High Court of Sindh at Karachi, Bench at Sukkur and Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana
Bench Wise Judgments / Orders
Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgments/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Total Judgements/Orders :
Code
S.No.
Citation
Case No.
Case Year
Parties
Bench
Order_Date
A.F.R
Head Notes
Judgement/Order
Mr. Justice Mushir Alam,
79680
1
Const. P. 288/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Syed Sajid Abbas Rizivi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naureen and others (Respondent)
D.B.
25-APR-13
Yes
Nil.
Mr. Justice Mushir Alam,
79081
2
Const. P. 1720/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Abdul Jabbar (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commission and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-MAY-13
No
Nil.
79613
3
Const. P. 3608/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Wasatullah Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Interior and others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-13
No
Nil.
79614
4
Const. P. 1684/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Dr. Nasir Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Prof. Manzoor Hussain and others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-APR-13
No
Nil.
79624
5
H.C.A 5/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
M/s Rock Well Enterprise (Appellant) VS Employees? Old Age Benefits Institution and another (Respondent)
D.B.
02-APR-13
No
Nil.
79625
6
Const. P. 3250/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Muhammad Shafiq (Appellant) VS Ministry of Finance (Respondent)
D.B.
27-MAR-13
No
Nil.
79661
7
Const. P. 533/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
D.B.
16-APR-13
Yes
Nil.
79662
8
H.C.A 152/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Mst. Khursheed Begum & another (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAR-13
No
Nil.
79801
9
Const. P. 277/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ahmed Ramzani (Respondent)
D.B.
06-AUG-13
Yes
Nil.
79802
10
Adm. Suit 160/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2002
Syed Mohsin Ali (Petitioner) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board and others (Respondent)
D.B.
06-AUG-13
Yes
Nil.
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Faisal Arab,
59252
11
Spl.H.C.A 279/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
S.B.
02-JUN-11
No
Nil.
69970
12
Cr.Bail 231/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Capt Retd Zubair Aslam Jerry (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent)
D.B.
25-MAY-12
No
Nil.
70031
13
H.C.A 77/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
D.B.
29-MAY-12
No
Nil.
70034
14
H.C.A 76/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
D.B.
29-MAY-12
No
Nil.
70090
15
I.T.R.A 46/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
D.B.
30-MAY-12
No
Nil.
71104
16
Const. P. 3319/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Muhammad Ayub (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent)
D.B.
27-APR-12
Yes
Nil.
71258
17
Adm.A 5/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
F.T. SELNES, a fishing trawler / vessel (Appellant) VS Mega International Commercial Bank Company Limited, Taiwan, Republic of China (Respondent)
D.B.
31-JUL-12
Yes
Nil.
71461
18
I. A 14/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Mst. Pathani (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Ltd and others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-APR-12
Yes
Nil.
71481
19
Const. P. 1707/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAY-12
No
Nil.
71483
20
Const. P. 1708/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAY-12
Yes
Nil.
71484
21
Const. P. 1709/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Muhammad Farogh Naseem (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAY-12
Yes
Nil.
71486
22
Const. P. 1710/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAY-12
Yes
Nil.
71487
23
Const. P. 1711/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd., (Petitioner) VS Pakistan, through the Secretary, Revenue Division & Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad& 2 others, (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAY-12
Yes
Nil.
71501
24
I. A 103/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Younus Kamal (Appellant) VS Standard Charterd Bank (Respondent)
D.B.
19-JUL-12
No
Nil.
71503
25
I. A 97/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
M/s.United Bank Ltd (Appellant) VS M.Mubeen Khan (Respondent)
D.B.
30-APR-12
Yes
Nil.
74041
26
Const. P. 3463/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Dr Raheela Magsi (Plaintiff) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Defendant)
D.B.
18-MAY-12
Yes
Nil.
74121
27
Const. P. 267/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
All Pakistan Security Agencies (Petitioner) VS Fedration of pakistan (Respondent)
D.B.
24-MAY-12
Yes
Nil.
74334
28
Const. P. 1182/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Mrs.Zarina (Plaintiff) VS Sirajul Hassan (Defendant)
D.B.
16-APR-12
No
Nil.
74346
29
Const. P. 3469/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Nasiruddin Shahab (Petitioner) VS Sub Registrar Clifton Town & Ors (Defendant)
D.B.
19-APR-12
No
Nil.
74891
30
H.C.A 162/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
The Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Appellant) VS M/s.Razaque Steel Pvt.,Ltd. (Respondent)
D.B.
11-APR-12
No
Nil.
76606
31
Const. P. 1170/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Sarfaraz Khan (Appellant) VS NBP (Respondent)
D.B.
19-FEB-13
No
Nil.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain M. Sheikh,
116417
32
Const. P. 3050/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Waqar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and orthers (Respondent)
D.B.
12-FEB-16
No
Nil.
116506
33
Const. P. 685/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Nawaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and orthers (Respondent)
D.B.
10-FEB-16
No
Nil.
Hon'ble Justice Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar,
71701
34
Const. P. 2783/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Ramoon Malah (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-AUG-12
No
Nil.
71721
35
Const. P. 280/1997 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
1997
Tariq Ahmed Khan Lodhi (Appellant) VS K.D.A Karachi (Appellant)
D.B.
08-AUG-12
No
Nil.
71722
36
Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 126/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
Additional Collector of Customs Model (Applicant) VS M/s.Fortune Commercial &Co.Ltd (Respondent)
D.B.
09-AUG-12
No
Nil.
71723
37
Const. P. 179/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
Sarana Hitshri Ayervedic Ashodhalaya Association (Appellant) VS Pakistan Drug House & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-AUG-12
No
Nil.
71762
39
Const. P. 3302/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Zaidi Abid Foundations (Petitioner) VS CDGK & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-AUG-12
No
Nil.
71763
40
Const. P. 2811/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Mrs.Zeba Israr (Petitioner) VS K.B.C.A. & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-AUG-12
No
Nil.
71821
41
Spl.H.C.A 191/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
M/s.Taha Spinning Mills Ltd., & Ors. (Petitioner) VS V/S M/s.NIB Bank Ltd (Respondent)
D.B.
27-AUG-12
No
Nil.
72041
42
Const. P. 2329/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
M/s.Union Insurance Co. (Petitioner) VS Federal Insurance Ombudsman (Respondent)
D.B.
31-AUG-12
No
Nil.
72061
43
Const. P. 3415/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Gul Muhammad Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
31-AUG-12
No
Nil.
74246
44
Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent)
S.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
74247
45
Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent)
S.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
74248
46
Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent)
S.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
74249
47
Const. P. 565/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
Muhammad Latif (Petitioner) VS District Judge South Karachi & other (Respondent)
S.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
74481
48
Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
74482
49
Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
74483
50
Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
74484
51
Const. P. 565/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2008
City Environment Society (Petitioner) VS KBCA & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
22-OCT-12
No
Nil.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Sarwar Korai,
79846
52
Const. P. 2862/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
D.B.
23-AUG-13
No
Nil.
79847
53
Const. P. 2120/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
D.B.
23-AUG-13
No
Nil.
79900
54
Const. P. 3133/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant)
D.B.
23-AUG-13
No
Nil.
Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan,
161764
55
Const. P. 2255/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Mst. Naseem (Petitioner) VS Home Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
29-APR-14
No
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi,
75321
56
Cr.Bail 1226/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
FAZAL WADOOD & 8 ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
D.B.
07-JAN-13
Yes
Nil.
75323
57
Cr.Bail 1227/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
SAIF MALOOK SHAH & 6 ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Appellant)
D.B.
07-JAN-13
Yes
Nil.
76989
58
Cr.Bail 1198/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
IRFAN AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
D.B.
03-JAN-13
Yes
Nil.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi,
72955
59
Const. P. 223/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Niaz Ali Areejo and others (Petitioner) VS D.C.O Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-12
No
Nil.
72956
60
Const. P. 436/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Muhammad Khan Shaikh (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-12
No
Nil.
72957
61
Const. P. 440/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Fida Hussain Rind (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer Irrigation Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-12
No
Nil.
72958
62
Const. P. 724/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Masood Ahmed Khuhro (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-12
No
Nil.
72959
63
Const. P. 1256/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Ahsan Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS D.E.O Male Jacobabad and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-12
No
Nil.
72960
64
Const. P. 1778/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Zulfiqar Ali Areejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-12
No
Nil.
72961
65
Cr.Bail 342/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Imdad Ali Bhatti (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
S.B.
03-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73008
66
Const. P. 735/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Dillip Kumar (Petitioner) VS V/S Secretary Local Govt. and others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73010
67
Const. P. 971/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Agha Nadeem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73011
68
Const. P. 995/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Shaman Ali Totani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Darri and others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73012
69
Const. P. 1945/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Jagan Khan Mazari (Petitioner) VS Plant Manager-I GENCO-II Guddu and others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73023
70
Const. P. 730/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Veshal Bano and others (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Market and others (Respondent)
S.B.
12-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73025
71
Const. P. 781/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Asif Hussain Chandio (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73030
72
Const. P. 2424/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: CP-2424,1960,2174 of2010 & CP-525,590,2600,2575,1696,53,2572,446 of 2011 & 857 of 2012
2010
Azhar Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
12-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73034
73
Const. P. 889/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Mst Bushra and another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Rehmatpur and others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73037
74
Const. P. 903/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Abdul Shakoor Chutto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73056
75
Const. P. 369/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: C.P. No. 404, 482, 763 & 774 of 2012
2010
Mst; Shaista Gaad (Petitioner) VS The Secretary Education and others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-SEP-12
Yes
Nil.
73057
76
Const. P. 537/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Mst Munawar Khatoon Patujo (Petitioner) VS SHO PS B-Section Shahdadkot and others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73058
77
Const. P. 727/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Mohammad Khan Barchond (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Shikarpur and others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73060
78
Const. P. 1974/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Faiz Mohammad Sarki (Petitioner) VS R.P.O Sukkur and other (Respondent)
D.B.
19-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73061
79
Const. P. 174/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Mst. Nazia Parveen Qadri (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar City Survey Officer Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73062
80
Const. P. 766/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Mst Sardaran Mugheri (Petitioner) VS SHO PS B Section Shahdadkot and others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73064
81
Const. P. 1984/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Nisar Ahmed Khokhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73065
82
Const. P. 2004/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Aamir Nazir Mirani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73087
83
Const. P. 227/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Liaquat Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73088
84
Const. P. 606/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Liaquat Ali Bangwar (Petitioner) VS Zonal Chief Z.T.B.L Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73089
85
Const. P. 722/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Assadullah Solangi (Petitioner) VS Principal CMC Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73090
86
Const. P. 1558/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Saifullah Lahori (Petitioner) VS District Officer Roads Kamber Shahdadkot and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73091
87
Const. P. 1706/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Const. Petition No.D-1707 of 2011
2011
Sultan Ahmed Katto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73092
88
Cr.Bail 59/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Javed Ali Mirani (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73093
89
Cr.Bail 60/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Sunny @ Ali Raza Malhani (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73095
90
Cr.Bail 61/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Allah Rakhio Jatoi and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
D.B.
26-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73096
91
Const. P. 2063/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Ali Asghar Khokhar (Petitioner) VS Manager NBP Dokri and others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73097
92
Const. P. 2102/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Hakim Ali Mamrani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73098
93
Const. P. 2228/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Abdul Aziz Dahani (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73099
94
Const. P. 2685/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Ahmed Ali Gadhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-SEP-12
No
Nil.
73123
95
Const. P. 647/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2009
Abdullah Solangi (Petitioner) VS Secretary Education Karachi & others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73124
96
Const. P. 998/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Muhammmad Hashim Panhyar and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73125
97
Const. P. 1093/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Muhammad Yaqoob Brohi (Petitioner) VS I.G.P Sindh, and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73126
98
Const. P. 1185/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2009
Gullan Wadho (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Education Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73129
99
Const. P. 953/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Manzoor Ahmed Jakhrani (Petitioner) VS SSP Jacobabad and others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73130
100
Const. P. 968/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Mukhtiar Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Sukkur Electric Power Larkana SEPCO and others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73131
101
Const. P. 1059/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2012
Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS District and Session Judge West Islamabad and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73132
102
Const. P. 1707/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Sikandar Ali Katto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-OCT-12
No
Nil.
73133
103
Cr.Bail 94/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Farooque Shar & an ors (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
D.B.
18-OCT-12
No
Nil.
152956
104
Const. P. 440/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2010
Fida Hussain Rind (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer Irrigation Larkana and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-12
No
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
150097
105
Const. P. 1726/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Agha Nazimuddin and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAR-21
No
150139
106
Const. P. 229/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Punhoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAR-21
Yes
150141
107
Const. P. 233/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-FEB-21
Yes
150153
108
Const. P. 1470/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-MAR-21
Yes
150154
109
Const. P. 1471/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Nadeem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & OtherS (Respondent)
D.B.
12-MAR-21
Yes
150187
110
Const. P. 255/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
M/s Al Raheem & Co (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAR-21
Yes
150188
111
Const. P. 374/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Samina Ambreen & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAR-21
Yes
150189
112
Const. P. 438/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Saddam Hussain (Petitioner) VS V.C University Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-MAR-21
Yes
150199
113
Const. P. 542/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Parvez Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-MAR-21
Yes
150200
114
Const. P. 837/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Qurat-ul-Ain Laghari & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAR-21
Yes
150201
115
Const. P. 853/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Adil Raheem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-JAN-21
Yes
150202
116
Const. P. 1424/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Dr Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-MAR-21
Yes
150203
117
Const. P. 1943/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
M/S Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Murtaza & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAR-21
Yes
150204
118
Const. P. 3494/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Ghulam Sarwar and Others (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-MAR-21
Yes
150246
119
Const. P. 52/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Muhammad Ibrahim & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-JAN-21
Yes
150250
120
Const. P. 100/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Muhammad Moosa (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-21
Yes
150289
121
Const. P. 336/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Irshad Ali Jesar (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAR-21
No
150332
122
Const. P. 310/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-311 of 2020 C.P. No.D-312 of 2020 C.P. No.D-313 of 2020 C.P. No.D-314 of 2020 C.P. No.D-315 of 2020 C.P. No.D-316 of 2020 C.P. No.D-317 of 2020 C.P. No.D-318 of 2020 C.P. No.D-319 of 2020 C.P. No.D-364 of 2020 C.P. No.D-401 of 2020 C.P. No.D-422 of 2020
2020
Abdul Aleem & Others (Petitioner) VS P. O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-JAN-21
No
150334
123
Const. P. 1105/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-21
No
150335
124
Const. P. 1500/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Mst. Gulshan & anothers (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-JAN-21
No
150336
125
Const. P. 2561/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Faraz Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-FEB-21
No
150339
126
Const. P. 1853/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS F.E.D. Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JAN-21
No
150344
127
I. A 1/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Habib Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ismail (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-21
No
150887
128
Const. P. 1726/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Agha Nazimuddin and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-MAR-21
No
150895
129
Const. P. 1726/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Agha Nazimuddin and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-21
No
150896
130
Const. P. 77/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-JAN-21
No
150897
131
Const. P. 121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Raja Sikandar Hayat (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-MAR-21
No
150898
132
Const. P. 284/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-MAR-21
No
152088
133
Const. P. 1307/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2020
Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-JUL-21
Yes
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
140881
134
2023 PLC Lab. Note 81
Const. P. 417/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Const. P. 1352/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Niaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
No
Contempt
142426
297
Const. P. 1085/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Nizakat Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O, HESCO, and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-DEC-19
No
Nil.
142427
298
Const. P. 2021/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2011
Tahir Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142428
299
Const. P. 2588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142429
300
Const. P. 131/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142430
301
Const. P. 400/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Other (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142431
302
Const. P. 523/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-NOV-19
Yes
Nil.
142432
303
Const. P. 1177/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2010
Perviaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142433
304
Const. P. 1195/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2011
Asmatullah (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142434
305
Const. P. 1247/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Allah Bux (Petitioner) VS M.D (CEO) H.B.F.C Ltd & others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142435
306
Const. P. 1659/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Miss Sanam & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142436
307
2021 SBLR Sindh Note 266
Const. P. 2054/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Natho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
11-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142437
308
Const. P. 2550/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Mohsin Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142438
309
Const. P. 2557/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Samad Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
No
Nil.
142439
310
Const. P. 2995/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Muhammad Akram Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-19
No
Nil.
142440
311
Const. P. 3031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Sajidullah (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
18-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142441
312
Const. P. 3365/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Zubair Ahmed. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142442
313
Const. P. 3495/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142443
314
Const. P. 2893/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142444
315
Const. P. 3020/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Manoj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142445
316
Const. P. 3504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142446
317
Const. P. 3618/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142447
318
Const. P. 3629/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2017
Mst.Mumtaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142448
319
Const. P. 492/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Dildar Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142449
320
Const. P. 671/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142450
321
Const. P. 1080/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142451
322
Const. P. 1140/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142452
323
Const. P. 2143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Inamullah Halepoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142453
324
Const. P. 2467/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Boota Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142454
325
Const. P. 2676/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Javed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142455
326
Const. P. 2680/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Sachal Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142456
327
Const. P. 2872/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142457
328
Const. P. 3319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Suresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142458
329
Const. P. 78/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Sharoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142459
330
Const. P. 1708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142460
331
Const. P. 1709/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142461
332
Const. P. 1937/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142462
333
Const. P. 1885/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142463
334
Const. P. 2510/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Mst.Razia Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-19
Yes
Deceased Quota
142666
335
Const. P. 1639/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Shafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142681
336
Const. P. 721/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-19
Yes
Irrigation matter
142682
337
Const. P. 1260/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Attique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
142699
338
Const. P. 721/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2010
Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-19
Yes
Irrigation matter
143003
339
Const. P. 502/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mst .Rani Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-JAN-20
Yes
whether Constable Mushtaque Khaskheli embraced Shahadat on 04.3.2015 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014.
143004
340
Const. P. 2761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Sadiq Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-JAN-20
Yes
University of Karachi--candidature for the post of professor was not considered--if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law.
143005
341
Const. P. 5784/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Abdul Salam Khatri (Petitioner) VS D.G MC & C and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-JAN-20
Yes
Non prosecution--Since the issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others supra, this petition is not maintainable.
143006
342
2022 PLC CS Note 24
Const. P. 8251/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Jamal Nasir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-JAN-20
Yes
STEVTA--promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA under Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--a civil/government servant is entitled for proforma promotion, once during his service his promotion is approved by the Competent Authority and in the meanwhile if he superannuates, he is entitled for all benefits as admissible under the law--we deem it appropriate to send the matter of the petitioner for the promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA to the Competent Authority of Sindh Government for consideration in accordance with law.
143036
343
Const. P. 6845/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Juanid Ahmed Sarki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JAN-20
Yes
Deceased quota-- Petitioner???s case if not approved by the competent authority may seek his remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law.
143037
344
Const. P. 6766/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Shoukat Qadri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JAN-20
Yes
pensionery benefits--Prim facie, the petitioner has qualifying length of service to his credit as per VSS calculation work sheet available at page-11 of the memo of petition. It is well settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder--In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed and Anis Hyder in C.P No.D-5734/2018 and C.P No.D-6225/2018, respectively.
143061
345
2021 SBLR Sindh Note 726
Civil Revision 219/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Muhammad Ayoob, (Applicant) VS PO Sindh (Respondent)
D.B.
13-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
143062
346
Const. P. 2184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Humayoon (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-NOV-19
Yes
Nil.
143067
347
Const. P. 400/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Mir Qadir Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
143068
348
Const. P. 444/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Mehbob Ali (Petitioner) VS D.C. Sanghar & others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
143214
349
Const. P. 4105/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Muhammad Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
16-JAN-20
Yes
this petition is allowed in the terms whereby the competent authority of CAA is directed to consider the case of petitioner for his proforma promotion in PG-10, Works and Development Directorate, CAA for the purpose of pensionery benefits within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law.
143219
350
Const. P. 5931/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Imtiaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-JAN-20
Yes
Actualization of promotion in BPS-19 and posting--The transfer and posting of a civil/government servant is prerogative of the Government, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, petitioner is under obligation to serve anywhere in the province, he has no vested right to remain at particular post for indefinite period, therefore the petitioner cannot ask for posting at particular place. Disposed of.
143224
351
Const. P. 3400/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Abdul Subhan (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JAN-20
Yes
NBP--demotion of the petitioner from the post of Vice President/Ex-Manager to next lower grade--Adverting to the claim of the petitioner with regard to his promotion in the next rank under NBP Staff Service Rules, 1973. It is well settled proposition of law that it is the Service Rules Committee of the respondent-bank which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion of the petitioner for which they have to take decision in accordance with law--In view of the foregoing facts concluded in para 07 supra, the action taken by the respondent Bank is/was too harsh, therefore we set aside the impugned orders dated 26.11.2014 regarding demotion of the petitioner and order dated 03.03.2017 regarding demotion in pay.
143225
352
2022 PLC CS Note 26
Const. P. 2695/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Tarruf Ali (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JAN-20
Yes
Police Department--Petitioner has been reverted / demoted from the rank of Police Inspector to his substantive rank of Police Head Constable on account of earning out of turn promotion during his tenure of service---In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is allowed whereby the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue retirement order of the petitioner to the rank of Police Inspector and is entitled to be paid his full pensionary benefits as admissible to Police Inspector under the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this judgment. Pending application stands disposed of accordingly.
143226
353
Const. P. 6563/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mazahar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Senior Director Culture & Sports and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-JAN-20
Yes
Contempt--This petition was disposed of vide order dated 11.12.2018 with direction to the respondent No.4 to process the case of petitioner in accordance with law and if he qualifies to be appointed / promoted subject to availability of the post, his case may be recommended to Metropolitan Commissioner Karachi for promotion strictly in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations--Therefore, at this juncture, no case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors is made out. Resultantly, CMA No. 7446/2019 is dismissed.
143228
354
Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
23-JAN-20
Yes
EOBI--pension of the petitioner was stopped by the respondent/institution without disclosing any reasonable cause--We are of the firm view that the petitioner did not qualify the minimum years of service as laid down under Section 22(b) of the Act, whereby the qualifying service for being entitled to pensionary benefits is 15 years, whereas, it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was an employee of the private company and had served it only for a period of 13 years. Petitioner does not meet the requisite criteria stipulated in the said Section to claim old age pension--Adverting to the next contention that the Labor Policy-2010 was fully applicable in the case of parties, in our view, Circular No.3 of 2010 (Policy) cannot override the Act, 1976, therefore, no benefit can be obtained arising out of it--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition, being devoid of any legal standing, is hereby dismissed along with pending application with no order as to costs.
143512
355
2023 PLC CS Note 103
Const. P. 340/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
M.Saleem Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-FEB-20
Yes
We are of the view that the post cannot be upgraded / re-designated merely by passing the Resolution by defunct CDGK, the law has to take its own course and to be followed for the aforesaid purpose for which the petitioner has failed to justify his entitlement for proforma promotion with retrospective effect---It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others , PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed.
143539
356
Const. P. 53/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Post Master General Khi and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JAN-20
Yes
Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly.
143568
357
Const. P. 5682/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-FEB-20
Yes
Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed.
143629
358
Const. P. 9013/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Raja Naved Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-FEB-20
Yes
fake appointment--Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable.
143630
359
Const. P. 7563/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Irshad Ahmed Siyal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-FEB-20
Yes
Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed.
143748
360
Const. P. 591/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-FEB-20
Yes
Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
143749
361
2023 PLC Lab. Note 10
Const. P. 2341/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2010
Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
D.B.
18-FEB-20
Yes
Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation.
143785
362
Const. P. 7576/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Badaruddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-FEB-20
Yes
the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively.
143839
363
Const. P. 7221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Talal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-FEB-20
Yes
Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine.
143874
364
2023 PLC CS Note 97
Const. P. 2293/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Noureen Naz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-FEB-20
Yes
Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
143906
365
Const. P. 2271/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Ms. Shama Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-FEB-20
Yes
The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs.
143916
366
Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-FEB-20
Yes
Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed.
144058
367
Const. P. 8536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Riffat John (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-FEB-20
Yes
Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
144059
368
Const. P. 5844/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Naeemullah Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
25-FEB-20
Yes
Deceased quota latest
144060
369
Const. P. 7604/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Syed Shoaib Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-FEB-20
Yes
petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay.
144103
370
Const. P. 3478/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-20
Yes
the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment.
144104
371
Const. P. 3479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Muhammad Irfanullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-20
Yes
the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years??? service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs.
144145
372
Const. P. 6090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Dr. Farrukh Mirza (Petitioner) VS The Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
26-FEB-20
Yes
The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
144146
373
Const. P. 4622/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
28-FEB-20
No
Contempt--- This petition was disposed of vide order dated 29.10.2018 with direction to the respondents to award benefit of Office Memorandum dated 11.02.1985 to the petitioner, without discrimination, within a period of two months. Respondents assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition No.1456-K of 2018, which was dismissed vide order dated 18.7.2019. Their review application was also dismissed vide order dated 24.12.2019. Now the respondents have complied with the order by depositing an amount of Rs.1, 208,000.00 with the Nazir of this Court and the same has been disbursed in favour of the petitioner, which factum is disclosed in the order dated 10.01.2020 passed by this Court-- In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that compliance of the order dated 29.10.2018 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit.
144147
374
Const. P. 6328/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Rashid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-20
Yes
Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
144148
375
Const. P. 408/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mohammad Mithal Lohach (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
28-FEB-20
Yes
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
144149
376
Const. P. 4461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Imtiaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
28-FEB-20
Yes
Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceased???s first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Hon???ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance.
144150
377
Const. P. 3247/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Prof: Syed Farhat Ali Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-20
Yes
By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed.
144151
378
Const. P. 7520/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Sect: Local Board and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAR-20
Yes
The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of.
144202
379
Const. P. 7506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Abdul Razzaque & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-MAR-20
Yes
Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh.
144203
380
Const. P. 7122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Zamir Hussain Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-MAR-20
Yes
Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh.
144263
381
Const. P. 6999/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS The Adjutant General & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
09-MAR-20
Yes
He assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon???ble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed
144303
382
Const. P. 1652/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Abdul Qudos Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-MAR-20
Yes
quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost.
144436
383
2023 PLC Lab. Note 78
Const. P. 6863/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-MAR-20
Yes
the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases.
144604
384
2022 SBLR Sindh 1070
Const. P. 1480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Dr. Maryam Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Fed. Urdu University & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAR-20
Yes
the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as ???University???), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
144605
385
2023 PLC Lab. Note 66
Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Syed Zahid Hassan Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAR-20
Yes
DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed.
144606
386
Const. P. 4646/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Z.A Quraishi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
04-MAR-20
Yes
Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same.
144607
387
Const. P. 2884/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Sikandar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-20
Yes
Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed.
144647
388
Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAR-20
No
Nil.
144662
389
Const. P. 6622/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Javed Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Home Dept Sindh: & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-MAR-20
Yes
The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test.
144663
390
Const. P. 8984/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Farzana Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAR-20
Yes
Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner??? late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner??? late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
144703
391
Const. P. 730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2018
Muhammad Asim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-MAR-20
Yes
The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed.
144740
392
Const. P. 6431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Irshad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-APR-20
Yes
Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance.
144741
393
Const. P. 6868/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Arsalan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-APR-20
Yes
the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed.
144742
394
Const. P. 5850/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Zeeshan Usman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-APR-20
Yes
The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of.
144743
395
Const. P. 5851/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Mst. Saima Ather (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-APR-20
Yes
The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of.
144780
396
Const. P. 1194/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-APR-20
Yes
The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs.
144949
397
I. A 31/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Government of Sindh & others (Appellant) VS M/S United Bank Limited (Respondent)
D.B.
12-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
144958
398
Const. P. 1040/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Muhammad Danish (Petitioner) VS Deputy General Hyderabad Development Authority & others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-19
Yes
Nil.
144963
399
Const. P. 2195/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent)
D.B.
29-APR-20
No
Nil.
144964
400
Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
29-APR-20
Yes
Nil.
144965
401
Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-APR-20
Yes
Nil.
145026
402
Const. P. 2387/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Allah Dino and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145027
403
Const. P. 2414/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
TYMS Education Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145044
404
Const. P. 2250/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145045
405
Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145046
406
Const. P. 2427/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mst. Ghulam Fatima (Petitioner) VS Controller Naval Accounts and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145047
407
Const. P. 2428/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145048
408
Const. P. 2429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145083
409
Const. P. 2387/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Allah Dino and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAY-20
No
Matters pertaining to Board of Revenue Sindh.
145084
410
Const. P. 2428/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAY-20
No
145085
411
Const. P. 2429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145086
412
Const. P. 2520/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145093
413
Const. P. 2477/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Amolakh Das (Petitioner) VS Speaker Provincial Assembly of SIndh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAY-20
No
Service matter regarding repateriation
145094
414
Const. P. 2445/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mubin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sinior Director, HR Management KMC & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAY-20
No
Service matter.
145095
415
Const. P. 2497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Syed Kifayat Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAY-20
No
Service matter.
145132
416
Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
D.B.
18-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145133
417
Const. P. 2414/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
TYMS Education Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145134
418
Const. P. 2509/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Rasheed Rizvi Centre & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145135
419
Const. P. 2590/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Bakhtiar Ahmed Sheikh & Another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145136
420
Const. P. 2622/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
P.I.A Senior Staff Association (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-20
No
Nil.
145235
421
Const. P. 2546/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Aftab Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS The Speaker Provincial Assembly and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
20-MAY-20
Yes
Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today.
146968
422
Const. P. 4905/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-OCT-20
Yes
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
146970
423
Const. P. 4906/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-OCT-20
Yes
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
146971
424
Const. P. 4907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fareed and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-OCT-20
Yes
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
147011
425
2022 PLC (CS) 481
Const. P. 4941/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-20
Yes
PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine.
147106
426
Const. P. 869/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS M.D STEVTA and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-OCT-20
Yes
Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service.
147108
427
Const. P. 6632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Fareed Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-OCT-20
Yes
regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review.
147110
428
Const. P. 6908/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Registrar High Court of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
15-OCT-20
No
. We have scanned the file and nothing is available on record to suggest that the petitioner was gainfully employed during the period that he was kept away from his job. The decision of respondent No.2 to the extent of treating the period with effect from 01.12.2014 to 06.11.2018 as extraordinary leave without pay is erroneous for the simple reason that the petitioner was reinstated in service by the order of Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal and no appeal was preferred against the said order. We have noted that respondent No.2 has not assigned valid reasons to decline the back benefits to the petitioner for the aforesaid period. Therefore, the Petitioner is entitled to the back benefits after his reinstatement in service under the law.
147111
429
Const. P. 2889/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ahmed Kehar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
15-OCT-20
Yes
We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74.
147112
430
Const. P. 6046/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Ghulam Mustafa Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-OCT-20
Yes
The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984.
147213
431
Const. P. 5909/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Sajid Jalil (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
19-OCT-20
Yes
It is a well-settled proposition of law that the Competent Authority is entitled to make rules in the interest of exigency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision making of the Respondent-Bank and the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted as no vested right of a Bank employee is involved in the matter of promotion, or the rules determining their eligibility or fitness, and in Bank Cases, the High Court has no jurisdiction through Writ to strike it down, except in the cases in which policy framed is against the public interest. This proposition of law has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in a plethora of judgments. Moreover, petitioner has not been able to point out any case where other employee(s), having rating equivalent to or lower than him, was / were promoted by the respondent-bank. Thus, prima facie it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination at least to the extent of the instant case.
147214
432
Const. P. 19/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Sikandar Ali Malah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-OCT-20
Yes
In view of the foregoing discussion, the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue a retirement order of the petitioner in BPS-17/18 under the law and to pay his full pensionary benefits, from the date of attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 31.12.2011 as admissible to him under the law within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioners and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 31.12.2011 to date. Petition and pending applications are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs.
147215
433
Const. P. 4224/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
19-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147218
434
Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
22-OCT-20
Yes
147219
435
Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
22-OCT-20
Yes
147244
436
Const. P. 3840/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTET and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-20
Yes
147245
437
2021 PLD Sindh Note 103
Const. P. 139/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) VS C.A.A (Respondent)
D.B.
14-OCT-20
No
It is the case of the petitioner that it was specifically stated by him in his above application for withdrawal of the petition that the same was being filed by him as the respondent had assured him that his post-retirement benefits will be disbursed in his favour immediately upon withdrawal of the petition---In view of the above admitted position, we are of the view that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner stood abated, and resultantly his status, for the time being, is that of a retired employee of the respondent for all legal intent and purposes--Such an absurd situation cannot be allowed to happen as ; firstly, it is a well-settled and consistent view of the Superior Courts that matters should be decided on merits rather than depriving a party on technical grounds ; secondly, it is the duty of the Court to ensure dispensation of justice by setting the controversy before it at rest ; and lastly, this Court, under its inherent powers, can allow restoration of the petition so that the petitioner may get a fair opportunity of decision of his case on merits. It may be observed that the question of restoration of a case or application, as the case may be, would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case--Our above view is fortified by the following cases. In H. M. Saya & Co. Karachi V/S Wazir Ali Industries Ltd., Karachi and another, PLD 1969 SC 65--In view of the above discussion, the listed application is allowed with no order as to costs, and resultantly the petition is restored to its original position. Needless to say the observations made herein shall not affect the merits or demerits of the case of either of the parties to the petition, which shall be decided on merits in accordance with law.
147246
438
2022 PLC (CS) 454
Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
22-OCT-20
No
Contempt--SSGC--We are of the considered view that the interest of justice would be best met if the respondent-company is granted last opportunity to comply with the direction of this Court as well as the Honorable Supreme Court in the instant matter without fail within two (02) weeks and to submit compliance report to this Court on the next date of hearing, failing which show cause notice shall be issued to alleged contemnors on the next date of hearing--To be listed on 09.11.2020 at 11:00 a.m., when alleged contemnors must be present in Court along with their compliance report.
147263
439
Const. P. 8261/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
23-OCT-20
Yes
147264
440
Const. P. 2735/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Mst. Ravi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-OCT-20
Yes
147393
441
Const. P. 7252/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Naveed Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147394
442
2021 SBLR Sindh Note 309
Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
26-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147395
443
Const. P. 2157/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Kashmir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147396
444
Const. P. 2978/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Khalid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147397
445
Const. P. 6032/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Waqarullah Korejo Advocate (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147398
446
Const. P. 5481/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147401
447
Const. P. 5344/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shafique Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS The Administrator KMC and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-20
No
Nil.
147402
448
Const. P. 5336/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s Alsons Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Alsons Ind Peoples Empl: Union and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-20
No
Nil.
147403
449
Const. P. 5337/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
M/s Alsons Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Alsons Ind Peoples Empl: Union and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
29-OCT-20
No
Nil.
147507
450
Const. P. 8033/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-NOV-20
No
Nil.
147535
451
Const. P. 1055/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Molvi Muhammad Hassan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147536
452
Const. P. 2797/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mohammad Rashid (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147537
453
Const. P. 5585/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mst. Fakhar un Nisa (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
09-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147538
454
Const. P. 6066/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147539
455
Const. P. 6100/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
05-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147540
456
Const. P. 6387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mst. Beenish Mobin & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147543
457
Const. P. 5814/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Tariq Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-20
No
Nil.
147544
458
Const. P. 4579/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Qasim Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-20
No
The petitioner ought to have approached the proper forum instead of invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
147545
459
Const. P. 7994/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Abdul Majeed Shar (Petitioner) VS NED Univeristy and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
06-NOV-20
No
We are of the view that final order is yet to be passed by the respondents pursuant to the inquiry, and as far as the present petition is concerned, the same has become infructuous as the impugned show cause notice has merged into the inquiry report.
147584
460
Const. P. 3652/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Ali Murad Sipio (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
27-OCT-20
Yes
Nil.
147590
461
Const. P. 7155/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mujtaba Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-20
No
Nil.
147591
462
Const. P. 5203/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Khalid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147595
463
Const. P. 6499/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Dr. Mashhood-uz-Zafar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147596
464
Const. P. 3405/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Nazim Inayat (Petitioner) VS National Command & Authority (NCA) and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147597
465
Const. P. 4340/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Whaeed ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-NOV-20
No
Nil.
147598
466
Const. P. 2593/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mst. Afsheen Sajid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-NOV-20
No
Nil.
147632
467
Const. P. 4932/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Abdul Haleem Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-OCT-20
Yes
147633
468
Const. P. 4542/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-OCT-20
Yes
In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners??? promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of.
147634
469
Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
No
We are of the considered view that the interest of justice would be best met if the respondents are granted last opportunity to comply with the direction of this Court in the instant matter without fail within two (02) weeks and to submit compliance report to this Court on the next date of hearing, failing which show cause notice shall be issued to alleged contemnors on the next date of hearing. To be listed on 04.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when alleged contemnors must be present in Court along with their compliance report.
147635
470
Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
Yes
It is well-settled law that the period of adhoc appointment cannot be counted towards service, the seniority in grade is to be taken effect from the date of regular appointment to a post and it cannot be conferred retrospectively. Since the service of the petitioner was confirmed admittedly with effect from 22.11.2019 as such promotion cannot be claimed by him without the requisite length of service except from the date of regular appointment. This reduces to the dictum that an ad-hoc appointee would only be entitled to seniority from the date of his regularization and not from the date of initial appointment. The petitioner accordingly is neither entitled for retrospective seniority nor promotion. This view is cemented by the judgment delivered in the case of Province of Sindh and others vs. Ghulam Farid and others, 2014 SCMR 1189, and Secretary to Government of Punjab and others vs. Muhammad Khalid Usmani and others, 2016 SCMR 2125.
147687
471
Const. P. 4802/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mansoor Ahmed Rajput and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
Yes
147707
472
2022 PLC (CS) 1289
Const. P. 4077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-20
Yes
147708
473
Const. P. 9015/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Qari Muhammad Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-20
No
Contempt--In our view, the compliance report submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnor is not in line with the order dated 26.09.2019 passed by this Court in letter and spirit. Resultantly, the compliance report is rejected.
147709
474
Const. P. 2866/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Wariyam and others (Petitioner) VS Prov.of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
No
Contempt--Admittedly, the aforesaid petitioners are literate i.e. Primary Pass, which is requisite qualification to claim regularization, therefore, the compliance report submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnor is not in line with the order dated 01.11.2018 passed by this Court in letter and spirit. Resultantly, the compliance report is rejected--To be listed on 02.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m., when alleged contemnor must be present in Court along with his compliance report.
147710
475
Const. P. 4976/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Naseer Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
11-NOV-20
Yes
Nil.
147713
476
2023 PLC Lab. 41
Const. P. 3026/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
Yes
147714
477
Const. P. 5644/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mst. Zain un Nisa (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
Yes
retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed.
147716
478
Const. P. 5646/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Sahiba (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-20
Yes
retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed.
147784
479
Const. P. 5723/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-NOV-20
Yes
147785
480
Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-NOV-20
Yes
Contempt proceedings--The explanation offered by the respondents, prima-facie, is tenable under the law as the petitioner was considered for the promotion in DPC in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 12.05.2020. It is noted that the representative of SGA&CD opined for deferment of the promotion of the petitioner and consideration of his case after finalization of the proceedings against him, in our view, this is the correct approach. Prima-facie such decision of the DPC to clear him for promotion during the pendency of criminal proceedings is erroneous. However, his deferment shall be subject to the outcome of the criminal proceedings presently pending against him. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed.
147786
481
Const. P. 630/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-NOV-20
Yes
147792
482
Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-NOV-20
No
147846
483
Const. P. 5853/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
National Engineering Servies Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
20-NOV-20
Yes
147868
484
Const. P. 4789/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Khizar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
25-NOV-20
Yes
147967
485
Const. P. 2692/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shahnawaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
25-NOV-20
Yes
147968
486
Const. P. 3263/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
30-NOV-20
No
147987
487
Const. P. 6021/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Syed Ahmed Maaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-NOV-20
No
147988
488
Const. P. 7214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Abdul Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-DEC-20
Yes
148003
489
Const. P. 4932/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Zakia Naz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-DEC-20
Yes
148064
490
Const. P. 876/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shakir Ali (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-DEC-20
Yes
148065
491
Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-DEC-20
Yes
148073
492
Const. P. 6200/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Syed Mehdi Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-DEC-20
Yes
148074
493
Const. P. 7450/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-DEC-20
Yes
148087
494
Const. P. 3454/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Attaullah Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
03-DEC-20
Yes
148088
495
Const. P. 4201/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-DEC-20
Yes
148090
496
Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-DEC-20
Yes
148114
497
Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
02-DEC-20
Yes
148115
498
Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-DEC-20
Yes
148175
499
Const. P. 6027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Kanwar Naveed Jameel (MPA) (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-20
No
148191
500
Const. P. 4890/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Garibdas (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-20
Yes
148192
501
Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent)
D.B.
09-DEC-20
Yes
148216
502
2023 SBLR Sindh 1992
Const. P. 1318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Wasim Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
09-DEC-20
Yes
148217
503
Const. P. 8063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Hafiz Muhammad Tabish (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-DEC-20
Yes
148218
504
Const. P. 4210/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Mumtaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-DEC-20
Yes
148219
505
Const. P. 3315/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mst. Zarina Anwar (Petitioner) VS The Secretary M/o Education & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-20
Yes
148221
506
Const. P. 5334/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Zubair Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. Board and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-DEC-20
Yes
148257
507
Const. P. 2666/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Saeed Habib (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-DEC-20
Yes
148258
508
2022 SBLR Sindh 537
H.C.A 253/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
K-Electric Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Anwar Ali & others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-DEC-20
Yes
148300
509
Const. P. 6275/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS D.J South Khi (Respondent)
D.B.
16-DEC-20
Yes
148301
510
Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
15-DEC-20
Yes
148302
511
2022 SBLR Sindh 949
Const. P. 2647/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-DEC-20
Yes
148303
512
Const. P. 483/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
11-DEC-20
Yes
148304
513
Const. P. 6236/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Raza Muhammad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
15-DEC-20
Yes
148354
514
Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-DEC-20
No
148407
515
Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-20
No
148425
516
Const. P. 7103/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-20
Yes
148426
517
Const. P. 2860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-20
Yes
148479
518
Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
11-DEC-20
Yes
148481
519
Const. P. 5571/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Majeedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS KW & SB and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
23-DEC-20
Yes
148482
520
Const. P. 3997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Dr. Liaquat Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-20
Yes
148483
521
Const. P. 4508/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-DEC-20
Yes
148484
522
Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
21-DEC-20
Yes
148485
523
Const. P. 7731/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Javed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-20
Yes
148644
524
Const. P. 6070/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Sana Jabeen Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman SPSC (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-20
No
148645
525
Const. P. 3376/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-DEC-20
No
148646
526
Const. P. 5695/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
11-DEC-20
No
148648
527
Const. P. 7530/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Dr. Mir Nusrat Ali Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-20
No
148649
528
Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-20
No
148684
529
Const. P. 5907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
24-DEC-20
Yes
148686
530
Const. P. 6027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Kanwar Naveed Jameel (MPA) (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-DEC-20
No
148687
531
Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-DEC-20
No
148791
532
Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-DEC-20
Yes
148813
533
Const. P. 3055/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Maqsood Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-21
Yes
148814
534
Const. P. 2576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-21
Yes
148816
535
2022 PLC (CS) 307
Const. P. 6948/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Anis Haroon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-21
Yes
150727
536
Const. P. 6241/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Anjum Badar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-APR-21
Yes
150747
537
Const. P. 828/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Faisal Khalid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-APR-21
No
151293
538
Const. P. 5659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Muhammad Sajjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-MAR-20
Yes
151294
539
Const. P. 3597/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Abdul Rauf Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-MAR-20
Yes
156674
540
Const. P. 1807/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Mirza Fayyaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-21
Yes
156698
541
Const. P. 912/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Zahid Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-NOV-21
Yes
156699
542
Const. P. 1721/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Ghulam Qadir Otho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-21
Yes
156700
543
Const. P. 438/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Shahnaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-21
No
156701
544
Const. P. 681/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2015
Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-21
No
156702
545
Const. P. 1536/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
shafi Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-21
Yes
156738
546
Const. P. 411/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Najaf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-NOV-21
Yes
164188
547
I. A 39/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Syed Ameer Ali & Ors. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent)
D.B.
30-MAR-22
Yes
164190
548
I. A 40/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Syed Zafar Ali & Another. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent)
D.B.
30-MAR-22
No
167446
549
Const. P. 583/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2009
Muhammad Yameen and Others (Petitioner) VS Begum Sarwari Irfanullah and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-OCT-19
No
167678
550
Const. P. 1165/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2010
Muhammad Akbar & Others (Petitioner) VS Riaz Hussain & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-DEC-19
No
167680
551
Const. P. 2064/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
27-NOV-19
No
167698
552
Const. P. 2828/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Ameer Bux and an other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-NOV-19
No
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui
110157
553
Const. P. 31/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Saify Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-JAN-17
No
Nil.
110283
554
Const. P. 3216/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Muhammad Younus Ahmed Zai (Petitioner) VS The Executive Officer, Malir Cantonment, and 03 others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JAN-17
No
Nil.
110510
555
Const. P. 1435/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (Respondent)
D.B.
25-JAN-17
No
Nil.
110515
556
Const. P. 1436/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Shah Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (Respondent)
D.B.
25-JAN-17
No
Nil.
110516
557
Const. P. 1438/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
S. Shamraiz and another (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (Respondent)
D.B.
25-JAN-17
No
Nil.
111796
558
Const. P. 932/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
President Gharib Nawaz Colony (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and 03 others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-FEB-17
No
Nil.
111805
559
Const. P. 182/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Mst. Naheed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-FEB-17
No
Nil.
111806
560
2018 SBLR Sindh 119
Const. P. 361/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Muhammad Umar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-FEB-17
No
Nil.
113044
561
Const. P. 7073/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ali Abdul Razzaq and other (Petitioner) VS Goverment of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JAN-17
No
Nil.
113777
562
Const. P. 3522/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mrs. Nighat Saimi and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and 10 others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-FEB-17
No
Nil.
113853
563
Const. P. 4490/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2013
M/s. I.S.M. Hospital (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-FEB-17
No
Nil.
114128
564
Const. P. 196/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Rafi Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS CDGK and others (Respondent)
D.B.
01-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114129
565
Const. P. 484/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Mir Muhammad Hingorjo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114304
566
Const. P. 854/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Shamsher Khan (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114329
567
Const. P. 2620/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Bashir Ahmed Khan advocate and others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Local Government Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114352
568
Const. P. 893/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Karachi Citizens Basic Rights Effectees Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS SBCA and others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114353
569
Const. P. 1083/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Dr. Muhammad Sharif (Petitioner) VS Military Estate Officer and another (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114354
570
2018 MLD 440
Const. P. 1412/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Muhammad Aqil Asim and 02 others (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Clifton (Respondent)
D.B.
22-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114355
571
Const. P. 1906/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Manzoor Ahmed Rajpot (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
21-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114364
572
Const. P. 1306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Jumma Khan (Petitioner) VS Arif Habib and others (Respondent)
D.B.
31-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114367
573
Const. P. 3178/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Nayab Haider (Petitioner) VS Project Director, Lines Area Re-Development Project, And 06 others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAR-17
No
Nil.
114388
574
Const. P. 3029/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Yaseen and others (Petitioner) VS Chairman PIDC Harnai Woolen Mill Ltd. and 06 others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-MAR-17
No
Nil.
116766
575
2018 CLC 743
Const. P. 867/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Mrs. Aneesa Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
01-MAR-17
No
Nil.
116767
576
Const. P. 7743/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Muhammad Javed and others (Petitioner) VS Karachi Cooperative Housing Society and others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-MAY-17
No
Nil.
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
184451
577
Const. P. 1739/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Ahsan Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-FEB-23
No
184453
578
Const. P. 3544/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Akash Ahmed Mubashar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
31-JAN-23
No
184502
579
Const. P. 988/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
18-JAN-23
No
184506
580
Const. P. 3565/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
31-JAN-23
No
184508
581
Const. P. 521/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Muhammad Munir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
01-FEB-23
No
184510
582
Const. P. 269/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Allah Dino (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Umer and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JAN-23
No
184512
583
Const. P. 3609/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Abdul Waheed Dangar (Petitioner) VS Dr. Sajid Rafee Memon & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-JAN-23
No
184514
584
Const. P. 3208/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Ghulam Ruquia @ Tooba Baloch Adv & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
26-JAN-23
No
184978
585
Const. P. 2071/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Zain-ul-Abideen & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JAN-23
No
184984
586
Const. P. 1790/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Jahangir Mastoi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-FEB-23
No
185034
587
Const. P. 3759/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Mst. Suraiya (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-23
No
185038
588
Const. P. 423/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Irshad Ahmed Qazi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-23
No
188836
589
Const. P. 118/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2023
Kamal Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
31-JAN-23
No
188842
590
Const. P. 988/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
16-MAR-23
No
188848
591
Const. P. 1394/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Qurat-ul-Ain & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-MAR-23
No
188856
592
Const. P. 1467/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Perma nand (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
15-FEB-23
No
188860
593
Const. P. 1664/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Mst: Parveen Bano & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-JAN-23
No
188864
594
Const. P. 2358/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Abdul Sattar & others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-FEB-23
No
188866
595
Const. P. 2701/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2019
Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
19-JAN-23
No
188868
596
Const. P. 2841/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-23
No
188870
597
Const. P. 3022/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Niaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-FEB-23
No
188874
598
Const. P. 3025/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Naveed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-FEB-23
No
188876
599
Const. P. 3026/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2016
Muhammad Nadeem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
14-FEB-23
No
188882
600
Const. P. 3103/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Khalid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-FEB-23
No
188884
601
Const. P. 3184/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Dr. Shamsa Arain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-FEB-23
No
188887
602
Const. P. 3547/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Sadaqat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-FEB-23
No
192365
603
Const. P. 423/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2021
Irshad Ahmed Qazi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
16-MAR-23
No
192766
604
I. A 29/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2022
Ameer Ul Hussain Kazi. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan. (Respondent)
D.B.
12-JAN-23
Yes
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
203421
605
I. A 24/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Jamil Ahmed Ghaznavi (Appellant) VS M/s. Bank Alfalah Limited (Respondent)
D.B.
04-OCT-23
No
203443
606
I. A 52/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Chakar Khan (Appellant) VS Mst. Saira Abdul Rauf & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-OCT-23
No
203445
607
H.C.A 330/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Umar Baloch Enterprises Pvt Ltd (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-OCT-23
No
203447
608
H.C.A 336/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Farid Shalwani (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ali Taufiq & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
04-OCT-23
No
203449
609
H.C.A 19/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Appellant) VS Najam Ahmed & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-23
No
203733
610
H.C.A 395/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
Impact Builders Pvt Limited & Another (Appellant) VS Iffat Iqbal & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-OCT-23
No
203735
611
H.C.A 135/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-OCT-23
Yes
203753
612
H.C.A 68/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Mian Parvez Akhtar (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-OCT-23
No
203783
613
H.C.A 289/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Institution of Business Administration & others (Appellant) VS Hammad Sarfraz (Respondent)
D.B.
11-OCT-23
No
203809
614
I. A 78/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2023
Syed Muhammad Naeem (Appellant) VS Ziauddin and Another (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-23
No
203815
615
H.C.A 358/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
Abdul Ghani & Others (Appellant) VS Waheeduddin Siddique throuh legal heirs & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-23
No
204489
616
I. A 67/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2022
Ali Asghar Hashim Ali (Appellant) VS Shabbir Hussain & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
09-OCT-23
No
208271
617
M.A. 6/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s. Asia Insurance Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Xibercom (Pvt) Ltd. (Respondent)
Const. P. 1697/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
Mubarak Maseh (Petitioner) VS V/S Muhammad Yaqoob & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAY-16
No
Nil.
103972
698
Const. P. 185/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Syed Tanveer-ul-Haq (Petitioner) VS V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAY-16
No
Nil.
103973
699
Const. P. 772/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation. (Petitioner) VS V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAY-16
No
Nil.
103974
700
Const. P. 2463/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Awwal (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAY-16
No
Nil.
103991
701
Const. P. 1088/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
KESC (Petitioner) VS V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Organization / Department Name (if any): (Respondent)
D.B.
03-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104386
702
Const. P. 2345/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
The Anjuman Masjid New Town and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Muhammad Shahid Zaki and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104387
703
Const. P. 2876/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Shahid Ansari (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104388
704
Const. P. 4295/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Samandas Vidani (Petitioner) VS V/S K.M.C & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104390
705
Const. P. 255/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Mst. Kishwar Jehan Sultana (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104415
706
Const. P. 2344/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ghulam Yasir (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
26-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104416
707
Const. P. 2666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
26-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104417
708
Const. P. 2702/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Makoo Bhatti (Petitioner) VS V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
26-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104418
709
Const. P. 5360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Muhammad Niaz Khan (Petitioner) VS V/S Mukhtiarkar & Assistant Collector & ors. (Respondent)
D.B.
26-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104433
710
Const. P. 2628/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
Fareedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS V/S Govt. of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104434
711
Const. P. 2875/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Muhammad Wali (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
19-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104497
712
Const. P. 3127/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s Check & Watch (Petitioner) VS V/S SBCA and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
31-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104498
713
Const. P. 3149/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s Jubilee Life Inusrance Co. (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
31-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104500
714
Const. P. 753/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2004
M/s.Karam Ceramic Ltd., (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh & ORS (Respondent)
D.B.
01-JUN-16
No
Nil.
104501
715
Const. P. 1841/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Sami Ahsan (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-JUN-16
No
Nil.
104502
716
Const. P. 3180/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ch: Muhammad Yahya (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-JUN-16
No
Nil.
104504
717
Const. P. 3193/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Talib Hussain (Petitioner) VS V/S The Director NFC Dept (NADRA) and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-JUN-16
No
Nil.
104505
718
Const. P. 3194/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Makhtar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS V/S The Director NFC Dept (NADRA) and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-JUN-16
No
Nil.
104506
719
Const. P. 3202/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s Admore Gas (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-JUN-16
No
Nil.
104507
720
Const. P. 3210/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Abdul Fateh Jamali (Petitioner) VS V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
01-JUN-16
No
Nil.
104513
721
Const. P. 1413/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2009
Mst. Taj Bibi Tahira and others (Petitioner) VS V/S VIth ADJ (South) and others (Respondent)
D.B.
31-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104514
722
Const. P. 2891/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Sikandar Khan Kalmati Baloch (Petitioner) VS V/S Sect: Irrigation and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
31-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104515
723
Const. P. 3145/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Farmanullah (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
31-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104516
724
Const. P. 3150/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
M/s Jubilee Life Insurance (Petitioner) VS V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
31-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104517
725
Const. P. 3172/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Cyrus Cowasjee and Ors (Plaintiff) VS V/S KMC and Ors (Defendant)
D.B.
31-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104647
726
Const. P. 4149/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) VS V/S Abdul Rasheed and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104648
727
Const. P. 6085/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Syed Riaz Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
D.B.
16-MAY-16
No
Nil.
104832
728
Const. P. 6660/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2014
Mst. Zamrad Begum and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Muhammad Rafiq Choudhry and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-MAY-16
No
Nil.
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar
80401
729
I. A 8/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
S.M.E. Leasing Limited (Appellant) VS M/S Hilton Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-OCT-13
No
Nil.
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahnawaz Tariq
84258
730
Const. P. 275/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2008
Abdul Khaliq @ Khalique (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khatija & others. (Respondent)
S.B.
20-MAR-14
No
Nil.
84276
731
Const. P. 24/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Munawar Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Secretary Land Utilization Dept and others (Respondent)
D.B.
18-FEB-14
No
Nil.
84277
732
Const. P. 184/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2014
Mst. Nagma and anothers (Petitioner) VS Suptd of Police Naushahro Feroze (Respondent)
D.B.
18-APR-14
No
Nil.
84278
733
Const. P. 1061/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2010
Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Haji Faiz Muhammad and others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-MAR-14
No
Nil.
84311
734
Cr.Appeal 151/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2012
Hajjan another (Appellant) VS The State and others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-MAR-14
No
Nil.
84314
735
Cr.Appeal 90/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Muhammad Qasim (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent)
D.B.
02-APR-14
No
Nil.
84348
736
Cr.Rev 186/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Sabir Zaman and others (Applicant) VS The State and others (Respondent)
D.B.
30-JAN-14
No
Nil.
84416
737
Cr.Bail 83/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2013
Mujahid (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
D.B.
30-JAN-14
No
Nil.
84428
738
Cr.Misc. 168/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
2011
Anwar Ali (Applicant) VS Mazhar Hussain Hisbani and others (Respondent)
D.B.
11-FEB-14
No
Nil.
84437
739
H.C.A 180/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2011
Zulfiqar Ahmed and others (Appellant) VS Suit No. 965 of 2003 (Respondent)
D.B.
23-OCT-13
No
Nil.
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
94683
740
Const. P. 1721/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Mashooque Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-15
No
Nil.
94749
741
Const. P. 516/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2015
Abdul Qadeem Pathan (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Shikarpur and others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-15
No
Nil.
94750
742
Const. P. 452/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2015
Rajib Ali Gadehi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS KN Shah and others (Respondent)
D.B.
07-MAY-15
No
Nil.
95147
743
Const. P. 1374/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2014
Mst Nooran Khatoon and another (Petitioner) VS SIP Mohammad Khan Abro SHO PS Bakrani and others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-MAY-15
No
Nil.
95148
744
Const. P. 2858/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2011
Tanveer Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-MAY-15
No
Nil.
95149
745
I. A 2/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
2010
Abdul Rauf Soomro (Applicant) VS Regional Manager House Building Finance and others (Respondent)
D.B.
06-MAY-15
No
Nil.
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
168546
746
Const. P. 692/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Ghulam Asghar Tanwari (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ismail Mahar & others (Respondent)
D.B.
17-JUN-22
No
168572
747
Const. P. 605/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Junaid Ahmed Indher (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-JUN-22
No
168574
748
Const. P. 612/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Kanaya Lal Hindu (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
08-JUN-22
No
168596
749
Const. P. 622/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. Ps. Nos. D-623, 626, 628, 633 and 678 of 2022
2022
Saeed Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Chief Election Commission Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
22-JUN-22
Yes
168602
750
Const. P. 615/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Arz Muhammad mahar & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
16-JUN-22
No
168616
751
Const. P. 617/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Khalique Zaman Maitlo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
D.B.
22-JUN-22
No
168618
752
Const. P. 618/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Khalique Zaman Maitlo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JUN-22
No
168620
753
Const. P. 642/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Muhammad Waseem Sethi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JUN-22
No
168622
754
Const. P. 649/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Majid Ali Danwar & another (Petitioner) VS The ECP & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-JUN-22
No
168688
755
Const. P. 613/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Ali Jan Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JUN-22
No
168690
756
Const. P. 644/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Shujauddin Khan Durrani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JUN-22
No
168692
757
Const. P. 645/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Agha Mir Mustafa Khan Durrani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JUN-22
No
168694
758
Const. P. 680/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JUN-22
No
168696
759
Const. P. 685/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Shafqat Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JUN-22
No
168698
760
Const. P. 650/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Ali Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
24-JUN-22
No
168738
761
Const. P. 579/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2022
Bangul Khan Mahar (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
23-JUN-22
No
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro
152731
762
Const. P. 230/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2012
Syed Qasim Hassan (Petitioner) VS Syed Muhammad Hassan & ors (Respondent)
D.B.
30-JAN-15
Yes
154476
763
Const. P. 2356/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Agha Siraj Khan Durrani (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB) (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154477
764
Const. P. 1637/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mrs. Naheed Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154479
765
Const. P. 1639/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Sara Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154480
766
Const. P. 1640/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Shahana Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154481
767
Const. P. 1641/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Sonya Durrani (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154482
768
Const. P. 1776/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Tufail Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS NAB (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154483
769
Const. P. 1850/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Mitha Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154484
770
Const. P. 1851/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Shamshad Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154485
771
Const. P. 2976/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154486
772
Const. P. 2236/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Zulfiqar Ali Dahar (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154487
773
Const. P. 2235/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Aslam Pervaiz Langah (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154488
774
Const. P. 6623/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154489
775
Const. P. 8474/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Sayed Muhammad Shah (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154490
776
Const. P. 584/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154491
777
Const. P. 585/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Gulbahar Lohar Baloch (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154492
778
Const. P. 586/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Munawar Ali (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
154493
779
Const. P. 1559/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-OCT-21
Yes
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan
152969
780
I. A 17/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2012
M/S ZTBL & Others (Appellant) VS Mst. Nawazi & Other (Respondent)
D.B.
26-OCT-17
Yes
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
145830
781
Const. P. 1336/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Farhan Ali Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-AUG-20
No
Nil.
145831
782
Const. P. 2039/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Masood Ahmed Sangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
10-AUG-20
No
Nil.
146057
783
Const. P. 2195/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2015
Syed Ali Irteza Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Re-Insurance Co. Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
11-AUG-20
No
Nil.
146058
784
Const. P. 1708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Haji Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Re-Insurance Co. Ltd and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
11-AUG-20
No
Nil.
146184
785
Const. P. 4000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2017
Muhammad Javed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
08-SEP-20
No
Order on contempt applications.
146185
786
Const. P. 6161/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Khaliq Dad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146186
787
Const. P. 3568/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Fareed Ahmed Sabir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
10-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146275
788
Const. P. 4309/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Asif Hashim Mughal (Petitioner) VS Dawood Uni of Engineering & Technology & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146276
789
Const. P. 4310/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Rizwan Khan (Petitioner) VS KMC and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146277
790
Const. P. 4316/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Rizwan ul Haque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146278
791
Const. P. 4327/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
14-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146348
792
Const. P. 2869/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
15-SEP-20
No
Nil.
146813
793
Const. P. 4326/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Abdul Waheed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-OCT-20
No
Nil.
146814
794
Const. P. 403/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2018
Ali Raza and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
D.B.
23-SEP-20
No
Nil.
151291
795
Const. P. 7096/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2019
Muhammad Nadeem Aqeel Rajput (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
05-OCT-20
No
151690
796
Const. P. 1497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2020
Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
D.B.
03-JUN-21
Yes
157253
797
H.C.A 249/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2021
D.G. Malir Development Authority & Another (Appellant) VS Fareedullah & Others (Respondent)
D.B.
02-FEB-22
No
, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
106724
798
Const. P. 2524/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi
2016
Ali Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)
D.B.
22-AUG-16
No
Registered sub-leases in respect of two apartment / units which were non-existent at the time of registration and even till the decision of the instant petition, have been directed to be cancelled by Nazir of Sindh High Court. It is an admitted position that these apartments are to be located at the third floor / story of the building which is not even constructed by the Builder.
Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, cannot be construed so as to include an immoveable property, which is not even existing at the time of registration. Property sought to be registered should be of ascertainable description. Similarly, Section 2, subsection (6) of the Registration Act, 1908, wherein an immoveable property is defined, inter alia, means that an immoveable property should be a tangible one and physically exists.
Different orders passed by this Court in various constitutional petitions, crux of which is that no registration of a residential or a commercial unit of a multistoried building should be done without a completion plan / occupancy certificate, are the decisions in rem, and thus applicable to the present case as well.
One of the main objectives, that can be achieved by looking at the completion plan / occupancy certificate is that it can help in identifying the property sought to be registered and also verify the fact that a multistoried building is Regulations compliant, particularly having structural stability.
Rule 135 of the West Pakistan Registration Rules, 1929, is not applicable to the facts of subject constitutional petition as the illegality of sub-leases in question were floating on surface and no further inquiry was required for ascertaining the validity of these sub-leases in question. Even otherwise a rule cannot be interpreted in such a manner that results in perpetuating illegality rather preventing it.
133873
799
Const. P. 2149/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: Const. P D 4729/2015
2015
Abdul Hameed and another (Petitioner) VS Provicne of Sindh and others (Respondent)
D.B.
30-MAY-18
Yes
Nil.
138182
800
Const. P. 1007/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2018
Muhammad Mehboob (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)
D.B.
28-MAY-18
Yes
Nil.
152890
801
I. A 5/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2015
Abdul Samad Mahar & others (Appellant) VS The Habib Bank Limited & another (Respondent)
D.B.
19-DEC-17
Yes
152891
802
First Appeal Against Order 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2015
Yameen Ali (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent)
D.B.
07-DEC-17
Yes
152892
803
I. A 5/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2013
Javed-ur-Rehman and others (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & another (Respondent)
D.B.
17-NOV-17
Yes
152967
804
I. A 7/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2014
Chaudhry Abdul Jabbar (Appellant) VS Presiding Officer, Banking Court-II, Sukkur & others (Respondent)
D.B.
13-DEC-17
Yes
152968
805
I. A 9/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
2011
Nand Lal and another (Appellant) VS M/S Askari Bank Ltd.and others (Respondent)