Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:| S.No. | Citation | Case No. | Case Type | Case Year | Parties | Order_Date | A.F.R | Head Notes/ Tag Line | Bench | Apex Court | Apex Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 SHC KHI 99 | Const. P. 3127/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Check & Watch (Petitioner) VS V/S SBCA and Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.6390/2021 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others,C.A.647/2022 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 2 | Nil | Const. P. 5312/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 20-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.516-K/2018 Abdullah Khan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1483 | Const. P. 2508/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Aftab Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 09-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 4 | 2020 PLC (CS) 360 | Const. P. 5839/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Arshad Noor Khan (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 25-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 5 | Nil | Const. P. 2949/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Abdullah Mushtaq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.830-K/2018 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation v. Abdullah Mushtaq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 6 | 2020 PLC (CS) 345 | Const. P. 2722/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Hameed Solangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 17-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2377/2018 Abdul Hameed Solangi & others v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Education & Litreracy Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.1027/2020 for withdrawal is Allowed | |
| 7 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1100 | Const. P. 3415/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Uzma Shaheen Pirzada (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 04-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.614-K/2017 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2019 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted [ Early date ],Disposed Disposed of | |
| 8 | 2019 PLC CS Note 30 | Const. P. 1026/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Aurangzeb and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 09-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 9 | Nil | Cr.Bail 136/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | ASHRAF ASHFAQ S/O ASHFAQ AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 16-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 10 | 2018 YLR Note 200 | Cr.Appeal 315/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | ALI SHER S/O URIS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 18-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 11 | 2018 YLR 1639 | Const. P. 770/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Faiz Muhammad & Another (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Sindh Police & Others (Respondent) | 13-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 12 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 1817, 2020 PLC (CS) 525 | Const. P. 4268/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Rabbani (Petitioner) VS Governor, State Bank of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 31-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 13 | 2017 PLC (CS) 1255 | Const. P. 2543/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Mansur-ul-Haque (Petitioner) VS Government of Pakistan and another (Respondent) | 17-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.313-K/2017 Mansoor-ul-Haque v. Govt. of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Defence and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 14 | Nil | Const. P. 390/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Shakoor Keerio (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 15 | Nil | Const. P. 2226/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Wahid Bux Aajiz Leghari (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 27-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 16 | Nil | Const. P. 1134/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Fatima (Petitioner) VS Vice Chancellor, Peoples University of Medical (Respondent) | 22-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 17 | Nil | Const. P. 513/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammasd Rashid Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 26-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.440-K/2019 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Interior and others,C.A.3044/2022 National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Syed Arshad Wahab and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed | |
| 18 | 2022 SHC KHI 890 | Const. P. 6629/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 19 | Nil | Const. P. 2833/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Muhammad Waseem and 4 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 20 | Nil | Const. P. 2250/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Rizwan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 21 | Nil | Const. P. 320/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Aqil Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & other (Respondent) | 01-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 22 | Nil | Const. P. 1094/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Irshad Begum (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shamim & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 23 | Nil | Const. P. 861/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zulfiqar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 27-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 24 | Nil | Const. P. 1724/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Raja Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.293-K/2019 Raja Mushtaq Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deptt:Govt. of Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 25 | Nil | Const. P. 3651/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Saleem Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 26 | Nil | Const. P. 2083/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Farhana Mansoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 27 | Nil | Const. P. 537/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Aziz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 28 | Nil | Const. P. 3445/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sheeraz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 29 | Nil | Const. P. 4000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Javed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 30 | Nil | Const. P. 5379/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Kamran Aziz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 31 | Nil | Const. P. 7211/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 32 | Nil | Const. P. 283/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 33 | Nil | Const. P. 1154/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Youth Action for Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2221/2019 Youth Action for Pakistan thr. Ghulam Murtaza Sheikh, Jamshoro v. Province of Sindh thr. the Secretary, Relief Department, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 34 | Nil | Const. P. 75/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Huma Jokhio & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.2980/2017 Oil and Gas Development Company (OGDCL) and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended. | |
| 35 | Nil | Const. P. 319/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mahadev (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 36 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1408 | Const. P. 649/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mst. Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-19 | Yes | Petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the non -action by the alleged Contemnors, filed an Application (CMA 14152/2015)under Article 204 of the Constitution, praying therein to initiate the Contempt Proceedings against the alleged Contemnors. The alleged Contemnors have filed statements showing compliance of the order dated 10.9.2015, passed by this Court with the assertion that they offered the post of Balder in BS-1 to the son of the Petitioner, Contempt Proceedings is always between the Court and the alleged Contemnor, thus its scope cannot be enlarged. the post of Field Assistant under Rule-10-A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant , for the simple reason that the aforesaid post can only be filled as per recruitment Rules. The explanation offered by the Respondents vide (CMA 14152/2015),prima facie, is tenable under the law as the Petitioners son was offered the post of Beldar in BS-1 by the Respondents in compliance of order dated 10.9.2015 passed by this Court; but the same was refused by the Petitioners son. we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged Contemnors that substantial compliance of the order dated10.9.2015 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit, therefore at this juncture, no case for initiating Contempt Proceedings is made out against the alleged Contemnors. Thus, we are not minded to proceed with any further on the listed application searing , having no merits, are accordingly dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 37 | Nil | Const. P. 1179/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mohammad Anwar (Petitioner) VS Fed:of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 06-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 38 | 2022 SHC KHI 452 | Const. P. 5818/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Abdul Nasir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.298-K/2015 Noor Jahan Mangi v. National Accountability Bureau,Crl.A.14-K/2025 Abdul Nasir v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 39 | Nil | Const. P. 808/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Bushra & Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 40 | Nil | Const. P. 4689/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sheikh Muhammad Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 41 | 2020 PLC (CS) 948, 2019 SBLR Sindh 1409 | Const. P. 745/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ghulam Hussain Iqbalani and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 29-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 42 | Nil | Const. P. 1282/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syeda Masooma Sughra Jafri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 43 | Nil | Const. P. 6933/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahmir Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 44 | 2019 CLC 1670 | H.C.A 317/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mussawar Ali (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 08-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 45 | 2019 PLC (CS) 751 | Const. P. 2520/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Syed Faisal Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 10-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 46 | Nil | Const. P. 1174/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.384-K/2019 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 47 | Nil | Const. P. 1155/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Kashif Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS M/s Alternative Energy And ors (Respondent) | 23-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 48 | Nil | Const. P. 4027/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Saddam Hussain Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.111-K/2019 Mohsin Mushtaq & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 49 | Nil | Const. P. 6803/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mian Dad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1102-K/2018 Mian Dad v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 50 | 2020 PLC (CS) Note 9, 2020 PLC CS Note 9 | Const. P. 5861/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Latif Mughal (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 51 | Nil | Const. P. 7995/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Razia Sultana Tahir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakista and Ors (Respondent) | 07-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.204/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & another v. Razia Sultana Tahir,C.A.1294/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & another v. Razia Sultana Tahir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 52 | Nil | Const. P. 4251/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Shushila Ramesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 53 | Nil | Const. P. 5326/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Nazeer Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 54 | Nil | Const. P. 6324/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Atta Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 55 | Nil | Const. P. 1580/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Abdul Majeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) | 01-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 56 | Nil | Const. P. 6629/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Touseef Nazeer (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 23-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.19-K/2019 Touseef Nazeer v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 57 | Nil | Const. P. 3638/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Saad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.114-K/2019 Barkat Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 58 | Nil | Const. P. 5619/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Pir Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 59 | Nil | Const. P. 5808/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Riaz Hussain Kanasoro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 60 | 2020 PLC (CS) 717 | Const. P. 1360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Adil Rashid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted, | |
| 61 | Nil | Const. P. 6546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Bheru Lal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 62 | Nil | Const. P. 2773/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Khushnood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Others (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 63 | Nil | Const. P. 6384/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Engr. Jehanzaib (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 06-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 64 | Nil | Const. P. 5601/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Waheed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4590/2017,C.A.1597/2017,C.P.L.A.3667/2017,C.A.1611/2017,C.P.L.A.3659/2017,C.A.1602/2017 SCP | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 65 | Nil | Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 23-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.882-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Muhammad Yaseen and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 66 | Nil | Const. P. 5424/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 67 | Nil | Const. P. 5547/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr Aftab Haider Deeshak & Ors (Petitioner) VS SPSC & Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 68 | Nil | Const. P. 1339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Kings Apparels Ind (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 69 | Nil | Const. P. 8535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s A & J Apparel (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 70 | Nil | Const. P. 5836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Faiz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.7-K/2018 Faiz Ali v. Province of Sindh and anothers Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 71 | Nil | Const. P. 6440/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Kundal Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 72 | 2018 PLC CS 817, 2018 PLC (CS) 817 | Const. P. 1267/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 12-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.558-K/2017 Zaheer Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.29-K/2014 Federal Board of Revenue and another v. Zaheer Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.651-K/2013 Federal Board of Revenue and another v. Zaheer Ahmed Kalwar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 73 | 2018 PLC CS 510, 2018 PLC (CS) 510 | H.C.A 108/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | P.T.C.L & another (Appellant) VS Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud & Others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.313/2018 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others,C.A.416/2022 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 74 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 177, 2018 PLC CS Note 177 | Const. P. 6940/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Iqbal Naseem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 75 | Nil | Const. P. 3486/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Jawaid Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1435-K/2018 Javed Alam v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Inter Provincial Co-Ordanation Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 76 | Nil | Const. P. 846/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Cancelled Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed. | |
| 77 | 2019 PLC (CS) 839 | Const. P. 631/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shah Abul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 78 | 2018 PCr.LJ 1027 | Cr.Rev 156/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | QABIL KHAN S/O SAHAB KHAN (Applicant) VS THE 5TH ADDL.S.J. SOUTH KHI & ORS (Respondent) | 09-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 79 | Nil | Const. P. 5331/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Shafqat Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 26-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 80 | 2018 PLC CS Note 131 | H.C.A 142/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Appellant) VS Malik Mohammad Asghar (Respondent) | 25-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.504-K/2017 Advocate Malik Muhammad Asghar v. Pakistan Defence Officer Housing Authority Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 81 | 2019 SCMR 984, 2020 PLC (CS) 67 | Const. P. 6555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Maj (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 12-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.514-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.26-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed | |
| 82 | 2019 PLC Lab. 63 | Const. P. 635/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/S Gerry (Petitioner) VS Learned Member NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 09-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.86-K/2018,C.P.L.A.84-K/2018,C.P.L.A.88-K/2018,C.P.L.A.83-K/2018,C.P.L.A.87-K/2018,C.P.L.A.85-K/2018 SCP | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 83 | Nil | Const. P. 3292/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Asif Abbasi V/S NED University & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Asif Abbasi (Respondent) | 05-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.632-K/2018 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi,C.A.135-K/2019 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed | |
| 84 | Nil | Const. P. 5140/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Loads Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3075/2018,C.P.L.A.3076/2018,C.A.81-K/2019,C.A.82-K/2019 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 85 | Nil | Const. P. 7177/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Dawn Impex Traders (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 86 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1114 | Const. P. 1610/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Ghulam Abbas Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 87 | Nil | Const. P. 3017/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Buksh Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 88 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 44, 2019 PLC CS Note 44 | Const. P. 994/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS D.G CHO, Rawalpindi and ors (Respondent) | 17-APR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.370-K/2017 Arshad Ali v. The Director General (Services) G.H.Q and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 89 | Nil | Const. P. 3019/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Hayat Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 90 | Nil | Const. P. 3898/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sabir Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 91 | Nil | Const. P. 3940/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Atlas Enterprises and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 92 | Nil | Const. P. 335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s HRSG Outsourcing (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 93 | 2020 SHC KHI 1506 | Const. P. 5470/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muzaffar Jamil Mirza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.443-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Sindh & others v. Muzaffae Jamil Mirza & others,C.P.L.A.376-K/2020 Muzaffar Jamil Mirza v. Province of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.1839/2020 Imtiaz Ali Shah and others v. Muzaffar Jamil Mirza and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed |
| 94 | Nil | Const. P. 3687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 26-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 95 | Nil | Const. P. 2681/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mazhar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 96 | Nil | Const. P. 376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 97 | Nil | Const. P. 1339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 98 | Nil | Const. P. 1524/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 99 | Nil | Const. P. 3078/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Aftab Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 100 | Nil | Const. P. 950/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Rasool & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 101 | Nil | Const. P. 2068/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Bishar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 102 | Nil | Const. P. 2183/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohammad Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 103 | Nil | Const. P. 2362/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Qurban Ali Khoso & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 104 | Nil | Const. P. 2566/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohammad Waseem Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Waseem Sadiq (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 105 | Nil | Const. P. 2765/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Darya Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 106 | Nil | Const. P. 2863/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Qasim & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 107 | Nil | Const. P. 2378/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Nazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 108 | Nil | Const. P. 126/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imran Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 109 | Nil | Const. P. 1537/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Ghani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 110 | Nil | Const. P. 1589/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ishaque & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 111 | Nil | Const. P. 1749/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | HuzoorBux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 112 | Nil | Const. P. 528/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Aijaz Ali &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 113 | Nil | Const. P. 8185/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.691-K/2019 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.20-K/2022 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 114 | Nil | Const. P. 3391/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Faisal Rajar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 115 | Nil | Const. P. 1639/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.M.A.2348/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.3787/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered and also notice be issued,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 116 | Nil | Const. P. 2304/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 117 | Nil | Const. P. 2399/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Nusrat Phulphoto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 118 | Nil | Const. P. 3177/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | WaliMuhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 119 | Nil | Const. P. 2065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 120 | Nil | Const. P. 2946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Fahad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 121 | Nil | Const. P. 676/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Abdul Salam and others (Petitioner) VS Jan Ali and others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 122 | Nil | Const. P. 455/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Farhan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 123 | 2020 PLC Lab. 145 | Const. P. 3926/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | M/S Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Petitioner) VS Member, Sindh Labour appellate Tribunal & Ors. (Respondent) | 30-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.748-K/2019 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation v. Member Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 124 | Nil | Const. P. 1080/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 125 | Nil | Const. P. 2872/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 126 | Nil | Const. P. 1885/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 127 | Nil | Const. P. 478/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Murtaza Soomro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 128 | Nil | Const. P. 1086/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | ( Master Abdul Jabbar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 129 | Nil | Const. P. 848/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 130 | Nil | Const. P. 3791/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 131 | 2021 SHC HYD 1255 | Const. P. 1588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Riffat Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 28-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 132 | Nil | Const. P. 6070/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Niaz Hussain Awan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.513-K/2019 Niaz Hussain Awan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 133 | Nil | Const. P. 2933/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dolat Khan (Petitioner) VS D.C. Tando Allahyar and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 134 | Nil | Civil Revision 41/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Usman and others (Applicant) VS Shoaib (Respondent) | 08-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 135 | Nil | Const. P. 639/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Arshad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 136 | Nil | Const. P. 1446/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Rehman Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 137 | Nil | Const. P. 2403/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Parvaiz Jamal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 138 | Nil | Const. P. 2526/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Waqas Tariq (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 139 | Nil | Const. P. 950/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Director Nara Canal Irrigation Department and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 140 | Nil | Const. P. 3300/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Jamshed Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 141 | Nil | Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-SEP-19 | Yes | whether the private Respondents who are holding the present postings qualify to continue the office? Whether the Chief Minister, Sindh is/was competent under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964 to nominate person as Assistant Commissioner? Whether the Chief Minister is competent to grant exemption to the private respondents from qualifying in passing the Departmental Examination prescribed for the posts under reference for regularization and promotion of the private respondents? | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4105/2019,C.P.L.A.4144/2019,C.P.L.A.622-K/2019,C.P.L.A.4410/2019 SCP | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of |
| 142 | Nil | Const. P. 8580/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Wasif and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.696-K/2019 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.25-K/2022 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 143 | Nil | Const. P. 1185/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 144 | Nil | Const. P. 1406/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Ilamzadi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 145 | Nil | Const. P. 1140/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 146 | Nil | Const. P. 301/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 147 | Nil | Const. P. 2366/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Danish Kaimkhani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 148 | Nil | Const. P. 2177/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Intezar Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 149 | Nil | Const. P. 3768/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mohammad Yakoob (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 150 | Nil | Const. P. 1268/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Allah Warrayo (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 151 | Nil | Const. P. 6071/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Ashar Afaq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.525-K/2019 Muhammad Ashar Afaq v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 152 | Nil | Const. P. 4920/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Maqsood Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 12-SEP-19 | Yes | regularization issue of employees of PSQCA | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3673/2020 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others,C.A.522/2021 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed and Remanded |
| 153 | Nil | Const. P. 3495/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.817/2017 Abdullah v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) thr. Its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 154 | Nil | Const. P. 2941/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 155 | Nil | Const. P. 729/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Fakhur din (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 156 | Nil | Const. P. 1533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 157 | Nil | Const. P. 3269/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Allah Jurrio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 158 | Nil | Const. P. 2016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Pir Ali Dino Shah Jeelani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 159 | Nil | Const. P. 2552/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zulqarnain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 160 | Nil | Const. P. 158/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 161 | Nil | Const. P. 1794/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and another (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 162 | Nil | Const. P. 2221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 163 | Nil | Const. P. 1084/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Khuda Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 164 | Nil | Const. P. 1085/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Khuda Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 165 | Nil | Const. P. 2334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 166 | Nil | Const. P. 2360/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Yaqboob (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 167 | Nil | Const. P. 3453/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Aachar& others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 168 | Nil | I. A 16/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Syed Muhammad Nadeem Shah Bukhari (Appellant) VS Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd (Respondent) | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 169 | 2020 SHC KHI 2128 | Const. P. 2584/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Farzana Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1796/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Farzana Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 170 | 2020 SHC HYD 587 | Const. P. 791/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Qdir & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 26-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 171 | 2020 SHC HYD 379 | Const. P. 153/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zafar Ali (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 24-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 172 | 2020 SHC HYD 938 | Const. P. 1573/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS HESCO and others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 173 | 2021 SHC KHI 1067 | Const. P. 646/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | M/s Al-Kousar Drinking Water (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-21 | Yes | to direct the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board (KW&SB) to grant him license to continue his business for supplying Brackish water via Pipe Line from Subsoil/boring to National Refinery and other industries in Karachi--we are not inclined to subscribe to the request of the petitioner because no right of the petitioner to extract minerals/brackish water has been established and prima-facie under the garb of this petition he has attempted to continue such an activity illegally | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 174 | 2020 SHC HYD 1521 | I. A 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Rana Imran Mehmood (Appellant) VS M/S NIB Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent) | 04-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 175 | 2020 SHC HYD 909 | Const. P. 3234/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 176 | 2020 SHC HYD 2234 | Const. P. 307/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Govind Ram (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 177 | 2020 SHC HYD 762 | Cr.Acq.A. 17/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | The State (ANF) Hyd (Appellant) VS Mumtaz Ali (Respondent) | 15-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.154-K/2019 Mst: Fatima v. Rehmat Ali and another,Crl.P.L.A.162-K/2020 The State through Anti Narcotics Force v. Mumtaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 178 | 2020 SHC HYD 2330 | R.A (Civil Revision) 56/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Wahid (Applicant) VS Punhoon (Respondent) | 25-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 179 | 2020 SHC HYD 2079 | Const. P. 2687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Santosh Kumar & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 180 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 537 | H.C.A 253/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | K-Electric Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Anwar Ali & others (Respondent) | 16-DEC-20 | Yes | KESC--Whether suit is maintainable by the retired employee of the KESC in the present form? 2. Whether through the KESC Officers Policy 2010, certain benefits to the Plaintiff under the previous policy, can be withdrawn by the Defendant ? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.507/2021 K-Electric Ltd, Karachi v. Syed Anwar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 181 | 2020 SHC HYD 963 | Const. P. 770/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Atta Muhammad Shahani (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 182 | 2020 SHC HYD 1876 | Const. P. 1865/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Younis & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 183 | 2020 SHC HYD 1541 | Civil Revision 115/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Hashim (Applicant) VS Daim thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) | 17-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 184 | 2020 SHC KHI 2146 | Const. P. 5585/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Fakhar un Nisa (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | 09-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 185 | 2020 SHC KHI 1943 | Const. P. 7450/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-DEC-20 | Yes | I. Whether respondent No.4 can hold the charge for the post of Director I.T. in BPS-18 under the law? II. Whether respondent No.4s case falls within the ambit of Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.594-K/2021 Mst.Tabassum Abbasi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 186 | 2020 SHC HYD 2181 | Const. P. 864/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Matloob Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3873/2023 Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Arif Hasnan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 187 | 2020 SHC KHI 1296 | Const. P. 4932/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zakia Naz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | petitioner has impugned the Notice dated 04.09.2020 issued by the respondents for vacating the official accommodation i.e. Flat No. B-18, situated in Government Official Residence (GOR-II) Sindhi Muslim Co-operative Housing Society ---Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-4129 of 2020 and other connected petitions vide common Judgment dated 12.10.2020, therefore, the instant petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is dismissed accordingly, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust her remedy, if any, as provided under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1442-K/2020 Zakia Naz v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 188 | 2020 SHC HYD 1104 | Const. P. 2325/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Abdul Azeem & others (Petitioner) VS Rehmatullah & others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 189 | 2020 SHC HYD 804 | Const. P. 424/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Farman Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 190 | 2020 SHC HYD 1896 | Civil Revision 188/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ramzan (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) | 11-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 191 | 2020 SHC HYD 1188 | Const. P. 1304/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Arbab Zakaullah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 192 | 2020 SHC KHI 825 | Const. P. 4905/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-20 | Yes | The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 193 | 2020 SHC KHI 452 | Const. P. 6046/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Mustafa Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-OCT-20 | Yes | The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. The disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3452/2020 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 194 | 2020 SHC KHI 38 | Const. P. 4201/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-DEC-20 | Yes | The pivotal question involved in the present proceedings is whether a Civil / Government Servant who is found guilty of misconduct under The Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, and a minor penalty was imposed upon him could be considered for promotion? ---In our view, the promotion to a post depends upon several circumstances. To qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. An employee found guilty of misconduct cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion committee takes the penalties imposed upon the employee into consideration and denies him the promotion, such denial cannot be termed as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal or unjustified. In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee should not be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the DPC, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess every proposal for promotion, on case to case basis. In cases where disciplinary case / criminal prosecution against the Civil / Government servant is not concluded even after the expiry of two years from the date of the meeting of the first DPC which kept its findings in respect of the Government servant the appointing authority may consider the desirability of giving him an ad-hoc promotion--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.405-K/2021 Shamsuddin Dal v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 195 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1533 | Const. P. 4997/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Azam Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 18-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 196 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 10, 2023 PLC CS Note 10 | Const. P. 2341/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 197 | 2020 SHC HYD 1842 | Civil Revision 131/1986 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 1986 | Khanzada Siddi Yakoob and others (Applicant) VS Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent) | 11-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 198 | 2020 SHC KHI 1209 | Const. P. 5650/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Reshma (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 199 | 2020 SHC KHI 931 | Const. P. 8984/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Farzana Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner??? late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner??? late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1756/2020 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another,C.A.4164/2022 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed |
| 200 | 2020 SHC HYD 326 | Const. P. 2690/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Wakeel (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 201 | 2020 SHC HYD 1604 | Criminal Appeal 108/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Muhammad Hanif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 202 | 2022 SHC KHI 511 | Const. P. 5814/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Tariq Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-22 | Yes | recruitment rules | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 203 | 2020 SHC KHI 1782 | Const. P. 2889/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ahmed Kehar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-OCT-20 | Yes | We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 204 | 2022 SHC KHI 403 | Const. P. 5503/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Ahad Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.793-K/2022 Abdul Ahad Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC | |
| 205 | Nil | Civil Revision 157/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Nazeer (Applicant) VS PO SINDH (Respondent) | 02-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 206 | 2021 SHC KHI 520 | Const. P. 5639/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Karim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | promotion case | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 207 | 2020 SHC KHI 1267 | Const. P. 7122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zamir Hussain Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-20 | Yes | Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 208 | 2020 SHC KHI 2159, 2021 SBLR Sindh 1887 | Const. P. 3997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Liaquat Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | i) whether the respondent namely Mrs. Abida Parveen was appointed in accordance with the law and had requisite qualifications and experience for the position of Registrar (BPS-19) in Environmental, Climate Change, and Coastal Development Department, Sindh Government to claim the post under the recruitment rules; ii) whether this Court can overrule the SPSCs recommendation under Article 199 of the Constitution or otherwise? And iii) whether the private respondent was awarded punishment in her previous employment and in view of such punishment, whether she could seek government employment in any other department or office. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.150-K/2021 Dr.Liaquat Ali Abro v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 209 | 2021 SHC KHI 539 | Const. P. 315/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Sheroz Kamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-21 | Yes | Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no appointment order had been issued, thus no vested right has accrued in favour of the petitioner. It is well-settled law that even a successful candidate does not acquire an indefeasible right to be appointed and that it could be legitimately denied. The notification inviting application for the appointment has been held only to be an invitation to the qualified candidates to apply for the recruitment. On his mere applying or offer/selection, he does not acquire any right to the post. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 210 | 2020 SHC KHI 2075 | Const. P. 1158/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Rehan Khalid (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 211 | 2022 PLC (CS) 307 | Const. P. 6948/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Anis Haroon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | i) Whether the post of Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations is to be filled amongst the career foreign service officers or eminent personalities from business, media, law, and other areas on a contract basis ; ii) Whether the Prime Minister of Pakistan is the competent authority under Rule 15(1)(g)(h) of the Rules of Business, 1973 or the Federal Cabinet under Article 90 of the Constitution of Pakistan to make such appointment ; and, iii) Whether appointments on a contract basis are prohibited under or contrary to Section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and the Policy unless the conditions specified therein are satisfied? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 212 | 2020 SHC KHI 1765 | Const. P. 438/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 213 | 2021 SHC KHI 637 | Const. P. 913/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ali Muhammad and another (Petitioner) VS Mukaram Khan and another (Respondent) | 07-JAN-21 | Yes | Habeas Corpus--custody of minors--In view of the statement of the parties, the petitioners are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs. 200,000/- before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose and in the meanwhile petitioners shall not take away the custody of minors out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights in the intervening period subject to tentative payment of maintenance of the minors @ Rs.3000/- per month for each minor and maintenance at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month for petitioner-mother till final adjudication by the learned trial Court. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 214 | 2020 SHC HYD 821 | Const. P. 2092/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 215 | 2020 SHC KHI 2173 | Const. P. 3652/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Murad Sipio (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) | 27-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 216 | 2020 SHC HYD 1030 | Const. P. 348/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Jannat Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 217 | Nil | Const. P. 400/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mir Qadir Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 218 | 2020 SHC KHI 1140 | Const. P. 5423/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Rizwan Ahmed Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-20 | Yes | This is the second contempt application arising out of order dated 24.05.2019 passed by this Court. This application is not maintainable on the ground that their earlier plea was discarded by this court in their earlier application, now they have again attempted to convince this Court by filling the second contempt application on the same grounds, which is not tenable under the law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. This is the second contempt application arising out of order dated 24.05.2019 passed by this Court. This application is not maintainable on the ground that their earlier plea was discarded by this court in their earlier application, now they have again attempted to convince this Court by filling the second contempt application on the same grounds, which is not tenable under the law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 219 | 2020 SHC KHI 2098 | Const. P. 5646/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sahiba (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 220 | 2020 SHC KHI 1275 | Const. P. 533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Khaleel Maseeh (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 221 | 2023 PLC CS Note 97 | Const. P. 2293/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Noureen Naz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.230-K/2020 Noureen Naz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 222 | 2020 SHC KHI 778 | Const. P. 5645/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Rubeena Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 223 | 2020 SHC KHI 1908 | Const. P. 7520/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Sect: Local Board and Ors (Respondent) | 03-MAR-20 | Yes | The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 224 | 2022 SHC KHI 262 | Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent) | 15-APR-22 | Yes | A person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of service are protected under the constitutional protection. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 225 | 2020 SHC HYD 785 | Const. P. 119/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Naila & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 226 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1992 | Const. P. 1318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Wasim Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 09-DEC-20 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking regularization of his service under section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 in Malir Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as MDA)--Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-6632 of 2019 and another connected petition vide common order dated 16.10.2020, therefore, this petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is disposed of in terms of the common order dated 16.10.2020, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust his remedy if any, as provided under the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 227 | 2020 SHC HYD 1257 | Const. P. 983/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 979,993,998/2020 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Kewal Ram (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 08-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3634/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Kewal Ram and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 228 | 2020 SHC HYD 882 | Const. P. 234/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Hidayat Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 229 | 2020 SHC HYD 2188 | Const. P. 176/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Akber Kharani (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1286-K/2020 Akber Kharani v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 230 | 2020 SHC HYD 1191 | Const. P. 3383/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Atif and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 231 | 2020 SHC HYD 433 | Const. P. 719/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Abdul Ali & another (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 232 | 2020 SHC KHI 422 | Const. P. 5653/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shakeela Bano (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 233 | 2020 SHC HYD 793 | Criminal Appeal 46/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | Aijaz Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 27-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.147-K/2020 Aijaz Ali Rajpar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 234 | 2022 PLC (CS) 1289 | Const. P. 4077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 17-NOV-20 | Yes | Repatriation, from the appointment as Assistant Commissioner (BPS-17) in Ex-PCS Cadre by way of nomination, to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue, Sindh---we are not impressed with the grounds urged by the petitioner in his petition for the simple reason that the appointment of the petitioner in Ex-PCS cadre (BS-17) had already been declared as illegal by the Honorable Supreme Court and ordered his repatriation to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue--In our view, since the directions of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters are still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 235 | 2020 SHC HYD 1237 | Const. P. 258/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 236 | 2021 SHC KHI 421 | Const. P. 2328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Tanveer (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.1027-K/2025 Pakistan Steel Mills v. Muhammad Tanveer Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 237 | 2021 SHC KHI 349 | Const. P. 562/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Munawar & others (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 238 | 2021 SHC KHI 558 | Const. P. 3590/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Water & Power Development & Ors (Respondent) | 04-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.559-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi & others,C.P.L.A.656-K/2021 Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi v. Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 239 | 2022 SHC KHI 31, 2021 PLC (CS) 1226 | Const. P. 1497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1089-K/2021 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation through its Chairman v. Nasir Kamal & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 240 | 2021 SHC KHI 487 | Const. P. 4896/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muzaffar Hussain Katpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-21 | Yes | suspension order | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 241 | 2021 SHC KHI 720 | Const. P. 3028/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Umair Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-OCT-21 | Yes | The questions in the context are whether the petitioner has any enforceable right to seek direction to respondents to allow him to join 49th Common Training Program 2021, commencing in the ensuing month. And whether the respondents are required to act fairly, in a manner which is not arbitrary and in accordance with the established practice followed by it over a long period in making such deferments to other candidates namely Hamood-ur-Rehman, Taveer Shahoor Rana, Abraiz Ali Abbasi, Ahmed Saeed Manj and Ateeq-Ullah under the prevailing occupational groups and services (Probation, Training, and Seniority) Rules, 1990. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 242 | 2021 SHC KHI 736 | Const. P. 6909/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Asadullah Shaikh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3521/2021 Asadullah Shaikh and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1920/2023 Asadullah Shaikh and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 3 months, Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks) | |
| 243 | 2021 SHC KHI 10 | Const. P. 7678/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | HBL (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | 26-MAR-21 | Yes | HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (NIRC-FB) in Appeal No.12(18)/2015-K, whereby order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Commission, at Karachi (NIRC-SB), in Grievance Petition No.4B (187)/2012-K, filed by the private respondent, was allowed with the compensatory cost of Rs.100,000/- while granting salary and all admissible back benefits to him by treating him to be in service from the date of his dismissal from service i.e. 09.09.2003, till reaching the age of superannuation i.e. 12.12.2012; and, he was also declared to be entitled to have pensionary benefits with effect from 12.12.2012 in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-886 of 2011. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3062/2021 Habib Bank Limited, Karachi v. Full Bench, National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 244 | 2021 SHC LAR 619 | Cr.Bail 258/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Raheem Bux (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 245 | 2021 SHC KHI 564 | Const. P. 4522/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Kh: Ghulam Ghous (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-21 | Yes | officers are posted on acting charge---Secretary Local Government says that he will examine the record as to whether Miss Shamona Sadaf is working in BPS-18 or BPS-16 till then he will relieve that lady and will not be posted on that post until the issue is resolved. In case, inquiry speaks that she is having BPS-18 or she is posted on same place on any other post and if she was working in BPS-16 and has been designated BPS-18, delinquent officers including that lady shall face the consequences to be carried out by the authorities. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 246 | 2021 SHC KHI 1357 | Const. P. 5020/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Irfan Mukhtar Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 23-FEB-21 | Yes | deferment of the Petitioners promotion on grounds of the pending disciplinary proceedings | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 247 | 2021 SHC KHI 78 | Const. P. 3603/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shanaz Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 20-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 248 | 2021 SHC KHI 1180 | Const. P. 6238/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Huzaifa Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-21 | Yes | deceased quota | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 249 | 2021 SHC LAR 199 | Cr.Bail 185/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Pathan Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 30-JUL-21 | Yes | For the aforesaid reasons, the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicant vide order dated 30.4.2021 is hereby confirmed. However, the applicant is required to furnish further solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50000/- (Fifty Thousand Rupees) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar of this Court within one week from today. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 250 | 2021 SHC KHI 1135 | Const. P. 6261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | 16-AUG-21 | Yes | M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC"), has sought enforcement of the guidelines provided by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order dated 11.03.2020 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.4450/2019 (M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. Karachi v. The Registrar Trade Unions, C/o National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad, and others), to the Registrar, National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), for conducting the referendum with respect of determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC as provided under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012--we direct the Deputy Registrar NIRC to announce the result of the referendum for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC. However, it is made clear that, if any of the parties in the proceedings is aggrieved by the outcome of the result of the referendum, they are at liberty to avail and exhaust their respective remedies in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 251 | 2021 SHC KHI 1239 | Const. P. 4668/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP D-1917/2017 attached | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 07-SEP-21 | Yes | Petitioner employers sought declaration that demand of contributions by the Federal EOBI under EOBI Act 1976 is illegal as EOBI became federal subject after 18th Amendment and subsequent Sindh EOBI Act 2014; Sindh Province did enact the Act 2014 but could not establish the Institution; CCI resolved EOBI shall remain with Federal Government. Held petitioners cant take benefit of dispute between the Federation and Province; priority must be given to the employees as the Old Age Benefit law is a beneficial law, aimed for the benefit of the employees therefore in case contribution amount is not received by the EOBI ultimately it is the employees who will suffer. Hence these petitions are disposed of in terms that petitioners shall deposit the contributions and other dues according to EOBI Act 1976; all amount deposited with the Nazir shall be returned in favour of the EOBI established under the EOBI Act 1976. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 252 | 2021 SHC KHI 361 | Const. P. 6300/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bashir Ahmed Abbasi Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-21 | Yes | Prima facie under the Sindh Rules of Business, 1986, the Chief Minister is the Chief Executive of the Province; and, has no direct role whatsoever in the matter of a Junior School Teacher, about his appointment, posting, transfer, promotion, and disciplinary issues. On the aforesaid proposition, the Honble Supreme Court in the case of The STATE v. ANWAR SAIF ULLAH KHAN (PLD 2016 Supreme Court 276) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.572-K/2021 Bashir Ahmed v. Government of Sindh Chief Secretary of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution as well as on Merits |
| 253 | Nil | Criminal Appeal 61/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Original Side | 2016 | Mir Hassan Bangwar and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 15-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | J.P.12/2021 Ali Akbar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 254 | 2021 SHC LAR 1376 | Cr.Bail 273/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Ali Solangi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 12-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 255 | 2021 SHC LAR 247 | Cr.Bail 319/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Majid Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | For the above reasons, the applicant Majid Ali has made out a case for post-arrest bail in FIR No.42 of 2021, registered with Police Station Darri, District Larkana, for offenses punishable under sections 452, 376, and 511 P.P.C. Accordingly, the applicant is admited to post arrest bail; he shall be released in the aforesaid crime subject to furnishing his bail bond in the sum of Rs.50, 000/- (Fifty Thousand Ruprees) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 256 | 2021 SHC KHI 846 | Const. P. 1955/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Bashir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | we direct the respondents that they shall constitute a fresh Board comprising of recruitment committee/Board and they shall conduct test in the applied Chemistry as well as provide ample opportunity to the Petitioner for an interview and shall pass a speaking order with regard to his regularization in case if he qualifies shall be accommodated within two months. It is pertinent to mention here that recruitment committee shall also examine the cases of the persons/employees who were batchmats of the petitioner were regularized; petitioner shall also be treated one same anology. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.939-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Zone-VI) v. Bashir Ahmed Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of, only Law point will be taken up in the 2nd week of July,24. |
| 257 | 2021 SHC LAR 739 | Cr.Bail 212/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Nabi @ Shuti Bhayo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 258 | 2021 SHC LAR 604 | Cr.Bail 165/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Azhar Ali Buledi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 17-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 259 | 2021 SHC LAR 8 | Cr.Bail 237/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghazi Katohar and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 260 | 2021 SHC KHI 716, 2022 SBLR Sindh 2025 | Const. P. 6218/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Faraz Ahmed Wajidi (Petitioner) VS Chancellor DOW University (Respondent) | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | The caption petition has raised substantial questions of law involving interpretation of the certain provisions of The DOW University of Health Sciences Act, 2004 (`Act-2004`) and the Dow Employees (Service) Statute, 2007, and the principles governing the Writ of Quo Warranto as well as the power of the syndicate/competent authority of respondent-University to make a contractual appointment under the Act-2004 as amended up-to-date and Service Statute 2007--In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee of respondent-university ought not to be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the competent authority, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess the candidature of a candidate for regular appointment or on contract basis, on case to case basis. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2014 SCMR 157). In the instant case, prima-facie, the competent authority has assessed the candidature of the private respondents and appointed them in the respondent-university, which does not require interference at our end. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 261 | 2021 SHC KHI 111 | Const. P. 1041/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-21 | Yes | regularization | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 262 | 2021 SHC KHI 465 | Const. P. 4485/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ashfaq Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-21 | Yes | the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 263 | 2021 SHC HYD 45 | Const. P. 882/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Hameed & others (Petitioner) VS IV Addl DJ Hyd and others (Respondent) | 28-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 264 | 2021 SHC HYD 1324 | Cr.Bail 770/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mashooque Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 265 | 2021 SHC HYD 928 | Cr.Bail 890/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD ALI RAJPUT (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 266 | 2021 SHC HYD 116 | Civil Revision 153/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Amin (Applicant) VS Nazimul Haq (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 267 | 2021 SHC KHI 1098 | Cr.Bail 2365/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | BASHEER AHMED S/O ABDUL WADOOD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 31-DEC-21 | Yes | seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.665/2021 of PS Ittehad Town, Karachi registered under Section 23(i) A of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 268 | 2022 SHC KHI 147 | Cr.Bail 1731/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD AWAIS S/O SALAHUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | whether, the criminal prosecution in such a circumstances, as required under Section 195 Cr.P.C., could be initiated at the complaint of the said Court and not by the private person---Primarily, the entire case as put forward by the parties, depends upon the documentary evidence, which is available with the prosecution; and it is yet to be determined by the learned trial Court, whether Sections 420, 468, 471 PPC are attracted in the present crime or otherwise, which could only be done, after recording of the evidence; besides that there is a delay of almost two years in lodging the FIR, which is sufficient ground to confirm the pre-arrest bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 269 | 2022 SHC KHI 488 | Cr.Bail 2350/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | SYED MUHAMMAD FARHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.473/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 270 | 2021 SHC HYD 1244 | Const. P. 917/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Mukhtaran (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 271 | 2021 SHC HYD 34 | Cr.Misc. 717/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | MST.SHAHZADI (Applicant) VS MASHOOQ @ CHEEZ & OTHERS (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 272 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 505 | Const. P. 974/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Isra village Housing Scheme (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 273 | 2021 SHC HYD 1149 | Const. P. 770/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Salman Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.1712-K/2021 Salman Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 274 | 2021 SHC HYD 120 | I. A 3/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2000 | Mir Kashif Ali and others (Appellant) VS Syed Muzaffar Hussain Shah and another (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 275 | 2021 SHC HYD 88 | Const. P. 51/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst Shahnaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.1713-K/2021 Mst. Shahnaz Bibi v. Ali Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 276 | 2021 SHC HYD 310 | Cr.Bail 729/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD UMER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 277 | 2021 SHC HYD 1398 | Const. P. 2623/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 278 | 2022 SHC KHI 817 | Cr.Bail 2221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | REHAN NADIR ALI S/O NADIR ALI BAIG (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | seeks bail after arrest in F.I.R No.1401/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 279 | 2021 SHC HYD 721 | Cr.Bail 912/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | DARYA KHAN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 22-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 280 | 2021 SHC HYD 1403 | Const. P. 1913/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sindh High Court Employees C.Operative (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 281 | 2021 SHC HYD 54 | Const. P. 526/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 282 | 2021 SHC HYD 1100 | Cr.Misc. 718/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ali Shah (Applicant) VS SP Complaint Cell (Respondent) | 22-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 283 | 2025 SHC KHI 1739 | Const. P. 1168/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Itrat Malik (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 04-FEB-25 | Yes | Major penalties aim to not only punish the offender but also deter others. Minor punishment may be preferred when the offense is less severe, and circumstances suggest no bad faith or willfulness. This view is supported by the Supreme Court of Pakistan's observations in Secretary, Government of Punjab, and others versus Khalid Hussain Hamdani and 2 others 2013 SCMR 817. 18. As a result of the above discussion, this Petition is allowed. The impugned orders dated 09.05.2019 and 19.11.2019, and the directions issued by the SLIC for withholding the service benefits of the petitioner and appellate order are set aside, and she is entitled to be paid for the period mentioned in the impugned orders, accordingly within two (02) months from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1563/2025 State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan and others v. Dr. Itrat malik and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Notice). Early date. Relist it before a 3 members bench |
| 284 | 2021 SHC HYD 506 | Const. P. 583/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Lakhmir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 285 | 2021 SHC HYD 499 | Const. P. 2382/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Attaullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federal Secretary Ministry of Water and Power dev.... (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 286 | 2021 SHC HYD 611 | Const. P. 2724/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Sattar Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 287 | 2021 SHC HYD 1001 | Civil Revision 221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | P.O Sindh and others (Applicant) VS Ahmed Nawaz and others (Respondent) | 20-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 288 | 2021 SHC HYD 1165 | Const. P. 1894/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Ashraf Arain (Petitioner) VS Water and Power Development Authority (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 289 | 2021 SHC HYD 1264 | Const. P. 1442/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muzaffar Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 290 | 2021 SHC KHI 969 | Criminal Miscelleneous 763/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | SYED MUHAMMAD AHMED RAZA & ORS (Applicant) VS IIIRD ADJ KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) | 29-DEC-21 | Yes | Primarily, there is a trend to use false F.I.R. and fabricated complaints to take revenge from someone. It has become a strong mechanism for the attack on mental health, reputation, and the creation of fear. In criminal matters the procedure of registration of cases in courts is provided under sections 154, 154(3), 156(3), 190 CrPC, and Private Complaint made before Magistrate under section 200 Cr.P.C., false FIR and complaints mean making false allegations and lodging FIR or complaints based on conspired fabricated facts and circumstances to harass the other person by misuse of law and judicial proceedings. The police are obliged to register FIR for all cognizable offenses and to pursue the investigation with due process of law. Innocent people, who are implicated in false cases under a malicious FIR, face many problems due to these legal procedures. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 291 | 2021 SHC HYD 501 | Const. P. 511/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sanullah (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ashraf alias Lala and others (Respondent) | 20-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 292 | 2021 SHC HYD 1317 | First Appeal Against Order 66/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Umer Farooque (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shafique (Respondent) | 21-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 293 | 2021 SHC HYD 905 | Const. P. 437/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Hawa & Ors (Petitioner) VS National Highway Authority & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 294 | 2021 SHC HYD 167 | Cr.Misc. 652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | ZULFIQAR ALI (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL DADU & OTHERS (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 295 | 2021 SHC HYD 139 | Const. P. 1163/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Altaf Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 23-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 296 | 2022 SHC KHI 395 | Const. P. 1016/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Hafeez (Petitioner) VS G.O.S & Ors (Respondent) | 10-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.772-K/2022 Abdul Hafeez v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of | |
| 297 | 2022 SHC KHI 517 | Const. P. 5987/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waqar Ali Khoso and Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.473-K/2022 Ghayasuddin Shahani & others v. The Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 298 | 2022 SHC KHI 715 | Const. P. 6752/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mukhtar Ahmed Mangia (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 299 | 2022 SHC KHI 686 | Const. P. 4329/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ullab Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 300 | 2022 SHC KHI 681 | Const. P. 5819/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Kareem (Petitioner) VS M/s Trading Co. and Ors (Respondent) | 07-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 301 | 2022 SHC KHI 909 | Const. P. 518/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 302 | 2022 SHC KHI 504 | Const. P. 3842/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Niaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Sect: School Education & Literacy Dept: & Others (Respondent) | 19-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 303 | 2022 SHC KHI 427 | Const. P. 5391/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sajid Akbar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-22 | Yes | We, therefore, in absence of the exceptions as enunciated in the case-law cited above, cannot travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the instant case and interfere with any Order passed under the hierarchy of Pakistan Armed Forces in service-related matters according to their applicable laws. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 304 | 2022 SHC KHI 256 | Const. P. 5504/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zuhaib Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Chairman Sindh Serices Tribunal (Respondent) | 03-JUN-22 | Yes | we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.832-K/2022 Zuhaib Hussain Soomro v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of [ Remanded to SST ] |
| 305 | 2021 SHC KHI 305 | Const. P. 2146/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 306 | 2021 SHC HYD 108 | M.A. 3/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Shamim Bano (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 307 | 2022 SHC KHI 824 | Const. P. 6187/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 11-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 308 | 2022 SHC KHI 333 | Const. P. 918/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 18-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | |||
| 309 | 2021 SHC KHI 1181 | Const. P. 4219/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Mehran Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 310 | 2022 SHC KHI 929 | Const. P. 4623/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | United Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.995/2022 M/s United Bank Limited Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Labour and Human Resources Development, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 311 | 2022 SHC KHI 348 | Const. P. 6549/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Habibur Rehman Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.484-K/2022 The Director General Military Land & Cantonment & another v. Habib Rehman Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 312 | 2021 SHC KHI 1158 | Const. P. 4311/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Hassan Textiles (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 313 | 2022 SHC KHI 246 | Const. P. 1469/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Allied Bank of Pak: and others (Petitioner) VS National Ind. Relation Commissio and ors (Respondent) | 17-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 314 | 2021 SHC KHI 937 | Const. P. 272/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Latif and Others (Petitioner) VS NBP and Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 315 | 2022 SHC HYD 630 | R.A (Civil Revision) 3/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) VS Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent) | 05-DEC-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 316 | 2023 SHC KHI 592 | Const. P. 1287/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 317 | 2022 SHC HYD 874 | II.A. 56/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Samad through L.rs (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.136-K/2022 Fayyaz Ahmed & another v. Abdul Samad deceased through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 318 | 2023 SHC KHI 655 | Const. P. 7523/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Atif Ghias (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 319 | 2023 SHC KHI 878 | Const. P. 6587/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mst. Zahoori (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) | 13-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 320 | 2023 SHC KHI 610 | Const. P. 1134/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | M/s Trio Ind (Petitioner) VS Babo Sher and Others (Respondent) | 31-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.451-K/2023 M/s Trio Industries (Pvt) Limited v. Babu Sher & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 321 | 2023 SHC KHI 924, 2024 PLC (CS) 817 | Const. P. 2856/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shakeel ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 20-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 322 | 2023 SHC KHI 904 | Const. P. 647/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Shahid Habib (Petitioner) VS FUUAST & Othres (Respondent) | 31-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1269-K/2023 Faiz Khan v. Zia Hussain kazilbash and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 323 | 2022 SHC HYD 220 | Const. P. 3305/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahrukh Ul Hassan & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 08-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1263-K/2022 Shahrukh ul Hassan & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 324 | 2022 SHC HYD 4 | Const. P. 1019/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Anjuman-e-Imamia Sindh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 325 | 2026 SHC KHI 506, 2026 SHC KHI 624 | Const. P. 5129/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Anjuman E Tajiran & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 326 | Nil | Criminal Appeal 107/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2018 | Zulfiqar Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 14-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 327 | 2022 SHC HYD 519 | II.A. 16/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Pir Shahab Ghous Shah (Appellant) VS M/S Matiari Sugar Mills Ltd (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 328 | 2023 SHC KHI 684 | Const. P. 593/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) VS Lal Jan and Others (Respondent) | 31-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 329 | 2023 SHC KHI 521 | Const. P. 8295/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Tariq Mehmood & Os (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.574-K/2023 Tariq Mehmood & others v. Federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Production & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC | |
| 330 | 2023 SHC KHI 1166 | Const. P. 5967/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Ayub Alvi (Petitioner) VS Admin Incharge Pakistan Cotton and Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 331 | 2023 SHC KHI 1046 | Const. P. 5043/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Allah Bux Soomro (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | 17-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1229/2023 General Manager, MCB Bank Ltd Sukkur v. Allah Bux Soomro dec. thr. LRs and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 332 | 2023 SHC KHI 153 | Const. P. 160/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Riaz Ahmed Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Auditor General of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 10-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 333 | 2025 SHC KHI 2139 | Const. P. 8200/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Saeeduddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-AUG-25 | Yes | The courts generally hold that appointments, promotions, and transfers must be made in strict accordance with the law and established rules. The power to create new posts or change promotion criteria rests with the government's rule-making authority, not with the courts. This Court is of the view that such a petition is considered "devoid of merit" when it seeks something not provided for in the existing rules. The petitioner's demand for proforma promotion in BS-21 promotion is not supported by the rules. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 334 | 2024 SHC KHI 374, 2024 PLC (CS) 1402 | Const. P. 5270/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ejaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-24 | Yes | The perusal of Article 199 (b)(ii) of the Constitution shows that a person performing duties in connection with affairs of the Province could be required to show under what authority he is holding a particular public office and for that purpose, the petitioner therein may not be required to be an aggrieved person, however, in the instant matter the directions sought by the petitioner were not merely confined to the afore-referred aspect of the matter rather the same include the issuance of directions like the Writ of Mandamus and prohibition against the respondent No.5 requiring him to show his fitness to hold the promotion post in BS-21 without fulfilling the criteria as outlined in the recruitment rules as the matter of appointment of the post of Inspector General of Prison Sindh (BPS-21) is governed under the Recruitment Rules | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 335 | 2024 SHC KHI 806 | Const. P. 4153/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | M/s Pakistan Beverages Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Afzal and Others (Respondent) | 25-MAR-24 | Yes | Section 12 of the Ordinance 1968 provides that no temporary workmen whether monthly rated, weekly rated daily rated or piece rated and no probational or badali shall be entitled to any notice if his services were terminated by the employer, nor shall any such workman be required to give any notice or pay wages in lieu thereof to the employer if he leaves the employment of his own accord. However, the situation is quite different than the permanent workman under Section 12(3) of the Ordinance 1968. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.461-K/2024 Muhammad Afzal and others v. M/s Pakistan Beverages Limited through its Executive Director and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned |
| 336 | 2024 SHC KHI 939, 2024 PLC (CS) 1134 | Const. P. 4216/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Habib Nasir Siddiqui and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-MAR-24 | Yes | Touching to the last proposition, it is well-settled law that a legislative act to nullify a judgment, without taking away its basis, is an impermissible exercise. Whereas in the present case, this Court in the case of Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and 28 others as discussed supra, directed the Competent Authority for inclusion of Orderly Allowance in pensionable; emoluments of the petitioners under law and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan, in the above-referred matter, as well as the observation made in the preceding paragraphs, however the respondent CAA without taking away the basis of the order omitted sub-regulation 10 of Regulation 46, which exercise amounts to nullify the effect of the order, which is not permissible under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2143/2024 Civil Aviation Authority, through its authorized officer, Islamabad v. Habib Nasir Siddique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 337 | 2023 SHC KHI 266 | Cr.Acq.A. 606/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | MALIK FURQAN AHMED (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ANOHTER (Respondent) | 05-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 338 | 2023 SHC KHI 875 | Const. P. 619/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst. Gulshan W/o Aashiq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-JUL-23 | Yes | Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cutoff social relations with the son or daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 339 | 2023 SHC KHI 1213 | Cr.Bail 734/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | ATEEQ AHMED KHAN S/O SHAMIM AHMED KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 11-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 340 | 2023 SHC KHI 1075 | Cr.Rev 139/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | MUHAMMAD AKHTAR S/O BASHIR AHMED (Applicant) VS VTH ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 21-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3744/2023 Agha Abid Majeed Khan v. Idrees Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 341 | 2024 SHC KHI 1316 | Const. P. 8480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | M/s Hayat Kimya Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-24 | Yes | Fire Fighting Equipment is equipment as defined in SRO SRO 41(I)/2009 and SRO 1097(1)/2012: entitled for exemption | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.470-K/2024 Collector of Customs and others v. M/s Hayat Kimy Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time |
| 342 | 2024 SHC KHI 1433 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1520/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 1521 of 2023 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | The Collector, Collectorate of Customs, Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s. Frontier Waziristan Shell Petr. Services &ors (Respondent) | 15-JAN-24 | Yes | period provided under section 179(3) of the Customs Act 1969 for passing an Order is mandatory and not directory | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 343 | 2025 SHC KHI 1655, 2025 SHC KHI 1668 | Const. P. 2668/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dhoni Das (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-25 | Yes | Regularization of employment hinges on legal backing. Without a specific law, policy, or rules governing regularization, an individual cannot simply petition the High Court for this relief. Both parties acknowledged that the petitioners were hired for temporary, contract-based positions, as explicitly stated in their employment contracts. These contracts also stipulated that they could not claim regularization. This aspect of the lack of qualification of the post as pointed out cannot be overlooked by this Court; these crucial details cannot be basis of principle to grant relief as they have already been nonsuited. The application of the law applied by the respondents while scrutinizing the cases of the petitioners is correct appreciation of law and supported by both regularization policy and existing legal precedents, rendering the decision of scrutiny committee valid and sustainable as the issue of qualification has been raised as this Court cannot change the disqualification into qualification. On the aforesaid proposition we are supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa v. Sher Aman (2022 SCMR 406). 8. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is found to be meritless and is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.748-K/2023,C.P.L.A.1098-K/2025,C.P.L.A.1076-K/2025,C.P.L.A.1077-K/2025 SCP | Disposed Disposed of, only Law point will be taken up in the 2nd week of July,24.,Pending ,Pending ,Pending |
| 344 | 2024 SHC SUK 1413 | Const. P. 780/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Nawaz & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 345 | 2024 SHC SUK 599 | Const. P. 873/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mehtab Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 346 | 2024 SHC SUK 685 | Const. P. 1024/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mumtaz Ali & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 347 | 2024 SHC SUK 1083 | Const. P. 732/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Javed Hussain Leghari & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 348 | 2024 SHC SUK 224 | Const. P. 623/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Sher and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 349 | 2024 SHC SUK 81 | Cr.Bail 259/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Allah Dino Shaikh (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 350 | 2024 SHC SUK 1057 | Const. P. 1244/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Rauf Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 351 | 2024 SHC SUK 446 | Const. P. 1716/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sahib Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 352 | 2024 SHC MPK 797 | Const. P. 1246/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Dolat & others (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) | 09-SEP-24 | Yes | The petitioner was appointed on a contract basis, and his satisfactory performance has not been disputed by the respondent. The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 was enacted to regularize the services of certain categories of employees appointed on adhoc and contract basis in Sindh. The Act defines "employee" as a person appointed to a post on adhoc and contract basis, excluding daily wages and work-charge employees. Section 3 of the Act outlines the specific categories of employees eligible for regularization. The law states that contract and adhoc employees working in government departments and projects in the province before the 2013 Act became effective should be considered as regular employees. However, despite this clear provision, the service of the petitioner has not been regularized, which is apathy. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 353 | 2024 SHC SUK 160 | Const. P. 996/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Jan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others0 (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 354 | 2024 SHC KHI 1176 | Cr.Rev 269/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | M/S MAPLE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD & ORS (Applicant) VS LEARNED CHAIRMAIN DRUG COURT KHI (Respondent) | 22-OCT-24 | Yes | It is well settled that the report of an expert cannot be used as evidence without taking it on record and exhibiting it to provide an opportunity for cross-examination. The Cr.P.C. allows certain expert reports to be admitted in evidence without calling the expert as a witness. This is to save time and speed up trials. However, the court may still summon and examine the expert if necessary. The admissibility of test reports has been questioned. However, the Qanun-e Shahadat Order (QSO) and Cr.P.C. should be interpreted progressively to give more space to modern forensic science. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 355 | 2024 SHC KHI 428 | Criminal Miscelleneous 640/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | KARIM BUX JOKHIO @ JAVED & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 04-NOV-24 | Yes | We have noticed that the Judicial Magistrate has been conferred with wide powers to take cognizance of an offense not only when he receives information about the commission of offense from a third person but also when he has knowledge or even suspicion that the offense has been committed. The Magistrate has the power to independently review a police report, even if it concludes that no offense was committed. They can disagree with the police's opinion and take cognizance of the offense, ordering further investigation or issuing process to the accused. The Magistrate's decision is based on their assessment of the facts, not solely on the police's opinion. The terms "charge sheet" and "final report" are not formally defined in the Code. However, they are commonly used in police rules to refer to reports filed under Section 170 Cr.P.C. Reports filed under Section 169, where there's insufficient evidence, are often termed "referred charge," "final report," or "summary." 16. In view of the above we, therefore, dispose of these Criminal Miscellaneous Applications along with the pending application(s), with direction to the trial court to proceed with the matter, frame the charge, and culminate the Criminal proceedings in its logical conclusion within a reasonable time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 356 | 2024 SHC SUK 13 | Const. P. 1902/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Waqar Ahmed Jagirani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.724-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Health and others v. Waqar Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 357 | 2024 SHC SUK 1228 | Const. P. 1429/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mohsin Ahmed Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.729-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Mohsin Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 358 | 2024 SHC SUK 591 | Const. P. 1318/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Syed Bachal Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 359 | 2024 SHC KHI 794 | Const. P. 6194/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Anwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-DEC-24 | Yes | Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the August court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the August Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 360 | 2024 SHC SUK 413 | Const. P. 508/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Nadir Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 361 | 2024 SHC SUK 1128 | Const. P. 202/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Raza Rabbani @ Sarang Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.758-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Department and others v. Raza Rabbani @ Sarang Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 362 | 2024 SHC SUK 298 | Const. P. 1206/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Azeem Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 363 | 2024 SHC MPK 585 | Const. P. 354/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | There is no cavil to the proposition that this court has no jurisdiction to take suo moto action under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court of Pakistan held in the case of Divisional Superintendent, Postal Services, Gujranwala and another vs. Muhammad Arif Butt (2021 SCMR 1033) that any government servant who misappropriates public money, regardless of the amount, has breached the trust and confidence placed in them. This is considered dishonesty and misconduct, and such an employee has no place in government service. It is well-settled that based on sheer technicalities, the persons cannot be exonerated from serious charges of misappropriation and fraud, if any, and that needs proper inquiry and investigation by the investigating agency to unearth the truth for placing the same before the competent Court of law. Therefore the titled Constitution Petitions are maintainable on various accounts, Articles 9 (security of person), 14 (inviolability of dignity of man), 24 (protection of property rights), and 25 (equality of citizens) of the Constitution and affecting the public at large because unlawful diversion of State resources from public development projects to private use leads to poverty, declining quality of life and injustice, as such these petitions can be heard and decided on merits. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 364 | 2024 SHC SUK 1198 | Const. P. 1490/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Haque Nawaz & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 365 | 2024 SHC KHI 872 | Const. P. 4971/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Sara & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-24 | Yes | We are not in agreement with him on the premise that the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act of 1939 recognizes the age of 16 as the legal age for marriage. Section 13 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 reads as under:- (13. Amendment of the dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939).In the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939) in section 2:- 1. After clause (ii) the following new clause (ii-a) shall be inserted, namely:- ???(ii-a) that the husband has taken any additional wife??? (b) In clause (vii), for the word ???fifteen??? the word ???sixteen??? shall be substituted). 8. According to Mulla's Principles of Muhammadan Law, a marriage of a minor performed by her father or grandfather is valid unless she repudiates it before 18. Even a marriage arranged by other guardians is valid unless the minor repudiates it on attaining puberty. At this juncture, it would be significant to refer to the case of Mauj Ali v. Syed Safder Hussain (1970 SCMR 437), wherein the Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929 was an issue while deciding such controversy by the Supreme Court. 9. The competent court of law is required to see the validity of the marriage carefully, considering the family's honor. If the information is found to be false, the family should not be unnecessarily harmed. However, as petitioner No.1 has made a statement before the court, no further action is required against the couple, and they should be protected, for the simple reason that adults have the right to marry whomever they choose, regardless of caste or religion. Parents may disapprove but cannot resort to threats or violence. Police authorities must protect such couples and prosecute those who harass or threaten them. However, this does not affect the legal rights of the couple or any underage issue before the court, if any, is pending. 10. The police official present in court must submit a summary report to the magistrate, who will decide the case based on the petitioner's statement. The police should protect the couple if they seek help. No further action should be taken against the couple, and their family should not harass them. 11. In view of the statement of the parties, the private respondents are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs.500,000/- each before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose 12. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 366 | 2024 SHC SUK 1406 | Const. P. 384/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Fayaz Ali Banbhan & Others (Petitioner) VS Director Food Department & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 367 | 2024 SHC SUK 1484 | Const. P. 373/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Sajjad Ali Jarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.748-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Sajjad Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 368 | 2024 SHC SUK 1464 | Const. P. 518/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Tarique Hussain Kubar & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 369 | 2024 SHC SUK 1026 | Const. P. 1676/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Aqib Ali Mirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 370 | 2024 SHC SUK 1420 | Const. P. 591/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr Ahmed Naeem Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 371 | 2024 SHC SUK 469 | Const. P. 418/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Mujtaba & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 372 | 2024 SHC SUK 1330 | Criminal Miscelleneous 216/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2024 | Syed Shahzad Ali Shah (Applicant) VS The State & Others (Respondent) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 373 | 2024 SHC SUK 644 | Const. P. 883/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mir Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 374 | 2024 SHC SUK 1223, 2025 PLC (CS) 520 | Const. P. 96/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nadeem Abbas Mallah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | C.A.110-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary School Education Department and others v. Nadeem Abbas,C.P.L.A.514-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary School Education Department and others v. Nadeem Abbas Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 375 | 2024 SHC SUK 993 | Const. P. 665/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Iqbal Hussain Otho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 376 | 2024 SHC SUK 1343 | Const. P. 406/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Zubaida (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1092-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Home Dept. and others v. Mst. Zubaida Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 377 | 2024 SHC SUK 165 | Cr.Rev 26/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mujeeb Rehman & Another (Applicant) VS Mst. Beebul & Others (Respondent) | 06-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 378 | 2024 SHC SUK 1339 | R.A (Civil Revision) 39/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zameer Hussain (Applicant) VS Abdul Khalique and Others (Respondent) | 06-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 379 | 2024 SHC SUK 1055 | Const. P. 119/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Anwaruddin Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 380 | 2024 SHC KHI 209 | Cr.Bail 1050/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | QASIM ANWAR S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 10-JUL-24 | Yes | This Court ordinarily does not interfere with the progression of the trial to avoid discussion and remarks on the merits of the case as held in the case of Ehsan Akbar v. The State and 2 others (2007 SCMR 482). It has been long settled by the Supreme Court that when the trial is likely to commence or begin, bail application should not be decided on merits, and the matter be left to the trial Court because it may prejudice the case of either party. On the aforesaid proposition, I am guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Muhammad Sadik & others vs The State 1980 SCMR 203, Muhammad Ismail vs Muhammad Rafiq PLD 1989 SC 585, Mian Dad vs The State 1992 SCMR 1418, Gohar Rehman vs Muhammad Tahir 2011 SCMR 815. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 381 | 2024 SHC KHI 67 | Cr.Bail 779/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | JAFFAR ALI S/O DOST ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 02-JUL-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 382 | 2024 SHC SUK 1217 | Const. P. 258/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Sajid ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 383 | 2024 SHC SUK 1358 | Const. P. 1417/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Atiq ur Rehman & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 384 | 2024 SHC SUK 510 | Const. P. 234/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 385 | 2024 SHC SUK 183 | Const. P. 91/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Hyder (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 386 | 2024 SHC KHI 737 | Cr.Bail 2324/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | MUHAMMAD TANVEER KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF KHAN (Applicant) VS XTH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | The only question involved in the present bail matter is whether the bail can be refused in section 471 PPC., which is a bailable offense, whereas Sections 406 & 468 are punishable by up to seven years. In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 387 | 2024 SHC SUK 321 | Const. P. 1037/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Abdul Razzaque Hakro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 388 | 2024 SHC SUK 699 | Const. P. 106/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Yaseen Ahmed Khaki (Petitioner) VS Fed Of Pak & Other (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 389 | 2024 SHC SUK 207 | Const. P. 401/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mujeeb Rehman Ansari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 390 | 2024 SHC SUK 563 | Const. P. 414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Younas Channa (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 391 | 2024 SHC SUK 1010 | Const. P. 481/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Yar Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 392 | 2024 SHC SUK 202 | Const. P. 1273/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Syed Ayaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.395-K/2025 The Province of Sindh through Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh & others v. Syed Ayaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 393 | 2024 SHC KHI 781 | Cr.Bail 1467/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Mustafa S/o Mahboob Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | In the instant case, neither the applicant, as per contents of the FIR, referred to above, is nominated as an accused, nor a warrant has been issued against him under sections 75/87, Cr. P.C was arrested upon his statement in police custody; even after his arrest in the above case, he was not forwarded to the Magistrate for his identification parade to the effect that he was the person who robbed subject Rikshw from the place of the incident as reported by the complainant for the reason, confession before the police is not admissible in evidence under the law. So far as recovery of the subject vehicle from the custody of the applicant is concerned, firstly, the recovery of the stolen vehicle has been effected on the pointation of the applicant and its evidentiary value is yet to be determined by the learned trial court after recording evidence; mere possession of the stolen property is not sufficient to constitute an offense under Section 411 PPC rather in addition it has got to be established that the person in possession of the stolen property had dishonestly received or retained the property knowing or having the reasons to believe the same to be stolen, however, the prosecution has not applied section 411 PPC in the charge sheet rather section 412 PPC has been invoked and the ingredient whereof are yet to be determined by the trial court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 394 | 2024 SHC KHI 572 | Cr.Bail 927/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | ALI RAZA S/O MUHAMMAD CHAND (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | In the instant case, prima facie the abductee has given two versions of the incident, one before the Police after her recovery and secondly before the Magistrate on 13.01.2024 voluntarily after 8 days from the date of registration of F.I.R, though the alleged offense took place on 16.12.2023 alleging therein that her brother in law Faizan had abducted her and committed the alleged crime but she failed to disclose the name of the present applicant though the applicant was already arrested in the FIR on 07.01.2024 and her statement was recorded on 13.01.2024, however, the statement does not transpire the name of the applicant, which makes the case of the applicant that of further inquiry. On the aforesaid proposition, I seek guidance from the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ehsan Ullah vs. The State (2012 SCMR 1137) wherein it has been held by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:- ???This shows that in the present case the prosecution itself has two versions vis-??-vis the petitioner, first of the complainant party according to which the petitioner was present at the spot and had resorted to firing and second of the investigating agency according to which the petitioner was not present at the spot and he was abetting his co-accused from behind the scene. All these considerations surely render the case against the petitioner one of further inquiry into his guilt.??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 395 | 2024 SHC KHI 1184 | Cr.Bail 968/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD YAMEEN S/O MUHAMMAD AMIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 19-JUL-24 | Yes | The question involved in the present proceedings is whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 396 | 2025 SHC KHI 624 | Const. P. 5888/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Basit Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 20-JAN-25 | Yes | Hence, in our view, the decision taken by the Cantonment Executive Officer Clifton Cantonment to impose the major penalty of compulsory retirement upon the petitioner is violative of the principles of natural justice and law on the subject issue, so as the length of service of the petitioner is concerned, which is not sustainable under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Jan Muhammad v. General Manager, Karachi Telecommunication Region and another, 1993 SCMR 1440, is clear in its terms. 15. Foregoing the reasons, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Cantonment Executive Officer Clifton Cantonment to take a fresh decision by hearing the petitioner within two months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 397 | 2024 SHC KHI 1309 | Const. P. 6009/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Jamil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-24 | Yes | The main issue involved in the present proceedings is about encashing LPR after retirement. The rules state that LPR must be applied for before retirement. The petitioner retired on 26 October 2016 and applied for LPR encashment later in the year 2002 after 8 years. The petitioner cited cases of his colleagues where the department allowed LPR enchament post-retirement, after a considerable period, when confronted with this position to the respondents, however, this fat was admitted by the department???s representative present I court and sought remittance of this case to the competent authority of the department concerned. 7. Both parties after arguing the matter at some length agreed to dispose of the case, directing the Chief Secretary Sindh who shall constitute a committee headed by him and co-opted by Secretary Finance, Secretary School Education Department, government of Sindh assisted by Regulation wing S&GAD to address the disparity issue and decide the matter, including the petitioner???s requests as made in the memo of the petition within one month after providing meaningful hearing to the parties. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 398 | 2024 SHC SUK 553 | Const. P. 484/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Amjad Ali Gabol & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 399 | 2024 SHC MPK 1351 | Criminal Miscelleneous 513/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Sabhago (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | So far as the question raised by the learned counsel for the application that under The Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act 2014, the purported marriage of Ms. Asha with Naseer Ahmed is illegal on the plea that she has not attained the age of 18 years, suffice it to say that the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939 recognizes such age as sixteen years (which earlier was 15 years but was substituted as sixteen years by the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (VIII of 1961), which finds a place as Section 13 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 and reads as under:- (13. Amendment of the dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939).In the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939) in section 2:- 1. After clause (ii) the following new clause (ii-a) shall be inserted, namely:- ???(ii-a) that the husband has taken any additional wife??? (b) In clause (vii), for the word ???fifteen??? the word ???sixteen??? shall be substituted) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 400 | 2024 SHC KHI 1493 | Cr.Rev 271/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | BASHEER AHMED SODHAR S/O BAKSHAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 20-NOV-24 | Yes | Coming to the main issue, the offenses under the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 2010, are cognizable. This means that the police have the authority to arrest the accused without a warrant and investigate the case further, which provision of the law ought to have been invoked by the Police, however, they rather preferred to invoke the jurisdiction of ATC on the purported plea that revenue officials were deterred from their duties with terror charges, but it is yet to be determined by the court whether sections 6, 7, and 8 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 were/are attracted or otherwise as the contents of F.I.R, prima facie show the allegations of general nature as such these offenses of PPC could be tried by the ordinary/regular court rather than the special court, in terms of the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Hussain case, just on the plea of Mukhtiarkar and Police to the effect that injury was caused to them; however, the police report lacks a medical certificate required to charge the accused under section 337-A (i) PPC. Besides it is unclear whether the official intended to remove encroachment from public or private land. A regular court should determine this aspect of the case after framing the charge, and transfer the case if necessary under the law for the reason that Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 allows for the transfer of a case from an Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) to an ordinary court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 401 | 2025 SHC KHI 654 | Const. P. 5748/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Faisal Saleem and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-25 | Yes | The police force is crucial for law enforcement. Effective training and capacity building are essential for its success. The institution should prioritize enhancing capabilities, productivity, and public awareness. Constant litigation hinders progress. A culture of strict adherence to internal rules is necessary for smooth governance and administration. 12. Rule 19.25 mandates that Inspectors, SIs, and ASIs complete courses (A, B, C, and D) for promotion. This training is crucial for capacity building and ensuring officers possess the necessary skills and knowledge for their higher roles. Senior police officers must possess the skills and competencies befitting their rank. Continuous professional development is crucial for all officers. Promotions should prioritize training and capacity building, rather than focusing on seniority. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 402 | 2024 SHC SUK 323 | Const. P. 736/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Saeed Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 403 | 2024 SHC KHI 611 | Criminal Appeal 208/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2023 | QAMBAR S/O KHAIR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 27-NOV-24 | Yes | We have noticed that the sample of purported narcotics was received by the chemical analyzer on January 5, 2022, from the I.O of Gulbahar Police Station, though the alleged recovery was made on December 30, 2021. The sample must be sent to the lab within 72 hours of seizure. All items in the police station's storeroom must be recorded in Register No. XIX. In the present case, the prosecution failed to send the drug sample to the lab within 72 hours as required by the law. The prosecution has not provided a valid reason for the 6-day delay. The issue raised has created reasonable doubt, but the lower courts failed to consider this aspect of the case in favor of the appellant. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Asif Ali v The State 2024 SCMR 1408, Muhammad Hazir v The State 2023 SCMR 986, Qaiser & another v The State 2022 SCMR 1641. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 404 | 2024 SHC SUK 1069 | Const. P. 428/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Illahi Bux Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 405 | 2024 SHC SUK 310 | Const. P. 554/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Halar Atteque-ur-Rehman Bullo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.771-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Health Department and others v. Halar Attique-Ur-Rehman Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 406 | 2024 SHC KHI 672 | Cr.Tran 54/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-JUL-24 | Yes | Primarily, Justice can be achieved only when the court deals in the presence of both parties and the court has the power to move cases from one court to another. But the rights of the parties cannot be curtailed, controlled, or interfered with subject to exceptions provided under the law. It is well-settled law that the transfer of a matter from one court to another could only be granted in exceptional circumstances, where it was shown that the same would be in the interest of justice. Reliance is placed upon the judgment in the case of All Pakistan Newspapers Society & Others vs. Federation of Pakistan & Others PLD 2012 Supreme Court 1. 5. Prima facie the ground raised by the learned counsel for the applicant is tenable based on the reason the trial court is lying vacant since long as such there is no progress in the trial of the applicant in that Court which amounts to keeping the accused behind the bar for indefinite period without trial; in such circumstances, he intends to seek a fair and speedy trial in the criminal case pending adjudication, which is only possible if he the trial court proceeds with the matter. However, in the best interest of justice, coupled with the instance taken by the learned special prosecutor, it would be appropriate for a speedy trial of the case. In such circumstances, judicial proprietary demand that Special Case No. 79 of 2022 arising out of FIR 26/2022 pending adjudication before the Court of CNS-II Clifton Karachi needs to be transferred to the Court of CNS-III for the smooth and speedy trial of the applicant. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 407 | 2024 SHC MPK 1440 | Const. P. 781/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Nazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, if any, pending before the competent court of law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 408 | 2024 SHC MPK 715 | Const. P. 213/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Rani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | Without touching the aforesaid crucial issue, which is not feasible at this stage to dilate upon and same shall be taken up in other proceedings. 8. In view of the above instant petition is disposed of with the direction that petitioners shall not be harassed by police officials or any other person and to protect the petitioners under law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 409 | 2024 SHC KHI 587 | Const. P. 4419/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mehwish Hameed and Another (Petitioner) VS School Education & Literacy Dept: and Another (Respondent) | 20-DEC-24 | Yes | The High Court can review SPSC decisions if they are unconstitutional, illegal, or unfair. However, the Court cannot substitute its judgment for the SPSC's, but can only ensure the decision's legality and fairness. However, in the present case, it appears that the Sindh Public Service Commission announced the posts of subject specialist Zoology and Botany (BS-17) under the School Education and Literacy Department Government of Sindh vide advertisement No. 09/2022 dated 11.11.2022, both petitioners applied against the said posts and secured fewer marks in pre-interview written test on Urban quota as alleged. The recommendation process has not been completed vide press release dated 10.10.2023, 17.10.2023, and 21.11.2023, and the candidates have been accommodated to their respective posts, at this stage to scrutinize the MCQs answer sheet of the petitioners by this Court is a herculean task, which cannot be undertaken under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Chairmen Sindh Public Service Commercial redressal of their grievances in terms of regulations framed by the competent authority of the Government of Sindh, which shall be taken care of after providing meaning hearing of the petitioners. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 410 | 2024 SHC SUK 1159 | Cr.Bail 321/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Kamran Ali Makwal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-24 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the recent case has held that the law of bail under Section 497 Cr. P.C, wherein it is provided that a person shall not be released on bail if there appear to be reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment of 10 years, though all the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497 Cr. P.C, however in pre-arrest bail this Court is only required to see the ulterior motives and malafide of the complainant and police and will also tentatively assess the material and can also touch the merits of the case so far as the allegations contained in the F.I.R, and statement of PWs and other material points available on the police file. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 411 | 2024 SHC SUK 1081 | Const. P. 632/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Alam Khan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 412 | 2024 SHC SUK 293 | Const. P. 1598/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Riaz Hussain Panhyar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 413 | 2024 SHC SUK 1359 | Const. P. 487/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zaheer Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 414 | 2024 SHC SUK 1109 | Const. P. 572/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hamz Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 415 | 2024 SHC SUK 387 | Const. P. 457/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 416 | 2024 SHC SUK 1257 | Const. P. 737/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Samano (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 417 | 2024 SHC SUK 252, 2025 PLC (CS) 430 | Const. P. 1417/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Abdul Samad Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 418 | 2024 SHC SUK 1056 | Const. P. 1336/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Adil Miskeen larik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.764-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Adil Miskeen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 419 | 2024 SHC KHI 1363 | Const. P. 825/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shamim Rabani (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.852-K/2024 Shamim Rabani v. Umair Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 420 | 2024 SHC SUK 1442 | Const. P. 539/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Madad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 421 | 2024 SHC KHI 1180 | Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Saif Shujaat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-24 | Yes | Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of the competent authority. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 422 | 2024 SHC SUK 17 | Const. P. 1737/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sanaullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.767-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education & Literacy Department and others v. Sanaullah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 423 | 2024 SHC KHI 322 | Const. P. 6122/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Tehseen Haroon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-24 | Yes | Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the Supreme Court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the Supreme Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 424 | 2024 SHC KHI 1064 | Const. P. 4667/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-DEC-24 | Yes | Primarily, the police force is a disciplined force; it shoulders the great responsibility of maintaining law and order and public order in the society; that people repose great faith and confidence in it; that it must be worthy of that confidence; that in recent times, the image of the police force is tarnished and instances of police personnel behaving in a wayward manner by misusing power are in Public domain and are a matter of concern. This factual position is also a cause of great concern these days in our Country as well. On numerous occasions, we come across the involvement of Police personnel in routine as well as heinous crimes, and even if they are apprehended, are let off by the Courts due to faulty and supportive investigation by their brethren by extending the benefit of the doubt. Taking guidance from these observations, it is observed that this must stop and Courts are also required to play their part and let this issue be decided by the Executive / Appointing Authority which in all fairness is in a much better position to ascertain facts and the relevant ground realities. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.200-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others v. Atta Muhammad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 425 | 2025 SHC KHI 146 | Const. P. 5300/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Rasheed Alam (Petitioner) VS Dr. Qadeer Muhammad Ali & Ors (Respondent) | 01-JAN-25 | Yes | We are also cognizant of the fact that the invocation of the writ of Mandamus under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been restricted to enforce the terms and conditions of non-statutory rules of service of government-owned and controlled organizations. However, the petitioner's case involves the enforcement of the university's service rules. The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that one of the respondents has retired from service as pointed out by the counsel for the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 426 | 2024 SHC KHI 1250 | Cr.Bail 1043/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | RIAZ KHAN S/O MUSHAD GUL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | Since the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court directed to record or take photographs at the time of search of the accused when search, seizure, or arrest is made as the law permits the use of modern devices or techniques but the police failed and neglected to adhere the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court, which is a constitutional command under Article 199 of the Constitution, therefore, appreciating whether the applicant was arrested with charas from his trousers requires deeper appreciation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 427 | 2024 SHC SUK 1349 | Const. P. 452/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Naeemuddin & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | The overlap between the jurisdiction of this Court on its Original Civil Side and under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 and the manner in which a Court should act in terms of the judicial propriety as clarified by the Supreme Court of Pakistan where both jurisdictions are invoked. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||
| 428 | 2024 SHC KHI 786 | Cr.Bail 1259/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Kamran @ Wago S/o Fareed Gul (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | The offense under section 353, P.P.C. is bailable and punishable for 2 years or a fine. As far as section 324 PPC is concerned, in an attempt to murder case falling within the ambit of section 324, P.P.C., the nature of the act done, the intention of the offender and the circumstances leading to the occurrence are the essential ingredients, which need to be probed into determine the guilt or otherwise of an accused as the police officials have not sustained any injury on their body. As such the subject offenses do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 (1) Cr.P.C. However to ascertain the offense for an attempt to murder the police officials, and bullet injuries sustained by the accused on the lower part of his leg requires serious consideration and further probe as none of the police personnel sustained any injury, and it is for the learned trial Court to thresh out the truth after recording the evidence being adduced by the prosecution and defense during trial. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 429 | 2024 SHC KHI 1273 | Criminal Miscelleneous 671/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | SALMAN SHAH S/O HAROON SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) | 19-JUL-24 | Yes | The statutory duty casts upon the officer of a police station to enter information regarding the cognizable offense first and then the investigation comes later to gather evidence and other relevant material to prosecute the identified culprits. No doubt, an Investigating Officer plays a crucial role in the administration of the criminal justice system and the constituent of the investigation report and its worth keeps hold of plenteous value and repercussions on the outcome of any criminal case, but tainted investigations can become an acute obstacle in the administration of justice. In the case of Sughra Bibi vs. State [PLD 2018 SC 595], it was held that during the investigation, the Investigating Officer is obliged to investigate the matter from all possible angles while keeping in view all the versions of the incident brought to his notice and as required by Rule 25.2(3) of the Police Rules, 1934. An Investigating Officer has to find out the truth of the matter under investigation. His object shall be to discover the facts of the case and to arrest the real offender or offenders. He shall not commit himself prematurely to any view of the facts for or against any person. Whereas in the case of Babubhai v. State of Gujrat and others [(2010) 12 SCC 254], the Supreme Court of India held that investigation must be fair, transparent, and judicious as it is the minimum requirement of the rule of law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 430 | 2024 SHC SUK 396 | Const. P. 574/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ahmed Ali Ttunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 431 | 2024 SHC SUK 600 | Const. P. 105/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imam Bux Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 432 | 2024 SHC SUK 1151 | Const. P. 530/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Illahi Bux Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 433 | 2024 SHC SUK 804 | Cr.Bail 16/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hamayoon Shahzad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 20-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 434 | 2024 SHC SUK 1475 | Const. P. 813/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shoukat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Food Dept & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.840-K/2024 Muhammad Saleem Khan v. Umair Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 435 | 2024 SHC SUK 325 | Const. P. 935/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mumtaz Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 436 | 2024 SHC MPK 972 | Const. P. 1114/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Director General Agricultural Resaerch (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | The details of F.R. 54 elucidate that in the situation where a dismissed government servant is reinstated, the revising or appellate authority may grant his pay to him for the period of his absence from duty. Seemingly, the letter in question refers to F.R. 54 (a), which emphasizes that if such a government servant is honorably acquitted, he shall be granted the full pay to which he would have been entitled if he had not been dismissed or removed, and, by an order to be separately recorded, any allowance of which he was in receipt before his dismissal or removal. In a case falling under clause (a), the period of absence from duty will be treated as a period spent on duty. According to the explanation attached to this Rule, the "revising authority" means the "authority" or "authorized Officer" as defined in the Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, who passes the final order on the case and not the authority who passes an order on appeal. 7. Even otherwise, the details of F.R. 54 clarify that in the case of reinstatement of a dismissed or removed employee, only the revising or appellate authority may grant him his pay for the period of his absence from duty, and if he is honorably acquitted then, the full pay to which he would have been entitled to, and his period of absence from duty will be treated as a period spent on duty. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 437 | 2024 SHC SUK 740 | Const. P. 364/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mujahid Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 438 | 2024 SHC KHI 1465 | Const. P. 5887/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sajjad Ahmed Sunny and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-24 | Yes | We do not agree with the findings of the IGP Sindh and other members of the Committee for the simple reason that transferring the investigation wing to the Executive branch is not justified by the Police Act or the Police Rules 1934, citing para 56 of the Gul Hassan Jatoi judgment. The transfer of investigation officers to the Executive branch contradicts the Supreme Court's judgment as their appointment letters as Inspector Investigations limit their transfer and posting to the Executive Branch, is a matter of their terms and conditions of service and is outside the jurisdiction of the court under Article 212 of the Constitution. Therefore, the petitioners cannot be allowed to be transferred from the Investigation wing to perform their service in the Executive Branch of the Police Department. The petition is dismissed as it lacks merit as well. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 439 | 2024 SHC SUK 448 | Cr.Bail 305/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Azhar Ali Makwal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-24 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the recent case has held that the law of bail under Section 497 Cr. P.C, wherein it is provided that a person shall not be released on bail if there appear to be reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment of 10 years, though all the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497 Cr. P.C, however in pre-arrest bail this Court is only required to see the ulterior motives and malafide of the complainant and police and will also tentatively assess the material and can also touch the merits of the case so far as the allegations contained in the F.I.R, and statement of PWs and other material points available on the police file. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 440 | 2025 SHC KHI 296 | Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Qurban Ali S/o Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 441 | 2025 SHC KHI 126 | Const. P. 2950/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Hasnain Raza and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 16-APR-25 | Yes | However, the Respondents also acknowledged that the Marine Fisheries Department (MFD) had already submitted up-gradation proposals for Research Assistants to BPS-14 to the relevant central bodies, with previous proposals facing delays, and that this matter is currently under their review. If this is the position of the case, these cases need to be referred back to the competent authority within the Respondents' administration. This authority needs to examine the issue of either upgrading the Petitioners' posts or considering them for promotion according to the prevailing recruitment rules, provided they meet the eligibility and fitness criteria for the position as requested, and after providing them an opportunity to be heard if they are still employed in the respondent department. This approach aligns with the Supreme Court's decisions in similar cases as discussed supra. Consequently, these petitions are being disposed of under these specified terms. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the respondents for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 442 | 2025 SHC KHI 579 | Const. P. 2952/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Nazakat Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 16-APR-25 | Yes | However, the Respondents also acknowledged that the Marine Fisheries Department (MFD) had already submitted up-gradation proposals for Research Assistants to BPS-14 to the relevant central bodies, with previous proposals facing delays, and that this matter is currently under their review. If this is the position of the case, these cases need to be referred back to the competent authority within the Respondents' administration. This authority needs to examine the issue of either upgrading the Petitioners' posts or considering them for promotion according to the prevailing recruitment rules, provided they meet the eligibility and fitness criteria for the position as requested, and after providing them an opportunity to be heard if they are still employed in the respondent department. This approach aligns with the Supreme Court's decisions in similar cases as discussed supra. Consequently, these petitions are being disposed of under these specified terms. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the respondents for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 443 | 2024 SHC SUK 353 | Const. P. 1660/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ashique Ali Chijjan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 444 | 2025 SHC KHI 360 | Const. P. 4020/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Sikandar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court has ruled that contractual employees do not have an automatic right to regularization unless explicitly supported by law or policy. Regularization lacking such a legal foundation is deemed a violation of fairness, transparency, and meritocracy. Furthermore, the argument of discrimination in such cases has been rejected by the apex court, as discrimination presupposes a legal entitlement to the initial benefit, which is absent. Consequently, regularization necessitates legal backing and a transparent, merit-based procedure. The Supreme Court underscores that regularization is primarily an executive policy decision, generally not subject to judicial intervention. Courts can only review such policies if they infringe upon constitutional rights. The principle of institutional autonomy, crucial for effective decision-making, further supports judicial restraint in policy matters. This autonomy is vital for public institutions to protect public interest and uphold democratic values, including academic freedom. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 445 | 2025 SHC SUK 543 | Const. P. 1818/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khalid (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 446 | 2025 SHC KHI 302 | Const. P. 805/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sarfaraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | The core issue is whether the Petitioner fulfilled the mandatory five-year service requirement with the respondent bank from his appointment date of March 20, 2010, until his termination letter dated January 19, 2016. Although clause 6.2 of the appointment letter stipulated a five-year service period, which appeared to have been completed by March 2015, this is rendered complex by the regularization of the Petitioner's unauthorized absence from September 8, 2014, to February 12, 2015 (258 days), as unpaid Extraordinary Leave. Furthermore, the Petitioner submitted his resignation on April 27, 2015, to which the respondent bank replied on May 8, 2015, requesting the settlement of liabilities. Given that the five-year term was completed during this period, it seems this clause should not have been invoked. Instead, the Petitioner's resignation could have been accepted. The respondent bank's inaction in this regard, persistently demanding liability clearance under clause 6.2, demonstrates a lack of consideration, ultimately forcing the Petitioner to file the present petition on February 10, 2016. Consequently, this petition is allowed, and the respondent bank is hereby directed to address the Petitioner's resignation and issue a decision within two months from the date of this order and if need to pursue any autstandig liabilities before the court of competent jurisdicition. The contested orders are accordingly overturned. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 447 | 2025 SHC KHI 310 | Const. P. 4281/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | Generally, a court should not readily interfere with an evaluation conducted by an Expert Committee, as the court typically lacks the specialized knowledge required for such assessments. It is an established legal principle that, within its designated powers and authority, the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) must evaluate each promotion proposal individually, in accordance with the law. In instances where a disciplinary case or criminal prosecution against a civil/government servant remains unresolved even two years after the initial DPC meeting deferred its findings regarding that individual, the appointing authority may consider granting an ad-hoc promotion, as per legal provisions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.870-K/2025 The Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others v. Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 448 | 2025 SHC KHI 676 | Const. P. 6223/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Nestle Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-24 | Yes | Petition against ad interim order of Tribunal dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 449 | 2025 SHC KHI 1033 | Const. P. 5982/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Jalil ur Rehman Khonbati (Petitioner) VS PSO Co. Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | For the reasons stated, the court finds that a "Master and Servant" relationship exists between the Petitioner and the Respondent-Authority. Consequently, the petitioner's grievance pertains to the terms and conditions of service, which cannot be enforced through a Writ Petition, especially since the Service Rules involved are non-statutory and are considered internal instructions for the Respondent-Company's employee management. This view aligns with the principles established by the Supreme Court in Shafique Ahmed Khan and others v. NESCOM through Chairman Islamabad and others (PLD 2016 SC 377) and Muhammad Zaman etc. v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Finance Division (Regulation Wing), Islamabad (2017 SCMR 571), which differentiate between statutory and non-statutory service rules in the context of writ jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 450 | 2025 SHC KHI 1039 | Const. P. 6761/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khetaram & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | Essentially, the petitioners are requesting the Court to direct the government of Sindh to elevate the official standing of their specific jobs within the government's structure. This reclassification would result in higher pay and possibly improved benefits, bringing them in line with what other Sindh Government employees in comparable roles earn. They feel their current job levels and salaries do not adequately acknowledge their years of service and the nature of their duties relative to others. 7. This Court acknowledges that the final decision on upgrading these positions is a policy matter for the relevant government authority and as such decline to interfere in the same, accordingly the petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 451 | 2025 SHC KHI 193 | Const. P. 2950/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Suhail Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent) | 16-APR-25 | Yes | The policy governing up-gradation takes into account structural improvements, increased responsibilities, and pay scale inconsistencies, generally disallowing individual-based up-gradations. However, the Respondents also acknowledged that the Marine Fisheries Department (MFD) had already submitted up-gradation proposals for Research Assistants to BPS-14 to the relevant central bodies, with previous proposals facing delays, and that this matter is currently under their review. If this is the position of the case, these cases need to be referred back to the competent authority within the Respondents' administration. This authority needs to examine the issue of either upgrading the Petitioners' posts or considering them for promotion according to the prevailing recruitment rules, provided they meet the eligibility and fitness criteria for the position as requested, and after providing them an opportunity to be heard if they are still employed in the respondent department. This approach aligns with the Supreme Court's decisions in similar cases as discussed supra. Consequently, these petitions are being disposed of under these specified terms. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the respondents for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 452 | 2025 SHC KHI 441 | Const. P. 3459/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Dr. Asma Sarwar Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | It appears that much water has flown under the bridge since 2015 when the captioned petitions were filed to claim implementation of the order dated 15.04.2012 passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-215 of 2012. Without touching the merits of the cases, these petitions can be resolved by directing the respondent department to look into the issue involved in the petition if the petitioners??? cause still subsists. In the meanwhile, the respondents are mandated to advertise all job vacancies that have not been previously advertised. This would ensure that all eligible individuals have the opportunity to compete for these positions if vacant based purely on merit through a competitive process. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 453 | 2025 SHC KHI 140 | Const. P. 1333/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Anjum (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | 5. The Supreme Court in the recent judgment in the case of Sakhib Zar vs. M/s K-Electric Limited & others ( 2024 SCMR 1722) has held that even 10 days??? absence without leave is quantified as misconduct and on proving the guilt of the employee after fulfilling the requisite formalities envisaged under the law, and that could not be modified. No premium or advantage could be given on this count for any compassionate or sympathetic view. The management has a legitimate and unbridled right and authority to make a decision and mete out the punishment as provided under the law, including the dismissal/termination of service of a delinquent. 6. The Supreme Court further held that the distinction between the act of misconduct and the quantum of punishment provided under the law for such misconduct. Likewise, different acts of misconduct are defined in the different laws with different quantum or genres of punishments to be 5 imposed according to the fine sense of judgment of the competent authority/management/employer, in which the Courts have no role to play in the decision making of management which is the sole arbiter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 454 | 2025 SHC KHI 485 | Const. P. 3393/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 23-APR-25 | Yes | We understand that Pakistan Steel Mills has incurred substantial financial losses exceeding Rs. 100 billion, with total liabilities surpassing Rs. 110 billion. Given this precarious financial situation, directing PSM to grant the retired officers' claimed financial benefits under the promotion policy 2009 in these petitions is not considered appropriate at this time for the reasons discussed above in terms of the decision passed in the aforesaid proceedings. 8. Based on the reasoning outlined above, the relief requested by the petitioners cannot be granted. Consequently, these petitions are dismissed as not maintainable, along with any pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 455 | 2025 SHC KHI 353 | Const. P. 4785/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Anwaruddin Solangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed.of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 07-APR-25 | Yes | Since Pakistan Steel Mill is no more in operation since 2015 as such the case of the petitioner cannot be referred to the respondent for continuation of their services from the date of joining in Pakistan Steel. 8. For the reasons stated above, this court finds the petition to be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is thus acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are also dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 456 | 2025 SHC KHI 570 | Const. P. 670/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Qayum Memon & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan are binding on all other courts, including High Courts, to the extent that they decide a question of law or enunciate a principle of law. All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.795-K/2025 Abdul Qayoom Memo v. Prime Minister of Pakistan through Principal Secretary, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned |
| 457 | 2025 SHC KHI 2153 | Const. P. 7230/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Sajid Farooqui & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | The result of the above discussion is that the captioned constitutional petition is allowed in the terms of the ratio of the order dated 20.04.2017, as well as a judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Director General Intelligence and Investigation, F.B.R., Islamabad, and others Vs. Muhammad Aslam Khan 2020 SCMR 1846. The competent authority of respondents is directed to consider the serving petitioner as LDC with effect from the date when they were holding the post of LDC on an acting/ look after/officiating charge basis; and the benefits accrued thereon shall also be given to the petitioners, if not already paid to them. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks, and a compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 458 | 2025 SHC KHI 1428 | Const. P. 9012/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Anis Uddin & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional rights. The concept of institutional autonomy, essential for effective decision-making, supports non-interference in policy matters. This autonomy is vital for public institutions to safeguard public interest and promote democratic values, including academic freedom. 10. This Court has determined that The petitioners cannot ask for regularization of their service through constitutional petitions under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, it is for the respondent???s competent authority to consider their case in terms of their policy, if any, without discrimination within reasonable time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 459 | 2026 SHC KHI 49 | Const. P. 6483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shah Jehan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | The main grievance of the petitioner is illegal construction which is going on at one side of 200 feet road in between Saeedulah Goth and Sector 19-A, Baldia Town, Karachi. Petitioner has moved a complaint to the Deputy Director Land, Baldia Kemari Town, District Kemari, Karachi, however, he has not received any reply. Accordingly, the Deputy Director Land Encroachment, Kemari was directed by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2025 to decide the application or complaint of the petitioner available at page 103 within three months, however, no compliance has been made and today the petitioner???s counsel is also absent. Since the decision has already been made, therefore, no further action is required at this stage. The contempt application/151 CPC application is dismissed for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 460 | 2025 SHC KHI 2160 | Const. P. 6684/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Hina Imran (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) | 01-SEP-25 | Yes | This court is disposing of the subject petition with direction to the respondents' competent authority to reconsider its decision and evaluate the petitioner for promotion to the next rank, in terms of law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Controller General of Accounts Vs Abdul Hameed, 2023 SCMR 111, without any discrimination. This must be completed within two months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 461 | 2025 SHC KHI 1429 | Const. P. 3553/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Fida Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional rights. The concept of institutional autonomy, essential for effective decision-making, supports non-interference in policy matters. This autonomy is vital for public institutions to safeguard public interest and promote democratic values, including academic freedom. 10. This Court has determined that The petitioners cannot ask for regularization of their service through constitutional petitions under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, it is for the respondent???s competent authority to consider their case in terms of their policy, if any, without discrimination within reasonable time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 462 | 2025 SHC KHI 1580 | Const. P. 5602/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bilal Mirza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-25 | Yes | The respondents' actions in this case appear negligent and reckless. It seems the departmental inquiry was intentionally skipped, creating procedural loopholes to technically benefit the petitioner. Remanding this case for a new inquiry now seems futile. Given the petitioner???s past conduct, a new inquiry would likely be a mere formality, potentially leading to the petitioner's reinstatement with full back benefits, effectively nullifying the punishment. After such a significant time lapse, an inquiry would not serve any constructive purpose by the order of this court. However, since the petitioner was removed with a stigma and seemingly denied a proper chance to present his defense, he is free to apply to the competent authority for a revival of proceedings from the beginning, following due legal process. If the respondents have concrete evidence against the petitioner, the law shall be followed in the strict sense; however, the competent authority, before deciding on the subject proposition, shall hear the petitioner without fail. The respondents shall also look into the decision of the Supreme Court. This exercise must be undertaken within three months. 8. This petition is disposed of in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Senior Superintendent of Police Vs Shahid Nazir 2022 SCMR 327. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 463 | 2025 SHC KHI 1751 | Const. P. 770/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Saleem Shahzad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 17-JUN-25 | Yes | Applying the legal principles established in Supreme Court of Pakistan judgment 2024 SCMR 527 (Vice Chancellor Agriculture University Peshawar & Others v. Muhammad Shafiq & Others), as well as this Court's full bench decision in Muhammad Arif v. Federation of Pakistan (CP D-875 of 2020 and connected petitions) dated April 20, 2024, and the Division Bench ruling reported as 2024 PLC (C.S) 1487 (Mumtaz Ali Panhwar & Others v. Province of Sindh & Others), these petitions are deemed not maintainable and are, therefore, dismissed. The Office is directed to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 464 | 2025 SHC KHI 1521 | Const. P. 1563/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Shoaib ul Manan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-MAY-25 | Yes | We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. 5. Given PSM's precarious financial state, with over Rs. 100 billion in losses and Rs. 110 billion in liabilities, this Court deemed it inappropriate to grant the petitioners' financial benefits in terms of revised pay scales in 2011 and 2020. Consequently, this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.957-K/2025 Muhammad Shoaib al Manan & others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Industries and Production, Pakistan Secretariat, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned |
| 465 | 2025 SHC KHI 2070 | Const. P. 2139/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ihsan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-AUG-25 | Yes | A successful job candidate does not have an absolute right to be appointed. The petitioner's claim is barred by the doctrine of laches because he waited from 2006 to 2022 to file his case. This doctrine holds that a legal right can become unenforceable if not pursued promptly, as excessive delay can create new rights for the opposing party. Therefore, even if an offer was made, the petitioner's failure to act promptly prevents the court from providing relief. 6. In light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is dismissed with no order as to cost. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 466 | 2025 SHC KHI 3206 | Const. P. 313/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Saman Ashfaq and others (Petitioner) VS The Government of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-SEP-25 | Yes | Today, nobody is interested to put their point of view to assist this Court. As such, this Court is left with no option, but to dismiss this lis on account of non-prosecution due to lack of interest of the petitioners. This petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 467 | 2025 SHC KHI 3188 | Const. P. 1139/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Rashid Latif (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Police Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | This Court, being the custodian of citizens??? fundamental rights, cannot tolerate custodial deaths or inaction in such grave matters and if such sort of incident takes place in future, the SSP, DSP, SHO and police personnel posted at concerned police stations shall be held personally and severely responsible for such an act on the part of subordinates as SSP and concerned police officials have also supervising role to look into the conduct of the subordinate police officials as the I.G. Police Sindh has to strictly direct the subordinates to act in accordance with law and no harassment shall be caused to any one. Therefore, a departmental inquiry is ordered against all SIU officials, from the SSP downward, to be supervised by the Chief Secretary Sindh, who shall appoint a DIGP of good repute as inquiry officer. This Court strongly condemns any form of torture in custody, as it is neither permissible under the Criminal Procedure Code nor the Police Act and rules framed thereunder. All police officials are expected to understand the serious legal consequences of such misconduct. The report shall be submitted within 15 days to this Court through the Registrar, who shall also seek compliance of the order positively. In case, the respondents failed to comply the order, he shall place the matter before the learned Bench for appropriate order in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution. 13. This petiton stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1199-K/2025 Amjad Ahmed Sheikh v. Government of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.1200-K/2025 Asif Ali v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending ,Pending |
| 468 | 2025 SHC KHI 3151 | Const. P. 1000/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sher Alam Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-25 | Yes | With these observations, the petition is disposed of. A copy of this order shall be sent to the IGP Sindh to ensure that the police act lawfully, refrain from harassment, and conduct any lawful inquiries or raids with due respect to citizens and their families. The subject report must be furnished to this court in time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 469 | 2025 SHC KHI 3239 | Const. P. 1119/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ali Sher (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | Petition stands disposed of with directions to the official respondents not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner. However, if there is a cognizable offence, the police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 470 | 2025 SHC KHI 3203 | Const. P. 660/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Ali s/o Bashir Ahmed Taimoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of above statement of the official respondents, this petition stands disposed of with directions to the official respondents not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner and shall act strictly in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 471 | 2025 SHC KHI 3219 | Const. P. 922/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s. Al-Hashmi Brothers Thr Attorny Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-25 | Yes | Prima facie, this is beyond the scope of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, this Court can only say that the petitioner shall not be harassed by the police officials or by the officials of the SITE, they shall act strictly in accordance with law and no harassment shall be caused to either party. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed / pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 472 | 2025 SHC KHI 3211 | Const. P. 731/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Irfan Magsi s/o Mureed Hussain Magsi (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above, these petitions are disposed of with the direction to the police to act under the law and no harassment shall be caused to the either party besides no interference shall be made in their private/civil/criminal dispute and the police shall be neutral in private affairs. However, if any of the parties indulged in cognizable offenses police shall act under law. All parties and officials are directed not to harass each other and to act strictly within the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 473 | 2025 SHC KHI 3238 | Const. P. 1099/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Salman S/o Malik Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS The Inspector General of Police (Sindh) and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | This is a case of simple harassment. However, the petitioner???s counsel did not press clause-2 of the prayer clause. Learned Assistant PG present in Court submits that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, however, if there is a cognizable offence, police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. With this observation, the instant petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 474 | 2025 SHC KHI 3204 | Const. P. 766/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Marjan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Saleem & Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of such statement, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s) with directions to the police to ensure that the private security guards of respondent No.7 shall not cause any harassment to the petitioner in any manner of whatsoever nature. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 475 | 2026 SHC KHI 256 | Const. P. 2571/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Jamal yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 476 | 2026 SHC KHI 270 | Const. P. 357/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Danish Ghous & Another (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Police and others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 477 | 2026 SHC KHI 297 | Const. P. 411/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Balochistan Engineering Work Ltd (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 478 | 2026 SHC KHI 155 | Const. P. 2654/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Akram & Others (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NADRA and Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-26 | Yes | After arguing the matter at some length, both parties agreed that Petitioners shall appear before the V&R Branch, Awami Markaz, on any working day with supporting documents, including pre-1979 documents, for processing by NADRA authorities in accordance with law. The request so made seems to be reasonable and acceded to. 7. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 479 | 2026 SHC KHI 150, 2026 SHC KHI 206 | Const. P. 1153/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sarfaraz Ali & Another (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Police Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the direction that the official respondents shall ensure that the petitioners are provided that any legal protection in accordance with law and are not harassed or coerced in any manner by the private respondents. SSP shall ensure coordination with Mukhtiarkar concerned and Board of Revenue with regard to the entitlement of the parties to the plots in question. The possession of the subject plots by producing the title documents and if they fail to produce the same, appropriate action shall be taken against them in accordance with law. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three weeks. The police shall continue the investigation strictly in accordance with the law without fear or favour and shall not misuse their authority. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the pending criminal cases, or entitlement of the subject plots, which shall be decided by the competent fora in accordance with the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 480 | 2026 SHC KHI 245 | Const. P. 2505/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Shafqat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 481 | 2026 SHC KHI 344 | Const. P. 2667/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | State Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL case (2020 PLC 153), Moulvi Aziz-ur-Rehman v. Ahmad Khan (2004 SCMR 1622), and Pak Telecom Mobile Limited v. Muhammad Atif Bilal (2024 SCMR 719) has consistently held that workers performing permanent duties under an establishment cannot be deprived of their rights based on a contractor arrangement. Similarly, the objection regarding NIRC???s jurisdiction is without merit. SBP-BSC is a trans-provincial, federal establishment, and the grievance petition was properly entertained under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, as discussed supra. 11. In view of the above, both Constitutional Petitions are dismissed. The impugned orders of the Single and Full Bench of NIRC are hereby maintained. However, with no order as to costs. JUDGE | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 482 | 2026 SHC KHI 435 | Const. P. 2351/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Javeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Learned counsel for KMC stated that all benefits have now been disbursed to Muhammad Javed Khan???s and Nazir Masih???s account. In such circumstances, the petitioner counsel seeks disposal of the petitions accordingly. Both petitions are disposed of in view of this Statement. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 483 | 2026 SHC KHI 508 | Const. P. 5169/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mumtaz Majeed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 484 | 2026 SHC KHI 513 | Const. P. 4109/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed Abdul Qadeem Agha & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 485 | 2026 SHC KHI 236 | Const. P. 5454/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Shahnaz Ejaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 486 | 2026 SHC KHI 296 | Const. P. 125/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another (Respondent) | 06-FEB-26 | Yes | The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 487 | 2026 SHC KHI 527 | Const. P. 691/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst. Razia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 488 | 2026 SHC KHI 607 | Const. P. 3510/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ashiq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 489 | 2026 SHC KHI 255 | Const. P. 2570/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shahzore Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 490 | 2026 SHC KHI 274 | Const. P. 4592/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 491 | 2026 SHC KHI 597 | Const. P. 55/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Saddique Rabi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 492 | 2026 SHC KHI 157 | Const. P. 5875/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Alliance Sugar Mill Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above, we are of the considered view that the Petitioner is entitled to continue its lawful operations without hindrance, and the Respondents are restrained from any arbitrary action against the Petitioner, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law . All directions of this Court concerning protection of the Petitioner???s rights and disciplinary action against delinquent officials shall remain in effect. 11. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 493 | 2026 SHC KHI 376 | Const. P. 572/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | In the present case, not only has the Petitioner been acquitted prior to such period, but no adverse material has been brought on record to demonstrate that the acquittal was not honorable or that the Petitioner suffers from any disqualification rendering him unsuitable for police service. Thus, withholding issuance of appointment letter in the peculiar facts of the case is neither supported by law nor by the governing recruitment policy and is violative of the Petitioner???s vested legal right accrued pursuant to his lawful recommendation for appointment by the SPSC. 9. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to implement the recommendation of the SPSC and issue offer letter to the Petitioner, subject to verification of his credentials an medical test in accordance with law if he is found fit for the subject post. However, the aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks. In the present case, not only has the Petitioner been acquitted prior to such period, but no adverse material has been brought on record to demonstrate that the acquittal was not honorable or that the Petitioner suffers from any disqualification rendering him unsuitable for police service. Thus, withholding issuance of appointment letter in the peculiar facts of the case is neither supported by law nor by the governing recruitment policy and is violative of the Petitioner???s vested legal right accrued pursuant to his lawful recommendation for appointment by the SPSC. 9. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to implement the recommendation of the SPSC and issue offer letter to the Petitioner, subject to verification of his credentials an medical test in accordance with law if he is found fit for the subject post. However, the aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 494 | 2025 SHC HYD 3564 | Const. P. 1053/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Rajab Ali Panhwar and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) | 25-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 495 | 2026 SHC KHI 124 | Const. P. 1431/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS SBCA & Ors (Respondent) | 19-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 496 | 2025 SHC HYD 3568 | Const. P. 970/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Jabbar and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 497 | 2026 SHC KHI 94 | Const. P. 5460/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Long Rout Bus Owner (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | For the foregoing reasons, this petition is dismissed along with pending application(s). However, it is clarified that the Petitioner???s members shall be at liberty to conduct their transport business only from lawfully approved and designated terminals or premises, strictly in accordance with law and applicable regulations. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 498 | 2026 SHC KHI 524 | Const. P. 6276/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Faiyaz Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 499 | 2026 SHC KHI 264 | Const. P. 556/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Daud Rustamani (Petitioner) VS Accountant General Pakistan Revenue & Others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 500 | 2026 SHC KHI 281 | Const. P. 187/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Mst. Balqees Akhter (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 501 | 2026 SHC KHI 452 | Const. P. 1942/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sheeraz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | The Court finds this approach to be both appropriate and in accordance with the law, ensuring that the petitioners??? grievances are addressed through the statutory mechanism without undermining the subjectivity and discretion of the interview process. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the direction that the memo of petition shall be treated as a Representation under Regulation 161, and the Chairman, Sindh Public Service Commission or Appellate committee shall decide the same strictly in accordance with law within fourteen (14) days. A copy of this Order along with memo of petition shall be forwarded and communicated to the Chairman, SPSC, for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 502 | 2026 SHC KHI 631 | Const. P. 4073/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Fareed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner shall be entitled to release of his pensionary benefits in accordance with law and no further recovery shall be effected from his pension. In case any amount has already been recovered, the petitioner may approach the competent authority for its refund. The respondents shall constitute a committee to hear the petitioner and the officials of the Audit Department and, after providing them an opportunity of hearing, decide the matter within three months in accordance with law and the observations made herein. 20. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 503 | 2026 SHC KHI 608 | Const. P. 5959/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Parveen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 504 | 2026 SHC KHI 85 | Const. P. 6317/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s. Inchauli Cooperative Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Tanveer Islam & others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-26 | Yes | This being the position of the case, coupled with challenging the impugned order of the learned Special Court which if of interim nature that needs to be fully concluded by the Court as its logical conclusion within reasonable time and just after conclusion, petitioner shall be at liberty to assail the legality of the findings is aggrieved in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. The Court only directed to maintain the status quo, and no further proceedings shall be conducted/concluded. 8. However, after hearing the parties and perusal of record we deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition, without touching its merits and direct that the election of the society be conducted as directed by the learned trial court within sixty days. 9. This petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 505 | 2026 SHC KHI 379 | Const. P. 1922/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Qadeer Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in view of the law laid down by this Court in the judgment reported as 2023 PLC (CS) 447, as affirmed by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan, these petitions are disposed of along with pending applications. i. The Respondents are directed to treat the Petitioners at par with their colleagues who were regularized pursuant to the aforesaid judgment and to regularize their services as Data Processing Assistants (BS-14) from the date of their initial appointment, subject to fulfillment of codal formalities; ii. The Respondents are further directed not to subject the Petitioners to any fresh or selective process for regularization; iii. The Respondents shall ensure that the salaries and other admissible benefits payable to the Petitioners are released forthwith in accordance with law if not earlier released; iv. Till issuance of the requisite notification regarding regularization, the services of the Petitioners shall not be terminated or dispensed with except in accordance with law. 12. It is expected from the respondents that they will implement the ratio of the judgment passed by this court reported in 2023 PLC (C.S) 447 in its letter and sprit without fail. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 506 | 2026 SHC KHI 119 | Const. P. 1674/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. Muzzamil Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 507 | 2026 SHC HYD 135 | Const. P. 724/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-DEC-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar | |||
| 508 | 2026 SHC KHI 623 | Const. P. 1345/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Amanat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 509 | 2026 SHC KHI 228 | Const. P. 7529/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mumtaz Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | While pensionary benefits constitute a recurring cause of action, such a principle does not dispense with the requirement of establishing entitlement under the governing rules. Since the petitioner was granted the promotion increment admissible to him and did not opt for alteration of his promotion date, denial of the additional annual increment cannot be termed illegal or discriminatory, as agitated by the petitioner after his retirement from service in the year 2021. 14. For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner has failed to make out a case of violation of law or constitutional right warranting interference by this Court in the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, the petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 510 | 2026 SHC KHI 229 | Const. P. 6802/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Phoenix Amour Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Usman and Ors (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that this Court does not sit as a court of appeal over findings of a statutory forum unless there is a lack of jurisdiction, coram non judice proceedings, or a violation of law apparent on the face of the record, none of which has been demonstrated in the present case. 14. The plea of the petitioner that there exists no authoritative judgment recognizing NIRC???s jurisdiction in matters arising under Standing Order 12(3) is contrary to the law laid down in the above-referred precedents. The statutory scheme of the IRA, 2012, read with Standing Order 12(3), clearly provides a complete mechanism for redress of individual grievances before the NIRC in cases of trans-provincial establishments. 15. For the foregoing reasons, the captioned petitions are devoid of merit and are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 511 | 2026 SHC KHI 260 | Const. P. 3976/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Nadeem Anwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 512 | 2026 SHC KHI 589 | Const. P. 5137/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muslim Khan (Petitioner) VS Appellate Authority Board of Trustee of EOBI & ors (Respondent) | 09-MAR-26 | Yes | The authority shall verify the employment record, take effective steps for recovery of outstanding contributions from the employer in accordance with law, and thereafter decide the entitlement of the petitioners to old-age or invalidity pension, as the case may be, strictly under the provisions of the Act. Such exercise shall preferably be completed within a reasonable period of two months. However the claim of the petitioners shall not be rejected on the premise that contribution could not be deposited by the employer as it was the duty of EOBI, to recover the contribution from employer and petitioners cannot be saddled with such non compliance on the part of the employer. 13. Both petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 513 | 2026 SHC KHI 97 | Const. P. 1/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Azhar uddin Noonari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-26 | Yes | Primarily, this Court cannot intervene in routine administrative or membership disputes of a private council unless there is clear evidence of fundamental rights violations, which facts are missing in the present case. Internal disputes must be resolved through the bodies by laws, regulations, or civil remedies, not writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is dismissed, leaving the petitioner to avail the remedy as per law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 514 | 2020 SHC KHI 532 | Const. P. 3598/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.254-K/2013 Muhammad Fareed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.202-K/2013 Muhammad Fareed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Allowed |
| 515 | Nil | Const. P. 6788/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | DR. SALMA KAUSA ALI (Petitioner) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Respondent) | 31-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.427-K/2017 Muhammad Ali Abbasi v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 516 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 2, 2019 PLC CS Note 2 | Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) | 23-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 517 | Nil | Cr.Bail 360/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | BABER JAMEEL S/O MUNSIF KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 518 | 2018 PLD Sindh 657 | Const. P. 1837/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Arif Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.852/2018 Muhammad Arif Akhtar & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed.there is also a short order/CO by HCJ | |
| 519 | 2018 SBLR Sindh 682 | Const. P. 2991/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ali Asghar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.441-K/2017 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others,C.A.62-K/2018 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 520 | Nil | Const. P. 802/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Noman (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 521 | Nil | Const. P. 8533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Toufiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 28-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 522 | Nil | Const. P. 1016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Pehalwan Ali (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 523 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 25, 2019 PLC CS Note 25 | Const. P. 634/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | M. Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent) | 20-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 524 | 2019 PLC CS Note 32 | Const. P. 5835/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Ali Kamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.6-K/2018 Muhammad Ali Kamal v. Province of Sindh and anothers Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 525 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 175, 2018 PLC CS Note 175 | Const. P. 697/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Sobia Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 07-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 526 | 2020 PLC (CS) 204 | Const. P. 4716/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.612-K/2018 Asif Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 527 | 2018 YLR 503 | Cr.Bail 918/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | MUHAMMAD AKRAM S/O MAQSOOD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 25-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | Crl.P.L.A.68-K/2017 Muhammad Akram v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 528 | 2020 PLC (CS) 1 | Const. P. 571/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Mateen Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 28-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.653-K/2018 Muhammad Mateen Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 529 | Nil | Const. P. 2899/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Yasse Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 530 | Nil | Const. P. 6202/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Syed Abbas Imran Jafry (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 25-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.530-K/2017 Syed Abbas Imran Jafry v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 531 | Nil | Const. P. 5049/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Shamsher Safdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1592/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Government of Pakistan M/o Infomation, Broadcasting & National Heritage, Islamabad & another v. Muhammad Shamsher Safdar & others,C.P.L.A.2494/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Govt of Pakistan, M/o Information, Islamabad & another v. Muhammad Shamsher Safdar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 532 | Nil | Const. P. 6708/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar & 3 others (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) | 30-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1782/2017 Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar and others v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 533 | Nil | Const. P. 2413/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shaheena Nasreen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 534 | Nil | Const. P. 862/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Jami (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 07-MAR-19 | Yes | Petitioner seeking relief that her husband was employee of Government of Sindh as Naib qasid died on 11-05-2012 during Service .Petitioner approached to concerned for pension &other benefits but no response and only Gratuity fund RS 38250/received. Respondent for the state appeared and argued that he was appointed on 20-08-1995 and he terminated from his job on 01-11-1995. However, he was reinstated on 21-03-2009,and he died on 11-05-2012 and not completed Service minimum required for pension & others therefore ,he is not entitled to pension. It was held that Rule 275 of Sindh Civil Service Regulations makes clear clear that he is entitled for family pension. He is also fully entitled for family pension and Salary of the intervening Period as provided under the Law rule 152 of Sindh Service rules. Respondent is directed to re calculated the family pension of intervening period and deposit the same in this court. Petition is disposed of with above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 535 | Nil | Const. P. 1903/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Ghulam Qadir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.341-K/2019 Ghulam Qadir v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 536 | Nil | Const. P. 86/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2007 | Mst. Hani through LRs (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 20-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 537 | Nil | Const. P. 1800/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 29-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 538 | Nil | Const. P. 1820/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Shahid Ali Bhutto & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.572-K/2018 Shahid Ali Bhutto and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 539 | Nil | I. A 10/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2009 | Province of Sindh Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 540 | Nil | Const. P. 321/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faiz Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government Department Sindh (Respondent) | 01-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 541 | Nil | Const. P. 1498/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Ashfaque Ahmed Rajpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 06-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 542 | Nil | Const. P. 3355/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Taaruf Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.376-K/2019 Taaruf Hussain and others v. Province of Sindh thr.Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 543 | Nil | Criminal Miscelleneous 106/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2017 | Arshad Mehmood and other (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 21-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 544 | Nil | Cr.Acq.A. 28/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Erum Abdul Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Hayat & Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 545 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 40 | Const. P. 6666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Majid Anwar Seehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 546 | Nil | Cr.Bail 29/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 547 | Nil | Const. P. 380/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 548 | 2020 PLC (CS) 1484 | Const. P. 6352/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Faheem Ahmed Attari and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 549 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 64 | Const. P. 4445/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Aftab Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 13-APR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1906/2017 Aftab Ali v. Federation of Pakistan, thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 550 | Nil | Cr.Appeal 181/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Ashraf (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) | 19-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 551 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 61 | Const. P. 69/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Muhammad Arif & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-APR-17 | Yes | Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.541-K/2017 Syed Muhammad Arif v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.4581/2018 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of |
| 552 | Nil | Cr.J.A 4/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Younis (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 21-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 553 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 71 | Const. P. 7383/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others (Respondent) | 24-APR-17 | Yes | Professor Dr. Masood Hameed Khan/Respondent No.3 filed listed application for initiation of contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors on account of their willful, and deliberate act of disobeying order passed by this Court. The learned law officer after consultation with the official present in Court, Additional Secretary (HE),Governor House informed that the Summary on the issue of 8appointment of Vice Chancellor is in process before the Governor Sindh/Chancellor and an order will be passed on the said summary within a week. This undertaking has also been given by the above named official . we are of the view that the same is pending in Suit No.893/2017, as such we would refrain to pass any order in this regard, because the same may prejudice the case of either party in the said Suit. assignment of the Additional Charge of Vice Chancellor of DUHS to Professor Dr. Khawar Saeed Jamali is concerned the same has already been taken care of in order dated19.04.2017 passed in Suit No.893/2017 .In view of the above discussion, at this juncture, we are of the view that no contempt of this Court's order dated 26.04.2016 is made out. Therefore, the listed applications accordingly dismissed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 554 | Nil | Cr.Bail 8/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | MUHAMMAD ILYAS & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 17-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 555 | Nil | Const. P. 3582/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shafi Muhammad Shah (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB and others) (Respondent) | 23-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.152-K/2019 Shafi Muhammad Shah v. The State (NAB) through its Director General, National Accountability Bureau, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 556 | Nil | Const. P. 233/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Rizwan Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.282-K/2019 Rizwan Ahmed and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 557 | Nil | Const. P. 141/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 30-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 558 | 2021 PLC (CS) 329, 2019 SBLR Sindh 1421 | Const. P. 1559/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Wahid Bux Chadhar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 559 | 2025 SHC KHI 1027 | Const. P. 816/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Zameer Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | The pivotal question is whether the Petitioner's M.Ed. and M.A. exceeded the necessary qualifications for his JST role when he earned them (1988/89) and for his subsequent HST promotion. If these degrees were mandatory, he seems to be ineligible for advance increments, which were meant for extra qualifications. His entitlement hinges on the Recruitment Rules in effect at the time he obtained the degrees. Despite the scheme's termination in 2001, any previously earned rights may still be valid. This aspect shall be scrutinized by the respondent department after hearing th petitioner. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.487-K/2016 The Province of Sindh and others v. Tanveer Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 560 | Nil | Const. P. 1280/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mst. Itrat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 561 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 1791 | Const. P. 2951/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | 26-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 562 | Nil | Const. P. 1174/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.384-K/2019 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 563 | Nil | Const. P. 460/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s K.H Fama Textile Processing (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 564 | 2021 SHC KHI 758, 2020 SBLR Sindh 535 | Const. P. 3467/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Shaista Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 03-SEP-21 | Yes | At this juncture, counsel for College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan (CPSP) contends that this is their complete prerogative and within the line of guidelines provided by the then PMDC (PMC) and they have to select examiners as per criterion from all universities. At this juncture, learned counsel for contemnors by one voice contends that Dr. Naveed Ahmed has not been recommended since 2011 by the JPMC. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that contempt application is not maintainable, hence, same is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 565 | Nil | Const. P. 1887/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Altaf Hussain Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 30-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 566 | Nil | Const. P. 3316/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Indus Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3239/2018 Indus Dyeing & Maufacturing Co. Ltd v. Government of SIndh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Recource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.93-K/2019 Indus Dyeing & Maufacturing Co. Ltd v. Government of SIndh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Recource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 567 | 2018 MLD 794, 2020 PCr.LJ 184 | Cr.Bail 1373/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | LUTUFULLAH S/O MAVAZ KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 29-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 568 | Nil | Cr.Bail 614/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | MUHAMMAD SOHAIL S/O KHALIL AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 13-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 569 | Nil | Const. P. 786/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 570 | Nil | Const. P. 143/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mujib ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1154-K/2018 Mujib-ul-Islam v. Province of Sindh thr.Chief Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 571 | Nil | Const. P. 5631/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Chandomal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 572 | Nil | Const. P. 6006/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Manthar Ali Zardari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3524/2017 Manthar Ali v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi & another,C.A.1594/2017 Manthar Ali v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 573 | Nil | Const. P. 5141/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Gul Hassan Dahri and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 574 | Nil | Const. P. 5504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Rehana Fayyaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 575 | Nil | Const. P. 6818/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Tahira Tauseef and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commisison and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 576 | Nil | Const. P. 284/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Roshan Ali Dero (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 577 | Nil | H.C.A 376/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Bheru Lal (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 578 | Nil | Const. P. 5613/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.1603/2017 Abdul Qayoom v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.3668/2017 Abdul Qayoom v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed | |
| 579 | Nil | Const. P. 482/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2972/2018 M/s The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.75-K/2019 M/s The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.P.256-K/2020 Mst. Sabra v. Muhammad Jamil & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | |
| 580 | Nil | Const. P. 5779/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s S. Zia ul Haq & Sons (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 581 | Nil | Const. P. 2040/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Agha Steel Ind (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 582 | Nil | Const. P. 5960/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Raja Shoaib and Ors (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh Police and Ors (Respondent) | 07-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 583 | 2018 SBLR Sindh 1641, 2018 PLC CS Note 127 | Const. P. 4236/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Bashir Ahmed lanjwani (Petitioner) VS Provvince of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 584 | Nil | Const. P. 3411/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Civil Aviation Authority (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 27-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 585 | 2019 PLC (CS) 817 | Const. P. 5307/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mst. Nazima Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 02-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 586 | 2018 YLR Note 79 | Cr.Bail 651/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | MUHAMMAD AMIN S/O SHAMIM AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 587 | 2020 PLC (CS) 50 | Const. P. 965/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 25-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.325-K/2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 588 | Nil | Const. P. 4859/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Khalil Ahmed Jalil and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.513-K/2018 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others,C.A.328/2020 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 2 weeks a/w C.A.34-K/2019 etc, Adjourned (Next Date: 20-Jan-25) | |
| 589 | 2019 PLC Lab. 233 | Const. P. 6548/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Bibi Hajra (Petitioner) VS The Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) | 15-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1501-K/2021 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. Bibi Hajra & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 590 | Nil | Const. P. 4581/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Gohar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Provinvce of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 591 | Nil | Const. P. 4433/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Abdul Waheed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.298/2018 Sajid Hussain & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 592 | Nil | Const. P. 7118/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Muhammad Yousuf Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 593 | Nil | Const. P. 2811/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Capt. Saifuddin (Petitioner) VS P.I.A and Ors (Respondent) | 13-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 594 | 2020 PLC (CS) 50 | Const. P. 3387/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 595 | Nil | Const. P. 389/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 23-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.673-K/2018 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others,C.A.49-K/2019 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 596 | 2019 PLC (CS) 962 | Const. P. 1929/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Sikandar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 04-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1151-K/2018 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others,C.A.120-K/2019 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted, | |
| 597 | 2019 PLC Lab. 140 | Const. P. 78/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Fareed Bhatti and Ors (Respondent) | 30-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.676-K/2018 M/s Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Ghulam Fareed Bhatti and others,C.P.L.A.1718/2025 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division), Islamabad and another v. Anwar Textile Mills Limited and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Pending | |
| 598 | Nil | Const. P. 2774/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Khushnood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Others (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 599 | Nil | Const. P. 3082/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | EPLA Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2963/2018 M/s ELPA Laboratories Pvt Ltd. v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.66-K/2019 M/s ELPA Laboratories Pvt Ltd. v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 600 | Nil | Const. P. 3569/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Pakistan Cables Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3079/2018 M/s. Pakistan Cables Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.85-K/2019 M/s. Pakistan Cables Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 601 | 2020 PLC (CS) 1249 | Const. P. 5147/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Yasmeen Akhtar and ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 14-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 602 | Nil | Const. P. 897/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s International Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 603 | Nil | Const. P. 608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Raheel & another (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) | 14-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 604 | Nil | Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 02-SEP-19 | Yes | whether there is any violation of Statutory Law, compelling the Petitioner to invoke the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court? | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another,C.P.L.A.4190/2019 Muzafar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Cabinet Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 605 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 913 | Const. P. 628/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Rasool Bux Shar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) | 17-JAN-19 | Yes | Whether the Petitioner is entitled to payment of pensionary benefits of his 14 years??? service in PQA in addition to Contributory Provident Fund received by the Petitioner from KoFHA upon his retirement in the year 2008? pensionary benefits | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 606 | 2022 PLC (CS) 833 | Const. P. 2307/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-21 | Yes | commutation--recalculation--subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law, if the parties are so aggrieved against the calculation of the Nazir, they may take resort of the Court of plenary jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 607 | Nil | Const. P. 2580/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ms. Samina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 608 | Nil | Const. P. 2084/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khair Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 609 | Nil | Const. P. 3629/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst.Mumtaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 610 | Nil | Const. P. 3273/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 611 | Nil | Const. P. 1173/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Jabbar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 612 | Nil | Const. P. 2078/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Hamid Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 613 | Nil | Const. P. 5632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Mohsin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 614 | Nil | Const. P. 1174/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s. Nadeem Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 615 | Nil | Const. P. 2449/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ali Bawani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 616 | Nil | Const. P. 643/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muazaffar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 617 | Nil | Const. P. 1497/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 618 | Nil | Const. P. 1814/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rana Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 619 | Nil | Const. P. 1965/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Fazal-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 620 | Nil | Const. P. 1605/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Habib ullah Khan Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 621 | Nil | Const. P. 399/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Salman Hussain Zubairi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 622 | 2020 PLC (CS) 417, 2020 PLC Lab. 417 | Const. P. 673/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ahmed Ali Saharan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 16-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.591-K/2019 Ahmed Ali Saharan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 623 | Nil | Const. P. 2628/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Wahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 624 | Nil | Const. P. 2833/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 625 | Nil | Const. P. 1860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 626 | Nil | Const. P. 131/1993 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 1993 | Muhammad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 627 | Nil | Const. P. 5866/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faisal Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-SEP-19 | Yes | The basic grievance of the Petitioner is with regard to his surrendering of look after charge for the post of Regional Director BPS-19 in Sindh Katchi Abbadis Authority (SKAA) --Dismissed | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 628 | Nil | Const. P. 1071/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 629 | Nil | Const. P. 291/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 630 | Nil | Const. P. 1727/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nadir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 631 | Nil | Const. P. 159/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Haji Mohammad Saleh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 632 | Nil | Const. P. 2079/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sikandar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 633 | Nil | Const. P. 2549/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dayal Chand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 634 | Nil | Const. P. 7524/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Arsalan Subeet (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.540-K/2019 Arsalan Subeet v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 635 | Nil | Const. P. 6342/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Ashar Afaq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 636 | Nil | Const. P. 1195/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Asmatullah (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 637 | Nil | Const. P. 3618/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 638 | Nil | Const. P. 2608/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 639 | Nil | Const. P. 3302/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Wajahat Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 640 | Nil | Const. P. 544/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nadeem and others (Petitioner) VS S.D.O HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 641 | Nil | Const. P. 1952/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Samani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 642 | Nil | Const. P. 7140/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muzaffar Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 02-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 643 | 2020 SHC KHI 1135 | Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | Contempt--Prima-facie the question of downgrading some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved persons to avail their respective remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 644 | Nil | Const. P. 494/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Mardan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 645 | Nil | Const. P. 2310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Qadir Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 646 | Nil | Const. P. 1627/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Meenhal & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 647 | Nil | Const. P. 2730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Inam ul Haq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 648 | Nil | Const. P. 1929/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khuda Dino (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 649 | Nil | Const. P. 2326/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mir Abbas Raza Talpur (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 650 | Nil | Const. P. 1508/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Nasir Memon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 651 | Nil | Const. P. 8184/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Adeel Khan (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | we do not concur with findings of the learned Appellate Tribunal, Sindh, as the private respondents/workers were inducted in service without completing the codal formalities and entire evidence supports the case/contention of the KPT. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.690-K/2019 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.19-K/2022 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed |
| 652 | Nil | Const. P. 231/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Associate Professor Saeeda Parveen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 653 | Nil | Const. P. 2939/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nasir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 654 | Nil | Const. P. 3800/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ayoob and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 655 | Nil | Const. P. 2680/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sachal Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 656 | Nil | Const. P. 1708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 657 | Nil | Const. P. 1946/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 658 | Nil | Const. P. 1368/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Rasool Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 659 | Nil | II.A. 52/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Asghar (Appellant) VS Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent) | 08-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 660 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 89 | Const. P. 985/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Hammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 661 | Nil | Const. P. 3437/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Hussain Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 662 | Nil | Const. P. 3879/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ghausia Jehangir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 663 | 2021 SBLR Sindh 2004 | Const. P. 5330/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mujahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-SEP-19 | Yes | i) Whether the petitioner was non-suited by this Court vide judgment dated 30.3.2018 in earlier round of litigation and the same view was affirmed by the Honorable Supreme Court in Civil Petition No457-k of 2018, vide order dated 19.4.2018, therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings? ii) Whether Rule 12 of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1974 was amended vide Notification dated 14.9.2018 issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh, whereby relaxation up to maximum of fifteen (15) Years in the upper age limit to all the applicants applying for the vacancies in all the Departments of Government of Sindh were done away against the posts to be filled through Combined Competitive Examination by the Sindh Public Service Commission? | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 664 | Nil | Const. P. 3020/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Manoj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 665 | Nil | Const. P. 3696/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sheikh Nabi Bux Azad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 666 | Nil | Const. P. 721/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Irrigation matter | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 667 | Nil | Const. P. 3009/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ayoub Khan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 668 | Nil | Const. P. 1112/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Ghulam Nabi Shah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 669 | Nil | Const. P. 2216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Noumanullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 670 | Nil | Const. P. 990/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Mohiuddin (Petitioner) VS C.E.O. (NTDC) WAPDA and others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 671 | Nil | II.A. 5/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ali Bux (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 22-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.729-K/2019 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others,C.A.88-K/2022 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 672 | Nil | Const. P. 2536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Yousuf Abrar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 673 | Nil | Const. P. 1544/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dilshad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 674 | Nil | Const. P. 2/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Pokarlal and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 675 | Nil | Const. P. 3369/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 676 | Nil | Const. P. 436/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Karim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 677 | Nil | Const. P. 3551/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Nabi Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 678 | Nil | Const. P. 10/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zafar Ali Khushk (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.549-K/2025 The Sindh Workers Welfare Board & others v. Rajby Industries & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 679 | Nil | Const. P. 2955/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Faisaluddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.556-K/2019 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.44-K/2020 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months, | |
| 680 | 2020 SHC KHI 421 | Const. P. 616/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Raees Khan and Others (Respondent) | 10-MAR-20 | Yes | private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 681 | 2020 SHC KHI 2303, 2025 SBLR Sindh 881 | Const. P. 2978/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Khalid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 682 | 2020 SHC KHI 876 | Const. P. 6589/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ms. Mehreen Safdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1802/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Mehreen Safdar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 683 | 2020 SHC HYD 974 | Const. P. 554/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Phapo & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 684 | 2020 SHC HYD 2005 | Civil Revision 124/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khair Muhammad Brohi & others (Applicant) VS District Judge Matiari & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 685 | 2020 SHC HYD 1931 | Const. P. 172/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Malik Faraz Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Agha Khursheed Ahmed & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3356/2020 Malik Faraz Ahmed and others v. Agha Khursheed Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 686 | 2020 SHC KHI 1258 | Const. P. 6499/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dr. Mashhood-uz-Zafar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 687 | 2020 SHC KHI 2148 | Const. P. 2518/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Huma (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1795/2020 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills thr. its CEO/Chairman, Karachi v. Huma and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 688 | 2020 SHC HYD 1424 | Const. P. 80/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Jalil & anothers (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 689 | 2020 SHC HYD 1921 | R.A (Civil Revision) 122/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Mola Bux & Ors (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 25-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 690 | 2020 SHC HYD 497 | Const. P. 455/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | HESCO (Petitioner) VS Qurban Ali & Ors (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 691 | 2020 SHC KHI 243 | Const. P. 1301/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 19-MAR-20 | Yes | contempt applications in the case of Sindh Textbook Board contempt applications in the case of Sindh Textbook Board | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1290/2020 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 692 | 2020 SHC HYD 1593 | Const. P. 723/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Farooqu-e-Azam & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 693 | 2020 SHC HYD 1340 | Civil Revision 184/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Bashir Ahmed (Applicant) VS Masood (Respondent) | 11-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 694 | 2023 PLC Lab. 62 | Const. P. 134/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Respondent) | 14-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 695 | 2020 SHC HYD 1453 | Const. P. 390/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP D 467,468,804,1304/2012 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sardar Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 696 | 2020 SHC HYD 559 | Const. P. 1753/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mazhar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 697 | 2020 SHC HYD 770 | Cr.J.A 58/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Subhan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 22-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 698 | 2020 SHC HYD 2010 | Const. P. 293/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Gulab Dewan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 699 | 2020 SHC HYD 734 | Const. P. 467/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Khalid Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 700 | 2020 SHC HYD 1083 | Const. P. 855/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Waheed Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Nabi & Others (Respondent) | 24-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1278-K/2020 Waheed Ali & others v. Ghulam Nabi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 701 | 2020 SHC HYD 817 | M.A. 10/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Fatima (Appellant) VS Umar Hayat & others (Respondent) | 17-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 702 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1070 | Const. P. 1480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Maryam Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Fed. Urdu University & Ors (Respondent) | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as ???University???), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as University), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 703 | 2020 SHC KHI 1692 | Const. P. 5851/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Saima Ather (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.937/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others,C.P.L.A.1755/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained. |
| 704 | 2020 SHC KHI 114 | Const. P. 6388/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Zaki Haider (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 705 | 2020 SHC KHI 570 | Const. P. 6389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 706 | 2020 SHC HYD 1803 | Const. P. 720/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Akbar Allauddin & another (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1274-K/2020 Akbar Allauddin & another v. The District Judge Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 707 | 2021 SHC KHI 1233 | Const. P. 3461/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shehzadi Erum (Petitioner) VS M.S Leprosy Hospital and Ors (Respondent) | 09-AUG-21 | Yes | review application | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 708 | 2020 SHC KHI 1818 | Const. P. 2268/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ali Akbar Leghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.383-K/2020 Ali Akber v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 709 | 2020 SHC HYD 668 | Const. P. 706/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 710 | 2020 SHC HYD 1247 | Const. P. 244/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Lateefan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 711 | 2020 SHC HYD 505 | Criminal Appeal 106/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Abdul Latif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 712 | 2020 SHC HYD 133 | Const. P. 320/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Samina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 713 | 2020 SHC SUK 471 | Cr.Misc. 16/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | P.C Nasir Hussain Arain (Applicant) VS Hasnain Shah & 3 Ors (Respondent) | 16-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | |||
| 714 | 2020 SHC HYD 2477 | Cr.J.A 36/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2009 | Noor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 715 | 2020 SHC KHI 940 | Const. P. 5578/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Anwar Hussain and Ors (Respondent) | 22-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 716 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 309, 2021 SBLR Sindh 309 | Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 26-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 717 | 2021 SHC KHI 1147 | Const. P. 912/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 08-FEB-21 | Yes | t is well-settled law that the advice of the Commission shall ordinarily be accepted by the department; and, if the advice of the Commission is not acceptable the case shall be submitted to the Government for orders as provided under Section 7 (1)(3) of Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules, 1990. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 718 | 2021 SHC KHI 870 | Const. P. 648/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Ali Unar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-21 | Yes | seeking direction to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, for transferring Chairman and Controller of Examination, Sindh Public Service Commission--Since the issue is confined to the transfer and posting of respondents 3 & 4 who are civil servants and the petitioner cannot seek direction for posting of a civil servant of his choice and it is for respondents 1&2 to look into their conduct and affairs of SPSC. Reference may be made to the case of Peer Muhammad v. Government of Balochistan and others, 2007 SCMR 54. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 719 | 2020 SHC HYD 2268 | Const. P. 347/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Arshad Arain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 24-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 720 | 2020 SHC HYD 1097 | Const. P. 111/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Farzana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1629/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Rahim Bux and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 721 | 2020 SHC HYD 62 | Cr.Acq.A. 37/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ramdas (Appellant) VS Sht. Aneeta & Another (Respondent) | 15-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 722 | 2021 SHC HYD 795 | Const. P. 585/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Inayatullah & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.1717-K/2021 Inayatullah & ohters v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 723 | 2020 SHC HYD 2150 | Const. P. 2969/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Wali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 724 | 2020 SHC KHI 838 | Const. P. 5644/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Zain un Nisa (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 725 | 2020 SHC HYD 2158 | Const. P. 1753/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Mazhar Ali Chandio & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 726 | 2020 SHC HYD 1327 | Const. P. 372/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Majdan & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 727 | 2020 SHC HYD 2110 | Const. P. 181/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Salma Khatoon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.1136/2021 Magna Processing Industries Pvt Ltd Faisalabad v. Sindh through the SecretaryExcise and Taxation Sindh Karachi and another,C.P.L.A.4842/2021 Magna Processing Industries Pvt Ltd Faisalabad v. Province of Sindh through the SecretaryExcise and Taxation Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended. | |
| 728 | 2020 SHC KHI 2483 | Const. P. 1826/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ayaz Hussain Khichi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 729 | 2020 SHC HYD 1487 | Cr.Tran 15/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Ilyas (Appellant) VS Ld. Additional Sessions Judge Shahdadpur & others (Respondent) | 24-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 730 | 2020 SHC KHI 814 | Const. P. 536/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 731 | 2020 SHC HYD 754 | Const. P. 285/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Mustafa Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 26-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 732 | 2020 SHC HYD 1938 | Criminal Appeal 173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Asad Ali Khaskheli (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 09-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 733 | 2020 SHC HYD 2175 | Const. P. 177/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1281-K/2020 Barkat Ali v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 734 | 2020 SHC KHI 1207 | Const. P. 3315/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Zarina Anwar (Petitioner) VS The Secretary M/o Education & Ors (Respondent) | 10-DEC-20 | Yes | We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Secretary Education, Government of Sindh and Secretary Education Department Government of Punjab, jointly and severally, to pay all her perks and privileges to which she was entitled to by issuance of notification of her retirement, inclusive of her entire pensionary benefits within two (02) months and report compliance through MIT-II of this Court. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 735 | 2020 SHC HYD 866 | Const. P. 925/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Jamal Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 736 | 2020 SHC HYD 1544 | Const. P. 103/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Anjleena (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Umerkot & others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 737 | 2020 SHC KHI 2037 | Const. P. 437/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 738 | 2020 SHC KHI 1883 | Const. P. 530/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Naseem (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 739 | 2020 SHC KHI 444 | Const. P. 7576/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Badaruddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 740 | 2020 SHC KHI 1809 | Const. P. 5481/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 741 | 2023 PLC CS Note 103 | Const. P. 340/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | M.Saleem Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-20 | Yes | We are of the view that the post cannot be upgraded / re-designated merely by passing the Resolution by defunct CDGK, the law has to take its own course and to be followed for the aforesaid purpose for which the petitioner has failed to justify his entitlement for proforma promotion with retrospective effect---It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others , PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. proforma promotion | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 742 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 78, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2079, 2023 PLC CS Note 78 | Const. P. 6863/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 743 | 2020 SHC HYD 2028 | Const. P. 733/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Barkat Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 13-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 744 | 2020 SHC KHI 1419 | Const. P. 6328/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Rashid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 745 | 2020 SHC KHI 679, 2021 PLC (CS) 452 | Const. P. 4461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Imtiaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 28-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceased???s first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Hon???ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceaseds first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Honble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 746 | 2021 SHC KHI 486 | Const. P. 5098/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Imtiaz Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 747 | 2023 SHC KHI 1118 | Const. P. 57/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ghulam Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 12-JUN-23 | Yes | It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.5245/2023 Ghulam Ali alias Tariq Ahmed and another v. Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks) |
| 748 | 2021 SHC KHI 150 | Const. P. 3520/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zahid Hussain Shah Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Addl I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 04-JUN-21 | Yes | official accommodation | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 749 | 2021 SHC KHI 171 | Const. P. 5868/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Salman & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAR-21 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore, and others Vs. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS and 29 others and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, NORTHERN REGION, ISLAMABAD, and another Vs. Syed MUNAWAR ALI and others (2017 P L C (C.S.) 1030). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts as Inland Revenue Audit Officer (BPS-18) with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3520/2021 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1919/2023 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 3 months, Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks) |
| 750 | 2021 SHC KHI 287 | Const. P. 3310/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Asad ul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-21 | Yes | the petitioners are seeking regularization of their services against the quota reserved for deceased civil servants as provided under the Prime Ministers Assistance Package for the Families of Government Employees, on the premise that their parents were serving in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on different posts, who passed away during their service. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 751 | 2021 SHC KHI 148 | Const. P. 3373/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abrar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 12-FEB-21 | Yes | proforma promotion | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 752 | 2021 SHC KHI 803 | Const. P. 1242/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Shakoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-FEB-21 | Yes | termination from service--Baqai Cadet College, Karachi--It is a well-settled principle of law that the appointment on contract and its subsequent expiration on the aforesaid charges cannot be threshed out through these proceedings and the petitioner cannot be ordered to be reinstated in service in absence of statutory rules of service. Resultantly, this Petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 753 | 2021 SHC KHI 964 | Const. P. 3969/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zain Suhail (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 754 | 2022 PLC (CS) 235 | Const. P. 3271/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bilqees (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Wafaqi Mohtasib and Others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-21 | Yes | whether Wafaqi Mohtasib is competent to absorb any deputationist by appointing her/him by transfer in the Establishment of the Wafaqi Mohtasib, Islamabad? | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1164/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others,C.A.1349/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed after 3 months, |
| 755 | 2021 SHC KHI 313 | Const. P. 6313/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Asadullah Lashari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-21 | Yes | quo warranto --maintainability of this petition on the ground that private respondents were appointed in the year 2013 in Lyari Development Authority.alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in the year 2013 when the aforesaid appointments were made by the Lyari Development Authority and now he has approached this Court on 09.12.2020 after a delay of approximately 07 years from the date of the alleged cause of action. Thus his case falls within the ambit of the doctrine of laches. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 756 | 2021 SHC KHI 353 | Const. P. 1846/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | S.M Ghayas (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 28-SEP-21 | Yes | Here the case of the petitioner is quite different, as he stood retired from service of KW&SB in the year 2020, and the DPC for promotion to BS-20 could not take place to consider his case. Besides he remained silent for the intervening period, except by moving two applications to the competent authority, the reason is obvious that he was enjoying the post in BPS 20 in violation of dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of the Province of Sindh Vs Ghulam Fareed and others 2014 SCMR 1189 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 757 | 2021 SHC KHI 998 | Const. P. 162/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) | 18-SEP-21 | Yes | We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the respondent-university as well suggestion of Secretary Universities and Board to the competent authority for the appointment of Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University as discussed supra was without lawful authority; and, we do not appreciate the conduct of the respondents in the manner they have dealt with the matter of appointment of the Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University, in bypassing the senior professor working in grade 22 and got recommended the private respondents for the said position in violation of the principle of natural justice and seniority, which is a universal principle. It is well-settled law that if a civil/public servant is appointed in violation of any provision of law, the competent authority can look into the matter---Coming to the next point that interest of the petitioner is also being agitated in the petition, suffice it to say when we have found that every action of the respondents dubious to propose the competent authority, the names of the shortlisted candidates, in a cursory manner, thus prima facie the competent authority was not properly appraised on the subject issue, therefore, the matter needs to be looked into by the competent authority afresh, keeping in view the seniority-cum merit principle as law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court on the subject and take a fresh decision to appoint Dean of Faculty of Science of respondent-university. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1547-K/2021 Dr.Nasira Khatoon v. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution |
| 758 | 2021 SHC KHI 672 | Const. P. 8756/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Jawed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 04-MAY-21 | Yes | the petitioner has assailed the vires of the office order No.42/2018 issued by respondent-Employees Old-age Benefits Institution (`EOBI`), whereby he was declared as Dead wood, consequently, he was forcibly sent on Early Retirement from the service of EOBI on the ground that his further retention in service would be of no benefit for the institution. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4249/2021 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another,C.A.49/2024 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed |
| 759 | 2021 SHC LAR 1032 | Cr.J.A 29/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Azmat Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-JUL-21 | Yes | Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 760 | 2021 SHC KHI 1062 | Const. P. 5657/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi (Petitioner) VS N.B.P (Respondent) | 12-MAR-21 | Yes | NBP--Dismissal from service | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.467-K/2021 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi,C.A.17/2024 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed |
| 761 | 2021 SHC KHI 753 | Const. P. 2410/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 21-APR-21 | Yes | promotion issue | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 762 | 2021 SHC KHI 1304 | Const. P. 3985/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Aurangzaib (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-21 | Yes | the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 763 | 2021 SHC KHI 670 | Const. P. 5878/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khalid Mansoor (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 23-FEB-21 | Yes | reinstatement along with back benefits | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 764 | 2021 SHC LAR 901 | Cr.Bail 150/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ali Murad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 765 | 2021 SHC LAR 603 | Cr.Bail 127/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sabir Ali Khoso (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | For the aforesaid reasons, the instant bail application merits no consideration is dismissed. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the case; dispose of the same preferably within two months from the date of this Order; and, it is made clear that the direction given by this Court in bail matters may not be taken lightly and valid reasons are to be assigned if the same direction is not complied with as now it is well-settled law that to have a speedy trial is the fundamental right of the accused being universally acknowledged. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, a smooth methodology and Scheme for a speedy trial are provided whether it is held by the Sessions Court or Magistrate, in recognition of the said right of an accused person. This principle shall apply more vigorously to the trials before Special Courts, constituted under the CNS Act, or any other special law so that unnecessary delay, a much less shocking one in its conclusion is avoided in all circumstances. Any unreasonable or shocking delay in the conclusion of the trial, before Special Courts, would amount to the denial of justice, or to say, denial of fundamental rights to the accused, of speedy trial. On the aforesaid proposition. In this context, I am fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Imtiaz Ahmed vs. The State (2017 SCMR 1194). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 766 | 2023 SHC KHI 100 | Const. P. 2363/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Imtiaz Ali Isani (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 31-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 767 | 2021 SHC HYD 94 | Const. P. 916/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Azra Khousar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 768 | 2021 SHC HYD 1154 | Cr.Misc. 660/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Imran Ali (Applicant) VS SP Jamshoro (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 769 | 2021 SHC HYD 428 | Cr.Bail 517/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 770 | 2021 SHC HYD 1369 | Const. P. 673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 771 | 2021 SHC HYD 1056 | Const. P. 1550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Jalauddin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 25-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 772 | 2021 SHC KHI 952 | Criminal Miscelleneous 769/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | NOMAN MARWAT S/O KAISAF KHAN (Applicant) VS IVTH ADJ KHI MALIR & ORS (Respondent) | 31-DEC-21 | Yes | In principle, the offense under section 489-F PPC is punishable with imprisonment of three years, thus, does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr. P.C; and, the grounds for cancellation of bail are altogether different from the grant of bail; and once pre-arrest bail is confirmed, the exceptional and extraordinary grounds, as well as strong reasons, are required to recall the bail order granted earlier to the accused. The principles enunciated, governing for grant of bail and cancellation whereof has been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme court in the case of Sharif Khan V/S The State and another, 2021 SCMR 87 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 773 | 2021 SHC HYD 27 | Civil Revision 13/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2000 | Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Applicant) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 774 | 2021 SHC HYD 810 | Const. P. 944/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 775 | 2021 SHC HYD 1254 | Const. P. 2155/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 776 | 2021 SHC HYD 317 | Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 777 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1604 | Const. P. 2358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 2358 & 2622 of 2019 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faisal Shah Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 778 | 2021 SHC HYD 895 | Const. P. 38/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Administrator Evacuee Trust property & Others (Petitioner) VS Pardeep Kumar & Others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 779 | 2021 SHC HYD 1278 | Const. P. 594/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 780 | 2021 SHC HYD 785 | Const. P. 386/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ahmed Nadeem Chohan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ishaque Khan & another (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 781 | 2021 SHC HYD 1162 | M.A. 88/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Iqbal Javed & Others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 782 | 2021 SHC HYD 621 | Civil Revision 28/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Aziz (Applicant) VS Mst. Irshad Bibi & others (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 783 | 2021 SHC HYD 578 | Criminal Miscelleneous 619/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2021 | NAZAKAT ABBAS (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE HYD & OTHERS (Respondent) | 06-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 784 | 2021 SHC HYD 587 | Cr.Bail 895/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Saleem Khan Qaimkhani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 10-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.2-K/2022 Saleem Khan Qaimkhani v. Mst. Ghazala & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 785 | 2021 SHC KHI 75 | Cr.Bail 2271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD TAHIR S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 30-DEC-21 | Yes | post-arrest bail in FIR No.451/2021 for offences punishable under sections 269, 270 PPC & 8(i) of Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale & Use of Gutka and Manpuri, Act 2019 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 786 | 2021 SHC HYD 1129 | Const. P. 2708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nazir Ahmed and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 787 | 2021 SHC HYD 203 | Civil Revision 116/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 1998 | Yousuf (Applicant) VS Muhammad Anwar (Respondent) | 13-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 788 | 2021 SHC HYD 636 | Cr.Bail 827/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | SHAHID ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 789 | 2021 SHC HYD 246 | R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2003 | The Islamic Repubilec Of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Rahim Bux & Others (Respondent) | 22-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 790 | 2021 SHC KHI 504 | Cr.Bail 1317/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | INTEKHAB ALAM QURESHI S/O MUHAMMAD YOUNUS QURESHI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 30-DEC-21 | Yes | seeking pre-arrest bail in F.I.R No. 432 of 2021, for an offense under section 489-F P.P.C at Liaquatabad Police Station, Karachi | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 791 | 2021 SHC HYD 930 | Const. P. 202/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Ghulam Mustafa Shah and anothers (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) & others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 792 | 2021 SHC HYD 241 | Civil Revision 116/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2002 | Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 793 | 2021 SHC HYD 149 | Const. P. 477/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Fareed Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.105/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Fareed Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 794 | 2021 SHC HYD 936 | Const. P. 1348/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 795 | 2022 SHC KHI 539 | Const. P. 1227/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Imran Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 796 | 2021 SHC HYD 1020 | M.A. 31/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Kirshan & another (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 797 | 2022 SHC KHI 81 | Const. P. 6132/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Zubair & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.489-K/2022 Muhammad Yaqoob Sheikh v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Human Rights Department & another,C.A.104-K/2024 Muhammad Zubair v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Human Rights Department & another,C.A.105-K/2024 Muhammad Yaqoob Sheikh v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Human Rights Department & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed | |
| 798 | 2022 SHC KHI 445 | Const. P. 888/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Prof: Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-22 | Yes | The Government of Sindh is directed to expedite the process by ensuring reconstituting of Search Committee within two months from the receipt of this order and shall also complete the process of interview of all the candidates afresh for the appointment for the post of Vice-Chancellor, University of Karachi, at the earliest. Meanwhile, the Search Committee (after reconstitution) shall send the copies of the original academic certificates/degrees/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for verification. The Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is directed to look into the academic qualification certificates/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents and after ascertaining genuineness or otherwise submit the report to the Search Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh in a sealed envelope within one month for further proceedings. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.392-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 799 | 2024 SHC SUK 291 | Const. P. 1428/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Attaullah Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 800 | 2022 SHC KHI 23 | Const. P. 2954/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 28-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.715-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Usman Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 801 | 2022 SHC KHI 67 | Const. P. 5862/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Aslam Awan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.492/2022 Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (KW&SB), Karachi through its Chairman v. Muhammad Aslam Awan and others,C.P.L.A.285-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Aslam Awan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed | |
| 802 | 2022 SHC KHI 426 | Const. P. 2805/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ansar Ahmed Gorar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-22 | Yes | whether the impugned notification is, in conformity with the judgments passed by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Crl. Org. Petition No.89/2011, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and Gul Hassan Jatoi; and, whether IGP Sindh is competent to issue the impugned notification under Section 12 of the Police Act, 1861, or it is for the Government of Sindh to order the repatriation of the petitioners to the ICT Police, Baluchistan Police and Pakistan Railways Police; and, whether police establishment is indivisible one force; and inter se transfer and subsequent absorption from the Federal Capital Police, Railways Police or Baluchistan Police to Sindh Police is permissible under Rule 1.5 of Police Rules, 1934; and, whether the repatriation of the petitioners to ICT Police, Baluchistan Police, and Pakistan Railways after rendering service for a considerable period in Sindh Police, attracts the principle of locus poenitentia and the same are within the principles laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2266/2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 803 | 2021 SHC KHI 945 | Const. P. 2145/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Hasnain Tanweer Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 804 | 2021 SHC KHI 842 | Const. P. 2157/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Mehran Bottlers and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 805 | 2021 SHC KHI 977 | Const. P. 3870/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Karachi Grain Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 806 | 2022 SHC KHI 91 | Const. P. 3972/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr.Rukhsana Iftikhar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 18-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | |||
| 807 | 2022 SHC KHI 192 | Const. P. 5282/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Rashida Syed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 20-JAN-22 | Yes | It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 808 | 2025 SHC KHI 649 | Const. P. 4769/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-APR-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.748-K/2025 Shabbir Ali Babar & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary , Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned | |
| 809 | 2022 SHC KHI 399 | Const. P. 4401/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Salma (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.784-K/2022 The Vice Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others v. Province of Sindh through/Chancellor of Universities of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 810 | 2021 SHC KHI 1109 | Const. P. 2606/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/ Din Leather Pvt Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 811 | 2022 SHC KHI 193 | Const. P. 4800/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 29-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | Crl.A.8-K/2023 Muhammad Akram v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 812 | 2025 SHC KHI 1664, 2025 SHC KHI 1676 | Const. P. 4149/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Wali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3672/2025 Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Ltd thr. its Manager & others v. Wali Muhammad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 813 | 2023 SHC KHI 1221 | Const. P. 3559/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Tariq and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 814 | 2023 SHC KHI 765 | Const. P. 4199/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Gul Zareen Muniri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 815 | 2023 SHC KHI 373, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1999 | Const. P. 4598/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | NBP Officers Welfare Association and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.790/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi and another v. NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through Senior Vice President others,C.P.L.A.1177/2023 NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through its Vice President and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending ,Pending | |
| 816 | 2022 SHC HYD 390 | I. A 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Umair (Appellant) VS Zulfiqar Ail Shaikh & another. (Respondent) | 29-AUG-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 817 | 2022 SHC LAR 641 | Const. P. 741/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ali Jan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-JUL-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 818 | 2023 SHC KHI 399, 2024 SBLR Sindh 866, 2024 SBLR Sindh 867 | Const. P. 5634/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-23 | Yes | The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2147/2023 Trustees of the Karachi Port, through its Board of Trustees, KPT, Karachi v. Habib ur Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned.to be fixed before 3 member bench |
| 819 | 2021 SHC HYD 86 | Const. P. 184/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Qazi Aslam (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.8-K/2022 Qazi Aslam v. Saadullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 820 | 2022 SHC LAR 912 | Const. P. 752/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 02-AUG-22 | Yes | The plea taken by the parties could not be agitated in Constitution petition, as this court is not in a position to look into the allegations and counterallegation in an election matter, in terms of section 60 of the Election Act, 2017, which is also covered by Article 63 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 821 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 672 | R.A (Civil Revision) 228/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Civil Aviation Authority (Applicant) VS Afzal ur Rehman (Respondent) | 31-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 822 | 2023 SHC KHI 178 | Const. P. 1785/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Majid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 10-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 823 | 2023 SHC KHI 940 | Const. P. 4321/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zahid Akhtar Siddique and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.575-K/2023 Zahid Akhtar Siddique & others v. Federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Production. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC | |
| 824 | Nil | Criminal Appeal 29/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2015 | Baggan @ Asghar and Others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 07-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 825 | 2023 SHC KHI 495 | Const. P. 7028/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Najmul Kareem and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 826 | 2023 SHC KHI 868 | Const. P. 6120/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) | 06-JUN-23 | Yes | Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3164/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight |
| 827 | 2023 SHC KHI 131 | Const. P. 6119/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) | 06-JUN-23 | Yes | Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3163/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another,C.P.L.A.3219/2023 Makhdoom Shakil uz Zaman v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight,Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight |
| 828 | 2023 SHC KHI 541 | Const. P. 4106/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Inam and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. and Others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 829 | 2023 SHC HYD 778 | Const. P. 288/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/S Sui Southran Gas Co Ltd (Petitioner) VS Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-23 | Yes | Consumer Court has no jurisdiction in matters of alleged excessive billing by a Gas Utility Company, it lies with the GAS Utility Court under the 2016 ACT. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 830 | 2023 SHC HYD 773 | R.A (Civil Revision) 236/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2000 | Muhammad Luqman (Applicant) VS Muhammmad Usman (Respondent) | 26-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 831 | 2024 SHC KHI 156 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1213/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 1214 of 2023 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. Taj Gasoline (Pvt) Ltd., Karachi & another (Respondent) | 16-JAN-24 | Yes | Finding of fact recorded by Tribunal cannot be interfered with under Section 196 of the Customs Act | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 832 | 2023 SHC KHI 195 | Cr.Bail 1494/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | MUHAMMAD ALI S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 25-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 833 | 2024 SHC SUK 1143, 2025 PCr.LJ 41 | Criminal Appeal 4/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2024 | Barkat Ali & Others (Appellant) VS The State & Another (Respondent) | 27-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 834 | 2024 SHC KHI 91 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 633/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Director, I & I, Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s Smart Power System (Pvt.) Ltd. & another (Respondent) | 01-FEB-24 | Yes | initial burden of proof under section 187 of the Customs Act, 1969; discharge thereof; requirements | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 835 | 2025 SHC SUK 588 | Const. P. 341/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: CPD 817 of 2021 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Saddam Hussain Sahito (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 836 | 2024 SHC KHI 1168 | Const. P. 3764/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 09-APR-24 | Yes | Applicability of Section 10 of Civil Servant Act, 1973, appointment of a junior officer when no suitable person is available for promotion; held No; appointment set-aside | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 837 | 2024 SHC KHI 262 | Const. P. 95/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Parvez Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 17-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 838 | 2023 SHC KHI 809 | R.A (Civil Revision) 139/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Agha Abid Majeed Khan Thr. Ghous Bakhsh Sahqani (Applicant) VS Idrees Ahmed and another (Respondent) | 01-AUG-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 839 | 2023 SHC KHI 269 | Cr.Bail 982/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | WAQAR @ WAKKO S/O ASLAM & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 04-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 840 | 2024 SHC SUK 45 | Const. P. 378/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sher Ahmed Mubejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 841 | 2024 SHC KHI 995 | Cr.Bail 971/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD IMRAN S/O NAWABUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | To invoke the provisions of section 364-A, it is incumbent upon the court to first see whether there was kidnapping within the meaning of section 361 PPC which envisages the co-existence of three elements contained therein namely (i) The minor was taken or enticed away by the kidnapper. (ii) The minor was out of the keeping of the lawful guardian (iii) The keeping of the minor was without the consent of the guardian. Once kidnapping is established, the question under section 364-A would be as to whether the appellant intended to murder the victim or subject her to grievous hurt or lust. 9. The words 'take' and 'entices away' used in section 361 PPC are key words to the offense of kidnapping implying some action on the part of the kidnapper to take or entice away the kidnapee followed by keeping the kidnapee out of the lawful guardianship of the guardian without his consent. The expression "taking" and "enticing" call for some positive steps taken by the accused to remove the girl from the custody of her guardian. Neither Section 361 PPC nor Section 363 PPC would have any application if the girl of her own accord the word 'kidnapping' connotes stealing away a child without the permission of a person under whose custody or care the child is'. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 842 | 2024 SHC SUK 503 | Const. P. 1299/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mujahid Ali Lund (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-AUG-24 | Yes | Perusal of the substituted Rule 10-A reflects that with widening its scope, certain conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died during service whereas the substituted rule included the children of the civil servant who were declared invalidated or incapacitated for further service and the post against which such category of persons could be appointed, was curtailed to BS-16-17 only instead of BS 11-20. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 843 | 2024 SHC SUK 823 | Const. P. 1788/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sarfraz Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 844 | 2024 SHC SUK 495 | Const. P. 753/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Jahangir Solangi & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the statements of the learned AAG, the petitioner/ growers/Khatedars who have paid the challan for aforesaid purpose shall proceed to appear before the concerned Official incharge Wheat Procurement Centers as notified on 24-05-2024 and after showing their requisite papers/Dhall/land revenue receipts of his land, the same application shall be processed forthwith by the concerned officials and the petitioner/growers/Khatedars and those small farmers who have not approached this Court shall also be issued BARDANA without fail and their ancillary issues about releasing the bills shall also be decided. So far as the receiving the procured wheat bags from the petitioner at the concerned Food Centers, it is subject to the Policy and if the policy so permits the same shall be taken care of by the concerned Officials without discrimination. In the meanwhile the concerned officials shall ensure their availability at the place of Wheat Procurement Centers; however if it is found that they remain absent, it shall be treated violation of the Order of this Court to attract penal action in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and they shall be proceeded without further notice. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 845 | 2024 SHC SUK 1468 | Criminal Miscelleneous 124/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2024 | Muhammad Hashim Mahesar (Appellant) VS The State and others (Opponent) | 20-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 846 | 2024 SHC SUK 649 | Const. P. 1162/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Azizullah Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 847 | 2024 SHC SUK 489 | Const. P. 541/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 848 | 2024 SHC SUK 256 | Const. P. 226/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Syed Safdar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 849 | 2024 SHC SUK 221 | Const. P. 343/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Shahnawaz Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 850 | 2025 SHC KHI 534 | Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zain Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police and Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-25 | Yes | In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he has been acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it is well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v. Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to do away with the candidature of the petitioner. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 851 | 2024 SHC MPK 1386 | Const. P. 205/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Hafeez Shoro (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | Learned Assistant A.G Sindh assisted by counsel for the private respondents??? alongwith police officials present in court and states that the official respondents as well as private respondents will act strictly in accordance with law and they will be neutral in the private affairs between the parties, if any. Police officials are present and state that they shall act strictly in accordance with law and provide the protection to the petitioner and his family members if any harassment is caused to them by the private respondents; however, if any cognizable offence is committed by either party, they will act swiftly in accordance with law. 3. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this petition in terms of the statement of learned A.A.G Sindh as well as counsel for the private respondents that no harassment shall be caused to either party. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 852 | 2024 SHC KHI 127 | Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A 153/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Appellant) VS SYED UMAR KAMAL (Respondent) | 12-NOV-24 | Yes | It is a well-settled principle of law that where the direct evidence fails the corroborative piece(s) of evidence will be of no help to the prosecution as portrayed by the learned APG. Reliance can be made to the case of ???Abid Ali & 2 others 2011 SCMR 208??? wherein it was held:- ???Although where the ocular account has been disbelieved the recovered articles which are carrying corroborative value cannot substantiate the charge against the appellants because, in the absence of direct evidence, corroborative evidence by itself cannot bring home the charge of murder against the appellants.??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 853 | 2024 SHC KHI 1268 | Cr.Bail 775/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | HARIS MAQSOOD S/O MAQSOOD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 04-JUL-24 | Yes | In a more recent case; namely, Criminal Bail Application No.1010/2014 (Muhammad Shafique V/S The State) decided on 11.07.2014, it has been observed that the terms ???arms??? and ???firearms??? have been separately and distinctly defined in Clauses (c) and (d), respectively, of Section 2 of the Act; amongst many other articles designed as weapons of offense or defense, ???pistols??? are included in the definition of ???arms??? in Clause (c) ibid and not in the definition of ???firearms??? defined in Clause (d) ibid ; the punishment and penalty for acquiring, possessing, carrying, or controlling any ???firearm??? or ammunition in infringement of Section 3 of the Act, is provided in Section 23(1)(a) of the Act, which is imprisonment for a term that may extend to 14 years and with fine; and, whereas, the punishment for possessing ???arms??? or ammunition, licensed or unlicensed, with the aim to use them for any unlawful purpose etc., is provided in Section 24 of the Act, which is imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years and with a fine. This court held in the aforementioned case that the above clearly shows the intention of the legislature that not only are the offenses to ???arms??? and those relating to ???firearms??? to be dealt with separately as provided in the Act; but since punishments having different terms in respect of ???arms??? and ???firearms??? have been specified separately in the Act, punishment under Section 23(1)(a) of the Act cannot be awarded for an offense committed under Section 24 of the Act, and vice versa. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 854 | 2024 SHC SUK 399 | Const. P. 1013/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Shazia & another (Petitioner) VS SHO Ps Thrushah & Others (Respondent) | 30-JUL-24 | Yes | Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, that if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action will be taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, if any, pending before the competent Court of law; so far as the issue of marriage over marriage if any is concerned the same shall be taken care of by the competent forum under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 855 | 2024 SHC SUK 24 | Const. P. 543/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Syeda Shamim Raza Syed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 856 | 2024 SHC SUK 1481 | Const. P. 1609/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sarfraz Ali Jalbani & another (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.720-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary, Home Department, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others v. Sarfaraz Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 857 | 2024 SHC KHI 813 | Cr.Bail 2426/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD AUQIB AKBAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 21-NOV-24 | Yes | Hence, because of what has been discussed above, in our tentative opinion, the trial Court has to see whether Sections 409 and 477-A PPC are attractive or otherwise and the application of the same would be resolved by the Trial Court after recording the evidence. 14. The question is whether bail can be granted during investigation, primarily, post-arrest bail can be granted during an investigation if there are no reasonable grounds to believe the accused committed the crime, or if the trial is delayed beyond the prescribed period. 15. For the forgoing reasons, applicant Muhammad Aquib Akbar son of Abdul Shakoor is admitted on post-arrest bail in Crime No.60 of 2024, under Section 409/420/468/471/477-A/109/34 PPC registered at PS FIA Crime Circle, Hyderabad, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees two lac only] and PR Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 858 | 2024 SHC SUK 212 | Const. P. 405/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Niaz Muhammad shambani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 859 | 2024 SHC SUK 721 | Const. P. 674/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Wasim Abbas Burriro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.732-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Health Department and another v. Wasim Abbas Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 860 | 2024 SHC SUK 257 | Const. P. 515/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Imdad Ali Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 861 | 2024 SHC SUK 84 | Const. P. 617/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Kashif & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 862 | 2024 SHC SUK 765 | Const. P. 357/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst Seema (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.747-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Health and others v. Mst. Seema Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 863 | 2024 SHC SUK 237 | Const. P. 520/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khadim Hussain Channa & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 864 | 2024 SHC SUK 736 | Const. P. 1232/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ayaz Hussain Solangi (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.751-K/2024 The Chief Sercretary Sindh and others v. Ayaz Hussain Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 865 | 2024 SHC KHI 86 | Cr.Bail 764/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SUBASH S/O JAYRAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-JUL-24 | Yes | Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case, who challaned the present applicant along with others, these two versions require thorough probe by the trial Court. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant as recorded above, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail in crime No. 145 of 2024 of PS Steel Town subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 866 | 2025 SHC KHI 443 | Const. P. 2228/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst. Shaiza Said Khan (Petitioner) VS Military Estate Officer and Another (Respondent) | 16-JAN-25 | Yes | This court concluded that the complex factual issues, including the subject issues as agitated by the petitioner to declare the subject notices as illegal, should be resolved in a civil/revisional court, where the lis is stated to be pending. Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 867 | 2024 SHC SUK 116 | Const. P. 449/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zakir Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 868 | 2024 SHC SUK 1392 | Cr.Bail 180/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Saleem Bheeri & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 869 | 2024 SHC SUK 1310 | Const. P. 1222/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ramaiz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 870 | 2024 SHC SUK 1241 | Const. P. 1332/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Hussain Bux Kalwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.745-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Public Health Engineering Department and others v. Hussain Bux Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 871 | 2024 SHC SUK 627 | Const. P. 1004/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 872 | 2025 SHC KHI 523 | Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Fatima Noor (Petitioner) VS Dow University of Health Science and Others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-25 | Yes | Coming to the main case, it is also a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence. This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 873 | 2025 SHC KHI 292 | Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Saleem Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-25 | Yes | It is well-settled that while considering the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the merit of all the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored by the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department. 14. In the light of the position explained above, it is concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be considered for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.421-K/2025 Province of Sindh & others v. Saleem Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 874 | 2025 SHC KHI 605 | Const. P. 5747/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Bashir Ahmed Khan and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-25 | Yes | The police force is crucial for law enforcement. Effective training and capacity building are essential for its success. The institution should prioritize enhancing capabilities, productivity, and public awareness. Constant litigation hinders progress. A culture of strict adherence to internal rules is necessary for smooth governance and administration. 12. Rule 19.25 mandates that Inspectors, SIs, and ASIs complete courses (A, B, C, and D) for promotion. This training is crucial for capacity building and ensuring officers possess the necessary skills and knowledge for their higher roles. Senior police officers must possess the skills and competencies befitting their rank. Continuous professional development is crucial for all officers. Promotions should prioritize training and capacity building, rather than focusing on seniority. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 875 | 2024 SHC SUK 1144 | Const. P. 585/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Muhammad Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 876 | 2024 SHC SUK 191 | Const. P. 513/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Amjad Ali Bhatii (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 877 | 2024 SHC SUK 1459 | Const. P. 1545/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Manzoor Ahmed Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 878 | 2024 SHC SUK 275 | Const. P. 1270/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sohail Aziz Mughal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.735-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Sohail Aziz Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 879 | 2024 SHC SUK 68 | Const. P. 514/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Jabir Ali Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 880 | 2024 SHC SUK 634 | Const. P. 414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Younas Channa (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 881 | 2024 SHC SUK 1060 | Const. P. 494/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Riaz Hussain Buriro & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 882 | 2025 SHC KHI 303 | Const. P. 1639/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Tariq Kaleem (Petitioner) VS Institute of Charted Accountant & Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-25 | Yes | 13. While the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) does not have explicitly named "statutory rules of service," it operates under a framework of regulations: Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961. This is the primary legislation governing ICAP's existence and functions. ICAP Bye-Laws. These bylaws provide the internal rules and procedures for ICAP's operations, including membership, examinations, and disciplinary matters. ICAP has internal policies and procedures that govern employment matters, including recruitment, performance management, and employee conduct. The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed by the respondent/Institute, these rules may not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework of the respondent/Institute. 14. In view of what has been discussed above, without touching the merits of the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition is sustained and the petition is held to be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution for the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 883 | 2024 SHC SUK 1353 | Const. P. 203/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ayaz Ali Mughal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 884 | 2024 SHC KHI 535 | Cr.Bail 2633/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD SALEEM S/O TAJ MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 10-DEC-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that the applicant is not nominated in the FIR and no recovery has been effected from his possession. The only allegation against the applicant that facilitated the co-accused who had named him in the present crime, this factum was recorded by the trial court in the order. The alleged extra-judicial confession of co-accused made before police, if any, is not admissible under Articles 38 and 39 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, that no confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence, while Article 39 emphasizes that, subject to Article 40, no confession made by any person whilst he is in the custody of a police officer, unless it be made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, shall be proved as against such person. Seemingly, a confession made before the police is not made admissible by dint of the aforesaid provisions of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 in order to preserve and safeguard the philosophy of safe administration of criminal justice and is also based on public policy. In the aforesaid backdrop, I am sanguine that the case of applicant requires further inquiry to prove his guilt which can only be thrashed out after recording of evidence in the trial Court. On the aforesaid proposition I am guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ikram-ul-Haq v Raja Naveed Sabir & others (2012 SCMR 1273). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 885 | 2024 SHC KHI 1013 | Cr.Bail 2053/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SAQLAIN ABBASS @ AYAN S/O NAWAB HUSSAIN SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 21-OCT-24 | Yes | This Court is not oblivious to the fact that unfortunately, one young lady has lost her life in the alleged accident of the present case, however, the fate of the bail application is also to be decided within the framework of Section 497 Cr.P.C. and under the guidelines on the subject laid down by the Supreme Court. Besides the above, the liability of the present applicant or charges leveled against him could only be determined by the trial Court after recording and evaluating the evidence. It is also a settled principle of law that at the bail stage deeper appreciation of the merit of the case cannot be undertaken and only a tentative assessment of the material available is to be made. The record shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict or hardened criminal. Moreover, he is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 886 | 2024 SHC SUK 74 | Const. P. 513/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shahryar Bhirajo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 887 | 2024 SHC SUK 271 | Const. P. 1596/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Zulfiqar Ali Qazi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 888 | 2024 SHC SUK 924 | Const. P. 621/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ahmed Bux Mangrio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 889 | 2024 SHC SUK 434 | Const. P. 588/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Shah Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 890 | 2024 SHC SUK 1319 | M.A. 11/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Farhan Yasir Danwar (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 891 | 2024 SHC MPK 814 | Const. P. 529/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Abid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-24 | Yes | The registration of an FIR does not guarantee conviction. If the investigation reveals insufficient evidence, the accused may be released on bail. The police officer is empowered to take cognizance of an offense and try the accused or send them for trial. After completing the investigation, the officer must submit a police report to a Magistrate. The report should include details of the parties, the nature of the information, and the names of witnesses. The report should also indicate whether the accused was arrested or released on bail. The police report can be classified as "A," "B," or "C." An "A" report indicates that the FIR is true but the accused is untraced or there is no evidence to justify trial. A "B" report indicates that the FIR is false or frivolous and no case is made out. A "C" report indicates that the criminal case was filed due to a mistake of fact or is of a civil nature. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 892 | 2024 SHC MPK 1422 | Cr.Bail 164/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zeeshan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-OCT-24 | Yes | The law on bail is now well settled. In cases where the offense falls outside the non-prohibitory clause of section 497(1) of Cr.P.C., bail is to be granted as a matter of course, and rejection of the same is an exception. Where, however, an offense falls within the prohibitory clause, bail can only be granted if the court concludes that there is no reasonable ground for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offense or where an accused makes out a case of further inquiry into the guilt of the accused or in case the accused is under the age of 16 years or is sick or infirm. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 893 | 2024 SHC SUK 711 | Const. P. 437/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Riaz Bhanbhro & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 894 | 2024 SHC SUK 603 | Const. P. 1192/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dilmurad Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 895 | 2024 SHC SUK 435 | Const. P. 285/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Qurban Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 896 | 2024 SHC SUK 879 | Const. P. 522/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali BUx & Others (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 897 | 2024 SHC SUK 1190 | Const. P. 1544/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Shabir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 898 | 2024 SHC KHI 480, 2025 YLR 561 | Criminal Appeal 57/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | ABDUL REHMAN S/O MUHAMMAD SULTAN@ MUHAMMAD AYYAZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 01-JUL-24 | Yes | It is a settled principle of law that no one should be convicted of a crime based on presumption in the absence of strong evidence of unimpeachable character and legally admissible. Similarly, the mere heinous or gruesome nature of the crime shall not detract the Court of law in any manner from the due course to judge and make the appraisal of evidence in a laid down manner and to extend the benefit of reasonable doubt to an accused person being indefeasible and inalienable right of an accused. It is also an established principle of law that an accused person is presumed to be innocent until and unless he is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and this presumption of his innocence continues until the prosecution succeeds in proving the charge against him beyond a reasonable doubt based on legally admissible, confidence-inspiring, trustworthy and reliable evidence. It has also been held by the Superior Courts that conviction must be based upon unimpeachable evidence and certainty of guilt and any doubt arising in the prosecution case must be resolved in favor of the accused | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 899 | 2024 SHC KHI 1103 | Cr.Bail 1260/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Kamran @ Wago S/o Fareed Gul (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | The offense under section 353, P.P.C. is bailable and punishable for 2 years or a fine. As far as section 324 PPC is concerned, in an attempt to murder case falling within the ambit of section 324, P.P.C., the nature of the act done, the intention of the offender and the circumstances leading to the occurrence are the essential ingredients, which need to be probed into determine the guilt or otherwise of an accused as the police officials have not sustained any injury on their body. As such the subject offenses do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 (1) Cr.P.C. However to ascertain the offense for an attempt to murder the police officials, and bullet injuries sustained by the accused on the lower part of his leg requires serious consideration and further probe as none of the police personnel sustained any injury, and it is for the learned trial Court to thresh out the truth after recording the evidence being adduced by the prosecution and defense during trial. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 900 | 2024 SHC SUK 179 | Const. P. 421/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 901 | 2024 SHC SUK 531 | Const. P. 603/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Raza Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 902 | 2024 SHC SUK 251 | Const. P. 826/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Fatah Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 903 | 2024 SHC SUK 367 | Const. P. 146/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Gulabi Khatoon Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 904 | 2024 SHC SUK 808 | Const. P. 670/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Waheed Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 905 | 2024 SHC SUK 980 | Const. P. 1261/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Amir Ghunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.728-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. M/s. Muhammad Amir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 906 | 2024 SHC SUK 1171 | Cr.Rev 61/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ameer Ali Shahani (Applicant) VS Ghulam Sarwar Shahani & Others (Respondent) | 29-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 907 | 2024 SHC SUK 775 | Const. P. 157/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Bushra Bibi Syed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 908 | 2024 SHC SUK 606 | Const. P. 617/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Ali Rattar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.740-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Asif Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 909 | 2024 SHC KHI 992 | Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Waheed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-24 | Yes | The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay fixation are not entertainable for the reasons that such matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient as such this petition is dismissed, which involves disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court is not in a position to dilate upon such disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.211-K/2025 Waheed Akhtar v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 910 | 2024 SHC KHI 1066 | Cr.Rev 100/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | ASKARI BANK LIMITED (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 14-NOV-24 | Yes | It is settled law that when the criminal charges depend on the outcome of the civil cases, proceeding with the criminal case before the civil cases are resolved could potentially harm the accused. Additionally, the amount owed, which is a crucial element in the criminal case, can only be determined in the civil court, and the criminal court is divested from such determination. 19. To establish criminal liability under these sections, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the accused has defaulted on a financial obligation to the bank and has failed to repay the amount due. The specific nature of the breached obligations and representations would need to be examined to determine whether they directly relate to the accused's financial obligations to the bank and whether they constitute a criminal offense under the FIO. Mere breach of a contract or civil obligation, without more, may not necessarily constitute a criminal offense. The prosecution would need to prove that the accused's actions were intentional, dishonest, or fraudulent and that caused significant financial loss to the bank. Additionally, the bank cannot unilaterally determine the amount owed and initiate criminal proceedings as such a proper judicial process is necessary to establish liability and debt amount before criminal charges can be pursued. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.16-K/2025 Askari Bank Limited v. Muhammad Farooq Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution |
| 911 | 2024 SHC KHI 1244 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 23/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | AMEERULLAH S/O MASTA JAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 20-NOV-24 | Yes | It was incumbent upon the police to associate some independent/private persons; and just saying that no one was available at the spot is not sufficient thus testimony of police officials in this regard in given circumstances, cannot be safely relied upon to maintain conviction against the appellant. For extending the benefit of the doubt to an accused, there do not need to be multiple circumstances creating doubt, if there is a single circumstance which creates reasonable doubt in a prudent mind about the guilt of accused, he will be entitled to such benefit. Once it was established on record that the Appellant did not commit an offense punishable under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the provisions pertaining to the exclusion of Section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), as referenced above, become inapplicable to the present case, where no conviction has been rendered under the ATA, 1997. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 912 | 2024 SHC SUK 1348 | Const. P. 527/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Jam Maqbool & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 913 | 2024 SHC SUK 1381 | Const. P. 654/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Raza Arain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 914 | 2024 SHC KHI 383 | Cr.Bail 1026/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | NAQEEBULLAH S/O GUL RAIZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 12-JUL-24 | Yes | 7. The prosecution has applied in FIR Section 397 PPC. Whereas Section 393 PPC pertains to an attempt to commit robbery which is punishable with RI for a term that shall be extended up to seven years, whereas Section 397 PPC provides the punishment for an attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapons for which the accused shall be punished not less than seven years, however, the prosecution was only bothered to invoke Section 397 PPC without corresponding offense. It is well settled that while examining the question of bail, the Court has to consider the minimum aspect of the sentence provided for the alleged offense. It is also the case of the prosecution that the applicant was not arrested on the spot but somewhere else after a couple of months and after his arrest on 4.4.2024, holding of test identification parade was necessary in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Farman Ali v. The State [1997 SCMR 971], which factum is missing in the present case, the reasons best known to the investigation officer, who allegedly narrated that applicant disclosed his identity when he was interrogated at the time of snap checking, if this is the stance of the investigating officer let this aspect be taken care of by the trial Court after examining him. Admittedly, the name of the Applicant is not mentioned in the F.I.R. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 915 | 2024 SHC SUK 96 | Const. P. 584/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Rafique Chijjan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 916 | 2024 SHC SUK 1260 | Const. P. 429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst Shamshad Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 917 | 2024 SHC SUK 537 | Const. P. 331/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Hassnain Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 918 | 2024 SHC SUK 1117 | Const. P. 488/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Manzoor Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 919 | 2024 SHC SUK 1169 | Const. P. 375/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Qadir Gabol (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 920 | 2024 SHC SUK 595 | Const. P. 518/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Safiullah Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 921 | 2024 SHC SUK 26 | Const. P. 495/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zain Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 922 | 2024 SHC SUK 659 | Const. P. 1146/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mazharuddin Koondhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.744-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Mazharuddin Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 923 | 2024 SHC SUK 33 | Const. P. 788/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Tahir Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.749-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Tahir Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 924 | 2024 SHC SUK 1272 | Cr.Rev 33/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mujeeb Rehman & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 20-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 925 | 2024 SHC SUK 474 | Const. P. 645/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Sarwar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 926 | 2024 SHC SUK 946, 2025 PLC (CS) 326 | Const. P. 93/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Sadaqat Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 927 | 2025 SHC SUK 265 | Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of NIRC & others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-25 | Yes | Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law requires that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial. If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | ||
| 928 | 2025 SHC KHI 122 | Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Musawar Shah (Petitioner) VS M.D CSD and Ors (Respondent) | 30-JAN-25 | Yes | First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No. 2137 of 1992 before this court which was misplaced by the office of this court and an inquiry was conducted by the office, however, the fate of the inquiry could not be brought on record. In the meanwhile he was acquitted of the charges by the trial court vide judgment dated 15.08.2014 as he was accused of criminal breach of trust w.e.f. 31.03.1990 to 29.05.1990 and on similar charges, he was dismissed from the service finally the respondents were bothered to decide the departmental appeal in the year 2016, and then he approached this court immediately, therefore the question of laches did not arise. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.559-K/2025 Syed Musawar Shah v. The Managing Director Canteen Store Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 929 | 2025 SHC KHI 598 | Const. P. 296/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ahmed Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-25 | Yes | Generally, civil servants have limited avenues to challenge transfers. The appropriate forum for challenging a transfer order is the Service Tribunal. This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 930 | 2025 SHC KHI 544 | Const. P. 273/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zulfiqar Ali Roshan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-25 | Yes | On the legal aspect, the petitioners either (a) availed the demarcation remedy but prematurely approached this Court without awaiting its outcome, or (b) failed to avail of the remedy provided in the Land Revenue Act and Rules. If the Mukhtiarkar refuses the application, the petitioners must first pursue remedies such as appeal, revision, or review. Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1033/2025 Zulfiqar Ali Roshan and others v. The Province of Sindh Board of Revenue Sindh through Deputy Commissioner District West, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 931 | 2025 SHC SUK 225 | Const. P. 289/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of NIRC & others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-25 | Yes | Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law requires that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial. If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | ||
| 932 | 2025 SHC KHI 234 | Const. P. 4117/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Muhammad Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-25 | Yes | So far as the stance of the respondent that the claim of annual increases is a policy decision of the provincial government and the KMC has no objection if the provincial releases funds for annual increase annual increases @ Rs. 15% and 10 % for the year 2019-20 and 2020-2021. 9. KMC claims to be an autonomous body and has not adopted the increases, so the petitioner's claim is invalid. The petitioner counters that increases have been paid (per bank statements), and the KMC is obligated to continue them. 10. Without touching the merits of the case of the issue of annual increases in the pensionary emoluments of the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, such annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to be made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.603-K/2025 Muhammad Ali Abbasi v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary , Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned for short date. |
| 933 | 2025 SHC KHI 3234 | Const. P. 950/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Javed Iqbal S/o Ahsan Ghani (Petitioner) VS Inspector General Sindh (IG) and Another (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | In view of the statement made by the learned AAG, the contempt application and all other pending applications stand disposed of accordingly, with the understanding that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 934 | 2025 SHC KHI 46 | Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 935 | 2025 SHC KHI 658 | Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Shir Bano and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the over marriage of the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 936 | 2025 SHC KHI 532 | Const. P. 4092/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Imran Khan Siyal (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | Generally, a contract employee who resigns forfeits the right to demand regularization. Resignation is a voluntary termination of the contract, which outlines employment terms. Regularization, a separate process for permanent positions, is not automatically triggered by resignation and requires specific policies or employer decisions. Contract employees don't have an inherent right to regularization based solely on service length or satisfaction. While legal remedies might exist for the unfair use of resignation to avoid regularization, they don't guarantee it. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 937 | 2025 SHC KHI 241 | Const. P. 1749/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Wahid and others (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | From 2010-2016, before formal FMU rules, petitioners submitted that Clause 31 of 2009 rules mandated applying State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) policies to their perks and privileges. They highlight that FMU adopted SBP's Monetized Salary Scales, approved by the PM, to attract market specialists with competitive packages. Petitioners contended that the same rationale necessitates implementing SBP's employee benefits at FMU, as SBP policies on appraisal, increments, TA/DA, and leave are already in effect for them. Despite lump-sum salaries upon appointment, governed by FMU rules (approved earlier than stated), petitioners were placed on SBP-aligned FMU scales. They pointed out that SBP officers at FMU received full SBP benefits per Rule 9(xiii). Thus, petitioners asserted that FMU Rule 31 entitled them to SBP's allowances, benefits, perks, and perquisites. Having served for several years without any issue, their non-confirmation contradicts FMU rules. They submitted that benefits like Employee Loans are limited to confirmed staff, causing frustration and resignations, including trained Analysts. Therefore, the petitioners requested that the application of SBP-related benefits under FMU Rule 31 from their appointment date and confirmation of their service as per FMU rules after completing probation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 938 | 2025 SHC KHI 1044 | Const. P. 1935/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shahid Rasool Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | It may be noted that although the Colleges in question are permanent and are required to have permanent status, the staff working therein is required to have permanent status. However, the respondents have created the relationship between the petitioners and Hadeed Welfare Trust as master and servant to avoid the regularization of their long service, as the issue has already been set at naught by the judgment rendered by this Court in Hafeez Junejo???s case has been implemented in its letter and spirit. Additionally, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has already taken care of the issue of regularization of service of teaching staff in the aforesaid cases; as such, no further deliberation is required on our part. 9. Based on our scrutinizing of the record, we are left in no manner of doubt that the respondents are causing discriminatory treatment with the petitioners, which is violative of Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, which is a fundamental right and this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution can protect the fundamental rights of the citizens including the petitioners in service-related issues. 10. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.919-K/2025 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills through its CEO/Chairman v. Shahid Rasool Memon and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 939 | 2025 SHC KHI 1051 | Const. P. 125/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Ataullah (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Having considered the legal precedents, we are of the opinion that the Petitioners' situation falls under the principle of Master and Servant. It is a well-established legal principle that a contractual employee does not possess a fundamental or acquired right to remain in their contractual position or to demand an extension or regularization of their service. Furthermore, it is settled law that courts generally avoid interfering with the policy-making authority of the Executive branch, unless it is demonstrated that such policies have violated the fundamental rights of citizens, which is not the situation presented in this case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 940 | 2025 SHC KHI 1053 | Const. P. 1768/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Faiz Muhammad Palari (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | This Court finds the present petition suitable for immediate dismissal ("in limine"). The reasons are that the Supreme Court is already addressing almost identical issues in an appeal connected to Civil Petition No. (Nill) of 2024, and the petitioner has not offered any fresh point of view, except that the petitioner has established an unauthorized Cattle Piri (market) for Eid-ul-Adha sacrificial animals, and the subject issue is under consideration before the Assistant Commissioner concerned. In such a scenario, the Assistant Commissioner needs to first handle the petitioner's local government application, annexed with the memo of petition regarding this issue. Seeking both certiorari and mandamus relief at this stage is premature because an alternative legal remedy is still available. Constitutional Courts intervene only when all other options are exhausted, which is not the situation here. Moreover, there is no final government decision for this court to review, and Article 199 of the constitution does not apply to disputes involving private parties. Since the Supreme Court is already considering the requested relief in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 5731 of 2024 (within the same Civil Petition), and a restraining order is operating, this court cannot entertain the current petition. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 941 | 2025 SHC KHI 320 | Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Atif S/o Latif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made clear that police is free to take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-field duties in the interim period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 942 | 2025 SHC KHI 1685 | Const. P. 2026/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Naveen Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-MAY-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 943 | 2025 SHC KHI 1738 | Const. P. 891/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Hyder Sultani & Ors (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) | 28-APR-25 | Yes | The court is of the considered view that "regularization" means immediate, permanent hiring of qualified contract employees as per the law, and without legal provisions, it is not possible. While the Constitution (Articles 4, 3, and 38) guarantees legal protection, equality, fair labor practices, and improved living standards, the petitioners' counsel has not presented any rules allowing the respondent (No. 2) to regularize their services. Although the respondents admit the petitioners work for them, the court is of the view that without a specific law, rule, or policy for regularization, it cannot assist the petitioners at this stage. This court leaves it to the respondent (No. 2) to consider their cases for suitability according to their own rules and regulations. Consequently, the petition is deemed not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution and is dismissed along with any pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 944 | 2025 SHC KHI 1785 | Const. P. 1617/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mansoorul Haque Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pak.& ors. (Respondent) | 24-JUN-25 | Yes | It is a settled principle that merit-based reinstatement entitles employees to full "back benefits" (retroactive pay), as established by the Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Sharif v. Inspector General of Police (supra). Exceptions arise if reinstatement is due to procedural defects (pending fault determination) or reduced penalties. FR 54 treats periods of full paid absence as duty. The petitioner's counsel argues the 'gainful employment' exception does not apply, as the Respondent failed to prove it, and his pro bono legal work is not "gainful employment." However, given the Supreme Court's previous ruling disallowing the petitioner's back benefits due to insufficient evidence of non-gainful employment, this court cannot contradict that decision. The onus is on the petitioner to present new evidence in the proper forum to substantiate his non-employment during the intervening period. 11. For the reasons stated above, this petition is dismissed with pending application(s), if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.967-K/2025 Mansoorul Haque Solangi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 945 | 2025 SHC KHI 1654, 2025 SHC KHI 1666, 2025 SHC KHI 1681 | Const. P. 3835/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Junaid Khalil (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-25 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, we are of the considered view that the matter of the petitioners needs to be processed further for regularization of their services as Naib Qasid and Driver as they have been appointed on regular posts (LARMIS), through a competitive process. 11. For all the above-mentioned reasons, we allow these petitions along with all pending application(s) in terms of order dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in C.P. No. D-4291 of 2020 and C.P. No. D-7528 of 2018, which decision was upheld by the Supreme Court vide order dated August 24 2023 in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 517-K of 2023. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.977-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Board of Revenue v. Junaid Khalil Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 946 | 2025 SHC KHI 1343 | Const. P. 2523/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Khalid Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-MAY-25 | Yes | Given the petitioner's similar situation, having been appointed in 1986 and obtaining his B.Tech (Hons) in 2007, this petition is disposed of in line with the Supreme Court's decision on October 7, 2011, in Civil Appeal No. 241 of 2011, with all resulting benefits to be provided to the petitioner within three months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 947 | 2025 SHC KHI 2142 | Const. P. 2723/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Shehbaz Haider (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 22-AUG-25 | Yes | We, for the aforesaid reasons, allow this constitutional petition and direct the competent authority/respondents to grant him proforma promotion along with his colleagues in BS-19/20, if they have been granted such rank, by way of circulation. As the petitioner has already retired, therefore, his proforma promotion will not affect the seniority of any person already in service, and he will be entitled to his emoluments and pensionary benefits. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 948 | 2025 SHC KHI 2067 | Const. P. 6202/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ayaz Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-AUG-25 | Yes | Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court has a discretionary power to act in support of the law and protect constitutional rights. This power is reserved for extraordinary situations to ensure justice is served, not to allow injustice to continue. If it is determined that substantial justice has already been achieved between the parties, the court may choose not to use this discretionary jurisdiction. 14. Since the petitioner has repeatedly challenged the decision and his appeals have consistently been rejected by all competent authorities, including the Prime Minister, there is no reason to interfere with the findings under Article 199 of the Constitution. 15. This petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s), if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4644/2025 Ayaz Ahmed Memon v. Federation of Pakistan, through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed. Leave Refused |
| 949 | 2025 SHC KHI 2432 | Const. P. 5954/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-25 | Yes | Primarily, appointments to government positions made on an officiating or additional/current charge basis are temporary, for a specific purpose, and cannot violate established laws or be continued indefinitely. Such practices can cause frustration among other employees, hinder the promotion of deserving candidates, and undermine the principles of transparency and fairness essential for good governance. The legal system requires that permanent vacancies be filled promptly to avoid the spoils system and ensure that civil servants are appointed based on merit. However, in the present case, this Court finds that the petitioner has no vested right to claim BS-20 position without regular promotion under the current recruitment rules, even though he currently has temporary charge of it, which is a stop gap arrangement till eligible officer of that cadre is appointed. 16. The petition is deemed "misconceived" and is dismissed along with pending application(s) without any order for costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1144-K/2025 Muhammad Rafiq v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 950 | 2025 SHC KHI 2155 | Const. P. 2309/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ahmed Ramzani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-AUG-25 | Yes | In principle, the High Court???s jurisdiction is supervisory, not appellate, and it must respect the finality and binding nature of a Supreme Court judgment. The petitioners to approach the appropriate forum for their grievance, which is the Supreme Court itself, as a similar matter is already being handled there, in such circumstances, the order dated 07.8.2025 passed in C.P No.503 of 2022 is recalled, consequently, both petitions and all pending applications are dismissed, without dilating upon the merits of the case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1224-K/2025 Ahmed Ramzani v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & Others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 951 | 2025 SHC KHI 1524 | Const. P. 2764/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hafiz Muhammad Usman and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-25 | Yes | It is established law that long or satisfactory service alone does not grant a right to regularization for ad-hoc or contract employees, nor can High Courts revive expired contracts or alter their terms and conditions of service (Deputy Commissioner Upper Dir v. Nusrat Begum (2022 SCMR 964), Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa v. Saeed ul Hasan (2021 SCMR 1376), Province of Punjab v. Prof. Dr. Javed Iqbal (2022 SCMR 897), Khushal Khan Khattak University v. Jabran Ali Khan) (2021 SCMR 977),. Primarily, regularization requires an executive policy or specific statute. Absent such a policy or statute, this Court lacks jurisdiction to order regularization. 6. However, this petition for the regularization of contract employees at the Lyari Development Authority (LDA) is disposed of in the terms that they were hired in 2014 for the Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Town (SMBBT) project to develop land management software, and their case needs to be remitted to the competent authority of the respondents as this decision is based on the recommendation of the Minister for Local Government, Sindh, which is in alignment with the Lyari Development Act 1993, and the Provincial Cabinet decision from March 2018, endorsing the regularization of qualified contract employees of different departments of government of Sindh. The competent authority is directed to decide on their regularization within three months after hearing the petitioners. This decision must consider their current serving status and the established legal principles regarding regularization, as discussed. The regularization issue is further supported by the SMBBT project's sponsoring agency having transitioned to the Local Government Housing Town Planning Department. 7. This petition is disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 952 | 2025 SHC HYD 1937 | Const. P. 2415/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zafar Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 09-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 953 | 2025 SHC KHI 1752 | Const. P. 2750/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mehtab Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-JUN-25 | Yes | As a Constitutional Court, this Court is tasked with ensuring public sector institutions operate lawfully, safeguarding public interest and citizens' rights. In this case, the regularization process for the petitioner was found to lack the backing of law, rules, or policy, thereby precluding their claim for regularization. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate any illegality or irregularity in the respondents' actions, thus providing no basis for this Court's interference under its writ jurisdiction to regularize his services based on ELP enrollment which concluded on January 16, 2020. 12. This petition lacks merit and is therefore, dismissed, along with any pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 954 | 2025 SHC KHI 1345 | Const. P. 3028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Javed Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 12-MAY-25 | Yes | We also note the Supreme Court's order dated 03.06.2019 in C.P Nos 575-K to 578-K and 590-K to 594-K /2018, where Pakistan Steel withdrew its petitions because teaching staff had already been regularized, leading to the dismissal of the petitions. 9. Therefore, this petition is concluded following the Supreme Court of Pakistan's orders dated March 21, 2017, and June 3, 2019, in the previously mentioned cases. There will be no order regarding costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.925-K/2025 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills, Karachi v. Javed Iqbal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 955 | 2025 SHC KHI 1419 | Const. P. 1123/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Rizwan Akbar Arain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-25 | Yes | Petitioner???s initial request for regularization with benefits from retrospect effect is not feasible at this stage to be discussed for the reason that petitioner earlier case has already been set at naught, the Petitioner now seeks this Court???s order for the release of the seniority list, as per the order dated September 2, 2013 in earlier round of litigation, and the same time-scale promotion (under SRO 1404(I)/2019) granted to his colleagues from January 31, 2020, subject to final outcome of the decision of the Islamabad High Court if not earlier released. Recognizing this issue, we direct the Respondents' competent authority to resolve his seniority and time-scale promotion issues within three months after hearing the Petitioner subject to final decision of the learned Islamabad High Court if not decided earlier. 8. This petition is disposed of under these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 956 | 2025 SHC KHI 2436 | Const. P. 817/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mrs. Naheed (Petitioner) VS NBP and Another (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.4913/2025 National Bank of Pakistan, through President, Karachi and another v. Naheed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 957 | 2025 SHC KHI 2266 | Const. P. 1462/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | SIP Rafiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1198-K/2025 SIP Rafiq Ahmed v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 958 | 2025 SHC KHI 2437 | Const. P. 287/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Prof: Dr. Moonis Ahmar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.4941/2025 Prof. Dr. Moonis Ahmar v. Province of Sindh, through the Chief Minister, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 959 | 2025 SHC KHI 3227 | Const. P. 1476/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Umeed Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 20-OCT-25 | Yes | This contempt application is disposed of. The petitioner shall approach the learned Sessions Judge, Dadu accordingly. However, no further application shall be entertained in the disposed of matter. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the learned Sessions Judge, Dadu, for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 960 | 2025 SHC HYD 3289 | Const. P. 962/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Khan Muhammad @ Papo & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 961 | 2025 SHC KHI 2607 | Const. P. 4437/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mehmood Akhtar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-SEP-25 | Yes | Be that as it may this petition stands disposed of in the terms of the judgment dated 12.09.2017 passed in the case of Kaneez Zehra Kazmi and preceding paragraphs, along with pending applications with no order as to costs. The said exercise shall be undertaken within three months from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 962 | 2025 SHC KHI 3223 | Const. P. 920/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Owais Durrani (Petitioner) VS S.M. Saleem & Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-25 | Yes | In view of above, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending applications with directions that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and the marriage ceremony shall be completed as suggested without interference of police, till that date, subject to all just exceptions as permitted under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 963 | 2025 SHC KHI 3224 | Const. P. 937/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Huma Noor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-25 | Yes | If this is the position of the case, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed application in terms of the statement of the SHO concerned and the counsel that parties have compromised the matter outside the Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 964 | 2025 SHC HYD 3498 | Const. P. 1550/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 20-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 965 | 2025 SHC KHI 2508 | Const. P. 1355/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Zahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 966 | 2026 SHC KHI 300 | Const. P. 414/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Welcome Industrial Service (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 967 | 2026 SHC KHI 267 | Const. P. 4800/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Furqan Khalid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 968 | 2026 SHC KHI 250 | Const. P. 1557/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Inchauli CHS Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that once elections have been ordered under court supervision, subsequent petitions seeking the same relief become academic or infructuous. It is also well settled that once the relief sought has been overtaken by events or already complied with under judicial direction, the petition cannot be maintained and is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. It is also a settled principle of law that intervention in matters where an election process is underway under judicial supervision may disrupt the lawful process and is not ordinarily warranted. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No further orders are required in view of the prior directions contained in CP No. D-6317/2025, and the Nazir shall continue to supervise the conduct of the elections, as per earlier directions. The petitioners are at liberty to raise grievances, including the legal grounds before the concerned officer, as agitated before this Court, if any, which shall also be entertained and decision be made in accordance with the law. 11. These petition along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 969 | 2026 SHC KHI 359 | Const. P. 3591/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sameer (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh, to conduct a fair, transparent, and impartial enquiry into the subject land, examine the relevant revenue record, including Village Form-II and Village Form-VII-B entries, and determine the lawful entitlement of the parties strictly in accordance with law. The Senior Member shall decide the matter after hearing all stakeholders and pass a reasoned order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Till such time, status quo with regard to the subject property shall be maintained, and the Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh, shall ensure protective custody of the land so as to safeguard the rights of the parties during the pendency of enquiry. 8. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 970 | 2026 SHC KHI 104 | Const. P. 281/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Nasir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 971 | 2026 SHC KHI 351 | Const. P. 4039/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Jawed Iqbal & Shunaid Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 13-FEB-26 | Yes | It is a settled principle of law that where a special statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal of grievances and regulation of matters falling within its domain, the same must be resorted to before invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Since the Act ibid envisages the constitution of a Committee under Section 8 thereof to examine and grant approval in respect of any alteration, renovation, or development concerning a protected heritage property, the Petitioners are required to approach the said forum for appropriate permission, strictly in accordance with law and just upon approach the committee shall take final decision in accordance with law within reasonable time. 9. Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the case, the instant Petition along with pending application(s), is disposed of with the direction that the Petitioners may avail the remedy available under the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act, 1994 and other applicable laws, whereafter any development activity shall be subject to approval granted by the competent authority in terms of the said Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 972 | 2026 SHC KHI 360 | Const. P. 136/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Shoaib Ahmed Butt (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, it is held that the Respondents may proceed in accordance with law regarding the subject accommodation if the same is not allocable to the Petitioner under the Accommodation Policy applicable to his service cadre; However, the Petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the presently occupied quarter except after being considered for and, if available, allotted alternate official accommodation commensurate with his entitlement under the relevant policy; In case no such alternate accommodation is presently available, the Petitioner shall be allowed reasonable time/three months to retain possession of the subject premises until suitable accommodation is provided in accordance with the rule and /or he may obtain private accommodation in the intervening period, which is subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. however this observation is tentative and shall not prejudice the case of either party. 11. Without touching the merits of the case, the captioned Petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 973 | 2026 SHC KHI 501 | Const. P. 5983/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Safoorah Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 04-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 974 | 2026 SHC KHI 505 | Const. P. 1076/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Faisal Hameed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 975 | 2026 SHC KHI 627 | Const. P. 5783/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Aslam Shakoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | Nevertheless, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in terms of a common order dated 18.2.2026 passed in C.P. No. D-815 of 2023 and other connected petitions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 976 | 2026 SHC KHI 38 | Const. P. 923/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | National Textile Foundation (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, since the cancellation order suffers from justiciable ground and failure to afford an opportunity of hearing, the same cannot be sustained. The impugned order is therefore set aside, with the direction that the competent authority may, if so advised, proceed afresh strictly in accordance with law after issuing proper notice to the petitioner and providing an adequate opportunity to submit the requisite documents and defend its case. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two months. 9. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 977 | 2026 SHC KHI 36 | Const. P. 4461/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Asif Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-JAN-26 | Yes | Thereafter Miscellaneous Application has been moved and it was lastly fixed on 03.12.2015, thereafter, there is no progress and on the very date no body was in attendance on behalf of petitioner. This Court is left with no option but to dismiss the Miscellaneous Application for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 978 | 2026 SHC KHI 89 | Const. P. 7768/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Farrokh K. Captain (Petitioner) VS S.B.C.A and Ors (Respondent) | 19-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 979 | 2026 SHC KHI 423 | Const. P. 1012/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | A. Tahir Thr. Abbas Bandukwala Thr. Adnan Abbas (Petitioner) VS Xth ADJ, Karachi South and Others (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | Lastly, the findings recorded by the learned Appellate Court are findings of fact arrived at after remand, examination of the postman, and scrutiny of documentary evidence based on the cross-examination of the witness. In these circumstances, the authorities cited by learned counsel for the petitioners are distinguishable and do not advance the petitioners??? case. The conclusion of willful default recorded by the learned Appellate Court is based on proper appreciation of evidence and correct application of law. 19. The constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is extraordinary and discretionary, meant to correct orders passed in violation of law or without lawful authority. It does not extend to reappraisal of evidence or substitution of findings of fact recorded by the Courts below after proper appreciation of evidence, unless such findings of Appellate Court suffer from a jurisdictional defect, misreading, non-reading of material evidence, perversity, or patent illegality. Therefore, the petitioners were rightly held to be willful defaulters, attracting eviction under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. 20. Accordingly, the instant Constitutional Petitions, being devoid of merit, are dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 980 | 2026 SHC KHI 504 | Const. P. 6452/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Arshad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS National Cement Employees C.H.S & Ors (Respondent) | 04-MAR-26 | Yes | In these circumstances, we are of the considered view that the Award dated 04.05.2020 in ABN Case No.08/2020 is still valid, subsisting and binding. The plea of non-availability of land, being a self-created or administrative constraint, cannot defeat execution of the Award. The executing authority is obligated to proceed in accordance with law and cannot decline execution unless compliance is shown to be legally impossible, not merely inconvenient. 15. Accordingly, the objections raised by Respondent No.1 are not sustainable. The competent authority is directed to proceed with execution of the Award strictly in accordance with law after hearing all concerned and to ensure that the petitioner???s lawful allotment is enforced without discrimination. 16. The petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 981 | 2026 SHC KHI 235 | Const. P. 131/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Younis Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 982 | 2026 SHC KHI 340 | Const. P. 6509/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Muhammad Hussain Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is clarified that in case of any resistance or obstruction by the occupants or any person claiming through respondents Nos. 4, 5 & 6, the law enforcement agencies shall take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law. 8. With these directions, the instant petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 983 | 2026 SHC KHI 284 | Const. P. 5102/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Lutuf Shah (Petitioner) VS Zarai Tarqiati Bank and Ors (Respondent) | 04-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 984 | 2026 SHC KHI 291 | Const. P. 972/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Mahnoor Tahir D/o Tahir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Dr. Mohammad Ahsan Baig (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 985 | 2026 SHC KHI 418 | Const. P. 2365/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mumtaz Begum (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent authority of NADRA to examine the case of the petitioner afresh, provide her an opportunity of hearing, and pass a speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of this order and if the order goes against the petitioner, she may avail the remedy as per law, as suggested for adjudication of the mater by producing the documentary evidence. 8. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 986 | 2026 SHC KHI 425 | Const. P. 4653/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Saqib (Petitioner) VS Rollins Industries Pvt Ltd & Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 987 | 2025 SHC HYD 3562 | Const. P. 34/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Haji Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 988 | 2026 SHC KHI 48 | Const. P. 4171/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Saad Malook (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioners, if so advised, shall file his complaint by using Smart Complaint Redressal Mechanism (SCRM) of the SBCA, who shall deal with the same in accordance with its own SOPs within reasonable time. This proposition is accepted by petitioner???s counsel. By consent, the petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with listed / pending application(s), if any. A copy of this order shall be sent to DG SBCA for information. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 989 | 2026 SHC KHI 305 | Const. P. 5927/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shamshad Coop Agricultural Marketing & Credit Soci (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, with consent of the parties, Justice (R) Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui is hereby appointed as Commissioner/Election Officer to conduct and supervise the election of the petitioner society strictly in accordance with the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020 and the Rules framed thereunder, including finalizing the voters??? list as per bylaws of the society and law, and completing the entire election process within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. He is further authorized to conduct the election at his convenience, to receive and decide objections, if any, in the interest of the society. He may also take financial decisions strictly limited to day-to-day affairs necessary for the completion of the election process. The parties shall extend full cooperation to the Commissioner/Election Officer and shall not interfere in the election process in any manner. The fee of Justice (R) Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui is fixed at Rs.200,000/-, which shall be paid by the petitioner society in advance. 7. With these directions, the petition, along with pending application(s) stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 990 | 2026 SHC KHI 634 | Const. P. 3752/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Siddiqullah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | Prime facie, the refusal to grant such encashment is therefore contrary to the CBA agreement and discriminatory. 13. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the respondents to reconsider the petitioner???s case within one month without fail after providing a meaningful hearing to him. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 991 | 2026 SHC KHI 535 | Const. P. 4073/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Fareed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 992 | 2026 SHC HYD 682 | R.A (Civil Revision) 139/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 1998 | Dadu & Ors (Applicant) VS Ziaul Haq &Ors (Respondent) | 23-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 993 | 2026 SHC KHI 517 | Const. P. 5184/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 994 | 2026 SHC KHI 294 | Const. P. 123/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Zulfiqar Ali Through Attorney Zahoor Alam (Petitioner) VS Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another (Respondent) | 06-FEB-26 | Yes | The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 995 | 2026 SHC KHI 377 | Const. P. 5566/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Humayyun Bakht (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that inclusion of a person???s name in the PNIL without any legal basis or due process violated Article 15 and other fundamental rights, and keeping the name of petitioner on the PNIL has no statutory backing and cannot override constitutional freedoms. Similarly, when the procedure lacked due process and cogent legal justification, the freedom of movement cannot be curtailed arbitrarily and must adhere to statutory safeguards as authorities must provide written reasons and afford an affected person a meaningful opportunity to be heard before placing names on restrictive lists, failing which such acts violate fundamental rights and are liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a declaration that the respondents are duty bound to remove the petitioner???s name from the PNIL and restore his right to travel unless a lawful basis supported by due process and clear legal authority is shown. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 996 | 2026 SHC KHI 91 | Const. P. 5615/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the petition merits acceptance, with directions to the competent authority of Respondents to recalculate and release all outstanding post-retirement benefits/dues if not earlier paid to him, and pensionary benefits if any forthwith, strictly in accordance with law, however the same shall not be withheld on the aforesaid analogy, as discussed supra.. 15. This petition stands allowed in the above terms along with pending application(s) if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 997 | 2026 SHC KHI 226 | Const. P. 4027/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Amir Suleman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, the continued non-reinstatement of the petitioner, despite setting aside of the General Order dated 11.03.2024, is without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits strictly in accordance with law within a period of one week from the date of receipt of this order. However with no order as to costs. All pending application(s) are disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 998 | 2026 SHC KHI 254 | Const. P. 2569/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 999 | 2026 SHC KHI 123 | Const. P. 6994/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mujeeb ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 1000 | 2021 SHC KHI 1406 | Const. P. 792/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) | 11-MAR-21 | Yes | contract employees | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1001 | Nil | Const. P. 6171/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Syed Shah Wajid Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.867-K/2016 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2017 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed | |
| 1002 | Nil | Const. P. 2187/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Dr. Asha Bai (Petitioner) VS Chairman KPT and Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1003 | Nil | Const. P. 5472/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shahid Iqbal Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent) | 20-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.573-K/2018 Shahid Iqbal Shaikh v. The Govt. of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1004 | Nil | Const. P. 4045/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Taj Rani (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.70-K/2018 Mst: Taj Rani v. The President National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1005 | 2019 PLC (CS) 791 | Const. P. 2377/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Atif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sect: Ministry of Textile Ind. and Ors (Respondent) | 31-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1006 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1145 | Const. P. 6911/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Imtiaz Ahmed Barakzai (Petitioner) VS Federal Tax Ombudsman and Ors (Respondent) | 08-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1007 | 2018 PLC CS 89 | Const. P. 178/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Khan Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1008 | 2019 CLC 85 | Const. P. 1144/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amir S/o Abdul Zahoor (Petitioner) VS Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | 26-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.533-K/2017 Amir v. Nasir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1009 | Nil | Const. P. 4348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Dileep Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.A.73-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others,C.P.L.A.426-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed | |
| 1010 | Nil | Const. P. 5541/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) | 20-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.705-K/2018 Tanveer Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1011 | 2018 PLC CS 398 | Const. P. 411/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Dr. Amir Bux and others (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) | 30-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1772/2017 Dr. Amir Bux and others v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1012 | 2018 PLC CS Note 108 | Const. P. 6254/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Prof: Abdul Razzaque Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 26-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.655-K/2017 Prof: Abdul Razzaque Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1013 | Nil | Const. P. 1798/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Petitioner) VS D.G Ports & Shipping and Ors (Respondent) | 18-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.526-K/2017 Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Guarantee) Ltd. v. D.G. (Port & Shipping) and others,C.A.62-K/2019 Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Guarantee) Ltd. v. D.G. (Port & Shipping) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1014 | 2018 CLC Note 51 | Const. P. 1368/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Niaz Hussain Shah S/o Shah Hussain (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samina Iqbal & Another (Respondent) | 10-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1015 | Nil | Const. P. 5542/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Noorullah Abro & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3657/2017,C.A.1599/2017,C.P.L.A.3664/2017,C.P.L.A.4780/2017,C.P.L.A.3708/2017,C.P.L.A.3658/2017,C.A.1606/2017,C.A.1596/2017,C.A.1595/2017 SCP | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Disposed of as not pressed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed | |
| 1016 | Nil | Const. P. 1098/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Bakhu Khan (Petitioner) VS Aamir Noor & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1017 | Nil | Const. P. 190/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Aqsa Mastoi (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1018 | Nil | Const. P. 1096/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ali & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1019 | Nil | II.A. 43/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Saba and others (Appellant) VS Mst. Fatima and others (Respondent) | 22-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1020 | Nil | Const. P. 357/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ishrat (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) | 25-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1021 | Nil | Const. P. 1952/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Syed Ali Ammar Jafry and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 02-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.424-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited and another v. Syed Ali Ammaar Jafrey and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1022 | 2020 SHC KHI 1587, 2021 PLC (CS) 526 | Const. P. 6090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Farrukh Mirza (Petitioner) VS The Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | 26-FEB-20 | Yes | The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.386-K/2020 Dr. Farrukh Mirza v. The Secretary Finance Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution |
| 1023 | Nil | Const. P. 3170/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Aliya Shabnam (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1024 | Nil | Const. P. 3172/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Husan Nayab (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1025 | Nil | Const. P. 3189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Captain (R) Javed Afzal & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.I.A.C.L & Ors (Respondent) | 09-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.442-K/2019 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd.,C.A.22-K/2020 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted, Adjourned | |
| 1026 | 2024 SBLR Sindh 210 | Const. P. 166/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAY-19 | Yes | Reverting to the plea taken by the Petitioner that other seven candidates were allowed to appear in the interview and he was left out. The aforesaid plea of the Petitioner cannot be considered as a valid ground to appear in the interview; therefore we do not see any discrimination on their part as discussed supra. The Petitioner has failed to make out a case on the basis of discrimination | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.390-K/2019 Sajid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 1027 | 2018 SBLR Sindh 134 | Const. P. 3199/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Bakht Siddiqui and 61 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.409-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Bakht Siddique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1028 | Nil | Const. P. 2912/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zafar Akbar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | PTV---since the representation of the petitioner has already been decided and prima-facie there is findings against him and the said findings are not impugned before this court, thus cannot be dilated upon. In view of such state of affairs, we without touching the merits of the case on the issue of his promotion in the next Rank, hold that, basically the purpose of filling of this lis is over, thus cannot be stretched further, on the premise that once the Respondent-Pakistan Television Corporation has decided the representation of the Petitioner which provides him fresh cause of action if he at all feels himself aggrieved of such order on his representation, he can file fresh petition if he is so advised, subject to all just exceptions. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.4404/2019 Zafar Akbar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Information, Government of Pakisan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 1029 | Nil | Const. P. 4460/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Marvi Aslam & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1030 | Nil | Const. P. 422/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Arshad (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1031 | Nil | Const. P. 810/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Nek Muhammad Jakhrani & another (Petitioner) VS Chairman WAPDA & others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1032 | Nil | Const. P. 503/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1033 | Nil | Const. P. 191/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Noor Muhammad Soomro & Other (Respondent) | 26-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1034 | Nil | Cr.Bail 4/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | MOHISIN ABBAS & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1035 | Nil | Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Peer Bux (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 19-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1036 | Nil | Const. P. 2034/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mir Asghar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.413-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Mir Asghar Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1037 | Nil | Const. P. 2980/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Dhano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1038 | 2021 SHC KHI 638 | Const. P. 4335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-21 | Yes | we are of the view that this Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot interfere in the findings recorded by the competent authority of respondent-PTCL vide decision dated 25.07.2017 as we do not see any illegality, infirmity or material irregularity in its decision warranting interference of this Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed |
| 1039 | Nil | Const. P. 2230/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1040 | Nil | Const. P. 678/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Haji Dhani Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1041 | Nil | Cr.Bail 1085/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Chanessar Bheel (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 15-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1042 | 2020 SHC KHI 848, 2017 PLC CS 659 | Const. P. 3206/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Shaukat Saleem Akhund (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Ors (Respondent) | 16-MAR-20 | Yes | Applicant being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid departmental decision filed an application under Section 151 CPC (CMA No.4898/2016) for setting aside the Office Memorandum dated 08.01.2016. This Court, after hearing the parties on the listed application, vide order dated 26.01.2018, allowed the aforesaid application and declared the Office Memorandum dated 08.01.2016 being violative of the judgment dated 16.12.2015 passed by this Court--In view of forgoing discussion, the listed application is disposed of with direction to the Respondent-Pakistan Steel to calculate the service benefits of the Petitioner till his retirement and other benefits as admissible under the law and make payment of the same to the Petitioner within a period of (60) days from the date of receipt of this Order. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1070/2018 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi & another v. Shaukat Saleem Akhund & another,C.A.2028/2019 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi & another v. Shaukat Saleem Akhund & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed |
| 1043 | Nil | Const. P. 3577/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Rizwan Ali Kazmi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1044 | Nil | Const. P. 5645/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Waqas Khan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1045 | Nil | Const. P. 543/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ashique Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1046 | Nil | Const. P. 387/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1047 | 2020 PLC (CS) 1449 | Const. P. 7319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Shamim Naqvi (Petitioner) VS P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.401-K/2019 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others,C.A.21-K/2020 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1048 | Nil | Cr.Misc. 9/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst Jannat Khatoon (Applicant) VS D.I.G, Hyd and Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1049 | Nil | Const. P. 776/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Qadratullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 09-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1050 | 2020 PLC (CS) 682 | Const. P. 4492/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sibghatullah Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1051 | Nil | Const. P. 6057/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Rasheed Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1052 | 2018 PCr.LJ Note 99 | Cr.Bail 704/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | MST. IMTIAZ LATIF @ NIHA GUL NAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 18-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1053 | 2019 PLC (CS) 999 | H.C.A 239/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Allah Dino Khaskheli (Appellant) VS Zakir Mehmood & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.14-K/2019 Allah Dino Khaskheli v. Zakir Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1054 | Nil | Const. P. 897/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Insaaf Labour Union (Petitioner) VS C.E.O Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1055 | Nil | Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 11-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1056 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 535 | Const. P. 3467/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Shaista Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 26-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1057 | Nil | Const. P. 4389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Lutfullah Kalhoro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1058 | Nil | Const. P. 887/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Fashion Knits Ind. (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1059 | Nil | Const. P. 946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Lucky Knits Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3077/2018 M/s. Lucky Knits Private Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.83-K/2019 M/s. Lucky Knits Private Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1060 | Nil | Const. P. 7936/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Primer Minister of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 10-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.308/2019 Saeed Ahmed v. Prime Minister of Pakistan thr. Principal Secretary, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 1061 | Nil | Const. P. 5595/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sajid Ali Mangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3523/2017 Sajid Ali Mangi & others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1593/2017 Sajid Ali Mangi & others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 1062 | Nil | Const. P. 5660/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Waseem Abbas Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3669/2017 Adnan Razi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1604/2017 Adnan Razi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 1063 | Nil | Const. P. 4947/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Askari Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.24-K/2019 Askari Bank Limited v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Labour & Human Resource Department and another,C.A.97-K/2019 Askari Bank Limited v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Labour & Human Resource Department and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1064 | Nil | Const. P. 3127/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Al-Karam Textile Mills Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1065 | Nil | Const. P. 2659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Khalid Hameed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 30-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1066 | Nil | Const. P. 8282/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Sarwar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 29-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1067 | Nil | Const. P. 3000/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Qayum Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 07-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1068 | Nil | Const. P. 8018/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mirza Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Dow Univesity of Health Service & ors. (Respondent) | 11-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1135-K/2018 Mirza Ghulam Sarwar v. Dow University of Health Sciences , Karachi thr. its Vice Chancellor and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1069 | 2021 SBLR Sindh 1804 | Const. P. 5776/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) | 09-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.582-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Imran Ali Hashmi & others,C.P.L.A.733-K/2021 Dr.Masooda Qadri v. The University of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1070 | Nil | Const. P. 42/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Zulfiqar Shah (Petitioner) VS State (Respondent) | 24-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1071 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1157 | Const. P. 2268/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Attaullah Khan Chandio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 26-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1072 | 2019 PLC Lab. 182 | Const. P. 5262/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | M/s Inland Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mehdi Khan and Ors (Respondent) | 16-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1073 | Nil | Const. P. 4666/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Afaq A. Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary and Ors (Respondent) | 29-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1074 | Nil | Const. P. 143/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Abbas Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4960/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others,C.A.506/2020 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed | |
| 1075 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1209 | Const. P. 4132/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shahnawaz Khatri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1076 | Nil | Const. P. 4429/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s.Multiple Autoparts Industries(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2964/2018 M/s Multiple Autoparts Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.67-K/2019 M/s Multiple Autoparts Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1077 | 2018 PLC Lab. 219 | Const. P. 1919/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | 15-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.605-K/2017 Muhammad Saleem v. The National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1078 | Nil | Const. P. 605/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Mian Gul (Petitioner) VS Pak: Steel Mills Corp. and ors. (Respondent) | 07-APR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.307-K/2017 Mian Gul v. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1079 | Nil | Const. P. 507/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nawaz Ali Jatt (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | 06-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1080 | 2018 MLD 1389 | Cr.Bail 667/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | FARHAN HASSAN S/O SAGHEER HASSAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 01-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1081 | Nil | Const. P. 7964/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ashiq Ali Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.623-K/2018 Ashiq Ali Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1082 | 2019 MLD 1295 | H.C.A 425/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Asif Seemab Sindhu (Appellant) VS Administrator, DHA and Others (Respondent) | 10-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) | |||
| 1083 | Nil | Const. P. 3016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Fulcrum (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1084 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1258 | Const. P. 3600/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | M. Afzal Kauser (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1085 | Nil | Const. P. 3134/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Chairman and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.521-K/2018 Chairman & others (Officer & Non-Officers) Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Finance Revenue and others,C.A.19-K/2019 Chairman & others (Officer & Non-Officers) Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Finance Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed.there is also a short order/CO by HCJ | |
| 1086 | Nil | Const. P. 4527/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Zahra Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1087 | Nil | Const. P. 7813/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Good Luck Industries (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1088 | Nil | Const. P. 3525/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ghulam Rasool Saand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 05-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1089 | 2024 PLC Lab. 23 | Const. P. 5192/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Pirzada Jamaluddin Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 31-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1115-K/2018 Prof: Dr. Pirzada Jamaluddin Ahmed Siddiqui v. The Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1090 | Nil | Const. P. 3907/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 07-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1091 | Nil | Const. P. 1766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s A.F.K Fashion (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1092 | 2018 PLC Lab. 117 | Const. P. 5362/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | M/s Soneri Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Aurangzeb and Ors (Respondent) | 21-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.4308/2017 M/s Soneri Bank Ltd thr. its President, Karachi v. Aurangzeb & another,C.A.2113/2019 M/s Soneri Bank Ltd thr. its President, Karachi v. Aurangzeb & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed immediately after 3 months, | |
| 1093 | Nil | Cr.Bail 251/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Yar Muhammad son of Jan Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1094 | Nil | Cr.J.A 81/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Abdul Fattah @ Fattoo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-JUL-19 | Yes | Criminal Whether every member of an unlawful assembly, in respect of an offence committed in prosecution of common object/intention, is guilty of that offence? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1095 | Nil | Const. P. 836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Inayat (Petitioner) VS PO sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1096 | Nil | Const. P. 2195/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Danish (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1097 | Nil | Const. P. 1027/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mir Muhammad &others (Petitioner) VS S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1098 | Nil | Const. P. 3150/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sajad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1099 | Nil | Const. P. 2031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohammad Achar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1100 | Nil | Const. P. 5714/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Qurban Ali (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-19 | Yes | Regularization of their service under Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--instant Petition clearly falls within the doctrine of laches as the Petitioner filed the instant Petition in the month of October 2016 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to them in the month of September 2013, i.e. approximately 3 years prior to the filing of the instant Petition. Those who slept over there cannot be given premium. The observations of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) is guiding principle on the issue of laches-- Dismissed. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1101 | Nil | Const. P. 370/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shahmeer (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1102 | Nil | Const. P. 3130/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Faisal Mughal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.827/2020 Faisal Mughal v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Water and Power, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 1103 | Nil | Const. P. 3097/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | AzamKhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1104 | Nil | Const. P. 1893/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Basit & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1105 | Nil | Const. P. 2551/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Hakeem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1106 | Nil | Const. P. 2598/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Haroon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1107 | Nil | Const. P. 135/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Rafiq & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | J.P.485/2021 Khuwaid Ahmed v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 1108 | Nil | Const. P. 1638/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Latif & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1109 | Nil | Const. P. 1873/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mehnoon Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1110 | Nil | Const. P. 2633/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1111 | Nil | Const. P. 310/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Hai (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1075-K/2022 Nizamuddin Mansoori thr.L.Rs. v. Abdul Lateef Rajput & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | |
| 1112 | Nil | Const. P. 6001/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Anees Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.512-K/2019 Syed Anees Ali v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 1113 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 365 | Const. P. 1589/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 1589 of 2013,CP No. D- 1803 of 2015,CP No D- 2423 of 2015,CP No. D- 2834 of 2015,CP No. D- 847 of 2016, CP No. D- 958 of 2016, CP No. D- 1071 of 2016, CP No. D- 1173 of 2016, CP No. D- 1826 of 2016, CP No. D- 2179 of 2016, CP No. D- 2539 of 2016, CP No. D- 2656 of 2016, CP No. D- 2776 of 2016, CP No. D- 2941 of 2016, CP No. D- 3078 of 2016, CP No. D- 3148 of 2016, CP No. D- 3212 of 2016, CP No. D- 3391 of 2016, CP No. D- 3445 of 2016, CP No. D- 02 of 2017, CP No. D- 43 of 2017, CP No. D- 201 of 2017, CP No. D- 291 of 2017, CP No. D- 301 of 2017, CP No. D- 314 of 2017, CP No. D- 322 of 2017, CP No. D- 379 of 2017, CP No. D- 478 of 2017, CP No. D- 547 of 2017, CP No. D- 639 of 2017, CP No. D- 733 of 2017, CP No. D- 729 of 2017, CP No. D- 917 of 2017, CP No. D- 1000 of 2017, CP No. D- 1054 of 2017, CP No. D- 1067 of 2017, CP No. D- 1084 of 2017, CP No. D- 1085 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1344 of 2017, CP No. D- 1533 of 2017, CP No. D- 1576 of 2017, CP No. D- 1727 of 2017, CP No. D- 2071 of 2017, CP No. D- 2137 of 2017, CP No. D- 2403 of 2017, CP No. D- 2452 of 2017, CP No. D- 2608 of 2017, CP No. D- 2634 of 2017, CP No. D- 2835 of 2017, CP No. D- 2879 of 2017, CP No. D- 3018 of 2017, CP No. D- 3130 of 2017, CP No. D- 3273 of 2017, CP No. D- 3341 of 2017, CP No. D- 3345 of 2017, CP No. D- 3369 of 2017, CP No. D- 3696 of 2017, CP No. D- 3742 of 2017, CP No. D- 3808 of 2017, CP No. D- 129 of 2018, CP No. D- 163 of 2018, CP No. D- 332 of 2018, CP No. D- 413 of 2018, CP No. D- 505 of 2018, CP No. D- 736 of 2018, CP No. D- 1066 of 2018, CP No. D- 1526 of 2018, CP No. D- 2094 of 2018, CP No. D- 2194 of 2018, CP No. D- 2195 of 2018, CP No. D- 2334 of 2018, CP No. D- 2366 of 2018, CP No. D- 2451 of 2018, CP No. D- 2469 of 2018, CP No. D- 2683 of 2018, CP No. D- 3069 of 2018, CP No. D- 3215 of 2018, CP No. D- 3218 of 2018, CP No. D- 3221 of 2018, CP No. D- 3302 of 2018, CP No. D- 84 of 2019, CP No. D- 108 of 2019, CP No. D- 369 of 2019, CP No. D- 436 of 2019, CP No. D- 544 of 2019, CP No. D- 696 of 2019, CP No. D- 1137 of 2019, CP No. D- 1609 of 2019, CP No. D- 1683 of 2019, CP No. D- 1827 of 2019, CP No. D- 1836 of 2019, CP No. D- 1904 of 2019, CP No. D- 1929 of 2019 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Kaleemullah (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1114 | Nil | Const. P. 472/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zohaib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1115 | Nil | Const. P. 590/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Director School ducation Mirpurkhas & Ors (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1116 | 2020 PLC (CS) 1359 | H.C.A 15/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Karachi International container Terminal Ltd. (Appellant) VS Brig (Retd.) Arif Mahmud Malik (Respondent) | 23-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1117 | Nil | Const. P. 2295/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Yasir Arfat and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1118 | Nil | Const. P. 3069/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1119 | Nil | Const. P. 3221/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Akhlaq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1120 | Nil | Const. P. 1904/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sham Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1121 | Nil | Const. P. 2123/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1122 | Nil | Const. P. 3109/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Javed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1123 | Nil | Const. P. 1771/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1124 | Nil | Const. P. 2171/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shaman Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1125 | Nil | Const. P. 1882/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1126 | Nil | Const. P. 538/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Arif and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1127 | 2023 PLC CS Note 99 | Const. P. 3218/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.739-K/2019 Zaheer Ahmed v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1128 | Nil | Const. P. 872/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1129 | Nil | Const. P. 3535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1130 | Nil | Const. P. 2071/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mithal Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1131 | Nil | Const. P. 454/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mansoor A. Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.541-K/2019 Mansoor Ahmed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 1132 | Nil | Const. P. 3316/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 12-SEP-19 | Yes | Petitioner has rendered 32 years??? service, however, the benefits as provided under clause 19 of the Resolution as discussed supra have been denied to him and no plausible reason has been assigned for withholding the same, for which the Petitioner cannot be held responsible. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1133 | Nil | Const. P. 6572/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sumair Saeed (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Aviation & Ors (Respondent) | 11-SEP-19 | Yes | whether the transfer and posting of private Respondents is the domain of the Competent Authority of CAA, if they found the private Respondents to be worthy of posting at the particular post on acting/additional charge basis, in our view, this Court cannot interfere in the service affair of the Respondent-Authority until and unless it is shown that the said posting and transfer orders negate basic provision of law and Constitution, which is lacking in the present case | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1134 | 2021 PLC (CS) 415 | Const. P. 948/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Umer Yamin (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-19 | Yes | Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.621-K/2019 Umar Yameen v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deptt: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1135 | 2021 PLC (CS) 109 | Const. P. 4356/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mohammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills (Respondent) | 16-SEP-19 | Yes | the Respondent-Pakistan Steel Mills is/was competent to award minor penalty, if they find/found any employee to be guilty of the dereliction of duty, therefore, contention of the Petitioner that he was mistakenly demoted is not borne out of record. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.627-K/2019 Muhammad Ismail v. The Chairman Pakistan Steel, Bin Qasim, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1136 | 2021 PLC (CS) 51 | Const. P. 679/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 20-SEP-19 | Yes | whether the petitioner can be regularized in the Respondent-Department. We have noticed that the Petitioner has admitted that he accepted the contingent/work charged appointment--Petitioner's contingent/work charged service could not be converted into regular service--The Petitioner, in our view, has failed to make out his case for regularization of his work charged service as his case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant Petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s)---Before parting with this judgment, we may observe that that the petitioner has served from 1992 with some breaks but the fact of the matter is that he has a long service of more than two decades at his credit, therefore, it is not justified at the end of department after sucking the youth of petitioner and kicked him out on the pretext that his case does not fall in the aforesaid policy and that the post held by him being temporary and contingent/work charge paid, being not pensionable. Since the Petitioner is 58 years old and two years remaining to attain the age of superannuation, therefore, his services be continued till his date of superannuation. The salary issue of the Petitioner for the intervening period may be decided in accordance with the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1137 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 81 | Const. P. 417/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zameer Hussain (Petitioner) VS Registrar & Campus Administrator & Security Advisor (Respondent) | 16-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1138 | Nil | Const. P. 736/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mengho (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1139 | Nil | Const. P. 2094/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mrs. Tanweer Baloch (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1140 | Nil | Const. P. 1137/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1141 | Nil | Const. P. 1683/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Raju (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1142 | Nil | Const. P. 1836/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faraz Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1143 | Nil | Const. P. 2078/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Chairman HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1144 | Nil | Const. P. 942/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sikandar Hayat & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1145 | Nil | Const. P. 1587/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1146 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 68 | Const. P. 3065/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Rehan Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1147 | Nil | Const. P. 633/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Israr ul Haq (Petitioner) VS Sindh Educational Foundation & Ors (Respondent) | 05-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.533-K/2019 Israr-ul-Haq v. Ms Naheed Shah Durrani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1148 | Nil | Const. P. 139/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Abdul Sattar and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1149 | Nil | Const. P. 78/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sharoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1150 | Nil | Const. P. 556/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Sadiq Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1151 | Nil | Const. P. 83/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1152 | Nil | Const. P. 2963/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS THE State (Respondent) | 20-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1153 | Nil | Const. P. 2129/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Raza Khan Sawati and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1154 | Nil | Const. P. 6955/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sidra Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-SEP-19 | Yes | whether in the appointment of Respondent No.3, the discretion was rightly observed or not by the Competent Authority. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1155 | Nil | Const. P. 308/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Rizwan Akbar Arain (Petitioner) VS Chairman NHA & ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-19 | Yes | Contempt---that no appointment made on contract basis shall be regularized retrospectively and the contract/ad-hoc period of service cannot be counted in seniority of a Civil Servant as seniority can be reckoned from the date of regular appointment. Thus, the question of regularization from the date of contract employment is misconceived. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1156 | Nil | Const. P. 3057/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mohammad Saleh &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1157 | Nil | Const. P. 2999/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ramzan Solangi & others (Petitioner) VS Raza Muhammad and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1158 | Nil | Const. P. 2926/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1159 | 2023 PLC CS Note 94 | Const. P. 5859/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Kamran Chandio (Petitioner) VS P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent) | 17-SEP-19 | Yes | Inquiry proceedings against employee of PDHA. Employee of PDHA cannot approach this court in Constitutional Jurisdiction, as they are regulated by the Pakistan Defence Housing Authority Service Rules 2008, which are non-statutory. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1160 | Nil | Const. P. 521/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rights Now Pakistan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1161 | Nil | Const. P. 32/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1162 | Nil | Const. P. 917/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Jabbar Abid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1163 | Nil | Const. P. 2859/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Masood Aslam Jat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1164 | 2020 SHC SUK 659 | Const. P. 634/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Wahid & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | |||
| 1165 | 2021 SHC KHI 827 | Const. P. 3167/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Sad Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.407-K/2021 Syed Saad Ali & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC | |
| 1166 | 2020 SHC KHI 1080 | Const. P. 2729/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1797/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Urooj Fatima and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 1167 | 2020 SHC HYD 1777 | Const. P. 2645/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khalid Sahoowal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-20 | Yes | The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1168 | 2020 SHC KHI 2261 | Const. P. 6385/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1169 | 2020 SHC HYD 1283 | Const. P. 456/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Khalil-Ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS PEPCO Wapda &ors (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1170 | 2020 SHC HYD 482 | Cr.Bail 1423/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | BACHAL MALLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1171 | 2020 SHC KHI 210 | Const. P. 440/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mulla Idrees (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1172 | 2020 SHC HYD 1046 | Const. P. 518/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Furqan Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.734-K/2022 Syed Furqan Ali & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1173 | 2020 SHC HYD 2070 | Const. P. 197/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sht. Marvi (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1174 | 2020 SHC KHI 1157 | Const. P. 6066/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 10-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1175 | 2020 SHC HYD 354 | Const. P. 597/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Mohammad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1176 | 2021 SHC KHI 1093 | Const. P. 4327/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1177 | 2020 SHC HYD 104 | Const. P. 747/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1178 | 2020 SHC HYD 715 | Criminal Appeal 89/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2017 | Muhammad Paryal @ Haji (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 23-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1179 | 2020 SHC HYD 563 | Const. P. 230/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1180 | 2020 SHC HYD 520 | Const. P. 468/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Qurban Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1181 | 2020 SHC HYD 2061 | Const. P. 806/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Javed Baig. (Petitioner) VS The Director General Military Lands and Cantonment Department and others. (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1182 | 2020 SHC HYD 907 | Criminal Appeal 13/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | Fahad. (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1183 | 2020 SHC HYD 1864 | Const. P. 823/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS P.O SINDH and others (Respondent) | 09-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1184 | 2020 SHC HYD 1824 | Const. P. 856/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ameer Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1185 | 2023 PLC CS 48 | Const. P. 2406/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khairullah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.633-K/2020 Khairullah Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary of Universilies Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1186 | 2020 SHC HYD 1500 | Const. P. 245/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Faiza Bibi & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1187 | 2020 SHC HYD 478 | Const. P. 804/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Siddique and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1188 | 2020 SHC KHI 1914 | Const. P. 4542/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners??? promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1189 | 2020 SHC KHI 1751 | Const. P. 5647/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ghazala Mughal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1190 | 2020 SHC HYD 924 | Const. P. 1562/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1191 | 2020 SHC HYD 2452 | Const. P. 664/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Iqbal & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1192 | 2020 SHC HYD 1403 | Const. P. 381/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Hyderabad Railway Cantt: Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1193 | 2020 SHC HYD 1205 | Civil Revision 185/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Yousuf (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) | 11-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1194 | 2020 SHC KHI 2325 | Const. P. 4890/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Garibdas (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 18-NOV-20 | Yes | It is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, competent authority and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court. With the above observations and direction, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Let notice be issued for compliance to the Chief Secretary Sindh and the Secretaries of all the departments of the Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1195 | 2020 SHC KHI 371 | Const. P. 6275/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS D.J South Khi (Respondent) | 16-DEC-20 | Yes | ACR--Admittedly, the Petitioner is a Civil Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal which has the exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of Civil Servants working in Sindh Subordinate Judiciary under the law and the petitioner has a right to file an appeal against the impugned order adversely affecting the terms and condition of his service before the Tribunal subject to the qualification provided therein. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1196 | 2020 SHC HYD 1168 | Const. P. 2115/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mansoor and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1197 | 2021 SHC KHI 93 | Const. P. 994/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s. Guidance Schooling System Thr. M. Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Mst. Seema Mohsin and others (Respondent) | 05-JAN-21 | Yes | Rent matter-- In view of the above, no illegality is found to have been committed by both courts below. Writ of certiorari against the order passed in rent jurisdiction can be exercised only if the order is beyond the jurisdiction or patently illegal, which is not the present case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1198 | 2023 SHC KHI 101 | Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-AUG-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 1199 | 2020 SHC KHI 1625 | Const. P. 5577/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Amjad Khan and Others (Respondent) | 22-DEC-20 | Yes | K-Electric-NIRC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | ||
| 1200 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 949 | Const. P. 2647/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-DEC-20 | Yes | relieving him from the post of Director Anti-Quackery Sindh Health Care Commission (`SHCC`)--In view of the above discussion, the petition is not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent- SHCC. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.104-K/2021 Dr.Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 1201 | 2020 SHC HYD 1594 | Const. P. 173/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1289-K/2020 Ishaque Ahmed v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1202 | 2020 SHC KHI 245 | Const. P. 529/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Omer Shah (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1203 | 2020 SHC HYD 1079 | Criminal Appeal 38/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Karim Bukhsh and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 12-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1204 | 2021 SHC KHI 690 | Const. P. 6435/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Danish Sidat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-21 | Yes | withholding the appointment of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (BPS-09) on the ground of pending criminal case--with directions to the competent authority / Inspector General of Police, Sindh to scrutinize the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (BPS-09) and if the petitioner is found fit in all respects to be admitted as Assistant Sub-Inspector in Sindh Police, his candidature may be processed for the appointment strictly under the Recruitment Rules for the aforesaid post within one month from the date of communication of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1205 | 2021 SHC KHI 304 | Const. P. 8908/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Pakistan Television Crop Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Habib Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) | 02-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.2836/2021 M/s Pakistan Television Corporation Limited thr. Muhammad Atif, Senior Personnel Officer, Karachi v. Muhammad Habib Ahmed Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1206 | 2020 SHC HYD 2314 | I. A 14/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Saeeda Bano (Appellant) VS Allied Bank limitd & another (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1207 | 2021 SHC KHI 778 | Const. P. 3815/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Maqsood Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 13-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1208 | 2020 SHC HYD 186 | Const. P. 3363/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1209 | 2021 SHC KHI 623 | Const. P. 858/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Taqi Muhammad Rajper (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-21 | Yes | Government Accommodation | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1210 | 2023 SHC KHI 482 | Const. P. 8033/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1439-K/2020 Muhammad Ayub Panhwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1211 | 2020 SHC HYD 276 | Const. P. 1633/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Munhadar Raza Shah (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1212 | 2020 SHC HYD 1804 | Const. P. 715/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | MUHAMMAD Juman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 06-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1213 | 2020 SHC HYD 1647 | Const. P. 363/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Pir Muhammad Hassan Qadir (Petitioner) VS Muhammad S/O Amoon (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.890-K/2020 Muhammad Mallah v. Pir Muhammad Qadir & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1214 | 2020 SHC HYD 2482 | Const. P. 730/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Shakeela (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Arif Abbasi & Others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1215 | 2020 SHC HYD 615 | Const. P. 16/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | General Secretary Fayaz Education Society Hyd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Javed Khan (Respondent) | 18-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.768-K/2020 General Secretary Fayaz Education Society Latifabad Hyderabad. v. Muhammad Javed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1216 | 2021 SHC KHI 1410 | Const. P. 3784/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Sakina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and 06 others (Respondent) | 25-JAN-21 | Yes | pension matter | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1217 | 2020 SHC HYD 1445 | Const. P. 1982/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1218 | 2020 SHC HYD 165 | Const. P. 164/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Samia Gulzar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1219 | 2020 SHC KHI 1667 | Const. P. 534/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mehmood Akhtar (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1220 | 2020 SHC KHI 279 | Const. P. 630/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-NOV-20 | Yes | We have noticed that the respondents have complied with the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court passed in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 in C.A. 30-K of 2014 and Crl. M.A 37-K of 2017 in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 and petitioner has been given a proforma promotion in BPS-20 with effect from 12.3.2017 one day before his retirement from service on 13.3.2017; thus no further indulgence of this court is required in the matter. It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1221 | 2020 SHC KHI 1005 | Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent) | 29-APR-20 | Yes | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of impugned Notification dated 21.04.2020 (page 37) shall remain suspended. To be listed on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. along with C.P No.D-6431/2019. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1222 | 2020 SHC KHI 124 | Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 19-NOV-20 | Yes | Contempt proceedings--The explanation offered by the respondents, prima-facie, is tenable under the law as the petitioner was considered for the promotion in DPC in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 12.05.2020. It is noted that the representative of SGA&CD opined for deferment of the promotion of the petitioner and consideration of his case after finalization of the proceedings against him, in our view, this is the correct approach. Prima-facie such decision of the DPC to clear him for promotion during the pendency of criminal proceedings is erroneous. However, his deferment shall be subject to the outcome of the criminal proceedings presently pending against him. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1223 | 2020 SHC KHI 204 | Const. P. 535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1224 | 2020 SHC HYD 66 | Const. P. 979/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 983,993,998/2020 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Azeem Khan (Petitioner) VS The State & Other (Respondent) | 08-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3633/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Abdul Azeem Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1225 | 2020 SHC KHI 297 | Const. P. 3399/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imtiaz Ali Sheikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue of project employees | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1226 | 2022 PLD Sindh 20 | Const. P. 847/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Khalid Ali Dars & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1227 | 2020 SHC KHI 994 | Const. P. 435/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shair Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1228 | 2020 SHC KHI 1775 | Const. P. 537/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Said Fateh Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1229 | 2020 SHC KHI 988 | Const. P. 53/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Post Master General Khi and Ors (Respondent) | 14-JAN-20 | Yes | Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1222/2020 Director General, Pakistan Post, Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Ibrahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1230 | 2023 SHC KHI 692 | Const. P. 1162/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Shabbir Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent) | 17-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1231 | 2021 SHC KHI 455 | Const. P. 4635/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Javed Raza Bhatti and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-21 | Yes | back benefits | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1262/2021 Javed Raza Bhatti and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1232 | 2021 SHC KHI 1134, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1453 | Cr.Bail 1737/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD KHAN KHOSO S/O KHAN MUHAMMAD KHOSO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 21-SEP-21 | Yes | Post-arrest bail--it appears that the applicant is Head Constable in Police Department and is bound to prevent the offenses in the area concerned; and, if he, from his acts or omissions, allows happening of the offense (s), or commits the offense, by escorting the vehicle, whereby he facilitated the co-accused to transport, the theft oil, thereby he breaches his official duties/obligations. The applicant, prima facie appears to be linked with the alleged offense of theft of a huge quantity of diesel oil, by allowing co-accused to tamper with the main Petroleum Pipe Line of PARCO-- | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1233 | 2021 SHC KHI 1429, 2024 PLC (CS) 524 | Const. P. 2207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Hafeez ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAR-21 | Yes | suspension from the service--SBCA--we are of the considered view that the Petitioner has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the disciplinary proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1234 | 2021 SHC KHI 216 | Const. P. 3736/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Noman Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1235 | 2022 SHC HYD 494 | II.A. 25/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Pakistan International Airline (Appellant) VS Suresh Kumar & Others (Respondent) | 19-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.166-K/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation v. Suresh Kumar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1236 | 2025 SHC KHI 1052 | Const. P. 5691/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sharjeel Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | This Court recognizes similar work, responsibilities, and standing between High Court establishment and district judiciary employees, despite different tiers, as both contribute to provincial justice administration. The High Court's administrative control under Article 203 of the constitution supports equal treatment under the "rule of parity." This applies to pay scales (equal pay for equivalent grades), standardized allowances (Judicial and Utility, with High Court percentage revisions extending to the district judiciary), other benefits (medical, housing, etc.), and pension benefits (if allowances are pensionable for High Court employees, the same should apply to the district judiciary). The rule of parity mandates equal treatment for similarly situated groups without discrimination in terms of Article 25 of the Constitution. The Government of Sindh is under its obligation to treat the employees of entire judiciary equally, so far as their perks and privileges are concerned without discrimination. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3354/2025 The Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and others v. Sharjeel Akhter and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 1237 | 2021 SHC KHI 1336 | Const. P. 5030/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Rafique Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | the petitioner has prayed that official respondents be directed to take over possession of the subject official accommodation i.e House No. Annexe No.2 situated at GOR-1 Bath Island Karachi from respondent No. 3 and to hand over the same to him as it has been allotted to him vide allotment order dated 16.11.2017 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1605-K/2021 Dr.Zeba Hussain Soomro v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1238 | 2021 SHC KHI 1087, 2024 YLR 713 | Const. P. 580/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Mansoob Ahmed Khatri and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 25-AUG-21 | Yes | principally the petitioners are seeking inclusion of `Orderly Allowance` in their pensionable emoluments in the light of Amendment No.19 in clause/regulation 46 of Chapter IV (Emoluments) of Civil Aviation Service Regulation-2014 (CSR-2014) and the decision of 179th meeting held on 1.8.2019 by Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA) Board Secretariat---Accordingly, while following the principle of law enunciated in I.A. Sherwani's case (ibid), and in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case while invoking the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, we hereby declare the impugned decision /action/order of the Respondent-CAA is in negation to the strict and prohibitory command contained in Article 25 of the Constitution, because the Petitioners have been treated with sheer discrimination, which cannot be approved on any premises whatsoever. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2285/2022 Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority through Director General, Karachi v. Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1239 | 2023 SHC KHI 52 | Const. P. 7622/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zulfiqar Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-JUN-23 | Yes | It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.5242/2023,C.P.L.A.5244/2023,C.P.L.A.5304/2021,C.P.L.A.1671-K/2021,C.P.L.A.6600/2021,C.A.352/2022,C.A.349/2022,C.A.347/2022,C.A.355/2022,C.P.L.A.6603/2021,C.P.L.A.2799/2023,C.P.L.A.5222/2023,C.M.A.8564/2023,C.P.L.A.3323/2023,C.P.L.A.5224/2023 SCP | Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed , Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Allowed, Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks) |
| 1240 | 2021 SHC KHI 178 | Const. P. 5777/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dr. Shaista Parveen (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.583-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Shaista Perveen & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1241 | 2021 SHC KHI 408 | Const. P. 6462/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Najam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | deceased quota | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 1242 | 2021 SHC LAR 584 | Cr.Bail 191/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mujeeb Rehman @ Mujahid (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 19-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1243 | 2021 SHC KHI 839 | Const. P. 2388/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Arifa Khatoon (Petitioner) VS The Governor of Sindh / Chancellor & Ors (Respondent) | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1244 | 2021 SHC LAR 1027 | Cr.Rev 52/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Wali Muhammad @ Hajan and Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-AUG-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1245 | 2021 SHC KHI 745 | Const. P. 5455/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Inayatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | The petitioner has challenged the notification dated 02.09.2021, in respect of his posting and transfer order as Principal (BS-20) National AGRO Technical Training Centre Hyderabad on the ground, inter alia, that the impugned notification was issued to post him under the junior officer--We are of the view that Article 212 of the Constitution ousts the jurisdiction of this Court in respect of the matters about terms and conditions of Civil Servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1246 | 2021 SHC KHI 732 | Const. P. 5144/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Dr. Altaf Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 28-APR-21 | Yes | they have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments/services be regularized in respondent-Water and Power Development Authority (`WAPDA`) without discrimination, with a further assertion that they have already served in WAPDA for a considerable period and they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis rather than joining fresh process with other candidates-- | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1519-K/2021 WAPDA through its Director Legal & others v. Dr.Haresh Kumar & others,C.P.L.A.1580/2022 Water and Power Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Lahore & others v. Dr. Altaf Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed/No Intereference |
| 1247 | 2021 SHC LAR 903 | Cr.Misc. 193/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Manzoor Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1248 | 2021 SHC KHI 155 | Const. P. 2191/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Saeed Akhter (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-21 | Yes | Primarily, this petition has served its purpose, which is disposed of in the terms, whereby the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to issue posting and transfer orders of the petitioner and the private respondent, if no disciplinary proceedings are pending against them, strictly under the schedule of the establishment of law department KMC, with correct description/designation of their respective posts as per their entitlement under the law. The said exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks from the date of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 1249 | 2021 SHC KHI 339 | Const. P. 1412/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ameet Kumar (Petitioner) VS The Chief Secretary Government of Sindh (Respondent) | 26-FEB-21 | Yes | joining, seniority and qualification | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.438-K/2022 Tahir Hussain & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Notice to Respondents and AG) |
| 1250 | 2021 SHC HYD 906 | Const. P. 152/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sat Bharai & another (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1251 | 2021 SHC HYD 289 | Const. P. 201/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Nabi Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1252 | 2021 SHC HYD 251 | Const. P. 1174/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sikandar Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1253 | 2021 SHC HYD 577 | Const. P. 1491/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Akhlaue Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1254 | 2021 SHC HYD 197 | Cr.Bail 840/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Imdad Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.150-K/2021 Imdad Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1255 | 2021 SHC HYD 944 | Civil Revision 159/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | M/s Kotri Roller Flour Mills (Applicant) VS Bheru Mal (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1256 | 2021 SHC HYD 451 | Conf.Case 23/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hassan @ Ali Hassan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 1257 | 2021 SHC HYD 420 | Const. P. 1478/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mst Hanifa Karim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.158-K/2022 Mst. Hanifa Karim & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1258 | 2021 SHC HYD 1090 | Cr.Tran 61/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | HAJI MIR HASSAN KHAN BHURGARI (Appellant) VS MUKHTIAR AHMED @ GUDO & OTHERS (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.155-K/2021 Haji Mir Massan Khan Bhurgari v. Mukhtiar Ahmed @ Gudo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 1259 | 2021 SHC HYD 1142 | Const. P. 745/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Asma Hameed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1260 | 2021 SHC HYD 230 | Cr.Bail 923/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Rajab Ali & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.152-K/2021 Rajab Ali Shah & another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh,Crl.A.17-K/2021 Rajab Ali Shah & another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 1261 | 2021 SHC HYD 301 | Civil Revision 122/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2001 | Haji Achar (Applicant) VS Qaisar Khan (Respondent) | 15-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1262 | 2021 SHC HYD 1039 | Const. P. 336/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Nawab (Respondent) | 13-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.66-K/2022 Muhammad Nawab Ali v. Muhammad Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1263 | 2021 SHC HYD 522 | Cr.Bail 652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Aijaz Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 29-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1264 | 2021 SHC HYD 655 | Const. P. 1328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mehboob Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1265 | 2021 SHC HYD 22 | Const. P. 182/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P.No.D-198 of 2021 [Qurban & another Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-435 of 2021 [Khalil Ahmed & anothervs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-479 of 2021 [Mushtaque Ali & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-509 of 2021 [Noorullah Dehraj vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-534 of 2021 [Nazar Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-668 of 2021 [Gul Mir vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-769 of 2021 [Mst. Razia & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-845 of 2021 [Abdul Majeed vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-914 of 2021 [Pir Bux & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1027 of 2021 [Ali Ahmed & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1070 of 2021 [Ayaz Ali & others vs. SHO PS Punhan Khan Chandio & another] C.P No.D-1198 of 2021 [Ali Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1277 of 2021 [Mukhtiar Ali & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1543 of 2021 [Behram Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1556 of 2021 [Khurram Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] -:2:- C.P No.D-182/2021 a/w connected petitions C.P No.D-1689 of 2021 [Muhammad Waris @ Suneel vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mevo Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1266 | 2021 SHC HYD 1327 | Const. P. 1523/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1267 | 2021 SHC HYD 469 | Cr.Misc. 93/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Rehmeed Raja (Applicant) VS SSP SBA & Others (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1268 | 2021 SHC HYD 559 | Const. P. 688/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imran (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1269 | 2022 SHC KHI 892 | Const. P. 2197/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | M/s Javedan Cement Ltd (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 11-JAN-22 | Yes | Compensation instead of reinstatment | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1210-K/2023 Ghulam Murtaza v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Notice) |
| 1270 | 2021 SHC HYD 403 | Const. P. 1181/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Ms. Allah Bachai Soomro (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 16-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1271 | 2021 SHC HYD 957 | Const. P. 1848/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Asif Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1272 | 2021 SHC HYD 18 | Const. P. 1857/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Kulsoom (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 04-NOV-21 | Yes | official accommodation | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.68-K/2022 Mst.Kulsoom v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Railways & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 1273 | 2021 SHC HYD 569 | Const. P. 2150/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khalil-ur-Rehman and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1274 | 2021 SHC HYD 1190 | Const. P. 1416/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zulfiqar Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 23-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.153-K/2022 Zulfiqar Ali Solangi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 1275 | 2021 SHC HYD 1382 | Const. P. 1216/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Martha Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 1276 | 2021 SHC HYD 1408 | Const. P. 1261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shamshad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | It is well-settled that conversion of an amenity plot into any other purpose is illegal and encroachment thereon cannot be allowed under any circumstances. This view is fortified by the following authorities of Honble Supreme Court and cases decided by learned Division Benches of this Court, laying down the principles regarding illegal conversion and use of amenity plots/public properties for other purposes, rights of public in respect of amenity plots/public properties and duties of authorities concerned for maintaining the status of amenity plots/public properties | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 1277 | 2021 SHC HYD 536 | Const. P. 1807/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mirza Fayyaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 17-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1278 | 2021 SHC HYD 777 | Cr.Bail 683/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ali Bahadur (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1279 | 2022 SHC KHI 922 | Const. P. 4279/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muzaffar Ali Talpur and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.640-K/2022 The Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Climate Change. v. Muzaffar Ali Talpur & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 1280 | 2021 SHC KHI 515 | Const. P. 7329/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Freeway Heights (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1281 | 2021 SHC KHI 1061 | Const. P. 7271/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Urban Properties (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1282 | 2021 SHC KHI 734 | Const. P. 7330/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ahmed Tabba (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Others (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1283 | 2022 SHC KHI 924 | Const. P. 2795/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 08-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1716/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1284 | 2022 SHC KHI 739 | Const. P. 2423/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Munawar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 07-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1285 | 2022 SHC KHI 792 | Const. P. 1312/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1286 | 2023 PLC CS 447 | Const. P. 7528/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahnawaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.517-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 1287 | 2022 SHC KHI 375 | Const. P. 5282/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Sect: College Education Dept: and Others (Respondent) | 18-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | |||
| 1288 | 2022 SHC KHI 270, 2024 PLC (CS) 267 | Const. P. 146/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Syed Zafar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 17-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1289 | 2021 SHC KHI 1161 | Const. P. 2085/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Employees Federation of Pakistan and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.345-K/2020,C.P.L.A.35/2022,C.P.L.A.76/2022,C.P.L.A.2145/2025 SCP | Disposed Disposed of, , ,Pending | |
| 1290 | 2021 SHC KHI 100 | Const. P. 2966/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Urban Properties (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1291 | 2026 SHC KHI 33 | Const. P. 2525/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Wahid Bakhsh Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority of respondents to restore the commuted portion of pension with all periodical increases granted by the Federal Government from the date of retirement to the date of restoration and thereafter, in accordance with applicable pension policy and relevant pension law, more particularly in terms of decision of the Supreme Court as discussed supra. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1292 | 2022 SHC KHI 799 | Const. P. 1263/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Waheed Memon (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) | 07-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.833/2022 Abdul Waheed Memon v. National Bank of Pakistan through its President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1293 | 2022 SHC KHI 437 | Const. P. 5450/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | M/s Dadex & Eternit Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 12-JAN-22 | Yes | NIRC jursidiction | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1294 | 2022 SHC KHI 336 | Const. P. 4861/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hadi Bux Siyal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1295 | 2022 SHC KHI 934 | Const. P. 322/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Sher Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1296 | 2022 SHC KHI 161 | Const. P. 128/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Asad Ali Laghari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1297 | 2022 SHC KHI 514 | Const. P. 1986/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Inayat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1298 | 2021 SHC KHI 1121 | Const. P. 2121/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | K & N Poultry Farms (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1299 | 2022 SHC KHI 186 | Const. P. 5505/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Faheem Ali (Petitioner) VS The Chairman SIndh Service Tribunal (Respondent) | 03-JUN-22 | Yes | we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.833-K/2022 Faheem Ali v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of [ Remanded to SST ] |
| 1300 | 2021 SHC KHI 783 | Const. P. 2120/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | U & I Garment(Units 1-3) & another (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1301 | 2022 SHC KHI 772 | Const. P. 5500/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Waris khaki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1302 | 2025 SHC KHI 637 | Const. P. 4769/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-APR-25 | Yes | Drawing an analogy from the present situation and, more importantly, guided by the principles established by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Dr. Naveeda Tufail and 72 others v. Government of Punjab and others (2003 SCMR 291) and Shahzad Shahmir and others v Government of Sindh & others (2021 SCMR 824). The Dr. Naveeda Tufail case shows that the Federal Government regularized ad hoc employees through the Public Service Commission. While the Petitioners, as provincial contract employees, cannot automatically claim this, Article 25 of the Constitution calls for equal treatment. In Naveeda Tufail, the Supreme Court recognized a legitimate expectation of regularization for Punjab's ad hoc lecturers due to continuous ad hoc appointments. The Supreme Court directed the Punjab government to regularize them via the Punjab Public Service Commission, following the Federal model with some concessions, ensuring separate consideration from direct recruits and non-retention of unsuitable candidates. This case highlights the need for fairness and the Public Service Commission's role in regularization. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.748-K/2025 Shabbir Ali Babar & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary , Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned |
| 1303 | 2021 SHC HYD 966 | Const. P. 1721/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Qadir Otho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.327/2022 Ghulam Qadir Otho v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1304 | 2022 SHC KHI 733 | Const. P. 6788/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Zafar Iqbal Shams (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and Others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1305 | 2021 SHC KHI 987 | Const. P. 2302/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s A & U Garments and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Paksitan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.90/2022 M/s Helix Pharma Pvt Ltd Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1306 | 2021 SHC KHI 225 | Const. P. 7212/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Union Textile Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1307 | 2023 SHC KHI 509, 2024 PLC (CS) 41 | Const. P. 1825/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Naseem us Sami and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1308 | 2021 SHC HYD 323 | Const. P. 186/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ayaz (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.9-K/2022 Ayaz v. Saadullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1309 | 2022 SHC HYD 490 | II.A. 33/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ghulam Akhtar & Ors. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1310 | 2023 SHC KHI 710 | Const. P. 2608/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdullah Soomro (Petitioner) VS UBL & Ors (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.330/2023 United Bank Limited through its President, Karachi and others v. Abdullah Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1311 | 2022 SHC HYD 647 | R.A (Civil Revision) 215/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | malook shah (Applicant) VS buxan & others (Respondent) | 14-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1312 | 2023 SHC KHI 503 | Const. P. 4744/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Majeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.520-K/2023 Abdul Majeed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan through Finance Secretary Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time as well as on merits | |
| 1313 | 2023 SHC KHI 1153 | Const. P. 3036/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Shehroz and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1712/2023 Muhammad Haider and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Aviation Division Pakistan Secretariat, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1314 | 2022 SHC HYD 583, 2003 PLD Sindh 526 | R.A (Civil Revision) 284/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2000 | WAPDA & Other (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ashraf (Respondent) | 31-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1315 | 2023 SHC KHI 63 | Const. P. 120/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mrs. Aseem Khalid (Petitioner) VS Secretary Schools Education & Ors (Respondent) | 06-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1316 | 2022 SHC HYD 379, 2009 MLD 1033 | Const. P. 1879/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 17-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1417-K/2022 Dr. Khalid Iqbal Talpur v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of | |
| 1317 | 2023 SHC KHI 654 | Const. P. 7976/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | HRDO (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1318 | 2023 SHC KHI 982 | Const. P. 3191/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Shaista Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1319 | 2023 SHC HYD 955 | Const. P. 1481/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sajjad Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1320 | Nil | Criminal Appeal 55/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2012 | Hassan @ Ali Hassan and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 31-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1321 | 2022 SHC LAR 86 | Const. P. 617/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Sajjad Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner and others (Respondent) | 27-JUL-22 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1322 | 2023 SHC KHI 817 | Const. P. 236/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Javed Iqbal Burqi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1323 | 2023 SHC HYD 542 | Const. P. 3072/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 21-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1324 | 2023 SHC HYD 999 | R.A (Civil Revision) 123/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Shahid Khan & another (Applicant) VS Mst. Sofia Bano & Others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1325 | 2023 SHC HYD 66, 2023 SBLR Sindh 1624 | R.A (Civil Revision) 9/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | Irfan Ali and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Tasleem and others (Respondent) | 20-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1326 | 2024 SHC KHI 3 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1355/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 1356 to 1447 of 2023, 1546 to 1557 of 2023 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. JW SEZ (Pvt) Ltd., Lahore (Respondent) | 22-FEB-24 | Yes | Transactional value; identical goods method; Section 25(5) read with Rule 107 of Customs Rules 2001; at or about the same time; 90 days period | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.335-K/2024 The Collector of Customs v. M/s JW SEZ. Pvt. Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed. Order dictated to Mr. M. Iqbal, PS |
| 1327 | 2023 SHC KHI 262 | Cr.Bail 1090/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | BABUL ALI S/O IQBAL & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 06-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1328 | 2023 SHC KHI 1053 | Cr.Bail 325/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | SIRAJ S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 19-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1329 | 2024 SHC KHI 1137 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 119/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Kar. (Applicant) VS M/s. Chase Up, Karachi & another (Respondent) | 15-MAR-24 | Yes | Time barred Order in Original. Collector cannot extend the time period under Section 179(3) of the Customs Act, 1969. In section 2(s) cases, | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1330 | 2024 SHC KHI 1030 | Const. P. 877/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Darwais Hameed (Petitioner) VS M/s South Asia Pakistan Terminal Pvt Ltd & Ors (Respondent) | 22-FEB-24 | Yes | It is well settled that certiorari is available to quash a decision for an error of law. It will also be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction when an inferior Court or a tribunal acts without jurisdiction or over its jurisdiction or fails to exercise its jurisdiction or where the Court or a tribunal acts illegally in the exercise of its undoubted jurisdiction and it decides a matter in violation of the principle of natural justice. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1331 | 2024 SHC KHI 36 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 47/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Driector, Dirc. Gen. Intell. & Invt. (Cus) Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. Internatioal Impex, Karachi & another (Respondent) | 29-FEB-24 | Yes | Penalty on Custom Agent; cannot be sustained in undervaluation by Importer in absence of any material to that effect. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1332 | 2023 SHC KHI 1185 | Cr.Bail 1121/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB & ANR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 17-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1333 | 2024 SHC SUK 1265 | Const. P. 852/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shoukat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1334 | 2024 SHC SUK 231 | Const. P. 658/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zaheer Abbas Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1335 | 2024 SHC SUK 558 | Const. P. 1107/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Aqeel Hyder Junejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1336 | 2024 SHC SUK 27 | Const. P. 540/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hussain Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1337 | 2024 SHC SUK 78 | Const. P. 699/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Meer Khan mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1338 | 2024 SHC SUK 1239 | Const. P. 1168/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1339 | 2024 SHC MPK 341 | Const. P. 771/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Teerath (Petitioner) VS Beena D/o Somji (Respondent) | 26-AUG-24 | Yes | The learned trial Court was duly empowered to appreciate the evidence and no case has been set forth to apprehend that the same was not done. Just because the view of one party did not prevail does not vitiate the process. The entire matter was open to the appellate Court, but not approached at the first instance for deliberation whether to differ with the judgment rendered by the learned trial Court or otherwise. The counsel remained unable to demonstrate any apparent infirmity about the appreciation of evidence that does not merit any consideration by this Court. Even otherwise such an exercise is not amenable for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. On the aforesaid proposition we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court reported as 2011 SCMR 1990; 2001 SCMR 574 and PLD 2001 Supreme Court 415. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1340 | 2024 SHC SUK 1204 | Const. P. 460/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sagheer Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1341 | 2024 SHC MPK 11 | Const. P. 491/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Imtiaz Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-SEP-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that petitioners are calling in question the Notice dated 04.10.2018 issued by the Assistant Commissioner/Assistant Director Anti Encroachment Taluka Hussain Bux Mari on the premise that the petitioners have titled documents in their favor issued by the Revenue authorities through registered sale deed and such Khatas are mutated in their names. If this is a position of the case, the issue involved in the proceedings can be resolved by the Anti Encroachment and/or competent Court of law as both the parties claim and counterclaim on the subject property. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1342 | 2024 SHC SUK 1220 | Const. P. 285/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Hafeez Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1343 | 2024 SHC SUK 564 | Criminal Miscelleneous 122/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2024 | Mst. Rizwana Hakro (Appellant) VS The State & 7 others (Opponent) | 29-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1344 | 2024 SHC SUK 460 | Const. P. 270/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mohammad Malook & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1345 | 2024 SHC SUK 354 | Const. P. 1382/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mureed Abbas Mirjat (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1346 | 2024 SHC SUK 735 | Const. P. 542/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Saboo Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1347 | 2024 SHC SUK 155 | Const. P. 555/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Kashif Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1348 | 2024 SHC SUK 174 | Const. P. 466/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Parvez Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.738-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Works and Services Department and others v. Parvaiz Ali Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1349 | 2024 SHC SUK 1289 | Const. P. 616/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Tahir & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1350 | 2024 SHC SUK 166 | Const. P. 354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Majid Ali Lakho & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], 8. All the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms. J U D G E J U D G E Nasim/P.A | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1351 | 2024 SHC SUK 630 | Const. P. 2040/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Hafeez Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1352 | 2024 SHC SUK 285 | Const. P. 505/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Wahid & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 1353 | 2024 SHC SUK 754 | Const. P. 456/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Razzak & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1354 | 2024 SHC SUK 1029 | Const. P. 413/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mumtaz Ali Siyal & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1355 | 2024 SHC SUK 1409 | Const. P. 1640/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst Naila Naz Gadani Balouch (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1356 | 2024 SHC SUK 1161 | Const. P. 298/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst Shabnam Parveen Through Attorney (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & another (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1357 | 2024 SHC SUK 1300 | Const. P. 532/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | AKK Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1358 | 2024 SHC SUK 342 | Const. P. 517/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Lal Dino Jakhro & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1359 | 2024 SHC SUK 1426 | Const. P. 546/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zain ul Abidin (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1360 | 2024 SHC SUK 908 | Const. P. 602/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | BIlal Hussain Chang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1361 | 2024 SHC SUK 1252 | Const. P. 831/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst Irshad Begum Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1362 | 2024 SHC SUK 671 | Const. P. 268/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Rajib Ali Jogi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1363 | 2024 SHC KHI 1104 | Criminal Miscelleneous 697/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Fahad Ahmed Gulzar S/o Gulzar Ahmed & another (Applicant) VS ASI/IO Saeed Mahroof & others (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | On the aforesaid proposition, the learned counsel for the applicants contended that the Judicial Magistrate had no authority to interfere in the investigation and exceeded his jurisdiction while directing the Investigating Officer to present the chargesheet before the Intellectual Property Tribunal in Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962. On facts, he contended that Sub Inspector PS PIB colony had lodged a false case against the applicants, as the alleged occurrence did not take place. The prosecution specifically alleged that the applicants had stocked different brands of Cigarettes, injurious to health but the same was never referred to the chemical examiner for verification. He maintained that in the peculiar circumstances of the case chemical examination of the purported case property was essential to corroborate the ocular account. The learned counsel further submitted that even if the prosecution version was assumed to be correct, Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962 could not be invoked against them. The impugned order had thus seriously prejudiced the applicants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1364 | 2024 SHC SUK 32 | Const. P. 1395/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Asim Sami Khan Pathan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1365 | 2024 SHC SUK 885 | Const. P. 627/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ameer Ali Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1366 | 2024 SHC SUK 1295 | Const. P. 947/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Punah Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1367 | 2024 SHC SUK 696 | Const. P. 1073/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mohammad Kamil (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1368 | 2024 SHC SUK 1102 | Cr.Bail 340/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Ali Gadani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-24 | Yes | Additionally the case against the applicant, in the absence of any independent witness of the alleged incident, requires further inquiry as contemplated under sub-section (2) to Section 497, Cr.P.C. In the case of Muhammad Tanveer v. The State (PLD 2017 Supreme Court 733) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1369 | 2024 SHC SUK 1283 | Const. P. 459/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shabir Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1370 | 2024 SHC SUK 1318 | Const. P. 1674/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ali Raza laghari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1371 | 2024 SHC SUK 1412 | Const. P. 233/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Munawar Hussain Mangrio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1372 | 2024 SHC KHI 1020 | Cr.Bail 1235/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | ZAHOOR AHMED S/O UMER KHAN & 02 ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-JUL-24 | Yes | The Supreme Court in similar circumstances has dealt with the issue involved in the present case. However, in the present case, the applicants have been charged with Section 337-F(III) i.e. Ghayrjaifah mutalimah. The punishment of Section 337-F(III) is daman and may also be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term that may extend to three years as ta???zir. So far as Section 337-F(V) Ghayrjaifah Hashmiya is daman and may also be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term that may extend to five years. 8. As far as section 324 PPC is concerned, in an attempt to murder case falling within the ambit of section 324, P.P.C., the nature of the act done, the intention of the offender and the circumstances leading to the occurrence are the essential ingredients, which need to be probed into determine the guilt or otherwise of an accused. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1373 | 2024 SHC SUK 216 | Const. P. 1169/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr Shafi Muhammad Ghanghro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1374 | 2024 SHC SUK 1435, 2025 PLC (CS) 68 | Const. P. 8/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Mustafa Mallah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 1375 | 2024 SHC SUK 772 | Const. P. 430/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Rahib Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1376 | 2024 SHC SUK 1181 | Const. P. 552/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst Najma Khokhar & another (Petitioner) VS The District & Session Judge Ghotki & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.553-K/2024 Mst. Najma Khokhar and another v. The DIstrict & Sessions Judge Ghotki and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned | |
| 1377 | 2024 SHC SUK 236 | Const. P. 1725/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imran Ali Shah & Another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.722-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Abdul Wahab Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1378 | 2024 SHC SUK 839 | Const. P. 2178/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst.Naziran Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1379 | 2024 SHC KHI 1047 | Cr.Bail 1477/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Yasmeen W/o Zulfiqar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 23-JUL-24 | Yes | According to the case of the prosecution, 560 grams of Heroin was recovered from the applicant, not only because the quantity of 60 grams exceeds the upper limit of 500 grams to bring the case within the prohibition contained in section 497(1) Cr. P.C. The Supreme Court in such circumstances granted post-arrest bail to the lady accused, keeping in view the (II) Proviso of Section 497 Cr. P.C. in the case of Mst. Kainat Bibi v. The State (2022 SCMR 609). The Supreme Court also in the case of Ateebur Rehman v. The State (2016 SCMR 1424), which involved the recovery of 1014 grams of heroin, and Ayaz Khan and another v. The State (2020 SCMR 350), which involved the recovery of 1100 grams of heroin, granted bail in both cases. In the present case, the guilt or innocence of the applicants is yet to be determined by the trial Court. The prosecution has not placed any material to establish that the applicant is a previous convict, mere involved in the same and similar offenses in the past cannot be a ground to refuse bail as this case can be decided on merit, therefore past record cannot be cited as precedent to refuse bail on this point. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1380 | 2024 SHC SUK 274 | Const. P. 712/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sameer Raheel (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.760-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary College Education Department and others v. Sameer Raheel Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1381 | 2024 SHC SUK 528 | Cr.Rev 25/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Khalique Buiro (Applicant) VS The State & Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1382 | 2024 SHC MPK 1208 | Cr.Bail 162/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhib and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | Keeping in view of the severity of the offense, bail is denied to the applicants at this stage, with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial within two months. However, it is made clear that in case of failure on the part of the trial Court to comply with the directions as contained in the order dated 07.08.2024 passed by this court in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.387 of 2024, the matter will be referred to the MIT-II of this Court for placing the matter before the competent authority for appropriate Orders on the administrative side. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1383 | 2024 SHC SUK 523 | Const. P. 556/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mian Assadullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1384 | 2024 SHC SUK 48 | Const. P. 381/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad hayat & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1385 | 2024 SHC KHI 1401 | Criminal Miscelleneous 734/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | MUHAMMAD ANWAR S/O MURTAZA (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 25-NOV-24 | Yes | Primarily, seized vehicles can generally be released during criminal trials. However, under the CNSA, vehicle release during drug offense trials is restricted. Only the lawful owner, who was/is unaware of the intended crime and has no connection to the accused, can seek release on Superdari. The prosecution must prove the owner's knowledge during the trial. The court can grant interim release if satisfied with the owner's claim and lack of association with the crime. To prevent the registration of crime-involved vehicles, the Supreme Court in the case of Amjad Ali Khan Vs the State vide order dated 13.03.2020, considered amending the Motor Vehicle Ordinance (MVO) and its rules. Additionally, develop an online verification system for vehicle crime history, require a No Objection Certificate from the police or an affidavit from the transferor/transferee at the time of registration. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1386 | 2024 SHC SUK 1120 | Const. P. 669/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Waheed Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1387 | 2024 SHC KHI 1185 | Criminal Miscelleneous 38/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Hina Siraj Manoo W/o Siraj Sadiq Manoo (Applicant) VS The State & another (Respondent) | 03-JUL-24 | Yes | In the instant case when the proceedings against the accused were stopped by the consent of the parties, they were on bail. It is well settled that release/discharge in such a case can only be construed to mean release from the liability for attending the Court, consequent upon the stoppage of the proceedings, the case comes to an end for an indefinite period. Prima facie, the accused are, therefore, no longer required to attend the Court proceedings due to stoppage of the proceeding sine a die till disposal of Civil Suit No. 945 of 2015. In such a scenario I have come across section 249, Cr. P.C., which is like section 253 Cr. P.C., which was deleted in the wake of law reforms. The defunct section empowered the Court to "discharge" the accused at any stage of the case before framing of charge against him/her. However, the accused's discharge under the said section did not operate as a permanent closure of the case against him/her. After his discharge, if sufficient evidence became available, the case could be revived against him/her. Similarly the stoppage of the proceedings under section 249, Cr.P.C. has the effect of discharging the accused until such time when on availability of the requisite evidence the case could be revived against him/her. However, in the present case, the proceedings have been adjourned sine a die till disposal of the civil proceedings and the prosecution was set at liberty to file an application for bringing the case on file before the Court after disposal of the aforesaid civil proceedings. In the meanwhile the bail bonds and sureties of the accused were ordered to remain intact till further orders, which triggered the cause the surety/applicant to apply for discharging the surety with substitution of P.R bond in the like amount as ordered by the competent Court of law, when the bail of the accused was granted. It is admitted position that the Civil Suit between the parties is pending adjudication before this Court and the fate of that suit is yet to be decided, in the meanwhile keeping in view the legal position of the case that normally criminal proceedings should not be postponed pending the disposal of the civil litigation connected with the same subject matter, but where it is clear that criminal liability is dependent upon the result of the civil litigation or is so intimately concern with it that there is a danger of grave injustice being done in the case, if there be a conflict of decision between the civil Court and the criminal Court then in such event it was/is equally clear that that criminal Court has not only the right to proceed but should also stay its hand until the civil litigation is disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1388 | 2024 SHC KHI 1163 | Cr.Rev 186/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | RASHID GHAZI S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 14-NOV-24 | Yes | The law allows joint trials/charges for offenses linked by time, place, or motive. The wisdom behind joinder of charges is to avoid conflicting decisions, minimize witness burden, and save court time by combining related offenses into a single trial. Additionally, the "same transaction" test, requiring continuity, intent, and shared design, is crucial. It is important to note that the court while trying any offense under the law as a special court may also try any other offense which an accused may, under the Cr. PC be charged, at the same trial if the offense is connected with such other offense. If in the course of any trial under the law of any scheduled offense, it is found that the accused person had committed, in addition, any other offense connected with the scheduled offense, the special court may pass the order for such other offense as authorized by the law or as the case may be such other law. To understand the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (ATA), we first examined its legislative intent as expressed in the preamble, which for convenience sake is referred to here under:- ??? whereas it is expedient to provide for the prevention of terrorism, sectarian violence and for speedy trial of heinous offenses and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1389 | 2024 SHC SUK 866 | Const. P. 90/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mudasir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1390 | 2024 SHC SUK 1449 | Const. P. 1823/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Khan Muhammad Meerani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1391 | 2024 SHC SUK 873 | Const. P. 1420/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Imran Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1392 | 2024 SHC SUK 1259 | Const. P. 646/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ameer Ali Rajper (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.115-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary law-Parliamentary Affairs and Criminal Prosecution Dept. and others v. Kazim Ali,C.P.L.A.669-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary law-Parliamentary Affairs and Criminal Prosecution Dept. and others v. Kazim Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 1393 | 2024 SHC SUK 1149 | Const. P. 165/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Husna Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1394 | 2024 SHC SUK 901 | Const. P. 259/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Hajan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1395 | 2024 SHC SUK 1052 | Const. P. 885/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Shakeel Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1396 | 2024 SHC KHI 450 | Const. P. 2739/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Haji Muhammad Ashraf Memon (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Housing & Works & Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-24 | Yes | The High Court's constitutional jurisdiction is extraordinary and should only be used when other remedies are unavailable. The Supreme Court's judgment in Dr. Abdul Nabi's case (2023 SCMR 1267) supports this view. ???The extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is envisioned predominantly for affording an express remedy where the unlawfulness and impropriety of the action of an executive or other governmental authority could be substantiated without any convoluted inquiry. The expression "adequate remedy" signifies an effectual, accessible, advantageous, and expeditious remedy that should also be remedium juris, i.e. more convenient, beneficial, and effective. To effectively bar the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, the remedy available under the law must be able to accomplish the same purpose which is sought to be achieved through a writ petition. This extraordinary jurisdiction is provided as a remedy to cure illegality which can be established without any elaborate inquiry into disputed facts??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1397 | 2024 SHC SUK 265 | Const. P. 526/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Mustafa & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1398 | 2024 SHC SUK 194 | Cr.Bail 161/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Khalique Gabol & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 27-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1399 | 2024 SHC KHI 192 | Const. P. 802/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Arif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | Admittedly, these are the cases of harassment at the hands of police in connivance with private respondents. The meaning of the word "harass" has been explained as "Injure and injury???; these words have numerous and comprehensive popular meanings, as well as having a legal import. A line may be drawn between these words and the word "harass" excluding the latter from being comprehended within the word "injure" or "injury". The synonyms of "harass" are: Weary, tire, perplex, distress tease, vex, molest, trouble, and disturb. They all have relation to mental annoyance." In the Oxford Dictionary of New Words, the meaning of the word "harassment" has been explained, which reads as "The subjection of a person to aggressive pressure or intimidation. ???Harassment" should be interpreted as potentially producing some unreasonably adverse impact on the victim. The conduct should produce more than "worry", "trouble", "discomfort" or "unease" unless perhaps these are experienced to an extreme degree." | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1400 | 2025 SHC KHI 316 | Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-25 | Yes | It is well established now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.604-K/2025 Fakar Ul Hasnain v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Notice) to Respondents and Addl AG Sindh |
| 1401 | 2024 SHC SUK 1256 | Const. P. 1553/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Kashif Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.736-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Health Department and others v. Kashif Masih Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1402 | 2025 SHC KHI 490 | Const. P. 1345/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | We find that it has not been disputed that working papers were prepared by the respondent- Department about the promotion of the petitioners in BPS-19 much before their retirement, but the matter was delayed without any justifiable reason, and in the meanwhile, Petitioner attained the age of superannuation. Prima facie they cannot be made to suffer on account of departmental lapse. Additionally, in the matter of civil service, there should not be at all any instance where the competent authority is found to be accommodating any one civil servant for grant of promotion and leaving all other equals and even seniors abandoned. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1403 | 2025 SHC KHI 226 | Const. P. 3063/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Syed Mehboob Ali Shah & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | Without addressing the substantive arguments of these cases and merits, these petitions are now considered concluded and are hereby disposed of in the terms that much water has flown under the bridge since 2008 and we are now in 2025 besides petitioners have not asked for the issuance of writ of quo warranto against the individual who were purportedly appointed in violation of the rules as no record has been produced to infer adverse against them at this stage in a case of writ of mandamus. However, if the cause of action for these petitions still exists, the petitioners retain the right to initiate appropriate legal action, including proceedings under a writ of quo warranto, if they believe the appointments of the private respondents are contrary to law and if such legal recourse is permissible. These petitions are disposed of along with the pending application(s) in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1404 | 2025 SHC KHI 471 | Const. P. 2257/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Abbas Halepota (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the right to claim a pension is a right connected with the tenure of service, which under the applicable pension rules has to be served by an employee to make him eligible for a pension. So, to claim a pension, the minimum qualifying service is the threshold that has to be crossed first, which would then entitle an employee to claim the pension. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1405 | 2025 SHC SUK 209 | Const. P. 16/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst Saima narejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1406 | 2025 SHC KHI 503 | Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Zoya and another (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 28-MAR-25 | Yes | Additionally, the main objectives of the police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation on the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect and not abduct. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1407 | 2025 SHC SUK 436 | Const. P. 2106/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Shabir & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1408 | 2025 SHC KHI 368 | Const. P. 4413/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Imran Muhammad Khan and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.468-K/2025 Imran Muhammad v. Province of Sindh through Secretary School Education & Literacy Department Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned | |
| 1409 | 2025 SHC KHI 307 | Const. P. 6238/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) | 07-APR-25 | Yes | In line with the opinion of the Advocate General Sindh, as detailed in the preceding paragraph, the petitioner's resignation from the Board, submitted as a consequence of his absorption, is considered invalid. In a landmark judgment as discussed supra, the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared all absorptions in different cadres as illegal, ordering employees to revert to their parent departments, while ensuring their seniority is retained. 12. This petition is hereby disposed of with the direction that the respondent, BISE Sukkur, must fully implement the Supreme Court's judgments (2013 SCMR 1752 and 2015 SCMR 456) by ordering the petitioner's return to his parent department while protecting his seniority, if he has not superannuated yet. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1410 | 2025 SHC KHI 1055 | Const. P. 6242/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Raheel Mehtab (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | The preceding analysis constrains the conclusion that NADRA's Regulations are non-statutory. Although the petitioner proceeded against the statutory Rules of 1973, their adoption under Regulation 23 of the non-statutory Regulations gives them a non-statutory status in this context. Consequently, this constitutional petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution more particularly in terms of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Maj. (Retd.) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas's case supra and is therefore, dismissed with the pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1411 | Nil | Const. P. 6241/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shakil Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | The respondent department submitted that the Petitioner's ad-hoc appointment since 1988, which has not been regularized, does not confer automatic promotion rights like those of permanent employees. Promotion typically requires specific qualifications, and the Petitioner lacks a relevant certificate, as highlighted. The provided seniority list is outdated and allegedly irregular, rendering it unreliable for promotion claims. Even if a junior's promotion was illegal, it does not ensure the Petitioner's promotion. Claims of delayed BS-14 promotion are weakened by the Petitioner's ad-hoc status and lack of certification. The "rule of parity" argument is also undermined by these factors. Consequently, the Petitioner's automatic entitlement to promotion is unlikely. Regularization and meeting the qualifications for the higher post are necessary prerequisites and as such this petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1412 | 2025 SHC KHI 1050 | Const. P. 5926/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Pakistan National Shipping Corp (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Having considered the legal precedents, we are of the opinion that the Petitioners' situation falls under the principle of Master and Servant. It is a well-established legal principle that a contractual employee does not possess a fundamental or acquired right to remain in their contractual position or to demand an extension or regularization of their service. Furthermore, it is settled law that courts generally avoid interfering with the policy-making authority of the Executive branch, unless it is demonstrated that such policies have violated the fundamental rights of citizens, which is not the situation presented in this case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1413 | 2025 SHC KHI 475 | Const. P. 2792/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | The foundation of the petitioner's case rests upon the precedent established in the matter of the Taimur Ali Khan case (C.P No. 2873 of 2012). In that instance, KPT proposed a Grade-II Traffic Supervisor position with seniority commencing from January 1, 2014, while declining to pay retroactive salary. Despite Taimur Ali Khan's initial request for arrears, this Court ultimately mandated his immediate assumption of the offered role. The present petitioner seeks analogous relief based on the findings of the division bench of this Court, as such deviation at this stage is almost impossible as the matter is sub judice before the Supreme Court. Consequently, this petition can be resolved in the same manner, contingent upon the Chairman of KPT's impartial determination, following a hearing with the petitioner within a three-month time frame, that the petitioner's circumstances are comparable to those of the Taimur Ali Khan case as discussed supra. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1414 | 2025 SHC KHI 232 | Const. P. 4984/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Piar ALi Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | Prima facie, this issue of late submission of Domicile and PRC, which prompted the respondents not to consider their candidature, needs to be looked into by the Secretary of Education after hearing both the petitioners within three months if the petitioners meet the requisite criteria as set out in the Teachers Recruitment Policy 2012; besides no other candidates having lower marks superseded the petitioners. A copy of this order shall be sent to Secretary Education for compliance. These petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1415 | 2025 SHC KHI 524 | Const. P. 4/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Rizwan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-MAR-25 | Yes | The respondent, appearing in court, informed that the Accountant General Sindh's office had issued letter No. AGS/Edu-V/Verification/2023-24/246, dated April 16, 2024, to the Secretary SE&LD, seeking the following clarifications: Firstly, the joining database was submitted to their office after a delay exceeding thirteen years, for which the department must provide an explanation. Secondly, according to the relevant Drawing and Disbursing Officer (DDO), the petitioner returned to duty following an eight-year absence, necessitating clarification under Sindh Civil Service Rule 33. To date, no response has been received. 4. Based on the circumstances, the respondents are required to review the issue and make a decision within a reasonable period, allowing the petitioner a hearing. 5. In view of the foregoing, without touching the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1416 | 2025 SHC KHI 156 | Const. P. 1346/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mumtaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | We find that it has not been disputed that working papers were prepared by the respondent- Department about the promotion of the petitioners in BPS-19 much before their retirement, but the matter was delayed without any justifiable reason, and in the meanwhile, Petitioner attained the age of superannuation. Prima facie they cannot be made to suffer on account of departmental lapse. Additionally, in the matter of civil service, there should not be at all any instance where the competent authority is found to be accommodating any one civil servant for grant of promotion and leaving all other equals and even seniors abandoned. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1417 | 2025 SHC KHI 1533 | Const. P. 1475/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Noor Ul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 21-MAY-25 | Yes | It is urged by the parties that the UBL paid the Petitioner PKR 605,112/- as termination dues, also known as a Golden Handshake, which the Petitioner acknowledged receiving on November 22, 2000. The Petitioner's employment with UBL ended due to retrenchment while he was a officer, consistent with the service rules then in effect. The Petitioner has since reached the age of superannuation, rendering the question of reversing his termination from service purely academic. This makes prayer clauses B to D redundant, as his service with UBL had already ended. Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has previously ruled on similar cases in United Bank Limited v. Ahsan Akhtar (1998 SCMR 68), the Supreme Court held that writ petitions filed by aggrieved former employees against UBL are not maintainable. The Supreme Court also allowed Civil Appeal Nos. 1487 to 1528 of 1998 in United Bank Ltd. v. Shamim Ahmed Khan & others (PLD 1999 SC 990) on May 25, 1999, which concerned the compulsory retrenchment scheme to reduce staff strength. Therefore, the issue of retrenchment cannot be revisited at this stage. Regarding the implementation of the Federal Cabinet's decision in the Petitioner's case, this is an old issue, and too much time has passed to issue any directions. Finally, no direction can be issued for the Petitioner's absorption into any department with the Golden Handshake due to his reaching the superannuation age. Consequently, all issues raised in this petition are no longer relevant, leading to the dismissal of the current petition and any pending applications. This petition is dismissed accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1418 | 2025 SHC KHI 1661, 2025 SHC KHI 1674 | Const. P. 7606/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Khurram Faizan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-25 | Yes | The petitioners' case appears to be similar to that of Muhammad Afzal Soomro, previously decided by this Court, and aligns with I. A Sherwani and others vs. Government of Pakistan, 1991 SCMR 1081. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the postgraduate/LL.M. degree allowance and its benefits should be extended to the employees of the District Judiciary. The purpose behind granting this incentive is evident from the February 8, 2018, notification issued by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, which provided a monthly allowance of Rs. 2500/- to Ph.D. degree holders in Public Sector Universities. Consequently, we direct the Finance Secretary, Sindh and Chief Secretary Sindh to examine the petitioners' case considering this notification and the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforementioned case and make a policy decision on the same. 10. The instant petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1054-K/2025 Khurram Faizan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 1419 | 2025 SHC KHI 2144 | Const. P. 4676/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Muhammad Ilyas Laghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-AUG-25 | Yes | In conclusion, a retired civil servant can be entitled to a pro forma promotion under the law, but only if he/she can establish that he/she was denied the promotion during their service due to an administrative lapse and not for a legitimate reason, such as being too junior on the seniority list. Based solely on the facts presented, it appears the department's position is legally sound, as the petitioner's seniority number was well below the threshold for promotion at the relevant time. Therefore this petition is liable to be dismissed on merit, which accordingly dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1097-K/2025 Dr. Muhammad Ilyas Laghari v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 1420 | 2025 SHC KHI 2149 | Const. P. 6285/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | In the light of the above discussion, the instant constitutional petitions, along with pending application(s) are dismissed on the ground that the petitioner's requested relief is no longer available. The petitioner first filed a similar case in 2016 (C.P. No. 1226 of 2016), which was withdrawn in 2022 without permission to file a new one. The current petition, filed on the same grounds, was submitted after the petitioner had already exceeded the age limit for the position. Besides, the petitioner has failed in the interview; as such, no further indulgence of this Court is required under Article 199 of the Constitution. 8. Petition Stands dismissed along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1174-K/2025 Irfan Ali v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 1421 | 2025 SHC KHI 2158 | Const. P. 5445/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mahmood Ahmed Khan and Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-25 | Yes | On the issue of proforma promotion we are fortified by the decisions of the Supreme Court rendered in the cases of Dr. Syed Sabir Ali v. Government of Punjab through Secretary Health Punjab and others, (2008 SCMR 1535), Federation of Pakistan and others v. Amir Zaman Shinwari, Superintending Engineer, (2008 SCMR 1138) and Dr. Muhammad Amjad v. Dr. Israr Ahmed, (2010 SCMR 1466). 8. This petition is disposed of in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Director General Intelligence and Investigation, F.B.R., Islamabad, and others Vs. Muhammad Aslam Khan 2020 SCMR 1846. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1422 | 2025 SHC KHI 2159 | Const. P. 5658/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Arif Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-25 | Yes | However, since the petitioners were removed with a stigma and seemingly denied a proper chance to present their defense, they are free to apply to the competent authority for a revival of proceedings from the beginning, following due legal process. If the respondents have concrete evidence against the petitioners, the law shall be followed in the strict sense; however, the competent authority, before deciding on the subject proposition, shall hear the petitioners. 8. This petition is disposed of in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Senior Superintendent of Police Vs Shahid Nazir 2022 SCMR 327. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1423 | 2025 SHC KHI 1436, 2025 SHC KHI 1451, 2025 SHC KHI 1454 | Const. P. 6139/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Prof: Asal Khan Tareen (Petitioner) VS N.I.C.V.D & Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAY-25 | Yes | the office staff of Satellite centre was undertaken by the petitioner does not mean that he was Head of Project to claim benefit of the minutes of the meeting. These all are disputed facts needs through examination which is to be done by the court of plenary jurisdiction and not under Article 199 of the Constitution. Besides as per statement of the respondents No. 1 & 2, there was final settlement with regard to service benefits of the petitioner, as such this case cannot stretch further, which is accordingly dismissed. 8. This petition is dismissed along with ending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.973-K/2025 Prof. Asal Khan Tareen v. National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1424 | 2025 SHC KHI 2008 | Const. P. 2106/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Syed Mehboob Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 06-AUG-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1425 | 2025 SHC KHI 1526 | Const. P. 1982/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed Aslam Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-25 | Yes | This petition is not covered by the respondents' policy, and therefore, the petitioner's request for selection grade in BS-16 cannot be entertained at this stage, as "much water has already flown under the bridge." Consequently, this petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution due to the doctrine of laches and is accordingly dismissed along with any pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1426 | 2025 SHC KHI 1420 | Const. P. 6861/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Anwar Ul Haq (Petitioner) VS Federal Urdu Universtiy & Another (Respondent) | 15-MAY-25 | Yes | Considering the case in hand, the respondent-university cannot modify the act of misconduct i.e. absence from duty without authorization into any of the minor penalties, hence the impugned order passed by the respondent-university dispensing with service of the petitioner due to unauthorized absence from duty was rightly passed and is now affirmed by this Court. 13. For the reasons stated, we find no error in the impugned order of the respondent-university. This petition is meritless and accordingly dismissed along with the pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1427 | 2025 SHC KHI 1418 | Const. P. 890/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Ashraf Sadique (Petitioner) VS The Governor of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-25 | Yes | Since the petitioner already received the Orderly Allowance, besides other officers also received such allowance as per the syndicate decision, recovery from the petitioner???s pension based on the governors' findings is unwarranted. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Shams-ur-Rehman v Military Accountant General 2020 SCMR 188, whereby the Supreme Court by applying the principle of estoppel against the department from recovering the emoluments and benefits from the petitioner. 11. While pension law is not an absolute shield against recovery in cases of overpayment, losses, dues, or misconduct, in this specific case, as the Orderly Allowance had already been paid and acted upon, therefore, the Governor of Sindh's order regarding recovery is set aside, while the rest of the order is maintained. 12. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is partly allowed on these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1428 | 2026 SHC KHI 45 | Const. P. 685/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sardar Muhammad Ashraf Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | Since the competent authority of the SBCA has already made a decision and compliance has been made, the petitioner???s application under Section 12(2) and 151 CPC is not maintainable at this stage which is dismissed as apparently there is no element of fraud as allegedly said, and a civil suit No. 460/2025 is also reportedly pending before the competent court. Both applications are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1429 | 2025 SHC KHI 1532 | Const. P. 1769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Mazhar Khan and Othes (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-MAY-25 | Yes | From the above discussion, it is quite clear that a person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of service are protected under the constitutional protection. 17. In view of the above discussion, these petitions are disposed of with understanding that the respondents shall reconsider their decision within three months to avoid discrimination amongst the employees of Quaid-i-Azam Mazar Management Board and Quaid-e-Azam Academy. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1430 | 2025 SHC KHI 1776 | Const. P. 2872/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Iqbal Memon (Petitioner) VS DG NAB (Respondent) | 25-JUN-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1431 | 2025 SHC KHI 2423 | Const. P. 4715/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Syed Ana Kazmi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, the petition is not maintainable either on facts or on the law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his/her grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated under the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1432 | 2025 SHC KHI 2422 | Const. P. 4991/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Khan Magsi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-SEP-25 | Yes | We for the aforesaid reasons dispose of this constitutional petition and direct the competent authority/respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioner for proforma promotion in BS-20 in terms of the Supreme Court decisions as discussed supra, by way of circulation, if he is found eligible under the law. As the petitioner has already retired, therefore, his proforma promotion will not affect the seniority of any person already in service and they would be entitled to their emoluments and pensionary benefits. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1433 | 2025 SHC KHI 2420 | Const. P. 8004/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ms. Nasreen Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case this petition stands disposed of in the terms that the petitioner???s pending appeal be decided by the competent authority within two months of the date of this order. The decision must be made in accordance with the established principles of seniority and after hearing all parties involved. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1434 | 2025 SHC KHI 2427 | Const. P. 4212/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-25 | Yes | Prima facie, respondents acted improperly by dismissing the petitioner without conducting a proper inquiry. The respondents should have held a hearing and allowed the petitioner to be heard, as required by the principles of natural justice, rather than simply relying on an alleged absence, especially since the petitioner had 558 days of leave available. 8. In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents' competent authority to give the petitioner a proper hearing and initiate disciplinary proceedings within two months of receiving the order, consequently Impugned orders are set aside.. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1435 | 2025 SHC KHI 3217 | Const. P. 684/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Junaid s/o Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-25 | Yes | Prima facie, this is a simple case of harassment, therefore, this petition stands disposed of alongwith pending applications with directions to the police officials to act strictly in accordance with law and if there is any private family dispute between the parties, that shall be taken care of in accordance with law and police shall be neutral in the private affairs. However, no harassment shall be caused to either party. However, it is made clear that if any cognizable offence is committed, police shall be free to act accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1436 | 2025 SHC KHI 2632 | Const. P. 4397/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shamsher Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 06-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1437 | 2025 SHC KHI 3207 | Const. P. 328/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mrs. Kubra and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 15-SEP-25 | Yes | Today, nobody has bothered to appear before this Court. As such, this Court is left with no option, but to dismiss this lis on account of non-prosecution due to lack of interest of the petitioners. This petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1438 | 2026 SHC KHI 516 | Const. P. 4458/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Darul Aman Cooperative Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | C.P.L.A.4591/2025 Karachi Co-operative Housing Societies Union Limited through its Managing Director Karachi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Housing & Town Planning Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 1439 | 2025 SHC KHI 3243 | Const. P. 1169/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Waheeda Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | Be that as it may, since this is a simple case of harassment, the police officials can only take action if there is concrete evidence against the family members of the petitioner in terms of Section 154 Cr.P.C. However, no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and her family members. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1440 | 2025 SHC KHI 3201 | Const. P. 551/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sajawal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-25 | Yes | Learned Assistant AG submits that the petitioner was called at police station and inquired about the abduction of the lady Mst. Safa daughter of Bilal aged about 19 years, who recorded her statement and did not implicate the petitioner. Such copies of FIR and statement have been placed on record. However, no harassment shall be caused by the police officials. In view of above, this petition stands disposed of | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1441 | 2025 SHC KHI 3210 | Const. P. 730/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Talha Nayaz s/o Muhammad Niyaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-SEP-25 | Yes | None present for the petitioner without intimation. On the last date of hearing i.e. 01.9.2025, this Court ordered for issuance of notices to the respondents, but the petitioner has failed to make compliance of office objections as well as the order passed by this Court. Today, absence of the petitioner as well as his counsel shows their lack of interest in pursuing this petition, which is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1442 | 2025 SHC KHI 3202 | Const. P. 649/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ismail s/o Aachoo Solangi (Petitioner) VS SHO, PS Sharifabad, Mehran Town & Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-25 | Yes | Detenue Hameed son of Muhammad Rahim Solangi has been produced by the police officials before this Court; therefore, the purpose of filing this petition has been served. However, no harassment shall be caused to each other. Petition stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1443 | 2025 SHC KHI 2602 | Const. P. 1768/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mujahid Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 03-OCT-25 | Yes | In view of the facts and circumstances of the case the competent authority of respondents is directed to consider the fixation of the petitioners' pay scale/grade at the level corresponding to the post of Deputy Manager, with the pay protected at the "last pay drawn" by them during their contract as Assistant Professors, as required by Chapter VII, Clause 7.2 of the Pakistan Steel Mills Officers Service Rules and Regulations and calculate and pay all the differential salary arrears owed to the petitioners, along with any associated benefits, from the date of this Court's original regularization order. The aforementioned exercise shall be undertaken within three months after hearing the petitioners. 9. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1444 | 2025 SHC KHI 2727 | Const. P. 5772/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Imtiaz Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1445 | 2025 SHC KHI 3242 | Const. P. 1156/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Saima & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | This Court vide order dated 23.10.2025, issued notices to the respondents with directions to the SHO concerned to provide protection to the petitioners. Today, the private respondents are called absent without intimation. The SHO present in Court submits that due protection shall be provided to the petitioners. He is directed to obtain bond of Rs.500,000/- (Rupees five lac) each from the private respondents to the effect that no bodily harm shall be caused to the petitioners and the same bonds shall be kept at the police station and can be used against them if there is harm caused to the petitioners. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.666-K/2025 Muhammad Kaleem v. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Local Government Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 1446 | 2026 SHC KHI 121 | Const. P. 3674/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Bravo Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-26 | Yes | The Petitioner agreed to submit the plan, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law, which SBCA will process the subject matter strictly in accordance with law within two weeks. 6. Without touching the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of by consent on these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1447 | 2026 SHC KHI 354 | Const. P. 1376/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Faisal Ibrahim Baif (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1448 | 2026 SHC KHI 242 | Const. P. 2226/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Jalila Khaton (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | It is settled that in case of death during service, the family is entitled to 75% of gross pension, along with admissible gratuity and commutation benefits, whereas in case of death after retirement, family pension is regulated in terms of the relevant pension rules, with restoration of the commuted portion after the prescribed period. 4. The officer present in court states that the recovery has already been effected and nothing remains outstanding against the Petitioner; hence, the matter has become infructuous. 5. In view of the above statement, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, it is directed that no further deduction shall be made from the Petitioner???s pensionary benefits in future, in line with the settled principle that pension is a vested right and cannot be withheld or reduced except in accordance with la | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1449 | 2026 SHC KHI 259 | Const. P. 1297/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Syed Sardar Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1450 | 2026 SHC KHI 161 | Const. P. 6310/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Hameed Suhag (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in law and equity, prima facie, the impugned transfer dated 20.11.2025 is not in the public interest. The Council???s considered recommendation provides a legitimate and rational basis for the Petitioner???s retention in office. Since a competent authority has recommended retaining the petitioner, the Government shall reconsider its decision and pass a speaking order within two weeks. Until then, the impugned order shall not be implemented. 8. The petition is disposed of in these terms along with pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1451 | 2026 SHC KHI 287 | Const. P. 185/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Junaid ul Haq S/o Javed ul Haq (Petitioner) VS XIIIth ADJ, Karachi (East) and others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1452 | 2026 SHC KHI 295 | Const. P. 124/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Zulfiqar Ali Through Attorney Zahoor Alam (Petitioner) VS Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another (Respondent) | 06-FEB-26 | Yes | The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1453 | 2026 SHC KHI 265 | Const. P. 5470/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1454 | 2026 SHC KHI 345 | Const. P. 2668/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | SBP Banking Services Corp (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL case (2020 PLC 153), Moulvi Aziz-ur-Rehman v. Ahmad Khan (2004 SCMR 1622), and Pak Telecom Mobile Limited v. Muhammad Atif Bilal (2024 SCMR 719) has consistently held that workers performing permanent duties under an establishment cannot be deprived of their rights based on a contractor arrangement. Similarly, the objection regarding NIRC???s jurisdiction is without merit. SBP-BSC is a trans-provincial, federal establishment, and the grievance petition was properly entertained under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, as discussed supra. 11. In view of the above, both Constitutional Petitions are dismissed. The impugned orders of the Single and Full Bench of NIRC are hereby maintained. However, with no order as to costs. JUDGE | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1455 | 2026 SHC KHI 346 | Const. P. 5248/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Moiz Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, it is concluded that the Petitioner in CP No. D-5248/2025 has undertaken all necessary remedial measures to restore the Subject Property to its original residential use in accordance with the sanctioned building plan and prevailing law, without altering the lawful structure or usage. The undertaking includes completing these measures within three (3) weeks from the date of the order, after which the property shall be de-sealed. 13. Accordingly, in light of the Petitioner???s statement in CP No. D-5248/2025 and compliance in time, both the Petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case of breach the undertaking the law will take its own course . | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1456 | 2026 SHC KHI 380 | Const. P. 2736/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Farhan Sheikh & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in view of the law laid down by this Court in the judgment reported as 2023 PLC (CS) 447, as affirmed by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan, these petitions are disposed of along with pending applications. i. The Respondents are directed to treat the Petitioners at par with their colleagues who were regularized pursuant to the aforesaid judgment and to regularize their services as Data Processing Assistants (BS-14) from the date of their initial appointment, subject to fulfillment of codal formalities; ii. The Respondents are further directed not to subject the Petitioners to any fresh or selective process for regularization; iii. The Respondents shall ensure that the salaries and other admissible benefits payable to the Petitioners are released forthwith in accordance with law if not earlier released; iv. Till issuance of the requisite notification regarding regularization, the services of the Petitioners shall not be terminated or dispensed with except in accordance with law. 12. It is expected from the respondents that they will implement the ratio of the judgment passed by this court reported in 2023 PLC (C.S) 447 in its letter and sprit without fail. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1457 | 2026 SHC KHI 388 | Const. P. 2509/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ali Asghar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it would meet the ends of justice if the matter relating to the interview performance of the petitioners is reconsidered by the competent authority, namely the office of the Sindh Police, through the Inspector General of Police, Sindh. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions: a) The rejection of the petitioners??? candidature based on the aforesaid criminal case, which has already been disposed of in their acquittal, is declared to be unlawful and of no legal that effect. b) The Inspector General of Police, Sindh, is directed to cause re-interview of the petitioners through a duly constituted Recruitment Committee or DIGP of good reputation so nominated by the IGP Sindh strictly in accordance with the Sindh Police Recruitment Policy-2022. c) In case the petitioners are found to have secured the minimum qualifying marks and are otherwise suitable for appointment, to the subject post, their candidature shall be considered afresh on merit for the post of Police Constable (BPS-07) in District Sujawal. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1458 | 2026 SHC KHI 233 | Const. P. 3254/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waqar Ahmed Sheikh Adv (Petitioner) VS Akbar and Abbas Co. & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1459 | 2026 SHC KHI 384 | Const. P. 374/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Nazirullah Mehsood (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | To ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance with the law, this Court with the consent of the parties present in Court considers it appropriate to appoint the Nazir of this Court as Commissioner to supervise the elections of the President and the Managing Committee in accordance with the society???s bylaws and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020. The Registrar is directed to provide complete society records to the Commissioner for verification and preparation of a valid voters??? list. The elections shall be conducted within two months or as per direction of the Nazir, after which the records shall be handed over to the newly elected management. All parties are directed to fully cooperate and refrain from interfering with the election process. The Commissioner???s fee of Rs. 300,000 shall be paid in advance by the society from its funds. The Commissioner is also empowered to hear and decide all legitimate questions or objections related to the election process including voter lists, and genuine plot owners/members, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The Commissioner is empowered to take all necessary steps for conducting the election in accordance with law. 9. The petitions along with all pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1460 | 2026 SHC KHI 534 | Const. P. 1819/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sarah Riaz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1461 | 2026 SHC KHI 502 | Const. P. 2352/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Aslam Faqira (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1462 | 2026 SHC KHI 609 | Const. P. 224/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Abdul Bais Baloch (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1463 | 2026 SHC KHI 507 | Const. P. 8006/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Meer Sajjad Ahmed Shahwani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1464 | 2026 SHC KHI 365 | Const. P. 4491/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Javeria Mobashir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1465 | 2026 SHC KHI 653 | Const. P. 5438/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Kubra Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Secretary Industries & Commerce & others (Respondent) | 18-MAR-26 | Yes | Although the reinstatement order denied arrears for the period of absence, such denial does not extend to pensionary benefits lawfully accrued after retirement, nor does it authorize indefinite withholding of dues without adjudicated liability as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Pension is calculated on qualifying service and cannot be curtailed on unproven allegations. 11. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with directions to the competent authority of respondents to release the withheld amount forthwith, recalculate pensionary benefits in accordance with rules and parity, and ensure compliance within 30 days, failing which the amount shall carry markup/interest as per law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1466 | 2026 SHC KHI 158 | Const. P. 2506/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Kamaluddin Mangejo (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction to the competent authority of the respondents to reconsider and decide the case of the petitioner afresh, strictly in line with the treatment accorded to his similarly placed colleagues if any, after affording an opportunity of meaningful hearing to the petitioner as well as the concerned departments. 11. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed expeditiously, preferably within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled, consequential benefits shall be extended in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1467 | 2026 SHC KHI 112 | Const. P. 5482/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Ahmed Lodhi & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-26 | Yes | In absence of evidence of ongoing illegal construction, the compliance of SBCA with Court orders, and the Nazir???s factual report confirming lawful use of the plot, the petitioners have not made out a prima facie case. 8. Accordingly, the petition lacks merit and is dismissed, with the liberty to SBCA and concerned authorities to take lawful action in case of any future unauthorized construction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1468 | 2026 SHC KHI 39 | Const. P. 5049/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sharifullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | In similar circumstances, this Court and other benches have held that petitions challenging the election or internal governance of associations registered under the Societies Registration Act are devoid of maintainability under Article 199 of the Constitution and must be dismissed since such bodies are not performing public functions nor represent a public authority amenable to constitutional jurisdiction. On the aforesaid proposition reliance has been placed on the cases of Mirza Muhammad Nazakat Baig v. Federation of Pakistan (through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad and another (2020 SCMR 631) and Syed Iqbal Hussain Shah Gillani v. Pakistan Bar Council through Secretary Supreme Court Bar Building Islamabad and others (2021 SCMR 425). 8. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed on maintainability grounds as no case is made out for exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1469 | 2026 SHC KHI 34 | Const. P. 609/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Nazir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing submissions, it is noted that the Petitioner, being a retired employee of Karachi Port Trust, had already received the annual increment in 2016 and had also opted not to avail the benefit of Rule 19 of the KPT Pay, Allowances, and Leave Rules. Accordingly, both petitions are dismissed in their entirety with no order as to costs alongwith pending applications, if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1470 | 2026 SHC KHI 421 | Const. P. 1826/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M. Tariq Mansoor (Advocate) (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Despite opportunity, nothing has been brought on record by the Petitioner to controvert the stance of the Respondents in this regard. In the absence of any specific challenge to an action taken under the repealed Notification, this Court is not inclined to proceed on mere presumptions or conjectures. 10. Accordingly, the instant Petition, having served its purpose upon repeal of the impugned Notification dated 13.03.2025, is dismissed as having become infructuous, along with all pending applications. However, the Petitioner may seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law against any specific action taken under the repealed Notification. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1471 | 2026 SHC KHI 279 | Const. P. 608/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Haroon Rasheed Through Attorney Muhammad Sohail (Petitioner) VS Abdul Raheem & Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | The principle of concurrent findings applies where both the trial and appellate Courts have reached a similar conclusion on fair rent after evaluating the evidence. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that such concurrent factual findings should not be interfered with unless shown to be wholly unjustified. 16. On the facts and law, the learned Rent Controller and the Appellate Court acted within the statutory scheme of Section???8, SRPO, 1979. Their consideration of prevailing market rent, evidence of comparable premises, and evaluation of costs and taxes was a lawful exercise of judicial discretion. The Petitioner???s objections regarding the age and condition of the premises go to the weight of evidence, not to jurisdiction or legal validity of the fixation order. Enhancement of fair rent on cross objection, and refusal to accept unsubstantiated comparisons offered by the tenant, do not amount to misreading of facts or illegal exercise of discretion. On established rent jurisprudence, concurrent findings affirmed on appeal deserve deference absent clear legal error. Therefore, the impugned orders dated 10.03.2025 and 24.05.2025 are legally sustainable, factually supported, and do not exhibit any jurisdictional error, perversity, or misapplication of law warranting interference. The petition seeking to set aside these judgments lacks merit and is dismissed along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1472 | 2026 SHC KHI 448 | Const. P. 2082/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | M. Tariq Mansoor Advocate (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, the appointment of a Deputy Prime Minister under Notification No. 2-4/2012-Min. I dated 28th April 2024, and the subsequent SRO 2062(I)/2024 dated 18th December 2024, prima facie, seems to be a policy decision of the cabinet. However, since the Deputy Prime Minister is not currently a party to these proceedings, and inclusion of the same at this stage may alter the status of the present petition under Article 199 of the Constitution to issue the Writ of Mandamus or quo warranto when the petitioner was confronted with the legal position, intends to withdraw the petition with permission to file a fresh one. Be that as it may, without touching the merits of the case, the petition, along with pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, while granting the Petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition, which is subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law and without prejudice to the rights of the respondents. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1473 | 2026 SHC KHI 525 | Const. P. 6277/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abid Hussain Marvi & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1474 | 2026 SHC KHI 533 | Const. P. 1078/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. Khushnood Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | In view thereof, this Court is satisfied that the Petitioner???s case warrants consideration. Accordingly, the competent authority of the Respondents is directed to actualize the promotion of the Petitioner to BPS-19 with effect from the date of recommendation of the DPC held on 08.11.2012, subject to there being no legal impediment, and thereafter recalculate and release her retiral benefits on such basis within a reasonable time, if not earlier paid. 6. The petition along with pending application(s) if any stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1475 | 2026 SHC KHI 499 | Const. P. 4251/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Safina Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-26 | Yes | However, in light of the categorical statement made by learned counsel for KMC before this Court that the remaining pensionary benefits, as disclosed in the comments, shall be released within one week, and the petitioner???s counsel having consented to disposal on that basis, the matter does not call for further adjudication on merits. 11. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the direction that the competent authority of respondents shall ensure release of the outstanding commuted pension amount. In case of default, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1476 | 2025 SHC HYD 3569 | Const. P. 1133/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-1362 of 2023 [Mst. Fazeela and others v. Province of Sindh and others], C.P. No.D-1919 of 2023 [Muhammad Zahid v. Province of Sindh and others] and C.P. No.D-1920 of 2023 [Abid Ali v. Province of Sindh and others]. | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Farhan Ahmed Shaikh and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & and Others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 1477 | 2026 SHC KHI 276 | Const. P. 5046/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Waseem Gul (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1478 | 2026 SHC KHI 246 | Const. P. 5696/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Fasihuddin Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-26 | Yes | Furthermore, the Petitioner???s claim is hit by the doctrine of laches. Having remained silent throughout his service tenure and having availed pensionary benefits as calculated by the Respondents, the Petitioner cannot be permitted to reopen settled matters after retirement. The courts have consistently discouraged such belated claims, particularly where third-party rights and administrative finality are involved. 10. In view of the above discussion, this Court finds that the petition is not maintainable due to the absence of statutory service rules. The Petitioner is bound by the terms of absorption accepted by him. The claim for counting past service rendered in PETROMAN lacks legal foundation, and the petition is barred by laches. 11. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, being not maintainable and without merit. No order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1479 | 2026 SHC KHI 639 | Const. P. 376/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Asad Waqar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-MAR-26 | Yes | Consequently, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective claims of the parties, both the petitions are dismissed as not maintainable, with the observation that the petitioners, if so advised, may avail appropriate remedy before the competent civil court or any other forum available under the law. Needless to observe that any observations made in this order are purely tentative in nature and shall not prejudice the rights of the parties before any competent forum. The petitions along with all pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1480 | 2026 SHC KHI 531 | Const. P. 561/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Shazia Arif Butt (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we intend to dispose of the petition with direction to the competent authorities of the respondents, including Respondents No. 2, 4, and 5, who are hereby directed to activate the Petitioner???s passport in all relevant systems and to remove her name from all watchlists, blacklists, and travel restrictions, unless a specific legal bar exists with cogent material and not without such material. Prima facie, the Petitioner is entitled to freedom of travel and needs to be allowed to proceed abroad without any administrative obstruction/restriction. 9. In such circumstances, this petition, along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms. Copies of this order shall be communicated to all relevant authorities, including the Director Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), and Directorate of Immigration, and relevant airline authorities, for strict compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1481 | 2026 SHC KHI 622 | Const. P. 1060/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | M/s International Industries Ltd (Petitioner) VS Jahangir Nawaz & Ors (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | In the present case, Respondent No.1 performed core manufacturing work under the petitioner???s direct supervision, satisfying the legal test for employer control. Unlike the FCC NBP case, where workers had no substantive integration, here the Full Bench rightly relied on IRA 2012 to recognize an employer-employee relationship. The Full Bench???s partial allowance of appeals and remand for further evidence aligns with industrial justice, ensuring due process and protection of statutory rights. Thus, the petitioner???s plea to set aside NIRC orders lacks merit, and the Full Bench???s decision is legally sound and justified. 15. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, Respondent No.1 is effectively entitled to the relief under IRA 2012, and the Petitioner company cannot rely solely on contractor arrangements to avoid these obligations in terms of admissions of the Petitioner-company. 16. This petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1482 | 2026 SHC KHI 93 | Const. P. 1094/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sohail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, this Court holds that the respondents have acted without lawful authority in withholding the petitioner???s pensionary benefits after his superannuation. The impugned action is declared illegal, arbitrary, and of no legal effect. Consequently, the respondents are directed to finalize and release the petitioner???s full pensionary benefits, including pension, gratuity, and all ancillary dues, forthwith, subject to law, within two months, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to appropriate relief in accordance with law. 13. The petition is, therefore, disposed of along with pending application(s) in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1483 | 2026 SHC KHI 96 | Const. P. 1750/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Maymar Housing Services (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-26 | Yes | Before issuing this order, the Board of Revenue, Deputy Commissioners, Assistant Commissioners, and Mukhtiarkars shall ensure protection and proper management of Government land in their jurisdictions. All actions, including verification, demarcation, regularization, and prevention of encroachments, must comply strictly with relevant laws and regulations. Unauthorized transfer, lease, or disposal of Government land is prohibited. Encroachments or illegal use shall be addressed promptly under the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 2010, and other applicable laws. Officials must act proactively to prevent loss to the public exchequer and address public grievances. Periodic compliance reports shall be submitted, with lapses, if any, inviting departmental and legal action. 11. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, without touching the merits of the case, leaving the petitioner with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances. Let this order be communicated to the Senior Member Board of Revenue for immediate compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1484 | 2026 SHC KHI 225 | Const. P. 5770/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Feroze 1888 Mills Ltd and Others (Petitioner) VS Board of Revenue and Othes (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority/respondents to re-examine the alignment and placement of the transmission line in consultation with all stakeholders to ensure that the effective width of the road ,and complies with statutory safety standards and lawful access of the Petitioners to their plots is not materially obstructed, subject to the entitlement under the law. 13. It is clarified that the Respondents No. 2 and 4 may proceed with the project if any in accordance with law and after ensuring that no unlawful encroachment or obstruction of access occurs. However that is subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1485 | 2026 SHC KHI 282 | Const. P. 826/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mehmood Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1486 | 2019 PLC Lab. 140 | Const. P. 77/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rehman and Ors (Respondent) | 30-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.675-K/2018 M/s Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Abdul Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1487 | 2020 SHC KHI 741, 2019 PLC CS Note 2 | Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-20 | Yes | Under Article 199 of Constitution In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that substantial compliance of the Judgment dated 23.01.2018 passed by this Court affirmed by the Honble Supreme Court vide order dated 09.07.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.322-K / 2018 has not been complied with in its letter and spirit. Therefore, at this juncture, prima facie, Petitioner No.2 has made out a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors. Therefore, the office is directed to issue show cause notice under section 17 (1) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 read with Article 204 of the Constitution, as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the Judgment. The listed application bearing (CMA No. 7200 of 2019), is adjourned to be taken up in the second week of January 2021. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1488 | 2021 SHC KHI 1389 | Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) | 19-JAN-21 | Yes | recruitment process of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 and their participation in SPSC. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1489 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 1046 | Const. P. 608/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Aijaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Director Bank Controller State Bank of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1490 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 1213 | Const. P. 1435/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mehboob Shah Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1854/2017 Mehboob Shah Khan and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 1491 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 1046, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1419 | Const. P. 6234/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mehr Iqbal Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) | 03-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.86-K/2017 Mehar Iqbal Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1492 | 2018 YLR Note 82 | Cr.Bail 888/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | MUHAMMAD AHSAN S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1493 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 1787 | Const. P. 324/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Ali Hyder Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 01-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.295-K/2020 Syed Ali Haider Shah v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 1494 | Nil | Const. P. 5608/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mansoor ul Haq Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) | 02-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.859-K/2016 Pakistan Automobile Corporation Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: M/o Industries and Production and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1495 | 2018 SCMR 2116 | Const. P. 4428/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Ahmed Ali Bhambro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.A.80-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others,C.P.L.A.440-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 1496 | Nil | Const. P. 1819/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 04-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1497 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1245 | Const. P. 2598/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Rashid Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | 26-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1498 | 2018 MLD 794 | Cr.Bail 845/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | LUTUFULLAH S/O MARAZ KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 27-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1499 | Nil | Const. P. 7368/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/s Sindh Club (Petitioner) VS Asif Ali (Respondent) | 30-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1500 | 2020 PLC (CS) 220 | Const. P. 4441/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Marina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 01-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1501 | Nil | Const. P. 52/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zafar Adil (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Javed Iqbal and others (Respondent) | 27-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1502 | Nil | Cr.Bail 1730/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) VS the State (Respondent) | 29-DEC-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1503 | 2022 SHC KHI 458 | Const. P. 1526/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | 18-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.441-K/2022 Lyari Development Authority & another v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1504 | Nil | Const. P. 3607/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | abc (Petitioner) VS xyz (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1505 | Nil | Const. P. 1092/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Hari Ram (Petitioner) VS Misri and others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1506 | 2020 SHC KHI 1294 | Const. P. 2342/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Feroz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.204-K/2013 Feroze Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.256-K/2013 Feroze Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed,Disposed |
| 1507 | Nil | Const. P. 1790/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Dodo and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1508 | Nil | Cr.Bail 102/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Rehman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1509 | Nil | Const. P. 1159/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Allah Dino (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1510 | Nil | Cr.Rev 138/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2007 | Abdul Sattar (Applicant) VS Muhammad Azeem (Respondent) | 01-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1511 | Nil | Const. P. 2209/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Khan Muhammad and another (Petitioner) VS Rasheed Khan & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1512 | Nil | Const. P. 1836/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shoukat Hayat Awan (Petitioner) VS A.I.G and Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1513 | Nil | Const. P. 7088/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Wazir Gul & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 02-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1514 | Nil | Const. P. 368/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Silk Bank Limited & others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.278-K/2019 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1515 | Nil | Const. P. 740/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | DR. Mazhar Ali Hisbani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind & Ors (Respondent) | 03-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1516 | Nil | Const. P. 550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1517 | Nil | Const. P. 1415/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Haji Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1518 | 2021 SHC KHI 529 | Const. P. 803/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Metatex (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1519 | Nil | Const. P. 1250/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1520 | Nil | Const. P. 1250/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1521 | Nil | Const. P. 3263/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst, Zarka Bano (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 06-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1522 | Nil | Const. P. 4510/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Irfan & 99 Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1523 | Nil | Const. P. 3625/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sania & another (Petitioner) VS SSP Matiari & others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1524 | Nil | Cr.Acq.A. 8/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Nabi (Appellant) VS MST.BAGHAL & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 07-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1525 | Nil | Const. P. 328/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sharif & others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1526 | Nil | Const. P. 4442/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Ehsan Ali Palari (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.2781/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended. | |
| 1527 | Nil | Const. P. 1017/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Rashid and 93 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-APR-17 | Yes | Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.402-K/2017 Shahid Ali Khan v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.560-K/2017 Muhammad Zahid Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of |
| 1528 | Nil | Const. P. 1091/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Zahoor Khan and 101 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.414-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Zahoor Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1529 | Nil | Const. P. 1119/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nasira Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Chairman Executive Committee & others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1530 | 2021 SHC KHI 840 | Const. P. 4335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed | |
| 1531 | Nil | Const. P. 255/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abu Bakar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.346-K/2019 Abu Bakar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1532 | Nil | Const. P. 1708/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Yousif Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1533 | Nil | Const. P. 210/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Atam Mal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 06-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1534 | Nil | Const. P. 48/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohammad Hashim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS D.C Mirpurkhas (Respondent) | 30-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1535 | 2021 PLC (CS) 295 | Const. P. 404/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.181-K/2019 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. and another v. Muhammad Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1536 | Nil | Const. P. 2446/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ms Noor Ul Ain (Petitioner) VS V/C University Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1537 | Nil | Const. P. 6848/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Human Help Welfar Association (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1538 | 2023 SHC KHI 92 | Const. P. 6766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Fazal-e-Rabbi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1539 | Nil | Const. P. 5133/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Abdul Razzaque Umrani (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1540 | Nil | Const. P. 6723/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Kassim (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1541 | Nil | Const. P. 6899/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s S. Zia-ul-Haq & Sons (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1542 | Nil | Const. P. 6971/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2966/2018 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.69-K/2019 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1543 | Nil | H.C.A 195/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Tauheed Khan (Appellant) VS The Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | 10-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1544 | 2020 PLC (CS) Note 3, 2020 PLC CS Note 3 | Const. P. 5083/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS THe Chairman P.N.S.C and Ors (Respondent) | 12-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1545 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 179, 2018 PLC CS Note 179 | Const. P. 5197/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mrs Sadia Ali Akram (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 22-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1546 | Nil | Const. P. 6745/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Sikandar Khan Laghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1547 | Nil | Const. P. 71/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Manzoor Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 22-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.18-K/2019 Karachi Port Trust and others v. Manzoor Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1548 | Nil | Const. P. 282/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Kazim Larik and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1549 | Nil | Const. P. 2191/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Wasim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Federal Govt. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 15-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1443-K/2018 Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation Pvt Ltd v. M. Wasim Akhtar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1550 | Nil | Const. P. 5537/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1551 | Nil | Const. P. 1102/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Vicky Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4380/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1609/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 1552 | Nil | Const. P. 875/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mirza Ashfaque Ahmed Baig (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) | 21-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1553 | Nil | Const. P. 2439/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mian Mushtaq Ahmed Sajid (Petitioner) VS DGE and CE GHQ and Ors (Respondent) | 04-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.176-K/2019 Mian Mushtaq Ahmed Sajid v. Director General Welfare and Chief Engineer (Army) Rawalpindi Cant. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1554 | 2018 PLC (CS) 1015, 2018 PLC (CS) 1009 | Const. P. 3555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 28-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.4307/2017,C.M.A.8212/2017,C.P.L.A.1247/2018,C.A.170/2018,C.A.171/2018,C.P.L.A.4865/2017 SCP | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered & fixed in Next Week.,Disposed Dismissed(Bench=HJ(12)+HJ(16),Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | |
| 1555 | 2019 CLC 1444 | Const. P. 846/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 26-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Cancelled Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed. | |
| 1556 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1258 | Const. P. 3472/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | M. Afzal Kausar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.544-K/2018 Muhammad Afzal Kausar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1557 | 2019 PLC (CS) 771 | Const. P. 8265/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Majid Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.135/2018 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others,C.A.636/2019 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 1558 | 2019 PLC Lab. 115 | Const. P. 615/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Rana Muhammad Rasheed (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) | 13-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1559 | Nil | Const. P. 464/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Bari Textile Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1560 | Nil | Const. P. 1309/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Multinational Exports (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1561 | Nil | Const. P. 5048/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Sabir Raza (Petitioner) VS HIGH COURT OF SINDH AND ORS (Respondent) | 20-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1562 | Nil | Const. P. 3954/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 07-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.887-K/2018 Syed Ishitiaque Ahmed Hashmi v. Province of Sindh thr. its Director General and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1563 | Nil | Const. P. 4622/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1456-K/2018 The Secy: M/o Port & Shipping Now M/o Maritime Affairs and another v. Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1564 | Nil | Const. P. 5871/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Allama Mousa and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 23-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.880-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Allana Mousa and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1565 | Nil | Const. P. 422/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Hafizullah & ors (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4655/2018,C.P.L.A.574/2019,C.A.1125/2019,C.A.1127/2019 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of. | |
| 1566 | Nil | H.C.A 149/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS Inam Hafiz (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1567 | Nil | Const. P. 3940/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Atlas Enterprises and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1568 | Nil | Const. P. 4068/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Fluid Technology International (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1569 | Nil | Const. P. 461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Mehboob Re-Rolling Mills (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1570 | Nil | Const. P. 6092/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Good Luck Ind. (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1571 | Nil | Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.416-K/2017,C.P.L.A.3670/2019,C.P.L.A.2085/2020,C.P.L.A.2109/2020 SCP | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1572 | 2020 SHC KHI 1715 | Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) | 09-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.416-K/2017,C.P.L.A.3670/2019,C.P.L.A.2085/2020,C.P.L.A.2109/2020 SCP | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1573 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 49, 2019 PLC CS Note 49 | Const. P. 2074/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nabi Bux Jamali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-APR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1574 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 2164 | Const. P. 8070/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mir Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 05-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1575 | Nil | Const. P. 8408/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nazir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.133-K/2019 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.71-K/2020 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 1576 | Nil | Cr.Bail 499/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Qamaruddin S/o Haji Muhammad Suleman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 21-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1577 | 2020 PLC (CS) 326 | Const. P. 7114/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Asifa Jawed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 07-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1578 | Nil | Const. P. 5523/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Muhammad Iqbal Kazmi (Petitioner) VS Mayor Karachi and Ors (Respondent) | 29-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.500-K/2019 Syed Muhammad Iqbal Kazmi v. Mayor of Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1579 | Nil | Const. P. 862/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Abdul Jabbar Qureshi (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1580 | Nil | Const. P. 280/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2004 | Pervaiz (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1581 | Nil | Const. P. 920/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shaikh Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar Revenue Nagarparkar and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1582 | Nil | Const. P. 1247/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Allah Bux (Petitioner) VS M.D (CEO) H.B.F.C Ltd & others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.38-K/2020 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others,C.A.2-K/2021 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed | |
| 1583 | Nil | Const. P. 2676/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Javed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1584 | Nil | Const. P. 1937/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1585 | Nil | Const. P. 2451/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahjehan Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1586 | Nil | Const. P. 2981/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Azeem Rind (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1587 | Nil | Const. P. 3175/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahan Lakho & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1588 | Nil | Const. P. 1768/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Bilawal & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1589 | 2021 SHC KHI 1300 | Const. P. 5561/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Ghulam Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 01-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.953-K/2025 Ghulam Hussain v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Petroleum/Gas & Natural Resources Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 1590 | Nil | Const. P. 1404/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Suleman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1591 | Nil | Const. P. 3596/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sayeda Kiran Batool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1592 | Nil | Const. P. 2671/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1593 | Nil | Const. P. 1781/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Moazam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1594 | Nil | Const. P. 7596/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Fouzia Munir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.555-K/2019 Fouzia Munir v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 1595 | Nil | Const. P. 2898/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dad Rahim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-SEP-19 | Yes | The service of the petitioners, employees of the Fishermen???s Cooperative Society Ltd., were terminated vide letter dated 31.12.2018 issued by the Administration Department of Fishermen???s Cooperative Society. Prima-facie, the society is purely a private corporate body with no public duty; hence, a writ of mandamus would not lie against the Respondent-Society. The Respondent-Society is a co-operative society constituted under the agreement between members thereof, who are to abide by the provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act, and the rules and bye-laws framed thereunder by the Society. The society is undisputedly not a department of the State and is also not a creature of any statute but merely governed by a statute. We may observe here that this Court can only interfere in the matter, if it is established that a mandatory Provision of a statute has been violated. The dispute so noted by this Court essentially related to the claims and counter claims of the private parties relating to the service matter, which in our view is an internal matter between them and rights of the petitioners are purely of a private character, not open to be dealt with in a writ petition; therefore, writ of mandamus cannot be issued under the Article 199 of the Constitution, 1973 for petitioners??? reinstatement in service. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1596 | Nil | Const. P. 761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ihsan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1597 | Nil | Const. P. 2550/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mohsin Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1598 | Nil | Const. P. 163/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1599 | Nil | Const. P. 1951/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mohammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1600 | Nil | Const. P. 2374/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1601 | Nil | Const. P. 2009/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohammad Essa Khan &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1602 | Nil | Const. P. 50/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Junaid Muzahir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1603 | Nil | Const. P. 5200/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Noman (Petitioner) VS NADRA & Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.520-K/2019 Noman v. National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) and others,C.A.42-K/2020 Noman v. National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months, | |
| 1604 | Nil | Const. P. 3445/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M. Fayaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1605 | Nil | Const. P. 314/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1606 | Nil | Const. P. 1000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Raza Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1607 | Nil | Const. P. 3739/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS NAB & others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1608 | Nil | I. A 49/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2000 | Mashooq Ali Bhutto (Appellant) VS ADBP Hyd & others (Respondent) | 23-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1609 | Nil | Const. P. 43/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Samuel Parvaiz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1610 | Nil | Const. P. 3216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mir Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1611 | Nil | Const. P. 2814/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Talib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1612 | Nil | Const. P. 1923/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Jam & others (Petitioner) VS Abbas & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.546-K/2019 Muhammad Saleem and others. v. Muhammad Jam and others. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 1613 | 2020 SHC KHI 796 | Const. P. 2761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Sadiq Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | University of Karachi--candidature for the post of professor was not considered--if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law. if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1614 | 2020 SHC KHI 1461 | Const. P. 5784/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Abdul Salam Khatri (Petitioner) VS D.G MC & C and Ors (Respondent) | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | Non prosecution--Since the issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others supra, this petition is not maintainable. The issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1615 | Nil | Const. P. 412/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Bahadur Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1616 | Nil | Const. P. 136/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1617 | Nil | Const. P. 492/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dildar Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1618 | Nil | Const. P. 379/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1619 | Nil | Const. P. 1961/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Haji Muhammad Roshan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1620 | Nil | Const. P. 2370/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1621 | Nil | Const. P. 2125/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1622 | Nil | Const. P. 6051/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sohrab Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1623 | Nil | Const. P. 3319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Suresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1624 | Nil | Const. P. 733/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1625 | Nil | Const. P. 2581/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1626 | Nil | Const. P. 3387/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1627 | Nil | Const. P. 3275/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1628 | Nil | Const. P. 112/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Tariq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1629 | Nil | Const. P. 4677/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Dr. Naeem Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) | 18-SEP-19 | Yes | Whether supersession is punishment---in promotion matters to such post could not be made in a mechanical manner and a variety of factors, such as examination of service records, evaluation reports of training institutions, record of disciplinary proceedings, reputation of integrity and efficiency, suitability for handling particular assignment, etc. had to be taken into consideration--- NCA Employees Service Rules 2011, on the aforesaid proposition, the matter has been set at rest by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others v. NESCOM through Chairman Islamabad and others (PLD 2016 SC 377)] therefore, question of declaring the Chapter II of the NCA Employees Service Rules 2011 as ultra vires of Section 9, 11 of the National Command Authority Act 2010 and Articles 4,9,10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 are not apropos at this stage for the reason discussed in the preceding paragraphs. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1630 | Nil | Const. P. 400/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Other (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1631 | Nil | Const. P. 2389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zahid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1632 | Nil | Const. P. 3018/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nafees Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1633 | Nil | Const. P. 1526/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nazar Muhammad (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1634 | Nil | Const. P. 3707/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Nawaz & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1635 | Nil | Const. P. 3127/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Faiz Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1636 | Nil | Const. P. 1347/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1637 | Nil | Const. P. 7655/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 23-SEP-19 | Yes | Disciplinary proceedings against employee of PSO--We, thus, are of the view that it is for the Respondent-Company to place its employees in accordance with its Service Rules and Regulations, which is an internal matter of the Respondent-Company, thus devoid of any Constitutional interference, at this juncture. Our view is supported by the latest decision announced on 13.5.2019 by the Honorable Supreme Court in an unreported case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals (2019 SCMR 984)--we are not inclined to interfere in the terms and conditions of the service of the Petitioner, in Constitutional Jurisdiction, being non-statutory Rules of Service, therefore, the instant petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1638 | Nil | Const. P. 2588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1639 | Nil | Const. P. 3498/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1640 | Nil | Const. P. 2744/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ghayas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1641 | 2021 SHC HYD 747 | Const. P. 178/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1642 | 2020 SHC HYD 201 | Cr.J.A 90/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ahsan @ Keso (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1643 | 2020 SHC KHI 1555 | Const. P. 439/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Haji Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1644 | 2020 SHC KHI 31 | Const. P. 617/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Boota and Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-20 | Yes | private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1645 | 2020 SHC HYD 1766 | I. A 12/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aalam & others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | The encroachment of amenity plot cannot be allowed to sustain under the law, which aspect, the official respondents have to look into and restore its position in accordance with law. The encroachment of an amenity plot to another use is treated as an abuse of discretion and therefore is unlawful for the simple reason that the paramount object of modern city planning is to ensure maximum comforts for the residents of the city by providing maximum facilities and that a public functionary entrusted with the work to achieve the above object cannot act in a manner, which may defeat the above objective and deviation from the planned scheme will naturally result in discomfort and inconvenience to others. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1646 | 2020 SHC HYD 2428 | Const. P. 151/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sahoo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1647 | 2020 SHC HYD 2300 | Const. P. 405/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Dr. Nazia Iram & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1648 | 2020 SHC KHI 1133 | Const. P. 408/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mohammad Mithal Lohach (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 28-FEB-20 | Yes | No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1649 | 2020 SHC HYD 539 | I. A 26/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rahim Dino & another (Appellant) VS Learned Asst: Commissioner/ LAO Islamkot @ Mithi (Respondent) | 04-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1287-K/2022 Muhammad Rizwan v. Saleem Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (C.M.A.486-K/2025 Allowed) | |
| 1650 | 2020 SHC HYD 75 | Const. P. 3385/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Assadullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1651 | 2020 SHC HYD 1273 | Const. P. 2094/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Akram Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1652 | 2020 SHC KHI 1197 | Const. P. 6868/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Arsalan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.369-K/2020 Muhammad Saleem v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1653 | 2020 SHC HYD 864 | Criminal Appeal 45/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | Bashir Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1654 | 2020 SHC HYD 448 | Criminal Appeal 12/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | JAVED & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1655 | 2020 SHC KHI 1662, 2021 PLC (CS) 919 | Const. P. 3840/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTET and Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-20 | Yes | The grievance of the petitioner, who is a retired employee of respondent No.2 / PTCL, is that pension has not been / is not being paid to him in accordance with law as substantial amounts have been / are being deducted therefrom illegally by the respondents on account of rent---It is well-settled that no amount on account of rent can be deducted from pension. On behalf of respondent No.2, their above named officer undertakes that the amount of Rs.476,373.00 illegally deducted from the petitioner's pension on account of rent shall be refunded to him within thirty (30) days from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the above undertaking and seeks disposal of the present petition in terms thereof. Regarding the amount illegally deducted by respondent No.2 from the pension of other retired employees on account of rent, further undertaking has been given by the above named officer on behalf of respondent No.2 that the entire said amount shall be refunded to all the said retired employees within three (03) months from today, and for this purpose they shall publish a public notice in leading English and Urdu newspapers having large circulation throughout Pakistan, inviting all the said retired employees to collect their refund. Respondent No.2 is directed to submit a compliance report to this Court in terms of this order through MIT-II latest by 31.01.2021---By consent, the petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs and listed application stands disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1656 | 2020 SHC KHI 616 | Const. P. 5907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | 24-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.228/2021 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation thr. its authorized Office, Karachi v. National Industrial Relations Commission(Full Bench) , Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1657 | 2020 SHC KHI 2196 | Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) | 04-DEC-20 | Yes | Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.737/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Sarvech Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 1658 | 2020 SHC KHI 1527 | Const. P. 2334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Azam and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1794/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Muhammad Azam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 1659 | 2021 YLR 867 | Const. P. 6168/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sardar Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1660 | 2020 SHC HYD 1495 | Const. P. 361/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nadeem Ahmed Khan &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.735-K/2022 Nadeem Ahmed Khan & another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1661 | 2020 SHC KHI 1830 | Const. P. 8536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Riffat John (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.294-K/2020 Riffat John v. Province of Sindh & others,C.A.976/2020 Riffat John v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months., Adjourned |
| 1662 | 2020 SHC KHI 1126 | Const. P. 5203/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Khalid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.93-K/2021 Muhammad Khalid v. Federation of Pakistan & others,C.A.18-K/2022 Muhammad Khalid v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 1663 | 2020 SHC HYD 777 | Civil Revision 28/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2008 | Muhammad Naseer and others (Applicant) VS H.M.C. and others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1664 | 2023 PLC Lab. 41 | Const. P. 3026/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1665 | 2020 SHC KHI 1077 | Const. P. 5651/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shabnam Magsi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1666 | 2020 SHC KHI 187, 2021 PLC (CS) 591 | Const. P. 5850/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zeeshan Usman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1754/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others,C.A.936/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.,Disposed Allowed |
| 1667 | 2020 SHC SUK 752 | Criminal Appeal 189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2019 | Azhar Ali & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 29-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | |||
| 1668 | 2020 SHC KHI 2454 | Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-20 | Yes | EOBI--pension of the petitioner was stopped by the respondent/institution without disclosing any reasonable cause--We are of the firm view that the petitioner did not qualify the minimum years of service as laid down under Section 22(b) of the Act, whereby the qualifying service for being entitled to pensionary benefits is 15 years, whereas, it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was an employee of the private company and had served it only for a period of 13 years. Petitioner does not meet the requisite criteria stipulated in the said Section to claim old age pension--Adverting to the next contention that the Labor Policy-2010 was fully applicable in the case of parties, in our view, Circular No.3 of 2010 (Policy) cannot override the Act, 1976, therefore, no benefit can be obtained arising out of it--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition, being devoid of any legal standing, is hereby dismissed along with pending application with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.206-K/2020 Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 1669 | 2020 SHC HYD 810 | Const. P. 382/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Pir Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Zakriya & Other (Respondent) | 04-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1670 | 2021 SHC KHI 835 | Const. P. 6018/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ali Gul Kalyar (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-21 | Yes | vacation for official accommodation | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1671 | 2020 SHC KHI 2478 | Const. P. 3479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Irfanullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years??? service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1662/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Irfan Ullah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 1672 | 2020 SHC KHI 1215, 2021 PLC (CS) 108 | Const. P. 615/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Aslam Shah and Others (Respondent) | 10-MAR-20 | Yes | private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1673 | 2020 SHC KHI 2357 | Const. P. 2860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | chowkidar in the office of District & Sessions Judge, Karachi East based on son quota--Therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings as it would fall within mischief of constructive res-judicata. Reliance is placed on the case of State Bank of Pakistan through Governor and others vs. Imtiaz Ali Khan and others (2012 SCMR 280). 5. In our view, once the stance of the petitioner on the aforesaid analogy has been set at rest by the Administrative Committee, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution as writ does not lie against such decision of the Administrative Committee. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1674 | 2020 SHC HYD 610 | Const. P. 34/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sitara (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1675 | 2020 SHC HYD 290 | Const. P. 175/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1269-K/2020 Ishaque Ahmed v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1676 | 2020 SHC HYD 1220 | Const. P. 724/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohammad Aslam Rana & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.739-K/2022 Syed Hassan Haider & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1677 | 2021 SHC KHI 1044 | Const. P. 827/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Irfan Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-21 | Yes | The petition thus does not require any consideration and indulgence and is accordingly dismissed along with listed applications. However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek appointment on differently-abled quota as and when the public notice is issued in the newspapers. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1678 | 2020 SHC KHI 1023 | Const. P. 6200/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Mehdi Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-20 | Yes | Prima-facie his matter on the subject issue is still subjudice before the learned FST, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioner. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct learned FST to decide the application under Rule 23-A of the Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules 1974 of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1679 | 2020 SHC HYD 265 | Const. P. 2644/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mir Imadad Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst Sajida & another (Respondent) | 22-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1680 | 2021 SHC KHI 978 | Const. P. 848/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | M/s Gerry (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 03-FEB-21 | Yes | M/s. Gerry's Dnata (Pvt.) Ltd.--Adverting to the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner-company that the NIRC was not competent to summon the Vice President for his appearance in Court, prima facie this assertion is misconceived for the simple reason that the learned Bench of NIRC is competent under section 54 & 55(1)(iii)(a)(b)(c)(d) and 57(a) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 . | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1681 | 2020 SHC HYD 33 | Const. P. 89/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Humera and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1682 | 2020 SHC HYD 1440 | Const. P. 438/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dheraj @ Wanio (Petitioner) VS Sht. Surma & Others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1683 | 2020 SHC HYD 2457 | Const. P. 2093/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Azam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1684 | 2021 SHC KHI 1446 | Const. P. 4067/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Masood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1685 | 2020 SHC HYD 1682 | Const. P. 253/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Azma & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1686 | 2020 SHC KHI 1210 | Const. P. 2797/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mohammad Rashid (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1332-K/2020 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1687 | 2020 SHC KHI 636 | Const. P. 3543/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sadaqat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue of project employees | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1688 | 2020 SHC HYD 2273 | Const. P. 174/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ameen Kharani (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1280-K/2020 Ameen Kharani v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1689 | 2020 SHC KHI 1062 | Const. P. 4932/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Haleem Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners' promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1690 | 2020 SHC HYD 1319 | Const. P. 2626/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khairullah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1691 | 2020 SHC KHI 2195 | Const. P. 4907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fareed and Others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-20 | Yes | The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1692 | 2020 SHC KHI 1564 | Const. P. 2634/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Islam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue of project employees | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1693 | 2020 SHC KHI 2220 | Const. P. 3234/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Habib ul Hassan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue of project employees | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1694 | 2022 YLR 450 | Const. P. 28/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Arsalan Aijaz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sanober & Others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1695 | 2020 SHC HYD 320 | Const. P. 2434/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khan Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 06-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1696 | 2020 SHC HYD 718 | Const. P. 865/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nazia & Others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1697 | 2020 SHC HYD 488 | Cr.Misc. 145/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Farzana (Applicant) VS SSP District Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1698 | 2020 SHC HYD 1318 | Criminal Appeal 290/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1699 | 2023 SHC KHI 502 | Const. P. 2512/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abrar Ali Khichi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1700 | 2022 SHC KHI 898 | Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1701 | 2022 PLC (CS) 1266 | Const. P. 3854/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Mst. Farah Naz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | 11-FEB-21 | Yes | we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1702 | 2021 SHC KHI 657 | Const. P. 4925/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Nazir Ahmed Palijo (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | In the light of the above discussion, it is demonstrably clear that the petitioner has not been denied or deprived of a legal right. He has not sustained an injury to any legally protected interest. The impugned working paper does not operate as a decision against him, much less does it wrongfully affect his title to something. He has not been subjected to a legal wrong. He has suffered no legal grievance. He has no legal peg for a justifiable claim to hang on. However the petitioner has only sustainable cause to be considered for promotion in BS-20 subject to qualification, experience, and availably of the post, however, the petitioner is not precluded to ask for consideration of his case for promotion as per Rule 13 of Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation, and Seniority) Rules, 1975 by PSB-I which is going to take place in the ensuing month. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1703 | 2021 SHC KHI 1358, 2025 SHC KHI 2028, 2023 PLC Lab. 186 | Const. P. 6712/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s Telenor Microfinance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 07-OCT-21 | Yes | Social Security for workers | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1704 | 2021 SHC KHI 1216 | Const. P. 887/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Hassan Zada & Ors (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) | 04-MAY-21 | Yes | that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4119/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others,C.A.1564/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Disposed of |
| 1705 | 2021 SHC KHI 755 | Const. P. 4485/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Prof. Javed Ahmed Badvi & another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-SEP-21 | Yes | Petitioner No.2 has impugned the recruitment process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the position of Vice-Chancellor, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, (SMBBMU)---We are of the view the ground of awarding marks to the shortlisted candidates by the Search Committee was not their mandate under reference set forth by the competent authority. On the subject, unreported order dated 21.12.2017 passed by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Civil Petition No.655-K of 2017 (Re-Prof. Abdul Razak Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others) and Professor Dr. Razia Sultana supra is clear in its terms | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1706 | 2021 SHC KHI 982 | Const. P. 2124/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | M/s Star Denim Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAR-21 | Yes | petitioner-M/s. Star Denim Pvt. Ltd. is asking for setting aside of the impugned letter dated 10.03.2021, whereby Audit Officers of the Sindh Employees Social Security Institution (`SESSI`) attempted to visit the establishment of the petitioner to verify the Secured Workers engaged by for issuing the R-5 cards so they could get the financial / Medical care facility-- | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1707 | 2021 SHC KHI 1065 | Const. P. 4048/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | M/s. Dalda Foods(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent) | 06-OCT-21 | Yes | We find that the private respondents were deprived of their due process rights. They were not confronted with the material based on which their services were verbally terminated. Even otherwise, the process followed by the petitioners was sketchy, one-sided, non-transparent, and not supported even by the law. We, therefore, find that both the Learned SLC and SLAT were justified in passing the impugned orders and recorded valid and cogent reasons for doing so, therefore, no ground existed for re-evaluation of the evidence, thus, we maintain the consolidated order dated 22.10.2011 passed by the Sindh Labour Court (SLC) in grievance Applications of the private respondents and common order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal (SLAT) in Appeal No. KAR-273/2011, Appeal Nos. KAR-445/2011 to KAR 496/2011 and KAR-498/2011 to KAR-603/2011. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.6488/2021 M/s Dalda Foods (Pvt) Limited v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.5640/2021 M/s Haq Engineering & Packing Service (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | , |
| 1708 | 2021 SHC KHI 1055 | Const. P. 4596/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Employers Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-OCT-21 | Yes | Title Minimum Wages under the Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.5863/2021,C.P.L.A.5800/2021,C.P.L.A.64/2022,C.P.L.A.1370/2022,C.P.L.A.6605/2021,C.P.L.A.6606/2021 SCP | ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed |
| 1709 | 2021 SHC KHI 1285, 2023 PLC CS Note 3 | Const. P. 4534/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faisal Rasheed (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) | 01-MAR-21 | Yes | Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2744/2022 Faisal Rasheed v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 1710 | 2021 SHC KHI 1097 | Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-21 | Yes | Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the respondents be directed to issue notification in respect of his retirement and to pay his post-retirement benefits and outstanding salary. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 1711 | 2021 SHC KHI 14 | Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1712 | 2021 SHC KHI 1328 | Const. P. 8065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) | 08-APR-21 | Yes | we asked the learned counsel for respondent-Institution under what law and authority they attempted to nullify the effect of the judgment passed by this Court, maintained by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4384/2021 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI) & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.10973/21 for impleadment is Dismissed as not pressed. |
| 1713 | 2021 SHC KHI 593 | Const. P. 3288/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Muhammad Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 11-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1714 | 2023 PLC CS 700 | Const. P. 63/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Iqbal Naseem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 23-FEB-21 | Yes | Shaheed quota | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1715 | 2021 SHC KHI 63 | Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-MAR-21 | Yes | alteration in date of Birth | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1716 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 371 | Const. P. 6167/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Al - Ghazi Traders Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-21 | Yes | whether the Sindh Human Rights Commission was/is empowered under Section 4 of the Sindh Protection of Human Rights Act, 2011, (Act, 2011) to entertain service-related issues and direct the reinstatement of the private respondents. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1717 | 2021 SHC KHI 711 | Const. P. 2511/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 14-SEP-21 | Yes | At this juncture, learned AAG contends that there is another judgment i.e. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Punjab Lahore etc. v. Ms. Shamim Usman (Civil Petition No.1097-L of 2020) and extends his no objection that if the matter is referred to the Competent Authority, who shall examine the case of the petitioners alongwith their batch-mates as well seniors within the guidelines of dicta laid down by the apex Court and rules in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 03 months. Needless to mention that any findings of that Committee can be challenged by the petitioners or by any aggrieved person through independent proceedings and not under the contempt proceedings. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners, contends that in another inquiry competent officers opined that the case of Gul Hassan Jatoi (supra) is not applicable to them with regard to promotion, suffice to say that Police Rules are binding upon authorities, however, interpretation of the apex Court and guidelines provided in judgment, particularly paragraphs 56 and 71, shall be examined as afresh and earlier opinion shall not come in the way of promotion. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1718 | 2021 SHC LAR 537 | Criminal Appeal 18/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Original Side | 2021 | Arsallah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 03-AUG-21 | Yes | The present appellant has been convicted by the trial Court on the same set of facts and evidence, above mentioned, which this Court has not considered sufficient to warrant conviction of the appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016 and award them afore-mentioned sentences. So far the case of present appellant is concerned; we do not find any special features that distinguish his case/role from those of said appellants, justifying recoding conviction and sentence to present appellant. Hence, the present appellant is also entitled to the same benefit of doubt earlier extended in favour of appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016. Consequently, we allow this criminal appeal, set aside the conviction and sentences of appellant recorded by the trial Court vide impugned judgment and acquit him of the charges. He shall be set at liberty forthwith, if not required to be detained in any other case | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1719 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 957 | Const. P. 4674/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Pakistan Services Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 27-APR-21 | Yes | (i) Whether Petitioner-PSL has locus standi to approach this Court as an aggrieved party under Article 199 of the Constitution against the decisions of NIRC? (ii) Whether petitioner-PSL is a Trans-Provincial Organization and falls within the ambit of National Industrial Relations Act, 2012? (iii) Whether or not the registration of industry-wise trade unions by the Registrar, Trade Union NIRC, Islamabad is violative of the mandatory requirement of Section 8 of Act, 2012, based on strength of workforce; and, liable to be canceled, in view of mandate of Section 11 of the IRA-2012? (iv) Whether the registrar of trade unions and/or NIRC is competent to determine the registration of the respondent unions? | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3497/2021 Pakistan Services Limitd, Islamabad through Director v. Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission, comprising three embers at Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1720 | 2021 SHC KHI 808 | Const. P. 8948/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 16-MAR-21 | Yes | Member of the Armed Forces--review petition pending before respondent No.1 may be ordered to be decided under the law. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1721 | 2021 SHC KHI 146, 2024 PLC (CS) 934 | Const. P. 2001/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mirza Anwer Mehmood Baig (Petitioner) VS DG C.A.A and Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioner has sought suspension of the operation of Show Cause Notice dated 25.2.2021 issued by the respondent-Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) on the accusation of production of a copy of the mark sheet No.00575 of BA (Pass) 1st and 2nd Year Examination of 1987, which was later on found fake, which amounts misconduct as provided under Civil Aviation Authority (Efficiency and Discipline) Regulations, 2014. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1722 | 2021 SHC KHI 295 | Const. P. 535/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M. Qasim Jakhar (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) | 07-SEP-21 | Yes | Enforcement of decision of SST---Besides above, the point of laches is also involved in this matter on the ground that the petitioner has approached this court in the year 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007 when he was purportedly terminated from his service, the reasoning assigned by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has approached this court based on decision passed by the learned SST in the year 2010; that a constitutional petition involving violation and infringement of fundamental rights of the citizens could not be thrown out on the ground of delay in filing the same. We do not concur with this assertion of the learned counsel for the Petitioner with his explanation of laches as rights of the petitioner were not dependent upon other petitioners in the referred petition. We are of the considered view that the instant Petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the Petitioner filed the instant Petition in January 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007, i.e. approximately 08 years before the filing of the instant Petition. It is well-settled law that those who slept over their rights cannot be given a premium of their own fault because such conduct does trigger the principle of waiver. The observations of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) is a guiding principle on the issue of laches. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1723 | 2022 PLD Sindh 131 | Const. P. 166/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Fayaz Ali Mastoi (Petitioner) VS Assistant XEN Irrigation Shahdadkot & others (Respondent) | 03-AUG-21 | Yes | Irrigation Water | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1724 | 2021 SHC KHI 82, 2024 PLC (CS) 967 | Const. P. 4452/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 06-APR-21 | Yes | Son Quota | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1725 | 2021 SHC LAR 235 | Cr.Bail 25/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sultan Ahmed Rind and Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-AUG-21 | Yes | PROTECTIVE BAIL | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1726 | 2021 SHC KHI 468 | Const. P. 5172/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Imran Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shafique and Others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1727 | 2021 SHC KHI 67 | Const. P. 5281/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ayaz Ahmed and Othes (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-21 | Yes | relieving letters of employer (SSGC Limited/respondents No.2 and 3) is against the spirit of the judgment and that paragraph 61 of the judgment cannot be treated as against the petitioners, hence SSGC has taken wrong decision in interpretation of that judgment--It is settled principle of law that promulgation of Ordinances are passed only when the assembly is not in session. The Ordinances are meant to deal with a situation of emergency required to be endorsed by the Assembly--Without prejudice to the above, it may safely be added that interpretation may be done of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court but such course would not be available when the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is being challenged while referring to interpretation thereof by this Court. If such view is allowed to hold the field, the same shall open the rooms for making a challenge to consequences of judgment(s) of Honourable Apex Court which, we would insist, may prejudice the binding effect thereof, as insisted by Article 189 of the Constitution. In the instant matter, the authority claims to have passed the order in compliance of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court. The legal position, being so, leave us with no other option but to add that appropriate remedy to challenge the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is only by approaching the Apex Court. The instant petition, being incompetent, is dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.5610/2021 Ayaz Ahmed Mahar and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous |
| 1728 | 2021 SHC KHI 705 | Const. P. 5063/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | M/s Gul Ahmed Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Court of Commission for Worksmen Comp. & another (Respondent) | 26-AUG-21 | Yes | we decide this petition with direction to the Commission /Authority to frame legal issue with regard to jurisdiction, as stated above, particularly in paragraph-8 of the impugned order, and allow the parties to submit documents, including additional documents if not already filed, or lead evidence and thereafter finally decide the jurisdictional question | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1729 | 2021 SHC KHI 19 | Const. P. 3184/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-JUN-21 | Yes | In the light of the above discussion, in our view, a deputationist could not be treated as an aggrieved person, because she has no vested right to remain on a post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period and can be repatriated at any time to her parent department more particularly in the light of aforesaid decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court. Reference is also made to the case of Dr. Shafi-ur-Rehman Afridi V/s CDA, Islamabad through Chairman and others (2010 SCMR 378). Even otherwise she cannot continue to serve on deputation in Sindh Government after her removal from service by the parent department, as discussed supra. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1730 | 2021 SHC KHI 135 | Const. P. 7700/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Husnain Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | Health Department, Government of Sindh, whereby the petitioners may be allowed to pursue their academic medical career subject to extraordinary leave (without pay) for the required period--At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners in substance has pleaded discrimination as they were not sent for training within time, however, he has seriously submitted that their other batch mates on the same consideration were considered and were sent for training and the petitioners were left out except petitioners No.6, 9, 10, and 14. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 1731 | 2021 SHC LAR 259 | Cr.Bail 272/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Bakhshal Abro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1732 | 2021 SHC KHI 1184 | Const. P. 2395/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS The Secretary SWWB & Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-21 | Yes | The aforesaid petition is virtually against the transfer and posting order of the private respondent on Own Pay Scale basis. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 1733 | 2021 SHC KHI 861 | Const. P. 4172/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sami Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) | 21-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 1734 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1193 | Cr.Bail 279/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Badal Bariro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1735 | 2021 SHC HYD 848 | Const. P. 1644/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Nawaz Murad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1736 | 2021 SHC HYD 489 | Const. P. 640/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Gulji & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1737 | 2021 SHC HYD 237 | Const. P. 907/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Nazim Taluka Municipal Administration Samaro & Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1738 | 2021 SHC HYD 253 | Cr.Bail 682/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Naqash and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1739 | 2021 SHC HYD 980 | Civil Revision 154/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Province Of Sindh and Ors (Applicant) VS Jalil Ahmed and Others (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1740 | 2021 SHC HYD 56 | Civil Revision 165/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2014 | Suleman (Applicant) VS Murad Ali & Others (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1741 | 2021 SHC HYD 814 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1742 | 2021 SHC HYD 866 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1743 | 2021 SHC HYD 1157 | Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Razzaque (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 1744 | 2021 SHC HYD 902 | Const. P. 1471/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Shahid Ahmed Khan Qaboolio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1745 | 2021 SHC HYD 324 | I. A 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Intra Court Appeal No.01 of 2019 [Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited versus Saleem Ahmed Memon] | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Saleem Ahmed Memon (Respondent) | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1746 | 2021 SHC HYD 1381 | Const. P. 6/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Asif & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | "Shifting of SABZI MANDI - MARKET COMMITTEE" | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 1747 | 2021 SHC HYD 1269 | Const. P. 3207/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sardar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.65-K/2022 Syed Sardar Ali Shah & others v. Government of Sindh through chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 1748 | 2021 SHC HYD 1428 | Const. P. 114/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: attached case ...... CP No. D- 1236 of 2014 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Mohammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1749 | 2021 SHC HYD 1445 | Const. P. 1930/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 09-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1750 | 2021 SHC HYD 370 | Const. P. 837/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mir Munawar Ali Talpur (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 1751 | 2021 SHC HYD 1422 | Const. P. 632/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.918-K/2022 Faheem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh Chief Minister, through Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 1752 | 2021 SHC HYD 663 | Cr.Rev 42/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Imran Ali (Applicant) VS Mst Shahina Irfan & others (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1753 | 2021 SHC HYD 801 | Const. P. 1536/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | shafi Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 18-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1754 | 2021 SHC KHI 804 | Const. P. 5067/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Akram Memon (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Civil Aviation Athority & Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1755 | 2021 SHC KHI 996 | Const. P. 2269/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Gadoon Textile Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.154/2022 M/s Gadoon Textile Mills Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan, through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development , Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1756 | 2022 SHC KHI 283 | Const. P. 5062/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Engr: Muharram Khan and Othes (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-JAN-22 | Yes | whether the private respondents are undertaking the work of professional engineers in terms of the Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975, being Diploma Holders. And whether their case falls within the ambit of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maula Bux Shaikh supra or otherwise. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1757 | 2022 SHC KHI 343 | Const. P. 3083/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Pir Bux Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 25-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1758 | 2021 SHC KHI 1183 | Const. P. 3791/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Shezan International Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.70/2022 M/s Shezan International Ltd, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1759 | 2021 SHC KHI 1191 | Const. P. 7331/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ahmed Tabba (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Others (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1760 | 2021 SHC KHI 478 | Const. P. 5121/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s CSM Pakistan (Guarantee) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1761 | 2022 SHC KHI 616 | Const. P. 5016/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sohail Memon and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.569-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others v. Sohail Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned | |
| 1762 | 2022 SHC KHI 28 | Const. P. 3981/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Saeed Babar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-APR-22 | Yes | Seniority in service, cadre, or post to which an official is promoted is to take effect from the date of regular promotion to that service, cadre, or post and not from the date of any ad-hoc induction | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1763 | 2022 SHC KHI 204 | Const. P. 1867/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Subhan Ali Shoro & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1764 | 2021 SHC KHI 1043 | Const. P. 2122/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Artistic Millinners Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1765 | 2021 SHC KHI 689 | Const. P. 2729/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Patel Foundation and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1766 | 2021 SHC KHI 84 | Const. P. 4369/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Fine Towel and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1767 | 2021 SHC KHI 400 | Const. P. 4587/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Adil Textile Ind and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1768 | 2021 SHC KHI 728 | Const. P. 5636/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Asad Apparel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1769 | 2022 SHC KHI 263 | Const. P. 102/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.714-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Uris Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1770 | 2021 SHC KHI 252 | Const. P. 2084/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Agility Logistics Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.69/2022 Agility Logistics Private Limited Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1771 | 2022 SHC KHI 810 | Const. P. 6114/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Sohail Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) | 18-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1772 | 2022 SHC KHI 595 | Const. P. 214/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mateen-ud-din Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) | 24-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1773 | 2022 SHC KHI 713 | Const. P. 576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mahmood Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1774 | 2021 SHC HYD 1424 | Const. P. 912/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Zahid Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1775 | 2025 SHC KHI 1074 | Const. P. 6571/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Masood Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-25 | Yes | Primarily the promotion in next rank is to be made based on senior cum fitness coupled with availability of vacancy under the Recruitment Rules and if those rules do not equate BPS-16 positions to BPS-17, the same cannot be granted based solely on possessing specific Second-Division degrees in Agriculture, Civil, or Mechanical Engineering, or an MSc in Agriculture from a recognized university. However, it is for the respondent department to deal with the service issues of the employees in accordance with law and without discrimination. 7. In view of the aforesaid legal position of the case, this petition is dismissed with pending application(s). JUDGE | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1776 | 2023 SHC KHI 632 | Const. P. 419/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Basheer Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.5397/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar,C.A.2856/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 1777 | 2023 SHC KHI 942 | Const. P. 7068/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Murtaza and Others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.525-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Ghulam Murtaza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1778 | 2022 SHC HYD 58 | I. A 56/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Govt. of Sindh & Others (Appellant) VS L.A. Officer & Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.14-K/2023 Khairuddin& another v. Government of Sindh through Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 1779 | 2023 SHC KHI 669 | Const. P. 3707/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst. Shereen Javed (Petitioner) VS The State Thru Governor and Others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1780 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 98 | Const. P. 1584/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst, Saabi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 08-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1781 | 2022 SHC KHI 640, 2023 PLC CS 19 | Const. P. 3531/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Faisal Manzoor Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1782 | 2025 SHC HYD 3548 | Const. P. 971/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS V.C QUEST& Other (Respondent) | 16-DEC-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar | C.P.L.A.3267/2022 The Vice Chancellor, Quaid-e-Awam University, Nawabshah and others v. Ali Asghar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1783 | 2022 SHC HYD 827 | Const. P. 2379/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Karam Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 01-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1784 | 2023 SHC KHI 685 | Const. P. 5638/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Farhana Zulfiqar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.561-K/2023 Dr. Farhana Zulfiqar v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary National Health Services Regulations & Coordination Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1785 | 2022 SHC KHI 206 | Const. P. 570/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Nasreen Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1786 | 2022 SHC HYD 451 | Criminal Appeal 237/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2021 | ALI DINO (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1787 | 2023 SHC KHI 433 | Const. P. 730/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS M.D Korangi Fisheries Harbour & Others (Respondent) | 25-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1192/2023 Managing Director, Korangi Fisheries Harbour Authority, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Ibrahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 1788 | 2022 SHC KHI 462 | Const. P. 1288/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Abdul Shakoor Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1789 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 952 | Const. P. 5552/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mansoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1790 | 2022 SHC KHI 404 | Const. P. 2220/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Nadeem Akber (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-22 | Yes | whether the recruitment rules have been notified or gazetted--whether the competent authority is empowered under the Rules, 1974, to appoint civil servants from different departments of Government of Sindh to the Inspection and Registration of Private Institutions, School Education, and Literacy Department Cadre | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2287/2022 Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo v. Muhammad Nadeem Akber and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 1791 | 2022 SHC LAR 716 | Const. P. 636/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ali Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer of Union Council Jacobabad and others (Respondent) | 27-JUL-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 1792 | 2023 SHC KHI 725 | Const. P. 602/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Ayesha Iftikhar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1793 | 2023 SHC KHI 297 | Const. P. 6311/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sheikh Nusrat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1794 | 2023 SHC KHI 257 | Const. P. 528/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Naeem (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1795 | 2025 SHC KHI 2542 | Const. P. 821/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Shoaib & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-25 | Yes | Since the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Muhammad Nazir, 1998 SCMR 1081, held that the employees of Pakistan Rangers fell within the definition of a civil servant, as their case falls within the ambit of the Federal Service Tribunal. 11. In view of the above discussion, without touching the merits of the case, the captioned petition, along with application(s), is dismissed, leaving the petitioners to challenge the legality of the impugned orders, including termination from service orders, if any, before the appropriate forum. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1796 | 2023 SHC KHI 491 | Const. P. 5703/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ali Haider and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1797 | 2023 SHC HYD 829 | Const. P. 2799/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Arab & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 21-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1798 | 2023 SHC KHI 454 | Const. P. 7111/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ahmed Habib ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-JUN-23 | Yes | It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1799 | 2023 SHC HYD 968 | Const. P. 828/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Qadir Khoso & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-MAY-23 | Yes | No benefit can be claimed of a consent order in respect of another party even passed by the Supreme Court. The same is not covered by the dicta laid down in the case of Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996 SCMR 1185) | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1800 | 2024 SHC KHI 1150, 2024 PLC (CS) 954 | Const. P. 5468/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Syed Ali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 29-FEB-24 | Yes | We reminded him that his service carries with it an obligation to serve the PSQCA, whichever place he is required to be posted in accordance with the exigencies of service or administrative requirements. It is for the PSQCA to take appropriate decision and such decision shall stand, unless it is vitiated either by mala fide or by extraneous consideration without any factual background or foundation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1801 | 2024 SHC KHI 378 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 412/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 494 of 2022 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Director, D. G., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyderabad. (Applicant) VS Liaquat Ali and another (Respondent) | 06-FEB-24 | Yes | 2nd Proviso to Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, is not applicable retrospectively. Vehicles used in smuggling with false cavities and extra tanks cannot be released on payment of redemption fine. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.214-K/2024 Liaquat Ali v. Director, Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 1802 | 2023 SHC KHI 137 | Cr.Bail 1622/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 04-AUG-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1803 | 2024 SHC KHI 1070 | Const. P. 6222/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-MAR-24 | Yes | firstly section 10 of the Civil Servant Act 1973 provides that every civil servant shall be liable to serve within and outside Pakistan under the Federal Government or any Provincial Government, whereas Rule 20-A of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1973 provides appointment of deputation | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.552-K/2024 Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 1804 | 2023 SHC KHI 990 | Cr.Bail 851/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | GHULAM RASOOL @ RASOOLI S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STASE (Respondent) | 17-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.174/2024 Zulfiqar Ali v. The State thr. PG Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1805 | 2024 SHC KHI 102 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 288/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294 & 295 of 2020 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Unique Industries (Respondent) | 30-JAN-24 | Yes | only such question of law can be answered under Section 196 of the Customs Act which arise out of the Order of Tribunal | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 1806 | 2024 SHC SUK 398 | Const. P. 451/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sarang Latif Panhwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1807 | 2024 SHC SUK 1469 | Const. P. 977/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Syed Abbas Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1808 | 2024 SHC SUK 1410 | Const. P. 2072/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Ghafoor Jagirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1809 | 2024 SHC SUK 240 | Const. P. 618/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Rabail Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1810 | 2024 SHC KHI 1331 | Const. P. 1485/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Gul (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary & Others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-24 | Yes | Section 491 of the Cr.P.C. empowers the High Court to issue writs of habeas corpus, which are used to challenge the legality of a person's detention. It provides a remedy for those who believe they are being unlawfully detained, whether by the government or private individuals. The primary purpose of Section 491 Cr.P.C is to ensure that the person is detained under due process of law. And the detention is not based on whim or caprice. Before parting with this order it is directed that the Police officials shall endeavor to contact with detenue and allows her to meet with her father/petitioner and ensure no harm is caused to her by either party and if any harassment is caused to her by any of the parties the police shall act swiftly. In view of the statement of the Investigating officer, no case of illegal detention is made out and the purpose of filing the instant petition under Article 199 read with section 491 Cr. P.C. has been served; therefore, the same stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1811 | 2024 SHC SUK 1178 | Const. P. 504/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Siddique Khaskheli & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1812 | 2024 SHC KHI 831, 2025 SBLR Sindh 442 | Const. P. 5736/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | M/s Meezan Tea Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-24 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Sarwar Zardari vs. Piyar Ali alias Piyaro and another (2010 SCMR 624) has laid down that the High Court can intervene under Article 199 of the Constitution to correct mala fide or beyond-jurisdiction investigations by authorities. As such this Court can quash an FIR but not necessarily an investigation at its preliminary stage. Let the investigation be carried out and the result whereof shall be submitted to the competent court for appropriate orders within one month. 8. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, no case for interference in the investigation, under article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is made at this stage. This petition is dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1813 | 2024 SHC SUK 849 | Const. P. 492/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sajjad Raza Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1814 | 2024 SHC SUK 1127 | Const. P. 432/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Sattar & Others (Petitioner) VS Federal Govt Through MD PASCO & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1815 | 2024 SHC SUK 1328 | Const. P. 456/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Wahab & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1816 | 2024 SHC MPK 832 | Criminal Miscelleneous 523/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Mst. NIyamat (Applicant) VS SSP Thrparkar @ Mithi & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | In view of the above, alleged detainee Mst. Hawa cannot be claimed in illegal detention, as portrayed by the applicant; however, if the grievance of applicant still subsists, he is at liberty to appear in C.P.No.S-437 of 2024 to assist the court, if the lis is pending. 5. The very purpose of filling this application under section 491 Cr. P.C. has been served as the alleged detainee is no more in illegal detention in terms of the order dated 17-04-2024 passed by this Court; therefore, the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1817 | 2024 SHC KHI 897, 2024 SBLR Sindh 465 | Const. P. 4296/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Nazeer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-24 | Yes | To apply for exhumation of the dead body under Section 176(2) of the Code a Magistrate's satisfaction that exhumation is necessary to determine the cause of death. This discretion should be exercised cautiously, even if the request comes from a stranger, as long as reasonable circumstances or suspicion exists. The purpose is to initiate criminal proceedings if necessary. Close relatives may be involved in homicides, so their objections alone should not be a barrier to disinterment if other circumstances warrant it. The case of Muhammad Ramzan and others v. The State and another (1987 SCMR 272) supports disinterment even after a year to determine the cause of death. 8. Primarily, the father has the right to know his loved one's true cause of death. As the Supreme Court upheld in Ameer Afzal Baig v. Ahsan Ullah Baig, disinterment orders based on suspicion are valid. Even after burial, the right to investigate the cause of death exists. The law allows such requests, even from strangers to ensure proper investigation and to satisfy concerns about potential foul play. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1818 | 2024 SHC SUK 190 | Const. P. 748/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Allah Bachayo Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1819 | 2024 SHC SUK 1404 | Const. P. 380/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Hassan Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 1820 | 2024 SHC SUK 905 | Const. P. 491/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Akbar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1821 | 2024 SHC SUK 750 | Const. P. 421/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst Hatul khatoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1822 | 2024 SHC SUK 171 | Const. P. 403/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Gul Sher Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | This Court reemphasizes the importance of the structured exercise of discretionary powers in terms of law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. The discretion given through the policy is not structured one and, therefore, is not being exercised transparently. The equality clause is being offended; because the price, higher than the market price, to purchase wheat crop is a privilege offered, yet several equally placed farmers/growers are not given a single bag. Notwithstanding the facts, that the policy is not only capable of being applied discriminately and discretionary powers are being used in a non-transparent manner; this Court is constrained not to strike down the policy, in the presence of the fact that the crop is lying under sky in open field and the delay in its collection shall cause loss of crop, which is national asset, but the grower shall also suffer as they shall be left on the mercy of investors who shall at liberty to determine forced sale price under compelling circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1823 | 2024 SHC SUK 988 | Const. P. 1135/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.726-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Shakeel Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1824 | 2024 SHC SUK 1067 | Const. P. 63/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mushtaque Ali Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1825 | 2024 SHC SUK 578, 2025 PLC (CS) 42 | Const. P. 23/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst Firdos Noor Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1826 | 2024 SHC KHI 1101 | Const. P. 5865/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Mehwish & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-NOV-24 | Yes | Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the underage issue if any, pending before the competent court of law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1827 | 2024 SHC SUK 651 | Const. P. 36/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Razaque Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.725-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Agriculture and othersz v. Abdul Razzaque Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1828 | 2024 SHC SUK 59 | Const. P. 312/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Salam Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1829 | 2024 SHC SUK 1078 | Const. P. 576/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Talib Hussain lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1830 | 2024 SHC SUK 843 | Const. P. 666/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Qadir Mahar & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 1831 | 2024 SHC KHI 560 | Cr.Bail 2574/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | ARSHAN S/O MUHAMMAD NASIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 03-JUL-24 | Yes | It is a well-settled principle that in a rape case, the solitary statement of the survivor victim is sufficient to form a tentative opinion. Upon a tentative assessment, and by looking into the ordeal of the victim and her family I am not inclined to endorse the viewpoint of the applicant at this stage for the simple reason that bail before arrest is meant to protect innocent citizens who have been involved in heinous offenses with mala fide and ulterior motives, however in the present case no such ground existed in favor of the applicant to show that there was a malafide intention or ulterior motive on the part of the complainant/victim to book the applicant in the rape case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1832 | 2025 SHC KHI 285 | Const. P. 3568/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Yawar Abbas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-25 | Yes | On the subject proposition, primarily, the disciplinary proceedings and criminal proceedings are altogether different and independent of each other and cannot be termed synonymous and interchangeable. The departmental inquiries for misconduct use a lower standard of proof ('balance of probabilities') compared to criminal trials ('proof beyond reasonable doubt'). The forums for adjudication, principles of evidence, and procedure are also separate and distinct. The decision of one forum cannot have a bearing on the decision of the other forum. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the cases of Dr. Sohail Hassan Khan v. Director General (Research), Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Punjab, Lahore and others (2020 SCMR 1708), (2021 SCMR 420), The District Police Officer, Mianwali and others v. Amir Abdul Majid, Province of Punjab v. Khadim Hussain Abbasi (2021 SCMR 1419) and Usman Ghani v. The Chief Post Master, GPO Karachi, and others (2022 SCMR 745). The respondent department's reliance on clause 27.1 (2) (i) of Estacode 2021 to defer proceedings against the petitioner is incorrect based on Supreme Court rulings. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1833 | 2024 SHC SUK 28 | Const. P. 427/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zameer Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1834 | 2024 SHC SUK 874 | Const. P. 1045/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Faiz Muhammad lakhan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1835 | 2024 SHC SUK 967 | Const. P. 528/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Jabbar & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1836 | 2024 SHC SUK 1478 | Const. P. 974/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zeeshan Ali Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.733-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Zeeshan Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1837 | 2024 SHC KHI 118 | Criminal Miscelleneous 114/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | MUHAMMAD ADEEL AKHTAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 09-JUL-24 | Yes | A bare perusal of the afore-quoted provision of law makes it clear that whenever an overt act is materialized and ended into an overt act, the provision of Section 506(ii) PPC would not be applicable and the only provision that will remain in the field is the overt act, which is committed in consequence of criminal intimidation. On the aforesaid proposition, I am guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rana Muhammad Imran Nasarullah Vs. The State 2022 SCMR 1946. However, in the present case, the complainant simply stated that the accused came to his house and on the pointation of a pistol extended threats of dire consequences, intimidated him to sign a divorce deed and other documents, and left such house after intimidation However the subject act was no materialized and ended into an overt act for the investigating officer opined that no such incident ever took place and the complainant had falsely roped the accused in the case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1838 | 2024 SHC SUK 1145 | Const. P. 739/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Bagh s/o Allahwassayo (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1839 | 2024 SHC SUK 1445 | Criminal Miscelleneous 15/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2023 | Mushtaque Ali Khoso (Appellant) VS The State & (04) Ors (Opponent) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1840 | 2024 SHC SUK 964 | Const. P. 713/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Syed Dur Muhammad Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1841 | 2024 SHC KHI 1483 | Criminal Appeal 150/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | NOOR ALAM S/O ALTAF HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS ABDUL AZIZUR REHMAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 03-JUL-24 | Yes | Primarily, the Illegal Dispossession Act, of 2005 was introduced to curb the activities of Qabza groups/property grabbers and land mafia. During arguments, it has been conceded by respondent No.1 that no material is available with him to establish that the appellant belonged to any Qabza group or land mafia or that he had the credentials or antecedents of being property grabbers. However, he states that his official accommodation has now been handed over to him in compliance with the court order. At this stage, the appellant states that he has paid an advance amount to the private respondent No.1, Which he is avoiding returning and has managed such drama, this aspect of the case is to be looked into by the competent court of law having jurisdiction if approached by the party. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1842 | 2024 SHC KHI 1015, 2025 PCr.LJ 786 | Cr.Bail 1376/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | IMTIAZ S/O MEHBOOB ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | Primarily, to constitute an offense under the aforesaid Section, the prosecution is not only required to prove the possession but also to establish the knowledge about the property to be stolen. In the present case, the prosecution has presented the case to the extent that the subject vehicles were stolen and involved in the subject FIRs under Section 381-A PPC and came into possession of the applicants, which were later on recovered from their possession, be that as it may, if the aforesaid section is supposed to be applied, the maximum punishment provided under the statute for the offense is seven years however under Section 411 PPC is three years, which provides dishonestly receiving stolen property and the same does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C. It is settled law that grant of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory clause is a rule and refusal is an exception. The liberty of a person is a precious right which cannot be taken away without exceptional foundations. So far as the applicability of sections 381-A PPC and 411 PPC, the trial Court has to determine, if the prosecution brings any cogent material to connect the applicant with the alleged crime, as the issue of confession before police and subsequent recovery has already been discussed in the preceding paragraph. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1843 | 2024 SHC KHI 1490 | Cr.Bail 1427/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | RAHEEMULLAH S/O BASHEERULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 11-JUL-24 | Yes | It is the cardinal principle of law that whenever a sample for forensic test is obtained or taken into possession, same should be sent to a Forensic Laboratory without any unnecessary and unexplained delay, to rule out the possibility of any fabrication or tampering. Now, in our jurisdiction too, the Supreme Court has started encouraging us to have recourse to such modern scientific and forensic evidentiary methods. In the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Haider alias Papu v. Jameel Hussain and others PLD 2021 SC 362 has elaborated the importance of this modern-day scientific evidence in the following words:- 5. The most significant advancement in criminal investigation since the advent of fingerprint identification is the use of DNA technology to help convict criminals or eliminate persons as suspects. DNA as scientific evidence means 'deoxyribonucleic acid.' DNA can be found in the human body and samples from semen, hair, blood, and flesh can establish a DNA matching with the DNA of another human being. Each human being has a unique DNA pattern, which is acquired by inheriting it from the biological parents. DNA analyses on saliva, skin tissue, blood, hair, and semen can now be reliably used to link criminals to crimes ..In criminal cases, like rape, murder, etc., timely medical examination and proper sampling of body fluids followed by quality forensic analysis can offer irrefutable evidence. The criminal justice system is in search of the truth. The development of DNA technology furthers the search for truth by helping police and prosecutors in the fight against violent crimes. Through the use of DNA evidence, prosecutors can establish the guilt of the accused and at the same time, DNA aids the search for truth by exonerating the innocent." | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1844 | 2024 SHC SUK 496 | Const. P. 886/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mumtaz Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.750-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Works & Services, Highways Department and others v. Mumtaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1845 | 2024 SHC SUK 1411 | Const. P. 1717/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Naseer Ahmed Muchi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1846 | 2024 SHC MPK 420 | Const. P. 218/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-OCT-24 | Yes | The controversy as raised by the parties about the custody of the minor needs to be looked into by the learned Guardian and Wards Court concerned, if approached and the decision thereof shall be made within a reasonable time, keeping in view the welfare of the minor strictly under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557 and Mst. Qurat-ul-Ain Vs. Station House Officer, Police Station Saddar Jalalpur Jattan, District Gujrat (2024 SCMR 484). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1847 | 2024 SHC SUK 25 | Const. P. 661/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shahid Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1848 | 2024 SHC SUK 762 | Const. P. 1517/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ali Muhammad Chano (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1849 | 2024 SHC SUK 94 | Const. P. 433/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Hassan Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1850 | 2024 SHC SUK 1040, 2024 PLC (CS) 1239 | Const. P. 212/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1851 | 2024 SHC SUK 254 | Const. P. 1191/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Ayob Gopang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1852 | 2024 SHC MPK 793 | Const. P. 210/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ashique Ali (Petitioner) VS Manzoor Ali & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | The courts below have consistently found against the applicants??? claims, and these decisions should not be overturned in a revision proceedings unless extraordinary circumstances exist. A revision court does not re-examine evidence like an appellate court. 8. Based on the foregoing, the findings of the courts below are not jurisdictionally flawed and do not show any misreading or non-reading of evidence that could have led to a miscarriage of justice. Therefore, the revision application is without merit and is dismissed. Each party will bear their costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1853 | 2024 SHC MPK 532 | Const. P. 1125/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Nabi Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | In principle, salary and arrears including reinstatement/regularization of service of the petitioners if any, be determined by departmental heads as discussed supra and if the petitioners are working for longer periods then the issue of their regularization of service be taken care of, if the law permits; however, the services of petitioners have already been dispensed with, such factum must be disclosed in the findings after hearing the parties. 10. On the aforesaid proposition, this Court seeks guidance from a Supreme Court judgment in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], regarding departmental determinations. The judgment states that departments should fairly determine employees' eligibility and take appropriate action, including the issue of the salary if they are validly appointed to the subject posts as pointed out by the petitioners in their pleadings. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1854 | 2024 SHC SUK 845 | Const. P. 486/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Niaz Hussain Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1855 | 2024 SHC SUK 575 | Const. P. 570/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Alam Shar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1856 | 2024 SHC SUK 577 | Const. P. 601/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Kashif Illahi Bambhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1857 | 2024 SHC SUK 247 | Const. P. 1822/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sadaruddin Mirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1858 | 2024 SHC SUK 1431 | Const. P. 388/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Azizullah @ Aziz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that several constitutional petitions have been filed alleging misuse of discretionary powers under the policy 2023-24 while distributing BARDANA to the growers. Initially petitioners raised their voices of concern alleging mall administration in distribution of BARDANA to some fictitious persons/traders having no agricultural land in the relevant areas to please them for extraneous consideration. It is urged by the petitioner???s side that a mafia in collusion with official respondents is active at the distribution centers. Small farmers are made to stand in lines to submit their applications, yet BARDANA is being distributed to the favorites upon political influence or to fictitious persons by manipulating records. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1859 | 2024 SHC SUK 1232 | Const. P. 269/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst Rabia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1860 | 2024 SHC SUK 1177 | Const. P. 82/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Waseem Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Sindh Industrial Estate (S.I.T.E) & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 1861 | 2024 SHC SUK 1369 | Const. P. 387/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hakim Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1862 | 2024 SHC SUK 530 | Const. P. 398/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1863 | 2024 SHC SUK 570 | Criminal Miscelleneous 934/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2023 | Lal Khan Shar (Appellant) VS Baroch son of Ghulam Mahar & Ors (Respondent) | 06-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1864 | 2024 SHC SUK 211 | Const. P. 916/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst Khadija Nazeer Dayo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1865 | 2024 SHC KHI 119 | Const. P. 3542/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhib Ali Unar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-24 | Yes | The petitioners, a married couple, were married against their parents' wishes. The wife's family filed a false police report against the husband, leading to fears of his arrest, which is illegal. The petitioners seek legal protection against potential harassment and unlawful demands. The police officers state that a final report has been submitted to the Magistrate for closure of the case. The complainant does not dispute this. The petitioner's lawyer requests that the Magistrate be directed to decide on the final report and that the police protect the petitioners regarding their marriage. The lawyer also requests that the complainant be restrained from harassing the petitioners. 7. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the investigating officer to inform the Magistrate about the Court's order to close the case. The Magistrate will then decide on the in terms of statement of the victim girl, the police must protect the petitioners and ensure they are not harassed. 8. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1866 | 2024 SHC SUK 335 | Const. P. 550/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Yasin Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1867 | 2024 SHC MPK 1367 | Criminal Miscelleneous 520/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Fida Hussain (Applicant) VS SSP Tharparkar & others (Respondent) | 25-SEP-24 | Yes | Before parting with this order it is directed that the Police officials shall protect Mst. Sain and ensure no harm is caused to her by either party and if any harassment is caused to her by any of the parties the police shall act swiftly. 5. In view of the statement of the alleged detenee, no case of illegal detention is made out and the purpose of filing the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 491 Cr. P.C. has been served; therefore, the same stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1868 | 2024 SHC SUK 483 | Const. P. 1197/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1869 | 2024 SHC SUK 913 | Const. P. 802/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Ali Ghunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1870 | 2024 SHC SUK 210 | Const. P. 407/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Allah Bachayo Mari & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | This Court reemphasizes the importance of the structured exercise of discretionary powers in terms of law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. The discretion given through the policy is not structured one and, therefore, is not being exercised transparently. The equality clause is being offended; because the price, higher than the market price, to purchase wheat crop is a privilege offered, yet several equally placed farmers/growers are not given a single bag. Notwithstanding the facts, that the policy is not only capable of being applied discriminately and discretionary powers are being used in a non-transparent manner; this Court is constrained not to strike down the policy, in the presence of the fact that the crop is lying under sky in open field and the delay in its collection shall cause loss of crop, which is national asset, but the grower shall also suffer as they shall be left on the mercy of investors who shall at liberty to determine forced sale price under compelling circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1871 | 2024 SHC KHI 235 | Const. P. 5113/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Hamid uz Zafar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-DEC-24 | Yes | Section 119 of the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013, primarily deals with the establishment and composition of the Provincial Local Government Commission. It outlines that the Commission shall consist of the Minister for Local Government, who serves as the Chairman, and two members of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh, nominated by the Leader of the House and the Leader of the Opposition. However, it does not explicitly address the tenure of members or the implications of the dissolution of the Provincial Assembly on their positions. Besides, Rule of the Provincial Local Government Commission (Conduct of Business) Rules, 2017, do not directly address the issue of a member's tenure or the impact of the Provincial Assembly's dissolution. It primarily outlines serving of notice and hearing before removing members. The Commission's rules do not address the salary issue for former MPAs on the Commission. As MPAs are already public servants with salaries. The court cannot decide if the former MPA can claim additional salary for their role on the Commission as the rules do not provide clear guidance on this matter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.185-K/2025 Hamid Uz Zafar v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Notice to Respondents and Addl: A.G.Sindh) |
| 1872 | 2024 SHC SUK 666 | Const. P. 647/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Lal Muhammad Magsi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1873 | 2024 SHC SUK 594 | Criminal Miscelleneous 652/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2023 | Mst. Fariha Ahmaree (Appellant) VS SHO PS A Section Sukkur & Others (Opponent) | 10-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1874 | 2024 SHC KHI 1142 | Const. P. 6123/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Waqas Javed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-24 | Yes | Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the Supreme Court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the Supreme Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1875 | 2024 SHC SUK 790 | Const. P. 1779/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Wazir Ali Chachar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.746-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Wazir Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 1876 | 2024 SHC KHI 805 | Cr.Bail 1310/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | MUHAMMAD ZULQARNAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 12-JUL-24 | Yes | The victim lady present in the Court has categorically stated that she contracted a valid marriage with the applicant out of her free will, such Nikahnama and affidavit of Free-will have been placed on record. Be that as it may, since the lady has no grievance as such this bail application needs to be disposed of based on her statement made in the Court without dilating upon the merit of the case. 6. If this is the position of the case, without touching the merits of the case, this Court is left with no option but to confirm the bail of the applicant in terms of the order dated 28.8.2023 on the statement of Mst. Kinza, however, the trial Court shall conclude the proceedings within two months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1877 | 2024 SHC SUK 1312 | Const. P. 444/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hoat Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1878 | 2024 SHC SUK 2 | Criminal Miscelleneous 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2024 | Dedar Ali Khoso (Appellant) VS The State and others (Opponent) | 20-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1879 | 2024 SHC SUK 789 | Const. P. 134/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Zakia Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1880 | 2024 SHC SUK 205 | Const. P. 178/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khalid Ahmed Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | C.A.111-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education & Literacy Department and others v. Khalid Ahmed,C.P.L.A.649-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education & Literacy Department and others v. Khalid Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 1881 | 2024 SHC SUK 1338 | Const. P. 1187/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Meer Ahmed Mirbahar (Petitioner) VS P.O SIndh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1882 | 2025 SHC KHI 452 | Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Saleem Jehangir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-25 | Yes | It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for becoming entitled to be considered for promotion to a higher grade, of course, is not without logic as the officer who is initially inducted to a particular post needs to serve on the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to serve the public in a befitting manner. It is also important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual length of service virtually violates the entire service structure as a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention of the law nor of the equity. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.555-K/2025 Muhammad Saleem Jehangir v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned for a short date.to be fixed before any other bench |
| 1883 | 2025 SHC KHI 619 | Const. P. 950/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Javed Iqbal S/o Ahsan Ghani (Petitioner) VS Inspector General Sindh (IG) and Another (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | Keeping in view the statement made in the proceedings, I cannot determine in the constitutional jurisdiction whether the petitioner is innocent or he has been falsely implicated in the cases or not, However, the IGP Sindh shall ensure adherence of the orders dated 03.11.2022, 10.03.2025 and 24.03.2025, before taking further action. 11. I am also of the view that the statement of Learned AAG and APG is tenable to the effect that an Enquiry Committee, headed by DIGP Investigation Karachi, was formed on March 12, 2025, to investigate the claim of the petitioner through CMA No. 2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance facing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, they are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1884 | 2025 SHC KHI 183 | Const. P. 223/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Pujab Beverages Company Pvt. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been achieved. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated above. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and the case shall be decided by the competent court of law if pending. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1885 | 2025 SHC KHI 603 | Const. P. 6753/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Habib Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 16-APR-25 | Yes | At this point, the petitioner's counsel stated that the sole remaining matter for resolution concerns the petitioner's promotion from BS-8 to BS-15 during his service period before his retirement as he was eligible and fit for promotion, however that was delayed leading him to retire, as such he is entitled for proforma promotion. This specific aspect of the case requires review by the respondents' competent authority within three months. This review should be conducted after hearing the petitioner's perspective, in accordance with the principles established by the Supreme Court in the cases of Capital Development Authority v Shabbir Hussain & others (2022 SCMR 627) and The Chairman Central Board of Revenue vs Muhammad Mlook (1999 SCMR 1540). This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1886 | 2025 SHC KHI 207 | Const. P. 986/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mohammad Khursheed (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 11-APR-25 | Yes | The petitioners are reportedly retired, and one has passed away during the case's proceedings, although no updated title reflecting this has been submitted. The core issue is the restoration of their basic pay to its pre-April 2012 level, particularly considering the cessation of Pakistan Steel's operations in 2015 and the retirement benefits already received by the petitioners. As such, no further cause of action appears to exist. The petition seems to have become ineffective ("infructuous") due to the closure of the Steel Mills after 2015. Therefore, remanding the case to Pakistan Steel or its affiliated company to re-fix the petitioners' pay after their retirement would be unproductive. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1887 | 2025 SHC KHI 465 | Const. P. 1725/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Younis and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | In line with the Supreme Court's directive in Suo Moto Case No. 15 of 2010, this matter is to be addressed by the provincial government. The Chief Secretary is directed to seek the necessary approval from the competent authority to determine whether the petitioners' employment will be regularized according to the law or if they will remain on contract until retirement. This decision must be made within three months after hearing the petitioners' perspective. Consequently, this petition is now disposed of under these specified conditions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1888 | 2025 SHC KHI 172 | Const. P. 609/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Dr. Tasnim Ahsan (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | This petition is being disposed of with the understanding that the Sindh government's retirement notification dated December 29, 2014, has already been implemented, and the petitioner has received some pension benefits. These benefits will be subject to the final outcome of the review petition regarding the core issue, which is currently pending before the Supreme Court between the Federal and Sindh governments. Therefore, this court will not delve into the merits of that underlying controversy at this stage, as the matter is sub judice. However, the respondent Sindh government is directed to abide by the Supreme Court's decision on their review application. The consequences of the Supreme Court's ruling (whether the review succeeds or fails) will then follow. This petition is disposed of in these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1889 | 2025 SHC KHI 1029 | Const. P. 2923/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | In the case of National Bank of Pakistan (Supra), the Supreme Court held in Paragraph 3 that the Respondent's unchallenged supersession in 2010 rendered his subsequent constitutional petition before the High Court time-barred (suffered from laches). Furthermore, the Respondent's claim for pro forma promotion lacked basis in the relevant service rules. Considering his retirement and receipt of all due benefits, the Supreme Court found the High Court's intervention unsustainable under the relevant law and rules governing the Bank's employees. Consequently, the petition was converted into an appeal, allowed, and the Peshawar High Court's judgment was set aside. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.968-K/2025 Altaf Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Notice -- Before 3 member Bench) |
| 1890 | 2025 SHC KHI 1041 | Const. P. 8456/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Farrukh Imran and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | This issue as raised firstly could be resolved by the competent authority of PSO at their end within three months from the date of receipt this order and if the respondent company decide the cases of the petitioners on the same analogy as put forward by the petitioners then the matter shall be over once for all, however if the decision goes against the petitioners they may recourse to the legal remedies as provided under the law, however the petitioners cannot be non-suited based non-statutory rules of service in terms of Supreme Court decision. This petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1891 | 2025 SHC KHI 1067 | Const. P. 1398/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ayaz ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 29-APR-25 | Yes | It is well-settled law that once a promotion order is acted upon and the employee has benefited from it, the order cannot be rescinded or withdrawn, especially if it has created vested rights for the employee. This principle, often referred to as animus revertendi or locus poenitentiae, protects individuals from having their accrued benefits taken away after an order has been implemented. Reference can also be made to the cases of Pakistan through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance v. Muhammad Himayatullah Farukhi (PLD 1969 SC 407), Capital Development Authority Through Chairman, Islamabad And Others v. Shabir Hussain And Others (2022 SCMR 627) and Mrs. Zeenat Parveen Jaffery versus Secretary to Government of Sind, Education Department and 4 others [1983 P L C (C.S.) 1260]. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.901-K/2025 The Director General, Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation and another v. Ayaz UL Islam Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 1892 | 2025 SHC KHI 1069 | Const. P. 332/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 28-APR-25 | Yes | It is well settled now that contractual employees of NADRA (which lacks statutory service rules), the petitioner could not invoke writ jurisdiction in terms of law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Chairman NADRA v. Muhammad Ali Shah (2017 SCMR 1979), holding that contractual employees of statutory bodies cannot use the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction to renegotiate regularization terms. In another case Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (Retd.) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan (2019 SCMR 984), stating contractual employees cannot challenge termination via writ. These precedents supported our view against the maintainability of the Constitution Petition. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1893 | 2025 SHC KHI 204 | Const. P. 3095/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Syed Shoukat Ali & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | Without addressing the substantive arguments of these cases and merits, these petitions are now considered concluded and are hereby disposed of in the terms that much water has flown under the bridge since 2008 and we are now in 2025 besides petitioners have not asked for the issuance of writ of quo warranto against the individual who were purportedly appointed in violation of the rules as no record has been produced to infer adverse against them at this stage in a case of writ of mandamus. However, if the cause of action for these petitions still exists, the petitioners retain the right to initiate appropriate legal action, including proceedings under a writ of quo warranto, if they believe the appointments of the private respondents are contrary to law and if such legal recourse is permissible. These petitions are disposed of along with the pending application(s) in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1894 | 2024 SHC SUK 875 | Const. P. 1230/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ashique Ali Chijjan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | Placing a person on Exit Control List or Passport Control List. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | ||
| 1895 | 2025 SHC KHI 514 | Const. P. 8715/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ehsanullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 22-APR-25 | Yes | The initial impression is that Order II Rule 2 of the CPC applies in the present case for the reason that the petitioner's complaint of wrongful denial of promotion to BS-20 seems to be a single cause of action. This rule required him to seek all related remedies, including proforma promotion to both BS-20 and BS-21, in his earlier petition (C.P. NO. D-1945 OF 2013). Consequently, he is now barred from claiming a relief not granted previously. Furthermore, even if the petitioner was senior to the BS-21 promotee, that promotion stands if the Selection Board found the junior officer more meritorious. To claim proforma promotion to BS-21, the petitioner must prove not only his eligibility and the injustice of his BS-20 non-promotion but also that he was at least as meritorious as the promoted junior. This is because BS-21 is a selection post where merit, not seniority, is the paramount factor in promotions, ensuring the most capable individuals are elevated. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.858-K/2025 Ehsanullah Khan v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned |
| 1896 | 2025 SHC KHI 2156 | Const. P. 7054/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Naeem Hussain Awan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 29-AUG-25 | Yes | Given the acknowledged driver shortage and the lengthy recruitment process, this court deem it proper to direct the respondent department to proceed with their proposal to waive the six-month waiting list limitation. The petitioners, who filed their case in 2022, should be appointed on the subject positions subject to availability of vacancy, and this action should be completed within two months. 9. Theses petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1897 | 2026 SHC KHI 511 | Const. P. 1959/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abid Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1898 | 2025 SHC KHI 2011 | Const. P. 6052/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Fakhruddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-25 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority/Mayer KMC, Karachi is directed to look into the service profile of the petitioner and if he finds the petitioner to be eligible and fit person for promotion to the post of Chief Fire Officer, Fire Brigade department KMC, he be considered along with all others eligible candidates for promotion under the law and decision be made within three months after hearing all concerned. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1899 | 2025 SHC KHI 1531 | Const. P. 2079/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asghar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-25 | Yes | It appears that following the Supreme Court's Order dated March 31, 2018, in Criminal Original Petition No. Crl. O.P. 15-K of 2016 (related to CA30-K of 2014 & Crl M.A. 37-K of 2017), and based on the recommendations of Provincial Selection Board No. I, as well as the approval of the Competent Authority/Chief Minister Sindh, the Specialists Cadre Doctors (BS-19) in the Health Department were granted proforma promotion from BS-19 to BS-20. This promotion was effective from the day immediately preceding their retirement from government service upon reaching the age of superannuation, as indicated against each name. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1900 | 2025 SHC KHI 2068 | Const. P. 2202/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The CEO Pakistan Steel & Others (Respondent) | 18-AUG-25 | Yes | According to information received, Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) has experienced a significant financial loss of over Rs. 100 billion, with total liabilities exceeding Rs. 110 billion. Given this financial crisis, it is not considered feasible to direct PSM to grant financial relief, such as ad-hoc allowances, to retired officers at this time under Article 199 of the constitution; however, there are outstanding dues petitioner may avail his remedy before the competent forum under the relevant law. 8. In view of the above reasoning, the relief so sought by the petitioner cannot be granted; therefore, this petition, being not maintainable against the purported claim under Article 199 of the constitution, is dismissed together with the pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1901 | 2025 SHC KHI 2069 | Const. P. 2415/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Imran Ahmed Alvi (Petitioner) VS Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) | 13-AUG-25 | Yes | We are of the considered view that instant petition is misconceived and not maintainable for having been filed on mere issuance of Show Cause Notice, which prima facie does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or patent illegality, whereas, the objections raised by the petitioner through instant petition can be agitated before the statutory forums while submitting the response/reply to the impugned Show Cause Notice in accordance with law. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1902 | 2025 SHC KHI 2113 | Const. P. 2740/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Aamir Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-AUG-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court of Pakistan decision in National Highways & Motorway Police case, that addresses the absorption of employees from different departments. In that case, Petitioners who were directly appointed to the National Highways & Motorway Police (NH&MP) claimed that the absorption of deputationists from other departments was illegal and negatively impacted their seniority rights. They submitted that these deputationists lacked the necessary qualifications and that the NH&MP had only partially implemented a previous court judgment that canceled all such absorptions. The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioners' request. It found that the NH&MP's decision to repatriate the deputationists was valid. The Supreme court has issued a clear directive to repatriate all person to their original departments. This order is to be carried out strictly in accordance with previous Supreme Court rulings, specifically those in the cases of Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary, Sindh (2013) and Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. Province of Sindh (2015). 17. This court agreed with the department's position taken in the their report/comments filed on 26.09.2022; and, we see no reason to review their point of view/ decision and, therefore, this petition is liable to be dismissed, which is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1046-K/2025 Aamir Ali & Others v. Federation of Pakistan & Others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 1903 | 2025 SHC KHI 2009 | Const. P. 763/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Abdul Qadeer (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 06-AUG-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the recent judgment 2025 SCMR 104 has held that any institution opting for regularization of its employees must be either mandated by law or must carry out regularization through a well-thought-out policy of the institution concerned laying down the criteria and the process for regularization; performance evaluation of the contractual employee must be assessed to determine if the employee meets the standards required for a regular position; there must be availability of positions that match the skills and experience of the contractual employee; the budgetary considerations and financial implication of a regular employee be weighed and considered. There must be a fair assessment of the employee???s qualifications, performance, and merit, to ensure only competent and committed employees be granted permanent employment status. Reference in this regard may also be made to the cases of Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Islamabad and another v. Fazal-e-Subhan and others (PLD 2024 SC 515); Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Forest, Peshawar and others v. Sher Aman and others (2022 SCMR 406); and Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1904 | 2025 SHC KHI 1659, 2025 SHC KHI 1672 | Const. P. 5227/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Noor Muhammad Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-25 | Yes | Before parting with this order it is observed that the petitioner reached superannuation without formal retirement notification, as ACE had already repatriated him to the Services, General Administration & Coordination Department (which he failed to join in due course), and the Chief Secretary of Sindh is directed to conduct an inquiry into this matter. The inquiry should aim to determine responsibility for these actions after hearing from all involved individuals. Additionally, the Chief Secretary of Sindh is to investigate whether the petitioner is entitled to a retirement notification and associated service benefits, considering his continuous service with ACE until his superannuation. A speaking order on this aspect is to be issued within three months after hearing the petitioner. 11. For these reasons, this petition is disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1905 | 2025 SHC KHI 1523 | Const. P. 6124/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Muhammad Amir Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-MAY-25 | Yes | The petitioner's claim for promotion, denied in 2010 and 2011, is subject to the doctrine of laches due to the delay in filing this petition on 06.10.2022. Without addressing the merits, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the respondent-university must consider the petitioner's candidature for any future promotion vacancy, in accordance with law and promotion policy, if the petitioner meets the eligibility criteria. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.913-K/2025 The Vice Chancellor NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi v. Dr. Muhammad Aamir Qureshi, Karahi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Notice+Status quo |
| 1906 | 2025 SHC KHI 1423 | Const. P. 1605/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst. Arshad Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-25 | Yes | Thus, we are inclined to entertain the request of the petitioner in the matter. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decisions of the Supreme Court rendered in the cases of Dr. Syed Sabir Ali v. Government of Punjab through Secretary Health Punjab and others, (2008 SCMR 1535), Federation of Pakistan and others v. Amir Zaman Shinwari, Superintending Engineer, (2008 SCMR 1138) and Dr. Muhammad Amjad v. Dr. Israr Ahmed, (2010 SCMR 1466). 8. We for the aforesaid reasons, dispose of this constitutional petition and direct the competent authority of the official respondents to re-consider the case of the petitioner for proforma promotion in BS-19, after her retirement, by way of circulation within two months subject to the availability of vacancy in BPS-19 under the Recruitment Rules. As the petitioner has already retired on April 12, 2021, therefore, her proforma promotion will not affect the seniority of any person already in service and he would be entitled to his emoluments and pensionery benefits under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1907 | 2025 SHC KHI 2151 | Const. P. 4588/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Aslam Pervaiz Durrani and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | This court will not interfere with the Sindh government's policy decision under Article 199 of the Constitution, as no mala fide has been attributed in such a policy decision. However, if the respondent department intends to change the status of the petitioners??? service, they must be heard. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition stands dismissed along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1908 | 2025 SHC KHI 2154 | Const. P. 5445/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Syed Muhammad Zeehan Hashmi and Others (Petitioner) VS Abbasi Shaheeh Hospital and Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | After thorough arguments from both sides, this court directs the respondents' competent authority to examine the petitioners' cases. This examination should determine if the petitioners and their colleagues, who performed comparable duties in wards/labs, emergency rooms, trauma centers, or their offices, are eligible for the Health Professional and Special Health Care Allowance, or any related allowances, according to existing laws and policies. Those who do not meet the legal requirements will be excluded. This review is to be completed within three months of this order. However, its implementation is contingent upon policy decisions by the Sindh government and the respondent Hospital. If the KMC/Hospital adopts such a policy, or has adopted it, the allowances may be granted. If the KMC/Hospital disagrees with the petitioners' claims after consultation with the Sindh Government, it must issue a reasoned order after providing the petitioners with a hearing. 9. Consequently, the petition and related applications are disposed of as directed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1909 | 2025 SHC KHI 2405 | Const. P. 5481/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mehwish Aziz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-SEP-25 | Yes | In the present case, the government of Pakistan's Finance Division vide letter dated 05.09.2023 approved the continuation of 103 contract positions, 71 Entomologists, and 32 Locust Assistants, for anti-locust operations until June 30, 2024. However, Petitioner was terminated with "stigma" after she took action against M/s Hyder Shah and Quetta Chambers. The official termination order, dated October 16, 2023, states her services were ended "as per clause 11 & 14" of her appointment letter, with immediate effect, but the minutes prima facie show something different. 12. In the aforesaid circumstances, the impugned order is set aside, and the case is being sent back to the competent authority, who must make a new decision on the matter within two months. The petitioner must be given a full opportunity to be heard. 13. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1910 | 2025 SHC KHI 2424 | Const. P. 4269/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Esha & Hamza Raheem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 09-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above, this constitutional petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned police to provide legal protection to the couple as and when they approach for such protection. In the meantime, no further action is required against them, and no harassment shall be caused to the couple by the family of petitioner No.1 at any cost. A copy of this order is to be sent to the Sessions Judge Ghotki, who will then guide the concerned Magistrate to ensure compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1911 | 2025 SHC KHI 2430 | Const. P. 5003/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Khawaja Maqbool Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 03-SEP-25 | Yes | We, for the aforesaid reasons, allow this constitutional petition and direct the competent authority/respondents to allow the petitioners proforma promotion by way of circulation. As the petitioner has already retired, therefore, his proforma promotion will not affect the seniority of any person already in service and he would be entitled to his emoluments and pensionary benefits. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1160-K/2025 Province of Sindh & another v. Khawaja Maqbool Mustafa Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 1912 | 2025 SHC KHI 2580 | Const. P. 2868/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1913 | 2025 SHC KHI 2541 | Const. P. 2259/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Wajid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 19-SEP-25 | Yes | Adverting to the assertion of the petitioner that he was not subject to the PAA, the same is misconceived on the premise that every officer/member of the force is subject to the PAA, as discussed supra, thus findings cannot be upset unless the same is shown to have been carried out without jurisdiction or with malafide intention. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 14.01.2020 passed in the case of Fayaz Khan v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary Aviation Cabinet Secretariat, Aviation Division, Islamabad and others (2020 SCMR 432 ). 12. For the reasons aforesaid, this Constitutional Petition fails and, accordingly, the same is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications are also dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1914 | 2025 SHC KHI 2640 | Const. P. 682/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Farman Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 07-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1915 | 2025 SHC KHI 2545 | Const. P. 733/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Fahad Kamr s/o Kamruddin (Petitioner) VS Inspector General Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the police to act under the law, and no harassment shall be caused to either party, besides no interference shall be made in their private/civil/criminal dispute, if any, and the police shall be neutral in private affairs of the parties. However, if any of the parties indulged in cognizable offenses police shall act under the law. All parties and officials are directed not to harass each other and to act strictly within the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1916 | 2025 SHC KHI 3212 | Const. P. 732/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shoukat Magsi & Others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above, these petitions are disposed of with the direction to the police to act under the law and no harassment shall be caused to the either party besides no interference shall be made in their private/civil/criminal dispute and the police shall be neutral in private affairs. However, if any of the parties indulged in cognizable offenses police shall act under law. All parties and officials are directed not to harass each other and to act strictly within the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1917 | 2025 SHC KHI 3222 | Const. P. 639/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Farooq A Ghaffar Through Attorney Daniyal Abbas (Petitioner) VS SHO, PS Gabol Town, Karachi & Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-25 | Yes | In view of above position, the official respondents are directed not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner and shall act strictly in accordance with law. So far as the construction of the bus station in front of the property of the petitioner is concerned, the same shall be constructed atleast 30 feet away from the plot of the petitioner. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed / pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1918 | 2025 SHC KHI 3228 | Const. P. 960/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Zubair (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 13-OCT-25 | Yes | However, if there is any criminal case pending against the petitioner, he may face the trial under the law and the same shall be decided in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1919 | 2025 SHC KHI 2642 | Const. P. 201/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Muhammad Abrar and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1920 | 2025 SHC KHI 3215 | Const. P. 928/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdullah s/o Fateh Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | Be that as it may, I.G. Police Sindh shall take action against all the police officials, who are indulged in these sorts of affairs and they shall be restrained not to take any coercive action against the innocent citizens on such false pretext until and unless there is cogent material against the individuals or involved in cognizable offences. However, it is made clear that if any cognizable offence is committed by any individual, police may take action in accordance with law and no harassment shall be caused to any individual. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1921 | 2025 SHC KHI 3209 | Const. P. 729/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Mohsin s/o Muhammad Ajaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-SEP-25 | Yes | None present for the petitioner without intimation. On the last date of hearing i.e. 01.9.2025, this Court ordered for issuance of notices to the respondents, but the petitioner has failed to make compliance of office objections as well as the order passed by this Court. Today, absence of the petitioner as well as his counsel shows their lack of interest in pursuing this petition, which is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1922 | 2025 SHC KHI 2522 | Const. P. 5281/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 24-SEP-25 | Yes | On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decisions of the Supreme Court rendered in the cases of Dr. Syed Sabir Ali v. Government of Punjab through Secretary Health Punjab and others, 2008 SCMR 1535, Federation of Pakistan and others v. Amir Zaman Shinwari, Superintending Engineer, 2008 SCMR 1138, and Dr. Muhammad Amjad v. Dr. Israr Ahmed, 2010 SCMR 1466. 9. We, for the aforesaid reasons, allow this constitutional petition along with pending application(s) and direct the competent authority/respondents to re-consider the case of the petitioner along with all eligible candidates for promotion in BS-19, in the next PSB meeting, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law/recruitment rules. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1923 | 2025 SHC KHI 3172 | Const. P. 4105/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Tariq Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1924 | 2026 SHC KHI 251 | Const. P. 4817/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Tanveer Islam & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that once elections have been ordered under court supervision, subsequent petitions seeking the same relief become academic or infructuous. It is also well settled that once the relief sought has been overtaken by events or already complied with under judicial direction, the petition cannot be maintained and is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. It is also a settled principle of law that intervention in matters where an election process is underway under judicial supervision may disrupt the lawful process and is not ordinarily warranted. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No further orders are required in view of the prior directions contained in CP No. D-6317/2025, and the Nazir shall continue to supervise the conduct of the elections, as per earlier directions. The petitioners are at liberty to raise grievances, including the legal grounds before the concerned officer, as agitated before this Court, if any, which shall also be entertained and decision be made in accordance with the law. 11. These petition along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1925 | 2026 SHC KHI 269 | Const. P. 78/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Hascol Petroleum (Petitioner) VS Shahzaib Rind & Another (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that Constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to short-circuit the statutory process merely on the basis of an arbitration clause which, in the facts of the case, does not govern the dispute in question. 15. For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds that the learned Rent Controller committed no illegality or jurisdictional error in dismissing the Petitioner???s application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The arbitration clause does not override the statutory jurisdiction of the Rent Controller in matters of rent and ejectment. Consequently, the petition is devoid of merit and does not warrant interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. 16. This petition is accordingly dismissed with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1926 | 2026 SHC KHI 275 | Const. P. 112/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Sarfarazuddin (Petitioner) VS Homi D. Ghadially & Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1927 | 2026 SHC KHI 333 | Const. P. 194/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Ruqia Taufeeq Mohiuddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, it is held that Respondent No.2 has no legal authority, statutory mandate, or jurisdiction to interfere in the affairs of Respondent No.3 Society, including but not limited to deployment of private guards, regulation of access, collection of maintenance charges, or management of funds from residents. Such interference, being without lawful sanction, is illegal and is hereby required to be halted forthwith. 12. Accordingly, the competent authorities are directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law to ensure that Respondent No.2 ceases to exercise any administrative or financial control within the limits of Respondent No.3 Society, and to safeguard the lawful governance framework envisaged under the applicable cooperative laws. 13. The Petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1928 | 2026 SHC KHI 230 | Const. P. 6803/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Phoenix Amour and Ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ishaque and Ors (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that this Court does not sit as a court of appeal over findings of a statutory forum unless there is a lack of jurisdiction, coram non judice proceedings, or a violation of law apparent on the face of the record, none of which has been demonstrated in the present case. 14. The plea of the petitioner that there exists no authoritative judgment recognizing NIRC???s jurisdiction in matters arising under Standing Order 12(3) is contrary to the law laid down in the above-referred precedents. The statutory scheme of the IRA, 2012, read with Standing Order 12(3), clearly provides a complete mechanism for redress of individual grievances before the NIRC in cases of trans-provincial establishments. 15. For the foregoing reasons, the captioned petitions are devoid of merit and are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1929 | 2026 SHC KHI 239 | Const. P. 1717/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Shamim Zohra & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-26 | Yes | The argument by the respondent that the petition has become infructuous is untenable, as the petition seeks enforcement of an existing policy and ensures that no retired officer is denied the benefits due. 9. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as per policy and law, and the Bank is directed to pay all arrears and benefits to those petitioners who retired on or after 01.07.1999 in accordance with the policy and continue to pay the pension/family pension to such petitioners in conformity with the policy. The Bank is under a legal obligation to implement its policy consistently and fully for all eligible retired officers/executives. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1930 | 2026 SHC KHI 249 | Const. P. 71/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS SBCA & Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-26 | Yes | The learned counsel for the SBCA lastly submitted that the site will be inspected, and if any irregularities are found, appropriate action will be taken in accordance with the law. Without prejudice to the rights of private respondents as they are not in attendance. However the statement of SBCA is being considered for disposal of this petition. 6. The request of SBCA seems to be reasonable is acceded to subject to all just exceptions, as such this petition is disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1931 | 2026 SHC KHI 465 | Const. P. 7595/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Azmat Ali (Petitioner) VS Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Ors (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 1932 | 2026 SHC KHI 350 | Const. P. 556/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Sarang & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, the petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. 14. In light of the foregoing, the instant petition challenging the seniority list dated 02.01.2026 is dismissed on the grounds of maintainability. The Petitioners, if so advised, are to seek any grievance regarding seniority before the competent Service Tribunal as provided under Article 212 of the Constitution. However, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1933 | 2026 SHC KHI 366 | Const. P. 4492/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed Obaid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1934 | 2026 SHC KHI 382 | Const. P. 744/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Nazirullah Mehsood Advocate (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | To ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance with the law, this Court with the consent of the parties present in Court considers it appropriate to appoint the Nazir of this Court as Commissioner to supervise the elections of the President and the Managing Committee in accordance with the society???s bylaws and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020. The Registrar is directed to provide complete society records to the Commissioner for verification and preparation of a valid voters??? list. The elections shall be conducted within two months or as per direction of the Nazir, after which the records shall be handed over to the newly elected management. All parties are directed to fully cooperate and refrain from interfering with the election process. The Commissioner???s fee of Rs. 300,000 shall be paid in advance by the society from its funds. The Commissioner is also empowered to hear and decide all legitimate questions or objections related to the election process including voter lists, and genuine plot owners/members, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The Commissioner is empowered to take all necessary steps for conducting the election in accordance with law. 9. The petitions along with all pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1935 | 2026 SHC KHI 160 | Const. P. 465/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Syed Imtiaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-26 | Yes | In these circumstances, learned counsel seeks the disposal of the present petition in terms of the aforesaid order. 4. Without touching the merits of the case, this petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the terms of the ratio of the order dated 23.01.2026, passed in C.P. No. D-6210 of 2025. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1936 | 2026 SHC KHI 521 | Const. P. 6273/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ashraf Godil & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1937 | 2026 SHC KHI 522 | Const. P. 6274/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M.S.G.P (School) Coop. H. Society Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1938 | 2026 SHC KHI 523 | Const. P. 6275/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Younus & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1939 | 2026 SHC KHI 247 | Const. P. 4710/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muzaffar Rasool & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | In such circumstances, the competing claims and the presence of disputed questions of fact regarding the lawfulness of disciplinary actions, suspension of licenses, and eviction notices, the Court finds that these issues require detailed examination of records, service rules, and administrative procedures, which cannot be conclusively determined at the constitutional petition stage. 8. In view of the above The petition raises serious allegations but also involves disputed facts relating to service and administrative matters of PIACL. The petitioners are not precluded from availing of alternate remedies available under PIACL service regulations and applicable laws. 9. The petition is disposed of with directions that the petitioners may pursue available remedies under PIACL service and disciplinary rules. The respondents shall ensure that any actions taken against the petitioners strictly comply with the law, rules, and principles of natural justice. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1940 | 2026 SHC KHI 458 | Const. P. 2436/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | M/s Super Long Route Bus Owners Association (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 1941 | 2026 SHC KHI 633 | Const. P. 468/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Talha Rasheed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1942 | 2026 SHC KHI 604 | Const. P. 1448/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M. Usman Shahzada Thrugh Attorney M. Shazil Hassan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Bisma Gulzar (Respondent) | 09-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1943 | 2026 SHC KHI 632 | Const. P. 340/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Zeeshan Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Interior & Ors (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | Needless to observe that while deciding the matter, the competent authority shall independently assess the necessity of retaining the petitioner???s name on the PCL and shall not treat the mere pendency of investigation as the sole ground to deny the petitioner relief unless supported by cogent and legally sustainable reasons. However, the observation recorded in the preceding paragraph shall not be ignored at all. 13. With the above directions, this petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for immediate compliance, and they shall also be served through electronic and WhatsApp applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1944 | 2026 SHC KHI 268 | Const. P. 1779/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Ayub (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1945 | 2026 SHC KHI 35 | Const. P. 7231/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nazir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing submissions, it is noted that the Petitioner, being a retired employee of Karachi Port Trust, had already received the annual increment in 2016 and had also opted not to avail the benefit of Rule 19 of the KPT Pay, Allowances, and Leave Rules. Accordingly, both petitions are dismissed in their entirety with no order as to costs alongwith pending applications, if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1946 | 2026 SHC KHI 116 | Const. P. 3376/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Mustafa Supro (Petitioner) VS NBP and Others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, the petition is maintainable. The Respondents??? actions restricting pensionary and provident fund benefits to 9 years are illegal, arbitrary, and without lawful authority. The Federal Service Tribunal judgment, De Novo Inquiry Report, and reinstatement orders restore continuity of service. The undertaking obtained on mercy appeal does not bar enforcement of vested service and pensionary rights. The Petitioner is legally entitled to re-fixation of pension and retirement benefits after counting his entire qualifying service and to payment of consequential financial benefits. 13. Accordingly, the impugned actions are set aside, and the Respondents are under a legal obligation to recalculate and release all lawful retirement and pensionary benefits in accordance with law. 14. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within one month. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 1947 | 2026 SHC KHI 163 | Const. P. 1773/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Makli Coop Housing Society Ltd & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-26 | Yes | The Administrator/Election Officer shall have all such powers as are necessary and incidental for the purpose of holding free, fair, and transparent elections, including but not limited to issuing election schedules, scrutinizing nominations, resolving electoral objections, and declaring election results. The entire election process shall be completed within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order and handing over the affairs to the newly elected body just after nominations. The fee of Mr. Justice (Retd.) Nadeem Azhar Siddique is fixed at Rs. 300,000/- (Rupees Three Hundred Thousand only), which shall be paid in advance by the Petitioner Society. 6. With these observations and directions and with the consent of the parties present in court, the petition stands disposed of in the above terms. A copy of this order shall be communicated to Mr. Justice (Retd.) Nadeem Azhar Siddique at his address through all modes, including electronic and WhatsApp applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1948 | 2026 SHC KHI 449 | Const. P. 5476/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Imtiaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-26 | Yes | The petitioner is drawing monthly pension from HBL Branch regularly. As far as the commutation of Rs.1,412,813/- is required to be paid and in this regard a cheque of the said amount bearing No.25361610 dated 19,.02.2026 has already been issued in favour of the petitioner. 4. When confronted with the above position, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this petition on the statement filed by the counsel for the Respondent/KMC. 5. Since purpose of this petition has been served, the petition stands disposed of accordingly along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1949 | 2026 SHC KHI 381 | Const. P. 1701/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Dr. Maliha Muhammad Ali Hasan Patel (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | The ends of justice would therefore be met by directing a change of supervisor strictly in accordance with CPSP regulations, without penalizing the Petitioner for circumstances not established through lawful proceedings. 9. Consequently, the petition is disposed of in the following terms: 1. The Respondents are directed to restore the Petitioner???s training status forthwith and permit her to continue and complete her FCPS-II (Internal Medicine) residency programme at Abbasi Shaheed Hospital. 2. The hospital administration shall, within a reasonable period, process and finalize the change of supervisor in accordance with the applicable rules and guidelines of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, ensuring transparency and due process. 3. CPSP shall not raise any technical objection on account of the intervening dispute and shall facilitate the Petitioner in completing her remaining training period, subject to fulfillment of academic requirements. 4. The Petitioner shall be allowed to complete her subject course without hindrance, and no coercive or punitive action shall be taken against her except strictly in accordance with law and after due process. 5. In case any allegation of misconduct is to be pursued, the same shall be proceeded with through a proper show-cause notice and reasoned order, affording full opportunity of hearing. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1950 | 2026 SHC KHI 383 | Const. P. 2243/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Quetta Town CHS Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | To ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance with the law, this Court with the consent of the parties present in Court considers it appropriate to appoint the Nazir of this Court as Commissioner to supervise the elections of the President and the Managing Committee in accordance with the society???s bylaws and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020. The Registrar is directed to provide complete society records to the Commissioner for verification and preparation of a valid voters??? list. The elections shall be conducted within two months or as per direction of the Nazir, after which the records shall be handed over to the newly elected management. All parties are directed to fully cooperate and refrain from interfering with the election process. The Commissioner???s fee of Rs. 300,000 shall be paid in advance by the society from its funds. The Commissioner is also empowered to hear and decide all legitimate questions or objections related to the election process including voter lists, and genuine plot owners/members, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The Commissioner is empowered to take all necessary steps for conducting the election in accordance with law. 9. The petitions along with all pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1951 | 2026 SHC KHI 232 | Const. P. 490/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Azhar Ali Shaikh & others (Petitioner) VS Vth Sr.Civil Judge & Ors (Respondent) | 12-FEB-26 | Yes | The Respondents filed a counter affidavit stating that the interim order has merged into the final impugned order and agreed that the suit be decided within one month. 5. The learned AAG also supported expeditious disposal. 6. By consent of parties, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to conclude the suit within one month. In the meantime, status quo shall be maintained. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1952 | 2026 SHC KHI 401 | Const. P. 5773/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Awab Alvi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 1953 | 2026 SHC KHI 141 | Const. P. 3935/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Waheed (Petitioner) VS SHO PS FIA & Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-26 | Yes | On the previous date of hearing, the officer from FIA also attended and submitted that the inquiry regarding the travel restriction imposed on the petitioner has been concluded, and there is currently no impediment to the return of his passport. 5. In view of the foregoing, with the consent of the parties present in Court this petition is disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1954 | 2026 SHC KHI 271 | Const. P. 127/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Muzammil Rafiq (Petitioner) VS Inspector General, Central Police Office & Others (Respondent) | 06-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1955 | 2026 SHC KHI 466 | Const. P. 4923/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ayesha Asif (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 1956 | 2026 SHC KHI 441 | Const. P. 621/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zameer-ul-Islam S/o Qamar-ul-Islam (Petitioner) VS Nimra Anwaar and another (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | No jurisdictional error, illegality, perversity or misapplication of law has been pointed out in the impugned judgment which may justify interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The findings recorded by the learned appellate court represent a balanced and reasoned determination of the respective claims of the parties after proper appraisal of the evidence, and are thus prima facie immune from interference under Article 199 of the Constitution under such circumstances of the case. 17. Consequently, both constitutional petitions along with pending application(s) being devoid of merit are dismissed, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1957 | 2026 SHC KHI 514 | Const. P. 5004/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Jaffar Abdul Majeed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 1958 | 2026 SHC KHI 277 | Const. P. 93/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS SESSI and Ors (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1959 | 2026 SHC KHI 635 | Const. P. 5238/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | It is clarified that in case the petitioner has not already submitted a formal application before the competent authority for removal of his name from the Passport Control List and restoration of his passport, he shall be at liberty to file a fresh application, which shall be duly received and processed by the concerned authority. Upon receipt of such an application, the competent authority shall communicate with the petitioner, if required, for personal appearance or submission of any relevant material, and thereafter decide the matter in accordance with law within the stipulated period. 8. With these observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1960 | 2026 SHC KHI 153 | Const. P. 1680/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Haleema (Petitioner) VS Chairman NADRA & another (Respondent) | 28-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the Petitioners are directed to appear before the V&R Branch of NADRA for submission of any outstanding documents and to facilitate the verification process. Upon compliance, NADRA shall process the case in accordance with law and unblock the CNICs without undue delay. 8. The petition is disposed of with the above directions, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1961 | 2026 SHC KHI 628 | Const. P. 5058/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | M/s State Bank of Pakistan Class IV CHS (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | For these reasons, the appointment of a neutral Administrator/Commissioner/Election Officer as proposed by the parties to conduct elections is considered the most appropriate course to resolve the present controversy and to ensure compliance with the statutory framework governing cooperative societies. However, the parties shall extend full cooperation to the Commissioner/Election Officer and shall not interfere in the election process in any manner. Meanwhile, the election officer shall decide ancillary issues affecting the genuine voters/allotees of the society solely for the purpose of conducting the election and no transactions with regard to the sale and purchase of the plots shall take place. The fee of Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi is fixed at Rs. 300,000/-, payable in advance by the parties. 10. With these directions, these petitions, along with pending application(s) stand disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1962 | 2025 SHC HYD 3565 | Const. P. 2005/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Aatiqa Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-DEC-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 1963 | 2026 SHC KHI 385 | Const. P. 3474/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shoukat Ali Khawaja and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-26 | Yes | Pensionary benefits are vested/legal rights and cannot be curtailed through executive transfer or financial constraints. The denial of Revised Pay Scales 2017 and 2022 to PMTF retirees, while granting the same to employees of Heavy Mechanical Complex and Heavy Electrical Complex under State Engineering Corporation, amounts to discrimination in violation of Articles 9 and 25 of the Constitution. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in the following terms: i) The competent authority of PMTF is directed to grant the benefit of Revised Pay Scales 2017 and 2022, along with all admissible Adhoc Relief Allowances, to the Petitioners notionally from the respective dates of their enforcement by the Federal Government, policy decision. ii) Upon such notional fixation, competent authority, Respondents PMTF and SEC shall recalculate the pension and commutation benefits of the Petitioners based on the revised last pay drawn. iii) The State Engineering Corporation Management Pension Fund is also directed to release revised pensionary benefits, including arrears, to the Petitioners within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order, if not earlier paid. iv) Any outstanding arrears accruing on account of such revision shall also be paid to the Petitioners within the aforesaid period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1964 | 2026 SHC KHI 620 | Const. P. 106/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Zaheer-ud-Din Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Madiha Naveed (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 1965 | 2026 SHC KHI 122 | Const. P. 6102/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shahryar Amjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 1966 | 2026 SHC KHI 362 | Const. P. 6024/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Khaliq uz Zaman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 1967 | Nil | Const. P. 7004/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Syed Umer Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1968 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1794, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 123, 2018 PLC CS Note 123 | Const. P. 954/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ms. Rehana Parveen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.354-K/2017 Ms. Rehana Parveen v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1969 | Nil | Cr.Bail 406/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | ZARDULLAH KHAN S/O SHUJA ALAM KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1970 | 2018 SCMR 1272 | Const. P. 4291/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Syeda Sakina Riaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) | 13-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.A.1189/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.P.L.A.343-K/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted. Relist after 3 months | |
| 1971 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 109, 2018 PLC CS Note 109 | Const. P. 407/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mr. Ghulam Akbar Allana (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) | 08-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1972 | 2018 MLD 1533 | Cr.Rev 184/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | JAVED S/O SOFAN ARFANI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 22-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1973 | 2022 SHC KHI 234 | Const. P. 4348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Dileep Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Ors (Respondent) | 26-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.73-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others,C.P.L.A.426-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed | |
| 1974 | Nil | Const. P. 3232/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muzaffar Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2945/2018 Secretary Ministry of National Food, Security & Research Department, Islamabad and others v. Muzaffar Iqbal Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1975 | Nil | Cr.Bail 1731/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) VS the State (Respondent) | 29-DEC-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1976 | Nil | Suit 614/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2008 | Muhammad Amin through LRs. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shamim Begum alias Lala (Defendant) | 13-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1977 | Nil | Const. P. 2162/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Hanif and another (Petitioner) VS Rahim Bux & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1978 | Nil | I. A 13/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2009 | Muhammad Yousif & others (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer/ Assistant Commissioner and others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1979 | Nil | Const. P. 2533/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-APR-19 | Yes | Sindh Government /Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of ASI on the basis of Son/Shaheedquota by issuing Standing Ordersor by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014by relaxing the requisite qualification for appointment in the disciplinary force. The appointment of ASI can only be made through competitive process on merit. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.392-K/2019 Asif Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deprtt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 1980 | 2020 SHC KHI 1717 | Const. P. 2343/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Muhammad Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.205-K/2013 Muhammad Sarwar v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.257-K/2013 Muhammad Sarwar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed,Disposed |
| 1981 | Nil | Const. P. 2477/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Jawaid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) | 19-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.563-K/2022 Javed Ahmed v. Atta-ur-Rehman and others. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 1982 | 2021 PCr.LJ 242 | Cr.Misc. 766/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Khalid Hussain & others (Applicant) VS Asif Iqbal & Others (Respondent) | 08-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1983 | Nil | Const. P. 2323/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Sultan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1984 | Nil | I. A 12/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2009 | Province of Sindh through Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Islamuddin & others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 1985 | Nil | Const. P. 2231/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Dawood Wagan (Petitioner) VS The province of Sindh (Respondent) | 04-MAR-19 | Yes | In the light of foregoing, we have reached the conclusion that the amenity plots cannot be converted into either commercial or residential purposes and no encroachment can be allowed on the amenity plot as discussed supra. The report of learned Commissioner is very clear in its terms that no any amenity plot was found in existence in the housing scheme during the inspection, except one open plot of about 1200 sq.ft and a mosque about 2400 sq. ft. in Kehkashan Housing Scheme and Midland Bungalow adjacent with plot No.38 and 39, therefore, the objections raised by the learned counsel for the Respondents 8 & 9 on the site inspection report are of no consequence in view of the orders passed by this Court and Honble Supreme Court | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 1986 | Nil | Const. P. 384/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Qazi Nazimuddin & others (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.288-K/2019 Qazi Nasimuddin v. Syed Sabit Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 1987 | Nil | Cr.Misc. 182/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ch. Azeem Ahmed (Applicant) VS S.H.O P.S Sanjar Chang District Tando Allahyar & 17 others (Respondent) | 01-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1988 | Nil | Const. P. 2230/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Agha Asghar Ali Babar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1989 | Nil | Const. P. 3330/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 10-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1990 | Nil | Const. P. 1969/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Aslam and another (Petitioner) VS Rajab Ali and others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1991 | Nil | Conf.Case 3/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Hassan alias Ali Hassan and others. (Appellant) VS Mst. Halima Chandio (Respondent) | 31-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1992 | Nil | Const. P. 4694/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Syed Abbas Haider (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.2783/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended. | |
| 1993 | Nil | Const. P. 446/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ayoub Afridi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.221-K/2019 Muhammad Ayoub Afridi v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: Water & Power and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 1994 | Nil | Const. P. 1035/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Sabir Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 21-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1995 | Nil | Const. P. 730/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Syed Hashmat Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 21-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1996 | Nil | Const. P. 3330/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Kishore Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1997 | Nil | Cr.Bail 6/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | MUNEER AHMED LASHARI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1998 | Nil | Const. P. 1281/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mst. Ishrat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 1999 | 2019 PLC (CS) 882 | Const. P. 3408/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Zafar Iqbal Zahid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 05-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.554-K/2018,C.P.L.A.555-K/2018,C.P.L.A.559-K/2018,C.P.L.A.562-K/2018,C.P.L.A.560-K/2018,C.P.L.A.553-K/2018,C.P.L.A.557-K/2018,C.P.L.A.558-K/2018,C.P.L.A.556-K/2018,C.P.L.A.561-K/2018 SCP | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2000 | Nil | Const. P. 5577/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3440/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1592/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 2001 | Nil | Const. P. 4849/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Kausar Iqbal Malik (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.609/2019 Kausar Iqbal Malik v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Finance, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2002 | Nil | Const. P. 3400/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 26-SEP-18 | Yes | In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2003 | Nil | Const. P. 1231/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Faraz Akhtar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and ORs (Respondent) | 13-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.118-K/2019 Faraz Akhtar Ali & another v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2004 | Nil | Const. P. 1920/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ishtiaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 18-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2005 | Nil | Const. P. 714/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Msr Mehfooza Bano (Petitioner) VS M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial & Ors (Respondent) | 12-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1480-K/2018 Mehfooz Bano v. M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial Dispensary & Meternity Home and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2006 | Nil | Const. P. 6825/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Akbar Ali Dero (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 28-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2007 | Nil | Const. P. 791/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Aijaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 12-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.1126/2019 Rana Ghulam Shabbir v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of. | |
| 2008 | Nil | Const. P. 7381/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Javd Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2009 | Nil | Const. P. 6291/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Capt: Abrar Arif (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Maritime Ministry & Ors (Respondent) | 04-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2010 | Nil | Const. P. 37/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Mithal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 14-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2011 | Nil | Const. P. 921/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Nasir & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | 15-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2012 | Nil | Const. P. 6893/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Rasheed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4685/2017 Abdul Rasheed and others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1612/2017 Abdul Rasheed and others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 2013 | 2020 SHC KHI 1000 | Const. P. 4224/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 19-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2014 | Nil | Const. P. 251/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Javed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2015 | Nil | Const. P. 423/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amanullah Khoso (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4379/2017 Amanullah Khoso v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another,C.A.1608/2017 Amanullah Khoso v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 2016 | Nil | Const. P. 2075/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mujeeb ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-APR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2017 | Nil | Const. P. 7087/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Fahad (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission & Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2018 | Nil | Const. P. 1643/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2007 | Mirza Hassan Ali (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills Corp. & ORS (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2019 | Nil | Const. P. 2117/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 1995 | Ansarul Hayue & Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Broadcasting Corp. & ors. (Respondent) | 17-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2020 | Nil | Const. P. 499/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Inam Hafiz Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2021 | Nil | Const. P. 598/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Al-Hadi Textile Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2022 | Nil | Const. P. 4637/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Quetta Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3311/2018 M/s Qutta Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secy. Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.95-K/2019 M/s Qutta Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secy. Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2023 | Nil | Const. P. 4810/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | EPLA Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2024 | Nil | Const. P. 336/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2025 | 2018 PLC Lab. 171 | Const. P. 3573/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | M/s Wyeth Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Nasimul Hassan and Ors (Respondent) | 13-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2026 | Nil | Const. P. 2378/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 08-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2027 | 2020 PLC (CS) 557 | Const. P. 1254/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syeda Anis Sughra Jafri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2028 | 2020 PLC (CS) 50 | Const. P. 965/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 08-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.325-K/2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2029 | Nil | Const. P. 6198/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union and Ors (Respondent) | 15-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2030 | 2020 PLC (CS) 24 | Const. P. 562/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Nabeela Ashfaq (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) | 07-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2031 | Nil | Const. P. 5261/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr Shakeel Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C & Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2032 | Nil | Const. P. 6825/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Kanwal Gul (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2033 | 2018 MLD 563, 2017 SBLR Sindh 2011 | Cr.Bail 975/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | ZEESHAN @ SHANI S/O SULEMAN @ CHACHOO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 21-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2034 | Nil | Const. P. 2863/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Pir Kaleemullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 11-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.643-K/2018 Pir Kalimullah and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Cheif Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2035 | 2020 PLC Lab. 88 | Const. P. 4506/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 12-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.267-K/2019 Mushtaque Ahmed v. Member Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2036 | 2020 SCMR 98 | Const. P. 5773/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Irfan Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 26-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1444-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others,C.A.86-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed | |
| 2037 | Nil | Const. P. 7375/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Qaim Ali Shahani (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister Secretariat & ors. (Respondent) | 25-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1474-K/2018 Qaim Ali Shahani v. Chief Minister Secretariat thr. P.S. to C.M. Govt: of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 2038 | Nil | Const. P. 4305/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Musarat Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2039 | Nil | Const. P. 931/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mansoor Pasha (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 12-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.515-K/2018 Mansoor Pasha v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.27-K/2018 Mansoor Pasha v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2040 | Nil | Const. P. 1764/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Apna Micro Finance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2041 | Nil | Const. P. 569/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Rasoom Bhagat (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2042 | Nil | H.C.A 42/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Rani (Appellant) VS Pakistan Internationial Airline Corporation & anor (Respondent) | 03-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2043 | Nil | Const. P. 4752/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ghulam Sarwat Thaheem (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 10-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.94-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Board & University Deptt: Govt. of Sindh v. Ghulam Sarwar Thaheem Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2044 | Nil | Const. P. 1276/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Specialized AUtoparts Ind. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2976/2018 M/s Specialized Autoparts Industries Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.79-K/2019 M/s Specialized Autoparts Industries Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2045 | Nil | Const. P. 4085/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Waseem Abbas & others (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.116-K/2019 Waseem Abbas & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2046 | Nil | Const. P. 6611/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ismail & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.498/2019 Muhammad Ismail Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2047 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 51, 2019 PLC CS Note 51 | Const. P. 1001/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ahsanullah Lakho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2048 | Nil | Cr.Bail 316/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghulam Mujtaba son of Imam Din by caste Lakho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2049 | Nil | Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 27-JAN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another,C.P.L.A.4190/2019 Muzafar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Cabinet Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2050 | Nil | Const. P. 5496/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hassan Jan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2051 | Nil | Const. P. 3756/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Anis-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.538-K/2019 Anis-ur-Rehman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2052 | Nil | Const. P. 3217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Muhammad Osama Shafiq (Petitioner) VS PEMRA and Others (Respondent) | 26-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2053 | Nil | Const. P. 964/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2054 | Nil | Const. P. 3102/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Haseeb Malik & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2055 | Nil | Const. P. 2834/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2056 | Nil | Const. P. 2770/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zulqarnain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2057 | Nil | Const. P. 2979/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dost Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2058 | Nil | Const. P. 2186/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Faqeer Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2059 | Nil | Const. P. 2922/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | GhulamRasool & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2060 | Nil | Const. P. 2731/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mustaqeem Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2061 | Nil | Const. P. 1151/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Gul (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2062 | Nil | Const. P. 1237/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ismail Narejo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2063 | Nil | Const. P. 2962/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sadique Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2064 | Nil | Const. P. 3337/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | HyderBux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2065 | Nil | Const. P. 1619/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Hakeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2066 | Nil | Const. P. 1635/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Shabana & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2067 | Nil | Const. P. 572/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Pir Naveed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2068 | Nil | Const. P. 1500/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2069 | Nil | Const. P. 1822/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Peer Bux Khan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2070 | Nil | Civil Revision 270/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad (Applicant) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2071 | Nil | Const. P. 758/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Nighat Sultana (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2072 | Nil | Const. P. 1910/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2073 | Nil | Const. P. 2342/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Naseeban (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2074 | Nil | Const. P. 637/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Manzoor Alam and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2075 | Nil | Const. P. 7654/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mirza Mansoor Baig (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2076 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 266 | Const. P. 2054/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Natho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 11-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2077 | Nil | Const. P. 3148/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2078 | Nil | Const. P. 2194/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2079 | Nil | Const. P. 2201/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zafar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2080 | Nil | Const. P. 3199/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Anees Raja (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2081 | Nil | Const. P. 5514/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Saif Shujaat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2082 | Nil | Const. P. 3119/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ahmed Amin Brohi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.526-K/2019 Ahmed Amin Brohi v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 2083 | Nil | Const. P. 1840/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Zahida Usman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2084 | Nil | Const. P. 2965/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2085 | 2020 PLC CS Note 23 | Const. P. 4064/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Yaseen Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 04-SEP-19 | Yes | NADRA | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2086 | Nil | Const. P. 8579/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Abdul Basit and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.695-K/2019 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.24-K/2022 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 2087 | 2020 SHC KHI 1376 | Const. P. 502/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst .Rani Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | whether Constable Mushtaque Khaskheli embraced Shahadat on 04.3.2015 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014. Shahadat | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2088 | 2021 PLC (CS) 374 | Const. P. 1310/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ms. Faryal Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Federal Ombudsman and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-19 | Yes | Posting and transfer of unmarried female government servants --In the light of Office Memorandum dated 17th December, 1999 as discussed supra the case of Petitioner explicitly falls within paragraph 2(i), as such Notification for transfer of the petitioner at Peshawar is declared against the policy decision of the Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat Establishment Division. Petition allowed. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2089 | Nil | Const. P. 2510/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst.Razia Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2090 | Nil | Const. P. 505/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1240/2021 Sindh Revnue Board through its Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi v. M/s. GMB Rass Services (Pvt) Limited and another,C.P.L.A.372-K/2021 The Provice of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. GMB Rass Services (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2091 | Nil | Const. P. 1827/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khalid Javed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2092 | Nil | Const. P. 349/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Adeel Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2093 | Nil | Const. P. 961/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | ShabbirHasan&another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2094 | Nil | Const. P. 969/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2095 | Nil | Const. P. 1596/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Umar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2096 | Nil | Const. P. 2063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Achar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2097 | Nil | Const. P. 1318/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Naimuddin Advocate (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO & others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Contempt | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2098 | Nil | Const. P. 1659/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Miss Sanam & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.99-K/2020 Director (Legal) WAPDA v. Miss Sanam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 2099 | Nil | Const. P. 2469/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dileep Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2100 | Nil | Const. P. 3031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sajidullah (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.M.A.178-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon and others,C.P.L.A.1451-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed | |
| 2101 | Nil | Const. P. 2143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Inamullah Halepoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2102 | Nil | Const. P. 1803/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Sohail Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2103 | Nil | Const. P. 2276/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sadique Ali Sohani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2104 | Nil | Const. P. 2340/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Noor Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2105 | Nil | Const. P. 2993/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Liaquat Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh Andothers (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2106 | Nil | Const. P. 224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Gul Bahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2107 | 2021 CLC 19 | M.A. 31/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Yameen Qureshi (Appellant) VS Arshad (Respondent) | 08-NOV-19 | Yes | In the light of decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee vs. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) and order passed by the learned Tribunal in the matter, I am of the considered view that the official respondents are under legal obligation to comply the directives of the Honourable Supreme Court passed in the cases of removal of illegal encroachment of amenity plots / public properties from its occupants | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4146/2019 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others,C.A.228/2023 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed |
| 2108 | Nil | Const. P. 1763/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Noor Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2109 | Nil | Const. P. 899/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Hameedullah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2110 | Nil | Const. P. 2928/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2111 | Nil | Const. P. 43/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Nawaz and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2112 | Nil | Const. P. 369/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Santosh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2113 | Nil | Const. P. 1826/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Wasayo Samijo & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2114 | Nil | Const. P. 2574/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghulam Nabi & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 20-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2115 | Nil | Const. P. 635/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Akram & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 21-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2116 | Nil | Const. P. 1224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2117 | 2020 SHC KHI 2415 | Const. P. 5410/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2118 | 2020 SHC HYD 1934 | Const. P. 1721/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.726-K/2020 Aijaz Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2119 | 2020 SHC KHI 330 | Const. P. 19/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sikandar Ali Malah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-OCT-20 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue a retirement order of the petitioner in BPS-17/18 under the law and to pay his full pensionary benefits, from the date of attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 31.12.2011 as admissible to him under the law within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioners and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 31.12.2011 to date. Petition and pending applications are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2120 | 2020 SHC KHI 21 | Const. P. 3006/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ms. Nayyar Qayum (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1798/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Nayyar Qayyum and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 2121 | 2020 SHC HYD 1043 | Const. P. 918/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 06-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2122 | 2020 SHC KHI 1639 | Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) | 22-OCT-20 | Yes | Differently abled persons' plea for appointment in the quota reserved for such persons--We are of the view that the Chief Secretary Sindh, being the senior most officer in the Province, would be the most suitable person to oversee the entire process under his personal supervision in order to ensure not only the compliance of this Court's orders, but also to conclude the exercise in relation to those petitioners whose cases have not yet been considered and/or finalized--To ensure that appointment orders are received by all the 102 (81 + 21) petitioners, before the next date of hearing, who have been already recommended for appointment --To ensure that cases of all such petitioners in these petitions, that have not yet been considered and/or finalized, are considered on merits, strictly in accordance with law, and after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to them a speaking order is passed by the competent authority before the next date of hearing in relation to every such petitioner who is rejected for appointment --To ensure that all those petitioners who have been or will be recommended and have been / will be issued appointment orders are allowed to join their duties before the next date of hearing after completion of all codal formalities--To communicate this order to all the relevant departments and their Secretaries with direction to ensure implementation and compliance thereof in letter and spirit within the stipulated period. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2123 | 2020 SHC KHI 1288 | Const. P. 3400/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Subhan (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 24-JAN-20 | Yes | NBP--demotion of the petitioner from the post of Vice President/Ex-Manager to next lower grade--Adverting to the claim of the petitioner with regard to his promotion in the next rank under NBP Staff Service Rules, 1973. It is well settled proposition of law that it is the Service Rules Committee of the respondent-bank which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion of the petitioner for which they have to take decision in accordance with law--In view of the foregoing facts concluded in para 07 supra, the action taken by the respondent Bank is/was too harsh, therefore we set aside the impugned orders dated 26.11.2014 regarding demotion of the petitioner and order dated 03.03.2017 regarding demotion in pay. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.197-K/2020 National Bank of Pakistan NBP and others v. Abdul Subhan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 2124 | 2020 SHC HYD 1892 | Const. P. 450/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Shafi Throgh His LRS (Petitioner) VS Raja Muhammad Bashir Khan & Others (Respondent) | 18-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2125 | 2020 SHC HYD 329 | Criminal Appeal 185/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2126 | 2020 SHC HYD 296 | Criminal Appeal 104/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Muhammad Akram (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | J.P.314/2020 Muhammad Akram v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 2127 | 2020 SHC HYD 1795 | Const. P. 824/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | HAMZO HAN ZARDARAND OTHER (Petitioner) VS P.O SNDH AND OTHER (Respondent) | 08-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2128 | 2020 SHC HYD 1115 | Const. P. 2112/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mst Haneefa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2129 | 2020 SHC HYD 189 | M.A. 1/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | (HESCO) Hyderabad (Applicant) VS Muhammad Tanveer & Others (Respondent) | 18-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2130 | 2020 SHC HYD 84 | Const. P. 317/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samina & others (Respondent) | 21-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.569-K/2020 Muhammad Irfan v. Mst.Saima & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2131 | 2020 SHC HYD 2280 | I. A 34/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Hyder (Appellant) VS Asif Ali Khyber (Respondent) | 21-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2132 | 2020 SHC HYD 901 | Const. P. 246/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sht. Kiran & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2133 | 2020 SHC KHI 2205 | Const. P. 2692/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shahnawaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 25-NOV-20 | Yes | Seniority matter--SRP--Police Constables--Adverting to the point raised by learned counsel for the petitioners that they were appointed in SRP Karachi and posted in RRF Karachi since 2009, thus their seniority is liable to be maintained in Karachi range, suffice it to say that prima-facie, the RRF was / is not part of the Karachi range, but is a combination of different regions/units of the Sindh police, merely their appointment in SRP Karachi and posting in RRF Karachi does not support their case to the effect that they belonged to Karachi Range Police, for the reason that they never remained posted in the Karachi range police, therefore, their seniority cannot be ordered to be mixed with Karachi range police. The record further reflects that their recommendations for initial appointments by their regional head were made based on their respective place of domicile. Petitioners have failed to point out that their appointment was / is based on Karachi domicile, therefore they are precluded to claim vested right for seniority and promotion at Karachi Range on the aforesaid analogy--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1438-K/2020 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others,C.A.57-K/2021 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted, Adjourned |
| 2134 | 2020 SHC HYD 3 | Const. P. 3215/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Majid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2135 | 2020 SHC HYD 325 | Civil Revision 129/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Hans lal @ Hans lo and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail and an others (Respondent) | 21-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2136 | 2020 SHC HYD 1384 | Const. P. 218/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Miss Shanaz Anwar (Petitioner) VS D.I.G. Shaheed Benazirabad & others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2137 | 2020 SHC KHI 1306 | Const. P. 2546/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Aftab Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS The Speaker Provincial Assembly and Ors (Respondent) | 20-MAY-20 | Yes | Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1879/2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar v. Speaker Provincial Assembly of Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 2138 | 2022 SHC HYD 407 | Const. P. 85/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 28-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.738-K/2022 Aziz Khan & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2139 | 2020 SHC KHI 2403 | Const. P. 7731/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Javed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-20 | Yes | promotion in PSO | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2140 | 2020 SHC HYD 2114 | Const. P. 649/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2141 | Nil | I. A 31/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2013 | Government of Sindh & others (Appellant) VS M/S United Bank Limited (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Appeal was allowed with costs and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2142 | 2020 SHC KHI 1676 | Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-OCT-20 | Yes | Employees of KDA whose pension and other post-retirement benefits have been stopped or delayed by KDA--According to the report, public notice in terms of order dated 19.03.2020 was published in newspapers on 27.08.2020 ; a total amount of Rs.234,749,894.00 is payable by KDA to its retired employees ; and, an amount of Rs.23,741,450.00, being 10% amount of the pension and post-retirement benefits, has been paid by KDA to its 988 retired employees. Learned counsel for the petitioners have expressed some reservations with regard to the contents of the above compliance report and state that the orders of this Court have not been complied with by KDA in letter and spirit. The above named Director Finance & Accounts KDA is directed to produce before this Court on the next date of hearing the complete bank statement of the bank account opened by KDA for the above purpose in pursuance of the order dated 19.03.2020. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2143 | Nil | Const. P. 2184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Humayoon (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2144 | 2020 SHC HYD 1266 | Const. P. 448/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Nadeem Iqbal & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2145 | 2020 SHC KHI 791 | Const. P. 1194/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.442-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary & another v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi & others,C.P.L.A.1840/2020 Aijaz Ali Sahto thr. University & Board Department of the Province fo Sindh and others v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed |
| 2146 | 2020 SHC HYD 1433 | Const. P. 96/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Rozina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.203-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Mst. Munwar Khatoon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 2147 | 2020 SHC HYD 831 | Const. P. 803/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | ALI HYDER (Petitioner) VS P.O SINDH & OTHER (Respondent) | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2148 | 2020 SHC KHI 2192 | Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 21-DEC-20 | Yes | Basically, the petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in BPS-05 on 02.12.1980 and his grade was enhanced and placed in BPS-06 vide office order dated 27.10.1985. Prima-facie, his juniors have been promoted in various grades whereas the petitioner has been ignored without disclosing his ineligibility or otherwise. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2149 | 2020 SHC HYD 913 | Const. P. 319/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Nisha & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2150 | 2020 SHC SUK 829 | Const. P. 558/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Meer Hazar Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | |||
| 2151 | 2020 SHC HYD 2412 | Const. P. 797/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Gulzar Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2152 | 2020 SHC KHI 2143 | Const. P. 5853/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | National Engineering Servies Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-NOV-20 | Yes | reinstatement in service--we may observe that the learned Single Bench of NIRC vide order dated 08.10.2020 allowed the Grievance Application of respondent No.2 and passed ex-parte order, which issue is still subjudice before the learned Full Bench of NIRC, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioners. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.5 to decide the case of the petitioners within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. Meanwhile, operation of the impugned order dated 08.10.2020 shall remain suspended. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2153 | Nil | Const. P. 1040/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Danish (Petitioner) VS Deputy General Hyderabad Development Authority & others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2154 | 2020 SHC KHI 473 | Const. P. 6032/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Waqarullah Korejo Advocate (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2155 | 2020 SHC KHI 102 | Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 14-DEC-20 | Yes | i) Whether the petitioner possesses the required qualifications for the post of police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police as per recruitment Rules-2016 ? And ii) Whether police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police can be recruited on a contract basis and subsequently be regularized in service under the law? | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time |
| 2156 | 2021 SHC KHI 761 | Const. P. 3055/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Maqsood Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | Since respondent No 3 has crossed the age of 60 years and left his position from KPT, no further action is required. However, it is made clear that he is not entitled to a second pension from KPT due to his illegal deputation and subsequent absorption in KPT in the intervening period without the approval of the competent authority as discussed in the preceding paragraphs---Before parting with this order, it may be observed that even on moral ground, the illegalities committed by the management of KPT and respondent No.3, being a retired naval forces personnel and a patriot, was expected to act honestly in the best interest of the country. However, he chose not only to get himself illegally absorbed in KPT, but also claimed and received pension from their different services causing heavy loss to the national exchequer. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1325/2021 CDR (R) Khalid Munir v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2157 | 2020 SHC HYD 2100 | Const. P. 828/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shaukat Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2158 | 2020 SHC HYD 152 | Const. P. 1748/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Allah Jurio (Petitioner) VS Commandant/Principal Cadet College Sanghar (Respondent) | 05-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2159 | 2022 PLD Sindh 308 | Const. P. 275/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bakaullah Khan Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2160 | 2020 SHC HYD 1584 | Const. P. 222/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Farhana (Petitioner) VS SSP Dadu and others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2161 | 2020 SHC HYD 4 | Const. P. 1526/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mirza Mukarram Hayat Baig & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Prov. Of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.736-K/2022 Mirza Mukarram Hayat Baig & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2162 | 2022 PLC (CS) 150 | Const. P. 1679/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mazhar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2163 | 2021 SHC KHI 630 | Const. P. 735/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2164 | 2020 SHC HYD 2256 | Const. P. 2947/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 18-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2165 | 2020 SHC HYD 847 | Const. P. 297/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst Madam (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2166 | 2021 SHC KHI 159 | Const. P. 6031/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammads Ayub (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 13-JAN-21 | Yes | appointment against son quota | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.427-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The Learned Member & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 2167 | 2020 SHC KHI 489 | Const. P. 1055/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Molvi Muhammad Hassan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary & Ors (Respondent) | 10-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2168 | 2020 SHC KHI 280 | Const. P. 434/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Nawaz Umar (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2169 | 2020 SHC KHI 1316 | Const. P. 532/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Saeed Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2170 | 2020 SHC HYD 2225 | Const. P. 780/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Tehseen Ahmed H. Qureshi & others (Petitioner) VS Ld. Distt: & Session Judge MirpurKhas & Others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1201-K/2020 Tahseen Ahmed H.Qureshi & others v. Learned District & Sessions Juge Mirpurkhas & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 2171 | 2020 SHC HYD 524 | Criminal Appeal 105/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Wahid Bux (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2172 | 2020 SHC HYD 2269 | Const. P. 811/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Hanif Lalani (Petitioner) VS The State Through DG NAB, Sindh (Respondent) | 09-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2173 | 2020 SHC HYD 458 | Const. P. 1029/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1204/2023 Shah Nawaz (deceased) through his L.Rs and others v. Mst. Erum Saleem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 2174 | 2020 SHC HYD 1284 | Const. P. 618/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Aslam & Others (Respondent) | 25-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1292-K/2020 Muhammad Aslam v. Muhammad Kamran & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2175 | 2020 SHC KHI 1770 | Const. P. 1769/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Murtaza Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 04-MAR-20 | Yes | Contempt--In our view, we cannot enlarge the scope of the main disposal order and do not find any violation of the order passed by this Court as his termination is a separate, subsequent and fresh cause of action which has already been impugned by him through a separate petition as noted above. Resultantly, CMA No. 23812 of 2017 along with pending applications is dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.317-K/2020 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2176 | 2020 SHC KHI 138 | Const. P. 2216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ashraf Khatti and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-20 | Yes | Contempt | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2177 | 2020 SHC KHI 2384 | Const. P. 3247/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Prof: Syed Farhat Ali Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2178 | 2020 SHC HYD 219 | Const. P. 741/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Rustam Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2179 | 2020 SHC HYD 1793 | Criminal Appeal 186/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2180 | 2020 SHC HYD 323 | Const. P. 574/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1287-K/2020 Abdul Rehman Rajput v. The District Judge Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2181 | 2020 SHC HYD 1150 | Const. P. 948/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Jhenwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2182 | 2020 SHC HYD 650 | Const. P. 3107/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ahsan H Khuwaja (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2183 | 2020 SHC KHI 1821 | Const. P. 5975/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Imtiaz Ali Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.382-K/2020 Imtiaz Ali Sangarasi v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2184 | 2020 SHC HYD 887 | Const. P. 3029/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Fakeer Manthar (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 04-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2185 | 2020 SHC KHI 111 | Const. P. 6845/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Juanid Ahmed Sarki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-JAN-20 | Yes | Deceased quota-- Petitioner???s case if not approved by the competent authority may seek his remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. Deceased quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2186 | 2020 SHC HYD 968 | Const. P. 1975/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Pir Ashfaq Ahmed Sarhandi & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2187 | 2020 SHC HYD 412 | Const. P. 70/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Aqsa Jawed (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Haseen & others (Respondent) | 18-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.825-K/2020 Muhammad Haseen v. Aqsa Jawed Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 2188 | 2020 SHC KHI 920 | Const. P. 436/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Sultan Shah (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2189 | 2020 SHC HYD 729 | Const. P. 178/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1282-K/2020 Muhammad Ali v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2190 | 2021 SHC KHI 1320 | Const. P. 837/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Faraz Rehan S/o Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S. Sir Syed (Central) Khi and others (Respondent) | 04-JAN-21 | Yes | Habeas Corpus directing the respondent-police officials to produce his minor son namely Master Zohan Faraz aged about 02 years to enable him to take his custody--I am of the view that the purpose of filing this petition is served as the minor has been produced before this Court; and, prima-facie the minor is no more in illegal custody as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Primarily, in the cases, concerning the custody of a child, this Court is not required to go into the intricacies/technicalities of the matter in constitutional jurisdiction and should confine its findings to the extent of the welfare of the child/minor which is a paramount consideration and it is for the learned Guardian and Wards Court to take appropriate measures in this regard. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2191 | 2025 SHC KHI 1662, 2025 SHC KHI 1665 | Const. P. 2328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Tanveer (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAY-25 | Yes | The petitioner's removal from service, ordered on October 20, 2009, appears unduly severe. This is because the inquiry officer had only recommended a one-stage reduction in pay. Furthermore, the petitioner was acquitted of the charges leveled by the Pakistan Steel Mills against him by a competent court. Given these circumstances, the punishment is disproportionate. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we have decided to change the punishment from removal from service to compulsory retirement, provided the petitioner meets the required length of service. The Pakistan Steel Mills, Ministry of Industry and Production, is directed to implement this change and its consequences within three months. 12. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1027-K/2025 Pakistan Steel Mills v. Muhammad Tanveer Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 2192 | 2021 SHC KHI 1414 | Const. P. 2805/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Shamim Qureshi (Petitioner) VS J.S.M.U and Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2193 | 2021 SHC KHI 1249 | Const. P. 427/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-21 | Yes | In our view, no candidate shall be appointed to a post unless after such medical examination as Government may prescribe such candidate is found medically fit to discharge the duties of the post. In the present case, the petitioner was relieved from the duties on medical grounds and his appeal was rejected on the same analogy. Besides above, the assertion of the petitioner is misconceived on the premise that he obtained a medical examination fitness test certificate on 02.12.2019 after the rejection of his appeal, on 14.5.2019, thus this document could not be taken into consideration, besides the respondents have relied upon the documents which prima facie show adverse inference against him. Thus, at this stage, we cannot declare him medically fit or otherwise for the subject post, which was a contractual position and by efflux of time expired. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 2194 | 2021 SHC KHI 992 | Const. P. 2707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to award him incentive of timescale i.e. BPS-17 to BPS-19, from the date of his entitlement; and, other ancillary benefits, to bring him at par with the employees of other departments of Government of Sindh--whether the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of the timescale from BPS-17 to BPS-19 under the law or otherwise. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2195 | 2021 SHC KHI 1111 | Const. P. 3502/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Syed Babar Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-JUN-21 | Yes | We do not agree with the statement of the learned counsel for the Petitioner on the aforesaid assertions for the simple reason that compulsory retirement from service is a major penalty under service jurisprudence and falls within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of the civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456] | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2196 | 2022 SHC KHI 141 | Const. P. 4535/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Jamil Khan (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) | 03-JUN-22 | Yes | Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2745/2022 Muhammad Jamil Khan v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 2197 | 2021 SHC KHI 502 | Const. P. 3314/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zeba Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2198 | 2021 SHC KHI 1431 | Const. P. 5616/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Aftab (Petitioner) VS Div: Supr: Pakistan Railways & Ors (Respondent) | 22-FEB-21 | Yes | medical issue in appointment | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1049-K/2022 Muhammad Aftab v. The Divisional Superintendent Pakistan Railway, Karachi Division & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2199 | 2025 SHC KHI 1421 | Const. P. 22/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | M. Ameenuddin Ahmed Siddiqi & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAY-25 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, and without touching to the other issues as agitated by the petitioners on merit, we confine ourselves to the extent of recovery proceedings, initiated against the petitioners pursuance of withdrawal of the up-gradation benefits by the department, in terms of decision of the Supreme Court in the Shams-ur-Rehman case supra. This petition is hereby disposed of with the directive that, given the petitioners' service at a higher post and the subsequent withdrawal of the upgradation by Supreme Court order, no recovery proceedings shall be initiated against them, if not earlier acted upon. 8. This petition is disposed of on these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2200 | 2023 PLC CS 228 | Const. P. 6221/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2201 | 2021 SHC KHI 508 | Const. P. 1661/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Noor Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-21 | Yes | WAPDA--Sindh Government--absorption--repatriation--since, he has been reported to have retired from service, during litigation; and, he has not joined WAPDA. Besides the notification of his repatriation has not been given effect. We may also notice that judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court does not apply to the retired employees as on retirement; as they do not affect the seniority, promotion, or any other benefit of the serving employees. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2202 | 2021 SHC KHI 1048 | Const. P. 4431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zaheeruddin Babar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2203 | 2021 SHC KHI 431 | Const. P. 1215/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bansi Lal Malhi & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-SEP-21 | Yes | the common grievance of the Petitioners is against the issuance of notifications dated 09.12.2019 and 26.2.2021 by the respondent-Establishment Division, whereby the direction was given to the Police Service of Pakistan Officers (PSPO), who were not pleaded as parties to the Petition bearing No D-1555 of 2021, serving in the Province of Sindh to report to the Establishment Division, basically they were also posted outside the Sindh Province----We may hold that Section 10 of the Civil Servants Act 1973, and Rule 10 of the Police Service of Pakistan (Composition Cadre and Seniority) Rules 1985, provide transfer and posting of the civil servants/PSP officers to different Provinces and the competent authority can withdraw any such officer of Federal government before the expiry of their tenure limitation, additionally, Rotation Policy cannot restrict the process of the competent authority from withdrawing any civil servant/PSP officer from the Provincial governments at any time on administrative grounds/ valid reasons. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1674-K/2021 Bansi Lal Malhi & another v. The Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2204 | 2021 SHC KHI 1299 | Const. P. 3788/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Wazir Rehman (Petitioner) VS Trustees of the Port of Karachi (Respondent) | 20-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1114-K/2021 Wazir Rehman v. Trustees of the Port of Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2205 | 2021 SHC LAR 551 | Cr.J.A 87/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zamir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-JUL-21 | Yes | For the foregoing facts and reasons, we have not found any misreading or non-appreciation of evidence and any illegality or legal or factual infirmity in the impugned judgment so as to justify interference by this Court in recording sentence and conviction to appellant by the trial Court. Hence, instant criminal appeal is dismissed. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | Crl.P.L.A.118-K/2021 Zamir v. The State,Crl.A.33-K/2022 Zamir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed |
| 2206 | 2021 SHC KHI 1281 | Const. P. 5779/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nisar Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioner has prayed for issuance of the writ of quo warranto against respondents 4 to 11, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not fit, eligible and qualified to hold the office of Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, and Senior Registrar in Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, (SMBBMC) and their future appointments in SMBBMC on contract are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2207 | 2021 SHC KHI 571 | Const. P. 4609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Asadullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-21 | Yes | Regularization | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2208 | 2021 SHC LAR 997 | Cr.Bail 322/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ashfaq Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2209 | 2021 SHC KHI 80 | Const. P. 1874/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ms. Shahid Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 26-MAR-21 | Yes | transfer and posting issue | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2210 | 2021 SHC LAR 1112 | Cr.Bail 285/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Suhail Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2211 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 50 | Const. P. 830/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Sohail and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 19-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1112-K/2021 Muhammad Junaid v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Ports & Shipping & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned | |
| 2212 | 2021 SHC KHI 1007 | Const. P. 2513/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Ali Unar and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 09-APR-21 | Yes | posting and transfer of District Food Controllers (DFCs) and Assistant District Food Controllers (ADFCs) in Food Department, Government of Sindh--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the transfer and posting is the prerogative of the respondent department as provided under Section 10 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973. However, the petitioners have raised the hue and cry in the matter with the assertion that their transfer and posting is based on malafide intention to accommodate the beneficiaries to usurp the huge amount or kickbacks in the disbursement of wheat in their respective area. If this is the factual position of the case, the Chief Secretary, Sindh, and Secretary Food Department, Government of Sindh, are directed to look into the affairs of disbursement of wheat in the Province of Sindh personally and ensure that the wheat is disbursed strictly under the law. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2213 | 2021 SHC KHI 786 | Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioner is an educationist and has been serving in the Public Education Sector in Sindh since 1987. Per learned counsel the Universities and Boards Department, the Government of Sindh, Karachi invited application for the position of Chairman-Board and petitioner was one of the candidates for the aforesaid post-- | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 2214 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1117 | Const. P. 6192/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | quo warranto | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.562-K/2021 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 2215 | 2021 SHC KHI 715 | Const. P. 3585/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-21 | Yes | termination--Sindh Madressatul Islam University | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 2216 | 2021 SHC KHI 773 | Const. P. 1042/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-21 | Yes | regularization | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.429-K/2021 Muhammad Ahmed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2217 | 2021 SHC KHI 1366 | Const. P. 6344/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Group insurance to employees of Government of Sindh, the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 and Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Rules, 1980, Boards for administration of the Funds, State life insurance corporation: Khyber Pukhtunkhwa Civil Servant Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation Act 2014, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation (amendment) Act No.V of 2016, judgment of the Peshawar High Court in case of Fida Muhammad Durrani and judgment of Islamabad High Court in case of Muhammad Rehan Khan; advice by Advocate General Sindh to the Government of Sindh with regard to amendment in existing law/rules. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2218 | 2021 SHC HYD 986 | Cr.Bail 580/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Aslam Muhammad Bakhsh and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2219 | 2021 SHC HYD 929 | Cr.Bail 926/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sajan Laghari (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2220 | 2021 SHC HYD 401 | II.A. 70/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mehfooz Ahmed (Appellant) VS Mst. Rehmat Begum & Others (Respondent) | 22-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.49-K/2022 Mst.Rehmat Begum v. Mehfooz Ahmed & othersmanhg Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2221 | 2021 SHC HYD 187 | Const. P. 532/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Arif & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.104/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Nadeem Arif and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2222 | 2021 SHC HYD 1151 | Const. P. 614/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mst:Akbaro (Petitioner) VS Appellate Authority Board Of Trustee E.O.B.I, & Or (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2223 | 2021 SHC HYD 668 | Criminal Appeal 123/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: conf:Case No D 23 of 2019 | Original Side | 2019 | Hassan Alias Ali HASSAN (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2224 | 2022 SHC KHI 89 | R.A (Civil Revision) 135/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Zakir S/o Abdul Malik (Applicant) VS Muhammad Faisal and others (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | In principle, the applicant has lost his case; and, at the revision stage, he has agitated the grounds already exhausted by him and properly adjudicated by the competent forum including the plea that the suit filed by the respondent was time-barred on the premise that he made last payment to the applicant on 12.8.2015 whereas, he filed his suit No.497/2017 for declaration, specific performance of sale agreement, permanent injunction and consequential relief on 24.4.2017 means 01 year, 08 months and 12 days | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2225 | 2021 SHC HYD 567 | Civil Revision 232/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2004 | Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Applicant) VS Kazi Nisar Ahmed and another (Respondent) | 22-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2226 | 2021 SHC HYD 632 | Const. P. 217/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2001 | Agha Nisar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory and others (Respondent) | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2227 | 2021 SHC HYD 440 | Const. P. 974/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2228 | 2021 SHC KHI 124 | Cr.Bail 2284/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | NOOR MUHAMMAD S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 31-DEC-21 | Yes | seeking admission on post-arrest bail in FIR No.732/2021 of PS Shahrah-e-Noorjehan, Karachi registered under Sections 397/34 PPC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2229 | 2022 SHC KHI 862 | Cr.Bail 1035/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | ASGHAR S/O BAKHT KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | seeks bail after arrest in F.I.R No.199/2020, registered under Sections 393/302/34 PPC at PS Peerabad, Karachi-- | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2230 | 2022 SHC KHI 694 | Cr.Bail 2264/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD TARIQ S/O HABIBULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.646/2021, registered under Sections 420/468/471/470/489-F/34 PPC---Coming to the allegations of three cheques, which were later on dishonored, a question as to what constitutes an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. primarily, every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation; and, lastly the cheque in question is dishonored on presentation. Prima-facie, in the present case allegations are almost same, therefore, tentative assessment of record explicitly shows that the complainant has been defrauded by the applicant for the reasons discussed supra. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2231 | 2021 SHC HYD 1331 | Cr.Bail 801/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | FAYAZ HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2232 | 2021 SHC HYD 299 | Const. P. 517/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abid Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.103/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Abid Hussain Yousafzai and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2233 | 2021 SHC HYD 1359 | Const. P. 1757/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Herlal and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2234 | 2021 SHC HYD 1356 | II.A. 3/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2014 | Abdul Samad Soomro (Appellant) VS Mst Nazir Bano and others (Respondent) | 29-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.157-K/2022 Abdul Samad v. Mst.Nazir Bano & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 2235 | 2021 SHC HYD 1059 | Cr.Misc. 691/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | KHUDA BUX (Applicant) VS SAJJAD & OTHERS (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2236 | 2021 SHC HYD 336 | Cr.Bail 510/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Rehman and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2237 | 2021 SHC HYD 250 | Const. P. 442/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2238 | 2021 SHC HYD 279 | Civil Revision 35/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2004 | Shamdas and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Hassan and others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2239 | 2021 SHC HYD 62 | Const. P. 1028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2240 | 2021 SHC HYD 429 | Const. P. 1343/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 28-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2241 | 2022 MLD 1315 | Cr.Bail 698/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD ALI SOOMRO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2242 | 2021 SHC HYD 1235 | Const. P. 49/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Ganj Bibi & Others (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2243 | 2021 SHC HYD 1054 | Const. P. 335/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2244 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1299 | Cr.Bail 1800/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | FAISAL MALIK S/O MALIK MUHAMMAD EJAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 29-DEC-21 | Yes | seeking pre-arrest bail in FIR No.553/2021 of PS Darakhshan, District South, Karachi registered for the offense under Section 489-F PPC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2245 | 2022 MLD 1506 | Const. P. 991/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst. Fatima Zehra D/o Zahid Abbas (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Sheroz and others (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | The learned Civil & Family Judge shall fix any two days in a month for the meeting of father-respondent No.1 with the minor baby Dua, and in the meanwhile, petitioner-mother shall not take away the custody of minor out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights i.e. Birthdays, Eid occasions, and summer and winter vacations and arrangements shall be made by the learned Family Court upon filing appropriate application by the respondent-father and the learned Family Court would be at liberty to pass appropriate order on such application concerning the date, time and place of meeting of minor with respondent-father, however, that arrangement is subject to the observation made by this Court as discussed in the preceding paragraph and also subject to payment of maintenance of the minor, which has already been done by the learned Family Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2246 | 2021 SHC HYD 1282 | Const. P. 2063/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Haji Dodo Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 16-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2247 | 2021 SHC KHI 597 | Cr.Bail 2170/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | SHAHID @ BURGER @ BOSS & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 28-DEC-21 | Yes | seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.427/2021 for offenses under Section 397/34 PPC registered at PS Gizri | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2248 | 2021 SHC HYD 888 | Const. P. 2134/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Abdul Wahid and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.101-K/2022 Abdul Wahid & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Livestock, Fisheries Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2249 | 2021 SHC HYD 204 | Const. P. 1564/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 15-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2250 | 2022 SHC KHI 139 | Const. P. 5666/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Farooq Legharii (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2251 | 2022 SHC KHI 413 | Const. P. 3380/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mumtaz Ali Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-22 | Yes | proforma promotion | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2252 | 2021 SHC KHI 882 | Const. P. 6927/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Razzaq A. Dawood (Petitioner) VS M/s Urban Builders and Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.1944/2018,C.P.L.A.5674/2024,C.P.L.A.6389/2021,C.A.646/2022 SCP | Disposed Disposed of,Pending ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 2253 | 2022 PLC CS 1378 | Const. P. 3031/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Akber Siyal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 03-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2254 | 2022 SHC KHI 729 | Const. P. 3804/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Abdul Karim Channa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 31-JAN-22 | Yes | 7. The question involved in the present proceedings is whether Temporary and officiating service rendered by the petitioner on retenairship as Medical Officer with effect from 1992 till his purported regularization firstly in 2008 and secondly in 2012 shall count for pension. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1006/2022 Civil Aviation Authority, through Director General CAA, Karachi and another v. Dr. Abdul Karim Channa and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2255 | 2022 SHC KHI 718 | Const. P. 4146/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Rizwan Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | |||
| 2256 | 2022 SHC KHI 737 | Const. P. 1312/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waqar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills (Respondent) | 09-MAR-22 | Yes | back benefits | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1480/2022 The Chief Executive Officer, Pakistan Steel Mills,Karachi v. Waqar Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2257 | 2021 SHC KHI 518 | Const. P. 6541/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Haji Asif S/o Haji Suleman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2258 | 2022 SHC KHI 502 | Const. P. 7072/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Badar ul Haq Kandhro (Petitioner) VS Chairman Council for Work & Housing Research & Ors (Respondent) | 07-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2259 | 2022 SHC KHI 339 | Const. P. 7321/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ali Hyder (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.552-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Ali Hyder Mallah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2260 | 2022 SHC KHI 855 | Const. P. 1707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rawal Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-22 | Yes | 7. To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2261 | 2021 SHC KHI 354 | Const. P. 7272/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Union Properites (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2262 | 2022 SHC HYD 619 | II.A. 47/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/S Housing and Land Development (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Noor Muhammad Qureshi thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1314-K/2022 M/s. Housing and Land Development Pvt. Ltd. v. Noor Muhammad Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2263 | 2022 SHC HYD 324 | R.A (Civil Revision) 215/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Syed Munawar Ali Shah. (Applicant) VS DFO, Sanghar @ Khipro & Ors. (Respondent) | 18-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2264 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 633 | Const. P. 3236/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mehrun Nisa Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2265 | 2022 SHC HYD 285 | II.A. 3/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ramzan (Appellant) VS Town Committee Khipro (Respondent) | 14-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.424-K/2020 Sartaj Ahmed Malgani & another v. Ali Hassan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2266 | Nil | Criminal Appeal 30/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2015 | Asif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 07-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2267 | 2022 SHC HYD 534 | I. A 36/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ashraf Ali Qureshi (Appellant) VS Qamaruddin Shaikh (Respondent) | 02-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3954/2022 Qamaruddin Sheikh v. Ashraf Ali Qureshi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 2268 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1995 | Const. P. 3035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Kamran Ali Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2269 | 2022 SHC HYD 370, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1023 | Const. P. 1088/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2270 | 2022 SHC HYD 158 | Cr.Acq.A. 174/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Noman Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 14-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2271 | 2022 SHC HYD 771 | Criminal Miscelleneous 593/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2022 | NIAZ HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS IMRAN KHAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 10-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2272 | 2022 SHC HYD 210 | R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2006 | Mst: Begum and Others (Applicant) VS Irshad Ahmed (Respondent) | 31-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2273 | 2022 SHC HYD 762 | R.A (Civil Revision) 72/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2001 | Medical Superintendent P.M.C. (Applicant) VS Baksh Ali Jamali (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.4081/2022 Baksh Ali v. Medical Superintendent, Peoples Medical College, Nawabshah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 2274 | 2023 SHC KHI 343 | Const. P. 5466/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Hujjan Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2275 | 2022 SHC HYD 273, 2024 PCr.LJ 121 | II.A. 29/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Farah Naz & another (Appellant) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2276 | 2023 SHC KHI 211 | Const. P. 5636/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS DMC West Karachi and Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2277 | 2022 SHC KHI 279 | Const. P. 5663/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mir Karam Ali Magsi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-22 | Yes | whether a person is legally qualified for appointment or promotion to a particular post and grade is relatable to the factum whether he possesses the requisite qualifications for consideration, whereas the question of fitness pertains to the competency of the person concerned, which is to be decided by the competent authority. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2278 | 2023 SHC KHI 1031 | H.C.A 387/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Pak Maniar Investment Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS Salebhoy & others (Respondent) | 10-MAR-23 | Yes | Against judgment and preliminary decree | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.958-K/2023 Pak Maniar Investment Limited & others v. Salehbhoy deceased through its legal heirs & others,C.P.L.A.885-K/2023 Salehbhoy v. M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending ,Pending |
| 2279 | 2023 SHC HYD 950, 2025 SBLR Sindh 76 | Cr.Acq.A. 245/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Saleem (Appellant) VS Naimat Ali @ Namat Ali and others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2280 | 2023 SHC HYD 74 | II.A. 107/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Siddique. (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ali trough LRs. (Respondent) | 19-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2281 | 2023 SHC HYD 16 | Criminal Appeal 157/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.A S 158 of 2022 | Original Side | 2022 | IRFAN ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 14-APR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2282 | 2023 SHC HYD 494 | II.A. 44/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Riaz-ul-Din @ Rajab Ali. (Appellant) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1017-K/2023 Riaz-ul-Deen Rajab v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | |
| 2283 | 2024 SHC KHI 787 | Const. P. 676/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | M/s Karachi Shipyard & Engineering (Petitioner) VS SLAT & Others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-24 | Yes | In principle cases in Courts are decided on the preponderance of evidence led in the case by the parties, and to reach a just and proper conclusion, the oral as well as the documentary evidence needs to be taken into consideration. But at the same time, when the matter comes to this Court in Constitutional Jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, it is not the domain of this Court to re-weigh or interpret the evidence and /or material produced before the forums below as this Court is not Appellate Court and under the Constitutional jurisdiction, this Court has limited jurisdiction until and unless the findings are shown to be perverse with jurisdictional defect. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2284 | 2023 SHC KHI 652 | Cr.Bail 1623/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 04-AUG-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2285 | 2024 SHC MPK 1024 | Criminal Miscelleneous 427/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Muhammad Umar Kunbhar (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) | 09-OCT-24 | Yes | This Court vide order dated 28-09-2024 disposed of the instant application with a direction to DIG Mirpurkhas to conduct the inquiry to ascertain the factual position of the case by hearing the parties; however, no compliance report was submitted and again another order dated 02-10-2024 was passed with direction to DIGP Mirpurkhas to submit a compliance report. Today, DIGP Mirpurkhas has submitted a compliance report. At this stage, both the parties agreed to the disposal of the contempt application in the term that SHO shall take a personal bond from the private respondents in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (PKR. one million) from each respondent to the effect that no harassment shall be caused to the applicant. If they fail to furnish the bond for the aforesaid purpose, DIGP shall take immediate action in terms of paragraph 05 of the compliance report. 3. This contempt/listed application is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2286 | 2024 SHC SUK 44 | Const. P. 844/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Yaseen & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2287 | 2025 SHC KHI 157 | Const. P. 1503/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Naveed Iqbal & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-25 | Yes | Sindh Civil Servants, are governed by the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1973, generally cannot file Constitutional Petitions (Article 199) for service matters, including termination. This is because the Sindh Service Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over service matters, as per Section 3(2) of the Act and Article 212 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court in Azhar Ali Khan Baluch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) held that "Terms and Conditions of Service" fall under the Service Tribunal's jurisdiction. Civil Servants have a remedy before the Sindh Service Tribunal against Dismissal and Appellate Orders. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2288 | 2024 SHC SUK 852 | Const. P. 730/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mohammad Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 2289 | 2024 SHC MPK 698 | Criminal Miscelleneous 532/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Mst. Sadia (Applicant) VS IG Police Sindh & others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-24 | Yes | alleged detainee Mst. Noshaba has been produced by her mother Mst. Farzana. On query, she states that she has been detained without her wish and will and torture has been inflicted upon her and now she wants to live with applicant Mst. Sadia, who is present before this Court. She also seeks protection. Since alleged detainee Mst. Noshaba is a sui juris lady, hence she is at liberty to go wherever she wants. However, the allegations of Mst. Noshaba shall be looked into by the SHO concerned and due protection shall be provided to her to the effect that no harassment shall be caused to the applicant as well to Mst. Noshaba. 3. The private respondents are warned to be careful while dealing with Mst. Noshaba and if any sort of harassment is caused to her and the applicant, they shall be dealt with under the law. 4. In view of the above, the instant application is disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2290 | 2024 SHC SUK 555 | Const. P. 458/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Liaquat Ali Arain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2291 | 2024 SHC KHI 615 | Cr.Bail 2017/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SYED ZIA HUSSAIN SHAH S/O SYED MEHRBAN SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 17-OCT-24 | Yes | About the statement of co-accused and subsequent arrest of the applicant leading to the recovery of incriminating material in terms of seizer memo as discussed supra, no doubt, as per Article 43 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 when more persons than one are being jointly tried for the same offense and a confession made by one of such persons admitting that the offense was committed by them jointly, is proved, the court may take into consideration the confessional statement of that co-accused as circumstantial evidence against the other co-accused (s). However, the statement of one accused can be relied upon if there is some other independent evidence corroborating such a confessional statement. The principle ingrained in Article 43 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat is also applied at the bail stage and the confessional statement of an accused can lead the court to form a tentative view about prima facie involvement of his co-accused in the commission of the alleged offence. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Sarfraz Ansari vs. The State and others (PLD 2021 SC 738 ). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2292 | 2025 SHC KHI 623 | Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zain Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-25 | Yes | To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. 11. In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, and in addition to the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court under Article 199 (1)(c) of the Constitution 1973, we deem it appropriate to direct the competent authority of respondents, to take a fresh decision after providing meaningful hearing to the petitioner, within three months, without discrimination. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2293 | 2024 SHC SUK 982 | Const. P. 1214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ashique Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.727-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Health and others v. Ashique Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2294 | 2024 SHC SUK 1074 | Const. P. 1736/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Fateh Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2295 | 2024 SHC SUK 1396, 2025 PLC (CS) 443 | Const. P. 580/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Javed Ali Khalidi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2296 | 2024 SHC SUK 802 | Const. P. 1419/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Riaz Hussain Thebo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2297 | 2024 SHC SUK 936 | Const. P. 701/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Rashid Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2298 | 2024 SHC SUK 945 | Const. P. 272/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Haseena (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2299 | 2024 SHC MPK 76 | Const. P. 206/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Hakeema & another (Petitioner) VS POS & Others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-24 | Yes | I, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the marriage of the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2300 | 2024 SHC SUK 691 | Const. P. 415/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zafarullah Bullo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2301 | 2024 SHC SUK 418 | Const. P. 417/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Ameen Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2302 | 2024 SHC SUK 85 | Const. P. 1421/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Javed Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2303 | 2024 SHC SUK 286 | Const. P. 543/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Wajahat Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2304 | 2024 SHC SUK 1454 | Const. P. 524/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Daud Channa & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.662-K/2024 Muhammad Ain-ul-Haq v. Abdul Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2305 | 2024 SHC SUK 1147 | Const. P. 738/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Riaz Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2306 | 2024 SHC KHI 234 | Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-DEC-24 | Yes | Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of the competent authority. The regularization of the petitioners shall be considered from the date of their regularization. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Deputy Director Food Faisalabad Division, Faisalabad, etc. vs Muhammad Tauqir Shah and others vide order dated 10.03.2021passed in C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.403-K/2025 Ali Raza Larik & another v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2307 | 2024 SHC SUK 835 | Const. P. 132/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mujeeb u Rehman Bhayo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2308 | 2024 SHC KHI 978 | Const. P. 2717/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Rizwana Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-DEC-24 | Yes | The 2011 letter granted certain benefits. It is the Competent Authority's responsibility to determine if these benefits apply to the petitioners, based on the FST decision. This Court cannot intervene, as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996 SCMR 1185). This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.544/2025 Rizwana Akhter and another v. Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of Finance (Finance Division), Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2309 | 2024 SHC SUK 151 | Const. P. 755/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shakeel Ahmed Chijjan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2310 | 2024 SHC SUK 312 | Const. P. 461/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Gul Hassan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2311 | 2024 SHC SUK 970 | Const. P. 521/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mushtaque Ali Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2312 | 2024 SHC KHI 417 | Cr.Bail 928/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | UBEDULLAH S/O GUL MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 03-JUL-24 | Yes | Now, I may take up the ground of statutory delay a bare perusal of the above quoted third proviso would show that the Court is obliged to release a person on bail, who, being accused of an offense not punishable with death if he has been detained for such an offense for a continuous period exceeding one year and whose trial for such offense has not been concluded. Similarly, under clause (b) of the above proviso, the Court is obliged to release a person, who, being accused of an offense punishable with death, has been detained for such offense for a continuous period exceeding two years and whose trial for such offense has not been concluded. However, this is subject to the condition provided in the above third proviso, i.e., the delay in the trial of the accused should not have occasioned by any act or omission of the accused or any other person acting on his behalf, while, the fourth proviso provides a further rider on the above statutory right of an accused person to bail on the above ground of statutory delay by laying down that the third proviso to above subsection shall not apply to a previously convicted offender for an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or a person who in the opinion of the Court is a hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal or involved in terrorism. In principle the right of an accused to be enlarged on bail under the proviso, referred to ibid, is a statutory right that cannot be denied under the discretionary power of the Court to grant bail, however, if the case falls under the fourth proviso, bail can be refused by the Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2313 | 2024 SHC SUK 287 | Const. P. 507/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khan Muhammad Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2314 | 2024 SHC SUK 473 | Cr.Rev 24/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zameer Ahmed Sahito (Applicant) VS Mst. Beebul & Others (Respondent) | 20-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2315 | 2024 SHC SUK 568 | Const. P. 937/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zain-ul-Abdin (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2316 | 2024 SHC SUK 1192 | Const. P. 1361/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Rahib Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2317 | 2024 SHC SUK 1130 | Const. P. 1576/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Khan Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2318 | 2024 SHC SUK 1214 | Const. P. 321/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Shafique Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2319 | 2024 SHC SUK 248 | Const. P. 454/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Amjad Arain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2320 | 2024 SHC SUK 145 | Const. P. 901/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ali Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2321 | 2024 SHC SUK 1093 | Const. P. 455/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sarfraz Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2322 | 2024 SHC SUK 1335, 2025 PLC (CS) 12 | Const. P. 1157/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ghulam Sarwar Chang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2323 | 2024 SHC SUK 657 | Const. P. 548/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ameer Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2324 | 2024 SHC SUK 1210 | Const. P. 581/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Rehmatullah Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2325 | 2024 SHC SUK 1191 | Const. P. 867/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Imdad Ali Lakho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.761-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Imdad Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2326 | 2024 SHC SUK 810 | Const. P. 1180/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst Marvi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.762-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Mst. Marvi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2327 | 2024 SHC SUK 114 | Const. P. 586/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Hussain mashori (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2328 | 2024 SHC SUK 1012 | Const. P. 587/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Syed Sikandar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2329 | 2024 SHC SUK 472 | Const. P. 221/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ali Baz mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.759-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Works and Services Department and others v. Ali Baz Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2330 | 2024 SHC KHI 1281 | Cr.Bail 1377/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | IMTIAZ S/O MEHBOOB ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the applicants have been involved in the cases by throwing a wider net by the Police under the garb of the pretext that the applicants are professional car snatchers. Mere allegations are no grounds to decline bail for an accused. It is now established that while granting post and pre-arrest bail, the merits of the case can be touched upon by the Court. Reliance is placed on Miran Bux Vs. The State (PLD 1989 SC 347), Sajid Hussain @ Joji Vs. The State (PLD 2021 SC 898), Javed Iqbal Vs. The State (PLD 2022 SCMR 1424) & Muhammad Ijaz Vs. The State (2022 SCMR 1271). Even otherwise the offense does not attract the prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. Thus the case calls for further probe, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Tanveer v. The State and another (PLD 2017 SC 733), the case against the applicants requires further inquiry within the meaning of sub-section 2 to Section 497 Cr.P.C. Consequently, these bail applications are allowed and the applicants are allowed post-arrest bail in F.I.R No.182 and 183 of 2024, registered under Section 381-A PPC at Police Station Joharabad, Karachi, subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.200,000 (Rupees two hundred thousand only) each in both cases and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2331 | 2024 SHC KHI 950 | Const. P. 824/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Arif Ali (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.851-K/2024 Arif Ali v. Umair Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2332 | 2024 SHC SUK 1082 | Const. P. 512/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zahid Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2333 | 2024 SHC SUK 373 | Const. P. 537/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Raheem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2334 | 2024 SHC SUK 933 | Const. P. 566/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Ghani Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2335 | 2024 SHC SUK 1395 | Const. P. 1494/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Piyaral maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2336 | 2024 SHC SUK 1173 | Const. P. 445/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Irshad Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 2337 | 2024 SHC SUK 244 | Const. P. 668/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Safdar Ali & Another (Petitioner) VS Secretary Food Dept & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2338 | 2024 SHC KHI 1136 | Const. P. 5309/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sidra & Another (Petitioner) VS The State and Others (Respondent) | 25-NOV-24 | Yes | In view of the statement of the parties, coupled with the report of the Investigation officer to the effect that the case has been recommended for C Class, therefore, the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 536 of 2024 registered for offenses under section 365-B, PPC needs to be quashed. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to, however, such order shall be passed by the Magistrate on the report submitted under section 173 Cr. P.C. within one week. 6. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2339 | 2024 SHC SUK 838 | Const. P. 423/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Talib Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt of sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2340 | 2024 SHC SUK 896 | Const. P. 1217/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Naseem Fatima Simair (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2341 | 2024 SHC KHI 1011 | Cr.Bail 1049/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | ALI HAIDER S/O JAVAID AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-JUL-24 | Yes | Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. for the simple reason that the complainant does not wish to prosecute the accused and makes a categorical statement through his affidavit. As such, this Court Court has left no option but to see the version of the complainant, which is a paramount consideration at the bail stage, though the offense is not compoundable, however, the version of the complainant cannot be brushed aside at this stage. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal as no record has been produced to the aforesaid effect. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lacs) and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2342 | 2024 SHC KHI 135 | Const. P. 4745/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Tufail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) | 19-DEC-24 | Yes | The Supreme Court's judgment, being in rem, applies to all and can be referenced even if the petitioner was not directly involved in the case. However, the Sindh government incorrectly repatriated the petitioner to a non-existent organization at the relevant time. They should have sent him to the Establishment Division as per the Supreme Court's order. But at the same time, we are cognizant of the fact that a non-civil servant does not fall under the category of individuals covered by Section 11-A of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. This section specifically applies to civil servants who are rendered surplus due to the reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are not subject to the provisions of the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the employing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2343 | 2024 SHC SUK 569 | Criminal Appeal 81/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2021 | Ghulam Akbar Buriro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 29-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2344 | 2024 SHC SUK 475 | Const. P. 1800/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mashooq Ali Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.730-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Mashooq Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2345 | 2024 SHC KHI 41 | Cr.Bail 628/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SANIYAL ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 11-JUL-24 | Yes | Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years, broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: - (b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2346 | 2024 SHC SUK 1298 | Criminal Miscelleneous 166/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2024 | Azizullah Nangrach (Appellant) VS SHO P.S Mithiani & others (Defendant) | 06-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2347 | 2024 SHC SUK 646 | Cr.Bail 923/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | Bilal Ghori (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2348 | 2024 SHC SUK 10 | Const. P. 273/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Naveed Ali Siyal (Petitioner) VS Government of sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | |||
| 2349 | 2024 SHC SUK 391 | Const. P. 88/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ishaque Ahmed Jagirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2350 | 2024 SHC SUK 501 | Const. P. 443/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Saleem & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2351 | 2024 SHC SUK 1463 | Const. P. 963/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Anwar Ali Chang & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4119/2025 Sindh Revenue Board through its Chairman, Karachi and another v. Sapphire Textile Mills Limited, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned |
| 2352 | 2024 SHC SUK 1402, 2024 PLC (CS) 1356 | Const. P. 2105/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Jamil Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2353 | 2024 SHC SUK 869 | Const. P. 1527/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ghulam Shabbir Deho (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2354 | 2024 SHC SUK 932 | Const. P. 847/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Rasheed kalwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2355 | 2024 SHC MPK 1209 | Const. P. 827/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | The right to life, as guaranteed by Article 9 of the Constitution, extends to the right to livelihood. This means that the petitioner has the right to earn a living. However, a respondent department can terminate the services of the petitioner if he fails in all respects, but only if it is done under the law, and the termination of service if any must follow established legal procedures and cannot be arbitrary or unfair. We are also equally conscious of the legal position that illegally gotten things cannot operate as a bar nor lapse of time could be made a reason to declare an ???illegality??? as ???legality??? but a suspicion alone shall not be sufficient to escape the requirement of ???due process??? because it is not whims or fancy of an executive functionary to deprive one of his right due process alone. Therefore, the respondents were/are not legally justified to withhold the posting order/joining letter of petitioner except after due process particularly when the respondents do not dispute or deny his appointment letter. A departure from ???due process??? resulting in taking away or infringing a fundamental right will be sufficient to entertain such a petition. Reference may be made to the case of Pir Imran Sajid & Ors v. MD /GM & Ors 2015 SCMR 1257. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2356 | 2024 SHC SUK 1487 | Const. P. 493/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Gulzar Ahmed Mahesar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2357 | 2024 SHC SUK 1405 | Const. P. 1691/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Jan Panhwar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.716-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Sindh Small Industries Corp. and others v. Ali Jan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2358 | 2024 SHC KHI 706 | Const. P. 6807/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Imam Bux (Petitioner) VS M/s Sea Board Service (Respondent) | 05-DEC-24 | Yes | Primarily, resignation is characteristically the voluntary surrender of a position by the one resigning, made freely and not under duress, here petitioner moved an application to the competent authority of the respondent company for withdrawal of his resignation on 07.08.2004, however before the subject application, the respondent company accepted the resignation of the petitioner on 10.07.2004 (page No. 305 of memo of petition) and it was accepted, but the petitioner remained mum and waited for 27 days to move the application to the respondent company for withdrawal of resignation. Prima facie, the petitioner was/is responsible for such delay, failure thereof, and the respondent company could not be held responsible. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2359 | 2025 SHC SUK 638 | Const. P. 817/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sheraz Mumtaz Rajper & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 2360 | 2025 SHC KHI 199 | Const. P. 257/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Zulfiqar Ali Kariro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-25 | Yes | It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. the Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]. The Supreme Court in paragraphs 146 to 150 has decided the issue in hand no need for further deliberation on our part. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2361 | 2025 SHC KHI 228 | Const. P. 6085/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zubair Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-25 | Yes | To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2362 | 2025 SHC SUK 327 | Const. P. 290/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of NIRC & others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 2363 | 2025 SHC SUK 438 | Const. P. 762/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Uzair Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 2364 | 2025 SHC KHI 571 | Const. P. 4765/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Badar ul Nisa Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | Petitioner seeks employment in a Government department based on a deceased quota/son quota. The Supreme Court has already declared the same to be unlawful vide judgment dated 26.09.2024 in the case of General Post Office Islamabad vs. Muhammad Jalal (Civil Petition No.3390 of 2021). 5. In view of the foregoing, without touching the merits of the case, this petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2365 | 2025 SHC KHI 243 | Const. P. 219/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Kazo and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | SSP and SHO concerned are also required to protect the petitioners and also secure the PR Bond of the private respondent in the sum of Rs. 500,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) each and the same shall be kept in the police station to the effect that no harm shall be caused to the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2366 | 2025 SHC KHI 260 | Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Ibrahim Noor (Petitioner) VS Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. (Respondent) | 07-APR-25 | Yes | Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence. 10. Based on the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition is not considered maintainable and is therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2367 | 2025 SHC KHI 423 | Const. P. 3600/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Ghulam Nabi & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | Without addressing the substantive arguments of these cases and merits, these petitions are now considered concluded and are hereby disposed of in the terms that much water has flown under the bridge since 2008 and we are now in 2025 besides petitioners have not asked for the issuance of writ of quo warranto against the individual who were purportedly appointed in violation of the rules as no record has been produced to infer adverse against them at this stage in a case of writ of mandamus. However, if the cause of action for these petitions still exists, the petitioners retain the right to initiate appropriate legal action, including proceedings under a writ of quo warranto, if they believe the appointments of the private respondents are contrary to law and if such legal recourse is permissible. These petitions are disposed of along with the pending application(s) in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2368 | 2025 SHC KHI 354 | Const. P. 1731/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Raheel Ahmed & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | Without addressing the substantive arguments of these cases and merits, these petitions are now considered concluded and are hereby disposed of in the terms that much water has flown under the bridge since 2008 and we are now in 2025 besides petitioners have not asked for the issuance of writ of quo warranto against the individual who were purportedly appointed in violation of the rules as no record has been produced to infer adverse against them at this stage in a case of writ of mandamus. However, if the cause of action for these petitions still exists, the petitioners retain the right to initiate appropriate legal action, including proceedings under a writ of quo warranto, if they believe the appointments of the private respondents are contrary to law and if such legal recourse is permissible. These petitions are disposed of along with the pending application(s) in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2369 | 2025 SHC KHI 391 | Const. P. 4754/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Nabi Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS M.D KW & SB and Ors (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | Upgradation with retrospective effect" refers to a situation where an employee's pay scale is increased to a higher level, without a change in their duties or position, and this increase is applied to a period before the official date of the upgradation. It is further clarified that upgradation cannot be construed to be promotion, as is generally misunderstood. Up-gradation is carried out without necessarily creating a post in the relevant scale of pay it is carried out under a policy and specified scheme. It is only for the incumbents of isolated posts, which have no avenues or channels of promotion at all. Up-gradation under the scheme is personal to incumbents of the isolated posts to address stagnation and frustration of incumbents on a particular post for a sufficient length of service on the particular post without any progression or avenue in the service. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2370 | 2025 SHC KHI 464 | Const. P. 6609/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Naved Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 22-APR-25 | Yes | Without touching the merits of the case and to resolve the encroachment on the public road as agitated by the parties, the Senior Member of the Board of Revenue (BOR), the Chief Executive Officer of the Cantonment Board, Korangi Creek, Karachi, and the head of the Anti-Encroachment Force Karachi are directed to jointly address this matter. They shall conduct a hearing involving all relevant parties to determine if an encroachment exists on the public road. If encroachment is confirmed, an immediate campaign must be launched to remove it from public pathways in Bhitai Colony, Karachi as well as from the relevant area. This entire process must be completed within three months. These petitions are disposed of accordingly with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2371 | 2025 SHC KHI 454 | Const. P. 1216/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mohammad Azam Jalbani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | The learned Assistant Advocate General (AAG) has informed the court that Mr. Muhammad Azam Jalbani was indeed promoted to Superintending Engineer (BS-19) as per the notification dated April 21, 2017. Based on this submission, the court has observed that the initial matter concerning petitioner's promotion appears to be resolved. The court has further directed the department to review the matter, considering that significant time has passed since 2016. If the issue was not resolved previously, the department is directed to resolve it in accordance with the law within a period of three months. Consequently, the petition stand is disposed of under these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2372 | 2025 SHC KHI 401 | Const. P. 3920/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Hafeez Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2373 | 2025 SHC KHI 1075 | Const. P. 4159/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zuryaman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-25 | Yes | If this is the position of the case, the petitioner can approach the civil court, as the Civil courts are the primary forum for resolving disputes arising from contracts, including employment contracts. They have the jurisdiction to examine the terms of the agreement, hear evidence, and award remedies for breach of contract. The petitioner's claim involving a monetary fine and forfeiture of benefits falls squarely within the purview of civil courts, which can order the recovery of such amounts if deemed unlawful, as the termination of the contract occurred before the Act 2023. 9. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, this petition is dismissed, allowing the petitioner to seek resolution for his grievances through a court with full jurisdiction, in accordance with the law, if he chooses to do so. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2374 | 2025 SHC KHI 1076 | Const. P. 8521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | While the Respondents have consistently alleged the submission of a tampered Matric Science certificate through three inquiries, their counsel conceded that the verification report does not specify the group. Although the Respondents maintained that the SSC-II result is genuine as per board???s verification later 15.02.2017, they allege that the Petitioner altered the group from Science to General. The Petitioner has consistently stated his qualifications as Matric (General Group, 2009) and Intermediate (Humanities, 2011), denying any tampering of his Matriculation Certificate. He explained that he informed the authorities and presented his original General Group certificates when asked to produce a Science certificate. He also pointed to previous official records from 2012 and 2013 that acknowledged his Matric (General Group) qualification. Given the Larkana Board's verification of the Petitioner's SSC-II results as authentic, and the lack of clarity in the verification report regarding the specific group at the time of application, this court sees no need for further action. This matter has been pending since 2013 without significant progress, and the inquiry proceedings have already been judicially reviewed by this Court. As the Petitioner's SSC-II results are verified and found genuine by the BISE Larkana, the Respondents should now allow him to continue his employment based on this Matric Certificate. The remaining issue of the specific group needs to be resolved by the head of the department of the respondents, considering the verification report from the Larkana Board. The outstanding issues as agitated shall also be resolved in the intervening period within three months. 6. This petition is therefore disposed of under the aforementioned terms, along with any pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2375 | 2025 SHC KHI 329 | Const. P. 5627/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Kamaluddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | Previously, the private respondent (now relevant to the current petitioner's seniority claim) sought promotion as an Assistant Accountant BPS-15. This court, noting the official respondents' commitment to consider the promotion in an upcoming DPC within six months, disposed of that petition. Now, the current petitioner requests the court to retroactively correct his initial BPS to BPS-15 from his appointment date and place him above the private respondent in the seniority list. He also seeks to prevent the promotion of any junior employee to Assistant Accounts Officer BPS-16 until his case is resolved. The respondents submitted that the private respondent's BPS-15 appointment followed a different advertisement with distinct criteria and that the petitioner's promotion to BPS-15 was through a DPC. They also clarified that a later BPS-13 to BPS-14 upgrade was not retroactive. The private respondent asserted his seniority in the BPS-15 cadre, which the official respondents claimed the petitioner had never challenged before. They alleged the petitioner's current action is driven by ulterior motives following the private respondent's earlier petition and cite a previous court order (dated 20.4.2017 in C.P D No. 3006 2016) in their favor. This court concludes that this seniority issue needs to be resolved by the competent authority of the respondents after hearing both parties within three months. This petition stands disposed of in these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2376 | 2025 SHC KHI 1025 | Const. P. 5893/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Salman Hasan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | Learned AAG submitted that the petitioners' appointments are illegal, contravening KoFHA's 1988 Regulations and 1982 Ordinance. The AAG refuted allegations against the former Secretary, noting his retirement on March 25, 2017. Regarding the former MD KoFHA's appointment, it was asserted to be improper and against procedure, resulting in a stayed removal directive. The AAG maintained the petitioners' appointments violated KoFHA regulations, the Ordinance, and federal policy, justifying the Ministry's actions as the supervisory authority. The petitioners' claims were argued to be unfounded in KoFHA's rules, and the principle of locus poenitentiae was inapplicable due to the initial illegality of the appointments in KoFHA. Fundamental rights claims were dismissed due to the illegal appointments. The AAG stated the Ministry correctly conveyed policy to the former MD, who then illegally appointed the petitioners. Consequently, they cannot be considered regular employees. The actions of Respondent No. 2 were defended as compliant with regulations, and no violation of apex court rulings by Respondent No. 1 occurred. The petitioners' appointments are deemed void from inception due to legal violations. The AAG concluded by stating that the petitioners concealed facts and requested the petition's dismissal with costs on behalf of the Respondent ministry. 5. The stance of the respondent/4 KoFHA is that KoFHA, an autonomous body under the Ministry operating under the 1982 Ordinance and 1988 Regulations, acknowledges the petitioners' appointments followed due process. While Petitioner No. 1's (BPS-17) confirmation is pending Board reconstitution, Petitioners No. 2-5 (BPS-16) have completed probation and deserved confirmation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2377 | 2025 SHC KHI 1063 | Const. P. 561/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Yousuf Malik & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | As per the Syed Munawar Ali case (2016 SCMR 859), post-upgradation needs restructuring, reform, or public interest; it is post-specific, not for personal gain or lateral moves, and is illegal without these justifications. Further, regarding upgradation, the Supreme Court in the Anwar-ul-Haq case (2017 SCMR 890) clarified that it is often mistaken for promotion. Promotion to a twice-upgraded post, bypassing the required selection process under the recruitment rules, is almost impossible. The established legal principle is that civil/public/government servants are appointed/promoted to posts, not just grades, as further clarified by the Supreme Court in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, case (2015 SCMR 456), requiring no further discussion here. 8. Considering the case's specifics, ordering further promotion on a twice-upgraded post is not possible unless recruitment rules permit it. However, the respondent department must address the petitioners' seniority within three months, considering their current substantive roles (if not purely for pay/pension fixation) in their substantive rank, after hearing all parties involved. This petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2378 | 2025 SHC KHI 1056 | Const. P. 1085/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Niaz Ali Abbasi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAY-25 | Yes | In View of the foregoing, the provincial government recommended the petitioners for PAS induction in 2014 and 2015, yet the Establishment Secretary took no action under the prevailing rules, citing ongoing consultations with the FPSC, significant time passed in pursuing the case by the petitioners, and one of the petitioner retired during the proceedings. The subsequent issuance of SRO 274(I)/2021 by the FPSC further complicated the petitioners' position due to inaction on the part of respondent No.1 for the reasons best known to him, which are obvious, with continued inaction being viewed unfavorably regarding PMS/PCS officers' PAS induction. Consequently, this court is left with no option but to direct the Establishment Secretary to immediately act on the provincial government's recommendations for PMS/PCS officers' PAS induction if they meet the eligibility criteria for recommendation through the competitive process under the law without any sort of delay. 10. This petition is thus disposed of under these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2379 | 2025 SHC KHI 1047 | Const. P. 4/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Attaullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Having considered the legal precedents, we are of the opinion that the Petitioners' situation falls under the principle of Master and Servant. It is a well-established legal principle that a contractual employee does not possess a fundamental or acquired right to remain in their contractual position or to demand an extension or regularization of their service. Furthermore, it is settled law that courts generally avoid interfering with the policy-making authority of the Executive branch, unless it is demonstrated that such policies have violated the fundamental rights of citizens, which is not the situation presented in this case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2380 | 2025 SHC KHI 1062 | Const. P. 5497/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Manzoor Ahmed Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-25 | Yes | The provided rule and Supreme Court precedents establish a civil servant's entitlement to pro-forma promotion. The Supreme Court in Secretary Schools of Education v. Rana Arshad Khan (2012 SCMR 126) granted proforma promotion to retirees due to unjustifiable departmental delays in their promotion process before retirement. Similarly, Federation of Pakistan v. Jahanzaib (2023 PLC (C.S.) 336) held that proforma promotion is applicable when an administrative oversight delays consideration for promotion until after retirement. Furthermore, in Homeo Dr. Asma Noureen Syed v. The Government of Punjab (2022 SCMR 1546), the Supreme Court remanded a case back to the Service Tribunal for fresh consideration of proforma promotion for a retired civil servant. These judgments underscore that employees should not suffer due to departmental failings regarding timely promotion consideration. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2381 | 2025 SHC KHI 594 | Const. P. 4242/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Niaz Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-APR-25 | Yes | Given the AAG's statement regarding the petitioners' current pay scales (BPS-17 for #1-6, BPS-16 upgraded to BPS-17 for #7-13 & #15-18, and BPS-11 upgraded to BPS-17 for #14) and the cancellation of prior upgrade orders under the 2020 Rules, this court finds itself unable to order the petitioners' post upgradation under Article 199 of the Constitution of 1973. Consequently, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2382 | 2025 SHC KHI 312 | Const. P. 1327/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mst. Iffat Khattak and Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-APR-25 | Yes | It may be noted that although the Colleges in question are permanent and are required to have permanent status, the staff which is working therein is required to have permanent status. However, the respondents have created the relationship between the petitioners and Hadeed Welfare Trust as master and servant to avoid the regularization of their service, as the issue has already been set at naught by the judgment rendered by this Court in Hafeez Junejo???s case has been implemented in its letter and spirit. Additionally, the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has already taken care of the issue of regularization of service of teaching staff in the aforesaid cases; as such, no further deliberation is required on our part. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.890-K/2025 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd, Karachi & another v. Mst. Iffat Khattak & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2383 | 2025 SHC KHI 639 | Const. P. 669/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Rashid Aziz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan are binding on all other courts, including High Courts, to the extent that they decide a question of law or enunciate a principle of law. All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2384 | 2025 SHC KHI 496 | Const. P. 5473/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Umer Ansari and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 23-APR-25 | Yes | Drawing an analogy from the present situation and, more importantly, guided by the principles established by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Dr. Naveeda Tufail and 72 others v. Government of Punjab and others (2003 SCMR 291) and Shahzad Shahmir and others v Government of Sindh & others (2021 SCMR 824). The Dr. Naveeda Tufail case shows that the Federal Government regularized ad hoc employees through the Public Service Commission. While the Petitioners, as provincial contract employees, cannot automatically claim this, Article 25 of the Constitution calls for equal treatment. In Naveeda Tufail, the Supreme Court recognized a legitimate expectation of regularization for Punjab's ad hoc lecturers due to continuous ad hoc appointments. The Supreme Court directed the Punjab government to regularize them via the Punjab Public Service Commission, following the Federal model with some concessions, ensuring separate consideration from direct recruits and non-retention of unsuitable candidates. This case highlights the need for fairness and the Public Service Commission's role in regularization. However, the Supreme Court in the case of Shahzad Shahmir held that appointments to BPS-17 under Article 242 of the Constitution must be made by the Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC), rendering contract appointments to such posts illegal from the outset. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.869-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi & others v. Umer Ansari & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2385 | 2025 SHC KHI 1656, 2025 SHC KHI 1669 | Const. P. 5020/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst. Nasreen Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-25 | Yes | The grievance of the petition is about payment of RS. 5.00 Million in lieu of plot against the PMA Package which has already been prepared and submitted to DAO /KYC for Financial concurrence. If this is the position of the case, let the same be processed within three months and be disbursed to the petitioner???s widow as per her eligibility. 7. This petition is disposed of in terms of commitment made by Deputy Chief Controller of Store, Pakistan Railway, Karachi Cantt. vide his comments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2386 | 2025 SHC KHI 1425 | Const. P. 4209/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Asif Khursheed (Petitioner) VS Chairman Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent) | 12-MAY-25 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the request of the petitioner at this stage cannot be acceded to, after acceptance the post of security guard, therefore his request seems to be unreasonable, which is discareded as such this petition stands dismissed with pending applicaition(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1016-K/2025 Asif Khursheed v. The Chairman Port Qasim authority, bin Qasim Town, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 2387 | 2025 SHC KHI 2135 | Const. P. 2690/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Umair (Petitioner) VS NAB & another (Respondent) | 29-AUG-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.5083/2025 National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman, Islamabad v. Muhammad Umair & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 2388 | 2025 SHC KHI 1660, 2025 SHC KHI 1673 | Const. P. 3802/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Naveed Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-25 | Yes | Regularization requires an executive policy or specific statute. Absent such a policy or statute, this Court lacks jurisdiction to order regularization. 10. We find that the petitioners have failed to establish grounds for the regularization of their service. Their situation does not meet the criteria outlined in Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor is it consistent with the Government of Sindh's regularization policy. Accordingly, the instant petition, along with all associated applications, is dismissed, and no costs are awarded. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2389 | 2025 SHC KHI 2145 | Const. P. 1117/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Tariq Aziz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 26-AUG-25 | Yes | Based on the judgment from February 4, 2025, this court is nullifying the impugned show-cause notice dated February 10, 2022. Consequently, the disciplinary action related to the specific allegations in that Show Cause Notice is dropped. However, the department is still free to take new disciplinary action against the petitioner for any other misconduct not covered by the now-invalidated Show Cause Notice. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1193-K/2025 Federal Board of Revenue through its Chairman v. Tariq Aziz Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 2390 | 2025 SHC KHI 1522 | Const. P. 4824/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Taufique Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-MAY-25 | Yes | Probation is typically for new hires to assess their suitability. Successful completion leads to regularization. However, imposing a new probation period on long-serving contractual employees being regularized for the same role can be seen as unjustified, especially with satisfactory prior service. The law often recognizes continuous service for benefits, and a new probation could negate this. 5. Given that the petitioners have now been regularized and are no longer on probation, the argument for removing the probation condition is now academic, and the purpose of the petition has been served. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2391 | 2025 SHC KHI 2146 | Const. P. 8075/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Sheikh Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) | 25-AUG-25 | Yes | Primarily, the promotion in next rank is to be made based on senior cum fitness coupled with availability of vacancy under the Recruitment Rules and if those rules do not equate positions to BPS-19, the same cannot be granted based solely on the analogy put forward by the petitioners. However, it is for the respondent department to deal with the service issues of the employees in accordance with law in terms of the decision of the Supreme court in the case of Moula Bux Shaikh (2018 SCMR 2098), and a similar matter is currently under consideration by the Supreme Court reported as 2024 SCMR 673, to see the legality of the aforesaid judgment rendered in Moula Bux Shaikh case. Consequently, this Court cannot examine the petitioner's eligibility for promotion in next rank based on their B.Tech degree, as the Supreme Court has already provided a definitive ruling on this matter. However the decision of the secretary Local Government is subject to final out of the supreme court. 9. In view of the aforesaid legal position of the case, this petition is dismissed with pending application(s) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2392 | 2025 SHC KHI 2402 | Const. P. 4060/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Rizwan Aziz Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) | 03-SEP-25 | Yes | Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court has a discretionary power to act in support of the law and protect constitutional rights. This power is reserved for extraordinary situations to ensure justice is served, not to allow injustice to continue. If it is determined that substantial justice has already been achieved between the parties, the Court may choose not to use this discretionary jurisdiction. 9. Since the petitioner has repeatedly challenged the decision before the various forums and the Supreme Court vide order dated 12.3.2020 in S.M.C. No.13/2016 directed him to agitate his claim before the appropriate forum and his representations / appeals have consistently been rejected by all competent authorities, there is no reason to interfere with the findings under Article 199 of the Constitution. 10. This petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed in limine along with pending application(s), if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2393 | 2025 SHC KHI 2403 | Const. P. 871/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ghulam Nabi & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-25 | Yes | For the aforesaid reasons and the Supreme Court's upholding of this court's decision in Shahzad Shahmir case, the competent authority of the Respondent Department is directed to forward the cases of interested petitioners to the SPSC for a fresh interview/assessment/suitability for the subject post, if not earlier assessed, within three months from the date of this Judgment. This referral will be based on verification of their qualifications and adherence to the Recruitment Rules, considering the principles in Dr. Naveeda Tufail???s and Shahzad Shahmir's cases. In the intervening period, the petitioners will retain their current positions unless they have already vacated them. 20. This petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s) in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2394 | 2025 SHC KHI 2404 | Const. P. 4252/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Aftab Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-SEP-25 | Yes | Given these circumstances, this court is not inclined to allow the petition on the analogy that the department's decision to withdraw the requisition was/is a lawful exercise of its administrative and policy-making authority. The petitioner, having only submitted an application, does not acquire a vested right to the post. The department's reasons for withdrawal (low enrollment) prima facie are valid and not demonstrably discriminatory. This court also noted that while the petitioner's frustration is understandable, it cannot compel a government department to create or fill a position that it has determined is no longer needed. This court's role is not to manage administrative affairs but to ensure that they are conducted in accordance with the law. In this case, the department's actions, though delayed, appear to be legally justifiable. Consequently, this petitions fails and is dismissed accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2395 | 2025 SHC KHI 2431 | Const. P. 5072/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Faisal Malik (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-25 | Yes | Based on the petitioner's actions in his official capacity, the show cause notice is no longer necessary. There is no evidence that the petitioner interfered with the administration of justice. 10. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2396 | 2025 SHC KHI 3213 | Const. P. 734/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Imam Bux s/o Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above, this Court is left with no option, but to dismiss this lis on account of non-prosecution as the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this case. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith pending application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2397 | 2025 SHC KHI 2679 | Const. P. 7175/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Khaliq Islam Qureshi and Others (Petitioner) VS NBP and Others (Respondent) | 08-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2398 | 2025 SHC KHI 3237 | Const. P. 1099/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Tehmina Syed (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Kaleem & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | This is a case of simple harassment. However, the petitioner???s counsel did not press clause-2 of the prayer clause. Learned Assistant PG present in Court submits that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, however, if there is a cognizable offence, police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. With this observation, the instant petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2399 | 2025 SHC KHI 2608 | Const. P. 5776/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Shahbaz Mazhar Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-25 | Yes | This committee is directed to conduct a thorough inquiry into the issue involved in the matter concerning the petitioner's educational documents, ensuring the petitioner is given a full opportunity to be heard. Determine and fix responsibility for the undue delay in the petitioner's appointment by transfer, and take action against the delinquent officials responsible, strictly in accordance with the law and Supreme Court observations. If the petitioner's credentials are found to be genuine, his case for appointment by transfer must be processed without any further delay, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. 11. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2400 | 2025 SHC KHI 3226 | Const. P. 1042/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Maria & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-OCT-25 | Yes | Since this is a simple case of harassment, therefore, the official respondents are directed not to cause harassment to the petitioners and if the private respondents are found to be indulged in harassing the petitioners, the police shall take action in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2401 | 2025 SHC KHI 2543 | Const. P. 797/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Mrs. Fouzia Basharat Samo (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | Reliance can be placed on the cases of Chief Secretary, Government of Punjab, Lahore, and others v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390; Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment, Islamabad v. M.Y. Labib-ur-Rehman and others, 2021 SCMR 1554; Khalillah Kakar and others v. Provincial Police Officer, Balochistan, and others, 2021 SCMR 1168; Shafi Muhammad Mughal v. Secretary, Establishment Division and others, 2001 SCMR 1446, and Zafar Iqbal v. MGO, MGO Branch, GHQ Rawalpindi, and 3 others, 1995 SCMR 881. 7. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of along with the listed applications, in the above terms however, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the findings of the respondent department before learned Service Tribunal if so advised. However if the representation of the petitioner is pending before the competent authority, the same shall be decided within three months after hearing the parties. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2402 | 2025 SHC KHI 3214 | Const. P. 898/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shams Uddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of above, this petition stands disposed of with directions to the SSP concerned as well as I.G. Police Sindh to take action against all the police officials who are indulged in the sort of nefarious designs to cause harassment to the individuals without lawful justification. They can only take action, if cognizable offence is reported to them. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2403 | 2025 SHC KHI 3241 | Const. P. 1126/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Kabil Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | Petition stands disposed of with directions to the official respondents not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioners. However, if there is a cognizable offence, the police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2404 | 2025 SHC KHI 2677 | Const. P. 4724/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Manzoor Qadir (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 08-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2405 | 2025 SHC KHI 3235 | Const. P. 1057/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Talib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | However, in the present case, no harassment shall be caused to either party. The police shall take action, if there is any concrete evidence available against the petitioner, in accordance with law. However, parties shall not harass to each other and police shall be neutral in private affairs subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2406 | 2026 SHC KHI 280 | Const. P. 269/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mohammad Haris S/o Salahuddin (Petitioner) VS Mrs. Shamim Begum and others (Respondent) | 06-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2407 | 2026 SHC KHI 253 | Const. P. 2566/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Nadeem Akhter Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2408 | 2026 SHC KHI 262 | Const. P. 2602/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ahsan ul Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2409 | 2026 SHC KHI 532 | Const. P. 180/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Shabana & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2410 | 2026 SHC KHI 240 | Const. P. 5315/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 03-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2411 | 2026 SHC KHI 352 | Const. P. 792/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Justice (R) Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 13-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that judicial review does not extend to re-evaluating executive policy decisions unless such decisions are arbitrary, without lawful authority, or offend fundamental rights. Accordingly, in the absence of any demonstrable violation of Articles 4, 9, 10-A, 25, or 175(3) of the Constitution, no case for interference is made out to invoke constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 23. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned Notification dated 06.02.2026 does not suffer from any legal infirmity. Accordingly, the instant Constitutional Petition, being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed along with any pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2412 | 2026 SHC KHI 361 | Const. P. 815/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Qazi Muhammad Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2413 | 2026 SHC KHI 109 | Const. P. 4747/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Shaheen Parveen (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | These petitions need to be disposed of in terms that if the petitioners are found to be entitled for the Assistance Package, the competent authority shall re-consider their decision and passing a speaking order after hearing the parties concerned within sixty (60) days. 5. These petitions stand disposed of in the above terms alongwith pending application(s), if any. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2414 | 2026 SHC KHI 590 | Const. P. 5136/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ameeruddin (Petitioner) VS Appellate Authority Board of Trustee of EOBI & ors (Respondent) | 09-MAR-26 | Yes | The authority shall verify the employment record, take effective steps for recovery of outstanding contributions from the employer in accordance with law, and thereafter decide the entitlement of the petitioners to old-age or invalidity pension, as the case may be, strictly under the provisions of the Act. Such exercise shall preferably be completed within a reasonable period of two months. However the claim of the petitioners shall not be rejected on the premise that contribution could not be deposited by the employer as it was the duty of EOBI, to recover the contribution from employer and petitioners cannot be saddled with such non compliance on the part of the employer. 13. Both petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2415 | 2026 SHC KHI 447 | Const. P. 386/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shama (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2416 | 2026 SHC KHI 515 | Const. P. 787/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Naeem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 2417 | 2026 SHC KHI 518 | Const. P. 6266/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Bihar Muslim Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 2418 | 2026 SHC KHI 536 | Const. P. 2954/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Zahid Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case we are of the considered view that the Petitioner???s service is legally valid and continuous from 02.02.1982 attaining 18 years to 02.02.2024 the age of superannuation. Pensionary benefits including commutation, GP Fund final bill, leave encashment, and arrears must be released in full, and any delay or withholding is inconsistent with. Accordingly, the Respondents??? objection based on age at the time of appointment is legally untenable, and the Petitioner is entitled to full pensionary benefit. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2419 | 2026 SHC KHI 588 | Const. P. 4996/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Arshad Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2420 | 2026 SHC KHI 630 | Const. P. 896/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Kamlesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, it appears that the allocation process was carried out strictly in accordance with the requisition received from the administrative departments and the applicable quota rules. Since the only post reserved for the Rural Minority Quota stood filled by a candidate higher in merit and no vacancy remained available in that quota, the Petitioner, having secured a lower merit position, could not be allocated a post as a matter of right. The allegations of arbitrariness or mala fide action, therefore, remain unsubstantiated. 17. Consequently, no case for interference in constitutional jurisdiction is made out at this stage due to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 18. The petition is dismissed, along with any pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2421 | 2026 SHC KHI 292 | Const. P. 121/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Moin-ud-Din (Petitioner) VS Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another (Respondent) | 06-FEB-26 | Yes | The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2422 | 2026 SHC KHI 610 | Const. P. 568/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | M/s. Sindhi Momin CHS Limited (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | In light of these findings, and to ensure compliance with the statutory scheme under the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Rules, 2020, this Court deems it fit and proper to direct the appointment of an Official Assignee as Election Officer. The Official Assignee shall, assume full authority to supervise and conduct the election process of the society in accordance with the law; Exercise all powers necessary under the cooperative statutes to ensure free, fair, and transparent elections; Restore the society records seized on 29-01-2026 and maintain full control over the election proceedings; Complete the election process within two months from the date of assumption of charge; and Fix his fee in consultation with the parties. However, the Official Assignee may proceed with the existing election process or make such modifications as he deems fit and proper, consistent with the law, to ensure that the elections are conducted fairly, transparently, and within the stipulated period. He shall aslo deal with all ancillary issues releted to election of the petitioner society. 18. The petition, along with pending applications, is disposed of in these terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance to be served through electronic and watsup application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2423 | 2026 SHC KHI 638 | Const. P. 7974/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Hafsa Binte Arshad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-MAR-26 | Yes | Consequently, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective claims of the parties, both the petitions are dismissed as not maintainable, with the observation that the petitioners, if so advised, may avail appropriate remedy before the competent civil court or any other forum available under the law. Needless to observe that any observations made in this order are purely tentative in nature and shall not prejudice the rights of the parties before any competent forum. The petitions along with all pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 2424 | 2026 SHC KHI 651 | Const. P. 4863/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | M/s Frontier Constabulary (Petitioner) VS Saleem ur Rehman & Ors (Respondent) | 17-MAR-26 | Yes | The findings recorded by the learned Single Member and upheld by the learned Full Bench of NIRC are based on proper appreciation of evidence and are neither perverse nor arbitrary. No violation of principles of natural justice or mandatory provisions of law has been demonstrated. Rather, the conduct of the petitioner reflects negligence and an attempt to delay compliance with lawful orders. 12. In view of the foregoing, this Court finds that the impugned orders do not suffer from any illegality, jurisdictional defect, or material irregularity warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, the instant Constitutional Petition is found not maintainable against the concurrent findings of two fora therefore is dismissed along with pending application(s), with no order as to costs. . | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2425 | 2026 SHC KHI 621 | Const. P. 218/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2426 | 2026 SHC KHI 629 | Const. P. 3492/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Syed Abdul Rehman and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-MAR-26 | Yes | For these reasons, the appointment of a neutral Administrator/Commissioner/Election Officer as proposed by the parties to conduct elections is considered the most appropriate course to resolve the present controversy and to ensure compliance with the statutory framework governing cooperative societies. However, the parties shall extend full cooperation to the Commissioner/Election Officer and shall not interfere in the election process in any manner. Meanwhile, the election officer shall decide ancillary issues affecting the genuine voters/allotees of the society solely for the purpose of conducting the election and no transactions with regard to the sale and purchase of the plots shall take place. The fee of Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi is fixed at Rs. 300,000/-, payable in advance by the parties. 10. With these directions, these petitions, along with pending application(s) stand disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2427 | 2026 SHC KHI 31 | Const. P. 664/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Muhammad Nazim Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | Thereafter Miscellaneous Application has been moved and it was lastly fixed on 03.12.2015, thereafter, there is no progress and on the very date no body was in attendance on behalf of petitioner. This Court is left with no option but to dismiss the Miscellaneous Application for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2428 | 2026 SHC KHI 374 | Const. P. 709/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mrs. Pinky Perwani Thr. Attorney Vikram (Petitioner) VS Additional Controller of Rent Clifton Cant. & ors (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | It is a settled principle that the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship is a jurisdictional requirement for a Rent Controller. If such a relationship is specifically denied, the Rent Controller must determine it as a preliminary issue before assuming jurisdiction. In its absence, any order, including a tentative rent order, would be subject to final determination on the subject issue. 7. In the present case, the learned Rent Controller has not examined whether a landlord-tenant relationship exists between the parties. 8. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, the impugned tentative rent order shall remain in abeyance. The learned Rent Controller is directed to first frame and decide the preliminary issue regarding the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship strictly in accordance with law before proceeding further. 9. The petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2429 | 2025 SHC HYD 3571 | Const. P. 275/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D-3200 of 2018 [Muhammad Owais Khan v. P.O. Sindh & others], C.P. No.D-2418 of 2019 [Khalid Hussain Qambrani and others v. P.O. Sindh & others], C.P. No.D-235 of 2024 [HDA Employees Co-operative Society Ltd v. P.O. Sindh & others], C.P. No.D-600 of 2024 [HDA Employees Co-operative Society Ltd v. P.O. Sindh & others] and C.P. No.D-1676 of 2025 [HDA Employees Co-operative Society Ltd v. P.O. Sindh & others]. | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imtiaz Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 20-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 2430 | 2026 SHC KHI 53 | Const. P. 6414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mariam Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | It is further directed that the issue of limitation shall not come in the way of the petitioners, and the appeal/case of the petitioners shall not be dismissed merely on technical grounds, including limitation, but shall be decided purely on merits in accordance with law. In the intervening period, the petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the subject property. Office to place copy hereof in connected petitions listed above. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2431 | 2026 SHC KHI 445 | Const. P. 2700/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Kalique Panhyar (Petitioner) VS The Sect. Board of Investment & Ors (Respondent) | 19-FEB-26 | Yes | The Competent Authority shall also examine the Petitioner???s grievance of discriminatory treatment vis-??-vis similarly placed officers in the light of Articles 25, 27 and 37 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and pass a reasoned and speaking order after affording a meaningful opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including the Petitioner. 10. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken independently, on its own merits, without being influenced by any tentative observations made herein or in earlier proceedings, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 11. The petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2432 | 2026 SHC KHI 261 | Const. P. 609/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Haroon Rasheed Through Attorney Muhammad Sohail (Petitioner) VS Abdul Raheem & Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2433 | 2026 SHC KHI 353 | Const. P. 803/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Faisal Hameed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | However, it is made clear that the official Respondents shall ensure that no such hazardous or dangerous material is stored within any residential area in future. In case any such inflammable material is found, the concerned authorities, in collaboration with the owner of the material, shall take immediate steps to have the same removed to a safe location so as to avert any untoward incident. The Inspector General of Police, Sindh, along with the local administration, shall also ensure that all necessary precautionary and preventive measures are undertaken in this regard to safeguard public life and property. This direction shall be strictly complied with by all concerned; failing which, appropriate proceedings shall be initiated against the delinquent officials in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution. 13. The Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2434 | 2026 SHC KHI 47 | Const. P. 6631/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rao Muhammad Tasleem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, does not press the instant petition, which is accordingly dismissed as not pressed along with pending application(s), if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2435 | 2026 SHC KHI 402 | Const. P. 5774/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Aftab Jhangir (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 2436 | 2026 SHC KHI 420 | Const. P. 3123/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Muttalib & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Consequently, the Petitioners, having been appointed against sanctioned posts through due process and having completed the requisite period of satisfactory service, are entitled to be considered for regularization strictly in terms of Regulation 21-A of the PQA Employees Service Regulations, 2011 (Revised), in parity with other similarly placed employees. 16. Accordingly, the Respondents are directed to place the cases of the Petitioners before the competent authority for consideration of their regularization in accordance with the applicable statutory Regulations, within three weeks, and no adverse action shall be taken against them in the meanwhile solely on account of their contractual status as they were appointed through a competitive process. 17. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2437 | 2026 SHC KHI 437 | Const. P. 5068/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Afreen Parveen & another (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2438 | 2026 SHC KHI 519 | Const. P. 6267/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Naeem & Maqbool CHS Limited (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 2439 | 2026 SHC KHI 619 | Const. P. 1460/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Rafiq Mallah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2440 | 2026 SHC KHI 596 | Const. P. 4435/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Security Printin Corp. of Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Mehmood Salahuddin and Ors (Respondent) | 11-MAR-26 | Yes | After examining the impugned judgment, we do not find that the discretion exercised by the Tribunal suffers from any jurisdictional defect, misreading of evidence, or violation of law warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The Tribunal has attempted to strike a balance between the competing claims of the parties and has granted partial back benefits in the circumstances of the case. 16. Consequently, C.P. No. D-5229 of 2016 filed by the employee seeking full back benefits is dismissed, while C.P. No. D-4435 of 2016 filed by the employer challenging the reinstatement and partial back benefits is also dismissed. The impugned judgment dated 26.05.2016 passed by the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal is maintained. 17. Both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, along with all pending applications, if any. However, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2441 | 2026 SHC KHI 378 | Const. P. 5335/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | In light of the foregoing discussion, we hold that the Respondent, i.e., the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board, is under a legal as well as constitutional obligation to ensure the regular supply of potable water to the affected locality through a properly maintained and functional pipeline system in accordance with its statutory mandate under the Sindh Water & Sewerage Board Act, 1996. The Respondent/Karachi Water & Sewerage Board is directed to take all necessary measures for the replacement and/or rehabilitation of the damaged and corroded transmission and distribution pipelines in Warsia Colony, Orangi Town, Karachi, either from its own resources or by submitting the requisite development scheme to the Government of Sindh for its inclusion in the Annual Development Programme (ADP). Until the development works are completed and a regular piped water supply is restored, the Respondent shall ensure the provision of a weekly water tanker of 1,000 gallons to the Petitioner as well as other similarly placed residents of the affected area. Furthermore, the Respondent-Board shall adopt effective administrative and regulatory measures to discourage and prevent the illegal extraction, pilferage, and unauthorized sale of water by tanker operators within its jurisdiction. All concerned law enforcement agencies, including the local administration, are hereby directed to extend full cooperation and assistance to the Respondent-Board in ensuring equitable distribution of water and in taking action against unauthorized hydrants and illegal water tankers strictly in accordance with law. 12. Accordingly, the instant Petition is allowed in the above terms with directions to the Respondent to ensure compliance in letter and spirit to safeguard the fundamental rights of the Petitioner and other residents of the locality. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2442 | 2026 SHC KHI 591 | Const. P. 667/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Zahid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2443 | 2026 SHC KHI 15 | Const. P. 73/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Rehan Shahab (Petitioner) VS Banking Court No. II & others (Respondent) | 08-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above, it is observed that adequate remedy is available to the petitioner before the learned Banking Court in the pending execution proceedings. The petitioner, instead of directly invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, may put up his appearance before the learned Banking Court for settlement of the decretal amount and for redressal of his grievance with regard to blocking of his CNIC. 7. As the order for blocking of CNIC has emanated from the learned Banking Court, the petitioner may move an appropriate application before the same Court which shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law; and, if the petitioner is presently out of the country, such circumstance may also be taken into consideration by the learned Banking Court while dealing with his request. 8. In the circumstances, no interference by this Court is warranted at this stage. The petition is, therefore, misconceived and is dismissed with the above observations, leaving the petitioner at liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the learned Banking Court in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||
| 2444 | 2026 SHC KHI 11 | Const. P. 4024/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abrar Hussain (Petitioner) VS SBP Banking Services Corporation & others (Respondent) | 05-JAN-26 | Yes | It is well-settled by the Supreme Court of Pakistan that disputes relating to terms and conditions of service, severance benefits, and enforcement of contractual obligations against the State Bank of Pakistan or its subsidiaries do not ordinarily fall within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 7. In the present case, the Petitioner???s grievance relates to the interpretation of service regulations, computation of dues, and alleged denial of contractual benefits. These even otherwise involve disputed questions of fact and contractual rights for which adequate alternate remedies exist before the competent forum. 8. In view of the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in a catena of judgments governing the maintainability of constitutional petitions against the State Bank of Pakistan and its subsidiaries, we are of the considered view that the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. 9. Accordingly, without prejudice to any other remedy available to the Petitioner under the law on the aforesaid analogy, the instant petition is dismissed along with pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||
| 2445 | 2026 SHC KHI 605 | Const. P. 4546/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | Accordingly, these petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of with directions to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to reconsider the petitioner???s candidature for the subject post. However their candidature shall not be rejected based on the subject cases, the process shall be completed within two months, and compliance reported to this Court in line with the Supreme Court???s decision dated 22.10.2024. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2446 | 2026 SHC KHI 285 | Const. P. 3891/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Sharafat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-26 | Yes | In these circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the continued placement of the petitioner???s name on the PCL/PNIL and the retention of his passport, based merely on suspicion and unsubstantiated intelligence input, is arbitrary, unlawful, and violative of Articles 4 and 15 of the Constitution. In the absence of concrete material establishing any involvement of the petitioner in activities prejudicial to the security or interest of Pakistan, the impugned restriction cannot be sustained under the Passport Rules, 2021. 17. In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents/competent authority to forthwith remove the name of the petitioner from the Passport Control List (PCL), the Provisional National Identification List (PNIL) and the Exit Control List (ECL, if any. The respondents are further directed to act strictly in accordance with law and shall not create any impediment in the petitioner???s travel abroad, subject to lawful exceptions, if any as discussed supra. The petitioner???s passport, if presently in the custody of the Immigration authorities, shall be released immediately. 18. The petition, along with all pending applications, stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time; failure whereof consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution will follow. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2447 | 2026 SHC KHI 606 | Const. P. 4547/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhram Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | Accordingly, these petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of with directions to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to reconsider the petitioner???s candidature for the subject post. However their candidature shall not be rejected based on the subject cases, the process shall be completed within two months, and compliance reported to this Court in line with the Supreme Court???s decision dated 22.10.2024. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2448 | 2026 SHC KHI 389 | Const. P. 3221/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Arshad Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | 17-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2449 | 2025 SHC KHI 608 | Const. P. 3257/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Hafiz Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) VS Fed.of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-25 | Yes | Progressing further on the subject issue, we have noticed that the (Amendment) Act, 2016, and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others supra came on 21st January 2016, which clarified the status of NCAES Rules, 2011 of National Command Authority. Therefore, there is no further discussion on the aforesaid proposition required on our part. It is well settled that the Government and control organization fall within the ambit of "person" within the meaning of Article 199(1)(a)(ii) read with Article 199 (5) of the Constitution and if their actions or orders are violative of the statute creating those bodies or of rules/regulations framed under a statute, the same could be interfered with by the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. It is also well settled that when the service issues of the employees of such organizations/authorities are non-statutory then its enforcement has been restricted by the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company v Syed Salahuddin (2022 SCMR 991). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.59-K/2011 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.489-K/2025 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed, Adjourned |
| 2450 | Nil | Const. P. 7004/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Syed Umer Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2451 | 2021 SHC KHI 1329 | Const. P. 953/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | A. Razzaq Dawood (Petitioner) VS V/S M/s Urban Builders and Ors (Respondent) | 05-JUL-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.1943/2018,C.P.L.A.1368/2019,C.P.L.A.5665/2024,C.P.L.A.5452/2021,C.P.L.A.6388/2021,C.A.644/2022,C.A.645/2022 SCP | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Pending ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed | |
| 2452 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 169 | Const. P. 447/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Ilyas & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 27-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.45-K/2018 Muhammad Ilyas and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2453 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 129, 2018 PLC CS Note 129 | Const. P. 4479/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 21-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.536-K/2017 Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2454 | Nil | Const. P. 448/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Khalid Inayat & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 25-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.57-K/2018 Munawar Ali and others v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.49-K/2018 Bilal Rasool and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2455 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 115, 2018 PLC CS Note 115 | Const. P. 6383/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Imtiaz Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 28-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2456 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 1861 | Const. P. 4377/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Dr. Itrat Malik (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Co-opration & ors (Respondent) | 29-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2849/2018 State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Dr. Itrat Malik Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2457 | 2019 PLC Lab. 83 | Const. P. 761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Habib Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Safeer Ahmed & Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2458 | Nil | Const. P. 8412/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muttahida Workers Front (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2459 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 14, 2019 PLC CS Note 14 | Const. P. 4053/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Maqbool Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2460 | Nil | Const. P. 7782/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) | 30-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1783/2017 Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2461 | Nil | Const. P. 1095/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ali (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2462 | Nil | Const. P. 365/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2463 | Nil | Const. P. 1091/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Irshad Begum (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shamim and others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2464 | Nil | Const. P. 730/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | M/s. Muhammadi Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 21-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2465 | Nil | Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Raza Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Home Department, Sindh & others (Respondent) | 21-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.382-K/2019 Salman Tahir and others v. Secy: Home Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2466 | Nil | Cr.Misc. 133/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Aijaz Ali (Applicant) VS Deputy Inspector General of Police Shaheed Benazirabad & others (Respondent) | 08-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2467 | Nil | Const. P. 2837/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mitho and others (Petitioner) VS Ashique Ali and others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1634/2019 Ashique Ali & others v. Mitho (decd) thr LRs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 2468 | Nil | Const. P. 1185/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Sher (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2469 | Nil | Const. P. 3171/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Azra Parveen Butt (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2470 | 2020 PLC (CS) 392 | Const. P. 6770/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Bostan Khan Khattak (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2471 | Nil | Const. P. 5250/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ziauddin Sabir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 30-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2472 | Nil | I. A 9/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2009 | Province of Sindh Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2473 | Nil | Const. P. 31/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2474 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 983 | Const. P. 100/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Nafees Fatima (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.357-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. and another v. Nafees Fatima and others,C.P.L.A.365-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust and another v. Nafees Fatima and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2475 | Nil | Const. P. 2216/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Others (Respondent) | 10-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2476 | Nil | Const. P. 3354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) VS Akhtar Hussain Chairman (Respondent) | 29-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2477 | Nil | Const. P. 209/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Alman and others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2478 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 943 | Cr.Bail 944/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shadu & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 22-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2479 | Nil | Const. P. 1677/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2480 | Nil | Const. P. 3713/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2481 | Nil | Const. P. 429/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Atif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2482 | Nil | Const. P. 4465/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Shafiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.2782/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended. | |
| 2483 | Nil | Const. P. 102/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Noor Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 29-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2484 | 2018 SBLR Sindh 524 | Const. P. 1547/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Aamir Jamil (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and others (Respondent) | 20-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.663-K/2017 Aamir Jamil v. University of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2485 | Nil | Cr.Misc. 36/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | MUHAMMAD YAQOOB (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE S.B.A & OTHERS (Respondent) | 01-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2486 | Nil | Const. P. 1556/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Khuda Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.200-K/2019 Khuda Bux and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Health Department Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2487 | Nil | Const. P. 140/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Allah Dino & Other (Intervenor) VS P>O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 29-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2488 | Nil | Cr.Acq.A. 15/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Ameen (Appellant) VS Ist A.D.J SBA & Ors (Respondent) | 31-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2489 | Nil | Const. P. 2243/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Sarfaraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS N.T.S and Ors (Respondent) | 12-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.614-K/2018 Sarfaraz Ahmed v. National Testing Services and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2490 | 2019 PLC Lab. 19, 2020 PLC (CS) 19, 2019 PLC Lab. 268 | Const. P. 7369/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/s Sindh Club (Petitioner) VS Nazar Hussain and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2491 | Nil | Const. P. 2700/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2492 | Nil | Const. P. 4538/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Riaz Ahmed Bhutto and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 31-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.428-K/2017 Riaz Ahmed and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2493 | Nil | Const. P. 4620/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nisra Ahmed Shaikh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2494 | Nil | Const. P. 866/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Karachi Vegetable & Tajir Association (Petitioner) VS M/s JS Bank Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2495 | Nil | Const. P. 3889/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Waris and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.115-K/2019 Muhammad Waris and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2496 | Nil | Const. P. 5626/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Rizwan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3715/2017,C.P.L.A.585-K/2017,C.A.1598/2017,C.P.L.A.3660/2017,C.A.1607/2017,C.P.L.A.583-K/2017,C.P.L.A.587-K/2017,C.P.L.A.586-K/2017,C.P.L.A.584-K/2017 SCP | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2497 | Nil | Const. P. 8152/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 25-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2498 | Nil | Const. P. 5519/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Kelash Babu (Petitioner) VS SPSC & Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2499 | 2020 PLC (CS) 717 | Const. P. 1360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Adil Rashid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 31-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted, | |
| 2500 | Nil | Const. P. 2082/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Brigadier (R) Kamran Jalil (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.490-K/2021 Brig (R) Kamran Jalil v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2501 | Nil | Const. P. 5987/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Sabrina and Ors (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2502 | Nil | Const. P. 6900/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s PICIC Insurance Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2503 | Nil | Const. P. 5736/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2504 | Nil | Const. P. 1340/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s S.M Trades (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2505 | Nil | Const. P. 5586/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mohsin Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.1605/2017,C.P.L.A.3666/2017,C.P.L.A.3674/2017,C.P.L.A.3665/2017,C.A.1600/2017,C.A.1601/2017 SCP | Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed | |
| 2506 | 2021 SHC KHI 703, 2021 SBLR Sindh 1804 | Const. P. 5776/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-21 | Yes | University of Karachi--we deem it appropriate to set aside the findings of the Selection Board dated 28.06.2018 to the extent of petitioners and private respondents. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondent-University to determine afresh as to whether the candidates i.e. petitioners and private respondents were having requisite academic qualifications duly recognized under the law for the subject posts in respondent-University, at the time of the cutoff date provided in the public notice dated 26.12.2014. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.582-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Imran Ali Hashmi & others,C.P.L.A.733-K/2021 Dr.Masooda Qadri v. The University of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of |
| 2507 | Nil | Const. P. 1279/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mst. Nikhat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 17-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2508 | Nil | Const. P. 6357/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imdad Hussain Mirani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2509 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 5, 2019 PLC CS Note 5 | Const. P. 6221/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Rab Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 30-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.675-K/2017 Rab Nawaz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2510 | 2019 PLC (CS) 557 | Const. P. 1842/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent) | 13-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2511 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1124 | Const. P. 1443/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Najeeb ur Rehman Jakhrani. (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 06-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.81-K/2018 Mir Najeeb-ur-Rehman Jakhrani v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2512 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1354 | Const. P. 3238/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ghulam Ali Gopang (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2513 | 2018 CLC 1221 | H.C.A 137/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s. Rahat & Company (Appellant) VS Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Respondent) | 06-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.649-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan,C.A.91-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2514 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1231 | Const. P. 3491/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Lal Badshah And Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman K.P.T And Ors. (Respondent) | 21-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.211-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.P.L.A.212-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.A.46-K/2022 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2515 | 2018 YLR 672 | Cr.Bail 330/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | IFTIKHAR GADAR S/O ABDUL RAZZAQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 04-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2516 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 20, 2019 PLC CS Note 20 | Const. P. 8306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 29-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1001/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 2517 | Nil | Const. P. 2281/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Anwar Textie Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3305/2018,C.A.94-K/2019,C.P.L.A.5413/2021,C.A.2867/2022 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed | |
| 2518 | Nil | Const. P. 453/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Akram Anjum Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 26-JAN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2519 | 2019 PTD 1765, 2019 CLC Note 37 | Const. P. 544/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ali Zahir Jafri (Petitioner) VS Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and Ors (Respondent) | 02-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.638-K/2018 Ali Zahir Jafri v. The Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2520 | Nil | Const. P. 4579/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Qasim Ali (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) | 26-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2521 | Nil | Const. P. 317/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2008 | Mst. Mehar Bano (Petitioner) VS The President Executive Board Defence Officer (Respondent) | 29-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1-K/2019 Mst: Mehar Bano v. The President of Executive Board of Defence Housing Authority DHA thr. DirectoR (Education) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2522 | Nil | Const. P. 1104/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mazhar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 25-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2523 | Nil | Const. P. 4422/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Irtaza Raza Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 19-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.68-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.2976/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Petroleum & Natural Resources Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2524 | Nil | Const. P. 2755/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Artistic Milliners (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1970/2019 Abdul Azeem Khan Pathan v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2525 | Nil | Const. P. 334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3729/2018 Shaman Khan and others v. NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others,C.A.117/2019 Shaman Khan and others v. NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed | |
| 2526 | Nil | Const. P. 481/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s IBM (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3102/2018 M/s Institute of Business Management, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.92-K/2019 M/s Institute of Business Management, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2527 | Nil | Const. P. 1272/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Aga Khan Maternal & Child Care Health Centre (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2974/2018 M/s The Agha Khan Maternal & Child Care Centre Hyderabad, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.77-K/2019 M/s The Agha Khan Maternal & Child Care Centre Hyderabad, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2528 | Nil | Const. P. 2076/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Abdul Hameed Pathan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 29-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.38-K/2018 Abdul Hameed Pathan v. Fedeation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2529 | Nil | Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 25-SEP-19 | Yes | Review--The grounds taken by the Petitioner in the review application were considered at the time of hearing of main petition and the request of the Petitioner regarding the factum of non-statutory rules of service of the Respondent-corporation, which is basically a non-statutory Corporation and claiming that Respondent-corporation has statutory rules of service is not the correct legal position of the case for the simple reason that merely publishing the service rules of a non-statutory body in the official gazette does not make the rules statutory ipso facto which even otherwise requires approval of the Government-- We are not in agreement with the contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner for the simple reason that this Court considered the aforesaid submissions of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner at paragraph Nos.16 to 18 and gave finding on the issue which he is now raising in the Review Application. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another,C.P.L.A.4190/2019 Muzafar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Cabinet Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 2530 | 2020 PLC Lab. 125, 2020 PLC (CS) 125, 2019 SBLR Sindh 2225 | Const. P. 910/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Sami Memon & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-19 | Yes | Issue of promotion of PSE-IV in Pakistan Steel Mill | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.551-K/2019 Abdul Sami Memon and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2531 | Nil | Const. P. 5495/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ismail Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2532 | Nil | Const. P. 429/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Naushad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2533 | Nil | Const. P. 2961/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahbaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2534 | Nil | Const. P. 2583/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2535 | Nil | Const. P. 2780/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Anwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2536 | 2021 SHC KHI 768 | Const. P. 5632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Mohsin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-MAR-21 | Yes | Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2537 | Nil | H.C.A 449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Waseem Ahmed (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shahnawaz & others (Respondent) | 19-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.712-K/2019 K-Elecric Ltd. v. Muhammad Shahnawaz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2538 | Nil | Const. P. 1177/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Perviaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2539 | Nil | Const. P. 2339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sanaullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2540 | Nil | Const. P. 674/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Latif &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2541 | Nil | Const. P. 1133/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khan and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2542 | Nil | Const. P. 1561/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Humayoon Mubarak (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2543 | Nil | Const. P. 1623/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mir Faisal Ahmed Talpur & others (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Irrigation and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2544 | Nil | Const. P. 1925/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Aleem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2545 | Nil | Const. P. 2199/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2546 | Nil | Const. P. 2217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2547 | Nil | Const. P. 2339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Baqa Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2548 | Nil | Const. P. 1774/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Mir Mohammad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2549 | 2021 MLD 304 | Const. P. 2385/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Qamar Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 16-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2550 | Nil | Const. P. 125/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition stands disposed of directing Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh to consider the case of the Petitioner for his appointment on any post against deceased quota as per his qualification on the basis of Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and in accordance with the dicta laid down by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in C. P. No. 482-K & 503-K of 2016, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2551 | Nil | Const. P. 87/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Fayyaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2552 | Nil | Const. P. 664/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Allah Bachayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2553 | Nil | Const. P. 1054/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Hakeem Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federal Ministry of Water & Power and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2554 | Nil | Const. P. 1066/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahzeb Mughal (Petitioner) VS HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2555 | Nil | Const. P. 721/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Irrigation matter | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2556 | Nil | Const. P. 655/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2557 | Nil | Const. P. 1709/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2558 | Nil | Const. P. 2539/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Imran Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2559 | Nil | Const. P. 322/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shaikh Rahim Rux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2560 | Nil | Const. P. 2452/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2561 | Nil | Const. P. 413/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sajjad Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2562 | Nil | Const. P. 696/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Altaf Hussain Khowaja (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2563 | Nil | Const. P. 1557/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Tail Abadgar Association (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2564 | Nil | Const. P. 298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2565 | Nil | Const. P. 2193/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Islam Nabi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2566 | Nil | Civil Revision 247/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Abdul Rehman (Applicant) VS Shafi Muhammad and Others (Respondent) | 01-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2567 | Nil | Const. P. 1390/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Noor Nabi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor & Others (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2568 | Nil | Const. P. 8267/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.693-K/2019 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.22-K/2022 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 2569 | Nil | Const. P. 990/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Faqir Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2570 | Nil | Const. P. 2747/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Jameela Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2571 | Nil | Const. P. 2551/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2572 | Nil | Const. P. 2558/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Arbab Ali &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2573 | Nil | II.A. 51/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nazeer Ahmed (Appellant) VS Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent) | 08-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2574 | Nil | Const. P. 7530/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Shahana Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2575 | Nil | Const. P. 44/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.1027/2021 Hilal Care Private Ltd Karachi and others v. Sindh through Secretary Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks) | |
| 2576 | Nil | Const. P. 358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Noorunisa @ Fatima and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2577 | Nil | Const. P. 2832/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2578 | Nil | Const. P. 1826/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2579 | Nil | Const. P. 2087/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Shazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2580 | Nil | Const. P. 1826/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Tamsila Ansari (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2581 | Nil | Const. P. 3341/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Shabeer (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2582 | Nil | Const. P. 2034/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2583 | Nil | Const. P. 1946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Liaqat Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2584 | Nil | Const. P. 2708/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | MumtazAli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2585 | Nil | Const. P. 3556/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst: Shareefan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2586 | Nil | Const. P. 2075/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Aijaz Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.146-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Engro Foods Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2587 | Nil | Const. P. 2619/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2588 | Nil | Const. P. 3147/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Javed Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2589 | Nil | Const. P. 3143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shafi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2590 | Nil | Const. P. 3089/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Jahangir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2591 | Nil | Const. P. 1857/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2592 | Nil | Const. P. 1690/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2593 | Nil | Const. P. 2021/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Tahir Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.437-K/2020 Tahir Muhammad v. Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 2594 | Nil | Const. P. 2011/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Anwar and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2595 | 2020 SHC HYD 2362 | Const. P. 116/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Lal Bux Jahejo (Petitioner) VS IInd Addl Distt Judge Hyd & Ors (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2596 | 2020 SHC HYD 2085 | Const. P. 2194/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Anwer and others (Petitioner) VS Fouji Foundation Model School & others (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2597 | 2020 SHC KHI 2034 | Const. P. 4906/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-20 | Yes | The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2598 | 2021 SHC KHI 7 | Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) | 28-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2599 | 2020 SHC KHI 1179 | Const. P. 7221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Talal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-20 | Yes | Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2600 | 2020 SHC HYD 301 | Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dad Muhammad Brohi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 29-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2601 | 2020 SHC HYD 230 | Criminal Miscelleneous 427/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | Hamid Ali (Applicant) VS 1st Adj. S.J/Ex.Officio J.P Tharparkar & Ors (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2602 | 2020 SHC KHI 50 | Const. P. 5649/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mst. Ghulam Sugharan (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2603 | 2020 SHC HYD 2211 | Const. P. 36/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2006 | Mumtaz Ali. (Petitioner) VS Secretary to the Govt Of Pakistan and Others. (Respondent) | 04-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2604 | 2020 SHC HYD 434 | Const. P. 813/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst Koonj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 13-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2605 | 2023 YLR 12 | II.A. 58/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: II.A S 60/2019 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Balach (Appellant) VS Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent) | 25-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1270-K/2020 Balach Chandio v. Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 2606 | 2020 SHC HYD 2226 | II.A. 60/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: II.A S 58/2019 | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Balach (Appellant) VS Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent) | 25-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1271-K/2020 Balach Chandio v. Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 2607 | 2020 SHC KHI 1172, 2021 PLC CS Note 18 | Const. P. 3478/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1661/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Bashir Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2608 | 2020 SHC HYD 2410 | Const. P. 575/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1288-K/2020 Abdul Rehman Rajput v. The District Judge Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2609 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 52 | Const. P. 325/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Aijaz and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 27-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2610 | 2020 SHC KHI 2328 | Const. P. 7214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | regularization of their contingent service as computer Operator, Naib Qasid and Chowkidar in the Sindh Coal Authority (SCA) Government of Sindh---The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor fall within the ambit of Policy of the Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2611 | 2020 SHC KHI 1086 | Const. P. 2250/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-20 | Yes | the private respondents are Assistant Food Controller in BPS-15, but they are holding the post of District Food Controller in BPS-16 in various districts of the Province of Sindh on Own Pay Scale (OPS) in violation of Article 199---Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. At the request of learned counsel, office is directed to issue cover-in-hand to him in respect of the notice to be issued to respondents 1 and 2 who shall also be served through courier service. To come up on 29.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2612 | 2020 SHC HYD 989 | Const. P. 1456/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2613 | 2020 SHC HYD 2297 | Const. P. 447/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Nazeer Ahmed & others. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 09-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2614 | 2020 SHC KHI 823 | Const. P. 3454/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Attaullah Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-20 | Yes | We are not impressed with the analogy as put forward by him for the reasons that departmental action against the petitioner having been initiated during his service independently of a criminal case registered against him. Merely obtaining an acquittal order in a criminal case would not nullify the departmental proceedings at this stage after his retirement. Since PSB-I did not consider his case for promotion and in the meanwhile, he stood retired from service, no benefit of Rule 7-A of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974, could be given to him after he retired from service in the year 2017--Dismissed | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.307-K/2021 Attaullah Bhutto v. Province of Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 2615 | 2020 SHC HYD 967 | Criminal Appeal 33/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | Ayaz alias Cottan Shah. (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2616 | 2020 SHC KHI 1634 | Const. P. 5723/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 19-NOV-20 | Yes | water tankers / business--it is the basic duty of the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board to supply water to the citizens of Karachi. When Karachi Water & Sewerage Board was / is unable to meet the water needs of the city of Karachi, a water tanker mafia had sprung up in Karachi. During the argument, we have been informed that there is certain direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the closing of illegal hydrants from Karachi city. Prima-facie, the Management of KW&SB has failed to remove illegal hydrants operating in the city despite Honorable Supreme Court directions. Moreover, the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan had directed the Management of KW&SB to focus upon their core operations to provide portable water via a regular distribution network. Even, if hydrants are needed, there should be a rational and scientific study to evaluate the need for hydrant services in water-scarce areas. The hydrant services preferably should supply water to improvised population. On the aforesaid proposition, this Court has already settled the issue in the case of Muhammad Rafique Sia vs Province of Sindh and others, 2016 CLC 170. Besides that, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in HRC No.28963/2014 directed the respondents to take action against illegal and unauthorized hydrants--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2617 | 2020 SHC KHI 2025 | Const. P. 7252/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Naveed Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1436-K/2020 Naveed Ahmed Abro v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2618 | 2021 SHC KHI 1201 | Const. P. 1702/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Hameedullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 02-FEB-21 | Yes | Enquiries and Anti-corruption Establishment Sindh (`E&ACE`) for issuance of his retirement notification and releasing his salaries up to 21.7.2013, wherein he has served for 10 years--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of respondents/Home Secretary, Government of Sindh is directed to issue his retirement notification within two weeks and release his pensionary benefits under the law within a month from the date of receipt of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this court | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2619 | 2020 SHC KHI 2103 | Const. P. 6766/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Shoukat Qadri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-20 | Yes | pensionery benefits--Prim facie, the petitioner has qualifying length of service to his credit as per VSS calculation work sheet available at page-11 of the memo of petition. It is well settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder--In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed and Anis Hyder in C.P No.D-5734/2018 and C.P No.D-6225/2018, respectively. pensionery benefits | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2620 | 2020 SHC KHI 132 | Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2621 | 2020 SHC KHI 1386 | Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-FEB-20 | Yes | transfer and posting transfer and posting | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2622 | 2020 SHC HYD 584 | Const. P. 674/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2623 | 2020 SHC HYD 2056 | Const. P. 347/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr M.H Mughal (Khi To Hyd) (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 13-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2624 | 2020 SHC KHI 364 | Const. P. 4789/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Khizar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 25-NOV-20 | Yes | whether the petitioner can challenge the show cause notice issued against him and his suspension order in a Constitution Petition?--We are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, a final decision against the petitioner has yet to be taken by the respondent- Police Department and he has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the said proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2625 | 2021 SHC KHI 932 | Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 02-SEP-21 | Yes | Perusal of above reflects that the word consider within adjudication made by this Court amounts approval to be promoted, hence, concerned Authority has already recommended the case for approval, therefore, the petitioners case shall be approved as per recommendations within 15 days with compliance report. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2626 | 2021 SHC KHI 351, 2021 PLD Sindh 328 | Const. P. 6241/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Anjum Badar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 08-APR-21 | Yes | petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employees appointed on contract in BS 16 and above can be deemed to have been validly appointed on regular basis, without going through the competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, merely in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the mandatory requirement of competitive process of selection only through the Sindh Public Service Commission for appointments in BS 16 and above, which is the command of the Constitution and specific direction to the Government of Sindh by the Honble Supreme Court, can be waived, relaxed, done away with, exempted and or bypassed in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the petitioners have any vested right for regular appointment, or to claim regularization, or to approach this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction to seek redressal of their grievance relating to regularization ; and, is there any corresponding legal duty cast on the Government of Sindh to appoint them on regular basis ? If no, then can a writ of mandamus to this effect be issued against the Government of Sindh ? --Whether Section 3 of the Act of 2013, to the extent of regularization / appointment in BS 16, 17 and 18 without the mandatory competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, is ultra vires the Constitution and against the law laid down and the direction given by the Honble Supreme Court to the Government of Sindh in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and others V/S Province of Sindh and others, 2015 SCMR 456. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1727-K/2021,C.P.L.A.1728-K/2021 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ],Disposed ,Disposed |
| 2627 | 2020 SHC KHI 70, 2021 PLC (CS) 507 | Const. P. 4646/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Z.A Quraishi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 04-MAR-20 | Yes | Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2628 | 2020 SHC KHI 2202 | Const. P. 4802/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mansoor Ahmed Rajput and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | Promotion to the post of Director Information BS-19, which has been deferred vide notification dated 29.9.2020 on account of pendency of NAB reference / proceedings--whether a Civil Servant can be promoted against whom prima facie involvement in the serious charges of misconduct was available in the shape of NAB reference / proceedings ? --we are of the view that the case of the petitioners for promotion was rightly deferred by the competent authority / Board, and such decision does not call for any interference by this Court. However, their deferment shall be subject to the final outcome of the NAB reference / proceedings presently pending against them. disposed of | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.786-K/2020 Mansoor Ahmed Rajput & another v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 2629 | 2020 SHC KHI 1194 | Const. P. 443/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2630 | 2020 SHC KHI 1902 | Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | In view of the statement of learned AAG, let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who are facing disciplinary proceedings or criminal cases, and enjoying the posting even those who entered into plea bargaining and Voluntary Return (VR) under the NAB law. To be listed on 21.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2631 | 2020 SHC HYD 1638 | Const. P. 2419/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghazala Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2632 | 2020 SHC HYD 380 | Criminal Appeal 126/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2017 | Taimoor Badshah and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2633 | 2020 SHC KHI 1446 | Const. P. 2735/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mst. Ravi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 23-OCT-20 | Yes | In view of the above, the competent authority of respondents is directed to consider the case of the petitioner-widow for her family pension if her deceased husband had a requisite length of service to claim pensionary benefits on account of family pension. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. By consent, this petition is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2634 | 2020 SHC KHI 228 | Const. P. 4210/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mumtaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-DEC-20 | Yes | Essentially in service jurisprudence, appointment, promotion is of utmost importance. If these are made on merit in accordance with definite rules, instructions, etc., and the same will rightly be considered and treated as part of the terms and conditions of service of a civil/government servant, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, besides that the petitioner has no vested right to claim promotion against the post which was meant for initial appointment, therefore, the petitioner is precluded to ask for the actualization of his alleged promotion made by DPC-II which was rightly cancelled. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2635 | 2020 SHC KHI 964 | Const. P. 6622/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Javed Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Home Dept Sindh: & Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAR-20 | Yes | The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.380-K/2020 The Province of Sindh & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others,C.A.1192/2020 The Province of Sindh thr. Secretary, Home Department & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Dismissed |
| 2636 | 2020 SHC KHI 171 | Const. P. 5580/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Javed Akhtar and Ors (Respondent) | 22-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2637 | 2020 SHC KHI 1671 | Const. P. 5571/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Majeedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS KW & SB and Others (Respondent) | 23-DEC-20 | Yes | correctio in date of birth | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2638 | 2021 SHC KHI 919 | Const. P. 6666/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mohsin Furqan (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) | 27-JAN-21 | Yes | proforma promotion in the rank of SEVP--NBP--Thus in our opinion, the impugned action taken by the competent authority of the respondent-bank was proper and based on reasonable grounds as well as in the terms of the promotion policy in vogue--it is a well-established principle in service jurisprudence that promotion from the backdate to the retired Public Servant cannot be granted until and unless he meets the criteria prescribed under the law; and, after his retirement from the respondent-bank in the light of the decision of Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the case of Government of Pakistan and others v. Hameed Akhter Niazi and others (PLD 2003 SC 110) | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.434-K/2021 Mohsin Furqan v. National Bank of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 2639 | 2020 SHC KHI 910 | Const. P. 5334/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zubair Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. Board and Ors (Respondent) | 08-DEC-20 | Yes | It is well-settled that in absence of codal formalities i.e. advertisement, the constitution of Selection Committee, test and interview, before filling up the subject post, this Court cannot come to rescue and entertain the grievance of the petitioner as made by him in the prayer clauses under the constitutional jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2640 | 2020 SHC HYD 396 | Const. P. 2735/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Liaquat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2641 | 2020 SHC KHI 2041 | Const. P. 528/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ashraf Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2642 | 2026 SHC KHI 375 | Const. P. 650/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sikandar Ali Sial and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that, pursuant to the Order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan dated 21.06.2012, passed in C.P. No. 2523 of 2011, the Petitioners were directed to avail the remedy before the Court of competent jurisdiction and intend to do so. However, counsel for the Respondent opposed this stance on the ground that a Suit filed by the Petitioners is already pending adjudication. Be that as it may, if no such remedy has been availed, the Petitioners may do so, or seek impleadment in the Suit already filed by their colleagues for decision on merits, as the issue of remaining GHS payment requires evidence which cannot be examined under Article 199 of the Constitution, preferably within three months, as considerable time has elapsed since 2012. 6. Without touching the merits of the case, this petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2643 | 2021 SHC KHI 76 | Const. P. 763/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ayub Khan (Petitioner) VS The Dist & Session Judge West and Ors (Respondent) | 04-FEB-21 | Yes | the appointment of sons of deceased/retired and serving employees of the District and subordinate Courts--whether the Petitioners son is entitled to be appointed on the son quota basis in view of policy decision /directives of the Honble Chief Justice of this Court vide letters dated 03.03.2010, 23.7.2012 & 4.3.2013--In the light of the above rule position, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution on the premise that petitioner failed to point out any administrative decision of the member of the subordinate judiciary; and, merely agitating the claim that his son was not accommodated in the Judicial District was/is no ground to direct the respondent No.1 to appoint his son. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply for the post on merit as and when the vacancy occurs in the office of District & Sessions, Judge Karachi West. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.544-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The District & Sessions Judge Karachi (West) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 2644 | 2021 SHC KHI 133 | Const. P. 8515/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sophia Ibrahim & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-FEB-21 | Yes | regularization--Benazir Bhutto Shaheed Human Resource Research Department Board--Since learned counsel for the respondent No.2 agreed to look into the matter of petitioners for regularization of their services in the respondent-department under the law; and, on the aforesaid analogy as set forth by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Board of Intermediate and Secretary Education, Faisalabad (supra) within a reasonable time. Learned counsel for the petitioners has agreed for the candid proposal of learned counsel for the respondent No.2, however without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners involved in the present proceedings. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2645 | 2021 SHC KHI 1223 | Const. P. 7112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nasir Ahmed Butt (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shaheen Afroz and Ors (Respondent) | 25-JAN-21 | Yes | Family Pension | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2646 | 2020 SHC HYD 155 | Const. P. 94/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 04-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2647 | 2020 SHC KHI 1201, 2021 PLC (CS) 463 | Const. P. 591/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (DRTA) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.433-K/2020 Okash Khalid Memon v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time |
| 2648 | 2020 SHC KHI 2260 | Const. P. 6999/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS The Adjutant General & Ors (Respondent) | 09-MAR-20 | Yes | He assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon???ble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed He assailed the aforesaid order before the Honble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.195-K/2020 Shabbir Aslam v. The Adjutant General and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2649 | 2020 SHC HYD 1313 | Const. P. 872/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Hassan Rajar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.142-K/2025 Haji Madan Shaikh Qureshi v. The Learned VIIth Additional District & Sessions Judge (MCAC) South Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of | |
| 2650 | 2020 SHC KHI 1165 | Const. P. 7604/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Shoaib Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) | 24-FEB-20 | Yes | petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2651 | 2020 SHC KHI 261 | Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-APR-20 | Yes | Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. As an interim measure, respondents are directed to consider the case of the present petitioner for promotion strictly on merits and in accordance with law. In case, his case is deferred and/or rejected, the competent authority shall pass a speaking order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. To be listed on 07.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2652 | 2023 PLC Lab. Note 66, 2023 PLC CS Note 66 | Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Zahid Hassan Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2653 | 2020 SHC HYD 263 | F.R.A 82/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 1985 | Shahzaman (Appellant) VS Haji Ghulam Hyder & Others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2654 | 2020 SHC KHI 414, 2020 SBLR Sindh 1988, 2020 PLC (CS) 1044 | Const. P. 2271/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ms. Shama Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1793/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Shama Hassan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 2655 | 2020 SHC HYD 1688 | Const. P. 993/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 979,983,998/2020 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Kamla (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 08-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3635/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Kamla & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2656 | 2020 SHC HYD 106 | Const. P. 27/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Achar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 01-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2657 | 2020 SHC HYD 1027 | Civil Revision 178/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ghulam Hyder and 10 others (Applicant) VS Zulfiqar Ali and 13 others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2658 | 2020 SHC HYD 1657 | Const. P. 1688/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mehrumal (Petitioner) VS D.O, Water Management NPIW, Mirpurkhas and Others (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2659 | 2020 SHC HYD 200 | Const. P. 239/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Shazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2660 | 2020 SHC KHI 2042 | Const. P. 5124/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s Farkhunda Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS Secretary, M/o Interior & Ors (Respondent) | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the service of temporary employees can be terminated on 14 days??? notice or pay in lieu thereof, whereas in the present case petitioner claims revival of the contract through reinstatement in service, which factum cannot be thrashed out in writ jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 2661 | 2021 SHC KHI 544 | Const. P. 6319/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Naseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-SEP-21 | Yes | we are clear in our mind that the petitioner proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of actualization of up-gradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits. On the subject, we are guided by the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioner has been unable to make out a case for the actualization of upgradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits with retrospective effect, based on the office order dated 31.8.2018. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1600-K/2021 Naseem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Ministry of Local Bodies & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution |
| 2662 | 2021 SHC KHI 735 | Const. P. 3623/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Air Marshal Arshad Malik and Others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | the Petitioner seeks direction to the management of Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), to provide medicine to him and his family, either from PIA's Medical Store as per prescription prescribed by the specialist Doctors without any interruption. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.5882/2021 Pakistan International Airlines through Chief Executive PIA, Karachi v. Javed Iqbal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 2663 | 2021 SHC KHI 1096 | Const. P. 391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Fayyaz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 04-MAY-21 | Yes | that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4118/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others,C.A.1563/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Disposed of |
| 2664 | 2021 SHC KHI 1229, 2021 SBLR Sindh 1929, 2021 SBLR Sindh 1990 | Const. P. 4685/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Azhar Hussain Solangi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2665 | 2021 SHC KHI 36 | Const. P. 3550/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Arsalan Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-21 | Yes | we are clear in our minds that no civil/public Servant of a non-cadre post can be posted, out of cadre. Reliance is placed on the cases of Muhammad Bachal Memon and others vs. Syed Tan veer Hussain Shah and others (2014 SCMR 1539), Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary Sindh and others (2013 SCMR 1752), Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456), and Ajmal Hassan Khan and another Versus Government of Sindh and others, 2012 P L C (C.S.) 1153 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1677-K/2021 Arsalan Hassan v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2666 | 2021 SHC KHI 399 | Const. P. 3100/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 29-APR-21 | Yes | whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.3922/2021 Managing Director Pakistan Bait ul Mal, Islamabad v. Surriya Kanwal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2667 | 2021 SHC KHI 263 | Const. P. 219/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Asim Sualeh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 29-SEP-21 | Yes | Petitioner has assailed the vires of show cause notice dated 30.12.2016 issued by respondent-Port Qasim Authority (PQA), whereby he has been called upon to explain his position concerning his initial appointment as Deputy General Manager / Director in BPS-20 in PQA-- | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2668 | 2021 SHC LAR 1195 | Const. P. 399/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Mustafa Bugti (Petitioner) VS S.E Operation Circle SEPCO Larkana & others (Respondent) | 14-JUL-21 | Yes | Transfer and Posting | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2669 | 2021 SHC LAR 678 | Cr.Bail 124/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Talib Hussain Chachar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 12-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2670 | 2021 SHC KHI 184 | Const. P. 6162/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 01-APR-21 | Yes | reinstatement in service as Staff SDO (B&R)--immoral activities--Article 199(3) of the Constitution--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2671 | 2021 SHC KHI 258 | Const. P. 4035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Bashir Ahmed Kalwar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.L.A.3921/2021 The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and another v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.L.A.757-K/2021 The Chairman (FBR) v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous |
| 2672 | 2021 SHC KHI 609 | Const. P. 1202/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Aftab Alam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 24-MAR-21 | Yes | SESSI | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.586-K/2021 Sindh Employees Social Security Institution v. Aftab Alam & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2673 | 2021 SHC KHI 1353 | Const. P. 1427/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 30-MAR-21 | Yes | seeking appointment as Primary School Teacher (PST) on the premise that he secured 94 marks in National Testing Service (NTS) test and his credentials were duly verified by the competent authority--we are not in a position to say for and against the documents attached with the memo of the petition and on this scope alone this petition fails on the ground of disputed question of facts. No case is made out for interfering with the impugned order dated 21.3.2017 passed by Director School Education (Primary) Sukkur Region, Sukkur (Chairman DRC | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1057-K/2021 Muhammad Rafique v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary, Education and literacy Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed |
| 2674 | 2021 SHC KHI 25 | Const. P. 195/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Riaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS M/s SSGC and Ors (Respondent) | 11-AUG-21 | Yes | Needless to add that this is because of which normally every service law or rules includes such right for competent authority. Here bundle of documents have been filed which, prima facie, requires determination of factual controversy; as well petitioner is ready to contest the enquiry and further action if any taken by the respondents. Accordingly, without commenting or adjudicating the merits of the case, we are of the view that instant petition against show cause notice is not maintainable hence is dismissed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2675 | 2021 SHC KHI 457 | Const. P. 4417/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-AUG-21 | Yes | that the petitioner has been placed on as an Officer on Special Duty (OSD) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.5297/2021 Trustees of the Karachi Port thr. its Board of Trustees, Karachi & others v. Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous |
| 2676 | 2021 SHC LAR 220 | Const. P. 471/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Nasir Ali Zangejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 04-AUG-21 | Yes | Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2677 | 2021 SHC KHI 210 | Const. P. 4356/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Arshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-21 | Yes | Without prejudice to above, since there is consent order, no review was preferred even that order was not assailed. In case, if there was no deduction by the department and they were sending salary directly to the account; that is not justification to withhold group insurance. Accordingly, Secretary Health, Government of Sindh shall ensure that group insurance amount is paid as per her entitlement to the nominee without any delay. While parting this order, learned AG Sindh shall ensure presence of any focal person of Accountant General Sindh (A.G. Sindh) to assist this Court that under what capacity complete salary was transferred and they failed to deduct the amount and who were responsible with regard to such irregularity, if any. This exercise shall be completed within 15 days. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2678 | 2021 SHC LAR 114 | Cr.Bail 24/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ali Hassan Jeho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 12-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2679 | 2021 SHC KHI 1374 | Const. P. 4112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-APR-21 | Yes | Petitioner seeks appointment in the Karachi University as Adhoc Teacher, based on differently-abled quota on the premise that he was/is a qualified and fit person to be considered for the subject post. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 2680 | 2021 SHC LAR 974 | Cr.Bail 316/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghazi Haleli Jatoi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2681 | 2021 SHC LAR 572 | Cr.Misc. 194/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Shahbaz Ali Seelro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2682 | 2021 SHC KHI 234 | Const. P. 1662/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Nawaz Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-21 | Yes | disposed of in the terms of paragraph 35(iii) of the judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by learned Sindh Service Tribunal maintained by the Honorable Supreme Court vide order dated 26.03.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.266-K and 1074 of 2016, resultantly the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA is directed to comply with the ratio of the aforesaid judgments in its letter and spirit and allow them joining from the date of their repatriation by the Sindh Government vide notification dated 5.7.2018 and the issue of their salary, for the intervening period, shall be decided by the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA accordingly within one month | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.542-K/2021 Muhammad Nawaz Soomro v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.558-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Muhammad Nawaz Soomro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed |
| 2683 | 2021 SHC KHI 101 | Const. P. 2089/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Jamshed Ali Bhutta (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Otherss (Respondent) | 25-MAR-21 | Yes | Government accommodation--Police Department | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2684 | 2021 SHC KHI 131 | Const. P. 3668/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dadan Khan Pirzado and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Education and Others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-21 | Yes | Prima facie, the impugned order dated 04.8.2020 does not disclose the justiciable reasons for recalling the promotion of the petitioners, however, the respondents have reservations against such promotion of the petitioners which primarily needs to be looked into by the competent authority under the relevant law and this Court, at this juncture, is not a position to thresh out such allegations and counter-allegations so raised by the parties hereinabove under writ jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2685 | 2021 SHC KHI 1091 | Const. P. 5196/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | SESSI United Staff Union sindh (CBA) & ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 23-FEB-21 | Yes | Sindh Employees Social Security Institution--vacant posts in SESSI were required to be filled through the competitive process--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the appointment in the public office can only be made through the competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise as discussed supra. It is well-settled law that appointments in public office are to be made strictly under applicable rules and regulations without any discrimination and in a transparent manner. Thus, all appointments in the public institution must be based on a process that is substantially and tangibly fair and within the parameters of its applicable rules, regulations, and bylaws. However, if the candidate has applied based on such admissible quota under the law he can be accommodated subject to his qualification for the post under the dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan on the subject issue-- | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2686 | 2021 SHC KHI 553 | Const. P. 1862/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Rao Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 30-MAR-21 | Yes | disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Police Department--Rule 3(a) (b) of the Sindh Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rule, 1988--disciplinary proceedings initiated against him which falls within the ambit of Section 3(2) of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1974 which provides that the tribunal shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of civil servants including the disciplinary matters. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2687 | 2021 SHC KHI 806 | Const. P. 6694/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Abdul Alim Zafar (Petitioner) VS The Education Sect: & Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2688 | 2021 SHC KHI 490 | Const. P. 3803/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Suhaila Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 28-MAY-21 | Yes | whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of her previous service rendered with effect from 1971 till her reinstatement/re-employment in the year 1990 or not? | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4282/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another,C.A.1423/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed |
| 2689 | 2023 SHC KHI 366 | Const. P. 6110/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Murtaza and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 12-JUN-23 | Yes | It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.5305/2021,C.P.L.A.1672-K/2021,C.A.351/2022,C.A.354/2022,C.A.350/2022,C.A.348/2022,C.P.L.A.6602/2021,C.P.L.A.6604/2021,C.A.356/2022,C.P.L.A.6599/2021,C.P.L.A.5223/2023,C.P.L.A.2919/2023,C.P.L.A.5241/2023,C.P.L.A.5243/2023 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed , Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks), Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks) |
| 2690 | 2021 SHC HYD 545 | Cr.Bail 875/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.151-K/2021 Ghulam Qadir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2691 | 2021 SHC HYD 834 | Const. P. 2593/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Rao Talib Hussain & anothers (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.6489/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited through its M.D. Karachi and others v. Rao Muhammad Asif and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 2692 | 2021 SHC HYD 940 | Cr.Acq.A. 240/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | HUZOOR BUX (Appellant) VS PIR SIDDIUE SAJJAD GHOUS SHAH & OTHERS (Respondent) | 25-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2693 | 2021 SHC HYD 535 | Const. P. 1761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Syed Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | CP No. D- 1761 of 2011 CP No. D- 1763 of 2011 CP No. D- 614 of 2012 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 2694 | 2021 SHC HYD 844 | Const. P. 1393/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2695 | 2021 SHC HYD 350 | Const. P. 1769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.282-K/2022 Dr.Khalid Iqbal Talpur v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 2696 | 2021 SHC HYD 771 | Const. P. 10/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2697 | 2021 SHC HYD 364 | Const. P. 1655/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Junaid Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.6282/2021 Junaid Ahmed v. Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2698 | 2021 SHC KHI 1206, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1713 | Criminal Miscelleneous 283/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHOSO S/O MUHAMMAD HASHIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 30-DEC-21 | Yes | Obviously, criminal cases are decided based on the material so collected by the prosecution during the investigation, and the evidence recorded in the trial Court, and that too, after appraisal of evidence by it under the law applicable thereto. This Court cannot assume the role of an investigation agency or of a trial Court to deliberate upon the factual controversies involved in the present case in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 561-A Cr.P.C. This view has been consistently enunciated by the Honorable Supreme Court that High Court ought to refrain from exercising inherent jurisdiction, during the investigation of a criminal case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2699 | 2021 SHC HYD 1224 | Civil Revision 240/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sarwar Ali (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2700 | 2021 SHC HYD 516 | Const. P. 1518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2701 | 2021 SHC HYD 910 | Const. P. 2608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Deepak (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2702 | 2021 SHC HYD 766 | Const. P. 96/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C. P. No. D- 06 of 2020 [Muhammad Asif & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C. P. No. D- 96 of 2020 [Abdul Rasheed & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-111 of 2020 [Muhammad Anwar vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-126 of 2020 [Nizamuddin & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-244 of 2020 [Wali Muhammad & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Rasheed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.4725/2021 Shahi Khan Jagirani v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Health Department, Larkana and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 2703 | 2021 SHC HYD 1209 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2704 | 2021 SHC HYD 285 | Const. P. 1619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst Shumaila & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2705 | 2021 SHC HYD 864 | Const. P. 943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | S & Sons Contractor (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2706 | 2021 SHC HYD 1395 | Civil Revision 249/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Hassan & Ors (Applicant) VS Yousuf & Ors (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2707 | 2021 SHC HYD 608 | Cr.Bail 1006/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Lal Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 13-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2708 | 2021 SHC KHI 476 | Cr.Bail 2347/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MST. ZULEEKHAN ABDULLAH & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 30-DEC-21 | Yes | , through the captioned bail application, has called in question, the rejection of their post-arrest Bail Application by the learned 1st Additional District Judge/Model Criminal Trial Court Malir, Karachi, vide order dated 21.10.2021, with the observations that quantity of 1400 and 1300 grams of charas is above the borderline, as settled by the Honble Supreme Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2709 | 2021 SHC HYD 249 | Civil Revision 317/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2010 | Esso (Applicant) VS Zahid Hussain (Respondent) | 10-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2710 | 2021 SHC HYD 1352 | Civil Revision 190/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: R.A. No. 195 of 2006 Muhammad Ishaque Vs. Photo and others | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2006 | Misri (Applicant) VS Photo and others (Respondent) | 06-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2711 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1061 | Const. P. 1170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Haroon Sohail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2712 | 2022 SHC KHI 287 | Const. P. 159/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Sadam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-FEB-22 | Yes | whether the private respondents have the requisite length of service to claim promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (BS-18) in the PHED; and, whether the DPC considered the case of the petitioners along with private respondents for promotion under law and policy of the Government of Sindh as introduced in the year 1984 or otherwise | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1709/2022 Fazal uddin Soomro and others v. Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi ad others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 2713 | 2021 SHC HYD 1 | Const. P. 1165/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Haque and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | Special Engineering Allowance of Rs.10,000/- as admissible to the graduate engineers i.e. B.E degree holders | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2714 | 2021 SHC HYD 70 | Criminal Miscelleneous 19/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2021 | Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) VS Senior Superintendent of Police (Respondent) | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 2715 | 2021 SHC HYD 1390 | Const. P. 63/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Amin & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.L.A.2268/2025 Sindh Revenue Board thr. its Chairman and another v. Lucky Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 2716 | 2021 SHC HYD 90 | Const. P. 356/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Sharafat Ali (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 2717 | 2022 SHC KHI 736 | Const. P. 1010/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2007 | Muhammas Aslam (Petitioner) VS P.I.A.C. & Ors (Respondent) | 01-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2718 | 2022 SHC KHI 411 | Const. P. 152/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ayaz Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2719 | 2022 SHC KHI 175 | Const. P. 7902/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2720 | 2022 SHC KHI 596 | Const. P. 184/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ghulam Qadir Thebo (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 27-JAN-22 | Yes | In our view, to qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. This is the minimum expectation to ensure a clean and efficient administration and to protect the public interest. An employee found not fit for promotion cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his / her case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his / her entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion denies him / her promotion, such denial would not be illegal or unjustified under the service jurisprudence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.550-K/2022 Ghulam Qadir Thebo v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan through Secretary, Establisment Division, Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded |
| 2721 | 2022 SHC KHI 281 | Const. P. 3961/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Abbas Sangi & anoher (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 24-JAN-22 | Yes | In principle, the Courts cannot play the role of assessing body and sit in judgment over subjective evaluation; however, can examine whether the required objective criterion for promotion was followed or otherwise in a suitable case subject to grave illegality and perversity in the action of the authority having domain to the affairs | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.292-K/2022 Ghulam Abbas Sangi & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed |
| 2722 | 2022 SHC KHI 27 | Const. P. 33/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Parvez Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-22 | Yes | the petitioner has called in question the vires of his posting order dated 01.01.2022 of respondent No.4 as Chairman Sindh Text Book Board (STBB), issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.527-K/2022 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan v. Pervez Ahmed Baloch & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 2723 | 2022 SHC KHI 612 | Const. P. 31/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Irfan Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of N.I.R.C & Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.721-K/2022 Irfan Ali Khan v. M/s. Habib Bank Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 2724 | 2022 SHC KHI 443 | Const. P. 6581/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Qamar ul Arafeen (Petitioner) VS The Vice Chancellor Karachi University and Ors (Respondent) | 18-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2725 | 2021 SHC KHI 244 | Const. P. 994/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Haji Rafiuddin Waliuddin and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2726 | 2022 SHC KHI 744 | Const. P. 4497/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muntazir Mehdi & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAR-22 | Yes | The petitioners who are serving as Deputy Prosecutor Generals in the prosecution department Government of Sindh contend that they are holding the LLM Degree and have claimed LLM degree allowance through this petition based on equality. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.501-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Muntazir Mehdi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 2727 | 2021 SHC KHI 1069 | Const. P. 3825/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Umer Textile and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2728 | 2022 SHC KHI 116 | Const. P. 3872/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 25-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2729 | 2021 SHC KHI 161 | Const. P. 3521/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | ENI Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2730 | 2022 SHC KHI 754 | Const. P. 4291/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Younus and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.542-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Muhammad Younis & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 2731 | 2022 SHC KHI 294 | Const. P. 7663/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shafqat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2732 | 2021 SHC KHI 461 | Const. P. 2355/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s S. Abdullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2733 | 2025 SHC KHI 1663, 2025 SHC KHI 1675 | Const. P. 4148/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Abbass (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-25 | Yes | We are of the considered view that the petitioners' situation regarding pensionary benefits is similar to the cases mentioned above. Their pension should be calculated from the date they were merged into TCP, rather than their later regularization dates in 2008 and 2011. This is because the petitioners were allowed to continue their service after the merger, and TCP continued to pay them until their superannuation. Since TCP acted upon the merger, any subsequent decision by the TCP Board is irrelevant. Therefore, in line with Supreme Court principles from the aforementioned cases, their pensionary benefits must be calculated from their merger date with TCP. This calculation should be completed and disbursed to them in accordance with law within three months. 13. These petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3673/2025 Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt Ltd thr. its Manager & others v. Ghulam Abbas and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2734 | 2022 SHC KHI 871 | Const. P. 3849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Khadija Kausar (Petitioner) VS Sect: Worker Welfare Board & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2735 | 2022 SHC LAR 864 | Const. P. 683/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muneer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer and others (Respondent) | 27-JUL-22 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2736 | 2022 SHC HYD 868 | II.A. 33/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Azhar Ilyas (Appellant) VS Govt Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2737 | 2023 SHC KHI 746 | Const. P. 839/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sarfaraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3038/2023 Ghulam Rasool v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Education Department, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Not Reached (Next Hearing: Week commencing 17-Nov-25) be fixed in top 20 serials (VO) | |
| 2738 | 2022 SHC LAR 60 | Const. P. 712/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Leela Kalpna Devi (Petitioner) VS Secretary Minority Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 02-AUG-22 | Yes | Hindu Panchayat, is not a 'person' in terms of Article 199(5), therefore no writ of Certiorari or Mandamus can be issued against its office holders, in terms of Article 199(1) (a) supra. Hindu Panchayat, has no status of a public body; therefore, Hindu Panchayat is not a person exercising functions in connection with the affairs of Federation / Province and Local Authority in terms of Article 199(1)(a)(i) and (ii) of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2739 | 2023 SHC KHI 14 | Const. P. 2606/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Saiqa Imdad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.733-K/2023 Saiqa Imdad v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned | |
| 2740 | 2022 SHC LAR 114 | Const. P. 196/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst Balqees Khatoon (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Qubo Saeed Khan and others (Respondent) | 04-JUL-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2741 | 2023 SHC KHI 193 | Const. P. 335/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. Muhammad Masood (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2742 | 2022 SHC KHI 351, 2024 PLC (CS) 203 | Const. P. 1607/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani (Petitioner) VS President N.B.P & Ors (Respondent) | 24-MAY-22 | Yes | The legal position of the case is that dispensing with the regular inquiry and awarding two punishments i.e. downgrading and major penalty of dismissal from service, ought not to have been imposed upon the Petitioner at the same time when the charges were denied by the Petitioner. The principle of natural justice demands that the petitioner ought to have been heard on the allegations leveled against him; however, the respondent had chosen not to conduct the regular inquiry and simply relied upon the purported admission of the petitioner which was not called for in the above circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1926/2022 The President, National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi and others v. Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2743 | 2025 SHC KHI 2609, 2023 SBLR Sindh 1995 | Const. P. 3035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Kamran Ali Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-25 | Yes | Despite the Health Department's defense of lacking a legal instrument, and the failure of the Sindh Contract Pay Scale Policy 2022 due to Provincial Assembly dissolution, the petitioners' services were extended under Policy 2022 until 2026 and they have been retained for a long period. Therefore, this contempt application is disposed of in terms that the competent authority must consider the petitioner???s regularization either under the existing policy or the two draft bills, The Sindh Contract Appointment Acts of 2023 (CPS-01 to CPS-05 and CPS-06 to CPS-08), once they are enacted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2744 | 2023 SHC KHI 1109, 2024 PLC (CS) 178 | Const. P. 2901/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Qazi Khalid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.147-K/2023 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others,C.A.40-K/2025 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed | |
| 2745 | 2021 SHC HYD 573, 2022 PLD Sindh 209 | Cr.Rev 1/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Murad @ Mann (Applicant) VS Manzoor Ahmed & Another (Respondent) | 18-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2746 | 2022 SHC HYD 918, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1032 | Const. P. 686/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 1995 | Moule Dino and others (Petitioner) VS Matloob Hussain and others (Respondent) | 14-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1319-K/2022 Matloob Hussain deceased through his LRs: & others v. Moule Dino deceased through his legal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Notice) | |
| 2747 | 2023 SHC KHI 169 | Const. P. 1693/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Amanullah Lakheer (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2748 | 2023 SHC KHI 117 | Const. P. 286/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst. Asharaf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2749 | 2023 SHC KHI 900 | Const. P. 4193/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst. Farzana (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2750 | 2023 SHC KHI 29 | Const. P. 1354/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Nadeem Alam (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2751 | 2023 SHC KHI 459 | Const. P. 366/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-23 | Yes | Be that as it may, it is admitted position that the petitioner is not enrolled as an advocate under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, and/ or a practicing lawyer and has no standing at the bar at all. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2752 | 2022 SHC KHI 571 | Const. P. 4597/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rizwan Tahir & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.765-K/2022 The University of Karachi through its Registrar v. Province of Sindh through the Education Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 2753 | 2023 SHC KHI 351 | Const. P. 3652/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sabir Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2754 | Nil | Criminal Appeal 106/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2018 | Zulfiqar Ali and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 14-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2755 | 2022 SHC KHI 758 | Const. P. 6061/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Azra Parveen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-22 | Yes | up-gradation and promotion issue in NICH | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2756 | 2022 SHC HYD 931 | R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) VS Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent) | 05-DEC-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2757 | 2023 SHC KHI 1005 | Const. P. 1372/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) | 22-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.941/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another,C.A.13/2024 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 2758 | 2022 SHC KHI 781 | Const. P. 1364/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Yasmeen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2759 | 2023 SHC KHI 401, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1184 | Const. P. 4009/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mr. Hamid Saleem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) | 12-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.449-K/2023 Mr. Hamid Saleem v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned | |
| 2760 | 2023 SHC KHI 194 | Const. P. 6122/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) | 06-JUN-23 | Yes | Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3166/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight |
| 2761 | 2023 SHC KHI 899 | Const. P. 6939/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2762 | 2023 SHC KHI 643 | Const. P. 1896/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Jalal uddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2763 | 2023 SHC HYD 1026 | Const. P. 3634/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Abdul Shakoor & another (Respondent) | 22-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2764 | 2023 SHC HYD 991 | R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2013 | Dr Allah Bux Th His LRs (Applicant) VS Ghulam Mustafa and others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2765 | 2023 SHC KHI 756 | Spl.Cr.Bail 38/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | MUSTAFA SIKANDAR S/O MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 14-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2766 | 2023 SHC KHI 132 | Cr.Bail 510/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | MUHAMMAD ABID S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 18-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2767 | 2023 SHC KHI 75 | Cr.Bail 2258/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | SHAIKH GHULAM MURTAZA ADV (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 13-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2768 | 2024 SHC KHI 1134, 2024 PTD 736 | Const. P. 4972/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P Nos. 5173, 5966 & 5626 of 2023 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Shamim Ahmed & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 31-JAN-24 | Yes | No interim relief or provisional release can be granted by this Court when assessment has been made on Valuation Ruling under Section 25A of the Customs Act | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1407/2024 Shamim Ahmed and another v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary (Revenue)/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR House, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned. Early date |
| 2769 | 2024 SHC KHI 1248 | Const. P. 7434/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Sami Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-24 | Yes | it is now well settled that if a person during the pendency of constitutional petition fulfilled the requisite qualification to hold such a post then writ of quo warranto could not be issued against such person as such Employees no more suffered disqualification to hold the post in question. On the aforesaid proposition the Supreme Court in the case of Asif Hussain and others v. Sabir Hussain and others | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2770 | 2024 SHC KHI 645, 2025 PLC (CS) 293 | Const. P. 2701/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Abdul Shakoor Abro... (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-APR-24 | Yes | In this context, it may be observed that the writ jurisdiction of this Court is not meant to be exercised to compel the competent authority to promote a Civil Servant against whom prima facie involvement in serious charges of misconduct was available, for the reason that any such direction would be disharmonious to the principle of good governance and canons of service discipline causing undue interference to hamper the smooth functioning of the departmental authorities. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is a well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2771 | 2024 SHC KHI 232 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 456/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. S.M. Traders (Respondent) | 09-APR-24 | Yes | Import into Export Processing Zones; Section 79 & 32 read with Section 156(1) of the Customs Act, 1969 are applicable | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2772 | 2024 SHC SUK 791 | Const. P. 447/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Haji Abdullah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2773 | 2024 SHC MPK 1116 | Cr.Bail 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Islam (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | The charge under section 377 P.P.C. was converted to one under section 377-A punishable under section 377-B P.P.C. To facilitate reference the two sections are reproduced below: 377-A. Sexual abuse. Whoever employs, uses, forces, persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any person to engage in, or assist any other person to engage in fondling, stroking, caressing, exhibitionism, voyeurism or any obscene or sexually explicit conduct or simulation of such conduct either independently or in conjunction with other acts, with or without consent where age of person is less than eighteen years, is said to commit the offence of sexual abuse. 377-B. Punishment. Whoever commits the offence of sexual abuse shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which [shall not be less than fourteen years and may extend up to twenty years and with fine which shall not be less than one million rupees]. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2774 | 2024 SHC MPK 1135 | Cr.Bail 215/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Inayatullah & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 25-SEP-24 | Yes | Bail before arrest is an extraordinary relief granted only in exceptional cases to protect innocent people from abuse of the law. It is not a substitute for post-arrest bail. The accused must show that their arrest is being sought for ulterior motives by the police to cause them irreparable harm. They must also establish that they have not done anything that would disqualify them from receiving this discretionary relief. The aforesaid ingredients of principles are missing in the present case as the facts obtained in the present case, are tentatively assessed which prima facie show that the alleged offense occurred on June 25, 2024, and was reported the same day. Police recorded witness statements, visited the scene, prepared injury reports, and collected medical evidence as well as empty shells of the crime weapon from the place of the incident. Charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint were filed against them. A medical examination confirmed injuries consistent with charges of Section 337-F (III) of the Pakistan Penal Code as Ghyr-i-Jaifah Mutalahimah. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2775 | 2025 SHC KHI 210 | Const. P. 6390/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Syeda Farhat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-25 | Yes | This court concluded that the complex factual issues, including the subject issues as agitated by the petitioner to declare the subject notices as illegal, should be resolved in a civil/revisional court, where the lis is stated to be pending. Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2776 | 2024 SHC KHI 1050 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 151/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2013 | Bawany Metals Ltd. (Applicant) VS Additional Collector of Customs (Respondent) | 08-MAY-24 | Yes | Exemption on import of copper cathode and Aluminium Ingots under SRO 565(I)/2006 | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2777 | 2024 SHC SUK 1068 | Const. P. 174/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Bashir Ahmed Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2778 | 2024 SHC SUK 629 | Const. P. 604/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Barkat (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2779 | 2024 SHC KHI 1100 | Const. P. 5370/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abid Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-24 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Khalid v. National Accountability Bureau (2017 SCMR 1340) has provided certain guidelines which need to be adhered to by the F.I.A. while probing the cases against the Housing Societies. 6. This Court, while exercising discretionary power under Article 199, of the Constitution is not an appellate court. Especially when alternative remedies exist under specific statutes and rules, and when the Court???s discretionary powers remain unaffected. However, in the present case question is whether F.I.A. has jurisdiction in Provincial employee cases in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of F.I.A. Vs Syed Hamid Ali Shah | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.5367/2024 Abid Khan and others v. The Federation of Pakistan through its Interior Secretary, Ministry of Interior Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2780 | 2024 SHC SUK 52 | Const. P. 1623/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Tarique Ali Kori (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2781 | 2024 SHC SUK 465 | Const. P. 817/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Nisar Ahmed malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2782 | 2024 SHC SUK 1112 | Const. P. 1760/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Hunain Raz Ansari (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.723-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Hunain Raza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2783 | 2024 SHC SUK 1207, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1436 | Const. P. 1556/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Gulshan Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2784 | 2024 SHC SUK 811 | Const. P. 1423/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Rashid Ahmed Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.766-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Irrigation Department and others v. Rashid Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2785 | 2024 SHC KHI 1133 | Criminal Appeal 471/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | The State/ANF through Assistant Director (Law) (Appellant) VS Sheikh Kaiser Waheed & another (Respondent) | 05-DEC-24 | Yes | Coming to the rule position of the case, Rule 22.16 of the Police Rules, 1934, outlines the procedures for handling case property, Police must seize relevant items and mark them with details of the case and the person from whom they were seized. Seized items must be stored securely until further legal action. Items connected with cases sent for trial or suspicious/unclaimed items ordered by a Magistrate must be submitted to headquarters or outposts. Detained material must be presented to a Magistrate for early disposal or release on security. The Police Rules require that case property be stored in the Malkhana and recorded in Register No. XIX. The police and prosecution are responsible for ensuring the safe custody of the property, including its secure transportation to laboratories for analysis. This procedure guarantees the integrity of the case property until it is presented in court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2786 | 2024 SHC SUK 605 | Const. P. 1379/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Afaq Ahmed Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.765-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education Department and others v. Affaq Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2787 | 2024 SHC SUK 1450 | Const. P. 608/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hussain BUx Dashti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2788 | 2024 SHC SUK 742 | Const. P. 403/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Gul Sher Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2789 | 2024 SHC SUK 170 | Const. P. 352/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Majida BIbi & another (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ramzan & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2790 | 2024 SHC SUK 840 | Criminal Miscelleneous 66/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2024 | Nauman Tarique (Appellant) VS The State & others (Respondent) | 10-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2791 | 2024 SHC SUK 546 | Const. P. 1592/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Nooruddin Baloch (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2792 | 2024 SHC SUK 547 | Const. P. 424/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Sattar & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2793 | 2024 SHC SUK 566, 2025 PLC (CS) 547 | Const. P. 1689/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zeeshan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2794 | 2024 SHC SUK 712 | Const. P. 1826/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shoaib Ahmed Mangi (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2795 | 2024 SHC KHI 424 | Cr.Bail 2483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD FAROOQ S/O ADUL WAHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 05-DEC-24 | Yes | Bail can be denied in cases involving fraud, forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy if the prosecution can establish a strong prima facie case against the accused. In the present case, the learned counsel for the applicant has been unable to explain why the applicant has been a beneficiary of Rs. 2200,000/- credited into his account No. 1286-0221929371001739 from the account of his brother Abdul Latif Sheikh (co-accused). The learned counsel although submitted the said payment was the internal transaction between two brothers i.e. Abdul Latif and the applicant, yet remained unable to explain the nature of the said transaction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2796 | 2024 SHC SUK 1086 | Const. P. 149/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sabit Ali Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author) | C.P.L.A.769-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Sabit Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2797 | 2024 SHC SUK 515 | Const. P. 419/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Kashmir Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2798 | 2024 SHC SUK 440 | Const. P. 426/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mehrab (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2799 | 2024 SHC SUK 230 | Const. P. 1056/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Adnan Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.741-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Adnan Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2800 | 2024 SHC SUK 921 | Const. P. 299/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sabir Hussain Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2801 | 2024 SHC SUK 697 | Const. P. 754/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shahrukh Dayo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2802 | 2024 SHC KHI 1046 | Cr.Bail 909/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SYED FURQAN ALI S/O SYED ASHFAQ ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 02-JUL-24 | Yes | To prove the charge against an accused under Section 489-F. P.P.C. all the ingredients of section 489-F, P.P.C. must be proved through cogent evidence and beyond any shadow of a doubt, however, in this case, the complainant claims that he made a Marketing business transaction with the applicant and the applicant issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.15000,000/- and in this regard, and the applicant has pleaded that the subject cheques were issued as a security amount in a business transaction which was not for the encashment as such he made an attempt to stop the payment but the Bank refused to entertain his request due to insufficient funds which are wrong notion on the part of Bank, however this aspect of the case is to be determined by the trial Court under what circumstances, the cheque (s) was/were issued and what was the intention of the person, issuing it. 7. Prima facie, the mere issuance of a cheque(s) and its being dishonored by itself is not an offense, unless and until dishonesty on the part of a payer is proved. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2803 | 2024 SHC SUK 1448 | Const. P. 965/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Naimatullah Jumani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2804 | 2024 SHC SUK 766 | Const. P. 1678/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sajida Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2805 | 2024 SHC SUK 888 | Const. P. 485/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Niaz Hussain Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2806 | 2024 SHC SUK 807 | Const. P. 576/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mohammad Liaqat Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2807 | 2024 SHC SUK 181 | R.A (Civil Revision) 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst, Salma Parveen and Others (Applicant) VS Mohammad Aslam and Othrs (Respondent) | 27-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2808 | 2024 SHC SUK 390 | Const. P. 69/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sajid Ali Phalia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2809 | 2025 SHC KHI 357 | Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Hafeezullah (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-25 | Yes | It is well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Sayyid A.S. Pirzada v. The Chief Secretary, Services and Administration Department, etc (2023 SCMR 1087). 7. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner can approach the Sindh Service Tribunal against the impugned order dated 05.1.2024 and it is for the learned Sindh Service Tribunal to take decision in terms of law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Sayyid A.S. Pirzada (supra). 8. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2810 | 2024 SHC SUK 193 | Const. P. 803/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Uzair & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2811 | 2024 SHC SUK 604 | Const. P. 628/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.114-K/2024 The Province of Sindh through Secretary Works & Services and others v. Muhammad Bachal,C.P.L.A.663-K/2024 The Province of Sindh through Secretary Works & Services and others v. Muhammad Bachal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 2812 | 2024 SHC SUK 1218 | Const. P. 536/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Dhani BUx (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2813 | 2024 SHC SUK 208 | Const. P. 538/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Douro Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2814 | 2024 SHC SUK 773 | Const. P. 48/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Asadullah jamro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2815 | 2024 SHC SUK 23 | Const. P. 70/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Kishwar Kumar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2816 | 2024 SHC SUK 1139 | Const. P. 483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Nabi Bux JIskani & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2817 | 2024 SHC SUK 846 | Const. P. 816/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khadim Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2818 | 2024 SHC SUK 780 | Const. P. 497/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hafeezullah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2819 | 2024 SHC SUK 863 | Const. P. 567/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Nawaz & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2820 | 2024 SHC SUK 679 | Const. P. 613/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Maqsood Ahmed Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2821 | 2024 SHC MPK 282 | Criminal Miscelleneous 530/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Babar Ali (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | It is evident from the contents of application under sections 22-A & B Cr.P.C filed by respondent Akbar Ali and FIR No.106/2024 lodged by applicant Babar Ali in respect of same incident, that it is a case of free fight between both the parties and both of them received injuries at the hands of each other; therefore, as per dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in its landmark judgment in the case of Mst. Sughran Bibi Vs. The Stte [PLD 2018 SC 595], the second FIR of the same incident was/is unwarranted. In a recent unreported case of Munawar Alam Khan Vs. Qurban Ali Malano & others [Criminal Petition No.31-K of 2022] decided on 08-04-2024, the Supreme Court while dealing with similar matter, discussed the proposition qua lodging second FIR of the same incident. The relevant portion reads as under:- 6. A common culture prevailing with our society and often chosen by the legal fraternity is to settle the disputes by converting them into criminal prosecution against each other which, in our candid view, is apparent on the record owing to the reason that there are other cases running in Court inter se the parties. After having received kicks and fists blows at the hands of the respondents, the petitioner has remained successful in seeking a direction for lodging an FIR from the trial Court, whereas FIR bearing No.98 of 2019 was also lodged against the petitioner in a similar context by some Advocates of accused/respondents' group. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2822 | 2024 SHC MPK 684 | Criminal Miscelleneous 358/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Arbab Ibrahim Rahimoon (Applicant) VS SSP Umerkot & Others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel states that the applicant may be permitted to file a private complaint in terms of section 200 Cr.P.C before the learned Magistrate concerned so far as the allegation of the applicant is concerned, which shall be dealt with by learned Magistrate after recording his statement on oath. If this is the position of the case, let the Magistrate concerned entertain the private complaint of the applicant and the same shall be decided within reasonable time in accordance with law. 6. In view of the above, instant Criminal Miscellaneous application stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2823 | 2024 SHC SUK 1229 | Const. P. 1591/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Siraj Ahmed Dharejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.755-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Health and others v. Siraj Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2824 | 2024 SHC SUK 407 | Const. P. 383/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Azam Abro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2825 | 2024 SHC KHI 504 | Cr.Bail 890/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | HABIBULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | There is another aspect of the case the applicant claims to be a juvenile born on 01.01.2009 and is about 15 years old as per his birth certificate duly issued by the NADRA, such certificate is available in the police file/ file of this Court (page 39) in such a scenario, again the Supreme Court in the case of Khawar Kayani Vs. The State (PLD 2022 SC 551) has come to rescue the person incarcerated in jail by interpreting Section 6(5) of the Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018. The question of whether the case of the applicant, being a child as disclosed by the investigating officer in the charge sheet, falls within the exception contained in section 83 P.P.C., for ease of reference, is hereby reproduced infra:- ???Act of a child above [ten] and under [fourteen] of immature understanding.- Nothing is an offense which is done by a child above [ten] years of age and under [fourteen], who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion.??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2826 | 2024 SHC KHI 749 | Criminal Appeal 815/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | THE STATE / ANF (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD JAVEED (Respondent) | 05-DEC-24 | Yes | The prosecution wanted to summon PW HC Muhammad Naeem Moharrar of Malkhana In-charge to re-examine him about handing over the sample parcel to the parcel witness. The trial court denied the request, on the premise that he was already examined on oath and his cross-examination had been conducted and now the prosecution wants to fill the lacuna. The reasoning of the learned trial court is justiciable for the simple reason that PW 4 Muhammad Naeem had already been examined by the trial court on 14.11.2024, in which he deposed clearly and produced certain documents and he was cross-examined by the defense. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2827 | 2024 SHC SUK 120 | Const. P. 2142/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Gulsher s/o Allah Rakhio Kharos (Petitioner) VS The State & an Other (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2828 | 2024 SHC SUK 1373 | Cr.Rev 38/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muzaffar Ali Soomro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 27-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2829 | 2024 SHC SUK 416 | Const. P. 534/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Awal Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2830 | 2024 SHC SUK 1045 | Const. P. 32/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Umair Qazi & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2831 | 2024 SHC SUK 1165 | Const. P. 315/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst Sadaf Naz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2832 | 2024 SHC MPK 973 | Cr.Bail 201/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Akber @Akber Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 01-OCT-24 | Yes | Primarily, this is a landed dispute between two real brothers. The case has been challaned and the applicant is no more required for further investigation, but no progress has been made before the trial Court. The applicant attends the trial Court regularly. The learned counsel for the applicant claimed that the witnesses are not attending the court. The learned counsel for the complainant has failed to plead that after granting pre-arrest bail, the applicant has made any attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence or misuse the concession of bail. In the case of Nadeem v. The State (2016 SCMR 1619); wherein the Supreme Court of Pakistan has held that: ??????3 In the absence of any evidence that the petitioner had tried to misuse the concession of bail or attempted to tamper with the prosecution evidence, it was not open for the learned High Court to recall the bail already granted to the petitioner. The learned Additional Prosecutor General has also confirmed that challan has already been submitted in the trial Court.??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2833 | 2024 SHC KHI 161 | Cr.Bail 1171/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Khan S/o Abdul Majeed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-JUL-24 | Yes | From the tentative assessment of the evidence in the hand of the prosecution, it appears that there is hearsay evidence against the present applicant/accused. Nonetheless, the truth or otherwise of charges leveled against the accused could only be determined after the trial after taking into consideration the evidence adduced by both parties. It may be observed that the offense alleged against the applicant/accused falls outside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. In such like case grant of bail is a rule and refusal is an exception. Reliance in this regard can be placed on the cases of Tariq Bashir and others v. The State [PLD 1995 SC 34] and Mohammed Tanveer v. the State [PLD 2017 Supreme Court 733]. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2834 | 2024 SHC SUK 162 | Const. P. 800/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Talib Hussain Sahito (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2835 | 2024 SHC SUK 1213 | Const. P. 600/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Asif Ali Bambhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2836 | 2024 SHC SUK 345, 2024 PLC (CS) 1186 | Const. P. 193/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2837 | 2026 SHC KHI 223 | Const. P. 1976/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Majlis-Tib-Wa-Adab Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Sect: Auqaf and Others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, as the petitioner has failed to establish a lawful, subsisting right in the property, and the alleged allotment appears prima facie without jurisdiction and contrary to the public purpose attached to the land, the petition is devoid of merit. 9. Consequently, the petition along with pending application(s) stands dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2838 | 2024 SHC SUK 1333 | Const. P. 849/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Eidan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2839 | 2024 SHC SUK 279 | Const. P. 978/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Naeem Qudrat & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 25-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2840 | 2024 SHC SUK 1418 | Const. P. 1671/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mumtaz Ali Jalbani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2841 | 2024 SHC KHI 1467 | Const. P. 6135/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-APR-24 | Yes | Nomination in FIR; quashment or compromise; disentitled for fresh appointment in Police Department | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2842 | 2024 SHC SUK 598 | Const. P. 987/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mir Hassan Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2843 | 2024 SHC SUK 1189 | Const. P. 479/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shahnawaz Khand & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2844 | 2025 SHC KHI 392 | Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Rehan Pervez (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 31-JAN-25 | Yes | It is well settled now that unexcused absence from duty is misconduct. This court cannot offer relief simply because the absence was brief or otherwise. Interpreting absence from duty as potentially extending to a certain period, improperly rewrites the law on the subject issue, effectively changing the threshold for misconduct. This is an incorrect interpretation. 13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is established and the employee is found guilty after due process of law, it is the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the various penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct is not adequate but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful manner. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2845 | 2025 SHC SUK 546 | Const. P. 750/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sohail Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 2846 | 2025 SHC KHI 552 | Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Saifullah Jamali (Disable) (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to the disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will take care of all the aspects of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties. The proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to. In the meantime police shall remain neutral in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall take prompt action against them under law. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2847 | 2025 SHC KHI 287 | Const. P. 138/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Zeeshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 17-APR-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2848 | 2025 SHC KHI 614 | Const. P. 2616/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Gulsher Siyal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-APR-25 | Yes | CSR Article 420 states that a break in an officer's service typically forfeits their previous service, except in these situations: (a) Approved leave. (b) Unauthorized absence directly following approved leave, as long as their position isn't permanently filled. If it is, the prior service is lost. (c) Suspension is immediately followed by reinstatement (in the same or a different role), or if the officer dies, retires, or is retired while suspended. (d) Abolition of their position or job loss due to staff reduction. (e) Transfer by a competent authority to non-pensionable service within government control (voluntary resignation from pensionable service forfeits this). Transferring to a grant-in-aid school also leads to forfeiture. (f) Transfer to the President's household staff. (g) Time spent traveling between appointments when transferred by a competent authority or, for non-gazetted officers, with their previous head of office's consent. (h) Any other reason provided the break wasn't due to the government servant's fault or intentional action (like unauthorized absence, resignation, or removal). Besides CSR Regulation 423 provides automatic relaxation of six months in case of short service, if he or she, is entitled for pensionary benefits as such the question of latches are of no significance at this stage as the petitioner is requesting for continuation of his past service in different government departments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2849 | 2025 SHC KHI 556 | Const. P. 6400/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Safia Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | In conclusion, while the petitioner has acquired educational qualifications that might make her eligible to apply for a teaching position, it is unlikely that there exists a direct promotion rule that allows a Lab Attendant to automatically be promoted to a High School Teacher. Her best course of action would be to look out for and apply to relevant teaching vacancies advertised by the Sindh government, provided she meets the stipulated criteria for those posts. 7. This petition stands dismissed with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2850 | 2025 SHC KHI 250 | Const. P. 6595/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ms. Khizra Saeed (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | The regularization of contractual employees through writ jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is contingent upon its permissibility under existing law and a universally applicable policy decision, provided the organization in question falls under the High Court's writ jurisdiction. This principle was also upheld by the Supreme Court in the case of Faraz Ahmed vs. Federation of Pakistan (2022 SCMR 1680). The Supreme Court specifically established that contractual employees do not possess an inherent right to regularization. However, their regularization may be considered based on their fitness, suitability, and the relevant laws, rules, and regulations of their respective department. An automatic right to regularization does not exist unless explicitly provided by law, and employees seeking it must demonstrate a statutory basis for their claim; otherwise, relief cannot be granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2851 | 2025 SHC KHI 277 | Const. P. 1979/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Abdul Razzak Memon (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 23-APR-25 | Yes | At first glance, the previously reached settlement between the parties cannot be revisited now. However, the court order dated December 8, 2011, and the terms of their compromise agreement, which has become final, must be strictly followed. Therefore, attempting to appoint the Petitioner to a new category is unwarranted. As the Petitioner, formerly a Labour Inspector (Shops & Establishment) Zone 'C' Hyderabad, was relieved from his duties specifically to join the National Bank of Pakistan under this compromise (endorsed by this Court on December 8, 2011 in Constitutional Petition No. D-106/2010), as such his prior service must be taken into account for pension, pay determination, and other employment benefits in terms of Civil Service Regulation (CSR) Article 371-A(i) as well as in terms of compromise application. on the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the cases of Nafees Ahmad V/S Government of Pakistan and others, 2000 SCMR 1864, Ch. Muhammad Azim V/S The Chief Engineer, Irrigation and others, 1991 SCMR 255, Chairman, Central Board of Revenue and others V/S Nawab Khan and others, 2010 SCMR 1399. And the case is reported as (2021 SCMR 1546). Besides, this protection is also provided under Fundamental Rule 22-A. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2852 | 2025 SHC KHI 1032 | Const. P. 1802/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghulam Hussain Khokhar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | In Registrar, Supreme Court of Pakistan v. Qazi Wali Muhammad (1997 SCMR 141), the Supreme Court reiterated its stance from Government of Punjab v. Mubarik Ali Khan (PLD 1993 SC 375). In Mubarik Ali Khan, case the Court held that High Court employees are not civil servants under the Civil Servants Act because the legislature has no role in determining their terms and conditions, ensuring judicial independence as per the Constitution. The Court in Qazi Wali Muhammad noted this exclusion. Applying this analogy, the Sindh High Court suggests treating High Court establishment employees and the Advocate General's Office employees similarly in terms of their connection to the administration of justice. While Advocate General's Office employees are civil servants (the office being constitutional under Article 140), their function is to assist the High Court. However, this view is tentative, based on the Sindh High Court's earlier decision in Amanullah Khan Yousufzai (allowing judicial allowance to the Advocate General's Office). The Sindh High Court has not differentiated between these two sets of employees while granting the simmiler relief, unless the Supreme Court overturns the Amanullah Khan Yousufzai decision. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3355/2025 The Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and others v. Ghulam Hussain Khokhar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2853 | 2025 SHC KHI 1057 | Const. P. 6407/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Amber Iqbal (Petitioner) VS The Registrar, High Court of SINdh & Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAY-25 | Yes | For judicial positions specifically, a clean record and thorough background checks are crucial. While a conviction for a serious offense would disqualify a candidate, mere unproven involvement in an issue might not automatically lead to the rejection of their application. 11. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, and without commenting on the legal validity of the order dated February 13, 2017, this petition is disposed of with the understanding that the petitioner is free to apply for future appointments or employment, provided she possesses the genuine academic qualifications required for any such future position. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2854 | 2025 SHC KHI 315 | Const. P. 198/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Khalid Sheikh S/o Muhammad Yousuf Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | Admittedly, this is the case of harassment at hands of police in connivance with private respondents. The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all ensure law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2855 | 2025 SHC KHI 1038 | Const. P. 7657/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Irshad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that promotion is not an inherent right of a civil or public servant, and therefore, cannot be demanded as such. However, in this specific instance, the petitioner was initially appointed as a Superintendent, Communication BS-16 in the Solid Waste Management Board (SWMB) of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) in 1991. Subsequently, his position was re-designated as Assistant Executive Engineer BS-17 following his B.Tech (Hons) qualification, as per an order dated March 8, 2023. Nevertheless, the petitioner's promotion prospects are contingent upon the legal precedent established in the case of Moula Bux Shaikh (2018 SCMR 2098), and a similar matter is currently under consideration by the Supreme Court. Consequently, this Court cannot examine the petitioner's eligibility for promotion to BS-18 based on his B.Tech degree, as the Supreme Court has already provided a definitive ruling on this matter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2856 | 2025 SHC KHI 1060 | Const. P. 6833/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Qadir Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-25 | Yes | Both Fida Hussain v. The Secretary, Kashmir Affairs and Northern Affairs Division, Islamabad (PLD 1995 SC 701) and Maula Bux Shaikh case, supra, confirmed the government's authority to decide promotion qualification sufficiency. However, key questions remain: Can a promotion policy violating the PEC Act or other laws (potentially leading to criminal liability) be valid? And does preventing an Executive Engineer (BS-18) from performing their professional duties create discriminatory classes within the same cadre, violating Article 25 of the Constitution? The issue of whether a promotion policy violates the PEC Act or creates discriminatory classes within the same cadre is valid is currently pending adjudication before the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Abbas Soomro vs The Province of Sindh, etc. (Civil Appeal No. 84-K of 2023). 11. Given the pending Supreme Court case (Ghulam Abbas Soomro), this petition is disposed of based on the existing Supreme Court dicta. The respondent department will revive the petitioners' case if the Ghulam Abbas Soomro decision warrants it, subject to the eligibility of the petitioners under the recruitment rules for proforma promotion to the next rank. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.887-K/2025 Abdul Qadir Shaikh and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Notice |
| 2857 | 2025 SHC KHI 1071 | Const. P. 4517/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Komal Jan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-25 | Yes | After extensive arguments, both sides reached a consensus to resolve the case with the understanding that Dr. Komal Jan's prior service at Bibi Aseefa Dental College, Larkana, commencing on December 1, 2016, and her subsequent transfer to DUHS on February 7, 2019, as a Lecturer BPS-18, will be taken into account when calculating her pension benefits after her retirement from service. Finding this proposal fair and consistent with the Civil Services Regulations, this court accepts it. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of according to the terms outlined above. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2858 | 2025 SHC KHI 1045 | Const. P. 3583/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ch: Muhammad Shafiq Ashgar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 06-MAY-25 | Yes | Determining the accurate amount of interest on the provident fund, claimed by the petitioners to be between PKR 4,000,000 and 4,500,000, necessitates the recording of evidence, a process that falls under the purview of a court with ordinary jurisdiction. 7. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, we see no valid reason to continue with this petition. It is therefore dismissed, along with all pending applications. The petitioners are at liberty to pursue their claims for outstanding dues through a competent court of law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2859 | 2025 SHC KHI 1054 | Const. P. 2636/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | P.N.S.C. (Petitioner) VS FEd of Pakistan & Orsd (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court in Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited vs. President of Pakistan (2020 SCMR 242) followed its precedent set in Peshawar Electric Supply Company Ltd. v. Wafaqi Mohtasib, supra. Quoting the PESCO case, the Court reiterated that the Wafaqi Mohtasib lacks jurisdiction under Article 9 of The Order, 1983, to entertain complaints regarding appointments or recommend appointments by relaxing age limits in public sector companies, as these are executive functions. Consequently, the Supreme Court in the Sui Northern case held that the Wafaqi Mohtasib did not have jurisdiction to hear Respondent No.3's case against the Petitioner Company, and the Lahore High Court erred in dismissing the Writ Petition. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2860 | 2025 SHC KHI 324 | Const. P. 5029/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Abdul Sattar Niazi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | It appears that much water has flown under the bridge since 2015 when the captioned petitions were filed to claim implementation of the order dated 15.04.2012 passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-215 of 2012. Without touching the merits of the cases, these petitions can be resolved by directing the respondent department to look into the issue involved in the petition if the petitioners??? cause still subsists. In the meanwhile, the respondents are mandated to advertise all job vacancies that have not been previously advertised. This would ensure that all eligible individuals have the opportunity to compete for these positions if vacant based purely on merit through a competitive process. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2861 | 2025 SHC KHI 385 | Const. P. 1344/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Altaf Hussain Awan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | Coming to the main case, the concept of Proforma Promotion is to remedy the loss sustained by an employee / civil servant on account of denial of promotion upon his/her legitimate turn due to any reason but not a fault of his own. 15. To appreciate the controversy from a proper perspective, we think it appropriate to have a glance at Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2862 | 2025 SHC KHI 197 | Const. P. 4604/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nazar Muhammad Gad (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 23-APR-25 | Yes | With the petitioner's subsequent retirement, the challenged action has become ineffective. Therefore, this petition needs to be disposed of with the understanding that the petitioner's deferment is no longer applicable, and he is entitled to proforma promotion in line with promotions granted to his juniors, as per Rule 13 of The Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation, and Seniority) Rules, 1975. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2863 | 2025 SHC KHI 220 | Const. P. 1231/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Nizar Ali Fazwani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 26-MAR-25 | Yes | Coming to the case in hand, it appears that the Ayyan Ali case supra establishes that mere criminal involvement does not justify ECL placement, which confirms that citizens have a fundamental right to liberty under Article 9, which, combined with Articles 4 and 15, includes the right to travel, unless restricted by a law enacted in the public interest. Numerous judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name on the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2864 | 2025 SHC KHI 2120 | Const. P. 5366/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Hamza Faheem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | The Constitution petition is not maintainable against the service matters of Pakistan's Armed Forces due to the constitutional bar in Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, which prevents High Courts from issuing orders regarding the terms and conditions of service or actions taken in relation to Armed Forces members. This constitutional provision aims to maintain discipline within the forces by restricting judicial interference in their internal affairs. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ex. Lt. Col. Anwar Aziz (PA-7122) vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2001 SC549). We, therefore, in the absence of the exceptions as enunciated in the case law cited above, cannot travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the instant case and interfere with any Order passed under the hierarchy of Respondents, pursuant to their applicable laws. However, if the appeal of the petitioner is pending, the same shall be decided within three months after hearing the petitioner. 6. In the light of the foregoing, we are of the view that the case of petitioner squarely falls within the ambit of the ouster clause of Article 199(3) of the Constitution, therefore, there is a bar of jurisdiction of this Court from entertaining the instant Constitutional Petition, which is accordingly dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 2865 | 2025 SHC KHI 1736 | Const. P. 3073/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Misbah Tunio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-MAY-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the National Bank of Pakistan case 2024 PLC (CS) 276 ruled that granting pro forma promotion after retirement, especially when the initial supersession was not challenged promptly, lacks legal basis under the relevant service rules. The Supreme Court found the High Court's intervention unsustainable, as the retired employee had already received all due benefits. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. 11. The petition is dismissed. Following the Supreme Court's decision in the National Bank of Pakistan case, supra, reopening this matter after the petitioner's 2022 retirement is not permissible. Furthermore, the petitioner failed to diligently pursue the case before the deletion of Fundamental Rule 17 in 2021 and did not obtain an order to keep the position vacant while the petition remained pending since 2020. Therefore, this issue is now closed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1011-K/2025 Muhammad Misbah Tunio v. Federation of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 2866 | 2025 SHC KHI 1769 | Const. P. 5276/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zeeshan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-JUN-25 | Yes | The application of the law applied by the respondents while scrutinizing the case of the petitioner is correct appreciation of law and supported by both regularization policy and existing legal precedents, rendering the decision of scrutiny committee valid and sustainable as the presen issue of qualification to hold BS-17 post rest with Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC), which has also been raised as this Court cannot change the contractual terms by allowing the petitioner to continue with his contractual post after expiry of the period. On the aforesaid proposition we are supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa v. Sher Aman (2022 SCMR 406). 7. In view of the above facts and circumstances we do not see any reason to entertain this petition as it is badly hit by laches; whereas, no case for exercising our discretion has been made out; hence the Petition, being misconceived and hit by laches, is hereby dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.984-K/2025 Zeeshan Ahmed v. Province of Sindh & Others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2867 | 2025 SHC HYD 1936 | Const. P. 2414/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Naimatullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 09-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2868 | 2025 SHC KHI 1535 | Const. P. 3847/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Allah Warayo Junejo (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-25 | Yes | Given that the Pakistan Post Office Department (PPOD), seemingly lacked the authority to change job nomenclatures, a power reserved for the Establishment Division; and considering the Assistant Attorney General's (AAG) acknowledgment of the 2007 up-gradation of relevant posts from BS-11 to BS-14, coupled with the Controller General of Accounts' (CGA), reclassification of Accounts Clerks as Auditors (BS-16) effective April 3, 2010, and referencing the CGA Ordinance 2001 and the Prime Minister's approval concerning the accounts cadre's administrative control. This matter is remitted to the Secretary, Establishment Division, for a decision on the subject issue within three months, ensuring no discrimination. A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the Secretary, Establishment Division, for immediate and timely compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2869 | 2025 SHC KHI 1652, 2025 SHC KHI 1677, 2025 SHC KHI 1678 | Const. P. 5021/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst. Khoban Jan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-25 | Yes | The respondents' counter-prayer indicates that most of the petitioner's grievances have been addressed, and the remaining amounts in shape of lump-sum grant cash payment in lieu of plot and Marriage Grant are "under process" and will be paid upon receiving cash release/authorization. If this is the position of the case, let the same be processed within three months and be disbursed to the petitioner???s widow as per her eligibility. 8. This petition stand disposed of in terms of comments filed by Superintendent of Pakistan Railways. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2870 | 2025 SHC KHI 1424 | Const. P. 5884/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Jadam Gaju and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-25 | Yes | It is well settled that while Article 199 allows High Court review of Cabinet decisions for reasons like lack of authority, constitutional violation, or bad faith, however, none of these apply here, as the petitioners have adequately been compensated by the decision of the Cabinet and this Court, does not see any reasonable justification to turn down the decision of the Cabinet approving the four-tier formula, therefore, the petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed because the Cabinet of Sindh has already provided sufficient relief through the four-tier formula, and the matter may not be prolonged further. 7. This petition is dismissed accordingly with the pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2871 | 2025 SHC KHI 2064 | Const. P. 183/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Saddam Hussain Khoso (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-AUG-25 | Yes | In the case of Muhammad Israrullah Vs Assistant Director, Manpower and others (2005 SCMR 716), the Supreme Court has held that the services of a deputationist could not be terminated as he retains his lien in the parent department for not having been confirmed in the borrowing department. A civil servant can claim his lien on his original post when he has not been permanently absorbed in the borrowing department. The Supreme Court in the case of Chief Secretary, Government of NWFP Vs Syed Zafarmand Ali (2005 SCMR 1212) has expounded that lien of a civil servant could not be terminated even with his consent, unless he had been confirmed against some other permanent post. It is further held that even in a case of willingness shown by the civil servant to be absorbed in borrowing department, in absence of any order of appointment by transfer and settlement of terms and conditions of such appointment, lien of the civil servant in his parent department would not be terminated. 8. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid judgments of the Supreme Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2872 | 2025 SHC KHI 1426 | Const. P. 5649/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Asif Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional rights. The concept of institutional autonomy, essential for effective decision-making, supports non-interference in policy matters. This autonomy is vital for public institutions to safeguard public interest and promote democratic values, including academic freedom. 10. This Court has determined that The petitioners cannot ask for regularization of their service through constitutional petitions under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, it is for the respondent???s competent authority to consider their case in terms of their policy, if any, without discrimination within reasonable time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2873 | 2025 SHC KHI 1415 | Const. P. 3100/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Nusrat and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the case of Nazeer Ahmed Chkrani v Government of Pakistan (2004 SCMR 623), reiterating the principle from Pakistan International Airlines v Nasir Jamal Malik (2001 SCMR 934), established that a promoted employee cannot be demoted without being given a chance to be heard and present their case. In the Nazeer Ahmed Chkrani case, the petitioner was promoted to General Manager in 1995 and then demoted to Deputy General Manager in 1997 without any prior explanation sought regarding the circumstances of their promotion or their capability to hold the higher post. The demotion order also lacked any stated reasons for the Competent Authority's opinion that the promotion was wrongful. The Supreme Court, without delving into the merits of the case, held that the demotion violated the principles of natural justice ("no one should be condemned unheard"). Consequently, the petition was converted into an appeal and allowed, setting aside the Federal Service Tribunal's order and the departmental demotion order. The Supreme Court clarified that the Pakistan State Oil Company Limited remains free to initiate fresh action against the petitioner, provided they follow the correct legal procedure, and no order regarding costs was issued. In recent judgment of 2022, the Supreme Court has ruled that no decision be taken effacing the right of any person without first being informed of the case and affording an ample opportunity of defense, therefore judicial propriety demand that this matter needs to be taken care of by the competitive authority of respondents before taking adverse view until and unless there is strict compliance of the Supreme Court decisions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2874 | 2025 SHC KHI 2012 | Const. P. 2083/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Allan Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-25 | Yes | The transfers and postings are administrative matters and do not violate civil servants' fundamental rights. Supreme Court precedents on the subject issue are clear as such this Court affirmed that civil servants have no legal right to a specific posting. Transfer orders are an administrative prerogative of the competent authority, intended to ensure the smooth functioning of the department. These orders can only be challenged if they are issued for "extraneous reasons" or violate statutory rules, neither of which is proven in this case as the reasons are obvious as pointed out and discussed supra, as such this Court cannot intervene. Besides, the petitioner's transfer after a few months is not considered excessive. 11. The petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or malice in the transfer order, and therefore, this petition lacks merit, which is accordingly dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2875 | 2025 SHC KHI 1579 | Const. P. 3230/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Kamran Zakria and Others (Petitioner) VS Executive Director HEC & Others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-25 | Yes | The court found the HEC's proposal reasonable and, direct the competent authority at HEC to resolve the subject issue at their end first within three months, in accordance with the law, after hearing the petitioners. 6. The petition is now disposed of under these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2876 | 2025 SHC KHI 1534 | Const. P. 1257/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Bashir Bughio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-MAY-25 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the cancellation of the individual's promotions without proper, separate notices was/is unlawful. However, in the present case, the reasons provided for this cancellation, after the promotions' implementation with effect from 2018 with benefits, are vague and lack a legal basis. The claim that the Senate of the respondent university necessitated the recall of the promotion order of the petitioner contradicts the decision of the Court in the reinstatement of the former VC, as pointed out by the parties. The respondents failed to provide justifiable and lawful reasons for reconsidering and cancelling the petitioners' promotions already granted vide Notification dated, acting unilaterally without adhering to legal procedures. It is well-settled law that altering vested rights, including promotions, requires granting the affected parties a meaningful hearing, which the learned counsel conceded was not provided. In our view that separate proceedings ought to have been initiated before recalling the promotion order. Furthermore, legal precedents, including PLD 1992 SC 207, 2007 PLC (C.S) 364 and Capital Development Authority case 2022 SCMR 627, suggest that such a recall may not be permissible. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2877 | 2025 SHC KHI 1998 | Const. P. 5859/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Liaqat Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-AUG-25 | Yes | The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is limited to the extent of ensuring that state functionaries do what they are required by law to do and refrain from doing what they are prohibited by law to do. Unless an act or omission of a state functionary falls within the above parameters, it is not liable to be interfered with. 8. We are of the view that all its directives were followed when the petitioner accepted the regularization. This court finds no violation of fundamental right of the petitioner that would justify its intervention through constitutional jurisdiction. The petition appears to have been filed with ulterior motives and is therefore dismissed, along with all pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2878 | 2025 SHC KHI 2421 | Const. P. 436/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Allah Wadhio & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-SEP-25 | Yes | Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974, allows for the promotion of civil servants even after they retire, provided the promotion was recommended by a committee while they were still in service. The rule states that a promotion can be approved from the date of the recommendation, and the retired officer does not need to take charge of the new post officially. The petitioners??? case does not fall under this provision because the petitioners were promoted from BPS-07 to BPS-16 on March 29, 2022. However, they had all retired in 2020, before the promotion committee met on January 31, 2022. As a result of their retirement, they were not considered for a further promotion to BPS-17, which 20 years of service as Senior livestock Assistant was/is required for the promotion 8. We, for the aforesaid reasons, dismiss this constitutional petition along with pending application(s). Judge | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2879 | 2025 SHC KHI 2425 | Const. P. 7346/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Sanaullah Manzoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 09-SEP-25 | Yes | Petitioner seeks employment in a Government department based on a deceased quota/son quota. The Supreme Court has already declared the same to be unlawful vide judgment dated 26.9.2024 in the case of General Post Office Islamabad v. Muhammad Jalal (PLD 2024 SC 1276). Besides, the petitioner failed to accept the offer for the Chowkidar (BS-01) position within the required 15 days, and therefore, cannot now seek to accept the same offer that he is trying to have set aside via this petition. This contradictory position is unacceptable at this point in time. 7. In view of the foregoing, without touching the merits of the case, this petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2880 | 2025 SHC KHI 2265 | Const. P. 1076/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | SIP Nisar Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1197-K/2025 SIP Nisar Ahmed & others v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 2881 | 2025 SHC KHI 2680 | Const. P. 4163/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shakeel Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 08-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2882 | 2025 SHC KHI 3208 | Const. P. 415/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Jam Allah Ditta Almas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-SEP-25 | Yes | This was the position on the previous date of hearing, which shows the conduct of the petitioner not to pursue the case; rather the petitioner has lack of interest in pursuing this petition. This petition is accordingly dismissed on account of non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2883 | 2025 SHC KHI 3240 | Const. P. 1120/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Fareed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | Learned Assistant AG and learned Assistant PG present in Court submit that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and every action of the police will be subject to law. However, if there is a cognizable offence, the police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2884 | 2025 SHC KHI 2544 | Const. P. 1502/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Hafeez Abbasi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | This Court has declared the PMS Rules 2018 ultra vires (beyond the powers of the government). Although an appeal is pending before the Supreme Court. The promotions are still subject to procedural requirements, including the availability of vacancies and a final seniority list. The Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meeting can be held as long as these prerequisites are met, subject to the outcome of ongoing cases, including Civil Appeal No. 347-356 of 2022 pending before the Supreme Court of Pakistan. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition stands disposed of with the direction that the respondent department must act in accordance with existing laws and rules until a final decision is issued by the Supreme Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2885 | 2025 SHC KHI 3225 | Const. P. 991/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed Asif & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-25 | Yes | The Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale & Use of Gutka and Manpuri Act, 2019 is a critical piece of legislation aimed at safeguarding public health and ensuring the well-being of citizens. It is the duty of all law enforcement agencies, under the leadership of the IGP Sindh, to uphold and enforce this law with diligence and integrity. This Court has made it clear that strict legal action will be taken against those who flout the law, and it is imperative that these directives are implemented in letter and spirit to eliminate the menace of gutka and manpuri from the province. 10. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with directions to the police to act lawfully and refrain from harassment to the citizens, while remaining empowered to act in case of cognizable offenses. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2886 | 2026 SHC KHI 302 | Const. P. 416/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2887 | 2026 SHC KHI 244 | Const. P. 6024/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed Khalid Mahmud & Ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Yaseen & Ors (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | For the reasons above, the Trial Court did not misread the law it applied settled principles governing the appointment of a receiver. There was/is no clear evidence of waste, mismanagement, or imminent loss that would justify appointing a receiver. The petitioners??? failed to show a strong prima facie case for the aforesaid purpose. The discretionary relief of appointing a receiver was refused based on certain reasons. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 26 03 2025 is legally sound, and the petition seeking its setting aside is dismissed along with pending application(s). However the trial Court shall expedite the proceedings to its logical conclusion as per law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2888 | 2026 SHC KHI 419 | Const. P. 4648/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ashfaq Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Consequently, the Petitioners, having been appointed against sanctioned posts through due process and having completed the requisite period of satisfactory service, are entitled to be considered for regularization strictly in terms of Regulation 21-A of the PQA Employees Service Regulations, 2011 (Revised), in parity with other similarly placed employees. 16. Accordingly, the Respondents are directed to place the cases of the Petitioners before the competent authority for consideration of their regularization in accordance with the applicable statutory Regulations, within three weeks, and no adverse action shall be taken against them in the meanwhile solely on account of their contractual status as they were appointed through a competitive process. 17. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2889 | 2026 SHC KHI 498 | Const. P. 777/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Farhan Muhammad Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-26 | Yes | Consequently, while the petition, is disposed of, with direction to the petitioner to approach the Ministry of Interior by filing a representation along with a certified copy of this order within fifteen (15) days. Upon receipt of such representation, the Ministry of Interior shall decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the concerned department, and shall pass a reasoned order within a stipulated period, preferably within thirty (30) days. Till such decision, if the petitioner arrives in Pakistan, no bottleneck shall be created to enter into Pakistan, solely on the basis of his name appearing on the ECL in connection with the present matter, unless required in any other criminal case in accordance with law. 11. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned including learned AAG Sindh for compliance in time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2890 | 2026 SHC KHI 500 | Const. P. 5982/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Gul Nawab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2891 | 2026 SHC KHI 587 | Const. P. 4997/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ghulam Jeelani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2892 | 2026 SHC KHI 595 | Const. P. 5229/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mehmood Salahuddin (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent) | 11-MAR-26 | Yes | After examining the impugned judgment, we do not find that the discretion exercised by the Tribunal suffers from any jurisdictional defect, misreading of evidence, or violation of law warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The Tribunal has attempted to strike a balance between the competing claims of the parties and has granted partial back benefits in the circumstances of the case. 16. Consequently, C.P. No. D-5229 of 2016 filed by the employee seeking full back benefits is dismissed, while C.P. No. D-4435 of 2016 filed by the employer challenging the reinstatement and partial back benefits is also dismissed. The impugned judgment dated 26.05.2016 passed by the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal is maintained. 17. Both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, along with all pending applications, if any. However, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2893 | 2026 SHC KHI 625 | Const. P. 269/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Ayaz Mahmood Chaudhry (Petitioner) VS Petrocon (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2894 | 2026 SHC KHI 599 | Const. P. 4259/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Majeed Awan and Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-26 | Yes | In view of the said commitment and without entering into the merits of the present case, the petition is disposed of with directions to the competent authority of the respondent Bank that the case of the petitioners be considered in accordance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the aforementioned matter. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within one month. 6. This petition, along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2895 | 2026 SHC KHI 439 | Const. P. 4849/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Late Freni Shahpur Shroff (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Another (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any, with the direction that the Petitioners shall appear before the Grievance Redressal Committee constituted by the Karachi Port Trust within one week from today. Upon their appearance, the Grievance Redressal Committee shall afford the Petitioners a fair and meaningful opportunity of hearing, consider their reply and all supporting documents in accordance with law, and thereafter place its recommendations before the Competent Authority for a final decision strictly in accordance with law after observing due process. It is clarified that till the final decision by the Competent Authority, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioners in respect of the Subject Property. 5. The petition, along with listed application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2896 | 2026 SHC KHI 156 | Const. P. 4945/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Dr. Shehla Kazmi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-26 | Yes | For the foregoing reasons, the impugned refusal letters are without lawful authority and are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to meaningfully reconsider the petitioner???s case for grant of pension and pensionary benefits in light of the notification dated 13-06-2014 and the judgments of the Supreme Court. Upon such consideration, pension shall be awarded to the petitioner strictly in accordance with her entitlement, after adjusting any service benefits already received, if any. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within three weeks, without fail.15. 14. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2897 | 2026 SHC KHI 110 | Const. P. 4748/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Nadeem Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | These petitions need to be disposed of in terms that if the petitioners are found to be entitled for the Assistance Package, the competent authority shall re-consider their decision and passing a speaking order after hearing the parties concerned within sixty (60) days. 5. These petitions stand disposed of in the above terms alongwith pending application(s), if any. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2898 | 2026 SHC KHI 17 | Const. P. 33/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Yousuf Masih (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 06-JAN-26 | Yes | So far as the aspect of protection is concerned, the record reflects that both parties have already been granted protection orders by the competent courts, namely the learned VIII ADJ East and the learned 2nd ADJ East, respectively. Thus, no further directions are required on this count. 6. Accordingly, without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the present petition is dismissed. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to approach the competent authority of SBCA under the prescribed legal mechanism for redressal of his grievance relating to alleged illegal construction, in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||
| 2899 | 2026 SHC KHI 55 | Const. P. 6414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mariam Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | It is further directed that the issue of limitation shall not come in the way of the petitioners, and the appeal/case of the petitioners shall not be dismissed merely on technical grounds, including limitation, but shall be decided purely on merits in accordance with law. In the intervening period, the petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the subject property. Office to place copy hereof in connected petitions listed above. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2900 | 2026 SHC KHI 117 | Const. P. 2155/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ghulam Dastagir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 2901 | 2026 SHC KHI 289 | Const. P. 154/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Anwar Fatima Thr. Zain Jafri (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sara Raza Jaffari and Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2902 | 2026 SHC KHI 349 | Const. P. 5071/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Taj Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & another (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | In the event that the Petitioner???s credentials are found to be correct and in order, the competent authority shall pass an appropriate speaking order within a period of two (02) weeks, after affording the Petitioner an opportunity of meaningful hearing, in terms of the directions already issued by this Court in C.P. No. D-3964/2013. 9. Without touching the merits of the case, this petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2903 | 2026 SHC KHI 95 | Const. P. 117/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Dr, Zaituna Yasmeen Shah through attorney (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, no demolition shall take place until proper approval is granted by the competent authority, in accordance with all conditions in the building plan and lease documents. 9. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2904 | 2026 SHC KHI 298 | Const. P. 412/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Die Caster (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2905 | 2026 SHC KHI 301 | Const. P. 415/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | R.H.M Enterprises (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2906 | 2026 SHC KHI 429 | Const. P. 2196/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Rollins Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Learned SLAT and Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2907 | 2026 SHC KHI 530 | Const. P. 2568/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Amanat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 2908 | 2026 SHC KHI 86 | Const. P. 272/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Yasir Hayat and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-26 | Yes | However, we confronted the parties with the Supreme Court???s order dated 22-01-2019, passed in Civil Petition No. 815-K/2016, which prohibits changing residential or amenity plots to commercial use. However, it is urged by the parties that this ban targets illegal or post-2019 approvals, and the Petitioners??? plot, being on a declared commercial road and having completed all requirements before the cut-off date i.e. 22-01-2019, falls within the exception; as such, the Respondents are legally obliged to issue the challan and process the change of land use. This issue needs to be examined by the Master Plan Authority by examining the decision of the Supreme Court. 10. Without touching the merits of the case, the competent authority is directed to comply with the Supreme Court???s order by issuing a speaking order on the subject issue after hearing all concerned within two months. If the case of the petitioners falls within the ratio of commercialization, the decision shall be made strictly in accordance with law. 11. The petition stands disposed of along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2909 | 2026 SHC KHI 102 | Const. P. 5978/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Imran Malik (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court directs the petitioner to first approach the concerned Union Council for cancellation of the Death Certificate, which shall be taken care of by the concerned Union Council without delay, by showing the relevant documents by the petitioner, and thereafter proceed to the Operation Branch of NADRA at the Regional Head Office, Karachi, within one week, who shall act strictly in accordance with law by redressing the grievance of the petitioner accordingly in the aforesaid period. 7. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the petition stands disposed of in these terms alongwith listed application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2910 | 2026 SHC KHI 107 | Const. P. 4745/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Robina Shaheen (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | These petitions need to be disposed of in terms that if the petitioners are found to be entitled for the Assistance Package, the competent authority shall re-consider their decision and passing a speaking order after hearing the parties concerned within sixty (60) days. 5. These petitions stand disposed of in the above terms alongwith pending application(s), if any. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2911 | 2026 SHC KHI 90 | Const. P. 2106/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Yousuf Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | 22-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the competent Review Committee is directed to decide the petitioner???s pending application dated 06.05.2025 strictly in accordance with law, after affording him an opportunity of hearing, by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of thirty (30) days from receipt of a fresh representation if the petitioner files in time. 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner has undertaken to submit such representation to the Secretary, Ministry of Interior within one week. 10. With these directions, the petition stands disposed of, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 2912 | 2026 SHC KHI 234 | Const. P. 824/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Raheela Noor (Petitioner) VS Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, this Court finds that the impugned letter dated 26.12.2023 is without lawful justification, suffers from misreading of the Pension Rules, and is the result of an arbitrary exercise of discretion. The same is hereby declared illegal, void ab initio, and of no legal effect. 11. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The Respondents are directed to restore and release the family pension in favour of the Petitioner forthwith, along with all admissible arrears from the date of its unlawful stoppage, within a period of 30 days from receipt of a certified copy of this order. Failure to comply shall entail consequences in accordance with the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2913 | 2026 SHC KHI 13, 2026 SHC KHI 14 | Const. P. 6329/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mumtaz Khan Tanoli (Advocate) (Petitioner) VS Sindh Bar Council (SBC) & others (Respondent) | 07-JAN-26 | Yes | Primarily, they are not amenable to the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. The rules framed by such bodies are non-statutory in nature and any alleged violation thereof does not attract writ jurisdiction. Since the KBA/respondent bodies are not persons performing functions in connection with the affairs of the State, and no statutory violation of enforceable fundamental rights has been demonstrated. For these reasons, the petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. 14. Without entering into the merits of the case, and while leaving the petitioner at liberty to challenge the continuation in office of the KBA office bearers before the competent forum, this petition is accordingly dismissed. The pending application(s) are also dismissed, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||
| 2914 | 2026 SHC KHI 341 | Const. P. 5884/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, this Court finds that the petitioner has failed to establish a legal right to lifelong family pension under the applicable rules of the respondent company. The action of the respondent in discontinuing the pension, upon discovering that it was granted in violation of Rule 14(b), cannot be termed as arbitrary or unlawful. The reliance placed on Federal Government pension rules is misconceived, and no case of maladministration or violation of law is made out for invoking constitutional jurisdiction. However keeping in view the precarious condition of Muhammad Asif we deem it proper to dispose of the petition by considering the peculiar circumstances of the case and the disability of Muhammad Asif. The competent authority/ respondent company may examine the matter for any compassionate relief or policy-based assistance as may be permissible under law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 2915 | Nil | Const. P. 1608/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Nizamuddin Kolachi V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-AUG-19 | Yes | whether the Petitioner can challenge his show cause notice, non- inclusion of his name in Upper School Course in a Constitution Petition | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2916 | 2018 PLC CS Note 31, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1170 | Const. P. 7077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shahbaz Garment (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2873/2018,C.M.A.8722/2018,C.M.A.8723/2018,C.M.A.8724/2018,C.M.A.8725/2018,C.P.L.A.461-K/2019,C.P.L.A.462-K/2019,C.P.L.A.463-K/2019,C.P.L.A.464-K/2019,C.P.L.A.465-K/2019,C.P.L.A.466-K/2019,C.P.L.A.467-K/2019,C.P.L.A.468-K/2019,C.A.98-K/2019,C.A.99-K/2019,C.A.100-K/2019,C.A.101-K/2019,C.A.65-K/2019,C.A.102-K/2019,C.A.103-K/2019,C.A.104-K/2019,C.A.105-K/2019,C.A.106-K/2019,C.A.107-K/2019,C.A.108-K/2019,C.A.109-K/2019,C.A.110-K/2019,C.A.111-K/2019,C.A.112-K/2019,C.A.113-K/2019,C.A.114-K/2019,C.A.115-K/2019,C.A.117-K/2019,C.A.116-K/2019,C.P.L.A.469-K/2019,C.P.L.A.470-K/2019,C.P.L.A.471-K/2019,C.P.L.A.472-K/2019,C.P.L.A.473-K/2019,C.P.L.A.474-K/2019,C.P.L.A.475-K/2019,C.P.L.A.476-K/2019,C.P.L.A.477-K/2019,C.P.L.A.478-K/2019,C.P.L.A.479-K/2019,C.P.L.A.480-K/2019 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed | |
| 2917 | 2019 PLD Sindh 500 | Const. P. 557/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Salman Aziz (Petitioner) VS Federal Urdu Unviersity and Ors (Respondent) | 16-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2918 | Nil | Const. P. 1847/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Yasin Ali Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS The Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) | 16-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2919 | Nil | Const. P. 4168/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Muhmmad Ali Asad (Petitioner) VS L.D.A and Ors (Respondent) | 27-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2920 | 2019 PLC Lab. 121, 2019 PLC (CS) 121 | Const. P. 1885/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/s CIM Shipping Inc (Petitioner) VS Tousif Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) | 13-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2921 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1084 | Const. P. 253/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Faraz Sherwani and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 24-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.70-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Asif and another,C.A.1000/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others,C.P.L.A.2215/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be heard a/w C.A.816/2020 out of C.P.1771/20 after 3 months. | |
| 2922 | 2018 CLC Note 56 | Const. P. 1784/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Indu (Petitioner) VS VIIth ADJ Karachi South & Others (Respondent) | 10-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.444-K/2017 Dr. Indu v. Additional District & Sessions Judge, No-7, South, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 2923 | 2018 MLD 574 | Const. P. 825/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amir Bashir (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nosheen Fatima & Another (Respondent) | 08-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2924 | 2021 SBLR Sindh 1909 | Const. P. 2108/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Asim Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 30-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2925 | 2018 CLC 50 | Const. P. 1456/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Zia Abbas (Petitioner) VS Mst.Mahiya and others (Respondent) | 20-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2926 | 2018 MLD 832 | Cr.Bail 977/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | MUHAMMAD YOUNUS S/O SHAMSUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 05-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2927 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 55, 2018 PLC CS Note 55 | Const. P. 4323/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Shahid Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 14-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.534-K/2017 Syed Shahid Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2928 | 2018 MLD 1649 | Const. P. 196/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Nayab Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hameeda Bano & Ors (Respondent) | 10-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.460-K/2017 Nayab Ali v. Mst: Hameeda Bano and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2929 | Nil | Const. P. 1415/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ghulam Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt.of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.571-K/2018 Umerdin Saand and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 2930 | Nil | Suit 614/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2008 | Muhammad Amin through LRs. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shamim Begum alias Lala (Defendant) | 13-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2931 | 2018 YLR 1695 | Cr.Acq.A. 252/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | State through Prosecutor General Sindh (Appellant) VS Waseem Faraz (Respondent) | 26-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2932 | Nil | Const. P. 371/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Asif Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-19 | Yes | In view of the above, it is crystal clear that the respondents cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment against son quota by issuing Standing Order for recruitment in Sindh Police against Shaheed Quota, Son Quota without approval of the Provincial Government | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2933 | Nil | Cr.Bail 94/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Deedar Ali son of Allah Bux Lakho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2934 | Nil | Const. P. 229/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others (Respondent) | 28-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2935 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 1493 | Const. P. 1375/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 18-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.410-K/2019 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy/Irrigation Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2936 | Nil | Const. P. 77/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 19-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2937 | Nil | Const. P. 366/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Altaf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh (Respondent) | 25-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2938 | Nil | Const. P. 2161/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Hanif and another (Petitioner) VS Rahim Bux and others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2939 | Nil | Const. P. 475/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2940 | Nil | Const. P. 7998/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zain ul Abideen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2941 | 2021 PLC Lab. 1404 | Const. P. 2393/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Manzar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.430-K/2019 Federal Board of Revenue thr. its Chairman v. Manzar Hussain & others,C.P.L.A.484-K/2019 Amer Rashid Shaikh v. Manzar Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 2942 | Nil | Const. P. 4605/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Amanullah Tamimy (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.410-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Amanullah Tamimy and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2943 | Nil | Const. P. 1016/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Nadeem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2944 | Nil | Const. P. 509/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Arif Khan and 31 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.412-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Arif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2945 | Nil | Const. P. 1932/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Saleem @ Muhammad Soomar (Petitioner) VS Senior Member Board of Revenue & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2946 | Nil | Const. P. 75/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Amjad Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Arif & others (Respondent) | 28-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2947 | Nil | Const. P. 1719/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zeeshan Ayoub Pathan, (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 07-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2948 | Nil | Const. P. 4000/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Prof: Dr. Parveen (Petitioner) VS Chancellor University of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 03-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2949 | Nil | Const. P. 364/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2950 | 2017 PLC Lab. 122 | Const. P. 1486/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Messrs Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Petitioner) VS Arif Aziz & others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2951 | Nil | Const. P. 1498/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.M.Appeal.12/2019 Ali Akbar v. Secretary, Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 2952 | Nil | Const. P. 94/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 07-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1897/2019 Munawar Ahmed Narejo & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary School Education & Litracy Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2953 | Nil | Const. P. 2773/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Rafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Regional Director & others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-19 | Yes | petitioner, filed an application under Section 3 & 4 of the Contempt of Court)for initiation of contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnor on account of his willful, intentional and deliberate act of disobeying order passed by this Court . Mr. Rafique Ahmed Advocate, who is argued that despite clear directions the contemnors have not complied . respondent No. 4 has filed an application with a prayer to recall the order passed by this Court on the ground that she is owner of Plot and the petitioner who is her neighbor and is raising multistoried (3 storied) construction over his plot without approval of the competent authority i.e. Sindh Building Control Authority; that she has made several representations to the concerned authorities regarding the illegal construction put up by petitioner and has sent several reminders, drawing the attention of the SBCA, to the illegal constructions being put up in breach of the revised plan and the permission granted by the authorities, as well as the statutory provisions of the SBCA regulations-2018. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons all, we are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that substantial compliance of the order. Therefore, at this juncture, prima-facie, Petitioner has made out a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnor. Therefore, the office is directed to issue show cause notice under section 17 (1) of the Contempt of Court, why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the order dated order dated 26.06.2018passed by this Court. . Consequently the application CMANo.13080 of 2018 filed by the Respondent No.4 is dismissed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 2954 | Nil | Criminal Miscelleneous 9/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2018 | Mst Jannat Khatoon (Insolvent) VS D.I.G, Hyd and Others (Contemnor) | 07-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2955 | Nil | Cr.Tran 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ismail Dahri (Appellant) VS Learned Specail Judge ATC SBA and others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2956 | Nil | Const. P. 1396/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Mujeeb Alam (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 01-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2957 | Nil | Const. P. 488/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Aftab Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.564-K/2024 M/s OMAL Sons Corporation v. Sheikh Abid & Co. Pvt. Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2958 | Nil | Const. P. 6381/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Barkat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 06-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2959 | Nil | Const. P. 785/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Pakistan Telecome Mobile (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Idrees Hadi and Ors (Respondent) | 12-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2960 | Nil | Const. P. 8518/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Munner Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 08-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3793/2018 Muneer Ahmed & another v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 2961 | 2019 PLC (CS) Note 41, 2019 PLC (CS) 41 | Const. P. 3759/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Kamran Ahmed Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 19-JAN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.67-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2962 | 2020 SHC KHI 2180 | Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-20 | Yes | Contempt--Primarily substantial compliance of the judgment passed by this Court has been made. Prima-facie, the question of not considering some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved petitioners to avail their remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondents, if any, for the reasons that the respondent-department was directed to take a fresh decision for regularization of their service, without any discrimination, in accordance with law subject to the budgetary sanction, qualifications, and eligibility of the petitioners, which compliance report has now been submitted. Prima-facie the reasons assigned in the aforesaid report cannot be dilated upon for and against in contempt proceedings. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.L.A.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 2963 | Nil | Const. P. 7035/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shahnawaz Babar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 17-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2964 | Nil | Const. P. 1323/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mst. Nikhat Yasmin (Petitioner) VS Pakistan International Air Lines & ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2965 | 2020 NLR Note 202020, 2020 PLC (CS) 268, 2020 PLC Lab. 268 | Const. P. 333/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mian Syed Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 06-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1116-K/2018 Mian Syed Hussain v. Province of Sindh thr. Food Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2966 | 2020 PLC (CS) 176 | Const. P. 4250/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Jameela (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 13-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1454-K/2018 Mst. Jameela v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2967 | Nil | Const. P. 4002/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ms Sahar Gul Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2968 | Nil | Const. P. 984/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Masood and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 12-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2969 | Nil | Const. P. 855/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Hantex (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2970 | Nil | Const. P. 5408/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Sultan Zareen and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and ORs (Respondent) | 26-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.119-K/2019 Sultan Zareen v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others,C.P.L.A.120-K/2019 Niaz Mohammad v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | , | |
| 2971 | Nil | Const. P. 2010/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Mst. Refat Seema and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 23-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.23-K/2019 Mst: Rifat Seema v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2972 | Nil | Const. P. 378/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Mubarik Ali Zaidi (Petitioner) VS The Finance Director HESCO (Respondent) | 14-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2973 | Nil | Const. P. 803/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Tanzeel-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and another (Respondent) | 03-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.124-K/2019 Tanzeel-ur-Rehman Khan Niazi v. Govt. of Sindh thr.Secy: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2974 | 2019 SBLR Sindh 418, 2019 PLC (CS) 1381 | Const. P. 6251/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Shaikh Muhammad Suleman (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited & another (Respondent) | 18-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2975 | 2020 PLC CS Note 44 | Const. P. 6643/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shiraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2976 | Nil | Const. P. 4391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zaheer uddin Mujahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.277/2019 Zaheeruddin Mujahid v. Province of Sindh thr. Cooperative Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2977 | Nil | Const. P. 6131/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Moomal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman SPSC and Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2978 | Nil | H.C.A 348/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ayub Khan (Respondent) | 11-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2979 | 2020 SHC KHI 1997 | Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 02-DEC-20 | Yes | Prima-facie, the question of downgrading the petitioner in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the petitioner to avail his remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.882-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Muhammad Yaseen and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 2980 | Nil | Const. P. 2821/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Fida Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 21-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.213-K/2020 The Trustees of the Port of Karachi thr. its Chairman v. Fida Muhammad Khan and others,C.A.47-K/2022 The Trustees of the Port of Karachi thr. its Chairman v. Fida Muhammad Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2981 | Nil | Const. P. 6859/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Besham Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Public Service Commission & Ors (Respondent) | 01-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2982 | Nil | Const. P. 783/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govr. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2967/2018 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.70-K/2019 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2983 | Nil | Const. P. 423/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Anwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2984 | Nil | Const. P. 1769/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ms. Lamika Zuberi (Petitioner) VS M/s Logo Guru (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | 21-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2985 | 2019 PLC (CS) 989 | Const. P. 2072/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Jawed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent) | 04-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2986 | 2019 PLC (CS) 572 | Const. P. 5798/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Anwery Begum (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 02-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2987 | 2018 MLD 1085 | Const. P. 510/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Moinuddin (Petitioner) VS Rashid Khan and 3 others (Respondent) | 14-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.490-K/2016 The Province of Sindh and others v. Dost Muhammad Chandio Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2988 | 2019 PLC (CS) 709 | Const. P. 3482/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Sher Muhammad Zafar & Others (Petitioner) VS PIAC & Others (Respondent) | 06-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2989 | 2020 PLC (CS) 245 | Const. P. 1595/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Fazl - e - Akbar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Defence Housing Authority and Ors (Respondent) | 26-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2990 | 2020 PLC (CS) 160 | Const. P. 2442/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Shaikh Aadil Jamil (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 2991 | Nil | Const. P. 1656/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Arham Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS M.D KW & SB and Oters (Respondent) | 19-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2992 | Nil | Const. P. 1662/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Uris and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 15-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2993 | Nil | Const. P. 480/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Phoenix Armour (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2971/2018 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.74-K/2019 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 2994 | Nil | Const. P. 6498/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Shafi Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Abdul Qayyum Solangi and Ors (Respondent) | 25-JAN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2995 | Nil | Const. P. 4422/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Irtaza Raza Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 26-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.68-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.L.A.2976/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Petroleum & Natural Resources Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 2996 | Nil | Const. P. 1282/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Haji Rafiudduin Waliuddin (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2997 | Nil | Const. P. 2913/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Hi-Tech Packages (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2998 | Nil | Const. P. 4533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nova Leather (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 23-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 2999 | Nil | Const. P. 624/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/S Good Luck Industries (Petitioner) VS Government oF Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3000 | Nil | Const. P. 1277/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Super Compounds Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3001 | Nil | Const. P. 1740/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Ismail Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3002 | Nil | Const. P. 2873/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Lotte Kolson (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3101/2018 M/s Lottee Kolson Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.91-K/2019 M/s Lottee Kolson Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3003 | Nil | Const. P. 6378/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 06-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3004 | Nil | Const. P. 68/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Sherbaz Khan Rind And ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 23-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.881-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Sherbaz Khan Rind and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3005 | Nil | Const. P. 5483/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Papoo Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 05-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1158-K/2018 Papoo Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3006 | Nil | Const. P. 2265/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Zia Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3078/2018 M/s. Zia Industries (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.84-K/2019 M/s. Zia Industries (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3007 | Nil | Const. P. 5447/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mazhar Ali Babar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Ors (Respondent) | 27-AUG-19 | Yes | whether the Civil Servants can file a Writ Petition by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court in respect of the terms and conditions of his service when there is a bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution? | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3008 | Nil | Const. P. 5387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | as to how the promotion of the Petitioner can be considered, when no Departmental Promotion Committee has been convened by the competent authority, besides that he is at the verge of retirement i.e. in the Month of September 2019 | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3009 | Nil | Const. P. 1897/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Munawar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3010 | 2022 PLC (CS) Note 1 | Const. P. 3123/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Rubina Bano and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3011 | Nil | Const. P. 199/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Talib Hussain (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) | 20-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3012 | Nil | Const. P. 635/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Bibi Sakeena and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3013 | Nil | Const. P. 3205/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shafqat Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3014 | Nil | Const. P. 2317/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Punhal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh &Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3015 | Nil | Const. P. 449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Jabbar& another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3016 | Nil | Const. P. 2360/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muharram Ali Khaskheli & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3017 | Nil | Const. P. 2708/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mujtaba Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3018 | Nil | Const. P. 2405/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Nasir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3019 | Nil | Const. P. 131/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3020 | Nil | Const. P. 1168/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shoukat Ali Uner and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3021 | Nil | Const. P. 87/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3022 | Nil | Const. P. 2040/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3023 | Nil | Const. P. 1141/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Umar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3024 | Nil | Const. P. 898/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shahbaz Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Mola Bux and another (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3025 | Nil | Const. P. 102/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mst. Zulekhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3026 | Nil | Const. P. 2041/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Arsalan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3027 | Nil | Const. P. 348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3028 | Nil | Const. P. 958/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Municipal Committee Kotri (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3029 | Nil | Const. P. 1173/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Usman Siddique & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3030 | Nil | Const. P. 3212/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3031 | Nil | Const. P. 201/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Yasir Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3032 | Nil | Const. P. 1344/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Mangial Shah @ Shaman Sain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3033 | Nil | Const. P. 3218/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Haneef and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3034 | Nil | Const. P. 1376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Soofi Ali Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3035 | Nil | Const. P. 1134/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3036 | Nil | Const. P. 1906/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ali Akbar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3037 | Nil | Const. P. 2299/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Hawa Jarwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3038 | Nil | Const. P. 1449/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst, Nadia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 24-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3039 | Nil | Const. P. 3193/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muneer Ahmed Shoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3040 | Nil | Const. P. 3504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3041 | Nil | Const. P. 3146/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Lala Aijaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3042 | Nil | Const. P. 3066/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3043 | Nil | Const. P. 5278/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Waqar Haider and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3044 | 2020 SBLR Sindh 715 | Const. P. 5924/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Baluchistan Wheel Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Industries - wise Trade NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 25-SEP-19 | Yes | To appreciate the aforesaid proposition, reference is made to Article 199(1) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, reproduced as under: - ???A High Court may if it is satisfied that no other adequate remedy is provided by law:- (a) on the application of any aggrieved party make an order??? (i) Directing??????. (ii) Declaring??????..??? 9. The above referred Article lays condition of satisfaction of this Court as to absence of any adequate remedy available under the law to the person/party invoking constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, Petitioner-establishment besides being aggrieved should have locus standi to approach this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. We have noticed that the certificate of registration issued by the Respondent No.1 is still in existence. The objection, which has now been raised by the petitioner-establishment, through the instant writ petition on the aforesaid pleas can hardly been looked into by this Court in presence of remedy provided to the Petitioner-Establishment under section 12 of Industrial Relations Act. Besides that the learned Counsel could not advance any convincing reason to establish that the Petitioner-establishment is an aggrieved party which can impugn registration of the Respondent No.2???s-Union by the Respondent No. 01 vide Order dated 25.7.2017 in constitutional jurisdiction of this court. Hence, the instant petition is a futile exercise. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3045 | Nil | Const. P. 2784/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Huzoor Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3046 | Nil | Const. P. 897/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Haji Anwar Ali &another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3047 | Nil | Const. P. 1943/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3048 | Nil | Const. P. 3100/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3049 | Nil | Const. P. 2347/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ali Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3050 | Nil | Const. P. 609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3051 | Nil | Const. P. 2261/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Wagho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3052 | Nil | Const. P. 2137/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3053 | Nil | Const. P. 2043/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Farman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3054 | Nil | Const. P. 2060/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Murtaza & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3055 | Nil | Const. P. 3280/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ali Asghar& others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3056 | Nil | Const. P. 1121/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3057 | Nil | Const. P. 6110/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Abid Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.539-K/2019 Muhammad Abid Shahzad v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.43-K/2020 Muhammad Abid Shahzad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months, | |
| 3058 | Nil | Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Therefore, the review application merits dismissal, which is accordingly dismissed as, in our view, the judgment dated 06.09.2019 passed by this court was based on correct factual as well as legal position of the case and we do not find any inherent flaw floating on the surface of the record requiring our interference. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4105/2019,C.P.L.A.4144/2019,C.P.L.A.622-K/2019,C.P.L.A.4410/2019 SCP | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of |
| 3059 | 2020 PLC CS Note 32 | Const. P. 5162/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Raees Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills and Ors (Respondent) | 05-SEP-19 | Yes | Pakistan-Steel Mill--whether the instant petition is suffering from laches or otherwise--petitioner is not entitled for relief which he is asking for through the instant proceedings on the premise that this Court cannot entertain the grievance of the Petitioner under Article 199 of the Constitution, in view of the bar contained under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution, which ousts the jurisdiction of this Court. The ouster clause under Article 212 (3) and Article 185 of the Constitution is a Constitutional command, which restricts the jurisdiction of this Court on the subject, which squarely falls within the exclusive domain of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, being an Appellate Court in respect of the decisions of this Court and Service Tribunals. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.594-K/2019 Raees Ahmed Ansari v. Pakistan Steel Mills thr. Chairman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3060 | Nil | Const. P. 1343/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Nek Muhammad (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and others (Respondent) | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.60-K/2020 Nek Muhammad v. The Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 3061 | Nil | Const. P. 2467/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Boota Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3062 | Nil | Const. P. 2423/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Syed Sadique Ali Masoomi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3063 | Nil | Const. P. 847/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3064 | Nil | Const. P. 1067/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Hassan Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3065 | Nil | Const. P. 2768/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3066 | Nil | Const. P. 93/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghulam Rabani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3067 | Nil | Civil Revision 14/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mansoor Ali (Applicant) VS Executive District Officer (Health) (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3068 | Nil | Civil Revision 149/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ali Ahmed & others (Applicant) VS Khamoon (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3069 | Nil | Const. P. 713/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Zafar Ali Shah. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 06-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4145/2019 Muhammad Hussain Ghumro & others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.P.L.A.4106/2019 Makhdoom Aqeeluz Zaman & another v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others,C.P.L.A.4433/2019 Shahzad Tahir Thaheem & others v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 3070 | Nil | Const. P. 8581/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Adeel Khan and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.697-K/2019 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.26-K/2022 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 3071 | Nil | Const. P. 2893/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3072 | Nil | Const. P. 1359/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sain Dino (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3073 | Nil | Const. P. 3808/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nazeer Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3074 | Nil | Const. P. 129/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sultan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3075 | Nil | Const. P. 2444/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Faisal Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3076 | Nil | Const. P. 2075/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mureed Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3077 | Nil | Const. P. 2644/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Ghafoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3078 | Nil | Const. P. 3616/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mohammad Panhwer & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3079 | Nil | Const. P. 1578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3080 | Nil | Const. P. 1761/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Anwar Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3081 | Nil | Const. P. 2656/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ali Nawaz Bagrani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3082 | Nil | Const. P. 2835/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Baloch Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3083 | Nil | Const. P. 2424/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3084 | Nil | Const. P. 3794/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Gul Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Chief Engineer Irrigation and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3085 | Nil | Const. P. 1256/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Abdul Razzaq and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3086 | Nil | Const. P. 495/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3087 | Nil | Const. P. 6812/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) | 05-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3088 | 2020 SHC HYD 2332 | Const. P. 504/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Noor Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS The Learned Election Tribunal Ps 52 Umarkot (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3089 | 2026 SHC KHI 593 | Const. P. 2576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | C.P.L.A.449-K/2021 Javed Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC | |
| 3090 | 2021 SHC KHI 958 | Const. P. 2576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, the petitions are not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-CAA. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.449-K/2021 Javed Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC |
| 3091 | 2020 SHC HYD 593 | Criminal Appeal 281/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Khalil-ur-Rehman alias Bholoo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 24-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.166-K/2020 Sher Muhammad v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 3092 | 2020 SHC KHI 540 | Const. P. 6386/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Inam Hafiz Siddiqi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3093 | 2020 SHC KHI 14 | Const. P. 6387/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sohail Ahmed Hakro (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3094 | 2020 SHC KHI 1260 | Const. P. 7506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Razzaque & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3095 | 2020 SHC HYD 1149 | Const. P. 667/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ashok Kumar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3096 | 2022 PLC CS Note 26 | Const. P. 2695/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Tarruf Ali (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 24-JAN-20 | Yes | Police Department--Petitioner has been reverted / demoted from the rank of Police Inspector to his substantive rank of Police Head Constable on account of earning out of turn promotion during his tenure of service---In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is allowed whereby the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue retirement order of the petitioner to the rank of Police Inspector and is entitled to be paid his full pensionary benefits as admissible to Police Inspector under the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this judgment. Pending application stands disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.193-K/2020 Province of Sindh thr. I.G.Police and others v. Taaruf Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3097 | 2020 SHC KHI 1561 | Const. P. 3392/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Asim Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1799/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Muhammad Asim Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 3098 | 2022 CLC 1447 | Const. P. 309/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Learnd Family Judge Tando Adam & Others (Respondent) | 18-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3099 | 2020 SHC KHI 268 | Const. P. 5685/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Umair Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.444-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Sindh & others v. Syed Umair Ahmed & others,C.P.L.A.377-K/2020 Syed Umair Ahmed v. Province of Sindh & others,C.P.L.A.1838/2020 Imtiaz Ali Shah and others v. Syed Umair Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed |
| 3100 | 2020 SHC HYD 554 | Const. P. 101/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Kazbano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3101 | 2020 SHC HYD 844 | Const. P. 2113/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Maryam Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3102 | 2020 SHC HYD 1966 | Criminal Appeal 212/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: 1200 grams of charas | Original Side | 2019 | Parvaiz (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 05-AUG-20 | Yes | 1200 grams of charas appeal allowed 1200 grams of charas appeal allowed | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3103 | 2020 SHC HYD 733 | Const. P. 286/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Shahnaz & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3104 | 2020 SHC HYD 294 | Const. P. 265/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Aqeela and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3105 | 2020 SHC HYD 374 | Const. P. 630/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Mattul (Petitioner) VS Khair Muhammad and others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3106 | 2020 SHC KHI 1227 | Const. P. 8063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hafiz Muhammad Tabish (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 09-DEC-20 | Yes | we are of the considered view that merely obtaining acquittal from a criminal case is no ground to take benefit to bypass the disciplinary proceedings. Since the show cause was issued against the petitioner and he replied and it is for the respondent-KPT to decide in accordance with law for which this Court is not required to show indulgence in the matter under Article 199 of the Constitution to set-aside the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him--we do not see any infringement of the right of the Petitioner which could be called in question by way of Writ Petition. It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During the course of arguments, we have been informed that petitioners service has been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3107 | 2020 SHC HYD 2476 | Const. P. 613/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Asim Gul (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Corpt. Of Pakistan (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3108 | 2020 SHC KHI 1402 | Const. P. 4483/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Pakistan International Airline Corp Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 3109 | 2020 SHC HYD 1366 | Const. P. 2882/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3110 | 2020 SHC HYD 836 | Const. P. 1403/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ali Dindo Channa (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3111 | 2020 SHC HYD 173 | R.A (Civil Revision) 24/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Malook & Ors (Applicant) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 25-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3112 | 2020 SHC KHI 535, 2021 SBLR Sindh 919 | Const. P. 4976/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Naseer Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 11-NOV-20 | Yes | Petitioner has called in question the rejection of his candidature for the post of District Public Prosecutor (BS-19) in Law Department, Government of Sindh vide letter dated 18.10.2019 issued by Sindh Public Service Commission Hyderabad (SPSC) on the analogy that he did not possess ten (10) years' experience as an Advocate of High Court ---In our view, the submission of respondents will be counterproductive and would prevent good Advocates from accepting appointments in civil service if this analogy persists. The second limb of the argument of the respondents is that once an Advocate is appointed as a Law Officer in any department of the Government of Sindh, he cannot be appointed to the post of District Public Prosecutor has to be ruled out for the understanding that it does not appeal to logic--We, therefore, hold that ten (10) years' service experience includes a period of serving as a law officer, which counts active practice at the bar which petitioner possesses and therefore is qualified to appear for the subject test for the position of District Public Prosecutor--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of SPSC is directed to allow the petitioner to appear in the subject interview and after conducting his interview announce the result accordingly within two (02) weeks from today. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3113 | 2020 SHC KHI 1601 | Const. P. 7563/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Irshad Ahmed Siyal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.289-K/2020 Irshad Ahmed Siyal & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 3114 | 2020 SHC HYD 2427 | Const. P. 241/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3115 | 2020 SHC HYD 1408 | Const. P. 2536/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Raza Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3116 | 2022 PLC CS Note 24 | Const. P. 8251/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Jamal Nasir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-JAN-20 | Yes | STEVTA--promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA under Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--a civil/government servant is entitled for proforma promotion, once during his service his promotion is approved by the Competent Authority and in the meanwhile if he superannuates, he is entitled for all benefits as admissible under the law--we deem it appropriate to send the matter of the petitioner for the promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA to the Competent Authority of Sindh Government for consideration in accordance with law. STEVTA | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3117 | 2020 SHC HYD 894 | Const. P. 1738/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Nizamuddin (Petitioner) VS WAPDA, and another (Respondent) | 06-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1437-K/2020 Nizamuddin Memon v. Water and Power Development Authority & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3118 | 2020 SHC HYD 82 | Const. P. 738/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Qadir Kaloi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3119 | 2020 SHC HYD 198 | Criminal Appeal 52/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2018 | Meer Muhammad Umer (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3120 | 2020 SHC HYD 496 | Const. P. 714/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Qabil Rind & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3121 | 2020 SHC HYD 626 | Const. P. 3366/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Qurban Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak and others (Respondent) | 12-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3122 | 2020 SHC HYD 1991 | Const. P. 1457/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Aqeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 12-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3123 | 2020 SHC KHI 2213 | Const. P. 6632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Fareed Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-OCT-20 | Yes | regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3640/2020 Abdul Haque Shaikh and others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Sectt. Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed |
| 3124 | 2021 SHC KHI 519 | Const. P. 343/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/s Mateen Shopping Galaxy (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3125 | 2020 SHC KHI 375 | Const. P. 442/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Sughran (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3126 | 2020 SHC HYD 1714 | Const. P. 755/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3127 | 2020 SHC HYD 1026 | Criminal Appeal 109/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Muhammad Arshad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3128 | 2020 SHC HYD 868 | I. A 9/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mushtaque Ali (Appellant) VS UBL (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3129 | 2020 SHC KHI 1979 | Const. P. 869/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS M.D STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) | 14-OCT-20 | Yes | Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3130 | 2020 SHC HYD 713 | Const. P. 721/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Abdul Manan (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1279-K/2020 Abdul Mannan v. The District Judge, Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3131 | 2020 SHC KHI 599 | Const. P. 2666/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Saeed Habib (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 16-DEC-20 | Yes | NBP--We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-bank. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.305/2021 Saeed Habib v. National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 3132 | 2020 SHC KHI 961 | Const. P. 483/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 11-DEC-20 | Yes | In view of the above, this petition is allowed with the direction to the competent authority of the respondent-police department to take the decision afresh as to whether Constable Amjad Ali embraced Shahadat on 26.12.2012 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014.The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within two (2) months from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3133 | 2021 SHC KHI 1280 | Const. P. 248/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Faiz Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-21 | Yes | Government accommodation in police department | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.819/2024 Cantonment Board Clifton thr. Cantonment Executive Officer, Karachi v. Mrs, Shehla Balal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 05-Aug-24) |
| 3134 | 2020 SHC KHI 1208 | Const. P. 5931/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imtiaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-20 | Yes | Actualization of promotion in BPS-19 and posting--The transfer and posting of a civil/government servant is prerogative of the Government, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, petitioner is under obligation to serve anywhere in the province, he has no vested right to remain at particular post for indefinite period, therefore the petitioner cannot ask for posting at particular place. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3135 | 2020 SHC KHI 1274 | Const. P. 3075/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) VS Chief Naval Staff and Ors (Respondent) | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect? Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3136 | 2020 SHC HYD 671 | Const. P. 544/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Shahid Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | 06-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3137 | 2020 SHC HYD 881 | Const. P. 1648/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Yaseen & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 12-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3138 | 2020 SHC KHI 638 | Const. P. 5682/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 10-FEB-20 | Yes | Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3139 | 2020 SHC KHI 411 | Const. P. 3597/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Mohammad Ashfaq Khan Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 18-FEB-20 | Yes | Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3140 | 2020 SHC HYD 552 | Const. P. 940/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Haroon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3141 | 2021 SHC KHI 286 | Const. P. 663/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Danish Sanober (Petitioner) VS KPT and Others (Respondent) | 08-FEB-21 | Yes | KPT-Termination--Besides respondents have leveled serious allegations against the petitioner about his appointment at the back door, and subsequent involvement in criminal activities, his absence from duty due to certain political/ criminal activities as discussed supra. Keeping in view the above-mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, we do not see any infringement of the right of the Petitioner which could be called in question by way of Writ Petition. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3142 | 2021 SHC KHI 1270, 2024 PLC (CS) 1097 | Const. P. 1018/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-21 | Yes | the decision of PSB-II for promoting the private respondent No.8 in BPS-19 against future vacancy in absence of ACRs is/was an erroneous decision--ACRs--it is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if the promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, the competent authority, and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3143 | 2020 SHC HYD 1132 | Const. P. 978/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3144 | 2020 SHC HYD 711 | Const. P. 730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Asim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-20 | Yes | The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3145 | 2020 SHC HYD 391 | Const. P. 1/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Allah Obhayo & Other (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3146 | 2021 SHC KHI 1260 | Const. P. 331/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waqas Behlum (Petitioner) VS KPT and Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-21 | Yes | KPT-fresh show cause notice--allegations of misconduct--It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During arguments, we have been informed that the petitioners service has not yet been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings, however, they are at liberty to conclude the disciplinary proceedings (if not earlier concluded) within a reasonable time under law after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3147 | 2020 SHC KHI 1540 | Const. P. 3405/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nazim Inayat (Petitioner) VS National Command & Authority (NCA) and Ors (Respondent) | 10-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3148 | 2020 SHC HYD 642 | Const. P. 1616/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3149 | 2020 SHC HYD 1878 | Const. P. 153/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Pervez Leghari (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naseema & another (Respondent) | 21-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3150 | 2020 SHC KHI 541, 2021 PLC (CS) 1573 | Const. P. 9013/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Raja Naved Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-20 | Yes | fake appointment--Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Honble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3151 | 2020 SHC HYD 1732 | Const. P. 127/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Nabi (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 13-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3152 | 2020 SHC HYD 1669 | Cr.Acq.A. 117/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sher Muhammad Jogi (Appellant) VS Liaquat Ali and others (Respondent) | 24-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3153 | 2020 SHC HYD 1608 | Const. P. 961/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Rustam Ali (Petitioner) VS Dr Sikandar Ali & Other (Respondent) | 01-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3154 | 2023 PLC (CS) 1133, 2021 PLD Sindh 103, 2023 PLC CS 1133 | Const. P. 139/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) VS C.A.A (Respondent) | 04-FEB-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3155 | 2020 SHC HYD 740 | Const. P. 747/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Khanan through his legal heirs (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Tando Allahyar & others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3156 | 2020 SHC KHI 1032 | Const. P. 2884/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sikandar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.381-K/2020 Sikandar Ali & others v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3157 | 2020 SHC HYD 903 | Const. P. 298/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ali Gohar & another (Petitioner) VS Abdullah Mallah & Other (Respondent) | 18-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.727-K/2020 Ali Gohar & another v. Abdullah Mallah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3158 | 2020 SHC HYD 1707 | Cr.Misc. 427/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Hamid Ali (Applicant) VS 1st Adj. S.J/Ex.Officio J.P Tharparkar & Ors. (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3159 | 2020 SHC SUK 1609 | Const. P. 32/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Bashir Ahmed Phulpoto & others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent) | 23-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | |||
| 3160 | 2020 SHC HYD 865 | Const. P. 925/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ayaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3161 | 2020 SHC KHI 1056 | Const. P. 1827/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Qasim Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3162 | 2020 SHC HYD 2027 | Civil Revision 174/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Azizullah and others (Applicant) VS Zulifqar Ali and others (Respondent) | 09-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3163 | 2021 SHC KHI 268 | Const. P. 882/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Ahmer Hameed S/o Syed Abdul Hameed @ Babar (Petitioner) VS Mst. Iqbal-un-Nisa Begum and others (Respondent) | 04-JAN-21 | Yes | civil dispute between the parties--I am not in agreement with the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner for the simple reason that the petitioner being a Head Constable in the Police Department is/was not required to indulge in such kind of disputes and take advantage of police uniform. Moreover, Petitioners prayer to direct the police officials not to entertain the complaint of the private respondent, prima facie is not maintainable as no ostensible evidence pertaining to any harassment being caused by the police officials to the petitioner has been substantiated to justify interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as the matter of a civil dispute between the parties is being tried by the competent civil Court.--Abdullah Memon, Superintendent of Police Madadgar 15 present in Court states that he will look into the matter and conduct an impartial inquiry. He is directed to hold an inquiry into the matter and if the petitioner is found involved in usurping the private property, he may proceed against him in accordance with law. The parties are at liberty to avail their remedy before the competent forum under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3164 | 2021 SHC KHI 852 | Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-APR-21 | Yes | Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 3165 | 2021 SHC KHI 325 | Const. P. 3735/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Malik Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAR-21 | Yes | Contempt proceedings--CAA | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3166 | 2021 SHC KHI 1185 | Const. P. 1929/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Mustafa Noonari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 19-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3167 | 2021 CLD 1008 | H.C.A 284/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Famous Brands (Private) Limited (Appellant) VS Samsonite IP Holdings S.A.R.L & another (Respondent) | 19-MAR-21 | Yes | By moving an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant does not surrender to the jurisdiction of the Court. The jurisdiction is conferred by law based on facts. A litigant may be right or wrong in asserting that the Court had no jurisdiction or that the suit is barred by law. But, this act of litigant would neither confer and/or bestow nor take away any jurisdiction which in fact is conferred by law. Actions of parties prior to litigation leads to constitution of a cause to initiate proceedings in Court of competent jurisdiction. - If the two applications were not moved simultaneously and would have been filed one after the other, will a litigant still be debarred from filing the other application such as Order VII Rule 10 CPC.A simple answer to this proposition is No as rejection of plaint has its own reasons whereas return of plaint has its own. In an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant has only to show that it does not disclose a cause of action; the relief claimed is undervalued or is not properly valued and that the suit appears to be barred by law. None of these rational is available while entertaining an application under order VII rule 10 CPC, which is for return of plaint on numerous counts including but not limited to pecuniary jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. Courts when plaint is presented are required to see whether they are bestowed with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction whereas under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Courts are required to see whether it is barred by law. The Court had to apply law to decide the issue of jurisdiction; it is the law that confers or takes away the jurisdiction of the Court and not based on moving of application under the aforesaid provision of law. Another proposition is that while entertaining and hearing application under order VII rule 11 CPC Court is empowered to return the plaint if the circumstances so warrants as required under the law. -Section 86(3) of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 provides that owner of the trademark which is entitled to protection under the Paris Convention as a well-known trademark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Pakistan of a trademark which, or the essential part of which, is identical or deceptively similar to the well-known trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services, where the use is likely to cause confusion or where such use cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the well-known trademark. - At the very outset there is nothing in the instant case which could attract Section 81 of Trademark Ordinance, 2001. The proprietor of the mark never gave up their right or it has not been demonstrated that for continuous period of five years from the date of alleged registration (in favour of user) in the use of registered mark in Pakistan, the proprietor was aware of it and that the proprietor ceased to be entitled on the basis of that earlier trademark or other rights. The engagement of the appellant with the respondent itself is enough to understand that there was no case of acquiescence at all. In fact the appellant conceded when they assumed the role of a distributor. -The appellate Court normally avoid interfering in the orders of the interlocutory nature involving exercise of discretion as the appellate Court cannot substitute its own discretion unless when the discretion has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, perversely or where the Court has ignored certain principles regulating grant or refusal of injunction. The appellate Court is not required to reassess the material to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the trial Court/learned Single Judge on the consideration that another view is possible. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.4034/2021 Famous Brands (Private) Limited, Lahore v. Samsonite IP Holdings S.a.r.l., Luxembourg through its Attorney Abdul Rasheed, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 3168 | 2021 SHC KHI 1221 | Const. P. 4848/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Tanveer Hyder Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | Prim facie, the petitioner has a qualifying length of service to his credit and he gave various reasons to claim the interest on the delayed payments. It is well-settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder---Thus, the competent authority of Pakistan-Railways is liable to release the withheld amount with profit and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 5.6.2017 to date. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3169 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1129 | Const. P. 4826/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Muhammad Usman Ghani Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 16-FEB-21 | Yes | appointment in PQA | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.535-K/2021 Muhammad Usman Ghani Qureshi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3170 | 2021 SHC KHI 283 | Const. P. 687/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Faizan Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 16-MAR-21 | Yes | deceased quota | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3171 | 2020 SHC KHI 418 | Const. P. 5659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Sajjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.283-K/2020 Muhammad Sajjad v. Federation of Pakistan,C.P.L.A.1324-K/2022 Muhammad Javed & others v. The Federation of Pakistan through & Secretary, Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed |
| 3172 | 2021 SHC KHI 1347 | Const. P. 6847/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Wazeer Ali Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3173 | 2021 SHC KHI 205 | Const. P. 6243/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mehtab Ahmed Siddiqui and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-OCT-21 | Yes | The Competent Authority of HBFCL is directed to forthwith initiate the process for selection of an eligible person to be appointed against the aforesaid public office / posts in HBFC, inter alia, having regard to the principles and law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3174 | 2021 SHC KHI 772 | Const. P. 3930/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 08-OCT-21 | Yes | The pivotal question involved in the listed application is whether Civil / Government / public servant is entitled to have the protection of the previous service rendered as Adhoc temporary/contingent basis in the organization for fixation and counting of the previous service for pension. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.77/2022 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another,C.P.L.A.5919/2021 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed |
| 3175 | 2021 SHC KHI 660 | Const. P. 2795/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Shahana Bano (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 08-OCT-21 | Yes | the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to upgrade/re-designate the post of Senior Librarian BPS-18 to BPS-19 in Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), in terms of the policy decision of the Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3176 | 2021 SHC KHI 797 | Const. P. 1435/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Qaiser Iqbal and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3177 | 2022 SHC KHI 354 | Const. P. 2463/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Khalid Abdul Maroof & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3178 | 2021 SHC KHI 1438 | Const. P. 6309/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Naeem Akhtar Khan (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 26-MAR-21 | Yes | we queried from the learned counsel for the Petitioner as to how this Petition is maintainable in its form against the National Command Authority (NCA) under the National Command Authority (Amendment) Act, 2016; besides that SUPARCO, comes under the definition of NCA as provided under clause (A) of Section 2 of the NCA Act, 2010. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3179 | 2021 SHC KHI 565 | Const. P. 1414/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Ahemd Kaleem Usmani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 19-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3180 | 2021 SHC LAR 798 | Cr.Bail 184/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Bhano Khan Hattar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3181 | 2021 SHC LAR 911 | Cr.Bail 252/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ahmed Ali @ Ali Bhutto and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 16-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3182 | 2021 SHC LAR 60 | Cr.Bail 216/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asghar Gahejo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 16-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3183 | 2021 SHC LAR 757 | Cr.Bail 205/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Nisar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3184 | 2021 SHC LAR 1010 | Cr.Bail 631/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Noor Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3185 | 2021 SHC KHI 396 | Const. P. 1297/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst. Nadia (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police and Others (Respondent) | 22-FEB-21 | Yes | under section 22-A & 22-B | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3186 | 2021 SHC LAR 1023 | Cr.J.A 62/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sadullah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 07-JUL-21 | Yes | We have also observed that in case in hand the prosecution has failed to prove the safe custody of the recovered charas and its safe transmission to Chemical Examiner. The recovery of charas was allegedly affected on 20.10.2017 and the sealed samples were sent for chemical analysis on 23.10.2017; however, it is not known as to where and in whose possession the alleged samples were kept during intervening period. PW-1 Excise Inspector Gul Muhammad Bhutto, the complainant/ I.O has not furnished in his evidence any detail regarding safe custody of the alleged samples, therefore, no evidence is available in record to prove the safe custody of the recovered substance at the Excise police station and its safe transmission from said place to the office of Chemical Examiner. It has been held by the Apex Court in the cases of Abdul Ghani and others v. The State and others (2019 SCMR 608), Faizan Ali v. The State (2019 SCMR 1649), The State through Regional Director ANF v. Imam Bukhsh and others (2018 SCMR 2039), Ikramullah and others v. The State (2015 SCMR 1002) and Amjad Ali v. The State (2012 SCMR 577) that in a case where safe custody of the recovered substance or safe transmission of sample of the recovered substance is not proved by the prosecution through any independent evidence, it cannot be said with any degree of confidence that the prosecution had succeeded in proving its case against an accused beyond reasonable doubt. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3187 | 2021 SHC KHI 847, 2024 PLC (CS) 1118 | Const. P. 2135/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Noman Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 30-MAR-21 | Yes | Sindh Education Foundation --we conclude that there is no illegality, infirmity, or material irregularity in the impugned letters dated 06.02.2020 & 30.11.2020 issued by the respondent-SEF. Besides, the issue of continue in service, since he is facing the NAB reference based on moral turpitude, thus we cannot order the competent authority to continue his service. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3188 | 2021 SHC KHI 725 | Const. P. 4496/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Chairman EOBI and Ors (Respondent) | 10-SEP-21 | Yes | With regard to length of service, counsel for the EOBI contends that the petitioner remained employee of the respondent for a period of four years, therefore, he is not entitled for any benefit. Needless to mention that decision/termination was challenged by the petitioner in referred grievance application which was allowed, hence, it cannot be said that length of service of the petitioner was only four years. That service would be treated as upto the age of superannuation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3189 | 2021 SHC LAR 507 | Cr.Bail 242/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ameer Bux @ Luqoo Bangwar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 26-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.112-K/2021 Deedar Ali v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution |
| 3190 | 2021 SHC KHI 496 | Const. P. 4003/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Munaza Yasmeen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Learned / Hon (Respondent) | 22-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakistan International Airline Company to allow joining period to them till 13.06.2019. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 3191 | 2021 SHC KHI 793 | Const. P. 2201/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Asif Ansari and Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Televison Corp. and ORs (Respondent) | 04-JUN-21 | Yes | the foremost questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the re-designation / induction of the private respondents as Producer Programs (G-5) was/is suffering from inherent disqualification under the PTVC rules, and whether the private respondents are holders of the public office, therefore, fall within the purview of sub-clause 1(b) (ii) of Article 199 of the Constitution and this Court has jurisdiction to entertain this petition? | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1075-K/2021 Muhammad Asif Ansari & another v. Pakistan Television Corporation through its Managing Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned |
| 3192 | 2021 SHC KHI 1267 | Const. P. 2643/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Nabi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-21 | Yes | appointment as Police-commandos (BPS-05) in SSU--whether a waiting list candidate, not declared successful, can be recommended for appointment against any vacancy occurring due to non-joining of any successful candidate. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.469-K/2021 Muhammad Nabi & others v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3193 | 2021 SHC HYD 1243 | Const. P. 639/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Ismail & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3194 | 2021 SHC HYD 828 | Cr.Misc. 444/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & Others (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3195 | 2021 SHC HYD 59 | Cr.Misc. 606/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD RIAZ (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL TANDO ALLAHYAR & OTHERS (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3196 | 2021 SHC HYD 166 | Const. P. 2648/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Neno (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3197 | 2021 SHC HYD 662 | Const. P. 68/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2009 | Gulshan and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 3198 | 2021 SHC HYD 163 | Cr.Bail 663/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | SYED QURBAN ALI SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3199 | 2021 SHC HYD 1075 | Cr.Bail 626/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Hizbullah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3200 | 2021 SHC HYD 1430 | Const. P. 1931/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Vishandas (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 3201 | 2021 SHC HYD 1411 | Const. P. 683/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Fawad Fatah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3202 | 2021 SHC HYD 1170 | Cr.Misc. 689/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Pir Shoaib Ahmed Qureshi and others (Applicant) VS SHO PS Khadhar SBA and others (Respondent) | 29-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3203 | 2021 SHC HYD 141 | Const. P. 466/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ajaz-ul-Haque (Petitioner) VS Mst. Urooj & Others (Respondent) | 06-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3204 | 2021 SHC HYD 512 | Civil Revision 224/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | P.O Sindh and others (Applicant) VS Ahmed Nawaz and others (Respondent) | 20-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3205 | 2021 SHC HYD 377 | Const. P. 427/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Arsalan Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3206 | 2021 SHC HYD 1370 | Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Out of turn promotion, deputation and OPS | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 3207 | 2021 SHC HYD 1127 | Const. P. 19/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Mushtaque Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.47-K/2022 Shahzad Khan v. Mushtaque Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3208 | 2021 SHC HYD 826 | Const. P. 2380/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Abdul Khaliq (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3209 | 2021 SHC HYD 1337 | Const. P. 1160/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Ghous Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3210 | 2021 SHC HYD 1072 | Const. P. 3157/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sh. Nenoo Bheel (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | we may observe that pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges; prima-facie there was/is no conviction in his credit, and pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on that score. In our view pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of any charges; and, is violative to the law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon (PLD 2007 SC 35) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 3211 | 2021 SHC KHI 606 | Criminal Miscelleneous 793/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2021 | ABDUL GHANI S/O SOOBAL KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ORS (Respondent) | 29-DEC-21 | Yes | the learned judge directed the police to register a case against the applicant-son under the Protection of Parents Ordinance 2021 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.688/2022 Ahmad Jahanzaib & others v. Mian Arshad Ali Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 3212 | 2021 SHC HYD 1252 | Const. P. 962/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Ashraf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 09-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3213 | 2021 SHC HYD 1138 | Const. P. 2507/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor Shaikhson (Respondent) | 25-NOV-21 | Yes | the Sindh Consumer Protection Act, 2014 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3214 | 2021 SHC HYD 1205 | Civil Revision 173/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ahmed Khan & Others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail & Another (Respondent) | 22-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3215 | 2021 SHC KHI 1251 | Cr.Bail 1917/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | SHAHZAD MASTOI S/O MUHAMAD RIAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 28-DEC-21 | Yes | seeking admission on post-arrest bail in FIR No.361/2021 for offenses under Section 324/34 PPC registered at PS Sukhan, Karachi | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3216 | 2021 SHC HYD 961 | Const. P. 2346/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mukhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Shoukat Ali (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3217 | 2021 SHC KHI 554 | Const. P. 3310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Imamdin and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 3218 | 2021 SHC HYD 238 | Const. P. 2665/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Majid Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 09-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3219 | 2021 SHC HYD 900 | Const. P. 2296/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 3220 | 2021 SHC KHI 1297 | Cr.Bail 1357/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | MUHAMMAD HUMAYUN QADRI S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 31-DEC-21 | Yes | Applicant Muhammad Humayun Qadri has earlier been admitted to ad-interim pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order dated 14.7.2021. Now the matter is fixed for confirmation of pre-arrest bail or otherwise | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3221 | 2022 SHC KHI 203 | Const. P. 413/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ms. Baby Hawa and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3222 | 2022 PLC (CS) 1304 | Const. P. 5143/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr. Tariq Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.639-K/2022 Dr.Tariq Ahmed Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3223 | 2022 SHC KHI 617 | Const. P. 1052/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Arshad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3224 | 2022 SHC KHI 82 | Const. P. 6779/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Salman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3225 | 2022 SHC KHI 692 | Const. P. 8567/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mahmood Zamir Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.544-K/2022 Mahmood Zamir Farooqui v. The Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Ports & Shipping & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | |
| 3226 | 2021 SHC HYD 1101 | Const. P. 849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mustafa Saeed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 23-DEC-21 | Yes | whether relaxation up to fifteen years in upper age limit, under sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 of the Sind Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974, applies to the appointments against the posts in BPS-16 and 17 to be filled through SPSC Competitive Examination-2021. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.183-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary Forest & Wildlife Department, Government of Sindh & others v. Mustafa Saeed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3227 | 2022 SHC KHI 54 | Const. P. 2161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Kamal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.568-K/2022 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Maritime Affairs Government of Pakistan & others v. Kamal Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 3228 | 2022 SHC HYD 76 | Const. P. 27/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2010 | Nooruddin and 05 others (Petitioner) VS Federal Land Commissioner and others (Respondent) | 25-JAN-22 | Yes | The pivotal questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the subject land surrendered under Martial Law Regulation (MLR) 64 of 1959, which was resumed by Deputy Land Commissioner (DLC) Hyderabad vide order dated 17.6.1959, and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners became Qabuli Land? And, whether Civil Suit No.40/1972 filed by respondent No.7 was rightly decreed vide judgment and decree dated 23.10.1974, and its viries, could be called in question in Constitution Petition, in the terms paragraph 19 and 26 of Martial Law Regulation-1972? And, whether the Chief Land Commissioner, Sindh could pass the order after the judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Qazalbash Waqf, to re-determine of holding declaration under MLR/115/72 and LR-II/77 after the surrender of the excess land by the declarant, its resumption by the government; and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners in the year 1959 and 1960? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1137/2022 Akhund Ghulam Muhammad through L.Rs and others v. Federal Land Commission, Islamabad through its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Notice) |
| 3229 | 2022 SHC KHI 661 | Const. P. 659/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Pervez Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3230 | 2022 SHC KHI 63 | Const. P. 5199/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sadullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 11-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3231 | 2021 SHC HYD 1259 | Const. P. 411/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Najaf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 18-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3232 | 2021 SHC KHI 1066 | Const. P. 2834/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Y.B Holdings Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3233 | 2022 SHC KHI 416 | Const. P. 806/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3234 | 2025 SHC KHI 1341 | Const. P. 7229/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Capt. Rizwan Saif Khan Ghouri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 13-MAY-25 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this court deems it proper to dispose of the captioned petition based on the observations made in paragraphs 5 to 13 of its prior order dated April 29, 2022, and preceeding paragraphs, for the reason that these observations served the broader public interest and aligned with Supreme Court decisions, and this order is in rem not personam therefore, the petitioner's retirement in 2022 did not render the legal principles outlined therein irrelevant. 5. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the Chairman Port Qasim Authority for compliance within time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.768-K/2022 Port Qasim Authority through its Chairman & another v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Maritime Affairs Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3235 | 2022 SHC KHI 286 | Const. P. 4082/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Haneef (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 15-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1715/2022 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commissoin (PAEC) through its Secretary (PAEC), Islamabad v. Muhammad Haneef and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned. Be fixed a/w CPLA.3433/21 etc | |
| 3236 | 2022 SHC KHI 687 | Const. P. 363/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3237 | 2022 SHC KHI 39 | Const. P. 3982/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Qadeer Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan And Ors. (Respondent) | 17-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1328/2022 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited through its President, Islamabad and others v. Syed Qadeer Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3238 | 2021 SHC KHI 754 | Const. P. 2148/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s OMI Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3239 | 2021 SHC KHI 395 | Const. P. 2837/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Tabba Heart Institute and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3240 | 2022 SHC KHI 482 | Const. P. 3153/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Yasir Ali Baloch and Others (Petitioner) VS Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Others (Respondent) | 10-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.931-K/2022 The Managing Director, Sindh Technical Education & Vocational Training Authority (STEVTA) v. Yasir Ali Baloch & another,C.P.L.A.1281-K/2022 Yasir Ali Baloch & another v. The Administrative Secretary STEVTA & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Pending Adjourned (Notice) to Respondent & DAG | |
| 3241 | 2022 SHC KHI 224 | Const. P. 1406/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Moula Bux Sahito & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1932/2022 Azeem Qadir and others v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4046/2022 Farzana Perveen v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4047/2022 Humaira Qayum v. Maula Bux Sahito and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed | |
| 3242 | 2021 SHC KHI 1073 | Const. P. 3024/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Qarora Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.403-K/2022 Dr. Qararo Shah v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of National Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 3243 | 2022 SHC KHI 696 | Const. P. 830/1999 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 1999 | Haroon Rashild. (Petitioner) VS Fed.of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) | 24-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3244 | 2023 SHC KHI 223, 2024 PLC (CS) 833 | Const. P. 579/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Faheemuddin Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.524-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Faheemuddin & others,C.P.L.A.2033/2023 Noor Ahmed Khuharo and others v. Faheemuddin Memon and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed, | |
| 3245 | 2022 SHC HYD 259 | II.A. 32/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Sachal thr LRs (Appellant) VS P.o Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3246 | 2022 SHC HYD 45 | II.A. 48/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | M/S Housing and Land Development (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Noor Muhammad Qureshi thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) | 05-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1315-K/2022 M/s. Housing and Land Development Pvt. Ltd. v. Noor Muhammad Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3247 | 2022 SHC HYD 194 | I. A 81/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Province of Sindh and Others (Appellant) VS Khairuddin and Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.13-K/2023 Khairuddin& another v. Government of Sindh through Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time | |
| 3248 | 2023 SHC KHI 398 | Const. P. 6291/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3249 | 2023 SHC KHI 1008 | Const. P. 5635/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-23 | Yes | The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2126/2023 Trustees of the Karachi Port, through its Board of Trustees, KPT, Karachi v. Mazhar Ali Jatoi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned.to be fixed before 3 member bench |
| 3250 | 2022 SHC KHI 430 | Const. P. 8830/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Wahid Khursheed Kunwar (Petitioner) VS EOBI and Ors (Respondent) | 13-MAY-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3251 | 2023 SHC KHI 996 | Const. P. 2260/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Syed Meeral Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3252 | 2022 SHC HYD 608 | Const. P. 163/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Haji Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chairman WAPDA & others (Respondent) | 01-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3253 | 2023 SHC KHI 553 | Const. P. 5681/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Sohail (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3254 | 2023 SHC KHI 348 | Const. P. 1171/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Dr. Muhammad Javaid Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 30-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3255 | 2023 SHC KHI 40 | Const. P. 3965/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 03-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3256 | 2023 SHC KHI 89 | Const. P. 3402/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Fazal Karim Mahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 03-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.714-K/2023 Fazal Karim Mehar v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Government of Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Notice to Respondent and Addl: A.G. Sindh) | |
| 3257 | 2022 SHC HYD 724 | R.A (Civil Revision) 38/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2001 | Wali Muhammad (Applicant) VS Secretary Health Depatt:and other (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.114/2023 Wali Mohammad v. The Secretary, Health Department Govt of Sindh through Deputy Commissioner, Nawabshah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 3258 | 2022 SHC LAR 71 | Const. P. 746/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Umeed Ali (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) | 02-AUG-22 | Yes | It is crystal clear that the respondentrevenue department/Government of Sindh has to make recruitment to every post applied by the candidates under the law as discussed supra as well as based on invalidated or incapacitated/minority/differently-abled and deceased quota reserved for those employees by issuing appointment order by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3259 | 2022 SHC LAR 638 | Const. P. 633/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Asif Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Kamber and others (Respondent) | 27-JUL-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 3260 | 2023 SHC KHI 876 | Const. P. 3105/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Aadill Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ORs (Respondent) | 16-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.573-K/2023 M. Asghar Janjua & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded to HC | |
| 3261 | 2022 SHC LAR 418 | Const. P. 684/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ali Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer and others (Respondent) | 27-JUL-22 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3262 | 2023 SHC KHI 230 | Const. P. 862/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Naveed Uddin Qadri and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3263 | 2023 SHC KHI 882 | Const. P. 838/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Farhan Khan Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3264 | 2022 SHC HYD 826 | R.A (Civil Revision) 95/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2007 | Sain Dino and others (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3265 | 2023 SHC KHI 483 | Const. P. 1827/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Ilyas (Petitioner) VS C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) | 25-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3266 | 2023 SHC KHI 821 | Const. P. 6118/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) | 06-JUN-23 | Yes | Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3162/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight |
| 3267 | 2023 SHC HYD 662 | Const. P. 2090/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Molua Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 21-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3268 | 2023 SHC KHI 253 | Const. P. 3409/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Rauf and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-JUN-23 | Yes | It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3269 | 2023 SHC HYD 242 | Criminal Appeal 158/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.A S 157 of 2022 | Original Side | 2022 | IRFAN ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 14-APR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3270 | 2023 SHC HYD 928 | Const. P. 1214/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ghulam Mustafa & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-MAY-23 | Yes | Encroachment on amenity plot, no title document in favour,petition dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3271 | 2023 SHC HYD 678 | Const. P. 613/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3272 | 2024 SHC KHI 853, 2024 PLC (CS) 875 | Const. P. 6365/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Naimatullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 13-FEB-24 | Yes | It is a settled proposition of law that the Government is entitled to make rules in the interest of expediency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee that has to determine the eligibility criteria for promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision-making of the Government the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted and no vested right of a Government employee is involved in the matter of promotion or the rules determining his/her eligibility or fitness. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3273 | 2023 SHC KHI 861 | Cr.Bail 1123/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | HAIDER ALI S/O SHER ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 20-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3274 | 2024 SHC MPK 441 | Cr.Tran 9/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Wali Ahad Khan (Appellant) VS Mumtaz Ali Mallah & others (Respondent) | 24-SEP-24 | Yes | Prima facie the ground raised by the learned counsel for the applicant is tenable based on the reason that he has life threats from the accused party to kill him if he/complainant attends the court at Khipro, in such circumstances, he intends to seek a fair and speedy trial in the criminal case pending adjudication before another court at Sanghar or otherwise, but not at Khipro, which is only possible if the trial court proceeds with the matter. However, in the best interest of justice, coupled with the instance taken by the learned counsel for the parties, it would be appropriate for a speedy trial of the case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3275 | 2024 SHC SUK 974 | Const. P. 805/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hoti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3276 | 2024 SHC SUK 328 | Const. P. 1564/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst Zainab Butwani & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3277 | 2024 SHC SUK 51 | Const. P. 1034/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Siddique Ujjan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3278 | 2024 SHC SUK 867 | Const. P. 482/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Abid Khorkhani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3279 | 2024 SHC SUK 457 | Const. P. 1784/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Nadeem Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.650-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and others v. Nadeem Solangi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3280 | 2024 SHC MPK 1414 | Const. P. 911/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Musrat (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | The subject issue involves the intricacies of marriages of the parties, which is governed by the Christian Marriage Act 1872, The Divorce Act 1869, and the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance. The court underscored in [2003 YLR 400 Lahore-High-Court-Lahore] that Christian marriages in Pakistan are monogamous unions, setting them apart from Muslim marriages, which are seen as civil contracts. The Christian Marriage Act stringently prohibits polygamy, making any second marriage conducted without dissolving the first one void and punishable. At the same time, the legal validity of a marriage is largely determined by the religious backgrounds of the individuals involved, as is the second marriage of Mst. Sughran after converting to Islam. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3281 | 2024 SHC SUK 146 | Const. P. 1784/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3282 | 2024 SHC SUK 1195 | Const. P. 478/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ashique Hussain Leghari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3283 | 2024 SHC KHI 925 | Const. P. 5001/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sania Zahra and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-24 | Yes | In a landmark 2019 judgment, the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the National Commission on Status of Women v Government of Pakistan PLD 2019 SC 218 declared jirgas illegal, citing violations of international human rights laws and the Constitution of Pakistan. The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of equal protection before the law, due process, and fair trial, rights that are often denied in jirga proceedings. This judgment is a significant step towards upholding women's rights and ensuring that justice is administered through legal channels. It is crucial to continue to monitor the implementation of this decision and to address the social and cultural factors that contribute to the persistence of harmful practices. In this regard, FIR can be lodged against the holding of illegal jirga by the chieftain and all others who participated in the Jirga in violation of the 2019 Supreme Court judgment. This judgment declared the jirga system as illegal and against the fundamental rights of citizens. Law enforcement agencies are obligated to take action against those who organize or participate in such jirgas. Let at the first instance, FIR be lodged by the SSP concerned and bring the culprits into justice without fail. 8. So far as FIR No.412 of 2024 of PS Malir Cantt, District Malir, Karachi registered under Section 365-B PPC is concerned the same is hereby quashed and such summary report be submitted before the concerned Magistrate for disposal of the case. He is directed to take action against all concerned police officials who failed and neglected to perform their duties to curb this menace. 9. The IGP Sindh is directed to take stock of the things and take prompt disciplinary action against all police officials of the concerned district/police station in accordance with the law. 10. In view of the statement of the parties, the private respondents are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs.500,000/- each before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose. 11. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3284 | 2024 SHC KHI 733 | Criminal Miscelleneous 639/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2022 | KARIM BUX JOKHIO @ JAVED & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 04-NOV-24 | Yes | We have noticed that the Judicial Magistrate has been conferred with wide powers to take cognizance of an offense not only when he receives information about the commission of offense from a third person but also when he has knowledge or even suspicion that the offense has been committed. The Magistrate has the power to independently review a police report, even if it concludes that no offense was committed. They can disagree with the police's opinion and take cognizance of the offense, ordering further investigation or issuing process to the accused. The Magistrate's decision is based on their assessment of the facts, not solely on the police's opinion. The terms "charge sheet" and "final report" are not formally defined in the Code. However, they are commonly used in police rules to refer to reports filed under Section 170 Cr.P.C. Reports filed under Section 169, where there's insufficient evidence, are often termed "referred charge," "final report," or "summary." 16. In view of the above we, therefore, dispose of these Criminal Miscellaneous Applications along with the pending application(s), with direction to the trial court to proceed with the matter, frame the charge, and culminate the Criminal proceedings in its logical conclusion within a reasonable time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3285 | 2024 SHC SUK 1005 | Const. P. 549/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Ahad Buriro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3286 | 2024 SHC SUK 330, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1435 | Const. P. 462/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sahib Dino Tanwari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3287 | 2024 SHC SUK 683 | Const. P. 873/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Yousif Joyo & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3288 | 2024 SHC SUK 549 | Const. P. 1595/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ghulam Sarwar Zardari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3289 | 2024 SHC SUK 4, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1439 | Const. P. 629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Javed Ali Balouch (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-24 | Yes | 7. For the reasons given in the aforesaid judgments, in my view, there can hardly be any doubt that Respondent-Company is also a ???person??? within the meaning of Article 199(1) (a) (ii) read with clause (5) thereof. The learned five Member Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Defence Officers' Housing Authority and others v. Lt. Col. Syed Jawaid Ahmed and other connected appeals supra has answered the question about the maintainability of the petition against the government-owned and controlled companies. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3290 | 2024 SHC SUK 412 | Const. P. 410/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Siddique Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3291 | 2024 SHC SUK 601 | Const. P. 431/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muharram Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3292 | 2024 SHC SUK 303 | Const. P. 519/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khadim Hussain Bhanbhro & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3293 | 2024 SHC SUK 1090 | Const. P. 533/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Niaz Husain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3294 | 2024 SHC SUK 971 | Const. P. 299/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Sajid Hussain Bhutto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3295 | 2024 SHC SUK 1249 | Const. P. 1725/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Wahab Ansari (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3296 | 2024 SHC SUK 331 | Const. P. 470/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Hidayatullah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3297 | 2024 SHC KHI 704 | Cr.Bail 1154/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | AAMIR ALI S/O MUHAMMAD SOOMRO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 09-JUL-24 | Yes | Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case, who challaned the present applicant along with others, these two versions require thorough probe by the trial Court. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant as recorded above, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail in crime No. 145 of 2024 of PS Steel Town subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3298 | 2024 SHC KHI 990 | Criminal Miscelleneous 987/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2023 | DR. FATEH ALI S/O YAMEEN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | 09-JUL-24 | Yes | Minute examination of a case and conducting a fact-finding exercise are not included in the functions of a Justice of Peace but he is saddled with a sense of duty to redress the grievance of the complainant who is aggrieved by the refusal of a Police Officer to register his report. The offenses have been categorized by the Cr.P.C. into two classes i.e., cognizable and non-cognizable. Section 154 of the Cr.P.C. lays down a procedure for conveying information to an S.H.O. to the commission of a cognizable offense, while the provisions of Section 155 (1) of the Cr.P.C. articulates the procedure vis-??-vis a non-cognizable offense. 5. At whatever time, an Officer in charge of a Police Station receives some information about the commission of an offense, he is expected first to find out whether the offense disclosed fell into the category of cognizable offenses or non-cognizable offenses. There is no provision in any law, including Section 154 or 155 of the Cr.P.C., which authorizes an Officer Incharge of a Police Station to hold any inquiry to assess the correctness or falsity of the information before complying with the command of the said provisions. He is obligated to reduce the same into writing, notwithstanding the fact whether such information is true or otherwise. 6. The condition precedent for recording an FIR is that it should convey the information of an offense and that too a cognizable one. The remedy of filing a direct complaint cannot measure or match up to the mechanism provided under section 154, Cr.P.C., in which the Officer Incharge of a Police Station is duty-bound to record the statement and register the FIR if a cognizable offence is made out. If in every case it is presumed or assumed that instead of insisting or emphasizing the lodgment of an FIR, the party may file a direct complaint, then the purpose of recording an FIR, as envisaged under section 154, Cr.P.C., will become redundant and futile and it would be very easy for the police to refuse the registration of an FIR with the advice to file a direct complaint. However, in some exceptional circumstances, the alternate remedy in the shape of a direct complaint may be availed but not in every case. 7. The statutory duty casts upon the officer of a police station to enter information regarding the cognizable offense first and then the investigation comes later to gather evidence and other relevant material to prosecute the identified culprits. No doubt, an Investigating Officer plays a crucial role in the administration of the criminal justice system and the constituent of the investigation report and its worth keeps hold of plenteous value and repercussions on the outcome of any criminal case, but tainted investigations can become an acute obstacle in the administration of justice. In the case of Sughra Bibi vs. State [PLD 2018 SC 595], it was held that during the investigation, the Investigating Officer is obliged to investigate the matter from all possible angles while keeping in view all the versions of the incident brought to his notice and as required by Rule 25.2(3) of the Police Rules, 1934. An Investigating Officer has to find out the truth of the matter under investigation. His object shall be to discover the facts of the case and to arrest the real offender or offenders. He shall not commit himself prematurely to any view of the facts for or against any person. Whereas in the case of Babubhai v. State of Gujrat and others [(2010) 12 SCC 254], the Supreme Court of India held that investigation must be fair, transparent, and judicious as it is the minimum requirement of the rule of law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3299 | 2024 SHC SUK 961 | Const. P. 1360/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Aqib Abro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.752-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Aqib Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3300 | 2024 SHC SUK 458 | Const. P. 1027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Aaqib Ali Shahani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.734-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Aaqib Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3301 | 2024 SHC SUK 514 | Const. P. 234/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mansoor Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3302 | 2024 SHC SUK 1388 | Criminal Miscelleneous 772/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Original Side | 2023 | Mst. Bashul Shaikh (Appellant) VS The State & Others (Opponent) | 13-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3303 | 2024 SHC SUK 1196 | Const. P. 848/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Asadullah Shar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.718-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Asadullah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3304 | 2024 SHC KHI 909 | Cr.Bail 987/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shahid S/o Abdul Ghani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-JUL-24 | Yes | It is settled that when an offense is also punishable with a fine only, the accused shall be entitled to bail as of right because if at the trial he is only sentenced to a fine, period as under trial prisoner due to refusal of bail shall amount to a case of double jeopardy. The Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799, has held in categorical terms that granting of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be a exception and directed the Courts of the country to follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by the Supreme Court are constitutionally binding [under Article 189] on all Courts throughout the country. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3305 | 2024 SHC SUK 1122 | Const. P. 1363/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ghulam Hyder Deho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.753-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Forest and others v. Ghulam Hyder Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3306 | 2024 SHC KHI 1154 | Const. P. 6120/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Saresh Kumar Manglani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-24 | Yes | Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the Supreme Court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the Supreme Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3307 | 2024 SHC MPK 1164 | Criminal Miscelleneous 502/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Paru (Applicant) VS Sagram & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | After perusing the material available on record, it appears that the offense was allegedly committed on 25.7.2024 and reported on 6.8.2024 delay of twelve (12) days, hence the deliberation and consultation for implicating the accused cannot be ruled out. It further appears that injuries except for one falling u/s 337-F(vi) PPC (Ghair Jaifah Daimah), are bailable under the schedule of offenses while Section 337- F(vi) PPC, does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr. P.C. is punishable with imprisonment for 07 years. So far the application of Section 506(ii), PPC is concerned, it is yet to be seen at trial after recording pro and contra evidence of the parties by the trial Court if the same attract at all in the facts of the case. There is no complaint of misusing the concession of pre-arrest bail granted to the respondents by the trial Court. 7. There is no denial to the fact that the Supreme Court since long has issued guidelines wherein the details of the considerations for the grant of bail and cancellation whereof are highlighted. This Court while handing down a judgment reported as Shahid Arshad Vs. Muhammad Naqi Butt (1976 SCMR 360) although found that the bail-granting order passed by the High Court is not sustainable in the eyes of the law and yet restrained to interfere in such order on the ground that there was nothing to show that the accused had misused the concession of bail. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3308 | 2024 SHC SUK 612 | Const. P. 583/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Bahawal jarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3309 | 2024 SHC SUK 1371 | Const. P. 614/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Najeebullah mahesar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3310 | 2024 SHC SUK 1247 | Const. P. 1552/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Lashkar Khan Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.754-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others v. Lashkar Khan Lashari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3311 | 2024 SHC SUK 968 | Const. P. 607/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Faqeer Mumtaz Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3312 | 2024 SHC KHI 889, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1645 | Cr.Bail 871/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SHAHZAD JUNAID S/O ROSHAN ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 10-JUL-24 | Yes | Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years , broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: - (b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3313 | 2024 SHC KHI 152 | Cr.Bail 646/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | TALHA SAMOO S/O GHULAM NABI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 12-JUL-24 | Yes | In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception, then, the subordinate Courts should follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by this Court under Article 203 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is binding on all subordinate Courts. My view is supported by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of The State v. Syed Qaim Ali Shah (1992 SCMR 2192) and the famous case of Khan Asfandyar Wali and others v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2001 SC 607). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3314 | 2024 SHC SUK 675 | Const. P. 1571/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mahakamuddin Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3315 | 2024 SHC MPK 907 | Criminal Miscelleneous 58/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Nadeem Jat (Applicant) VS Manager HBL Chandi Chock (Respondent) | 02-OCT-24 | Yes | It appears from the cross examination of complainant that he had made certain admissions, like he admitted that he did not produce the ownership documents of alleged plot. He also admitted that the respondent was/is his real brother and civil proceedings is pending on subject issue. He admitted that there was mobile tower installed on the disputed land and such agreement was executed between the company and the respondent. The witness of the complainant admitted that there was/is civil dispute between the parties over the plot. Such admissions on the part of complainant and his witnesses leads to believe that there were strained relations between two real brothers and registration of subject case appears to be result of such dispute. The complainant has also admitted that place of incident is located in populated area, but none from the locality came forward to corroborate the version of complainant. The complainant also admitted that previously, the respondent had lodged ???NC??? against him and such fact could not be overlooked. The Medicolegal Officer Doctor Kanwar Lal admitted in the deposition that there was/is correction in the OPD slip. He admitted that there was/is no injury upon the body and head of the complainant. He admitted that there is possibility that the present injured might have received injury by falling on tile or marble. He also admitted that on the same day, injured Jhaman appeared with the police letter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3316 | 2024 SHC SUK 34 | Const. P. 656/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Allahdad & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3317 | 2024 SHC SUK 1035 | Const. P. 411/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Sohbat Ali Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3318 | 2024 SHC SUK 366 | Const. P. 598/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Qadir Chandio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.739-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Forest Department and others v. Abdul Qadir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3319 | 2024 SHC SUK 1084 | Const. P. 1710/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Javed Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3320 | 2024 SHC SUK 109 | Const. P. 186/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Saleem Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.731-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others v. Saleem Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3321 | 2024 SHC KHI 349 | Criminal Miscelleneous 716/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2024 | Muhammad Ibrahim S/o Usman (Applicant) VS The State & Others (Respondent) | 11-JUL-24 | Yes | The condition precedent for recording an FIR is that it should convey the information of an offense and that too a cognizable one. The remedy of filing a direct complaint cannot measure or match up to the mechanism provided under section 154, Cr.P.C., in which the Officer Incharge of a Police Station is duty-bound to record the statement and register the FIR if a cognizable offence is made out. If in every case it is presumed or assumed that instead of insisting or emphasizing the lodgment of an FIR, the party may file a direct complaint, then the purpose of recording an FIR, as envisaged under section 154, Cr.P.C., will become redundant and futile and it would be very easy for the police to refuse the registration of an FIR with the advice to file a direct complaint. However, in some exceptional circumstances, the alternate remedy in the shape of a direct complaint may be availed but not in every case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3322 | 2024 SHC SUK 1215 | Const. P. 938/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Rashid Ali Pitafi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3323 | 2024 SHC KHI 1452 | Cr.Bail 1064/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SAMEEULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD YOUNUS (Applicant) VS THE SATE (Respondent) | 15-JUL-24 | Yes | This Court vide order dated 05.09.2023 directed the trial Court to examine the eye witness Hammad within one month and as per record his examination in chief has been recorded and his further examination in chief needs to be recorded. Prima facie partial compliance has been made, therefore, this bail application is disposed of by directing the learned trial Court to examine the remaining witnesses within one month. In case of failure, MIT shall refer the matter to the competent authority for passing appropriate orders on the administrative side. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3324 | 2024 SHC KHI 1337, 2025 SBLR Sindh 825 | Const. P. 886/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Khair Nawaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-DEC-24 | Yes | Regularization of contractual employees requires a clear legal basis, a well-defined policy, and a fair assessment of the employee's performance and qualifications. Without these, employees cannot claim regularization of service. Reference in this regard may be made to the cases of Vice Chancellor Agriculture University, Peshawar v Muhammad Shafiq 2024 SCMR 527, Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Islamabad and another v. Fazal-e-Subhan and others (PLD 2024 SC 515); Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Forest, Peshawar and others v. Sher Aman and others (2022 SCMR 406); and Messrs. State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3325 | 2024 SHC SUK 1006 | Const. P. 630/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Akbar Narejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3326 | 2024 SHC MPK 283 | Const. P. 858/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zahid Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | If this is a position of case and keeping in view the order dated 12-01-2023 passed by this Court, this matter needs to be transmitted to the Chief Secretary Sindh, who in co-ordination with Secretary Education and Literacy Department, is directed to look into the matter of the petitioners at his end, if the grievances of the petitioners are found to be genuine, the same shall be redressed under policy and law within three weeks, after hearing the parties concerned. However, the Chief Secretary shall also look into the factual position of the case and if he finds any candidate obtained lesser marks than the petitioners and subsequently appointed, then appropriate directions shall be issued to the competent authority for the relief so claimed, which shall be in line with Articles 25 and 27 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3327 | 2024 SHC KHI 836 | Cr.Bail 784/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD TAUQEER S/O NAZIM HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 14-OCT-24 | Yes | It is by now well settled that an accused can maintain a subsequent bail application, at the post-arrest stage, only on the strength of fresh ground, accrued after dismissal of his first plea. In the case reported by The State through Advocate General N.W.F.P. vs. Zubair Ahmed and others (PLD 1986 SC 173) the Supreme Court has held that second or the subsequent bail application to the same Court shall lie only on a fresh ground, which did not exist at the time when the first bail application was made, however in the present case learned counsel for the applicant has pointed out fresh grounds which were not available to the applicant at the time of filing of his first bail application. He nevertheless emphasized that directions given by this Court while disposing of the bail application of the applicant have not been complied with, as such, the applicant is entitled to bail on this ground alone. I am unable to subscribe to such submission of the learned counsel for the applicant. Non-compliance with the directions issued to the trial Court to examine witnesses within some specified time cannot be fatal in terms of the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Nisar Ahmed vs. The State and others (PLD 2016 SC 11). However, in the present case, the applicant has shown multiple fresh grounds for consideration of his request for grant of the bail bail application. The case against the applicant prima facie is based on two versions due to the complainant's negation of the story put forward by the police and the affidavit of no objection beside the PW Abdul Ghaffar has narrated a different story including the statement of PC Warid Ali and SIP Muzzafar Ali. The accused's previous bail was denied, but new evidence now warrants reconsideration of his bail plea. Therefore, under such circumstances, this court has left with no option but to release the applicant on post-arrest bail in the subject crime the trial court is still in chaos and the reasons assigned are not sufficient to keep the applicant behind the bar for an indefinite period for the simple reason that the Supreme Court has ruled that delays in trials violate the constitutional rights of the accused to liberty, fair trial, and dignity. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3328 | 2024 SHC SUK 1400 | Const. P. 475/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Qayoom & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3329 | 2024 SHC SUK 422 | Const. P. 863/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Iqbal Shambani & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3330 | 2024 SHC SUK 1266 | Const. P. 120/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Aijaz Ali Rajper & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3331 | 2025 SHC KHI 426 | Const. P. 8499/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Haris Hamid (Petitioner) VS Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent) | 28-JAN-25 | Yes | It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. the Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]. The Supreme Court in paragraphs 146 to 150 has decided the issue in hand no need for further deliberation on our part. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3332 | 2025 SHC KHI 583 | Const. P. 1015/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | LT CDR (R) Dr. Muhammad Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 10-APR-25 | Yes | The primary submissions of the petitioner is that the staff plot is a contractual entitlement. However, this raises the question of whether a Constitutional Petition is the appropriate legal avenue for an employee of a statutory corporation with non-statutory service rules to enforce the terms of those rules. Established service law dictates that if a statutory body's employee service conditions aren't governed by statute-based rules but by internal rules or instructions, their violation is generally not enforceable through constitutional jurisdiction and falls under the principle of master and servant. Here, the petitioner seeks enforcement of the DHA Service Rules 2008, which this Court cannot typically enforce via a Constitutional Petition. This position is supported by the Supreme Court of Pakistan's ruling in Pakistan Defense Officers Housing Authority vs. Mrs. Itrat Sajjad Khan and others (2017 SCMR 2010). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.864-K/2025 LT CDR (R) Dr. Muhammad Nawaz, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 3333 | 2025 SHC KHI 154 | Const. P. 2951/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Faheem and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 16-APR-25 | Yes | However, the Respondents also acknowledged that the Marine Fisheries Department (MFD) had already submitted up-gradation proposals for Research Assistants to BPS-14 to the relevant central bodies, with previous proposals facing delays, and that this matter is currently under their review. If this is the position of the case, these cases need to be referred back to the competent authority within the Respondents' administration. This authority needs to examine the issue of either upgrading the Petitioners' posts or considering them for promotion according to the prevailing recruitment rules, provided they meet the eligibility and fitness criteria for the position as requested, and after providing them an opportunity to be heard if they are still employed in the respondent department. This approach aligns with the Supreme Court's decisions in similar cases as discussed supra. Consequently, these petitions are being disposed of under these specified terms. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the respondents for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3334 | 2025 SHC KHI 345 | Const. P. 1524/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Raees Mohammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 17-APR-25 | Yes | At the outset, we address the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain this petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The maintainability of a writ petition against the Respondent-Bank is supported by the Supreme Court's judgments in Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited, etc vs. Said Rehman & others (2013 SCMR 642) and Muhammad Rafiullah & others vs. Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited & another (2018 SCMR 598). Based on these precedents, we conclude that this Petition falls within the Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court and can be heard and decided on its merits. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2625/2025 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited, Islamabad and others v. Raees Muhammad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 3335 | 2025 SHC KHI 317 | Const. P. 6920/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Owais Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-APR-25 | Yes | The respondents have established a committee, including representatives from the Local Government & HTP Department and the Secretary of HDA, to examine the cases of former HDA contract, work-charge, and daily wage employees, in light of a Supreme Court order from November 29, 2023, and the Sindh Regularization Act of 2013. While the petitioners request a resolution of their petition per the Supreme Court's directive, the learned Assistant Advocate General (AAG) submitted that their case does not fall within the scope of that Supreme Court decision and thus cannot be decided on those terms, praying for the dismissal of the petition. Regardless, let this matter first be referred to the Secretary of the Local Government Department to scrutinize the petitioners' case. If their case falls outside the purview of the newly formed committee, the petitioners must be granted a hearing, and a decision should be reached within three months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3336 | 2025 SHC KHI 1064 | Const. P. 6405/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Jawed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: & Ors (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | Laches, an equitable defense, bars relief for unreasonable delay that prejudices the opponent. Unlike strict limitations, its application depends on case facts and fairness. The Supreme Court in Farzand Raza Naqvi case 2004 SCMR 400) held that delay can bar writ petitions, but not if equitable, the petitioner was not indolent, and relief is just. Laches is less impactful for recurring issues, as past delay might not preclude action on current occurrences. The AAG argued that 2013-2018 (now 2025) is laches, countered by petitioners citing timely prior cases. 8. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, without touching the merits of the case, we find no justification to entertain this petition in 2025. It is significantly barred by laches, as the cause of action arose in 2013 with the impugned order, yet the petitioner filed this petition in 2018, a delay of approximately five years. Furthermore, no compelling reason to exercise our discretionary powers has been presented. Consequently, the Petition, being ill-conceived and barred by laches, is hereby dismissed with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3337 | 2025 SHC KHI 1065 | Const. P. 6240/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Bakhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | The core issue is whether proceedings under the statutory Rules of 1973 constitute statutory intervention, allowing a writ petition based on the Pakistan Defence Officers??? Housing Authority case (2013 SCMR 1707). That case held that statutory proceedings override non-statutory rules. Here, the Supreme Court found statutory intervention because proceedings against corporation employees were initiated under the Removal from Service Ordinance, 2000. However, the present petitioner was proceeded against under the Rules of 1973, which inherently apply only to civil servants, not NADRA employees. These rules were applied to the petitioner solely through adoption in NADRA's non-statutory Regulation 23. Statutory intervention would only exist if the Rules of 1973 directly applied to NADRA employees, independent of NADRA's adoption. Since their application is solely via non-statutory regulations, they do not gain a superior statutory status, therefore, assertion of the learned counsel for the petitioner is misconceived and discarded. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3338 | 2025 SHC KHI 1037 | Const. P. 1915/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Asha Bai (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | The petitioner's regularization case, ongoing since 2015 (CP 2187/2015), was sent for reconsideration in 2018, but a committee found her unsuitable based on subjective criteria. While challenging this as arbitrary, this court notes it cannot reassess her now, especially with another candidate already working on the post. In terms of the Supreme Court decision in the case of Asif Hassan v Sabir Hussain, 2019 SCMR 1720, this court typically does not interfere with the expert committee's subjective evaluations under Article 199. It is the competent authority's prerogative to assess candidates, and this court cannot substitute its judgment if the chosen candidate is qualified and eligible, a principle supported by the Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2014 SCMR 157). 6. This petition is dismissed as it seeks to reopen a reassessment already conducted in previous litigation, rendering it not maintainable at this stage. All pending applications are also dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3339 | 2025 SHC KHI 1061 | Const. P. 5965/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Mithal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-25 | Yes | The term "absorption" lacks definition in the 1973 Act and its Rules, 1974, but Rule 9-A (1974) governs surplus employee transfers to suitable posts (ideally equivalent grade), this proposition is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court. According to Paragraph 116 of the 2013 SCMR 1752 judgment, clarified that Rule 9-A governs the transfer of surplus employees (due to post abolition or government takeover of their organization) to suitable government posts, provided they meet the qualifications for an equivalent or comparable scale. Seniority in the new cadre starts from the appointment date. 5. The Petitioner has sought his original Accountant BS-15 benefits and upgrades, consistent with Supreme Court rulings. This court accept the plea of the petitioner and direct the respondent's competent authority to reconsider its decision within three months after hearing the Petitioner, in line with those rulings as discussed supra and observation recorded hereinabove. 6. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3340 | 2025 SHC KHI 1066 | Const. P. 8068/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ajay Kumar Sehwani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAY-25 | Yes | This court orders a reassessment of the petitioners' credentials and eligibility for their current posts by a committee headed by the Chief Secretary. This reassessment should include degree verification and the fulfillment of other codal formalities. A decision will be made within three months after hearing the petitioners. This petition is disposed of in line with the Supreme Court's judgment in Muhammad Suleiman Vs Chief Secretary, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 2023 SCMR 1932. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3341 | 2025 SHC KHI 1070 | Const. P. 6697/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mehroz Alam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-APR-25 | Yes | This court directs the competent KMC authority to treat the petitioners' positions without discrimination, aligning them with the BS-9 women's squash markers within three months. Consequently, the petitions are disposed of under these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3342 | 2025 SHC KHI 1026 | Const. P. 5570/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amjad Ali Pechuho (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court's 2021 judgment declared the Sacked Employees Ordinance 2009 and the Act 2010 unconstitutional, rendering the Petitioner's reinstatement under the Ordinance and his higher grade claim under the Act legally questionable. This revives his original grievance regarding his 1996 termination as Officer Grade-III, weakening the Bank's defenses of a settled matter, estoppel, and laches. The legality of the 1996 termination and the fairness of subsequent proceedings, particularly the Enquiry Officer's report (no proof of willful absence), became the central point. The ultra vires declaration significantly strengthens the Petitioner's case on merit. Therefore, the Bank's competent authority is directed to reconsider its decision after hearing the Petitioner within three months, focusing on the legality of the 1996 termination order and subsequent reinstatement on a lower grade. If the termination was illegal, reinstatement to his 1996 position should be considered strictly in accordance with the law and policy of the bank. However, the observation recorded hereinabove is tentative, subject to the final decision of the respondent bank on the merits of the case. 7. This petition is disposed of accordingly. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3343 | 2025 SHC KHI 1068 | Const. P. 3257/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Raeesuddin (Petitioner) VS Sindh Tecnical Education And ors (Respondent) | 29-APR-25 | Yes | In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, coupled with the Respondent's admission that the contested seniority list was/is provisional and that the petitioners' assignment as Data Processing Assistants (BPS-14) was an adjustment, not a merger, therefore it is ordered that if the Petitioners wish to retain their original cadre, post, and seniority within the Technical Education Department, Sindh Karachi (provided this department still exists and they have not merged into STEVTA since 2010), the Respondent department must hear the Petitioners. If their claim is valid on the subject issue, their original cadre and seniority, along with accrued service benefits, should be maintained according to the law. The competent authority of the respondents shall complete this process within three months after hearing the petitioners. Consequently, this petition is disposed of under these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3344 | 2025 SHC KHI 651 | Const. P. 4985/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Rahim Bux Narejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 14-APR-25 | Yes | Prima facie, this issue of late submission of Domicile and PRC, which prompted the respondents not to consider their candidature, needs to be looked into by the Secretary of Education after hearing both the petitioners within three months if the petitioners meet the requisite criteria as set out in the Teachers Recruitment Policy 2012; besides no other candidates having lower marks superseded the petitioners. A copy of this order shall be sent to Secretary Education for compliance. These petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3345 | 2025 SHC KHI 248 | Const. P. 188/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shaikh Osama Rafi S/o Shaikh Muhammad Rafi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | Wthout prejudice the rights of the parties this matter is referred to the concerned DIGP to resolve the dispute between the parties after hearing them within two weeks. If the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and proceed according to the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3346 | 2025 SHC KHI 177 | Const. P. 1063/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mudasar Jilani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-MAR-25 | Yes | Given the presented facts and circumstances, the Court concludes that the Petitioner has not established sufficient grounds for intervention. Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal has not yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3347 | 2025 SHC KHI 415 | Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others (Respondent) | 08-APR-25 | Yes | The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made clear that police is free to take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to law. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also ensure respect of the family shed in accordance with law and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been achieved. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated above. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3348 | 2025 SHC KHI 1735 | Const. P. 5102/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-MAY-25 | Yes | Given the petitioner's retirement in 2021, this court find it unnecessary to refer the case back to the Selection Board (SB) in 2025. Besides the current legal framework does not recognize pro forma promotion for retired public servants. Without a legal basis, this court cannot compel the CAA to take an action impermissible by law. Guidance on this matter can be found in the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Secretary Ministry of Finance, Finance Division, Government of Pakistan Versus Muhammad Anwer (2025 SCMR 153), National Bank of Pakistan through its President Versus Sajjad Ali Khaskhelli and another (2024 PLC (CS) 276), and Inspector General of Police Punjab versus Waris Ali (2024 SCMR 1109). 10. Based on the aforementioned discussion and keeping in view the legal position of the case, we find no merit in this petition that justifies intervention by this Court. Consequently, the Constitution Petition and any pending applications are dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3349 | 2025 SHC KHI 2111 | Const. P. 5236/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Taufeeque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-AUG-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3350 | 2025 SHC KHI 2066 | Const. P. 2044/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ms. Mahvish Butt (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-AUG-25 | Yes | With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to consider the case of promotion of the petitioner in BPS-19 in the light of dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Dr. Muhammad Arif, 2017 SCMR 969; and, his earlier deferment/supersession if any as recorded hereinabove will not come in his way, while considering her case for promotion in next rank. As Censure is not a barrier to promotion consideration. The petitioner has met the required length of service, and the censure period has passed. Given that significant time has elapsed since the deferment in 2021, the NAB authority is directed to reconsider her promotion to BPS-19 alongside her colleagues within the next three months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3351 | 2025 SHC KHI 1417 | Const. P. 1450/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Khalid Ahmed Bablani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-25 | Yes | In such circumstances, we are of the view that both parties were appointed to unadvertised positions, and were accommodated on the post which were not put up for competitive process, as such the respondents can not curcmvent the legal procedure through their minuts of Departmental Seclection Committee (DSC) held on 10th and 30th August 2007 as the department had already received 20 applications and after scrutiny only 12 applications were shortlisted as per required qualifications, experience and domicile and all short listed candidates were called for interview and DSC interviewed the petitioner and respondent No.4 found suitable on their performance for the post of Deputy Direcotr (Electronics) but the situation is quite different when they were offered the different position i.e. Depurty Director (Instrumention) and conformity assessement rather the post of Deputy Director (Electronics) which is direct conflict with the recruitment rules, vide offer letter dated 12.09.2007, as such this Court is inclined to direct the Respondent-PSQCA to either regularize both their positions based on a similar principle of seniority in terms of ratio of the judgment of Supreme court in the case of Sarosh Haider Vs Muhammad Javed Chundrigar PLD 2014 SC 338 or re-advertise the relevant positions afresh within a reasonable timeframe. Consequently, the parties promotion and seniority claims in this context become irrelevant. 9. This petition stands disposed of in the aforsaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3352 | 2025 SHC KHI 1338 | Const. P. 1334/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Tahir Hussain Akhger (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-25 | Yes | The legal right to the Petitioner's BPS-13 upgrade is disputed, especially since the Respondents say the 1994 rule did not apply to him, his work group has different rules, there's no higher Photographer job, his duties have not changed, he agreed to BPS-07, and the job is being ended due to abolishment of post, this Court cannot order the upgrade of the post which had already been abolished. Upgrading a job, especially one being ended, is a decision for the Ministry of Defence, and this Court may not interfere at this point. The people in charge at the Ministry can consider his request if the rules and policies allow it. So, this petition is dismissed based on these reasons. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.875-K/2025 Tahir Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defence , Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Notice) for Next Session |
| 3353 | 2025 SHC KHI 1339 | Const. P. 4446/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Syed Farhat Abbas Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-MAY-25 | Yes | Considering the Petitioner's 2019 retirement and his inaction until now (2025), reversing the retirement notification is not possible. His failure to diligently pursue the case since 2019 means this court cannot order his retirement in BS-20 as he claims. He may still seek other legal remedies if he believes his rights were violated. 8. In light of the Petitioner's service history as detailed above, this Court is compelled to dismiss this petition and any associated pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.832-K/2025 Syed Farhat Abbas Zaidi v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government and others. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 3354 | 2025 SHC KHI 1658, 2025 SHC KHI 1671 | Const. P. 2872/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Amir Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-25 | Yes | In this specific case, the petition appears to be in conflict with the Federal Government's up-gradation policy outlined in the Establishment Division O.M. dated September 11, 2018. Furthermore, the petitioners' cadre already has a clear path for promotion under the Recruitment Rules notified on August 2, 2012, which provide for career progression up to BS-20. The respondents have pointed out that the petitioners are only citing paragraph 1 of the O.M. dated February 2, 2012, while deliberately omitting paragraph 2, which clearly upgrades various posts. The formulation of SRO 953(1)/2012 dated August 2, 2012, was necessary due to the merger of the Inland Revenue cadres of the former Income Tax Group (ITG), Sales Tax Department (STD), and Directorate of Reforms & Statistics (DR&S) into the newly formed Inland Revenue Department under the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). Given this existing promotion avenue, up-gradation is not permissible under the law for the petitioners. The Office Memorandum dated September 11, 2018, explicitly states that up-gradation is only considered for isolated cadres that lack promotion opportunities. Since the petitioners' cadre has clear avenues for promotion, they have no valid claim for an up-gradation as a matter of right. They have a defined career progression up to BS-20 as per the Recruitment Rules. 8. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition stands dismissed along with the listed application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3355 | 2025 SHC KHI 1578 | Const. P. 4810/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Tanveer Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 26-MAY-25 | Yes | It is well settled that contractual appointments ended with contract expiration/termination, and a temporary/contract employee cannot claim permanent status as a matter of right, nor can he /she be reinstated merely for continuing service beyond his/her term after reaching superannuation age. 8. This Court, under Article 199 of the Constitution, cannot order reinstatement of temporary, contract, or ad-hoc employees whose terms had ended with the termination of their contract with allegations. Here the petitioners??? contract was terminated by the order of the majority of the council members in the meeting held on 13.08.2020 and 09.09.2020, as such his contractual period cannot be extended after reaching the age of superannuation. Consequently, this petition is dismissed, with no order regarding costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1060-K/2025 Tanveer Ahmed Siddiqui v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 3356 | 2025 SHC KHI 1577 | Const. P. 6484/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst. Sumaira Shakeel & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-25 | Yes | Currently, both departments are disclaiming responsibility for the appointments, despite the petitioners purportedly working in the KMC's education department. The Secretary Local Government Department (Respondent) should resolve this issue at his end by coordinating with KMC and DMC-Central, where the petitioners claimed employment. If the petitioners' appointments are verified as genuine, their regularization case must be considered. This petition is accordingly disposed of, with the regularization process to be completed within three months, contingent on the petitioners' educational qualifications and eligibility for the respective posts. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3357 | 2025 SHC KHI 1525 | Const. P. 3388/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ashfaq Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-25 | Yes | This petition is not covered by the respondents' policy, and therefore, the petitioner's request for selection grade in BS-16 cannot be entertained at this stage, as "much water has already flown under the bridge." Consequently, this petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution due to the doctrine of laches and is accordingly dismissed along with any pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3358 | 2025 SHC KHI 2023 | Const. P. 3496/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zulfiqar Ali Memon and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-AUG-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court in the recent judgment, The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Vs Ghulam Shabbir and others, passed in (Civil Appeals Nos.52-K to 71-K of 2022) vide judgment dated 30.12.2025 has observed that the competent authority was/is expected to carefully consider the promotions of candidates who hold acting charge positions. This consideration should be retroactive, dating back to when the promotional posts first became vacant. However, the service tribunal's decision was not deemed illegal because it simply directed the competent authority to re-evaluate the case rather than making the final promotion decision itself.This petition stand dismissed along with pending application(s) if any. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1216-K/2025 Zulfiqar Ali Memon & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 3359 | 2026 SHC KHI 386 | Const. P. 7507/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst Uzma Aamir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 30.04.2015 is set aside, and the Petitioner shall be deemed to have continued in service as a regular employee of Jinnah University for Women with continuity of service up to the age of superannuation, i.e., 60 years, until and unless she is subject to any disciplinary proceedings, if any. The Respondents are directed to restore all withheld annual increments and to release the outstanding salary payable to the Petitioner from 01.06.2020 onwards, along with all ancillary benefits, within a period of two months from receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3360 | 2025 SHC KHI 2065 | Const. P. 283/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Munawar Ali Matto and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-AUG-25 | Yes | There is no doubt that the regularization of a contractual employee constitutes a fresh appointment into the stream of regular appointments in civil services as observed by the Supreme Court in the cases of the Province of Punjab through Secretary Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore and others v. Dr. Javed Iqbal and others (2021 SCMR 767). It is also held that even otherwise, any institution opting for regularization of its employees must be either mandated by law or must carry out regularization through a well-thought-out policy of the institution concerned laying down the criteria and the process for regularization; performance evaluation of the contractual employee must be assessed to determine if the employee meets the standards required for a regular position; there must be availability of positions that match the skills and experience of the contractual employee;This petition is dismissed as it seeks to reopen a reassessment already conducted by the respondent department, rendering it not maintainable at this stage. All pending applications are also dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1148-K/2025 Munawar Ali & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 3361 | 2025 SHC KHI 1344 | Const. P. 5953/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Khalid Hameed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-MAY-25 | Yes | Recognizing that the Supreme Court has already settled this legal point through various pronouncements, and noting the Respondents' in-principle agreement to assign the Petitioner a proper posting according to the law and KMC rules within two weeks, this petition is disposed of in terms of the statements made by the learned AAG and the learned counsel for the KMC, without addressing the merits of the case, and is subject to the applicable laws and KMC rules. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3362 | 2025 SHC KHI 2150 | Const. P. 7742/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Bilal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 27-AUG-25 | Yes | In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of , directing the petitioner to seek a remedy before the Sindh Service Tribunal. This court notes that the petitioner has been pursuing the wrong legal channel since 2022 and the Service Tribunal may address the case if it deems it appropriate. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3363 | 2025 SHC KHI 1342 | Const. P. 4283/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: & Ors (Respondent) | 13-MAY-25 | Yes | Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, without touching the merits of the case, we find no justification to entertain this petition in 2025. It is significantly barred by laches, as the cause of action arose in 2011 with the impugned order dated 1.07.2011, yet the petitioner filed this petition in 2020, a delay of approximately nine years. Furthermore, no compelling reason to exercise our discretionary powers has been presented. Consequently, the Petition, being ill-conceived and barred by laches. This petition is dismissed because the Supreme Court of Pakistan has already dismissed an identical case through its judgment/order dated October 28, 2022, in CRP.No:510-K/2022 within Civil Petition No.1717-K of 2022. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3364 | 2025 SHC KHI 2264 | Const. P. 4268/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Naeem Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 11-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3365 | 2025 SHC KHI 2393 | Const. P. 4439/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Najam uz Zaman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 17-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.4429/2025 National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman v. Najmuzaman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 3 weeks). To be heard along with CPLA No.4767/2025 | |
| 3366 | 2025 SHC KHI 2434 | Const. P. 5068/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | kanwal Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) | 04-SEP-25 | Yes | In our view, the stance of the petitioner is based on erroneous premises which is discarded. In light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is found to be misconceived and is accordingly dismissed, along with the pending application(s), with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3367 | 2025 SHC KHI 2452 | Const. P. 2555/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ansar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Another (Respondent) | 12-SEP-25 | Yes | We have informed that the government of Sindh???s policy prohibits the re-enrolment of retired police official. However in the present case, the petitioner was appointed a Police Constable (PC/2164), who joined the force on August 18, 1994. He competed 25 years of service on August 17, 2019. He retired from government service on his own request, effective August, 1, 2020. After his retirement, he received all his due benefits, including gratuity/communication, leave encashment. GP fund payment, retirement grant, and a monthly pension. Petitioner later appealed to be re-enrolled or reinstated in service. The request was forwarded to higher authorities, who cited two government letters from 1981 and 2019 that bar such re-enrollment in government service. Based on this policy, his appeal was rejected vide order dated 31.12.2021 and the petitioner was informed accordingly. 6. This petition is misconceived and is dismissed along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3368 | 2025 SHC KHI 2429 | Const. P. 3003/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mazhar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-25 | Yes | At this point, we proposed remitting the case to the respondents' competent authority for reconsideration. This would involve a thorough review of the service record of the petitioners, consideration of relevant Supreme Court judgments, and granting the petitioners a proper hearing to reach a fresh decision within three months. As such, we find it appropriate to remit the matter to the Chief Secretary of Sindh. The Chief Secretary will coordinate with the Secretary of Education to convene a meeting. After examining the petitioners' service records and promotion orders, a new decision will be made within three months. 9. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3369 | 2025 SHC KHI 2524 | Const. P. 5494/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Syed Muhammad Mehdi Raza Taqvi (Petitioner) VS The Secretary M/o Science & Technology & Ors (Respondent) | 24-SEP-25 | Yes | The above discussion leads us to an irresistible conclusion that the appointment/posting of Civil / Public Servant on OPS/additional charge basis, is violative of law and public interest as a result thereof the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent authority of respondents to comply with the ratio of the decisions passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases of Province of Sindh & others v. Ghulam Fareed & others [2014 SCMR 1189] and Khan Muhammad vs. Chief Secretary Baluchistan and others (2018 SCMR 1411) in its letter and spirit and avoid making the transfer and posting on own pay scale in future, however, subject to conditions as enumerated in the aforesaid judgments of the Supreme Court. Consequently, the office order dated 16.08.2021 issued by the Respondent department to the extent of respondent No.4 on OPS is set aside. The same post shall be filled on regular basis strictly under the recruitment rules. Resultantly, the pending Application[s] are disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3370 | 2025 SHC KHI 3205 | Const. P. 766/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst. Salma Nazir W/o Muhammad Nazir Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of such statement, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s) with directions to the police to ensure that the private security guards of respondent No.7 shall not cause any harassment to the petitioner in any manner of whatsoever nature. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3371 | 2025 SHC KHI 2523 | Const. P. 4792/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Rizwan Ashraf and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-SEP-25 | Yes | Primarily, this court's role is not to rewrite policy or interfere with the executive's financial decisions unless a clear violation of law or fundamental rights is proven which is not the case at hand. The government actions were not "without lawful authority" because the new pay scale and the freezing/reduction of allowances were approved by the Cabinet, the highest executive body, and they. acted within their lawful powers to manage the budget and government affairs. We do not see that the government's policy is discriminatory and violates the petitioner???s legitimate expectations. Prima facie, the government acted within its lawful authority for budgetary reasons. No interference on our part at this stage is required under Article 199 of the Constitution. 10. For the above reasons, this petition is dismissed along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3372 | 2026 SHC KHI 428 | Const. P. 2195/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Rollins Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Learned SLAT and Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | C.P.L.A.4498/2025 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Sindh Secretariat Karachi v. Tahir Hussain and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3373 | 2025 SHC KHI 2511 | Const. P. 422/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. S. Ershad Hussain Kazmi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3374 | 2025 SHC KHI 3246 | II.A. 92/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Syed Zaheer Hussain (Late) Thr LRs Syed Marakh Sha (Appellant) VS Commodities Textile (Private) Limited and Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | This Court vide order dated 06.10.2025 issued direct notice to him to appear and assist this Court for today, but today he is called absent. The official of the I.T. Department is present in Court has informed that on video link only respondent No.1 is present, however, applicant is not in attendance even on video link, therefore, this Court is left with no option, but to dismissed this review application in default, though chances have been given to him to appear. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3375 | 2025 SHC KHI 3236 | Const. P. 1098/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Rafi (Petitioner) VS Maaroof Sultana & Another (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | None present for the petitioner. This was the positon when this Court vide order dated 20.10.2025 directed the petitioner to satisfy this Court about the maintainability of this petition. Today, he is called absent without intimation. Perhaps the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing this petition, that???s why he is unable to satisfy this Court about the maintainability. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith pending application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3376 | 2026 SHC KHI 237 | Const. P. 3351/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Anwary Begum (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3377 | 2026 SHC KHI 263 | Const. P. 147/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | M/s. Pir Illahi Bux Cooperative Housing Society Lt (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, this Court is persuaded to hold that the impugned order dated 26-12-2025 has been passed without lawful authority and jurisdiction, in violation of Section 55(1) of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, and is therefore void ab initio. 15.???Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The impugned order bearing No. RCS/KYC/424/2025 dated 26-12-2025 is hereby set aside. However, it is clarified that this shall not preclude the Registrar Cooperative Societies from taking action strictly in accordance with law, if the statutory conditions prescribed under Section 55 are duly fulfilled in the future. 16. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3378 | 2026 SHC KHI 227 | Const. P. 5782/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Petitioner) VS DC Malir & others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-26 | Yes | Based on the foregoing settled principles, the Petitioners were prima facie necessary parties to the suit under Order 1, Rule 10(2), CPC. The learned Tribunal???s order dismissing their application was therefore unsustainable in law. 15. Accordingly, the Impugned Order dated 15.11.2025 is set aside. The Petitioners shall be impleaded as parties in Suit No.07 of 2024 before the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal, Karachi, and the proceedings shall continue in accordance with law within a reasonable time period. 16. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3379 | 2026 SHC KHI 238 | Const. P. 153/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Shafique (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-26 | Yes | When confronted with this legal position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be disposed of with the direction that he be allowed to appear before the DLC Central and that respondents facilitate processing of his case in accordance with law within two weeks. The request seems to be reasonable and is acceded to; however, the respondent, NADRA, shall create bottlenecks in such a process in terms of the latest view of the superior courts. 5. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, even without touching the merits of the case, this petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3380 | 2026 SHC KHI 288 | Const. P. 966/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Kamran (Petitioner) VS Rafiuddin Paracha & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3381 | 2026 SHC KHI 306 | Const. P. 6230/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Adeel Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3382 | 2026 SHC KHI 101 | Const. P. 3939/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Imtiaz Ahmed Siddiqui & others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the case squarely warrants judicial intervention to protect the statutory and democratic rights of the members of the Society. Therefore, this court deems it proper to direct Respondent No.2 to immediately initiate and complete the process of free, fair, and transparent elections of the Managing Committee, strictly in accordance with law and the bye-laws, within a specified timeframe as discussed in the preceding paragraph, and the existing committee is refrained from taking any policy or financial decisions beyond routine administration until a duly elected body assumes charge. Liberty, as already observed earlier, shall remain available to the parties to avail appropriate remedies in respect of any grievances arising from bifurcation or allied issues, strictly in accordance with law. 13. This petition, along with all pending application(s), stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3383 | 2026 SHC KHI 363 | Const. P. 6025/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Arif Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3384 | 2026 SHC KHI 356 | Const. P. 690/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s. Khas Trading Through Attorney M. Rafiq Nizami (Petitioner) VS Habib Ismail Lotia & Others (Respondent) | 16-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing and after arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the parties have mutually agreed to the disposal of the instant petition on the undertaking that the Petitioner/Tenant shall vacate the demised premises on or before 30.06.2026, subject to payment of usual rend. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the instant Constitutional Petition stands disposed of in the above terms, with the direction that the Petitioner shall hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the demised premises to the Respondents within the stipulated period, failing which the Respondents shall be at liberty to seek enforcement of this order in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3385 | 2026 SHC KHI 368 | Const. P. 4488/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3386 | 2026 SHC KHI 164 | Const. P. 1376/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Sajid Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3387 | 2026 SHC KHI 440 | Const. P. 442/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst. Nimra and Another (Petitioner) VS IXth ADJ, Karachi East and Another (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | No jurisdictional error, illegality, perversity or misapplication of law has been pointed out in the impugned judgment which may justify interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The findings recorded by the learned appellate court represent a balanced and reasoned determination of the respective claims of the parties after proper appraisal of the evidence, and are thus prima facie immune from interference under Article 199 of the Constitution under such circumstances of the case. 17. Consequently, both constitutional petitions along with pending application(s) being devoid of merit are dismissed, with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3388 | 2026 SHC KHI 451 | Const. P. 3362/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Imdad Ali Soho (Petitioner) VS G.M (Thermal) PEPCO and Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | The delay in filing the grievance petition and subsequent appeal before the NIRC arose due to circumstances beyond his control and, therefore, falls within the scope of condonation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The impugned orders dated 13-10-2020 and 17-02-2021, which dismissed the Petitioner???s grievance petition and appeal solely on the technical ground of limitation without considering the merits of the case, are legally unsustainable and unjust. The period spent by the Petitioner in obtaining certified copies of earlier orders cannot be counted for the purposes of limitation. 10. In the interest of justice, procedural bars of limitation must yield to the Petitioner???s fundamental right to service and livelihood. Accordingly, the impugned orders are set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned Bench of the NIRC for a fresh decision on the merits within one month. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3389 | 2026 SHC KHI 464 | Const. P. 787/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Naeem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 3390 | 2026 SHC KHI 512 | Const. P. 2006/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ehsan ur Rehman & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 3391 | 2026 SHC KHI 252 | Const. P. 5664/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Inchauli Cooperative Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that once elections have been ordered under court supervision, subsequent petitions seeking the same relief become academic or infructuous. It is also well settled that once the relief sought has been overtaken by events or already complied with under judicial direction, the petition cannot be maintained and is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. It is also a settled principle of law that intervention in matters where an election process is underway under judicial supervision may disrupt the lawful process and is not ordinarily warranted. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No further orders are required in view of the prior directions contained in CP No. D-6317/2025, and the Nazir shall continue to supervise the conduct of the elections, as per earlier directions. The petitioners are at liberty to raise grievances, including the legal grounds before the concerned officer, as agitated before this Court, if any, which shall also be entertained and decision be made in accordance with the law. 11. These petition along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3392 | 2026 SHC KHI 266 | Const. P. 1851/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Fateh Deen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3393 | 2026 SHC KHI 278 | Const. P. 2828/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mirza Afzal Baig (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 03-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3394 | 2026 SHC KHI 364 | Const. P. 5344/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Saleem Akhter (Petitioner) VS Secretary Finance Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3395 | 2026 SHC KHI 100 | Const. P. 5000/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Shama Shoaib (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-26 | Yes | Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, and without touching its merits, the petition is disposed of with the direction that CNIC No.42101-4514305-2 be retained, and the competent authority shall remove the petitioner???s name from the blacklist if there is no any impediment under the law. However, the aforementioned proposition ensures compliance with NADRA???s policy while upholding the petitioner???s lawful rights. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3396 | 2026 SHC KHI 598 | Const. P. 4992/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Nuzhat (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 11-MAR-26 | Yes | In view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in 2025 SCMR 168, and keeping in view the undisputed fact that the petitioner has rendered about fifteen years of continuous service with the respondent institution, this Court is of the considered view that the respondents were not justified in excluding the contractual period from the computation of qualifying service for pensionary purposes. 14. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to count the petitioner???s contractual service from 16-06-2009 to 14-08-2015 along with her regular service for the purpose of determining qualifying service for pension and thereafter calculate and release the petitioner???s pensionary benefits in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3397 | 2026 SHC KHI 617 | Const. P. 285/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Gyro Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Station House Officer Bahadurabad P.S. & others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | It is clarified that this Court has not examined or adjudicated upon the legality or otherwise of the construction being carried out on the subject property, the nature or status of the plot, or any alleged violation of building regulations, environmental laws or planning requirements. Any grievance with regard to the construction, alleged encroachment upon amenity land, violation of building regulations, or any other ancillary issue shall be raised before and decided by the competent authority, Court or forum in accordance with law. 6. The present proceedings are confined only to the issue of alleged harassment and interference raised in this petition. With the above observations, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3398 | 2025 SHC HYD 3563 | Const. P. 1552/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Bilawal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-NOV-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 3399 | 2026 SHC KHI 438 | Const. P. 2378/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Jahangir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3400 | 2026 SHC KHI 16 | Const. P. 37/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Sohail (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 06-JAN-26 | Yes | In these circumstances, without touching the merits of the case, Respondent No. 2 is expected to expeditiously dispose of the subject Bail application in accordance with the law. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||
| 3401 | 2026 SHC KHI 37 | Const. P. 31/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Sohail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | This is a matter of an illegal use of property bearing plot No. 15/172, Block-3, Bihar Muslim Cooperative Housing Society, Bahadurabad, Karachi. At the very outset, both the parties state that the matter is pending before the competent authority of SBCA for a decision on 15.01.2026. If this is a position of the case, this petition is disposed of with the directions to decide the issue between the parties within two weeks, after hearing the parties concerned and pass a speaking order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3402 | 2026 SHC KHI 115 | Const. P. 263/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Shahzad Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above, and considering that the proforma produced by learned counsel for respondent No. 7 does not mandate disclosure of CNIC numbers or mobile phone numbers, and further noting that the voters??? list placed on record at page 31 of the memo of the petition already contains all requisite particulars, namely the serial number, plot number, membership number, name, and post of each member, in such circumstances, this Court finds no illegality, irregularity, or non-compliance on the part of the respondents. 8. The grievance raised by the petitioners, therefore, lacks legal substance and does not warrant any further interference by this Court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed along with all pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3403 | 2026 SHC KHI 151, 2026 SHC KHI 167 | Const. P. 4744/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Tasleem un Nisa (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above, with the consent of the parties, even without touching the merits of the case, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the respondents for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3404 | 2026 SHC KHI 111 | Const. P. 3950/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Tahira Khatoon and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 22-JAN-26 | Yes | The relevant passport records should be corrected to reflect the lawful issuance of passports and remove any reference to duplicate passports. The respondents are directed to facilitate the issuance and renewal of passports without delay, ensuring the petitioners can exercise their lawful right to travel; and any further administrative action should be taken in accordance with law, with due process, and without causing prejudice to the petitioners. 7. This petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3405 | 2026 SHC KHI 503 | Const. P. 4349/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Siddiq Masih (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 04-MAR-26 | Yes | The KMC counsel assured the Court that the outstanding pensionary benefits would be released within one week, subject to his entitlement under the law. 6. With the respondents??? counsel consenting to disposal on this basis, this Court, without touching the merits of the case, directs the competent authority to ensure payment subject to his entitlement under the law, allowing the petitioner to seek legal remedies in case of default. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3406 | 2025 SHC HYD 3570 | Const. P. 1612/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Riaz Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-DEC-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Riazat Ali Sahar(Author) | |||
| 3407 | 2026 SHC KHI 106 | Const. P. 231/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Kamran (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 3408 | 2026 SHC KHI 273 | Const. P. 567/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Maria Zakir D/o Muhammad Zakir Ali Siddiqi (Petitioner) VS Khawaja Nabeel Ahmed Siddiqi (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3409 | 2026 SHC KHI 528 | Const. P. 490/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Azhar Ali Shaikh & others (Petitioner) VS Vth Sr.Civil Judge & Ors (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3410 | 2026 SHC KHI 290 | Const. P. 1011/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Chemtech Trading Services (Petitioner) VS M/s. Ebrahim Trust & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3411 | 2026 SHC KHI 526 | Const. P. 129/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Naeem & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 3412 | 2026 SHC KHI 257 | Const. P. 4429/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3413 | 2026 SHC KHI 586 | Const. P. 5050/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-26 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the Respondent No.2 / Law Department to place the case of the petitioner for grant of incentive of higher grade on time-scale basis before the Chief Executive of the Province in accordance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Kaneez Zehra Kazmi v. Syed Hassan Naqvi, as well as the directive issued by the Chief Minister Sindh dated 28.11.2024. The said exercise shall be undertaken within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 15. Needless to observe that if the petitioner is found entitled under the applicable policy decision of the Chief Executive of Sindh, he shall be granted the consequential benefits strictly in accordance with such policy. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3414 | 2026 SHC KHI 585 | Const. P. 795/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Mustafa Fuzail Merchant & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-26 | Yes | In these circumstances, while taking note of the statement made by the learned Assistant Attorney General that petitioner No.2 is not on any stop list and is free to travel abroad on valid documents, this petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioners shall not be subjected to any unlawful obstruction in future, provided they fulfill all legal requirements for international travel. 13. Furthermore, the Director General, Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) is directed to conduct a proper inquiry through a competent officer into the allegations raised in the petition regarding the conduct of the concerned immigration officials and, if any misconduct, abuse of authority or harassment of the petitioners is found to have been committed, appropriate disciplinary action shall be taken against the delinquent officials strictly in accordance with law and the applicable service rules. 14. With the above observations and directions, the instant constitutional petition stands disposed of along with any pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3415 | 2026 SHC KHI 611 | Const. P. 1712/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Rukhsana Asghar Choudhry (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3416 | 2026 SHC KHI 626 | Const. P. 653/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Rehana D/o Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Asif & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3417 | 2026 SHC KHI 283 | Const. P. 6089/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Majeed (Thr. Attorney M. Faisal) (Petitioner) VS Javed Hameed & Ors (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | In the present case, the trial was conducted by a learned V-Senior Civil Judge, Karachi (West) / Special Court for Co-operative Societies exercising judicial powers under statutory notification; therefore, the impugned Judgment and Decree are valid, binding, and enforceable, subject to the final say of the appellate court. 13. In view of the above, the petitioner has failed to make out any legal or factual ground to set aside the impugned judgment and decree. The petition is thus devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed. 14. The petition is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s), if any. The impugned Judgment and Decree dated 07.12.2023 passed by the learned V-Senior Civil Judge, Karachi (West) / Special Court for Co-operative Societies, is hereby upheld with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3418 | 2026 SHC KHI 286 | Const. P. 81/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3419 | 2026 SHC KHI 154 | Const. P. 2555/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Taimoor & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners have failed to establish any legal right presently infringed, nor any corresponding legal duty breached by the respondents. Consequently, the constitutional petition is not maintainable and does not call for the exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 11. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded hereinabove, the petition is dismissed, along with all pending applications. No with costs. 12. These are the reasons for our short order of even date whereby the captioned petition was dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3420 | 2026 SHC KHI 56 | Const. P. 6417/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Nighat Hameed (Petitioner) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 3421 | 2026 SHC KHI 272 | Const. P. 4437/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Zahid Kalam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 02-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3422 | Nil | Const. P. 693/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Malik Irfanullah Aman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3423 | 2018 PLC Lab. Note 29, 2018 PLC CS Note 29 | Const. P. 7339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Independent Media Corp (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Raja Tariq Mehmood and Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.66-K/2018 M/s Independent Media Corporation (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Raja Tariq Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3424 | Nil | Const. P. 411/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Syed Akhtar Hussain (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 25-JAN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3425 | Nil | Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) | 21-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3426 | Nil | Const. P. 1940/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Prof: Jan Muhammad Memon (Petitioner) VS Governor of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 16-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2715/2018 Professor Jan Muhammad Memon v. The Governor of Sindh/Chancellor thr. the Principal Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 3427 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1324 | Const. P. 608/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Sajjad Hussain And ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 14-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.610-K/2018 The Chairman Port Qasim Authority Bin Qasim and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Ports and Shipping and others,C.A.74-K/2018 The Chairman Port Qasim Authority Bin Qasim and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Ports and Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 3428 | 2018 PLC CS Note 171 | Const. P. 3525/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) | 18-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.431/2018 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3429 | 2018 MLD 1649 | Const. P. 196/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Nayab Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hameeda Bano & Ors (Respondent) | 10-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.460-K/2017 Nayab Ali v. Mst: Hameeda Bano and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3430 | Nil | Const. P. 1503/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Syed Tariq Mustafa (Petitioner) VS National Insurance Corporation Limited (Respondent) | 29-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3431 | Nil | Const. P. 301/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Khalique Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 12-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3432 | Nil | Const. P. 3657/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ehsan Ali Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3433 | Nil | Const. P. 1093/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Hari Ram (Petitioner) VS Misri and others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3434 | Nil | Const. P. 291/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Wasim (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) | 25-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3435 | Nil | Const. P. 6629/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 3436 | 2020 PLC (CS) 1078 | Const. P. 3169/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Fouzia Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3437 | Nil | Const. P. 3173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rafi Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3438 | Nil | Const. P. 3500/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Hijab Qazi (Petitioner) VS Chairman/CEO PIAC and Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3439 | 2017 SBLR Sindh 443 | Const. P. 5176/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Muhammad Shoaib (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.121-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Syed Muhammad Sohaib and others,C.P.L.A.599-K/2018 Syed Muhammad Shoaib and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3440 | 2018 SBLR Sindh 128, 2019 PLC (CS) 2013 | Const. P. 1377/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Akmal Hussain (Petitioner) VS Secretary Establishment Government of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 15-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.14-K/2018 Akmal Hussain v. The Secy: Estabishment Div. Govt. of Pakistan, Islambad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3441 | Nil | Const. P. 402/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Tahseen Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) | 04-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3442 | Nil | I. A 11/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2009 | Province of Sindh through Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Ashrafuddin & others (Respondent) | 13-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3443 | Nil | Const. P. 218/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Elbert son of Faredo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3444 | Nil | Const. P. 441/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Samiuddin son of Babouddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3445 | Nil | Const. P. 3037/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Saifur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 05-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3446 | Nil | Const. P. 1826/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Syed Muzaffar Ali Jaffro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3447 | Nil | Const. P. 1097/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Bakhu Khan (Petitioner) VS Aamir Noor & others (Respondent) | 14-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3448 | Nil | Const. P. 3623/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Deedar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3449 | Nil | Const. P. 101/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Hasnain Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.426-K/2019 Syed Hasnain Raza v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: I.T & Telecom M/o Information Technology and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3450 | Nil | Const. P. 151/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Miss Nabila Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-16 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.122-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Nabiha Zafar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3451 | Nil | Const. P. 1069/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ikramullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 28-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3452 | Nil | Const. P. 61/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Bibi Muzammil (Petitioner) VS Accountant District Court MPS & Other (Respondent) | 30-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3453 | Nil | Const. P. 284/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Mian Tahir Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3454 | Nil | Const. P. 3580/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Humair Altaf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3455 | 2018 CLC 1632 | Const. P. 3580/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Humair Altaf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3456 | Nil | Const. P. 1865/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mst. Sadia & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-19 | Yes | Petitioner in Pursuance advertisement applied for the post of Oriental Teacher and Drawing Teacher .They claimed that on conducting the written test were declared Successful candidate. They approached for obtaining offer order but could not. State council informed that Since irregularities were found in the test no result of test was announced. However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and appointed .pursuant to an advertisement did not confer any right to be appointed to the posts in question to entitle the selectees to a writ of mandamus or any other writ compelling the authority to make the appointment, for the simple reason that the whole process has been scrapped and nothing is left to be filled up. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents Since the Government also has the right to cancel the recruitment process. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh & others (supra), Civil petition No 186k /2013 consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.281-K/2019 Miss Sadia and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3457 | Nil | Cr.Bail 5/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | MOHISIN ABBAS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 15-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3458 | Nil | Const. P. 5079/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Syed Farhat Iqbal and 11 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.411-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Syed Farhat Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3459 | Nil | Const. P. 199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 24-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.167-K/2019 Ahsanullah Abro v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB and others,C.P.L.A.125-K/2019 Muhammad Ayaz Abro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3460 | Nil | Const. P. 2826/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3461 | Nil | Const. P. 62/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 30-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3462 | Nil | Const. P. 905/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Miss. Erum & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-19 | Yes | Petitioner in pursuance advertisement applied for drawing teacher & Orientale teacher. They claimed on conducting the written test they declared successful candidate. they approached obtaining offer letter but could not. State council informed that since irregularities were found in the test no result of written test was announced .However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and not appointed. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents had found something fishy in the matter and recommended for scrapping of the whole recruitment process. The material placed on record before this Court clearly shows that a policy decision was taken by the Government to have the recruitment undertaken for the posts by way of fresh advertisement. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Civil petition no 186K/2013 Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh &others(supra), consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.283-K/2019 Miss Erum and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3463 | Nil | Const. P. 307/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3464 | 2020 PLC Lab. 180 | Const. P. 1983/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rafique Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 28-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3465 | Nil | Cr.Rev 55/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | Ali Muhammad Joyo (Applicant) VS Baggan @ Asghar and others (Respondent) | 07-MAR-13 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.71-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Baggan @ Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | |
| 3466 | Nil | Const. P. 787/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M. Imran Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) | 13-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3467 | Nil | Const. P. 8356/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Qamar Shahid Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3468 | Nil | Const. P. 2018/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mohammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Market Committee and Ors (Respondent) | 28-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1426-K/2018 Market Committee Karachi and another v. Muhammad Saddiq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3469 | Nil | Const. P. 4577/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Salam International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 09-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3470 | 2020 PLC (CS) 101 | Const. P. 2831/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Nazia Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 18-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3471 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1217 | Const. P. 1389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Anwar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3472 | Nil | Suit 1671/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2016 | Rana Muhammad Nadeem. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad rasheed Siddiqui. (ISSEUS) (Defendant) | 24-JAN-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3473 | Nil | Const. P. 4022/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | (Engr) Muhammad Hashim Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman(SUPARCO) & Others (Respondent) | 23-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3474 | Nil | Const. P. 7142/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mumtaz Ali Magsi (Petitioner) VS I.G Police and Ors (Respondent) | 12-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3475 | Nil | Const. P. 6990/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Nawal Kishore and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3476 | Nil | Const. P. 3362/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 07-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1431-K/2018 Shabbir Aslam v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secy: Govt. of Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3477 | Nil | Const. P. 916/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sub-Engineer / Staff Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) | 09-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3478 | 2020 PLC (CS) Note 13, 2020 PLC CS Note 13 | Const. P. 7941/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Mst. Sabiha Ilyas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 19-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3479 | 2019 PLC Lab. 19 | Const. P. 7370/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/S SINDH CLUB (Petitioner) VS MUHAMMAD MISKEEN & OTHERS (Respondent) | 16-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3480 | Nil | Const. P. 2722/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3481 | Nil | Const. P. 1741/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ali Murad Brohi (Petitioner) VS Zarai Tarqiati Bank and ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.126-K/2019 Ali Murad Brohi v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3482 | 2018 CLC 443 | II.A. 98/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Saleh Muhammad (Appellant) VS Mst.Rahima Bai & Others (Respondent) | 09-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.85-K/2017 Mst: Rahima Bai and others v. Saleh Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3483 | Nil | Const. P. 1689/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Syed Aamir Hashmi and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3484 | Nil | Const. P. 2415/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Raja Muhammad Asad Khan (Petitioner) VS D.E.O Sanghar and Ors (Respondent) | 04-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3485 | Nil | Const. P. 6546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Bheru Lal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 11-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3486 | Nil | Const. P. 1740/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Ghafoor Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 19-DEC-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3487 | Nil | Const. P. 6063/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2965/2018 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.68-K/2019 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3488 | Nil | Const. P. 2263/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Descon Engineering Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2977/2018 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.80-K/2019 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3489 | Nil | Const. P. 5680/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Hyder Ali Liskani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4402/2017 Hyder Ali Liskani & others v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1610/2017 Hyder Ali Liskani & others v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 3490 | Nil | Const. P. 479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Phoenix Security Services (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2970/2018 M/s Phoenix Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.73-K/2019 M/s Phoenix Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3491 | Nil | Const. P. 539/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Younus Textile Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3492 | Nil | Const. P. 1037/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shamrof (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3493 | 2019 PLC (CS) 1278 | Const. P. 4930/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Musheer Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 27-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.263-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Musheer Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3494 | 2020 PLC (CS) 239 | Const. P. 5918/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Dr. Ahsanullah Khan Nazir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 15-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1104-K/2018 Dr. Ahsanullah Khan Wazir v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 3495 | 2018 PLC (CS) Note 121 | Const. P. 2798/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Arham Aziz Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 09-OCT-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3496 | Nil | Const. P. 2381/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s B.P Ind (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 26-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3497 | 2019 PLD SC 710, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 118, 2018 PLC CS Note 118 | Const. P. 4177/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Parveen Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-NOV-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.664-K/2017 Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.130-K/2019 Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 3498 | 2018 YLR 360 | Cr.Rev 154/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2015 | ALI MUHAMMAD S/O LATE HAJI MOOSA (Applicant) VS SHAHZAD S/O ALI MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Respondent) | 25-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3499 | 2021 SBLR Note 654, 2021 SBLR Sindh 654 | Const. P. 1068/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Riffat Humayun (Petitioner) VS P.T.V and Ors (Respondent) | 02-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.637-K/2018 Riffat Humayun v. Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd. thr. its Managing Director and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3500 | Nil | Const. P. 4918/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Gatron (Ind.) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3501 | Nil | Const. P. 7119/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Multinational Export Bureau (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3502 | Nil | Const. P. 2825/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Shoaibee Industries (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3503 | Nil | Const. P. 3570/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Younus Textile Mills (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3589/2018 M/s Younas Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 3504 | 2018 CLC 443 | II.A. 97/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2011 | Saleh Muhammad (Appellant) VS Mst.Rahima Bai & Others (Respondent) | 15-AUG-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.84-K/2017 Mst: Rahima Bai and others v. Saleh Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3505 | Nil | Const. P. 1452/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mirza Muhammad Umar Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 24-JUL-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3506 | Nil | Const. P. 2438/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | P.P.L Officers and Associates & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 08-SEP-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.681-K/2017 Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association thr. its Chairman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3507 | Nil | Const. P. 2076/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ayaz Hussain Abro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 11-APR-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3508 | Nil | Const. P. 3083/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | MIMA KNIT PVT LTD (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3509 | Nil | Const. P. 3337/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 08-MAY-17 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3510 | Nil | Const. P. 6016/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Buyer Pakitstan (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3511 | Nil | Const. P. 6194/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Jaffer Brothers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3512 | Nil | Const. P. 8357/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | M/s Premier Towels (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3513 | Nil | Const. P. 1273/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Ghani Glass Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2975/2018 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.78-K/2019 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3514 | Nil | Const. P. 1274/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s J & P Coats Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 22-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3515 | Nil | Const. P. 4507/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nighat Munir (Petitioner) VS Madam Humera and Ors (Respondent) | 03-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3516 | Nil | Cr.Misc. 1218/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Zuriat W/o Sheeral Khan (Applicant) VS Kouro Khan @ Kouro and others (Respondent) | 21-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3517 | Nil | Cr.Bail 180/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Waheed Dehpal Chandio (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 24-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3518 | Nil | Cr.Misc. 398/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nawab Ali (Applicant) VS Yawar Abbas & 3 others (Respondent) | 24-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3519 | 2021 SBLR Sindh 1966 | Const. P. 1151/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr Fozia Akmal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-19 | Yes | whether the services of the petitioner as Consultant Gynecologist in SESSI can be regularized | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3520 | Nil | Const. P. 2071/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3521 | Nil | Const. P. 1406/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nehal Chang (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3522 | Nil | Const. P. 3365/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zubair Ahmed. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3523 | Nil | Const. P. 332/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mir Peer Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3524 | Nil | Const. P. 1260/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Attique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3525 | Nil | Const. P. 2868/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Mutlab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3526 | Nil | Const. P. 3241/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ayoob Lanjwani (Petitioner) VS Director Left Bank Canal area (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3527 | Nil | Const. P. 795/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3528 | Nil | Const. P. 1122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | ManzoorHussain& another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3529 | Nil | Const. P. 1767/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Nabi Dost (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3530 | Nil | Const. P. 2542/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | RaheemBux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3531 | Nil | Const. P. 2739/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Shabbir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3532 | Nil | Const. P. 271/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-19 | Yes | In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3533 | Nil | Const. P. 1680/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nisar Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.1276-K/2020 Subhan Ali v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Allotment Committee & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | |
| 3534 | Nil | Const. P. 2058/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Saddam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3535 | Nil | Const. P. 250/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | SawanKhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3536 | Nil | Const. P. 505/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Habibullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3537 | Nil | Const. P. 681/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sher Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3538 | Nil | Const. P. 1540/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mir Noor Ahmed &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3539 | Nil | Const. P. 3360/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3540 | Nil | Const. P. 738/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3541 | Nil | Const. P. 1327/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Irfan Victor (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khalida (Respondent) | 25-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3542 | Nil | Const. P. 794/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 01-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3543 | Nil | Const. P. 2715/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Yameen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.740-K/2019 Muhammad Yameen v. Chairman Sindh Irrigation & Drainage Authority (SDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3544 | Nil | Const. P. 1142/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Naveed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3545 | Nil | Const. P. 511/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Farooque (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 12-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3546 | Nil | Const. P. 300/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Hyder Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3547 | Nil | Const. P. 2320/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Shah Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3548 | Nil | Const. P. 456/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.542-K/2019 Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 3549 | Nil | Const. P. 2179/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3550 | Nil | Const. P. 1576/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3551 | Nil | Const. P. 3005/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Hamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3552 | Nil | Const. P. 523/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 13-NOV-19 | Yes | Deceased Quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3553 | Nil | Const. P. 2634/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3554 | Nil | Const. P. 3345/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Nangar Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3555 | Nil | Const. P. 2683/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Hamayoon Mubarak (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3556 | Nil | Const. P. 84/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imdad Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3557 | Nil | Const. P. 377/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3558 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 261 | Const. P. 144/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Leemon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3559 | Nil | Const. P. 3215/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Rais Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3560 | Nil | Const. P. 2085/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | AijazAli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3561 | Nil | Const. P. 1410/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sain Dino &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3562 | Nil | Const. P. 3196/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Raza Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3563 | Nil | Const. P. 3306/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 05-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3564 | Nil | Const. P. 5783/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nazir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 13-SEP-19 | Yes | Adverse remarks ???Not Yet Fit??? | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3565 | Nil | Const. P. 8186/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Kashif (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.692-K/2019 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.21-K/2022 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 3566 | Nil | Const. P. 671/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3567 | Nil | Const. P. 547/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Razia Rizwan (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3568 | Nil | Const. P. 3742/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3569 | Nil | Const. P. 1609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Inam Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3570 | Nil | Const. P. 1134/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Sindh Growers Alliance (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3571 | Nil | Const. P. 1397/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abrar Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3572 | Nil | Const. P. 1724/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Idrees Adil and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3573 | Nil | Const. P. 4935/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Asad Akram and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3574 | Nil | Const. P. 339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3575 | Nil | Const. P. 5479/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Kaleemullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3576 | Nil | Const. P. 2854/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mohammad Bakhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 30-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3577 | Nil | Const. P. 8578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tariq and Ors (Respondent) | 26-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.694-K/2019 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.23-K/2022 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 3578 | Nil | Const. P. 857/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 28-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3579 | Nil | Const. P. 1997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3580 | Nil | Const. P. 3578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | KhudaBux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3581 | Nil | Const. P. 1708/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zulfiqar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3582 | Nil | Const. P. 2232/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Saifullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3583 | Nil | Const. P. 2339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3584 | Nil | Const. P. 317/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3585 | Nil | Const. P. 221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3586 | Nil | Const. P. 3274/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Asif Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 31-OCT-19 | Yes | Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3587 | Nil | Const. P. 1511/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Jam Mitha Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-19 | Yes | Petitioner is seeking direction to the Respondents to issue notification of his post-retirement benefits, on the premise that he was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) BPS-17 in Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) ---the petitioner???s Counsel was directed to assist this Court more particularly regarding Article 187(2) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 that whether this Court can examine and or modify the Judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court or only to enforce it in accordance with the law--We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Sindh Government to pay all his perks and privileges to which he was entitled to on issuance of notification of his repatriation, inclusive of his entire pensionary benefits within [02] months and report compliance through MIT-II of this court. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3588 | Nil | Const. P. 507/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mohsin Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3589 | Nil | Const. P. 2776/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Miss Nasreen Qadri (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3590 | Nil | Const. P. 3600/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Atique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3591 | Nil | Const. P. 3063/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Jam Memon (Petitioner) VS Abdul Shakoorand others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3592 | Nil | I. A 13/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Lachman Das & others (Appellant) VS Tano Lal and Harji (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | The property in question being a public amenity cannot be encroached upon and as per the dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court, an area earmarked and reserved for an amenity like Massan/Graveyard and Aasaish, cannot be used for any other purposes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3593 | Nil | Const. P. 207/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Achar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 20-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3594 | Nil | Const. P. 2114/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3595 | 2020 SHC HYD 1815 | Const. P. 1270/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Jhando Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent) | 12-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3596 | 2020 SHC KHI 2023 | Const. P. 1652/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Abdul Qudos Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-20 | Yes | quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3597 | 2020 SHC HYD 2364 | Criminal Appeal 64/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Sikandar Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 18-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3598 | 2020 SHC KHI 2141, 2021 PLC (CS) 683 | Const. P. 876/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shakir Ali (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) | 04-DEC-20 | Yes | Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.736/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Shakir Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 3599 | 2020 SHC HYD 1787 | Const. P. 2881/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3600 | 2020 SHC HYD 1451 | Const. P. 550/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Amad Hussain Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 03-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3601 | 2020 SHC HYD 1329 | Const. P. 998/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 983,993,979/2020 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Jalil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 08-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3636/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Jaleel Ahmed Lashari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3602 | 2020 SHC KHI 2229 | Const. P. 7067/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ms. Samreen Mazari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1800/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Samreen Mazari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 3603 | 2020 SHC HYD 1595 | Criminal Appeal 23/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | Nazer Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 05-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3604 | 2020 SHC KHI 1870 | Const. P. 6387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Beenish Mobin & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 04-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1432-K/2020 Amjad Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3605 | 2020 SHC HYD 2459 | Civil Revision 187/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) VS Maqsood Ahmed (Respondent) | 11-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3606 | 2021 SHC KHI 383 | Const. P. 6787/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Prof: (R) Syed Anwar Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | University of Karachi--accommodation--Prima-facie the petitioner No.1 stood retired from the service of respondent-university on 06.10.2018 and after retirement, he was allowed to remain in possession up to 05.10.2019, therefore, no vested right can be claimed by them to retain the university accommodation for an indefinite period. Even otherwise, we are not satisfied with this assertion made by learned counsel for the petitioners to the effect that they are authorized residents of subject accommodation, which act on their part is not appreciated for the simple reason that to date no allotment order has been made in favour of petitioner No.2 who is stated to be an employee of respondent-university and it is for them to take appropriate decision if the petitioner No.2 is entitled to under the law. The documents relied upon by them do not confer any right thereupon permitting them to ask for the continuation of the allotment of subject premises. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3607 | 2020 SHC KHI 1737 | Const. P. 3766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Ms. Kishwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 20-FEB-20 | Yes | Regularization issue in PSM | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1801/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Kishwar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 3608 | 2020 SHC HYD 1200 | Const. P. 564/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Sarwar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3609 | 2020 SHC HYD 2307 | R.A (Civil Revision) 217/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) VS Haresh Kumar & Others (Respondent) | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3610 | 2020 SHC HYD 1119 | Const. P. 683/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Dr Muhammad Khan Shar & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3611 | 2020 SHC HYD 2465 | Const. P. 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Sikandar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3612 | 2020 SHC KHI 131, 2020 PLC CS 1411 | Const. P. 6431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Irshad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-APR-20 | Yes | Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to submit before this Court on the next date hearing a list of all such employees of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh who were absorbed / appointed at any post and are still holding such post, and also the notification of repatriation of respondent No.7 to his parent department. Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.279-K/2020 Ghulam Ali v. Irshad Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3613 | 2020 SHC HYD 2289 | Const. P. 85/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.738-K/2022 Aziz Khan & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3614 | 2020 SHC KHI 315 | Const. P. 825/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | release his monthly salary--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3615 | 2020 SHC HYD 92 | Const. P. 1741/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mst. Sadia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3616 | 2020 SHC KHI 590 | Const. P. 4105/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Muhammad Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 16-JAN-20 | Yes | this petition is allowed in the terms whereby the competent authority of CAA is directed to consider the case of petitioner for his proforma promotion in PG-10, Works and Development Directorate, CAA for the purpose of pensionery benefits within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3617 | 2020 SHC KHI 1776 | Const. P. 7103/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent) | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | release his monthly salary--whether the salary of the petitioner can be withheld without providing an opportunity of hearing? --In our view, he, who seeks equity, must do equity and approach the Court with clean hands, ill-gotten gains cannot be protected. It is argued by the learned AAG that the petitioner had got his appointment through the backdoor, thus cannot agitate any grievance on the pretext of denial of due opportunity of hearing to him--we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and since the Competent Authority has already determined the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims on the issue of appointment of non-teaching staff in the Directorate of School Education (Elementary/ Secondary / Higher Secondary Karachi), vide order dated 11.01.2019 on the subject as discussed supra, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained. On the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, we are guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3618 | 2021 SHC KHI 595 | Const. P. 5663/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Jawad Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sect: Ind & Production and Ors (Respondent) | 01-FEB-21 | Yes | policy decision---Prima facie, the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV was/is a policy decision which has already been taken care of by the Secretary Ministry of Industries and Production, Government of Pakistan, whereby the request of PSMC was declined for delinking of the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme from the privatization process vide letter dated 13.04.2015. Besides the subject matter in these proceedings is a policy matter and Privatization Commission has already taken back the decision vide letter dated 16.02.2015 for the launching of aforesaid Society till the privatization of PSMC which is the policy decision of respondents; and, in the given circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the policy decision under its Constitutional jurisdiction, for the reasons already given hereinabove. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3619 | 2020 SHC HYD 1014 | Civil Revision 189/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ashraf (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) | 11-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3620 | 2020 SHC KHI 1916 | Const. P. 2157/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Kashmir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3621 | 2020 SHC KHI 1121 | Const. P. 5648/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Musarat Nazeer (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3622 | 2020 SHC HYD 357 | Criminal Appeal 103/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2019 | Faheem (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 11-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | J.P.315/2020 Faheem v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 3623 | 2020 SHC KHI 2191 | Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the period of adhoc appointment cannot be counted towards service, the seniority in grade is to be taken effect from the date of regular appointment to a post and it cannot be conferred retrospectively. Since the service of the petitioner was confirmed admittedly with effect from 22.11.2019 as such promotion cannot be claimed by him without the requisite length of service except from the date of regular appointment. This reduces to the dictum that an ad-hoc appointee would only be entitled to seniority from the date of his regularization and not from the date of initial appointment. The petitioner accordingly is neither entitled for retrospective seniority nor promotion. This view is cemented by the judgment delivered in the case of Province of Sindh and others vs. Ghulam Farid and others, 2014 SCMR 1189, and Secretary to Government of Punjab and others vs. Muhammad Khalid Usmani and others, 2016 SCMR 2125. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3624 | 2020 SHC KHI 2447 | Const. P. 5844/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Naeemullah Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-20 | Yes | Deceased quota latest Deceased quota | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3625 | 2020 SHC KHI 651 | Const. P. 5652/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ashiq Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3626 | 2020 SHC HYD 1723 | Civil Revision 186/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Ashraf (Applicant) VS Maqsood Ahmed (Respondent) | 11-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3627 | 2021 SHC KHI 775 | Const. P. 2/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Salman Bari S/o Abdul Bari (Petitioner) VS Samia Khan and another (Respondent) | 04-JAN-21 | Yes | Under Article 199 of Constitution, Petitioner seeks recall of order dated 01.12.2020, whereby non-bailable warrants (NBWs) was issued against the petitioner-- Section 51, CPC-- In the present case, the petitioner has specifically, pleaded that he had already paid a partial payment of Rs.2,71,000/- (Rupees Two Lac and Seventy-One Thousand) to the private respondent vide statement dated 10.11.2020 (available at page 73 of memo of petition) and undertake to pay the remaining amount within a reasonable time as per his financial position-- In the light of the aforesaid legal position of the case and an undertaking of the petitioner, the operation of NBWs issued against him by the learned trial Court is converted into BWs, enabling him to furnish security / appropriate bond equivalent to the remaining amount before the learned trial Court. However, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on the next date of hearing and in case of failure, the order passed by the learned trial Court on 01.12.2020 shall be operative. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.216-K/2024 Salman Bari v. Samia Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 3628 | 2020 SHC HYD 2221 | Const. P. 359/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Annwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3629 | 2022 PLC (CS) Note 6 | Const. P. 1970/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 30-SEP-20 | Yes | In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2553/2020 Prof. Dr. Shamsuddin Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariate, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3630 | 2022 PLC (CS) 481 | Const. P. 4941/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) | 13-OCT-20 | Yes | PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine. we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3631 | 2021 SHC KHI 730 | Const. P. 5978/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mustafa Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 12-JAN-21 | Yes | out of turn promotion | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3632 | 2020 SHC KHI 1089 | Const. P. 4508/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-DEC-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.269-K/2021 Dr.Dilshad Ahmed v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3633 | 2020 SHC SUK 2163 | Cr.Misc. 307/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Hassan Narejo & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 28-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author) | |||
| 3634 | 2020 SHC HYD 176 | Const. P. 292/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Ume-e-Rubab & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3635 | 2021 SHC KHI 1064 | Const. P. 7550/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS The Overseas Employment Corp & Ors (Respondent) | 02-FEB-21 | Yes | reinstatement of service as Driver in Overseas Employment Corporation--In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, the instant Constitution Petition is allowed, both the impugned orders passed by the learned National Industrial Commission are set aside, consequently, termination order dated 26.7.2012 passed by the respondent-corporation is also set aside. Resultantly, the petitioner is directed to be reinstated in service forthwith along with back benefits as Driver in the respondent-Overseas Employment Corporation. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.478-K/2021 Managing Director Overseas Employment Corporation & another v. Mir Abdul Majeed Dhillo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3636 | 2020 SHC HYD 1001 | Const. P. 2012/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Abdul Faheem (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 13-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1231-K/2020 Abdul Faheem v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3637 | 2020 SHC KHI 1860 | Const. P. 531/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Muhammad Naseer Farooqi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) | 16-NOV-20 | Yes | VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3638 | 2020 SHC HYD 948 | Cr.J.A 222/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Saleem (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 29-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | J.P.364/2020 Saleem v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 3639 | 2020 SHC HYD 1212 | Criminal Appeal 51/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2020 | ASGHAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 29-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3640 | Nil | Const. P. 444/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Mehbob Ali (Petitioner) VS D.C. Sanghar & others (Respondent) | 12-DEC-19 | Yes | Prima-facie the subject land is reserved for Musafir khana which is for the people of area, legal title may vest in the Government, but such title, and the exercise of powers based thereon, is to be exercised in public interest, in accordance with the Constitution and the laws framed thereunder. Similarly, in the case reported as Ardeshir Cowasjee and 10 others v. Karachi Building Control Authority (KMC), Karachi and 4 others (1999 SCMR 2883) in somewhat similar facts in respect of a plot which was carved out within a park area, the Honble Supreme Court has held that an amenity plot cannot be used for any commercial purpose. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3641 | 2021 SHC KHI 843 | Const. P. 4066/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Zaheer Ahmed Hisbani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-21 | Yes | deceased quota | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3642 | 2020 SHC KHI 867 | Const. P. 6100/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 05-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3643 | 2020 SHC HYD 484 | Const. P. 1488/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Sindhu Abbas Leghari (Petitioner) VS Major (R) Omer Farooq (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3644 | 2020 SHC HYD 2017 | Cr.Misc. 295/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Fouzia @ Waziran (Applicant) VS SSP District Jamshoro & others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3645 | 2020 SHC KHI 293 | Const. P. 6236/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Raza Muhammad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-DEC-20 | Yes | The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed in limine along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1220-K/2025 Raza Muhammad Alias Kaloo & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 3646 | 2020 SHC KHI 1955 | Const. P. 6563/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Mazahar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Senior Director Culture & Sports and Ors (Respondent) | 23-JAN-20 | Yes | Contempt--This petition was disposed of vide order dated 11.12.2018 with direction to the respondent No.4 to process the case of petitioner in accordance with law and if he qualifies to be appointed / promoted subject to availability of the post, his case may be recommended to Metropolitan Commissioner Karachi for promotion strictly in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations--Therefore, at this juncture, no case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors is made out. Resultantly, CMA No. 7446/2019 is dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3647 | 2020 SHC KHI 1466 | Const. P. 8261/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-OCT-20 | Yes | Repatriation from the post of Additional Deputy Commissioner-I, Hyderabad to his parent department i.e. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. vide Notification dated 12.2.2016 issued by Chief Secretary--whether the petitioner was qualified to be inducted from Sui Southern Gas Company in Sindh Government on deputation for three years' And, whether the Chief Minister, Sindh was competent to nominate the petitioner as Assistant Commissioner in Ex-PCS cadre under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964? and, whether his repatriation to his parent department is in accord with the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court?--It is well-settled law that a deputationist does not have any vested right to remain on the post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period. He can be repatriated to his parent department at any time. The Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafiur Rehman Afridi v. CDA, 2010 SCMR 378, has settled the issue on the aforesaid proposition. Therefore, no further deliberation is required by us--In our view, since the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters is still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3648 | Nil | Const. P. 1895/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mst. Faiza Gul (Petitioner) VS Zubaid Gul and others (Respondent) | 18-NOV-19 | Yes | Since the question of law has been answered accordingly; therefore, the above observation on the other points is tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the either party in their other family matter if any pending before the court of law which shall be decided independently in accordance with law. Disposed of. Since the question of law has been answered accordingly; therefore, the above observation on the other points is tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the either party in their other family matter if any pending before the court of law which shall be decided independently in accordance with law. Disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4816/2019 Mst. Faiza Gul v. Zubaid Gul & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 3649 | 2020 SHC KHI 1231 | Const. P. 5909/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Sajid Jalil (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) | 19-OCT-20 | Yes | It is a well-settled proposition of law that the Competent Authority is entitled to make rules in the interest of exigency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision making of the Respondent-Bank and the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted as no vested right of a Bank employee is involved in the matter of promotion, or the rules determining their eligibility or fitness, and in Bank Cases, the High Court has no jurisdiction through Writ to strike it down, except in the cases in which policy framed is against the public interest. This proposition of law has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in a plethora of judgments. Moreover, petitioner has not been able to point out any case where other employee(s), having rating equivalent to or lower than him, was / were promoted by the respondent-bank. Thus, prima facie it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination at least to the extent of the instant case. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.269/2021 Sajid Jalil v. National Bank of Pakistan through President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of |
| 3650 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 726 | Civil Revision 219/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Ayoob, (Applicant) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) | 13-DEC-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3651 | 2020 SHC HYD 808 | Const. P. 190/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst. Darya Khatoon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 07-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3652 | 2020 SHC HYD 1862 | Const. P. 699/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Nizam U Din Unar (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 20-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3653 | 2023 PLC CS 194 | Const. P. 4462/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 31-MAR-21 | Yes | appointment for the post of Naib Qasid in respondent-School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Sindh--Rule 16 of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--The matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondents for afresh decision on the issue of appointment of Naib Qasid under law, and consider the case of the petitioner for the subject post within two months, from the date of receipt of the order of this Court and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3654 | 2022 SHC KHI 674 | Const. P. 2849/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shahabuddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 01-MAR-22 | Yes | quo warranto | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.892-K/2020 Jam Abdul Fatah v. Federation of Pakistan & others,C.P.L.A.1333/2022 Shahabuddin Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn |
| 3655 | 2021 SHC KHI 1342, 2021 SBLR Sindh 1605 | Const. P. 7997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | 18-MAR-21 | Yes | Regional Manager Askari Guards (Pvt.) Ltd--NIRC--back benefits -- | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2931/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.472/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted, |
| 3656 | 2021 SHC KHI 177 | Const. P. 7382/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Akhtar Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 12-FEB-21 | Yes | issuance of offer/appointment orders to the post of Gavi Vaccinators (BPS-6) in the Health Department on the plea that they have already been declared successful candidates based on marks they obtained in the competitive process --i) Whether the recruitment process for the post of vaccinator (BPS-6) was flawed under the law? ii) Whether the Selection Committee was lawfully constituted; and, the Provincial Minister was competent to reduce the passing marks and facilitate private respondents/beneficiaries for appointment to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)? iii) Whether some of the private respondents/beneficiaries on the recommendation of the two-member Selection Committee were lawfully appointed as vaccinators in BPS-6? iv) Whether the petitioners can claim a right to be appointed through the two-member Selection Committee to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)?-- | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3111/2021 Ghayasuddin Shahani and others v. Akhtar Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed |
| 3657 | 2021 SHC KHI 437 | Const. P. 1578/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Saqib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 05-APR-21 | Yes | departmental proceedings initiated against him as contemplated under Section 3(b)(c) of the Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1988--as to how this petition is maintainable against departmental proceedings initiated against him and the final order for dismissal from service served upon him, which action of the respondent-department ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal (SST) at Karachi. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3658 | 2021 SHC KHI 686 | Const. P. 2028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Abid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 16-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.470-K/2021 Muhammad Abid v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3659 | 2021 SHC KHI 819 | Const. P. 6368/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Ishtiaq & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 19-MAY-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1058-K/2021 Mohammad Ishtiaq & others v. Federation of Pakistan & anotherabdi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3660 | 2021 SHC KHI 948 | Const. P. 5025/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Imdad Ali Abro & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 28-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 3661 | 2021 SHC KHI 1005 | Const. P. 169/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Fajjar Din (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 01-JUN-21 | Yes | This Constitutional Petition has been filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorari/ mandamus to call for the records relating to the Compulsory Retirement Order dated 01.11.2012 and Appellate Order dated 30.10.2017 passed by the respondent-Airport Security Force (hereinafter referred to as `ASF'), and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to reinstate services of the petitioner as an Inspector (ASF). | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.760-K/2021 Mr. Fajjar Din v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (Refer to Const. Bench) |
| 3662 | 2021 SHC KHI 143 | Const. P. 1869/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Talat Mehmood and Others (Petitioner) VS Bahria Univeristy and Others (Respondent) | 16-MAR-21 | Yes | Bahria university Karachi--release order | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3663 | 2021 SHC KHI 413 | Const. P. 3228/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Misri Ladhani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | 24-SEP-21 | Yes | prima-facie the claim of the Petitioner for proforma promotion is tenable under the law for the simple reason that CSB recommended his promotion in BS-21 during his tenure of service, in the meanwhile, he reached the age of superannuation, just after the recommendation made by SCB in his favour, as a consequence, the pay of the petitioner is required to be re-fixed and his post-retirement benefits will be re- calculated by allowing his proforma promotion in BS-21 and arrears shall be paid to him with 6% simple interest per annum--The competent authority of respondents is directed to notify the proforma promotion of the petitioner in BS-21 with effect from 13.02.2014 i.e. the date on which the CSB recommended his case for promotion in BS-21 and other ancillary benefits under the law, without discrimination, within 02 weeks | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.5548/2021,C.A.21/2022,C.A.22/2022,C.P.L.A.5779/2021 SCP | Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months |
| 3664 | 2021 SHC KHI 212 | Const. P. 3001/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr. Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and Ors (Respondent) | 10-MAR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3665 | 2021 SHC KHI 667 | Const. P. 723/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Allah Bachayo & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh & Others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-21 | Yes | Secretary Schools shall also ensure that close schools are re-started by providing all facilities in the area of Union Council Bijora, Taluka Sujawal, District Sujawal. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3666 | 2021 SHC LAR 1035 | Cr.Bail 2013/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Latif Kodrani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 06-AUG-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3667 | 2020 SHC KHI 1022 | Const. P. 3597/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Rauf Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 11-MAR-20 | Yes | Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3668 | 2021 SHC KHI 991 | Const. P. 3386/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mehreen Fatima and Others (Petitioner) VS Learned / Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent) | 25-AUG-21 | Yes | It is pertinent to mention that services of the petitioners fall within the ambit of master and servant hence servant cannot compel the master with regard to his posting on the plea of wedlock policy as in field but that alone shall not be a reason and terms and conditions are to be followed. Without prejudice to the issue pending before the NIRC which presently is not available, at present we are not inclined to grant relief and stay transfer of the petitioners hence petition is dismissed. However petitioners will be at liberty to agitate their issue before NIRC as and when bench is available and this order shall not be used against them. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3669 | 2025 SHC KHI 2428 | Const. P. 2511/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of the above, prima facie, the previous orders have been mostly followed. The application is now dismissed based on the committee's decision. However, the petitioners are free to challenge the legality of that decision in the appropriate legal forum. This Court also directs that the case of Petitioner Saeed Akhtar Naqvi be reconsidered for a pro forma promotion within two months, provided he is eligible based on his seniority. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3670 | 2021 SHC KHI 384 | Const. P. 852/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Naeem Sadiq and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 10-MAR-21 | Yes | CBC janitorial staff-- minimum wage | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3671 | 2023 SHC KHI 474 | Const. P. 161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Karim Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3672 | 2021 SHC KHI 1432 | Const. P. 6244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-MAY-21 | Yes | Whether the Petitioner is qualified for the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh? ii) Whether the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh is to be filled by 80% by initial appointment through Sindh Public Service Commission (except contract employees) and 20% by promotion amongst the various categories of teachers having 7 years service in BPS-16? | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4278/2021 Aziz ullah v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 3673 | 2021 SHC KHI 1022 | Const. P. 4989/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-AUG-21 | Yes | Needless to mention that mere allegation that respondent No.2 is biased is not sufficient to avoid least delay of conclusion of the inquiry. Needless to add that inquiry officer is bound to conduct to impartial inquiry and submit report to the competent authority; hence at this premature stage we are not inclined to interfere with the inquiry proceedings merely on uttering of word biasness when there has been placed nothing on record to substantiate such allegation. Accordingly, petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications. However, with directions to respondent No.2 that he shall conduct inquiry by providing all rights of hearing and complete the same preferably within one monthbeing SSP, is enjoying his position as SSP Sujawal and inquiry is pending since 2018, yet same has not been completed which is shocking, particularly when it relates to irregular appointment under directives of Honourable Apex Court. The competent officer(s), surprisingly, yet failed to conduct inquiry within stipulated period---Without prejudice to this denovo inquiry has been notified, hence, petitioner cannot chose a particular officer and manner of inquiry other than provided under the law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3674 | 2021 SHC KHI 653 | Const. P. 2966/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Raees Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS The Karachi Dock Labor and Others (Respondent) | 24-FEB-21 | Yes | enforcement of Board Resolution of Karachi Dock Labor Board | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.541-K/2021 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another,C.A.97-K/2023 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted [ Appeal within 3 months ], Adjourned |
| 3675 | 2021 SHC KHI 815 | Const. P. 2844/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muneer Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Health Department (Respondent) | 30-APR-21 | Yes | The petitioners have called in question, their suspension from the service order dated 01.04.2020 and subsequent order dated 18.08.2020, whereby their reinstatement in service order dated 22.7.2020 was cancelled/withdrawn by the respondent-Secretary, Health Department, Government of Sindh. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3676 | 2021 SHC LAR 43 | Criminal Appeal 45/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Original Side | 2020 | Allahdad Waswano (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 13-JUL-21 | Yes | Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years) | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3677 | 2021 SHC KHI 708 | Const. P. 4978/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-21 | Yes | It is pertinent to mention that petitioner is working in BPS-19 and his promotion will be due after one year hence at this juncture questioning direct appointment on BPS-20 cannot be termed justified and legal; hence instant petition is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3678 | 2021 SHC LAR 479 | Cr.Bail 271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Ali Solangi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 12-JUL-21 | Yes | Post Arrest Bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3679 | 2021 SHC KHI 1271, 2021 SBLR Sindh 2303 | Const. P. 1736/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Akhlaque Hussain Memon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 03-JUN-21 | Yes | whether the post of Additional/Assistant Advocate General could be filled amongst District Attorneys as per the Sindh Law Officers (Conditions of Service Rules), 1940 as amended up to date; and, whether between the notification dated 10.5.2016 bearing S.REG:1(22)2015/117 and notification dated 9.4.2018 bearing S.REG.4(07)/2018 which one is to prevail; and, whether the service structure for Deputy District Attorney and District Attorney in Solicitor Department, Government of Sindh needs to be streamlined ? | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1633-K/2021 Amir Ahmed Kehar v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed |
| 3680 | 2021 SHC KHI 907 | Const. P. 416/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Majid Hussain Khokhar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 17-MAR-21 | Yes | PCSIR | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.801-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Majid Hussain Khokhar,C.P.L.A.810-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Tariq Mateen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed |
| 3681 | 2021 SHC KHI 1258 | Const. P. 5467/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Jamal Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 10-SEP-21 | Yes | Admittedly the petitioner is/was a civil servant and the question of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal under section 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1974, however, he remained silent for the considerable time and purportedly preferred mercy appeal for reinstatement in service in the year 2008 followed by another application in the year 2020. Besides that, the disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question under Article 199 of the Constitution to set aside the dismissal from service order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3682 | 2021 SHC KHI 1318, 2024 PLC (CS) 1024 | Const. P. 2217/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Zeeshan Anjum and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 02-APR-21 | Yes | The main grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been declined without announcing the final merit list i.e. written test and interview--Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no offer of appointment order had been issued in their favor, thus no vested right had/has accrued in favor of the petitioners. | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3683 | 2021 SHC LAR 935 | Cr.Bail 7/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ghulam Mustafa (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 08-JUL-21 | Yes | In view of the above, the role of applicants with regard to commission of alleged offence requires further enquiry as envisaged under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr. P.C. We; therefore, admit the applicants to bail subject to their furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) each and P.R. Bond in like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3684 | 2021 SHC HYD 550 | Cr.Misc. 445/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & Others (Respondent) | 08-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3685 | 2021 SHC HYD 192 | Const. P. 503/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Vishandas (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 08-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 3686 | 2021 SHC HYD 1095 | Const. P. 894/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Muhammad Rafique and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3687 | 2021 SHC HYD 666 | Const. P. 1102/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | MS Beenish Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3688 | 2021 SHC HYD 254 | Const. P. 262/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2012 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3689 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1826 | Cr.Bail 2327/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | RIAZ AHMED DAHIRI S/O HAJI NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | From the above discourse, primarily, the pre-arrest bail is extraordinary relief and can be granted only in exceptional circumstances, if there is mala fide of the complainant and police in lodging the FIR. Prima facie, there is no mala fide of the complainant to lodge the FIR of the incident against the applicant. Previous conviction of the applicant in a criminal case as discussed supra, disentitle him for extraordinary relief as provided under Section 498 Cr.P.C. Also, there is nothing placed on record by the applicant, which could show that the applicant has been acquitted from the aforesaid case by the learned appellate Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.6-K/2022 Riaz Ahmed Dahri v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 3690 | 2021 SHC HYD 956 | Cr.Bail 903/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | AMEERUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3691 | 2021 SHC KHI 658 | Cr.Bail 2424/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Daro Khan S/o Naseer Ahmed Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 29-DEC-21 | Yes | The proposal seems to be plausible and exceeded to, therefore, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed. Resultantly, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within four (4) months. In case the trial is not concluded, within the stipulated period, the Applicant will be at liberty to move fresh Bail Application before the learned Trial Court on fresh ground if any and the learned trial Court shall decide the same on merit. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3692 | 2022 SHC KHI 95 | Cr.Bail 1899/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 07-JAN-22 | Yes | Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3693 | 2021 SHC HYD 326 | Cr.Bail 860/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | AMEER MAVIYA @ MAVIYA & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 25-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | Crl.P.L.A.146-K/2021 Ameer Maviya @ Maviya & others v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3694 | 2021 SHC HYD 872 | Civil Revision 260/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Abdul Hameed (Applicant) VS Mst Irshat Begum (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3695 | 2021 SHC HYD 68 | Const. P. 1763/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2011 | Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3696 | 2021 SHC HYD 137 | Civil Revision 199/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 1999 | Professor Muhammad Rahim & Others (Applicant) VS Municipal Committee Mirpurkhas (Respondent) | 19-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3697 | 2021 SHC HYD 447 | M.A. 46/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Idress Rajput (Appellant) VS Learned 8th Addl: District Judge Hyderabad & other (Respondent) | 01-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3698 | 2021 SHC HYD 580 | Const. P. 441/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3699 | 2021 SHC HYD 1108 | Const. P. 256/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Sajid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3700 | 2021 SHC HYD 1349 | Const. P. 656/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3701 | 2021 SHC HYD 1171 | Cr.Misc. 619/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | NAZAKAT ABBAS (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE HYD & OTHERS (Respondent) | 06-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3702 | 2021 SHC HYD 352 | Const. P. 203/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2003 | Saifal Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and others (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3703 | 2021 SHC HYD 209 | Const. P. 1197/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Dr. Ali Murad Lajwani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3704 | 2021 SHC HYD 483 | First Appeal Against Order 21/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Irfan son of Abdul Ghani (Appellant) VS The Province of Sindh (Respondent) | 24-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3705 | 2021 SHC HYD 1021 | Const. P. 1167/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Jalaluddin Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh (Respondent) | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 3706 | 2021 SHC HYD 600 | Const. P. 1523/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3707 | 2021 SHC KHI 620 | Const. P. 1995/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP NO.D-1995/2016 CP NO.D-2084/2016 CP NO.D-2085/2016 CP NO.D-2120/2016 CP NO.D-2121/2016 CP NO.D-2122/2016 CP NO.D-2345/2016 CP NO.D-2146/2016 CP NO.D-2148/2016 CP NO.D-2157/2016 CP NO.D-2269/2016 CP NO.D-2270/2016 CP NO.D-2302/2016 CP NO.D-2316/2016 CP NO.D-2355/2016 CP NO.D-2440/2016 CP NO.D-2606/2016 CP NO.D-2690/2016 CP NO.D-2729/2016 CP NO.D-2774/2016 CP NO.D-2803/2016 CP NO.D-2834/2016 CP NO.D-2835/2016 CP NO.D-2836/2016 CP NO.D-2837/2016 CP NO.D-2853/2016 CP NO.D-2909/2016 CP NO.D-3327/2016 CP NO.D-3521/2016 CP NO.D-3527/2016 CP NO.D-3791/2016 CP NO.D-3825/2016 CP NO.D-3870/2016 CP NO.D-4060/2016 CP NO.D-4219/2016 CP NO.D-5096/2016 CP NO.D-5121/2016 CP NO.D-5637/2016 CP NO.D-6680/2016 CP NO.D-6681/2016 CP NO.D-6996/2016 CP NO.D-803/2017 CP NO.D-2329/2016 CP NO.D-2337/2016 CP NO.D-2649/2016 CP NO.D-2792/2016 CP NO.D-4311/2016 CP NO.D-4369/2016 CP NO.D-4587/2016 CP NO.D-5636/2021 CP NO.D-7212/2016 CP NO.D-994/2017 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Dairy Land (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | It is also, prima facie, evident that vires of the Act 2016 has not been challenged, but the notification, so issued under such Act, impugned. A challenge to application of notification only without assailing the vires of the Act under which the notification has been issued, legally, cant be made, particularly where things notified are with reference to the Act itself. On this count, too, the instant petition (s) are not tenable in law. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed with no order as to cost. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3708 | 2023 SBLR Sindh 94 | Const. P. 1430/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Mst Touqeer Fatima Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 3709 | 2022 SHC KHI 778 | Const. P. 629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Amanullah Brohi (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: & Ors (Respondent) | 17-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3710 | 2018 PLC Lab. 287 | Const. P. 3542/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | M/s UBL (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Afzal Solangi and ors (Respondent) | 29-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3711 | 2022 SHC KHI 346 | Const. P. 567/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Nasir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.A.2990/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Ahsan Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed | |
| 3712 | 2022 SHC KHI 521 | Const. P. 3015/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 25-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3713 | 2022 SHC KHI 927 | Const. P. 3698/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Nadeemuddin Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-22 | Yes | The short question is whether compulsory retirement of the petitioner on the aforesaid grounds would be a valid exercise of the powers; and, whether such a purpose could be termed to be in the public interest? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3714 | 2022 SHC HYD 819, 2022 CLD 872, 2012 SBLR Sindh 1232, 2013 MLD 176 | I. A 39/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Syed Ameer Ali & Ors. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent) | 30-MAR-22 | Yes | The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside with direction to the learned Banking Court to decide the Suit expeditiously. Needless to say the Suit shall proceed ex-parte against appellants 2 and 3 as they did not file any application for leave to defend. | Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3715 | 2022 SHC KHI 656 | Const. P. 7241/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Muhammad Saleem Baloch and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 31-JAN-22 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, we find that a five-member Bench of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Gul Taiz Khan Marwat (supra) has decided the question of maintainability of a Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution against the administrative orders passed by an Administrative Committee or the Honorable Chief Justice of High Court. Besides that, all the legal grounds raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioners in the present petition have already been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid decisions as such this Court cannot further dilate upon the issue more. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3716 | 2023 SHC KHI 322 | Const. P. 5975/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Toufiq Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Atomic Energy and Others (Respondent) | 15-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1726/2023 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) through its Secretary Islamabad v. Mohammad Taufique Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 3717 | 2022 SHC KHI 858 | Const. P. 7039/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mis Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pak Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Javaid and another (Respondent) | 15-MAR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.1644/2022 Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pakistan (Pvt) Limited Karachi v. Muhammad Javaid and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | ||
| 3718 | 2022 SHC KHI 833 | Const. P. 5613/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Aftab Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3719 | 2022 SHC KHI 593 | Const. P. 5229/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Karachi Tax Bar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 07-MAR-22 | Yes | whether a probationer has the capability and potential to make a satisfactory career in the organization, and whether or not the organization/employer will have any benefit of his services. We are of the view that the period of probation provides equal opportunity to the employer and employee to decide whether they would like to continue with the engagement or not. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3720 | 2021 SHC KHI 165 | Const. P. 2649/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | M/s Daniyal Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | 03-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3721 | 2022 SHC KHI 373 | Const. P. 3751/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Naz Parveen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 21-FEB-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3722 | 2022 SHC KHI 383 | Const. P. 2160/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Syed Ali Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 19-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.567-K/2022 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Maritime Affairs Government of Pakistan & others v. Syed Ali Zafar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous | |
| 3723 | 2022 SHC KHI 349 | Const. P. 6583/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Azhar Ali Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 18-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | C.P.L.A.2368/2022 The Secretary, Establishment/Cabinet Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad v. Azhar Ali Farooqi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 3724 | 2022 SHC KHI 98 | Const. P. 4275/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2014 | Abdul Latif and ORs (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 18-APR-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain | |||
| 3725 | 2022 SHC KHI 365 | Const. P. 7022/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3726 | 2022 SHC KHI 654 | Const. P. 3052/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ayaz Ali Thahim (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 15-MAR-22 | Yes | suspension | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3727 | Nil | Cr.J.A 57/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2012 | Hassan @ Ali Hassan and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | 31-JAN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3728 | 2022 SHC KHI 469 | Const. P. 2782/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Sajjad Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) | 30-MAY-22 | Yes | the petitioners have assailed the suspension from service order, inquiry proceedings initiated by respondent No. 8, and subsequent issuance of show-cause notices to them by the Director-General (DG) SBCA without hearing them is illegal, unlawful, malafide, without jurisdiction and ultra-vires to the Articles 4,5,6,9,14,10-A of the Constitution and the provisions of Sindh Building Control Authority (Recruitment) Regulations 2017 read with Rule 5,6,7,8,9 and 12 of the Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3729 | 2023 SHC KHI 400 | Const. P. 1786/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Nasir and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 10-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.263-K/2023 The Chief Executive Officer Pakistan Steel Mills & another v. Muhammad Nasir & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned (-) Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar | |
| 3730 | 2022 SHC HYD 19 | II.A. 55/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2021 | Abdul Samad through L.rs (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) | 28-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.135-K/2022 Fayyaz Ahmed & another v. Abdul Samad deceased through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 3731 | 2022 SHC HYD 537 | Const. P. 10/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mehmood Ali (Petitioner) VS Fedration of Pakisran & Others (Respondent) | 30-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3732 | 2023 SHC KHI 770 | Const. P. 6164/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Afaq Ahmed Qureshie (Petitioner) VS The Chief Secretariat, Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 18-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.518-K/2023 Afaq Ahmed Qureshi v. The Chief Secretary, Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3733 | 2023 SHC KHI 226 | Const. P. 1494/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Ashiq Ali Narejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) | 03-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3734 | 2023 SHC KHI 671 | Const. P. 141/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Yasmeen Nagori (Petitioner) VS Dy.Director (RCMHC) & Ors (Respondent) | 10-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3735 | 2023 SHC KHI 281 | Const. P. 1813/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Naveed Hussain Tunio (Petitioner) VS V.C SMIU & Ors (Respondent) | 13-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3736 | 2023 SHC KHI 827 | Const. P. 690/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Nazar Muhammad Jamali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3737 | 2022 SHC HYD 740 | II.A. 67/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2019 | Muhammad Usman Soomro thr: L.Rs (Appellant) VS Abdul Razzak Soomro (Respondent) | 02-SEP-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.3147/2022 Abdul Razzak Soomro v. Muhammad Usman Soomro (decd.) thr. L.Rs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Allowed and Remanded | |
| 3738 | 2026 SHC KHI 550 | Const. P. 769/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Afzal Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-MAR-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 3739 | 2022 SHC HYD 751 | II.A. 59/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2022 | Manthar Ali & Another. (Appellant) VS Registrar Sindh University & Ors. (Respondent) | 04-NOV-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.453-K/2023 Manthar Ali & another v. Registrar Sindh University Jamshoro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | |
| 3740 | 2022 SHC HYD 940 | II.A. 57/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Civil Appellate Jurisdictions | 2018 | Muhammad Iqbal (Appellant) VS Mehmood Ali & Others (Respondent) | 05-DEC-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1473-K/2022 Muhammad Iqbal deceased through his LRs. & others v. Mehmood Ali & others,C.A.1013/2024 Muhammad Iqbal deceased through his LRs. & others v. Mehmood Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed | |
| 3741 | 2023 SHC KHI 709 | Const. P. 6360/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Kamran Shamshad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.558-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another v. Kamran Shamshad,C.P.L.A.500-K/2023 Kamran Shamshad v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another,C.P.L.A.1367-K/2023 Muhammad Aslam Khoso & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed,Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight | |
| 3742 | 2022 SHC HYD 32 | Criminal Miscelleneous 243/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Original Side | 2021 | AZHAR ALI (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD ACHAR & OTHERS (Respondent) | 17-OCT-22 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3743 | 2023 SHC KHI 356 | Const. P. 861/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Aziz Ahmed Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3744 | 2023 SHC KHI 484 | Const. P. 154/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Dr. Atteque Rehman Khuharo (Petitioner) VS The Chairman Sindh Higher Education Com. & Ors (Respondent) | 10-JAN-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3745 | 2023 SHC KHI 308 | Const. P. 273/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Inspector Rukhsana Leghari and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 06-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3746 | 2023 SHC KHI 914 | Const. P. 6121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) | 06-JUN-23 | Yes | Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.3165/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned afte a fortnight |
| 3747 | 2023 SHC KHI 452 | Const. P. 5748/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Dr.Samreen Riaz Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS D.O.U.H.S and Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3748 | 2023 SHC KHI 455 | Const. P. 7084/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Ahmed Gul & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 28-FEB-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3749 | 2023 SHC KHI 206 | Const. P. 5343/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Khawaja Zakir uddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3750 | 2023 SHC HYD 47 | Const. P. 2879/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D- 2939, 2980, 2991, 2992, 3046, 3066, 3075, 3076, 3077, 3084, 3095, 3096, 3275, 3306, 3318, 3454 of 2022 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mir Muhammad khan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-23 | Yes | The petitioners have challenged imposition/charge of Fuel Price Adjustment (FPA) in their electricity bills issued by respective Electricity Distribution Companies. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3751 | 2023 SHC HYD 565 | Const. P. 762/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Armughanullah & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 17-MAY-23 | Yes | Courts cannot grant equivalence of degree qualification for a particular advertisement. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3752 | 2023 SHC HYD 637 | Const. P. 3022/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Eric Ghori & another (Petitioner) VS Learned Consumer Judge Hyd & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3753 | 2023 SHC KHI 1085 | Criminal Miscelleneous 457/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Original Side | 2023 | ASIF ALI SOLANGI (Applicant) VS MST. ASMA ABDULLAH & & ORS (Respondent) | 24-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3754 | 2023 SHC KHI 1080 | Cr.Bail 1114/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2023 | MOAZAM S/O ABDUL BARI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 18-JUL-23 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3755 | 2025 SHC KHI 214 | Const. P. 3666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Ahmed Nawaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 15-APR-25 | Yes | Prisons Department has been pursuing the extension of these benefits to their teachers since the early 1990s, engaging in correspondence with the Home and Finance Departments. The matter remains "under process" with the government, with requests for information and financial implications being exchanged. The AAG requests the court to pass orders as deemed appropriate given the ongoing process, more particularly the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baluch case 2015 SCMR 456. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.3030/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Abdul Majeed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed |
| 3756 | 2025 SHC KHI 2148 | Const. P. 6200/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zakir Hussain Samo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-AUG-25 | Yes | Prima facie substantial compliance report has been made as such no further action is required as this court considering the case facts, ordered that his eligibility for a pro forma promotion to Grade-19 be reviewed, and if he is found eligible, he should be promoted accordingly, which has been done As such Contempt Application is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.207-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretarty and others v. Zakir Hussain Samo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Not Reached |
| 3757 | 2024 SHC SUK 597 | Const. P. 821/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3758 | 2024 SHC SUK 525 | Const. P. 506/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Misri Khan Samo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3759 | 2024 SHC MPK 1466 | Const. P. 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-SEP-24 | Yes | The learned counsel(s) for the private respondents and learned A.P.G with one voice state that neither they caused harassment to the petitioner nor they intend to do so in the future. Learned A.P.G further states that protection will be provided to the petitioner in accordance with law. 3. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with the direction that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and police shall be neutral in private affairs; however, if any cognizable offense is committed police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3760 | 2024 SHC SUK 228 | Const. P. 671/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Waseem Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3761 | 2024 SHC MPK 596 | Const. P. 1001/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-SEP-24 | Yes | Learned Assistant A.G Sindh has resisted these petitions on the premise that there are disputed questions of facts involved in the matters, as such these petitions cannot be entertained. At this stage, we confronted him with the proposition that the issue of the salary of the petitioners, if any needs to be resolved at the end of the respondents' departments and this Court cannot decide the subject issue under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. However, at the same time, if the petitioners are working with the Government Departments, their salary issue must be resolved within a reasonable time, as this issue cannot be left unattended for an indefinite period. Learned A.A.G without filing comments, though notices have been issued to the respondents to put their defense, they failed to do so for the reason best known to him, submit that these matters are required to be resolved by the competent authority of the respondents if the cause of the petitioners still subsists. The proposal seems to be reasonable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3762 | 2024 SHC MPK 830 | Criminal Miscelleneous 512/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Muhammad Khan & others (Applicant) VS SSP Tharparkar @ Mithi & others (Respondent) | 03-OCT-24 | Yes | Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 561-A Cr.P.C assailing order dated 30-08-2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II/ Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, Tharparkar @ Mithi, in Criminal Miscellaneous application No.493/2024, whereby application under section 22-A & B Cr.P.C filed by the respondent No.3 was allowed with direction to the S.H.O concerned to record statement of the respondent/complainant and same be incorporated in 154 Cr.P.C book, if it constitutes a cognizable offence. 2. Learned counsel submits that F.I.R No.28/2024 under sections 393, 506(2), 504, 114, 34 P.P.C has already been registered at PS Kaloi District Tharparkar on 31-08-2024 against the applicants; therefore, the purpose of filing this Crl. Misc. Application has become infructuous. However, he insists that he will pursue his remedy as per law. 3. In view of above interim order passed by this court vide order dated 04-09-2024 is hereby re-called and this Crl. Miscellaneous Application is disposed of as FIR No. 28/2024 of PS Kaloi District Tharparkar has already been registered. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3763 | 2024 SHC KHI 1354, 2024 SBLR Sindh 1660 | Const. P. 2628/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP No.D-3301/2022 | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mumtaz Ali Panhwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 04-JUN-24 | Yes | No regularisation of project employees can be ordered by the Court in absence of any law, rules or policy to that effect | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | C.P.L.A.3909/2024 Mumtaz Ali Panhwar and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 3764 | 2024 SHC SUK 316 | Cr.Bail 445/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Baqir Manghanhar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-24 | Yes | It is a settled principle of law that the bail plea is to be decided based on material available on record tentatively and the deeper appreciation of evidence is not permissible under the law. However, the allegations against the applicant are serious and there could be no redemption or compensation for the victim because he would have to live with the worst scars that one could imagine. However, as per the version, during the investigation medical examination of the victim Ali Abbas was conducted but such a report is negative even though a DNA report is negative, therefore, when the exact language of the definition of the offense is placed in juxtaposition, a ground of further inquiry in terms of sub-clause 2 of section 497 Cr.P.C. is made out. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3765 | 2024 SHC SUK 960 | Const. P. 446/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Shakoor & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3766 | 2024 SHC SUK 592 | Const. P. 240/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Shafaullah Korejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3767 | 2024 SHC SUK 31 | Const. P. 1271/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Saindad kalhoro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.763-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Saindad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3768 | 2024 SHC KHI 774, 2025 SBLR Sindh 458 | Const. P. 5497/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Naseer Rais (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-NOV-24 | Yes | Principally, Courts should avoid pejorative remarks against non-parties and unjust criticism of parties, vilifying them should also be avoided. Judges can criticize relevant matters and witnesses but should avoid criticizing those in official positions without valid justification that is subject to jurisdiction. A presiding officer of the Court must give a person the opportunity to explain condemnatory facts before criticizing him/her. This is especially important for public servants, who should be given a chance to defend themselves before being criticized. Criticizing someone without giving them a chance to respond is unfair and may be considered outside the judge's jurisdiction. Judges must be independent, but also fair and restrained. They should only criticize people if they have a chance to defend themselves if there is evidence to support the criticism, and if it is necessary for the case. Judicial pronouncements should be sober, moderate, and reserved. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Nusrat Yasmin v. Registrar, PHC,(PLD 2019 SC 719) and Aijaz Ahmed v. State. (PLD 2021 SC 752). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3769 | 2024 SHC SUK 95 | Const. P. 1093/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Imtiaz Ali Ghunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.A.109-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary School Education and others v. Imtiaz Ali,C.P.L.A.513-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary School Education and others v. Imtiaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted | |
| 3770 | 2024 SHC SUK 196 | Const. P. 557/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zikram Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3771 | 2024 SHC SUK 551 | Const. P. 104/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Sagar Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.737-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue and others v. Sagar Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3772 | 2024 SHC SUK 289 | Const. P. 371/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Tarique Hussain Chajro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3773 | 2025 SHC KHI 350 | Const. P. 6115/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ms. Shafaq Ishtiaq (Petitioner) VS The Principal Govt. Elemetary College & Others (Respondent) | 01-JAN-25 | Yes | This Court has limited power to interfere in college disciplinary matters. Intervention is warranted only if bias, inadequate defense, unfair procedures, statutes, or regulations are breached, fundamental rights are infringed (Right to education, expression), and the decision is manifestly unjust. Courts prioritize fairness and uphold fundamental rights while respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing in the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3774 | 2024 SHC SUK 58 | Const. P. 535/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3775 | 2024 SHC SUK 172 | Const. P. 544/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Rasool Rajper (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.222-K/2025 The Province of Sindh through Secretary School Education & Literacy Department,Government of Sindh & others v. Amir Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Disposed of | |
| 3776 | 2024 SHC SUK 385 | Const. P. 408/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Ameen Arain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3777 | 2024 SHC SUK 1270 | Const. P. 1145/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Athar Ali Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.719-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Athar Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3778 | 2024 SHC SUK 1317 | Const. P. 1447/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Shafqat Ali Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3779 | 2024 SHC SUK 648 | Const. P. 589/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ghulam Muhammad Mari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3780 | 2025 SHC KHI 108 | Const. P. 3980/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Adam Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-JAN-25 | Yes | It appears from the record that this Court has previously issued orders on multiple dates in 2023 and 2024, directing action against forestland encroachers. These orders align with a Supreme Court judgment. Law enforcement agencies must assist the Forest Department in enforcing this court's orders. However, this Court does not endorse the Forest Department's authority to rent out shops to private individuals, as they have failed to clarify the stance backed by law. 12. Foregoing the reasons, this petition is disposed of in terms of orders dated 12.03.2024, 27.05.2024, 21.08.2024, 04.09.2024, 25.09.2024, and 09.10.2024, passed by this court, which must be complied with by the officials respondents without fail. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh, the Secretary Forest Department, and all concerned to ensure compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.401-K/2025 Mairaj Ul Haq Qazi & another v. Muhammad Adam Soomro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 3781 | 2025 SHC KHI 372 | Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Dr. Pritam Das (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 15-JAN-25 | Yes | So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set by the government. In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of the parent department of the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3782 | 2024 SHC KHI 222 | Const. P. 5828/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shiraz Mazhar (Petitioner) VS D.H.A and Others (Respondent) | 16-DEC-24 | Yes | Article 199 of the Constitution allows this Court intervention only when: All other legal remedies have been exhausted, or, no alternative legal remedies exist. To invoke the jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner must demonstrate a vested/legal right or interest that has been violated, which the petitioners failed to demonstrate by producing cogent material on record, merely saying that reclassifying Plot No. 12-B for commercial use is not sufficient until and unless it is proved in evidence that it is illegal as the Board of DHA has no power and authority to do so under the relevant regulations, which involve zoning approvals and environmental impact assessments, depending on the proposed commercial use. Besides it is yet to be determined that Plot No. 12-B, a corner plot on Commercial Avenue, was always shown as an open plot for residential purposes, however, respondents had shown the plot's purpose as a "Sewerage Pump" station on older maps and now relocated it somewhere else. These all facts require evidence and this court at this stage cannot give concrete findings on the subject issue. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3783 | 2024 SHC KHI 1253 | Cr.Bail 942/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | ISMAIL S/O MOMIN KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 08-JUL-24 | Yes | On the point of the defense version, as pleaded by the accused, is concerned, he submitted that this Court is not to make a probe into the defense version to advance a plea of bail, rather it has to assess tentatively the material produced before it and to see if reasonable ground exists to believe, prima facie involvement of accused in the commission of the offense and if the accused found connected with the commission of the offense, he will not be released on bail based on further inquiry. Per learned counsel, the applicants/Accused has failed to demonstrate mala fide or ulterior motive on the part of the complainant or police to falsely implicate him in this case. He next argued that so far as the plea of the applicant/accused Ismail that his extra-judicial confession was recorded in police custody, thus not admissible under Articles 38 & 39 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, is concerned, the legal position in such a case is that if any incriminatory material related to the case is recovered or any fact is discovered in consequence of the information conveyed by the accused person, then the information so received would be admissible in evidence within the purview of Article 40 of the Qanun-e- Shahadat Order, 1984 because then the presumption would be towards its truthfulness. Since the disclosure of the accused Ismail has been followed by the recovery of some stolen property as well as the discovery of new facts of selling the gold ornaments including the present applicant/accused Habibullah, which earlier was not known. He argued that Article 40, of Qanoon-e-Shahadat, provides that when any fact is revealed in consequence of information received from any accused in the custody of a police officer, such information whether it amounts to a confession or not as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. The information supplied by the applicant Ismail under Article 40 ibid relating to incriminating articles is admissible. In support of his contention, he relied upon the case of Muhammad Akbar v The State 1995 SCMR 693, Murad Khan v Fazl-e-Subhan PLD 1983 SC 82, and copy of the charge-sheet, statements of ASI Shahbaz Ali and PC Humayoon Baig recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3784 | 2025 SHC KHI 518 | Const. P. 339/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Munawar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-25 | Yes | It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. the Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456]. The Supreme Court in paragraphs 146 to 150 has decided the issue in hand no need for further deliberation on our part. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3785 | 2024 SHC SUK 56 | Const. P. 473/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Naeem Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3786 | 2024 SHC KHI 952 | Cr.Tran 55/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | SHAKEEL AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 01-JUL-24 | Yes | To answer the aforesaid proposition, it is well-settled law that any aggrieved person can file a Transfer Application before this Court under Section 526, Cr.P.C. if there appears reasonable apprehension of injustice being done due to the conduct of the court subordinate to the High Court. The said grievances must be agitated before this Court but should be supported by legal requirements of law. It would be advantageous to go through provisions of Section 526, Cr.P.C. which read as follows:- ???Section 526. High Court may transfer case or itself try it. (1) Whenever it is made to appear to the High Court:- (a) that a fair and impartial inquiry or trial cannot be had in any Criminal Court subordinate thereto, or (b) that some question of law of unusual difficulty is likely to arise, or (c) that a view of the place in or near which any offence has been committed may be required for the satisfactory inquiry into or trial of the same, or (d) that an order under this section will tend to the general convenience of the parties or witnesses, or (e) that such an order is expedient for the ends of justice, or is required by any provision of this Code; it may order: (i) that any offence be inquired into or tried by any Court not empowered under sections 177 to 184 (both inclusive), but in other respects competent to inquire into or try such offence. (ii) that any particular case or appeal, or class of cases or appeals, be transferred from a Criminal Court subordinate to its authority to any other such Criminal Court of equal or superior jurisdiction; (iii) that any particular case or appeal be transferred to and tried before itself; or (iv) that an accused person be sent for trial to itself or to a Court of Session. (2) When the High Court withdraws for trial before itself any case from any Court [....] it shall observe in such trial the same procedure which that Court would have observed if the case had not been so withdrawn. (3) The High Court may act either on the report of the lower Court, or the application of a party interested, or on its own initiative. (4) Every application for the exercise of the power conferred by this section shall be made by motion, which shall, except when the applicant is the Advocate-General, be supported by affidavit or affirmation. (5) When an accused person makes an application under this section the High Court may direct him to execute a bond, with or without sureties, conditioned that he will, if so ordered, pay any amount which the High Court may under this section award by way of compensation to the person opposing the application. (6) Notice to Public Prosecutor of application under this section. Every accused person making any such application shall give to the Public Prosecutor notice in writing of application, together with a copy of the grounds on which it is made; and no order shall be made on the merits of the application unless at least twenty four hours have elapsed between the giving of such notice and the hearing of the application. (6A) When any application for the exercise of the power conferred by this section is dismissed, the High Court may if it is of opinion that the application was frivolous or vexatious, order the applicant to pay by way of compensation to any person who has opposed the application such sum not exceeding [five hundred rupees] as it may consider proper in the circumstances of the case.??? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3787 | 2024 SHC KHI 9 | Cr.Bail 1117/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | JAWAD KHAN S/O ABDUL LATEEF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 05-JUL-24 | Yes | The essential prerequisite for the grant of bail by sub-Section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C. is that the Court must be satisfied based on the material placed on record that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The condition of this Clause is that sufficient grounds exist for further inquiry into the guilt of the accused, which would mean that the question should be such, that has nexus with the result of the case and can show or tend to show that the accused was not guilty of the offense with which he is charged. 8. Primarily, grant or rejection of bail is a discretionary relief but such discretion should be exercised fairly and judicially. The word discretion when applied to Court means sound discretion judiciously guided by law and to lessen the hardship of the people. For what has been discussed above, prima facie the applicant has made out a case for further inquiry into their guilt within the meaning of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C. 9. For the foregoing reasons, the applicant Jawad Khan is admitted to post-arrest bail in Crime No. 04 of 2024 under Section 6/9-2 S. No. 3 and 6/9-2 S No. 6 of CNS amended Act 2022 of PS Excise West subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 100,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand Only) and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3788 | 2024 SHC SUK 1264 | Const. P. 558/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ravi Das (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3789 | 2024 SHC SUK 7 | Const. P. 749/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Nirmal John (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3790 | 2024 SHC SUK 410 | Const. P. 389/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Dr Imamuddin & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 3791 | 2024 SHC SUK 1397 | Const. P. 64/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Samad Thebo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3792 | 2024 SHC SUK 720 | Cr.Bail 320/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shahzaib Gul Wassan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 02-AUG-24 | Yes | Additionally the case against the applicant, in the absence of any independent witness of the alleged incident, requires further inquiry as contemplated under sub-section (2) to Section 497, Cr.P.C. In the case of Muhammad Tanveer v. The State (PLD 2017 Supreme Court 733) the Supreme Court while extending the grace, granted bail | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3793 | 2024 SHC SUK 77 | Const. P. 477/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khursheed Ahmed Leghari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman | |||
| 3794 | 2024 SHC SUK 687 | Const. P. 591/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Akshay Kumar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3795 | 2024 SHC SUK 355 | Const. P. 660/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khuda Bux & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3796 | 2024 SHC SUK 317 | Const. P. 1608/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zeeshan Raza Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.756-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Social Welfare Department and others v. Zeeshan Raza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3797 | 2024 SHC SUK 1140 | Const. P. 128/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ali Raza Burdi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.757-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Chief Minister and others v. Ali Raza Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3798 | 2024 SHC MPK 716 | Cr.Bail 224/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Ali Gohar & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 25-SEP-24 | Yes | The applicants are accused of a heinous crime, including murder, and prima facie, there is sufficient incriminating evidence to connect them to the alleged offenses. It is well settled that while the court does not delve into a deep analysis of the evidence at this stage, the available materials, including the FIR, witness statements, and medical reports, support the prosecution's allegations. The delay in lodging the FIR is explained by the nature of the incident and the immediate medical attention required for the injured. There is no evidence of any malicious intent on the part of the complainant. The gravity of the charges and the potential for the applicants to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, granting bail at this stage would not be appropriate. Therefore, the bail application is dismissed. The trial court is directed to examine the material witnesses within two months and if the charge is not framed the same shall be framed on the date so fixed by the trial court. The direction of this court shall not be ignored at all, which has serious repercussions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3799 | 2024 SHC SUK 1322 | Const. P. 1737/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mst Tehmina (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3800 | 2024 SHC SUK 761 | Const. P. 553/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Ghafoor & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3801 | 2024 SHC SUK 1340 | Const. P. 559/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Irshad Ali Morojo & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3802 | 2024 SHC KHI 1160, 2025 PCr.LJ 517 | Cr.Bail 1304/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | AYAZULLAH S/O SYED UMER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 11-JUL-24 | Yes | A bare perusal of the aforementioned provisions of law demonstrates that the same is applicable in the class of persons, who trade in such stolen articles known as receivers as the complainant has failed to recognize the applicant. Primarily, a person, immediately, after theft found to be in possession of the stolen property, the presumption would be that either he is a thief or in possession of goods with knowledge that those are stolen. Mere possession of the stolen property is not sufficient to constitute an offense under the aforementioned provisions rather in addition it has to be established that the person in possession of the stolen property had dishonestly received or retained the property knowing or having the reasons to believe the same to be stolen. The onus is always on the part of the prosecution to prove the essential elements of the offense. In case of failure on the part of the prosecution to prove the basic ingredients i.e. receipt or retention of property belonging to someone else, the property being stolen, the existence of knowledge or belief on the part of the person found in possession, and the receipt and retention as dishonest, no bail can be refused as in such circumstances it is well settled that no conviction can be awarded on such analogy. The prosecution to establish an offense under the aforesaid section, must not only prove that the property is stolen, but it must also be established that the person charged with having stolen property either knows the property to be stolen or has reasonable grounds for believing the same to be stolen. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3803 | 2024 SHC SUK 719 | Const. P. 563/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Zikram Rizvi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3804 | 2024 SHC SUK 487, 2025 PLC (CS) 136 | Const. P. 74/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Tarique Mubeen Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3805 | 2024 SHC SUK 305 | Const. P. 801/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Pir Bux & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3806 | 2024 SHC SUK 153 | Const. P. 571/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abid Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3807 | 2024 SHC SUK 593 | Const. P. 615/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Imtiaz Ali mahesar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3808 | 2024 SHC SUK 484 | Cr.Bail 264/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | Khalid Hussain & Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | 27-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3809 | 2024 SHC KHI 1002 | Const. P. 5293/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Rabia and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 25-NOV-24 | Yes | In view of the statement of the parties, coupled with the report of the Investigation officer to the effect that the case has been recommended for C Class, therefore, the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 536 of 2024 registered for offenses under section 365-B, PPC needs to be quashed. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to, however, such order shall be passed by the Magistrate on the report submitted under section 173 Cr. P.C. within one week. 6. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3810 | 2024 SHC SUK 928 | Const. P. 622/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Syed Mureed Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3811 | 2024 SHC SUK 622 | Const. P. 906/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Riaz Hussain Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3812 | 2024 SHC KHI 906 | Cr.Bail 1367/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions | 2024 | MUHAMMAD NAVEED ZAMEER S/O ZAMEERUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | 19-JUL-24 | Yes | The questions involved in the present proceedings is whether the cheques in question given for surety purpose could be dishonoured, entailing the punishment under Section 489-F P.P.C. and whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3813 | 2024 SHC SUK 1461 | Const. P. 787/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | AIjaz Ali Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3814 | 2024 SHC SUK 829 | Const. P. 1682/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Zaheer Ahmed Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3815 | 2024 SHC KHI 382 | Const. P. 5911/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Nasir Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 10-DEC-24 | Yes | This petition seeking reconsideration of Rules framed by the respondent department vide notification dated 23.9.2024 cannot be entertained as this Court lacks the jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution for the reasons that it lacks the expertise to dictate policy decisions/framing the rules and that such decisions are required to be made by experts in the field. 6. This petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3816 | 2024 SHC SUK 777 | Const. P. 218/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Manzoor Ahmed Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3817 | 2024 SHC SUK 1324 | Const. P. 674/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muzafar Ali Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 16-MAY-24 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3818 | 2024 SHC SUK 994 | Const. P. 820/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Razzaque Ghanghro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 01-AUG-24 | Yes | Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3819 | 2024 SHC MPK 154 | Criminal Miscelleneous 529/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas | Original Side | 2024 | Hantho @ Hansraj (Applicant) VS Learned Session Judge Tharparkar @ Mithi & others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-24 | Yes | Section 22-A of Cr.P.C. limits a Justice of Peace's role to ensuring whether a cognizable offense is apparent from a complaint. If so, he can order police to record the statement under section 154 Cr.P.C. His function is to assist the Criminal Justice System, not to investigate or prosecute. The prompt registration of a First Information Report (FIR) is a crucial aspect of criminal justice systems. An Officer In-Charge of a Police Station is obligated to record an FIR when a cognizable offense is reported, regardless of the truthfulness of the information. This duty is separate from the subsequent investigation process. The failure to register an FIR can have serious consequences for victims and can hinder justice. Investigating officers must conduct impartial and honest investigations. They should follow the law and aim to bring the truth to light. If an FIR is not registered or a statement is not recorded, the aggrieved person can file an application under Section 22-A of the Cr.P.C. The Justice of Peace will then examine the application and pass an appropriate order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3820 | 2024 SHC SUK 97 | Const. P. 44/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mustaqeem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 31-JUL-24 | Yes | A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3821 | 2024 SHC SUK 1377 | Const. P. 468/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Asif Ali Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 14-MAY-24 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.717-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Asif Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 3822 | 2025 SHC KHI 497 | Const. P. 2925/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | M.Israr Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 28-JAN-25 | Yes | In view of the foregoing legal position of the case, the petitioner is entitled to claim the service dues of the intervening period from 19.02.2007 to 13.04.2011 when he remained out of service till his reinstatement. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Nafees Ahmad V/S Government of Pakistan and others, 2000 SCMR 1864, Ch. Muhammad Azim V/S The Chief Engineer, Irrigation and others, 1991 SCMR 255, and Chairman, Central Board of Revenue and others V/S Nawab Khan and others, 2010 SCMR 1399. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.4582/2025 Pakistan International Company Limited through its President and CEO, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Israr Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 3823 | 2025 SHC KHI 134 | Const. P. 671/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ashfaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan are binding on all other courts, including High Courts, to the extent that they decide a question of law or enunciate a principle of law. All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3824 | 2025 SHC KHI 593 | Const. P. 858/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Rauf Jetelserwala (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-MAR-25 | Yes | Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan are binding on all other courts, including High Courts, to the extent that they decide a question of law or enunciate a principle of law. All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3825 | 2025 SHC KHI 656 | Const. P. 5575/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2016 | Syed Sajjad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) | 18-APR-25 | Yes | The consistent stance of the Supreme Court is that contractual employees possess no inherent right to regularization. Regularization can only be considered based on fitness, suitability, and applicable departmental laws and rules. Cases like Khushal Khan Khattak University v. Jabran Ali Khan (2021 SCMR 977), Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa v. Raheel Ali Gohar (2020 SCMR 2068), and others reiterate that regularization requires a legal and statutory basis. Contractual employees serve at the pleasure of their master and cannot seek reinstatement for wrongful termination, only compensation through a competent court. Chairman NADRA v. Muhammad Ali Shah (2017 SCMR 1979) clarifies that contractual employees are governed by their contract terms until regularized and generally cannot invoke the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that temporary, contract, or project employees lack a vested right to regularization unless their initial appointment followed regular recruitment rules against sanctioned vacant posts, which is not the case here. Vice-Chancellor, Bacha Khan University v. Tanveer Ahmad (2022 PLC (C.S.) 85), Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. v. Muhammad Samiullah (2021 SCMR 998), Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa v. Sher Aman (2022 SCMR 406), and Deputy Director Finance and Administration FATA v. Dr. Lal Marjan (2022 SCMR 566) all decisions confirm that regularization is not a vested right but requires a statutory basis, which is absent in this instance. A contractual employee seeking regularization must demonstrate this statutory basis, as relief cannot be granted solely on the principle of "similarly placed persons." | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3826 | 2025 SHC KHI 379 | Const. P. 4545/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Kaleem Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 25-APR-25 | Yes | The core argument is that the 1999 Move-over Policy entitles an employee to the next higher scale one year after reaching their maximum pay. Reaching the maximum is presented as an independent criterion, not subordinate to the eight-year service requirement. Thus, employees at their maximum should not be denied move-over solely for not completing eight years, as this is an alternative condition intended to prevent pay stagnation without promotion. In this case, the petitioner, who retired on 24th May 2018, claims SVP move-over eligibility from 01/01/2017. He reached his VP scale's maximum on 01/01/2016 (promoted 01/04/2015), and the ZTBL policy allows a move-over one year after reaching maximum post-promotion. However he was simply denied his moveover based on his recovery performance being as Manager in the year 2016-2017, which prima facie is against th merit based on the anology that the employee is entitiiled to next higher scale one year after reaching maximum pay whereas petitioner reached his VP scalces maximum in the year 2016, however the denial is not based on merit, rather based on recovery, which can not be made an excuse to deny the benefit of move over policy by adding the provision in agenda item No.30 in Clause a and b which is conditional criteria cannot supersede the merit, thus the declining the request of the petitioner is not in consonance with the basic spirit of the policy. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3827 | 2025 SHC KHI 1740 | Const. P. 42/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | Mohsin Jameel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | 17-APR-25 | Yes | This Court emphasizes the Competent Authority's established legal right to formulate rules for efficient service and resolve inconsistencies within the Service Rules. Setting promotion eligibility criteria is the responsibility of the Service Rules Committee and is fundamentally an administrative function within the Respondent-Bank's exclusive policy-making authority. Therefore, this court generally finds intervention in such promotion matters unwarranted, as bank employees lack a guaranteed right to promotion or the rules defining their eligibility and fitness. Moreover, in banking cases, the High Court typically lacks the jurisdiction to invalidate such policies via a writ petition, except when the policy contradicts public interest, which is not the situation here. The Supreme Court has consistently affirmed this legal principle in numerous previous rulings. It is not for the courts to interfere with policy decision which have been made in good faith with the object of promoting merit. 12. Accordingly this petition is without merit and is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3828 | 2025 SHC SUK 364 | Const. P. 395/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Mst. Haneefa Bano (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3829 | 2025 SHC KHI 1024 | Const. P. 3170/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Shahzad Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 08-MAY-25 | Yes | Cantonment Boards, operating under the Cantonments Act, 1924, and overseen by the ML&C Department, primarily govern their employees' service terms through the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. While these rules detail appointments, they lack a specific regularization policy. However, government and Cabinet decisions, as well as the 2019 Director Conference directive and case law on the subject issue favoring permanent status for temporary employees with over 10 years of service with available posts, often guide regularization in public sector entities and could apply in the cantonment boards. It appears that the Petitioners have served over 12 years (since 2007-2008), were seemingly listed for regularization per Cabinet Sub-Committee decisions, meet the 10-year service criterion, and their advertised vacancies suggest available posts. 7. The petition also notes past regularization in other Cantonment Board regions. Therefore, the competent authority of the Respondents is directed to resolve this issue at their end as per policy and law, within three months by hearing the Petitioners and determining if they meet the government's regularization criteria. This petition is disposed of under these terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3830 | 2025 SHC KHI 1072 | Const. P. 7448/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2019 | Mansoor Umer Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 07-MAY-25 | Yes | The current legal issues emphasize that achieving equal benefits and seniority for these regularized employees of SIDA requires clear administrative decisions. While the Act 2013 facilitated their regularization only, fully integrating them into the civil service structure, particularly given SIDA employees' unique position, necessitates further clarification and implementation. The purpose of this petition is to determine whether SIDA employees can be treated equally with other government employees regarding service benefits and the budgetary allocation for their positions. 10. Therefore, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the Chief Secretary Sindh to convene a meeting coordinated by the Head of SIDA and Irrigation department Government of Sindh, within three months to address this discrepancy and resolve the subject issue at their end on administrative side. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3831 | 2025 SHC KHI 493 | Const. P. 672/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Aamir Siraj (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 24-MAR-25 | Yes | Judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan are binding on all other courts, including High Courts, to the extent that they decide a question of law or enunciate a principle of law. All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3832 | 2025 SHC KHI 535 | Const. P. 7544/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Aziz Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-MAR-25 | Yes | The principle of equal pay for equal work is legally enforceable. Article 25 of the Constitution permits reasonable employee classification, provided it aligns with intended objectives. In this instance, the petitioner seeks enforcement of Sindh Government policies dated July 9, 2020, February 20, 2021, and June 2, 2020. Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Consequently, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, and the respondents' objections are overruled. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3833 | 2025 SHC KHI 1653, 2025 SHC KHI 1768 | Const. P. 3836/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Javed Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 29-MAY-25 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, we are of the considered view that the matter of the petitioners needs to be processed further for regularization of their services as Naib Qasid and Driver as they have been appointed on regular posts (LARMIS), through a competitive process. 11. For all the above-mentioned reasons, we allow these petitions along with all pending application(s) in terms of order dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in C.P. No. D-4291 of 2020 and C.P. No. D-7528 of 2018, which decision was upheld by the Supreme Court vide order dated August 24 2023 in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 517-K of 2023. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.985-K/2025 Province of Sindh through Secretary Board of Revenue & Others v. Javed Solangi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | |
| 3834 | 2025 SHC KHI 1527 | Const. P. 2857/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Zafar Ahmed Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 22-MAY-25 | Yes | Faced with this legal point, the petitioners, who are representing themselves, asked to withdraw their petitions. They stated that the department had already submitted a summary to the Chief Minister of Sindh regarding the subject matter. This request appeared reasonable and is granted. These petitions are therefore disposed of as withdrawn, without a decision on the merits of the case and with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3835 | 2025 SHC KHI 1737 | Const. P. 5015/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Syed Israr Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-MAY-25 | Yes | Consequently, the Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Interior, is hereby directed to remit all outstanding contractual dues to the Petitioner within three months from the date of receiving this order. A copy of this order shall be promptly transmitted via fax and electronic mail to the Secretary of the Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan, for immediate compliance. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3836 | 2025 SHC KHI 1427 | Const. P. 8209/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Wahid Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 30-APR-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional rights. The concept of institutional autonomy, essential for effective decision-making, supports non-interference in policy matters. This autonomy is vital for public institutions to safeguard public interest and promote democratic values, including academic freedom. 10. This Court has determined that The petitioners cannot ask for regularization of their service through constitutional petitions under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, it is for the respondent???s competent authority to consider their case in terms of their policy, if any, without discrimination within reasonable time. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3837 | 2025 SHC KHI 1562 | Const. P. 1299/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Rafique Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-25 | Yes | With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to reconsider the case of promotion of the petitioner in BPS-20, within three months, in the light of dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Dr. Muhammad Arif, 2017 SCMR 969; and, his earlier supersession as recorded hereinabove will not come in his way, while considering his case for promotion in next rank with his batchmates, provided he is still in NAB service. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3838 | 2025 SHC KHI 1560 | Const. P. 2714/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Jawaid Akhtar Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-25 | Yes | This petition is disposed of in accordance with the Supreme Court's directives mentioned earlier. However, the respondent Bank is at liberty to reassess the petitioner's promotion issue, considering the 2016 policy and any other prevailing policy, without discrimination. Any decision made must align with the Supreme Court's directives on this matter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3839 | 2025 SHC KHI 2141 | Const. P. 228/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Alauddin (Petitioner) VS The President NBP and Others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-25 | Yes | The petitioner's acceptance of the reinstatement and the signing of the joining report, which designated his time away as "extraordinary leave without pay," prevents him from now claiming back benefits for that period. He did not challenge the conditional reinstatement at the time, and since that order is now final, this court is not required to intervene under Article 199 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court in the case of National Bank of Pakistan vs Zahoor Ahmed Mengal 2021 SCMR 144 has ruled that an employer can treat an unauthorized absence as "Extra Ordinary Leave (EOL) without pay" and that this is not a form of punishment. 9. The petition is dismissed based on the Supreme Court's ruling in the NBP case mentioned earlier. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3840 | 2025 SHC KHI 1347 | Const. P. 4596/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2020 | Muhammad Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 12-MAY-25 | Yes | The Supreme Court has ruled that proforma promotion is a remedy for individuals who miss promotion due to administrative errors or delays and subsequently retire. If a qualified and senior employee is denied timely consideration by a DPC or Selection Board due to administrative oversight, they have a legitimate expectation for proforma promotion with related benefits. This concept is rooted in the now-omitted Fundamental Rule 17, which allowed for back pay and allowances through proforma promotion for those wrongly prevented from higher posts through no fault of their own. Unjustified delays in proforma promotion cases cause hardship and unnecessary litigation. Competent authorities should establish strict timelines for proforma promotion committees to ensure swift and rational decisions, preventing retired employees from having to seek court intervention for their rightful benefits. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | ||
| 3841 | 2025 SHC KHI 1561 | Const. P. 8501/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 23-MAY-25 | Yes | Given that the HPSB, the competent authority, determined the petitioner was not fit for promotion to a merit-based selection post, this Court cannot re-evaluate that decision under Article 199 of the constitution at this stage, when we are in 2025. Therefore, there's no basis to invoke Article 25 of the Constitution, especially in light of the Supreme Court's decision in National Bank of Pakistan v Sajjad Ali Khaskheli (2023 PLC(CS) 276), which held that there is no provision for proforma promotion in relevant service rules. This is further supported by the fact that the petitioner has retired and received all due benefits. 8. Given the foregoing discussion, we find no merit in this petition that would warrant intervention by this Court. Therefore, the petition is dismissed, along with any pending applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3842 | 2025 SHC KHI 2140 | Const. P. 558/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muzaffar Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 19-AUG-25 | Yes | The petitioners' claims relate to a recruitment process from 2012, and this petition was filed in 2022, too late and is therefore "hit by laches." we find no justifiable reason for the decade-long delay. The similar cases where other benches of this court had dismissed identical petitions on the same grounds, including at the Sukkur and Hyderabad Circuit Courts. 6. This court finds this petition misconceived and not maintainable, and liable for its dismissal. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3843 | 2025 SHC KHI 2147 | Const. P. 5778/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Dr. Shamim Razzak (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-AUG-25 | Yes | In view of what has been discussed above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the Respondents to actualize the promotion of the petitioners with effect from the date of recommendation of the DPC held on August 11, 2012, if there does not impede the law. Thus, the competent authority of respondents is liable to release the service benefits of the petitioners of the intervening period to which they are entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.1222-K/2025 Province of Sindh & others v. Dr. Farzana & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 3844 | 2025 SHC KHI 2152 | Const. P. 5648/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Azmat Khan (Petitioner) VS Appellate Board of Bahria University & Others (Respondent) | 28-AUG-25 | Yes | The appellate order shows that the petitioner's employment was governed by a specific contract, not by general government rules, regardless of whether the organization is government-controlled. When a special contract outlines all terms, including termination, it overrides any general policies. The law requires contracts to be honored as they were intended, and since the petitioners had already benefited from the contract, they could not now challenge its terms under Article 199 of the Constitution, through an appeal order. Therefore, this court without touching the merits of the case leave the petitioners to challenge the appellate order before the competent forum as this petition is held to be not maintainable and is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3845 | 2025 SHC KHI 1337 | Const. P. 1406/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-MAY-25 | Yes | Considering the rulings of the Supreme Court in the aforementioned cases, we are of the considered opinion that the sole legal avenue available to Respondent No. 6 is to file a Review Petition before the Apex Court itself. Resorting to the Islamabad High Court or any other departmental forum is not permissible under the law as in the present case respondent No.6 attempted to circumvent the orders of this Court as well as Supreme Court based on opinion of the learned Advocate General Sindh and department concerned and they ought to have laid off their hands rather they could have advised the respondent No.6 to approach the Supreme Court for which his earlier Review Petition was dismissed, as such the stance of the respondent No.3 and 6 is discarded subject to final review of the Supreme Court if approach by the respondent No.6. Consequently, his attempts to seek favor from the department are not only unlawful but also contradict the principles established by the Supreme Court. Prima facie, all actions taken by the respondent department to accommodate Respondent No. 6 appear to be inconsistent with the law and the Supreme Court's decisions and, therefore, are not endorsed by this court. He shall be repatriated to his parent department forthwith, however, his seniority issue shall be decided in accordance with the Supreme Court decision on the subject issue. As such this petition is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | C.P.L.A.2286/2025 Abdul Jabbar v. Manzoor Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Adjourned. 3JJ |
| 3846 | 2025 SHC KHI 1422 | Const. P. 2612/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Shah Jahan Khattak (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | 15-MAY-25 | Yes | This is a simple case of enforcement of the judgment of the Supreme Court in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution and to resolve the subject issue involved in this petition, this Court directs the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh to fully implement the Supreme Court's ruling in Gul Hassan Jatoi the case (2016 SCMR 1254) in letter and spirit and take care of the seniority issues of Police Constables to Inspector Level within reasonable time. With this direction, the petition is now disposed of along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3847 | 2025 SHC KHI 1528 | Const. P. 5254/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Muhammad Iqbal and Others (Petitioner) VS Provice of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 21-MAY-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3848 | 2025 SHC KHI 1657, 2025 SHC KHI 1670 | Const. P. 7430/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | Syed Adnan Zaidi (Petitioner) VS M.D KW & SB and Ors (Respondent) | 29-MAY-25 | Yes | In light of these facts, this court direct the competent authority of the respondents to re-inquire into the Petitioner's status and if no formal punishment was ultimately awarded for the purported misconduct, his salary will be released, subject to verification of his service record. This process must be completed within three months. 9. This petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3849 | 2025 SHC KHI 2217 | Const. P. 4504/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Zia uddin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 08-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3850 | 2025 SHC KHI 2392 | Const. P. 1984/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Advocate Ashfaque Ali Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-SEP-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3851 | 2025 SHC KHI 3218 | Const. P. 740/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdullah s/o Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 29-SEP-25 | Yes | In view of above, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s) with directions to the official as well as private respondents not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner, even no harassment shall be caused to either party by anyone and they shall act strictly in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3852 | 2025 SHC KHI 3245 | Const. P. 219/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Dua (Anita) and Another (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | Now the restoration application has been preferred, however, today, the applicant is called absent without intimation. Perhaps the applicant has lost interest in the listed restoration application, which is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3853 | 2025 SHC KHI 2527 | Const. P. 4217/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 24-SEP-25 | Yes | We, for the aforesaid reasons, allow this constitutional petition along with pending application(s) and direct the competent authority/respondents to consider the case of the petitioner along with all eligible candidates for promotion in the next rank in the next DPC meeting, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law, meanwhile the issue of seniority of the petitioner shall also be decided in the light of Rule 9-A of APT Rules 1974 more particularly in terms of the ratio of judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Tika Khan v Syed Muzaffar Hussain Shah 2018 SCMR within three months. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3854 | 2025 SHC KHI 2605 | Const. P. 4371/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Registrar High Court of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 01-OCT-25 | Yes | In the light of the foregoing, we direct the Registrar of this Court and Chief Secretary Sindh and the head of the concerned departments, where the petitioner has served and retired from service from district judiciary. The representative of Accountant General Sindh???s office and other accounts officers of the concerned departments shall attend the office of the Registrar of this Court, on the date and time so fixed by him, to resolve the issue of service benefits of the petitioner, and other ancillary matters including arrears if any outstanding, in its true perspective, within one month; and if he is entitled under the law, his service benefits must be released, if not already paid, strictly in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Copy shall be forwarded to Registrar of this Court for compliance. 15. Petition stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3855 | 2025 SHC KHI 2606 | Const. P. 5014/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Abdul Hameed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 02-OCT-25 | Yes | This review must consider the petitioner's eligibility, the availability of a vacancy, and all other relevant rules. The authority must also adhere to the law established by the Supreme Court in the Maula Bux Shaikh case and other relevant judgments on the subject issue, specifically the one that mandates that a civil servant's promotion must be considered from the date a vacancy in their quota became available, provided they were eligible at that time, and in accordance with the 1984 notification, if applicable/and or any decision of the suprem court in earlier round of litigation between the parties. 16. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Let this order be communicated to the Chief Secretary and the head of the department of the Government of Sindh, for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3856 | 2025 SHC KHI 3244 | Const. P. 1185/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Asma Bano Rizvi & Anoth3er (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 03-NOV-25 | Yes | The purpose of filing this petition prima facie is served, therefore, no further action on the part of this Court required. However, it is made clear that no harassment shall be caused to either party by the police, who shall be neutral in the private affairs. If there is a criminal / civil litigation between the parties, the same shall be taken care of by the competent Court of law. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3857 | 2025 SHC KHI 2678 | Const. P. 5844/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Ahmed Ali Afridi and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 08-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3858 | 2025 SHC KHI 3216 | Const. P. 935/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | S. Nusrat Jameel Naqvi Thr Atrny M. Wasee Sharjeel (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sher Bano & Others (Respondent) | 22-SEP-25 | Yes | Since the civil suit is pending in respect of the properties of the late husband of respondent No.1, parties are directed to act strictly in accordance with law and the respondents especially private respondents are directed not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner. However, it is made clear that if any cognizable offence is committed, police shall be free to act accordingly. So far as the recovery is concerned, the petitioner is free to take resort of any legal proceedings before the competent Court of law for redressal of his grievance; as such the issue of harassment is over. Petitioner stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed applications. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3859 | 2025 SHC KHI 3128 | Const. P. 5008/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Ashfaq Ali Panhwar Adv (Petitioner) VS Zia ul Hassan Lanjar & Ors (Respondent) | 30-OCT-25 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon | |||
| 3860 | 2026 SHC KHI 120 | Const. P. 6210/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Parkash Kumar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing, it is directed that until the completion of the election process, no party shall take any coercive, prejudicial, or unilateral action which may, directly or indirectly, affect the electoral process, the voters??? list, or the candidature of any contestant. The newly appointed Administrator/Election Officer shall strictly confine himself to conducting the election in a fair, transparent, and lawful manner and shall not take any major financial or administrative decision, save and except those necessary for the conduct of elections and routine day-to-day affairs, and shall announce the result and handing over the affairs of the society to duly elected body in accordance with law. 7. With these directions, the petition and all pending applications stand disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3861 | 2026 SHC KHI 444 | Const. P. 5500/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Legal Aid Society (Petitioner) VS NADRA & others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, both petitions are allowed and Respondent No.1 NADRA, in coordination with the concerned Union Councils and the Social Welfare Department, is directed to devise and implement a uniform and child-sensitive mechanism for the registration of orphaned and abandoned children of unknown parentage residing in registered orphanage institutions in the Province of Sindh, without insisting upon parental particulars, upon verification by the head of the institution in accordance with law and policy. Necessary steps shall also be taken to facilitate issuance of birth certificates and CNICs / Child Registration Certificates to such children within a reasonable time, so as to ensure that they are not deprived of their fundamental rights to legal identity, education, healthcare, and social protection. Compliance report in this regard shall be submitted before the MIT within a period of eight (08) weeks. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3862 | 2026 SHC KHI 293 | Const. P. 122/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Abdul Wahid (Petitioner) VS Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another (Respondent) | 06-FEB-26 | Yes | The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3863 | 2026 SHC KHI 42 | Const. P. 1484/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Fatima (Petitioner) VS Abdul Qadir & others (Respondent) | 05-JAN-26 | Yes | For the foregoing reasons, I am of the considered view that this case does not warrant interference in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, the issue of possession of the subject premises shall be determined by the executing Court in civil proceedings, during the execution, as the alleged tenant has already vacated the subject premises, as informed by the parties. Consequently, this Constitutional Petition is dismissed, being devoid of merit, along with all pending applications, if any. The parties shall, however, bear their own costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3864 | 2026 SHC KHI 373 | Const. P. 5015/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Kiran Chanzeb & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with directions to the petitioners to approach the competent/concerned NADRA office for correction of the marital status of the deceased spouse, and the respondent Authority is also directed to process the case of the minor petitioner for issuance of Juvenile Card expeditiously and without creating any bottlenecks. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3865 | 2026 SHC KHI 342 | Const. P. 2418/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2017 | S.M. Kaleem Makki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | 12-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above legal position, we are of the considered opinion that the withdrawal of the Petitioner???s absorption in the PSS cadre was lawful and in compliance with the judgment of the Supreme Court. The promotion to BPS-20, being consequential to such absorption, could not survive after the absorption was declared void ab initio. The Petitioner cannot claim a vested or accrued right in BPS-20 in the absence of a lawful substantive position in that cadre or under the recruitment rules. The impugned notification treating the Petitioner as a BPS-19 officer does not suffer from illegality or lack of lawful authority. 15. Accordingly, the Constitutional Petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed along with pending application(s), with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3866 | 2026 SHC KHI 422 | Const. P. 1011/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Ebrahim Abdul Ali Thr. Fatima Abbas (Petitioner) VS Xth ADJ, Karachi South and Others (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | Lastly, the findings recorded by the learned Appellate Court are findings of fact arrived at after remand, examination of the postman, and scrutiny of documentary evidence based on the cross-examination of the witness. In these circumstances, the authorities cited by learned counsel for the petitioners are distinguishable and do not advance the petitioners??? case. The conclusion of willful default recorded by the learned Appellate Court is based on proper appreciation of evidence and correct application of law. 19. The constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is extraordinary and discretionary, meant to correct orders passed in violation of law or without lawful authority. It does not extend to reappraisal of evidence or substitution of findings of fact recorded by the Courts below after proper appreciation of evidence, unless such findings of Appellate Court suffer from a jurisdictional defect, misreading, non-reading of material evidence, perversity, or patent illegality. Therefore, the petitioners were rightly held to be willful defaulters, attracting eviction under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. 20. Accordingly, the instant Constitutional Petitions, being devoid of merit, are dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | ||
| 3867 | 2026 SHC KHI 443 | Const. P. 4983/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | M/s Sarim Burney Welfare Trust (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & another (Respondent) | 19-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above, both petitions are allowed and Respondent No.1 NADRA, in coordination with the concerned Union Councils and the Social Welfare Department, is directed to devise and implement a uniform and child-sensitive mechanism for the registration of orphaned and abandoned children of unknown parentage residing in registered orphanage institutions in the Province of Sindh, without insisting upon parental particulars, upon verification by the head of the institution in accordance with law and policy. Necessary steps shall also be taken to facilitate issuance of birth certificates and CNICs / Child Registration Certificates to such children within a reasonable time, so as to ensure that they are not deprived of their fundamental rights to legal identity, education, healthcare, and social protection. Compliance report in this regard shall be submitted before the MIT within a period of eight (08) weeks. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3868 | 2026 SHC KHI 450 | Const. P. 1621/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Another (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | In the present case, while issuance of a charge sheet per se does not constitute unfair labour practice, the allegation of procedural impropriety and victimization if specifically pleaded and proved could bring the matter within the ambit of Section 31 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. Since the Commission has neither finally assumed jurisdiction conclusively nor granted final relief but has merely directed recording of evidence, the orders cannot be termed coram non judice at this stage, as portrayed by the petitioner. 14. In view of the settled legal position, the impugned orders being interlocutory and evidentiary in nature do not warrant interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The proper course would be to allow the Commission to determine, on the basis of evidence, whether the disciplinary proceedings amount to unfair labour practice. The petition, therefore, is dismissed along with pending application(s) as premature, subject to the petitioner???s right to assail the final order, if adverse, in accordance with law. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3869 | 2026 SHC KHI 510 | Const. P. 1524/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Qadoos Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 3870 | 2026 SHC KHI 537 | Const. P. 5909/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Abdul Qayoom Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the above discussion, the refusal of the Respondents to consider and include the Petitioner???s adhoc service towards qualifying service for pension, despite extending similar benefits to other similarly placed officers, appears to be arbitrary and discriminatory, and not sustainable in law. 14. Consequently, the impugned order dated 23.09.2024 is declared to be without lawful justification and of no legal effect, and the competent authority of Respondents is directed to recompute the pension and pensionary benefits of the Petitioner by counting his adhoc service from 22.10.1996 to 30.04.2001 as regular service for all intents and purposes, including consequential benefits, strictly in accordance with law. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks without fail. 15. The petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3871 | 2026 SHC KHI 538 | Const. P. 2773/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mst. Shamim Akhtar & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 03-MAR-26 | Yes | We are not satisfied with such deduction from the service benefits of deceased at this stage and reject the PSM???s request to deduct utility and rent costs from the settlement. The Nazir is directed to recalculate the deceased???s total service benefits and after that exercise, these funds, if deposited, must be released to the legal heirs of deceased as per their entitlement without any deductions for rent or electricity. However, the release of payment is subject to proper identification and verification of the legal heirs and the legal heirs should be at liberty to challenge the validity of the orders passed by the learned Labour Court before legal forum under the law subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. 5. With these directions, the Constitutional Petition and all pending applications are disposed of. We are not satisfied with such deduction from the service benefits of deceased at this stage and reject the PSM???s request to deduct utility and rent costs from the settlement. The Nazir is directed to recalculate the deceased???s total service benefits and after that exercise, these funds, if deposited, must be released to the legal heirs of deceased as per their entitlement without any deductions for rent or electricity. However, the release of payment is subject to proper identification and verification of the legal heirs and the legal heirs should be at liberty to challenge the validity of the orders passed by the learned Labour Court before legal forum under the law subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. 5. With these directions, the Constitutional Petition and all pending applications are disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3872 | 2026 SHC KHI 509 | Const. P. 6352/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Haji Abdul Raziq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 27-FEB-26 | Yes | In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 3873 | 2026 SHC KHI 520 | Const. P. 6271/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Nasim Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||
| 3874 | 2026 SHC KHI 231 | Const. P. 6804/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2015 | Phoenix Amour Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Gul Faraz and Ors (Respondent) | 11-FEB-26 | Yes | It is well settled that this Court does not sit as a court of appeal over findings of a statutory forum unless there is a lack of jurisdiction, coram non judice proceedings, or a violation of law apparent on the face of the record, none of which has been demonstrated in the present case. 14. The plea of the petitioner that there exists no authoritative judgment recognizing NIRC???s jurisdiction in matters arising under Standing Order 12(3) is contrary to the law laid down in the above-referred precedents. The statutory scheme of the IRA, 2012, read with Standing Order 12(3), clearly provides a complete mechanism for redress of individual grievances before the NIRC in cases of trans-provincial establishments. 15. For the foregoing reasons, the captioned petitions are devoid of merit and are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3875 | 2026 SHC KHI 21 | Const. P. 99/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Saeed Khan Advocate & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 09-JAN-26 | Yes | In view of the above, the roadside seating / encroachment by any means is not permissible to ensure traffic flow, public safety, and orderly use of public space. The Petitioners have now submitted an undertaking before this Court that they will refrain from encroaching upon public roads, and operate their restaurant within the lawful limits specified. 8. Given this undertaking, the Petitioners are expected to comply with all laws, policies, and SOPs, and accordingly, the sealing of the subject restaurant is set aside and mobile phone, if any, confiscated is restored to its owner. The Sindh Government and head of the KMC shall ensure compliance of the order forthwith without fail. 9. This Petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Chief Secretary Sindh and competent authority of KMC for compliance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed | ||
| 3876 | 2026 SHC KHI 618 | Const. P. 266/2026 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Cedar (Private) Limited (Petitioner) VS Sr.C.J/R.C-II, Karachi South & another (Respondent) | 16-MAR-26 | Yes | Having considered the overall circumstances, including the operational nature of the Petitioner???s institution and the reasonable time already granted to vacate. However at this stage both parties have reached a consensual resolution to the effect that the Petitioner shall vacate and hand over peaceful, vacant, and physical possession of the premises bearing No. D-120, Block-4, Clifton, Karachi on or before 27.05.2026 to the respondent No.2. without fail upon payment of rent as determined by the rent controller In case of failure by the Petitioner to vacate the premises by the above date, the premises shall be repossessed through lawful means, including police assistance and break-open of locks, without further notice. However, the breach of this undertaking so given by the petitioner shall be treated as contemptuous if breached, and consequences shall follow. This petition stands disposed of along with pending application(s) in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3877 | 2026 SHC KHI 654 | Const. P. 1544/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Jawed Akhtar Khichi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 18-MAR-26 | Yes | In view of the above, the impugned order is liable to be annulled as being arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of Articles 4 and 25 of the Constitution, and the petitioner/ interveners/similar employees are entitled to the same incentive time-scale benefit as granted to District Attorneys more particularly in terms of ratio of the judgments passed by this Court as discussed in the preceding paragraphs. 16. At the same time, it cannot be overlooked that the Petitioner and other similarly placed officers have remained stagnated for a considerable period due to the non-availability of a proper service structure, which prima facie calls for the attention of the competent authority. The recommendations of the Law Department and Prosecutor General Sindh also reflect acknowledgment of this structural deficiency. 17. In these circumstances, it is appropriate to direct the competent authority of the Respondents to expeditiously consider and finalize the matter of service structure and promotional avenues for the Criminal Prosecution Service, in light of this Court???s judgment dated 01.06.2021 passed in C.P. No. 1736/2013, and observation recorded hereinabove; and thereafter give meaningful consideration to the case of the Petitioner for all consequential benefits, including pensionary purposes on merits. 18. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of with the above directions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3878 | 2026 SHC KHI 258 | Const. P. 2298/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Mrs. Farhat Qazi (Petitioner) VS The Minister for Local Govt & Others (Respondent) | 09-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3879 | 2026 SHC KHI 54 | Const. P. 6414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mariam Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board and Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | It is further directed that the issue of limitation shall not come in the way of the petitioners, and the appeal/case of the petitioners shall not be dismissed merely on technical grounds, including limitation, but shall be decided purely on merits in accordance with law. In the intervening period, the petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the subject property. Office to place copy hereof in connected petitions listed above. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3880 | 2026 SHC KHI 32 | Const. P. 144/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Zahid Hassan Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 13-JAN-26 | Yes | Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioners, if so advised, shall file his complaint by using Smart Complaint Redressal Mechanism (SCRM) of the SBCA, who shall deal with the same in accordance with its own SOPs within reasonable time. This proposition is accepted by petitioner???s counsel. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with listed / pending application(s). A copy of this order shall be sent to DG SBCA for information. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3881 | 2026 SHC KHI 87 | Const. P. 7047/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2021 | Karachi College Teachers Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | However, prima facie, this is a fit case for the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The ends of justice, protection of fundamental rights, and enforcement of the rule of law demand that the Respondent authorities be directed to forthwith remove all illegal encroachments from the subject land if this is found to be in illegal occupation, using the writ of the State, so that illegality is not perpetuated and constitutional guarantees are not rendered meaningless. 7. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three months. To come up after completion of the aforesaid period. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3882 | 2026 SHC KHI 103 | Const. P. 744/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2023 | Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS DG SBCA and Others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 3883 | 2026 SHC KHI 162 | Const. P. 6232/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed M. Hamid Kazim Alvi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 27-JAN-26 | Yes | It is clarified that in case the petitioner remains aggrieved by the order so passed by the competent authority, he shall be at liberty to avail the remedy available to him under the law. 9. Without touching the merits of the case and the above observations and directions, the present Constitutional Petition, along with pending application(s) stands disposed of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3884 | 2026 SHC KHI 165 | Const. P. 1329/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Mubeen Shah S/o Kashif Shah (Petitioner) VS Majlis Intizamia Jama Makki Masjid Trust (Respondent) | 26-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3885 | 2026 SHC KHI 46 | Const. P. 2329/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Shamsi Coop Housing Society Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 14-JAN-26 | Yes | After arguing the matter at some length, both the parties have agreed for disposal of the instant petition in terms that the inquiry proceedings initiated against the petitioner-society be culminated to its logical conclusion within two months and the fate of the inquiry proceedings shall be placed on record through Registrar of this Court. However, the petitioner-society shall not be harassed during inquiry proceedings. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3886 | 2026 SHC KHI 446 | Const. P. 3943/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Abdul Khalique Panhyar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 19-FEB-26 | Yes | Consequently, the petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction to the competent authority of the Respondents to withdraw the aforesaid Notification and to reconsider the matter strictly in accordance with law, after affording a meaningful opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including the Petitioner. The authority shall decide the matter independently, on its own merits, without being influenced by any tentative observations made herein. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within one month from the date of receipt of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3887 | 2026 SHC KHI 427 | Const. P. 2194/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Rollins Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Learned SLAT and Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3888 | 2026 SHC KHI 303 | Const. P. 417/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Gold Star Enterprises (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3889 | 2026 SHC KHI 367 | Const. P. 4493/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Syed Muhammad Sohail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 18-FEB-26 | Yes | It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3890 | 2026 SHC KHI 299 | Const. P. 413/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2013 | Alpha Engineering (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Others (Respondent) | 30-JAN-26 | Yes | Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3891 | 2026 SHC KHI 118 | Const. P. 3934/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 23-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | |||
| 3892 | 2026 SHC KHI 426 | Const. P. 4655/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Muhammad Amir Hameed (Petitioner) VS Rollins Industries Pvt Ltd & Others (Respondent) | 25-FEB-26 | Yes | Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3893 | 2026 SHC KHI 529 | Const. P. 2567/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Khalid Hafeez (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 26-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3894 | 2026 SHC KHI 603 | Const. P. 868/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Maula Bux Sahito & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | So far as the issue of seniority is concerned, it is well settled that disputes relating to seniority, promotion, or other service matters of civil servants are to be agitated before the competent Service Tribunal constituted under Article 212 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and ordinarily, the constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 is not invoked where an adequate statutory remedy is available. Since the competent authority has now passed a speaking order deciding the representations of the petitioners, a fresh cause of action, if any, has accrued to them to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 11. Consequently, the present petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of with the observation that if the petitioners feel aggrieved by the speaking order passed by the competent authority dated 04.03.2026 or the determination of seniority made therein, they may avail the remedy available to them under the law before the appropriate Service Tribunal. All questions of law and fact are left open to be agitated before the said forum if approached. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3895 | 2026 SHC KHI 652 | Const. P. 72/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Shakeela & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 18-MAR-26 | Yes | In the present case, the Respondent has failed to demonstrate any lawful basis or documented deficiency justifying refusal or delay in issuance. Mere reference to ???verification??? without any specific discrepancies communicated to the Petitioners does not constitute lawful justification under the NADRA Ordinance, Rules, or SOPs. 10. In view of settled legal principles and judicial precedents protecting identity rights, this petition is disposed of with directions that the Petitioners??? cases shall be processed within two weeks. The Petitioners shall appear before the concerned NADRA branch to complete the required formalities, and arbitrary denial of CNICs or other documents shall not be tolerated, subject to lawful exceptions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3896 | 2026 SHC KHI 594 | Const. P. 4907/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Eijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 09-MAR-26 | Yes | In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that he appointment of Respondent No.4 as Inspector General Prisons (BS-21) vide Notification dated 05.06.2025 has been made in accordance with the Sindh Prisons and Corrections Services (Amendment) Act, 2025, which expressly authorizes the Chief Minister to appoint the IG from officers of BS-21/20 belonging to the Police Service of Pakistan, Pakistan Administrative Service, Executive Provincial Civil Service, Provincial Management Service, or the Sindh Prisons and Corrections Service. Respondent No.4, being a BS-20 officer of the Police Service of Pakistan, prima facie fulfills the statutory eligibility criteria for the post. The Amendment Act enlarges the pool of eligible candidates and grants the Government discretion in appointments, and such statutory discretion cannot be questioned through a writ of quo warranto unless a clear illegality is established. The procedural requirements under the APT Rules, 1974, including PSB recommendation, do not override the specific statutory authority granted by the Amendment Act. Reliance on general service rules or prior notifications cannot invalidate a statutory appointment made in accordance with a special law. There is no evidence of mala fide or unlawful exercise of discretion, and the appointment does not violate any statutory provision. 15. In view of the above, the petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto against Respondent No.4 is dismissed along with pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||
| 3897 | 2026 SHC KHI 108 | Const. P. 4746/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Ishrat Bano (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | 20-JAN-26 | Yes | These petitions need to be disposed of in terms that if the petitioners are found to be entitled for the Assistance Package, the competent authority shall re-consider their decision and passing a speaking order after hearing the parties concerned within sixty (60) days. 5. These petitions stand disposed of in the above terms alongwith pending application(s), if any. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho | ||
| 3898 | 2026 SHC KHI 424 | Const. P. 7148/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2018 | M/s Computer Relation Educational Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | 23-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3899 | 2026 SHC KHI 168 | Const. P. 849/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | Aqeel Hassan Awan S/o Haji Muhammad Shafi Awan (Petitioner) VS Sana Hassan and others (Respondent) | 26-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) | |||
| 3900 | 2026 SHC KHI 140 | Const. P. 320/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2026 | Nasrullah Korai (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | 29-JAN-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3901 | 2026 SHC KHI 243 | Const. P. 4001/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2022 | Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS C.E.O Pakistan Steel & Ors (Respondent) | 10-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3902 | 2026 SHC KHI 248 | Const. P. 4323/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2025 | Mst. Masooda & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | 10-FEB-26 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 3903 | 2026 SHC KHI 576 | Const. P. 5483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | Writ Jurisdictions | 2024 | M/s Mall Developers Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | 05-MAR-26 | Yes | 17. For the foregoing reasons, this Court is of the considered view that the controversy regarding the land measuring 3,600 square yards has already been conclusively determined through earlier judicial proceedings; the present petition amounts to re-litigation of matters that have attained finality; and the relief claimed cannot be granted within the scope of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 18. Consequently, the present Constitutional Petition is dismissed as not maintainable, along with the pending application(s). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) |