Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.No. | Citation | Case No. | Case Year | Parties | Bench Type | Order/Judgment | Order_Date | A.F.R | Head Notes/ Tag Line | Bench | Apex Court | Apex Status |
| 1 | Const. P. 531/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Dhmro Kholi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 2 | Cr.Bail 686/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Asif @ Meenda (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 3 | Cr.Bail 104/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Meena (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 4 | Cr.Bail 836/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Eidan (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 5 | Const. P. 26/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 6 | Cr.Bail 673/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Iftikhar Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 7 | Const. P. 1163/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mohan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 8 | Cr.Misc. 283/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ramesh Kumar (Applicant) VS SSP Tando Muhammad Khan & ors. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 9 | Const. P. 2137/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Nawaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 10 | Cr.Bail 1086/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Hassan and an Other (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 11 | 2022 PLC (CS) Note 6 | Const. P. 1970/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.2553/2020 Prof. Dr. Shamsuddin Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariate, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 12 | H.C.A 29/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2006 | Muhammad Imran Mustaqeem & Ors (Appellant) VS Muhammad Mustaqeem & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-FEB-24 | Yes | The object of petition for Letters of Administration is only to the extent of its grant or otherwise and the question of sale and purchase of the properties does not arise whereas in the instant matter despite objections taken by one of the legal heirs for its conversion into a suit, the property was attempted to be auctioned. Once the property devolved amongst the legal heirs that was and is the end of the lis filed in shape of petition for Letters of Administration. Hence, in all fairness not only the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed but now since the property is to be devolved amongst the legal heirs, the Letters of Administration be issued accordingly, if it has not been issued as yet, leaving it up to them i.e. legal heirs to see/decide the fate of their property as they deem fit and proper and not in a petition, which is/was only to the extent of grant of Letters of Administration. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 13 | Criminal Appeal 7/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2021 | Ali Nawaz Lolai (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-JUN-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 14 | Cr.Bail 697/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MST. DANIA WD/O SHAHBAZ NATHWANI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 15 | I. A 20/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | WAPDA (Appellant) VS L.A.O. & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||||
| 16 | H.C.A 52/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Khoula Siddiqui Advocate (Appellant) VS Tariq Bin Azad & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-JAN-24 | Yes | It was eventually be decided by the learned single Judge on the strength of the evidence likely to be recorded by the parties, however, prima facie it seems that the amount was paid from the account of deceased Azad Bin Haider and at this point of time respondent No.1 (son of deceased), cannot get away with the entire rental income of the aforesaid property depriving the daughters of deceased. In all fairness, he could only claim his share out of the rental income from the said property from the Nazir, whereas, rest of the amount shall remain with the Nazir duly invested in a profit bearing scheme, until and unless it is resolved by the court. Order accordingly. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 17 | 2024 SBLR Sindh 1781 | H.C.A 52/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Gohar Yaqoob Khan through attorney Ghulam Qadir (Appellant) VS Abdul Rasheed Memon and Another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-FEB-24 | Yes | The present cause, as disclosed in the application seeking amendments, is a cause which triggered on 28.09.2020, which is altogether different than the frame of the suit itself. If that is permitted to carry out, this not only would change complexion of the suit but rights of the parties will also be prejudiced as material evidence, either in the shape of plaintiff/ appellant???s evidence or defendants???/respondents??? evidence in shape of affidavit-in-evidence has already been recorded/filed and that would have not disclosed the facts of incident reported in the application. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.524-K/2024 Gohar Yaqoob Khan v. Abdul Rasheed Memon and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 18 | H.C.A 354/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Punjab Trading Agency (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Trading Corporation of Pakistan Matter | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | |||
| 19 | Const. P. 2224/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sajjan Khan Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 20 | Const. P. 2195/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 21 | Cr.Bail 757/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sabagho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 22 | Cr.Bail 943/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Haroon (Applicant) VS The State & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 23 | Const. P. 2174/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Qamar Ul Din (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 24 | Cr.Bail 418/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Sajid @ Jaro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 25 | Cr.Bail 355/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Sajid @ Aatish (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | Crl.P.20-K/2018 Mohammad Sajid @ Aatish v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | ||
| 26 | Cr.Bail 117/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Siddique (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 27 | Cr.Bail 566/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Adnan Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 28 | Cr.Bail 882/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | chetan & another (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 29 | Const. P. 2239/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Farzana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 30 | Criminal Appeal 3/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Dost Muhammad Thebo & Another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-JUN-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 31 | I. A 11/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Works & Service (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) Hyd & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 32 | Criminal Appeal 79/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1999 | Taj Mohammad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 33 | Cr.Misc. 229/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | DR. SHEHZAD NASIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-APR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 34 | Cr.Bail 518/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | MUHAMMAD TAHIR JATOI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-OCT-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 35 | 2024 PLD Sindh 276, 2024 CLD 765, 2024 CLD 888 | I. A 127/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Mst Khursheed Begum & Ors (Appellant) VS NIB Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-FEB-24 | Yes | limitation of liability to the extent of a cap provided by the registered mortgage deed | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.284-K/2024 Mst. khursheed begum through L.Rs. and others v. M.C.B. Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 36 | Const. P. 2070/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS Mst. Anita Kalim and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-JAN-24 | Yes | This is not the court which can reappraise the facts as concurrently maintained by the two courts below as this is not the court of appeal. The jurisdiction of this court under Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan in relation to findings of facts is limited. The petitioner has already exhausted their remedies by moving the application under Section-12(2) CPC followed by dismissal of revision application and this court under Article-199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan cannot sit on the concurrent findings of facts of two courts below. No interference is required as far as the dismissal of the main revision application is concerned. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 37 | H.C.A 220/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | M/s. S.M.Corporation (Pvt) Ltd Ors (Appellant) VS Muhammad Mohsin Butt & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-APR-24 | Yes | Not always but invariably the limitation is found to be mixed question of law and fact. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 38 | H.C.A 325/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Pakistan Defence Officers (Appellant) VS Muhammad Akram Qureshi & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 39 | Cr.Bail 998/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Soomar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 40 | Cr.Bail 939/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Sumaira (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 41 | Cr.Bail 1117/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ghulam Murtaza (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 42 | Const. P. 1615/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mr. Darvesh Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 43 | Cr.Bail 231/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mir Khan & Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Applicants Dildar & Gul Bahar have sought post-arrest bail under Section 302, 337-J & 34 P.P.C. after by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. It is stated in the FIR that her daughter Khushboo was married to Applicant Dildar. Dildar used to beat her daughter. On17-7-2016 she was informed by her brother named Mushtaq Ahmed that Khushboo had been poisoned by Applicant Dildar, his parents Applicants Mir Khan and Hasina and his brother Hajan and that she is serious condition and he istaking her to civil hospital Daur. The final medical report bearing number PMCHNSBA/679/2017 dated 28-9-2017 concluded that no poison has been detected. The medical report further concluded that due to decomposition of the body, the cause of death cannot be ascertained however bone injury and poison has been excluded. The F.I.R. is delayed by nearly 5 months. It appears from the prosecution case that some time was consumed in the complainant filing a section 22- A, B Cr.P.C. Applicant Gul Bahar was not nominated in the present F.I.R. Neither, the learned DPG nor his own counsel can explain how and when he was included in the case. Neither does the challan filed by the police reveal any detail . Pre-arrest bail granted earlier to applicants Mir Muhammad, Mst. Haseena and Hajjan @ Haji and Dildar Machi & Gul Bahar were admitted to post arrest bail. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | |||
| 44 | Const. P. 76/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Parakho (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 45 | Const. P. 44/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Jameela (Petitioner) VS Prvoince of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 46 | Cr.Acq.A. 107/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst Bakhtawar (Appellant) VS Aqeel Ahmed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 47 | Const. P. 2242/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Younus & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 48 | Cr.Bail 1046/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Nazeer Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 49 | Cr.Bail 957/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Wahid (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 50 | Cr.Bail 924/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Khalil (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 51 | Cr.Bail 576/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Muhammad Ilyas & Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 52 | Const. P. 978/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 53 | Cr.Rev 5/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Chatto Khan Suhandro (Applicant) VS Ghulam Nabi Suhandro and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-APR-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.653/2021 Chatto Khan v. Ghulam Nabi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 54 | Cr.Bail 1105/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | ABDUL GHAFFAR MEMON (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 55 | Cr.J.A 268/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | KHAMISO @ JOGI S/O HASHIM BARAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 56 | Cr.Bail 461/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Crl.Misc. Nos.98 and 107 of 2022 | 2022 | HAMZA S/O SOOMAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||||
| 57 | H.C.A 274/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | M/s. China Mobile Pak Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Makran Communication & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 18-JAN-24 | Yes | Health status of one of the partners of firm could not be attributed to the termination of agreement/license agreement and more importantly, if it is not established to be an ???unlawful termination of license???, then the principal cannot be saddled with the responsibility of paying the damages of whatsoever nature. A lawful termination may have effected someone???s health, but the lawful actions taken cannot be subjected to claim of damages. Only unlawful termination may give rise to a claim of damages. Since it is not established to be an unlawful termination, therefore question of awarding damages does not arise | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.221-K/2024 M/s China Mobile Pak Ltd. v. M/s Makran Communication and others,C.A.11-K/2024 M/s China Mobile Pak Ltd. (C.M. Pak LTD Zong) v. M/s Makran Communication and others,C.A.12-K/2024 M/s Makran Communication and another v. M/s China Mobile Pak Ltd & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending ,Pending ,Pending | |
| 58 | I. A 21/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | WAPDA thr: Supdt: Engg: (Appellant) VS L.A.O. & LBOD Project Wapda Sanghar & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 59 | 2024 SBLR Sindh 793 | H.C.A 465/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Murtaza Baig & others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-24 | Yes | The impugned order is only an interlocutory order and the main application under section 12(2) CPC is pending. The elections of the society pending since last more than six years i.e. ever since this appeal is filed and pending. It is therefore in the interest of the Society itself that the elections be held at the earliest with the inclusion of these applicants of application under section 12(2) CPC, identified as respondents in the instant appeal. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.302-K/2024 P.I.D.C Employees Multipurpose & another v. Province of Sindh &Y others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 60 | Spl. Cr. A. 31/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Bacha Khan Khilji (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-JUN-23 | Yes | The Complainant and Investigation Officer were the same person, the threshold of the constitution of conscious possession of the accused under the Control of Narcotics Substance Act, safe custody and safe transmission established where the sample remains sealed and contradictions in witness statements and the memos prepared to be understood in the background of surrounding facts. Appeal dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) | Crl.P.134-K/2023 Bacha Khan v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 61 | H.C.A 129/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Raeesa Begum (Appellant) VS Mst. Zubaida Idress (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-MAR-24 | Yes | The evidence produced by the appellants were hearsay and the witnesses were unable to support the case of the appellants, particularly when it is weighed and compared with the evidence as produced by plaintiff/respondent No.1, orally as well as documentary | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.330-K/2024 Mst. Raeesa Begum through L.Rs. v. Mst. Zubaida idrees through her L.Rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 62 | H.C.A 90/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Basham Baloch and Others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-MAR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.518-K/2024 Basham Baloch through L.Rs. and others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others,C.P.L.A.247-K/2024 Hussain Bux Soomro v. Atta Muhammad Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending ,Pending | ||
| 63 | Spl.Cr.J.A 7/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Lal Bux Brohi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-JUN-23 | Yes | Establishing the chain of safe custody under the Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) | |||
| 64 | 2024 PLD Sindh 279 | H.C.A 256/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | Karachi Electric Supply Corporation (Appellant) VS Mst. Batool Fatima (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-JAN-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | C.A.2-K/2024 Mst. Batool Fatima deceased through legal heirs & others v. Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Limited (KESC) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 65 | Const. P. 137/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Tanzeela Bibi & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 66 | Cr.Bail 930/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Arz Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 67 | Const. P. 4387/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Pakistan Tibbi Pharmaceuticals Manufacturers (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-FEB-18 | Yes | The petitions arise under and in relation to the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 (DRAP Act). petitioners contend, the DRAP Act cannot, does not and should not apply to various products as manufactured, sold, used or imported by them, including Unani medicines, prescriptions and preparations, We start with the first set of questions, which relate to the constitutionality of the DRAP Act as enacted under Article 144. This Article originally had two clauses, of which the second was omitted by the 8th Amendment in 1985. two changes made by the 18th Amendment, one was necessitated by the omission of the Concurrent List, and need not detain us. The other, which will require some comment, was that originally Article 144 applied only if two or more Provincial Assemblies passed the necessary resolutions. The present Constitution of course had two Legislative Lists on its commencement. The competences listed in the Federal List were exclusive to the Federation, those on the Concurrent List were common, and those which were not enumerated were exclusive to the Provinces. VThat ability of course is one of the defining characteristics of federal legislative power, since in respect of matters that lie in the Federal domain by right Parliament can make laws for the whole of Pakistan or any part thereof. It would be unduly restrictive of the purpose and intent behind Article 144 if Parliament, while making the law for which it has been given power cannot include therein provisions that relate to matters in the Federal domain as of right. Secondly, a provincial law made subsequent to the law made by the Federation under Article 144 may override or impliedly repeal the latter. This follows directly from the express provision that the Provincial Assemblies may amend or repeal the law made by Parliament. The 1976 Act, in like manner, fractured and receded. It became provincial legislation and hence territorially bound. It now so operates in this and all other Provinces. It must be kept in mind that this position has remained unaltered, and is unaffected by the enactment of the DRAP Act under Article 144. Whatever may be the relationship of, and interaction between, the two laws, the 1976 Act does not now transcend or cross provincial boundaries in the manner of the DRAP Act. It is therefore our conclusion that in the present case, the scope of the legislative competence entrusted to Parliament in terms of Article 144 is governed by the terms of the resolution passed by the Punjab Assembly. Within 30 days of announcement of judgment the Authority under the DRAP Act shall issue proper guidelines, Simultaneously with posting the guidelines on its website, the Authority shall issue notice to each petitioner in the petitions to which this para applies. Interim orders made in any petition to which this para applies shall continue but will lapse 30 days from the date on which the guidelines are posted as above or the date on which the determination is made, whichever is later. following petitions are dismissed: CP D-4387/2014 and CP D-1684/2017. e following petitions are disposed off in terms of para 50 herein above: CP Nos. D- 6532/2014, 2623/2016, 6262/2016, 6263/2016, 6264/2016, 6265/2016, 6310/2016, 6820/2016, 7134/2016, 7135/2016, 1135/2017, 1921/2017, 2329/2017, 424/2017, 4421/2017, 5237/2017 and 5892/2017. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar(Author) | |||
| 68 | Cr.Bail 371/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Zulfiqar @Daboo (Applicant) VS SP.C 2082 Mukhtiar Ali PS. Sehwan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 69 | Cr.Bail 761/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Qadeer & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 70 | Cr.Bail 1028/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Siddique (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 71 | Cr.Bail 1030/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst Zainab @ Jumna (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 72 | Const. P. 113/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Waseem Gul Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 73 | Cr.Bail 888/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Aijaz Shaikh (Applicant) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 74 | Cr.Bail 786/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Aijaz Shaikh (Applicant) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 75 | Const. P. 2188/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Arshad Khan (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Hyd & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 76 | Cr.Bail 361/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ramzan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 77 | Cr.Bail 1043/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Amjad Ali (Applicant) VS V/S The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 78 | Const. P. 2244/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Waseem Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 79 | Const. P. 8/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ali Murad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 80 | Const. P. 2125/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Umer (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 81 | Const. P. 14/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Haji (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 82 | Cr.J.A 78/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Tarique Ali (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-JUN-21 | Yes | Appellant filed appeal against Conviction and Sentenced for the offence U/S 302,338-B, 337-H(2), 386, 114, 34 P.P.C r/w S-7(a) & (h) of Anti-Terrorism Act. Samina wife of Complainant she was signer/artist. At the time of incident she was pregnant of eight months. Samina as usual was singing a song at stage. Tarique Ali, with two unknown culprits, whose faces were open armed with Pistols they by pointing their Pistols asked his wife Mst. Samina that she may sing a song in standing position. On that his wife Mst. Samina told to them that she was running pregnancy On hearing so, they asked my wife Mst. Samina that if she would not sing a song in standing position, then she may be ready for death Tarique Ali Jatoi fired at his wife Mst. Samina, when she was giving instructions to her co artist . She died It was told by the lady doctor that baby in womb of Mst. Samina had also died. The complainant who is the husband of the deceased had changed his entire version given by him in the FIR at the time of recoding his evidence. He completely exonerated the appellant. In the FIR he shows himself as an eye witness while during his examination-in-chief he deposed that he was informed through phone that his wife sustained firearm injury on such he rushed at hospital where he came to know that his wife has already died. Two more eyewitnesses not supported the case of prosecution. Both the witnesses exonerated the appellant and not supported. Criminal jail appeal was allowed Appellant Tarique Ali Jatoi was acquitted of the charge . | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 83 | Cr.Bail 965/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: cr.bail966 of 2022 | 2022 | SOHAIL KHAN S/O ROAMAN & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-JUN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||||
| 84 | H.C.A 234/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Cedar Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) VS Soneri Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-JAN-24 | Yes | *The subject matter of the suit is not just simply a negotiable instrument but it is the rent of the subject period which was not paid, therefore, there is no logic in saying that since the Rent Controller could not pass any order on ???negotiable instrument???. **Section-12 of the SRPO, 1979 does not empower the civil court to adjudge necessary repairs to be carried out by the landlord; neither an application was filed by the tenant in this regard. ***once the rent is deposited pursuant to the orders of the Court, which the appellant had not deposited till date, the tenant/appellant will ???not??? be under the obligation to deposit the arrears of rent in compliance of Section-16(1) of the SRPO, 1979, as the tenant cannot be waxed twice. Security would not come in the way unless the tenant vacates the premises. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.293-K/2024 Cedar (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Marina Construction (Pvt.) Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 85 | H.C.A 202/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Mahmooda Tapal & another (Appellant) VS Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan Ltd. & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | C.P.L.A.3365/2024 Mahmooda Tapal (deceased) through her legal heirs and another v. Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan ltd Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 86 | Cr.Bail 710/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Anees-ur-Rehman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 87 | Const. P. 1935/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Zubeda & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 88 | Cr.Bail 603/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Hameed and Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | Crl.P.22-K/2018 Abdul Hameed @ Shero and another v. The State thr. P.G.Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 89 | Const. P. 206/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Dr. Muhammad Umar (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khatija & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 90 | Cr.Bail 446/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Sattar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 91 | Cr.Bail 920/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Safdar Ali & Ors (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 92 | Cr.Bail 956/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Zafar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 93 | Cr.Bail 567/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mir Hassan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 94 | Cr.Rev 141/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Aziz Gupchani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 95 | Cr.Bail 638/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Nazar Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 96 | Const. P. 59/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Benazir & another (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 97 | Const. P. 102/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Ghulam Shabbir & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 98 | Cr.Bail 690/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Dildar Madni & Ors (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | The final medical report shows that no poison has been detected, The F.I.R. is delayed by nearly 5 months. and applicant / accused is not nominated in the F.I.R. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | |||
| 99 | Cr.Misc. 344/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Aamir Khan Old Name Amresh Kumar (Applicant) VS Sher & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 100 | 2022 PLD Sindh 47 | Civil Ref. 2/2018 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Assistant Chief Inspector of Stamps (Appellant) VS .. (Respondent) | F.B. | Judgement | 16-NOV-21 | Yes | The Court had itself observed that the valuation done by the family Court was for a particular purpose and since it was not a decree of a Court the valuation so carried out was not binding. And then the Court went on to observe that even if there is a decree of the Court, the stamp duty would be payable as per Valuation Table. Though on facts the said judgment is not relevant; nonetheless, since it has been cited before this Full Bench, therefore, we are compelled to hold that we do not approve such observations made by the Division Bench in the aforesaid paragraph. Had it been in performance of decree, an instrument is being registered, it ought to be on the basis of value determined in the decree and/or agreement entered into for which performance is to be made in terms of Court decree. In such situation there was no occasion for altering/undervaluing the property to avoid stamp duty as the value is already determined by Court of law or decree. It is only in case when the property has changed its status lawfully i.e. from a built-up property to an open plot or from a semi-constructed property to a fully constructed property, the value of the property may be altered in instrument sought to be registered. Thus, when the property sold out on the basis of a decree, which decree has valued the property in question, then the right of valuing the property does not rest with the vendor and vendee and/or the concerned authority. H | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar | ||
| 101 | Cr.Rev 17/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | SANA-UR-REHMAN S/O ZAKA-UR-REHMAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 102 | Criminal Appeal 345/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | HABIBULLAH S/O HAJI FAZAL HAQ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | J.P.41/2023 Habibullah v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 103 | Cr.Bail 2333/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Cr. Bail Application No.2338 of 2022 | 2022 | FAISAL MAQBOOL SHAIKH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 104 | I. A 22/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Wapda Thr: Supdt Engineer LBOD and Ors (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer LBOD and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||||
| 105 | 2024 CLD 604 | Spl.H.C.A 153/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Fateh Textile Mills Pvt Ltd & Others (Appellant) VS Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-JAN-24 | Yes | It seems that while the claim of the bank is being multiplied continuously with the passage of time, whereas, the value of the property as determined in the year 2016 was fixed to be set off against current exaggerated claim of Bank. This is no justification. No one should suffer on account of court???s error whether it is a borrower or the bank. If at all the claim is to be set off, it should be set off in terms of the present market value and not on the basis of value of 2016 against claim of bank, as exist now. Six years have been passed and the properties must have been multiplied manifolds, which was not accounted. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||
| 106 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 46/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2022 | Shafiq-ur-Rehman Malkani & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-JUN-23 | Yes | Re-appraisal of evidence in light of the delay in lodging the Crime Report, uncertainties in recording Statements, last seen together witnesses, retracted confessions, recoveries made and weak investigation leading to acquittal. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) | |||
| 107 | Cr.Acq.A. 88/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2005 | Muhammad Hameed (Appellant) VS Sirajuddin and anothers (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 108 | Cr.Misc. 42/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muhammad Kamran (Applicant) VS learned A.D.J shahdadpur & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 109 | Const. P. 2225/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ajeeb Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 110 | Const. P. 25/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Muhammad Arshad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 111 | Const. P. 130/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Allah Dino Kandhro (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 112 | Const. P. 166/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Shaheen & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 113 | Const. P. 2149/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Jan Muhammad @ Jannan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 114 | Cr.Bail 95/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Syed Lal Shah and Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | Crl.P.553/2017 Mukhtiar v. The State thr. Prosecutor General, Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 115 | Const. P. 2156/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Moomal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 116 | Cr.Bail 785/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | aijaz shaikh (Applicant) VS PO sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 117 | Const. P. 53/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Sial Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 118 | Cr.Bail 1096/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mumtaz Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 119 | Const. P. 77/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Qurban Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 120 | Cr.Bail 363/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Rauf (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 121 | Const. P. 21/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Saleem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 122 | Cr.Bail 1120/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Atta Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 123 | Cr.Bail 81/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Malik Akthar Ali Awan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 124 | Const. P. 263/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C/W CPD 264/2006 and 265/2006 | 2006 | Evacuee Trust Property Board. (Petitioner) VS Wahabuddin and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | C.P.710-K/2022 Evacuee Trust Property Board Government of Pakistan v. Wahabuddin & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 125 | Criminal Appeal 699/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | MUHAMMAD IMRAN @ MAMA S/O MUHAMMAD BASHIR @ KAKA (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 126 | Cr.Bail 2107/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | SALMAN ZAHID S/O ZAHID IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 127 | 2024 CLD 744 | I. A 120/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Faysal Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Masood Asghar & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-JAN-24 | Yes | Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (???FIO 2001???) is a special law and covers all proceedings upto execution. In the previous law that is Act of 1997, it enabled the Court to convert the proceedings into execution application on preferring an application whereas the frame of instant law is different as can be seen in terms of Section 19 of the FIO 2001. It provides that upon announcement of Judgment and decree the suit shall automatically convert into execution application. Thus no sooner the Judgment and Decree is passed the proceedings stand converted into execution application and the act does not provide a way to file a fresh execution application, as inadvertently did by the appellant. At the most, since an appeal was pending before this Court and the machinery of execution was not triggered, the application that was inadvertently moved as an execution application could at the most be considered for triggering machinery of the Banking Court where the suit was decreed and converted into execution application. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||
| 128 | 2024 SBLR Sindh 1160 | H.C.A 168/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Shahryar through attorney Kashif Naseem (Appellant) VS Sheikh Muhammad Iqbal & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-MAR-24 | Yes | The appellant has already challenged the order of respondent No.3 before a forum he has elected hence to circumvent the findings of respondent No.3, being a judicial forum as invoked by the appellant, the jurisdiction of this Court on the original side cannot be invoked for an injunction. The order of the respondent No.3 in the follow up of its jurisdiction could well be agitated before a proper forum, though apparently the appellant in his own wisdom has challenged it separately by filing a writ petition No.1850 of 2022. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||
| 129 | H.C.A 107/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Javed Iqbal (Appellant) VS Abdul Rasheed Tagr & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-APR-24 | Yes | The specific performance agreement itself may have been contingent upon events that relate to the happening of an event when the defendant/ respondent No.1 may have been allotted another piece of land from Government of Sindh/Board of Revenue in lieu of suit land or otherwise but that is not the precise relief claimed in the suit in the prayer clauses. Suit was for specific property and not for performance of entire agreement. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 130 | Const. P. 8580/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | M/s Shahzad Estate Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mrs. Neelofar Nasreen & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 18-APR-24 | Yes | We have enquired as to what was the jurisdictional defect or constitutional error that compelled them to file these petitions under Article-199, learned counsel repeated that in fact the service was not effected. This could hardly be a reason for us to intervene, as this is not the fact-finding court. Unless the jurisdictional defect or a constitutional violation is pointed out, this Court cannot probe further. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.597-K/2024 M/s Shahzad Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Nelofar Nasreen and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 131 | I. A 59/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Arshad Mirza (Appellant) VS Darsyus T. Sethna & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-JAN-24 | Yes | There is no cavil to this proposition that under special summary chapter, only special jurisdiction is conferred upon the court, proceeding whereunder could only be seen under negotiable instruments and any deviation thereof would give rise to an exercise of jurisdiction not vested upon the court and the order/judgment is only a nullity. In the instant matter, a decree is passed under summary chapter against an individual who has not executed any negotiable instrument and hence could not have been subjected to summary proceedings. Certainly, if the presence of appellant/defendant No.2 was necessary and important in the wisdom of plaintiff/respondent No.1, in the sense that he was a guarantor or that amount could be recovered from him, then the case could have been proceeded against them/him under ordinary civil jurisdiction. When confronted, Mr. Fazal ur Rehman that this decree could not have been passed under summary chapter against him and/or could not be executed against the appellant, learned counsel for the respondents though initially insisted that it was a belated attempt on the part of the appellant to raise this point, but later conceded as no limitation would run against an order which is a nullity or without jurisdiction in the eyes of law. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 132 | H.C.A 117/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | Uzair Saboor (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-APR-24 | Yes | To regulate the products described in the DRAP Act, 2012, the respondent No.2 only wants that they may be enlisted with it so that they may regulate it as being an alternative medicine/therapeutic goods. While appellants would make an application for enlistment, it would certainly be without prejudice to above understanding and notwithstanding their stance, a proper scrutiny would still be undertaken by DRAP to adjudge it as a product/drug etc, to be enlisted within frame of law (act and rules), which order will then be conclusive, subject to a challenge within DRAP Act, 2012. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 133 | Const. P. 8554/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Unity Foods Ltd (Petitioner) VS S.E.C.P & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-SEP-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||||
| 134 | Const. P. 2229/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Azeema (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 135 | Const. P. 11/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Noor Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 136 | Cr.Bail 520/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | ghulam haider (Applicant) VS the state (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 137 | Cr.Bail 528/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Daya Ram (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 138 | Cr.Bail 1020/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Bux (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 139 | Const. P. 10/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Mst. Reena & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 140 | Cr.Bail 778/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Prof Dr.Raiz Ahmed Raja (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 141 | Cr.Bail 549/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Dadlo Jatoi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 142 | Cr.Bail 999/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Qasim (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 143 | Cr.Misc. 40/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ali Muhammad (Applicant) VS SSP Tharparkar & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 144 | Cr.Bail 1157/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Ghazi @ Aijaz (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 145 | Const. P. 747/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||||
| 146 | Cr.Bail 575/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Asif Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 147 | 2024 CLD 648 | I. A 105/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Naveed & other (Appellant) VS Habib Bank Ltd. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-JAN-24 | Yes | The judgment may not bind us in terms of Article 189 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, but we are in agreement with the observations made therein that in the first instance it is to be seen whether a plaint has complied all the requirement of Section 9 of the FIO, failing whereof, the consequences would follow, which in the instant case should have been a grant of leave in the absence of a true Statement of Accounts, as it is not the correct reflection of account. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||
| 148 | Const. P. 3730/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Sarfaraz (Petitioner) VS Qamar Mushtari Begum and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-MAR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.332-K/2024 Muhammad Sarfaraz v. Qamar Mushtari Begum through her L.rs. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 149 | H.C.A 72/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Majida Akram and Others (Appellant) VS Kausar Khursheed Allahwala and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-FEB-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.217-K/2024 Mst. Majida AKram and others v. Kausar Khursheed Allahwala and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 150 | 2024 CLC 1068, 2024 CLD 770 | I. A 25/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Zafar Hasan Khan & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Habib Bank Ltd. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-MAR-24 | Yes | The issuance of warrants in respect of decrees, which were allegedly unaccomplished, is not a routine matter. The case of Abdul Basit Zahid1 and the case of Precision Engineering Ltd.2 speaks volume. In the first case the Division Bench was of the view that Section-51 CPC provides for execution of a decree through arrest and detention of the judgment-debtor and the proviso thereof furnishes certain safeguards against the deprivation of liberty and contemplates that such power can only be exercised under certain given situations. In the instant case, such situations were not considered prior to the issuance of warrants. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||
| 151 | 2024 CLD 864 | I. A 61/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | United Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Ghulam Nabib Sheikh (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-APR-24 | Yes | Section 20(4)' s requirement is different than the gist of complaint; ibid provision only enabled the Court to frame punishment if the customer/whosoever, breached the terms by ???dishonestly issuing cheques??? towards repayment of finance or fulfillment of such obligation which was/were dishonored. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||
| 152 | Criminal Appeal 10/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas; attached cases: Judgment | 2023 | Sikandar Ali Kolachi and others (Appellant) VS The State and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 15-SEP-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 153 | Const. P. 1723/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2024 | Sirbuland Khan (Petitioner) VS R.O PS-112 & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-SEP-24 | Yes | *There is no cavil that the point of jurisdiction of this Court is to be addressed first and at no point in time the merits of case should be discussed however the arguments of the petitioner???s counsel are of such nature which compelled us to go into brief history of the case, which should, in any case, may not be counted as exercise of jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. **Now since our jurisdiction is contoured in terms of vely couched Article 225, having essence of mandatory application, read with numerous judgments of Supreme Court providing a limited scope to thrive, we could also draw an inference that both acceptance and denial to a recount of votes on any ground could fetch and attract the jurisdiction of the Tribunal followed by orders of Returning Officer/ Commission | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 154 | Cr.Bail 379/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Criminal Bail Application No.S-387 of 2024, 388 of 2024, 391 of 2024, 398 of 2024, 399 of 2024, 400 of 2024, 401 of 2024, 406 of 2024, 416 of 2024, 428 of 2024, 444 of 2024, 445 of 2024, 450 of 2024, 459 of 2024, 474 of 2024, 495 of 2024, | 2024 | Muhammad Bilal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 155 | Cr.Bail 227/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Imran (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 156 | Const. P. 2178/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Mst. Nimra & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 157 | Cr.Bail 1021/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Bux (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 158 | Const. P. 2097/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Abdul Qayoom (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 159 | Cr.Bail 810/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Shoukat Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 160 | Cr.Bail 823/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Noor Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 161 | Cr.Bail 784/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Aijaz Shaikh (Applicant) VS PO sindh (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 162 | Const. P. 2216/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 163 | Cr.Rev 48/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) VS Presiding Officer (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 164 | Const. P. 2079/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Chaman (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 165 | Cr.Acctt.A 30/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | HAROON PUNJWANI S/O SULEMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.1337/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Haroon Punjwani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 166 | Cr.Acctt.A 31/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD ASAD ABBASI S/O MUHAMMAD KHURSHID ABBASI (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.1338/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Muhammad Asad Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 167 | Cr.Acctt.A 29/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | ALEEMUDDIN S/O ZIAUDDIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (NAB) (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | Crl.P.1336/2020 Chairman National Acountability Bureau through Prosector General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Aleemuddin Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 168 | Criminal Appeal 21/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | Sanaullah & Another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 04-JUN-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 169 | Cr.Bail 184/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2023 | MST. DANIA BIBI D/O MALIK MUKHTIAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 170 | Cr.Appeal 215/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MST. TAZEIN @ JASMINE D/O SULTAN QURESHI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author) | ||||
| 171 | H.C.A 224/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Mst. Khursheed Begum & others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Iqbal & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-24 | Yes | The rights of the legal heirs to intervene in terms of Order XXI Rule 89 and 90 CPC (though both rules are separate in nature), to be exercised within 30 days??? time of the acceptance of offer, as sale certificate was also ordered to be issued | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | C.P.L.A.732/2024 Faraz Ali v. Mst. Khursheed Begum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 172 | H.C.A 111/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | M/s. Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. (Appellant) VS M/s. Ahmed Brothers & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 20-FEB-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||||
| 173 | H.C.A 301/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (Appellant) VS M/s. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-FEB-24 | Yes | As to the objection that decretal amount has to be deposited before this Court as without it appeal could not be heard and decided, we are of the view that Order XXI Rule 23-A PC, as relied upon by the learned counsel for respondent, does not demonstrate an embargo on powers being exercised by the appellate Court while hearing appeal; it only demonstrates that the executing Court hearing objections, filed by judgment debtor to the grant of execution, shall not proceed unless the decretal amount is secured. We are not executing Court who is hearing the objections of judgment debtor, rather an appellate authority | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | |||
| 174 | 2024 CLD 1344 | I. A 23/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Zahoor Ahmed & others (Appellant) VS M/s. Al-Zamin Leasing Modraba & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-APR-24 | Yes | The only ground which impressed the learned Banking Court was that apparently the registered instruments (subleases) were fictitious and forged. These are only words against words; it is only in response to 12(2) application that the banking Court found that the instruments are not genuine and fake. In all fairness this requires trial, more particularly when the registered instruments were obtained and/or executed much before equitable and registered mortgage of 2003; whereas the subleases of the appellants were apparently registered in the year 1998. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||
| 175 | Const. P. 129/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2023 | Salahuddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial | ||||