G. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

1881) 405/2017 Cr.Bail Ashraf Barach & Another (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 21-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1882) 37/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Mithal (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

1883) 1033/2017 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed Baqai and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Service matters ( annual increment awarded after move-over)
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 678
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 18-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.885-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Secretary, Education & Literacy Department Government of Sindh & others v. Nazeer Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1884) 291/2014 Const. P. Syed Mujahid Rasool & 2 others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & 4 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 26-FEB-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.123-K/2014 Syed Mujahid Rasool and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1885) 42/2016 H.C.A Mst. Rani (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Internationial Airline Corporation & anor (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1886) 21/2012 Judicial Companies Misc. King?s Food (Pvt.) Ltd. and Hilal Confectionery (Pvt.) Ltd.a (Applicant) V/S Nonw (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 07-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting

1887) 128/2024 M.A. Asim Iqbal S/o Iqbal Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Mateen Sadiq and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In light of what has been held above, the instant appeal is allowed within no order as to costs. The matter is remanded back to the learned trial Court who is further directed to conclude the proceedings in the above-mentioned suit within a period of six (06) months from today.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 60
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1888) 5300/2020 Const. P. Rasheed Alam (Petitioner) V/S Dr. Qadeer Muhammad Ali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:We are also cognizant of the fact that the invocation of the writ of Mandamus under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been restricted to enforce the terms and conditions of non-statutory rules of service of government-owned and controlled organizations. However, the petitioner's case involves the enforcement of the university's service rules. The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that one of the respondents has retired from service as pointed out by the counsel for the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 146
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Muhammad Yousuf Chohan(ADVO-3371-SBC-KHI),Dr. Tahir Rasheed(ADVO-4392-SBC-KHI),Shoaib Mohiuddin Ashraf(ADVO-4396-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

1889) 7084/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ateeq and others (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Shafiq and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

1890) 40/2006 R.A (Civil Revision) Khadim Hussain and an others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ibrahim and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Sale of property covered by Section 19 of the Colonization Act, 1910. Parties can enter into such sale and there is no legal bar however, the same can only be a deferred sale, specific performance of which was postponed to a date when the grantees had acquired the proprietary rights
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 578
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1891) 949/2022 Const. P. Pakistan Medical Commission (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 57
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.719-K/2022 Jinnah Sindh Medical University & another v. Pakistan Medical Commission & others,C.P.L.A.718-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. Pakistan Medical Commission & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of

1892) 5062/2020 Const. P. Engr: Muharram Khan and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether the private respondents are undertaking the work of professional engineers in terms of the Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975, being Diploma Holders. And whether their case falls within the ambit of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maula Bux Shaikh supra or otherwise.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 283
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Jhamat(ADVO-14-SBC-HYD),Deputy Attorney General(),Abdul Aziz(ADVO-20687-SBC-KHS),Asif Ali Jokhio(ADVO-14779-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

1893) 42/2007 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Bux and others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Burden of proof. Articles 117 and 119, Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1361
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1894) 5144/2015 Const. P. Dr. Altaf Hussain and Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:they have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments/services be regularized in respondent-Water and Power Development Authority (`WAPDA`) without discrimination, with a further assertion that they have already served in WAPDA for a considerable period and they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis rather than joining fresh process with other candidates--
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 732
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1519-K/2021 WAPDA through its Director Legal & others v. Dr.Haresh Kumar & others,C.P.L.A.1580/2022 Water and Power Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Lahore & others v. Dr. Altaf Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed/No Intereference

1895) 1817/2014 Cr.Bail Sikandar Ali Lashari S/o Ali Muhammad (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 15-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.9-K/2015 Hunain Tarique v. The State and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1896) 438/2012 Suit Farid Virani & another (Plaintiff) V/S Feroz Virani (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Citation:2013 PLD Sindh 386
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 20-MAR-13
Approved for Reporting

1897) 1410/2013 Suit Toyoshima & Co. limited (Plaintiff) V/S Shadman Cotton mills limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Territorial jurisdiction of Sindh High Court was questioned by Defendant, primarily on the ground that Defendant-Company has been shifted from Karachi to Lahore, therefore, a foreign company / Plaintiff cannot enforce an International Arbitral Award by filing a suit in Sindh High Court. The crucial documentary evidence shows that when the suit proceeding was filed for enforcement of the Award under Section 6 of the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, the Defendant had its registered office in Karachi and even Annual Report of the Company also shows that the Management notice for convening the Annual General Meeting was also to be held at Karachi. Consequently, it has been held, that Sindh High Court has jurisdiction in the matter.
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Territorial Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:Territorial jurisdiction of Sindh High Court was questioned by Defendant, primarily on the ground that Defendant-Company has been shifted from Karachi to Lahore, therefore, a foreign company / Plaintiff cannot enforce an International Arbitral Award by filing a suit in Sindh High Court. The crucial documentary evidence shows that when the suit proceeding was filed for enforcement of the Award under Section 6 of the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, the Defendant had its registered office in Karachi and even Annual Report of the Company also shows that the Management notice for convening the Annual General Meeting was also to be held at Karachi. Consequently, it has been held, that Sindh High Court has jurisdiction in the matter.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

1898) 4187/2023 Const. P. Aurangzaib Khan Bangash (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Abida & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1491
Advocates:Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHC),Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHS),Shah Jehan(ADVO-4580-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 19-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1899) 6026/2018 Const. P. Shoukat Hussain Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S The Stae thr Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Lastly, we may observe that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but the only tentative assessment is required, and a cursory glance of the record show that all the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connivance with each other have caused huge loss to the Government exchequer, therefore, the pre-arrest bail of petitioners Sabah-ul-Islam, Muhammad Waseem, Roshan Ali Shaikh, Fazal-ur-Rehman, Ahmed Ali, Farrukh Jamal Siddiqui, Nadeem Qadir Khokhar and Sohail Yar Khan is recalled with imidiate effect, their petitions are dismissed.
Topic: NAB (Post arrest bail granted , on the ground, hardship and 56 witnesses have examined , accused are in Custody since 2 years )
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.486-K/2020 Sabah-ul-Islam Khan & another v. The Chairman NAB Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

1900) 1106/2014 Suit Habib University Foundation (Plaintiff) V/S Mecatch (Pvt.) Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

1901) 82/2021 II.A. Sohail Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Ghulam ali Murtaza & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 18
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.650-K/2025 Sohail Ahmed v. Ghulam Ali Murtaza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1902) 6095/2021 Const. P. Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Belated challenge to seniority, rested upon pre contractual employment antecedents of a regularized employee.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 900
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 30-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1202-K/2022 Capt. Muhammad Ali Khan v. Port Qasim Authority through its Chairman Port Qasim & others,C.A.112-K/2024 Capt. Muhammad Ali Khan v. Port Qasim Authority through its Chairman Port Qasim & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ For Next Session -- Before 3-HJJ ],

1903) 3478/2018 Const. P. Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment.
Topic: Service matters (Counting of previous service for pension)
Tag Line:the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1172
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1661/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Bashir Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1904) 8477/2019 Const. P. Stafford Miller (Ireland) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S M/s ZNS Auto Corp & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 386
Advocates:Masooda Siraj(ADVO-3949-SBC-KHC),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI),Mumtaz Khan(ADVO-6377-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 06-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

1905) 5102/2021 Const. P. Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Given the petitioner's retirement in 2021, this court find it unnecessary to refer the case back to the Selection Board (SB) in 2025. Besides the current legal framework does not recognize pro forma promotion for retired public servants. Without a legal basis, this court cannot compel the CAA to take an action impermissible by law. Guidance on this matter can be found in the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Secretary Ministry of Finance, Finance Division, Government of Pakistan Versus Muhammad Anwer (2025 SCMR 153), National Bank of Pakistan through its President Versus Sajjad Ali Khaskhelli and another (2024 PLC (CS) 276), and Inspector General of Police Punjab versus Waris Ali (2024 SCMR 1109). 10. Based on the aforementioned discussion and keeping in view the legal position of the case, we find no merit in this petition that justifies intervention by this Court. Consequently, the Constitution Petition and any pending applications are dismissed.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1735
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-13137-SBC-KHS),Noor Nabi(ADVO-19386-SBC-KHC),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1906) 6540/2019 Const. P. SICPA SA (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 MLD 2049
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.361-K/2020 SICPA SA v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1907) 2495/2014 Suit Javed Akhtar Chauhan (Plaintiff) V/S Mumtaz Ali & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 19-NOV-15
Approved for Reporting

1908) 3437/2010 Const. P. Asif Chamdia (Petitioner) V/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 CLC 114
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

1909) 2322/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Umair (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969, Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules 2019 , Pakistan Plant Quarantine Act, 1976
Tag Line:The customs officials have only held the goods and have not passed an order as required under section 17 of Customs Act, 1969 that whether on account of such deviation and in the light of Methyl Bromide test/fumigation having been performed and certificate of physical inspection having been issued by the Department of Plant Protection whether the subject consignment could be subjected to the detention, seizure, confiscation or could be subjected to the fine/ penalty only or otherwise.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1843
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ishaque Pirzada(ADVO-4443-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad
Order Date: 05-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1910) 131/1986 Civil Revision Khanzada Siddi Yakoob and others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1842
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

1911) 2393/2019 Const. P. Manzar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.430-K/2019 Federal Board of Revenue thr. its Chairman v. Manzar Hussain & others,C.P.L.A.484-K/2019 Amer Rashid Shaikh v. Manzar Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

1912) 248/2021 Const. P. Azizullah Panhwar (Petitioner) V/S Ali Nawaz Panhwar and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Jurisdiction of Encroachment Tribunal.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 62
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 24-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

1913) 829/1999 I.T.A. M/s.N.D.F.C. (Appellant) V/S Comm Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 374
Advocates:Mazahr Elahi Jafari(ADVO-1920-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jamil(ADVO-2525-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zubair Hashmi(ADVO-12273-SBC-KHS),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

1914) 4976/2020 Const. P. Naseer Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Petitioner has called in question the rejection of his candidature for the post of District Public Prosecutor (BS-19) in Law Department, Government of Sindh vide letter dated 18.10.2019 issued by Sindh Public Service Commission Hyderabad (SPSC) on the analogy that he did not possess ten (10) years' experience as an Advocate of High Court ---In our view, the submission of respondents will be counterproductive and would prevent good Advocates from accepting appointments in civil service if this analogy persists. The second limb of the argument of the respondents is that once an Advocate is appointed as a Law Officer in any department of the Government of Sindh, he cannot be appointed to the post of District Public Prosecutor has to be ruled out for the understanding that it does not appeal to logic--We, therefore, hold that ten (10) years' service experience includes a period of serving as a law officer, which counts active practice at the bar which petitioner possesses and therefore is qualified to appear for the subject test for the position of District Public Prosecutor--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of SPSC is directed to allow the petitioner to appear in the subject interview and after conducting his interview announce the result accordingly within two (02) weeks from today.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 535
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

1915) 211/2018 H.C.A Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (Appellant) V/S M/s. Gillani (Pvt) Ltd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 251
Advocates:Abdur Razzaq(ADVO-11476-SBC-KHI),QAMAR ABBAS & CO.(FIRM-124-SBC-KHI),Faheem Shah(ADVO-14407-SBC-KHE),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1916) 65/2018 Cr.J.A Himat Gul Pathan & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned Judgment, appeal dismissed . Narcotics case. )
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 225
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 20-APR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.820/2022 Himat Gul S/o Muhammad Anwar Khan and another v. The State through P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1917) 100/2022 Cr.Rev ASKARI BANK LIMITED (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:It is settled law that when the criminal charges depend on the outcome of the civil cases, proceeding with the criminal case before the civil cases are resolved could potentially harm the accused. Additionally, the amount owed, which is a crucial element in the criminal case, can only be determined in the civil court, and the criminal court is divested from such determination. 19. To establish criminal liability under these sections, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the accused has defaulted on a financial obligation to the bank and has failed to repay the amount due. The specific nature of the breached obligations and representations would need to be examined to determine whether they directly relate to the accused's financial obligations to the bank and whether they constitute a criminal offense under the FIO. Mere breach of a contract or civil obligation, without more, may not necessarily constitute a criminal offense. The prosecution would need to prove that the accused's actions were intentional, dishonest, or fraudulent and that caused significant financial loss to the bank. Additionally, the bank cannot unilaterally determine the amount owed and initiate criminal proceedings as such a proper judicial process is necessary to establish liability and debt amount before criminal charges can be pursued.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1066
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHS),Furqan Ahmed Siddiqui(ADVO-19117-SBC-KHS),Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui(ADVO-2269-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.16-K/2025 Askari Bank Limited v. Muhammad Farooq Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1918) 18/2014 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Shan Khatoon and others (Applicant) V/S Haji Ghulam Hussain and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1146
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

1919) 1/2018 Election Appeal Allah Bux Khan (Appellant) V/S Mukhtiar Ahmed Sahto (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

1920) 891/2017 Suit Karim Sayani (Plaintiff) V/S Almina Pardhan (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Family matter ( Marriage dissolved in the settlement and indenture of Mubarat. compromise application is allowed. )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting

1921) 6378/2016 Const. P. Mst. Fatima Begum (Petitioner) V/S Bashir Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 09-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

1922) 1309/2024 Const. P. Manahil Imran and Another Thr. Imran Latif (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Sadiq Khurshid and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Scheme of the law envisioned under Sections 7 and 19 of the Guardian & Ward Act, 1890.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1832
Advocates:Shazia Nazir(ADVO-22572-SBC-KHE),Aadil Channa(ADVO-20822-SBC-KHS),Irfan Bashir Bhutta(ADVO-14755-SBC-KHI),Rehan Kayani(ADVO-12724-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 07-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

1923) 395/2016 H.C.A Jamshoro Joint Venture Limited (Appellant) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

1924) 7684/2019 Const. P. H.D.A (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Labour
Tag Line:1. writ petition, ordinarily, not maintainable against concurrent findings of two forums below. 2. Work charged employees of Hyderabad Development Authority can approach Labor Court for regularisation and back benefits
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 10
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Syed Jamal Uddin Bukhari(ADVO-14803-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1107-K/2022 Hyderabad Development Authority v. Moiz Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1925) 6291/2021 Const. P. Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 398
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1926) 46/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) EDO Roads Kashmore @ Kandhkot & others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Hafeez Chachar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Moulding of relief )
Tag Line:The courts can mould the relief within the scope of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ("C.P.C."), and are empowered to grant such relief as the justice may demand in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Citation:2023 SHC LAR 852
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

1927) 4597/2019 Const. P. Rizwan Tahir & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 571
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.765-K/2022 The University of Karachi through its Registrar v. Province of Sindh through the Education Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1928) 1757/2009 Const. P. Qaiser Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting

1929) 771/2004 Const. P. Capt. S. M . Asllam (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Building Control Authority & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:When the application was made in the year 2003, the Resolution No.383 dated 06.01.2004 was in the field. Commercialization charges /fees as applicable in the year 2004 should be charged.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 316
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Manzoor Ahmed(ADVO-2423-SBC-KHI),In Person(INP),Syed Jamil Ahmed.(ADVO-3431-B-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 12-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1657-K/2021 Captain S.M.Aslam v. Sindh Master Plan Authority Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Next Session)

1930) 237/2018 Cr.Acq.A. GHULAM MUJTABA S/O LATE ABDUL AZIZ (Appellant) V/S SYED HASSAN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 182---False information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person---Appeal against acquittal---"Aggrieved person"---Scope---Station House Officer (SHO) requested the trial court for prosecution of respondent under S. 182, P.P.C. on the ground that he had furnished false information for lodgment of first information report (FIR) under Ss. 506 and 34, P.P.C. read with S. 25 of Telegraph Act, 1885---Trial court acquitted the respondent of the charge---Validity---Appellant, nominated accused in earlier FIR, could not be aggrieved by the decision of the Magistrate on the complaint under S. 182, P.P.C. filed by public servant---Section 182, P.P.C. did not refer to any private person and it related "to cause public servant to use his power" and in case such information was found false then such public servant could initiate proceedings---Appellant was not a public servant nor the alleged false information was given to him---Right of appeal on the orders passed by Magistrate did not lie with the nominated accused for the reason that an appeal was continuity of original proceedings and admittedly the proceedings were not initiated by the appellant---Appeal against acquittal was dismissed. Khuwaja Muhammad Waseem v. Syed Jalees Anjum and others 2018 PCr.LJ 1230 rel. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ---S. 182---False information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person---Scope--- Proceedings under S. 182, P.P.C. are not a remedy of any humiliation or insult suffered by the accused nominated in the false information given by the complainant to the Incharge Police Station.
Citation:2019 MLD 1994
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

1931) 1257/2014 Cr.Bail Naveed (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

1932) 2817/2023 Const. P. Humanitas Education Services (Pvt) Ltd & Another (Petitioner) V/S SBCA (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Illegal commercial activity on residential property. Complete ban on change of use of land.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 396
Advocates:Khursheed Javed(ADVO-8182-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Mujtaba Sohail Raja(ADVO-65496-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

1933) 949/2022 Const. P. Pakistan Medical Commission (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:"MDCAT" ADDITIONAL NOTE
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 552
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.719-K/2022 Jinnah Sindh Medical University & another v. Pakistan Medical Commission & others,C.P.L.A.718-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. Pakistan Medical Commission & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of

1934) 805/2021 Const. P. Project Implementation Managers Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 517
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Sara Malkani(ADVO-15404-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2412/2023 Tehreem Muneeba v. Governor of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

1935) 2/2009 Conf.Case Ref. made by 3rd ADJ-South (Appellant) V/S None (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 21-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting

1936) 433/2022 Const. P. Mir Muhammad Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Grievance Notice can be sent in form of appeal, representation or review. Company can initiate disciplinary proceedings against employee within one month, wrong entry of date of birth in a proforma does not amount to misconduct.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1594
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2660/2025 Managing Director, Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGCL), Karachi and others v. Mir Muhammad Brohi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Notice) to contesting Respondent. Early date

1937) 103/2021 Cr.Tran Akhtiar Ali Solangi (Appellant) V/S Qamar-uridin Solangi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Transfer Application is allowed. Counter case issue
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 506
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 01-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

1938) 68/2024 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Saleem (Appellant) V/S Meraj ud Din and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2024 SHC MPK 1118
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting

1939) 22/2014 I.T.R.A M/S AP MOllar Marersk (Applicant) V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PTD 1614, 2021 PTCL 285
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.560-K/2019 Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-IV, Karachi v. M/s A.P. Moller Maersk Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1940) 159/2010 Suit.B Deutsche Bank AG (Plaintiff) V/S Fateh Textile Mills Limited (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-JUL-16
Approved for Reporting

1941) 672/2015 Const. P. Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S IIIrd Additional Session Judge SBA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2018 YLR 261
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1942) 253/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous TAHIR IQBAL KHAN & ANTOHER (Applicant) V/S XITH CJ/JM KARACHI EAST & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 496
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Aftab Ahmed Shar(ADVO-16408-SBC-KHE),Nawabuddin Shar(ADVO-17728-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

1943) 48/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Gahi @ Gada Hussain Samtio and others (Applicant) V/S Shaman Samtio and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Section 11 C.P.C enunciates that once a court has conclusively adjudicated an issue, it cannot be re-litigated in a subsequent suit
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 63
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

1944) 217/2024 Const. P. Mehboob Ali Channa (Petitioner) V/S District & Sessions Judge, Larkana & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Inheritable right to employment in the judicial establishment; Per-incuriam?; Contempt of Court notice to Registrar High Court."
Citation:2024 SHC LAR 5, 2025 SHC LAR 1705
Advocates:Abdul Rehman Bhutto(ADVO-430-SBC-LAR),Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(ADVO-545-SBC-LRK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1945) 85/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD AMEER S/O MOMIN KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 146
Advocates:Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

1946) 325/2016 H.C.A Pakistan Defence Officers (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Akram Qureshi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 728
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1358/2024 Muhammad Akram Qureshi (decd.) thr. L.Rs & another v. Pakistan Defence Officer's Housing Authority, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1947) 410/2025 Const. P. Anwer Zaib (Petitioner) V/S M/s Rasheed Fabrics (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984
Tag Line:The Article 162 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984
Citation:2025 SBLR Sindh 897
Advocates:Inayat Hussain Shah(ADVO-10288-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

1948) 211/2017 Cr.Bail SALMAN ABRO S/O GHULAM SARWAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ilyas Khan(ADVO-1410-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 18-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.829/2017 Salman Abro v. The State thr. P.G, Sindh,Crl.A.267/2017 Dhani Bux v. The State thr. P.G, Sindh,Crl.P.L.A.684/2017 Dhani Bux v. The State thr. P.G, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

1949) 1572/2010 Suit Zahid Hussain (Plaintiff) V/S United Bank Limited & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 MLD 1369
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 16-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

1950) 21/2021 First Appeal Against Order Muhammad Irfan son of Abdul Ghani (Appellant) V/S The Province of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 483
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

1951) 5578/2023 Const. P. Nutrico Morinaga Pvt Ltd &Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Child Nutrition Act,2023
Tag Line: Article 116 of the Constitution' Governor cannot retain a Bill beyond 10 days; either has to return it with objections, and if not, there shall be "deemed assent" and will become an ACT of the Provincial Assembly.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 57
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 21-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.370/2025 Nutrico Morinaga (Private) Limited, Karachi and others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1952) 747/2019 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD RAMZAN S/O KARIM BUX (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ---Ss. 320, 107 & 114---Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965), Ss. 3 & 5---Qatl-i-khata by rash or negligent driving--- Abetment--- Scope--- Abettor present when offence is committed---Prohibition on driving without licence---Scope---Accused, while driving a water tanker, hit an unknown lady who received injuries and expired on the spot---Driving licence of accused was found to be fake and bogus---Investigating Officer of the case was required to have included the owner of the vehicle in investigation as co-accused for allowing the vehicle to be driven by a person who was not holding a valid driving licence or whose licence was not genuine---Owner of the vehicle was an abettor in terms of S.107, P.P.C. and his case fell under S.114, P.P.C.---Investigating Officer was directed to take action against owner of the vehicle and the prosecution was directed to expeditiously complete the trial against the owner as co-accused---Appeal was adjourned pending action against the owner of the vehicle. Atta Muhammad v. The State 2005 PCr.LJ 1648 rel.
Citation:2021 YLR 409
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

1953) 727/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Zahid Ali Company (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 337
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

1954) 99/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous Sikandar Ali Lund (Applicant) V/S DSP complaint Cell N/Feroze and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 1766
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1955) 106/2017 Criminal Miscelleneous Arshad Mehmood and other (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-JUL-17
Approved for Reporting

1956) 2157/2019 Const. P. Kashmir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1916
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

1957) 412/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director, D. G., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyderabad. (Applicant) V/S Liaquat Ali and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line: 2nd Proviso to Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, is not applicable retrospectively. Vehicles used in smuggling with false cavities and extra tanks cannot be released on payment of redemption fine.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 378
Advocates:Asim Muneer Bajwa(ADVO-3939-SBC-KHI),Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Pervez Ahmed Memon(ADVO-8069-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.214-K/2024 Liaquat Ali v. Director, Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

1958) 1634/2009 Suit Mst. Humera Jabeen & Ors (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Arshad & Ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Principles of recusals of a Judge.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 907
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

1959) 756/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Graveyard case
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 823
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.927-K/2025 Muhammad Ashraf & others v. Proince of Sindh through its Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1960) 2954/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 23
Advocates:Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.715-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Usman Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

1961) 1429/2015 Suit DEWAN STEEL MILLS. (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1962) 1027/2015 Suit Shapes (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Cantonment Board Clifton and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 12-JUN-17
Approved for Reporting

1963) 1683/2017 Suit OPI Gas (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S United Energy Pakistan Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (International Arbitration Law Act 2011)
Tag Line:(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 18---Sale purchase agreements---Creation of vested rights---"Freedom of trade"---Scope---Plaintiff sought to establish a vested right to be the sole supplier of LPG manufactured by defendants and sought to restrain the defendants from allowing any third-party to make such supply---Contention of plaintiff, inter alia, was that it had made a huge investment to enable such supply which had created a vested right in its favour---Validity----Investment of plaintiff had not created any vested right in its favour as the LPG itself belonged to the defendants prior to sale purchase contract between the parties and also upon termination of said contract---Huge investment in the business by a trader could not be considered as an investment to acquire any rights whatsoever in the product/property which was owned by the other contracting party beyond the limited extent incorporated in the written sale / purchase agreement---Plaintiff could also not interfere in the defendants' freedom of trade guaranteed by Article 18 of the Constitution---Suit was dismissed, in circumstances. 1994 CLC 728; Chitty on Contract (13th edition) page 56-57 from Volume.1 General Principles; AIR 1978 SC 798; AIR 2006 SC 40; Bank Alfalah Ltd. v. NEU Multiplex and Entertainment Square Company (Pvt.) Ltd. 2015 YLR 2141; Royal Foreign Company v. The Civil Aviation Authority and another 1998 CLC 374; Messrs World Wide Trading Co. v. Sanyo Electric Trading Co. Ltd. and another PLD 1986 Kar. 234 and Messrs Universal Business Equipment (Pvt.) Ltd., v. Messrs Kokusai Commerce Inc. and others 1995 MLD 384 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VI, Rr. 2 & 4---Pleadings generally---Practice of counsel/lawyers placing on record several documents which such counsel/lawyer did not even refer to during course of arguments or otherwise and such documents were not part of their own record needed in support of their pleadings---High Court observed that such practice was due to the reason that counsel/lawyer/ wanted to give an impression to the court that the case filed by them was an important one requiring immediate attention; which practice was against the basic principles of pleadings to be filed in court under O.VI, C.P.C. wherein emphasis of law makers/legislature was on "material facts" and "effect of material documents" in pleadings.
Citation:2018 CLC 279
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting

1964) 2829/2010 Const. P. M/s.Iqbal & Sons (Petitioner) V/S CDGK through DCO & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
No rule is prescribed under Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010, whereby on rejection of a tender to the lowest bidder, the second lowest bidder can be considered as the successful bidder on the same terms but the same states that negotiations with the bidder are not permissible in terms of Rule 52 and 83 of the Sindh Public Procurement Rules 2010. It is trite principle of law that a public functionary while performing function under the law, rule and regulation, is required to adhere to such law, rule and regulation in its letter and spirit. The discretion vested in a public functionary is to be exercised strictly in accordance with law in a reasonable and transparent manner and not under a colorful exercise of authority. Though, while exercising constitutional jurisdiction, there is no absolute bar in entertaining the grievances of the aggrieved person against the orders or actions of public functionaries, however, such discretion is to be exercised rarely in cases where there is some jurisdictional error or gross violation of law and the alternate remedy is not considered to be efficacious under the facts and circumstances of the case. Detailed principle as per rules explained. In such circumstances, the case is remanded back to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and the relevant rules and dispose of the same within a period of seven days after providing proper opportunity to the petitioner and if the petitioner still fails to justify his claim he may avail the alternate remedy before the forum provided in terms of Rule 31 of Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010, whereafter the petitioner may avail any other remedy as available to him under the facts and circumstances of the case. The instant petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed applications.
Tag Line:Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 16-NOV-10
Approved for Reporting

1965) 388/2014 Spl.Cr.Misc LAJPAT S/O PAROMAL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH D.A.G (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Application under section 561-A CrPC for quashing investigation of FIR, not maintainable.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 758
Advocates:Darvesh Mandhan(ADVO-10700-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

1966) 4610/2018 Const. P. Inamuddin Marwat (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 03-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1967) 1904/2014 Const. P. Fotile Kitchen & Home Appliances (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 1580
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 13-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting

1968) 1346/2012 Const. P. M/s M.R Industires (Petitioner) V/S The Sindh Employees & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PLC Lab. 72
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Rasool Memon
Order Date: 12-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.234-K/2014 M/s M.R. Industries through its Managing Partner v. The Sindh Employees Social Security Institution and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1969) 2748/2009 Const. P. Malir Development Authority (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Humayon Khan
Order Date: 21-APR-17
Approved for Reporting

1970) 982/2008 Suit Muhammad Ali Shaikh (Plaintiff) V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 YLR 444
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 21-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting

1971) 88/2021 M.A. Iqbal Javed & Others (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1162
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

1972) 1057/2018 Const. P. Board of Secondary Education (Petitioner) V/S Provincial Ombudsman Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 1531
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

1973) 465/2018 H.C.A Murtaza Baig & others (Appellant) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Tag Line:The impugned order is only an interlocutory order and the main application under section 12(2) CPC is pending. The elections of the society pending since last more than six years i.e. ever since this appeal is filed and pending. It is therefore in the interest of the Society itself that the elections be held at the earliest with the inclusion of these applicants of application under section 12(2) CPC, identified as respondents in the instant appeal.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 793
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 26-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.302-K/2024 P.I.D.C Employees Multipurpose & another v. Province of Sindh &Y others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

1974) 13/2012 II.A. Mohammad Ashfaq & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mohammad Haroon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-6927-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ramzan Tabassum(ADVO-7688-SBC-KHI),Abdul Ghaffar Kalwar(ADVO-10009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

1975) 1602/2002 Suit Adnan Abid (Plaintiff) V/S Munaf Attara and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

1976) 3190/2011 Const. P. mran Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 474
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 11-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

1977) 451/2019 Cr.Acq.A. GHULAM ALI S/O DAD MUHAMMAD MAGSI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal Procedure Code (Acquittal Appeal )
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 436
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

1978) 443/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Director DG I&I (Customs) (Applicant) V/S Nasir ul Haq & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 PTD 1193
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4070/2021 Nasir-ul-Haq v. Director, Directorate of Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

1979) 20/2018 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Sharif and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 24-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1013/2019 Muhammad Sharif S/o Khuda Nazar Pathan & another v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh,Crl.A.183/2022 Muhammad Sharif S/o Khuda Nazar Pathan & another v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed

1980) 67/2007 H.C.A Muhammad Hussain Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Mrs Mumtaz Muzakkir & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.352-K/2019 Muhammad Faisal and another v. Mrs. Mumtaz Muzakkir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

1981) -52/2016 Suit Allahdino & Others.. (Plaintiff) V/S H.H Shaikh Zaid Bin ultan Al-Nahyan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

1982) 991/2021 Const. P. Mst. Fatima Zehra D/o Zahid Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Sheroz and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 12 G&W Interim Custody Modified. )
Tag Line:The learned Civil & Family Judge shall fix any two days in a month for the meeting of father-respondent No.1 with the minor baby Dua, and in the meanwhile, petitioner-mother shall not take away the custody of minor out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights i.e. Birthdays, Eid occasions, and summer and winter vacations and arrangements shall be made by the learned Family Court upon filing appropriate application by the respondent-father and the learned Family Court would be at liberty to pass appropriate order on such application concerning the date, time and place of meeting of minor with respondent-father, however, that arrangement is subject to the observation made by this Court as discussed in the preceding paragraph and also subject to payment of maintenance of the minor, which has already been done by the learned Family Court.
Citation:2022 MLD 1506
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Raheel(ADVO-15925-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ishaque @ Sathi M. Ishaq(ADVO-3650-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

1983) 940/2016 Const. P. Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) V/S Dr. Nizamuddin Ghori and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

1984) 249/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Kashif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 275
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

1985) 1434/2015 Suit Zahid Shakeel & others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

1986) 10/2009 I. A Syed Itrat Hussain Rizvi (Appellant) V/S M/s. Tameer Micro Finance & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
Tag Line:The appellant through present first appeal has challenged the Judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Karachi (Central), in a summary chapter suit filed by respondent No.1 for recovery its amount against the appellant. In this case Section 3(2) of Microfinance Institution Ordinance 2001 and Order XXXVII of CPC were discussed. It was considered that in a summary suit under Order XXXVII of CPC, in which summons have been issued in Form No.4 Appendix B, the defendant is not entitled to appear or defend the suit as a matter of course unless he obtains leave from the Court so to appear and defend. In default of his obtaining such leave for his appearance and defence in pursuance thereof the allegations in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted and the plaintiff shall be entitled to a decree. Section 3(2) of Microfinance Institution Ordinance 2001, was examined and it was observed that the Banking Companies Ordinance and any law for the time being in force relating to banking companies or financial institutions shall not apply to microfinance institutions licensed under the Ordinance. And microfinance institutions shall not be deemed to be a banking company for the purposes of the said ordinance
Citation:2018 CLD 116
Advocates:Agha Muhammad Saleem Raza(ADVO-7105-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting

1987) 114/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD ADEEL AKHTAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Disposal of FIR under B Class)
Tag Line:A bare perusal of the afore-quoted provision of law makes it clear that whenever an overt act is materialized and ended into an overt act, the provision of Section 506(ii) PPC would not be applicable and the only provision that will remain in the field is the overt act, which is committed in consequence of criminal intimidation. On the aforesaid proposition, I am guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rana Muhammad Imran Nasarullah Vs. The State 2022 SCMR 1946. However, in the present case, the complainant simply stated that the accused came to his house and on the pointation of a pistol extended threats of dire consequences, intimidated him to sign a divorce deed and other documents, and left such house after intimidation However the subject act was no materialized and ended into an overt act for the investigating officer opined that no such incident ever took place and the complainant had falsely roped the accused in the case.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 118
Advocates:Sajid(ADVO-14482-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1988) 8756/2018 Const. P. Jawed Qureshi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the petitioner has assailed the vires of the office order No.42/2018 issued by respondent-Employees Old-age Benefits Institution (`EOBI`), whereby he was declared as Dead wood, consequently, he was forcibly sent on Early Retirement from the service of EOBI on the ground that his further retention in service would be of no benefit for the institution.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 672
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4249/2021 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another,C.A.49/2024 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed

1989) 1367/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD NAVEED ZAMEER S/O ZAMEERUDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Tag Line:The questions involved in the present proceedings is whether the cheques in question given for surety purpose could be dishonoured, entailing the punishment under Section 489-F P.P.C. and whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 906
Advocates:Muhammad Ishtiaque(ADVO-1512-SBC-HYD),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

1990) 79/2002 Cr.S.M.Rev State (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ayub (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Mr. Justice Khalid Ali Z. Qazi
Order Date: 23-JUN-08
Approved for Reporting

1991) 255/2019 Const. P. Mst Iffat & another (Petitioner) V/S Umar Farooque & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Family matter (CP dismissed with Cost . Maintenance of minor and her mother till iddat Period is Maintained. )
Tag Line:Family Matter. Filing of a Constitutional petition under Article 199 against concurrent findings of family court and Appellate Court. Not a matter of right and cannot be heard and decided as an appeal as in that case it would make such jurisdiction indistinguishable from the Appellate Court's jurisdiction which is not the intention of the Constitution makers.
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 422
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

1992) 184/2023 Cr.Rev MST. IRAJ JAWAID W/O JAWAID (Applicant) V/S RAM LAL & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1451
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ayoub Chaniho(ADVO-15383-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

1993) 5732/2024 Const. P. Trade Smart Securities Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S SECP and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Arbitration Law (Judicial review not maintainable)
Tag Line:No judicial review is made out against the Pakistan Stock Exchange under Article 199(1)(a)(ii) of the 1973 Constitution when an arbitration is ongoing and PSX has not done any act or proceeding in connection with the functions and affairs of the Federal Government
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 276
Advocates:Muhammad Asad Ashfaq Tola(ADVO-17101-SBC-KHS),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE),Zoha Sirhindi(ADVO-13544-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

1994) 977/2019 Const. P. Public Interest Law Association of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Bomb Detector Khoji case
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

1995) 162/2021 Const. P. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the respondent-university as well suggestion of Secretary Universities and Board to the competent authority for the appointment of Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University as discussed supra was without lawful authority; and, we do not appreciate the conduct of the respondents in the manner they have dealt with the matter of appointment of the Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University, in bypassing the senior professor working in grade 22 and got recommended the private respondents for the said position in violation of the principle of natural justice and seniority, which is a universal principle. It is well-settled law that if a civil/public servant is appointed in violation of any provision of law, the competent authority can look into the matter---Coming to the next point that interest of the petitioner is also being agitated in the petition, suffice it to say when we have found that every action of the respondents dubious to propose the competent authority, the names of the shortlisted candidates, in a cursory manner, thus prima facie the competent authority was not properly appraised on the subject issue, therefore, the matter needs to be looked into by the competent authority afresh, keeping in view the seniority-cum merit principle as law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court on the subject and take a fresh decision to appoint Dean of Faculty of Science of respondent-university.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 998
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1547-K/2021 Dr.Nasira Khatoon v. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

1996) 17/2018 E.P Mir Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 415
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

1997) 4657/2023 Const. P. Ubaidullah Qazi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Absorption contrary to section 11A Civil Servants Act. Writ issued.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 545
Advocates:Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-19967-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Syed Shoa-un-Nabi(ADVO-2865HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 04-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

1998) 743/2018 Const. P. Ali Sher Shanbani (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 13-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

1999) 181/2012 Cr.Appeal Ashraf (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

2000) 5623/2023 Const. P. Fatima Quaid (Petitioner) V/S Principal S.M. Govt. Law College & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 309
Advocates:Khurram Lakhani(ADVO-12563-SBC-KHI),Raafia Rizwana(ADVO-6950-SBC-KHI),Yusuf Moulvi(ADVO-4051-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

2001) 8542/2018 Const. P. Sukkur Beverages (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLD 110
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

2002) 463/2021 Criminal Appeal HAJI KHAN S/O SHAH WALI KHAN & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 380
Advocates:Raja Babar Hamid(ADVO-40313-PBC-LHR),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

2003) 1197/2025 Cr.Bail AZMAT HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI S/O SHARAFAT HUSSAIN SIDDIQ (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2585
Advocates:Mushtaq Ahmed(ADVO-10705-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Ayoub Chaniho(ADVO-15383-SBC-KHS),Syed Hassan Ali Khalid(ADVO-21897-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2004) 8/2023 Suit Syed Tahir Imam Rizvi (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 734
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Sarmad Hani(ADVO-14089-SBC-KHI),Zarar Qadir(ADVO-282-SBC-JMS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

2005) 2187/2015 Const. P. Dr. Asha Bai (Petitioner) V/S Chairman KPT and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

2006) 102/2011 Suit Muhammad Akram Solangi and others (Petitioner) V/S D.C.O, Khairpur and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 09-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting

2007) 3580/2014 Const. P. Humair Altaf (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 06-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

2008) 29/2010 I. A Mansoor Khalil (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Moizuddin & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1535
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 29-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.150-K/2015 Modarba Al-Mali v. Mansoor Khalil and another,C.A.149-K/2015 Muhammad Moizuddin v. Mansoor Khalil and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed [Both Allowed],Disposed Allowed [Both Allowed]

2009) 972/2014 Const. P. Dr. Shabbir Hussain Hyderi (Petitioner) V/S Syed Rizwan Hussain Rizvi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 07-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

2010) 108/2012 H.C.A P.T.C.L & another (Appellant) V/S Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLC CS 510
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.313/2018 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others,C.A.416/2022 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed

2011) 854/2023 Const. P. Mst. Lily Nadeem and Others (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ, Karachi West and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Christian marriage Judicial Separation
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1048
Advocates:Mirza Saleem Akhtar(ADVO-7001-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Ayaz Kandhro(ADVO-20686-SBC-KHS),Saddam Bhutto(ADVO-19398-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

2012) 555/2019 Criminal Appeal MUSHTAQUE AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 134
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

2013) 46/2007 Cr.Rev Muhammad Haroon.. (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 497(5) & 561-A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 489-F & 420---Bail, cancellation of---Condonation as to appearance of accused during pendency of application for cancellation of bail---Inherent powers of High Court---Scope---Pre-arrest bail granted to accused was conditionally confirmed by Court of Session on basis of compromise between the parties, subject to payment of the amount mentioned in the dishonoured cheque in monthly instalments---Accused failed to make payments, on which the complainant filed application for cancellation of bail---Accused, instead of appearing before the court, filed application for condonation of his appearance for an indefinite period on medical grounds, which was dismissed by the court---In the garb of impugned order the accused had challenged the maintainability of the cancellation application---Question of jurisdiction had to be first raised before the Court, which had granted the bail---Grounds which had not been taken by the accused before the trial court, could not be examined by the High Court in exercise of inherent powers under S. 561-A, Cr.P.C. to interfere with the proceedings of the court below, as the same would amount to usurpation of power of the lower court---Accused, in such circumstances, before violating the bail order, should have filed application before the same court for modification of said order or breach of any undertaking by the complainant---Accused was guilty of violating the undertaking given by him before the court below for obtaining order of confirmation of bail---Accused was, thus, playing with the courts by unilaterally claiming that the complainant had not withdrawn the case--- Accused without exhausting said remedy had directly invoked the inherent jurisdiction of High Court, to obtain relief which had not been prayed before the Court of first instance---Accused had avoided to explain his position before the court below by abusing the process of the High Court under the cover of present proceedings for about eleven months---High Court, holding that the accused was to be put on notice as to why bail before arrest granted by the court below should not be cancelled on ground of violating the terms thereof, directed the accused, pending cancellation application, to comply with initial order for payment of monthly instalments by depositing the arrears of instalments with the Nazir of the High Court---Application under S. 561-A, Cr.P.C. was disposed of accordingly.
Citation:2016 PCr.LJ 700
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 11-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.4-K/2016 The State v. Muhammad Haroon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2014) 277/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Khas Trading Co (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 PTD 22
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 05-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

2015) 1702/2020 Const. P. Hameedullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Enquiries and Anti-corruption Establishment Sindh (`E&ACE`) for issuance of his retirement notification and releasing his salaries up to 21.7.2013, wherein he has served for 10 years--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of respondents/Home Secretary, Government of Sindh is directed to issue his retirement notification within two weeks and release his pensionary benefits under the law within a month from the date of receipt of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this court
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1201
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

2016) 1372/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) V/S NBP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1005
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.941/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another,C.A.13/2024 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

2017) -1049/2024 Suit Muhammad Nasser Janjua & others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Services Tribunals Act 1974), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Civil Courts, including a Judge (in Chambers) of High Court of Sindh, exercising jurisdiction on the original side as a civil court under C.P.C. cannot entertain a civil suit of a civil servant relating to the terms and conditions of his service.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 326
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Uzair Qadir Shoro(ADVO-207-SBC-JMS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

2018) 5868/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Salman & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line: In view of the above discussion, we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore, and others Vs. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS and 29 others and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, NORTHERN REGION, ISLAMABAD, and another Vs. Syed MUNAWAR ALI and others (2017 P L C (C.S.) 1030). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts as Inland Revenue Audit Officer (BPS-18) with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 171
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3520/2021 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1919/2023 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 3 months, Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)

2019) 1398/2018 Const. P. Ayaz ul Islam (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:It is well-settled law that once a promotion order is acted upon and the employee has benefited from it, the order cannot be rescinded or withdrawn, especially if it has created vested rights for the employee. This principle, often referred to as animus revertendi or locus poenitentiae, protects individuals from having their accrued benefits taken away after an order has been implemented. Reference can also be made to the cases of Pakistan through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance v. Muhammad Himayatullah Farukhi (PLD 1969 SC 407), Capital Development Authority Through Chairman, Islamabad And Others v. Shabir Hussain And Others (2022 SCMR 627) and Mrs. Zeenat Parveen Jaffery versus Secretary to Government of Sind, Education Department and 4 others [1983 P L C (C.S.) 1260].
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1067
Advocates:Muhammad Khalid(ADVO-8216-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),S. M. Shuja Abbas(ADVO-3695-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.901-K/2025 The Director General, Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation and another v. Ayaz UL Islam Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2020) 4679/2016 Const. P. Sohail Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PLC CS 510
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 01-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.846-K/2016 Additional Member Inspection Team-1 (M.I.T) High Court of Sindh, Karachi v. Sohail Ahmed and others,C.A.633/2018 Additional Member Inspection Team-1 (M.I.T) High Court of Sindh, Karachi v. Sohail Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.TO BE FIXEDIN 3 MONTHS,Pending Adjourned(-) Mr Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi

2021) 8033/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 482
Advocates:Altafur-Rehman(ADVO-193-SBC-SUK),Mushtaque Hussain(ADVO-14825-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1439-K/2020 Muhammad Ayub Panhwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

2022) 620/2014 Const. P. The Fauji Foundation Charitable Trust (Petitioner) V/S Federal Land Commission & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: MLR 115 of1972 , Land Revenue Act, 1967 , Law of laches , Act II of 1977 , law of acquiescence , Estoppel , Doctrine of Election
Tag Line:Subject: Resumption of land under MRL 115 Fauji Foundation a "Charitable Trust" operating under endowment Act 1980 was functioning through a committee formed vide notification of 08.03.1972 of federal Government. Committee after deliberation resolved that secretary to act as authorized person. Unless otherwise explained, it does not deemed to have empowered /authorized secretary to further delegate the powers by a simple authority letter signed by Secretary alone, when it's not borne out of resolution. In the earlier petition when resumption of land was questioned, the parties withdrew their lis in view of negotiation which ended as 30 years leases of subject land and the cause of resumption deemed to have exhausted by way of doctrine of election, Petitioner opted for a long term lease instead to continue litigation against resumption of land .Such right (if any) was bartered with long term lease. Such right to challenge the resumption of land thus was not available when present petition was filed. Process of execution for long term lease should have followed requirement of MLR 115 and section 17 of Act II of 1977 and since it was not transparent, the two leases were executed in an unlawful manner and which period (30 years) has already been exhausted. Scheme of recovery of land revenue includes a process of attachment of holding against arrears which are due. Unless a remedy is exhausted, immediate jump to arrest and detention would not be justified. The question of declaring MLR 115 being repugnant to injunctions of Islamic law has already been decided but with its prospective effect as highlighted in the judgment of Qazalbash Waqf v. Chief Land Commissioner and the effective date was set as 23rd March, 1990 before which the process of resumption had already been completed yet long term leases were executed surrendering rights over the land. (if any)
Citation:2020 YLR 2188
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 09-APR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1751/2020 The Fauji Foundation, Charitable Organization under the Committee of Administration thr. Brig. (R) Sabir Ali, Fauji Foundation, Fauji Towers, Rawalpindi v. The Federal Land Commission thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2023) 132/2023 R.A (Civil Revision) Pervaiz Ahmed Soomro (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Umar @ Amir Ali Soomro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1605
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2024) 2109/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.63-K/2017 Muhammad Ramazan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2025) 1299/2022 Const. P. Mujahid Ali Lund (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Perusal of the substituted Rule 10-A reflects that with widening its scope, certain conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died during service whereas the substituted rule included the children of the civil servant who were declared invalidated or incapacitated for further service and the post against which such category of persons could be appointed, was curtailed to BS-16-17 only instead of BS 11-20.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 503
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

2026) 120/2019 Cr.Bail Shahid Ahmed Shaikh (Applicant) V/S PO SIndh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-19
Approved for Reporting

2027) 2712/2021 Const. P. Mst. Almas Bano (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 538
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

2028) 358/2024 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Allmed Laboratories, Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:No Reassessment under Section 80(3) of the Customs Act, when goods are out of charge and released
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 249
Advocates:Saad Fayaz(ADVO-15882-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Azam Khan(ADVO-7754-SBC-KHI),Ayaz Ali(ADVO-21000-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Rizwan Saeed(ADVO-13041-SBC-KHI),Raja Muhammad Arsalan(ADVO-16013-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 18-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

2029) 1700/2014 Cr.Bail MIRZA KARIM BAIG S/O MIRZA MUHMMAD MAHBOOB BAIG (Petitioner) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 16-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting

2030) 5920/2015 Const. P. Kainat Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Directions given by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito in C.P.No.D-5920 of 2015 to the I.G. Sindh for implementation of SOP for sampling and preservation of DNA samples in rape, sodomy and sexual violence cases.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 984
Advocates:Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

2031) 92/2011 I. A Anwar Mehmood (Appellant) V/S Askari Bank Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2013 CLD 912
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 11-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

2032) 68/2015 Cr.Rev SULEMAN LALANI & 02 OTHERS (Applicant) V/S AQEEL KARIM DEDHI S/O HAJI KARIM DEDHI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Test for issuing process under section 204 CrPC.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 701
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.77-K/2024 Jahangir Siddiqui v. The State and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned..for 2 weeks

2033) 46/2024 Criminal Appeal Barkat Bakhrani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1761
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

2034) 3/2021 M.A. M/s. Jiangsu Dajin Heavy Industry Co. Limited (Appellant) V/S Port Qasim Authority (PQA) and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: General Clauses Act, 1897 (Section 24A), PPRA Rules, 2004 (Rule 36), PPRA Rules, 2004 ( Rule 25, 29, 30 and 31)
Tag Line:- Indeed, it appears that it was more than a month after opening of the bid that the appellant made an attempt to rectify its material inability by furnishing a separate/counter bank guarantee from Bank AlHabib for both the tenders. This deficiency could not have been resurrected as by then the ship sailed. These belated attempts would have amounted to a modification of the tender documents, which is not permissible under Rule 31 of Rules 2004. Eventually only those whose technical bids were found to be in consonance with the terms of the invitation, were liable to be considered for further steps and were considered accordingly. -Petitioner being aware of the said tender conditions participated and having participated in the tender cannot challenge or dislike prerequisites meant for technical qualification. He could only expect judicious treatment within the playing rules however, it was too late for appellant when it realized that playing conditions were not palatable to it. The situation faced by appellant based on the aforesaid facts is not res integra as a number of judgments are in the filed covering the issue as settled law. - Even if I have to measure bidding terms on the touchstone of malice and mala fide, I would come out with understanding that these terms are for every one and not to exclude anyone. These are commercial transactions and decisions in this regard should base on strict compliance of terms of tenders whereas equity and fair play based on financial offer is not primary concern. Even if someone intends to impress by showing better financial offer, he has to qualify first on technical grounds. It is the overall impact till completion of job that needs serious consideration by procuring agency. Whether a bidder has the ability to deliver as per terms of tenders and having capacity to ensure projects completion should be the primary concern of procuring agency. There is thus nothing which could lead to conclude that the process ended up in a decision of rejecting technical bid of appellant was flawed. - Any term within frame of law is also not open for a judicial review even under the hierarchy of procurement laws as Rule 25 enables the procuring agency to require bid security not exceeding five per cent of the bid price to be furnished by every bidder and procuring agency may save its effectiveness for a period as they required in terms of Rule 26.
Citation:2021 CLC 1931
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting

2035) 60/2022 II.A. Rais Muhammad Mithal. (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Hassan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1062
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

2036) 41/1999 J.M MOULANA IBADUR REHMAN (Applicant) V/S JEHANGIR ADAM & ORS. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 410
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

2037) 35/2020 Cr.Bail Manzoor Thebo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail After Arrest---497- Under S. 302 PPC)
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 774
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 17-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

2038) 4445/2013 Const. P. Aftab Ali (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Reinstatement into service)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 64
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 13-APR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1906/2017 Aftab Ali v. Federation of Pakistan, thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2039) 1426/2018 Const. P. Zia-ul-Hassan Lanjar (Applicant) V/S Election Commissioner of Pakistan & othrs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

2040) 5220/2016 Const. P. Works Cooperative Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.707-K/2018 Works Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2041) 3617/2013 Const. P. M/s Chevron Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 818
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 10-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.151-K/2021 Commissiner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Chevron Pakistan Ltd & another,C.A.96-K/2022 Commissiner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Chevron Pakistan Ltd & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

2042) 113/2017 I. A Province of Sindh & another (Appellant) V/S Abdul Raheem Khan (Late) & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 YLR 1799
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

2043) 471/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Zeeshan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 239
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Syed Asif Ali(ADVO-10999-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Ishaque(ADVO-7611-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.532-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Zeeshan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2044) 4389/2016 Const. P. Lutfullah Kalhoro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

2045) 2018/2016 Const. P. Mohammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Market Committee and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1426-K/2018 Market Committee Karachi and another v. Muhammad Saddiq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2046) 340/2013 Cr.Appeal Mst. Haseena Begum (Appellant) V/S Ibrahim, Fahim Lodha and The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 04-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2047) 5147/2017 Const. P. Mst. Yasmeen Akhtar and ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

2048) 68/2018 S.M.A Dr.Mohammad Sharif (Petitioner) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: S.M.A (Until Petitioner not Submitted FRC , Case not fixed for hearing.), Succession Act, 1925
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 249
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 23-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

2049) 1003/1997 Suit MST. FATIMA BAI & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S K.B.C.A. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-APR-13
Approved for Reporting

2050) 7663/2019 Const. P. Shafqat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 294
Advocates:Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-10943-SBC-KHC),Mahtab Alam(ADVO-12521-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

2051) 1/2020 Judicial Companies Misc. JOHNSON CONTROL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED (Applicant) V/S SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Companies matters (Company winding up )
Tag Line:Company wound up
Citation:2023 CLD 162
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Basil Nabi Malik(ADVO-13956-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

2052) 398/2022 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Legal Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Kolachee International, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2600
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 26-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

2053) 2987/2018 Const. P. TCS (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Post & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 PLD SC 69
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 03-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4990/2018 Skynet Worldwide Express, Karachi & others v. Pakistan Post having their place of business at Director General, Pakistan Post Office, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

2054) 81/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. MUHAMMAD JAVED S/O MUHAMMAD ESSA @ ESSAL KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 750
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 04-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1486/2020 The State through Prosectutor General Sindh v. Muhammad Javed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2055) 45/2020 Criminal Appeal Allahdad Waswano (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 43
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

2056) 1673/2006 Suit Mrs. Shamshad Begum and another (Plaintiff) V/S Syed Iftikhar Hussain Jaffary and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 19-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

2057) 2520/2014 Const. P. Syed Faisal Ali and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 751
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

2058) 3759/2017 Const. P. Kamran Ahmed Mallah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 41
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.67-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2059) 5791/2016 Const. P. Zona Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 2), Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:There is no space of interpretation provided by petitioners in relation of Foreign Exchange Manual read with Section 154 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Similarly, there is no applicability of extra territorial operation for giving effect to Article 141 of the Constitution. Hence we conclude accordingly. The doctrine of occupied field would also not come into play as we are of the view that Entry 49 of Federal Legislative List, as structured after 18th Amendment, empowers the province to legislate on the subject under consideration. The legislative powers defined under Articles141, 142 and 143 of the Constitution have not been violated while encompassing services rendered by indenters to be within the frame of SSTA 2011 and find its place within exclusion defined in Entry 49 of Federal Legislative List of Fourth Schedule of Constitution.
Citation:2022 PTD 984, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1536
Advocates:Kazim Hassan(ADVO-2630-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Murtaza Korai(ADVO-14432-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 10-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.917/2022 Zona Pakistan (Private) Limited Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Karachi and others,C.A.4024/2022 Zona Pakistan (Private) Limited Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, CMA Notice, Relist with connected appeals after vacations at Islamabad,Disposed Disposed of

2060) 43/2016 Cr.J.A Sadique Ali Sabzoi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal allowed, on Contradiction ,Delay in Shifting dead body & Injured in Hospital, tracking foot print via dogs not disclose in FIR.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 410
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

2061) 3803/2020 Const. P. Suhaila Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of her previous service rendered with effect from 1971 till her reinstatement/re-employment in the year 1990 or not?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 490
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4282/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another,C.A.1423/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed

2062) 3189/2019 Const. P. Captain (R) Javed Afzal & Ors (Petitioner) V/S P.I.A.C.L & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Pension matters)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.442-K/2019 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd.,C.A.22-K/2020 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted, Adjourned

2063) 491/2017 Suit SINOTEC Co. Limited (Plaintiff) V/S The Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 303
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 15-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

2064) 421/2016 Const. P. Amir Khursheed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Imdad Khan(ADVO-9959-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 24-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

2065) 63/2022 M.A. M/s. Getz Pharma International FZ LLC (Appellant) V/S The Registrar of Trade Marks and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Deceptive Trademark
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 411
Advocates:Zain Sheikh(ADVO-3193-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Kashan Anwar(ADVO-15087-SBC-KHE),Saleem(ADVO-2477-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Sarmad Khan(ADVO-17309-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1726/2024 GLITZ PHARMA thr. Attorney v. GETZ PHARMA INTERNATIONAL FZ LLC and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)

2066) 83/2011 Civil Revision Ghulam Rasool through L.Rs & Ors (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 5
Advocates:Muhammad Ismail Bhutto(ADVO-261-SBC-LAR),Abdul Ghaffar Kalwar(ADVO-10009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

2067) 7/2017 M.A. Southern Networks Limited (Appellant) V/S PEMRA Thr. Its Chairman & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules, 2009, PEMRA Ordinance, 2002
Tag Line:-Definition of a person is provided under Ordinance, 2002, which includes an individual, partnership, association, company, trust or corporation. Invariably in the show-cause/decision impugned, PEMRA presumed to have issued licenses to individual directors hence referred that licenses to them should not have been transferred by them. It is misconceived impression. --The issuance of licence is subject to Section 19 of Ordinance 2002. The authority enjoys exclusive right to issue licence for the establishment and operation of broadcasting media and distribution services and that these licences shall be in conformity with the principles of fairness and equity and the eligibility of such applicant to whom the licence is likely to be granted is based on prescribed criteria notified in advance. ---With this understanding of law perhaps the intensity of violation and penalty imposed on appellant should be viewed in term of their proportionality. Wednesburys principle while defining proportionality has discussed role of public officers entrusted with the discretionary powers. However, it is often seen that officers entrusted with such powers exercising their discretion goes unattended. Discretion at times goes unmeasured. Subjective analysis of a discretion exercised by public officers is a difficult proposition but proportionality is a tool which can play its role to serve the subject. The principle requires that measures adopted by the authority should not exceed the limits of what is proper and necessary in order to attain the objectives, legitimately. It is generally expected that where there is choice between several appropriate remedies and measures, the recourse that must be the least onerous and least cumbersome be adopted.
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 6
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.5469/2021 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its Chiarman, Islamabad and another v. Southern Networks Limited, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2068) 1066/2010 Suit MUHAMMAD KHALIL (Plaintiff) V/S PTCL & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: PTCL Service Regulations, 1996
Tag Line:Disciplinary proceedings against employee of PTCL were initiated and proceeded under Government Servant (E&D) Rules, 1973, and not under the PTCL Service Regulations, 1996. Furthermore, it is a well settled principle of law that where the law required an act to be done in a particular manner, it had to be done in that manner alone and such dictate of law cannot be termed as a technicality or mere formality, and where things have not been done in the manner, as required by the law and procedure, the same cannot be given legal sanctity particularly when the same are resulting in penal consequences or causing irreparable injury to an individual
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 69
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Abdul Ghani(ADVO-4801-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting

2069) 5016/2019 Const. P. AKD Investments Management & Ors (Petitioner) V/S JS Investment & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLD 596
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2070) 4446/2022 Const. P. Hascol Petroleum Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Like Letter of Credits, which essentially establishes the intent and commercial transaction the presence of vessel at high seas has to be seen within the same frame i.e. it is there for petitioners and such has not been established via vessels Bill of Lading or private contracts as they are easily getable
Citation:2023 PTD 1415
Advocates:Khalid Jawed(ADVO-8533-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Ahmer(ADVO-11937-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 14-APR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.680-K/2023 HASCOL Petroleum Limited & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary (Revenue Division) Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Re-List

2071) 536/2018 Const. P. Jangi Mahar & another (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 22-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

2072) 1064/2022 Const. P. Sartaj Hyder Shar (Petitioner) V/S P.o Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: National Disaster Managment Act 2010 (Constitution of committee for preparation of Master Plan )
Citation:2023 SHC SUK 1176
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 02-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1348/2023 Ghulam Asghar Kansaro v. Chairman Planning and Development Board, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others,C.P.L.A.943-K/2022 Province of Sindh through Chief Minister & others v. Sartaj Hyder Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Disposed of

2073) 3550/2013 Const. P. Akhter Billoo (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 11-APR-14
Approved for Reporting

2074) 3016/2019 Const. P. Khawaja Izhar ul Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 932
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 22-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1073-K/2023 Khawaja Izhar ul Hassan v. Chief Minister, Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

2075) 485/2012 Suit SOORTY ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S K.E.S.C. LTD & ANOTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Electricity Act, 1910 (section 20 )
Tag Line:when the parties are not at issue the question of its determination does not arise. The plaintiffs was already put on notice by notices dated 17.2.2012 and the controversy came to an end on account of such admission with regard to keeping the load as standby. The distinguishing features as far as this suit and the Suit No. 329/2012 are concerned is of course the admitted position with regard to the status of the sanctioned load when the initial notices dated 17.02.2012 were replied. Since there was no question of determination and even after the issuance of notices it was consistent stand of the plaintiff that it was keeping the sanctioned load as standby, the defendant No.1 was well within their right to disconnect the electricity as the determination is not required.
Citation:2012 CLC 1508
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-12
Approved for Reporting

2076) 1631/2008 Const. P. Allauddin Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 18-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting

2077) 838/2014 Const. P. Imran Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. Since the Petitioners service was terminated under Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, which rule has since been declared un-constitutional by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Itrat Sajjad (2017 SCMR 2010), the only point left for our consideration is whether the effect of the declaration in Itrat Sajjad on the case of the Petitioner can be addressed by us in writ jurisdiction. 2. It had been settled by a 5 member Bench of the Supreme Court in DHA v. Jawaid Ahmed (2013 SCMR 1707) that applying the function test, the DHA is a person to whom a writ can issue under Article 199(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution of Pakistan. But then, moving to a question distinct, viz. whether the employee of a statutory authority can invoke the writ jurisdiction of the High Court to enforce service rules of the statutory authority, it was held that where service rules were non-statutory, those cannot normally be enforced in writ jurisdiction for such rules attract the principle of master and servant; but at the same time it was also held that where action of a statutory authority in a service matter is in violation of principles of natural justice, such action can be interfered with in writ jurisdiction. Itrat Sajjad reiterates the same principles, and while it was concluded that the DHA Service Rules are non-statutory and thus not enforceable ordinarily by way of a writ petition, the judgment went on to hold that since Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules violated the principle of natural justice, the case fell within the recognized exception that a writ can issue where the action of a statutory authority in a service matter is violative of the principle of natural justice. For the same reason, this petition, to the extent it assails termination issued under the same Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, is also maintainable.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 962
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting

2078) 6/2022 M.A. Muhammad Hassan (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Yousif & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 18
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 01-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

2079) 514/2018 Const. P. Mohammad Ali Hakro (Petitioner) V/S Returing Officer and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2871/2018 Muhammad Ali v. Returning Officer P.S. 16-Kamber Shahdakot-III & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2080) 394/2020 S.M.A Saleem Islam s/o late SYed Zafar ul Islam (Petitioner) V/S Wing Cdr Syed Feroze Ali Rizvi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Succession Act
Tag Line:Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that every suit shall be instituted in a Court of lowest grade competent to try it. The primary reason, amongst many, is that a right of appeal may be available before appellate jurisdiction which jurisdiction is asked to exercise concurrent jurisdiction. Concurrent jurisdiction could only be exercised in exceptional cases and circumstances which do not exist here. It could also be exercised when appeal is being heard and orders are required to be passed as being from original court/forum, for exercise of concurrent jurisdiction as in the case of Idara-e-Noore-Haq.
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 278
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Abid(ADVO-17679-SBC-KHE),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Zara Saba Tariq(ADVO-15089-SBC-KHS),Syed Ali Bin Maaz(ADVO-13125-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

2081) 5958/2023 Const. P. Shakar ud Din (Petitioner) V/S M/s Twin Badar and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Estoppel
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 169
Advocates:In Person(INP),Muhammad Ali(ADVO-10647-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.594-K/2025 Shakar Ud Din v. M/s Twin Badar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2082) 2782/2024 Const. P. Aamir Ali (Petitioner) V/S Dist. & Session Judge Larkana & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 436
Advocates:Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-605-SBC-LRK),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 20-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting

2083) 600/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Applicant) V/S Additional Collector of Customs & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 02-APR-12
Approved for Reporting

2084) 2578/2014 Suit Muhammad Ali Barry. (Plaintiff) V/S Kaybee Snacks & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Jurisdiction (Plaint Retuned U/Order 7 rule 11 CPC. definition of ???Intellectual Property Act, 2012??? is barred)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1029
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

2085) 2662/2023 Cr.Bail SUMAIRA BIBI W/O MUHAMMAD IMRAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1269
Advocates:Javaid Ahmed Chhatari(ADVO-4333-SBC-KHI),Muahmamd Javed(ADVO-8539-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Saima(ADVO-16387-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 19-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

2086) 562/2012 Const. P. Nabeela Ashfaq (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

2087) 1233/2017 Const. P. Major (Rtd) Raja Mohammad Basharat Ahmed & others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Re-grant of land under Colonization Act.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 277
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 04-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

2088) 30/2003 Suit.B MIRZA SUGAR MILLS LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S P.I.C.I.C (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Restructuring Agreement )
Tag Line:Banking suit. Effect of Restructuring Agreement.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 41
Advocates:Abubakar I. Chundrigar(ADVO-155-SBC-KHI),Ainuddin Khan(ADVO-2221-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

2089) 1129/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. National Foods Limited (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs, Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Exemption of duties and taxes on prefabricated buildings as Capital Goods under SRO 41 of 2009 read with Chapter 9917(2) of the Customs Tariff; HELD: YES
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1117
Advocates:Hyder Ali Khan(ADVO-44631-PBC-LHR),Faheem Raza(ADVO-3408-IBC-ISD)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 12-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2090) 126/2018 Civil Revision Mst. Tahira Bano thr: L.Rs (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Bilal & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

2091) 3387/2018 Const. P. Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 PLC (CS) 50
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

2092) 4452/2013 Const. P. Mir Hassan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Son Quota (Dismissed))
Tag Line:Son Quota
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 82
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

2093) 1979/2019 Suit Syed Sulaiman Jafri (Plaintiff) V/S United Bank Limited & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 836
Advocates:Syed Asghar Ali(ADVO-7775-SBC-KHI),Imtiaz Ali Effandi(ADVO-3387-SBC-KHS),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

2094) 224/2025 Const. P. Ali Sher Kaloo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2739
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1190-K/2025 Abid Hussain & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2095) 102/2006 Suit MST.ISHRAT PARVEEN (Plaintiff) V/S SYED AZHAR ALI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 726
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

2096) 2901/2022 Const. P. Qazi Khalid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1109
Advocates:M/S. MANSOOR AHMED KHAN & CO.(FIRM-106-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Irfan Siddiqui(ADVO-9254-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.147-K/2023 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others,C.A.40-K/2025 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed

2097) 553/2014 Suit Khalil Mughal. (Plaintiff) V/S P.I.A. Corporation. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Masood Ahmed Noorani(ADVO-97-SBC-HYD),Fiaz Ahmed(ADVO-19358-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Abdul Haleem Siddiqui(ADVO-3062-SBC-KHI),M/S. HALEEM & KHAN(FIRM-248-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-16
Approved for Reporting

2098) 270/2023 Const. P. Farooque Alias Ayaz Ali Jamali (Petitioner) V/S Mst: Asma Jamali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:A.F.R Recovery of Dowry Article
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 409
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.882-K/2025 Mst. Asma v. Farooque alias Ayaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2099) 212/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Mian Azam Waheed (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 744
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3215/2021 Mian Azam Waheed v. The Collector of Customs thr. Addl. Collector of Customs, Model Customs Collectorate of Appraisement (East), Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2100) 1469/2010 Suit MST.AFSHAN (Plaintiff) V/S SYED KAMRAN ALI SHAH & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 28-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting

2101) 409/2016 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SULEMAN S/O JAHANZAIB KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 17-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

2102) 32/2019 II.A. Bundoo Khan & another (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Younus (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2103) 1885/2015 Const. P. M/s CIM Shipping Inc (Petitioner) V/S Tousif Ahmed and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Compensation)
Citation:2019 PLC Lab. 121
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

2104) 1294/2015 Const. P. Abdul Bari Mangi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 24-JUL-15
Approved for Reporting

2105) 256/2005 H.C.A Karachi Electric Supply Corporation (Appellant) V/S Mst. Batool Fatima (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 279
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2-K/2024 Mst. Batool Fatima deceased through legal heirs & others v. Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Limited (KESC) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2106) 2301/2023 Const. P. Abid Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Quashment of FIR (Remedy under section 265-K and 249-A Cr.P.C)
Tag Line:Once Challan / Report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been filed before the trial Court, High Court must not interfere in its Constitutional jurisdiction and an accused must avail alternate remedy under the Law.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 402
Advocates:Umar Farooq Khan(ADVO-1914-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro
Order Date: 08-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

2107) 7493/2021 Const. P. AUS Food (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sales Tax
Tag Line:Extra Sales Tax under Section 3(5) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 on consumers of Electric Power and Gas under SRO 1221(I)/2021; held; valid
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1106
Advocates:Zulfiqar Ali Mirjat(ADVO-11639-SBC-KHI),Syed Hamza Ahmed Hashmi(ADVO-16626-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 24-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

2108) 5691/2019 Const. P. Sharjeel Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:This Court recognizes similar work, responsibilities, and standing between High Court establishment and district judiciary employees, despite different tiers, as both contribute to provincial justice administration. The High Court's administrative control under Article 203 of the constitution supports equal treatment under the "rule of parity." This applies to pay scales (equal pay for equivalent grades), standardized allowances (Judicial and Utility, with High Court percentage revisions extending to the district judiciary), other benefits (medical, housing, etc.), and pension benefits (if allowances are pensionable for High Court employees, the same should apply to the district judiciary). The rule of parity mandates equal treatment for similarly situated groups without discrimination in terms of Article 25 of the Constitution. The Government of Sindh is under its obligation to treat the employees of entire judiciary equally, so far as their perks and privileges are concerned without discrimination.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1052
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3354/2025 The Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and others v. Sharjeel Akhter and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2109) 36/2001 Execution M/S. HABIB BANK LIMITED (Decree Holder) V/S M/S. NATIONAL FIBRES LIMITED (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

2110) 579/2015 Cr.Bail HAMOODUR REHMAN KHAN NIAZI & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 19-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

2111) 977/2014 Suit Asim Jofa. (Plaintiff) V/S K.M.C. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 MLD 207
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting

2112) 526/2022 Cr.J.A MEHBOOB ALI S/O MUHAMMAD AYOOB MALLAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2450
Advocates:Nasrullah Malik(ADVO-11854-SBC-KHE),Through Superintendent Central Prison Hyderabad(SCPHyd),Gul Hafsa(ADVO-10689-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 22-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2113) 206/2010 Const. P. Mst.Jameela and others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Iqbal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

2114) 324/2025 Const. P. Sanam Soomro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Wedlock Policy - Spouses be stationed at the same place
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2083
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Order Date: 19-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

2115) 992/2014 Const. P. Majid Ali Memon, (Petitioner) V/S Senior Superintendent of Police Shikarpur and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Service matters (Applicant acquitted in Criminal Case. Hence is entitled to Job. )
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 467
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1009-K/2021 The Senior Superintendent of Police Shikarpur & others v. Majid Ali Memon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

2116) 6599/2014 Const. P. M/s Lucky Cement (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 963
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 20-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.21/2022 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Revenue, Islamabad and another,C.A.318/2022 Lucky Cement Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Revenue Division, Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Ministry of Finance and Revenue, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

2117) 145/2017 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. AQAL NAWAB S/O AMEER NAWAB (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

2118) 157/2016 Cr.Rev MOHAMMAD MESUM ABBASS S/O ANWAR HAIDER (Applicant) V/S THE IST ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

2119) 745/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Hussain Iqbalani and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

2120) 137/2023 Spl.H.C.A National Tiles and Ceramics Ltd & Another (Appellant) V/S Sindh Bank Limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXI Rule 89& 26 CPC), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 21 Rule 86)
Tag Line:Judgment-Debtor did not take any action under Order 21 Rules 89 or 90 CPC during the hearing of the appeal against the impugned Order passed by the learned Single Judge on Order 21 Rule 86 CPC, Division Bench passed. ad-interim Order beyond the scope of Order 21 Rule 89. Such an interim Order was a provisional measure subject to hearing the Auction-Purchaser; it was not final, did not meet the procedural requirements of CPC, and was barred by limitation. No grounds were agitated by the Judgment-Dector under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC. The period of 30 days under the Limitation Act of 1908 commenced from the date of sale (i.e. when the Court approved the sale pursuant to Order 21 Rule 86 CPC. Valuable rights had accrued to the Auction-Purchaser which could not be taken lightly. Appeal dismissed.
Citation:2024 CLD 264
Advocates:Abdul Wahab Baloch(ADVO-5874-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Iqbal Haider(ADVO-12894-SBC-KHI),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

2121) 314/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Khyzer Iqbal (Applicant) V/S The Deputy Collector of Customs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PTD 458
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 29-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting

2122) 114/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Ali Gohar through his LRs . (Applicant) V/S Mumtaz Ali though LRs and others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2023 SHC LAR 518
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-23
Approved for Reporting

2123) 228/2003 I.T.C M/s.Habib Insurance Co.Ltd., (Appellant) V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 23-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.58-K/2018 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Habib Insurance Company Ltd.,C.A.632/2019 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Habib Insurance Company Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted [ Appeal to be heard on 11-04-2019 ],Disposed Allowed

2124) 2/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) V/S Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 931
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

2125) 1847/2017 Const. P. Yasin Ali Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) V/S The Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 16-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

2126) 1258/2010 Suit DR. ISHAQUE MUHAMMAD SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1580/2021 Dr. Ishaque Muhammad Shah (deceased) through L.Rs v. National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2127) 20/2013 Cr.Acq.A. Syed Abdul Wahab Mehdi (Appellant) V/S Bachal & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 21-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

2128) 3062/2020 Const. P. Sabre Travel Network Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 260), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 74, 112, 114, 120 and 122)
Tag Line:No order could be passed even if the show-cause notice is issued on the last day when limitation ends, as essentially the "order" could not be passed after expiry of five years.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 140
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 21-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.56-K/2025 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi v. M/s. Sabre Travel Network Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd & others.,C.P.L.A.719-K/2025 Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi v. International Air Transport Association, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: ,

2129) 245/2009 Suit SAEEDUDDIN QURESHI (Plaintiff) V/S WAQAR SAEED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2130) 1511/2019 Const. P. Jam Mitha Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner is seeking direction to the Respondents to issue notification of his post-retirement benefits, on the premise that he was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) BPS-17 in Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) ---the petitioner???s Counsel was directed to assist this Court more particularly regarding Article 187(2) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 that whether this Court can examine and or modify the Judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court or only to enforce it in accordance with the law--We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Sindh Government to pay all his perks and privileges to which he was entitled to on issuance of notification of his repatriation, inclusive of his entire pensionary benefits within [02] months and report compliance through MIT-II of this court.
Topic: Service matters (post retirement benefits)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

2131) 7357/2017 Const. P. M/s. Marosh & 24 others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & 3 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PTD 1787, 2026 SBLR Sindh 1520, 2026 SBLR Sindh 1958, 2018 PTCL 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar
Order Date: 23-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.841-K/2018 The Collector of Customs Appraisement (West) and others v. M/s Marosh and others,C.P.L.A.4483/2017 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman FBR, Islamabad & others v. M/s Marosh, Lahore & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Judgment Reserved ,Disposed Disposed of

2132) 4867/2013 Const. P. Qasim International Container Terminal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 14A), Constitution of Pakistan
Tag Line:The main object of the Customs Act, 1969 is to make it expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to levy and collection of customs duties, fee and service charges and to provide for other allied matters. So it does not matter that the amending provisions do not itself qualify as one imposing duties and taxes etc. All other ancillary and allied provisions in the Customs Act are meant to facilitate the officials to carry out their main objective and mandate and that is the collection of duties and taxes by applying law. Customs Act is nothing but a fiscal Statute meant to extract customs duties and other taxes. A simple reading of Article 73(2) (a to g), may distract the ideal conclusion but it is to be seen that these very amendments are inserted in a fiscal statute, the main object of which is to extract duties, taxes etc. These amendments are thus nothing but to toe and facilitate the main object of the statute and hence it is ancillary and incidental to main object of imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax which they would ultimately perform while performing their duties within the premises of these private port/terminal operators to whom licenses were issued. Each statute carry different mechanics to assign a varying meaning of the "same word". The meaning of same word may vary from one legislation to another and it is the Statute and the very provision itself that would determine as to which varying definition would come into play to carry the object of such legislation. In order to find intent of word in any provision of statute, it is always wise or logical to discover individual meaning of a solitary word first, however at times it is to be read in connection with entire provisions to find logical meaning closer to the functioning of the Statute and provisions. A word may have potential to be explained differently. Meaning of a word discovered judicially to understand a provision of statute does not necessarily be applied to provision of another Statute as it may dis-balance the scheme of that Statute. It may tend to carry same meaning in a similar Statute, if used in different provisions/Sections etc. but may not necessarily carry same intent in another Statute. Entertaining an application by an adjudicating authority is altogether different in the present contest as they (port operator) do not enjoy such authority and authorization as far as adjudication is concerned. Certificate itself is adjudication by someone having authority in this regard which require no more deliberation by private port operators.
Citation:2020 PTD 1952
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 06-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.426/2020 Qasim International Container Terminal Pakistan Ltd, Karachi & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary, Revenue Division, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others,C.A.194/2020 Qasim International Container Terminal Pakistan Ltd, Karachi & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary, Revenue Division, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted/Stay,Pending

2133) 180/2019 Criminal Appeal ARSHAD HUSSAIN S/O SANARAS KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 336
Advocates:Umair Akram Khan Noon(ADVO-17396-SBC-KHC),Tarique Mehmood(ADVO-4864-SBC-KHI),Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

2134) 314/2020 Const. P. Muhamamd Hanif Gohar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2127
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting

2135) 789/2024 Const. P. Dalan Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:HESCO Matter
Citation:2024 SHC HYD 625
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2136) 3228/2020 Const. P. Misri Ladhani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Promotion (Proforma Promotion after Retirement)
Tag Line:prima-facie the claim of the Petitioner for proforma promotion is tenable under the law for the simple reason that CSB recommended his promotion in BS-21 during his tenure of service, in the meanwhile, he reached the age of superannuation, just after the recommendation made by SCB in his favour, as a consequence, the pay of the petitioner is required to be re-fixed and his post-retirement benefits will be re- calculated by allowing his proforma promotion in BS-21 and arrears shall be paid to him with 6% simple interest per annum--The competent authority of respondents is directed to notify the proforma promotion of the petitioner in BS-21 with effect from 13.02.2014 i.e. the date on which the CSB recommended his case for promotion in BS-21 and other ancillary benefits under the law, without discrimination, within 02 weeks
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 413
Advocates:Sagar Ladhani(ADVO-17211-SBC-KHS),Additional Attorney General khi(AAGKhi)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5548/2021,C.A.21/2022,C.A.22/2022,C.P.L.A.5779/2021 SCP Status:Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months

2137) 16/2020 Suit Mohammad Ahmed Kausar (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
Tag Line:I am unswayed with the submission of the learned counsel on the ground that the plaintiffs employees have not been terminated hitherto which is an admitted position and are seeking enforcement of their fundamental right of fair trial and due process hence the principle of master and servant is not attracted at this stage of the case at hand.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 711
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

2138) 753/2024 Suit Muhammad Faisal & others (Plaintiff) V/S SBCA & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Historical original and Current regulation of Town Planning and Building Control in Karachi. Whether Flats can be constructed on commercial plots? Whether SBCA can unilaterally alter an FAR of designated area without a proportionate change in the infrastructure.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2004
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 11-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

2139) 1830/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Ikhlaq and another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 3401, 2025 SHC HYD 3402, 2025 SHC HYD 3403
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 28-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

2140) 5/2014 Adm.A SAJID PLASTIC FACTORY (Petitioner) V/S MSC BAHAMAS & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The learned single Judge stayed the admiralty suit keeping in view the clause of Bills of Lading with regard to gist of form provided therein, however, the appellate court set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge at O.S. and decided that the suit may be heard and decided in view of Admiralty Jurisdiction of the High Court Ordinance, 1980.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 561
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 09-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

2141) 166/2020 Const. P. Fayaz Ali Mastoi (Petitioner) V/S Assistant XEN Irrigation Shahdadkot & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Irrigation Water
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 131
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

2142) 3167/2020 Const. P. Syed Sad Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 827
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.407-K/2021 Syed Saad Ali & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC

2143) 223/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/S. A. R. Industries, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Valuation of goods; section 25 of the Customs Act; determination in a sequential order; fall back method under section 25(9); how to be applied guidelines
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 243
Advocates:Imran Taj(ADVO-9526-SBC-KHC),Aamir Raza(ADVO-15010-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.737-K/2023 M/s. A.R. Industries Karachi v. The Collectors of Customs Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2144) 816/2008 Suit Mrs.Nuzhat Irfan (Plaintiff) V/S City District Government Karachi & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 810
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 05-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

2145) 1534/2012 Suit MS. GULNAR (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD YOUSUF BARAKZAI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 20
Advocates:Ejaz Mubarak(ADVO-3235-SBC-KHI),Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Usman Tufail Shaikh(ADVO-8304-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-22
Approved for Reporting

2146) 1342/2007 Suit MUHAMMAD SHAFI (Appellant) V/S SYED CHAN PIR SHAH & ORS (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Liaquat Hussain Khan(ADVO-8341-SBC-KHI),Mahboob Aftab Khan(ADVO-7393-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aslam Khan(ADVO-8086-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Arif Khan(ADVO-2437-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 31-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

2147) 13/2020 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Laiq Khatiyan (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1977
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

2148) 103/2019 Cr.J.A Momin & others (Appellant) V/S State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 YLR 1160
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 07-JAN-20
Approved for Reporting

2149) 133/2022 Const. P. Nauman Qasim Paracha and Others (Petitioner) V/S SBCA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Illegal commercial / school activity on residential plot.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 336
Advocates:Soofia Saeed(ADVO-3712-SBC-KHI),Abdul Moiz Jaferii(ADVO-15832-SBC-KHS),Asad Anwer Alavi(ADVO-16067-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.200/2025 Head Start School System, Owner/Occupant Karachi v. Sindh Building Control Authority, through its Director, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2150) 1490/2023 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Dua International & Co., Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Classification of Goods; a specialized job; to be decided by the Classification Centre established by the Collector of Customs Appraisement.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1415
Advocates:Tania Alam(ADVO-8924-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Nabi(ADVO-15504-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 26-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

2151) -9/2018 Suit Muhammad Afzal (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 02-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

2152) 2562/2015 Const. P. Tasawar Abbas Tanveer (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:S. Ashfaq Hussain Rizvi(ADVO-3111-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.64-K/2017 Tasawar Abbas Tanveer v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2153) 629/2021 Const. P. Javed Ali Balouch (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:7. For the reasons given in the aforesaid judgments, in my view, there can hardly be any doubt that Respondent-Company is also a ???person??? within the meaning of Article 199(1) (a) (ii) read with clause (5) thereof. The learned five Member Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Defence Officers' Housing Authority and others v. Lt. Col. Syed Jawaid Ahmed and other connected appeals supra has answered the question about the maintainability of the petition against the government-owned and controlled companies.
Citation:2024 SHC SUK 4
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2154) 16/2010 R.A (Civil Revision) Shahnawaz and another (Applicant) V/S Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2021 SHC SUK 311
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

2155) 253/2015 Const. P. Faraz Sherwani and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1084
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.70-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Asif and another,C.A.1000/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others,C.P.L.A.2215/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be heard a/w C.A.816/2020 out of C.P.1771/20 after 3 months.

2156) 66/2009 Suit MOIN US SAMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S MRS.TANVEER QAZI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 135
Advocates:S. Abid Hussain Shah(ADVO-3430-SBC-KHS),Abdallah Azzaam Naqvi(ADVO-15005-SBC-KHI),Nasir Jahangir Rifat(ADVO-4555-SBC-KHS),Salman Pirzada(ADVO-12966-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-22
Approved for Reporting

2157) 372/2023 H.C.A M/s National Refinery Limited (Appellant) V/S Syed Mansoor Ali and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Law Reforms Ordinance,1972
Tag Line:Sub-section-2 of Section-3 provides an appeal to a Bench of two or more Judges of High Court from an order made by a single Judge of that Court under clause-1 of Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, not being an order made under subparagraph (i) of paragraph (b) of that clause. To our understanding, it excludes an appeal in relation to a subject summarized in Article199(1)(b)(i), whereas, rest of the "subjects" of Article-199(1) have been subjected to appeal. Subject of dismissal of a claim made under Section-15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is already subjected to appeal under Section-17, but this is not the ???subject??? which could be impugned in any of the lower fora and hence neither appeal nor petition is a remedy. For the purpose of appeal under Law Reforms Ordinance or this appeal in particular wherefrom the impugned order has arisen, out of proceeding under Article-199 from a single Bench, we may sum-up by referring to Appellate side of Sindh Chief Court Rules. Rule-8 confers jurisdiction ordinarily exercised by two Judges of this Court, except otherwise provided by law in particular. Similarly Rule-9 discussed matter to be decided by single Judge of appellate side, not necessarily under Article-199 as there may be some miscellaneous lis etc. Such work (subject) assigned under Rule9 ibid is not the one impugned by the appellant before learned single Judge, hence jurisdiction was not vested and incorrectly exercised.
Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1347
Advocates:Shoukat Ali(ADVO-10357-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 14-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4312/2023 National Refinery Limited, Karachi v. Syed Mansoor Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2158) 700/2009 Cr.Bail Insaf Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Topic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Confirmed)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed
Order Date: 26-OCT-09
Approved for Reporting

2159) 717/2010 Suit AGAH ASAD ABBAS (Plaintiff) V/S MST.NASEEM IRFAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Limitation for an application for restoration of a suit dismissed for non-prosecution, is governed by Article 163 of the Limitation Act, not by Article 181.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 829
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil(ADVO-3154-SBC-KHE),Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

2160) 2427/2010 Const. P. Iftikhar Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S CDGK and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2090
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 21-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting

2161) 6200/2022 Const. P. Zakir Hussain Samo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Proforma Promotion)
Tag Line:Entitlement for Proforma Promotion. If a person reaches superannuation and is not considered for promotion or no meeting is held by the Departmental Promotion Committee, then he is entitled for consideration for proforma promotion as per rules.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 263
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.207-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretarty and others v. Zakir Hussain Samo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2162) 3429/2021 Const. P. Akhtar Hussain Abro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Promotion (respondents are hereby directed to consider the petitioner???s case for promotion in DPC. CP Allowed.)
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 906
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

2163) 6608/2020 Const. P. Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue (Petitioner) V/S Fed: Sect: / Revisional Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1548
Advocates:Manzoor Ahmed(ADVO-17465-SBC-KHS),Shahid Iqbal Rana(ADVO-7703-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Akram Tariq(ADVO-14630-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 27-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1012-K/2025 Evacuee Trust Property Board v. Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2164) 6939/2021 Const. P. Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 899
Advocates:Muhammad Haroon(ADVO-13231-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

2165) 5/2006 Adm.A Bourbon Maritime Private Limited (Appellant) V/S M.V. Salaj & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2016 PLD 124
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 17-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2166) 558/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O JAN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Effect of the prohibition in section 51(1) of the CNS Act, 1997.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1484
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

2167) 67/2019 II.A. Muhammad Usman Soomro thr: L.Rs (Appellant) V/S Abdul Razzak Soomro (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 740
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.3147/2022 Abdul Razzak Soomro v. Muhammad Usman Soomro (decd.) thr. L.Rs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Allowed and Remanded

2168) 1557/2021 Suit SALEEM BUTT (Plaintiff) V/S DR. AFNAN ULLAH KHAN & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Parliamentary privilege cannot be vitiated by civil suits.
Citation:2025 PLD Sindh 28, 2023 SBLR Sindh 28
Advocates:Umair Usman Ghani(ADVO-17297-SBC-KHE),M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

2169) 1/2019 I. A Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Saleem Ahmed Memon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 324
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 30-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

2170) 3416/2025 Const. P. Haji Muhammad Yousuf Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2389
Advocates:Sufiyan Zaman(ADVO-15548-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid Bhurgri(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2171) 646/2021 Const. P. M/s Al-Kousar Drinking Water (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:to direct the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board (KW&SB) to grant him license to continue his business for supplying Brackish water via Pipe Line from Subsoil/boring to National Refinery and other industries in Karachi--we are not inclined to subscribe to the request of the petitioner because no right of the petitioner to extract minerals/brackish water has been established and prima-facie under the garb of this petition he has attempted to continue such an activity illegally
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1067
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

2172) 2217/2021 Const. P. Zeeshan Anjum and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The main grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been declined without announcing the final merit list i.e. written test and interview--Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no offer of appointment order had been issued in their favor, thus no vested right had/has accrued in favor of the petitioners.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1318
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

2173) 1762/2018 Suit Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Plaintiff) V/S Haji Jaffar & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-JUL-19
Approved for Reporting

2174) 500/2024 Cr.Acq.A. MUHAMMAD QAISER MIRZA (Appellant) V/S NAZIM ALI PANHWAR & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 569
Advocates:Muhammad Yousif(ADVO-18584-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Daud(ADVO-10638-SBC-KHE),Haad Abid(ADVO-15656-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo
Order Date: 15-APR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.84-K/2025 Nazim Ali Panhwar v. Muhammad Qaiser Mirza & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2175) 7380/2018 Const. P. Karamuddin Panhyar (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
We have decided the main appeal of the appellant therefore the Constitution Petition No: 7380 of 2018 filed by the appellant for suspension of his sentence during the pendency of the appeal has become infructuous and is also dismissed.
Topic: NAB (misused his authority and with malafide intention made illegal fifteen (15) entries in Record . appeal dismissed.)
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 685
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 01-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

2176) 508/2022 Cr.Bail Hakeem Khan & Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 335
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

2177) 1585/2013 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD QAISER S/O MUHAMMAD SHARIF (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 25-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting

2178) 92/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Applicant) V/S Wali Oil Mills Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 30-MAY-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.340-K/2014 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Wali Oil Mills Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2179) 10/2023 Criminal Appeal Sikandar Ali Kolachi and others (Appellant) V/S The State and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2023 SHC MPK 390
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting

2180) 349/2019 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. Sindh Revenue Board (Applicant) V/S M/s. Logon Broadband (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2762
Advocates:Shamshad Ahmed Narejo(ADVO-2185-SBC-HYD),In Person(INP),Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto(ADVO-3732-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

2181) 1869/2022 Suit SYEDA RUBINA SHAHID (Plaintiff) V/S SYED SHAHRUKH ABBAS ZAIDI & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Appointment of Receiver under Order XL Rule 1)
Tag Line:Illegal use of residential property for commercial purposes as a motel / guest house. Receiver appointed; property to be sealed.
Citation:2025 MLD 544
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

2182) 2201/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Asif Ansari and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Televison Corp. and ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the foremost questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the re-designation / induction of the private respondents as Producer Programs (G-5) was/is suffering from inherent disqualification under the PTVC rules, and whether the private respondents are holders of the public office, therefore, fall within the purview of sub-clause 1(b) (ii) of Article 199 of the Constitution and this Court has jurisdiction to entertain this petition?
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 793
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1075-K/2021 Muhammad Asif Ansari & another v. Pakistan Television Corporation through its Managing Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

2183) 243/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous AZHAR ALI (Applicant) V/S MUHAMMAD ACHAR & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 32
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

2184) 483/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Bilal Sarwar s/o Muhammad Sarwar (Petitioner) V/S IVth ADJ, Karachi East & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2355
Advocates:Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-21569-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2185) 404/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Euro Tiles & Granites (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 390
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

2186) 902/1997 Suit MRS SARDAR BEGUM FARROQUI (Plaintiff) V/S MR AZHAR MASOOD AHMED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

2187) 348/2011 Cr.Bail Kashif Raza (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 21-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting

2188) 2/2008 Cr.Org.Misc. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Applicant) V/S Adnan Faisal & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 231
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 22-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2189) 5391/2021 Const. P. Sajid Akbar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:We, therefore, in absence of the exceptions as enunciated in the case-law cited above, cannot travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the instant case and interfere with any Order passed under the hierarchy of Pakistan Armed Forces in service-related matters according to their applicable laws.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 427
Advocates:Shahid Mushtaq(ADVO-12762-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

2190) 193/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Rasool Bux (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Colonization and disposal of Government Lands Sindh Act, 1912
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 340
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2191) 328/2022 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) V/S The ECP & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Election Matters
Tag Line:The Delimitation is to be carried out in terms of the mandatory provisions of Section 8 to 10 of the Local Government Act, 2013, Read with Section 20(3) & (4) read with section 221 to 223 of the Election Act, 2017 keeping uniformity in population of Union Councils.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 946
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 26-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

2192) 195/2017 H.C.A Abdul Tauheed Khan (Appellant) V/S The Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

2193) 3876/2011 Const. P. Junaid & M/s Al-Raziq PVT (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2012 CLC 1962
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
Order Date: 05-SEP-12
Approved for Reporting

2194) 2288/2016 Const. P. Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) V/S KMC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Promotion)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) Note 2
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 23-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2195) 2432/2008 Const. P. Works Coop. Housing Society Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 16-FEB-10
Approved for Reporting

2196) 793/2021 Criminal Miscelleneous ABDUL GHANI S/O SOOBAL KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the learned judge directed the police to register a case against the applicant-son under the Protection of Parents Ordinance 2021
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 606
Advocates:Nusrat Ali Shar(ADVO-881-SBC-KHP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.688/2022 Ahmad Jahanzaib & others v. Mian Arshad Ali Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2197) 66/2013 Cr.J.A Rafique @ Peeko (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1356
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 26-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.285/2020 Rafiq @ Peeko v. The State,Crl.A.161/2023 Rafiq @ Peeko v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Partly Allowed

2198) 20/2011 II.A. Muhammad Azam (Appellant) V/S Honourary General Secretary, Jamiat Dehli Punjabi Saudagran (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Advocates:Abdul Malik(ADVO-6378-SBC-KHI),Mahmooda Suleman(ADVO-10749-SBC-KHI),Younis Inayat(),Shamdas Chhangani(ADVO-137-SBC-KHI),Mukesh Kumar(ADVO-11446-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 23-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

2199) 578/2023 Cr.Appeal ASHIR @ WASEEM S/O BOOTA MASIH (Appellant) V/S LEARNED XTH ADJ KHI WEST (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 614
Advocates:Waseem Abbas(ADVO-16925-SBC-KHE),Abdul Naeem(ADVO-20803-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

2200) 341/2006 Cr.Appeal Meharban and 2 others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 23-AUG-10
Approved for Reporting

2201) 256/2012 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Siddiq Traders. (Applicant) V/S Deputy Collector & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 03-OCT-14
Approved for Reporting

2202) 712/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Uzair Ahmed Maniya (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990
Tag Line:Quashment of FIR in Constitutional jurisdiction; Held No:
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 364
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),S. Ahsan Ali Shah(ADVO-16440-SBC-KHS),Aqeel Ahmed(ADVO-12466-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-716-SBC-NSF)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 22-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

2203) 798/2007 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Mr. Justice Malik Muhammad Aqil
Order Date: 11-MAR-09
Approved for Reporting

2204) 127/2021 Cr.Bail Sabir Ali Khoso (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:For the aforesaid reasons, the instant bail application merits no consideration is dismissed. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the case; dispose of the same preferably within two months from the date of this Order; and, it is made clear that the direction given by this Court in bail matters may not be taken lightly and valid reasons are to be assigned if the same direction is not complied with as now it is well-settled law that to have a speedy trial is the fundamental right of the accused being universally acknowledged. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, a smooth methodology and Scheme for a speedy trial are provided whether it is held by the Sessions Court or Magistrate, in recognition of the said right of an accused person. This principle shall apply more vigorously to the trials before Special Courts, constituted under the CNS Act, or any other special law so that unnecessary delay, a much less shocking one in its conclusion is avoided in all circumstances. Any unreasonable or shocking delay in the conclusion of the trial, before Special Courts, would amount to the denial of justice, or to say, denial of fundamental rights to the accused, of speedy trial. On the aforesaid proposition. In this context, I am fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Imtiaz Ahmed vs. The State (2017 SCMR 1194).
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

2205) 322/2021 Cr.Bail Ashfaq Ahmed (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2021 SHC LAR 997
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

2206) 207/2016 H.C.A M/s. Karachi Water & Sewerage Board & another (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Ali Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLC 718
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

2207) 3411/2017 Const. P. Civil Aviation Authority (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

2208) 26/2012 J.M MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Petitioner) V/S MUHAMMAD AKBER BHATTI & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 1446
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting

2209) 471/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Victory Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd, Islamabad. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 85
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.782-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Victory Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.3289/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Victory Pipe Industries (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed in the light of earlier judgement

2210) 1978/2015 Suit Pakistan Beverage (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:here is a need of carving out a distinction between a determined/prescribed price for the consumer and sale price for the consumer. OGRA only determines the prescribed price on the basis of estimated revenue requirements and that is the only determination that they forwarded to the federal government i.e. Rs.469.04 per MMBTU. It cannot be considered as a sale price for each category of consumer since this could only be culminated and matured into a sale price once the federal government sends it back to the authority/OGRA for issuing a notification considering it to be a sale price in the notification. Determined prescribed price of OGRA cannot prematurely be considered to be sale price under the given circumstances. The impugned notification further lacks its sanctity as the same was much higher i.e. Rs.600 MMBTU than the prescribed/recommended price of Rs.469.04 per MMBTU by OGRA itself.
Citation:2016 SBLR Sindh 1268
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

2211) 2108/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Asim Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (age relaxation)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

2212) 4/2015 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Ali Bux (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Qadir Leghari, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 11-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

2213) 721/2009 Const. P. Fazal Ahmed Samtio (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Mr. Justice Bin Yamin
Order Date: 11-JUN-09
Approved for Reporting

2214) 123/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Haji Abdul Sattar Koshka & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 983
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

2215) 4/2003 Service Appeal Ghulam Shabbir (Appellant) V/S High Court of Sindh through its Registrar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Jamil Ahmed Rajpar(ADVO-826-SBC-HYD),Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author)
Order Date: 24-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

2216) 875/2024 Cr.Bail FAHAD ALTAF S/O ALTAF HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Bail Matters
Tag Line:**There is no doubt a departure from normal process is enshrined under Section-5(6) of the Ordinance, 1984 that is offences in respect of Bank (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984 and Section-497 Cr.P.C but that alone will not subside the constitutional mandate. **Section-5 Sub-section-6 of the Ordinance, 1984 does not restrict the court absolutely from not extending the accused person/applicant on bail. It restricts the court from not extending the accused/ applicant on bail if it appears to the court that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of scheduled offence. Such does not seems to be a case here.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1356
Advocates:Irtafa Ur Rehman(ADVO-19686-SBC-KHS),Khuda Dino Sangi(ADVO-1679-SBC-SUK),Deputy Attorney General(),Barrister Gazain Magsi(ADVO-67-BBC-QTA-QTA),Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah(ADVO-13398-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 23-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2217) 2/2014 Judicial Companies Misc. Industrias Cannon de Colombia S.A (Applicant) V/S Olympia Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Companies matters, LIMITATION
Tag Line:The claim of the petitioner itself is yet to be ascertained on the touchstone of Article 51 and Section 19 of the Limitation Act which summarily cannot be decided here. Even in the case of Halla Spinning Mills the observation of the Honble Supreme Court was that efforts should be made by the judicial forums to adopt such device so that the project may continue running commercially and its financial liabilities starts reducing gradually. --The statutory notice of demand under clause (a) of subsection (1) of Section 306 of the Companies ordinance is in relation to a debt claimed by the petitioner which as observed is to be ascertained and is also subjected to a limitation clause and hence such statutory notice would also loses its strength when not only the claim is bonafidely disputed but is also subjected to the Limitation Act, which in this particular case appears to be a mixed question of law and facts.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-16
Approved for Reporting

2218) 91/2021 I. A Mansoor Ahmed Mughal (Appellant) V/S Mrs. Naureen Mughal & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 779
Advocates:Khawaja Naveed Ahmed(ADVO-2102-SBC-KHI),Shahzeb Akhtar Khan(ADVO-13473-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
Order Date: 02-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3413/2023 Manzoor Ahmed Mughal v. Naureen Mughal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned

2219) 5312/2016 Const. P. Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.516-K/2018 Abdullah Khan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2220) 2413/2019 Const. P. Shaheena Nasreen (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Proforma Promotion)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

2221) 2924/2011 Const. P. Clarissa James and another (Petitioner) V/S M/S SIS Builders and Developers and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 20-OCT-11
Approved for Reporting

2222) 1298/2024 Const. P. Jan Muhamad (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 406
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
Order Date: 03-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5196/2024 Abdul Sattar Jatoi v. Jaan Muhammad Lakho and others,C.P.L.A.4843/2024 Abdul Sattar Jatoi v. Jaan Muhammad Lakho and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: , Adjourned (a/w CPs.5194 & 5196/24)

2223) 5507/2020 Const. P. Dr. Arif Dawood Harekar (Petitioner) V/S M/s Sea Breeze (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 955
Advocates:Syed Ali Ahmed Tariq(ADVO-2510-SBC-KHC)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 21-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1601-K/2021 Dr. Arif Dawood Harekar v. M/s Sea Breeze Private Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2224) 854/2015 Suit M/s. Axact (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Federal Investigation Agency & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:M/S. MANSOOR AHMED KHAN & CO.(FIRM-106-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer(ADVO-10014-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting

2225) 1331/2017 Suit Mst. Sufia Nasim & others (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Hasan Khan & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (O.XXXIX, Rule.1 & 2 Interim Injunction)
Tag Line:specific performance
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 104
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Khan(ADVO-3399-SBC-KHS),Hifzur Rahman(ADVO-4819-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Iqbal Aqeel(ADVO-3233-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 10-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

2226) 503/2024 Const. P. SIP (Retd) AIjaz Ali Kandhro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 433
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 03-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

2227) 787/2024 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Anwar (Applicant) V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 12
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

2228) 2333/2022 Cr.Bail FAISAL MAQBOOL SHAIKH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 232
Advocates:Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan(),Munir A. Malik(ADVO-1969-SBC-KHI),Ali Ashfaq(ADVO-46574-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

2229) 7/2018 E.P Muzaffar Ali Brohi (Petitioner) V/S Meer Nadir Ali Magsi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:The question now which remains for resolution is whether the omission on part of the Oath Commissioner in mentioning, in the attestation of verification or the affidavit, if the oath had been administered to the appellant/deponent, shall have the effect of invalidating the election petition. As regards the above, suffice it to say that according to the provisions of Article 129, illustration (e) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, there is presumption of correctness attached to an official act and it could not be controverted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the oath commissioner who is appointed by the respective High Courts under the law shall be performing the official acts for which he was appointed. However, he has stressed that the administration of oath before attestation by the Oath Commissioner should not be presumed in this case rather should reflect from the contents of attestation. We have applied our mind to this aspect of the matter and hold that in order to meet the real object and the spirit of the election laws which require verification on oath, in an ideal situation, the Oath Commissioner at the time of verification of the petition etc. and also the affidavit, must record and endorse verification/attestation that the oath has been actually, physically and duly administered to the election petitioner/deponent. But as the law has not been very clear till now, we should resort to the principle of presumption stipulated by Article 129(e) ibid in this case for avoiding the knock out of the petition for an omission and lapse on part of the Oath Commissioner. But for the future we hold that where the election petition or the affidavit is sought to be attested by the Oath Commissioner, the election petitioner shall insist and shall ensure that the requisite endorsement about the administration of oath is made, otherwise the election petition/affidavit shall not be considered to have been attested on oath and thus the election petition shall be liable to be, inter alia, dismissed on the above score. We consciously and deliberately neither apply this rule to the instant case nor any other matter pending at any forum (election tribunal or in appeals).
Citation:2020 CLC 92
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

2230) 274/2024 I.T.R.A MUKESH KUMAR (Applicant) V/S APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:No Reference Application is maintainable against dismissal of Rectification Application.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1334
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-20870-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 03-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

2231) 877/2024 Const. P. Darwais Hameed (Petitioner) V/S M/s South Asia Pakistan Terminal Pvt Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:It is well settled that certiorari is available to quash a decision for an error of law. It will also be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction when an inferior Court or a tribunal acts without jurisdiction or over its jurisdiction or fails to exercise its jurisdiction or where the Court or a tribunal acts illegally in the exercise of its undoubted jurisdiction and it decides a matter in violation of the principle of natural justice.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1030
Advocates:Inayat Hussain Shah(ADVO-10288-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

2232) 527/2018 Const. P. Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2233) 89/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Mohammad Sharif (Applicant) V/S Abdul Baseer Shamsi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2023 SHC SUK 485
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 15-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

2234) 340/2018 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S M/s. Tariq Chobdar & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1960
Advocates:Khalid Mahmood Rajpar(ADVO-10488-SBC-KHS),Zain ul Abdin Jatoi(ADVO-6347-SBC-KHI),Fouzia Rasheed(ADVO-6865-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-NOV-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1456-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. Tariq Chobdar & others,C.A.1432/2021 The Collector of Customs, Karachi v. Tariq Chobdar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Judgment Reserved Judgment Reserved

2235) 3525/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Rasool Saand (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

2236) 1231/2024 Const. P. Nizar Ali Fazwani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Coming to the case in hand, it appears that the Ayyan Ali case supra establishes that mere criminal involvement does not justify ECL placement, which confirms that citizens have a fundamental right to liberty under Article 9, which, combined with Articles 4 and 15, includes the right to travel, unless restricted by a law enacted in the public interest. Numerous judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name on the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 220
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor NAB(SpPNAB),Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Dy Attorney General(DAG)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2237) 3463/2010 Suit Dr Raheela Magsi (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting

2238) 527/2021 Criminal Appeal ZARDULLAH KHAN S/O SHUJA ALAM KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 235
Advocates:Muhammad Haris(ADVO-17401-SBC-KHS),Ajab Khan Khattak(ADVO-8138-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Syed Nadeem-ul Haq(ADVO-6993-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-DEC-22
Approved for Reporting

2239) 52/2025 M.A. Naseem Fatima (since deceased) thr. LRs (Appellant) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2574
Advocates:Ibad Jawed(ADVO-23217-SBC-KHS),Abdul Hameed(ADVO-13458-SBC-KHI),Zeeshan Asad(ADVO-530-SBC-SGR),Javed Ahmed Rajput(ADVO-4482-SBC-KHE),Nadir Khan Burdi(ADVO-13227-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2240) 348/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Ali Gohar Kanasro & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2024 SHC LAR 470
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 08-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2241) 40/2009 Const. P. Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Article, 177, 193, 199 of Constitution of Pakistan In Article 193, the word a?Safter consultationa?y has been comprehensively considered and is held that the object of providing consultation, inter alia, in Article 177 and 193 for the appointment of Judges in the Supreme Court and in the High Courts was to accord constitutional recognition to the practice/ convention of consulting the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned and the Chief Justice of the Federal Court which was obtaining prior to independence of India and post-independence period, in order to ensure that competent and capable people of known integrity should be inducted in the superior judiciary; The Chief Justice of a High Court and Chief Justice of Pakistan are well equipped to asses as to the knowledge and suitability of a candidate of judgeship in the superior Courts whereas the Governor of a Province and the Federal Government are better equipped to find out about the antecedents of a candidate and to acquire other information as to his character/conduct. The consistent view as developed by Superior Courts is that that the Executive Authority is bound to accept the views of Chief Justice of High Court concerned and Chief Justice of Pakistan in the matter of appointment of judges in superior judiciary and such view cannot be rejected arbitrarily for extraneous consideration and if the Executive wishes to disagree with their views, it has to record strong reasons which will be justiciable and that if a person is found to be unfit by the Chief Justice of a High Court concerned and Chief Justice of Pakistan for appointment as a judge of a High Court, he cannot be appointed as it will not be a proper exercise of power to appoint under Articles of the Constitution.
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam, Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab
Order Date: 25-JUN-09
Approved for Reporting

2242) 1000/2021 Const. P. M/s. Shabbir Tiles & Ceramics Limited (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Unions Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Trans-Provincial status.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1489
Advocates:Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-10142-SBC-KHI),Farhan Ul Hassan(ADVO-15556-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zaheer ul Hassan(ADVO-8707-SBC-KHI),Khalid Imran(ADVO-8140-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2243) 5058/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Rashid Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 PLC CS 1216
Advocates:Muhammad Taha Ali Khan(ADVO-16320-SBC-KHC),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ashfaq Rafiq Janjua(ADVO-4858-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

2244) 3234/2025 Const. P. Liaquat Ali Fazlani (Petitioner) V/S General Manager SSGCL & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Relationship of employee Governed under principle of Master and Servant Petition not maintainable
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1933
Advocates:In Person(INP)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 17-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

2245) 1547/2016 Const. P. Aamir Jamil (Petitioner) V/S University of Karachi and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (statutory or non statutory rules of service)
Citation:2018 SBLR Sindh 524
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.663-K/2017 Aamir Jamil v. University of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2246) 66/1999 J.M MST. ZULEKHA BIBI & ORS (Applicant) V/S MST. HAFIZA AHMED & ORS. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:No relief can be granted to the non-existent person.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1477
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

2247) 41/2025 Cr.Bail Imran Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1812
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1267/2025 National Accountability Bureau thr. Its Chairman, Islamabad v. Imran Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed. Leave Refused.

2248) 2262/2016 Const. P. Syed Athar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Bail admitted)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 29-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

2249) 8149/2018 Const. P. M/s Fabrica (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sale Tax Act 1990 (Section 3)
Tag Line: A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan has pronounced the judgment on 18th January 2021 in the case of Al-Razzaq Fibres Pvt. Ltd. and others v. The Federation of Pakistan and another (alongwith other connected Petitions), whereby, the petitioners have challenged the vires of the amendment in in subsection (2)(b) of Section 3 and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge as well as SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(I)/2011 for being ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Divisional Bench of this Court has been pleased to allow the aforesaid Petitions in the following terms: - 11. Accordingly, for the above reasons, instant petitions are allowed in the following terms:- (i) Amendment in Section 3(2)(b) read with Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, through Finance Act, 2017, to the extent of substituting the words Board with the approval of Federal Minister Incharge, is ultravires to Constitution, and contrary to law, hence of no legal effect. (ii) SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 issued in terms of and in purported exercise of powers conferred by, the amendment in Section 3(2)(b) and Section 4(c) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, particularly adding of a new condition XIV to SRO 1125(1)/2011, is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution, and is of no legal effect. (iii) The respondents are restrained from demanding any duty in terms of SRO 584(I)/2017 dated 01.07.2017 from the petitioners. (iv) Provisions of Section 74A, suffice to say, have no relevance to the controversy in hand because it seeks validation of the acts of Federal Government, and not that of the Board, with the approval of the Federal Minister-in-Charge.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1080
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 18-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.518-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Fabrica Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

2250) 146/2022 Const. P. Syed Zafar Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 270
Advocates:Syed Farhan Ali Shah(ADVO-16966-SBC-KHS),Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-628-SBC-KHP),Saif Sohail Yunus(ADVO-16965-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

2251) 3518/2015 Const. P. Asad Abdullah and others (Petitioner) V/S The State and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 02-DEC-15
Approved for Reporting

2252) 43/2022 H.C.A Jamil Ahmed Shaikh & Others (Appellant) V/S Mst. Hamida & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3400
Advocates:Syed Maqbool Hussain Shah(ADVO-15174-SBC-KHI),Mustafa Lakhani(ADVO-208-SBC-KHS),Abdul Wajid Wyne(ADVO-2246-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 25-NOV-25
Approved for Reporting

2253) 18/2011 Civil Revision Mehboob (Applicant) V/S Nadir Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Revision Application and pending stay application were dismissed with no order as to costs.
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 16-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2254) 5270/2013 Const. P. Qadir Fabrics (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 06-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

2255) 6286/2016 Const. P. Abdul Majeed & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 09-DEC-16
Approved for Reporting

2256) 1155/2023 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Contract Employees claiming regularization.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 548
Advocates:Muhammad Saleem Khaskheli(ADVO-481-SBC-MPR),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

2257) 200/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Mst. Rashida Begume & Others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Karim & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Judicial integrity upheld, fraud must be proven, not presumed. Admissions and established legal principles affirm the validity of registered documents.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1541
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2258) 1312/2022 Const. P. Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 792
Advocates:Muhammad Saeeduz-Zaman.(ADVO-4476-SBC-KHI),Dildar Ahmad(ADVO-19038-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting

2259) 163/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN S/O GHULAM SARWAR & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Discrepancies and contradictions)
Tag Line:No ransom demand has been proved by the prosecution through any tangible evidence. For instance, there is no CDR to link the appellants to the offence. No one saw the appellants throw the body of the deceased in the canal and the last seen evidence without proper identification of the appellants cannot be relied upon which in any event is only circumstantial evidence and is to be viewed with extreme caution. No toxicology report was produced to show that the child had even been drugged.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 474
Advocates:Insaf Ahmed(ADVO-4455-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 24-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

2260) 1253/2011 Suit ABDUL AZIZ (Plaintiff) V/S ABDUL WAHAB & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

2261) 526/2022 Const. P. Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 YLR 2537
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.282-K/2024 Allah Wadhayo through L.Rs. v. Sher Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

2262) 48/1996 R.A (Civil Revision) Mateen Khan and other (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ishaque and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:(1). Non-examining of Second Witness-Fatal, (2). Appraisal of Evidence and (3). Bona fide Purchaser for Value without Notice.
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 2097
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 19-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting

2263) 1/2013 J.M United Banik Limited (Applicant) V/S Gulistan Textile Mills Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 20-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

2264) 1607/2020 Const. P. Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani (Petitioner) V/S President N.B.P & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Double Jeopardy )
Tag Line:The legal position of the case is that dispensing with the regular inquiry and awarding two punishments i.e. downgrading and major penalty of dismissal from service, ought not to have been imposed upon the Petitioner at the same time when the charges were denied by the Petitioner. The principle of natural justice demands that the petitioner ought to have been heard on the allegations leveled against him; however, the respondent had chosen not to conduct the regular inquiry and simply relied upon the purported admission of the petitioner which was not called for in the above circumstances.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 351
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Zain Mustafa Soomro(ADVO-17295-SBC-KHS),Afaq Ahmed Saeed(ADVO-5783-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1926/2022 The President, National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi and others v. Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2265) 4859/2018 Const. P. Naeem Adil Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S R.O & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Election Matters
Tag Line:Instant petition challenging the orders, passed by Returning Officer and learned Election Appellate Tribunal, whereby the nomination papers of the petitioner for contesting the forthcoming general election-2018 was rejected. sub-section (9) and (10) of Section 62 of the Election Act 2017 are discussed. So far as the exercise of the discretionary powers in upsetting the order passed by the forum below is concerned, this court has to comprehend what illegality or irregularity and or violation of law has been committed by the courts below which caused miscarriage of justice. Reference may be placed to the case of Muslim Commercial Bank Ltd. through Attorney v. Abdul Waheed Abro and 2 others (2015 PLC 259). The instant petition is devoid of merit, thus, constrained to dismiss the petition with no order as to costs.
Advocates:Muhammad Makhdoom Ali Khan(ADVO-2885-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Hussain Ali Almani(ADVO-12585-SBC-KHI),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

2266) 283/2021 Cr.Bail Dado Adam son of Muhammad Qasim Abbasi (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2021 SHC SUK 762
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-21
Approved for Reporting

2267) 269/2017 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/S PACIFIC DISTRIBUTION (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 01-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.1031/2018 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Pacific Distributors,C.P.18-K/2018 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s Pacific Distributors Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted [ Before (3)HJJs ]

2268) 118/2012 Suit AZHAR MUKHTAR (Plaintiff) V/S MST. TAZEEN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-15
Approved for Reporting

2269) 351/2025 Criminal Appeal SAJJAN SHORO S/O SOOMAR SHORO (Appellant) V/S MAHBOOB ALI @ MIR MAHBOOB BROHI & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Illegal Dispossession
Citation:2026 SHC KHI 6
Advocates:Naveed Musrat(ADVO-17956-SBC-KHE),Abdul Khalil Brohi(ADVO-19721-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 02-JAN-26
Approved for Reporting

2270) 104/2016 Cr.Appeal Syed Waris (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 20-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

2271) 6629/2016 Const. P. Touseef Nazeer (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 23-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.19-K/2019 Touseef Nazeer v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2272) 24/2011 II.A. Bibi Amirunnisa (Appellant) V/S Syed Ghulam Hyder Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 11-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

2273) 9/2008 II.A. Malik Muhammad Yaseen (Appellant) V/S Syed Raza Hyder and ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 17-APR-13
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.432/2014 Syed Raza Haider v. Malik Muhammad Yaseen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

2274) 28/2009 Cr.J.A Muhammad Azeem Almani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.511/2020 Muhammad Azeem Almani v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

2275) 24/2012 J.M KANDAWALLA TRUST (Petitioner) V/S PUBLIC AT LARGE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 SBLR Sindh 26
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

2276) 259/2014 H.C.A First Women Bank Limited (Appellant) V/S Hakim Sons Overseas Trading (Pvt) Limited and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Citation:2016 MLD 333
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 20-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

2277) 1585/2023 Const. P. Hamid Mehmood & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Interpretation of Regulation No.18-4.1 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in respect of the conversion of amenity plots.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 439
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

2278) 317/2015 Criminal Appeal MUMTAZUL HAQ S/O LATE ZAHOORUL HAQ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Appeal (Appeal)
Tag Line: Appellant Mumtaz ul Haq has assailed judgment Anti-Corruption(Provincial), under Sections 5-B and 5-C read with section 5(2)of Prevention of Corruption Act (Act II of 1947), whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years (5)and to pay fine of Rs.5 Lacs to the Government. He purchased a bungalow measuring 600 sq, During his posting at Park and Recreation Department, K.D.A., he got allotted KDA land for Nursery and now he is running Nursery thereon. accused has neither applied for permission to purchase the above property, nor the declaration of assets has been furnished. During the course of enquiry, he failed to prove justification regarding his source of income for the purchase of the above properties. Accused in his statement on oath had given sufficient details regarding the properties and the source from which the same came into his possession. Another serious lacuna on the part of Investigating Officer is that it took almost eight (8) years in submitting challan before the competent Court of law, as admittedly the F.I.R. was lodged on05.7.1997. Apart from above, none of the prosecution witnesses has specifically involved the accused in amassing the properties beyond known sources of his income by misusing his official position /authority and / or indulging in corruption or corrupt practices. Criminal appeal is allowed.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1391
Advocates:Mirza Sarfraz Ahmed(ADVO-4467-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Asif Ali Jokhio(ADVO-14779-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 27-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

2279) 315/2021 R.A (Civil Revision) Sharif Polani (Applicant) V/S Sindh Industrial Trading Estate Ltd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SBLR Sindh 1512
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.236-K/2024 Sharif Polani v. Sindh Industrial Trading Estate Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

2280) 39/2021 Suit.B THE BANK OF PUNJAB (Plaintiff) V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Banking Law, Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891
Tag Line:----With regard to candid admission on the part of the defendant, the execution of documents referred above including a request letter for grant of loan, sanction letters, finance agreements and creation of charge documents are of much significance. ----Defendants have neither denied execution of agreement nor challenged the authority of Mr. Jawed Khan to execute the agreement with it on behalf of the bank. It is thus not a question of law that could form substantial question out of the pleadings in consideration of law of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and execution of documents in particular
Citation:2023 CLD 920
Advocates:Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHS),Syed Ali Bin Maaz(ADVO-13125-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 06-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

2281) 8518/2017 Const. P. Munner Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3793/2018 Muneer Ahmed & another v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

2282) 1421/2022 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Encrochment over Public Property)
Tag Line:The court dismissed the petition on illegal encroachments and ordered an inquiry into the actions of Revenue and Anti-Encroachment authorities. The inquiry, led by the Chairman of the Provincial Anti-Corruption Establishment, will verify the legality of their actions and report within 90 days, with strict penalties for any interference.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1394
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro
Order Date: 31-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2283) 1644/2013 Suit Sheikh Muhammad Javaid (Plaintiff) V/S Sartaj Saqlain and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 1 Rule 10 CPC)
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 12---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 17 & 79---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 113 & S. 22---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. I, R. 10---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Ss. 290 & 309---Suit for specific performance of contract---Impleadment of party during pendency of suit---Limitation, commencement of---Agreement to sell by the Directors of a private limited company---Effect---Document---Proof---Procedure---Private limited company was impleaded as one of the defendants during pendency of suit on 07-09-2015---Suit against the said defendant was to be deemed to have been instituted from the date when company was impleaded as defendant---Plaintiff had stated in the plaint that cause of action had accrued on 26-08-2011---Present suit was time barred against newly impleaded defendant private limited company---Remaining defendants were not owners of the suit property---Suit to compel the said defendants to execute sale in favour of plaintiff was not maintainable---Plaintiff was bound to prove execution of agreement to sell with the lawful owner of suit property---Alleged agreement to sell was not executed by the company or any duly authorized person by the company in accordance with law---Managing Directors of a company had to act on the basis of authorization by the Board of Directors of company or on the basis of its Articles of Association---Even plaint/suit on behalf of a company could not be filed by the Director of a company for its benefit without proper authorization---Nothing was on record with regard to any meeting of the company to propose sale of its property---Even sale consideration was not paid to the company---Immovable property owned by a private limited company could not be sold by its Director---Suit property remained to be the property of company in the record of Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan---Documents including alleged agreement to sell appeared to be forged and fabricated---Even legal heirs of Director of company could not step into the shoes of Director on his/her death to deal with the assets of a private limited company---Suit property belonged to a private limited company and possession of plaintiff on the suit property was result of fraud and mismanagement of the assets of private limited company---Plaintiff had not produced any of the marginal witnesses of agreement to sell and payment receipts---Photocopy of document was inadmissible in evidence---Business of registered company was to be transacted through Bank account held by the said company---Any transaction by or between the third party with any person who was even Director of company could not be treated as transaction binding on the company itself---Plaintiff had failed to establish contract with the lawful owner of suit property---Plaintiff had made attempt to misuse the process of court on the basis of forged documents---Court was bound to protect such immovable property owned by the company---Company had abandoned its business and its property should be dealt with in accordance with law---Suit property could only be protected or disposed of by winding-up of the company for the benefits of its affectees, if any---Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan was directed to initiate proceedings against the company and wind-up the same---Nazir of the High Court was directed to inspect the suit property and take over possession of entire suit property till final order by the Court---Member Inspection Team was directed to examine affidavit filed by the plaintiff in his examination-in-chief on oath and file a complaint against him if any case was made out---Suit was dismissed in circumstances. Bashir Dawood v. Haji Suleman Goawala and Sons Ltd. and others 2010 CLC 191 rel.
Citation:2018 CLC 1676, 2018 CLD 1237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 17-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

2284) 384/2021 Criminal Appeal SHAHNAWAZ S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Non-association of private witness)
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellant against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during the cross-examination.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 815
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHS),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.583/2022 Shahnawaz v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2285) 40/2001 Civil Revision Shamsuddin and others (Applicant) V/S Abdul Jabbar & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Tag Line:Islamic law--- ----Pre-emption suit--- Talbs, performance of--- Requirements---Plaintiffs had failed to produce two witnesses of the occasion/event when they came to know that defendants had sold or they were about to sell their property and plaintiffs raised their right of pre-emption against the defendants---Plaintiffs were required to produce two witnesses of Talb-i-Ishhad but they had not produced the second witness nor had mentioned second witness in their claim of pre-emption---Plaintiffs had failed to prove their right of pre-emption, in circumstances---Revision was dismissed accordingly. [Paras. 7, 8, 9 & 10 of the judgment]
Citation:2020 CLC Note 25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

2286) 4047/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Ali Javed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The general principles of up-gradation that to our mind emerge from the enunciations of the Supreme Court can be elucidated as follows: (i) Up-gradation is not the same as promotion, the latter being a term specifically defined in civil service statutes; (ii) Up-gradation is essentially an upgrade of the post to a higher pay-scale and not a promotion to a higher grade. Thus, the incumbent of the upgraded post retains his substantive grade; (iii) Up-gradation is meant for isolated posts, where the service structure does not provide avenues for promotion to a higher pay-scale thus putting the incumbent at a disadvantage as compared to other employees, its purpose being to address the stagnation and frustration of the employee of such post so that he/she remains productive; (iv) To justify up-gradation, the Government will have to demonstrate that it is required for restructuring or reforming the department or to meet exigencies of service in the public interest. In other words, up-gradation should be pursuant to a scheme or a policy; (v) Up-gradation should not be to the prejudice of other employees and should not be used to by-pass prescribed rules of promotion. Rel. Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456); Regional Commissioner Income Tax v. Munawar Ali (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030); and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890).
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

2287) 97/2018 II.A. Zulfiqar Ali Sheera Through His Attorney (Appellant) V/S Shaukat Ali & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XXIII, R. 3---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54---Suit for declaration and permanent injunction---Appeal--- Compromise--- Suit was dismissed concurrently against which appeal had been preferred---Defendants had filed compromise application with the request to decree the suit against them on their admission of claim of the plaintiff--- Validity--- Compromise application with the clause of two months' time to be given to defendants to vacate suit property from the date of order on the said application had been filed---Two months' time to vacate suit property by the defendants had already expired prior to filing of present application---Terms and conditions of compromise should have already been complied with by the parties during the period of pendency of proceedings---Condition of order of the Court on such compromise was absurd---Decree for disposal of suit/appeal on compromise would not serve the purpose---Appeal on such compromise had become infructuous, in circumstances---Alleged compromise was one sided and contrary to the record and conduct of appellant---Compromise application was dismissed, in circumstances and counsel for the appellant was directed to address the court on merit of the case on the fixed date. Peer Dil and others v. Dad Muhammad 2009 SCMR 1268 rel.
Citation:2020 YLR 2418
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

2288) 404/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Ali and another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 295
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.181-K/2019 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. and another v. Muhammad Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2289) 5888/2015 Const. P. Abdul Basit Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Hence, in our view, the decision taken by the Cantonment Executive Officer Clifton Cantonment to impose the major penalty of compulsory retirement upon the petitioner is violative of the principles of natural justice and law on the subject issue, so as the length of service of the petitioner is concerned, which is not sustainable under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Jan Muhammad v. General Manager, Karachi Telecommunication Region and another, 1993 SCMR 1440, is clear in its terms. 15. Foregoing the reasons, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Cantonment Executive Officer Clifton Cantonment to take a fresh decision by hearing the petitioner within two months.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 624
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

2290) 830/1999 Const. P. Haroon Rashild. (Petitioner) V/S Fed.of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 696
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Federal Counsel()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

2291) 470/2021 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O BASHIR AHMED & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Tag Line:There is no evidence to ascertain as to whether the property was kept in safe custody from its recovery till its arrival at the office of the chemical examiner. Therefore, by failing to prove the safe custody of the recovered contraband, the same could not be used against the appellants in this regard and the chemical report is of no legal value.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 536
Advocates:Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Zakir Hussain Bughio(ADVO-11959-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 16-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

2292) 983/2017 Suit Mrs. Hina Mumtaz Somroo (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Sami Soomro (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

2293) 2227/2015 Suit Allied Bank Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Qamar Hussain Naqvi & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Plaint rejected by invoking legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? and Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? (a personal right of action dies with the person) ??? death extinguishes liability in Tort, is enforceable in Pakistan subject to certain exceptions. First, where a tortfeasor???s estate is benefited by the wrong done, then an action would lie against his representatives, secondly, when already a decree is passed, inter alia, for damages, the legal representatives / heirs of a deceased can continue the litigation, thirdly, if in a service case, the Trial Court has reinstated a petitioner in service, which is overturned by an appellate court and in the intervening period, person dies, his legal heirs can continue the litigation, because if a Higher Forum restores the Order of Trial Court, then the legal heirs would at least be entitled for the service benefits. However, no suit can be filed after the death of a person for his individual acts, against his legal heirs.
Topic: Order VII, Rule 11., LIMITATION
Tag Line:Plaint rejected by invoking legal maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona and Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Legal maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona (a personal right of action dies with the person) death extinguishes liability in Tort, is enforceable in Pakistan subject to certain exceptions. First, where a tortfeasors estate is benefited by the wrong done, then an action would lie against his representatives, secondly, when already a decree is passed, inter alia, for damages, the legal representatives / heirs of a deceased can continue the litigation, thirdly, if in a service case, the Trial Court has reinstated a petitioner in service, which is overturned by an appellate court and in the intervening period, person dies, his legal heirs can continue the litigation, because if a Higher Forum restores the Order of Trial Court, then the legal heirs would at least be entitled for the service benefits. However, no suit can be filed after the death of a person for his individual acts, against his legal heirs.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 18-NOV-19
Approved for Reporting

2294) 1679/2017 Const. P. Mazhar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 150
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

2295) 85/2012 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 407
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.738-K/2022 Aziz Khan & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2296) 883/2015 Suit Dr. Abdul Malik. (Plaintiff) V/S K.M.C., & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 846
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

2297) 23/2016 Spl.H.C.A M/s. Muslim Cotton Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & others (Appellant) V/S Allied Bank Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 110
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.588/2021 Liberty Mills Limited, Karachi v. Muslim Cotton Mills (Pvt) Limited, Karachi and others,C.A.1740/2021 Liberty Mills Limited, Karachi v. Muslim Cotton Mills (Pvt) Limited, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of. CMA 1983/21 is allowed,Pending

2298) 1842/2015 Const. P. Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Back benefits)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 557
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

2299) 411/2016 Criminal Appeal ABDUL QADIR SOOMRO S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) V/S THE SPL COURT OFFENCES IN BANKS SINDH KHI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal
Tag Line:Appellants filed Appeal against the judgment passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Special Court (Offences in Banks) for the offence under sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 477-A PPC, whereby both the appellants were convicted u/s. 409 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for ten (10) years each and fine of Rs.2 Million on each count .Branch Manager Abdul Qadir Soomro of Bhriya misappropriated the money through RTC of different persons and had received different amounts through deposit slips duly stamped/signed from eleven customers name of whom are mentioned in the FIR and instead of crediting the said amount in their account fraudulently pocketed the same as such they have committed embezzlement of Rs.82,44,300/- . s (PW-4) Farooq Ali in his evidence deposed that in the month of November 2012 he has deposited cash of Rs.335,000/- in his account which was received by accused Abdul Qadir, Branch Manager but the said cash amount was not credited in his account The accused had misappropriated an amount of Rs.985,300/-, Rs.13,30,000/- and Rs.300,000/- by using his ID. He further deposed that he cannot say that the accused has transferred money from the account of Shahnawaz, Ghulam Rasool and Abdul Baqi .appellant Abdul Qadir Soomro that he is not a dangerous, desperate and hardened criminal as well as he is not a previous convict, it is a matter of record that the appellant is in jail for a period of six (6) years, two (2) months and fourteen (14) days .instant appeal is dismissed on merits.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-19
Approved for Reporting

2300) 220/2011 H.C.A Muhammad Farooque vs Aman Elahi (Appellant) V/S Aman elahi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 14-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

2301) 92/2014 Suit M/s. Haidri Beverages (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The precise controversy involved is that whether the Plaintiffs industry (beverage industry) is an agro-based industry, being entitled for exemption and benefits allowed vide SRO No.575(I)/2006 dated 05.06.2006 (SRO 575); and whether, can the Plaintiffs seek protection under the doctrine of departmental practice whereby in the past their industry has been recognized as an agro based industry. It has been held by the Court that the Plaintiffs have not been able to make out a case in their favor, in that the beverage industry cannot be called or classified as an agro-based industry for the purposes of exemption claimed under SRO 575; nor they are protected under the doctrine of past practice, once it is held that such practice was a wrong practice.
Citation:2021 PTD 362
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

2302) 1920/2016 Const. P. Ishtiaq Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting

2303) 272/2021 Cr.Bail Bakhshal Abro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Post Arrest Bail
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 259
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

2304) 2598/2016 Const. P. Rashid Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Section 3 of Sindh Regularization Act, )
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 1245
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 26-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting

2305) 692/2013 Const. P. M/s. Memon Motors (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 21-APR-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.267-K/2014 National Accountability Bureau v. M/s Memon Motors and others,C.A.70-K/2014 National Accountability Bureau v. M/s Memon Motors and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted & Refixed on 29.12.2014,Disposed Disposed of

2306) 4934/2024 Const. P. Samina Alvi & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 509
Advocates:Anwar Mansoor Khan(ADVO-2746-SBC-KHI),Asim Mansoor Khan(ADVO-4784-SBC-KHI),Zeeshan Bashir(ADVO-12488-SBC-KHI),Umaimah Anwar Khan(ADVO-11287-SBC-KHI),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

2307) 2346/2014 Suit Muhammad Arshad Awan. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Siindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 04-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting

2308) 398/2021 Const. P. M/S J.S Bamk Limted (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 500
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

2309) 4435/2023 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Cantonments Act 1924 (section 179-A)
Tag Line:Approval of Layout Plans in Cantonment Areas under Section 178 AA and 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1114
Advocates:Ashraf Ali(ADVO-3161-SBC-KHI),Mirza Sikandar Baig(ADVO-17936-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Vishwa Mittar(ADVO-19681-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 14-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

2310) 273/2013 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD ALI S/O YAMEEN KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Conviction Set aside, Delay in Identification, JM not examined, Recovered article not produced, at the time of Statement, No hulia given in FIR )
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ Note 13
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

2311) 70/2021 II.A. Mehfooz Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Mst. Rehmat Begum & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 401
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.49-K/2022 Mst.Rehmat Begum v. Mehfooz Ahmed & othersmanhg Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2312) 97/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Waseem Ahmed and others (Applicant) V/S Saleem Shehzad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3404
Advocates:Falak Sher Khan(ADVO-9233-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Tamaz Khan(ADVO-3343HLC-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-NOV-25
Approved for Reporting

2313) 508/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Shoaib Palijo & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Petition challenging vires of a law while seeking enforcement of fundamental rights can only be heard by a Constitutional Bench
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 665
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
Order Date: 22-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

2314) 378/2017 Const. P. Syed Mubarik Ali Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S The Finance Director HESCO (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

2315) 80/2017 Civil Revision Abdul Qadir Memon (Applicant) V/S Shahid Umar Rajput (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting

2316) 4296/2024 Const. P. Nazeer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Exhumation of dead body under section 176(2) Cr.P.C
Tag Line:To apply for exhumation of the dead body under Section 176(2) of the Code a Magistrate's satisfaction that exhumation is necessary to determine the cause of death. This discretion should be exercised cautiously, even if the request comes from a stranger, as long as reasonable circumstances or suspicion exists. The purpose is to initiate criminal proceedings if necessary. Close relatives may be involved in homicides, so their objections alone should not be a barrier to disinterment if other circumstances warrant it. The case of Muhammad Ramzan and others v. The State and another (1987 SCMR 272) supports disinterment even after a year to determine the cause of death. 8. Primarily, the father has the right to know his loved one's true cause of death. As the Supreme Court upheld in Ameer Afzal Baig v. Ahsan Ullah Baig, disinterment orders based on suspicion are valid. Even after burial, the right to investigate the cause of death exists. The law allows such requests, even from strangers to ensure proper investigation and to satisfy concerns about potential foul play.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 897
Advocates:Abbadul Hussnain(ADVO-6779-SBC-KHI),Safir Uddin Khan Gandapur(ADVO-16031-SBC-KHS),Sana Kheshgi(ADVO-21300-SBC-KHS),Salah-ud-Din Khan Gandapur(ADVO-2969-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Bilal Rashid (ADVO-16235-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 31-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

2317) 3337/2011 Const. P. Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-MAY-17
Approved for Reporting

2318) 809/2014 Cr.Bail MUkhtiar and an other (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 09-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

2319) 16/2012 I. A Province of Sindh & others (Appellant) V/S Deputy District Officer (Rev) & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Land Acquisition Act,1894 (Limitation)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting

2320) 3573/2014 Const. P. M/s Wyeth Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Nasimul Hassan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLC Lab. 171
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting

2321) 35/2022 I. A Athar Waseem & Another (Appellant) V/S Shaikh Anjum Rehmat (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 439
Advocates:Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Hafiz Muhammad Yahya(ADVO-16854-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 17-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

2322) 4925/2021 Const. P. Nazir Ahmed Palijo (Petitioner) V/S Chief Minister Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In the light of the above discussion, it is demonstrably clear that the petitioner has not been denied or deprived of a legal right. He has not sustained an injury to any legally protected interest. The impugned working paper does not operate as a decision against him, much less does it wrongfully affect his title to something. He has not been subjected to a legal wrong. He has suffered no legal grievance. He has no legal peg for a justifiable claim to hang on. However the petitioner has only sustainable cause to be considered for promotion in BS-20 subject to qualification, experience, and availably of the post, however, the petitioner is not precluded to ask for consideration of his case for promotion as per Rule 13 of Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation, and Seniority) Rules, 1975 by PSB-I which is going to take place in the ensuing month.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 657
Advocates:Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

2323) 61/2007 H.C.A National Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) V/S M/s. White Gold Exporters (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 30-NOV-11
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.224-K/2011 Mst. Abida Parveen v. National Bank of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2324) 3872/2020 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 116
Advocates:Muhammad Nishat Warsi(ADVO-3988-SBC-KHI),Durdana Tanweer(ADVO-10812-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

2325) 5862/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam Awan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 67
Advocates:Abdul Qadir Leghari(ADVO-4868-SBC-KHI),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 17-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.492/2022 Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (KW&SB), Karachi through its Chairman v. Muhammad Aslam Awan and others,C.P.L.A.285-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Aslam Awan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed

2326) 2546/2020 Const. P. Aftab Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) V/S The Speaker Provincial Assembly and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today.
Topic: Service matters (Repatriation)
Tag Line:Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1306
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1879/2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar v. Speaker Provincial Assembly of Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2327) 799/2018 Suit Ms. Ambreen Bashir & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Injunction; restraining operation of a private school on residential property.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1290
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Shuaban(ADVO-9969-SBC-KHI),Touqeer Ahmed(ADVO-52245-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Vawda(ADVO-14001-SBC-KHI),Faisal Siddiqi(ADVO-8504-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

2328) 402/2002 Cr.Appeal Muhammad (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 15-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

2329) 8/2024 Judicial Companies Misc. EFG HERMES PAKISTAN LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S Court Notice - PSX & SECP (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Sanction of scheme of merger.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 536
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

2330) 1256/2019 Suit Eaton Phonenixtec MMPL Co., LTD (Plaintiff) V/S Messrs. New Rabia Enterprises (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Plea of equitable set-off in defense to Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 181
Advocates:Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI),Syed Daanish Ghazi(ADVO-13558-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zahid Khan(ADVO-3162-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting

2331) 5043/2017 Const. P. Allah Bux Soomro (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1046
Advocates:Syed Amir Shah(ADVO-12175-SBC-KHW),Muhammad Yaqoob(ADVO-8956-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1229/2023 General Manager, MCB Bank Ltd Sukkur v. Allah Bux Soomro dec. thr. LRs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2332) 635/2018 Const. P. M/S Gerry (Petitioner) V/S Learned Member NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (transfer and posting)
Citation:2019 PLC Lab. 63
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-FEB-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.86-K/2018,C.P.L.A.84-K/2018,C.P.L.A.88-K/2018,C.P.L.A.83-K/2018,C.P.L.A.87-K/2018,C.P.L.A.85-K/2018 SCP Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

2333) 1203/2015 Const. P. Baby Ramma Khan (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Khurram Khan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 12-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.446-K/2016 The Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Department and others v. Naeem Ali Maitlo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2334) 567/2019 Const. P. Nasir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 346
Advocates:Muhammad Arshad Khan Tanoli(ADVO-8709-SBC-KHI),Abdul Salam(ADVO-9175-SBC-KHE),Additional Attorney General khi(AAGKhi),Rabya Javed(ADVO-15733-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 24-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.2990/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Ahsan Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

2335) 55/2013 H.C.A Muhammad Athar Hafeed Khan (Appellant) V/S Sangyong & Usmani JV (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 CLC 135
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 28-OCT-16
Approved for Reporting

2336) 375/2014 Const. P. Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Waheed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1529
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 13-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

2337) 504/2020 Const. P. Syed Noor Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S The Learned Election Tribunal Ps 52 Umarkot (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (Petition allowed)
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 2332
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

2338) 1470/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 1335
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

2339) 518/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD TAHIR JATOI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Dismissed), Criminal After Arrest Bail (Bail in Abduction and Rape)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 109
Advocates:Muhammad Moosa(ADVO-16214-SBC-MLR),Imdad Ali Malik(ADVO-1469-SBC-SUK),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

2340) 40/2025 Cr.Bail imran Shaikh (Applicant) V/S The State & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1817
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Miran Muhammad Shah, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1266/2025 NAB thr. Its Chairman v. Imran Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed. Leave Refused.

2341) 5688/2019 Const. P. ASG Metal Ltd (Petitioner) V/S S.E.C.P (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2342) 192/2022 H.C.A Muhammad Aqeel & Others (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: H.C.A (Discretionery Powers of Single Judge to pass interlocutory order)
Tag Line:-----Learned Division Bench on the apprehension of the appellants and the counsel representing Board of Revenue, Government of Sindh that the private respondents will create third party interest as the construction was being raised regularly, granted an interim order that no further third party interest shall be created, however, nowhere the order suggests that the powers of learned Single Judge to pass any other injunctive order that may require in the interest of justice before or at the time of disposal of the injunction application, were also curtailed. This aspect of the argument of appellants cannot be termed as ratio of judgment. ------If the learned Single Judge was empowered to pass an order while deciding the injunction application finally, then the said judge equally enjoys the powers to pass interim or ad interim orders of the restraining nature, on the tentative assessment of claims, keeping the interest of the parties and to save interest of the litigants involved. Discretionary powers of the court are wide enough to foster the interest of justice and equity, as it demands.
Citation:2023 PLD Sindh 400, 2022 SBLR Sindh 1938
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Ali Nawaz Khuhawar(ADVO-16396-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General(),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI),Addl. Advocate General Sindh khi(AdlAdvSindh)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 27-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

2343) 201/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (Applicant) V/S Collector of Customs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2017 PTD 397
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 04-FEB-15
Approved for Reporting

2344) 2933/2021 Suit PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMIANL LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ANOTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Plaintiff is in no position to succeed on the strength of investment made by him as it was on Build Operate and Transfer (BOT) basis. Plaintiff build and operated it for 21 years and now it stands transferred at the conclusion of Agreement.
Citation:2023 CLC 2119
Advocates:M/S. MOHSIN TAYEBALY & CO.(FIRM-118-SBC-KHI),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

2345) 1798/2016 Suit Syed Ali Haider & others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airline (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Suit decreed. Independent promotion orders cannot be recalled through Admin Order No. 17/2016 without proper Notice and confronting the Plaintiffs.
Citation:2021 PLC (CS) 221
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2346) 169/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. HASHIM RAZA @ TAARO S/O NAWAB HAIDER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

2347) 38/2023 Spl.Cr.Bail MUSTAFA SIKANDAR S/O MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 756
Advocates:Barrister Ziaul Haq(ADVO-3966-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Nadeem Qureshi(ADVO-3530-SBC-KHS),Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

2348) 8408/2018 Const. P. Nazir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.133-K/2019 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.71-K/2020 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

2349) 1723/2024 Const. P. Sirbuland Khan (Petitioner) V/S R.O PS-112 & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Elections Act, 2017 (Jurisdiction)
Tag Line:*There is no cavil that the point of jurisdiction of this Court is to be addressed first and at no point in time the merits of case should be discussed however the arguments of the petitioner???s counsel are of such nature which compelled us to go into brief history of the case, which should, in any case, may not be counted as exercise of jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. **Now since our jurisdiction is contoured in terms of vely couched Article 225, having essence of mandatory application, read with numerous judgments of Supreme Court providing a limited scope to thrive, we could also draw an inference that both acceptance and denial to a recount of votes on any ground could fetch and attract the jurisdiction of the Tribunal followed by orders of Returning Officer/ Commission
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 388
Advocates:Mian Raza Rabbani(ADVO-3376-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Ali Tahir(ADVO-17114-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 12-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4736/2024 Sirbuland Khan v. The Returning Officer, Provincial Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned. Be fixed a/w CPLA.5327/24

2350) 940/2010 Cr.Bail Ghulam Nabi alias Papu, (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 26-AUG-11
Approved for Reporting

2351) 232/2014 Cr.Misc. Azhar Ahmed Batla (Applicant) V/S M/s. I.G.I. Finex Securities Limited and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Ashraf Jehan
Order Date: 28-NOV-14
Approved for Reporting

2352) 64/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) V/S Samiullah Sheikh & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 439
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

2353) 45/1996 I.T.R Commissioner of Income Tax (Applicant) V/S M/S. B.R.R Investment (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 13-JUN-11
Approved for Reporting

2354) 53/2012 R.A (Civil Revision) Gulsher Kosh (Applicant) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 150
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 16-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

2355) 20/2013 Adm. Suit MUHAMMAD YAQOOB S/O MUHAMMAD TAHIR (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. A.P MOLLER MAERK A.S. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In light of the above it is held that the Plaintiff has not been able to establish his claim under tort. For the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 632
Advocates:M/S. LARI & CO.(FIRM-272-SBC-KHI),Aga Faquir Mohammad(ADVO-2855-SBC-KHI),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 14-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2356) 2353/2014 Const. P. Pakistan Airlines Pilots Association and others (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Internatinal Airline Corporation and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 23-SEP-16
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.839-K/2016 Pakistan Airline Pilots and others v. P.I.A. and another,C.A.585/2018 Pakistan Airline Pilots and others v. P.I.A. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed

2357) 1140/2014 Cr.Bail Ashraf (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

2358) 165/2017 H.C.A Imran Modi (Appellant) V/S Mizhar Uddin (Farooqui) & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 YLR 874
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

2359) 323/2007 Suit M/S.FRIENDS ASSOCIATES BUILDERS (Plaintiff) V/S TOWN MUNICIPAL ADMINSTRATION (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting

2360) 8115/2022 Const. P. Amma Foundation (trust) & Barkati Foundation (Petitioner) V/S Province of sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1883
Advocates:M/S. IQBAL AND ASIM(FIRM-226-SBC-KHI),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI),Syed Muhammad Ishaq Shah(ADVO-13528-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1167-K/2025 Amma Foundation (Trust) & Barkati Foundation v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

2361) 7782/2015 Const. P. Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar (Petitioner) V/S The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 30-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1783/2017 Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2362) 5907/2020 Const. P. Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 616
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.228/2021 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation thr. its authorized Office, Karachi v. National Industrial Relations Commission(Full Bench) , Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2363) 1117/2024 Cr.Bail JAWAD KHAN S/O ABDUL LATEEF (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Failure to record video or or photograph at the time of arrest and seizure )
Tag Line:The essential prerequisite for the grant of bail by sub-Section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C. is that the Court must be satisfied based on the material placed on record that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The condition of this Clause is that sufficient grounds exist for further inquiry into the guilt of the accused, which would mean that the question should be such, that has nexus with the result of the case and can show or tend to show that the accused was not guilty of the offense with which he is charged. 8. Primarily, grant or rejection of bail is a discretionary relief but such discretion should be exercised fairly and judicially. The word discretion when applied to Court means sound discretion judiciously guided by law and to lessen the hardship of the people. For what has been discussed above, prima facie the applicant has made out a case for further inquiry into their guilt within the meaning of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C. 9. For the foregoing reasons, the applicant Jawad Khan is admitted to post-arrest bail in Crime No. 04 of 2024 under Section 6/9-2 S. No. 3 and 6/9-2 S No. 6 of CNS amended Act 2022 of PS Excise West subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 100,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand Only) and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 9
Advocates:Prosecutor General ANF(PGANF),Waqas Ali(ADVO-18259-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

2364) 8265/2017 Const. P. Majid Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Seniority)
Citation:2019 PLC (CS) 771
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-DEC-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.135/2018 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others,C.A.636/2019 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed

2365) 562/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Munawar & others (Petitioner) V/S Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 349
Advocates:Dr. Raana Khan(ADVO-4571-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General()
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

2366) 61/2023 Cr.Rev Ameer Ali Shahani (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Sarwar Shahani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1171
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

2367) 13/2010 II.A. Allah Bachayo & Others (Appellant) V/S Sain Bux & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Gift--- ----Gift deed was executed by pardanasheen lady---Effect---Contention of plaintiffs was that alleged gift was not executed and signed by the donor---Suit was dismissed by the Trial Court but was decreed by the Appellate Court---Validity---Plaint and evidence produced by the plaintiffs were silent with regard to ingredients of gift---Plea of pardanasheen lady was available only if she had denied the execution of document---Stranger to the gift could not dispute that execution of the same was not proper since it was executed by a pardanasheen lady---Mere fact that donor was a pardanasheen lady was not fatal to the execution of gift as she had gifted the property in presence of her nephew and other independent witnesses to the donees---Findings recorded by the Appellate Court were contrary to record and evidence as well as law which were set aside---Second appeal was allowed in circumstances. [Paras. 12, 15 and 16 of the judgment] (b) Islamic law--- ----Gift---Ingredients---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession of corpus of gift. [Para. 12 of the judgment] Bashir Ahmed v. Mst. Taja Begum and others PLD 2010 SC 906; Syed Abdullah Shah and 3 others v. Abdul Ghaffar and another PLD 1988 Quetta 60; Mst. Farrukh Sultana v. Messrs Darul Aloom Amjadia 1989 MLD 3795; Muhammad Ibrahim v. Province of Sindh through D.C.O. Revenue and 4 others PLD 2013 Sindh 501; Noor Muhammad and other v. Mst. Azmat-e-Bibi 2012 SCMR 1373 and Abdur Rehman v. Khalilur Rehman and others 1996 (W.P. Pesh.) 121 distinguished. Mst. Bai and 3 others v. Province of Sindh and others 2014 YLR 1244 and Muhammad Sadiq and others v. Bashir Ahmed and others 2004 SCMR 1734 rel.
Citation:2016 YLR Note 42
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 30-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.188-K/2015 Sain Bux and others v. Allah Bachayo and others,C.P.L.A.3249/2022 National Fertilizer Marketing Limited thr. its Managing Director, Lahore v. M/s Seven Stars Enterprises thr. its Managing Partner, Sukkur & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed

2368) 1351/2011 Suit MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM THAHIM (Plaintiff) V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2369) 4920/2016 Const. P. Maqsood Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
regularization issue of employees of PSQCA
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3673/2020 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others,C.A.522/2021 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed and Remanded

2370) 69/2018 Cr.J.A Niaz Hussain Soomro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (Murder Appeal dismissed. appellant remained absconder for considerable time, then a negative inference can be made .)
Citation:2022 SHC LAR 760
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 11-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

2371) 4479/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Appointment)
Citation:2018 PLC (CS) Note 129
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-AUG-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.536-K/2017 Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2372) 1497/2023 Const. P. M/S pakistan Chemical & Energy Sector Skills (Petitioner) V/S Rabnawaz & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 16, 2025 PLC Lab. 14
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2373) 1258/2014 Cr.Bail Kamran Alias Babloo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

2374) 676/2009 Const. P. Abdul Salam and others (Petitioner) V/S Jan Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Advocates:Eijaz Ali Hakro Associates(Firm-390-SBC-HYD)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

2375) 2566/2024 Const. P. Masjid-e-Saheem and Others (Petitioner) V/S PDOHA and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 266
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.485-K/2025 Masjid-e-Saheem & others v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority through its Administrator DHA Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned on application

2376) 1977/2022 Const. P. Sajid Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S NBP & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Factual controversy, writ not maintainable
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1702
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Malik Khushhal Khan(ADVO-4812-SBC-KHI),Nousheen Khan(ADVO-10691-SBC-KHE),Tajammul Hussain Lodhi(ADVO-10103-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

2377) 872/2019 Cr.Bail Mirza Ali Adil Baig (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Bail Matters (Bail Dismissed In Gas theft Sections 15, 17 and 24 of Gas (Theft Control & Recovery))
Citation:2020 PCr.LJ 780
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

2378) 5558/2016 Const. P. ARY Communications Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Council of Complaints Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 604
Advocates:Ali Shah Gillani(ADVO-39478-PBC-LHR),M/S. ABID S. ZUBERI & CO(FIRM-229-SBC-KHI),Manzar Bashir(ADVO-13572-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1365/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad and others v. ARY Communication Limited, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2379) 42/2019 Const. P. Pir Bux Chandio (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Order Date: 07-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting

2380) 79/2022 Criminal Appeal Abdul Rasheed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 (Conviction (Police officials are good witnesses and recovery proved) )
Tag Line:The sole evidence of a material witness i.e. an eyewitness is always sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused if the same is confidenceinspiring and trustworthy and supported by another independent source of evidence because the law considers the quality of evidence and not its quantity to prove the charge.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 321
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting

2381) 4667/2023 Const. P. Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Primarily, the police force is a disciplined force; it shoulders the great responsibility of maintaining law and order and public order in the society; that people repose great faith and confidence in it; that it must be worthy of that confidence; that in recent times, the image of the police force is tarnished and instances of police personnel behaving in a wayward manner by misusing power are in Public domain and are a matter of concern. This factual position is also a cause of great concern these days in our Country as well. On numerous occasions, we come across the involvement of Police personnel in routine as well as heinous crimes, and even if they are apprehended, are let off by the Courts due to faulty and supportive investigation by their brethren by extending the benefit of the doubt. Taking guidance from these observations, it is observed that this must stop and Courts are also required to play their part and let this issue be decided by the Executive / Appointing Authority which in all fairness is in a much better position to ascertain facts and the relevant ground realities.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1064
Advocates:Zaheer Ahmed Ujjan(ADVO-13500-SBC-KHS),Vishal(ADVO-409-SBC-KSH),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.200-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others v. Atta Muhammad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2382) 50/1998 Civil Revision Gul (Applicant) V/S Jumo & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Permanent Injunction)
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---- ----Ss. 42 & 52----Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 14---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XLI, R. 30 & S. 96---Suit for declaration and permanent injunction---Maintainability and limitation---Determination---Appeal from original decree---Judgment in appeal---Plaintiffs filed present suit claiming that suit land originally belonged to their grandfather and they, being one of the legal heirs, were entitled to be declared as owners of suit land to the extent of their shares and to get their name entered in revenue record accordingly---Trial Court dismissed the suit on grounds of limitation and same being hit by proviso to S. 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877; whereas, appellate court decreed the same as prayed for---Validity---Order of appellate court was devoid of any reasoning and support of evidence led by parties---Appellate court had not even framed points for determination for deciding appeal and failed to examine order of Deputy Commissioner and appellate authority under Land Revenue Code, 1894 and report of the Commissioner---Appellate court, while setting aside findings of Trial Court, did not give any reasoning on the point of limitation---While reversing the findings of court below, appellate court had to give reasons for disagreeing with findings of lower court and also to advance reasons for its opinion in support of reversing the findings---Plaintiffs had not prayed for possession from defendant and only sought declaration of ownership as legal heirs and declaration as to cancellation of mutation---Appellate court failed to appreciate that predecessor of plaintiff had appeared before Revenue Authorities for effecting mutation in respect of suit property in favour of defendant---Trial court, on basis of evidence on issue regarding possession of suit property and following mandatory proviso to S.42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877, had rightly held the suit not maintainable---Appellate court's judgment was silent on issue of maintainability of suit with reference to S. 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---High Court, setting aside judgment and decree of appellate court, restored that of trial court---Revision petition was allowed in circumstances. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---- ----O. XLI, R. 30 & S. 96---Appeal from original decree---Judgment in appeal---Duty of appellate court---Whenever appellate court is to reverse findings of court below, it has to give reasons for disagreeing with findings of lower court and also to advance reasons for its opinion in support of reversing the findings.
Citation:2017 MLD 1878
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

2383) 285/2007 H.C.A Mst. Nafeesa Siddiqui & others (Appellant) V/S Danish Rafiq & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1178-K/2018 Mst: Nafeesa Siddiqui and others v. Danish Rafique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2384) 198/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Ramesh Lal (Applicant) V/S Gul Hassan Through Legal heir (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 272
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 23-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

2385) 220/2022 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) V/S M/s. Raz Textile, Karachi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Valuation of goods; section 25 of the Customs Act; determination in a sequential order; 25(7); deductive value method how to be applied guidelines
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 261
Advocates:Imran Taj(ADVO-9526-SBC-KHC),Aamir Raza(ADVO-15010-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.736-K/2023 M/s. Raz Textile Karachi v. The Collectors of Customs Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2386) 1265/2005 Suit ANWAR KHAN & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S FOUZIA KHAN & ORSll (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 83
Advocates:M/S. SAATHI M. ISHAQUE LAW ASSOCIATES(FIRM-181-SBC-KHI),Mirza Saeed Baig(ADVO-1960-SBC-KHI),Mian Ashfaq Ahmed(ADVO-6296-SBC-KHI),Kamran Shahzad Siddiqui(ADVO-8203-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 13-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

2387) 74/2018 I. A Intekhab Hussain Shah (Appellant) V/S National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 CLD 1021
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.593-K/2019 Intakhab Hussain Shah and another v. National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2388) 45/2024 Criminal Appeal Munawar @ Munni & others (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2024 SHC MPK 911
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting

2389) 1721/2022 Suit Shehzad Arshad (Plaintiff) V/S Pervez Arshad & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 227
Advocates:Waqar Ahmed(ADVO-15702-SBC-KHS),Abdallah Azzaam Naqvi(ADVO-15005-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Hanif Faisal Alam(ADVO-17587-SBC-KHS),Khalid Mahmood Siddiqui(ADVO-6801-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

2390) 1228/2014 Cr.Bail Sajjad & anothers (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

2391) 840/2019 Suit M/s. Zafa Pharmaceuticals Labs (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Drug Appellate Board has no jurisdiction of revision of its own orders under Rule 5 of the Drugs (Appellate Board) Rules 1976; however, the Drug Registration Board can exercise powers under Section 7(11) of The Drugs Act 1976. Injunction allowed and impugned order passed by Drug Appellate Board suspended.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2338
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

2392) 2652/2023 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD JAVED MEMON (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 902
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Zahid Farooq(ADVO-9494-SBC-KHE),Qadir Raza(ADVO-8786-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting

2393) 491/2016 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Urooj Autos (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 237
Advocates:Munawar Ali(ADVO-10937-SBC-KHE),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-2108-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Khalil Dogar(ADVO-3544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.530-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Urooj Autos & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2394) 2515/2024 Cr.Bail ARSALAN KHAN S/O GHOUS KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 461
Advocates:Syed Waseem Raza(ADVO-16754-SBC-KHW),Rashid Hussain(ADVO-21192-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2395) 267/2012 Const. P. All Pakistan Security Agencies (Petitioner) V/S Fedration of pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 24-MAY-12
Approved for Reporting

2396) 166/2013 Cr.J.A Rehman Burfat and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 384
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

2397) 7/2007 M.A. Searle Pakistant Ltd. & anor (Appellant) V/S The Monopoly Control Authority (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices (Control & Prevention) Ordinance, 1970 (Section 59), Competition Act, 2010 (Sections 61), Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices (Control & Prevention) Ordinance, 1970 (Sections 3, 4, 11 and 12)
Tag Line:**Maintainability of appeal on the count of ???Aggrieved person???:- Aggrieved person not necessarily be one facing financial losses; a person/entity feels and considers a process as an intervention to business decisions and actions are being an intervention to business decisions, it can qualify as basis of being an aggrieved person. To be an aggrieved, you do not have to show yourself in a frame of financial loss alone. An attempt to justify that intervention to the business understanding is unnecessary by regulator, notwithstanding financial gains, the intervention can be objected by objector as being aggrieved person. **Public interest:- Laws are made to protect public interest and the enforcement of such laws is in eminent public interest. The distribution arrangement between Searle and IBL has unfairly benefitted IBL and its shareholders to the prejudice of Searle and its shareholders which include minority shareholders from the general public. The general public minority shareholders have no other appropriate remedy through which they could have corrected such arrangement or recovered their losses. It is therefore a matter of public interest that action should have been taken by the Authority to redress the situation
Citation:2024 CLD 1314
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas
Order Date: 07-JUN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3933/2024 The Searle Company Limited Formerly Known as Searle Pakistan Limited Karachi and another v. The Competition Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2398) 811/2018 Const. P. Ehsan ur Rehman (Petitioner) V/S FOP & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.982-K/2018 Ehsan-ur-Rehman Mazari v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.492/2021 Ehsan-ur-Rehman Mazari v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. Early date,Disposed Disposed of and remanded

2399) 140/2012 I.T.R.A Commissioner Inland Revenue. (Applicant) V/S Independent Newspaper Corp(Pvt)Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 06-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

2400) 56/2017 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD KHAN S/O ABDUL SATTAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 10-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting

2401) 77/2024 R.A (Civil Revision) Khan Bahadur Lund (Applicant) V/S Federal of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 304
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2402) 443/2007 Suit HUMAIR ASSOCIATES BUILDERS PVT. LTD (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. CHAPPAL BUILDERS & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Order Vii, Rule 11 C.P.C (Dismissed.)
Tag Line:Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.)--- ----R.14---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 151---Inherent powers of High Court---Miscellaneous applications---Maintainability---High Court directed the office to be cautious while receiving applications under 5.151, C.P.C., in pending cases; it was also imperative for court to be vigilant and very careful in exercising inherent jurisdiction under S.151., lest it should not be "advancing" instead of "preventing" abuse of process of court---Office while referring miscellaneous applications to Judges in terms of second proviso to R.14 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.) was directed to ensure scrutiny of each and every application under S.151, C.P.C. filed in any civil suit before placing the same in court for order/hearing---High Court directed the office to examine/scrutinize such applications bearing in mind amongst. other at the queries to the effect that as to whether applicant who had involved provision of S.151, C. P. C. was already a party in proceedings or not; that whether prayer in application was relevant to issues between parties and was directed against adverse party in the lis or not and that whether inherent powers sought to be invoked were with respect to the procedural matters or it would affected substantive rights of either party.
Citation:2014 PLD 327
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 06-NOV-13
Approved for Reporting

2403) 5178/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Imran Mehmood and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 525
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Ali Asadullah Bullo(ADVO-12811-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

2404) 5/2005 Execution Mrs. Meher Rohinton Minwalla (Decree Holder) V/S S Darayus Cyrus Minwalla & Ors. (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.)--- ----R. 50---Withdrawal of power of attorney by advocate of party---Effect---Applicant sought restoration of her execution petition which was dismissed after withdrawal of power of attorney by her advocate---Validity---Grievance of applicant was that intimation notice was issued to previous attorney after withdrawal of Vakalatnama---Issuance of notice to the attorney of applicant was not even required after compliance of notice under R.50 of Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.)---Court had shown grace by issuing notice, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the Court could not ignore deliberate and wilful negligence of applicant herself in pursuing the case---Applicant failed to show bona fide in prosecuting her case with due diligence---High Court declined to restore execution petition---Application was dismissed in circumstances. Messrs United Bank Limited v. Messrs. Plastic Pack (Pvt.) Limited 2012 CLD 239; United Bank Limited v. The Chairman, Banking Tribunal-I, Lahore 1999 MLD 3267; Alamgir v. The State 1988 SCMR 642 distinguished. Bashir Ahmed v. Settlement of Rehabilitation Commissioner 1982 SCMR 188; Rafiq Ahmed v. Abdul Haleem 1982 SCMR 1229; Muhammad Rahim v. Mst. Begum Kaniz Fatima Hayat 1986 CLC 178 and Zulfiqar Ali v. Lal Din and others 1974 SCMR162 ref. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 10-A---Right to fair trial---Scope---Provisions of Art.10-A of the Constitution are not for prosecutor to claim "fair trial and due process"---Protection of Art.10-A of the Constitution is available only to defendant and / or accused facing civil or criminal trial, as the case may be so that they may not be condemned unheard or treated unfairly in the process of adjudication.
Citation:2014 CLC 1312, 2014 SBLR 1021
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 29-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting

2405) 1656/2016 Const. P. Arham Khan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S M.D KW & SB and Oters (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

2406) 8570/2019 Const. P. Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:There is not an iota of evidence available to disagree with the observation of the Tribunal which ordered its (vehicles) release unconditionally however subject to verification of ownership. This being situation no question has arisen to deviate from the findings of the Tribunal and proposed question No.1 is answered in affirmative as the seizing agency has failed to comply with the provisions as required under section 26 of Customs Act, 1969 whereas the proposed questions No.2 is irrelevant for the purpose of declaring the subject vehicle as an smuggled vehicle.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1196
Advocates:Dilkhurram Shaheen(ADVO-9087-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Bilal Bhatti(ADVO-15212-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 16-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

2407) 3500/2013 Const. P. Hijab Qazi (Petitioner) V/S Chairman/CEO PIAC and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

2408) 103/2018 I. A Muhammad Anis (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Gulf Leasing Company Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 641
Advocates:Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-10676-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Ali(ADVO-2986-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting

2409) 224/2013 Suit ABDUL QAYUM KHAN (Plaintiff) V/S ABDUL AZIZ KHAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Mistake of Court. Court-Sale set-aside under inherit powers.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 177
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-24
Approved for Reporting

2410) 65/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf Baloch S/o Lal Muhammad Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Shazia Naz Baloch and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 848
Advocates:Adnan Ahmed(ADVO-3134-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.143/2025 M/s. Boulevard Ltd Formerly M/s. Hero Construcdtio Ltd. thr. its Authorized, Hyderabad v. Sohail Ladhani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2411) 275/2018 Cr.J.A MST. RAZIA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1690, 2025 SHC HYD 1692, 2025 SHC HYD 1693
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 03-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.694/2025 Razia v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2412) 17/2006 II.A. Saeed Akhtar & Another (Appellant) V/S Zafarullah Khan & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1113
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)
Order Date: 20-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1038-K/2024 Zafarullah Khan and another v. Saeed Akhtar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed (Marked to Mr.Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui)

2413) 1109/2025 Const. P. Sikandar Hayat Buriro (Petitioner) V/S The state & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2718
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2414) 921/2009 Cr.Bail Palyo Shar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahid Anwar Bajwa
Order Date: 06-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

2415) 76/2013 Const. P. Naveed Khan Domki (Petitioner) V/S Director Health Hyderababad and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Service matters (Section 3 of Sindh Regularization Act, ), Constitution of Pakistan (Labour Law)
Tag Line: Petitioner was appointed as Laboratory Technician (BPS-09) in Health Department as Medical Technician for 90 days w.e.f. 18.2.1997. The period of his contract was repeatedly extended on expiry of 90 days time and since 1997 he has been working in same capacity without being regularized despite the fact that he was entitled for regularization in terms of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013. The petitioner is declared to be regularized in service with effect from 1997.Petition is allowed.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar
Order Date: 24-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

2416) 591/2018 Const. P. Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (Appointment by transfer)
Tag Line:Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (DRTA) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1201
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 18-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.433-K/2020 Okash Khalid Memon v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time

2417) 17/2020 M.A. DR. FAROOQ AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE SECRETARY FPSC & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 841
Advocates:Imran Ahmed(ADVO-2097-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1716-K/2021 Dr. Farooq Ahmed v. The Secretary Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2418) 858/2019 Cr.J.A DIL AHMED S/O QASIM ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 619
Advocates:The Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi(SCPKhi),Sara Malkani(ADVO-15404-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

2419) 135/2020 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD SOHAIL S/O JAHAN SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Section 353/324/34 PPC
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 2020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
Order Date: 22-DEC-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.48-K/2021 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh v. Muhammad Sohail Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2420) 448/2017 H.C.A Ahsanuddin (Appellant) V/S Shahid Hussain Malik & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting

2421) 633/2009 Suit SYED QAMAR SULTAN (Plaintiff) V/S JAVED IQBAL GOHR & OTHER (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Raja Hassan Nawaz(ADVO-10701-SBC-KHI),Hifzur Rahman(ADVO-4819-SBC-KHE),Mushtaq Ahmed(ADVO-4412-SBC-KHI),Ghulam Asghar(ADVO-8770-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAR-17
Approved for Reporting

2422) 37/2020 Suit.B UNITED BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD ISMAIL DOSSA (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Having obtained Foreign Judgment, the Bank has to options for its enforcement in Pakistan.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1033
Advocates:Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Saalim Salam Ansari(ADVO-3307-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

2423) 1339/2014 Cr.Bail Kanji & others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

2424) 13/2015 J.M Shujaatullah Khan. (Petitioner) V/S Shahid Jamil Ansari & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 06-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

2425) 882/2020 Const. P. Arif Pasha (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Tag Line:Direction Matter
Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1712
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

2426) 33/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhab ALi (decd), thr: L.Rs: and others (Applicant) V/S Mukhtiar Ahmed and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 1474, 2025 CLC 1018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2427) 6194/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Anwar & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the August court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the August Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 794
Advocates:Musharraf Azhar(ADVO-15411-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

2428) 3603/2016 Const. P. Shanaz Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 78
Advocates:Zafar Imam(ADVO-7019-SBC-KHI),Deputy Attorney General(),Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-3297-SBC-KHI),Arsalan Wahid(ADVO-14854-SBC-KHI),Irfan Mir Halepota(ADVO-9555-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting

2429) 242/2024 Const. P. Mst. Uroosa & another (Petitioner) V/S The Learned IX-ADJ Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1582
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2430) 20/2004 Execution Union Bank Limited (Decree Holder) V/S Iqbal Ahmed Malik (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 1524
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 20-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

2431) 310/2021 Const. P. Habib Bank Limited (Petitioner) V/S IXth Rent Controller, Khi (Central) & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:-Since statute does not provide remedy of appeal, this petition has been filed to invoke jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. By dismissal of an application under order VII rule 11 CPC, none of the fundamental right of the petitioner was violated to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. -The whole gummit of the lis is yet to be decided and hence if an appeal against such order could not be maintained, how this alternate recourse be made available, when no fundamental right of the petitioner seems to have been violated.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 811
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

2432) 677/2010 I.T.R.A The Comm, InlandRevenue (Applicant) V/S M/s Karachi Port Trust (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 144
Advocates:Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Imran Ali Mithani(ADVO-15070-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 12-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

2433) 2/2015 M.A. Hashoo Holdings (Pvt.) Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan & Ano (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Companies matters (Penalty u s 224)
Tag Line:Companies Ordinance 1984- Section 224- Limitation to issue show cause and in passing of an order is not fatal - Trading by Directors and shareholders in violation of S. 224 ibid- liable to penalty.
Citation:2019 CLD 675
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 04-FEB-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.377-K/2019 Hashoo Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. v. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan and another,C.A.24-K/2020 Hashoo Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. v. Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned for next Session.

2434) 10/2019 Suit.B Soneri Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Quetta Textile Mills Limited & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 446
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Salim Thepdawal(ADVO-3099-SBC-KHI),Waqar Ahmed Ch:(ADVO-11376-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

2435) 2136/2012 Const. P. Hassan Jameel Ansari (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 18-JUL-12
Approved for Reporting

2436) 3764/2022 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters
Tag Line:Applicability of Section 10 of Civil Servant Act, 1973, appointment of a junior officer when no suitable person is available for promotion; held No; appointment set-aside
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1168
Advocates:Sarmad Hani(ADVO-14089-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Ali Ghumro(ADVO-793-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 09-APR-24
Approved for Reporting

2437) 104/2018 H.C.A Port Qasim Authority (Appellant) V/S Industrial Management & Investment Co. Ltd. & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.577/2019 Aromatic Foods Limited v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.578/2019 Industrial Management & investment Company Ltd. v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.579/2019 Project Development Corporation LTD v. Port Qasim Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending ,Pending ,Pending

2438) 1725/2000 Suit PAK. STATE OIL CO. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. GILLANI PVT. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act,1940 Section 34)
Tag Line:Arbitration Act (X of 1940)--- ----Ss. 8, 20, 25, 32 & 34---Suit for recovery of money---Arbitration clause---Referring matter to Arbitrator---After filing of suit, proceedings were stayed and matter was referred to Arbitrator---Subsequently plaintiff filed application for restoration of suit and sought appointment of Arbitrator under Ss. 8 & 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940---Validity---Once parties were referred to Arbitrator, the purpose / object of Arbitration Act, 1940, was effectively achieved and parties were prevented to obtain a decree from Court contrary to their own agreement that their disputes were to be adjudicated by a private party as provided in arbitration agreement---Order on application under S. 34 of Arbitration Act, 1940, and / or on application under S. 20 of the Act, was one and the same---Purpose of both the provisions was to seek enforcement of an 'arbitration clause/agreement' against the party guilty of avoiding / refusing arbitration for resolution of their dispute---High Court declined exercise of discretion under S. 25 of Arbitration Act, 1940---Plaintiff had repeatedly approached the High Court by suppressing arbitration agreement and attempted to obtain a decree from a civil Court despite the fact that the suit was barred under S. 32 of Arbitration Act, 1940---Suit was dismissed in circumstances.
Citation:2018 MLD 1770
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 26-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

2439) 1504/2023 Const. P. Ahsanuddin & Another (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Failure to obtain alternate remedy under Sub-Section (5) of Section 9 of the Election Act, 2017
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 472
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Syed Amir Shah(ADVO-12175-SBC-KHW),Huzaifa Khan(ADVO-14330-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3990/2023 Ahsan Uddin and another v. The Election Commission of Pakistan through its Secretary, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned for last week of Oct.24

2440) 6121/2021 Const. P. Waheed Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 914
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI),Ahmed Mujtaba(ADVO-20757-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Ali Ashfaq(ADVO-46574-PBC-LHR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3165/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned afte a fortnight

2441) 207/2010 Civil Revision Muhammad Mian @ Raja & another (Applicant) V/S Mst. Noor Fatima & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:No Pre-emption right can be claimed in respect of gift of property; and Plaint can be rejected even without a formal application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 326
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

2442) 2053/2024 Cr.Bail SAQLAIN ABBASS @ AYAN S/O NAWAB HUSSAIN SHAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:This Court is not oblivious to the fact that unfortunately, one young lady has lost her life in the alleged accident of the present case, however, the fate of the bail application is also to be decided within the framework of Section 497 Cr.P.C. and under the guidelines on the subject laid down by the Supreme Court. Besides the above, the liability of the present applicant or charges leveled against him could only be determined by the trial Court after recording and evaluating the evidence. It is also a settled principle of law that at the bail stage deeper appreciation of the merit of the case cannot be undertaken and only a tentative assessment of the material available is to be made. The record shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict or hardened criminal. Moreover, he is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1013
Advocates:Hussain Bux(ADVO-13264-SBC-KHE),Shah Nawaz(ADVO-17921-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-24
Approved for Reporting

2443) 28/2023 Suit.B FIRST WOMEN BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1429
Advocates:Salman Talibuddin(ADVO-4367-SBC-KHI),Maria Ahmad(ADVO-14446-SBC-KHI),Jam Asif Mehmood Lar(ADVO-10595-SBC-KHI),Alizeh Bashir(ADVO-14714-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author)
Order Date: 15-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

2444) 34/2017 R.A (Civil Revision) Wikiyo (Applicant) V/S Mst. Aami and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: S.M.A (Section 4 of Muslim Fanily Law Ordinance, 1961 )
Tag Line:The succession to the estate of a Muslim under Muhammadan Law is open only at the time of his/her death and legal heirs alive at such time could be entitled to inherit his/her estate. It is only Section 4 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 which intervened with prospective effect. Thus the legal heirs of a predeceased son in the instant case were never devolved of any share or could not draw title by inheriting estate of his grandfather/ great grandfather under Muhammadan Law
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 361
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

2445) 234/2023 H.C.A Cedar Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (section 12), Law Reforms Ordinance (Appeal Against modification in Interim Order)
Tag Line:*The subject matter of the suit is not just simply a negotiable instrument but it is the rent of the subject period which was not paid, therefore, there is no logic in saying that since the Rent Controller could not pass any order on ???negotiable instrument???. **Section-12 of the SRPO, 1979 does not empower the civil court to adjudge necessary repairs to be carried out by the landlord; neither an application was filed by the tenant in this regard. ***once the rent is deposited pursuant to the orders of the Court, which the appellant had not deposited till date, the tenant/appellant will ???not??? be under the obligation to deposit the arrears of rent in compliance of Section-16(1) of the SRPO, 1979, as the tenant cannot be waxed twice. Security would not come in the way unless the tenant vacates the premises.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 947
Advocates:Muhammad Ahmed Masood(ADVO-14634-SBC-KHE),Uzma Farooq(ADVO-14781-SBC-KHI),Ovais Ali Shah(ADVO-14184-SBC-KHI),Haider Waheed(ADVO-10131-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 23-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.293-K/2024 Cedar (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Marina Construction (Pvt.) Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2446) 619/2021 Criminal Appeal KAMRAN ATTAULLAH S/O ATTAULLAH CHAUDHRY (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3154
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Deputy Attorney General(),Jamshed Iqbal(ADVO-10830-SBC-KHI),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Mahmood Akhtar Qureshi(ADVO-3582-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jan Ali Junejo(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

2447) 7039/2021 Const. P. Mis Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pak Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Javaid and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 858
Advocates:Muhammad Rashid Khan Mahar(ADVO-15076-SBC-KHS),Shahan Karimi(ADVO-15097-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI),Inayat Hussain Shah(ADVO-10288-SBC-KHW),Jahanzeb Awan(ADVO-11549-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-MAR-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1644/2022 Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pakistan (Pvt) Limited Karachi v. Muhammad Javaid and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2448) 378/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous Zulfiqar Ali Khoso (Applicant) V/S SIO Crime No.141/2023 PS Mehar and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 119
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2449) 330/2018 Criminal Appeal AYAZ AHMED SIDDIQUI S/O ANSAR AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PCr.LJ 325
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
Order Date: 18-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

2450) 2270/2018 Suit Mir Muhammad Raza (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Injunction refused in fake degree case
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 10-OCT-19
Approved for Reporting

2451) 118/2013 II.A. M/S INTERFLEW COMMUNICATION PVT (Appellant) V/S AAMIR ALI S/O BAKHSH ALI (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Delay in payment of Court Fee)
Tag Line:Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R. 2 & S. 100---Money suit---Second appeal---Limitation---Court fee fixed after period of limitation---Effect---Defendant did not appear for cross-examination and his affidavit-in-evidence was discarded and suit was decreed---Validity---Defendant had not produced any witness to discharge his burden---Courts below had decreed the suit on the basis of unimpeachable evidence of plaintiff---No mis-reading or non-reading of evidence had been pointed out in the impugned judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below---Defendant had paid court fee after one year and nine months of filing of present appeal, which was time barred---Defendant was guilty of contumacy and had no respect to the authority of law---Valuable right of limitation having accrued in favour of plaintiff, second appeal was dismissed. Hassan Bakhsh and others v. Syed Afzal Shah and others 1974 SCMR 364; Allah Yar v. Muhammad Riaz and others PLD 1981 SC 489 and Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Collector, Badin v. Haji Abdul Shakoor and others 1997 SCMR 919 rel.
Citation:2020 CLC Note 33
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 20-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

2452) 154/2019 Criminal Miscelleneous MRS. FARHEEN W/O AURANGZEB MUHAMMAD KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:1. The ratio of the said judgments of the Supreme Court is that where the remedy under section 249-A Cr.P.C. is available before the trial Court, the High Court should not exercise inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A Cr.P.C except in extraordinary circumstances which warrant such an action. In other words, the question is not to the jurisdiction of the High Court, but the manner in which such jurisdiction is to be regulated by the High Court. Ref. Muhammad Farooq v. Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani (PLD 2016 SC 55); Maqbool Rehman v. State (2002 SCMR 1076); Bashir Ahmed v. Zafar-ul-Islam (PLD 2004 SC 298); Mian Munir Ahmad v. State (1985 SCMR 257). 2. It is a misconception to state that in all cases where it is being contended that a civil dispute has been converted into a criminal case, an applicant need not approach the trial Court under section 249-A Cr.P.C. or 265-K Cr.P.C. 3. The argument that section 249-A Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked until a formal charge is framed under section 242 Cr.P.C., is misconceived. Section 249-A Cr.P.C. categorically states that the power thereunder can be exercised at any stage of the case. Rel. State v. Ashiq Ali Bhutto, 1993 SCMR 523.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2453) 98/2017 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Habib Sugar Mills Ltd. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 582
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

2454) 1489/2024 Const. P. Ms. Aisha Qazi (Petitioner) V/S Irshad Ali Shah (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 660
Advocates:Zakir Laghari(ADVO-12695-SBC-KHI),Saadat Yar Khan(ADVO-8217-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2455) 303/2023 Cr.Acq.A. M/S NTL PVT LTD (Appellant) V/S THE IIND CJ/JM KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3405
Advocates:Badar Alam(ADVO-3219-SBC-KHI),Abdullah Munshi(ADVO-17280-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Kashif Badar(ADVO-14870-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 26-NOV-25
Approved for Reporting

2456) 87/2023 Const. P. Sajjad Ahmed Thr. Muhammad Arif (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Nosheen Khan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 111
Advocates:Makhdoom Javed Husnain(ADVO-16983-SBC-KHW)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 03-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

2457) 923/2025 Const. P. Amna Jatoi (Petitioner) V/S Jahanzaib (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the entries relating to dower in Nikahnama--the wife shall return the dower amonunt if she dissolves the marriage on the ground of Khula
Citation:2026 SHC KHI 328
Advocates:Ali Wahid(ADVO-16298-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS),Zahrah Sehr Vayani(ADVO-15100-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 16-FEB-26
Approved for Reporting

2458) 39/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. NASEER AHMED @ MULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (Delay in Identification Parade)
Tag Line:For an identification parade to be properly held, it is essential that it must be conducted soon after the arrest of the accused and that accused is not shown to the witnesses before the identification parade. However, the said guidelines were not followed.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 820
Advocates:Zahoor Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10377-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Moula Bux Bhutto(ADVO-15386-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting

2459) 160/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Tahir (Petitioner) V/S Gulab & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 701
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 08-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

2460) 48/2021 Cr.J.A Mohammad Siddique Brohi (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Explosive Substances Act. Benefit of doubt. Acquittal.
Citation:2025 SHC LAR 1242
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2461) 138/2013 Cr.Rev Nawab Liaquat Ali and others (Applicant) V/S the State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 25-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting

2462) 1652/2021 Suit MUHAMMAD AMIN (Plaintiff) V/S ASIF YOUNUS & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Tag Line:Undisputedly, IPO is subsequent in time and following the rule laid down in the aforementioned Decisions, the present Lis and issues agitated therein is triable by the Tribunal [in accordance with law], established and functioning under the IPO. Consequently, this Application is treated as the one for return of plaint rather rejecting it. Accordingly accepted. Plaint is returned.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 590
Advocates:Sultan Ahmed Sheikh(ADVO-274-SBC-KHI),K. A. Wahab(ADVO-71-SBC-KHI),Salman Ahmed Shaikh(ADVO-10256-SBC-KHS),Saleem(ADVO-2477-SBC-KHS),Moiz Ahmed(ADVO-13395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 08-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

2463) 1260/2012 Const. P. Attique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2464) 34/2022 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. AMMAR ASSAD S/O SYED HAFEEZ UR REHMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Murder Trial (Unseen incident)
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 145
Advocates:Shama Parveen(ADVO-6390-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Moula Bux Bhutto(ADVO-15386-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio(Author)
Order Date: 22-AUG-23
Approved for Reporting

2465) 904/2002 Suit Major (Retd) Abdul Rauf Khan (Plaintiff) V/S National Logistic Cell (NLC) (Def.No.1), Federation of Pakistan called absent (Def.No.2) (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Nil
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Ahmed Khan
Order Date: 01-MAR-07
Approved for Reporting

2466) 3895/2020 Const. P. M. Saeed Shahzad and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Othes (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1215
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1368-K/2023 Muhammad Ali (Haider) v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Govt. of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.1369-K/2023 Zulfiqar Ali & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed ,Disposed

2467) 395/2006 Const. P. Israr Ul Haq & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Zohra Jabeen & Ors (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Rent Matters)
Tag Line:The petitioners through instant constitutional petition has challenged the concurrent finding of facts by the learned courts below, whereby the Rent Controller allowed the fair rent case of the respondent, which order was subsequently upheld by the Rent Appellate Court. Section 8 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was discussed. It was taken into consideration that law requires that while deciding such application the Rent Controller shall take into consideration the four factors as stated in clause (a) to (d) of subsection (1) of Section 8 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, including the rent of similar premises situated in the similar circumstances, in the same adjoining locality, the rise in cost of construction and repair charges, the imposition of new taxes, if any, after commencement of the tenancy and the annual value of the premises, if any, on which property tax is levied. If a party succeeds in establishing through evidence the aforesaid factors, the Rent Controller is required to examine cumulative effect of all four factors as enumerated in section 8(1) for fixation of fair rent. It was discussed that where there are concurrent findings of facts recorded by the Courts below, this Court under its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot reappraise the entire evidence in the matter, as such jurisdiction besides being discretionary in nature is very limited and not plenary in nature.
Citation:2017 YLR 1769, 2018 SBLR Sindh 104
Advocates:Abdullah Chandio(ADVO-1763-SBC-KHI),Qaiser Hassan Khan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

2468) 2325/2009 Const. P. Sultan Ahmed Siddiqui & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 17-JAN-11
Approved for Reporting

2469) 1/2023 M.A. Independent Newspapers Corp. (Pvt.) Ltd & Others (Appellant) V/S Learned VIth ADJ, Karachi South and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2386
Advocates:Ravi Pinjani(ADVO-11673-SBC-KHS),Qutab-ud-Din Saim(ADVO-9414-SBC-KHI),Bahzad Haider(ADVO-14183-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2470) 3375/2023 Const. P. Saeed Rabi Arain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Right of a person having acquired title to a unit in a building without an approved plan to be made a party in a proceeding.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 1027
Advocates:Faheem Shah(ADVO-14407-SBC-KHE),In Person(INP),Amna Usman(ADVO-17283-SBC-KHC),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting

2471) 791/2023 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Farhan S/o Absar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Safia Fatima and Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1255
Advocates:Muhammad Rais(ADVO-13802-SBC-KHE),Shahid Iqbal(ADVO-8278-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

2472) 682/2023 Const. P. Farman Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2640
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

2473) 44/2010 H.C.A Saeed Qureshi V/S Mrs.Surriya Afzal & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Saeed Qureshi V/S Mrs.Surriya Afzal & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 28-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting

2474) 40/2011 J.M DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING (Petitioner) V/S MRS.SHAHIDA KAUSAR & OTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

2475) 366/2023 Const. P. Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Be that as it may, it is admitted position that the petitioner is not enrolled as an advocate under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, and/ or a practicing lawyer and has no standing at the bar at all.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 459
Advocates:In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

2476) 6920/2019 Const. P. Aache Garments (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:s.37 STA summons/notice sans underlying inquiry.
Citation:2021 PTD 1576
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

2477) 1123/2023 Cr.Bail HAIDER ALI S/O SHER ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 861
Advocates:Zahid Iqbal(ADVO-8996-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 20-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

2478) 290/2019 I.T.R.A THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (Applicant) V/S M/s Agha Steel Industries (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1225
Advocates:Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 27-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

2479) 1279/2017 Suit Muhammad Nazir Awan. (Plaintiff) V/S Imtiaz Fatima Rizvi & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 174
Advocates:Arshad Iqbal(ADVO-2647-SBC-KHI),Dara Shaikh(ADVO-1915-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-21
Approved for Reporting

2480) 1181/2014 Cr.Bail Khadim Hussain & Ors (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 02-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

2481) 1020/2019 Const. P. M/s Shaheen Freight Services (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 CLC 323
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 05-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.703-K/2019 M/s National Logistic Cell (NLC) v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.46-K/2020 M/s National Logistic Cell (NLC) v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2482) 69/2011 Const. P. Ashfaq Ghori (Petitioner) V/S IV-Addl: District Judge Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 09-FEB-11
Approved for Reporting

2483) 697/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Fahad Ahmed Gulzar S/o Gulzar Ahmed & another (Applicant) V/S ASI/IO Saeed Mahroof & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:On the aforesaid proposition, the learned counsel for the applicants contended that the Judicial Magistrate had no authority to interfere in the investigation and exceeded his jurisdiction while directing the Investigating Officer to present the chargesheet before the Intellectual Property Tribunal in Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962. On facts, he contended that Sub Inspector PS PIB colony had lodged a false case against the applicants, as the alleged occurrence did not take place. The prosecution specifically alleged that the applicants had stocked different brands of Cigarettes, injurious to health but the same was never referred to the chemical examiner for verification. He maintained that in the peculiar circumstances of the case chemical examination of the purported case property was essential to corroborate the ocular account. The learned counsel further submitted that even if the prosecution version was assumed to be correct, Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962 could not be invoked against them. The impugned order had thus seriously prejudiced the applicants.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1104
Advocates:Muhammad Salaman Khan(ADVO-18081-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Nadeem Qureshi(ADVO-3530-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Waqar Alam Abbasi(ADVO-13665-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-JUL-24
Approved for Reporting

2484) 213/2016 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD UMER S/O MUHAMMAD SULEMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.30/2020 Muhammad Umar & Muhammad Fazil @ Rana v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2485) 891/2021 Suit MST. FEHMIDA BEGUM (Plaintiff) V/S MATI-UR-RAHMAN & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Arbitration Law (Section 32 and 33)
Tag Line:Stranger to an arbitration award cannot file objections.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 684
Advocates:Umar Farooq Khan(ADVO-1914-SBC-KHI),VELLANI & VELLANI & CO.(FIRM-133-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 09-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

2486) 135/2005 Cr.J.A Amir Bux (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2022 SHC HYD 438
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-22
Approved for Reporting

2487) 143/2013 Criminal Appeal Malik Babar and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2024 SHC HYD 1162
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 09-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

2488) 12/2001 R.A (Civil Revision) Shaikh Imran Ahmed (Applicant) V/S K.D.A & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act (V of 1975)--- ----Ss.3 & 4---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42, 54 & 55---Suit for declaration, perpetual and mandatory injunction---Contention of plaintiff was that he was in occupation of suit plot for the last 20 years and had raised Pacca construction of a residential house on one portion and on the other he was doing business---Notice under S. 3 Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1975 to the plaintiff who apprehended that either, he would be forcibly evicted or the plot would be auctioned and filed suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction against the authorities---Authorities had denied all the averments in the plaint and stated that the plaintiff had illegally encroached upon the suit plot and raised construction thereon unauthorizedly---Trial Court decreed suit filed by the plaintiff, and appellate court in appeal set aside judgment passed by the Trial Court---Validity---Plaintiff had failed to prove any assertion from the plaint about his lawful right under any statute for regularization of the suit plot by Karachi Development Authority---Plaintiff had sought regularization of the suit plot in his illegal possession---Plaintiff could not prove that he was in possession of suit plot for 20 years---Even if proved, it was not sufficient to claim legal cover for such occupation; nor it created legal obligation on Karachi Development Authority for conferring title of the suit plot on him---Plaintiff had not produced any of the Rules or Regulations of the Authority to show that the possession on land for 20 years was enough to confer on him legal status for occupation of suit plot---Show-cause notice, impugned through suit by the plaintiff, was supposed to be replied by the plaintiff within three days by way of review application in terms of S.4 of the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1975 which he neither complied nor removed encroachment and straightway filed suit in response to show-cause notice within 10 days---Plaintiff filed suit without showing his own entitlement to any legal character to the plot---Suit filed by the plaintiff was not maintainable and the plaintiff was guilty of abusing the process of court---Courts of law, were not supposed to help the illegal occupants to perpetuate their possession on the Government land, which possession was even protected by the inaction of the officials of the Authority---Rules, Regulations and the law relevant for the disposal of the State property should have been followed in letter and spirit by the Authority---Appellate court below had rightly reversed the findings of the Trial Court declaring that notice issued under S.3 of the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 1975 by Karachi Development Authority (KDA) against encroachment by the plaintiff, was not illegal and unlawful and held to have been issued lawfully---Revision application was dismissed and cost of Rs.200,000 was imposed on the plaintiff for illegal occupying Government land for 35-40 years including 26 years in courts---Authority was also directed to deposit cost of Rs.100,000 on account of their willful inaction for 16 years, which had resulted in damaging the image of judiciary---Order accordingly. [Paras. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 12 of the judgment]
Citation:2017 CLC 224
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 19-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

2489) 5205/2020 Const. P. Prof: Dr. Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) V/S Chancellor of Fed: Urdu University & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-5205 of 2020 challenging the appointment of Search Committee and its members for the appointment of Vice Chancellor of Federal Urdu University of Arts, Sciences and Technology (FUUAST).
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 73
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 28-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

2490) 2003/2022 Suit TIME PRESS (PVT) LTD (Plaintiff) V/S SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Gas (Theft, Control and Recoverey) Act, 2016 (Order VII Rule XI CPC)
Tag Line:Gas (Theft Control and Recovery) Act 2016 designates the fora for pertinent prosecution, adjudication and matters ancillary and related thereto; plaint rejected.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 112, 2025 SBLR Sindh 1861
Advocates:Ghazi Khan Khalil(ADVO-18768-SBC-KHE),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

2491) 5887/2024 Const. P. Sajjad Ahmed Sunny and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:We do not agree with the findings of the IGP Sindh and other members of the Committee for the simple reason that transferring the investigation wing to the Executive branch is not justified by the Police Act or the Police Rules 1934, citing para 56 of the Gul Hassan Jatoi judgment. The transfer of investigation officers to the Executive branch contradicts the Supreme Court's judgment as their appointment letters as Inspector Investigations limit their transfer and posting to the Executive Branch, is a matter of their terms and conditions of service and is outside the jurisdiction of the court under Article 212 of the Constitution. Therefore, the petitioners cannot be allowed to be transferred from the Investigation wing to perform their service in the Executive Branch of the Police Department. The petition is dismissed as it lacks merit as well.
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1465
Advocates:G. M. Bhutto(ADVO-8053-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-DEC-24
Approved for Reporting

2492) 6238/2015 Const. P. Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In line with the opinion of the Advocate General Sindh, as detailed in the preceding paragraph, the petitioner's resignation from the Board, submitted as a consequence of his absorption, is considered invalid. In a landmark judgment as discussed supra, the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared all absorptions in different cadres as illegal, ordering employees to revert to their parent departments, while ensuring their seniority is retained. 12. This petition is hereby disposed of with the direction that the respondent, BISE Sukkur, must fully implement the Supreme Court's judgments (2013 SCMR 1752 and 2015 SCMR 456) by ordering the petitioner's return to his parent department while protecting his seniority, if he has not superannuated yet. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three months.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 307
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

2493) 46/2024 Cr.J.A Aftab (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1865
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

2494) 91/2021 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. sindh revenue board (Applicant) V/S appellate tibunal of SRB and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011
Tag Line:Limitation as to deciding an Appeal by Commissioner is directory and not mandatory; Interpretation of Section 59 of the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011;
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 300
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Shahida Nasreen(ADVO-8068-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI),Ch. Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-2175-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
Order Date: 23-SEP-24
Approved for Reporting

2495) 474/2022 Suit All Pakistan Solvent Extractors Association & ors (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Quarantine pests. Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 2019.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 680
Advocates:Aamir Raza(ADVO-15010-SBC-KHS),Abid S. Zuberi & Ayan M. Memon Law Associates(FIRM-425-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAY-22
Approved for Reporting

2496) 1697/2009 Const. P. Mubarak Maseh (Petitioner) V/S V/S Muhammad Yaqoob & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 25-APR-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.889-K/2018 Mubarak Masih v. Muhammad Yaqoob and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2497) 97/2010 I. A M/s.United Bank Ltd (Appellant) V/S M.Mubeen Khan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 30-APR-12
Approved for Reporting

2498) 2161/2016 Suit Roche Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD 222
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 12-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

2499) 1459/2024 Const. P. Murad Ali Lehri (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2024 SHC KHI 940
Advocates:Muhammad Asadullah Shaikh(ADVO-13708-SBC-KHI),Bilal Haider(ADVO-352019-BBC-QTY),Shariq A. Razzak(ADVO-15492-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 07-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

2500) 6190/2023 Const. P. Abdullah Yaqoob (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Obligation on the SBCA to demolish a building under Section 14 of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1179
Advocates:Khursheed Javed(ADVO-8182-SBC-KHI),Ishrat Zahid Alvi(ADVO-6918-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 12-JAN-24
Approved for Reporting

2501) 434/2023 Const. P. Sarfarazuddin S/o Rafiullah (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Paras Commercial Company and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979
Tag Line:Limitation condoned. The Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 380
Advocates:Qazi Ajmal Kamal(ADVO-8710-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Kamran Mirza(ADVO-11996-SBC-KHE),Junaid Alam Khan(ADVO-8752-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 10-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

2502) 2186/2021 Const. P. Zabardast Khan Mehar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:NAB Petition for Reduction of Surety Amount
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 215
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 05-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.4267/2021 Zabardast Khan Mahar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB,Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

2503) 1136/2015 Const. P. M/s Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S The Chief Minister and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 755
Advocates:Sajeel Shehriyar(ADVO-29442-PBC-LHR),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Amjad Javed Hashmi(ADVO-9187-SBC-KHI),Taimur Ali Mirza(ADVO-12244-SBC-KHI),Syed Muhammad Ishaq Shah(ADVO-13528-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 17-OCT-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3781/2022 Lucky Cement Limited Karachi v. The Chief Minister Sindh through Chief Secretary Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

2504) 806/2015 Cr.Bail Muhammad Ameen (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 365-B, 34 & 511---Kidnapping, abduction or inducing woman to compel for marriage and common intention----Bail, refusal of---Accused sought post-arrest bail on the ground that complainant had executed/sworn affidavit of "no objection" to the grant of bail in favour of accused---Complainant had named the accused in FIR and abductee was his real niece---Contention was that affidavit of "no objection" to the grant of bail had been sworn by the complainant amounted to exonerating of accused from the charge and it also amounted to retracting from the contents of FIR---Validity---Once the contents of FIR were shattered then the door would be open for all accused persons to take benefit of doubt at the trial or even at bail stage---Affidavit sworn by complainant in favour of accused at bail stage could not be considered as a case of free will and if it was so, it was the most shameful act of the complainant that he was ready to exonerate the accused in a crime of abduction of his real niece, knowingly---Accused was not pressing the bail application as the Court tried to dig out the real reasons for swearing affidavit in favour of accused by the complainant---Bail application was dismissed, in circumstances, as not pressed.
Citation:2016 YLR 1118
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 30-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2505) 34/2003 R.A (Civil Revision) Nandomal and others (Applicant) V/S The P.O. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 1309
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

2506) 2/2013 Adm.A AGILITY LOGISTICS PVT LIMITED (Appellant) V/S B K SHIPPING & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 23-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

2507) 2944/2020 Const. P. M/s Outdoorsman (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 622
Advocates:Mohsin Kadir Shahwani(ADVO-12570-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 12-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

2508) 31/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Yousif and Others (Applicant) V/S Dr. Allah Nawaz Bugti & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2025 SHC LAR 2444
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 18-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2509) 1740/2014 Suit Sadan General Trading LLC. (Plaintiff) V/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan & another. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Measure of damages under section 73 of the Contract Act. Assessment of reasonable compensation under section 74 of the Contract Act.
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh Note 57
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 25-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting

2510) 44/2018 Civil Revision Govt of sindh & Ors (Applicant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVIII Rule 18)
Citation:2018 YLR 2420
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 03-MAR-18
Approved for Reporting

2511) 1477/2023 Cr.Bail HYDER ABBAS S/O GUL HASSAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 216
Advocates:Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Raham Ali(ADVO-12316-SBC-KHI),Arifa Raham Ali(ADVO-10439-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 31-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting

2512) 31/2007 II.A. Bhoja Airlines (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) V/S P>I.A. Corporation (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
Tag Line:The case of respondent is based on a contract, breach of which is claimed by the respondent and hence they preferred a claim for recovery. Article 120 will only be made applicable when no Article prescribes the limitation to file a suit for recovery as claimed by the respondent. Perusal of Article 115 shows that it is for the recovery/compensation for breach of any contract either express or implied. Respondent has claimed nothing but a breach of contract in respect of service which was allegedly rendered by it as it is claimed that they have failed, refused and neglected to make payment which is breach of a contract.
Advocates:Amir Malik(ADVO-2673-SBC-KHS),Sana Akram Minhas(ADVO-4195-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 30-OCT-17
Approved for Reporting

2513) 493/2009 I.T.R.A Commissioner (Legal Division) (Applicant) V/S Pakistan Services Limited (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Income-tax
Tag Line:no penalty can be imposed or sustained under Section 111(2)(b) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, without proving mensrea and deliberate intention to claim expenses not incurred actually.
Citation:2023 PTD 773
Advocates:Jawaid Farooqi(ADVO-3964-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Aqeel Qureshi(ADVO-7601-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

2514) 34/2004 M.A. Jatco Kaburshiki Kaisha (Applicant) V/S The Registrar of Trade Marks (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Justice Muhammad Tasnim
Order Date: 04-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting

2515) 1550/2022 Suit M/S CROWN HOLDINGS LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S PORT QASIM AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 249
Advocates:Muhammad Saad Siddiqui(ADVO-12321-SBC-KHI),Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Shahzad Mahmood(ADVO-12500-SBC-KHS),M/S. NAZIM H. SIDDIQUI & CO.(FIRM-466-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 10-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

2516) 1395/2005 Suit HINA GHORI & ORS (Plaintiff) V/S NATIONAL LOGESTIC CELL & ORS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Fatal Accident (Compensation and Damages)
Advocates:Abdul Hameed(ADVO-13458-SBC-KHI),Nasir Maqsood(ADVO-3349-SBC-KHI),M. Sarfaraz Sulehry(ADVO-1929-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2517) 2552/2014 Suit Jubilee General Ins. Co. Ltd., & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Assistant Director, Directorate of Intelligence & Investigation, Islamabad has no jurisdiction to issue any notice to a tax payer, who is not registered either with LTU or RTO Islamabad in terms of SRO 350(I)/2014 dated 7.5.2014.
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1705
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 12-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting

2518) 98/2012 Spl.H.C.A Irfan Nawab (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2013 CLD 1922
Advocates:Ijaz Ahmed Zahid(ADVO-11135-SBC-KHI),Mian Raza Rabbani(ADVO-3376-SBC-KHI),Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Zeeshan Abdullah(ADVO-11819-SBC-KHI),Saalim Salam Ansari(ADVO-3307-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-13
Approved for Reporting

2519) 33/2007 Civil Revision Muhammad Younus (Applicant) V/S TMA Mirpurkhas and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) --- ----S. 8---Suit for recovery of specific immovable property---Locus Standi---Scope---Plaintiff filed suit without obtaining any succession certificate to show that he was entitled to inherit the suit plot along with other legal heirs of the deceased---Plaintiff without disclosing legal heirs of deceased had no right/locus standi to sue defendants in his own right. (b) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) --- ----S. 8---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXI, R.1(3) ---Suit for recovery of specific immovable property---Scope---Plaintiff had same cause of action which had accrued to his father even prior to formal purchase of suit plot---Cause of action of plaintiff as mentioned in plaint was one and the same that "octroi post was available on suit plot and his father had sought recovery of possession of that portion from Municipal Committee and Municipal Committee had promised to settle the issue, therefore, suit was withdrawn by plaintiff's father"---Same cause of action had been shown by plaintiff in capacity of son of earlier plaintiff by saying that octroi post was on suit plot and Municipal Committee had refused to vacate the same---Held, that merely because a sale deed was registered subsequently, cause of action could not be said to have accrued subsequently---Plaintiff had failed to even disclose the date of withdrawal of said suit---Plea of fresh cause of action on ground of registration of sale deed subsequent to filing of earlier suit had lost its value---Revision petition was dismissed, accordingly.
Citation:2016 MLD 916
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 07-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

2520) 28/2008 Civil Revision Muhammad Naseer and others (Applicant) V/S H.M.C. and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 777
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

2521) 618/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Aslam & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1284
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1292-K/2020 Muhammad Aslam v. Muhammad Kamran & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2522) 25/2011 Civil Revision Abdul Jabbar and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Mustafa and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 29-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

2523) 5025/2016 Const. P. Imdad Ali Abro & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 948
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 28-APR-21
Approved for Reporting

2524) 99/2001 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. Muhammad Jamil Ahmed & anothers (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Mr. Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany, Mr. Justice Rahmat Hussain Jafferi
Order Date: 08-NOV-04
Approved for Reporting

2525) 1893/2021 Const. P. Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 591
Advocates:Assitant Adv.Gen. Sindh(AssAdvGen),Badar Hussain(ADVO-11544-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 26-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

2526) 80/2015 Const. P. Abdul Jalil & anothers (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 1424
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-20
Approved for Reporting

2527) 445/2020 Const. P. Mst. Seema D/o. Noor Muhammad (Late) (Petitioner) V/S Wajid Ali Shah & Others. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Family matter (Remarrying after Khulla )
Tag Line:I would, respectfully, add that bona fide be attached with her act of second marriage as same is, undeniably, after resort to her available course i.e approaching honourable Court for khula and obtaining thereof; technical remand order as well dismissal of her suit (challenged by her) should not be allowed to undo a legal and rightful act i.e remarrying afterkhula because such act (remarriage) can be nothing but a seal on door of her first-marriage and that she is happy with decision of khula. Any technical defect, in such peculiar circumstances, needs to be ignored because law favours the rights over procedure.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1053
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 14-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.406-K/2021 Wajid Ali Shah v. Mst.Seema Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2528) 6360/2019 Const. P. Kamran Shamshad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 709
Advocates:M. M. Aqil Awan(ADVO-10438-SBC-KHI),Waleed Rehan Khanzada(ADVO-14977-SBC-KHI),Asad Ali(ADVO-666-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Ahmed Pirzada(ADVO-3502-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.558-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another v. Kamran Shamshad,C.P.L.A.500-K/2023 Kamran Shamshad v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another,C.P.L.A.1367-K/2023 Muhammad Aslam Khoso & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed, Adjourned afte a fortnight

2529) 564/2020 Cr.Misc. Allah Bachayo (Applicant) V/S SHO P.S Matli (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application . (SHO is directed to record statement u/s 154 Cr.P.C and Register FIR against Proposed accused. )
Citation:2021 SHC HYD 677
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 17-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

2530) 8784/2017 Const. P. Shahnaz Parveen (Petitioner) V/S The Additional District Judge-III, Karachi East & 3 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2019 MLD 1008
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-18
Approved for Reporting

2531) 1646/2015 Suit Prof. Dr. Masood Hameed Khan (Plaintiff) V/S Dr. Shfqat Abbasi (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 03-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2532) 6611/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Ismail & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 17-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.498/2019 Muhammad Ismail Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2533) 25/2012 Execution Askari Bank Ltd. (Decree Holder) V/S A.H. International (Pvt) Ltd. & OTHERS (Judgment Debtor)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:??? BLOCKING OF CNIC. ORDER BY COURT AGAINST DEFENDANT OR JUDGMENT DEBTOR. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS. RIGHT TO LIFE. CIVIL RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS. NADRA. ??? Suspension or blocking of CNIC of a citizen carries severe implications. It virtually brings life of the affected citizen to a halt; his right of employment and access to bank accounts is affected; his right to engage in trade, business or profession is affected. His access to education, health, etc. is also denied. His family members are also affected. Ultimately, his Right to Life, as guaranteed under Article 9 of the Constitution, is virtually taken away, and the citizen is denied the exercise of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of Pakistan. ??? No provision exists in CPC. or the Financial Institutions Ordinance 2001 for blocking of CNIC of a Judgment Debtor. ??? Even a warrant of arrest under section 51 CPC. cannot be issued routinely, without fulfilling certain mandatory pre-requisites.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2590, 2026 SHC KHI 723
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)
Order Date: 23-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2534) 37/2001 Adm. Suit Hashim Ali Rizvi (Plaintiff) V/S M.V.Eco Ekram & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 114
Advocates:Ramchand Alias Manoharlal.(ADVO-2049-SBC-KHI),Aga Faquir Mohammad(ADVO-2855-SBC-KHI),QAMAR ABBAS & CO.(FIRM-124-SBC-KHI),AGA FAQUIR MOHAMMAD & CO.(FIRM-140-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

2535) 1528/2020 Const. P. Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani (Petitioner) V/S National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Citation:2021 SHC SUK 123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 16-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.3022/2022 Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani v. National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman NAB, HQ, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed

2536) 405/2007 I.T.R.A The Commissioner of Income Tax (Applicant) V/S M/s Shaista Estate (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 08-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting

2537) 3818/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Maqsood (Petitioner) V/S Tauheed Sultan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (locus standi)
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 245
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-21
Approved for Reporting

2538) 42/2023 Judicial Companies Misc. Muhammad Sohail & Abdul Wahab (Applicant) V/S M/s. Union Cargo (Private) Limited & 4 ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Whether an agreement in respect of the transfer of shares can be repudiated in the Company jurisdiction
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1439
Advocates:Mohammad Maaz Waheed(ADVO-16053-SBC-KHE),Syed Kawish Hussain Naqvi(ADVO-19083-SBC-KHS),Farhat Hussain(ADVO-4881-SBC-KHC),Tarique Mehmood(ADVO-4864-SBC-KHI),Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-15448-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
Order Date: 17-AUG-24
Approved for Reporting

2539) 288/2020 Const. P. M/S Sui Southran Gas Co Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Sindh Consumer Protection Act 2014 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
Tag Line:Consumer Court has no jurisdiction in matters of alleged excessive billing by a Gas Utility Company, it lies with the GAS Utility Court under the 2016 ACT.
Citation:2023 SHC HYD 778
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-23
Approved for Reporting

2540) 154/2016 Criminal Appeal Manzoor & others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 366
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 13-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

2541) 825/2010 Const. P. Hassan Ali Gopang (Petitioner) V/S E.D.O Revenue Kamber Shahdadkot and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Tag Line: We have prima facie observed that the impugned order was passed in haste without dilating upon the earlier order passed 21 days before by the same Executive District Officer in respect of the same land and it clearly smacks mala fide. Once an order was passed on the basis of certain facts based on reports of two Mukhtiarkars referred above, he practically becomes functus officio and cannot exercise such jurisdiction as exercised in the impugned order. The objection relating to the maintainability of this petition is, therefore, not sustainable and we hold that in view of the present facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is maintainable; particularly in the manner in which the impugned order was passed, when we see that there is no deliberation regarding earlier order and that too passed by same officer in the span of 21 days without notice to petitioner. The impugned order is not a speaking order particularly when earlier he has decided the entitlement of land in favour of the petitioner twenty one days before. The case law cited by learned counsel for respondent are distinguishable.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah
Order Date: 23-JAN-13
Approved for Reporting

2542) 821/2021 Const. P. Noor Muhammad Chandio (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Petition of Employees of SEPCO (Sukkur Electric Power Company) in respect of service matters is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution.
Citation:2022 SHC SUK 860
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Order Date: 10-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

2543) 503/2017 Const. P. Vishandas (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 192
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 08-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

2544) 444/2024 Cr.Bail Khair Muhammad Abro (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 123
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author)
Order Date: 21-FEB-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.273/2025 Khair Muhammad v. The State through P.G. Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2545) 35/2022 Cr.Rev THE STATE THROUGH DAG (Applicant) V/S LEARNED SPL. COURT ( OFFENCE IN BANKS ) KHI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3553
Advocates:Nadir Hussain(ADVO-3251-SBC-HYD),Asst Attorney Gen(AsstAG),Meer Ahmed(ADVO-39-SBC-JMS),Asadullah(ADVO-993-SBC-MKS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-DEC-25
Approved for Reporting

2546) 1980/2015 Suit Engro Fertilizers Ltd. (Plaintiff) V/S Pak. Standards & Quality Control Authority & Ors. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Custom Act, 1969
Tag Line:Before parting I may observe that at an interlocutory stage this being not a petition or an appeal but an interlocutory application a detail discussion of the factual aspects of the matter and the Pakistan Standard & Quality Control Authority Act (Act VI of 1996) itself may prejudice case of the either parties.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 09-MAY-16
Approved for Reporting

2547) 1691/2018 Const. P. Sultan Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Muhammad Sohail Hasan(ADVO-9593-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Barrister Zulfiqar Ali Khan Jalbani(ADVO-17147-SBC-KHS),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 28-NOV-18
Approved for Reporting

2548) 688/2009 Cr.Bail Akbar and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 19-MAR-10
Approved for Reporting

2549) 2/2018 Civil Ref. Assistant Chief Inspector of Stamps (Appellant) V/S .. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Stamps Act, 1899 (Sections 27), Stamps Act, 1899 (Sections 57), Stamps Act, 1899 (Sections 56)
Tag Line:The Court had itself observed that the valuation done by the family Court was for a particular purpose and since it was not a decree of a Court the valuation so carried out was not binding. And then the Court went on to observe that even if there is a decree of the Court, the stamp duty would be payable as per Valuation Table. Though on facts the said judgment is not relevant; nonetheless, since it has been cited before this Full Bench, therefore, we are compelled to hold that we do not approve such observations made by the Division Bench in the aforesaid paragraph. Had it been in performance of decree, an instrument is being registered, it ought to be on the basis of value determined in the decree and/or agreement entered into for which performance is to be made in terms of Court decree. In such situation there was no occasion for altering/undervaluing the property to avoid stamp duty as the value is already determined by Court of law or decree. It is only in case when the property has changed its status lawfully i.e. from a built-up property to an open plot or from a semi-constructed property to a fully constructed property, the value of the property may be altered in instrument sought to be registered. Thus, when the property sold out on the basis of a decree, which decree has valued the property in question, then the right of valuing the property does not rest with the vendor and vendee and/or the concerned authority. H
Citation:2022 PLD Sindh 47
Advocates:Muhammad Aqil(ADVO-3154-SBC-KHE),Abdul Wajid Wyne(ADVO-2246-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-NOV-21
Approved for Reporting

2550) 147/2016 Cr.Rev MUHAMMAD KHALID S/O MUHAMMAD RASHEED ASLAM & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 09-AUG-18
Approved for Reporting

2551) 128/2020 Const. P. Asad Ali Laghari & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 161
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 14-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

2552) 1693/2022 Const. P. Amanullah Lakheer (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 169
Advocates:Altaf Hussain(ADVO-12224-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-23
Approved for Reporting

2553) 28/2011 I. A Nadir Sajid Syed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S M/sU.B.L (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 16-JAN-15
Approved for Reporting

2554) 6357/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Taqui Nayani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 491
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 02-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.906-K/2020 Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Mohammad Taqui Nayani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2555) 140/2024 Criminal Appeal Nano @ Razi Khan Marfani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2370
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-25
Approved for Reporting

2556) 659/2018 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SHAH @ SHAH JEE & ORS (Appellant) V/S GULSHAN ELLAHI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

2557) 395/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Shamim Ali S/o Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Asma Begum and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Bridal gifts given by a husband are the absolute property of a wife and cannot be taken away from her. A bride can always recover the articles of bridal gifts, ???WARI??? and presents given to her by a bridegroom or his family at the time of the marriage
Citation:2024 SHC KHI 1019
Advocates:Mohammad Kashif Ayaz(ADVO-9096-SBC-KHE),Jamshed A. Shaikh(ADVO-8896-SBC-KHE),Dr. Raana Khan(ADVO-4571-SBC-KHI),Gulnaz Kausar(ADVO-9422-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.263-K/2024 Muhammad Shamim v. Mst. Asma Begum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

2558) 19/2013 Civil Revision Mst Shahida Parveen (Appellant) V/S Saiful Malook (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Specific Performance of Contract (Section 79 of Qanaun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984)
Tag Line:(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S.12---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 79---Suit for specific performance to sell immovable property---Agreement to sell, proof of---Scope---Contention of plaintiff was that she purchased suit property form defendant on the basis of agreement to sell---Validity---Burden was on plaintiff to prove the existence of agreement to sell and handing over of possession of suit property through sale agreement---Record showed that neither plaintiff had produced receipt of payment nor she had produced marginal witnesses or any other witness to prove execution of sale agreement with defendant---Sole testimony of plaintiff was not sufficient, thus, plaintiff had failed to discharge her burden in terms of S.79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) --- ----S. 115---Revision---Concurrent findings of lower courts---Concurrent findings of lower courts could not be set aside in exercise of jurisdiction under S.115 of C.P.C. unless same were found perverse or contrary to record.
Citation:2016 MLD 1696
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 17-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

2559) 746/1998 Suit MUHAMMAD ISMAIL & ORS. (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD AHMED & ORS. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 12-APR-16
Approved for Reporting

2560) 33/2018 Cr.J.A Gulzar Sanghro (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Topic: Criminal Jail Appeal (prosecution has proved in Murder Case. prosecution who were the natural witnesses, and the evidence of witnesses is fully supported.)
Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 128
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 05-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting

2561) 61/2024 Cr.J.A Irshad Ali (Appellant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Citation:2025 SHC MPK 1959
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 24-JUL-25
Approved for Reporting

2562) 652/2021 Cr.Bail Aijaz Ali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 522
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

2563) 1004/2025 Cr.Bail Javaid S/o Mehmood (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1228
Advocates:Khadim Hussain Soomro(ADVO-20661-SBC-KHE)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 13-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2564) 58/2020 Cr.Rev Faraz Memon (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2020 SHC HYD 251
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 31-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

2565) 82/2023 I. A Muhammad Ifrahim & Another (Appellant) V/S M/S. JS Bank Limited and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Execution , Banking Law (Recovery )
Tag Line:The value and/or forced sale value is provided in the sale proclamation only as equity and to have an idea about the possible price.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 804
Advocates:Muhammad Mobeen Khan(ADVO-16336-SBC-KHE),Mukesh Kumar G. Karara(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK),Suleman Hudda(ADVO-8799-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 29-DEC-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.166-K/2024 Muhammad Ifrahim and another v. M/s J.S. Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2566) 14/2009 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S Haider Abbas (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 16-DEC-09
Approved for Reporting

2567) 500/2021 Criminal Appeal SHAKEEL AHMED S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE/ ANF (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CNS Act, 1997 ((No legal bar or restriction to consider statement of official witnesses))
Tag Line:No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during their cross-examination.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 130
Advocates:Muhammad Farooq(ADVO-6839-SBC-KHI),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-NOV-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.653/2022 Shakeel Ahmed & 3 others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2568) 4079/2021 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed Kanasa (Petitioner) V/S Federal Tax Ombudsman and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Tax matters
Tag Line:Petitioners have neither been served any notice intimating them with regard to the complaints against which the investigations were to be conducted nor have been given fair opportunity to respond to the accusations of alleged maladministration and corrupt practices. Furthermore, the Federal Tax Ombudsman is authorized to summon record under section 10(9) of Ordinance 2000 and no reasons have been provided as to why the powers conferred therein have not been exercised and resort has been made directly to inspection of the petitioners offices. Indeed there must be some refusal by the petitioners to comply with Section 10(9) of the ibid ordinance before measures such as inspections are resorted to and/or a case has to be made out to jump/short-circuit the mechanics.
Citation:2024 PTD 1, 2024 SBLR Sindh 569
Advocates:Dy Attorney General(DAG),Abid Shahid Zuberi(ADVO-3473-SBC-KHI),Ameer Nausherwan Adil Memon(ADVO-15705-SBC-KHS),Ameer Bakhsh Metlo(ADVO-13549-SBC-KHI),Ayan Mustafa Memon(ADVO-13030-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 28-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

2569) 2636/2009 Const. P. P.N.S.C. (Petitioner) V/S FEd of Pakistan & Orsd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The Supreme Court in Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited vs. President of Pakistan (2020 SCMR 242) followed its precedent set in Peshawar Electric Supply Company Ltd. v. Wafaqi Mohtasib, supra. Quoting the PESCO case, the Court reiterated that the Wafaqi Mohtasib lacks jurisdiction under Article 9 of The Order, 1983, to entertain complaints regarding appointments or recommend appointments by relaxing age limits in public sector companies, as these are executive functions. Consequently, the Supreme Court in the Sui Northern case held that the Wafaqi Mohtasib did not have jurisdiction to hear Respondent No.3's case against the Petitioner Company, and the Lahore High Court erred in dismissing the Writ Petition.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1054
Advocates:Choudhry Rashid Ahmed(ADVO-2453-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Muhammad Latif(ADVO-3023-SBC-KHI),Khalid Javed(ADVO-2417-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-APR-25
Approved for Reporting

2570) 3035/2014 Const. P. Telenor LDI Communication (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Syed Aijaz Hussain Shirazi(ADVO-8688-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 11-MAR-15
Approved for Reporting

2571) 1845/2013 Const. P. Wajid Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Civil Judge and JM-1 Tando Muhammad Khan and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 24-OCT-13
Approved for Reporting

2572) 7/2017 F.R.A Engineers & Professionals Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Appellant) V/S The Institute of Engineering Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 31-JAN-19
Approved for Reporting

2573) 1971/2011 Const. P. Khursheed Ali Junejo (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Province Through Chief Secretary and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 12-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

2574) 489/2010 Cr.Appeal Mst. Shehnaz (Appellant) V/S State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai
Order Date: 21-MAR-14
Approved for Reporting

2575) 342/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. National Feed Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 631
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 01-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.634-K/2021 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. National Feeds Limited & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2576) 1/2013 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Asif Traders (Applicant) V/S The Collector of Customs & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2014 PTD 1057
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 24-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

2577) 243/2009 Cr.Acctt.A State / Anti Narcotics Force (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Adeel Hussain & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 27-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

2578) 830/2014 Const. P. Sohail and ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SBLR Sindh 50
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1112-K/2021 Muhammad Junaid v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Ports & Shipping & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned

2579) 569/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Syed Abid Ali & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979, Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (FRA Remanding Order Set aside and declared null & void. )
Tag Line:Hence the only presumption, deducible in absence of any contrary evidence is that it was executed and authenticated in presence of Notary Public who is one of the authority to authenticate the subject document i.e. Power of Attorney. --
Citation:2020 SBLR Sindh 239
Advocates:Muhammad Touqeer Randhawa(ADVO-14636-SBC-KHI),M/S. ADNAN & CO(FIRM-247-SBC-KHI),Afaq Ahmed(ADVO-4782-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting

2580) 88/2014 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Eastern Construction Co., Khi (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 22-DEC-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.159-K/2015 Collector of Customs v. M/s Eastern Construction Company Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2581) 1343/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 429
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

2582) 208/2013 Cr.Misc. Abdul Malik Brohi and others (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 24-SEP-13
Approved for Reporting

2583) 2442/2018 Const. P. Faique Ali Jagirani & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2021 PLD Sindh 139
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAR-20
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.290-K/2020 Faique Ali Jagirani v. The Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2584) 85/2021 Cr.Acq.A. ZAHEER ANWAR ALVI S/O ANWER AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3526
Advocates:Syed Muhammad Abdul Kabir(ADVO-18603-SBC-KHE),Muhammad Umar Farooque(ADVO-17319-SBC-KHS),Shoukat Hayat(ADVO-3213-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jameel(ADVO-4255-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Haider 'Ada'(Author)
Order Date: 12-DEC-25
Approved for Reporting

2585) 868/2019 Cr.Misc. Notan Lal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Citation:2020 SHC SUK 2233
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUL-20
Approved for Reporting

2586) 703/2010 Const. P. Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Amenity Plot (Conversion of amenity plot into Residential / commercial), Amenity Plot (Allowed)
Tag Line:The action of Respondent No.3 in changing amenity nature and use of reserved plots is void ab initio. Consequently, very allotment in favour of private Respondents has no sanctity in the eyes of law and it is also settled principle that transferor cannot transfer a better title then what he himself possesses, therefore, if the title of the private Respondents being purported allottees of the above subject Plots is defective then further transfers of these plots do not improve the legal status of these allottees / private Respondents vis-??-vis the respective newly created purported Plots No.261 to 265 or any other Plot(s) created / allocated in a land exclusively earmarked / reserved for amenity purpose(s).
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 26-SEP-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.550-K/2024 Abdul Hameed and others v. Abdul Qadir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2587) 205/2018 Criminal Appeal AASHIQUE ALI CHANDIO S/O G. MUHAMMAD CHANDIO & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Advocates:Ajab Khan Khattak(ADVO-8138-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 18-APR-18
Approved for Reporting

2588) 1457/2015 Suit M/s UNISA Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 02-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting

2589) 4780/2018 Const. P. M/s M. Iqbal & Sons & ORs (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 707
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 02-MAR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.643-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan & others v. M/s. Iqbal & Sons & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2590) 560/2000 Suit Nasreen Yousuf (Plaintiff) V/S Aijaz Safdar Kiyani and others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 24-DEC-13
Approved for Reporting

2591) 88/2016 I. A House Building Finance Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Major Muhammad Abdul Aziz & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Section 3 (Cost of funds))
Tag Line:The learned Judge has correctly granted HBFC cost of funds from 2010 onwards in the Judgment, which, according to Respondent No.1-Customer???s admission, was the date of default, yet there is no explanation why the learned Judge proceeded to apply a varying rate of cost of funds as already discussed. Therefore, HBFC???s claim that the learned Judge of the Banking Court has not granted the cost of funds from the date of default is incorrect. In fact, the Banking Court granted costs of funds but did not grant HBFC the cost of funds as certified by the State Bank of Pakistan from time to time from 2010 till the date of Judgment in May 2016. The case is remanded to the Banking Court to determine the cost of funds amount payable to HBFC in terms of section 3(2) of the FIO, 2001. There shall be no change in the already decreed principal outstanding amount of Rs.1,771,340 and the costs of the suit of Rs.31,425, which will remain the same. The Respondent No.1-Customer has already paid HBFC through the Banking Court a total sum of Rs.3,057,486, which comprised of the old decretal (i) principal outstanding amount, (ii) the disputed cost of funds amount, and (iii) the costs of the suit. The Banking Court shall adjust the payment already made by Respondent No.1-Customer to HBFC of Rs.3,057,486 against the fresh cost of funds to be determined by it and pass an amended Decree, accordingly. All the other terms and conditions of the Decree dated 05.05.2016 shall remain intact.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 473
Advocates:Muhammad Aslam(ADVO-5915-SBC-KHE),S. Muhammad Salam Kazmi(ADVO-3937-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 08-NOV-23
Approved for Reporting

2592) 1434/2023 Const. P. Gazain Zafar Magsi Adv and Another (Petitioner) V/S Karachi Bar Association and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 173
Advocates:Amir Saleem(ADVO-4522-SBC-KHS),In Person(INP),Muhammad Abdul Rehman(ADVO-15571-SBC-KHE),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAR-23
Approved for Reporting

2593) 1638/2022 Const. P. Syed Muhammad Jamshed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Regularization to seek regularization initial contract appointment must be in accordance with law
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1721
Advocates:Samiullah Soomro(ADVO-960-SBC-SUK)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-25
Approved for Reporting

2594) 493/2018 Const. P. Umaid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Election Commission and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 CLC 344
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 31-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2236/2019 Umaid Ali v. The Election Commission of Pakistan thr. Secretary Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad & others,C.A.1400/2019 Umaid Ali v. The Election Commission of Pakistan thr. Secretary Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Leave Granted. Impugned judgment suspended. Notict to AG Sindh xxvii-A CPC. Relist after vacations,Disposed Allowed

2595) 796/2019 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs MCC Appraisement (West) (Applicant) V/S M/s. SG Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 881
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 26-JAN-21
Approved for Reporting

2596) 2350/2021 Cr.Bail SYED MUHAMMAD FARHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.473/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 488
Advocates:Khatija Kulsoom(ADVO-9274-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

2597) 1047/2005 Const. P. Hakeemuddin and anor. (Petitioner) V/S D.G. of Customs Intelligence and ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Judge Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
Order Date: 22-JAN-10
Approved for Reporting

2598) 687/2010 I.T.R.A Cargill Pakistan Holding(Pvt) Ltd. (Applicant) V/S Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Farooq Ali Channa, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 21-AUG-13
Approved for Reporting

2599) 38/2003 Civil Revision Anwar Hussain (Applicant) V/S Rafiuddin & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 12---Suit for specific performance---Agreement to sell immovable property---Scope---Contention of plaintiff was that he was a bona fide purchaser of suit shop, since he had purchased the same after cancellation of agreement between defendants and the courts below had failed to appreciate that there was a penalty clause for defaulting party in case of failure to perform their part of agree-ment---Defendant's plea was that neither there was any stipulation in agreement that either party could seek cancellation of agreement on payment of penalty nor there was any justification for cancelling the agreement after having received the earnest money---Defendant also contended that his agreement with other defendants was coupled with the possession of suit shop and therefore his agreement was protected against any third party---Held, that plaintiff had failed to produce any evidence that at the time of purchase of suit shop he had made any effort to check the status of agreement between defendants---Defendant conceded in his evidence that he had purchased three shops and even there was no separate agreement of purchase of another shop after alleged cancellation of agreement of sale between defendants rather it was only interpolation in agreement of sale between plaintiff and sub-attorney of defendants that Shop No. 3 was changed to Shop No. 6 in said agreement with a view to obtain separate portion of building which was in fact in two parts---Plaintiff admitted that he was next door neighbour as he was already in possession of suit property but at no point of time defendant was contacted by plaintiff to confirm that agreement of sale with him was cancelled by defendants----Plaintiff had failed to establish his bona fide and in such circumstances, no case was made out for interference in concurrent findings of courts below---Revision was dismissed, accordingly.
Citation:2016 YLR 1108
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 10-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2600) 300/2015 Const. P. Mian Trust (Petitioner) V/S Lyari Expressway And ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Amenity Plot
Tag Line:It may be noted that in view of the express statutory Bar, inter alia, as provided in Regulation 18-4.1 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002, a land reserved for amenity purpose cannot be converted and utilized for any other purpose. In this regard, a reported Judgment in the case of Mansoor Sharif Hamid vs. Shafique Rehman-2015 SCMR 1172 handed down by Honble Supreme Court, cited by the learned counsel for Petitioner is relevant.
Citation:2021 SHC KHI 425
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 18-OCT-21
Approved for Reporting

2601) 2068/2016 Const. P. Gulistan Textiles Mills Limited (Petitioner) V/S VIIIth ADJ Karachi South & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 8 (Fair Rent))
Tag Line:- Similarly, a presumptive view in respect of overall inflation and rate of taxes cannot be applied. The maintenance claimed to have been made/done by the landlord/respondent and in support thereof they have filed some accounts and debit vouchers but it pertains to a period w.e.f. March 2007onward. How these debit vouchers and maintenance bills are being applied to entire building and on what calculation and basis its ratio in terms of facilities provided to the premises is being applied, is inconceivable on the strength of the evidence available on record. Floor-wise true calculation is not provided. The presumptive analysis thus is beyond the domain and jurisdiction of the Rent Controller. The statistics in terms of inflation and maintenance charges should have been provided in statement recorded on oath and only then it could have been taken into consideration by the appellate Court. Filing plethora of documents disclosing them as debit vouchers in respect of maintaining the entire building is inconceivable. Statistics showing percentage of taxation over the building in question as well as maintenance as to be applied to entire building and has to be established statistically and not generally. Such data was not provided to Rent Controller. Taxation and maintenance are differently applied on ground floor and upper floors. - Similarly in presence of lease deeds of the same building between same landlord and tenant or between same landlord and other tenants, the reliance/applicability of rent or fair rent of other buildings in the adjoining locality should not have been applied as a priority, wherein respect of which direct evidence is available. When a building is operated by lifts there is not a serious degree of difference between second and third floor of the same building where premises are situated. - Though the Rent Controller while determining fair rent of the premises in question has taken a very conservative view by fixing fair rent at Rs.10/-per sq. foot, yet I am of the view that fair rent fixed by the appellate Court is on higher side. The Rent Controller and appellate Court were required to provide a cumulative effect of all those factors available under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 subject to availability of evidence though the quantum of inflation and the enhancement of taxation has not been statistically provided in terms of applicability of such claim/charges per sq. foot yet the other factors may contribute for the determination of fair rent. - The rise in cost of construction has also not been demonstrated statistically. It is only presumptive analysis that cost of construction rises with the passage of time, however, the witness is required to provide data of such rise in cost of construction through his affidavit or any expert witness. It is a difficult assignment but the requirement of law. This burden could be relieved had appropriate lease deeds of same building or of adjoining building having similar facilities could be cited in evidence. - Section 8(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 enables the Rent Controller to revise such fair rent on account of changes/ additions brought or improving the premises in question which is not the case here. Similarly, there cannot be an automatic enhancement at the rate of 10% per annum on the fair rent in terms of Section 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. It provides a maximum cap of 10% per annum on the existing fair rent and not an automatic enhancement to its maximum. Such enhancement at any particular rate, which in any case should not be 10% per annum, is dependent on certain factors which were not decided in the application under section 8 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. Besides, there was no prayer for such enhancement under section 9 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979.
Citation:2024 YLR 16
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 25-MAY-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.1490-K/2021 Gulistan Textile Mills Limited v. The Learned VIIIth Addl.District Judge, South at Karachi. & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2602) 1310/2018 Const. P. Mir Shabbir Ali Khan Bijarani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 603
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author)
Order Date: 10-JUL-18
Approved for Reporting

2603) 39/2016 M.A. Liaquat Ali (Appellant) V/S Mst. Huma Faiz and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Federal Employees Benevolent Fund and Group Insurance Act, 1969, Succession Act, 1925 (S. 372)
Tag Line:Succession Certificate could have been granted only in respect of assets left by the deceased either in favour of widow or any of the brothers of deceased as deem fit and proper and the purpose of granting succession certificate was the distribution of assets amongst the legal heirs, which is not the case here at least for these financial heads which does not form assets of deceased. --Widow being nominee is entitled for such funds i.e. provident fund, gratuity, group insurance, welfare funds and benevolent fund without having any recourse of obtaining any succession certificate.
Citation:2018 PLD Sindh 251
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),Muhammad Ramzan(ADVO-7072-SBC-KHI),Sajjad Hussain(ADVO-14677-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 08-JAN-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.28-K/2018 Liaquat Ali v. Mst: Huma Faiz and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2604) 52/2006 Suit.B National Bank of Pakistan (Plaintiff) V/S M/S ARK Garments Industry (Pvt.) Ltd. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 15-JAN-14
Approved for Reporting

2605) 1940/2014 Const. P. Prof: Jan Muhammad Memon (Petitioner) V/S Governor of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-MAY-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2715/2018 Professor Jan Muhammad Memon v. The Governor of Sindh/Chancellor thr. the Principal Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous

2606) 6803/2018 Const. P. Mian Dad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1102-K/2018 Mian Dad v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2607) 43/2015 Cr.Bail Ismail (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto
Order Date: 26-OCT-15
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.M.A.12-K/2017 Ismail v. The State through P. G. Sindh,Crl.P.76-K/2015 Ismail v. The State through P. G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed

2608) 2/2019 F.R.A Ahmed Khan (Appellant) V/S Javed Ali (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)
Order Date: 23-DEC-19
Approved for Reporting

2609) 245/2024 II.A. Abdul Khaliq Saleem S/o Hafiz Fateh Muhammad Khan (Appellant) V/S Imran Hyder (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:The instant Second Appeal merits no consideration and is dismissed with no order as to cost. Impugned Judgment and decree dated 23.05.2024 is upheld.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 429
Advocates:Kulsoom Khan Jadoon(ADVO-21096-SBC-KHS),Sannia Khalique(ADVO-21260-SBC-KHS),Abdul Baqi(ADVO-11889-SBC-KHI),Abdul Rauf(ADVO-16009-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Jaffer Raza(Author)
Order Date: 26-MAR-25
Approved for Reporting

2610) 719/2014 Suit Malik Zulfiqar Hussain. (Plaintiff) V/S Anees Parekh & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2020 SHC KHI 321
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 26-FEB-20
Approved for Reporting

2611) 4/2021 Criminal Appeal Nakeef Nindwani (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Tag Line:Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
Citation:2021 SHC LAR 1139
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 22-APR-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:J.P.514/2023 Rahamtullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending

2612) 113/2011 I. A Al Baraka Bank Pvt Ltd (Appellant) V/S Raja Ashfaq Hussain (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001
Tag Line:We may observe that the aforesaid provision of Section 9 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001 is not comprehensive and exhaustive in deriving conclusion regarding the jurisdiction of the Court as the recourse in terms of Section 15 have to be made to discover as to what is the precise jurisdiction vested on the Banking Court under the Ordinance in terms of Section 15. No doubt that the preamble/title of the Ordinance provides that it has been primarily for the purpose of recovery of finance. The other recourse that is available under section 15 of the Ordinance, 2001 is off-course is the mechanism which provides for the recovery of the loan by way of sale of the mortgaged property with or without intervention of the Court and the jurisdiction in terms of Section 15 of the Ordinance, 2001 is also open and extended as far as the disputes of the sale of the mortgaged property is concerned. Such disputes if at all, raised are to be dealt with in terms of Section 15 of the Ordinance, 2001. There is no cavil to this proposition and perhaps to this extent the jurisdiction of the Banking Court extends so far as it relates to a dispute for the sale of the mortgaged property, which is not the case here.
Citation:2013 CLD 511, 2013 SBLR Sindh 318
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam
Order Date: 07-DEC-12
Approved for Reporting

2613) 637/2016 Cr.Misc. Riaz Ahmed Bhutto & othr (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & othr (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
Order Date: 02-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

2614) 6134/2024 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Suleman (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973, Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974
Tag Line:Promotion set-aside.
Citation:2025 SHC KHI 762
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana
Order Date: 07-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.5164/2024 Kausar Abbas Saldera v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Health Services Regulation & Coordination, Islamabad and others,C.P.L.A.1845/2025 Dr. Kausar Abbas Saldera v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Health Services Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution, Adjourned

2615) 4082/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Haneef (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2022 SHC KHI 286
Advocates:Deputy Attorney General(),In Person(INP),Altamash Arab(ADVO-14079-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 15-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1715/2022 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commissoin (PAEC) through its Secretary (PAEC), Islamabad v. Muhammad Haneef and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned. Be fixed a/w CPLA.3433/21 etc

2616) 518/2023 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD SHARIF S/O MUHAMMAD QASIM (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 3392
Advocates:Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Moazzam Hussain(ADVO-10276-SBC-KHS),Moula Bux Bhutto(ADVO-15386-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Fiaz Ul Hassan Shah(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

2617) 84/2015 Cr.Appeal EJAZ RAFIQ S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 17-APR-15
Approved for Reporting

2618) 197/2020 Cr.Bail SHEERAZ S/O IMAM BUX (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Bail Matters (Post arrest bail Granted u/s 353/324/302/34 PPC. How Complainant Knew the name of accused . )
Citation:2021 MLD 292
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 04-MAY-20
Approved for Reporting

2619) 1489/2022 Const. P. Mst Shabnam (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Tag Line:Petitioner entitled to appointment under disable quota - disability ratio alien to law
Citation:2025 SHC SUK 2084
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro(Author)
Order Date: 13-AUG-25
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1070-K/2025 Province of Sindh & Others v. Mst. Shabnam wife of Shahbaz Dino Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:

2620) 67/2021 M.A. Zubair Ahmed S/o Muhammad Yousif Abro (Appellant) V/S Sindh Thr. Chief Secretary and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2023 SHC KHI 641
Advocates:In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 02-FEB-23
Approved for Reporting

2621) 119/2001 Civil Revision Ghulam Mustafa (Applicant) V/S Shafi Muhammad & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Tag Line:Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 8, 12, 42 & 52----Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XLI, R. 31---Suit for specific performance, declaration, return of articles, mesne profit and injunction---Power of attorney, revocation of---Principles---Judgment in appeal---Plaintiff filed suit claiming that he had obtained possession of suit property after paying substantial part of consideration, but defendant later unlawfully cancelled general power of attorney and illegally took back possession of suit property from tenant of plaintiff and refused to perform his part of sale contract---Both trial court and appellate court decreed the suit on admission of defendant as to execution of sale agreement---Validity---Defendant failed to point out any instance of misreading or non-reading of evidence to show that courts below had come to wrong conclusion---Defendant had admitted execution of contract of sale with plaintiff and handing over possession of suit property on realization of substantial amount and transfer of loan in favour of plaintiff---As suit property was rented out by plaintiff and plaintiff had been paying loan of House Building Finance Corporation, thus there was no justification for defendant to unilaterally cancel power of attorney without notice to plaintiff and fraudulently obtain possession by inducing tenant of respondent---Defendant had not established his defence plea through cogent evidence---Plaintiff, on the other hand, had established by cogent evidence execution of sale agreement and payment of consideration---Power of attorney was not without consideration---Defendant had not made any public notice in newspapers while revoking power of attorney---Defendant failed to prove rescission of sale agreement---Defendant's witnesses were chance witnesses---Tenant of suit property, as witness of defendant, had admitted that he was put in possession of premises by plaintiff---Persons who appeared as witness before Registrar for registration of revocation of power of attorney had not come in witness box---Contents of cancellation deed did not disclose reasons for cancelling power of attorney---Cancellation deed was contrary to terms of power of attorney, which provided that cancellation of same was to be proceeded with no objection certificate from House Building Finance Corporation---Cancellation of power of attorney after receiving entire consideration for executing same was not lawful---Appellate court, while marshalling evidence, had examined all issues framed by trial court and affirmed findings of trial court, which was sufficient compliance of provisions of O. XLI, R. 31 C.P.C.---High Court observed that appellate court was not always required to discuss each issue, unless same was reversed by first appellate court---Defendant had lingered on the matter for last twenty years---Revision petition was dismissed with cost in circumstances.
Citation:2016 MLD 168
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 30-SEP-15
Approved for Reporting

2622) 33/2022 Const. P. Parvez Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:the petitioner has called in question the vires of his posting order dated 01.01.2022 of respondent No.4 as Chairman Sindh Text Book Board (STBB), issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 27
Advocates:Zamir Hussain Ghumro(ADVO-10861-SBC-KHI),Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Faizan Hussain Memon(ADVO-15395-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 24-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.527-K/2022 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan v. Pervez Ahmed Baloch & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2623) 4163/2025 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 2680
Advocates:Faisal Mahmood Ghani(ADVO-8286-SBC-KHS),Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-OCT-25
Approved for Reporting

2624) 865/2019 Const. P. Atta Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Nazia & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Citation:2020 SHC HYD 718
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20
Approved for Reporting

2625) 2307/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:commutation--recalculation--subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law, if the parties are so aggrieved against the calculation of the Nazir, they may take resort of the Court of plenary jurisdiction.
Citation:2022 PLC (CS) 833
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting

2626) 14/2014 Conf.Case The State (Applicant) V/S Zahid alias Liaquat and Muhammad Ibrahim (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
Order Date: 11-MAR-16
Approved for Reporting

2627) 1529/2018 Suit Mohammad Ahmed Ansari (Plaintiff) V/S Interglobe Commerce Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd & another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Lifting the veil of incorporation
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 834
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 13-JUN-22
Approved for Reporting

2628) 38/2021 Judicial Companies Misc. MFG Insurance Company Limited (Applicant) V/S Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Companies matters (reduction of share capital)
Tag Line:In case for confirmation of resolution of reduced share capital the question for consideration are, should the Court refuse its sanction to the reduction out of regard to the interest of those members of the public who may be induced to take shares in the company; is the reduction fair and equitable between different classes of shareholders; whether the reduction is shared by all; and is it designed to work justly and equitably and whether it does not involve diminution of the liability in respect of unpaid capital or payment of any shareholder of any paid up capital; and there is evidence regarding loss of capital and nonrepresentation of available assets. None of these impediments exist in the case of the petitioners company and consequently in view of above proposed reduction in the share capital, as resolved by the company itself, apparently seems to be just, fair and reasonable and not likely to adversely affect the interests of shareholders who have themselves resolved to the approval of this scheme of reduction. The proposal for reduction of share capital is therefore confirmed in terms of the requirements of Companies Act, 2017.
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 486
Advocates:Aman Aftab(ADVO-18333-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 15-FEB-22
Approved for Reporting

2629) 555/2020 Suit M/s Taj Medicos (Plaintiff) V/S Public Procurement Regulatory Authority & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Auction
Citation:2021 CLC 472
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-20
Approved for Reporting

2630) 1089/2016 Const. P. MAL Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S PAKISTAN through secretary revnue Division (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan (199), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Amendment of pleadings )
Tag Line:Through this common order the applications under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151, CPC filed in C.P.No.1089/2016 and filed in C.P.No.D-1720/2016 respectively were disposed of. In this case, it was discussed and observed that there is no cavil to the legal proposition that Court always has the jurisdiction under Order VI, Rule 17, C.P.C. and enjoys vast discretionary powers to allow amendments in a plaint at any stage of the proceedings, which in the opinion of the Court, are just and necessary for final disposal of case between the parties in accordance with law. However, at the same time, the Court is bound to exercise such discretion in accordance with settled judicial principles, It needs no reiteration that while allowing amendment in the plaint, the defendant's right should also be kept in view and no amendment should be allowed, which is aimed to change complexion of the case altogether or to introduce a new case based on new cause of action. It was further observed that keeping in view of the legal position, the proposed amendments if allowed to be incorporated in the existing pleadings of the petitioners, the same shall not either change the nature or complexion of the case, as the proposed amendments sought to be incorporated are legal questions, which even otherwise do not require any factual investigation. Conversely, since the present cases are constitutional petitions therefore, in order to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings, all constitutional points relating to subject issue can be dealt with comprehensively in the present constitutional petitions. Furthermore, since the respondent will have the right to amend their pleadings as well, in the event, the proposed amendments if allowed to be incorporated, therefore, we are of the view that no prejudice will be caused to the respondents.
Citation:2017 CLC 1204, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1052
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 27-FEB-17
Approved for Reporting

2631) 166/2018 Const. P. Sajid Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Service matters (Change of date of examination)
Tag Line:Reverting to the plea taken by the Petitioner that other seven candidates were allowed to appear in the interview and he was left out. The aforesaid plea of the Petitioner cannot be considered as a valid ground to appear in the interview; therefore we do not see any discrimination on their part as discussed supra. The Petitioner has failed to make out a case on the basis of discrimination
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.390-K/2019 Sajid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2632) 5833/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2021 SHC KHI 1333
Advocates:Syed Ashiq Raza(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHI),Zahid F. Ebrahim(ADVO-4876-SBC-KHI),Dy Attorney General(DAG),Syed Muhammad Mujtaba Raza(ADVO-15118-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-DEC-21
Approved for Reporting

2633) 1664/2023 Cr.Bail Syed Ovais Hussain & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Pre arrest bail - dismissed in limine.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 83
Advocates:Aamir Mansoob Qureshi(ADVO-7457-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Order Date: 31-JUL-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:Crl.P.L.A.1008/2023 Syed Ovais Hussain v. The State through P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn

2634) 124/2023 Cr.Rev NADIR HUSSAIN ADV (Applicant) V/S DR MUHAMMAD ALI ZAIDI & ORS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2025 SHC KHI 1601
Advocates:Mohammad Arif(ADVO-4057-SBC-KHS),Farooq Hashmat Abbasi(ADVO-4616-SBC-KHC),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Syed Hassan Mujtaba Abidi(ADVO-15596-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khalid Hussain Shahani(Author)
Order Date: 30-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2635) 2180/2017 Const. P. Masood Ahmed Wassan & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Colonization of Government Land (Sindh) Act, 1912, Sindh Land Utilization Department
Tag Line:For roads, bridges, gas/oil line etc. most precious lands were/are being acquired or intercepted in between to have a shortest distance to minimize the cost of that project, but we do not realize that while doing so we are not only destroying fertile/ agriculture land but so also risking our future. This acquisition is normally based on feasibility report of that particular project but there is no realization that for providing some convenience or low cost project, precious land is being destroyed, which is far more important for our future than the convenience and low cost project. The project may cost less but consequences would be detrimental. We are living in a world where natural resources such as fertile land is being vacuumed up by development of concrete structure and this would count a lot in future and no one would come for our rescue when we have to yield our own food for our own consumption. In this case land was attached with the research based agriculture department of Sindh which caters for not only fruit crop but other agri products as well. The authorities responsible for identifying this land have not applied their mind at all and in an attempt to please, the most fertile land of the province had been provided for an object which could conveniently be achieved on non-agriculture land, subject to law. Blanket recommendation was forwarded by the Committee constituted for the aforesaid purpose and without identifying the reasons of disassociating the land with the agriculture based research department, they have made this land available for a scheme called Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Town. The recommendation of the Committee and the action of the authority is neither transparent nor lawful but in fact a mala fide attempt to usurp the most precious and fertile land of district Mirpurkhas where research is being conducted. The provincial government should have emphasized to uplift the research system of the agriculture department and steered the progress by maintaining it rather than to ignore the research based system. They could always find the land anywhere else and provide resources and amenities for dwellers where the land could be developed by land developers. The performance of Ministry of Agriculture to save the land was half-hearted and they only presented themselves as marionette since they have not taken action against usurpation of their land. If we really want to protect the agricultural lands and to promote sustainable agrarian growth for the future, large scale basic reforms and legislation are needed.
Citation:2020 YLR 2597
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 29-APR-20
Approved for Reporting

2636) 262/2017 H.C.A Gulshan Weaving Mills Limited (Appellant) V/S Al Baraka Bank (Pakistan) Limited & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-NOV-17
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1008/2018 Bank of Punjab, Karachi v. Gulshan Weaving Mills Ltd, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

2637) 2197/2019 Const. P. M/s Javedan Cement Ltd (Petitioner) V/S S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:Compensation instead of reinstatment
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 892
Advocates:M/S. SIDDIQUI & RAZA(FIRM-240-SBC-KHI),Sanaullah Noor Ghauri(ADVO-4123-SBC-KHI),Rafiullah(ADVO-4519-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Jaffer Raza(ADVO-13211-SBC-KHI),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 11-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.1210-K/2023 Ghulam Murtaza v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status: Adjourned (Notice)

2638) 4752/2013 Const. P. Ghulam Sarwat Thaheem (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 10-DEC-18
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.94-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Board & University Deptt: Govt. of Sindh v. Ghulam Sarwar Thaheem Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2639) 39/2008 I. A Habib Bank Ltd., (Appellant) V/S Rafiq Ahmed & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
Order Date: 03-OCT-11
Approved for Reporting

2640) 8/2009 II.A. Ghulam Muhammad (Appellant) V/S Anand Kohistan Cotton and an Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Tag Line:(a) Registration Act (XVI of 1908)--- ----S. 17---Suit filed by registered firm---Not hit by S. 17, Registration Act, 1908---Appeals were dismissed. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 100---Second appeal---Scope---Scope of second appeal was limited to three grounds mentioned in S. 100, C.P.C.---In the present case, none of the ingredients of S. 100, C.P.C. had been found in memo. of appeal or in grounds of appeal---Appellant had failed to point out anything contrary to law or to some usage having force of law in judgments and decrees of lower courts---Appellant had not pointed out any misreading or non-reading of evidence nor he had been able to point out any legal lacuna in findings of lower court---Second appeals were dismissed, in circumstances.
Citation:2016 CLD 421
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 17-AUG-15
Approved for Reporting

2641) 78/2025 Const. P. Gulzaib (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Umme Lubaba & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 1583
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 19-MAY-25
Approved for Reporting

2642) 224/2019 Cr.Bail MST. FOZIA D/O ABDUL GHAFFAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 480
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 19-APR-22
Approved for Reporting

2643) 1670/2018 Suit Liaquat Ali Bhatti & others (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & ors (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The issue involved in this Suit was in respect of promotions of private Defendants as Chief Engineers from Deputy Chief Engineers in PIA and leaving out the Plaintiffs though they were admittedly senior. It was claimed by PIA that neither seniority nor promotion is a vested right; hence, no case is made out by the Plaintiffs; however, there being no cavil to this legal proposition; such contention has been repelled by the Court and the impugned order of promotion of private defendants has been suspended, for the reason that firstly the Plaintiffs have not been provided with any reason or justification as to why they have been left out; and secondly, even the Court was not assisted as to the entire material and record for promoting private defendants, and therefore, the Plaintiffs cannot be left without any remedy. They being seniors at least ought to have been communicated with a proper response for not being considered so that they could have availed any further remedy as per law; and this has been found a valid ground for suspending the impugned order, whereas, if the management of PIA feels that due to exigency, fresh proceedings are necessary for carrying out promotion(s); then they are at liberty to do so but in accordance with the Agreement and the revised policy, if any, and so also keeping in mind the discussion made hereinabove, including consultation with Defendant No.2 as per the Agreement.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-19
Approved for Reporting

2644) 100/2004 Civil Revision Bahadur and Others (Applicant) V/S Government of Sindh (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
Order Date: 19-NOV-12
Approved for Reporting

2645) 127/2011 I. A Mst Khursheed Begum & Ors (Appellant) V/S NIB Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Banking Law (limitation of liability to the extent of a cap provided by the registered mortgage deed)
Tag Line:limitation of liability to the extent of a cap provided by the registered mortgage deed
Citation:2024 PLD Sindh 276, 2024 CLD 765, 2024 CLD 888
Advocates:Khaleeq Ahmed(ADVO-3926-SBC-KHS),Syed Daanish Ghazi(ADVO-13558-SBC-KHI),S. Riaz Haider(ADVO-4452-SBC-KHI),Barrister Gazain Magsi(ADVO-67-BBC-QTA-QTA)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Order Date: 14-FEB-24
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.284-K/2024 Mst. khursheed begum through L.Rs. and others v. M.C.B. Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Disposed of

2646) 135/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Zakir S/o Abdul Malik (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Faisal and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:In principle, the applicant has lost his case; and, at the revision stage, he has agitated the grounds already exhausted by him and properly adjudicated by the competent forum including the plea that the suit filed by the respondent was time-barred on the premise that he made last payment to the applicant on 12.8.2015 whereas, he filed his suit No.497/2017 for declaration, specific performance of sale agreement, permanent injunction and consequential relief on 24.4.2017 means 01 year, 08 months and 12 days
Citation:2022 SHC KHI 89
Advocates:Syed Khurram Kamal(ADVO-16504-SBC-KHI),Syed Ehsan Raza(ADVO-4790-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 07-JAN-22
Approved for Reporting

2647) 85/2021 Criminal Appeal Dilshad Mahar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana

Citation:2024 SHC LAR 850
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)
Order Date: 14-NOV-24
Approved for Reporting

2648) 545/2020 Cr.Bail SHAHID AHMED S/O ROSHAN UDDIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Citation:2020 SHC KHI 1295
Advocates:Shamsuddin Bhayo(ADVO-19492-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS),Muhammad Asim Iqbal(ADVO-17584-SBC-KHS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-20
Approved for Reporting

2649) 934/2023 Criminal Miscelleneous Lal Khan Shar (Appellant) V/S Baroch son of Ghulam Mahar & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur

Citation:2024 SHC SUK 570
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-MAY-24
Approved for Reporting

2650) 85/2018 H.C.A SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd. & others (Appellant) V/S WALIA Steel Industries PLC & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 07-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.2407/2019 SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd & others v. WALIA Steel Industries & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed

2651) 6498/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Shafi Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Qayyum Solangi and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-JAN-17
Approved for Reporting

2652) 10/2012 H.C.A Pangrio Sugar Mills Limited (Appellant) V/S Bankers Equity Limited & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Citation:2015 CLD 637
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 04-SEP-14
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.L.A.368-K/2014 M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Bankers Equity Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed Dismissed

2653) 141/2016 S.M.A Muhammad Iqbal S/o Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) V/S Noor Muhammad Chutani - Deceased (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
Order Date: 24-SEP-18
Approved for Reporting

2654) 41/2025 Cr.Bail Ali Ahmed & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2025 SHC HYD 212
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 27-JAN-25
Approved for Reporting

2655) 25/2021 F.R.A M/s. Nixor College (Pvt) Ltd and another (Appellant) V/S Dr. Suleiman Muhammad Al Suleiman (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:MRC. Where a landlord refused to accept rent, it was mandatory for the tenant first to remit the rent through postal money order and if that was not done, deposit of rent in Court would not absolve the tenant from being a defaulter for the relevant period.
Citation:2023 SHC KHI 927
Advocates:Khawaja Shams ul Islam(ADVO-3953-SBC-KHS),Khawaja Saif ul Islam.(ADVO-7383-SBC-KHI),Salahuddin Ahmed(ADVO-9058-SBC-KHS),Ahmed Ali Hussain(ADVO-14280-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 08-SEP-23
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.P.3609/2023 M/s Nixor College Pvt Limited, Karachi and another v. Dr. Suleiman Muhammad Ali Suleiman Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Disposed

2656) 361/2018 Criminal Appeal FARAZ AHMED BALOCH & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Appeal (Appeal)
Tag Line: Appellants Challenged the Conviction and sentenced for the offence under sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 109 PPC, whereby both the appellants were convicted u/s.409 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for seven (07) years each and fine of Rs.15 lacs. complainant Nadeem Hamid, Branch Manager Askari Bank made a complaint alleging therein that , an entry of Rs.1.500 million was posted in transfer mode by debiting head office account. The transaction was posted with advice On scrutiny, the voucher has not been found in the branch record and was missing. On 29.06.2011 cash amounting of Rs.1.480 million was withdrawn through cheque from account of Gul Wali and Ahmed Khan, the said cheque was posted by Shafiq Abro through his ID and was supervised with the ID of Nasir Mehmood, e. The said cheque was bearing forged signature of the customer. The customer Gul Wali Khan and Ahmed Khan also denied withdrawal of amount through cheque and informed that cheque had been misplaced . The transactions of every cheque are reconciled on every 15 days and the said entry of Rs.14,80,000/- was not reconciled/made and verified through the Page 9 of 13 record. The inquiry was continued for about six (6) months but the said inquiry proved about it through Head Office referred the matter to FIA. The handwriting of whole staff was obtained by the Head office and sent to the Handwriting Expert and the office received a report from the Handwriting Expert whereby the Handwriting of the accused Faraz being matched with the handwriting mentioned on the disputed cheque. Pervez Ahmed, SI FIA ,it is correct to say that incident took place due to sharing of password and ID. It is correct to say according to the regulation, SBP Bank officials are not expected to share their IDs and Passwords. He further admitted that PW Sohail Noor in his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. shown doubt that Raheel Rauf CD Incharge might have used his ID. The overall discussions involved a conclusion that the prosecution has failed to bring the guilt against the appellants beyond any reasonable doubt. The convictions and sentences awarded to the present appellants are set-aside and they are acquitted of the charge .
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)
Order Date: 21-MAY-19
Approved for Reporting

2657) 276/2017 Civil Revision Shah Nawaz (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Azam & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Citation:2021 SHC HYD 312
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-FEB-21
Approved for Reporting
Apex Court Detail:C.A.6-K/2021 Muhammad Azam & others v. Dr.Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Status:Pending Adjourned