Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.No. | Citation | Case No. | Case Year | Parties | Bench Type | Order/Judgment | Order_Date | A.F.R | Head Notes/ Tag Line | Bench | Apex Court | Apex Status |
| 1 | 2016 CLD 2106 | Suit 268/1980 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1980 | Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant) VS V/S Muhammad ASLAM SIDDIQUI & ORS (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JAN-16 | No | It is proved that Defendant No.3 was the sole beneficiary of embezzled amount, which landed in her bank account. Therefore, the stance of Defendant No.3 has been rejected that the amount was embezzled by her husband (Defendant No.1) who has since disappeared and the said Defendant No.3 is not a beneficiary. In the circumstances, Article 129 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 squarely applies to the facts of the present case. Defendant Bank has been also held liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the losses it suffered, as admittedly relationship between Defendant No.2-Bank and Plaintiff is of a fiduciary nature and thus former (Defendant No.2) owed a duty of care to the latter (Plaintiff) that its bank account had to be maintained in a professional and diligent manner. Nature of duty of Defendant No.2 implies exercise of due diligence and by making payment of such a substantial amount on the basis of a Request Letter containing some alternations and that too in the name of Defendant No.3 (the beneficiary of said amount) with which the Plaintiff-the customer of Defendant No.2 had no business relationship, latter (said Defendant No.2) had acted negligently. Suit for Recovery---Decreed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 2 | Suit 1008/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | WASIM IQBAL (Plaintiff) VS KARWAN E ISLAMI (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-NOV-22 | Yes | It is a settled rule that special damages cannot be awarded, unless Plaintiff has led a convincing and positive evidence in support of his claim, which in the present case has not been done. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 3 | Suit 67/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1988 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-FEB-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 4 | Const. P. 4404/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Syed Dost Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-15 | Yes | In exceptional circumstances the writ jurisdiction under article 199 of the Constitution can be invoked, despite availability of an alternate remedy.---- * Excessive use of unlawful powers is itself unlawful.---- * Under grab of a pending civil suit, in which even no restraining order is operating and which is ex facie being not pursued, a bona fide purchaser of a property cannot be deprived of its use and enjoyment, as this violates the fundamental rights of a citizen relating to proprietary rights and guaranteed under article 23 and 24 of the Constitution. Caution note attached by the respondent-DHA to the property in question merely on the ground that some civil suit is pending as stated above, is not a proper exercise of discretion vested in Respondent-DHA, in the circumstances, as admittedly Respondent-DHA refused to even process the application for approval of the completion plan issuance of completion certificate of the Subject property on the basis of the impugned caution note it has put in its record. * A Genuine claimant can invoke section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, by notifying the concerned registrar/ responsible for registration of sale/ conveyance deed (under Registration Act, 1908) about the pendency of litigation in competent Court of Law, inter alia, to protect one | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 5 | Suit 826/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1987 | M/S. MUSTAFA SONS PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) VS PORT QASIM AUTHORITY. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-AUG-16 | No | There is a distinction between a routine board resolution that authorizes a person / Officer of a Company to do certain acts, including instituting a legal proceeding and a non-routine resolution as contemplated under Section 164 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (the Ordinance 1984). Similarly, a special resolution passed under Section 172 of the Companies Ordinance 1984, which has been defined in Section 2 sub-section (36) of the Ordinance 1984, is also of distinct nature and different import. For a routine and a procedural resolution as mentioned hereinabove, there is no requirement that the same should be filed with the SECP (Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan). If a board resolution is passed without giving prior notice to the Directors of the Board then the meeting convened and the resolution passed there at, both are held to be invalid and not in accordance with the Ordinance 1984. Even otherwise, if a Board Meeting is allowed to be held without prior notice to other directors, then it would lead to a chaotic situation and it will be against the basic principle of good corporate governance, which cannot be permitted. A suit instituted on behalf of a Plaintiff-Company without a valid authorization simply means that the plaint is not existing for all intents and purposes. A suit instituted on behalf of a Plaintiff-Company without a valid authorization simply means that the plaint is not existing for all intents and purposes. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 6 | Const. P. 718/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Ali Hassan & Others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-APR-16 | No | Mere issuance of conditional appointment letters that too for a contract employment, cannot be invoked for seeking a relief for issuance of writ of mandamus, when official respondents have categorically disputed the relationship of the employment. Non-fulfillment of other codal formalities as mentioned in the offer letter has disentitled the petitioners from invoking the writ jurisdiction. Mere issuance of conditional appointment letters that too for a contract employment, cannot be invoked for seeking a relief for issuance of writ of mandamus, when official respondents have categorically disputed the relationship of the employment. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 7 | 2018 PLC Lab. 36 | Const. P. 84/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mst. Samina Pathan (Petitioner) VS National Database and Registration Authority [NADRA] (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-MAY-16 | Yes | Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction. Dismissal from service in undue haste and in violation of statutory service rules, can be assailed in a writ jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.2857/2016 National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others v. Samina Pathan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted |
| 8 | Suit 1318/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Mrs. Almas Farooqi and another (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Battery Manufacturing Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 09-MAR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 9 | Const. P. 4570/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Munir Ahmed (Applicant) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-APR-16 | Yes | Mere fact that petitioner opted for plea bargain, which was not even recommended by the NAB Authorities, or duly approved by the Accountability Court, cannot operate as a bar for withholding the bail, if the accused otherwise makes out a case for grant of bail on merits. Mere fact that petitioner opted for plea bargain, which was not even recommended by the NAB Authorities, or duly approved by the Accountability Court, cannot operate as a bar for withholding the bail, if the accused otherwise makes out a case for grant of bail on merits. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 10 | Const. P. 1493/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Gul Menjraan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 11 | Const. P. 792/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Lutufullah & Anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 12 | Election Appeal 22/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Rao Wahid Ali (Appellant) VS Rao Muhammad sullman & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 13 | Const. P. 830/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst.Fahmida (Petitioner) VS SSP Hyd &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 14 | Const. P. 1267/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Muhammad Umar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 15 | Const. P. 1412/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 16 | Const. P. 1011/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Rasool Bux Khoso (Petitioner) VS Goverment of Sindh Through Home Secretary & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 17 | Cr.Bail 1032/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Moin Akhtar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 18 | Const. P. 1479/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Damro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 19 | Suit 1560/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Syed Masood Hussain Jafri (Plaintiff) VS Registrar Cooperative Societies, Sindh. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 20 | Suit 1724/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | MST.ZAIBUNISA & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS IQBAL AHMED & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-JAN-19 | Yes | Section 39 of Specific Relief Act. Cancellation of Document. An instrument inherently void not required a formal cancellation under Section 39 of Specif Relief Act. Object of Law is to advance justice and remedy the wrong forthwith, instead of putting a law abiding person through the mill. to enforce orderly behaviour in a society. General Damages awarded for sufferings of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs awarded general damages due to protracted litigation and on account of fraudulent act of Defendants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 21 | Suit 620/1994 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1994 | ISMAIL MEMORIAL TRUST (Plaintiff) VS KARACH COOP H.S. UNION LTD. & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-MAY-19 | Yes | Hospitals fall within the category of amenity plots, as envisaged in Article 52-A of the Karachi Development Authority (KDA) Order, 1957. Suit decreed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 22 | Suit 74/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1991 | Mohammad Sarwar (Plaintiff) VS Government of Sindh and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-JUN-17 | Yes | Suit for recovery of compensation amount--Deceased died in the custody of police officials---Contention of the police was that deceased died due to cardiac arrest---Validity---None of the police officials entered the witness box to defend the claim against them---Written statement filed by the police officials had lost its evidentiary value as contents whereof were never proved in the evidence---Deceased died while he was in the custody of police officials---Plaintiff was to prove the factum of incident only---Burden would shift on the police officials to disprove the causation if they wanted to succeed in the claim against the plaintiff---Present case did fall within the purview of Fatal Accidents Act, 1855---Prosecution in a criminal case was to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of accused but in civil proceedings the matter had to be decided on the basis of preponderance of probabilities---Acquittal of (private) defendants in the criminal case did not have any adverse bearing on the present lis---Police official were liable to compensate the plaintiff by applying the rule of vicarious liability--- Claim of plaintiff with regard to quantum of damages was also unchallenged---Life expectancy of seventy five years in plaintiff's family had been proved---Deceased might also have lived for another fifty years approximately---Claim of awarding damages of Rs.50,00,000/- was justified---Master/employer in the claims with regard to tortuous liabilities would be liable for the wrongful acts of his employees/servants---Provincial Government and Inspector General of Police were liable to compensate the plaintiff besides other defendants---Defendants (Police officials) were liable to pay the damages/compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- together with 10% markup from the date of institution of suit till realization of the amount to the plaintiff and his wife i.e. parent of the deceased jointly and severally. Suit decreed. Custodial death, suit for recovery of compensation amount decreed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 23 | 2017 CLC 1650 | Const. P. 2199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Haji Khan (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-JUN-16 | No | The eligibility criteria f a contesting candidate mentioned in the Sindh Government Act, 2013 (2013 Act), is to be interpreted keeping in view the basic concept of 2013 Act, which spells out that if a candidate is voter registered in an urban area, then he can only be elected for a Council falling within an urban area of the District as envisaged in Section 8 and 15 of the 2013 Act, including town committees; irrespective of the fact that a candidate is voter of the same district. The eligibility criteria f a contesting candidate mentioned in the Sindh Government Act, 2013 (2013 Act), is to be interpreted keeping in view the basic concept of 2013 Act, which spells out that if a candidate is voter registered in an urban area, then he can only be elected for a Council falling within an urban area of the District as envisaged in Section 8 and 15 of the 2013 Act, including town committees; irrespective of the fact that a candidate is voter of the same district. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.367-K/2016 Haji Khan Bhatti v. Province of Sindh through Provincial Election Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 24 | Suit 1511/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1999 | Pakistan Railwasy Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Plaintiff) VS Mirza Abdul Sattar Baig and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-SEP-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 25 | Const. P. 1624/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Moulo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 26 | Civil Revision 38/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Mansoor Ali (Applicant) VS Amir Bux (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-16 | No | It is a settled principle that the applicant/plaintiff has to prove his case on its own merits. The contents of the plaint/pleadings do not carry weight unless they are proved by leading evidence and for which the applicant/plaintiff has to enter the witness box and lead the evidence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 27 | Cr.Bail 871/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Nazeeran (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 28 | Const. P. 841/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Muhammad Fayyaz (Petitioner) VS Mst Nighat & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 29 | Civil Revision 285/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Muhammad Aabid (Appellant) VS Shamshad Ahmed and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 30 | Const. P. 1669/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 31 | Const. P. 583/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Abdul Ghaffar Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 32 | Const. P. 1600/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 33 | Const. P. 665/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Rawal (Petitioner) VS Walam and otehrs (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 34 | Const. P. 1434/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 35 | Const. P. 1617/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Sanam & another (Petitioner) VS Dost Muhammad & ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 36 | Const. P. 1814/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Sidho (Petitioner) VS SSP Tharparkar @ Mithi & Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 37 | Const. P. 2020/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Matiari and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 38 | Const. P. 1087/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 39 | Const. P. 6915/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-17 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 40 | Suit 601/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 41 | Const. P. 3488/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-SEP-17 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3309/2017 Iqbal Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary, Local Government , Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 42 | Election Appeal 3/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Jam Javed Ahmed Khan Dehar (Appellant) VS Haji Muhammad Akbar and 14 others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 43 | Suit 112/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | SAFDAR HUSSAIN BIRLAS & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS MOHSIN ALI (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 44 | Const. P. 1424/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Hajiran & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 45 | Const. P. 1451/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Imdadullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 46 | Const. P. 475/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sht Nano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 47 | Const. P. 1663/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Rasool Bux & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 48 | Const. P. 1567/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Nazia & Ors (Petitioner) VS Nazeer & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 49 | Const. P. 6274/2017 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Bushra Jabeen and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | F.B. | Order | 08-APR-19 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar | C.P.3854/2018,C.P.4573/2018,C.A.1486/2018,C.A.1487/2018,C.P.4475/2018,C.P.4476/2018 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 50 | Const. P. 1974/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Shahzad Hussain Shahani (Petitioner) VS Governor of Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 51 | 2016 SBLR Sindh 1651 | Adm. Suit 287/1990 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1990 | Jugolinifa (Plaintiff) VS Sayeed A.Tayyab (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-MAR-16 | Yes | Rule of 'best evidence' explained; according to which, if a best piece of evidence is not produced by a party or is withheld, then an adverse inference would be drawn against such party, that it deliberately not produced the evidence coupled with some ulterior motive. Objection can be taken during pendency of case that the Suit has been instituted by a person who was not duly authorized or competent to file the proceeding, as envisaged under Order XXIX, Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, even though no specific Issue was framed in this regard, but, in the evidence the Plaintiff witness was cross-examined on this particular fact and was given an opportunity to produce relevant authorization, under which the suit was instituted, but, he failed to do so. Since defect in filing proceeding was incurable, hence, suit was dismissed. Suit filed by unauthorized person---Defect in filing proceeding was incurable, hence, suit was dismissed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 52 | Civil Revision 245/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Party-1 (Applicant) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 53 | Cr.Ref 15/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | IInd Additional Sessions Judge Mirpurkhas. . (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 54 | 2018 CLC Note 24 | Suit 611/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Qadir and another (Plaintiff) VS Laeeq Ahmed and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-JUL-17 | Yes | Defendant sought rejection of plaint on the ground that plaintiff had concealed material facts---Validity---Object and principle of O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C. was that a frivolous litigation should be laid to rest at the earliest and bona fide parties should be saved from rigors of such a litigation---Subject matter of litigation in question, i.e. the house property was not in dispute and sale consideration was admitted---Communication of offer and acceptance by parties to each other with regard to subject matter and total sale consideration was acknowledged by both the parties---All ingredients of a valid agreement enforceable as a contract existed---Defendants failed to make a case for grant of application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C.---Application was dismissed in circumstances. Defendants failed to make a case for grant of application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C.---Application was dismissed in circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 55 | Const. P. 222/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Abdullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-NOV-18 | Yes | It is also necessary to clarify that a plot of land, even if it is situated in some housing scheme, cannot be presumed to be reserved for amenity purpose, unless it is shown as an amenity plot in the duly approved layout plan. No plausible material or document has been brought on record by the Petitioners side which can lead to the conclusion that the Plot Nos.163 and 164 were actually the amenity plots and their use was illegally changed/converted from amenity to that of commercial | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 56 | F.R.A 8/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Khalid Hayat (Appellant) VS Mst Tehmina (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 57 | Const. P. 164/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 58 | Civil Revision 13/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2006 | Shankar Marecho (Applicant) VS Ranjho (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-SEP-18 | No | Mr. Mukesh Kumar G. Karara, Advocate, at this juncture complains that the respondents have been harassed by the applicants due to their close relationship with the Administration and particularly police. This has been disputed by Mr. David Lawrence Advocate who represents the applicants and further assures that no harassment either has been caused or will be caused in future, even otherwise since matters are sub judice, therefore, parties are directed to conduct themselves within parameters of law and not otherwise. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1170-K/2018 Shankar and others v. Ranjho thr. his L.Rs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 59 | Const. P. 4700/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Muhammad Ramzan P.O Sindh & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-MAY-18 | No | we must observe, that while exercising such discretion to grant or refuse permission or lease/license, the Respondents should adhere to the prevailing rules, inter alia, Sindh Mining Concession Rules 2002. The other aspect of the case is that the official respondents have already issued a mining permit for lime stones over an area of 90.6 acres, which is part of the subject area, to private respondent No.9 vide aforementioned Notification, which fact is neither disputed by the petitioner nor any illegality has been pointed out by the latter in the procedure adopted by official respondents. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 60 | Election Appeal 27/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Jumman (Appellant) VS Zulfiqar and 3 others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 61 | Const. P. 2288/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | khair Muhammad M/S Gul Bottles another (Petitioner) VS M/S Gul Bottles another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAY-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 62 | Const. P. 1019/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Muhammad Roshan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 63 | Civil Revision 172/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Shadi S/o Rahimdino (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 64 | Const. P. 1732/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 65 | Suit 1118/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | MRS. BILQUIS MOHSIN BUTT & ORS (Plaintiff) VS GHULAM RASOOL UMER & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-JUL-18 | No | In these circumstances, Sections 19 and 22 of Specific Relief Act are invoked to extend a relief to the Plaintiff. Section 22 speaks about, inter alia, hardship that Defendants can face if a decree of Specific Performance is granted, but, on the other hand, the Plaintiff will not face such a hardship, if the relief is refused. Section 19 makes a provision for compensation. In the present case it will be the above named third party who will face hardship, all the more if the subject property is further transacted. Therefore, I am inclined to follow the decision of Honble Supreme Court handed down in Liaquat Ali Khan versus Falak Sher, reported in PLD 2014 Supreme Court page-506 (ibid). In this case, the Honble Apex Court though did not decree the suit for Specific Performance, but granted compensation | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 66 | Const. P. 2578/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Mohammad Ibrahim Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-MAR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 67 | Const. P. 1815/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mashoque Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 68 | Const. P. 1843/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Lakha Dino (Petitioner) VS SSP Distt SBA & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 69 | Const. P. 1473/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Rafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 70 | Const. P. 705/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Chhagan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Learned A.A.G states that no criminal case has been registered against any party to this petition nor police officials have caused any harassment to the petitioner. In these circumstances, present petition is dismissed being meritless | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 71 | Const. P. 2874/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Mst Hira (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 72 | Const. P. 356/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Naseer Ahmed Mallah (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 73 | Suit 771/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | MASJID E ABDEEN TRUST (Plaintiff) VS DUBAI SHOPING MALL (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-MAY-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 74 | Suit 504/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1985 | TEWFIQ FIKREE & ORS (Plaintiff) VS V/S USMANI FIKREE & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 75 | Suit 5/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | NOMAN ABID CO (Plaintiff) VS NAVEED HAIDER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-JUL-19 | Yes | The Plaintiff has already received the amount of disputed cheque, therefore, the present suit was filed with mala fide intention and is not maintainable. Not only this, the overall conduct of the Plaintiff Company, from the time of granting Leave to Defend Application was not of a bona fide litigant. Hence, the present suit is dismissed with costs. The Plaintiff has already received the amount of disputed cheque, therefore, the present suit was filed with mala fide intention and is not maintainable. Not only this, the overall conduct of the Plaintiff Company, from the time of granting Leave to Defend Application was not of a bona fide litigant. Hence, the present suit is dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 76 | Election Appeal 3/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Jam Javed Ahmed Khan Dahar (Appellant) VS Haji Muhammad Akbar and 14 others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-FEB-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 77 | Const. P. 411/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | High Court Bar Hyd (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-MAR-20 | Yes | Petition pertains to the current issue of Corona Virus (COVID-19) | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 78 | H.C.A 260/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Appellant) VS Haji Jaffar & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 79 | Const. P. 1905/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cp.D 1932/2011 &1269/2016 | 2011 | Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-20 | Yes | Law Discussed: Land Acquisition Act, 1894----- Standing Order of the revenue department No.12, subsection 31 regarding land acquisition provides that if the land was not required for the purpose it was acquired, it should be relinquished and should be offered to the original occupant/owner on payment of compensation received by them and in case of their refusal to have it back on the said terms, it should be considered as a government property in the record. The proceedings of acquiring land could only be ended once the compensation is deposited and the possession was taken over by the acquiring agency. Thus, this would be in severe violation of Articles 23 and 24 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, depriving the land owner not only from enjoying the property but also from its compensation. Thus, there is no justification that he (the owner/private respondent) may be granted interest now after almost three decades of litigation when the value of the property multiplied several hundred folds, as against the compensation, the value of which was determined three decades before and grant of interests under Land Acquisition Act, under the circumstances has no justification. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.420-K/2020 Hyderabad Municipal Corporation v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 80 | Suit 826/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Security Organizing System Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) VS National Bank of Pakistan & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 28-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 81 | R.A (Civil Revision) 13/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Sohail Ahmed Ansari (Applicant) VS Irfan Ahmed Ansari and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 82 | Suit 1738/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | SYED HUSSAIN ALI (Plaintiff) VS SYED AKHTAR ALI & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 83 | S.M.A 47/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Raza Muhammad S/o (Late) Muhammad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JAN-20 | Yes | Petition not maintainable. Dismissed. Petition not maintainable. Dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 84 | Suit 394/1997 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1997 | MUHAMMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) VS PAK. STEEL MILLS CORP. LTD. & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Non-production of Departmental Inquiry Report in the evidence by Defendants has raised adverse presumption against them, as envisaged in Article 129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Loss of consortium; that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries or death caused by a tortfeasor. Well known rules about "foreseeability",causation and but for explained; if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s), then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of Care] that has resulted in causing injury and the "but for" test if simply put, means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant's negligence. Legislative amendments are proposed. Non-production of Departmental Inquiry Report in the evidence by Defendants has raised adverse presumption against them, as envisaged in Article 129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Loss of consortium; that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries or death caused by a tortfeasor. Well known rules about foreseeability,causation and but for explained; if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s), then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of Care] that has resulted in causing injury and the "but for" test if simply put, means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant's negligence. Legislative amendments are proposed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 85 | Const. P. 2186/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Zabardast Khan Mehar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-APR-21 | Yes | NAB Petition for Reduction of Surety Amount | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.4267/2021 Zabardast Khan Mahar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB,Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 86 | Const. P. 3542/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Mukhtiar Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS N A B & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.4122/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Mukhtiar Ahmed and others,C.A.3029/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Mukhtiar Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | ||
| 87 | Const. P. 1272/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Mst. Salma @ Ume-Salma (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh, through Secretary Home Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 88 | Suit 493/1993 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1993 | Shahimah Sayeed (Plaintiff) VS Base Commander and three others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 89 | I. A 5/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Abdul Samad Mahar & others (Appellant) VS The Habib Bank Limited & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 90 | Const. P. 8680/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Muqeem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 91 | Const. P. 4447/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Ashiq Ali Lakhan (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.4186/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Ashique Ali Lakhan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | ||
| 92 | Const. P. 661/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2019 | Nazeeruddin Qazi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.4204/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Nazeeruddin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | ||
| 93 | Const. P. 3779/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS KDA & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 94 | Const. P. 5553/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Iqbal Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Farooq Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 95 | Const. P. 5539/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mst Aysha Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-NOV-21 | Yes | Bonafide purchaser for value without notice Rule will apply where purchasers are not equally at fault with their predecessors. Property purchased on the basis of official record and transactions spreading over many years and did not change hands in quick succession showing undue haste, hence 5th owner cannot be penalized. Responsible officials of KDA to be dealt with strictly, DG KDA directed to hold enquiry and fix responsibility on officials involved in committing illegality and fraud, whether in service or retired, alive or dead, should be mentioned in the Inquiry Report. An alternate plot of same value and utility be allotted to the petitioner. Cost of Rs.100,000/- is imposed on respondent KDA payable to the petitioner. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.286-K/2022 Mst.Aysha Begum v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Housing & Town Planning & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 96 | Const. P. 6423/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Tahira Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 97 | Const. P. 5707/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Ghulam Sarwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 98 | Const. P. 8498/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mst. Uzma (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 99 | Const. P. 5574/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | M/s Messe Incorporation (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 100 | Const. P. 2440/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-AUG-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 101 | Const. P. 7578/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Abdul Quddus Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 102 | Const. P. 3906/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) VS Administrator Through CDGK and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-AUG-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 103 | Const. P. 2122/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Ali Jaan Brohi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 104 | Suit 1717/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Plaintiff) VS Najam Ahmed & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-22 | Yes | Collateral proceeding is principle of law and thus suit is barred. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 105 | Execution First Appeal 20/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/S. METROPOLITAN STEEL CORP. LTD (Decree Holder) VS MEPCO & AN ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Order | 16-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 106 | Suit 610/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | UNION FABRICS PRIVATE LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 31-AUG-22 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, it must be reiterated, that Defendants have to formulate and implement a Policy, which should not result in the closure of businesses of consumers, including present Plaintiffs, as it would violative of Articles 18 and 24 of the Constitution, inter alia, relating to trade, business and proprietary rights. However, both the Plaintiffs are at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority, in accordance with the above Statute and other Regulations and if representations are filed, same should be decided expeditiously by the OGRA. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 107 | Suit 379/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | MISS. UZMA AMJAD ALI & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS MRS.SAEEDA BANO & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-DEC-22 | Yes | Since the Defendant No.1 has accepted a substantial amount of rupees six million as part payment towards sale price, and never returned the same till the above Order was passed, which means for almost seven years the same was beneficially utilized by her, therefore, Defendant No.2 (Purchaser) despite the afore discussed lacuna in her claim for damages, is entitled for monetary relief, in view of the judicial consensus, that by invoking Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, where the circumstances so permit, monetary compensation can be given, while refusing the specific performance to plaintiff | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 108 | Cr.Bail 1215/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Tayyab (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-DEC-22 | Yes | Conversely, the case law relied upon by Applicants counsel is relevant, wherein bail was granted, inter alia, considering the earlier Court case. Both male members of a family are behind bars who are bread earners. There is no record of earlier conviction. Guilt of accused is yet to be determined in the above circumstances, because at this stage a deeper appreciation of facts cannot be made. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 109 | Const. P. 84/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Aleemuddin (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito | ||||
| 110 | Const. P. 712/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Mst. Sundas Asghar (Petitioner) VS Talal Ahmed Qureshi& Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 111 | Const. P. 115/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-FEB-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 112 | Suit 1188/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Sadia Siddiqui & another (Plaintiff) VS Adnan Andalaib Siddiqui & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-22 | Yes | The other undisputed but crucial fact is that since decades both Plaintiffs and their families are residing in the Suit Property, although the lease is in the name of Claimant. It is to be determined through a proper trial that whether the Suit Property was given to the Claimant as her exclusive Property or the same was the compensation given to the Family of the above named Deceased, through his widow, viz. the Claimant, as children, including the above Son [Adnan Andalib] were minors [at the relevant time]. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 113 | Const. P. 1977/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mst. Kausar Sikandar (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-JAN-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1036-K/2022 The Collector of Customs v. M/s. Noor Traders & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 114 | Cr.Rev 14/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS IST A.D.J BADIN & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-MAY-23 | Yes | It is not prohibited under the law for complainant to become investigation officer, provided it does not prejudice the accused person;but, this practice is not approved by the Courts, as it would compromise his impartiality as an investigation officer to find out the truth. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 115 | Suit 1246/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Sarfaraz Khamisani & others (Plaintiff) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-AUG-23 | No | Massive land grabbing in the City of Karachi by Local Administration. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 116 | II.A. 29/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.Misc.A.S.394/2023 | 2022 | Mian Bux. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-23 | Yes | Section 47 of C.P.C in wrongly invoked by the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 117 | Const. P. 1572/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Hidyatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 118 | Const. P. 69/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 119 | Const. P. 133/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Asif Anwar (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 120 | Const. P. 721/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | 2024 | Muhammad Yaqoob Anjum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author) | ||||
| 121 | Const. P. 2319/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Adam Ali M. Ali Lotia Thr. Naheed Lotia & Another (Petitioner) VS The Standard Chartered Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 122 | R.A (Civil Revision) 222/1993 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1993 | Delhi Mercantile Muslim Co.Operative Hou (Applicant) VS M.Jawaid & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | Conversion of plot void ab initio ??? MLO 34. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 123 | I. A 12/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mazharuddin (Appellant) VS The Manager SME Leasing Ltd (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro | ||||
| 124 | Suit 972/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | DR. HASAN FATIMA JAFERY & ORS (Appellant) VS ROYAL SAUDI CONSULATE KARACHI & ANOTHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-FEB-07 | No | With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 125 | Suit 1150/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1991 | ISLAMIC ESTATES & BUILDERS (Appellant) VS V/S HAJI ALLAH DINO & ORS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-07 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 126 | 2014 CLC 322 | Suit 119/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | MRS. SHABEENA FARHAT (Appellant) VS V/S M/S HIGHWAY HOUSING PROJECT & ORS (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-SEP-19 | Yes | Defendant has neither provided basic amenities in the Housing Scheme nor has produced any document, rules / bye-laws or Agreement between the parties hereto, to substantiate its evidence, that it is not the responsibility of Defendant to provide these basic amenities. the subject Housing Project launched by Defendant was not complete at least till the time of giving evidence till September, 2014; thus, the grievance of Plaintiff is of continuing nature, inter alia, in terms of Section 23 of the Limitation Law. This is a further ground in addition to the above, for determining that the present lis is maintainable. Hence, suit partly decreed. Defendant has neither provided basic amenities in the Housing Scheme nor has produced any document, rules / bye-laws or Agreement between the parties hereto, to substantiate its evidence, that it is not the responsibility of Defendant to provide these basic amenities. the subject Housing Project launched by Defendant was not complete at least till the time of giving evidence till September, 2014; thus, the grievance of Plaintiff is of continuing nature, inter alia, in terms of Section 23 of the Limitation Law. This is a further ground in addition to the above, for determining that the present lis is maintainable. Hence, suit partly decreed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 127 | 2016 YLR 2008, 2017 SBLR Sindh 202 | Suit 871/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1987 | MUHAMMAD HABIB (Plaintiff) VS HUMAYOON LTD. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 128 | 2017 YLR 1551 | Suit 13/1972 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1972 | PREMIER INSURANCE CO. V/S KARACHI SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING (Plaintiff) VS M/S. FAROOQI & CO., Surridge & Beecheano, ARFIN & CO., Abdul Rauf, Samiuddin Sami, H. A. Rahmani (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-MAY-16 | No | Marine Insurance Policy is assignable and consequently an Insurance Company after being subrogated, can sue the tortfeasor in its own name, in terms of Sections 130A read with 135A, of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Foreseeability Causation and but for is that if any reasonable person by applying his ordinary prudence can foresee a loss that can arise from his act(s) then he owes a duty of care to others [claimant] and is liable for the negligent act that has caused damaged to the other person (claimant). Similarly, causation is the linkage between the negligent act [breach of duty of care] that has resulted in causing injury and the but for test if simply put means, that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant is negligence. Subject Marine Insurance Policy being a 'time policy' had covered the risk, while the Vessel in question was dry-docked and subsequently damaged. Marine Insurance Policy is assignable and consequently an Insurance Company after being subrogated, can sue the tortfeasor in its own name, in terms of Sections 130A read with 135A, of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 129 | Suit 462/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Sajid Ali Qureshi (Plaintiff) VS V/S Saleem Dawood. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 130 | 2016 CLC 1326, 2016 CLD 2106 | Suit 749/1989 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1989 | Rice Export Corporation of Pakistan (Plaintiff) VS Mohammad Alam (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-APR-16 | No | In absence of a counter claim, the Defendant being a handling agent of Plaintiff was held liable to render report of the outstanding balance of unaccounted for rice stock lying in go-down, which was in custody of Defendant. Latter status is of bailee of the goods, who is clothe with the same obligations. Import and applicability of Sections 151 and 161 of the Contract Act [1872] has been discussed vis-??-vis res ipsa loquitur [things speak for themselves]. Defendant has been held liable to compensate Plaintiff for the losses it suffered. Import and applicability of Sections 151 and 161 of the Contract Act [1872] has been discussed [things speak for themselves]. Defendant has been held liable to compensate Plaintiff for the losses it suffered. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 131 | Const. P. 2293/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-15 | No | The Petitioner being the landlady has complained that the Lessee/tenant PSO [Respondent] in violation of Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002, particularly 25-12.3, has set up a CNG facility at the existing petrol / service station. Since area of the plot was admittedly more than 1000 square yards, hence the applicable regulation is 25-11.12, where under a CNG facility can be added at an existing petrol station / retail outlet, subject to fulfillment of other requisite formalities, which were complied with. When an Oil Marketing Company appoints a Franchise in respect of a retail outlet / service station, the status of the said Franchise is that of a dealer, that is, a licensee, as envisaged in the Storage, Distribution and Marketing of Petroleum Rules, 1971. Franchisee is a term in vogue in the international Oil and Gas Industry. Different agreements entered into between an Oil Marketing Company as a lessee / tenant of a property, with its Franchisee or other person(s), in particular, for NFR [non-fuel retail] business, is subservient to the main lease agreement being a registered document, entered into between an Oil Marketing Company and owner / lessor of a property. Therefore, for such agreements a written no objection is not necessarily required from landlord / lessor, but only from the concerned government functionary. Different agreements entered into between an Oil Marketing Company as a lessee / tenant of a property, with its Franchisee or other person(s), in particular, for NFR [non-fuel retail] business, is subservient to the main lease agreement being a registered document, entered into between an Oil Marketing Company and owner / lessor of a property. Therefore, for such agreements a written no objection is not necessarily required from landlord / lessor, but only from the concerned government functionary. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 132 | 2017 CLC 1783 | Suit 378/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1987 | Habib Jute Mills Limited (Plaintiff) VS The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 133 | Const. P. 1221/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sht. Kaveta & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 134 | Suit 622/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Habib Ismail (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Syeda Fiza Hashmi & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-AUG-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 135 | Const. P. 638/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 136 | Const. P. 1906/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS SSP T.M Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 137 | Const. P. 1745/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Husna & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 138 | Const. P. 1075/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 139 | Civil Revision 78/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Nazar Muhammad (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 140 | Civil Revision 78/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Nazar Muhammad (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 141 | Suit 1311/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | Shaikh Abdul Jabbar through his Legal Heirs (Plaintiff) VS Irfan Jami Rafique and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 142 | 2019 YLR 380 | Suit 1007/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | Mrs. Uzma Moinuddin (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-JUL-18 | No | When a Government functionary or statutory body was vested with discretionary powers then same were to be exercised in a structured manner---Discretion was to be exercised in a fair, just and reasonable manner. Suit of Plaintiff was decreed except the claim of damages. When a Government functionary or statutory body was vested with discretionary powers then same were to be exercised in a structured manner---Discretion was to be exercised in a fair, just and reasonable manner. Suit of Plaintiff was decreed except the claim of damages. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 143 | Const. P. 1778/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Nazeeran & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP Badin & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 144 | Const. P. 1812/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Zainab & Ors (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 145 | Const. P. 1794/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Dayal Kohli (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 146 | Const. P. 1975/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Ramzana & another (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Shaheed Benazirabad & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 147 | Const. P. 1955/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Mahnaz & another (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 148 | Const. P. 1571/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Sitara & ors. (Petitioner) VS SSP N.Feroze & ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 149 | 2017 PLC CS 625 | Const. P. 1519/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Abdul Ghafar (Applicant) VS Govt of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-APR-16 | Yes | Group Insurance being not part of inheritance (Tarka) and the same is payable to the nominee mentioned therein. Since, it is an admitted position as also supported by all documentary evidence, the present petitioner has been mentioned as nominee in the Nomination Form of State life Insurance Corporation, therefore, petitioner is entitled to amount of group insurance.---Rules 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1963 are interpreted and pensionary benefits were allowed to the petitioner being a nominee. Group Insurance being not part of inheritance (Tarka) and the same is payable to the nominee mentioned therein. Since, it is an admitted position as also supported by all documentary evidence, the present petitioner has been mentioned as nominee in the Nomination Form of State life Insurance Corporation, therefore, petitioner is entitled to amount of group insurance.---Rules 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1963 are interpreted and pensionary benefits were allowed to the petitioner being a nominee. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 150 | M.A. 10/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Muhammad Rafique (Applicant) VS Federal Public Service Commision (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 151 | Suit 1151/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Mrs. Hailey Vincent D'Abreo (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-OCT-17 | No | Rent arrears of School building. S.R.P.O does not apply to the Government buildings. Relief of rent arrears and possession of school building was allowed. Rent arrears of School building. S.R.P.O does not apply to the Government buildings. Relief of rent arrears and possession of school building was allowed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 152 | Suit 2702/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-FEB-17 | No | Under Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. the Court has ample power to even reject the plaint suo moto if it comes to the conclusion that the plaint is hit by any of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. What it appears that defendant No.4-Society after losing their case at different judicial fora, has brought forward the present plaintiff with a claim that already stood adjudged by the aforereferred Judgment of the Appellate Court. Principle of collateral proceeding is a settled rule, under which, a final decision by a competent Court of jurisdiction cannot be upset or interfered with in some parallel or collateral proceeding, as the plaintiff has attempted to do through present suit. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 153 | Suit 2702/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 12-APR-17 | No | Under Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. the Court has ample power to even reject the plaint suo moto if it comes to the conclusion that the plaint is hit by any of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. What it appears that defendant No.4-Society after losing their case at different judicial fora, has brought forward the present plaintiff with a claim that already stood adjudged by the aforereferred Judgment of the Appellate Court. Principle of collateral proceeding is a settled rule, under which, a final decision by a competent Court of jurisdiction cannot be upset or interfered with in some parallel or collateral proceeding, as the plaintiff has attempted to do through present suit. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 154 | Suit 1461/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1998 | A. QUBUBUDDIN KHAN (Plaintiff) VS CHEC MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-APR-19 | Yes | if illegallity is separable from the main award, the same can be modified / corrected by invocking section 15 of the Arbiration Act, 1940. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 155 | Suit 160/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | FAHIM ZAFAR LARI (Plaintiff) VS M/S. SANDAL DYESTUFF IND. LTD. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 156 | Suit 515/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | M/S SOORTY ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ARSHAD SYED (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-FEB-19 | Yes | The Plaintiffs side has not pursued the matter diligently nor has come forward to lead the evidence, inter alia, at least Plaintiff could have examined any of its authorized representative, but he did not. It appears that the Plaintiff has lost interest in the matter. Unnecessarily a case for want of evidence should not be kept pending if the conduct of the parties does not seem to be bona fide, as in the present case, in view of the above discussion | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 157 | Suit 1078/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2002 | INAMULLAH SHAIKH. (Plaintiff) VS M/S.CITY SECURITIES & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-FEB-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 158 | Civil Revision 30/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Iqbal Ahmed (Applicant) VS Muhammad Saleem (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 159 | Const. P. 1653/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Pir Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 160 | Const. P. 1136/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Fayaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 161 | Const. P. 177/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Azhar Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Zareena Bibi (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 162 | Const. P. 677/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS Mst Sultana Begum & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 163 | Const. P. 1750/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Karim Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 164 | Const. P. 1150/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS SSP Jamshoro & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 165 | Const. P. 1579/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Wajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 166 | Const. P. 1724/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shankar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 167 | Civil Revision 266/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Bachal (Applicant) VS Haji Allah Dino and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-16 | No | It is observed though regretfully that a recent trend is, that parties move such application for transfer of the case with an object to prolong the matter, though cogent material is usually not available with the parties, which can justify grant of such transfer application but yet in order to create sensationalism in the matter and to gain sympathy of the Court, having supervisory jurisdiction, even the allegations are leveled against the Presiding Officers/Judicial Officers, before whom the cases are pending adjudication. These applications even otherwise cannot be allowed or granted as a matter of routine as it will lead to a situation where at some point in time, the parties and their Counsel in effect would be choosing Courts and Benches of their choice, which is against the norms of administration of justice. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 168 | Const. P. 1858/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Khan Chand (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 169 | Cr.Misc. 414/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Nazeer Begum (Applicant) VS Illahi Bux Abro & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 170 | Civil Revision 135/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Ayoub (Applicant) VS Mushtaque Ahmed & ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 171 | Const. P. 416/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Maqsood Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst Raheeda & anothers (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 172 | Const. P. 481/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Akhtar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 173 | Const. P. 1742/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 174 | Const. P. 579/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mevo Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 175 | Suit 2651/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Zohaib Shakoor (Plaintiff) VS Mahwish Pirzada & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 06-APR-17 | Yes | With these observations, the third basic ingredient of suffering irreparable loss is not difficult to decide. The forecasting done by Plaintiff while entering into the subject agreement and making investment in relation to that is bound to be frustrated and jeopardized if the injunctive relief is refused. Hence, Plaintiff cannot be compensated in monetary terms; whereas, the Defendants will not suffer any loss as they will be getting their agreed payments, rather now the enhanced payments as per Plaintiff Statement dated 30.01.2017 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 176 | Const. P. 1550/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Salma & another (Petitioner) VS SSP District Sanghar & ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 177 | Const. P. 1621/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Qadir (Petitioner) VS S.S.P, SBA and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 178 | M.A. 3/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Shehar BAno (Applicant) VS Public @ Lodge Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 179 | Execution First Appeal 25/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/s. S.K. Enterprises (Decree Holder) VS Dadabhoy Multi-purpose Coperative Housing Soceity (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-JUN-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 180 | Const. P. 1802/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Vasdev (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 181 | Const. P. 1853/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Ahmed Ali Manzoor (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Railways and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 182 | Suit 1767/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Abdul Sattar Shaikh. (Plaintiff) VS Adeel Zahoor Malik & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-19 | Yes | Violation of proprietary right being a fundamental right should be remedied forthwith. Failure to examine both attesting witnesses of a Sale Agreement, which is a disputed document, is fatal to the case of Defendant, who is basing his claim on the Sale Agreement. Sufficient evidence is brought on record justifying grant of mesne profits. No Village / Goth can exist in a developed Scheme-36. The Passport entries and presumption of genuineness as envisaged in Articles-90, 92 and 129 (e) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, is attracted. Hence, Plaintiff is entitled to mesne profits. The conclusive evidence about the wrongful / illegal possession of Defendants No.1 and 2 of the suit plot does not require an inquiry as mentioned in Order XX, Rule 12, Sub Rule 1 (b). Suit Decreed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 183 | Const. P. 1417/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Abdul Ghafoor Jatoi (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 184 | Civil Revision 111/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1999 | Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) VS Mian Sajjad Ahmed (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 185 | Const. P. 2680/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Munawar Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 186 | Const. P. 84/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Samina Pathan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.A.843/2017 National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others v. Samina Pathan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | ||
| 187 | Const. P. 1464/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Punhal Khan (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-15 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.22-K/2016 Punhal Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 188 | Civil Revision 60/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Fazal Muhammad (Applicant) VS V/S Abdul Majeed & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 189 | Suit 127/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | SURRIYA ZAHEER (Plaintiff) VS MRS.RUQAYA & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 04-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 190 | Const. P. 71/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Miss Rukhsana and others (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.13-K/2018 The Province of Sindh and others v. Mst: Rukhsana Mallah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 191 | I. A 28/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Sajjan Nangore (Appellant) VS Saeed Ahmed Mughul (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 192 | Const. P. 4726/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 193 | Const. P. 3528-A/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Mst Najma Soomro (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Othr (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.8-K/2017 North Sindh Urban Services Corporation Ltd. (NSUSC) v. Mst: Najma Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 194 | Suit 1271/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | HAJI SULEMAN. (Plaintiff) VS HAJI ADAM ALI & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 18-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 195 | Suit 2227/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Allied Bank Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Qamar Hussain Naqvi & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Plaint rejected by invoking legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? and Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Legal maxim ???actio personalis moritur cum persona??? (a personal right of action dies with the person) ??? death extinguishes liability in Tort, is enforceable in Pakistan subject to certain exceptions. First, where a tortfeasor???s estate is benefited by the wrong done, then an action would lie against his representatives, secondly, when already a decree is passed, inter alia, for damages, the legal representatives / heirs of a deceased can continue the litigation, thirdly, if in a service case, the Trial Court has reinstated a petitioner in service, which is overturned by an appellate court and in the intervening period, person dies, his legal heirs can continue the litigation, because if a Higher Forum restores the Order of Trial Court, then the legal heirs would at least be entitled for the service benefits. However, no suit can be filed after the death of a person for his individual acts, against his legal heirs. Plaint rejected by invoking legal maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona and Article 36 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Legal maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona (a personal right of action dies with the person) death extinguishes liability in Tort, is enforceable in Pakistan subject to certain exceptions. First, where a tortfeasors estate is benefited by the wrong done, then an action would lie against his representatives, secondly, when already a decree is passed, inter alia, for damages, the legal representatives / heirs of a deceased can continue the litigation, thirdly, if in a service case, the Trial Court has reinstated a petitioner in service, which is overturned by an appellate court and in the intervening period, person dies, his legal heirs can continue the litigation, because if a Higher Forum restores the Order of Trial Court, then the legal heirs would at least be entitled for the service benefits. However, no suit can be filed after the death of a person for his individual acts, against his legal heirs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 196 | Civil Revision 26/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Iyas & others (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 197 | S.M.A 315/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Ms. Anam Jawed D/o Syed Jawed Naseer (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JAN-20 | No | Matter throughout remained non-contentious. Petition granted. Matter throughout remained non-contentious. Petition granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 198 | Suit 1258/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | DR. ISHAQUE MUHAMMAD SHAH (Plaintiff) VS NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1580/2021 Dr. Ishaque Muhammad Shah (deceased) through L.Rs v. National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | ||
| 199 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 460 | H.C.A 251/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Government of Pakistan & Ors. (Appellant) VS Mian Khalid Manzoor (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 200 | 2021 PLD Sindh Note 108 | H.C.A 241/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Syed Asadul Haq (Appellant) VS M/s.Balochistan Glass Ltd., (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 201 | Suit 1954/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | RAZAK LATIF & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS ACE SECURITIES (PVT) LTD (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 202 | Const. P. 4177/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s I.S Traders (Petitioner) VS FBR and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-SEP-20 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 203 | Const. P. 5581/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) | ||||
| 204 | Const. P. 300/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mian Trust (Petitioner) VS Lyari Expressway And ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-OCT-21 | Yes | It may be noted that in view of the express statutory Bar, inter alia, as provided in Regulation 18-4.1 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002, a land reserved for amenity purpose cannot be converted and utilized for any other purpose. In this regard, a reported Judgment in the case of Mansoor Sharif Hamid vs. Shafique Rehman-2015 SCMR 1172 handed down by Honble Supreme Court, cited by the learned counsel for Petitioner is relevant. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 205 | R.A (Civil Revision) 26/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Iyas & others (Applicant) VS VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | A first question which comes to mind is that Defence Quota must have been based on a criteria that a person or a beneficiary of this Defence Quota must have performed any act of gallantry or bravery for the State of Pakistan. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 206 | Suit 215/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Rafiq (Plaintiff) VS Habib Bank Limited. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 207 | M.A. 8/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Appellant) VS Jahangir Moghul (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-FEB-21 | Yes | As per Section 118 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000, a claim is to be settled within ninety days, subject to certain conditions contained in the above provision. Consequently, finding of learned Tribunal, even on this issue, does not justify any interference. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.445-K/2021 M/s. EFU General Insurace Ltd. v. Jahangir Moghul Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 208 | Const. P. 6524/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Arif Kasmani & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-21 | No | Besides, the survey numbers claimed by the petitioners in this petition do not find mention in the said Deh For VII-B, while the survey numbers mentioned therein are on the name of Circular Railway. The petitioners have also annexed some other documents with this petition in support of their claim but the same also do not bear their names as owners. As per claim of the petitioners the subject land is occupied by respondents No. 6 & 7 and other housing societies, the possession of government or semi-government departments cannot be termed as land grabbing. This petition being devoid of any merit is; therefore, dismissed accordingly, alongwith listed application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 209 | Const. P. 6329/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Suleman (Petitioner) VS Syed Agha Rafiullah and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 210 | Const. P. 4496/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 211 | Suit 1979/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Sulaiman Jafri (Plaintiff) VS United Bank Limited & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 22-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 212 | Const. P. 5849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shafi Muhammad Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar Gadap Malir and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 213 | Criminal Miscelleneous 475/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2021 | Mst.Mumtaz & Ors (Applicant) VS The State & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 214 | Const. P. 1992/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 215 | Cr.Bail 486/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | GHULAMUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-JUL-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 216 | R.A (Civil Revision) 260/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Shah Fahad and an other (Applicant) VS Pir Ghulam Kareem and other (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 217 | R.A (Civil Revision) 243/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: R.A.Nos.244, 245 & 246 of 2010 | 2010 | WAPDA,Thr:Superintending Eng,LBOD (Applicant) VS Land Acquistion Officer LBOD Project Wapda and Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 218 | Cr.Bail 119/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Muhammad Anus (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 219 | Const. P. 3152/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Nasiruddin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-MAR-20 | No | Pensionary benefits were commuted, not entitled to retirement benefits as ordered by Hon'ble Supreme Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 220 | Criminal Miscelleneous 394/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: II.A. S.29/2022 | 2023 | Nasreen Qadri (Applicant) VS Mian Bux (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-23 | Yes | Section 47 of C.P.C in wrongly invoked by the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 221 | Suit 58/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ASGHAR HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) VS ABDUL WAKEEL & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-SEP-23 | Yes | Even if a cause of action there it ceases after cancellation of General Power of Attorney | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 222 | II.A. 32/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Mst. Hamida Iqbal (Appellant) VS Alay Raza & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-APR-24 | Yes | Appellant has failed to prove the Sale Agreement, hence, Receipt issued in pursuance thereof, has no legal value. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 223 | Const. P. 485/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Ch. Ghulam Muhuyuddin (Petitioner) VS Sheikh Abid & Co (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-APR-24 | Yes | Non examining of marginal witnesses-fatal | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 224 | I. A 36/1986 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1986 | L.A.O Nawabshah & others (Appellant) VS Haji Ghulam Nabi thr: L.Rs (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-DEC-23 | Yes | LAND ACQUISITION ACT. No Notice under Section 12. Limitation of six months as mentioned in Section 18 2(b) applies. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 225 | Const. P. 1299/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Abdul Hafeez Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-23 | No | (i) Government of Sindh should immediately appoint a competent and suitable person as Director Finance in Respondent No.4 (University) as required by Section 16 of the above Statute. (2) Education should be a top priority for any Nation or Society and those who are at the helm of the affairs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 226 | Const. P. 83/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | M/s Muhib Ali Sadhayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 227 | Const. P. 1498/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Jahanzaib Khan & Other (Petitioner) VS Secretary Home Dept & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 228 | R.A (Civil Revision) 103/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Noor Ahmed Abrejo (Applicant) VS Tanveer Hussain Shah and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 229 | Const. P. 1952/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 230 | Suit 1347/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | ASADULLAH KHAWAJA (Appellant) VS INVESTMENT CORP. OF PAKISTAN (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 231 | Suit 1640/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | MST. ZUBAIDA KHATOON (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 18-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 232 | Suit 762/1995 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1995 | SHAHZAB GOTH RESIDENTS (Plaintiff) VS GOVT. OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 233 | Suit 287/1990 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1990 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-MAR-16 | No | Suit filed by unauthorized person---Defect in filing proceeding was incurable, hence, suit was dismissed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 234 | 2016 CLC 1063 | Suit 456/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1988 | MUHAMMAD WAJID KHAN. (Plaintiff) VS M/S. ATTOCK CEMENT FAC. PAK. LTD. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-MAR-16 | Yes | A remedy available to a person under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, cannot operate as an absolute bar for seeking a remedy under an ordinary civil jurisdiction by filing a suit. Article 22 and 24 of the Limitation Act, 1908, where under an action to seek compensation for an injury should be instituted within one year, is not applicable in the instant case, for the reason that Plaintiff was made to run from pillar to post for redressal of his grievance but without any success. Plaintiff was lastly operated upon on 15.10.1987 and the suit was filed on 17.11.1987, hence the cause of action and so is the grievance is of continuous nature. Well entrenched principle that if a person has a right to claim compensation for a wrong done to him, he should also have a remedy, has been attracted in the instant case. The Defendants, who are Employer [Client], Contractor and sub-contractors, respectively, were jointly and severally held liable to pay damages for the negligent acts, which caused the Plaintiff serious injury and partial disability of permanent nature. Damages have been awarded by invoking the principle of composite negligence. A remedy available to a person under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, cannot operate as an absolute bar for seeking a remedy under an ordinary civil jurisdiction by filing a suit.The Defendants, who are Employer [Client], Contractor and sub-contractors, respectively, were jointly and severally held liable to pay damages for the negligent acts, which caused the Plaintiff serious injury and partial disability of permanent nature. Damages have been awarded by invoking the principle of composite negligence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 235 | 2017 CLC 1783 | Suit 378/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1987 | Habib Jute Mills Limited (Plaintiff) VS The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-16 | No | Claim under Risk Sale is only tenable when there is an enforceable agreement, that is, a contract as defined in subsection (h) of Section 2 of the Contract Act, 1872, exists between the parties, which is subsequently breached by Defendant. In order to succeed in his claim, the Plaintiff has to show that what measures it took to mitigate its losses before arranging or manufacturing the requisite goods / gunny bags for Defendants, if at all, the Plaintiff was under an impression or understanding that it had been actually awarded the contract. Any prudent businessman or a corporate entity like Plaintiff would have addressed a notice or any other type of communication to the Defendants about the fact that the Plaintiff was about to make preparation or commence production of subject goods / jute bags for supplying them to Defendants within the given time frame. In response to Plaintiff bid, the Defendant by its correspondence reduced the price of gunny bags with an explicit condition that the communication is without any commitment. It is also an admitted position that other requisite formalities in such type of tender were never completed. For instance, Plaintiff was never issued a letter of intent nor the latter submitted any performance bond, which fact has been acknowledged by Plaintiff Admiralty suit dismissed (Being filed by unauthorized person) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 236 | Suit 750/1989 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1989 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-APR-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 237 | 2017 MLD 200 | Const. P. 424/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Kamran Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 238 | Const. P. 2199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-JUN-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 239 | Const. P. 2524/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ali Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-AUG-16 | No | Registered sub-leases in respect of two apartment / units which were non-existent at the time of registration and even till the decision of the instant petition, have been directed to be cancelled by Nazir of Sindh High Court. It is an admitted position that these apartments are to be located at the third floor / story of the building which is not even constructed by the Builder. Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, cannot be construed so as to include an immoveable property, which is not even existing at the time of registration. Property sought to be registered should be of ascertainable description. Similarly, Section 2, subsection (6) of the Registration Act, 1908, wherein an immoveable property is defined, inter alia, means that an immoveable property should be a tangible one and physically exists. Different orders passed by this Court in various constitutional petitions, crux of which is that no registration of a residential or a commercial unit of a multistoried building should be done without a completion plan / occupancy certificate, are the decisions in rem, and thus applicable to the present case as well. One of the main objectives, that can be achieved by looking at the completion plan / occupancy certificate is that it can help in identifying the property sought to be registered and also verify the fact that a multistoried building is Regulations compliant, particularly having structural stability. Rule 135 of the West Pakistan Registration Rules, 1929, is not applicable to the facts of subject constitutional petition as the illegality of sub-leases in question were floating on surface and no further inquiry was required for ascertaining the validity of these sub-leases in question. Even otherwise a rule cannot be interpreted in such a manner that results in perpetuating illegality rather preventing it. Registered sub-leases in respect of two apartment / units which were non-existent at the time of registration and even till the decision of the instant petition, have been directed to be cancelled by Nazir of Sindh High Court. It is an admitted position that these apartments are to be located at the third floor / story of the building which is not even constructed by the Builder. Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, cannot be construed so as to include an immovable property, which is not even existing at the time of registration. Property sought to be registered should be of ascertainable description. Similarly, Section 2, subsection (6) of the Registration Act, 1908, wherein an immovable property is defined, inter alia, means that an immovable property should be a tangible one and physically exists. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 240 | Const. P. 1363/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Azhar Ali Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 241 | Suit 1482/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1998 | Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) VS Deedar Ali Issran (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-DEC-17 | Yes | Sale Deed registered in favour of defendants are valid documents and have been entered by the authorized Attorney (having registered sub-irrevocable general power of attorney which is in pursuance of earlier registered irrevocable general power of attorney given by the legal heirs to one of legal heirs) of the plaintiffs. Suit dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 242 | Const. P. 1158/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Marvi (Petitioner) VS SSP Tando Allahyar & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 243 | Civil Revision 78/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Nazar Muhammad (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 244 | Const. P. 2378/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Shahzad Qamer Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 245 | 2018 PLD Sindh 327 | Suit 750/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Syed Farukh Mazhar (Plaintiff) VS SGS Headquarters and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-APR-17 | Yes | Injunction dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||
| 246 | 2017 MLD 903 | I. A 13/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Nadeem Ali (Appellant) VS Muhammad Yaseen Atta & Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 247 | Const. P. 1562/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shoukat Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 248 | Const. P. 779/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Abdul Jabbar (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 249 | Const. P. 1656/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Nadia and an Other V/S Province Of Sindh and Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 250 | Const. P. 1592/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mian Dad (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 251 | Suit 1353/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Iqbal Umer (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Gymkhana and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-SEP-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 252 | Const. P. 1020/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muneer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS DIGP SBA & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 253 | F.R.A 3/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Saeed Ali Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Zubaida Bai & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 254 | 2019 PLD Sindh 130, 2017 SBLR Sindh 2034 | S.M.A 230/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | In the matter of Letter of Administration of deceased Tahir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Nil (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 02-JUN-17 | Yes | It would be an inconvenience, rather a hardship for the present Petitioner and her siblings to file the proceeding in respect of properties of her deceased father in three different Countries; Pakistan for moveable property, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates for the immoveable properties, particularly, when instant Proceeding is a noncontentious in nature. Proprietary rights are mentioned in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and hence they can neither be ignored nor their significance can be lessened. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 255 | Suit 101/1984 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1984 | Karachi Properties Investment Company (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Properties Investment Company (1974) (Private) Limited and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-JUN-17 | No | Once it has been admitted by the defendant that a huge amount rupees 9.3 Million was paid way back in 1978, which at the time was no doubt enormous amount, then onus on defendants to prove that either they paid back this amount to plaintiff or kept this amount in a separate account and it was never utilized in their other transactions. The Defendants failed to discharge their onus. Suit decreed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 256 | Const. P. 1720/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Amb (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 257 | Const. P. 1586/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Tania & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 258 | Const. P. 1719/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Heero Mal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 259 | Const. P. 1810/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Faheem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 260 | Civil Revision 218/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2000 | Jamshad Ali & Others (Applicant) VS Shamshad Ali & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 261 | Const. P. 1634/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 262 | Const. P. 1271/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS SSP Sanghar & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 263 | Const. P. 1384/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mumtaz @ Mano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 264 | Civil Revision 246/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Party-1 (Applicant) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 265 | Criminal Appeal 98/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Urs Zardari (Appellant) VS The State & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | J.P.490/2018 Mst. Sakina Ramzan v. The State,Crl.A.184/2020 Mst. Sakina Ramzan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted (Crl.M.A.304/2020 application for permission to appaear and argue allowed),Disposed Allowed (Short order/Reasons later) | ||
| 266 | Const. P. 894/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 267 | Const. P. 787/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Hassan & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.117-K/2019 Muhammad Shoaib & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 268 | Const. P. 1062/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Hussain Thaheem (Petitioner) VS SSP Tando Allahyar & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 269 | Const. P. 1519/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Saeeda (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 270 | Const. P. 1245/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ahmed Khan & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 271 | Const. P. 1491/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Suleman & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 272 | Const. P. 1292/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 273 | Suit 1022/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | ABID & ORS (Plaintiff) VS K.B.C.A (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 25-JAN-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 274 | Suit 425/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | RIZWAN AHMED (Plaintiff) VS JAMEEL AHMED & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JAN-19 | No | It is not difficult to conclude that the Suit Property belonging to the deceased father has to be distributed in accordance with the Hanafi Law of Inheritance amongst all the legal heirs, viz. Plaintiff and Defendants. With regard to the stance of contesting Defendants No.1, 2 and 4, that Plaintiff misappropriated some amount and so also the gold ornaments, the same stand disproved. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 275 | Const. P. 1682/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Shela & another (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 276 | Cr.Bail 951/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Hayat (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 277 | Const. P. 681/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Salim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.502-K/2016 The Province of Sindh and others v. Zameer Hussain Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 278 | Suit 889/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1998 | Mirza Abdul Sattar Baig (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Railways and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-SEP-17 | No | Suit for Declaration, Permanent and Mandatory Injunction dismissed with cost. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 279 | Suit 1650/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Mrs. Shamima Alam (Plaintiff) VS Syed Abu Obedah and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-MAR-18 | No | Suit for Declaration, Cancellation, Injunction and Mesne profit. suit decreed except the Mesne profit as same were not proved. However, damages were awarded to the plaintiff for the loss which she suffered on account of demolition of boundary wall of her plot. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 280 | 2018 YLR 1319 | Suit 1367/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Muhammad Iqbal Dawood and another (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Qayoom Hot and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-MAY-17 | Yes | Suit for possession of immovable property and mesne profits---Defendant was inducted by the plaintiffs as care taker to look after the suit land---Defendant/care taker had committed default in payment of money earned from the cultivation to the plaintiffs---Defendant had kept the plaintiffs out of possession of suit property---Plaintiffs were deprived of use and enjoyment of their land---Suit land was leased out to the plaintiffs and period/term of lease had been consumed by the care taker, mesne profits was to be granted to the plaintiffs in circumstances---Care taker was directed to hand over vacant possession of suit land to the plaintiffs free from all encumbrances and claims---Defendant/care-taker should pay mesne profits and contract money to the plaintiffs---Suit was decreed accordingly. Suit for possession of immovable property and mesne profits. Suit Decreed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 281 | Const. P. 520/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Ghous Bux (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 282 | Const. P. 804/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Mst: Shahnaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-NOV-18 | No | Even departmental rules, regulations and instructions, which are non-statutory, have to be adhered to and an employer (Organization) cannot deviate from such rules and instructions, which are in the nature of a contract, binding on the parties. With regard to the Policy matters, it has been held, that even in the absence of vested right, the principle of policy is enforceable. The Respondents have failed to justify the issuance of impugned Officer Order, which ex facie is violative of the policy of the Respondent No.1 contained in Office Memorandum dated 13-04-1988 besides being unreasonable, hence, having no legal sanctity. Consequently, the impugned Office Order is of no consequence and is set aside. Accordingly, petition is accepted and the grant of BPS-15 to the Petitioner is restored with effect from 14-10-1991 and her other service benefits have to be fixed and calculated accordingly. Even departmental rules, regulations and instructions, which are non-statutory, have to be adhered to and an employer (Organization) cannot deviate from such rules and instructions, which are in the nature of a contract, binding on the parties. With regard to the Policy matters, it has been held, that even in the absence of vested right, the principle of policy is enforceable. The Respondents have failed to justify the issuance of impugned Officer Order, which ex facie is violative of the policy of the Respondent No.1 contained in Office Memorandum dated 13-04-1988 besides being unreasonable, hence, having no legal sanctity. Consequently, the impugned Office Order is of no consequence and is set aside. Accordingly, petition is accepted and the grant of BPS-15 to the Petitioner is restored with effect from 14-10-1991 and her other service benefits have to be fixed and calculated accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.1504-K/2018 Water & Power Development Authority and others v. Mst: Shahnaz Akhtar,C.P.265-K/2016 Mazhar Umrao Bundo Khan v. Abdul Haq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 283 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 395 | Suit 534/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | M/s Mehran Associates (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-MAR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 284 | Const. P. 1948/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Khursheed Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.621-K/2016 Commissioner Inland Revenue Larger Tax Payer Unit and others v. Maersk Pak. (Pvt) Ltd.,C.P.594-K/2016 The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others v. Pakistan thr. Secy: Revenue Div. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted | ||
| 285 | Const. P. 179/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 286 | Const. P. 484/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Irtaza@ Shahrukh V/S Province of Sindh & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 287 | Const. P. 1360/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst Rubeena Shar (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 288 | Const. P. 1346/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 289 | Const. P. 2634/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Haji alias Hajjan (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 290 | 2021 MLD 284 | Cr.Rev 73/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2018 | Muhammad Bux Chandio (Applicant) VS Zulfiqar Ali and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JUN-19 | Yes | Investigation under Section 5 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, was not properly done by the Trial Court and the case was decided merely on the reports of Officials without conducting further probe into the veracity of such reports. Impugned order set aside, case remanded. Investigation under Section 5 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, was not properly done by the Trial Court and the case was decided merely on the reports of Officials without conducting further probe into the veracity of such reports. Impugned order set aside, case remanded. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||
| 291 | Criminal Appeal 20/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2018 | Muhammad Sharif and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | Crl.P.1013/2019 Muhammad Sharif S/o Khuda Nazar Pathan & another v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh,Crl.A.183/2022 Muhammad Sharif S/o Khuda Nazar Pathan & another v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending | ||
| 292 | Suit 727/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | IQBAL RASHEED (Plaintiff) VS BABAR MIRZA CHUGTAI & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-JAN-17 | Yes | It is apparent from the record that no arbitration proceeding under the Arbitration Act, 1940 took place. To a query, learned counsel for the plaintiff did not deny this fact that the said arbitration decision which in fact is a Compromise Agreement, which is a result of mediation done by two persons, namely Zaheer H. Minhas, Advocate and Wazeerzada Afridi; the latter has also testified about the authenticity of the above document. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 293 | Election Appeal 7/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Ameen and another (Appellant) VS Jawaid Ali and 5 others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 25-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 294 | Suit 754/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2002 | Abrarul Hassan. (Plaintiff) VS Qazi Muhammad Shakil (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-SEP-19 | No | It has been observed that the suit plot was carved out from an amenity plot and has not been regularized in a proper manner and resultantly, the petition challenging the status of plot was allowed with the directions to Defendant No.10 to take over the plot and maintain its status as an amenity plot. Present Plaintiff was impleaded as Respondent No.1 in the above constitutional petition, thus, Plaintiff is in knowledge of the above Order. In this view of the matter the present proceeding cannot be kept pending anymore. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 295 | Suit 1472/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1998 | Abdul Qadir (Plaintiff) VS Mr.Ameer Zadi& Ors (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 296 | 2021 PLD Sindh Note 88 | Suit 1498/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Feroze Sajan & others (Plaintiff) VS Farzana Sajan (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 297 | Suit 1696/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | BEECHAM PAKISTAN PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) VS ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-APR-20 | Yes | The imposition of impugned ten percent loading (charges) was in effect a levy, which could not have been imposed or recovered except through a valid legislation or other permissible statutory method. This impugned loading of 10% was/is illegal per se and cannot be sustained. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 298 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 571 | H.C.A 428/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Data Stee Pipe Industries Pvt Ltd. & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 299 | Suit 432/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Arif. (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Uzma Jawaid & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 300 | Suit 87/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | MUHAMMAD AZAM MASOOD (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD RAUF & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-JAN-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 301 | H.C.A 347/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Naseem Ahmed Malik & others (Appellant) VS Saeed Iqbal & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.94-K/2021 Naseem Ahmed Malik & others v. Saeed Iqbal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 302 | Suit 1213/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | SYED ZIANUDDIN (Plaintiff) VS M/S. CONTINENTAL LTD. & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 303 | H.C.A 116/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shahzad Noor Muhammad (Appellant) VS Karachi Gymkhana & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 304 | Suit 1316/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | DR. ABDUL RASHID PARACHA (Plaintiff) VS THE DEF. HOUSING AUTHORITY (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-JAN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 305 | Const. P. 5660/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mann-O-Salva Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.1542-K/2021 Mann-O-Salva Agri Pakistan Private Limited v. Chief Secretary Sindh Member/ Secretary LU, Board of Revenue Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 306 | Suit 1152/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | INAYAT MASIH & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS WAQAR AHMED & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-SEP-21 | Yes | Outcome of a criminal proceeding would not adversely affect determination of a Civil liability in a fatal accident suit, inter alia, because standard of proof in both proceedings is different. Family of the deceased is also entitled for damages for "loss of consortium", that is, deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to the death caused by a tortfeasor. Suit decreed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 307 | Const. P. 1502/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Abdul Hameed Khan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Deputy Director NAB & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3241/2021 Abdul Hameed Khan Pathan v. Deputy Director NAB Airport Road, Sukkur and others,C.P.3130/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Abdul Hameed Pathan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 308 | Const. P. 771/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | Capt. S. M . Asllam (Petitioner) VS Karachi Building Control Authority & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | When the application was made in the year 2003, the Resolution No.383 dated 06.01.2004 was in the field. Commercialization charges /fees as applicable in the year 2004 should be charged. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.L.A.1657-K/2021 Captain S.M.Aslam v. Sindh Master Plan Authority Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 309 | Election Appeal 13/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Zunaira Rehman W/o Ali Rehman (Appellant) VS The Election Commission of Pakistan and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-APR-21 | Yes | Once an identity of Seconder has been finally confirmed by NADRA, as discussed above, then difference in signature would not be a substantial defect (in terms of above provisions) and cannot be termed that it is not genuine, in the above given circumstances, resulting in rejection of the Nomination Form of present Appellant. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 310 | I.T.R 201/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: 47/2006, 52/2006 & 442/2006 | 2005 | M/s State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 311 | Const. P. 4882/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Khalid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Court of Minister of Cooperation & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 312 | Suit 2364/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/s. Wadood Engineering Services (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS The Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 313 | Const. P. 4923/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Sindh Games Association (Regd) (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 314 | Const. P. 1893/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 315 | Const. P. 4770/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Muhammad Tauheed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-21 | No | Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 Though the petitioner has not specifically prayed for the implementation of the order of Provincial Ombudsman dated 30th December, 2014 in the instant petition; however, it is an admitted position that the relief claimed by the petitioner through instant petition was already agitated by him before the Provincial Ombudsman, who adjudicated the same vide aforementioned order. We are not impressed with the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner that no efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner for getting the order of Provincial Ombudsman implemented, in view of section 11(5) of The Establishment of the Office of Ombudsmen for the Province of Sindh Act, 1991, which provides that If the Agency concerned does not comply with the recommendations of the Ombudsman or does not give reasons to the satisfaction of the Ombudsman for non-compliance, it shall be treated as "Defiance of Recommendations" and shall be dealt with as hereinafter provided. Section 12 (1) ibid provides that If there is a "Defiance of Recommendations" by the public servant in any Agency with regard to the implementation of a recommendation given by the Ombudsman, the Ombudsman may refer the matter to the Chief Minister who may, in his discretion, direct the Agency to implement the recommendation and inform the Ombudsman accordingly. We are; therefore, of the view that the Provincial Ombudsman is duly empowered to get his order implemented under the aforesaid Act and the remedy which is equally efficacious lies before him in terms of Section 11(5) and 12(1) ibid. We are also of the considered view that the instant petition is not maintainable in law as the same has been filed by a stranger, as it appears that the subject plot was allotted to one Syed Muhammad Tauheed (S. M. Tauheed) while the instant petition has been filed through one Parvaiz Arshad, claiming to be the Attorney of the petitioner. Copy of the General Power of Attorney (GPA) is available as annexure P at page 19 of the memo of petition. It appears from the perusal of the said GPA that it has not been executed by the petitioner but by one Muzammil Syed s/o S. M. Tauheed. No authority has been annexed with the memo of petition to establish that executor/principal of the said GPA, namely, Muzammil Syed has an authority to act on behalf of petitioner Syed Muhammad Tauheed and to appoint Parvaiz Arshad as his Attorney. Moreover, the GPA is though attested by the Attache, Consulate General of Pakistan at Houston (U.S.A.) but the same is not duly charged with duty. Power of Attorney as defined by section 2(21) of the Stamps Act, 1899 is required under section 3 (ibid) to be charged with duty of the amount indicated in the Schedule-I. Under Article 27(c) of the Sindh Schedule Stamp-Duty on Instrument GPA is to be charged with duty of five hundred rupees. Section 35 (ibid) imposes an absolute bar against acting upon the instrument not duly stamped. Hence, Parvaiz Arshad has no legal capacity to act on behalf of petitioner Syed Muhammad Tauheed and to file the instant petition. For the foregoing facts and reasons, this petition being devoid of legal merit is accordingly dismissed in limine, alongwith listed application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 316 | Const. P. 99/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mst. Syeda Sheerin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 317 | Suit 341/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | SHIAKH KHALID SAFDAR (Plaintiff) VS ALI HUSSAIN & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 29-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 318 | Const. P. 2046/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 319 | Criminal Appeal 87/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | RAHIB ALIAS RAHU (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 320 | Cr.Bail 1216/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Arbab (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-DEC-22 | Yes | Conversely, the case law relied upon by Applicants counsel is relevant, wherein bail was granted, inter alia, considering the earlier Court case. Both male members of a family are behind bars who are bread earners. There is no record of earlier conviction. Guilt of accused is yet to be determined in the above circumstances, because at this stage a deeper appreciation of facts cannot be made. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 321 | Suit 229/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Aga Khan Fund For Economic Development S.A. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-JAN-23 | Yes | It is held that provisions of Treaty, which are statutorily recognized in terms of Section 107 of the Income Tax Law, has been given preference and would prevail over the provisions of the Income Tax Law. In Paragraph-9 of the above judgment, question of imposition of Super Tax has been specifically dealt with and the contention of the Department / Suit No.229 of 2017 present Defendants, has been discarded. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 322 | Cr.Bail 799/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Muhammad Sajjan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 323 | Criminal Appeal 121/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Dildar Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-APR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 324 | R.A (Civil Revision) 35/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Saeed Ahmed (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-OCT-23 | Yes | When the entire record is before the Appellate Court, it is not proper to remand the matter to the learned Trial Court in a routine manner, only for resolving trivial issues, which under the law, can be determined by the Appellate Court itself. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 325 | Const. P. 826/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: IInd Appeal No.8 of 2020 & CP.No.S-167 of 2021 | 2022 | Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Muhammad yasin & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-NOV-23 | Yes | APPLICATION OF A JUDICIAL MIND, THAT INCLUDES, ELEMENT OF VISIBLE FAIRNESS IN A DECISION. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 326 | R.A (Civil Revision) 88/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Haji Gohar Khan Thr. Attorney Aziz Ur Rehman (Applicant) VS Gul Faraz Ahmed Murwat and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JAN-24 | No | Both impugned Orders dated 14.09.2021 passed by learned Trial Court have not only dismissed the injunction applications, but also Applications under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of plaint. In the impugned Order, one of the reasons, inter alia, is that the status of Plaintiffs / Applicants is yet to be determined [in the Trial]. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 327 | II.A. 192/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Sumbul Saud W/o Saud Hasan Khan (Appellant) VS Humaira Mateen Thr. Syed Muhammad Mateen & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JAN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 328 | Const. P. 86/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | National Refinery Ltd Thr. Rana Waqar Haider (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Zakir and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-FEB-24 | No | Writ of certiorari. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 329 | Const. P. 1788/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Saadabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-APR-24 | Yes | Notification to supersede the Society, set-aside | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 330 | Const. P. 167/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: IInd Appeal No.8 of 2020 & CP No.S-826 of 2022 | 2021 | Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Yasin & anothers (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-NOV-23 | Yes | APPLICATION OF A JUDICIAL MIND, THAT INCLUDES, ELEMENT OF VISIBLE FAIRNESS IN A DECISION. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 331 | Suit 377/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | ABDUL REHMAN (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | The Impugned Cancellation Letter is set-aside. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 332 | Const. P. 606/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | M/s Muhib Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 333 | Const. P. 2365/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Nighat Rafey Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-FEB-24 | No | Enforcement of Ombudsman order under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan,1973 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 334 | II.A. 83/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Altaf Ali Thr. Attorney Pehlwan Khaskheli (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Sale Deed-matter pending before the Revenue Authority- still plaint cannot be rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 335 | Const. P. 1063/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Mst. Rehana and others (Petitioner) VS Mst. Razia Bibi and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | ||||
| 336 | Const. P. 1555/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Abdul Majeed Babar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 337 | R.A (Civil Revision) 80/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: 81, 82 and 83 of 2019 | 2019 | Mohammad Shabbir (Applicant) VS Muhammad Anwar (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-NOV-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 338 | Const. P. 655/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | Dildar Khan & Ors (Appellant) VS V/S Mst. Fatima Bibi & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-APR-24 | No | Appellant has failed to prove the Sale Agreement, hence, Receipt issued in pursuance thereof, has no legal value. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 339 | 2016 YLR Note 133 | Suit 241/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | MRS. ZAREENA (Plaintiff) VS ISLAM UDDIN & OTHERS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 24-NOV-15 | No | Principle of res judicata as envisaged under Section 11 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, can in appropriate cases be made applicable to the interlocutory orders as well, particularly to forestall the abuse of process of Court, which is apparent from the conduct of the parties. Principle of res judicata as envisaged under Section 11 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, can in appropriate cases be made applicable to the interlocutory orders as well, particularly to forestall the abuse of process of Court, which is apparent from the conduct of the parties. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 340 | 2016 CLC 1326 | Suit 67/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1988 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-FEB-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 341 | 2016 CLC 1326, 2016 SBLR Sindh 967 | Suit 796/1987 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1987 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-MAR-16 | No | No party is allowed to set up a new case in evidence, which is beyond his pleadings. Defendant was appointed as handling agent of Plaintiff in respect of one of latter's go-downs, inter alia, with an express obligation to submit periodical Reserve Stock Account (RSA), which Defendant failed to submit. Defendant being bailee in terms of Section 161 of Contract Act, 1872, was responsible for delivery of goods as well as keeping a proper account for the same. Defendant held liable for the reported short fall in the rice stock and bardanas (wheat / gunny bags). Concept of the Best Evidence Rule' vis-??-vis Article 129, Illustration (g) of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 has also been discussed; that if a party relying upon a best piece of evidence but withholds it while leading evidence, then it will be presumed that under some sinister motive the best piece of evidence was not produced. No party is allowed to set up a new case in evidence, which is beyond his pleadings | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 342 | 2016 YLR 1436 | Execution 25/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Askari Bank Ltd. (Decree Holder) VS A.H. International (Pvt) Ltd. & OTHERS (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-JAN-16 | No | From facts of the case, when it is obvious that subject property though was transferred in favour of a creditor Bank through a registered deed of conveyance, on the basis of which said Bank filed Objection and resisted Execution proceeding, which is the outcome of a compromise decree between another Bank and the judgment debtor. Admittedly, the above transfer of property took place after passing of the above Decree in favour of another Bank [Decree Holder] that too on the basis of a settlement agreement in which the property in question was also part of subject matter. It is held, that the impugned transfer of property was made in clear violation of Section 23 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, therefore, the transfer/conveyance of property in favour of the creditor bank is void and it is not necessary that the registered conveyance deed should first be adjudged as cancelled in terms of Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, but, in the Execution proceeding of the nature this determination can be made. Financial Institutions have to streamline their working and banking transactions should have transparency as they [Financial Institutions] have a fiduciary relationship with their customers. Transfer of property made in clear violation of Section 23 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, is void. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 343 | 2016 SBLR Sindh 594 | Execution 39/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Party-1 (Decree Holder) VS Party-2 (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-DEC-15 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 344 | Suit 646/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1999 | KHAN JAMAL (Plaintiff) VS M/S. LONG LIFE BUILDERS & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-OCT-16 | No | Considering the facts mentioned in the preceding paragraph, I hold that the suit filed by Khan Jamal is not barred by law but he had / has a legal character in terms of Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, for filing the present proceedings [Suit No. 646 of 1999], inter alia, to safeguard his interest in respect of the suit property. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 345 | Const. P. 1822/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Raja Ishtiaque Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 346 | Const. P. 15/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | IInd Additional Sessions Judge Mirpurkhas (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 347 | Adm. Suit 7/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Fair Sea International FZC (Plaintiff) VS MV "MISKI" & Others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-SEP-19 | Yes | Plaintiff has incurred and still incurring expenses for supply of necessaries and other products to Defendant No.1 since or about 09.10.2017 and onwards, when the Defendant No.1 (subject Vessel) is berthed at Karachi Port; therefore, only those documents can be considered, which relate to this period and onwards, or, when the subject Vessel entered territorial waters of Pakistan and not before that. Suit of the Plaintiff is partly decreed to the extent of US Dollars-120,710.6 (US Dollars One Lac Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred and Ten only) and Pak Rupees-22,42,497/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lacs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred Ninety Seven only). Plaintiff has incurred and still incurring expenses for supply of necessaries and other products to Defendant No.1 since or about 09.10.2017 and onwards, when the Defendant No.1 (subject Vessel) is berthed at Karachi Port; therefore, only those documents can be considered, which relate to this period and onwards, or, when the subject Vessel entered territorial waters of Pakistan and not before that. Suit of the Plaintiff is partly decreed to the extent of US Dollars-120,710.6 (US Dollars One Lac Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred and Ten only) and Pak Rupees-22,42,497/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lacs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred Ninety Seven only). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 348 | 2018 CLC Note 39 | Suit 566/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Tariq Rafi. (Plaintiff) VS Topgen Health Care/T.G. Pharma & Ors. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-APR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 349 | Civil Revision 57/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Allah Dino (Applicant) VS Mst: Saleha Begum and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 350 | Civil Revision 9/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Ali Muhammad alias Aloo thr: L.Rs (Applicant) VS Haji Natho (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 351 | Const. P. 1455/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Faiz Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 352 | Civil Revision 155/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 353 | Const. P. 1966/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Asan Dass (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 354 | Const. P. 1999/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Gulab Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 355 | Cr.Bail 979/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Jameel Ahmed Memon (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 356 | Const. P. 1986/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Shareefan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 357 | Const. P. 198/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Abdul Majeed (Applicant) VS NAB and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-MAY-16 | No | Bail Granted--- Petitioner was a Bank official and arrested by National Accountability Bureau on a complaint by manager of a private Bank that he, along with co-accused persons, misused their authority and misappropriated/embezzled funds of bank by illegally opening an imprest account---Validity---Fact that as to how much amount landed in pocket of petitioner as beneficiary was not highlighted. No loss was caused to public exchequer as matter pertained to a private Bank. Company in whose favour purported fake Letters of Guarantee were issued also did not come forward with their claim or complaint. Validity of Letters of Guarantee had expired. Under instruments, no fiscal fraud of cheating was committed. Prosecution had to still prove its case before Trial Court and therefore, case fell within established ingredients for grant of bail, as it was a case of further inquiry in order to prove guilt of petitioner. Bail Granted--- Petitioner was a Bank official and arrested by National Accountability Bureau on a complaint by manager of a private Bank that he, along with co-accused persons, misused their authority and misappropriated/embezzled funds of bank by illegally opening an imprest account---Validity---Fact that as to how much amount landed in pocket of petitioner as beneficiary was not highlighted. No loss was caused to public exchequer as matter pertained to a private Bank. Company in whose favour purported fake Letters of Guarantee were issued also did not come forward with their claim or complaint. Validity of Letters of Guarantee had expired. Under instruments, no fiscal fraud of cheating was committed. Prosecution had to still prove its case before Trial Court and therefore, case fell within established ingredients for grant of bail, as it was a case of further inquiry in order to prove guilt of petitioner. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 358 | Const. P. 1733/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Dost Ali & another (Petitioner) VS SSP Umerkot & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 359 | Const. P. 1263/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Maryam Khatoon (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 360 | Const. P. 1716/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Jamal ud Din (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 361 | Suit 1661/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Dewan Steel Mills and others (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 362 | 2018 PTD 668 | Suit 1661/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Dewan Steel Mills and others (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUN-17 | Yes | Ant- Dumping Case: Concept of dumping explained. Section 31 Anti Dumping Act, 2015, explained. NTC not required to first give an independent decision or determination before delivering its preliminary determination. Concession of parties cannot confer jurisdiction on a Court. Suit barred in view of Section 70 of the Anti Dumping Act, 2015. Confidentiality issue to be considered by Appellate Forum. Information and database about prices of a product obtained from Customs Department, not confidential, unless otherwise barred by any statute or rule. Decisions of National Tariff Commission should not be resulting in creating directly or indirectly any monopoly or cartel of any business. Claim of confidentiality should be decided on the touchstone of Article 19A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and Freedom of Information Ordinance, 2002. Role of National Tariff Commission is very significant vis-a-vis CPEC. NTC to ensure that local industry is not destroyed. Time enlarged for filing Appeal before the Appellate Authority. Case referred to National Tariff Commission. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 363 | 2018 MLD 1099 | Suit 2702/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-APR-17 | No | Under Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. the Court has ample power to even reject the plaint suo moto if it comes to the conclusion that the plaint is hit by any of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. What it appears that defendant No.4-Society after losing their case at different judicial fora, has brought forward the present plaintiff with a claim that already stood adjudged by the aforereferred Judgment of the Appellate Court. Principle of collateral proceeding is a settled rule, under which, a final decision by a competent Court of jurisdiction cannot be upset or interfered with in some parallel or collateral proceeding, as the plaintiff has attempted to do through present suit. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 364 | Const. P. 1007/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Muhammad Mehboob (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAY-18 | Yes | The prohibitions contained in Sections 3 and 4 and the punishments provided therein for their contravention clearly show that the persons who do not fall within the exemptions provided in Section 5 or who knowingly and willfully show disrespect for the persons fasting and/or for the holy month of Ramazan, are to be dealt with strictly and punished under Sections 3 and 4, as the case may be. Another important aspect is that no person should be allowed to take advantage of the exemptions provided in Section 5 or to exploit the same if he is not entitled to the same.Since the hotels and restaurants of the petitioners are admittedly not situated within the premises of any of the places enumerated in Section 5 of the Ordinance, they are not certainly entitled to seek exemption under the said Section, and as such all these petitions are liable to be dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 365 | Const. P. 1852/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Piyar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 366 | Const. P. 1558/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Malook (Petitioner) VS Jameel Ahmed & ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 367 | Const. P. 1574/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Aneesa Begum (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 368 | Const. P. 1590/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Hamid Ali & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 369 | Const. P. 4725/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Mansoor Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-AUG-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.662-K/2016 Mst. Fareeda Zafar and others v. Mansoor Ashraf and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 370 | I. A 35/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Ahmed Khan & Ors (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 371 | Const. P. 1775/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 372 | Const. P. 1276/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Kirshan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 373 | Const. P. 1353/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sht. Vidya Bai (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 374 | Const. P. 1714/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mashooq Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 375 | Civil Revision 225/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2000 | Abdul Haq (Applicant) VS Mir Ali Nawaz & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 376 | Const. P. 1583/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Mustafa & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 377 | Const. P. 1855/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Hakim Zadi & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 378 | M.A. 9/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2001 | Arbab Khatoon (Applicant) VS Mst Sakina & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 379 | Const. P. 1961/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Ameeran & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 380 | S.M.A 202/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 13-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 381 | Suit 1059/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Ali (Plaintiff) VS Government of Sindh & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-SEP-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 382 | Adm. Suit 3/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | GLANDER INTERNATIONAL BUNKERING DMCC (Plaintiff) VS M.V. MISKI AND 2 OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-SEP-19 | Yes | It is an established Rule that pleadings themselves cannot be considered as evidence unless the Plaintiff or Defendant, as the case may be, enters the witness Box and lead the evidence in support of one's claim or defence. Plaintiff has not come forward to testify and discharge the burden of proof about its claim. The reported decision of Hon???ble Supreme Court handed down in the case of Rana Tanveer Khan v. Naseer Khan-2015 SCMR page-1401, is relevant. Since Plaintiff has failed to prove the allegations against the Defendants, thus the Plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. Suit dismissed. It is an established Rule that pleadings themselves cannot be considered as evidence unless the Plaintiff or Defendant, as the case may be, enters the witness Box and lead the evidence in support of one's claim or defence. Plaintiff has not come forward to testify and discharge the burden of proof about its claim. The reported decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court handed down in the case of Rana Tanveer Khan v. Naseer Khan-2015 SCMR page-1401, is relevant. Since Plaintiff has failed to prove the allegations against the Defendants, thus the Plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. Suit dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 383 | Suit 1526/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Creek Marina Private Limited (Plaintiff) VS Guangdong Overseas Construction Group Company Limited and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 384 | Const. P. 1633/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Khalida and another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 385 | Civil Revision 244/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | WAPDA,Thr:Superintendin Eng,LBOD(WAPDA) (Applicant) VS Land Acquistion Officer LBOD Project (WAPDA)&Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 386 | Adm. Suit 6/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | FAREED AHMED KHAN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS M.V. MISKI & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 387 | Suit 1090/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1991 | Sunray Corporation (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Total Parco Marketing Ltd (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-OCT-16 | Yes | The Defendant in breach of its contractual obligation did not purchase the lubricants product from plaintiff. Suit decreed by awarding damages with markup rate of 12% from the date of institution of the suit till realization amount. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 388 | Const. P. 1533/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Allah Wasaya (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 389 | Suit 1744/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Hanif Ahmed and another (Plaintiff) VS Sindh Building Control Authority and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-FEB-18 | No | Application U/O. XXXIX, R. 1 & 2 C.P.C dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 390 | Civil Revision 42/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Pir Ghulam Kareem Shah (Applicant) VS Ali Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 391 | Election Appeal 26/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Mumtaz Ali (Appellant) VS Bakhshan Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 392 | Const. P. 2457/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | kAREEM bUX AND OTHERS (Petitioner) VS po sINDH (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-MAR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 393 | Const. P. 346/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-APR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1475-K/2022 Sukkur Municipal Corporation through its Municipal Commissioner v. Ali Mardan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 394 | Const. P. 377/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 395 | Const. P. 2464700/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Muhabat Khan alias Dado Mahar (Petitioner) VS EDO Gambat (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 396 | Const. P. 4372/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Hafiz Mustafa Kamal Siyal & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 397 | Civil Tran 11/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Dinal and others Mst. Zareena and others (Applicant) VS Mst. Zareena and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 398 | Const. P. 1949/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Abdul Karim (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 399 | 2018 YLR 1053 | Suit 327/1966 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1966 | Raza Hussain and others (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Khan and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-AUG-17 | Yes | Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Compromise on behalf of defendants---Scope---Transferee of property could not confer upon a transferor a better title than he himself possessed---Defendants had no lawful authority, right or interest at the relevant time in the subject property when they entered into a compromise with the plaintiffs---Neither any appeal was preferred against the partition order nor authenticity or validity of the same was challenged by any of the parties---Possession of suit property was wrongly handed over to the plaintiffs by the Nazir of the Court---Nazir of the Court was directed to take appropriate measures to hand over the possession of suit land to its claimants. Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell. Directions to the Nazir to handover the possession of suit land to its claimants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 400 | Const. P. 1422/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Salma (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 401 | Const. P. 2297/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 402 | Const. P. 1506/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Haq Nawaz (Petitioner) VS PO (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 403 | Const. P. 1414/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst. Hajani (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 404 | Civil Revision 153/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Ghulam Hussain (Applicant) VS Abdullah and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 405 | Const. P. 893/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Ghulam Murtaza and 26 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 406 | 2019 CLD 185 | Suit 1625/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s. Fine Enterprises Traders.. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Constellation Co-Op. H.S. Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 15-AUG-18 | Yes | Suit by a partner on behalf of firm---Maintainability---Partner was not required to have an authority from other partners before initiating any action by way of a suit---No adverse consequence had been mentioned in the provision of O. XXX, R. 1, C.P.C. if compliance was not made---Partner could neither relinquish a claim of the firm nor withdraw a suit or proceeding without the authorization or endorsement of the other partners of a firm. Suit by a partner on behalf of firm---Maintainability---Partner was not required to have an authority from other partners before initiating any action by way of a suit---No adverse consequence had been mentioned in the provision of O. XXX, R. 1, C.P.C. if compliance was not made---Partner could neither relinquish a claim of the firm nor withdraw a suit or proceeding without the authorization or endorsement of the other partners of a firm. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||
| 407 | Suit 862/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | PERVAIZ HUSSAIN & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS MIAN KHURRAM RASOOL (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-JUL-19 | Yes | The Defendant issues / has issued the cheques in favour of Plaintiffs, but the same upon presentation could not be encashed because of closure of account, then this conduct on the part of Defendant is a mala fide one and is done with a dishonest intention to defraud the Plaintiffs. Hence, suit is decreed. The Defendant issues / has issued the cheques in favour of Plaintiffs, but the same upon presentation could not be encashed because of closure of account, then this conduct on the part of Defendant is a mala fide one and is done with a dishonest intention to defraud the Plaintiffs. Hence, suit is decreed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 408 | Cr.Bail 286/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Cr. Muzafar Ghanghro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JUN-19 | Yes | Case falling within the ambit of sick person as mentioned in the first proviso of Section 497 Cr.P.C., Applicant is entitled to the concession of bail. Challan submitted. Applicant was not required for further investigation. In order to prove the guilt of the Applicant and to connect him with the commission of the offense, matter requires further inquiry, which can only be done after conclusion of trial. Bail granted. Case falling within the ambit of sick person as mentioned in the first proviso of Section 497 Cr.P.C., Applicant is entitled to the concession of bail. Challan submitted. Applicant was not required for further investigation. In order to prove the guilt of the Applicant and to connect him with the commission of the offense, matter requires further inquiry, which can only be done after conclusion of trial. Bail granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 409 | Suit 1315/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 410 | Adm. Suit 1/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | M/S. COMMERCIAL BANK INT (Plaintiff) VS M.V. MISKI AN OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-OCT-19 | Yes | There cannot be two decisions with regard to same loan transaction / finance facility; that is, one passed in the foreign jurisdiction as above and the other one in the present proceeding. the Judgment given by the Court of Sharjah (UAE) in the Case filed by present Plaintiff against Defendant No.2, can be executed through the present proceeding. Therefore, the Judgment of Sharjah Court in a sum of AED 5723557 (Five Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Seven Dirhams) together with 5% (five percent) of the legal interest, can be executed through the present proceeding. There cannot be two decisions with regard to same loan transaction / finance facility; that is, one passed in the foreign jurisdiction as above and the other one in the present proceeding. the Judgment given by the Court of Sharjah (UAE) in the Case filed by present Plaintiff against Defendant No.2, can be executed through the present proceeding. Therefore, the Judgment of Sharjah Court in a sum of AED 5723557 (Five Million Seven Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Seven Dirhams) together with 5% (five percent) of the legal interest, can be executed through the present proceeding | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 411 | 2020 MLD 257 | Suit 725/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mazhar Ali. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Pak Avenue Owners/Occup. Welf. Ass. & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-OCT-19 | Yes | The undisputed record and the evidence adduced by the parties, concludes that Defendants and particularly Defendant No.1 was responsible for causing the death of the deceased Mazhar Ali, because despite collecting enormous amounts towards maintenance charges each month from different offices/Units in the said Building, the elevators / lifts were not maintained properly. Negligence rather callousness of Defendant No.1 in particular, is also proved from the undisputed fact that no remedial measures were taken even after another incident preceding the one of the present lis, in which a person was injured due to fault in one of the lifts (in the said Building). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||
| 412 | Const. P. 3088/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mukhatiar Ali (Petitioner) VS Shahdad Ali and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.L.A.447-K/2020 Mukhtiar Ali v. Shahdad Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 413 | Suit 1438/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Sabir Hussain Warsi. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Rani (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-JAN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 414 | Election Appeal 12/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Hasnain Ali Chohan S/o Mumtaz Ahmed (Appellant) VS Miftah Ismail Ahmed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-APR-21 | Yes | To a specific query, Appellant replied, which is supported by the record, that till date Respondent No.1 has not been convicted in the NAB Reference pending against him; but his assets have been frozen by the NAB (National Accountability Bureau), which shows that he is involved in corrupt and illegal practice. This argument is not acceptable as there is no supporting record, including any judicial order. No information or material has been brought on record to prima facie show that Respondent No.1 is a defaulter of loans, taxes and Government dues, as envisaged in sub-section (4) of Section 63 of the Elections Law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 415 | Const. P. 623/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Haji Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh through Home Secretary, Karachi & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 416 | Suit 133/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1998 | MRS. PARVEEN MEHMOOD. (Plaintiff) VS THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC CO. LT (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | The delay in filing the claim in not of few days but it is of eleven months regarding which the Plaintiff had not led any positive evidence to justify that why the above delay beyond prescribed period should be condoned, or, the said delay in filing this Lis, is not hit by Rule 29. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 417 | Const. P. 2587/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Iltaf Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3387/2021 Iltaf Hussain and another v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 418 | Suit 1657/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | TCB AVIATION (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS SRI LANKAN AIRLINES LTD THR. COUNTRY MANAGER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 17-MAY-21 | Yes | The Court can take further proceeding, inter alia, as provided under Section 3 of the above Act, 2011, that is, invoking Civil Procedure Code. It must be clarified that grant of interim relief is not prohibited under the scheme of Arbitration Act, 2011, inter alia, in view of Section 3 thereof, but, in exceptional circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 419 | Const. P. 3310/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sohail Haroon (Petitioner) VS Saleem Memon and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 420 | Const. P. 1115/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 421 | Const. P. 849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Barkat Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-AUG-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.L.A.827/2023 Abdul Aziz v. Mustafa Saeed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Judgment Reserved | ||
| 422 | Const. P. 1516/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Asjad Sattar Adv (Petitioner) VS DG SBCA and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-AUG-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 423 | Const. P. 5604/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | West Wharf Warehouse Co. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.6339/2021 Karachi Port Trust Estate Department, Karachi v. West Wharf Warehouse Company (Pvt) Limited, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 424 | Suit 28/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Isphanyar M. Bhandara.. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Goshi M. Bhandara & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 425 | Suit 749/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | DR. NAFEES ZUBAIR (Plaintiff) VS MRS. SAEEDA BANO & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-DEC-22 | Yes | Since the Defendant No.1 has accepted a substantial amount of rupees six million as part payment towards sale price, and never returned the same till the above Order was passed, which means for almost seven years the same was beneficially utilized by her, therefore, Defendant No.2 (Purchaser) despite the afore discussed lacuna in her claim for damages, is entitled for monetary relief, in view of the judicial consensus, that by invoking Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, where the circumstances so permit, monetary compensation can be given, while refusing the specific performance to plaintiff | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 426 | Const. P. 1994/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Shah Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 427 | Const. P. 812/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mst. Uzma (Petitioner) VS Faheem Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JUN-22 | No | Proper course could and should have been that if the learned Court has observed that onus to prove this claim was on Petitioner, then she should have been given ample opportunity to lead the evidence in this regard. Both the impugned decisions show that on this particular point Petitioner could not lead the evidence as required. Record is silent that whether proper opportunity was given to the Petitioner and she failed to bring plausible/tangible evidence on record in support of her claim concerning the gold ornaments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 428 | Const. P. 2053/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer Local Govt: Sanghar & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 429 | S.M.A 440/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Shamsuddin s/o Aboobakar (Petitioner) VS Yasin Hasan (Deceased) (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-AUG-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 430 | Cr.Bail 45/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Muhammad Iqbal Abbasi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUL-02 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 431 | Const. P. 2059/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Saifal (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 432 | Const. P. 2655/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Anwar Naeem Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive Officer (HESCO) & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-MAR-20 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 433 | Suit 538/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | UNIVERSAL LOGISTICS (PVT.) LTD (Plaintiff) VS NATIONAL DATABASE AND REGISTRATION AUTH & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 28-FEB-23 | Yes | Prima facie case even was there at the start of this Lis, in favour of Plaintiff together with the other two ingredients; balance of convenience and irreparable loss; these factors with the passage of time have diminished. Conversely, now it is Defendant No. 1 being a Procuring Agency is facing inconvenience and hardship because its Tender Process is incomplete, in which everyone is allowed to participate including Plaintiff. The interim arrangement with Pakistan Post Office cannot continue for an indefinite period as it would question the transparency of the Tender Process itself of the Procuring Agency, besides, over all governance | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 434 | R.A (Civil Revision) 38/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Mansoor Ali (Applicant) VS Amir Bux (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-16 | No | It is a settled principle that the applicant/plaintiff has to prove his case on its own merits. The contents of the plaint/pleadings do not carry weight unless they are proved by leading evidence and for which the applicant/plaintiff has to enter the witness box and lead the evidence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 435 | Cr.Bail 136/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | SHAH NAWAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Complainant) | S.B. | Order | 30-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 436 | Criminal Miscelleneous 689/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Nazeer Ahmed (Applicant) VS S.H.O, P.S Islamkot Distt. Tharparkar and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-APR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 437 | R.A (Civil Revision) 130/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Muhammad Saleh and another (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ramzan and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JAN-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 438 | Suit 434/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Imtiaz Ahmed & another. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Hussain (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-NOV-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 439 | Const. P. 1001/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Syed Muhammad Faisal & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-23 | No | Trivial administrative issues concerning Institutes and Hospitals are brought before Courts for decision, which squarely fall within the domain of the Executive, but due to its continuous inaction to the extent of negligence, Courts have to intervene, in order to save these Institutions and above all the public interest. Education and Health should be given top priority. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | C.P.2990/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Govt of Sindh, Karachi and others v. Syed Muhammad Faisal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 440 | Suit 323/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | MST.RASHEEDA BANO & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS MST.KHURSHEED BEGUM & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 22-MAR-24 | Yes | Reauction refused. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 441 | Const. P. 1385/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P.No.D-1242 of 2023 | 2023 | Mumtaz Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-23 | Yes | Human Capital Development is the need of the hour. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 442 | R.A (Civil Revision) 89/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Aziz ur Rehman S/o Gul Rehman (Applicant) VS Gul Faraz Ahmed Murwat and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JAN-24 | No | Both impugned Orders dated 14.09.2021 passed by learned Trial Court have not only dismissed the injunction applications, but also Applications under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of plaint. In the impugned Order, one of the reasons, inter alia, is that the status of Plaintiffs / Applicants is yet to be determined [in the Trial] | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 443 | Const. P. 1955/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Israr Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Otehrs (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-JAN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio(Author) | ||||
| 444 | J.M 33/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mrs. Samar Rais. (Applicant) VS Askari Bank Limited & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 445 | Suit 662/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | SYED ABID ALI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 22-AUG-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 446 | J.M 66/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1999 | MST. ZULEKHA BIBI & ORS (Applicant) VS MST. HAFIZA AHMED & ORS. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-SEP-24 | Yes | No relief can be granted to the non-existent person. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 447 | Const. P. 589/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Ghulam Hydder (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 448 | Const. P. 1768/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Mohamnmad Aslam Khan Rajput (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 449 | Const. P. 1000/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/s. Shabbir Tiles & Ceramics Limited (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Unions Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Trans-Provincial status. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 450 | Suit 336/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | JAVED AKHTAR ARBAB (Plaintiff) VS FEDERAT (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 20-SEP-24 | Yes | Injunction Application against the Transfer Order is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 451 | Judicial Companies Misc. 11/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | M/S LIVEN PHARMACEUTICALS (PVT) LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) VS M/s. Landmark Spining Industries Limited (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-SEP-24 | Yes | Amalgamation Scheme approved. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 452 | R.A (Civil Revision) 53/1990 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1990 | Mohammad Ibrahim (Applicant) VS Mst.Zubeda Begum & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-JUN-24 | Yes | PTD Valid - Acquiescence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 453 | Suit 1500/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | VIRGOZ OILS & FATS (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS FAISAL EXPORTS (PVT) LTD. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-AUG-24 | Yes | Suit for enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award, is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 454 | Suit 972/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | DR. HASAN FATIMA JAFERY & ORS (Appellant) VS ROYAL SAUDI CONSULATE KARACHI & ANOTHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights. With the passage of time, the principle governing immunity has undergone a change. National Courts in different jurisdictions, specially where there exists constitutional dispensation, have generally narrowed down the scope of immunity, whether constitutional, diplomatic or any other type of immunity. One of the reasons for adopting such view, while interpreting the law or clauses relating to immunity is that the concept of immunity is to be balanced with the accountability and those rights guaranteed as fundamental and human rights. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 455 | Const. P. 340/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Vth A.D.J Hyd & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-AUG-15 | No | The discretion exercised by the Appellate Court in awarding limited maintenance for the iddat period appears to be justified as the iddat period is the time provided in shariah in which a woman is not allowed to exercise her right of living as wife of somebody else in accordance with law. Therefore, maintenance of wife during her iddat on account of khula / divorce as the case may be is about the time in which she has already performed her obligation as wedded wife of the petitioner. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 456 | 2017 CLC 1387 | Suit 1052/1988 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1988 | Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd., (TCP) (Plaintiff) VS Haji Khuda Bux Amir Umar (Pvt) Ltd (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 457 | 2017 PLC CS 80 | Const. P. 2105/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mst. Bhalan (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-MAY-16 | No | The petition is completely silent about the fact that what steps the petitioner took to get her official service record corrected, while she was in service. This apparent contradiction about date of birth is a pure question of factual controversy and cannot be resolved in a writ jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Even otherwise, issue at hand does not fall within the ambit of writ jurisdiction as it is barred under Article 212 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as, inter alia, the subject dispute is about an order of retirement from service passed by the departmental authority, as envisaged in Section 2(a) of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1973, and can be otherwise assailed before Service Tribunal in accordance with law. Correction in date of birth---The petition is completely silent about the fact that what steps the petitioner took to get her official service record corrected, while she was in service. This apparent contradiction about date of birth is a pure question of factual controversy and cannot be resolved in a writ jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.---Even otherwise, issue at hand does not fall within the ambit of writ jurisdiction as it is barred under Article 212 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as, inter alia, the subject dispute is about an order of retirement from service passed by the departmental authority, as envisaged in Section 2(a) of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1973, and can be otherwise assailed before Service Tribunal in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 458 | Const. P. 1416/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Faqeer Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 459 | Const. P. 1471/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Sughra Bibi (Petitioner) VS DIGP SBA & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 460 | Const. P. 714/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Javed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-SEP-17 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 461 | Const. P. 726/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Sheela & anothers (Petitioner) VS Prov of sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Be that as it may, it appears that the petitioners have lost interest to pursue the matter as purpose of filing the petition has been achieved. Official respondents have undertaken neither to cause any harassment to the petitioners nor patronize any of the private respondents. With these observations, this petition stands disposed of | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 462 | Const. P. 581/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ranjho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 463 | Civil Revision 72/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Muhammad Ramzan andothers (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 464 | Const. P. 997/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 465 | Const. P. 1553/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Marriam & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP Umerkot & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 466 | R.A (Civil Revision) 60/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Fazal Muhammad (Appellant) VS Abdul Majeed & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 467 | Const. P. 1631/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Punhoon (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 468 | 2018 YLR 713 | Suit 627/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mr. Hamood Mehmood (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shabana Ishaque and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-NOV-17 | No | Suit for specific performance of contract---Ad-interim injunction subject to deposit of balance sale consideration---Object---Non-deposit of balance sale consideration---Effect---Object for giving direction to deposit the balance sale consideration in the Court was to see the bona fides of a purchaser---Injunction in such case was granted so that the corpus of dispute remained intact and ultimately could be transferred to a successful party in litigation---Balance sale consideration was to be invested in some profit bearing scheme enabling the vendor/defendant to get an increased amount as sale consideration---If purchaser/plaintiff was unsuccessful then deposited amount was to be returned back to him with accruals in order to safeguard his interest---Non-deposit of sale consideration would raise adverse presumption against plaintiff that he was not serious in performing his agreed part of contract disentitling him to decree for specific performance---Party seeking remedy of specific performance was to apply to the Court for depositing the balance amount---Any contumacious/ omission in that regard would entail in dismissal of suit or decretal of the same if it was filed by the other side---Plaintiff, in the present case, enjoyed the ad-interim injunctive relief but despite giving ample opportunities and chances to comply with the orders of Court he kept on defying all such directions/orders---One who sought equity must also do equity---Suit was dismissed in circumstances. Plaintiff, in the present case, enjoyed the ad-interim injunctive relief but despite giving ample opportunities and chances to comply with the orders of Court he kept on defying all such directions/orders---One who sought equity must also do equity---Suit was dismissed in circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 469 | 2018 YLR 1557 | H.C.A 47/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Haroon Zia Malik (Appellant) VS Mst. Fariha Razzak and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-NOV-17 | Yes | Plaintiff was owner of suit property who voluntarily gifted the same to the donee-wife---Trial Court had correctly appraised the evidence while recording his findings---Impugned gift deed was not a forged and fabricated document but same had been signed by the donor---Suit property had been gifted in favour of defendant who was wife of donor at the relevant time---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession which were present in the case---Possession of suit property was already with the donee which till date continued to be with her---If husband had made a gift of anything to his wife or vice-versa then it could not be retracted---Transaction in question was not a financial one but it was gift of which a reciprocal financial obligation was not a consideration---Provisions of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 were not applicable in the matter of gift---Gift did not require a compulsory registration---Donor did not suffer any mental distress at the hand of donee---Impugned judgment did not suffer from any infirmity or illegality---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Plaintiff was owner of suit property who voluntarily gifted the same to the donee-wife---Trial Court had correctly appraised the evidence while recording his findings---Impugned gift deed was not a forged and fabricated document but same had been signed by the donor---Suit property had been gifted in favour of defendant who was wife of donor at the relevant time---Ingredients of gift were offer, acceptance and delivery of possession which were present in the case---Possession of suit property was already with the donee which till date continued to be with her---If husband had made a gift of anything to his wife or vice-versa then it could not be retracted---Transaction in question was not a financial one but it was gift of which a reciprocal financial obligation was not a consideration---Provisions of Arts. 17 & 79 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 were not applicable in the matter of gift---Gift did not require a compulsory registration---Donor did not suffer any mental distress at the hand of donee---Impugned judgment did not suffer from any infirmity or illegality---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.96/2018 Haroon Zia Malik v. Mst. Fariha Razzak and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 470 | 2018 YLR 1557 | H.C.A 48/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Haroon Zia Malik (Appellant) VS Mst. Fariha Razzak (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.95/2018 Haroon Zia Malik v. Mst. Fariha Razzak Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 471 | Suit 1408/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mirza Naseem Baig.. (Plaintiff) VS K.E.S.C. Employees Co-Op.H.S. Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 472 | Adm. Suit 2/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | HAYS TRADING & SHIPPING (Plaintiff) VS M.V. MISKI (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 473 | Const. P. 1074/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Noro (Petitioner) VS IG of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 474 | Civil Revision 94/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1991 | Ghulam Muhammad (Applicant) VS Karim Bux (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 475 | Const. P. 891/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 476 | Const. P. 1684/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Khalid Hussain (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 477 | Const. P. 1781/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Partab Rai & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP Umerkot & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 478 | Const. P. 1628/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 479 | Const. P. 439/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Adnan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 480 | Const. P. 1652/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Bakhtawer and an Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 481 | Civil Revision 356/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Mubarak Cooperative Credit Society & another (Applicant) VS Ismail S/o Imam Dino Khowaja (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 482 | Const. P. 1423/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Gul Bahar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 483 | Const. P. 1895/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Jian (Petitioner) VS DIG Police Dist Mirpurkhas & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.744-K/2019 M/s Star Electronics v. Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-IV Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 484 | Const. P. 1611/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Qasim and others (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 485 | Const. P. 1632/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Najma and an Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 486 | Cr.Bail 902/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Faqeer Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 487 | Const. P. 1709/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Arshee & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP Hyd & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 488 | Const. P. 1761/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Jhaman Das (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 489 | Const. P. 1725/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Moure & another (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 490 | Cr.Misc. 419/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sh. Rubeena (Applicant) VS SSP Dist. Naoshero Feroz & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 491 | I. A 44/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | M/s CIE Computers through its Manager Aqeeel Hassan Khan & 2 others (Appellant) VS NIB Bank Limited Banking Company through its Manager Mr. Sajid A. Shaikh (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 492 | Suit 209/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | MOHSIN ALI (Plaintiff) VS SAFDAR HUSSAIN BIRLAS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-MAR-19 | Yes | Suit for Specific Performance should have been filed and no possession can be given without seeking a Declaration in respect of title, because Agreement of Sale cannot be considered as a title / ownership document. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 493 | Const. P. 1904/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Bhooro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 494 | Const. P. 227/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Zubair Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 495 | Const. P. 1817/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Nazia Hassan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 496 | Civil Revision 213/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Mst Shakeela (Applicant) VS Muhammad Saleem & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 497 | Const. P. 482/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Akram Bajwa (Petitioner) VS SSP Tando Allahyar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 498 | Const. P. 1038/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Reshma (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 499 | Const. P. 1518/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Fazeelan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 500 | Const. P. 438/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 501 | Const. P. 1156/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Rukhsana & another (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Naseem Nagar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 502 | Const. P. 1746/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sajjan (Petitioner) VS DIG Hyd & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 503 | Const. P. 1126/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Khairan (Petitioner) VS D.I.G, Hyd and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 504 | Civil Revision 134/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Zameer Hussain (Applicant) VS Mst. Sonan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 505 | Suit 1546/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Trustees of the Port of Karachi (Plaintiff) VS Syed Fazal Mahmood Shah (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 506 | Const. P. 416/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 507 | Suit 1079/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | MAKRAN COMM. &ORS (Plaintiff) VS CHINA MOBILE PAK (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-MAY-19 | No | In my considered view, the rule laid down in the two well-known Judgments of the Honourable Supreme Court, that is, Abdul Majeed Case and Ishaque Case [P L D 1996 Supreme Court page-737], applies to the present case. In the first one (as already stated), the principle, inter alia, with regard to general damages has been discussed in detail; whereas, in second reported decision, the rule with regard to grant of damages on account of mental anguish has been explained, because the Plaintiffs have also claimed a sum of Rs.15 Million towards mental torture in paragraphs-50 and 54 of the Plaint and paragraphs-61 and 63 of the Affidavit-in-Evidence / Examination-in-Chief, which, remained uncontroverted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 508 | R.A (Civil Revision) 78/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Nazar Muhammad (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 509 | Const. P. 1802/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Vasdev (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 510 | Suit 1713/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Sharif Ahmed Qureshi (Plaintiff) VS Wing Cdr.(R) Mazhar Mirza and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-MAY-19 | Yes | Housing Scheme_ If a Housing Scheme is announced by Defendant No.3, primarily, for Military Personnel, then either there should be a complete embargo on transferring of land to the civilians, or, if the same embargo is not in place and civilians / citizens can purchase in a housing scheme launched by Defendant No.3, then the policy and formalities of Defendant No.3 should be equitable and fair and no one should be discriminated against. It is understandable that there are security issues, for which NOC and other formalities are to be completed, but the security concern cannot be allowed to be misused, or, under the garb of security issue, rights of citizens cannot be compromised. Proprietary rights are guaranteed under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973; inter alia, in terms of Article 24. Pleadings_ Admission made in Written Statement (on oath) does not need further proof. Executive Action_ Executive actions based on the premise of national security are justiciable on the basis of Rationale Basis Test. Sale NOC_ Non issuance of sale NOC by the Army Housing Directorate, violates Section 24A of the General Clauses Act, 1897. Thus, requirement of NOC cannot be given that degree of importance or significance, that it can be allowed to impinge upon a statutory and fundamental right of ownership of a citizen, who is a lawful and bona fide transferee of a property, situated in a Housing Scheme of Official Defendants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 511 | Const. P. 109/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Hibibullah Dahar (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-APR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 512 | Election Appeal 29/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Abdul Hakeem (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 513 | Civil Revision 55/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Ahmed Ali (Applicant) VS Manzoor Ahmed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 514 | Const. P. 1557/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst Mukhtiar Khatoon (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 515 | Civil Revision 51/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mohammad Yaseen and others (Applicant) VS Mureed Kalhoro and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-APR-18 | No | The undisputed position that emerges from examining of record of present civil revision is that though the judgment of the trial Court has been handed down in the manner mentioned herein above, the same has been set aside by the appellate Court and case was remanded for deciding a fresh, but without complying Rule 31 of the provision which has been mentioned exclusively for the appellate Court. In my considered view this falls within the ambit of material irregularity existing in the impugned decision dated 22.2.2017 of the Appellate Court; hence the impugned decision is not a legal one | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 516 | Const. P. 2586/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Rehana Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and an other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 517 | Suit 1774/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Asad Zaheer. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ismail & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 03-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 518 | Const. P. 2149/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: Const. P D 4729/2015 | 2015 | Abdul Hameed and another (Petitioner) VS Provicne of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-18 | Yes | In our humble opinion, one of the reasons for introducing the doctrine of alternate remedy was to avoid and reduce the number of cases that used to be filed directly before this Court, and at the same time to allow the prescribed lower forum to exercise its jurisdiction freely under the law. Moreover, if a person moves this Court without exhausting the remedy available to him under the law at lower forum, not only would the purpose of establishing that forum be completely defeated, but such person will also lose the remedy and the right of appeal available to him under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 519 | Const. P. 1589/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 520 | Election Appeal 5/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Wajid Hussain (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 521 | Const. P. 674/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 522 | Const. P. 335/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Ishtiaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS D.J Badin & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 523 | Const. P. 1019/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Mst Fouzia (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 524 | Suit 1142/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | Pakistan Battery Mfg. Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and another (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Fahad Farooqi and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 09-MAR-18 | No | Suit for Specific Performance. Suit Decreed except the prayers clause of awarding the compensation for withholding the performance. It was held that since the specific performance of MoU is allowed, subject to codal formalities, therefore, the claim of compensation of plaintiff is rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 525 | Civil Revision 45/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2007 | Mst Hajul through special attorney (Applicant) VS Nasrullah Malik and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 526 | Const. P. 2379/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 527 | Election Appeal 41/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Tariq Hussain (Appellant) VS Subhan Ali (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 17-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 528 | Civil Revision 144/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Mst. Parveen Raza Jadun through her legal heirs (Applicant) VS Bashir Ahmed Chandio and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-JUL-19 | Yes | (i). In direct benami claim requires a higher standard of proof; (ii) every transaction between family members cannot be recognized as benami; (iii). Claimant not challenged the purchase of property by father in favour of his son, during the life time of the father, then claim of Plaintiff (sister) is meritless. (i). In direct benami claim requires a higher standard of proof; (ii) every transaction between family members cannot be recognized as benami; (iii). Claimant not challenged the purchase of property by father in favour of his son, during the life time of the father, then claim of Plaintiff (sister) is meritless. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 529 | Suit 1847/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Emirates Airline / Emirates Sky Cargo & other (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-MAY-20 | Yes | Term an act of war or armed conflict as mentioned in Rule 18(2)(c) of the Fourth Schedule of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, also means non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Armed attack at Jinnah International Airport on 08.06.2014 falls within non-international armed conflict (NIAC) or at least it may be categorised as a hybrid phenomena; where repeated acts of terrorism in furtherance of defined objectives translated into a non-international armed conflict. Term an act of war or armed conflict as mentioned in Rule 18(2)(c) of the Fourth Schedule of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, also means non-international armed conflict (NIAC). Armed attack at Jinnah International Airport on 08.06.2014 falls within non-international armed conflict (NIAC) or at least it may be categorised as a hybrid phenomena; where repeated acts of terrorism in furtherance of defined objectives translated into a non-international armed conflict. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 530 | S.M.A 144/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Meer Hussain Buksh Talpur S/o Meer Muhammad Murad (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-JAN-20 | No | Petition being non-contentious was granted. Petition being non-contentious was granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 531 | Const. P. 2371/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-MAR-20 | Yes | Direction A public office cannot be offered / bartered or given in consideration of some donation, but a vacancy in respect of a public office is to be filled up strictly in accordance with law and the recruitment rules so that merit is not compromised and nepotism is curbed. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 532 | 2021 PTD 867 | Const. P. 4793/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Kashif Feroz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-20 | Yes | Implementation petitions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) | ||
| 533 | Civil Revision 169/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Province of Sindh and others (Applicant) VS Mst. Tasleem Begum and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 534 | Const. P. 14/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hurrat-ul-Maleka and 2 others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 535 | Suit 168/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | SYED HAMID HUSSAIN RIZVI (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD ASIF SAEED (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 536 | I. A 51/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Province of Sindh and another (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-JUN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 537 | 2020 YLR 2597 | Const. P. 2180/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Masood Ahmed Wassan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-APR-20 | Yes | For roads, bridges, gas/oil line etc. most precious lands were/are being acquired or intercepted in between to have a shortest distance to minimize the cost of that project, but we do not realize that while doing so we are not only destroying fertile/ agriculture land but so also risking our future. This acquisition is normally based on feasibility report of that particular project but there is no realization that for providing some convenience or low cost project, precious land is being destroyed, which is far more important for our future than the convenience and low cost project. The project may cost less but consequences would be detrimental. We are living in a world where natural resources such as fertile land is being vacuumed up by development of concrete structure and this would count a lot in future and no one would come for our rescue when we have to yield our own food for our own consumption. In this case land was attached with the research based agriculture department of Sindh which caters for not only fruit crop but other agri products as well. The authorities responsible for identifying this land have not applied their mind at all and in an attempt to please, the most fertile land of the province had been provided for an object which could conveniently be achieved on non-agriculture land, subject to law. Blanket recommendation was forwarded by the Committee constituted for the aforesaid purpose and without identifying the reasons of disassociating the land with the agriculture based research department, they have made this land available for a scheme called Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Town. The recommendation of the Committee and the action of the authority is neither transparent nor lawful but in fact a mala fide attempt to usurp the most precious and fertile land of district Mirpurkhas where research is being conducted. The provincial government should have emphasized to uplift the research system of the agriculture department and steered the progress by maintaining it rather than to ignore the research based system. They could always find the land anywhere else and provide resources and amenities for dwellers where the land could be developed by land developers. The performance of Ministry of Agriculture to save the land was half-hearted and they only presented themselves as marionette since they have not taken action against usurpation of their land. If we really want to protect the agricultural lands and to promote sustainable agrarian growth for the future, large scale basic reforms and legislation are needed. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 538 | 2021 PLD Sindh Note 76 | H.C.A 24/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) issued by the Company can be considered as directions /instructions with a binding effect provided it is not violative of fundamental principles of law | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.L.A.1054-K/2020 Pakistan State Oil Company Limited v. M/s.Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises,C.A.4-K/2022 Pakistan State Oil Company Limited v. M/s.Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Pending |
| 539 | Const. P. 8963/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Faisal Mubeen Jumani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 540 | Const. P. 1094/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Suresh Kumar Hindu (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-FEB-21 | Yes | Precise facts are that Petitioners have challenged the Wheat Release Policy 2020-21 dated 14th October 2020 (said Policy), on the ground that Clause (xii) whereof is violative of the Food Stuffs (Control) Act, 1958, and the Food-grains (Licensing Control) Order, 1957, and consequently, be set aside and Flour Mills of Petitioners be given wheat as per the uniform Policy. The legal team of Respondents has stated that it is purely an executive matter regarding which no petition of the nature is maintainable. Crux of the rule laid down in these decisions is that ordinarily under Article 199 of the Constitution, High Court cannot interfere in the policy matters of the Executive, except if it is violative of law or is product of mala fide; whereas, the mala fide is also explained, inter alia, that unless an un rebuttable material is on record with regard to a specific plea of mala fide and not a vague one, the decision or action complained of, cannot be annulled or declared illegal This principle has been evolved through judicial pronouncements and opinions of jurists, the crux of which is that punishment must fit the crime. When on the record there is no evidence that Petitioners / Flour Mills have entered into plea bargain with NAB, then Clause (xii) cannot be stretched to include Petitioners / Flour Mills, and such an action of Respondents is hit by this doctrine of proportionality also and is unreasonable and discriminatory. Petitions are accepted only to the extent, that the Clause (xii) of the Wheat Policy is not applicable to the present Petitioners / Flour Mills and they are entitled to get their respective share / quota of wheat in accordance with the present Wheat Policy 202021 like other Flour Mills established and operating in the Province of Sindh. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 541 | I. A 7/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Chaudhry Abdul Jabbar (Appellant) VS Presiding Officer, Banking Court-II, Sukkur & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 542 | I. A 5/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Javed-ur-Rehman and others (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 543 | Suit -758/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MIAN NASSER HYATT MAGGO (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 19-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 544 | Const. P. 4631/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Sir Syed Cooperative H.S Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 545 | Const. P. 262/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Haji Jaffar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 546 | Const. P. 5885/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Bushra Umer and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 547 | Const. P. 7697/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Shoaib (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 548 | Const. P. 321/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Khawaja Qadeer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS S.I.T.E & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 549 | Const. P. 321/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2000 | Grandiphar Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Drug Appellate Board & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-MAR-20 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 550 | Const. P. 5588/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/s IGI Holdings (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 551 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 744 | Const. P. 213/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Burhan (Petitioner) VS Election Commisson Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-FEB-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 552 | Const. P. 5017/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Ihsanullah Khan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 553 | Const. P. 8092/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Barrister Mujtaba Sohail Raja and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 554 | Const. P. 1950/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Abdul Majid (Petitioner) VS Dist: Judge/Appellate Authority SNG & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 555 | Const. P. 885/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Dur e Shawar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-DEC-22 | No | Protection Matter | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 556 | Const. P. 1199/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mirza Aleem Agha S/o Mirza Ahmed Agha (Petitioner) VS M/s. Modern Motors (Pvt) Ltd and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-MAR-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 557 | Suit 1205/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | HASAN AHMAD (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-JAN-23 | Yes | Since sale transaction in respect of the Suit Property has been proved by Plaintiff, therefore, Specific Performance can be granted, | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 558 | Const. P. 1554/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Regional Election Commissioner SBA and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 559 | Suit 852/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/s Visionary Baluchistan Media Corporation (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shahnaz Abid & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 06-SEP-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 560 | Suit 66/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | MOIN US SAMAD KHAN (Plaintiff) VS MRS.TANVEER QAZI (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-AUG-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 561 | Const. P. 509/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Shoaib Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 562 | Suit 1132/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | NASIR HUSSAIN (Plaintiff) VS MST.SHAHNAWAZ BEGUM & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 563 | Cr.Bail 140/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | ALLAD DAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 564 | Suit 777/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | UNITED BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-MAY-22 | Yes | Closure of Branch / Premises of Plaintiff is directly linked to commercial activity / trade, which is one of the fundamental rights; which cannot be compromised in the manner as is done by Defendant No.2. No specific statutory provision has been pointed out during arguments to show that Cantonment Board has this specific power to seal the Branch / Premises of the Plaintiff in such a situation. This penal consequence cannot be said to be an implied authority of Defendant No.2, but it has to be expressly mentioned in their parent statute viz. Cantonment Act, 1924. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 565 | R.A (Civil Revision) 94/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1991 | Ghulam Muhammad (Applicant) VS Karim Bux (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 566 | Criminal Miscelleneous 163/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | NIZAMUDDIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 567 | II.A. 21/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Nisar Ahmed Shahwani (Appellant) VS Lal Muhammad & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-APR-23 | No | Section 53/A Transfer of Property Act-Time will continue to run. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 568 | Suit 1652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MUHAMMAD AMIN (Plaintiff) VS ASIF YOUNUS & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 08-JUN-23 | Yes | Undisputedly, IPO is subsequent in time and following the rule laid down in the aforementioned Decisions, the present Lis and issues agitated therein is triable by the Tribunal [in accordance with law], established and functioning under the IPO. Consequently, this Application is treated as the one for return of plaint rather rejecting it. Accordingly accepted. Plaint is returned. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 569 | Const. P. 132/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Mrs Zoya (Petitioner) VS Salauddin & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-MAY-23 | No | No review is provided under West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, hence, Appellate Court cannot review its earlier decision. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 570 | Election Appeal 4/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Amir Khan. (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan and others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-MAY-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 571 | Const. P. 1382/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Syed Hussain Ali Shah & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-NOV-23 | Yes | This Province is longing for a good governance, but due to dishonest and corrupt officials, the sufferings of people at large are increasing day by day and an ordinary citizen does not even have access to Senior Officials, for redressal of their grievances and to hear complaints against the Subordinate Officials. This continuous mal-administration, abuse of authority and corrupt practices have resulted in an unprecedented level of litigation against the Government, which is unnecessarily burdening the Courts. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | |||
| 572 | R.A (Civil Revision) 18/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2000 | Muhammad Bachal (Applicant) VS Banhoon & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-NOV-23 | Yes | Responsibility of First Appellate Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 573 | II.A. 3/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Nina Industries Limited (Appellant) VS Bhanero Textile Mills (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-24 | Yes | A legitimate claim is also proprietry, protected under Article 24 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 574 | Const. P. 87/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Shakir Mehmood Siddiqui and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-FEB-24 | No | Writ of certiorari. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 575 | Const. P. 1168/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Syed Iftikhar Haider Rizvi S/o Syed Mumtaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS VIth ADJ, Karachi Central and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-MAR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 576 | Suit 300/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN (Plaintiff) VS THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-AUG-23 | No | Glaring interpolation in the official record. Inquiry should be held. This ground reality cannot be ignored that recent surge in property related litigation is due to the collusion and dishonest acts of Government Officials; many of them are even involved in land grabbing. The Chief Secretary should take immediate notice of this alarming situation, which can lead to deterioration of law and order situation in the City of Karachi. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 577 | Const. P. 1619/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Mst Fiza and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-NOV-24 | No | Quashment Refused | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro | |||
| 578 | Const. P. 178/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Sultan Ali (Petitioner) VS V.C University Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-OCT-24 | Yes | Petition is hit by Laches. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 579 | Const. P. 1032/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Abdul Haque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 580 | Const. P. 2869/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Liaquat Ali Bhand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 05-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 581 | Const. P. 1541/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Accountant General Sindh Employees CHS (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-APR-24 | No | Abuse of authority-Notification is set-aside. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 582 | Const. P. 1624/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Shah Nawaz Meerani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 583 | Const. P. 1566/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-1680, 1698, 1740, 1875, 1887, 1900 & 1907 of 2023 C.P. No.D-87,138, 208, 427, 828, 946, 1303 & 1379 of 2024 | 2024 | Muhammad Ahsraf Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 584 | Const. P. 1023/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Mst Muskan and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 585 | Const. P. 1807/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Muhammad Shabbir Baloch & Others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Anees Sakaria & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 586 | Suit 33/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | MUHAMMAD AMIN HOOSEIN (Plaintiff) VS EXPORT PROCESSING ZONES AUTHORITY (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-JUL-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 587 | Suit 390/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2001 | CAPT. TARIQ MEHMOOD MALIK. (Appellant) VS P.A.L.P.A. (Appellant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | Claim of Plaintiff has been disproved that he suffer any loss (financial or otherwise) or mental anguish on account of any decision or acts on the part of Defendant. Plaintiff was adequately compensated monetarily by his erstwhile employer - PIAC, International Association as well as Defendant, coupled with the fact that he was reemployed by PIAC. Consequently, not encashing the cheque given by Defendant will not improve the case of Plaintiff, who is not entitled for any further amount in view of Bye-Law 25(v). Both Issues are answered in affirmative that Plaintiff received his insurance and other compensation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 588 | Suit 541/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | MST. AMTUL FATIMA & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS SYED TAHIR ALI JAFRI & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 20-APR-17 | Yes | Judgment debtor raised the plea that entire sale proceeds were received beyond statutory period of two weeks which was in violation of O. XXI, R. 85, C.P.C.---Validity---Time that was consumed in remitting amount from two accounts; one maintained by auction purchaser and other by the Court official on which neither court official nor auction purchaser had control---Such transaction and proceeds were governed by regulations of State Bank of Pakistan---Judicial sale had a sanctity and once sale was confirmed, auction purchaser had interest in proceedings---Application was dismissed in circumstances. Order XXI, Rule 85. Application dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 589 | Execution 25/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | Askari Bank Ltd. (Decree Holder) VS A.H. International (Pvt) Ltd. & OTHERS (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-23 | Yes | Order of Banking Court cannot be interfered with in a collateral proceeding. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 590 | Suit 1410/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Toyoshima & Co. limited (Plaintiff) VS Shadman Cotton mills limited (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-MAR-16 | Yes | Territorial jurisdiction of Sindh High Court was questioned by Defendant, primarily on the ground that Defendant-Company has been shifted from Karachi to Lahore, therefore, a foreign company / Plaintiff cannot enforce an International Arbitral Award by filing a suit in Sindh High Court. The crucial documentary evidence shows that when the suit proceeding was filed for enforcement of the Award under Section 6 of the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, the Defendant had its registered office in Karachi and even Annual Report of the Company also shows that the Management notice for convening the Annual General Meeting was also to be held at Karachi. Consequently, it has been held, that Sindh High Court has jurisdiction in the matter. Territorial jurisdiction of Sindh High Court was questioned by Defendant, primarily on the ground that Defendant-Company has been shifted from Karachi to Lahore, therefore, a foreign company / Plaintiff cannot enforce an International Arbitral Award by filing a suit in Sindh High Court. The crucial documentary evidence shows that when the suit proceeding was filed for enforcement of the Award under Section 6 of the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011, the Defendant had its registered office in Karachi and even Annual Report of the Company also shows that the Management notice for convening the Annual General Meeting was also to be held at Karachi. Consequently, it has been held, that Sindh High Court has jurisdiction in the matter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 591 | Const. P. 1822/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Raja Ishtiaque Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 592 | Const. P. 1147/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 593 | Const. P. 1504/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 594 | Criminal Appeal 234/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Taj Muhammad (Appellant) VS The State (Complainant) | S.B. | Order | 23-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 595 | 2018 CLC 883 | Suit 2489/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | M/s. Al Naseeb Welfare Foundation International (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Latif Memorial Hospital & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 30-MAY-17 | No | O. VII, R. 11---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42---Suit for declaration---Rejection of plaint---Cause of action, absence of---Defendant, a Welfare Association was dissolved and plaintiff, a Welfare Foundation, wanted to takeover the assets of the Association---Plea raised by plaintiff was that objectives contained in Memorandum of Association of both the organisations were similar, therefore after dissolution, Association was bound to donate its assets to any such organization---Validity---Held, in absence of any clause under the Memorandum and Articles of Association of defendant Association, that assets would be given/handed over or donated to any specific entity or any agreement between the organizations that was plaintiff and defendant, plaintiff could not as a matter of right claim the assets of dissolved entity should be handed over to plaintiff---Such was an undisputed factual position and in absence of any such document or undertaking by defendant Association, neither any right nor any interest had accrued in favour of plaintiff for bringing an action of such nature---Plaintiff did not have any legal character for instituting suit as no cause of action had accrued for filing the same and it was hit by S.42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Basic features to attract O.VII, R.11, C.P.C. were present---Plaint was rejected in circumstances. Suit for declaration---Rejection of plaint. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 596 | Const. P. 1779/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Qadir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 597 | Const. P. 772/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Naz Bano (Petitioner) VS SSP Tando Muhammad Khan (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 598 | Const. P. 1251/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 599 | Const. P. 580/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Nizamuddin (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-NOV-16 | No | Numbers of reported decisions have been cited by both sides, however, what is relevant is 1992 SCMR 1149, wherein, the Honourable Apex Court has held that in such cases before deciding the application under Section 16(1) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, the issue about relationship of landlord and tenant should be framed and decided. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 600 | Const. P. 1612/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sht Washan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 601 | Const. P. 1557/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Rashida (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh&ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 602 | Adm. Suit 539/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | Al-Riaz (Pvt.) Limited and another (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ismail and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 603 | Const. P. 1192/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Habibullah Khan (Petitioner) VS D.J. Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 604 | Const. P. 1348/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 605 | Const. P. 756/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Rafique Masih (Petitioner) VS Mst Agnes @ Inayat Bibi & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 606 | Suit 421/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1991 | Rahim Ali Palari & ors. (Plaintiff) VS Govt. of Sindh & ors.. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Suit under Fatal Accident Act is independent of proceeding under Motor Vehicle Ordinance, 1965 and Criminal Proceeding (If any). Res Ipsa Loquitor applies to fatal accident cases. If accident / incident disputed then onus on Defendant to disprove negligence. Defendant to disprove causation of death. Criteria for awarding damages. Deprivation of the association of a family member (loss of consortium). Tort Law as a Tool for enforcing good governance. Computing income of deceased when no evidence of employment. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 607 | Suit 315/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | S.M.INAMUL HAQ. (Plaintiff) VS MIRZA AMJAD BAIG & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 608 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 105 | Const. P. 4725/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Mansoor Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-DEC-15 | No | Let notice be issued to the respondents as well as Additional Advocate General for 23.12.2015 when concerned SHO the respondent No.4 shall be in attendance. In the meanwhile Mr.Abdul Rahim Memon, Reader of this Court is appointed as Commissioner to inspect the site after issuance of notices to all concerned parties and if there are certain articles lying on the subject-property, which are claimed to be owned by the petitioner an inventory of such articles may be prepared. Report may be submitted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.662-K/2016 Mst. Fareeda Zafar and others v. Mansoor Ashraf and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 609 | Const. P. 1651/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Syed Anwar Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 610 | Const. P. 1786/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Zahida & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 611 | Const. P. 728/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Rabia Khan (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 612 | Const. P. 766/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Walam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 613 | Const. P. 1505/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Aail Khatoon and an Other (Petitioner) VS S.S.P, SBA and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 614 | Const. P. 1871/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sht Tejoo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 615 | Civil Revision 260/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Liaquat & Ors (Applicant) VS Gul Muhammad Shah (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 616 | Const. P. 1755/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Wahid Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 617 | Civil Revision 254/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst: Syeda Aftab Jehan (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 618 | Const. P. 1783/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Hyder (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 619 | 2018 YLR 2210 | Suit 622/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | Major Ret. Sheikh Abdul Naeem (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-JAN-18 | No | Suit for declaration---Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority---Cancellation of allotment of plot---Plaintiff being employee of Pakistan Army was allotted plot but same was cancelled by the Housing Authority on the ground that he had already been allotted another plot---Contention of plaintiff was that said plot was allotted to him as per his service entitlement---Validity---Plaintiff was earlier allotted a plot under his membership---Plaintiff when filled up and submitted application form knowingly suppressed the fact with regard to allotted plot---Plaintiff was not entitled to more than one residential plot under by-laws of the Housing Authority---Impugned allotment was in violation of by-laws of the Housing Authority---Allotment of suit plot had been obtained through misrepresentation of facts---No person could be allowed to retain ill-gotten gain---Court was not to come to the aid of a person to retain a benefit or privilege to which he was not entitled at the very inception---Plaintiff was afforded chance to appear before the Scrutiny Committee of Housing Authority but he failed to avail that opportunity---Housing Authority had not violated any of the principles of natural justice---Suit was dismissed in circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 620 | 2019 PLD Sindh 697 | Const. P. 1913/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 31-MAY-18 | Yes | Cutting of Trees (Environment): Green Belt with trees is a 'Public Trust' resource. Environmental Human Rights are in fact fundamental human rights. Plea of National Security is also justiciable. "Rational Basis Test" explained. Balance is to be struck between the policies relating to security and civil liberties. State Institutions are subject to the accountability. Judiciary in a Muslim Polity is clothed with greater obligation. Only concern council can direct the cutting of dangerous trees under paragraph 55 of Part II-Schedule II of SLGA 2013. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||
| 621 | Suit 1232/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | RIZWAN RASOOL JAN (Plaintiff) VS P.I.A.C (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-FEB-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 622 | Suit 357/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Muhammad Junaid Makhdumi. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Iqbal & Others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 623 | Suit 786/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | MUHAMMAD MANSOOR (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD RASHID (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 20-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 624 | Suit 1037/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | M/S SIDDIQUI FUND TRUST (Plaintiff) VS NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-FEB-19 | No | It is an established Rule that pleadings themselves cannot be considered as evidence unless the Plaintiff or Defendant, as the case may be, enters the witness Box and lead the evidence in support of his / her claim or defence. In the present case, despite providing ample opportunities, the Plaintiff has not come forward to testify and prove his claim. The reported decision of Honble Supreme Court handed down in the case of Rana Tanveer Khan v. Naseer Khan-2015 SCMR page-1401, is relevant. Since Plaintiff has failed to prove the allegations against the Defendants, thus the former (Plaintiff) is not entitled to any relief. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 625 | S.M.A 58/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Mrs. Atteeya Mahmood (Petitioner) (Petitioner) VS Nighat Muzaffar and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JUL-17 | Yes | The Objectors' counsel has failed to point out any error, factual or legal in the order dated 30-01-2017, sought to be reviewed by the present applicant. C.M.A dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 626 | Const. P. 1743/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Iqra & ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 627 | Const. P. 1990/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 628 | Const. P. 1977/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Roshna and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Badin and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 629 | Const. P. 1488/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Samina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 630 | Const. P. 1111/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Essro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 631 | Const. P. 1630/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Chetan and an Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 632 | Const. P. 703/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-SEP-17 | Yes | The action of Respondent No.3 in changing amenity nature and use of reserved plots is void ab initio. Consequently, very allotment in favour of private Respondents has no sanctity in the eyes of law and it is also settled principle that transferor cannot transfer a better title then what he himself possesses, therefore, if the title of the private Respondents being purported allottees of the above subject Plots is defective then further transfers of these plots do not improve the legal status of these allottees / private Respondents vis-??-vis the respective newly created purported Plots No.261 to 265 or any other Plot(s) created / allocated in a land exclusively earmarked / reserved for amenity purpose(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.L.A.550-K/2024 Abdul Hameed and others v. Abdul Qadir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 633 | Suit 1689/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Mst. Saira Khatoon (Appellant) VS Syed Muhammad Ashraf and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Suit for Recovery of Earnest Money and Damages decreed. The defendant had not any authority from the owner of the apartment for its sale, hence, the defendant through misrepresentation and fraud, induced the plaintiff in paying the amount of rupees fifty thousand towards part payment/earnest money for sale of apartment. The Defendant no. 1 was directed to pay the earnest money and the damages of rupees five hundred thousand to the plaintiff. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 634 | Const. P. 1865/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Khadim Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 635 | I. A 50/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Ilyas (Appellant) VS Haji Farooque (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.943-K/2011 Muhammad Saleem v. Bank Al-Falah Ltd. & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 636 | Civil Revision 220/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Ghulam Mustafa Shaheen Abbasi (Applicant) VS Mst Shahnaz Kaka & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 637 | Suit 1107/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Work Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 638 | Const. P. 448/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Aslam Pervaiz (Petitioner) VS Rent Controller (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 639 | Const. P. 1689/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Imtiaz Ali Maitlo P O Sindh & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 640 | Civil Revision 260/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Shah Fahad and an other (Applicant) VS Pir Ghulam Kareem and other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 641 | Const. P. 1354/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Shahnawaz Mahar (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 642 | Const. P. 552/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Asma kaka (Petitioner) VS DEO Matiari (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 643 | Election Appeal 35/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Israr Ahmed (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 644 | Const. P. 1598/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Lal Bux (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 645 | Const. P. 6439/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Javeria (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.4396/2019 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others,C.A.611/2020 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 646 | Const. P. 302/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Secretary Board of Revenue & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-MAR-20 | Yes | Service Although it is not a vested right of the Petitioner to get an appointment order from the official Respondents, but at least he has a legitimate expectation, and for that matter any citizen, who is qualified and cleared different tests as prescribed by government functionary, to be dealt with fairly and considered for the post advertised, and in this regard an eligible candidate cannot be discriminated against or not considered, merely on account of extraneous consideration, which includes political consideration and nepotism. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 647 | S.M.A 38/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Aijaz Khan S/o (Late) Haji Faiz Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Sikandar Begum (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 648 | 2020 YLR 2188 | Const. P. 620/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | The Fauji Foundation Charitable Trust (Petitioner) VS Federal Land Commission & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-APR-20 | Yes | Subject: Resumption of land under MRL 115 Fauji Foundation a "Charitable Trust" operating under endowment Act 1980 was functioning through a committee formed vide notification of 08.03.1972 of federal Government. Committee after deliberation resolved that secretary to act as authorized person. Unless otherwise explained, it does not deemed to have empowered /authorized secretary to further delegate the powers by a simple authority letter signed by Secretary alone, when it's not borne out of resolution. In the earlier petition when resumption of land was questioned, the parties withdrew their lis in view of negotiation which ended as 30 years leases of subject land and the cause of resumption deemed to have exhausted by way of doctrine of election, Petitioner opted for a long term lease instead to continue litigation against resumption of land .Such right (if any) was bartered with long term lease. Such right to challenge the resumption of land thus was not available when present petition was filed. Process of execution for long term lease should have followed requirement of MLR 115 and section 17 of Act II of 1977 and since it was not transparent, the two leases were executed in an unlawful manner and which period (30 years) has already been exhausted. Scheme of recovery of land revenue includes a process of attachment of holding against arrears which are due. Unless a remedy is exhausted, immediate jump to arrest and detention would not be justified. The question of declaring MLR 115 being repugnant to injunctions of Islamic law has already been decided but with its prospective effect as highlighted in the judgment of Qazalbash Waqf v. Chief Land Commissioner and the effective date was set as 23rd March, 1990 before which the process of resumption had already been completed yet long term leases were executed surrendering rights over the land. (if any) | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.L.A.1751/2020 The Fauji Foundation, Charitable Organization under the Committee of Administration thr. Brig. (R) Sabir Ali, Fauji Foundation, Fauji Towers, Rawalpindi v. The Federal Land Commission thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 649 | Const. P. 4634/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Idrees and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-SEP-21 | Yes | 1. Extraneous considerations keep officials of SBCA away from illegal construction being raised by the persons. 2. If exemplary punishments are awarded to these officials, issue of illegal construction can be controlled. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 650 | Const. P. 2589/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Saddique Ali Laghari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3389/2021 Saddique Ali Laghari v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 651 | Const. P. 7173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Sheikh Imran Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The D.G KDA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-SEP-21 | No | It is a settled proposition of law that an encroacher can neither claim any alternate land/plot nor is entitled for any compensation when admittedly the petitioner was an encroacher. It is also a settled proposition of law that simply on the basis of having utility bills in ones name, ownership rights could neither be claimed nor could be conferred upon a person | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 652 | R.A (Civil Revision) 34/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2003 | Nandomal and others (Applicant) VS The P.O. of Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 653 | Const. P. 2588/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Sundor Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3388/2021 Sundar Khan v. The Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 654 | Suit 1758/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Hilal Foods (Private) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Danpak Food Industries (Private) Limited (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-AUG-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 655 | First Appeal Against Order 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Yameen Ali (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 656 | Const. P. 1528/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani (Petitioner) VS National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-MAR-21 | Yes | National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3022/2022 Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani v. National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman NAB, HQ, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed | |
| 657 | Const. P. 6536/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Bilal (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 658 | Const. P. 6099/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Bass Khatoon and Another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 659 | Const. P. 4107/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Perviaz Masih & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 660 | Const. P. 5947/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Ali Shahzad (Petitioner) VS IIIrd Sr. Civil Judge and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 661 | Const. P. 319/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Mubashir Qadir Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-AUG-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 662 | Const. P. 1535/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Khaliq-ur-Rehman & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.222/2022 Imam Bux, Honorary Secretary of Madrass Cooperative Housing Society Ltd Karachi v. Province of Sindh, through the Secretary Cooperative Department, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 663 | Const. P. 1226/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. P. No. D-721 of 2017 | 2017 | Kashmir Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 664 | Const. P. 1542/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Muhammad Siddique Pathan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 665 | Const. P. 5895/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Uzma Naz and Ors (Petitioner) VS The D.G Rangers & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.860-K/2022 The Director General Rangers Sindh through Ashraf Hussain Shah Deputy Superintendent Rangers v. The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Government of Sindh & others,C.P.859-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh & another v. Uzma Naz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned after summer vacation,Pending Adjourned after summer vacation | ||
| 666 | Suit 611/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | WESTERN TEXTILE INDUSTRIES (Plaintiff) VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 31-AUG-22 | Yes | Undoubtedly, the provisions of OGRA Law and its purposive interpretation given by the Courts, have comprehensively elaborated the statutory scheme. However, in the present cases, issue of implementation of Policy concerning RLNG is to be considered, coupled with the fact, that Plaintiffs have seriously disputed the Undertakings given by them for supply of RLNG and the apprehended discontinuance of Gas Supply, as it was done before. Therefore, in my considered view, the facts of present case fall within the exception to the Rule laid down in the above Case Law relied upon by the learned Advocate of Defendant No.2, and the plaints of both these Suits should not be rejected at this stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 667 | Cr.Bail 45/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Muhammad Iqbal Abbasi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-JUL-22 | Yes | The state functionaries should realise that if such incidents are not curbed with an iron hand, then public trust in Police force will be completely diminished, resulting in a chaotic situation. Such incidents can result in disturbing the civil order of the Society, if persons in uniform act with such impunity. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 668 | Cr.Bail 1305/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr Bail.A S 1306/2022 | 2022 | MUHAMMAD SULTAN & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-DEC-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 669 | Const. P. 2000/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 670 | Suit 223/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | ARY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-MAR-23 | Yes | Injunction granted for broadcasting PSL-8. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 671 | Suit 1740/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MUHAMMAD RAMEEZ KHAN & ANOTHER (Plaintiff) VS THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Application(s) for withdrawal of Suits dismissed. Directions given. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 672 | Const. P. 1969/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Saifullah Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Faiza Mughal & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-APR-23 | Yes | Rule 22 W.P Family Court Act, 1964. Appellate Court decided appeal on merits, hence condoned the limitation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.695-K/2023 Saifullah Abbasi v. Mst. Faiza Mughal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 673 | Cr.Rev 128/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | MUSHTAQUE ALI (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD ALI (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-APR-23 | Yes | Owner unable to utilize his property, in effect is dispossessed, case falls within Section 3 of Illegal Dispossession Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 674 | R.A (Civil Revision) 205/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2000 | Province Of Sindh & Others (Applicant) VS Ali Muhammad & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-MAY-23 | Yes | Highhandedness in supply of water, will result in disastrous situation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 675 | R.A (Civil Revision) 250/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Umed Ali and Others (Applicant) VS Ist: Additional Distt & Sessions Judge Badin & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-MAY-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 676 | Suit 2195/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Sohrab Khan (Plaintiff) VS Allied Bank of Pakistan Limited (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 26-JUN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 677 | II.A. 8/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP.No.S-167 of 2021 & CP.No.S9826 of 2022 | 2020 | Muhammad Yaseen (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aslam (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-NOV-23 | Yes | APPLICATION OF A JUDICIAL MIND, THAT INCLUDES, ELEMENT OF VISIBLE FAIRNESS IN A DECISION. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 678 | Const. P. 1241/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Wilayat Khan thr: L.Rs (Petitioner) VS Aamir Azad & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-DEC-23 | Yes | Sale of property is confirmed in writ Jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | |||
| 679 | Const. P. 277/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Muhammad Nadeem and Another (Petitioner) VS Sumeira Nadeem Sulemani and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-MAR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 680 | Const. P. 179/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Babu (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 681 | Const. P. 178/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | 2024 | Mohammad yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar | ||||
| 682 | Cr.Bail 243/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Shaman Brohi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 683 | Const. P. 1293/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Sartaj Noohani (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-NOV-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro | ||||
| 684 | Const. P. 2576/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Jumani Builders & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 685 | Const. P. 1144/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Shahbaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 686 | Const. P. 852/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Munawar Ali Pathan (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 687 | Const. P. 2903/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Syed Khalid Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 688 | Const. P. 605/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | M/s Muhib Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 689 | 2017 CLC 155 | Suit 541/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | MST. AMTUL FATIMA & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS SYED TAHIR ALI JAFRI & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-DEC-14 | No | Order XXI, Rule 85. Application dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 690 | Suit 287/1990 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1990 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 691 | 2016 SBLR Sindh 162 | Const. P. 4404/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Syed Dost Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-NOV-15 | Yes | * In exceptional circumstances the writ jurisdiction under article 199 of the Constitution can be invoked, despite availability of an alternate remedy.---- * Excessive use of unlawful powers is itself unlawful.---- * Under grab of a pending civil suit, in which even no restraining order is operating and which is ex facie being not pursued, a bona fide purchaser of a property cannot be deprived of its use and enjoyment, as this violates the fundamental rights of a citizen relating to proprietary rights and guaranteed under article 23 and 24 of the Constitution. Caution note attached by the respondent-DHA to the property in question merely on the ground that some civil suit is pending as stated above, is not a proper exercise of discretion vested in Respondent-DHA, in the circumstances, as admittedly Respondent-DHA refused to even process the application for approval of the completion plan issuance of completion certificate of the Subject property on the basis of the impugned caution note it has put in its record. * A Genuine claimant can invoke section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, by notifying the concerned registrar/ responsible for registration of sale/ conveyance deed (under Registration Act, 1908) about the pendency of litigation in competent Court of Law, inter alia, to protect one * In exceptional circumstances the writ jurisdiction under article 199 of the Constitution can be invoked, despite availability of an alternate remedy. * Excessive use of unlawful powers is itself unlawful. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 692 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 105 | Const. P. 4725/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Ubedullah Siddiqi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-AUG-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 693 | Const. P. 755/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Muhammad Ameen & Anothers (Petitioner) VS Iqbal Ahmed & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 694 | Const. P. 1647/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Soorath and an Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 695 | Const. P. 1695/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Syed Muhammad Khalid Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 696 | Const. P. 1593/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Saiqa Mahwish & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 697 | Const. P. 7101/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Anwar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.634-K/2017 Anwar Ahmed and others v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority and others,C.P.4383/2017 Clifton Cantonment Board, Karachi v. Anwar Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 698 | Const. P. 1723/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Rabia & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 699 | I. A 36/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Haji Shafi Muhammad (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 700 | Cr.Appeal 98/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Urs Zardari (Appellant) VS The State & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 701 | Civil Revision 295/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Muhammad Sadiq Leghari (Applicant) VS Shamshad Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 702 | Const. P. 581/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Habib Ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-NOV-16 | No | In view of above and for reasons to be record later, both these petitions are allowed and consequently rent applications filed by the respondents stand revived and the learned Rent Controller will first frame an issue with regard to relationship of landlord and tenant and decide the same before proceeding further. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 703 | Const. P. 1530/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Lakhmir Mal (Petitioner) VS SSP Hyd & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 704 | Cr.Misc. 421/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shazia Syed (Applicant) VS Fida Hussain and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-16 | No | It is ordered that minor Farman Ali Shah, who is of tender age (around three years), henceforth will live with applicant Shazia Syed till such time the respondent No.1 (Fida Hussain), the real father of minor, either files a proper proceeding before the concerned Guardian Court for hizanat/custody of minor and when such a proceeding is filed, the concerned Guardian Court will be at liberty to regulate the question of interim custody. However, if some order is passed under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, and the same is flouted by the applicant, the learned Guardian Court will treat such violation as disobedience. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 705 | Const. P. 1408/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Faiza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 706 | Const. P. 1716/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Jamal ud Din (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 707 | J.M 7/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: J. M. No. 81 of 2015 | 2016 | Muhammad Iqbal Pirani. (Applicant) VS Khurram Ashraf & Others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-APR-19 | Yes | Framing of Issues not mandatory. In exceptional cases while deciding 12(2) application, main case may also be decided. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 708 | Suit 2322/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Dr. Arifa Farid and others (Plaintiff) VS Mitha Khan and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-APR-19 | Yes | Exception to right of hearing; where the results can and would not have been any different. Dispute between the government departments should not affect bona fide purchasers. Judgment in rem / personam. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 709 | Suit 1203/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ehtisham Zubair. (Plaintiff) VS Ashraf Hussain & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 25-JAN-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 710 | Const. P. 1689/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shr. Seeta & another (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 711 | Const. P. 1596/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 712 | Const. P. 1646/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Danial (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 713 | Civil Revision 134/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1998 | Abdul Latif & ors (Applicant) VS Subedar Jamsheed (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 714 | Const. P. 583/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Nasreen & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 715 | Const. P. 1731/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Nazim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 716 | Const. P. 1534/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Safdar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 717 | Const. P. 1738/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 718 | Suit 1663/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Clariant Pakistan Limited (Plaintiff) VS Deputy Commssioner Inland Revenue Service (AEC) and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 719 | Civil Revision 69/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Mst Noor Jahan @ Noor Jehan (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 720 | Const. P. 1250/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 721 | Suit 358/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1985 | Ghazanfar Ali and another (Plaintiff) VS Cherat Cement Limited and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-JUL-17 | Yes | NIL Suit for Declaration, Cancellation and Damages dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 722 | Const. P. 1898/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Ambar Sultana & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP Khairpur & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 723 | Execution 153/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | Party-1 (Decree Holder) VS Party-2 (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Order | 13-OCT-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 724 | 2017 CLD 1737 | Suit 1042/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Khalid Mehmood and others (Plaintiff) VS M/s Multi Plus Corporation Private Limited and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 725 | 2019 PLC CS 178 | Suit 754/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Mrs. Rukhsana Yahya (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-FEB-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 726 | 2017 MLD 200 | Const. P. 424/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Shabbir Ahmed (Applicant) VS Chairman NAB and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 04-FEB-16 | No | Recovery of 'amount due'---Willful default---Quashing of proceedings---Petitioners alleged to have committed offences of corruption and corrupt practice and had entered into Voluntary Return under S. 25(a) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Petitioners failed to deposit amount settled under Voluntary Return, therefore, NAB filed fresh reference against them---Validity---When a person did not pay entire agreed amount as determined by Trial Court, then such default did not fall within the mischief of 'wilful default' as mentioned in S. 5(r) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Remedy for NAB in such default lay in invoking S. 33-E, of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, as the same had been termed as a special provision to execute recovery of 'amount due' under National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Petitioners had agreed to pay back the amounts as determined by NAB, by signing Voluntary Return agreements, therefore, subsequent filing of NAB Reference against petitioners was not justified and the same was tainted with malice---High Court directed petitioners to pay Voluntary Return amounts in four equal instalments and quashed proceedings pending before Trial Court---Constitutional Petition was allowed in circumstances. NAB Case: Recovery of 'amount due'---Willful default---Quashing of proceedings. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3010/2016 National Accoutability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Shabbir Ahmed Malik & others,C.A.621/2019 National Accoutability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Shabbir Ahmed Malik & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Disposed of |
| 727 | Const. P. 1668/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Azizan and an Other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 728 | Const. P. 1823/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Aniqa Khurram &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 729 | Const. P. 875/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 730 | Civil Revision 150/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Ghulam Safdar Khan (Applicant) VS Sodho Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 731 | Const. P. 1431/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Allah Dino (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 732 | Suit 1682/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | MAZHAR SAYEED (Plaintiff) VS ATIF MAZHAR & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 733 | 2016 SBLR Sindh 594 | J.M 62/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/s. Shahtaj Textile Lmited. (Applicant) VS Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd., & Others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-15 | Yes | If triable issues are not involved, which required leading and recording of evidence, then it is not mandatory to frame issues and an application under Section 12(2) of C.P.C. can be decided on the basis of available case record and undisputed facts. Ratable distribution under Section 73 read with Order XXXIV Rule 13 of Civil procedure Code; Bank having a mortgage decree in its favour has a preferential status over a money decree, which is in favour of Plaintiff. Analysis of the discussion brings forth the conclusion that neither Judgment Debtors nor Bank have actively concealed a fact, or, misrepresented certain facts in such a fraudulent way, which, if not made or committed, would have not resulted in passing of the impugned Compromise Decree. Consequently, element of fraud is not present in instant cases. By analogy a cardinal principle of administrative law, which, time and again has been enunciated by the courts and later enacted as Section 24A of the General Clauses Act, 1897, inter alia, that an authority should act reasonably, fairly and justly, is also applicable to the financial institutions. If triable issues are not involved, which required leading and recording of evidence, then it is not mandatory to frame issues and an application under Section 12(2) of C.P.C. can be decided on the basis of available case record and undisputed facts. Ratable distribution under Section 73 read with Order XXXIV Rule 13 of Civil procedure Code; Bank having a mortgage decree in its favour has a preferential status over a money decree, which is in favour of Plaintiff. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 734 | Suit 1306/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | DARUS SALAM C.H.S (Plaintiff) VS KBCA & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-MAY-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 735 | 2017 CLD 508 | I. A 1/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sikandar Ali (Appellant) VS Ali Akber (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 736 | Const. P. 1780/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ladhiya (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 737 | Suit 886/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1999 | Syed Raza Haider Rizvi (Plaintiff) VS Gordon Shipping Company Ltd. and another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUL-18 | No | Plaintiff was employee of defendants (employers) who were bound to provide him proper medical treatment---Plea raised by plaintiff was that due to failure of defendants to provide medical treatment, he had suffered permanent physical disability due to injury sustained by him during duty---Validity---Defendants neither produced any document about complete recovery of plaintiff nor had questioned authenticity of documents produced by plaintiff---Expert opinion of doctors further substantiated the fact that till March-1999 plaintiff was not fully recovered from injury which inhibited his pursuit of career---Testimony of plaintiff (employee) and undisputed documentary evidence produced by him weighed in favour of plaintiff as against oral evidence of defendant that complete medical treatment was given to plaintiff---To extent of negligence shown by defendants (employers) in providing incomplete medical treatment of plaintiff stood proved---Suit for damages and compensation was decreed accordingly. Plaintiff was employee of defendants (employers) who were bound to provide him proper medical treatment---Plea raised by plaintiff was that due to failure of defendants to provide medical treatment, he had suffered permanent physical disability due to injury sustained by him during duty---Validity---Defendants neither produced any document about complete recovery of plaintiff nor had questioned authenticity of documents produced by plaintiff---Expert opinion of doctors further substantiated the fact that till March-1999 plaintiff was not fully recovered from injury which inhibited his pursuit of career---Testimony of plaintiff (employee) and undisputed documentary evidence produced by him weighed in favour of plaintiff as against oral evidence of defendant that complete medical treatment was given to plaintiff---To extent of negligence shown by defendants (employers) in providing incomplete medical treatment of plaintiff stood proved---Suit for damages and compensation was decreed accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 738 | Civil Revision 139/1997 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1997 | Abdul Salam thr Lrs and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Yaqoob and other (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 739 | Const. P. 4843/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Maj. Rtd. Tariq Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khalida Jilajni and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.528-K/2017 Maj.(Retd) Tariq Lodhi v. Mst: Khalida Jilani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 740 | Suit 1755/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Ahmed Saeed and others (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh, through the Secretary, Education Department and two others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 741 | Adm. Suit 628/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Marhaba Aviation Services Private Limited (Plaintiff) VS Real Air Travel (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-FEB-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 742 | Const. P. 1564/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Kirshan (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 743 | Const. P. 864/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Mohammad Ali Jamro (Petitioner) VS Chairman National Database and Registration Athou (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.48-K/2018 Muhammad Ali Jamro v. The Chairman National Database and Registration Authority and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 744 | Election Appeal 39/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Mohib Ali (Appellant) VS Returning Officer and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 745 | Const. P. 1283/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Ali Abid Bozdar (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 746 | Judicial Companies Misc. 47/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Aisha Steel Mills Limited & Others (Applicant) VS Nil (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 747 | Const. P. 4675/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Abid Hussain Solangi & Ors P O Sindh & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-APR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 748 | Const. P. 3166/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Saima Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 749 | Const. P. 3381/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Mst. Fozia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 750 | Const. P. 1563/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Munwar Hussain Solangi (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-MAR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 751 | Const. P. 1407/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Dr. Moiinuddin Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federal Secretary, Water and Power, Govt. of Pakistan (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 752 | Const. P. 1286/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Nabi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 753 | Civil Revision 289/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Vth Addl Distt Judge & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 754 | Civil Revision 160/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Hussain thr: L.Rs & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 755 | Const. P. 1659/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Naila Bano & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 756 | Const. P. 116/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | mST nASEERAN (Petitioner) VS po sINDH (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 757 | Const. P. 428/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Khuda Bux (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S K.N.Shah and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-JUN-19 | Yes | Parties recklessly invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of Court, which act on their part consumes valuable time of Court and litigants should be dealt with strictly and such type of petition is to be dismissed with heavy costs. Parties recklessly invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of Court, which act on their part consumes valuable time of Court and litigants should be dealt with strictly and such type of petition is to be dismissed with heavy costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 758 | Suit 1396/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | AURANGZAIB QURESHI & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS THE CHAIRMAN P.I.A & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 08-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 759 | Const. P. 2178/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Muhammad Asif Khan (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board Faisal (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) | ||||
| 760 | Suit 1680/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Shahzad Nabi. (Plaintiff) VS Naseer Turabi & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 761 | 2021 PCr.LJ 1270 | Const. P. 2147/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Abdul Ghafar S/o Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | Every disease, if not attended properly, would cause negative and hazardous effect to life but it doesn???t mean that its medical remedy is bail from the recovery of such diseases. His treatment in a best available hospital under a care of best team of doctors could serve the best option. These stresses and pressures discussed could only be ruled out if a patient remains away from all these stresses and strains and the best possible place for the prescribed health issues is a Hospital where a patient could be treated free from all such stress possibilities. Post Arrest Bail Application on medical ground dismissed in view of the recommendations of the Medical Board | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.363-K/2020 Abdul Ghaffar v. Federation of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 762 | H.C.A 249/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) VS Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-NOV-20 | Yes | principal of awarding demurrage charges and analysis of Force Majeure clause of COA | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.A.76-K/2020 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation v. Pakistan State Oil Company, Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 763 | Const. P. 8061/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Ms. Rahila Anjum Ansari (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 764 | Suit 436/1993 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1993 | SHAHIMAH SAYEED (Plaintiff) VS BASE CDR PAF BASE MASROOR (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 765 | Const. P. 1256/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mrs. Farida Mansoor (Petitioner) VS S.B.C.A and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 766 | Const. P. 355/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Muneer Ahmed Bhutto & others (Petitioner) VS Director General NAB & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.1376/2021 Muneer Ahmed Bhotto and others v. The Director General, National Accountability Bureau (Sindh), Sukkur Sindh and another,C.P.4153/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountablity, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Muneer Ahmed Bhutto and others,C.A.3034/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountablity, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Muneer Ahmed Bhutto and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | ||
| 767 | Suit 1778/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Iqbal. (Plaintiff) VS Zafar Hussain & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-JUN-21 | Yes | With regard to the claim of damages of Rupees Two Hundred Crores, for suffering mental agony and physical torture, no evidence has been led by the Plaintiff in support of the same. If Plaintiff was physically assaulted, the first thing, which comes to mind, is that whether any complaint was lodged with the Police? Plaintiff has not led any evidence, nor brought on record anything about the fact that he was physically tortured or suffered mental agony. Thus, this claim also cannot be accepted in absence of positive evidence, as onus to prove the same is on Plaintiff, but he failed to discharge it. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 768 | Const. P. 6559/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Imtiaz Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 769 | Const. P. 4028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Tanvir Jamshed (Petitioner) VS Muhamad Hanif and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 770 | Const. P. 7194/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 771 | Const. P. 6148/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Fahim Khan Gabol and Others (Petitioner) VS DG SBCA & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1644-K/2021 Fahim Khan Gabol & others v. Director General Sindh Building Control Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 772 | Const. P. 3902/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mst. Rukhsana Bano and Ors (Petitioner) VS KMC and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.55-K/2022 Haji Jaffer Khan v. KMC (Karachi Muncipal Coorporation) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 773 | Const. P. 1407/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Ashwar Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1675-K/2021 Ashwar Kumar v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 774 | Const. P. 6989/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Farhan (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 775 | Const. P. 139/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2021 | Kamran Khan Yousufzai (Petitioner) VS Mst Asma Yousufzai & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-MAR-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 776 | Const. P. 861/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Imdad Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-JAN-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 777 | Const. P. 1071/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Manzoor Ahmed Lashari (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 778 | Cr.Rev 110/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2019 | Ashique Ali Shah & others (Applicant) VS Punhal Khan Chandio & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-JAN-22 | No | The issue was decided multiple times in earlier round of litigation, as discussed above, and although applicants can file an application under Section 265-H or 265-K, Cr. P. C, for a premature acquittal in the matter, but allowing such type of cases to continue would be an abuse of the process of Court, which can and should be remedied under Section 561-A, Cr. P. C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 779 | Const. P. 2387/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Jason Charles (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 780 | Const. P. 3207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Bawar Tawfiq & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 781 | Const. P. 370/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Mst Bibi Naz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-JAN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 782 | Const. P. 6734/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mst. Bilqis Bano and Others (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Defence and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-AUG-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 783 | Suit 614/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | ZAFAR AHMED. (Plaintiff) VS ASSOCIATES PRESS OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-AUG-22 | Yes | The Defendants have illegally deprived the Plaintiff from the benefits of enhanced pension since 01.07.2000. Defendants should have considered the service rendered by Plaintiff to the Organization; he has given his prime years of life to Defendants No.1 and in all fairness deserves a fair treatment from Defendant No1. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 784 | Const. P. 2024/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Zaffar Ali (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 785 | Const. P. 2052/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Mehmood S/O Muhammad Rahim (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer Local Govt: Sanghar & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 786 | Suit 41/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Shahid & another. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Zainab & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 28-FEB-23 | Yes | no Inheritable Property. Plaint Rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 787 | Suit 234/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | BASIRAT DAD KHAN LODHI & ORS (Plaintiff) VS FARHAT DAD KHAN LODHI & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-APR-23 | Yes | Defendant is bonafide Purchaser for Value whose interest is to be protected. Suit dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 788 | Const. P. 153/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mst. Sheza Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Irfan (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-APR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 789 | Const. P. 22/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Khatoon Parekh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 790 | Criminal Miscelleneous 117/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | MUNEER ALI (Applicant) VS P.O SINDH & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-APR-23 | No | Habeas Corpus Petition dismissed. Declining moral standards of Society. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 791 | R.A (Civil Revision) 55/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Muhammad Tarique (Applicant) VS Director of Southern Circle of Archeology (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-MAY-23 | Yes | Cause of action ceased to exist cannot be revived by a subsequent correspondence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 792 | R.A (Civil Revision) 91/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Hussaini S/o Asghar Ali (Applicant) VS Ali Tayab and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-24 | No | Headnote is not a case law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 793 | Const. P. 1437/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Rana Khawar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-APR-24 | No | The Secretary / Chairman, Sindh Cooperative Housing Authority denied his Signature-Matter referred to the Chief Secretary. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 794 | Const. P. 362/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Dr. Ikram Baig (Petitioner) VS 6.th Addational Session judg Hyd & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-NOV-23 | Yes | In this writ jurisdiction appraisal of the evidence cannot be done, but it can be seen only to such an extent, to consider, whether the Finding / Decision of the Family Court or the Appellate Court is either contrary to the undisputed record or have completely ignored the law developed on a particular issue, by the Superior Courts. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 795 | Suit 1592/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | MST.SHAMIM AKHTER & ORS. (Plaintiff) VS MST.NAZAR BARI & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-SEP-23 | Yes | Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, not applicable retrospectively. Legal Heirs of pre-deceased son will not inherit. Suit not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 796 | Const. P. 1194/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Abdul Hakeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 797 | Const. P. 645/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Mst Mumtaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 798 | Const. P. 905/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Saqib S/o Aurangzeb (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Employment in lieu of monetary claim. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 799 | F.R.A 655/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | M/s.Delawala Enterprises (Appellant) VS Salman Saeed Mahmood (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Rent accepted in lump sum, no default is committed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 800 | Cr.Bail 405/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Muhammad Awais (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 801 | Criminal Appeal 152/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Allan S/o Sachidino (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUN-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 802 | Const. P. 653/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Aftab Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-JUN-24 | No | Guidelines for utilization of Social Welfare Funds. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 803 | Const. P. 293/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Adil & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-OCT-24 | Yes | Matter falls within the competence of Tribunal as such challenge to the subject Notification does not lie under Article 199 of the Constitution in view of bar set out in Article 212 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | |||
| 804 | II.A. 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mrs. Raisa Bano and others (Appellant) VS Ms. Tooba Shoaib and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JAN-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 805 | Suit 286/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | SYED WAQAR HAIDER ZAIDI (Plaintiff) VS MST.ALAM ARA (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 806 | 2016 PLD Pesh. 367 | Suit 1030/1991 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1991 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-MAR-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 807 | Const. P. 1460/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Saleem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & O rs (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 808 | 2016 CLC 878, 2017 CLC 1387 | Suit 176/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1985 | Trading Corporation of Pakistan Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Haji Khuda Bux Amir Umer ltd (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-JAN-16 | No | ??? Any shortcoming in compliance of Order 29 Rule 1 is curable, for instance, if a formal Board Resolution is not there, then the Articles of Association and / or internal record [un-rebutted one] like Note Sheets, can be taken into account to determine about the authority of a person instituting a legal proceeding / suit. Articles of Association empower the Board of Directors to institute and defend legal proceedings; Articles 106 and 113, deal with quorum and at least two Directors can pass an effective and valid Board resolution. Since Noting sheet produced in the evidence confirms that Directors of the Plaintiff Corporation had discussed the issue and authorized the filing of instant suit, which was subsequently filed by the person authorized in the above document, the conclusion is that the suit was properly and competently filed. Noting sheet can be taken as Board Resolution by Circulation. ??? If the very suit has been unauthorizedly and incompetently filed, that is, neither any authorization from the Board of Directors exists, nor the Articles of Association provide such authority, then such a defect remains incurable, even by a subsequent ratification. If the very suit has been unauthorizedly and incompetently filed, that is, neither any authorization from the Board of Directors exists, nor the Articles of Association provide such authority, then such a defect remains incurable, even by a subsequent ratification. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 809 | 2017 YLR 242, 2017 YLR 424 | Const. P. 846/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Abdul Haq and Others (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-APR-16 | Yes | Constitutional petition---Claim of petitioner was disputed by respondents and Revenue Authorities---Due process of law---Applicability---Due process of law was of wide import and its applicability varied from case to case in accordance with the set of facts and circumstances---Due process of law was also directly related to the rights, interest and entitlement of a person as recognized by law---Petitioners could not make out a prime facie case of their legal entitlement of possession of suit property---Entries in the revenue record about their alleged claim were under scrutiny before the concerned authorities---Term "due process of law" was not applicable in circumstances---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. Constitutional petition---Claim of petitioner was disputed by respondents and Revenue Authorities---Due process of law---Applicability---Due process of law was of wide import and its applicability varied from case to case in accordance with the set of facts and circumstances---Due process of law was also directly related to the rights, interest and entitlement of a person as recognized by law---Petitioners could not make out a prime facie case of their legal entitlement of possession of suit property---Entries in the revenue record about their alleged claim were under scrutiny before the concerned authorities---Term "due process of law" was not applicable in circumstances---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.10-K/2017 Tariq Javed v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 810 | 2017 YLR 1174 | Const. P. 3379/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Latif Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-JUL-16 | No | An election for the reserved seat in a Municipal Committee without first filling up the vacant general seat in one of its Wards, will be an exercise in futility, as it will adversely affect the subsequent election of Chairman and Vice Chairman of that Municipal Committee. Consequently, in terms of Rule 47 of the Sindh Local Councils (Election) Rules, 2015, relating to electoral college should be complied with. Thus propriety also demands that a political party which enjoys a majority in a Municipal Committee should at least be given a fair opportunity to elect a chairman and vice chairman of that Municipal Committee An election for the reserved seat in a Municipal Committee without first filling up the vacant general seat in one of its Wards, will be an exercise in futility, as it will adversely affect the subsequent election of Chairman and Vice Chairman of that Municipal Committee. Consequently, in terms of Rule 47 of the Sindh Local Councils (Election) Rules, 2015, relating to electoral college should be complied with. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.2292/2016 Sheikh Khalid Hussain v. Abdul Latif Sheikh & others,C.P.1823/2016 Shaikh Khalid Hussain v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of |
| 811 | Const. P. 1672/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 812 | Const. P. 586/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Shabnam & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 813 | Suit 1063/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Rauf & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Amin Lakhani & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-SEP-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 814 | 2018 PLD SC 483 | Suit 139/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Diamond Weld Rods (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Messrs Stal Co GmbH and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JAN-18 | Yes | Suit for recovery of money and injunction---Freight, payment of---Grievance of plaintiff company against shipping company was that due to local shipping agent, a delay was caused in unloading product from vessel and it resulted in incurring of demurrage and other avoidable expenses/charges---Validity---Document produced by plaintiff as Bill of Lading was though not forged but it did not fulfil requirement of Bill of Lading and same could be considered as such--- Bill of Lading produced by shipping company was genuine as it fulfilled its statutory requirements---Plaintiff was required to pay freight to shipping company as Bill of Lading clearly mentioned that Suit for recovery of money and injunction---Freight. Document produced by plaintiff as Bill of Lading was though not forged but it did not fulfil requirement of Bill of Lading and same could be considered as such--- Bill of Lading produced by shipping company was genuine as it fulfilled its statutory requirements---Plaintiff was required to pay freight to shipping company as Bill of Lading clearly mentioned that 'freight to be collected at destination port'---Such legal and factual position was backed by Ss. 47 & 48 of Karachi Port Trust Act, 1886 and goods could not be removed from public warehouse or sheds until freight in respect thereof was paid either to master or owner of vessel--- Suit was decreed accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||
| 815 | Const. P. 1626/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ayaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 816 | Const. P. 1845/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Rozina & another (Petitioner) VS SSP N/Feroz & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 817 | Const. P. 1555/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mubarak Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 818 | Const. P. 1613/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sht Husna (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 819 | Const. P. 1789/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 820 | Const. P. 961/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst: Raheema (Petitioner) VS Noor Muhammad & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 821 | Const. P. 1061/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Jamalan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 822 | Const. P. 1894/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Islamuddin (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.746-K/2019 M/s Star Electronics v. Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-IV Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 823 | Const. P. 828/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Naveed Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 824 | Const. P. 1522/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mir Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 825 | Const. P. 3553/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Niaz Ali Balouch and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 826 | Civil Revision 243/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | WAPDA,Thr:Superintending Eng,LBOD (Applicant) VS Land Acquistion Officer LBOD Project Wapda and Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 827 | Suit 1417/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | MRS. ZAIBA KABLY (Plaintiff) VS TARIQ NAZIR BUKHARI (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 02-APR-19 | Yes | Plaint will not be returned, merely because immovable property is situate outside territorial jurisdiction, when the actual relief sought is for recovery of sale price and damages against wrongful act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 828 | Suit 1763/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mrs. Farha Zafar. (Plaintiff) VS Major (R) Wasim Pasha Tajammal & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 829 | Const. P. 645/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Sardar (Petitioner) VS SSP Jamshoro & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 830 | Const. P. 1464/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Mustafa Machi & another (Petitioner) VS IG Sindh &Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 831 | Const. P. 1819/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Sakrand SBA & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 832 | Const. P. 556/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Qadir Bux (Petitioner) VS DIG SBA and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 833 | Const. P. 1660/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Kainat & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP Khairpur & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 834 | Const. P. 1151/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 835 | Const. P. 1402/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Faiza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 836 | Const. P. 1432/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Syed Muhammad Asghar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 837 | Const. P. 1726/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Manjhi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 838 | Const. P. 1735/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mubin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA & Or.s (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 839 | Const. P. 1772/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Haji Punhoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 840 | Const. P. 1857/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Nabi Kapri (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 13-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 841 | Suit 752/1984 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1984 | Cherat Cement Company Limited (Plaintiff) VS Ghazanfar Ali & two others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-JUL-17 | Yes | Two Suits i-e, Suit for Recovery filed by the plaintiff and suit for Declaration, Cancellation and Damages filed by the defendants were decided in a single judgment. The Suit of Plaintiff was decreed whereas the Suit of defendant was dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 842 | 2019 CLC 583 | Const. P. 1802/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Premier Battery Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Karachi Water and Sewerage Board and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-AUG-17 | Yes | Petitioner had not participated in bidding process and assailed Public Notice and bidding process without fulfilling any of the conditions mentioned in the Public Notice---Validity---Petitioner had commercial motive that entire process should be started afresh--- Once the procuring authorities started bidding/ tendering process, provisions of Rr. 17(3) & 18 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, would be applicable and such stage was a subsequent one and had not reached---Petitioner did not have any locus standi to assail procurement process, as it did not even participate in first stage of the process by submitting Expression of Interest---Public Notice in question did not violate any of the provisions of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010---Basic information according to R. 73 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, contained about subject project, eligibility of participants, date of purchase of Expression of Interest document and the same could also be down loaded from Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority website and last date of submission also---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Once the procuring authorities started bidding/ tendering process, provisions of Rr. 17(3) & 18 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, would be applicable and such stage was a subsequent one and had not reached---Petitioner did not have any locus standi to assail procurement process, as it did not even participate in first stage of the process by submitting Expression of Interest---Public Notice in question did not violate any of the provisions of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010---Basic information according to R. 73 of Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2010, contained about subject project, eligibility of participants, date of purchase of Expression of Interest document and the same could also be down loaded from Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority website and last date of submission also---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.481-K/2017 Premier Barrtery Industries (Pvt) Ltd v. Karachi Water & Seawerage Board and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 843 | Const. P. 1891/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Ali (Petitioner) VS Inspector Allan Abbasi & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 844 | Const. P. 1832/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 845 | Civil Revision 50/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Syed Ghulam Rasool Shah (Petitioner) VS Abdul Jabbar & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 846 | Suit 1042/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Khalid Mehmood and others (Plaintiff) VS M/s Multi Plus Corporation Private Limited and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-OCT-17 | Yes | The Limitation Law is a part of positive law as held in Ghulam Qadir case (ibid) and should be given due effect in the light of numerous dicta. When an action is filed after the prescribed period of limitation, it can prejudice rights and interest of opponents, which right have accrued in the intervening period, hence, time barred actions cannot be termed as a mere technicality. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 847 | Suit 504/1984 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1984 | Tewfiq Fikree and others (Plaintiff) VS Umahani Fikree and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-JAN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 848 | Const. P. 1526/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 849 | Const. P. 1981/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Lachhmi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 850 | Const. P. 1861/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Khano (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 851 | Const. P. 1990/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 09-JAN-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio | ||||
| 852 | Suit 1569/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2000 | Ali Muhammad & another (Plaintiff) VS Faizullah & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-MAY-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 853 | Const. P. 1776/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Saira & another (Petitioner) VS SSP Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 854 | Suit 2531/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-JUN-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 855 | Const. P. 1539/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ifsar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst Fahmida & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 856 | Const. P. 294/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Habibullah (Petitioner) VS Iftikhar Ahmed and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 857 | Const. P. 686/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 858 | Const. P. 1459/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ubaidullah (Petitioner) VS Learned 5th Addl S.J Hyd (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 859 | Const. P. 741/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Muhammad Haroon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary [L.U], Board of Revenue & 4 others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 860 | Const. P. 2105/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Mst. Bhalan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-MAY-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 861 | Suit 2501/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Umer Sharif & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Saeed Bakhsh (Pvt) Limited. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JAN-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 862 | Const. P. 1850/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Syed Wilayat Shah (Petitioner) VS SSP SBA & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 863 | Const. P. 2732/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Hayat Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1438-K/2018 Hayat Muhammad v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: M/o Defence and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 864 | Const. P. 65/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Mst. Razia Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 865 | Const. P. 1392/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Abdul Hameed Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 866 | Const. P. 1189/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS PO Sindfh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 867 | Const. P. 157/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Uroosa Kalwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-JUL-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 868 | Suit 595/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | INAM HAFIZ SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 19-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 869 | Civil Revision 94/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2002 | Muhammad Bux and others (Applicant) VS Abdul Rasool and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-DEC-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 870 | Election Appeal 1/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Allah Bux Khan (Appellant) VS Mukhtiar Ahmed Sahto (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 871 | Suit 665/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2003 | Umar Islam Khan (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Basit and others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 23-FEB-18 | Yes | Suit for Declaration and Cancellation decreed. Held that the impugned transaction/transfer in favour of Defendant No. 1 is to be struck down on three grounds. (i) Admittedly no sale price was paid by the Defendant no. 1 to plaintiffs. (ii) Even the mother could not have entered into such type of transaction, if at all it even assumed that deceased mother of plaintiffs did sign the affidavit, though no convincing evidence has been led by Defendant No. 1 with regard to this fact, and (iii) Under section 11 of Contract Act, Plaintiffs No. 2 and 3, being minors at that relevant time, could not have entered into sale transaction with Defendant No. 1, again, even if it assumed that these plaintiffs had signed the documents under challenge; such kind of transaction is held void ab initio. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 872 | Const. P. 375/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Imtiaz Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Education & Literacy & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-NOV-17 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 873 | Const. P. 1078/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Riaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 874 | Election Appeal 19/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Ghulam Hyder (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 875 | Cr.Bail 275/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Roshan Cholyani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-JUN-19 | Yes | Mere absondence of Applicant cannot be made ground for rejection of bail, if he is otherwise entitled to the concession of bail. Co-accused was already admitted to bail, hence, Applicant is also entitled to the concession of bail on the ground of rule of consistency. Case calls for further inquiry. Bail granted. Mere absondence of Applicant cannot be made ground for rejection of bail, if he is otherwise entitled to the concession of bail. Co-accused was already admitted to bail, hence, Applicant is also entitled to the concession of bail on the ground of rule of consistency. Case calls for further inquiry. Bail granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 876 | Suit 845/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ashraf Hussain Khan. (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Rehman Khan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 30-SEP-19 | Yes | Cases involving rights of inheritence are at higher pedestal, inter alia, in view of the Sharia Act, 1991. Cases involving rights of inheritence are at higher pedestal, inter alia, in view of the Sharia Act, 1991. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | |||
| 877 | Const. P. 598/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Kamran Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-APR-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 878 | H.C.A 78/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Fateh Sports Wear Ltd & Ors (Appellant) VS Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-AUG-20 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 879 | H.C.A 149/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Farhat Rashid (Appellant) VS Saba Farhat Rashid & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-AUG-20 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 880 | Const. P. 1101/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s Sun Metal Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 881 | 2021 CLC 389 | H.C.A 422/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Zafar Ali Kayani & others (Appellant) VS Ahmed Saleem Khan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 882 | Const. P. 4454/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Tariq Wali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 883 | Const. P. 1317/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Farida Azam Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-SEP-21 | Yes | Section 64-A of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925. The proceedings of Arbitration and that of the Appellate forum, under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, are to be executed as a decree of Civil Court, hence, the same cannot be overturned or interfered with by exercising administrative revisional jurisdiction, under Section 64-A of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, by the Provincial Government. Proceeding declared coram non judice and impugned Order quashed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 884 | Const. P. 3222/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Abdul Aziz Bullo (Petitioner) VS N A B and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.3480/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Abdul Aziz and another,C.A.2979/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Abdul Aziz and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | ||
| 885 | J.M 8/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/S. GETZ PHARMA (PVT.) LIMITED (Applicant) VS NOVARTIS AG & ANOTHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-SEP-21 | Yes | The Patents Ordinance, 2000. Section 27 of the Patents Ordinance, 2000, has two parts. One is relating to grant of Sealing Order about the main invention and the second part relates to Patent of Addition. There is no concept of automatic stay order, if a proceeding including that of Appeal is pending regarding the grant of patent in respect of the main invention. The Sealing Order under the Patents Ordinance, 2000, was issued after complying of fundamental requirements, coupled with the fact that there is a presumption under Article 129 Clause (e) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, that official acts are regularly performed, then, unless such official act is declared illegal in the main case, the basic ingredients for grant of injunction are not present in favour of Petitioner/Applicant. Injunction refused. Interpretation of statute: expressio unis est exclusio alterius and casus omissus explained. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.5311/2021 M/s Getz Pharma Pvt Limited, Karachi v. Novartis A.G. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 13-Feb-24) | |
| 886 | I. A 9/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Nand Lal and another (Appellant) VS M/S Askari Bank Ltd.and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 887 | Const. P. 3615/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Abdul Khaliq Pahinyar (Petitioner) VS NAB through its Chairman & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | C.P.4217/2021 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Abdul Khaliq and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | ||
| 888 | Const. P. 6377/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Meer Badsha (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 889 | Const. P. 6018/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Nawabzada Fatehullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 890 | Const. P. 145/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Goth Wasand Khan Kalmati Baloch Welfare Associatio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 891 | Const. P. 3091/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shahid Pervaiz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 892 | W.T.A 938/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: WTA 939 of 2000 | 2000 | Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) VS M/s Hashwani Services (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 893 | Const. P. 4886/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/s Amadeus I.T Group S.A (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 894 | Civil Revision 74/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Ameer Ahmed Jagirani (Applicant) VS P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 14-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 895 | Const. P. 181/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2021 | Kamran Khan Yousufzai (Petitioner) VS Mst Asma Yousufzai & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-MAR-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 896 | Const. P. 1146/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Irshad (Petitioner) VS SBCA & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-SEP-21 | No | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 897 | Const. P. 2116/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mst. Nighat Naeem (Petitioner) VS K.D.A and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 898 | Const. P. 1568/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Mst Rehana Hamid Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 899 | Const. P. 2001/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2022 | Karim Bux Rind (Petitioner) VS Regional Election Commission SBA Div & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-JUN-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 900 | Suit 1202/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | MRS.TARANUM SABIH (Plaintiff) VS KBCA & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 901 | Suit 424/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MADNI AHMED ALI ARFAT SIDDIQUI (Plaintiff) VS SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-OCT-22 | Yes | Length of service only is not a criteria for promotion; present qualification of plaintiff should have direct nexus with the Posts advertised. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 902 | Suit 1228/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mst. Shahnaz Abid. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Visionary Baluchistan Media Corp. (Pvt) Ltd. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 06-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 903 | R.A (Civil Revision) 72/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Muhammad Ramzan andothers (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 904 | Cr.Bail 193/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | MUHAMMAD UMAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE489 (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 905 | Suit 1189/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Captain Adnan Andalib Siddiqui & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Shahnaz Hyder & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 24-OCT-22 | Yes | The other undisputed but crucial fact is that since decades both Plaintiffs and their families are residing in the Suit Property, although the lease is in the name of Claimant. It is to be determined through a proper trial that whether the Suit Property was given to the Claimant as her exclusive Property or the same was the compensation given to the Family of Deceased | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 906 | F.R.A 1/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of 2023 | 2023 | Mirza Nadeem Baig (Appellant) VS Pakistan Kaimkhani Education Trust (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-MAY-23 | Yes | Rent Controller determined unfair rent instead of fair rent. Order set-aside. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | C.P.1004-K/2023 Pakistan Kaimkhani Education Trust v. Mirza Nadeem Baig Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 907 | Const. P. 206/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Wateen Telecom Pvt. Ltd. Hyd (Petitioner) VS Abdul Sattar Khoso & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 06-NOV-23 | Yes | No inquiry done under section 15 of the Sindh Payment of Wages Act 2015. Case remanded. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 908 | J.M 51/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | Humayun Kabir Khan and another. (Applicant) VS Mst.Gulshan Naseem Akhtar and another. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-JUL-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 909 | Const. P. 1716/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | P&T Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Sect: Coop Department and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-APR-24 | Yes | Impugned Notification set-aside. The Society should not be subject to unnecessary scrutiny by the officials. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 910 | Const. P. 1242/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P.No.D-1385 of 2023 | 2023 | Faisal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-NOV-23 | Yes | Human Capital Development is the need of the hour. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | |||
| 911 | Const. P. 1084/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | M/s Chase Up (Petitioner) VS The Commissioner IR & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-APR-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 912 | Criminal Appeal 24/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Akhtar Zaman (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-JUN-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam | ||||
| 913 | Const. P. 1486/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Faqeer Fateh Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 914 | Const. P. 1594/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Muhammad Sultan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 915 | Const. P. 1509/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 916 | Const. P. 1199/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Razique Dino (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||
| 917 | I. A 2/1983 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 1983 | Muhammad Aslam (Appellant) VS Mst. Shakila and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author) | ||||
| 918 | Const. P. 914/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2024 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-OCT-24 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||||