Export
Report-002 AFR

Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.

Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:

Show Only Authored Judgements/Orders

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon

High Court of Sindh, Principal Seat Karachi, Bench at Sukkur, Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana
S.No. Citation Case No. Case Year Parties Bench Type Order/Judgment Order_Date A.F.R Head Notes/ Tag Line Bench Apex Court Apex Status
1 Const. P. 953/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 A. Razzaq Dawood (Petitioner) VS V/S M/s Urban Builders and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1943/2018,C.P.1368/2019,C.P.5452/2021,C.P.6388/2021,C.A.644/2022,C.A.645/2022 SCP Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
2 Const. P. 77/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rehman and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.675-K/2018 M/s Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Abdul Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3 Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-20 Yes Under Article 199 of Constitution In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that substantial compliance of the Judgment dated 23.01.2018 passed by this Court affirmed by the Honble Supreme Court vide order dated 09.07.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.322-K / 2018 has not been complied with in its letter and spirit. Therefore, at this juncture, prima facie, Petitioner No.2 has made out a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors. Therefore, the office is directed to issue show cause notice under section 17 (1) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 read with Article 204 of the Constitution, as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the Judgment. The listed application bearing (CMA No. 7200 of 2019), is adjourned to be taken up in the second week of January 2021. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4 2018 SBLR Sindh 682 Const. P. 2991/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ali Asghar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.441-K/2017 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others,C.A.62-K/2018 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
5 Const. P. 2949/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdullah Mushtaq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.830-K/2018 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation v. Abdullah Mushtaq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
6 Const. P. 448/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Khalid Inayat & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.57-K/2018 Munawar Ali and others v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.49-K/2018 Bilal Rasool and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
7 Const. P. 1940/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Prof: Jan Muhammad Memon (Petitioner) VS Governor of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2715/2018 Professor Jan Muhammad Memon v. The Governor of Sindh/Chancellor thr. the Principal Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
8 2020 PLC (CS) 345 Const. P. 2722/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Hameed Solangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2377/2018 Abdul Hameed Solangi & others v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Education & Litreracy Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.1027/2020 for withdrawal is Allowed
9 Const. P. 5835/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ali Kamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.6-K/2018 Muhammad Ali Kamal v. Province of Sindh and anothers Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
10 Const. P. 3525/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.431/2018 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
11 Const. P. 4716/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.612-K/2018 Asif Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
12 2018 YLR 503 Cr.Bail 918/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD AKRAM S/O MAQSOOD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.P.68-K/2017 Muhammad Akram v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
13 Const. P. 1819/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
14 Const. P. 4348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Dileep Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.73-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others,C.P.426-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
15 Const. P. 371/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asif Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes In view of the above, it is crystal clear that the respondents cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment against son quota by issuing Standing Order for recruitment in Sindh Police against Shaheed Quota, Son Quota without approval of the Provincial Government Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
16 Const. P. 1098/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Bakhu Khan (Petitioner) VS Aamir Noor & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
17 Const. P. 190/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Aqsa Mastoi (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
18 Const. P. 301/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalique Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
19 Const. P. 229/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
20 Const. P. 862/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Jami (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Petitioner seeking relief that her husband was employee of Government of Sindh as Naib qasid died on 11-05-2012 during Service .Petitioner approached to concerned for pension &other benefits but no response and only Gratuity fund RS 38250/received. Respondent for the state appeared and argued that he was appointed on 20-08-1995 and he terminated from his job on 01-11-1995. However, he was reinstated on 21-03-2009,and he died on 11-05-2012 and not completed Service minimum required for pension & others therefore ,he is not entitled to pension. It was held that Rule 275 of Sindh Civil Service Regulations makes clear clear that he is entitled for family pension. He is also fully entitled for family pension and Salary of the intervening Period as provided under the Law rule 152 of Sindh Service rules. Respondent is directed to re calculated the family pension of intervening period and deposit the same in this court. Petition is disposed of with above terms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
21 Const. P. 3169/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Fouzia Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
22 Const. P. 1836/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shoukat Hayat Awan (Petitioner) VS A.I.G and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
23 Const. P. 2833/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Muhammad Waseem and 4 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
24 Const. P. 368/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Silk Bank Limited & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.278-K/2019 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
25 Const. P. 3355/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Taaruf Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.376-K/2019 Taaruf Hussain and others v. Province of Sindh thr.Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
26 Const. P. 1097/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Bakhu Khan (Petitioner) VS Aamir Noor & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
27 Cr.Misc. 182/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ch. Azeem Ahmed (Applicant) VS S.H.O P.S Sanjar Chang District Tando Allahyar & 17 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
28 Const. P. 4000/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Prof: Dr. Parveen (Petitioner) VS Chancellor University of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
29 Const. P. 810/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Nek Muhammad Jakhrani & another (Petitioner) VS Chairman WAPDA & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
30 Const. P. 1969/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Aslam and another (Petitioner) VS Rajab Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
31 Const. P. 209/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Alman and others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
32 Const. P. 1250/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
33 Cr.Bail 29/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
34 Const. P. 1154/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Youth Action for Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2221/2019 Youth Action for Pakistan thr. Ghulam Murtaza Sheikh, Jamshoro v. Province of Sindh thr. the Secretary, Relief Department, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
35 2018 CLC 1632 Const. P. 3580/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Humair Altaf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
36 Cr.Appeal 181/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ashraf (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
37 Const. P. 4465/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Shafiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2782/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
38 Const. P. 5079/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Farhat Iqbal and 11 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.411-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Syed Farhat Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
39 Const. P. 2826/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
40 Const. P. 1556/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Khuda Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.200-K/2019 Khuda Bux and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Health Department Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
41 Const. P. 2230/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
42 Const. P. 140/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Intervenor) VS P>O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
43 Const. P. 387/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
44 Const. P. 1281/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Ishrat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
45 Const. P. 6848/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Human Help Welfar Association (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
46 2017 SBLR Sindh 1791 Const. P. 2951/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
47 2019 PLC (CS) Note 41 Const. P. 3759/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Kamran Ahmed Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
48 2020 PLC (CS) Note 9 Const. P. 5861/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Latif Mughal (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
49 Const. P. 887/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Fashion Knits Ind. (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
50 Const. P. 946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Lucky Knits Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3077/2018 M/s. Lucky Knits Private Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.83-K/2019 M/s. Lucky Knits Private Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
51 Const. P. 984/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Masood and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
52 Const. P. 5408/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sultan Zareen and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.119-K/2019 Sultan Zareen v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others,C.P.120-K/2019 Niaz Mohammad v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned
53 2019 PLC Lab. 19 Const. P. 7370/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/S SINDH CLUB (Petitioner) VS MUHAMMAD MISKEEN & OTHERS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
54 Const. P. 71/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Manzoor Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.18-K/2019 Karachi Port Trust and others v. Manzoor Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
55 Const. P. 282/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Kazim Larik and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
56 Const. P. 5631/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Chandomal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
57 Const. P. 5619/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pir Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
58 Const. P. 5519/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Kelash Babu (Petitioner) VS SPSC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
59 Const. P. 1360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Adil Rashid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
60 H.C.A 348/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ayub Khan (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
61 Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes Prima-facie, the question of downgrading the petitioner in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the petitioner to avail his remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.882-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Muhammad Yaseen and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
62 Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.882-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Muhammad Yaseen and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
63 Const. P. 5547/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr Aftab Haider Deeshak & Ors (Petitioner) VS SPSC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
64 Const. P. 598/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Al-Hadi Textile Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
65 Const. P. 4810/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 EPLA Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
66 2018 PLC Lab. 171 Const. P. 3573/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s Wyeth Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Nasimul Hassan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
67 Const. P. 3411/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Civil Aviation Authority (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
68 Const. P. 1254/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syeda Anis Sughra Jafri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
69 2019 PLC Lab. 182 Const. P. 5262/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/s Inland Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mehdi Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
70 Const. P. 4433/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Abdul Waheed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.298/2018 Sajid Hussain & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
71 Const. P. 4506/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.267-K/2019 Mushtaque Ahmed v. Member Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
72 Const. P. 5871/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Allama Mousa and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.880-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Allana Mousa and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
73 Const. P. 1104/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mazhar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
74 2019 PLC (CS) 962 Const. P. 1929/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sikandar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1151-K/2018 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others,C.A.120-K/2019 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned
75 Const. P. 3134/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Chairman and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.521-K/2018 Chairman & others (Officer & Non-Officers) Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Finance Revenue and others,C.A.19-K/2019 Chairman & others (Officer & Non-Officers) Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Finance Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed.there is also a short order/CO by HCJ
76 Const. P. 4068/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Fluid Technology International (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
77 Const. P. 3569/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan Cables Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3079/2018 M/s. Pakistan Cables Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.85-K/2019 M/s. Pakistan Cables Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
78 Const. P. 5147/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Yasmeen Akhtar and ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
79 Const. P. 6016/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Buyer Pakitstan (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
80 Const. P. 6194/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Jaffer Brothers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
81 Const. P. 1276/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Specialized AUtoparts Ind. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2976/2018 M/s Specialized Autoparts Industries Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.79-K/2019 M/s Specialized Autoparts Industries Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
82 Const. P. 5192/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Pirzada Jamaluddin Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1115-K/2018 Prof: Dr. Pirzada Jamaluddin Ahmed Siddiqui v. The Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
83 Const. P. 2265/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Zia Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3078/2018 M/s. Zia Industries (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.84-K/2019 M/s. Zia Industries (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
84 Cr.Misc. 1218/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mst. Zuriat W/o Sheeral Khan (Applicant) VS Kouro Khan @ Kouro and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
85 Cr.Misc. 398/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Nawab Ali (Applicant) VS Yawar Abbas & 3 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
86 Const. P. 836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Inayat (Petitioner) VS PO sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
87 Const. P. 635/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Bibi Sakeena and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
88 Const. P. 1524/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
89 Const. P. 2868/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Mutlab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
90 Const. P. 3241/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoob Lanjwani (Petitioner) VS Director Left Bank Canal area (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
91 Const. P. 2362/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Qurban Ali Khoso & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
92 Const. P. 271/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-SEP-19 Yes In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
93 Const. P. 5632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Mohsin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
94 H.C.A 449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Waseem Ahmed (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shahnawaz & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.712-K/2019 K-Elecric Ltd. v. Muhammad Shahnawaz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
95 Const. P. 1174/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 M/s. Nadeem Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
96 Const. P. 1589/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ishaque & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
97 Const. P. 1925/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Aleem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
98 Const. P. 2339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Baqa Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
99 Const. P. 2598/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Haroon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
100 Const. P. 2633/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
101 Const. P. 8185/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.691-K/2019 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.20-K/2022 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
102 2020 SBLR Sindh 365 Const. P. 1589/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 1589 of 2013,CP No. D- 1803 of 2015,CP No D- 2423 of 2015,CP No. D- 2834 of 2015,CP No. D- 847 of 2016, CP No. D- 958 of 2016, CP No. D- 1071 of 2016, CP No. D- 1173 of 2016, CP No. D- 1826 of 2016, CP No. D- 2179 of 2016, CP No. D- 2539 of 2016, CP No. D- 2656 of 2016, CP No. D- 2776 of 2016, CP No. D- 2941 of 2016, CP No. D- 3078 of 2016, CP No. D- 3148 of 2016, CP No. D- 3212 of 2016, CP No. D- 3391 of 2016, CP No. D- 3445 of 2016, CP No. D- 02 of 2017, CP No. D- 43 of 2017, CP No. D- 201 of 2017, CP No. D- 291 of 2017, CP No. D- 301 of 2017, CP No. D- 314 of 2017, CP No. D- 322 of 2017, CP No. D- 379 of 2017, CP No. D- 478 of 2017, CP No. D- 547 of 2017, CP No. D- 639 of 2017, CP No. D- 733 of 2017, CP No. D- 729 of 2017, CP No. D- 917 of 2017, CP No. D- 1000 of 2017, CP No. D- 1054 of 2017, CP No. D- 1067 of 2017, CP No. D- 1084 of 2017, CP No. D- 1085 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1344 of 2017, CP No. D- 1533 of 2017, CP No. D- 1576 of 2017, CP No. D- 1727 of 2017, CP No. D- 2071 of 2017, CP No. D- 2137 of 2017, CP No. D- 2403 of 2017, CP No. D- 2452 of 2017, CP No. D- 2608 of 2017, CP No. D- 2634 of 2017, CP No. D- 2835 of 2017, CP No. D- 2879 of 2017, CP No. D- 3018 of 2017, CP No. D- 3130 of 2017, CP No. D- 3273 of 2017, CP No. D- 3341 of 2017, CP No. D- 3345 of 2017, CP No. D- 3369 of 2017, CP No. D- 3696 of 2017, CP No. D- 3742 of 2017, CP No. D- 3808 of 2017, CP No. D- 129 of 2018, CP No. D- 163 of 2018, CP No. D- 332 of 2018, CP No. D- 413 of 2018, CP No. D- 505 of 2018, CP No. D- 736 of 2018, CP No. D- 1066 of 2018, CP No. D- 1526 of 2018, CP No. D- 2094 of 2018, CP No. D- 2194 of 2018, CP No. D- 2195 of 2018, CP No. D- 2334 of 2018, CP No. D- 2366 of 2018, CP No. D- 2451 of 2018, CP No. D- 2469 of 2018, CP No. D- 2683 of 2018, CP No. D- 3069 of 2018, CP No. D- 3215 of 2018, CP No. D- 3218 of 2018, CP No. D- 3221 of 2018, CP No. D- 3302 of 2018, CP No. D- 84 of 2019, CP No. D- 108 of 2019, CP No. D- 369 of 2019, CP No. D- 436 of 2019, CP No. D- 544 of 2019, CP No. D- 696 of 2019, CP No. D- 1137 of 2019, CP No. D- 1609 of 2019, CP No. D- 1683 of 2019, CP No. D- 1827 of 2019, CP No. D- 1836 of 2019, CP No. D- 1904 of 2019, CP No. D- 1929 of 2019 2013 Kaleemullah (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
103 Const. P. 472/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zohaib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
104 Const. P. 1910/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
105 Const. P. 1860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
106 Const. P. 2342/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Naseeban (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
107 Const. P. 7654/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mirza Mansoor Baig (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
108 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 266 Const. P. 2054/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Natho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
109 Const. P. 3218/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Haneef and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
110 Const. P. 3109/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Javed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
111 Const. P. 3177/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 WaliMuhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
112 Const. P. 2065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
113 Const. P. 5200/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Noman (Petitioner) VS NADRA & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.520-K/2019 Noman v. National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) and others,C.A.42-K/2020 Noman v. National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned
114 Const. P. 2872/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
115 Const. P. 3345/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Nangar Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
116 Const. P. 2683/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hamayoon Mubarak (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
117 Const. P. 3302/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Wajahat Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
118 Const. P. 2965/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
119 Const. P. 1557/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Tail Abadgar Association (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
120 Const. P. 2814/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Talib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
121 Const. P. 502/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst .Rani Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes whether Constable Mushtaque Khaskheli embraced Shahadat on 04.3.2015 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014. Shahadat Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
122 Const. P. 609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
123 Const. P. 2730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Inam ul Haq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
124 2021 PLC (CS) 374 Const. P. 1310/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ms. Faryal Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Federal Ombudsman and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-19 Yes Posting and transfer of unmarried female government servants --In the light of Office Memorandum dated 17th December, 1999 as discussed supra the case of Petitioner explicitly falls within paragraph 2(i), as such Notification for transfer of the petitioner at Peshawar is declared against the policy decision of the Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat Establishment Division. Petition allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
125 Const. P. 950/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Director Nara Canal Irrigation Department and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
126 Const. P. 8580/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Wasif and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.696-K/2019 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.25-K/2022 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
127 Const. P. 339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
128 Const. P. 2469/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dileep Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
129 Const. P. 2581/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
130 Const. P. 1826/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
131 Const. P. 8581/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Adeel Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.697-K/2019 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.26-K/2022 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
132 Const. P. 2893/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
133 Const. P. 2389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zahid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
134 Const. P. 317/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
135 Const. P. 2776/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Miss Nasreen Qadri (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
136 Const. P. 43/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
137 Const. P. 1826/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Wasayo Samijo & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
138 Const. P. 3794/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Gul Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Chief Engineer Irrigation and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
139 Const. P. 2011/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Anwar and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
140 Const. P. 178/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
141 Const. P. 1721/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.726-K/2020 Aijaz Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
142 Const. P. 2729/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1797/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Urooj Fatima and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
143 Const. P. 1270/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Jhando Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
144 Const. P. 3400/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Subhan (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-20 Yes NBP--demotion of the petitioner from the post of Vice President/Ex-Manager to next lower grade--Adverting to the claim of the petitioner with regard to his promotion in the next rank under NBP Staff Service Rules, 1973. It is well settled proposition of law that it is the Service Rules Committee of the respondent-bank which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion of the petitioner for which they have to take decision in accordance with law--In view of the foregoing facts concluded in para 07 supra, the action taken by the respondent Bank is/was too harsh, therefore we set aside the impugned orders dated 26.11.2014 regarding demotion of the petitioner and order dated 03.03.2017 regarding demotion in pay. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.197-K/2020 National Bank of Pakistan NBP and others v. Abdul Subhan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
145 Const. P. 7221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Talal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-20 Yes Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
146 Const. P. 450/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Shafi Throgh His LRS (Petitioner) VS Raja Muhammad Bashir Khan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
147 Const. P. 5685/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Umair Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.444-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Sindh & others v. Syed Umair Ahmed & others,C.P.377-K/2020 Syed Umair Ahmed v. Province of Sindh & others,C.P.1838/2020 Imtiaz Ali Shah and others v. Syed Umair Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
148 I. A 26/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rahim Dino & another (Appellant) VS Learned Asst: Commissioner/ LAO Islamkot @ Mithi (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
149 Criminal Appeal 23/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nazer Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
150 Const. P. 80/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Jalil & anothers (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
151 II.A. 60/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: II.A S 58/2019 2019 Balach (Appellant) VS Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
152 I. A 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Rana Imran Mehmood (Appellant) VS M/S NIB Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
153 Const. P. 6787/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Prof: (R) Syed Anwar Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-21 Yes University of Karachi--accommodation--Prima-facie the petitioner No.1 stood retired from the service of respondent-university on 06.10.2018 and after retirement, he was allowed to remain in possession up to 05.10.2019, therefore, no vested right can be claimed by them to retain the university accommodation for an indefinite period. Even otherwise, we are not satisfied with this assertion made by learned counsel for the petitioners to the effect that they are authorized residents of subject accommodation, which act on their part is not appreciated for the simple reason that to date no allotment order has been made in favour of petitioner No.2 who is stated to be an employee of respondent-university and it is for them to take appropriate decision if the petitioner No.2 is entitled to under the law. The documents relied upon by them do not confer any right thereupon permitting them to ask for the continuation of the allotment of subject premises. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
154 Const. P. 3766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Kishwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1801/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Kishwar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
155 Const. P. 597/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Mohammad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
156 Const. P. 2250/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-20 Yes the private respondents are Assistant Food Controller in BPS-15, but they are holding the post of District Food Controller in BPS-16 in various districts of the Province of Sindh on Own Pay Scale (OPS) in violation of Article 199---Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. At the request of learned counsel, office is directed to issue cover-in-hand to him in respect of the notice to be issued to respondents 1 and 2 who shall also be served through courier service. To come up on 29.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
157 Const. P. 2094/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Syed Akram Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
158 Const. P. 5851/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Saima Ather (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.937/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others,C.P.1755/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.
159 Const. P. 649/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
160 Criminal Appeal 12/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 JAVED & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
161 Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-20 Yes Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.737/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Sarvech Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
162 Const. P. 738/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Qadir Kaloi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
163 Const. P. 7103/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-20 Yes release his monthly salary--whether the salary of the petitioner can be withheld without providing an opportunity of hearing? --In our view, he, who seeks equity, must do equity and approach the Court with clean hands, ill-gotten gains cannot be protected. It is argued by the learned AAG that the petitioner had got his appointment through the backdoor, thus cannot agitate any grievance on the pretext of denial of due opportunity of hearing to him--we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and since the Competent Authority has already determined the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims on the issue of appointment of non-teaching staff in the Directorate of School Education (Elementary/ Secondary / Higher Secondary Karachi), vide order dated 11.01.2019 on the subject as discussed supra, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained. On the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, we are guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
164 Const. P. 7252/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Naveed Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1436-K/2020 Naveed Ahmed Abro v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
165 2019 PLC (CS) 1533 Const. P. 4997/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azam Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
166 Const. P. 448/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Nadeem Iqbal & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
167 Civil Revision 131/1986 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1986 Khanzada Siddi Yakoob and others (Applicant) VS Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
168 Const. P. 714/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Qabil Rind & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
169 Const. P. 347/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr M.H Mughal (Khi To Hyd) (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
170 2023 PLC Lab. 41 Const. P. 3026/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
171 Criminal Appeal 103/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faheem (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.315/2020 Faheem v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
172 Const. P. 245/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Faiza Bibi & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
173 Const. P. 4542/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners??? promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
174 Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes It is well-settled law that the period of adhoc appointment cannot be counted towards service, the seniority in grade is to be taken effect from the date of regular appointment to a post and it cannot be conferred retrospectively. Since the service of the petitioner was confirmed admittedly with effect from 22.11.2019 as such promotion cannot be claimed by him without the requisite length of service except from the date of regular appointment. This reduces to the dictum that an ad-hoc appointee would only be entitled to seniority from the date of his regularization and not from the date of initial appointment. The petitioner accordingly is neither entitled for retrospective seniority nor promotion. This view is cemented by the judgment delivered in the case of Province of Sindh and others vs. Ghulam Farid and others, 2014 SCMR 1189, and Secretary to Government of Punjab and others vs. Muhammad Khalid Usmani and others, 2016 SCMR 2125. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
175 Const. P. 558/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Meer Hazar Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
176 Const. P. 5853/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 National Engineering Servies Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-20 Yes reinstatement in service--we may observe that the learned Single Bench of NIRC vide order dated 08.10.2020 allowed the Grievance Application of respondent No.2 and passed ex-parte order, which issue is still subjudice before the learned Full Bench of NIRC, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioners. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.5 to decide the case of the petitioners within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. Meanwhile, operation of the impugned order dated 08.10.2020 shall remain suspended. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
177 Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes In view of the statement of learned AAG, let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who are facing disciplinary proceedings or criminal cases, and enjoying the posting even those who entered into plea bargaining and Voluntary Return (VR) under the NAB law. To be listed on 21.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
178 Const. P. 2419/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghazala Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
179 Const. P. 3075/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) VS Chief Naval Staff and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect? Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
180 Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
181 Const. P. 1018/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 Yes the decision of PSB-II for promoting the private respondent No.8 in BPS-19 against future vacancy in absence of ACRs is/was an erroneous decision--ACRs--it is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if the promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, the competent authority, and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
182 Const. P. 615/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Aslam Shah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
183 Const. P. 1/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Allah Obhayo & Other (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
184 Const. P. 6435/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Danish Sidat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-21 Yes withholding the appointment of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (BPS-09) on the ground of pending criminal case--with directions to the competent authority / Inspector General of Police, Sindh to scrutinize the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (BPS-09) and if the petitioner is found fit in all respects to be admitted as Assistant Sub-Inspector in Sindh Police, his candidature may be processed for the appointment strictly under the Recruitment Rules for the aforesaid post within one month from the date of communication of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
185 Const. P. 531/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Naseer Farooqi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
186 Const. P. 811/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hanif Lalani (Petitioner) VS The State Through DG NAB, Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
187 Const. P. 1753/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Mazhar Ali Chandio & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
188 Const. P. 1029/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1204/2023 Shah Nawaz (deceased) through his L.Rs and others v. Mst. Erum Saleem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
189 Const. P. 730/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Shakeela (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Arif Abbasi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
190 Const. P. 2093/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Azam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
191 Const. P. 400/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mir Qadir Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
192 Const. P. 5423/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rizwan Ahmed Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 Yes This is the second contempt application arising out of order dated 24.05.2019 passed by this Court. This application is not maintainable on the ground that their earlier plea was discarded by this court in their earlier application, now they have again attempted to convince this Court by filling the second contempt application on the same grounds, which is not tenable under the law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. This is the second contempt application arising out of order dated 24.05.2019 passed by this Court. This application is not maintainable on the ground that their earlier plea was discarded by this court in their earlier application, now they have again attempted to convince this Court by filling the second contempt application on the same grounds, which is not tenable under the law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
193 Const. P. 94/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
194 2023 PLC (CS) 1133 Const. P. 139/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) VS C.A.A (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-FEB-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed
195 Const. P. 181/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Salma Khatoon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1136/2021 Magna Processing Industries Pvt Ltd Faisalabad v. Sindh through the SecretaryExcise and Taxation Sindh Karachi and another,C.P.4842/2021 Magna Processing Industries Pvt Ltd Faisalabad v. Province of Sindh through the SecretaryExcise and Taxation Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.
196 Const. P. 630/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-20 Yes We have noticed that the respondents have complied with the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court passed in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 in C.A. 30-K of 2014 and Crl. M.A 37-K of 2017 in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 and petitioner has been given a proforma promotion in BPS-20 with effect from 12.3.2017 one day before his retirement from service on 13.3.2017; thus no further indulgence of this court is required in the matter. It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
197 Const. P. 6999/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS The Adjutant General & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-20 Yes He assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon???ble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed He assailed the aforesaid order before the Honble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.195-K/2020 Shabbir Aslam v. The Adjutant General and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
198 Const. P. 872/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Hassan Rajar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
199 Const. P. 7604/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Shoaib Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-20 Yes petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
200 Cr.Misc. 427/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hamid Ali (Applicant) VS 1st Adj. S.J/Ex.Officio J.P Tharparkar & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
201 Const. P. 574/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
202 Const. P. 4907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fareed and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-20 Yes The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
203 Const. P. 8261/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-20 Yes Repatriation from the post of Additional Deputy Commissioner-I, Hyderabad to his parent department i.e. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. vide Notification dated 12.2.2016 issued by Chief Secretary--whether the petitioner was qualified to be inducted from Sui Southern Gas Company in Sindh Government on deputation for three years' And, whether the Chief Minister, Sindh was competent to nominate the petitioner as Assistant Commissioner in Ex-PCS cadre under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964? and, whether his repatriation to his parent department is in accord with the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court?--It is well-settled law that a deputationist does not have any vested right to remain on the post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period. He can be repatriated to his parent department at any time. The Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafiur Rehman Afridi v. CDA, 2010 SCMR 378, has settled the issue on the aforesaid proposition. Therefore, no further deliberation is required by us--In our view, since the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters is still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
204 Const. P. 5975/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imtiaz Ali Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.382-K/2020 Imtiaz Ali Sangarasi v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
205 Const. P. 3383/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Atif and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
206 Const. P. 437/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
207 Cr.Misc. 145/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Farzana (Applicant) VS SSP District Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
208 Const. P. 719/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Ali & another (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
209 Const. P. 837/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Faraz Rehan S/o Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S. Sir Syed (Central) Khi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JAN-21 Yes Habeas Corpus directing the respondent-police officials to produce his minor son namely Master Zohan Faraz aged about 02 years to enable him to take his custody--I am of the view that the purpose of filing this petition is served as the minor has been produced before this Court; and, prima-facie the minor is no more in illegal custody as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Primarily, in the cases, concerning the custody of a child, this Court is not required to go into the intricacies/technicalities of the matter in constitutional jurisdiction and should confine its findings to the extent of the welfare of the child/minor which is a paramount consideration and it is for the learned Guardian and Wards Court to take appropriate measures in this regard. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
210 2023 PLC CS Note 103 Const. P. 340/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M.Saleem Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-20 Yes We are of the view that the post cannot be upgraded / re-designated merely by passing the Resolution by defunct CDGK, the law has to take its own course and to be followed for the aforesaid purpose for which the petitioner has failed to justify his entitlement for proforma promotion with retrospective effect---It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others , PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. proforma promotion Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
211 Const. P. 1688/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mehrumal (Petitioner) VS D.O, Water Management NPIW, Mirpurkhas and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
212 Const. P. 53/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Post Master General Khi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-20 Yes Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1222/2020 Director General, Pakistan Post, Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Ibrahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
213 Const. P. 2512/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abrar Ali Khichi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
214 Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-21 Yes Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
215 Const. P. 2805/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Shamim Qureshi (Petitioner) VS J.S.M.U and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
216 Const. P. 427/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-21 Yes In our view, no candidate shall be appointed to a post unless after such medical examination as Government may prescribe such candidate is found medically fit to discharge the duties of the post. In the present case, the petitioner was relieved from the duties on medical grounds and his appeal was rejected on the same analogy. Besides above, the assertion of the petitioner is misconceived on the premise that he obtained a medical examination fitness test certificate on 02.12.2019 after the rejection of his appeal, on 14.5.2019, thus this document could not be taken into consideration, besides the respondents have relied upon the documents which prima facie show adverse inference against him. Thus, at this stage, we cannot declare him medically fit or otherwise for the subject post, which was a contractual position and by efflux of time expired. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
217 Const. P. 7997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 Yes Regional Manager Askari Guards (Pvt.) Ltd--NIRC--back benefits -- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2931/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.472/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
218 Const. P. 7382/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Akhtar Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-21 Yes issuance of offer/appointment orders to the post of Gavi Vaccinators (BPS-6) in the Health Department on the plea that they have already been declared successful candidates based on marks they obtained in the competitive process --i) Whether the recruitment process for the post of vaccinator (BPS-6) was flawed under the law? ii) Whether the Selection Committee was lawfully constituted; and, the Provincial Minister was competent to reduce the passing marks and facilitate private respondents/beneficiaries for appointment to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)? iii) Whether some of the private respondents/beneficiaries on the recommendation of the two-member Selection Committee were lawfully appointed as vaccinators in BPS-6? iv) Whether the petitioners can claim a right to be appointed through the two-member Selection Committee to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)?-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3111/2021 Ghayasuddin Shahani and others v. Akhtar Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
219 Const. P. 1869/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Talat Mehmood and Others (Petitioner) VS Bahria Univeristy and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes Bahria university Karachi--release order Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
220 Const. P. 3550/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arsalan Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 Yes we are clear in our minds that no civil/public Servant of a non-cadre post can be posted, out of cadre. Reliance is placed on the cases of Muhammad Bachal Memon and others vs. Syed Tan veer Hussain Shah and others (2014 SCMR 1539), Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary Sindh and others (2013 SCMR 1752), Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456), and Ajmal Hassan Khan and another Versus Government of Sindh and others, 2012 P L C (C.S.) 1153 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1677-K/2021 Arsalan Hassan v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
221 Const. P. 5616/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Aftab (Petitioner) VS Div: Supr: Pakistan Railways & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-21 Yes medical issue in appointment Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1049-K/2022 Muhammad Aftab v. The Divisional Superintendent Pakistan Railway, Karachi Division & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
222 Const. P. 4534/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Faisal Rasheed (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 Yes Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
223 Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-21 Yes Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the respondents be directed to issue notification in respect of his retirement and to pay his post-retirement benefits and outstanding salary. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
224 2022 SBLR Sindh 1129 Const. P. 4826/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammad Usman Ghani Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-21 Yes appointment in PQA Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.535-K/2021 Muhammad Usman Ghani Qureshi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
225 Const. P. 6847/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Wazeer Ali Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
226 Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes alteration in date of Birth Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
227 Const. P. 3930/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 Yes The pivotal question involved in the listed application is whether Civil / Government / public servant is entitled to have the protection of the previous service rendered as Adhoc temporary/contingent basis in the organization for fixation and counting of the previous service for pension. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.77/2022 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another,C.P.5919/2021 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
228 Cr.Bail 258/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Raheem Bux (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
229 2022 SBLR Sindh 371 Const. P. 6167/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Al - Ghazi Traders Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 Yes whether the Sindh Human Rights Commission was/is empowered under Section 4 of the Sindh Protection of Human Rights Act, 2011, (Act, 2011) to entertain service-related issues and direct the reinstatement of the private respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
230 Const. P. 2511/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 Yes At this juncture, learned AAG contends that there is another judgment i.e. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Punjab Lahore etc. v. Ms. Shamim Usman (Civil Petition No.1097-L of 2020) and extends his no objection that if the matter is referred to the Competent Authority, who shall examine the case of the petitioners alongwith their batch-mates as well seniors within the guidelines of dicta laid down by the apex Court and rules in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 03 months. Needless to mention that any findings of that Committee can be challenged by the petitioners or by any aggrieved person through independent proceedings and not under the contempt proceedings. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners, contends that in another inquiry competent officers opined that the case of Gul Hassan Jatoi (supra) is not applicable to them with regard to promotion, suffice to say that Police Rules are binding upon authorities, however, interpretation of the apex Court and guidelines provided in judgment, particularly paragraphs 56 and 71, shall be examined as afresh and earlier opinion shall not come in the way of promotion. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
231 Const. P. 6162/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 Yes reinstatement in service as Staff SDO (B&R)--immoral activities--Article 199(3) of the Constitution--Dismissed. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
232 Cr.J.A 87/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Zamir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUL-21 Yes For the foregoing facts and reasons, we have not found any misreading or non-appreciation of evidence and any illegality or legal or factual infirmity in the impugned judgment so as to justify interference by this Court in recording sentence and conviction to appellant by the trial Court. Hence, instant criminal appeal is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.P.118-K/2021 Zamir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted
233 Const. P. 2463/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khalid Abdul Maroof & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
234 Const. P. 195/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Riaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS M/s SSGC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-21 Yes Needless to add that this is because of which normally every service law or rules includes such right for competent authority. Here bundle of documents have been filed which, prima facie, requires determination of factual controversy; as well petitioner is ready to contest the enquiry and further action if any taken by the respondents. Accordingly, without commenting or adjudicating the merits of the case, we are of the view that instant petition against show cause notice is not maintainable hence is dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
235 Cr.Bail 631/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Noor Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
236 Const. P. 5455/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inayatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 Yes The petitioner has challenged the notification dated 02.09.2021, in respect of his posting and transfer order as Principal (BS-20) National AGRO Technical Training Centre Hyderabad on the ground, inter alia, that the impugned notification was issued to post him under the junior officer--We are of the view that Article 212 of the Constitution ousts the jurisdiction of this Court in respect of the matters about terms and conditions of Civil Servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
237 Const. P. 5281/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ayaz Ahmed and Othes (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 Yes relieving letters of employer (SSGC Limited/respondents No.2 and 3) is against the spirit of the judgment and that paragraph 61 of the judgment cannot be treated as against the petitioners, hence SSGC has taken wrong decision in interpretation of that judgment--It is settled principle of law that promulgation of Ordinances are passed only when the assembly is not in session. The Ordinances are meant to deal with a situation of emergency required to be endorsed by the Assembly--Without prejudice to the above, it may safely be added that interpretation may be done of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court but such course would not be available when the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is being challenged while referring to interpretation thereof by this Court. If such view is allowed to hold the field, the same shall open the rooms for making a challenge to consequences of judgment(s) of Honourable Apex Court which, we would insist, may prejudice the binding effect thereof, as insisted by Article 189 of the Constitution. In the instant matter, the authority claims to have passed the order in compliance of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court. The legal position, being so, leave us with no other option but to add that appropriate remedy to challenge the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is only by approaching the Apex Court. The instant petition, being incompetent, is dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5610/2021 Ayaz Ahmed Mahar and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 09-Dec-21) at 11:30 a.m.
238 Const. P. 2135/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noman Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 Yes Sindh Education Foundation --we conclude that there is no illegality, infirmity, or material irregularity in the impugned letters dated 06.02.2020 & 30.11.2020 issued by the respondent-SEF. Besides, the issue of continue in service, since he is facing the NAB reference based on moral turpitude, thus we cannot order the competent authority to continue his service. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
239 Const. P. 2363/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imtiaz Ali Isani (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
240 Const. P. 2201/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Asif Ansari and Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Televison Corp. and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-JUN-21 Yes the foremost questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the re-designation / induction of the private respondents as Producer Programs (G-5) was/is suffering from inherent disqualification under the PTVC rules, and whether the private respondents are holders of the public office, therefore, fall within the purview of sub-clause 1(b) (ii) of Article 199 of the Constitution and this Court has jurisdiction to entertain this petition? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1075-K/2021 Muhammad Asif Ansari & another v. Pakistan Television Corporation through its Managing Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
241 Cr.Bail 580/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Aslam Muhammad Bakhsh and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
242 II.A. 70/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mehfooz Ahmed (Appellant) VS Mst. Rehmat Begum & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
243 Const. P. 201/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Nabi Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
244 Const. P. 532/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arif & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
245 Const. P. 1174/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sikandar Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
246 Const. P. 1491/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Akhlaue Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
247 Const. P. 614/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mst:Akbaro (Petitioner) VS Appellate Authority Board Of Trustee E.O.B.I, & Or (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
248 Cr.Bail 2365/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 BASHEER AHMED S/O ABDUL WADOOD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.665/2021 of PS Ittehad Town, Karachi registered under Section 23(i) A of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
249 Const. P. 262/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
250 Const. P. 1655/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Junaid Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
251 Cr.Bail 729/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD UMER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
252 Criminal Miscelleneous 283/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHOSO S/O MUHAMMAD HASHIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes Obviously, criminal cases are decided based on the material so collected by the prosecution during the investigation, and the evidence recorded in the trial Court, and that too, after appraisal of evidence by it under the law applicable thereto. This Court cannot assume the role of an investigation agency or of a trial Court to deliberate upon the factual controversies involved in the present case in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 561-A Cr.P.C. This view has been consistently enunciated by the Honorable Supreme Court that High Court ought to refrain from exercising inherent jurisdiction, during the investigation of a criminal case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
253 Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Out of turn promotion, deputation and OPS Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
254 Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
255 Cr.Bail 1899/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
256 Civil Revision 165/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Suleman (Applicant) VS Murad Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
257 Const. P. 1913/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sindh High Court Employees C.Operative (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
258 Const. P. 441/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
259 Civil Revision 35/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Shamdas and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Hassan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
260 Const. P. 1028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
261 Const. P. 2507/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor Shaikhson (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 Yes the Sindh Consumer Protection Act, 2014 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
262 Const. P. 437/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Hawa & Ors (Petitioner) VS National Highway Authority & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
263 2023 SBLR Sindh 1299 Cr.Bail 1800/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 FAISAL MALIK S/O MALIK MUHAMMAD EJAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes seeking pre-arrest bail in FIR No.553/2021 of PS Darakhshan, District South, Karachi registered for the offense under Section 489-F PPC Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
264 Const. P. 2346/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mukhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Shoukat Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
265 Const. P. 3542/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s UBL (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Afzal Solangi and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
266 Const. P. 7329/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Freeway Heights (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
267 Const. P. 5987/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqar Ali Khoso and Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
268 Const. P. 6779/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Salman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
269 Const. P. 8567/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mahmood Zamir Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
270 Const. P. 4329/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ullab Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
271 Const. P. 2795/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
272 Const. P. 33/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Parvez Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-22 Yes the petitioner has called in question the vires of his posting order dated 01.01.2022 of respondent No.4 as Chairman Sindh Text Book Board (STBB), issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
273 Const. P. 888/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Prof: Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-22 Yes The Government of Sindh is directed to expedite the process by ensuring reconstituting of Search Committee within two months from the receipt of this order and shall also complete the process of interview of all the candidates afresh for the appointment for the post of Vice-Chancellor, University of Karachi, at the earliest. Meanwhile, the Search Committee (after reconstitution) shall send the copies of the original academic certificates/degrees/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for verification. The Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is directed to look into the academic qualification certificates/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents and after ascertaining genuineness or otherwise submit the report to the Search Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh in a sealed envelope within one month for further proceedings. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.392-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
274 Const. P. 5504/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zuhaib Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Chairman Sindh Serices Tribunal (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-22 Yes we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.832-K/2022 Zuhaib Hussain Soomro v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
275 2023 PLC CS 447 Const. P. 7528/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shahnawaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
276 Const. P. 6581/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Qamar ul Arafeen (Petitioner) VS The Vice Chancellor Karachi University and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
277 Const. P. 3791/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Shezan International Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.70/2022 M/s Shezan International Ltd, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
278 Const. P. 2966/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Urban Properties (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
279 Const. P. 27/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Nooruddin and 05 others (Petitioner) VS Federal Land Commissioner and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-22 Yes The pivotal questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the subject land surrendered under Martial Law Regulation (MLR) 64 of 1959, which was resumed by Deputy Land Commissioner (DLC) Hyderabad vide order dated 17.6.1959, and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners became Qabuli Land? And, whether Civil Suit No.40/1972 filed by respondent No.7 was rightly decreed vide judgment and decree dated 23.10.1974, and its viries, could be called in question in Constitution Petition, in the terms paragraph 19 and 26 of Martial Law Regulation-1972? And, whether the Chief Land Commissioner, Sindh could pass the order after the judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Qazalbash Waqf, to re-determine of holding declaration under MLR/115/72 and LR-II/77 after the surrender of the excess land by the declarant, its resumption by the government; and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners in the year 1959 and 1960? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1137/2022 Akhund Ghulam Muhammad through L.Rs and others v. Federal Land Commission, Islamabad through its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
280 Const. P. 5450/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Dadex & Eternit Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-22 Yes NIRC jursidiction Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
281 M.A. 3/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Shamim Bano (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
282 Const. P. 5636/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Asad Apparel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
283 Const. P. 918/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
284 Const. P. 2121/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 K & N Poultry Farms (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
285 Const. P. 6114/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sohail Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
286 Const. P. 214/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mateen-ud-din Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
287 Const. P. 1406/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Moula Bux Sahito & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1932/2022 Azeem Qadir and others v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4046/2022 Farzana Perveen v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4047/2022 Humaira Qayum v. Maula Bux Sahito and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed
288 Const. P. 1469/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 Allied Bank of Pak: and others (Petitioner) VS National Ind. Relation Commissio and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
289 Const. P. 830/1999 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1999 Haroon Rashild. (Petitioner) VS Fed.of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
290 Cr.J.A 57/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Hassan @ Ali Hassan and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
291 Const. P. 272/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Latif and Others (Petitioner) VS NBP and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
292 II.A. 55/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Samad through L.rs (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
293 I. A 56/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Govt. of Sindh & Others (Appellant) VS L.A. Officer & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
294 Const. P. 4199/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Gul Zareen Muniri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
295 Const. P. 1494/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ashiq Ali Narejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
296 Const. P. 3531/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Faisal Manzoor Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
297 2023 SBLR Sindh 1995 Const. P. 3035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kamran Ali Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
298 Const. P. 1693/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Amanullah Lakheer (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
299 II.A. 67/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Usman Soomro thr: L.Rs (Appellant) VS Abdul Razzak Soomro (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
300 Const. P. 2379/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Karam Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
301 R.A (Civil Revision) 38/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Wali Muhammad (Applicant) VS Secretary Health Depatt:and other (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
302 Const. P. 1785/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Majid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
303 Const. P. 4321/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zahid Akhtar Siddique and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
304 Const. P. 684/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ali Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
305 Const. P. 1372/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.941/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
306 Const. P. 5663/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mir Karam Ali Magsi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-22 Yes whether a person is legally qualified for appointment or promotion to a particular post and grade is relatable to the factum whether he possesses the requisite qualifications for consideration, whereas the question of fitness pertains to the competency of the person concerned, which is to be decided by the competent authority. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
307 Const. P. 838/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Farhan Khan Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
308 Const. P. 1364/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Yasmeen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
309 Const. P. 4009/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mr. Hamid Saleem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
310 Const. P. 1827/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Ilyas (Petitioner) VS C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
311 Const. P. 7084/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ahmed Gul & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
312 Const. P. 5703/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ali Haider and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
313 II.A. 44/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Riaz-ul-Din @ Rajab Ali. (Appellant) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
314 R.A (Civil Revision) 9/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Irfan Ali and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Tasleem and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
315 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1213/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 1214 of 2023 2023 The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. Taj Gasoline (Pvt) Ltd., Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-JAN-24 Yes Finding of fact recorded by Tribunal cannot be interfered with under Section 196 of the Customs Act Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
316 Const. P. 6365/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Naimatullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 Yes It is a settled proposition of law that the Government is entitled to make rules in the interest of expediency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee that has to determine the eligibility criteria for promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision-making of the Government the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted and no vested right of a Government employee is involved in the matter of promotion or the rules determining his/her eligibility or fitness. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
317 Const. P. 5270/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ejaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-FEB-24 Yes The perusal of Article 199 (b)(ii) of the Constitution shows that a person performing duties in connection with affairs of the Province could be required to show under what authority he is holding a particular public office and for that purpose, the petitioner therein may not be required to be an aggrieved person, however, in the instant matter the directions sought by the petitioner were not merely confined to the afore-referred aspect of the matter rather the same include the issuance of directions like the Writ of Mandamus and prohibition against the respondent No.5 requiring him to show his fitness to hold the promotion post in BS-21 without fulfilling the criteria as outlined in the recruitment rules as the matter of appointment of the post of Inspector General of Prison Sindh (BPS-21) is governed under the Recruitment Rules Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
318 Cr.Acq.A. 606/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MALIK FURQAN AHMED (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ANOHTER (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
319 Cr.Bail 2258/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHAIKH GHULAM MURTAZA ADV (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
320 Cr.Bail 325/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SIRAJ S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
321 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 633/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Director, I & I, Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s Smart Power System (Pvt.) Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-FEB-24 Yes initial burden of proof under section 187 of the Customs Act, 1969; discharge thereof; requirements Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
322 Cr.Bail 734/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 ATEEQ AHMED KHAN S/O SHAMIM AHMED KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
323 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1520/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 1521 of 2023 2023 The Collector, Collectorate of Customs, Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s. Frontier Waziristan Shell Petr. Services &ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-24 Yes period provided under section 179(3) of the Customs Act 1969 for passing an Order is mandatory and not directory Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
324 Cr.Bail 1121/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB & ANR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
325 Const. P. 693/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Malik Irfanullah Aman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
326 Const. P. 7004/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Umer Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
327 Const. P. 6788/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 DR. SALMA KAUSA ALI (Petitioner) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.427-K/2017 Muhammad Ali Abbasi v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
328 2018 PLC (CS) Note 129 Const. P. 4479/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.536-K/2017 Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
329 2019 PLC (CS) 1084 Const. P. 253/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Faraz Sherwani and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.70-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Asif and another,C.A.1000/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others,C.P.2215/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be heard a/w C.A.816/2020 out of C.P.1771/20 after 3 months.
330 Const. P. 8533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Toufiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
331 2019 PLC (CS) 1324 Const. P. 608/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sajjad Hussain And ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.610-K/2018 The Chairman Port Qasim Authority Bin Qasim and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Ports and Shipping and others,C.A.74-K/2018 The Chairman Port Qasim Authority Bin Qasim and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Ports and Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
332 2018 CLC 50 Const. P. 1456/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Zia Abbas (Petitioner) VS Mst.Mahiya and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
333 2018 MLD 832 Cr.Bail 977/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD YOUNUS S/O SHAMSUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
334 Cr.Bail 1731/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) VS the State (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
335 Cr.Bail 94/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Deedar Ali son of Allah Bux Lakho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
336 Const. P. 1134/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Fatima (Petitioner) VS Vice Chancellor, Peoples University of Medical (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
337 2023 SBLR Sindh 1493 Const. P. 1375/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.410-K/2019 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy/Irrigation Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
338 Const. P. 1096/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
339 Const. P. 2343/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Muhammad Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.205-K/2013 Muhammad Sarwar v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.257-K/2013 Muhammad Sarwar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed
340 Cr.Bail 102/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Rehman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
341 Const. P. 357/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ishrat (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
342 Const. P. 2837/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mitho and others (Petitioner) VS Ashique Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1634/2019 Ashique Ali & others v. Mitho (decd) thr LRs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
343 Const. P. 3172/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Husan Nayab (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
344 Const. P. 1016/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Nadeem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
345 Const. P. 5250/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ziauddin Sabir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
346 2018 SBLR Sindh 128, 2019 PLC (CS) 2013 Const. P. 1377/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Akmal Hussain (Petitioner) VS Secretary Establishment Government of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.14-K/2018 Akmal Hussain v. The Secy: Estabishment Div. Govt. of Pakistan, Islambad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
347 I. A 11/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh through Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Ashrafuddin & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
348 I. A 12/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh through Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Islamuddin & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
349 Const. P. 1498/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ashfaque Ahmed Rajpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
350 Const. P. 740/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 DR. Mazhar Ali Hisbani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
351 Const. P. 1724/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Raja Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.293-K/2019 Raja Mushtaq Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deptt:Govt. of Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
352 Const. P. 3651/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saleem Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
353 Cr.Acq.A. 28/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Erum Abdul Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Hayat & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
354 Const. P. 2083/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Farhana Mansoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
355 Const. P. 1250/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
356 Const. P. 6352/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faheem Ahmed Attari and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
357 2018 PLC (CS) Note 64 Const. P. 4445/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Aftab Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1906/2017 Aftab Ali v. Federation of Pakistan, thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
358 Const. P. 1498/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.M.Appeal.12/2019 Ali Akbar v. Secretary, Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
359 Const. P. 1119/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nasira Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Chairman Executive Committee & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
360 Cr.Misc. 36/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MUHAMMAD YAQOOB (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE S.B.A & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
361 Const. P. 1179/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Anwar (Petitioner) VS Fed:of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
362 Const. P. 5818/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Nasir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.298-K/2015 Noor Jahan Mangi v. National Accountability Bureau Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
363 Const. P. 62/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
364 Const. P. 3330/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Kishore Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
365 Const. P. 3577/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Rizwan Ali Kazmi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
366 Const. P. 5645/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Waqas Khan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
367 Const. P. 488/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Aftab Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
368 Const. P. 785/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pakistan Telecome Mobile (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Idrees Hadi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
369 Const. P. 787/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M. Imran Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
370 Const. P. 8518/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Munner Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3793/2018 Muneer Ahmed & another v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
371 2019 CLC 1670 H.C.A 317/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mussawar Ali (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
372 Const. P. 1174/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.384-K/2019 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
373 Const. P. 4027/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Saddam Hussain Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.111-K/2019 Mohsin Mushtaq & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
374 Const. P. 1231/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faraz Akhtar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.118-K/2019 Faraz Akhtar Ali & another v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
375 Const. P. 4577/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Salam International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
376 H.C.A 195/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Tauheed Khan (Appellant) VS The Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
377 Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-20 Yes Contempt--Primarily substantial compliance of the judgment passed by this Court has been made. Prima-facie, the question of not considering some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved petitioners to avail their remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondents, if any, for the reasons that the respondent-department was directed to take a fresh decision for regularization of their service, without any discrimination, in accordance with law subject to the budgetary sanction, qualifications, and eligibility of the petitioners, which compliance report has now been submitted. Prima-facie the reasons assigned in the aforesaid report cannot be dilated upon for and against in contempt proceedings. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
378 Const. P. 3316/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Indus Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3239/2018 Indus Dyeing & Maufacturing Co. Ltd v. Government of SIndh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Recource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.93-K/2019 Indus Dyeing & Maufacturing Co. Ltd v. Government of SIndh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Recource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
379 Const. P. 4389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Lutfullah Kalhoro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
380 Cr.Bail 614/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD SOHAIL S/O KHALIL AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
381 Const. P. 7995/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Razia Sultana Tahir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakista and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.204/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & another v. Razia Sultana Tahir,C.A.1294/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & another v. Razia Sultana Tahir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned (Next Hearing: Week commencing 11-Mar-24)
382 Const. P. 855/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Hantex (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
383 Const. P. 5326/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Nazeer Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
384 Const. P. 37/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Mithal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
385 Const. P. 143/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mujib ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1154-K/2018 Mujib-ul-Islam v. Province of Sindh thr.Chief Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
386 Const. P. 6006/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Manthar Ali Zardari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3524/2017 Manthar Ali v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi & another,C.A.1594/2017 Manthar Ali v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
387 Const. P. 2082/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Brigadier (R) Kamran Jalil (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.490-K/2021 Brig (R) Kamran Jalil v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
388 Const. P. 6546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bheru Lal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
389 Const. P. 284/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Roshan Ali Dero (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
390 Const. P. 1643/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Mirza Hassan Ali (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills Corp. & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
391 Const. P. 2773/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Khushnood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
392 Const. P. 783/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govr. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2967/2018 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.70-K/2019 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
393 Const. P. 479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Phoenix Security Services (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2970/2018 M/s Phoenix Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.73-K/2019 M/s Phoenix Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
394 Const. P. 875/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mirza Ashfaque Ahmed Baig (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
395 2018 MLD 1085 Const. P. 510/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Moinuddin (Petitioner) VS Rashid Khan and 3 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.490-K/2016 The Province of Sindh and others v. Dost Muhammad Chandio Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
396 2019 PLC (CS) 817 Const. P. 5307/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Nazima Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
397 2018 YLR Note 79 Cr.Bail 651/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD AMIN S/O SHAMIM AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
398 Const. P. 1443/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Najeeb ur Rehman Jakhrani. (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.81-K/2018 Mir Najeeb-ur-Rehman Jakhrani v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
399 2018 PCr.LJ 1027 Cr.Rev 156/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 QABIL KHAN S/O SAHAB KHAN (Applicant) VS THE 5TH ADDL.S.J. SOUTH KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
400 2019 PLD SC 710, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 118 Const. P. 4177/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Parveen Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.664-K/2017 Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
401 2019 PLC Lab. 63 Const. P. 635/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/S Gerry (Petitioner) VS Learned Member NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.86-K/2018,C.P.84-K/2018,C.P.88-K/2018,C.P.83-K/2018,C.P.87-K/2018,C.P.85-K/2018 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
402 2019 PLC Lab. 233 Const. P. 6548/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bibi Hajra (Petitioner) VS The Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1501-K/2021 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. Bibi Hajra & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
403 Const. P. 7177/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Dawn Impex Traders (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
404 Const. P. 1309/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Multinational Exports (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
405 Const. P. 453/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Akram Anjum Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
406 2018 MLD 563 Cr.Bail 975/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 ZEESHAN @ SHANI S/O SULEMAN @ CHACHOO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
407 Const. P. 1662/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Uris and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
408 Const. P. 422/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Hafizullah & ors (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4655/2018,C.P.574/2019,C.A.1125/2019,C.A.1127/2019 SCP Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.
409 Const. P. 6498/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Shafi Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Abdul Qayyum Solangi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
410 Const. P. 4422/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Irtaza Raza Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.68-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
411 H.C.A 149/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS Inam Hafiz (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
412 Const. P. 2913/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Hi-Tech Packages (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
413 Const. P. 4527/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Zahra Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
414 Const. P. 8357/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Premier Towels (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
415 Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-SEP-19 Yes Review--The grounds taken by the Petitioner in the review application were considered at the time of hearing of main petition and the request of the Petitioner regarding the factum of non-statutory rules of service of the Respondent-corporation, which is basically a non-statutory Corporation and claiming that Respondent-corporation has statutory rules of service is not the correct legal position of the case for the simple reason that merely publishing the service rules of a non-statutory body in the official gazette does not make the rules statutory ipso facto which even otherwise requires approval of the Government-- We are not in agreement with the contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner for the simple reason that this Court considered the aforesaid submissions of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner at paragraph Nos.16 to 18 and gave finding on the issue which he is now raising in the Review Application. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
416 Const. P. 5447/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mazhar Ali Babar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-19 Yes whether the Civil Servants can file a Writ Petition by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court in respect of the terms and conditions of his service when there is a bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
417 Const. P. 3217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Muhammad Osama Shafiq (Petitioner) VS PEMRA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
418 Const. P. 1937/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
419 Const. P. 3205/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shafqat Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
420 Const. P. 2583/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
421 Const. P. 5632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Mohsin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 Yes Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
422 Const. P. 1177/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Perviaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
423 Const. P. 126/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imran Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
424 Const. P. 643/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muazaffar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
425 Const. P. 1749/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 HuzoorBux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
426 Const. P. 2199/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
427 Const. P. 1141/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Umar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
428 Const. P. 1404/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Suleman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
429 Const. P. 1638/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Latif & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
430 Const. P. 1873/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mehnoon Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
431 2021 MLD 304 Const. P. 2385/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Qamar Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
432 Const. P. 87/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Fayyaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
433 Const. P. 399/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Salman Hussain Zubairi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
434 Const. P. 664/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Allah Bachayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
435 Const. P. 131/1993 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1993 Muhammad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
436 Const. P. 590/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Director School ducation Mirpurkhas & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
437 Const. P. 1639/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Shafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.M.A.2348/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others,C.P.3787/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered and also notice be issued,Disposed Disposed of
438 Const. P. 2304/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
439 Const. P. 1376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Soofi Ali Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
440 Const. P. 3199/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Anees Raja (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
441 Const. P. 50/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Junaid Muzahir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
442 Const. P. 1840/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Zahida Usman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
443 Const. P. 2634/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
444 2023 PLC CS Note 99 Const. P. 3218/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.739-K/2019 Zaheer Ahmed v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
445 Const. P. 3791/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
446 Const. P. 377/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
447 Const. P. 5278/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Waqar Haider and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
448 Const. P. 8579/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Abdul Basit and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.695-K/2019 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.24-K/2022 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
449 Const. P. 1627/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Meenhal & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
450 Const. P. 1923/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Jam & others (Petitioner) VS Abbas & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.546-K/2019 Muhammad Saleem and others. v. Muhammad Jam and others. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
451 Civil Revision 247/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Abdul Rehman (Applicant) VS Shafi Muhammad and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
452 Const. P. 3306/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
453 Const. P. 379/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
454 Const. P. 547/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Razia Rizwan (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
455 Const. P. 1683/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Raju (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
456 Const. P. 1827/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalid Javed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
457 Const. P. 2370/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
458 Const. P. 990/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Faqir Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
459 Const. P. 1596/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Umar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
460 2023 PLC Lab. Note 68 Const. P. 3065/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Rehan Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
461 Const. P. 4935/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asad Akram and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
462 Const. P. 139/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Sattar and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
463 Const. P. 1406/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Ilamzadi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
464 Const. P. 78/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sharoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
465 Const. P. 1708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
466 Const. P. 1067/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Hassan Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
467 Const. P. 1946/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
468 Const. P. 2768/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
469 Const. P. 3275/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
470 Const. P. 556/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Sadiq Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
471 Const. P. 2963/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS THE State (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
472 Const. P. 6955/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sidra Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-19 Yes whether in the appointment of Respondent No.3, the discretion was rightly observed or not by the Competent Authority. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
473 Const. P. 2941/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
474 Const. P. 1359/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sain Dino (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
475 Const. P. 1533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
476 Const. P. 3018/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nafees Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
477 Const. P. 1526/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nazar Muhammad (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
478 Const. P. 2034/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
479 Const. P. 3127/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Faiz Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
480 Const. P. 3147/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Javed Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
481 2021 CLC 19 M.A. 31/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi (Appellant) VS Arshad (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes In the light of decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee vs. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) and order passed by the learned Tribunal in the matter, I am of the considered view that the official respondents are under legal obligation to comply the directives of the Honourable Supreme Court passed in the cases of removal of illegal encroachment of amenity plots / public properties from its occupants Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
482 Const. P. 521/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rights Now Pakistan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
483 Const. P. 1857/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
484 Const. P. 2221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
485 Const. P. 3551/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Nabi Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
486 Const. P. 3063/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Jam Memon (Petitioner) VS Abdul Shakoorand others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
487 Const. P. 207/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Achar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
488 Const. P. 2955/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Faisaluddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.556-K/2019 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.44-K/2020 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned
489 Const. P. 504/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Syed Noor Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS The Learned Election Tribunal Ps 52 Umarkot (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
490 Const. P. 2576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes In view of the above discussion, the petitions are not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-CAA. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.449-K/2021 Javed Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
491 Cr.J.A 90/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ahsan @ Keso (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
492 Const. P. 554/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Phapo & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
493 Const. P. 791/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Qdir & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
494 Const. P. 918/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
495 Const. P. 667/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ashok Kumar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
496 Const. P. 876/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shakir Ali (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-20 Yes Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.736/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Shakir Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
497 Const. P. 617/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Boota and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
498 I. A 12/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aalam & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes The encroachment of amenity plot cannot be allowed to sustain under the law, which aspect, the official respondents have to look into and restore its position in accordance with law. The encroachment of an amenity plot to another use is treated as an abuse of discretion and therefore is unlawful for the simple reason that the paramount object of modern city planning is to ensure maximum comforts for the residents of the city by providing maximum facilities and that a public functionary entrusted with the work to achieve the above object cannot act in a manner, which may defeat the above objective and deviation from the planned scheme will naturally result in discomfort and inconvenience to others. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
499 Criminal Miscelleneous 427/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hamid Ali (Applicant) VS 1st Adj. S.J/Ex.Officio J.P Tharparkar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
500 Const. P. 197/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sht. Marvi (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
501 Const. P. 6066/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
502 Const. P. 3478/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1661/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Bashir Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
503 Const. P. 683/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr Muhammad Khan Shar & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
504 Const. P. 293/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Gulab Dewan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
505 Const. P. 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sikandar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
506 Const. P. 6431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Irshad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-20 Yes Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to submit before this Court on the next date hearing a list of all such employees of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh who were absorbed / appointed at any post and are still holding such post, and also the notification of repatriation of respondent No.7 to his parent department. Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
507 Criminal Appeal 45/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Bashir Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
508 Const. P. 1403/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Ali Dindo Channa (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
509 Const. P. 1738/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Nizamuddin (Petitioner) VS WAPDA, and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
510 Criminal Appeal 33/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ayaz alias Cottan Shah. (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
511 Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-20 Yes Employees of KDA whose pension and other post-retirement benefits have been stopped or delayed by KDA--According to the report, public notice in terms of order dated 19.03.2020 was published in newspapers on 27.08.2020 ; a total amount of Rs.234,749,894.00 is payable by KDA to its retired employees ; and, an amount of Rs.23,741,450.00, being 10% amount of the pension and post-retirement benefits, has been paid by KDA to its 988 retired employees. Learned counsel for the petitioners have expressed some reservations with regard to the contents of the above compliance report and state that the orders of this Court have not been complied with by KDA in letter and spirit. The above named Director Finance & Accounts KDA is directed to produce before this Court on the next date of hearing the complete bank statement of the bank account opened by KDA for the above purpose in pursuance of the order dated 19.03.2020. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
512 Criminal Appeal 52/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Meer Muhammad Umer (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
513 Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-20 Yes transfer and posting transfer and posting Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
514 Const. P. 8984/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Farzana Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner??? late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner??? late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1756/2020 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
515 Const. P. 5844/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Naeemullah Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-20 Yes Deceased quota latest Deceased quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
516 Const. P. 1562/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
517 Const. P. 5503/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Ahad Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.793-K/2022 Abdul Ahad Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
518 Const. P. 2/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Salman Bari S/o Abdul Bari (Petitioner) VS Samia Khan and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JAN-21 Yes Under Article 199 of Constitution, Petitioner seeks recall of order dated 01.12.2020, whereby non-bailable warrants (NBWs) was issued against the petitioner-- Section 51, CPC-- In the present case, the petitioner has specifically, pleaded that he had already paid a partial payment of Rs.2,71,000/- (Rupees Two Lac and Seventy-One Thousand) to the private respondent vide statement dated 10.11.2020 (available at page 73 of memo of petition) and undertake to pay the remaining amount within a reasonable time as per his financial position-- In the light of the aforesaid legal position of the case and an undertaking of the petitioner, the operation of NBWs issued against him by the learned trial Court is converted into BWs, enabling him to furnish security / appropriate bond equivalent to the remaining amount before the learned trial Court. However, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on the next date of hearing and in case of failure, the order passed by the learned trial Court on 01.12.2020 shall be operative. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
519 Const. P. 5639/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Karim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-21 Yes promotion case Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
520 Const. P. 994/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. Guidance Schooling System Thr. M. Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Mst. Seema Mohsin and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JAN-21 Yes Rent matter-- In view of the above, no illegality is found to have been committed by both courts below. Writ of certiorari against the order passed in rent jurisdiction can be exercised only if the order is beyond the jurisdiction or patently illegal, which is not the present case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
521 Criminal Appeal 189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Azhar Ali & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
522 Const. P. 6622/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Javed Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Home Dept Sindh: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-20 Yes The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.380-K/2020 The Province of Sindh & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others,C.A.1192/2020 The Province of Sindh thr. Secretary, Home Department & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Dismissed
523 Const. P. 5578/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Anwar Hussain and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
524 Const. P. 828/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Shaukat Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
525 Const. P. 663/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Danish Sanober (Petitioner) VS KPT and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes KPT-Termination--Besides respondents have leveled serious allegations against the petitioner about his appointment at the back door, and subsequent involvement in criminal activities, his absence from duty due to certain political/ criminal activities as discussed supra. Keeping in view the above-mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, we do not see any infringement of the right of the Petitioner which could be called in question by way of Writ Petition. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
526 Const. P. 222/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Farhana (Petitioner) VS SSP Dadu and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
527 Const. P. 529/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Omer Shah (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
528 Cr.Acq.A. 37/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ramdas (Appellant) VS Sht. Aneeta & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
529 Const. P. 978/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
530 Const. P. 724/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Aslam Rana & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
531 Const. P. 827/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Irfan Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 Yes The petition thus does not require any consideration and indulgence and is accordingly dismissed along with listed applications. However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek appointment on differently-abled quota as and when the public notice is issued in the newspapers. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
532 Const. P. 528/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ashraf Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
533 Cr.J.A 222/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saleem (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
534 Const. P. 715/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 MUHAMMAD Juman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
535 Const. P. 438/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dheraj @ Wanio (Petitioner) VS Sht. Surma & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
536 Const. P. 4067/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Masood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
537 Const. P. 253/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Azma & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
538 Const. P. 961/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Rustam Ali (Petitioner) VS Dr Sikandar Ali & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
539 Const. P. 164/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Samia Gulzar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
540 Const. P. 534/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mehmood Akhtar (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
541 Const. P. 3247/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Prof: Syed Farhat Ali Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
542 Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-20 Yes Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of impugned Notification dated 21.04.2020 (page 37) shall remain suspended. To be listed on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. along with C.P No.D-6431/2019. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
543 Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-20 Yes Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. As an interim measure, respondents are directed to consider the case of the present petitioner for promotion strictly on merits and in accordance with law. In case, his case is deferred and/or rejected, the competent authority shall pass a speaking order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. To be listed on 07.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
544 Const. P. 6563/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mazahar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Senior Director Culture & Sports and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-20 Yes Contempt--This petition was disposed of vide order dated 11.12.2018 with direction to the respondent No.4 to process the case of petitioner in accordance with law and if he qualifies to be appointed / promoted subject to availability of the post, his case may be recommended to Metropolitan Commissioner Karachi for promotion strictly in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations--Therefore, at this juncture, no case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors is made out. Resultantly, CMA No. 7446/2019 is dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
545 2023 PLC Lab. Note 66 Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Zahid Hassan Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
546 Const. P. 535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
547 Const. P. 536/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
548 2023 SBLR Sindh 1992 Const. P. 1318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wasim Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-20 Yes the petitioner is seeking regularization of his service under section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 in Malir Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as MDA)--Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-6632 of 2019 and another connected petition vide common order dated 16.10.2020, therefore, this petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is disposed of in terms of the common order dated 16.10.2020, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust his remedy if any, as provided under the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
549 Const. P. 948/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Jhenwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
550 Const. P. 3234/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Habib ul Hassan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
551 Const. P. 234/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Hidayat Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
552 2022 YLR 450 Const. P. 28/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Arsalan Aijaz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sanober & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
553 Const. P. 3315/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Zarina Anwar (Petitioner) VS The Secretary M/o Education & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-20 Yes We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Secretary Education, Government of Sindh and Secretary Education Department Government of Punjab, jointly and severally, to pay all her perks and privileges to which she was entitled to by issuance of notification of her retirement, inclusive of her entire pensionary benefits within two (02) months and report compliance through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
554 Const. P. 103/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Anjleena (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Umerkot & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
555 Civil Revision 174/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Azizullah and others (Applicant) VS Zulifqar Ali and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
556 Const. P. 7576/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Badaruddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 Yes the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
557 Criminal Appeal 290/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
558 2023 PLC Lab. Note 78 Const. P. 6863/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
559 Const. P. 258/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
560 Const. P. 2328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Tanveer (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
561 Const. P. 3502/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Babar Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-21 Yes We do not agree with the statement of the learned counsel for the Petitioner on the aforesaid assertions for the simple reason that compulsory retirement from service is a major penalty under service jurisprudence and falls within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of the civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456] Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
562 Const. P. 2028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Abid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.470-K/2021 Muhammad Abid v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
563 Const. P. 5868/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Salman & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 Yes In view of the above discussion, we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore, and others Vs. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS and 29 others and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, NORTHERN REGION, ISLAMABAD, and another Vs. Syed MUNAWAR ALI and others (2017 P L C (C.S.) 1030). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts as Inland Revenue Audit Officer (BPS-18) with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3520/2021 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1919/2023 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 3 months,Pending
564 Const. P. 2124/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Star Denim Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-21 Yes petitioner-M/s. Star Denim Pvt. Ltd. is asking for setting aside of the impugned letter dated 10.03.2021, whereby Audit Officers of the Sindh Employees Social Security Institution (`SESSI`) attempted to visit the establishment of the petitioner to verify the Secured Workers engaged by for issuing the R-5 cards so they could get the financial / Medical care facility-- Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
565 Const. P. 3100/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-21 Yes whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
566 Const. P. 3969/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zain Suhail (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
567 Const. P. 219/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Asim Sualeh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 Yes Petitioner has assailed the vires of show cause notice dated 30.12.2016 issued by respondent-Port Qasim Authority (PQA), whereby he has been called upon to explain his position concerning his initial appointment as Deputy General Manager / Director in BPS-20 in PQA-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
568 Const. P. 1661/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Noor Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes WAPDA--Sindh Government--absorption--repatriation--since, he has been reported to have retired from service, during litigation; and, he has not joined WAPDA. Besides the notification of his repatriation has not been given effect. We may also notice that judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court does not apply to the retired employees as on retirement; as they do not affect the seniority, promotion, or any other benefit of the serving employees. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
569 II.A. 25/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Pakistan International Airline (Appellant) VS Suresh Kumar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.166-K/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation v. Suresh Kumar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
570 Const. P. 1215/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bansi Lal Malhi & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-21 Yes the common grievance of the Petitioners is against the issuance of notifications dated 09.12.2019 and 26.2.2021 by the respondent-Establishment Division, whereby the direction was given to the Police Service of Pakistan Officers (PSPO), who were not pleaded as parties to the Petition bearing No D-1555 of 2021, serving in the Province of Sindh to report to the Establishment Division, basically they were also posted outside the Sindh Province----We may hold that Section 10 of the Civil Servants Act 1973, and Rule 10 of the Police Service of Pakistan (Composition Cadre and Seniority) Rules 1985, provide transfer and posting of the civil servants/PSP officers to different Provinces and the competent authority can withdraw any such officer of Federal government before the expiry of their tenure limitation, additionally, Rotation Policy cannot restrict the process of the competent authority from withdrawing any civil servant/PSP officer from the Provincial governments at any time on administrative grounds/ valid reasons. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1674-K/2021 Bansi Lal Malhi & another v. The Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
571 Const. P. 3386/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehreen Fatima and Others (Petitioner) VS Learned / Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 Yes It is pertinent to mention that services of the petitioners fall within the ambit of master and servant hence servant cannot compel the master with regard to his posting on the plea of wedlock policy as in field but that alone shall not be a reason and terms and conditions are to be followed. Without prejudice to the issue pending before the NIRC which presently is not available, at present we are not inclined to grant relief and stay transfer of the petitioners hence petition is dismissed. However petitioners will be at liberty to agitate their issue before NIRC as and when bench is available and this order shall not be used against them. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
572 Cr.Bail 184/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Bhano Khan Hattar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
573 Const. P. 6261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-AUG-21 Yes M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC"), has sought enforcement of the guidelines provided by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order dated 11.03.2020 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.4450/2019 (M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. Karachi v. The Registrar Trade Unions, C/o National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad, and others), to the Registrar, National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), for conducting the referendum with respect of determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC as provided under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012--we direct the Deputy Registrar NIRC to announce the result of the referendum for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC. However, it is made clear that, if any of the parties in the proceedings is aggrieved by the outcome of the result of the referendum, they are at liberty to avail and exhaust their respective remedies in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
574 Cr.Bail 252/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ahmed Ali @ Ali Bhutto and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
575 Const. P. 4668/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP D-1917/2017 attached 2015 Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 Yes Petitioner employers sought declaration that demand of contributions by the Federal EOBI under EOBI Act 1976 is illegal as EOBI became federal subject after 18th Amendment and subsequent Sindh EOBI Act 2014; Sindh Province did enact the Act 2014 but could not establish the Institution; CCI resolved EOBI shall remain with Federal Government. Held petitioners cant take benefit of dispute between the Federation and Province; priority must be given to the employees as the Old Age Benefit law is a beneficial law, aimed for the benefit of the employees therefore in case contribution amount is not received by the EOBI ultimately it is the employees who will suffer. Hence these petitions are disposed of in terms that petitioners shall deposit the contributions and other dues according to EOBI Act 1976; all amount deposited with the Nazir shall be returned in favour of the EOBI established under the EOBI Act 1976. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
576 Cr.Bail 285/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Suhail Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
577 Const. P. 5063/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Gul Ahmed Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Court of Commission for Worksmen Comp. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-21 Yes we decide this petition with direction to the Commission /Authority to frame legal issue with regard to jurisdiction, as stated above, particularly in paragraph-8 of the impugned order, and allow the parties to submit documents, including additional documents if not already filed, or lead evidence and thereafter finally decide the jurisdictional question Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
578 Const. P. 1736/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Akhlaque Hussain Memon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JUN-21 Yes whether the post of Additional/Assistant Advocate General could be filled amongst District Attorneys as per the Sindh Law Officers (Conditions of Service Rules), 1940 as amended up to date; and, whether between the notification dated 10.5.2016 bearing S.REG:1(22)2015/117 and notification dated 9.4.2018 bearing S.REG.4(07)/2018 which one is to prevail; and, whether the service structure for Deputy District Attorney and District Attorney in Solicitor Department, Government of Sindh needs to be streamlined ? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1633-K/2021 Amir Ahmed Kehar v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
579 Const. P. 3585/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 Yes termination--Sindh Madressatul Islam University Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
580 Const. P. 7700/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Husnain Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes Health Department, Government of Sindh, whereby the petitioners may be allowed to pursue their academic medical career subject to extraordinary leave (without pay) for the required period--At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners in substance has pleaded discrimination as they were not sent for training within time, however, he has seriously submitted that their other batch mates on the same consideration were considered and were sent for training and the petitioners were left out except petitioners No.6, 9, 10, and 14. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
581 Cr.Bail 242/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ameer Bux @ Luqoo Bangwar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
582 Const. P. 5467/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jamal Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 Yes Admittedly the petitioner is/was a civil servant and the question of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal under section 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1974, however, he remained silent for the considerable time and purportedly preferred mercy appeal for reinstatement in service in the year 2008 followed by another application in the year 2020. Besides that, the disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question under Article 199 of the Constitution to set aside the dismissal from service order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
583 Const. P. 1955/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Bashir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 Yes we direct the respondents that they shall constitute a fresh Board comprising of recruitment committee/Board and they shall conduct test in the applied Chemistry as well as provide ample opportunity to the Petitioner for an interview and shall pass a speaking order with regard to his regularization in case if he qualifies shall be accommodated within two months. It is pertinent to mention here that recruitment committee shall also examine the cases of the persons/employees who were batchmats of the petitioner were regularized; petitioner shall also be treated one same anology. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.939-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Zone-VI) v. Bashir Ahmed Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 12-Feb-24)
584 Cr.Misc. 193/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Manzoor Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
585 Const. P. 6218/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Faraz Ahmed Wajidi (Petitioner) VS Chancellor DOW University (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-21 Yes The caption petition has raised substantial questions of law involving interpretation of the certain provisions of The DOW University of Health Sciences Act, 2004 (`Act-2004`) and the Dow Employees (Service) Statute, 2007, and the principles governing the Writ of Quo Warranto as well as the power of the syndicate/competent authority of respondent-University to make a contractual appointment under the Act-2004 as amended up-to-date and Service Statute 2007--In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee of respondent-university ought not to be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the competent authority, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess the candidature of a candidate for regular appointment or on contract basis, on case to case basis. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2014 SCMR 157). In the instant case, prima-facie, the competent authority has assessed the candidature of the private respondents and appointed them in the respondent-university, which does not require interference at our end. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
586 Const. P. 1042/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 Yes regularization Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.429-K/2021 Muhammad Ahmed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
587 Const. P. 3668/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dadan Khan Pirzado and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-21 Yes Prima facie, the impugned order dated 04.8.2020 does not disclose the justiciable reasons for recalling the promotion of the petitioners, however, the respondents have reservations against such promotion of the petitioners which primarily needs to be looked into by the competent authority under the relevant law and this Court, at this juncture, is not a position to thresh out such allegations and counter-allegations so raised by the parties hereinabove under writ jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
588 Const. P. 1862/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Rao Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 Yes disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Police Department--Rule 3(a) (b) of the Sindh Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rule, 1988--disciplinary proceedings initiated against him which falls within the ambit of Section 3(2) of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1974 which provides that the tribunal shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of civil servants including the disciplinary matters. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
589 Const. P. 916/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Azra Khousar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
590 Cr.Misc. 445/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
591 Cr.Misc. 606/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD RIAZ (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL TANDO ALLAHYAR & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
592 Cr.Acq.A. 240/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 HUZOOR BUX (Appellant) VS PIR SIDDIUE SAJJAD GHOUS SHAH & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
593 Cr.Bail 2350/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SYED MUHAMMAD FARHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.473/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
594 Const. P. 466/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ajaz-ul-Haque (Petitioner) VS Mst. Urooj & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
595 Civil Revision 13/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Applicant) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
596 Const. P. 427/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Arsalan Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
597 Const. P. 974/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
598 Const. P. 2155/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
599 Cr.Bail 801/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 FAYAZ HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
600 Const. P. 517/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abid Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
601 Const. P. 1763/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
602 II.A. 3/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Abdul Samad Soomro (Appellant) VS Mst Nazir Bano and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
603 Const. P. 745/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Asma Hameed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
604 Cr.Bail 510/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Rehman and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
605 Civil Revision 122/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Haji Achar (Applicant) VS Qaisar Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
606 Const. P. 2380/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Khaliq (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
607 Const. P. 361/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
608 I. A 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Intra Court Appeal No.01 of 2019 [Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited versus Saleem Ahmed Memon] 2019 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Saleem Ahmed Memon (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
609 Cr.Misc. 93/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rehmeed Raja (Applicant) VS SSP SBA & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
610 Const. P. 962/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Syed Ashraf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
611 Civil Revision 173/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ahmed Khan & Others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
612 Civil Revision 116/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1998 Yousuf (Applicant) VS Muhammad Anwar (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
613 Const. P. 1163/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Altaf Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
614 Const. P. 3310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imamdin and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
615 Const. P. 1523/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
616 Cr.Bail 2170/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAHID @ BURGER @ BOSS & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-21 Yes seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.427/2021 for offenses under Section 397/34 PPC registered at PS Gizri Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
617 Const. P. 1995/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP NO.D-1995/2016 CP NO.D-2084/2016 CP NO.D-2085/2016 CP NO.D-2120/2016 CP NO.D-2121/2016 CP NO.D-2122/2016 CP NO.D-2345/2016 CP NO.D-2146/2016 CP NO.D-2148/2016 CP NO.D-2157/2016 CP NO.D-2269/2016 CP NO.D-2270/2016 CP NO.D-2302/2016 CP NO.D-2316/2016 CP NO.D-2355/2016 CP NO.D-2440/2016 CP NO.D-2606/2016 CP NO.D-2690/2016 CP NO.D-2729/2016 CP NO.D-2774/2016 CP NO.D-2803/2016 CP NO.D-2834/2016 CP NO.D-2835/2016 CP NO.D-2836/2016 CP NO.D-2837/2016 CP NO.D-2853/2016 CP NO.D-2909/2016 CP NO.D-3327/2016 CP NO.D-3521/2016 CP NO.D-3527/2016 CP NO.D-3791/2016 CP NO.D-3825/2016 CP NO.D-3870/2016 CP NO.D-4060/2016 CP NO.D-4219/2016 CP NO.D-5096/2016 CP NO.D-5121/2016 CP NO.D-5637/2016 CP NO.D-6680/2016 CP NO.D-6681/2016 CP NO.D-6996/2016 CP NO.D-803/2017 CP NO.D-2329/2016 CP NO.D-2337/2016 CP NO.D-2649/2016 CP NO.D-2792/2016 CP NO.D-4311/2016 CP NO.D-4369/2016 CP NO.D-4587/2016 CP NO.D-5636/2021 CP NO.D-7212/2016 CP NO.D-994/2017 2016 M/s Dairy Land (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes It is also, prima facie, evident that vires of the Act 2016 has not been challenged, but the notification, so issued under such Act, impugned. A challenge to application of notification only without assailing the vires of the Act under which the notification has been issued, legally, cant be made, particularly where things notified are with reference to the Act itself. On this count, too, the instant petition (s) are not tenable in law. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed with no order as to cost. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
618 Const. P. 356/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Syed Sharafat Ali (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
619 Cr.Bail 683/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Bahadur (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
620 Const. P. 1536/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 shafi Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
621 Const. P. 1227/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Imran Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
622 Const. P. 7271/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Urban Properties (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
623 M.A. 31/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Kirshan & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
624 Const. P. 3961/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Abbas Sangi & anoher (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-22 Yes In principle, the Courts cannot play the role of assessing body and sit in judgment over subjective evaluation; however, can examine whether the required objective criterion for promotion was followed or otherwise in a suitable case subject to grave illegality and perversity in the action of the authority having domain to the affairs Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.292-K/2022 Ghulam Abbas Sangi & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
625 Const. P. 2423/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Munawar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
626 Const. P. 6132/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Zubair & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
627 Const. P. 31/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Irfan Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of N.I.R.C & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
628 Const. P. 5975/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Toufiq Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Atomic Energy and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
629 Const. P. 659/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Pervez Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
630 Const. P. 4861/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hadi Bux Siyal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
631 Const. P. 6187/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
632 Const. P. 2145/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Hasnain Tanweer Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
633 Const. P. 4623/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 United Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
634 Const. P. 576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mahmood Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
635 Const. P. 2302/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s A & U Garments and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Paksitan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.90/2022 M/s Helix Pharma Pvt Ltd Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
636 Const. P. 2355/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s S. Abdullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
637 Const. P. 2782/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Sajjad Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-22 Yes the petitioners have assailed the suspension from service order, inquiry proceedings initiated by respondent No. 8, and subsequent issuance of show-cause notices to them by the Director-General (DG) SBCA without hearing them is illegal, unlawful, malafide, without jurisdiction and ultra-vires to the Articles 4,5,6,9,14,10-A of the Constitution and the provisions of Sindh Building Control Authority (Recruitment) Regulations 2017 read with Rule 5,6,7,8,9 and 12 of the Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
638 Const. P. 6587/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Zahoori (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
639 Const. P. 1134/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Trio Ind (Petitioner) VS Babo Sher and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
640 Const. P. 2606/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Saiqa Imdad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
641 Const. P. 196/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mst Balqees Khatoon (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Qubo Saeed Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
642 Const. P. 647/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shahid Habib (Petitioner) VS FUUAST & Othres (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
643 Const. P. 3036/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Shehroz and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
644 Const. P. 1813/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Naveed Hussain Tunio (Petitioner) VS V.C SMIU & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
645 Const. P. 741/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ali Jan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
646 Const. P. 5681/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Sohail (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
647 Const. P. 120/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mrs. Aseem Khalid (Petitioner) VS Secretary Schools Education & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
648 II.A. 16/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Pir Shahab Ghous Shah (Appellant) VS M/S Matiari Sugar Mills Ltd (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
649 Const. P. 236/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Javed Iqbal Burqi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
650 Const. P. 5043/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Allah Bux Soomro (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
651 Const. P. 6939/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
652 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 412/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 494 of 2022 2022 Director, D. G., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyderabad. (Applicant) VS Liaquat Ali and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-FEB-24 Yes 2nd Proviso to Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, is not applicable retrospectively. Vehicles used in smuggling with false cavities and extra tanks cannot be released on payment of redemption fine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
653 Const. P. 676/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s Karachi Shipyard & Engineering (Petitioner) VS SLAT & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-24 Yes In principle cases in Courts are decided on the preponderance of evidence led in the case by the parties, and to reach a just and proper conclusion, the oral as well as the documentary evidence needs to be taken into consideration. But at the same time, when the matter comes to this Court in Constitutional Jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, it is not the domain of this Court to re-weigh or interpret the evidence and /or material produced before the forums below as this Court is not Appellate Court and under the Constitutional jurisdiction, this Court has limited jurisdiction until and unless the findings are shown to be perverse with jurisdictional defect. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
654 Const. P. 4216/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Habib Nasir Siddiqui and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAR-24 Yes Touching to the last proposition, it is well-settled law that a legislative act to nullify a judgment, without taking away its basis, is an impermissible exercise. Whereas in the present case, this Court in the case of Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and 28 others as discussed supra, directed the Competent Authority for inclusion of Orderly Allowance in pensionable; emoluments of the petitioners under law and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan, in the above-referred matter, as well as the observation made in the preceding paragraphs, however the respondent CAA without taking away the basis of the order omitted sub-regulation 10 of Regulation 46, which exercise amounts to nullify the effect of the order, which is not permissible under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
655 Cr.Bail 1090/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BABUL ALI S/O IQBAL & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
656 Const. P. 3764/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-APR-24 Yes Applicability of Section 10 of Civil Servant Act, 1973, appointment of a junior officer when no suitable person is available for promotion; held No; appointment set-aside Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
657 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 456/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. S.M. Traders (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-APR-24 Yes Import into Export Processing Zones; Section 79 & 32 read with Section 156(1) of the Customs Act, 1969 are applicable Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
658 Const. P. 3127/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Check & Watch (Petitioner) VS V/S SBCA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.6390/2021 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others,C.A.647/2022 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
659 Const. P. 7077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shahbaz Garment (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2873/2018,C.M.A.8722/2018,C.M.A.8723/2018,C.M.A.8724/2018,C.M.A.8725/2018,C.P.461-K/2019,C.P.462-K/2019,C.P.463-K/2019,C.P.464-K/2019,C.P.465-K/2019,C.P.466-K/2019,C.P.467-K/2019,C.P.468-K/2019,C.A.98-K/2019,C.A.99-K/2019,C.A.100-K/2019,C.A.101-K/2019,C.A.65-K/2019,C.A.102-K/2019,C.A.103-K/2019,C.A.104-K/2019,C.A.105-K/2019,C.A.106-K/2019,C.A.107-K/2019,C.A.108-K/2019,C.A.109-K/2019,C.A.110-K/2019,C.A.111-K/2019,C.A.112-K/2019,C.A.113-K/2019,C.A.114-K/2019,C.A.115-K/2019,C.A.117-K/2019,C.A.116-K/2019,C.P.469-K/2019,C.P.470-K/2019,C.P.471-K/2019,C.P.472-K/2019,C.P.473-K/2019,C.P.474-K/2019,C.P.475-K/2019,C.P.476-K/2019,C.P.477-K/2019,C.P.478-K/2019,C.P.479-K/2019,C.P.480-K/2019 SCP Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
660 2022 SBLR Sindh 1794, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 123 Const. P. 954/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Rehana Parveen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.354-K/2017 Ms. Rehana Parveen v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
661 2018 PLD Sindh 657 Const. P. 1837/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Arif Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.852/2018 Muhammad Arif Akhtar & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed.there is also a short order/CO by HCJ
662 Const. P. 825/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amir Bashir (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nosheen Fatima & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
663 2018 PLC (CS) Note 175 Const. P. 697/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sobia Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
664 Const. P. 1026/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Aurangzeb and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
665 Const. P. 8412/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muttahida Workers Front (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
666 Const. P. 196/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nayab Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hameeda Bano & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.460-K/2017 Nayab Ali v. Mst: Hameeda Bano and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
667 Const. P. 3607/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 abc (Petitioner) VS xyz (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
668 Const. P. 2342/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Feroz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.204-K/2013 Feroze Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.256-K/2013 Feroze Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed
669 Const. P. 1790/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Dodo and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
670 Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Raza Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Home Department, Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.382-K/2019 Salman Tahir and others v. Secy: Home Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
671 Cr.Rev 138/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Abdul Sattar (Applicant) VS Muhammad Azeem (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
672 Const. P. 77/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
673 Cr.Misc. 133/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aijaz Ali (Applicant) VS Deputy Inspector General of Police Shaheed Benazirabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
674 Const. P. 1952/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Ali Ammar Jafry and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.424-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited and another v. Syed Ali Ammaar Jafrey and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
675 Const. P. 6629/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
676 Const. P. 2161/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hanif and another (Petitioner) VS Rahim Bux and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
677 Const. P. 166/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-MAY-19 Yes Reverting to the plea taken by the Petitioner that other seven candidates were allowed to appear in the interview and he was left out. The aforesaid plea of the Petitioner cannot be considered as a valid ground to appear in the interview; therefore we do not see any discrimination on their part as discussed supra. The Petitioner has failed to make out a case on the basis of discrimination Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.390-K/2019 Sajid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
678 Const. P. 402/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Tahseen Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
679 Const. P. 31/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
680 Const. P. 75/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Amjad Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Arif & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
681 Const. P. 441/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Samiuddin son of Babouddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
682 Const. P. 2231/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Dawood Wagan (Petitioner) VS The province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-19 Yes In the light of foregoing, we have reached the conclusion that the amenity plots cannot be converted into either commercial or residential purposes and no encroachment can be allowed on the amenity plot as discussed supra. The report of learned Commissioner is very clear in its terms that no any amenity plot was found in existence in the housing scheme during the inspection, except one open plot of about 1200 sq.ft and a mosque about 2400 sq. ft. in Kehkashan Housing Scheme and Midland Bungalow adjacent with plot No.38 and 39, therefore, the objections raised by the learned counsel for the Respondents 8 & 9 on the site inspection report are of no consequence in view of the orders passed by this Court and Honble Supreme Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
683 Const. P. 3037/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Saifur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
684 Const. P. 3623/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Syed Deedar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
685 Const. P. 422/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Arshad (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
686 Const. P. 503/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
687 Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Peer Bux (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
688 Conf.Case 3/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Hassan alias Ali Hassan and others. (Appellant) VS Mst. Halima Chandio (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
689 Const. P. 1677/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
690 Const. P. 380/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
691 Cr.Acq.A. 8/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Nabi (Appellant) VS MST.BAGHAL & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
692 Const. P. 446/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoub Afridi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.221-K/2019 Muhammad Ayoub Afridi v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: Water & Power and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
693 2018 PLC (CS) Note 61 Const. P. 69/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Muhammad Arif & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-APR-17 Yes Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.541-K/2017 Syed Muhammad Arif v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.4581/2018 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of
694 Const. P. 75/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Huma Jokhio & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2980/2017 Oil and Gas Development Company (OGDCL) and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
695 Const. P. 2034/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mir Asghar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.413-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Mir Asghar Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
696 Const. P. 2980/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Dhano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
697 Cr.J.A 4/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Younis (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
698 Const. P. 1091/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Zahoor Khan and 101 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.414-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Zahoor Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
699 Const. P. 199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.167-K/2019 Ahsanullah Abro v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB and others,C.P.125-K/2019 Muhammad Ayaz Abro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
700 Const. P. 4335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-OCT-21 Yes we are of the view that this Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot interfere in the findings recorded by the competent authority of respondent-PTCL vide decision dated 25.07.2017 as we do not see any illegality, infirmity or material irregularity in its decision warranting interference of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
701 Const. P. 94/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1897/2019 Munawar Ahmed Narejo & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary School Education & Litracy Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
702 Const. P. 678/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Haji Dhani Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
703 Const. P. 3206/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Shaukat Saleem Akhund (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-20 Yes Applicant being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid departmental decision filed an application under Section 151 CPC (CMA No.4898/2016) for setting aside the Office Memorandum dated 08.01.2016. This Court, after hearing the parties on the listed application, vide order dated 26.01.2018, allowed the aforesaid application and declared the Office Memorandum dated 08.01.2016 being violative of the judgment dated 16.12.2015 passed by this Court--In view of forgoing discussion, the listed application is disposed of with direction to the Respondent-Pakistan Steel to calculate the service benefits of the Petitioner till his retirement and other benefits as admissible under the law and make payment of the same to the Petitioner within a period of (60) days from the date of receipt of this Order. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1070/2018 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi & another v. Shaukat Saleem Akhund & another,C.A.2028/2019 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi & another v. Shaukat Saleem Akhund & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
704 Const. P. 6933/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shahmir Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
705 2019 PLC (CS) 751 Const. P. 2520/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Faisal Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
706 Const. P. 5133/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Razzaque Umrani (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
707 Const. P. 1155/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Kashif Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS M/s Alternative Energy And ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
708 Const. P. 460/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s K.H Fama Textile Processing (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
709 Const. P. 791/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Aijaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1126/2019 Rana Ghulam Shabbir v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.
710 2020 SBLR Sindh 535 Const. P. 3467/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Shaista Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
711 Const. P. 4620/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nisra Ahmed Shaikh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
712 Const. P. 4250/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Jameela (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1454-K/2018 Mst. Jameela v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
713 Const. P. 3362/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1431-K/2018 Shabbir Aslam v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secy: Govt. of Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
714 Const. P. 6324/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Atta Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
715 Const. P. 1689/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Aamir Hashmi and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
716 Const. P. 4224/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
717 Const. P. 5141/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Gul Hassan Dahri and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
718 Const. P. 5504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Rehana Fayyaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
719 Const. P. 6818/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Tahira Tauseef and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commisison and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
720 Const. P. 1360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Adil Rashid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
721 H.C.A 376/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Bheru Lal (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
722 Const. P. 2117/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1995 Ansarul Hayue & Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Broadcasting Corp. & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
723 Const. P. 5987/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Sabrina and Ors (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
724 Const. P. 336/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
725 2019 PLC (CS) 1278 Const. P. 4930/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Musheer Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.263-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Musheer Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
726 Const. P. 5586/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohsin Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1605/2017,C.P.3666/2017,C.P.3674/2017,C.P.3665/2017,C.A.1600/2017,C.A.1601/2017 SCP Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed
727 Const. P. 2072/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Jawed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
728 2018 PLC CS 817 Const. P. 1267/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.558-K/2017 Zaheer Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.29-K/2014 Federal Board of Revenue and another v. Zaheer Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.651-K/2013 Federal Board of Revenue and another v. Zaheer Ahmed Kalwar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
729 Const. P. 965/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.325-K/2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
730 Const. P. 464/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Bari Textile Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
731 Const. P. 2281/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Anwar Textie Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3305/2018,C.A.94-K/2019,C.P.5413/2021,C.A.2867/2022 SCP Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
732 Const. P. 605/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 Mian Gul (Petitioner) VS Pak: Steel Mills Corp. and ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.307-K/2017 Mian Gul v. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
733 Const. P. 3954/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.887-K/2018 Syed Ishitiaque Ahmed Hashmi v. Province of Sindh thr. its Director General and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
734 Const. P. 3016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Fulcrum (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
735 Const. P. 7375/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Qaim Ali Shahani (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister Secretariat & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1474-K/2018 Qaim Ali Shahani v. Chief Minister Secretariat thr. P.S. to C.M. Govt: of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
736 Const. P. 4305/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Musarat Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
737 2019 PLC Lab. 140 Const. P. 78/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Fareed Bhatti and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.676-K/2018 M/s Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Ghulam Fareed Bhatti and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
738 Const. P. 3898/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sabir Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
739 Const. P. 3600/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M. Afzal Kauser (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
740 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
741 Const. P. 3907/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
742 Const. P. 4085/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Waseem Abbas & others (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.116-K/2019 Waseem Abbas & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
743 Const. P. 1766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s A.F.K Fashion (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
744 2020 PLC (CS) 326 Const. P. 7114/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asifa Jawed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
745 2022 PLC (CS) 833 Const. P. 2307/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-21 Yes commutation--recalculation--subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law, if the parties are so aggrieved against the calculation of the Nazir, they may take resort of the Court of plenary jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
746 Const. P. 964/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
747 Const. P. 1897/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Munawar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
748 Const. P. 280/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Pervaiz (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
749 Const. P. 920/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shaikh Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar Revenue Nagarparkar and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
750 Const. P. 2068/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Bishar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
751 Const. P. 2078/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hamid Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
752 Const. P. 2708/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mujtaba Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
753 Const. P. 2780/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Anwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
754 Const. P. 2731/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mustaqeem Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
755 Const. P. 5561/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ghulam Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
756 Const. P. 3130/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Faisal Mughal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.827/2020 Faisal Mughal v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Water and Power, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
757 Const. P. 1893/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Basit & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
758 Const. P. 681/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sher Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
759 Const. P. 2833/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
760 Const. P. 456/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.542-K/2019 Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
761 Const. P. 2550/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mohsin Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
762 Const. P. 1071/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
763 Const. P. 3069/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
764 Const. P. 159/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Haji Mohammad Saleh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
765 Const. P. 1771/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
766 Const. P. 2079/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sikandar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
767 Const. P. 3119/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ahmed Amin Brohi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.526-K/2019 Ahmed Amin Brohi v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
768 2020 PLC Lab. 145 Const. P. 3926/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 M/S Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Petitioner) VS Member, Sindh Labour appellate Tribunal & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.748-K/2019 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation v. Member Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
769 Const. P. 1885/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
770 Const. P. 3445/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 M. Fayaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
771 Const. P. 478/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Murtaza Soomro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
772 Const. P. 2452/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
773 Const. P. 84/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imdad Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
774 Const. P. 848/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
775 Const. P. 3146/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Lala Aijaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
776 Const. P. 43/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Samuel Parvaiz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
777 Const. P. 6070/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Niaz Hussain Awan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.513-K/2019 Niaz Hussain Awan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
778 Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes Contempt--Prima-facie the question of downgrading some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved persons to avail their respective remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
779 Const. P. 494/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Mardan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
780 Const. P. 298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
781 Const. P. 2347/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
782 Const. P. 2071/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mithal Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
783 Const. P. 3196/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Raza Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
784 Const. P. 136/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
785 Const. P. 1446/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Rehman Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
786 Const. P. 3742/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
787 Const. P. 2094/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mrs. Tanweer Baloch (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
788 Const. P. 1609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Inam Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
789 Const. P. 2078/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Chairman HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
790 Const. P. 2326/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Abbas Raza Talpur (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
791 Const. P. 2558/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Arbab Ali &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
792 Const. P. 1724/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Idrees Adil and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
793 Const. P. 6110/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Abid Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.539-K/2019 Muhammad Abid Shahzad v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.43-K/2020 Muhammad Abid Shahzad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned
794 Const. P. 7530/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shahana Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
795 Const. P. 633/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Israr ul Haq (Petitioner) VS Sindh Educational Foundation & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.533-K/2019 Israr-ul-Haq v. Ms Naheed Shah Durrani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
796 Const. P. 1185/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
797 Const. P. 3387/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
798 Const. P. 1268/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Allah Warrayo (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
799 Const. P. 83/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
800 Const. P. 1803/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Sohail Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
801 Const. P. 3808/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nazeer Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
802 Const. P. 129/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sultan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
803 Const. P. 721/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Irrigation matter Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
804 Const. P. 2644/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Ghafoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
805 Const. P. 3616/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Panhwer & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
806 Const. P. 2552/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulqarnain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
807 Const. P. 2999/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ramzan Solangi & others (Petitioner) VS Raza Muhammad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
808 Const. P. 221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
809 Const. P. 1578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
810 Const. P. 1761/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Anwar Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
811 Const. P. 2859/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Masood Aslam Jat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
812 Const. P. 2574/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Nabi & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
813 Const. P. 2114/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
814 Const. P. 5410/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
815 Const. P. 6589/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Mehreen Safdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1802/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Mehreen Safdar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
816 Criminal Appeal 281/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalil-ur-Rehman alias Bholoo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
817 Const. P. 1573/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
818 Const. P. 4906/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-20 Yes The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
819 Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-20 Yes Differently abled persons' plea for appointment in the quota reserved for such persons--We are of the view that the Chief Secretary Sindh, being the senior most officer in the Province, would be the most suitable person to oversee the entire process under his personal supervision in order to ensure not only the compliance of this Court's orders, but also to conclude the exercise in relation to those petitioners whose cases have not yet been considered and/or finalized--To ensure that appointment orders are received by all the 102 (81 + 21) petitioners, before the next date of hearing, who have been already recommended for appointment --To ensure that cases of all such petitioners in these petitions, that have not yet been considered and/or finalized, are considered on merits, strictly in accordance with law, and after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to them a speaking order is passed by the competent authority before the next date of hearing in relation to every such petitioner who is rejected for appointment --To ensure that all those petitioners who have been or will be recommended and have been / will be issued appointment orders are allowed to join their duties before the next date of hearing after completion of all codal formalities--To communicate this order to all the relevant departments and their Secretaries with direction to ensure implementation and compliance thereof in letter and spirit within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
820 Cr.Bail 1423/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 BACHAL MALLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
821 2022 CLC 1447 Const. P. 309/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Learnd Family Judge Tando Adam & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
822 Criminal Appeal 104/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Akram (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.314/2020 Muhammad Akram v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
823 Const. P. 36/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Mumtaz Ali. (Petitioner) VS Secretary to the Govt Of Pakistan and Others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
824 2023 YLR 12 II.A. 58/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: II.A S 60/2019 2019 Balach (Appellant) VS Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
825 Const. P. 723/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Farooqu-e-Azam & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
826 R.A (Civil Revision) 56/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Wahid (Applicant) VS Punhoon (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
827 R.A (Civil Revision) 217/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) VS Haresh Kumar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
828 Const. P. 747/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
829 Civil Revision 115/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Hashim (Applicant) VS Daim thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
830 Cr.J.A 58/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Subhan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
831 Const. P. 8063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hafiz Muhammad Tabish (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-20 Yes we are of the considered view that merely obtaining acquittal from a criminal case is no ground to take benefit to bypass the disciplinary proceedings. Since the show cause was issued against the petitioner and he replied and it is for the respondent-KPT to decide in accordance with law for which this Court is not required to show indulgence in the matter under Article 199 of the Constitution to set-aside the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him--we do not see any infringement of the right of the Petitioner which could be called in question by way of Writ Petition. It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During the course of arguments, we have been informed that petitioners service has been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
832 Const. P. 3215/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Majid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
833 Criminal Appeal 89/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Paryal @ Haji (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
834 Const. P. 7450/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-20 Yes I. Whether respondent No.4 can hold the charge for the post of Director I.T. in BPS-18 under the law? II. Whether respondent No.4s case falls within the ambit of Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.594-K/2021 Mst.Tabassum Abbasi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
835 Const. P. 6868/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Arsalan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-20 Yes the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.369-K/2020 Muhammad Saleem v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
836 Const. P. 85/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
837 Const. P. 4483/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corp Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
838 Const. P. 2882/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
839 Const. P. 2536/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Raza Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
840 Const. P. 3454/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Attaullah Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-20 Yes We are not impressed with the analogy as put forward by him for the reasons that departmental action against the petitioner having been initiated during his service independently of a criminal case registered against him. Merely obtaining an acquittal order in a criminal case would not nullify the departmental proceedings at this stage after his retirement. Since PSB-I did not consider his case for promotion and in the meanwhile, he stood retired from service, no benefit of Rule 7-A of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974, could be given to him after he retired from service in the year 2017--Dismissed Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.307-K/2021 Attaullah Bhutto v. Province of Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
841 Const. P. 6046/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Mustafa Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-20 Yes The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. The disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3452/2020 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
842 Const. P. 5723/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-20 Yes water tankers / business--it is the basic duty of the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board to supply water to the citizens of Karachi. When Karachi Water & Sewerage Board was / is unable to meet the water needs of the city of Karachi, a water tanker mafia had sprung up in Karachi. During the argument, we have been informed that there is certain direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the closing of illegal hydrants from Karachi city. Prima-facie, the Management of KW&SB has failed to remove illegal hydrants operating in the city despite Honorable Supreme Court directions. Moreover, the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan had directed the Management of KW&SB to focus upon their core operations to provide portable water via a regular distribution network. Even, if hydrants are needed, there should be a rational and scientific study to evaluate the need for hydrant services in water-scarce areas. The hydrant services preferably should supply water to improvised population. On the aforesaid proposition, this Court has already settled the issue in the case of Muhammad Rafique Sia vs Province of Sindh and others, 2016 CLC 170. Besides that, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in HRC No.28963/2014 directed the respondents to take action against illegal and unauthorized hydrants--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
843 Const. P. 2157/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kashmir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
844 Const. P. 5203/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Khalid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
845 Const. P. 1194/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.442-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary & another v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi & others,C.P.1840/2020 Aijaz Ali Sahto thr. University & Board Department of the Province fo Sindh and others v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
846 Const. P. 96/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Rozina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
847 Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-20 Yes Basically, the petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in BPS-05 on 02.12.1980 and his grade was enhanced and placed in BPS-06 vide office order dated 27.10.1985. Prima-facie, his juniors have been promoted in various grades whereas the petitioner has been ignored without disclosing his ineligibility or otherwise. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
848 Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 Yes Perusal of above reflects that the word consider within adjudication made by this Court amounts approval to be promoted, hence, concerned Authority has already recommended the case for approval, therefore, the petitioners case shall be approved as per recommendations within 15 days with compliance report. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
849 Const. P. 2268/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Akbar Leghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.383-K/2020 Ali Akber v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
850 Const. P. 804/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Siddique and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
851 Const. P. 797/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Gulzar Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
852 Const. P. 381/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hyderabad Railway Cantt: Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
853 Const. P. 4890/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Garibdas (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-20 Yes It is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, competent authority and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court. With the above observations and direction, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Let notice be issued for compliance to the Chief Secretary Sindh and the Secretaries of all the departments of the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
854 Const. P. 2115/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mansoor and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
855 Const. P. 5931/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imtiaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-20 Yes Actualization of promotion in BPS-19 and posting--The transfer and posting of a civil/government servant is prerogative of the Government, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, petitioner is under obligation to serve anywhere in the province, he has no vested right to remain at particular post for indefinite period, therefore the petitioner cannot ask for posting at particular place. Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
856 Criminal Appeal 106/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Latif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
857 Const. P. 940/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Haroon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
858 Const. P. 3479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Irfanullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years??? service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1662/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Irfan Ullah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
859 Const. P. 315/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Sheroz Kamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-21 Yes Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no appointment order had been issued, thus no vested right has accrued in favour of the petitioner. It is well-settled law that even a successful candidate does not acquire an indefeasible right to be appointed and that it could be legitimately denied. The notification inviting application for the appointment has been held only to be an invitation to the qualified candidates to apply for the recruitment. On his mere applying or offer/selection, he does not acquire any right to the post. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
860 Const. P. 173/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
861 2022 PLC (CS) 307 Const. P. 6948/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Anis Haroon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes i) Whether the post of Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations is to be filled amongst the career foreign service officers or eminent personalities from business, media, law, and other areas on a contract basis ; ii) Whether the Prime Minister of Pakistan is the competent authority under Rule 15(1)(g)(h) of the Rules of Business, 1973 or the Federal Cabinet under Article 90 of the Constitution of Pakistan to make such appointment ; and, iii) Whether appointments on a contract basis are prohibited under or contrary to Section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and the Policy unless the conditions specified therein are satisfied? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
862 Criminal Appeal 38/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Karim Bukhsh and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
863 Const. P. 5571/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Majeedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS KW & SB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-20 Yes correctio in date of birth Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
864 Const. P. 3363/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
865 Const. P. 8033/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1439-K/2020 Muhammad Ayub Panhwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
866 Const. P. 348/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Jannat Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
867 Const. P. 7112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Ahmed Butt (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shaheen Afroz and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 Yes Family Pension Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
868 Const. P. 9013/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raja Naved Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-20 Yes fake appointment--Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Honble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
869 Const. P. 2216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ashraf Khatti and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 Yes Contempt Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
870 Const. P. 5646/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sahiba (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
871 Const. P. 7520/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Sect: Local Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-20 Yes The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
872 F.R.A 82/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1985 Shahzaman (Appellant) VS Haji Ghulam Hyder & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
873 Civil Revision 178/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ghulam Hyder and 10 others (Applicant) VS Zulfiqar Ali and 13 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
874 Const. P. 5909/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sajid Jalil (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-20 Yes It is a well-settled proposition of law that the Competent Authority is entitled to make rules in the interest of exigency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision making of the Respondent-Bank and the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted as no vested right of a Bank employee is involved in the matter of promotion, or the rules determining their eligibility or fitness, and in Bank Cases, the High Court has no jurisdiction through Writ to strike it down, except in the cases in which policy framed is against the public interest. This proposition of law has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in a plethora of judgments. Moreover, petitioner has not been able to point out any case where other employee(s), having rating equivalent to or lower than him, was / were promoted by the respondent-bank. Thus, prima facie it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination at least to the extent of the instant case. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.269/2021 Sajid Jalil v. National Bank of Pakistan through President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
875 Const. P. 537/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Said Fateh Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
876 Const. P. 190/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Darya Khatoon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
877 Const. P. 699/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nizam U Din Unar (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
878 2022 PLC (CS) 1266 Const. P. 3854/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mst. Farah Naz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 Yes we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
879 Const. P. 4925/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nazir Ahmed Palijo (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 Yes In the light of the above discussion, it is demonstrably clear that the petitioner has not been denied or deprived of a legal right. He has not sustained an injury to any legally protected interest. The impugned working paper does not operate as a decision against him, much less does it wrongfully affect his title to something. He has not been subjected to a legal wrong. He has suffered no legal grievance. He has no legal peg for a justifiable claim to hang on. However the petitioner has only sustainable cause to be considered for promotion in BS-20 subject to qualification, experience, and availably of the post, however, the petitioner is not precluded to ask for consideration of his case for promotion as per Rule 13 of Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation, and Seniority) Rules, 1975 by PSB-I which is going to take place in the ensuing month. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
880 Const. P. 57/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghulam Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
881 Const. P. 4635/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Javed Raza Bhatti and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 Yes back benefits Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1262/2021 Javed Raza Bhatti and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
882 Const. P. 4596/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Employers Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 Yes Title Minimum Wages under the Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5863/2021,C.P.5800/2021,C.P.64/2022,C.P.1370/2022,C.P.6605/2021,C.P.6606/2021 SCP Pending Adjourned. Club with CA 952/18 etc,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
883 Const. P. 4848/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Tanveer Hyder Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes Prim facie, the petitioner has a qualifying length of service to his credit and he gave various reasons to claim the interest on the delayed payments. It is well-settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder---Thus, the competent authority of Pakistan-Railways is liable to release the withheld amount with profit and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 5.6.2017 to date. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
884 Const. P. 6243/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mehtab Ahmed Siddiqui and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 Yes The Competent Authority of HBFCL is directed to forthwith initiate the process for selection of an eligible person to be appointed against the aforesaid public office / posts in HBFC, inter alia, having regard to the principles and law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
885 Const. P. 4522/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Kh: Ghulam Ghous (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-21 Yes officers are posted on acting charge---Secretary Local Government says that he will examine the record as to whether Miss Shamona Sadaf is working in BPS-18 or BPS-16 till then he will relieve that lady and will not be posted on that post until the issue is resolved. In case, inquiry speaks that she is having BPS-18 or she is posted on same place on any other post and if she was working in BPS-16 and has been designated BPS-18, delinquent officers including that lady shall face the consequences to be carried out by the authorities. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
886 Const. P. 8948/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes Member of the Armed Forces--review petition pending before respondent No.1 may be ordered to be decided under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
887 Const. P. 3985/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aurangzaib (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-21 Yes the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
888 Const. P. 1435/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Qaiser Iqbal and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
889 Const. P. 4417/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-21 Yes that the petitioner has been placed on as an Officer on Special Duty (OSD) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5297/2021 Trustees of the Karachi Port thr. its Board of Trustees, Karachi & others v. Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
890 Const. P. 471/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Nasir Ali Zangejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 Yes Deceased Quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
891 Cr.Bail 205/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Nisar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
892 2022 PLD Sindh 131 Const. P. 166/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Fayaz Ali Mastoi (Petitioner) VS Assistant XEN Irrigation Shahdadkot & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 Yes Irrigation Water Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
893 Const. P. 4452/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-21 Yes Son Quota Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
894 Cr.Bail 24/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ali Hassan Jeho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
895 Cr.Bail 25/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Sultan Ahmed Rind and Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 Yes PROTECTIVE BAIL Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
896 Const. P. 4112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-21 Yes Petitioner seeks appointment in the Karachi University as Adhoc Teacher, based on differently-abled quota on the premise that he was/is a qualified and fit person to be considered for the subject post. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
897 Criminal Appeal 45/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Allahdad Waswano (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-JUL-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
898 Const. P. 1297/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Nadia (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-21 Yes under section 22-A & 22-B Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
899 Cr.J.A 62/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Sadullah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-JUL-21 Yes We have also observed that in case in hand the prosecution has failed to prove the safe custody of the recovered charas and its safe transmission to Chemical Examiner. The recovery of charas was allegedly affected on 20.10.2017 and the sealed samples were sent for chemical analysis on 23.10.2017; however, it is not known as to where and in whose possession the alleged samples were kept during intervening period. PW-1 Excise Inspector Gul Muhammad Bhutto, the complainant/ I.O has not furnished in his evidence any detail regarding safe custody of the alleged samples, therefore, no evidence is available in record to prove the safe custody of the recovered substance at the Excise police station and its safe transmission from said place to the office of Chemical Examiner. It has been held by the Apex Court in the cases of Abdul Ghani and others v. The State and others (2019 SCMR 608), Faizan Ali v. The State (2019 SCMR 1649), The State through Regional Director ANF v. Imam Bukhsh and others (2018 SCMR 2039), Ikramullah and others v. The State (2015 SCMR 1002) and Amjad Ali v. The State (2012 SCMR 577) that in a case where safe custody of the recovered substance or safe transmission of sample of the recovered substance is not proved by the prosecution through any independent evidence, it cannot be said with any degree of confidence that the prosecution had succeeded in proving its case against an accused beyond reasonable doubt. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
900 Const. P. 1662/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Nawaz Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes disposed of in the terms of paragraph 35(iii) of the judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by learned Sindh Service Tribunal maintained by the Honorable Supreme Court vide order dated 26.03.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.266-K and 1074 of 2016, resultantly the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA is directed to comply with the ratio of the aforesaid judgments in its letter and spirit and allow them joining from the date of their repatriation by the Sindh Government vide notification dated 5.7.2018 and the issue of their salary, for the intervening period, shall be decided by the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA accordingly within one month Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.542-K/2021 Muhammad Nawaz Soomro v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others,C.P.558-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Muhammad Nawaz Soomro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
901 Const. P. 5144/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dr. Iltaf Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 Yes they have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments/services be regularized in respondent-Water and Power Development Authority (`WAPDA`) without discrimination, with a further assertion that they have already served in WAPDA for a considerable period and they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis rather than joining fresh process with other candidates-- Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1519-K/2021 WAPDA through its Director Legal & others v. Dr.Haresh Kumar & others,C.P.1580/2022 Water and Power Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Lahore & others v. Dr. Altaf Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Pending
902 Cr.Bail 319/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Majid Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes For the above reasons, the applicant Majid Ali has made out a case for post-arrest bail in FIR No.42 of 2021, registered with Police Station Darri, District Larkana, for offenses punishable under sections 452, 376, and 511 P.P.C. Accordingly, the applicant is admited to post arrest bail; he shall be released in the aforesaid crime subject to furnishing his bail bond in the sum of Rs.50, 000/- (Fifty Thousand Ruprees) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
903 Const. P. 2217/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zeeshan Anjum and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-APR-21 Yes The main grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been declined without announcing the final merit list i.e. written test and interview--Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no offer of appointment order had been issued in their favor, thus no vested right had/has accrued in favor of the petitioners. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
904 Const. P. 6344/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Group insurance to employees of Government of Sindh, the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 and Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Rules, 1980, Boards for administration of the Funds, State life insurance corporation: Khyber Pukhtunkhwa Civil Servant Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation Act 2014, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation (amendment) Act No.V of 2016, judgment of the Peshawar High Court in case of Fida Muhammad Durrani and judgment of Islamabad High Court in case of Muhammad Rehan Khan; advice by Advocate General Sindh to the Government of Sindh with regard to amendment in existing law/rules. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
905 Const. P. 2593/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Rao Talib Hussain & anothers (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
906 Const. P. 640/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Gulji & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
907 Const. P. 907/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Nazim Taluka Municipal Administration Samaro & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
908 Const. P. 1102/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 MS Beenish Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
909 R.A (Civil Revision) 135/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Zakir S/o Abdul Malik (Applicant) VS Muhammad Faisal and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes In principle, the applicant has lost his case; and, at the revision stage, he has agitated the grounds already exhausted by him and properly adjudicated by the competent forum including the plea that the suit filed by the respondent was time-barred on the premise that he made last payment to the applicant on 12.8.2015 whereas, he filed his suit No.497/2017 for declaration, specific performance of sale agreement, permanent injunction and consequential relief on 24.4.2017 means 01 year, 08 months and 12 days Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
910 Civil Revision 232/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Applicant) VS Kazi Nisar Ahmed and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
911 Const. P. 217/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Agha Nisar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
912 2022 SBLR Sindh 1826 Cr.Bail 2327/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 RIAZ AHMED DAHIRI S/O HAJI NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes From the above discourse, primarily, the pre-arrest bail is extraordinary relief and can be granted only in exceptional circumstances, if there is mala fide of the complainant and police in lodging the FIR. Prima facie, there is no mala fide of the complainant to lodge the FIR of the incident against the applicant. Previous conviction of the applicant in a criminal case as discussed supra, disentitle him for extraordinary relief as provided under Section 498 Cr.P.C. Also, there is nothing placed on record by the applicant, which could show that the applicant has been acquitted from the aforesaid case by the learned appellate Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
913 Civil Revision 224/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 P.O Sindh and others (Applicant) VS Ahmed Nawaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
914 Civil Revision 154/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Province Of Sindh and Ors (Applicant) VS Jalil Ahmed and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
915 Const. P. 38/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Administrator Evacuee Trust property & Others (Petitioner) VS Pardeep Kumar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
916 2022 MLD 1315 Cr.Bail 698/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD ALI SOOMRO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
917 Const. P. 256/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Sajid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
918 Const. P. 386/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ahmed Nadeem Chohan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ishaque Khan & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
919 M.A. 88/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Iqbal Javed & Others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
920 Const. P. 6/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Asif & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes "Shifting of SABZI MANDI - MARKET COMMITTEE" Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
921 Const. P. 3207/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sardar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
922 Cr.Bail 2271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD TAHIR S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes post-arrest bail in FIR No.451/2021 for offences punishable under sections 269, 270 PPC & 8(i) of Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale & Use of Gutka and Manpuri, Act 2019 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
923 Const. P. 1894/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Ashraf Arain (Petitioner) VS Water and Power Development Authority (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
924 2022 MLD 1506 Const. P. 991/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Fatima Zehra D/o Zahid Abbas (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Sheroz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes The learned Civil & Family Judge shall fix any two days in a month for the meeting of father-respondent No.1 with the minor baby Dua, and in the meanwhile, petitioner-mother shall not take away the custody of minor out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights i.e. Birthdays, Eid occasions, and summer and winter vacations and arrangements shall be made by the learned Family Court upon filing appropriate application by the respondent-father and the learned Family Court would be at liberty to pass appropriate order on such application concerning the date, time and place of meeting of minor with respondent-father, however, that arrangement is subject to the observation made by this Court as discussed in the preceding paragraph and also subject to payment of maintenance of the minor, which has already been done by the learned Family Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
925 Const. P. 159/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sadam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-22 Yes whether the private respondents have the requisite length of service to claim promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (BS-18) in the PHED; and, whether the DPC considered the case of the petitioners along with private respondents for promotion under law and policy of the Government of Sindh as introduced in the year 1984 or otherwise Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
926 Const. P. 2197/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Javedan Cement Ltd (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-22 Yes Compensation instead of reinstatment Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
927 R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 The Islamic Repubilec Of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Rahim Bux & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
928 Const. P. 1165/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Haque and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Special Engineering Allowance of Rs.10,000/- as admissible to the graduate engineers i.e. B.E degree holders Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
929 Civil Revision 116/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2002 Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
930 Const. P. 1348/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
931 Const. P. 2269/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Gadoon Textile Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.154/2022 M/s Gadoon Textile Mills Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan, through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development , Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
932 Const. P. 629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Amanullah Brohi (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
933 Const. P. 7241/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Saleem Baloch and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-22 Yes In view of the foregoing, we find that a five-member Bench of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Gul Taiz Khan Marwat (supra) has decided the question of maintainability of a Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution against the administrative orders passed by an Administrative Committee or the Honorable Chief Justice of High Court. Besides that, all the legal grounds raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioners in the present petition have already been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid decisions as such this Court cannot further dilate upon the issue more. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
934 Const. P. 1312/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
935 Const. P. 3842/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Niaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Sect: School Education & Literacy Dept: & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
936 Const. P. 5282/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Sect: College Education Dept: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
937 Const. P. 994/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Haji Rafiuddin Waliuddin and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
938 Const. P. 2649/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Daniyal Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
939 Const. P. 7072/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Badar ul Haq Kandhro (Petitioner) VS Chairman Council for Work & Housing Research & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
940 Const. P. 128/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asad Ali Laghari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
941 Const. P. 4082/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Haneef (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
942 Const. P. 2148/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s OMI Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
943 Const. P. 1986/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Inayat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
944 Const. P. 2120/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 U & I Garment(Units 1-3) & another (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
945 Const. P. 5282/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Rashida Syed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-22 Yes It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
946 Const. P. 7272/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Union Properites (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
947 Const. P. 4800/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
948 Const. P. 579/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Faheemuddin Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
949 Const. P. 1786/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Nasir and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.263-K/2023 The Chief Executive Officer Pakistan Steel Mills & another v. Muhammad Nasir & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
950 Const. P. 1825/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naseem us Sami and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
951 Const. P. 6291/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
952 Const. P. 335/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Muhammad Masood (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
953 I. A 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Umair (Appellant) VS Zulfiqar Ail Shaikh & another. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-AUG-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
954 Cr.Acq.A. 174/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Noman Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
955 Const. P. 1171/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Muhammad Javaid Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
956 Criminal Appeal 107/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
957 Const. P. 4193/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Farzana (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
958 Const. P. 6360/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kamran Shamshad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
959 Const. P. 1354/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Nadeem Alam (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
960 Const. P. 5466/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Hujjan Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
961 Const. P. 2220/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Nadeem Akber (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-22 Yes whether the recruitment rules have been notified or gazetted--whether the competent authority is empowered under the Rules, 1974, to appoint civil servants from different departments of Government of Sindh to the Inspection and Registration of Private Institutions, School Education, and Literacy Department Cadre Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2287/2022 Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo v. Muhammad Nadeem Akber and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
962 Const. P. 6061/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Azra Parveen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-22 Yes up-gradation and promotion issue in NICH Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
963 R.A (Civil Revision) 95/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Sain Dino and others (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
964 Const. P. 528/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Naeem (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
965 Const. P. 1896/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jalal uddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
966 Const. P. 160/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Riaz Ahmed Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Auditor General of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
967 Const. P. 4106/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Inam and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
968 Const. P. 1214/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Mustafa & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-23 Yes Encroachment on amenity plot, no title document in favour,petition dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
969 Const. P. 4153/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Pakistan Beverages Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Afzal and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAR-24 Yes Section 12 of the Ordinance 1968 provides that no temporary workmen whether monthly rated, weekly rated daily rated or piece rated and no probational or badali shall be entitled to any notice if his services were terminated by the employer, nor shall any such workman be required to give any notice or pay wages in lieu thereof to the employer if he leaves the employment of his own accord. However, the situation is quite different than the permanent workman under Section 12(3) of the Ordinance 1968. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
970 Cr.Bail 510/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ABID S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
971 Cr.Bail 1622/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
972 Const. P. 7434/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Sami Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAR-24 Yes it is now well settled that if a person during the pendency of constitutional petition fulfilled the requisite qualification to hold such a post then writ of quo warranto could not be issued against such person as such Employees no more suffered disqualification to hold the post in question. On the aforesaid proposition the Supreme Court in the case of Asif Hussain and others v. Sabir Hussain and others Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
973 2019 PLC (CS) 1483 Const. P. 2508/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Aftab Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
974 2019 PLC (CS) Note 2 Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
975 Const. P. 4168/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Muhmmad Ali Asad (Petitioner) VS L.D.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
976 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-21 Yes recruitment process of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 and their participation in SPSC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
977 2018 PLC (CS) Note 115 Const. P. 6383/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imtiaz Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
978 Const. P. 4045/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Taj Rani (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.70-K/2018 Mst: Taj Rani v. The President National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
979 2019 SBLR Sindh 1861 Const. P. 4377/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Dr. Itrat Malik (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Co-opration & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2849/2018 State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Dr. Itrat Malik Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
980 2018 CLC Note 56 Const. P. 1784/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Indu (Petitioner) VS VIIth ADJ Karachi South & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.444-K/2017 Dr. Indu v. Additional District & Sessions Judge, No-7, South, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
981 2019 PLC (CS) Note 25 Const. P. 634/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M. Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
982 2018 YLR Note 82 Cr.Bail 888/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD AHSAN S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
983 Const. P. 5608/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mansoor ul Haq Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.859-K/2016 Pakistan Automobile Corporation Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: M/o Industries and Production and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
984 2020 PLC (CS) 1 Const. P. 571/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Mateen Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.653-K/2018 Muhammad Mateen Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
985 Const. P. 2899/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Yasse Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
986 Const. P. 7368/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Sindh Club (Petitioner) VS Asif Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
987 2018 MLD 1649 Const. P. 196/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nayab Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hameeda Bano & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.460-K/2017 Nayab Ali v. Mst: Hameeda Bano and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
988 2018 CLC Note 51 Const. P. 1368/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Niaz Hussain Shah S/o Shah Hussain (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samina Iqbal & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
989 Const. P. 3232/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muzaffar Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2945/2018 Secretary Ministry of National Food, Security & Research Department, Islamabad and others v. Muzaffar Iqbal Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
990 Const. P. 1503/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Tariq Mustafa (Petitioner) VS National Insurance Corporation Limited (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
991 2018 YLR 1695 Cr.Acq.A. 252/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 State through Prosecutor General Sindh (Appellant) VS Waseem Faraz (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
992 Const. P. 390/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Shakoor Keerio (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
993 Const. P. 291/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Wasim (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
994 II.A. 43/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Saba and others (Appellant) VS Mst. Fatima and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
995 Const. P. 2477/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jawaid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
996 Const. P. 86/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Mst. Hani through LRs (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
997 Const. P. 513/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammasd Rashid Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.440-K/2019 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Interior and others,C.A.3044/2022 National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Syed Arshad Wahab and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
998 Const. P. 6629/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
999 2020 PLC (CS) 392 Const. P. 6770/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Bostan Khan Khattak (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1000 I. A 9/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1001 I. A 10/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1002 Const. P. 218/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Elbert son of Faredo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1003 Const. P. 321/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faiz Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government Department Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1004 Const. P. 1826/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Muzaffar Ali Jaffro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1005 Const. P. 861/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zulfiqar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1006 Const. P. 151/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Miss Nabila Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.122-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Nabiha Zafar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1007 Const. P. 1069/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ikramullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1008 Const. P. 803/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Metatex (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1009 2019 PLC (CS) Note 40 Const. P. 6666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Majid Anwar Seehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1010 Const. P. 5379/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Kamran Aziz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1011 Const. P. 429/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Atif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1012 Cr.Bail 5/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MOHISIN ABBAS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1013 Cr.Bail 8/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MUHAMMAD ILYAS & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1014 Const. P. 3582/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Shafi Muhammad Shah (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB and others) (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.152-K/2019 Shafi Muhammad Shah v. The State (NAB) through its Director General, National Accountability Bureau, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1015 2019 PLC (CS) 1408 Const. P. 649/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Mst. Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 Yes Petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the non -action by the alleged Contemnors, filed an Application (CMA 14152/2015)under Article 204 of the Constitution, praying therein to initiate the Contempt Proceedings against the alleged Contemnors. The alleged Contemnors have filed statements showing compliance of the order dated 10.9.2015, passed by this Court with the assertion that they offered the post of Balder in BS-1 to the son of the Petitioner, Contempt Proceedings is always between the Court and the alleged Contemnor, thus its scope cannot be enlarged. the post of Field Assistant under Rule-10-A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant , for the simple reason that the aforesaid post can only be filled as per recruitment Rules. The explanation offered by the Respondents vide (CMA 14152/2015),prima facie, is tenable under the law as the Petitioners son was offered the post of Beldar in BS-1 by the Respondents in compliance of order dated 10.9.2015 passed by this Court; but the same was refused by the Petitioners son. we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged Contemnors that substantial compliance of the order dated10.9.2015 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit, therefore at this juncture, no case for initiating Contempt Proceedings is made out against the alleged Contemnors. Thus, we are not minded to proceed with any further on the listed application searing , having no merits, are accordingly dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1016 Const. P. 255/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abu Bakar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.346-K/2019 Abu Bakar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1017 Const. P. 1983/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rafique Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1018 Cr.Acq.A. 15/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Ameen (Appellant) VS Ist A.D.J SBA & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1019 Const. P. 1396/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Mujeeb Alam (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1020 Cr.Misc. 9/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst Jannat Khatoon (Applicant) VS D.I.G, Hyd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1021 Const. P. 1282/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syeda Masooma Sughra Jafri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1022 Const. P. 4492/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sibghatullah Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1023 Cr.Bail 704/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MST. IMTIAZ LATIF @ NIHA GUL NAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1024 2019 PLC (CS) 999 H.C.A 239/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Allah Dino Khaskheli (Appellant) VS Zakir Mehmood & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.14-K/2019 Allah Dino Khaskheli v. Zakir Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1025 Const. P. 6723/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Kassim (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1026 Const. P. 897/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Insaaf Labour Union (Petitioner) VS C.E.O Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1027 Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1028 Suit 1671/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rana Muhammad Nadeem. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad rasheed Siddiqui. (ISSEUS) (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1029 Const. P. 7381/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Javd Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1030 Const. P. 6990/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nawal Kishore and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1031 Const. P. 4002/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ms Sahar Gul Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1032 Const. P. 916/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sub-Engineer / Staff Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1033 Const. P. 6745/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sikandar Khan Laghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1034 Const. P. 2010/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Refat Seema and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.23-K/2019 Mst: Rifat Seema v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1035 Const. P. 6893/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Rasheed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4685/2017 Abdul Rasheed and others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1612/2017 Abdul Rasheed and others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1036 Const. P. 786/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1037 Const. P. 5537/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1038 Const. P. 1102/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Vicky Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4380/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1609/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1039 Const. P. 6546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bheru Lal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1040 Const. P. 499/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Inam Hafiz Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1041 Const. P. 5736/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1042 Const. P. 8535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s A & J Apparel (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1043 Const. P. 1037/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shamrof (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1044 Const. P. 8282/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Sarwar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1045 Const. P. 423/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Anwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1046 Const. P. 2439/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mian Mushtaq Ahmed Sajid (Petitioner) VS DGE and CE GHQ and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.176-K/2019 Mian Mushtaq Ahmed Sajid v. Director General Welfare and Chief Engineer (Army) Rawalpindi Cant. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1047 Const. P. 2378/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1048 Const. P. 6357/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imdad Hussain Mirani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1049 2019 PLC (CS) 1157 Const. P. 2268/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Attaullah Khan Chandio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1050 Const. P. 3482/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sher Muhammad Zafar & Others (Petitioner) VS PIAC & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1051 Const. P. 3292/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Asif Abbasi V/S NED University & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Asif Abbasi (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.632-K/2018 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi,C.A.135-K/2019 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed
1052 2019 PLC (CS) 1209 Const. P. 4132/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shahnawaz Khatri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1053 Const. P. 5261/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr Shakeel Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1054 Const. P. 4429/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s.Multiple Autoparts Industries(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2964/2018 M/s Multiple Autoparts Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.67-K/2019 M/s Multiple Autoparts Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1055 Const. P. 2825/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shoaibee Industries (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1056 2018 CLC 443 II.A. 97/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Saleh Muhammad (Appellant) VS Mst.Rahima Bai & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.84-K/2017 Mst: Rahima Bai and others v. Saleh Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1057 Const. P. 507/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nawaz Ali Jatt (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1058 Const. P. 5048/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammad Sabir Raza (Petitioner) VS HIGH COURT OF SINDH AND ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1059 Const. P. 4622/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1456-K/2018 The Secy: M/o Port & Shipping Now M/o Maritime Affairs and another v. Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1060 Const. P. 389/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.673-K/2018 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others,C.A.49-K/2019 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1061 2019 PLC (CS) Note 44 Const. P. 994/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS D.G CHO, Rawalpindi and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.370-K/2017 Arshad Ali v. The Director General (Services) G.H.Q and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1062 Const. P. 2076/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ayaz Hussain Abro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1063 Const. P. 3083/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 MIMA KNIT PVT LTD (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1064 Const. P. 461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Mehboob Re-Rolling Mills (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1065 Const. P. 3337/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1066 Const. P. 335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s HRSG Outsourcing (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1067 Const. P. 2873/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Lotte Kolson (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3101/2018 M/s Lottee Kolson Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.91-K/2019 M/s Lottee Kolson Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1068 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1069 Cr.Bail 499/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Qamaruddin S/o Haji Muhammad Suleman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1070 2020 PLC Lab. 125 Const. P. 910/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Sami Memon & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-AUG-19 Yes Issue of promotion of PSE-IV in Pakistan Steel Mill Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.551-K/2019 Abdul Sami Memon and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1071 Const. P. 5470/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muzaffar Jamil Mirza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.443-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Sindh & others v. Muzaffae Jamil Mirza & others,C.P.376-K/2020 Muzaffar Jamil Mirza v. Province of Sindh & others,C.P.1839/2020 Imtiaz Ali Shah and others v. Muzaffar Jamil Mirza and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1072 Const. P. 2580/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ms. Samina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1073 Const. P. 3365/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zubair Ahmed. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1074 Const. P. 3629/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst.Mumtaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1075 Const. P. 1027/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mir Muhammad &others (Petitioner) VS S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1076 Const. P. 2961/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahbaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1077 Const. P. 1173/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Jabbar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1078 Const. P. 2378/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Nazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1079 Const. P. 131/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1080 Const. P. 2339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sanaullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1081 Const. P. 674/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Latif &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1082 Const. P. 3337/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 HyderBux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1083 Const. P. 1537/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Ghani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1084 Const. P. 1561/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Humayoon Mubarak (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1085 Const. P. 1623/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Faisal Ahmed Talpur & others (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Irrigation and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1086 Const. P. 1635/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Shabana & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1087 Const. P. 2217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1088 Const. P. 1500/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1089 Const. P. 1774/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Mir Mohammad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1090 Const. P. 1781/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Moazam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1091 Const. P. 1327/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Irfan Victor (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khalida (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1092 Const. P. 2320/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shah Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1093 2020 PLC (CS) 1359 H.C.A 15/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Karachi International container Terminal Ltd. (Appellant) VS Brig (Retd.) Arif Mahmud Malik (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1094 Const. P. 2295/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Yasir Arfat and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1095 Const. P. 958/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Municipal Committee Kotri (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1096 Const. P. 3212/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1097 Const. P. 1344/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Mangial Shah @ Shaman Sain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1098 Const. P. 2374/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1099 Const. P. 2299/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Hawa Jarwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1100 Const. P. 7524/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Arsalan Subeet (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.540-K/2019 Arsalan Subeet v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1101 Const. P. 314/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1102 Const. P. 322/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shaikh Rahim Rux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1103 Const. P. 2608/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1104 I. A 49/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Mashooq Ali Bhutto (Appellant) VS ADBP Hyd & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1105 Const. P. 1952/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Samani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1106 Const. P. 2784/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Huzoor Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1107 Const. P. 3215/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Rais Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1108 Const. P. 3535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1109 Const. P. 2085/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 AijazAli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1110 Const. P. 1410/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sain Dino &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1111 Const. P. 2193/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Islam Nabi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1112 Const. P. 2761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Sadiq Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes University of Karachi--candidature for the post of professor was not considered--if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law. if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1113 Const. P. 5784/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Salam Khatri (Petitioner) VS D.G MC & C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes Non prosecution--Since the issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others supra, this petition is not maintainable. The issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1114 Const. P. 454/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mansoor A. Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.541-K/2019 Mansoor Ahmed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1115 Const. P. 492/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dildar Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1116 Const. P. 671/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1117 Const. P. 639/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Arshad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1118 Const. P. 2403/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Parvaiz Jamal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1119 Const. P. 1836/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faraz Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1120 Const. P. 2043/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Farman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1121 Const. P. 2526/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Waqas Tariq (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1122 Const. P. 3280/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Asghar& others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1123 Const. P. 942/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sikandar Hayat & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1124 Const. P. 961/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 ShabbirHasan&another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1125 Const. P. 2551/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1126 Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Therefore, the review application merits dismissal, which is accordingly dismissed as, in our view, the judgment dated 06.09.2019 passed by this court was based on correct factual as well as legal position of the case and we do not find any inherent flaw floating on the surface of the record requiring our interference. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4105/2019,C.P.4144/2019,C.P.622-K/2019,C.P.4410/2019 SCP Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1127 Const. P. 1318/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Syed Naimuddin Advocate (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Contempt Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1128 Const. P. 1659/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Miss Sanam & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.99-K/2020 Director (Legal) WAPDA v. Miss Sanam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1129 Const. P. 1140/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1130 Const. P. 2423/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Syed Sadique Ali Masoomi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1131 Const. P. 1368/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Rasool Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1132 Const. P. 2832/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1133 Const. P. 112/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Tariq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1134 Civil Revision 149/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Ahmed & others (Applicant) VS Khamoon (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1135 Const. P. 713/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Zafar Ali Shah. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4145/2019 Muhammad Hussain Ghumro & others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.P.4106/2019 Makhdoom Aqeeluz Zaman & another v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others,C.P.4433/2019 Shahzad Tahir Thaheem & others v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of
1136 Const. P. 1826/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Tamsila Ansari (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1137 Const. P. 2444/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faisal Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1138 Const. P. 2075/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mureed Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1139 Const. P. 3578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 KhudaBux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1140 Const. P. 3707/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1141 Const. P. 1112/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Ghulam Nabi Shah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1142 II.A. 5/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Bux (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1143 Const. P. 1544/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dilshad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1144 Const. P. 1690/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1145 Const. P. 1085/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Khuda Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1146 Const. P. 3600/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Atique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1147 Const. P. 2744/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ghayas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1148 Const. P. 2645/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalid Sahoowal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-20 Yes The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1149 Const. P. 153/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Zafar Ali (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1150 Const. P. 6387/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sohail Ahmed Hakro (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1151 Const. P. 7506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Razzaque & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1152 Const. P. 172/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Malik Faraz Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Agha Khursheed Ahmed & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1153 2022 PLC CS Note 26 Const. P. 2695/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Tarruf Ali (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-20 Yes Police Department--Petitioner has been reverted / demoted from the rank of Police Inspector to his substantive rank of Police Head Constable on account of earning out of turn promotion during his tenure of service---In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is allowed whereby the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue retirement order of the petitioner to the rank of Police Inspector and is entitled to be paid his full pensionary benefits as admissible to Police Inspector under the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this judgment. Pending application stands disposed of accordingly. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.193-K/2020 Province of Sindh thr. I.G.Police and others v. Taaruf Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1154 Const. P. 3392/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Asim Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1799/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Muhammad Asim Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1155 Const. P. 7067/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Samreen Mazari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1800/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Samreen Mazari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1156 Const. P. 2112/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mst Haneefa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1157 R.A (Civil Revision) 122/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Mola Bux & Ors (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1158 Const. P. 6387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Beenish Mobin & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1432-K/2020 Amjad Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1159 Civil Revision 187/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) VS Maqsood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1160 Const. P. 390/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP D 467,468,804,1304/2012 2012 Sardar Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1161 Const. P. 2687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Santosh Kumar & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1162 Const. P. 1865/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Younis & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1163 Const. P. 230/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1164 Const. P. 806/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Javed Baig. (Petitioner) VS The Director General Military Lands and Cantonment Department and others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1165 Const. P. 613/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Asim Gul (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Corpt. Of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1166 Const. P. 7731/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Javed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-20 Yes promotion in PSO Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1167 R.A (Civil Revision) 24/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Malook & Ors (Applicant) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1168 Const. P. 3840/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTET and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-20 Yes The grievance of the petitioner, who is a retired employee of respondent No.2 / PTCL, is that pension has not been / is not being paid to him in accordance with law as substantial amounts have been / are being deducted therefrom illegally by the respondents on account of rent---It is well-settled that no amount on account of rent can be deducted from pension. On behalf of respondent No.2, their above named officer undertakes that the amount of Rs.476,373.00 illegally deducted from the petitioner's pension on account of rent shall be refunded to him within thirty (30) days from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the above undertaking and seeks disposal of the present petition in terms thereof. Regarding the amount illegally deducted by respondent No.2 from the pension of other retired employees on account of rent, further undertaking has been given by the above named officer on behalf of respondent No.2 that the entire said amount shall be refunded to all the said retired employees within three (03) months from today, and for this purpose they shall publish a public notice in leading English and Urdu newspapers having large circulation throughout Pakistan, inviting all the said retired employees to collect their refund. Respondent No.2 is directed to submit a compliance report to this Court in terms of this order through MIT-II latest by 31.01.2021---By consent, the petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs and listed application stands disposed of accordingly. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1169 Const. P. 6388/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Zaki Haider (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1170 Const. P. 424/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Farman Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1171 Criminal Appeal 13/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Fahad. (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1172 Const. P. 825/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes release his monthly salary--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1173 Const. P. 2334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Azam and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1794/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Muhammad Azam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1174 Const. P. 3461/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shehzadi Erum (Petitioner) VS M.S Leprosy Hospital and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-21 Yes review application Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1175 Const. P. 6766/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Shoukat Qadri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-20 Yes pensionery benefits--Prim facie, the petitioner has qualifying length of service to his credit as per VSS calculation work sheet available at page-11 of the memo of petition. It is well settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder--In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed and Anis Hyder in C.P No.D-5734/2018 and C.P No.D-6225/2018, respectively. pensionery benefits Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1176 Const. P. 674/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1177 Civil Revision 189/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ashraf (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1178 Const. P. 3366/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Qurban Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1179 Const. P. 6632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Fareed Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-20 Yes regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3640/2020 Abdul Haque Shaikh and others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Sectt. Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1180 Criminal Appeal 108/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Hanif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1181 Const. P. 343/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Mateen Shopping Galaxy (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1182 Criminal Appeal 109/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arshad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1183 Const. P. 2889/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahmed Kehar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-20 Yes We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1184 Civil Revision 186/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ashraf (Applicant) VS Maqsood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1185 Const. P. 6275/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS D.J South Khi (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-20 Yes ACR--Admittedly, the Petitioner is a Civil Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal which has the exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of Civil Servants working in Sindh Subordinate Judiciary under the law and the petitioner has a right to file an appeal against the impugned order adversely affecting the terms and condition of his service before the Tribunal subject to the qualification provided therein. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1186 Const. P. 483/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-20 Yes In view of the above, this petition is allowed with the direction to the competent authority of the respondent-police department to take the decision afresh as to whether Constable Amjad Ali embraced Shahadat on 26.12.2012 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014.The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within two (2) months from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1187 Const. P. 1040/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Danish (Petitioner) VS Deputy General Hyderabad Development Authority & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1188 Const. P. 1748/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Allah Jurio (Petitioner) VS Commandant/Principal Cadet College Sanghar (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1189 Const. P. 347/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Arshad Arain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1190 Const. P. 730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Asim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-20 Yes The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1191 Const. P. 8908/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Pakistan Television Crop Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Habib Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-FEB-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2836/2021 M/s Pakistan Television Corporation Limited thr. Muhammad Atif, Senior Personnel Officer, Karachi v. Muhammad Habib Ahmed Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1192 I. A 14/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Saeeda Bano (Appellant) VS Allied Bank limitd & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1193 Const. P. 3815/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Maqsood Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1194 Const. P. 6666/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mohsin Furqan (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-21 Yes proforma promotion in the rank of SEVP--NBP--Thus in our opinion, the impugned action taken by the competent authority of the respondent-bank was proper and based on reasonable grounds as well as in the terms of the promotion policy in vogue--it is a well-established principle in service jurisprudence that promotion from the backdate to the retired Public Servant cannot be granted until and unless he meets the criteria prescribed under the law; and, after his retirement from the respondent-bank in the light of the decision of Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the case of Government of Pakistan and others v. Hameed Akhter Niazi and others (PLD 2003 SC 110) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.434-K/2021 Mohsin Furqan v. National Bank of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1195 Const. P. 2969/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Wali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1196 Const. P. 848/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Gerry (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 Yes M/s. Gerry's Dnata (Pvt.) Ltd.--Adverting to the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner-company that the NIRC was not competent to summon the Vice President for his appearance in Court, prima facie this assertion is misconceived for the simple reason that the learned Bench of NIRC is competent under section 54 & 55(1)(iii)(a)(b)(c)(d) and 57(a) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 . Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1197 Const. P. 1616/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1198 Const. P. 763/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ayub Khan (Petitioner) VS The Dist & Session Judge West and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-FEB-21 Yes the appointment of sons of deceased/retired and serving employees of the District and subordinate Courts--whether the Petitioners son is entitled to be appointed on the son quota basis in view of policy decision /directives of the Honble Chief Justice of this Court vide letters dated 03.03.2010, 23.7.2012 & 4.3.2013--In the light of the above rule position, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution on the premise that petitioner failed to point out any administrative decision of the member of the subordinate judiciary; and, merely agitating the claim that his son was not accommodated in the Judicial District was/is no ground to direct the respondent No.1 to appoint his son. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply for the post on merit as and when the vacancy occurs in the office of District & Sessions, Judge Karachi West. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.544-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The District & Sessions Judge Karachi (West) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1199 Criminal Appeal 105/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Wahid Bux (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1200 Const. P. 372/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Majdan & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1201 Const. P. 1769/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Contempt--In our view, we cannot enlarge the scope of the main disposal order and do not find any violation of the order passed by this Court as his termination is a separate, subsequent and fresh cause of action which has already been impugned by him through a separate petition as noted above. Resultantly, CMA No. 23812 of 2017 along with pending applications is dismissed with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1202 Cr.Acq.A. 117/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sher Muhammad Jogi (Appellant) VS Liaquat Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1203 Const. P. 533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Khaleel Maseeh (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1204 Const. P. 747/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Khanan through his legal heirs (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Tando Allahyar & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1205 Const. P. 3543/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sadaqat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1206 Criminal Appeal 186/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1207 Const. P. 2271/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Shama Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1793/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Shama Hassan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1208 Const. P. 2626/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khairullah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1209 Const. P. 979/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 983,993,998/2020 2020 Abdul Azeem Khan (Petitioner) VS The State & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3633/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Abdul Azeem Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1210 2022 PLD Sindh 20 Const. P. 847/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Khalid Ali Dars & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1211 Const. P. 177/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1212 Const. P. 70/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aqsa Jawed (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Haseen & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1213 Const. P. 435/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shair Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1214 Const. P. 5653/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shakeela Bano (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1215 Const. P. 239/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Shazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1216 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 726 Civil Revision 219/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ayoob, (Applicant) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1217 Const. P. 5098/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imtiaz Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1218 Const. P. 6712/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Telenor Microfinance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-OCT-21 Yes Social Security for workers Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1219 Const. P. 1929/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Mustafa Noonari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1220 Const. P. 887/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hassan Zada & Ors (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4119/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others,C.A.1564/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Pending
1221 Const. P. 6368/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ishtiaq & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1058-K/2021 Mohammad Ishtiaq & others v. Federation of Pakistan & anotherabdi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1222 Const. P. 169/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Fajjar Din (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-21 Yes This Constitutional Petition has been filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorari/ mandamus to call for the records relating to the Compulsory Retirement Order dated 01.11.2012 and Appellate Order dated 30.10.2017 passed by the respondent-Airport Security Force (hereinafter referred to as `ASF'), and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to reinstate services of the petitioner as an Inspector (ASF). Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.760-K/2021 Mr. Fajjar Din v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1223 2021 CLD 1008 H.C.A 284/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Famous Brands (Private) Limited (Appellant) VS Samsonite IP Holdings S.A.R.L & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAR-21 Yes By moving an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant does not surrender to the jurisdiction of the Court. The jurisdiction is conferred by law based on facts. A litigant may be right or wrong in asserting that the Court had no jurisdiction or that the suit is barred by law. But, this act of litigant would neither confer and/or bestow nor take away any jurisdiction which in fact is conferred by law. Actions of parties prior to litigation leads to constitution of a cause to initiate proceedings in Court of competent jurisdiction. - If the two applications were not moved simultaneously and would have been filed one after the other, will a litigant still be debarred from filing the other application such as Order VII Rule 10 CPC.A simple answer to this proposition is No as rejection of plaint has its own reasons whereas return of plaint has its own. In an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant has only to show that it does not disclose a cause of action; the relief claimed is undervalued or is not properly valued and that the suit appears to be barred by law. None of these rational is available while entertaining an application under order VII rule 10 CPC, which is for return of plaint on numerous counts including but not limited to pecuniary jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. Courts when plaint is presented are required to see whether they are bestowed with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction whereas under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Courts are required to see whether it is barred by law. The Court had to apply law to decide the issue of jurisdiction; it is the law that confers or takes away the jurisdiction of the Court and not based on moving of application under the aforesaid provision of law. Another proposition is that while entertaining and hearing application under order VII rule 11 CPC Court is empowered to return the plaint if the circumstances so warrants as required under the law. -Section 86(3) of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 provides that owner of the trademark which is entitled to protection under the Paris Convention as a well-known trademark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Pakistan of a trademark which, or the essential part of which, is identical or deceptively similar to the well-known trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services, where the use is likely to cause confusion or where such use cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the well-known trademark. - At the very outset there is nothing in the instant case which could attract Section 81 of Trademark Ordinance, 2001. The proprietor of the mark never gave up their right or it has not been demonstrated that for continuous period of five years from the date of alleged registration (in favour of user) in the use of registered mark in Pakistan, the proprietor was aware of it and that the proprietor ceased to be entitled on the basis of that earlier trademark or other rights. The engagement of the appellant with the respondent itself is enough to understand that there was no case of acquiescence at all. In fact the appellant conceded when they assumed the role of a distributor. -The appellate Court normally avoid interfering in the orders of the interlocutory nature involving exercise of discretion as the appellate Court cannot substitute its own discretion unless when the discretion has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, perversely or where the Court has ignored certain principles regulating grant or refusal of injunction. The appellate Court is not required to reassess the material to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the trial Court/learned Single Judge on the consideration that another view is possible. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4034/2021 Famous Brands (Private) Limited, Lahore v. Samsonite IP Holdings S.a.r.l., Luxembourg through its Attorney Abdul Rasheed, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1224 Const. P. 1846/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 S.M Ghayas (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 Yes Here the case of the petitioner is quite different, as he stood retired from service of KW&SB in the year 2020, and the DPC for promotion to BS-20 could not take place to consider his case. Besides he remained silent for the intervening period, except by moving two applications to the competent authority, the reason is obvious that he was enjoying the post in BPS 20 in violation of dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of the Province of Sindh Vs Ghulam Fareed and others 2014 SCMR 1189 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1225 Const. P. 5030/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rafique Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes the petitioner has prayed that official respondents be directed to take over possession of the subject official accommodation i.e House No. Annexe No.2 situated at GOR-1 Bath Island Karachi from respondent No. 3 and to hand over the same to him as it has been allotted to him vide allotment order dated 16.11.2017 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1605-K/2021 Dr.Zeba Hussain Soomro v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1226 Criminal Appeal 18/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Arsallah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-AUG-21 Yes The present appellant has been convicted by the trial Court on the same set of facts and evidence, above mentioned, which this Court has not considered sufficient to warrant conviction of the appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016 and award them afore-mentioned sentences. So far the case of present appellant is concerned; we do not find any special features that distinguish his case/role from those of said appellants, justifying recoding conviction and sentence to present appellant. Hence, the present appellant is also entitled to the same benefit of doubt earlier extended in favour of appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016. Consequently, we allow this criminal appeal, set aside the conviction and sentences of appellant recorded by the trial Court vide impugned judgment and acquit him of the charges. He shall be set at liberty forthwith, if not required to be detained in any other case Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1227 Const. P. 5779/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nisar Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-21 Yes the petitioner has prayed for issuance of the writ of quo warranto against respondents 4 to 11, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not fit, eligible and qualified to hold the office of Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, and Senior Registrar in Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, (SMBBMC) and their future appointments in SMBBMC on contract are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1228 Const. P. 4609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asadullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-21 Yes Regularization Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1229 Const. P. 852/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Naeem Sadiq and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-MAR-21 Yes CBC janitorial staff-- minimum wage Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1230 Const. P. 7622/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zulfiqar Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5304/2021 Ghulam Murtaza and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi and others,C.P.1671-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Zulfiqar Khushk & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted
1231 Const. P. 6244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAY-21 Yes Whether the Petitioner is qualified for the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh? ii) Whether the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh is to be filled by 80% by initial appointment through Sindh Public Service Commission (except contract employees) and 20% by promotion amongst the various categories of teachers having 7 years service in BPS-16? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4278/2021 Aziz ullah v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1232 Const. P. 4989/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 Yes Needless to mention that mere allegation that respondent No.2 is biased is not sufficient to avoid least delay of conclusion of the inquiry. Needless to add that inquiry officer is bound to conduct to impartial inquiry and submit report to the competent authority; hence at this premature stage we are not inclined to interfere with the inquiry proceedings merely on uttering of word biasness when there has been placed nothing on record to substantiate such allegation. Accordingly, petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications. However, with directions to respondent No.2 that he shall conduct inquiry by providing all rights of hearing and complete the same preferably within one monthbeing SSP, is enjoying his position as SSP Sujawal and inquiry is pending since 2018, yet same has not been completed which is shocking, particularly when it relates to irregular appointment under directives of Honourable Apex Court. The competent officer(s), surprisingly, yet failed to conduct inquiry within stipulated period---Without prejudice to this denovo inquiry has been notified, hence, petitioner cannot chose a particular officer and manner of inquiry other than provided under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1233 Const. P. 6300/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bashir Ahmed Abbasi Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-21 Yes Prima facie under the Sindh Rules of Business, 1986, the Chief Minister is the Chief Executive of the Province; and, has no direct role whatsoever in the matter of a Junior School Teacher, about his appointment, posting, transfer, promotion, and disciplinary issues. On the aforesaid proposition, the Honble Supreme Court in the case of The STATE v. ANWAR SAIF ULLAH KHAN (PLD 2016 Supreme Court 276) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1234 Cr.Misc. 194/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Shahbaz Ali Seelro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1235 Const. P. 2513/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asif Ali Unar and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-APR-21 Yes posting and transfer of District Food Controllers (DFCs) and Assistant District Food Controllers (ADFCs) in Food Department, Government of Sindh--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the transfer and posting is the prerogative of the respondent department as provided under Section 10 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973. However, the petitioners have raised the hue and cry in the matter with the assertion that their transfer and posting is based on malafide intention to accommodate the beneficiaries to usurp the huge amount or kickbacks in the disbursement of wheat in their respective area. If this is the factual position of the case, the Chief Secretary, Sindh, and Secretary Food Department, Government of Sindh, are directed to look into the affairs of disbursement of wheat in the Province of Sindh personally and ensure that the wheat is disbursed strictly under the law. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1236 Cr.Bail 272/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Bakhshal Abro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1237 Const. P. 4003/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Munaza Yasmeen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Learned / Hon (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakistan International Airline Company to allow joining period to them till 13.06.2019. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1238 Cr.Bail 212/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghulam Nabi @ Shuti Bhayo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1239 Const. P. 5196/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 SESSI United Staff Union sindh (CBA) & ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-FEB-21 Yes Sindh Employees Social Security Institution--vacant posts in SESSI were required to be filled through the competitive process--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the appointment in the public office can only be made through the competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise as discussed supra. It is well-settled law that appointments in public office are to be made strictly under applicable rules and regulations without any discrimination and in a transparent manner. Thus, all appointments in the public institution must be based on a process that is substantially and tangibly fair and within the parameters of its applicable rules, regulations, and bylaws. However, if the candidate has applied based on such admissible quota under the law he can be accommodated subject to his qualification for the post under the dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan on the subject issue-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1240 Const. P. 1412/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ameet Kumar (Petitioner) VS The Chief Secretary Government of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-21 Yes joining, seniority and qualification Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.438-K/2022 Tahir Hussain & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1241 Const. P. 6110/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Murtaza and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5305/2021 Ghulam Murtaza and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi and others,C.P.1672-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others v. Ghulam Murtaza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted
1242 Civil Revision 153/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Amin (Applicant) VS Nazimul Haq (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1243 Const. P. 446/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Irfana &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1244 Const. P. 673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1245 Const. P. 1761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-DEC-21 Yes CP No. D- 1761 of 2011 CP No. D- 1763 of 2011 CP No. D- 614 of 2012 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1246 Const. P. 894/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Rafique and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1247 Const. P. 1550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Jalauddin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1248 I. A 3/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Mir Kashif Ali and others (Appellant) VS Syed Muzaffar Hussain Shah and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1249 Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1250 Cr.Bail 652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Aijaz Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1251 Const. P. 3157/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sh. Nenoo Bheel (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes we may observe that pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges; prima-facie there was/is no conviction in his credit, and pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on that score. In our view pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of any charges; and, is violative to the law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon (PLD 2007 SC 35) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1252 Cr.Bail 895/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Saleem Khan Qaimkhani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1253 Const. P. 114/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: attached case ...... CP No. D- 1236 of 2014 2018 Ghulam Mohammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1254 Const. P. 1442/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muzaffar Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1255 Civil Revision 190/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: R.A. No. 195 of 2006 Muhammad Ishaque Vs. Photo and others 2006 Misri (Applicant) VS Photo and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1256 Cr.Misc. 652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 ZULFIQAR ALI (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL DADU & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1257 Const. P. 632/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.918-K/2022 Faheem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh Chief Minister, through Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1258 Const. P. 1216/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Martha Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1259 Const. P. 1261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Shamshad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 Yes It is well-settled that conversion of an amenity plot into any other purpose is illegal and encroachment thereon cannot be allowed under any circumstances. This view is fortified by the following authorities of Honble Supreme Court and cases decided by learned Division Benches of this Court, laying down the principles regarding illegal conversion and use of amenity plots/public properties for other purposes, rights of public in respect of amenity plots/public properties and duties of authorities concerned for maintaining the status of amenity plots/public properties Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1260 Cr.Rev 42/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imran Ali (Applicant) VS Mst Shahina Irfan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1261 2023 SBLR Sindh 94 Const. P. 1430/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Touqeer Fatima Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1262 2022 PLC (CS) 1304 Const. P. 5143/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Tariq Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1263 Const. P. 6927/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Razzaq A. Dawood (Petitioner) VS M/s Urban Builders and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1944/2018 A. Razzaq Dawood v. Director General/Chief Executive, Sindh Building Control Authority & others,C.P.6389/2021 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. A. Razzaq Dawood and others,C.A.646/2022 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. A. Razzaq Dawood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
1264 Const. P. 2161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Kamal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1265 Const. P. 1312/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-22 Yes back benefits Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1266 Const. P. 5613/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aftab Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1267 Const. P. 3981/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saeed Babar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-APR-22 Yes Seniority in service, cadre, or post to which an official is promoted is to take effect from the date of regular promotion to that service, cadre, or post and not from the date of any ad-hoc induction Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1268 Const. P. 3825/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Umer Textile and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1269 Const. P. 4587/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Adil Textile Ind and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1270 Const. P. 3521/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 ENI Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1271 Const. P. 3153/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Yasir Ali Baloch and Others (Petitioner) VS Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.931-K/2022 The Managing Director, Sindh Technical Education & Vocational Training Authority (STEVTA) v. Yasir Ali Baloch & another,C.P.1281-K/2022 Yasir Ali Baloch & another v. The Administrative Secretary STEVTA & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1272 Const. P. 912/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Zahid Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1273 Const. P. 1721/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Qadir Otho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.327/2022 Ghulam Qadir Otho v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1274 Const. P. 4401/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Salma (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.784-K/2022 The Vice Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others v. Province of Sindh through/Chancellor of Universities of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1275 Const. P. 7068/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Murtaza and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1276 R.A (Civil Revision) 215/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Munawar Ali Shah. (Applicant) VS DFO, Sanghar @ Khipro & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1277 II.A. 3/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ramzan (Appellant) VS Town Committee Khipro (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.424-K/2020 Sartaj Ahmed Malgani & another v. Ali Hassan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1278 Const. P. 6164/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Afaq Ahmed Qureshie (Petitioner) VS The Chief Secretariat, Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1279 Const. P. 2260/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Meeral Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1280 Cr.Rev 1/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Murad @ Mann (Applicant) VS Manzoor Ahmed & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1281 Const. P. 3305/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahrukh Ul Hassan & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1263-K/2022 Shahrukh ul Hassan & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1282 Criminal Miscelleneous 593/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 NIAZ HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS IMRAN KHAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1283 Const. P. 3965/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1284 II.A. 59/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Manthar Ali & Another. (Appellant) VS Registrar Sindh University & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1285 Const. P. 570/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nasreen Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1286 Const. P. 184/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Qazi Aslam (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1287 Const. P. 366/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-23 Yes Be that as it may, it is admitted position that the petitioner is not enrolled as an advocate under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, and/ or a practicing lawyer and has no standing at the bar at all. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1288 2023 SBLR Sindh 672 R.A (Civil Revision) 228/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Civil Aviation Authority (Applicant) VS Afzal ur Rehman (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1289 Const. P. 730/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS M.D Korangi Fisheries Harbour & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1290 Const. P. 593/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) VS Lal Jan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1291 2023 SBLR Sindh 952 Const. P. 5552/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mansoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1292 R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) VS Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1293 Const. P. 862/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Naveed Uddin Qadri and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1294 Criminal Appeal 29/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Baggan @ Asghar and Others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1295 Const. P. 6120/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1296 Const. P. 6119/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1297 Const. P. 2090/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Molua Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1298 Const. P. 288/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Sui Southran Gas Co Ltd (Petitioner) VS Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-23 Yes Consumer Court has no jurisdiction in matters of alleged excessive billing by a Gas Utility Company, it lies with the GAS Utility Court under the 2016 ACT. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1299 Const. P. 7111/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ahmed Habib ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1300 R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Dr Allah Bux Th His LRs (Applicant) VS Ghulam Mustafa and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1301 Const. P. 613/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1302 Criminal Miscelleneous 457/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASIF ALI SOLANGI (Applicant) VS MST. ASMA ABDULLAH & & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1303 Cr.Bail 1494/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ALI S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1304 Const. P. 6222/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-24 Yes firstly section 10 of the Civil Servant Act 1973 provides that every civil servant shall be liable to serve within and outside Pakistan under the Federal Government or any Provincial Government, whereas Rule 20-A of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1973 provides appointment of deputation Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1305 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 288/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294 & 295 of 2020 2020 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Unique Industries (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-24 Yes only such question of law can be answered under Section 196 of the Customs Act which arise out of the Order of Tribunal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1306 Const. P. 6171/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Shah Wajid Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.867-K/2016 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2017 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
1307 Const. P. 5312/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.516-K/2018 Abdullah Khan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1308 Const. P. 557/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Salman Aziz (Petitioner) VS Federal Urdu Unviersity and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1309 Const. P. 2187/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dr. Asha Bai (Petitioner) VS Chairman KPT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1310 2017 SBLR Sindh 1213 Const. P. 1435/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mehboob Shah Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1854/2017 Mehboob Shah Khan and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1311 Const. P. 761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Habib Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Safeer Ahmed & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1312 2019 PLC (CS) 1100 Const. P. 3415/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Uzma Shaheen Pirzada (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.614-K/2017 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2019 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Early date ],Disposed Disposed of
1313 2018 PLC (CS) Note 109 Const. P. 407/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Mr. Ghulam Akbar Allana (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1314 Cr.Appeal 315/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 ALI SHER S/O URIS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1315 2019 PLC (CS) Note 14 Const. P. 4053/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Maqbool Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1316 2018 MLD 1533 Cr.Rev 184/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 JAVED S/O SOFAN ARFANI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1317 Cr.Bail 845/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 LUTUFULLAH S/O MARAZ KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 27-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1318 Const. P. 7782/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1783/2017 Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1319 Const. P. 52/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zafar Adil (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Javed Iqbal and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1320 Const. P. 1526/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1321 I. A 13/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Muhammad Yousif & others (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer/ Assistant Commissioner and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1322 Const. P. 2413/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shaheena Nasreen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1323 2021 PCr.LJ 242 Cr.Misc. 766/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Khalid Hussain & others (Applicant) VS Asif Iqbal & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1324 Const. P. 1185/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Sher (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1325 Const. P. 2393/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Manzar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.430-K/2019 Federal Board of Revenue thr. its Chairman v. Manzar Hussain & others,C.P.484-K/2019 Amer Rashid Shaikh v. Manzar Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1326 Const. P. 2912/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zafar Akbar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes PTV---since the representation of the petitioner has already been decided and prima-facie there is findings against him and the said findings are not impugned before this court, thus cannot be dilated upon. In view of such state of affairs, we without touching the merits of the case on the issue of his promotion in the next Rank, hold that, basically the purpose of filling of this lis is over, thus cannot be stretched further, on the premise that once the Respondent-Pakistan Television Corporation has decided the representation of the Petitioner which provides him fresh cause of action if he at all feels himself aggrieved of such order on his representation, he can file fresh petition if he is so advised, subject to all just exceptions. Disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4404/2019 Zafar Akbar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Information, Government of Pakisan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1327 Const. P. 2323/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Sultan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1328 Const. P. 100/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Nafees Fatima (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.357-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. and another v. Nafees Fatima and others,C.P.365-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust and another v. Nafees Fatima and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1329 Criminal Miscelleneous 106/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Arshad Mehmood and other (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1330 Const. P. 3354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) VS Akhtar Hussain Chairman (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1331 Const. P. 191/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Noor Muhammad Soomro & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1332 Const. P. 537/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aziz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1333 Const. P. 4000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Javed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1334 Const. P. 284/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mian Tahir Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1335 Const. P. 4442/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Ehsan Ali Palari (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2781/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
1336 Const. P. 233/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Rizwan Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.282-K/2019 Rizwan Ahmed and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1337 Criminal Miscelleneous 9/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst Jannat Khatoon (Insolvent) VS D.I.G, Hyd and Others (Contemnor) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1338 Const. P. 307/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1339 Const. P. 4689/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sheikh Muhammad Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1340 Const. P. 2446/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ms Noor Ul Ain (Petitioner) VS V/C University Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1341 Const. P. 543/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ashique Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1342 Cr.Bail 6/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MUNEER AHMED LASHARI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1343 2021 PLC (CS) 329 Const. P. 1559/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Wahid Bux Chadhar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1344 Const. P. 6057/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Rasheed Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1345 Const. P. 1174/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.384-K/2019 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1346 Const. P. 3400/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1347 Const. P. 4538/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Riaz Ahmed Bhutto and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.428-K/2017 Riaz Ahmed and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1348 Const. P. 1920/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ishtiaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1349 Const. P. 6803/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mian Dad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1102-K/2018 Mian Dad v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1350 Const. P. 1887/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Altaf Hussain Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1351 Const. P. 1323/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Mst. Nikhat Yasmin (Petitioner) VS Pakistan International Air Lines & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1352 Const. P. 866/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Karachi Vegetable & Tajir Association (Petitioner) VS M/s JS Bank Ltd and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1353 Const. P. 7142/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mumtaz Ali Magsi (Petitioner) VS I.G Police and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1354 Const. P. 4251/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Shushila Ramesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1355 2018 PLC (CS) Note 179 Const. P. 5197/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mrs Sadia Ali Akram (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1356 Const. P. 921/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Nasir & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1357 Const. P. 4391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zaheer uddin Mujahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.277/2019 Zaheeruddin Mujahid v. Province of Sindh thr. Cooperative Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1358 Const. P. 423/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amanullah Khoso (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4379/2017 Amanullah Khoso v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another,C.A.1608/2017 Amanullah Khoso v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1359 Const. P. 2075/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mujeeb ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1360 Const. P. 2415/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Raja Muhammad Asad Khan (Petitioner) VS D.E.O Sanghar and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1361 Const. P. 5424/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1362 Const. P. 2263/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2977/2018 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.80-K/2019 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1363 Const. P. 1339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Kings Apparels Ind (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1364 Const. P. 2040/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Agha Steel Ind (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1365 Const. P. 3127/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Al-Karam Textile Mills Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1366 Const. P. 5836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faiz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.7-K/2018 Faiz Ali v. Province of Sindh and anothers Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1367 Const. P. 5776/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes University of Karachi--we deem it appropriate to set aside the findings of the Selection Board dated 28.06.2018 to the extent of petitioners and private respondents. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondent-University to determine afresh as to whether the candidates i.e. petitioners and private respondents were having requisite academic qualifications duly recognized under the law for the subject posts in respondent-University, at the time of the cutoff date provided in the public notice dated 26.12.2014. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.582-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Imran Ali Hashmi & others,C.P.733-K/2021 Dr.Masooda Qadri v. The University of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1368 2019 PLC (CS) 572 Const. P. 5798/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Anwery Begum (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1369 2018 PLC (CS) Note 177 Const. P. 6940/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Iqbal Naseem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1370 2019 PLC (CS) Note 5 Const. P. 6221/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Rab Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.675-K/2017 Rab Nawaz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1371 Const. P. 846/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted, Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed.
1372 Const. P. 965/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.325-K/2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1373 2019 PLC (CS) 839 Const. P. 631/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shah Abul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1374 2019 PLC Lab. 115 Const. P. 615/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Rana Muhammad Rasheed (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1375 2019 PLC (CS) 1231 Const. P. 3491/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Lal Badshah And Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman K.P.T And Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.211-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.P.212-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.A.46-K/2022 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Session),Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned (Next Session)
1376 H.C.A 142/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Appellant) VS Malik Mohammad Asghar (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.504-K/2017 Advocate Malik Muhammad Asghar v. Pakistan Defence Officer Housing Authority Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1377 Const. P. 2442/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Shaikh Aadil Jamil (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1378 2019 PLC (CS) Note 20 Const. P. 8306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1001/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1379 2021 SBLR Note 654 Const. P. 1068/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Riffat Humayun (Petitioner) VS P.T.V and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.637-K/2018 Riffat Humayun v. Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd. thr. its Managing Director and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1380 Const. P. 5140/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Loads Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3075/2018,C.P.3076/2018,C.A.81-K/2019,C.A.82-K/2019 SCP Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1381 2019 PTD 1765 Const. P. 544/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ali Zahir Jafri (Petitioner) VS Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.638-K/2018 Ali Zahir Jafri v. The Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1382 Const. P. 2863/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Pir Kaleemullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.643-K/2018 Pir Kalimullah and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Cheif Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1383 Const. P. 1656/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Arham Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS M.D KW & SB and Oters (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1384 Const. P. 4579/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Qasim Ali (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1385 Const. P. 931/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mansoor Pasha (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.515-K/2018 Mansoor Pasha v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.27-K/2018 Mansoor Pasha v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed
1386 Const. P. 4422/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Irtaza Raza Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.68-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1387 Const. P. 3019/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Hayat Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1388 Const. P. 7813/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Good Luck Industries (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1389 Const. P. 334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3729/2018 Shaman Khan and others v. NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others,C.A.117/2019 Shaman Khan and others v. NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed
1390 Const. P. 624/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/S Good Luck Industries (Petitioner) VS Government oF Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1391 Const. P. 897/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s International Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1392 2019 PLC (CS) Note 49 Const. P. 2074/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nabi Bux Jamali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1393 Const. P. 68/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sherbaz Khan Rind And ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.881-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Sherbaz Khan Rind and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1394 2022 SBLR Sindh 2164 Const. P. 8070/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mir Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1395 Const. P. 6611/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ismail & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.498/2019 Muhammad Ismail Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1396 2019 PLC (CS) Note 51 Const. P. 1001/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ahsanullah Lakho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1397 Const. P. 3687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1398 Const. P. 376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1399 Const. P. 1406/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nehal Chang (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1400 Const. P. 2084/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khair Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1401 Const. P. 332/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mir Peer Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1402 Const. P. 1260/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Attique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1403 Const. P. 2317/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Punhal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1404 Const. P. 2031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Achar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1405 Const. P. 2566/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Waseem Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Waseem Sadiq (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1406 Const. P. 2739/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shabbir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1407 Const. P. 2765/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Darya Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1408 Const. P. 2405/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Nasir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1409 Const. P. 1168/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shoukat Ali Uner and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1410 Const. P. 1133/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1411 Const. P. 2058/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1412 Const. P. 505/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Habibullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1413 Const. P. 528/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aijaz Ali &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1414 Const. P. 3596/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Sayeda Kiran Batool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1415 Const. P. 738/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1416 2020 PLC (CS) 417 Const. P. 673/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ahmed Ali Saharan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.591-K/2019 Ahmed Ali Saharan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1417 Const. P. 102/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Zulekhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1418 Const. P. 758/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Nighat Sultana (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1419 Const. P. 300/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hyder Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1420 Const. P. 2179/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1421 Const. P. 1576/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1422 Const. P. 3221/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Akhlaq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1423 Const. P. 3005/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1424 Const. P. 2549/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dayal Chand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1425 Const. P. 455/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Farhan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1426 Const. P. 538/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arif and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1427 Const. P. 655/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1428 Const. P. 3504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1429 Const. P. 2539/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Imran Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1430 Const. P. 1086/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 ( Master Abdul Jabbar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1431 Const. P. 1588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Riffat Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1432 Civil Revision 41/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Usman and others (Applicant) VS Shoaib (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1433 2021 PLC (CS) 109 Const. P. 4356/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mohammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-19 Yes the Respondent-Pakistan Steel Mills is/was competent to award minor penalty, if they find/found any employee to be guilty of the dereliction of duty, therefore, contention of the Petitioner that he was mistakenly demoted is not borne out of record. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.627-K/2019 Muhammad Ismail v. The Chairman Pakistan Steel, Bin Qasim, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1434 2021 PLC (CS) 51 Const. P. 679/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-19 Yes whether the petitioner can be regularized in the Respondent-Department. We have noticed that the Petitioner has admitted that he accepted the contingent/work charged appointment--Petitioner's contingent/work charged service could not be converted into regular service--The Petitioner, in our view, has failed to make out his case for regularization of his work charged service as his case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant Petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s)---Before parting with this judgment, we may observe that that the petitioner has served from 1992 with some breaks but the fact of the matter is that he has a long service of more than two decades at his credit, therefore, it is not justified at the end of department after sucking the youth of petitioner and kicked him out on the pretext that his case does not fall in the aforesaid policy and that the post held by him being temporary and contingent/work charge paid, being not pensionable. Since the Petitioner is 58 years old and two years remaining to attain the age of superannuation, therefore, his services be continued till his date of superannuation. The salary issue of the Petitioner for the intervening period may be decided in accordance with the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1435 Const. P. 8186/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Kashif (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.692-K/2019 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.21-K/2022 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1436 2023 PLC Lab. Note 81 Const. P. 417/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zameer Hussain (Petitioner) VS Registrar & Campus Administrator & Security Advisor (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1437 Const. P. 2510/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst.Razia Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1438 Const. P. 2747/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jameela Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1439 Const. P. 1587/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1440 II.A. 51/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nazeer Ahmed (Appellant) VS Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1441 Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-SEP-19 Yes whether the private Respondents who are holding the present postings qualify to continue the office? Whether the Chief Minister, Sindh is/was competent under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964 to nominate person as Assistant Commissioner? Whether the Chief Minister is competent to grant exemption to the private respondents from qualifying in passing the Departmental Examination prescribed for the posts under reference for regularization and promotion of the private respondents? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4105/2019,C.P.4144/2019,C.P.622-K/2019,C.P.4410/2019 SCP Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1442 Const. P. 847/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1443 Const. P. 2366/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Danish Kaimkhani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1444 Const. P. 2177/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Intezar Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1445 Const. P. 3768/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Yakoob (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1446 II.A. 52/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Asghar (Appellant) VS Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1447 Civil Revision 14/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mansoor Ali (Applicant) VS Executive District Officer (Health) (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1448 Const. P. 857/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1449 Const. P. 3031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sajidullah (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.M.A.178-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon and others,C.P.1451-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
1450 Const. P. 3696/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sheikh Nabi Bux Azad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1451 Const. P. 2708/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 MumtazAli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1452 Const. P. 3556/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst: Shareefan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1453 Const. P. 2216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Noumanullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1454 Const. P. 2232/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Saifullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1455 Const. P. 2339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1456 Const. P. 2619/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1457 Const. P. 3143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shafi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1458 Const. P. 1347/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1459 Const. P. 158/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1460 Const. P. 3089/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Jahangir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1461 Const. P. 2536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Yousuf Abrar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1462 Const. P. 7655/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Disciplinary proceedings against employee of PSO--We, thus, are of the view that it is for the Respondent-Company to place its employees in accordance with its Service Rules and Regulations, which is an internal matter of the Respondent-Company, thus devoid of any Constitutional interference, at this juncture. Our view is supported by the latest decision announced on 13.5.2019 by the Honorable Supreme Court in an unreported case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals (2019 SCMR 984)--we are not inclined to interfere in the terms and conditions of the service of the Petitioner, in Constitutional Jurisdiction, being non-statutory Rules of Service, therefore, the instant petition is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1463 Const. P. 1794/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1464 Const. P. 1763/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1465 Const. P. 899/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hameedullah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1466 Const. P. 2021/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Tahir Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.437-K/2020 Tahir Muhammad v. Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1467 Const. P. 436/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Karim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1468 Const. P. 3498/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1469 Const. P. 1256/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Abdul Razzaq and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1470 Const. P. 3006/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Nayyar Qayum (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1798/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Nayyar Qayyum and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1471 Const. P. 116/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Lal Bux Jahejo (Petitioner) VS IInd Addl Distt Judge Hyd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1472 Const. P. 1652/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Qudos Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1473 Const. P. 439/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Haji Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1474 Const. P. 2194/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Anwer and others (Petitioner) VS Fouji Foundation Model School & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1475 Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1476 Const. P. 151/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sahoo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1477 Const. P. 824/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 HAMZO HAN ZARDARAND OTHER (Petitioner) VS P.O SNDH AND OTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1478 M.A. 1/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 (HESCO) Hyderabad (Applicant) VS Muhammad Tanveer & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1479 Const. P. 265/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Aqeela and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1480 2023 PLC Lab. 62 Const. P. 134/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1481 Const. P. 630/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Mattul (Petitioner) VS Khair Muhammad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1482 2022 SBLR Sindh 537 H.C.A 253/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 K-Electric Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Anwar Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-DEC-20 Yes KESC--Whether suit is maintainable by the retired employee of the KESC in the present form? 2. Whether through the KESC Officers Policy 2010, certain benefits to the Plaintiff under the previous policy, can be withdrawn by the Defendant ? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.507/2021 K-Electric Ltd, Karachi v. Syed Anwar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session ]
1483 Const. P. 467/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Khalid Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1484 Const. P. 2325/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Azeem & others (Petitioner) VS Rehmatullah & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1485 Const. P. 1456/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1486 Civil Revision 188/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ramzan (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1487 Const. P. 4105/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-20 Yes this petition is allowed in the terms whereby the competent authority of CAA is directed to consider the case of petitioner for his proforma promotion in PG-10, Works and Development Directorate, CAA for the purpose of pensionery benefits within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1488 2021 YLR 867 Const. P. 6168/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sardar Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1489 Const. P. 1702/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Hameedullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-21 Yes Enquiries and Anti-corruption Establishment Sindh (`E&ACE`) for issuance of his retirement notification and releasing his salaries up to 21.7.2013, wherein he has served for 10 years--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of respondents/Home Secretary, Government of Sindh is directed to issue his retirement notification within two weeks and release his pensionary benefits under the law within a month from the date of receipt of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1490 2023 PLC Lab. Note 10 Const. P. 2341/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1491 Const. P. 5648/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Musarat Nazeer (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1492 Const. P. 442/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Sughran (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1493 Const. P. 5814/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Tariq Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-22 Yes recruitment rules Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1494 Const. P. 6241/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Anjum Badar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 Yes petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employees appointed on contract in BS 16 and above can be deemed to have been validly appointed on regular basis, without going through the competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, merely in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the mandatory requirement of competitive process of selection only through the Sindh Public Service Commission for appointments in BS 16 and above, which is the command of the Constitution and specific direction to the Government of Sindh by the Honble Supreme Court, can be waived, relaxed, done away with, exempted and or bypassed in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the petitioners have any vested right for regular appointment, or to claim regularization, or to approach this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction to seek redressal of their grievance relating to regularization ; and, is there any corresponding legal duty cast on the Government of Sindh to appoint them on regular basis ? If no, then can a writ of mandamus to this effect be issued against the Government of Sindh ? --Whether Section 3 of the Act of 2013, to the extent of regularization / appointment in BS 16, 17 and 18 without the mandatory competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, is ultra vires the Constitution and against the law laid down and the direction given by the Honble Supreme Court to the Government of Sindh in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and others V/S Province of Sindh and others, 2015 SCMR 456. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021 SCP Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ]
1495 Const. P. 856/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ameer Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1496 Const. P. 319/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Nisha & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1497 Criminal Appeal 126/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Taimoor Badshah and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1498 Const. P. 7122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zamir Hussain Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1499 Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-20 Yes EOBI--pension of the petitioner was stopped by the respondent/institution without disclosing any reasonable cause--We are of the firm view that the petitioner did not qualify the minimum years of service as laid down under Section 22(b) of the Act, whereby the qualifying service for being entitled to pensionary benefits is 15 years, whereas, it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was an employee of the private company and had served it only for a period of 13 years. Petitioner does not meet the requisite criteria stipulated in the said Section to claim old age pension--Adverting to the next contention that the Labor Policy-2010 was fully applicable in the case of parties, in our view, Circular No.3 of 2010 (Policy) cannot override the Act, 1976, therefore, no benefit can be obtained arising out of it--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition, being devoid of any legal standing, is hereby dismissed along with pending application with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.206-K/2020 Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1500 Const. P. 1648/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Yaseen & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1501 Cr.J.A 36/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Noor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1502 Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-20 Yes i) Whether the petitioner possesses the required qualifications for the post of police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police as per recruitment Rules-2016 ? And ii) Whether police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police can be recruited on a contract basis and subsequently be regularized in service under the law? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1503 Const. P. 5577/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Amjad Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-20 Yes K-Electric-NIRC Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1504 Const. P. 3055/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maqsood Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes Since respondent No 3 has crossed the age of 60 years and left his position from KPT, no further action is required. However, it is made clear that he is not entitled to a second pension from KPT due to his illegal deputation and subsequent absorption in KPT in the intervening period without the approval of the competent authority as discussed in the preceding paragraphs---Before parting with this order, it may be observed that even on moral ground, the illegalities committed by the management of KPT and respondent No.3, being a retired naval forces personnel and a patriot, was expected to act honestly in the best interest of the country. However, he chose not only to get himself illegally absorbed in KPT, but also claimed and received pension from their different services causing heavy loss to the national exchequer. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1325/2021 CDR (R) Khalid Munir v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1505 Const. P. 5978/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mustafa Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-21 Yes out of turn promotion Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1506 Const. P. 3597/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mohammad Ashfaq Khan Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1507 Const. P. 3997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Liaquat Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-20 Yes i) whether the respondent namely Mrs. Abida Parveen was appointed in accordance with the law and had requisite qualifications and experience for the position of Registrar (BPS-19) in Environmental, Climate Change, and Coastal Development Department, Sindh Government to claim the post under the recruitment rules; ii) whether this Court can overrule the SPSCs recommendation under Article 199 of the Constitution or otherwise? And iii) whether the private respondent was awarded punishment in her previous employment and in view of such punishment, whether she could seek government employment in any other department or office. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.150-K/2021 Dr.Liaquat Ali Abro v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1508 Const. P. 912/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes t is well-settled law that the advice of the Commission shall ordinarily be accepted by the department; and, if the advice of the Commission is not acceptable the case shall be submitted to the Government for orders as provided under Section 7 (1)(3) of Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules, 1990. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1509 Const. P. 648/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asif Ali Unar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 Yes seeking direction to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, for transferring Chairman and Controller of Examination, Sindh Public Service Commission--Since the issue is confined to the transfer and posting of respondents 3 & 4 who are civil servants and the petitioner cannot seek direction for posting of a civil servant of his choice and it is for respondents 1&2 to look into their conduct and affairs of SPSC. Reference may be made to the case of Peer Muhammad v. Government of Balochistan and others, 2007 SCMR 54. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1510 Const. P. 6018/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Gul Kalyar (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 Yes vacation for official accommodation Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1511 Const. P. 2860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-20 Yes chowkidar in the office of District & Sessions Judge, Karachi East based on son quota--Therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings as it would fall within mischief of constructive res-judicata. Reliance is placed on the case of State Bank of Pakistan through Governor and others vs. Imtiaz Ali Khan and others (2012 SCMR 280). 5. In our view, once the stance of the petitioner on the aforesaid analogy has been set at rest by the Administrative Committee, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution as writ does not lie against such decision of the Administrative Committee. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1512 Const. P. 292/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Ume-e-Rubab & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1513 Const. P. 1526/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mirza Mukarram Hayat Baig & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Prov. Of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1514 Const. P. 7550/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS The Overseas Employment Corp & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-21 Yes reinstatement of service as Driver in Overseas Employment Corporation--In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, the instant Constitution Petition is allowed, both the impugned orders passed by the learned National Industrial Commission are set aside, consequently, termination order dated 26.7.2012 passed by the respondent-corporation is also set aside. Resultantly, the petitioner is directed to be reinstated in service forthwith along with back benefits as Driver in the respondent-Overseas Employment Corporation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.478-K/2021 Managing Director Overseas Employment Corporation & another v. Mir Abdul Majeed Dhillo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Notice [ For Next Session }
1515 Const. P. 2092/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1516 Const. P. 1055/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Molvi Muhammad Hassan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1517 Const. P. 5334/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zubair Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-20 Yes It is well-settled that in absence of codal formalities i.e. advertisement, the constitution of Selection Committee, test and interview, before filling up the subject post, this Court cannot come to rescue and entertain the grievance of the petitioner as made by him in the prayer clauses under the constitutional jurisdiction. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1518 Const. P. 2735/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Liaquat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1519 Const. P. 532/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Saeed Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1520 Const. P. 8515/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sophia Ibrahim & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes regularization--Benazir Bhutto Shaheed Human Resource Research Department Board--Since learned counsel for the respondent No.2 agreed to look into the matter of petitioners for regularization of their services in the respondent-department under the law; and, on the aforesaid analogy as set forth by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Board of Intermediate and Secretary Education, Faisalabad (supra) within a reasonable time. Learned counsel for the petitioners has agreed for the candid proposal of learned counsel for the respondent No.2, however without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners involved in the present proceedings. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1521 Const. P. 153/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Pervez Leghari (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naseema & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1522 Const. P. 4066/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zaheer Ahmed Hisbani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1523 Const. P. 1982/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1524 Const. P. 1488/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Sindhu Abbas Leghari (Petitioner) VS Major (R) Omer Farooq (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1525 Const. P. 591/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (DRTA) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.433-K/2020 Okash Khalid Memon v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1526 Const. P. 5645/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rubeena Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1527 Const. P. 1826/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ayaz Hussain Khichi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1528 Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-APR-22 Yes A person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of service are protected under the constitutional protection. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1529 Const. P. 119/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Naila & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1530 Const. P. 174/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ameen Kharani (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1531 Const. P. 4932/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Haleem Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners' promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1532 Const. P. 32/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Bashir Ahmed Phulpoto & others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
1533 Const. P. 993/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 979,983,998/2020 2020 Kamla (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1534 Const. P. 3399/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imtiaz Ali Sheikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1535 Const. P. 1975/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Pir Ashfaq Ahmed Sarhandi & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1536 Const. P. 925/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jamal Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1537 Const. P. 27/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Achar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1538 Const. P. 5481/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1539 Const. P. 1162/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Shabbir Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1540 Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1541 Const. P. 2849/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahabuddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-22 Yes quo warranto Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.892-K/2020 Jam Abdul Fatah v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1542 Const. P. 3520/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zahid Hussain Shah Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Addl I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-JUN-21 Yes official accommodation Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1543 Const. P. 1497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1089-K/2021 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation through its Chairman v. Nasir Kamal & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1544 Const. P. 4048/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 M/s. Dalda Foods(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 Yes We find that the private respondents were deprived of their due process rights. They were not confronted with the material based on which their services were verbally terminated. Even otherwise, the process followed by the petitioners was sketchy, one-sided, non-transparent, and not supported even by the law. We, therefore, find that both the Learned SLC and SLAT were justified in passing the impugned orders and recorded valid and cogent reasons for doing so, therefore, no ground existed for re-evaluation of the evidence, thus, we maintain the consolidated order dated 22.10.2011 passed by the Sindh Labour Court (SLC) in grievance Applications of the private respondents and common order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal (SLAT) in Appeal No. KAR-273/2011, Appeal Nos. KAR-445/2011 to KAR 496/2011 and KAR-498/2011 to KAR-603/2011. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.6488/2021 M/s Dalda Foods (Pvt) Limited v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi & others,C.P.5640/2021 M/s Haq Engineering & Packing Service (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned
1545 Const. P. 4896/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muzaffar Hussain Katpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 Yes suspension order Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1546 Const. P. 723/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Allah Bachayo & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 Yes Secretary Schools shall also ensure that close schools are re-started by providing all facilities in the area of Union Council Bijora, Taluka Sujawal, District Sujawal. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1547 Const. P. 8065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-APR-21 Yes we asked the learned counsel for respondent-Institution under what law and authority they attempted to nullify the effect of the judgment passed by this Court, maintained by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4384/2021 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI) & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.10973/21 for impleadment is Dismissed as not pressed.
1548 2022 PLC (CS) 235 Const. P. 3271/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bilqees (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Wafaqi Mohtasib and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes whether Wafaqi Mohtasib is competent to absorb any deputationist by appointing her/him by transfer in the Establishment of the Wafaqi Mohtasib, Islamabad? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1164/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others,C.A.1349/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed after 3 months,Pending Adjourned
1549 2023 PLC CS 228 Const. P. 6221/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asif Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1550 Const. P. 687/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Faizan Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1551 Cr.Bail 124/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Talib Hussain Chachar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1552 Const. P. 2410/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 Yes promotion issue Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1553 Const. P. 4035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Bashir Ahmed Kalwar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-21 Yes Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1554 Const. P. 1427/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 Yes seeking appointment as Primary School Teacher (PST) on the premise that he secured 94 marks in National Testing Service (NTS) test and his credentials were duly verified by the competent authority--we are not in a position to say for and against the documents attached with the memo of the petition and on this scope alone this petition fails on the ground of disputed question of facts. No case is made out for interfering with the impugned order dated 21.3.2017 passed by Director School Education (Primary) Sukkur Region, Sukkur (Chairman DRC Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1057-K/2021 Muhammad Rafique v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary, Education and literacy Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1555 Cr.Bail 191/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Mujeeb Rehman @ Mujahid (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1556 Cr.Bail 185/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Pathan Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-JUL-21 Yes For the aforesaid reasons, the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicant vide order dated 30.4.2021 is hereby confirmed. However, the applicant is required to furnish further solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50000/- (Fifty Thousand Rupees) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar of this Court within one week from today. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1557 Const. P. 5878/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khalid Mansoor (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-21 Yes reinstatement along with back benefits Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1558 Cr.Bail 150/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ali Murad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1559 Const. P. 2844/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muneer Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Health Department (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-21 Yes The petitioners have called in question, their suspension from the service order dated 01.04.2020 and subsequent order dated 18.08.2020, whereby their reinstatement in service order dated 22.7.2020 was cancelled/withdrawn by the respondent-Secretary, Health Department, Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1560 Const. P. 5172/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imran Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shafique and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1561 Cr.Bail 316/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghazi Haleli Jatoi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1562 Cr.Bail 271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Muhammad Ali Solangi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1563 Cr.Bail 273/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Muhammad Ali Solangi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1564 Cr.Bail 237/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghazi Katohar and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1565 Const. P. 2643/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Nabi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAR-21 Yes appointment as Police-commandos (BPS-05) in SSU--whether a waiting list candidate, not declared successful, can be recommended for appointment against any vacancy occurring due to non-joining of any successful candidate. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.469-K/2021 Muhammad Nabi & others v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1566 Cr.Bail 7/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghulam Mustafa (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-21 Yes In view of the above, the role of applicants with regard to commission of alleged offence requires further enquiry as envisaged under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr. P.C. We; therefore, admit the applicants to bail subject to their furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) each and P.R. Bond in like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1567 Const. P. 639/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Ismail & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1568 Cr.Bail 517/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1569 Const. P. 1393/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1570 Const. P. 1478/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mst Hanifa Karim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1571 Const. P. 770/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Salman Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.1712-K/2021 Salman Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1572 Const. P. 10/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Dr. Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1573 2023 SBLR Sindh 1604 Const. P. 2358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 2358 & 2622 of 2019 2019 Faisal Shah Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1574 Cr.Bail 2284/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NOOR MUHAMMAD S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes seeking admission on post-arrest bail in FIR No.732/2021 of PS Shahrah-e-Noorjehan, Karachi registered under Sections 397/34 PPC Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1575 Civil Revision 260/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Hameed (Applicant) VS Mst Irshat Begum (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1576 Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1577 Civil Revision 249/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Hassan & Ors (Applicant) VS Yousuf & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1578 Const. P. 526/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1579 Cr.Bail 923/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rajab Ali & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1580 M.A. 46/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Idress Rajput (Appellant) VS Learned 8th Addl: District Judge Hyderabad & other (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1581 Cr.Bail 1006/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Lal Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1582 Cr.Bail 2347/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST. ZULEEKHAN ABDULLAH & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes , through the captioned bail application, has called in question, the rejection of their post-arrest Bail Application by the learned 1st Additional District Judge/Model Criminal Trial Court Malir, Karachi, vide order dated 21.10.2021, with the observations that quantity of 1400 and 1300 grams of charas is above the borderline, as settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1583 Const. P. 583/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Lakhmir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1584 Const. P. 1328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mehboob Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1585 Const. P. 2724/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Sattar Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1586 Const. P. 49/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Ganj Bibi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1587 Cr.Misc. 619/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 NAZAKAT ABBAS (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE HYD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1588 First Appeal Against Order 21/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Irfan son of Abdul Ghani (Appellant) VS The Province of Sindh (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1589 2022 SBLR Sindh 1061 Const. P. 1170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Haroon Sohail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1590 Const. P. 2665/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Majid Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1591 Const. P. 1848/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asif Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1592 Const. P. 2150/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalil-ur-Rehman and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1593 Const. P. 2134/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Wahid and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1594 Const. P. 1416/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Zulfiqar Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1595 Const. P. 4279/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muzaffar Ali Talpur and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1596 Const. P. 5666/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Farooq Legharii (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1597 Const. P. 1052/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arshad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1598 Const. P. 152/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ayaz Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1599 2022 PLC CS 1378 Const. P. 3031/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Akber Siyal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1600 Const. P. 518/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1601 Const. P. 4146/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Rizwan Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1602 Const. P. 7331/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ahmed Tabba (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1603 Const. P. 4497/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muntazir Mehdi & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 Yes The petitioners who are serving as Deputy Prosecutor Generals in the prosecution department Government of Sindh contend that they are holding the LLM Degree and have claimed LLM degree allowance through this petition based on equality. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1604 Const. P. 2146/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1605 Const. P. 1867/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Subhan Ali Shoro & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1606 Const. P. 3982/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Qadeer Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan And Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1607 Const. P. 6583/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Azhar Ali Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1608 Const. P. 5500/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Waris khaki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1609 Const. P. 4275/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Latif and ORs (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1610 Const. P. 4311/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Hassan Textiles (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1611 Const. P. 7022/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1612 Const. P. 419/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Basheer Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5397/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar,C.A.2856/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
1613 II.A. 33/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Azhar Ilyas (Appellant) VS Govt Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1614 II.A. 56/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Samad through L.rs (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1615 Const. P. 3707/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Shereen Javed (Petitioner) VS The State Thru Governor and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1616 Const. P. 186/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ayaz (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1617 II.A. 33/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Akhtar & Ors. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1618 Const. P. 8830/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Wahid Khursheed Kunwar (Petitioner) VS EOBI and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1619 Const. P. 1019/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Anjuman-e-Imamia Sindh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1620 R.A (Civil Revision) 284/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 WAPDA & Other (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ashraf (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1621 Const. P. 5638/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Farhana Zulfiqar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1622 Const. P. 1879/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1417-K/2022 Dr. Khalid Iqbal Talpur v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1623 Const. P. 752/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 Yes The plea taken by the parties could not be agitated in Constitution petition, as this court is not in a position to look into the allegations and counterallegation in an election matter, in terms of section 60 of the Election Act, 2017, which is also covered by Article 63 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
1624 R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Mst: Begum and Others (Applicant) VS Irshad Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1625 Const. P. 3652/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sabir Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1626 Const. P. 1481/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sajjad Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1627 Const. P. 636/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ali Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer of Union Council Jacobabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
1628 Const. P. 273/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Inspector Rukhsana Leghari and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1629 Const. P. 6311/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sheikh Nusrat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1630 Const. P. 3409/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Rauf and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1631 II.A. 107/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Siddique. (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ali trough LRs. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1632 Cr.Bail 1114/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MOAZAM S/O ABDUL BARI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1633 Const. P. 95/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Parvez Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1634 2018 PLC (CS) Note 169 Const. P. 447/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Muhammad Ilyas & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.45-K/2018 Muhammad Ilyas and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1635 2018 PLC Lab. Note 29 Const. P. 7339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Independent Media Corp (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Raja Tariq Mehmood and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.66-K/2018 M/s Independent Media Corporation (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Raja Tariq Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1636 Cr.Bail 360/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 BABER JAMEEL S/O MUNSIF KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1637 Cr.Bail 406/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ZARDULLAH KHAN S/O SHUJA ALAM KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1638 2019 PLC Lab. 121 Const. P. 1885/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s CIM Shipping Inc (Petitioner) VS Tousif Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1639 Const. P. 5472/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shahid Iqbal Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.573-K/2018 Shahid Iqbal Shaikh v. The Govt. of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1640 2018 PLC CS 89 Const. P. 178/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Khan Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1641 2018 SCMR 1272 Const. P. 4291/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syeda Sakina Riaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.1189/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.P.343-K/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted. Relist after 3 months
1642 2018 YLR 1639 Const. P. 770/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Faiz Muhammad & Another (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Sindh Police & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1643 Const. P. 4348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Dileep Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.73-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others,C.P.426-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1644 Const. P. 5541/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.705-K/2018 Tanveer Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1645 Const. P. 4441/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Marina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1646 2018 PLC CS 398 Const. P. 411/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dr. Amir Bux and others (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1772/2017 Dr. Amir Bux and others v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1647 Const. P. 6254/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Prof: Abdul Razzaque Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.655-K/2017 Prof: Abdul Razzaque Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1648 Const. P. 5049/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Shamsher Safdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1592/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Government of Pakistan M/o Infomation, Broadcasting & National Heritage, Islamabad & another v. Muhammad Shamsher Safdar & others,C.P.2494/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Govt of Pakistan, M/o Information, Islamabad & another v. Muhammad Shamsher Safdar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1649 Const. P. 6708/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar & 3 others (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1782/2017 Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar and others v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1650 Suit 614/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Muhammad Amin through LRs. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shamim Begum alias Lala (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1651 Const. P. 5542/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Noorullah Abro & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3657/2017,C.A.1599/2017,C.P.3664/2017,C.P.4780/2017,C.P.3708/2017,C.P.3658/2017,C.A.1606/2017,C.A.1596/2017,C.A.1595/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Disposed of as not pressed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
1652 Const. P. 365/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1653 Const. P. 2533/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-APR-19 Yes Sindh Government /Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of ASI on the basis of Son/Shaheedquota by issuing Standing Ordersor by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014by relaxing the requisite qualification for appointment in the disciplinary force. The appointment of ASI can only be made through competitive process on merit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.392-K/2019 Asif Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deprtt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1654 Const. P. 730/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 M/s. Muhammadi Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1655 Const. P. 1159/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Allah Dino (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1656 Const. P. 1903/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ghulam Qadir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.341-K/2019 Ghulam Qadir v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1657 Const. P. 366/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Altaf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1658 Const. P. 3173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rafi Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1659 Const. P. 6090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Farrukh Mirza (Petitioner) VS The Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-20 Yes The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.386-K/2020 Dr. Farrukh Mirza v. The Secretary Finance Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1660 Const. P. 3170/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Aliya Shabnam (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1661 2018 SBLR Sindh 134 Const. P. 3199/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Bakht Siddiqui and 61 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.409-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Bakht Siddique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1662 Const. P. 4605/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Amanullah Tamimy (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.410-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Amanullah Tamimy and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1663 Const. P. 1820/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shahid Ali Bhutto & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.572-K/2018 Shahid Ali Bhutto and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1664 Const. P. 1415/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Haji Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1665 Const. P. 364/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1666 2020 SBLR Sindh 943 Cr.Bail 944/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shadu & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1667 Const. P. 3445/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sheeraz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1668 Const. P. 3713/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1669 Const. P. 4694/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Syed Abbas Haider (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2783/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
1670 Const. P. 328/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sharif & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1671 2018 PLC (CS) Note 71 Const. P. 7383/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-17 Yes Professor Dr. Masood Hameed Khan/Respondent No.3 filed listed application for initiation of contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors on account of their willful, and deliberate act of disobeying order passed by this Court. The learned law officer after consultation with the official present in Court, Additional Secretary (HE),Governor House informed that the Summary on the issue of 8appointment of Vice Chancellor is in process before the Governor Sindh/Chancellor and an order will be passed on the said summary within a week. This undertaking has also been given by the above named official . we are of the view that the same is pending in Suit No.893/2017, as such we would refrain to pass any order in this regard, because the same may prejudice the case of either party in the said Suit. assignment of the Additional Charge of Vice Chancellor of DUHS to Professor Dr. Khawar Saeed Jamali is concerned the same has already been taken care of in order dated19.04.2017 passed in Suit No.893/2017 .In view of the above discussion, at this juncture, we are of the view that no contempt of this Court's order dated 26.04.2016 is made out. Therefore, the listed applications accordingly dismissed in the above terms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1672 Const. P. 4335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
1673 Const. P. 730/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Hashmat Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1674 Const. P. 48/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Hashim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS D.C Mirpurkhas (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1675 Const. P. 905/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Miss. Erum & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 Yes Petitioner in pursuance advertisement applied for drawing teacher & Orientale teacher. They claimed on conducting the written test they declared successful candidate. they approached obtaining offer letter but could not. State council informed that since irregularities were found in the test no result of written test was announced .However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and not appointed. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents had found something fishy in the matter and recommended for scrapping of the whole recruitment process. The material placed on record before this Court clearly shows that a policy decision was taken by the Government to have the recruitment undertaken for the posts by way of fresh advertisement. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Civil petition no 186K/2013 Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh &others(supra), consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.283-K/2019 Miss Erum and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1676 2021 PLC (CS) 295 Const. P. 404/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.181-K/2019 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. and another v. Muhammad Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1677 Cr.Tran 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ismail Dahri (Appellant) VS Learned Specail Judge ATC SBA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1678 Const. P. 2243/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Sarfaraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS N.T.S and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.614-K/2018 Sarfaraz Ahmed v. National Testing Services and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1679 Const. P. 2018/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Market Committee and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1426-K/2018 Market Committee Karachi and another v. Muhammad Saddiq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1680 Const. P. 6899/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s S. Zia-ul-Haq & Sons (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1681 Const. P. 4022/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 (Engr) Muhammad Hashim Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman(SUPARCO) & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1682 2020 PLC (CS) Note 13 Const. P. 7941/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Sabiha Ilyas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1683 Const. P. 803/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Tanzeel-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.124-K/2019 Tanzeel-ur-Rehman Khan Niazi v. Govt. of Sindh thr.Secy: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1684 2019 SBLR Sindh 418, 2019 PLC (CS) 1381 Const. P. 6251/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shaikh Muhammad Suleman (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1685 Const. P. 2191/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Wasim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Federal Govt. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1443-K/2018 Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation Pvt Ltd v. M. Wasim Akhtar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1686 Const. P. 6643/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shiraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1687 Const. P. 6629/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Touseef Nazeer (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.19-K/2019 Touseef Nazeer v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1688 Const. P. 3638/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Saad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.114-K/2019 Barkat Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1689 Const. P. 5595/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sajid Ali Mangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3523/2017 Sajid Ali Mangi & others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1593/2017 Sajid Ali Mangi & others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1690 Const. P. 5660/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Waseem Abbas Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3669/2017 Adnan Razi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1604/2017 Adnan Razi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1691 Const. P. 5601/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Waheed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1597/2017,C.A.1611/2017,C.P.3659/2017,C.A.1602/2017 SCP Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1692 Const. P. 6859/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Besham Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Public Service Commission & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1693 Const. P. 6900/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s PICIC Insurance Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1694 Const. P. 4637/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Quetta Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3311/2018 M/s Qutta Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secy. Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.95-K/2019 M/s Qutta Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secy. Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1695 Const. P. 5779/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s S. Zia ul Haq & Sons (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1696 Const. P. 2659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khalid Hameed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1697 Const. P. 5918/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Ahsanullah Khan Nazir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1104-K/2018 Dr. Ahsanullah Khan Wazir v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1698 2018 SBLR Sindh 1641 Const. P. 4236/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Bashir Ahmed lanjwani (Petitioner) VS Provvince of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1699 Const. P. 3555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4307/2017,C.M.A.8212/2017,C.P.1247/2018,C.A.170/2018,C.A.171/2018,C.P.4865/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered & fixed in Next Week.,Disposed Dismissed(Bench=HJ(12)+HJ(16),Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
1700 2018 PLC CS 510 H.C.A 108/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 P.T.C.L & another (Appellant) VS Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.313/2018 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others,C.A.416/2022 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
1701 Const. P. 3486/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Jawaid Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1435-K/2018 Javed Alam v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Inter Provincial Co-Ordanation Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1702 Const. P. 2381/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s B.P Ind (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1703 2019 PLC (CS) 557 Const. P. 1842/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1704 2019 PLC (CS) 1258 Const. P. 3472/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 M. Afzal Kausar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.544-K/2018 Muhammad Afzal Kausar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1705 Const. P. 4859/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Khalil Ahmed Jalil and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.513-K/2018 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others,C.A.328/2020 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 2 weeks a/w C.A.34-K/2019 etc,Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 1 month)
1706 2019 PLC (CS) 771 Const. P. 8265/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Majid Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.135/2018 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others,C.A.636/2019 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1707 Const. P. 4666/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Afaq A. Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1708 Const. P. 143/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Abbas Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4960/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others,C.A.506/2020 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed
1709 Const. P. 4581/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ali Gohar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Provinvce of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1710 Const. P. 4918/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Gatron (Ind.) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1711 Const. P. 7119/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Multinational Export Bureau (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1712 Const. P. 2811/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Capt. Saifuddin (Petitioner) VS P.I.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1713 2019 PLC (CS) 1114 Const. P. 1610/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Ghulam Abbas Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1714 2020 PLC (CS) 50 Const. P. 3387/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1715 2019 MLD 1295 H.C.A 425/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asif Seemab Sindhu (Appellant) VS Administrator, DHA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
1716 Const. P. 3940/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Atlas Enterprises and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1717 Const. P. 1282/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Haji Rafiudduin Waliuddin (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1718 Const. P. 1764/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Apna Micro Finance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1719 Const. P. 569/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Rasoom Bhagat (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1720 Const. P. 4752/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ghulam Sarwat Thaheem (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.94-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Board & University Deptt: Govt. of Sindh v. Ghulam Sarwar Thaheem Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1721 Const. P. 4533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nova Leather (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1722 Const. P. 6092/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Good Luck Ind. (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1723 Const. P. 481/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s IBM (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3102/2018 M/s Institute of Business Management, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.92-K/2019 M/s Institute of Business Management, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1724 Const. P. 1273/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2975/2018 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.78-K/2019 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1725 Const. P. 1277/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Super Compounds Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1726 Cr.Bail 180/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Waheed Dehpal Chandio (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1727 Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1728 Cr.J.A 81/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Abdul Fattah @ Fattoo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-JUL-19 Yes Criminal Whether every member of an unlawful assembly, in respect of an offence committed in prosecution of common object/intention, is guilty of that offence? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1729 Const. P. 1151/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr Fozia Akmal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-AUG-19 Yes whether the services of the petitioner as Consultant Gynecologist in SESSI can be regularized Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1730 Const. P. 5496/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hassan Jan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1731 Const. P. 429/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Naushad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1732 Const. P. 3102/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Haseeb Malik & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1733 Const. P. 2676/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Javed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1734 Const. P. 2834/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1735 Const. P. 2981/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Azeem Rind (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1736 Const. P. 2770/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulqarnain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1737 Const. P. 3150/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sajad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1738 Const. P. 950/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Rasool & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1739 Const. P. 1768/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Bilawal & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1740 Const. P. 2186/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Faqeer Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1741 Const. P. 2863/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Qasim & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1742 Const. P. 1151/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Gul (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1743 Const. P. 3097/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 AzamKhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1744 Const. P. 1619/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Hakeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1745 Const. P. 1680/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nisar Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1276-K/2020 Subhan Ali v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Allotment Committee & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1746 Const. P. 1965/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Fazal-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1747 Const. P. 2040/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1748 Const. P. 2551/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Hakeem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1749 Const. P. 250/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 SawanKhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1750 Const. P. 2671/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1751 Const. P. 7596/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Fouzia Munir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.555-K/2019 Fouzia Munir v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1752 Const. P. 6001/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Anees Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.512-K/2019 Syed Anees Ali v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1753 Const. P. 2898/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dad Rahim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-19 Yes The service of the petitioners, employees of the Fishermen???s Cooperative Society Ltd., were terminated vide letter dated 31.12.2018 issued by the Administration Department of Fishermen???s Cooperative Society. Prima-facie, the society is purely a private corporate body with no public duty; hence, a writ of mandamus would not lie against the Respondent-Society. The Respondent-Society is a co-operative society constituted under the agreement between members thereof, who are to abide by the provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act, and the rules and bye-laws framed thereunder by the Society. The society is undisputedly not a department of the State and is also not a creature of any statute but merely governed by a statute. We may observe here that this Court can only interfere in the matter, if it is established that a mandatory Provision of a statute has been violated. The dispute so noted by this Court essentially related to the claims and counter claims of the private parties relating to the service matter, which in our view is an internal matter between them and rights of the petitioners are purely of a private character, not open to be dealt with in a writ petition; therefore, writ of mandamus cannot be issued under the Article 199 of the Constitution, 1973 for petitioners??? reinstatement in service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1754 Const. P. 794/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1755 Const. P. 1173/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Usman Siddique & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1756 Const. P. 201/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Yasir Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1757 Const. P. 291/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1758 Const. P. 163/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1759 Const. P. 2194/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1760 Const. P. 2201/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zafar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1761 Const. P. 721/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Irrigation matter Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1762 Const. P. 1906/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ali Akbar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1763 Const. P. 2171/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shaman Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1764 Const. P. 2946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Fahad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1765 Const. P. 6342/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ashar Afaq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1766 Const. P. 1195/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Asmatullah (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1767 Const. P. 1080/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1768 Const. P. 1000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Raza Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1769 Const. P. 3066/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1770 Const. P. 4064/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Yaseen Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-19 Yes NADRA Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1771 2020 SBLR Sindh 715 Const. P. 5924/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Baluchistan Wheel Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Industries - wise Trade NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-SEP-19 Yes To appreciate the aforesaid proposition, reference is made to Article 199(1) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, reproduced as under: - ???A High Court may if it is satisfied that no other adequate remedy is provided by law:- (a) on the application of any aggrieved party make an order??? (i) Directing??????. (ii) Declaring??????..??? 9. The above referred Article lays condition of satisfaction of this Court as to absence of any adequate remedy available under the law to the person/party invoking constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, Petitioner-establishment besides being aggrieved should have locus standi to approach this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. We have noticed that the certificate of registration issued by the Respondent No.1 is still in existence. The objection, which has now been raised by the petitioner-establishment, through the instant writ petition on the aforesaid pleas can hardly been looked into by this Court in presence of remedy provided to the Petitioner-Establishment under section 12 of Industrial Relations Act. Besides that the learned Counsel could not advance any convincing reason to establish that the Petitioner-establishment is an aggrieved party which can impugn registration of the Respondent No.2???s-Union by the Respondent No. 01 vide Order dated 25.7.2017 in constitutional jurisdiction of this court. Hence, the instant petition is a futile exercise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1772 Const. P. 3216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mir Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1773 Const. P. 1943/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1774 Const. P. 412/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Bahadur Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1775 Const. P. 1390/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Noor Nabi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1776 Const. P. 3316/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-19 Yes Petitioner has rendered 32 years??? service, however, the benefits as provided under clause 19 of the Resolution as discussed supra have been denied to him and no plausible reason has been assigned for withholding the same, for which the Petitioner cannot be held responsible. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1777 Const. P. 2261/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Wagho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1778 Const. P. 2137/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1779 Const. P. 736/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mengho (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1780 Const. P. 1929/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khuda Dino (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1781 Const. P. 1961/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Haji Muhammad Roshan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1782 Const. P. 1121/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1783 Const. P. 1134/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sindh Growers Alliance (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1784 Const. P. 8184/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Adeel Khan (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes we do not concur with findings of the learned Appellate Tribunal, Sindh, as the private respondents/workers were inducted in service without completing the codal formalities and entire evidence supports the case/contention of the KPT. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.690-K/2019 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.19-K/2022 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1785 Const. P. 44/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1027/2021 Hilal Care Private Ltd Karachi and others v. Sindh through Secretary Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1786 Const. P. 2467/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Boota Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1787 Const. P. 733/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1788 Const. P. 3437/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Hussain Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1789 Const. P. 2854/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Bakhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1790 Const. P. 2129/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raza Khan Sawati and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1791 Const. P. 4920/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maqsood Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-19 Yes regularization issue of employees of PSQCA Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3673/2020 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others,C.A.522/2021 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed and Remanded
1792 Const. P. 4677/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Dr. Naeem Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-SEP-19 Yes Whether supersession is punishment---in promotion matters to such post could not be made in a mechanical manner and a variety of factors, such as examination of service records, evaluation reports of training institutions, record of disciplinary proceedings, reputation of integrity and efficiency, suitability for handling particular assignment, etc. had to be taken into consideration--- NCA Employees Service Rules 2011, on the aforesaid proposition, the matter has been set at rest by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others v. NESCOM through Chairman Islamabad and others (PLD 2016 SC 377)] therefore, question of declaring the Chapter II of the NCA Employees Service Rules 2011 as ultra vires of Section 9, 11 of the National Command Authority Act 2010 and Articles 4,9,10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 are not apropos at this stage for the reason discussed in the preceding paragraphs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1793 Const. P. 1997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1794 Const. P. 400/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1795 Const. P. 2143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Inamullah Halepoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1796 Const. P. 3341/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Shabeer (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1797 Const. P. 1946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Liaqat Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1798 Const. P. 3009/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ayoub Khan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1799 Const. P. 3057/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Saleh &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1800 Const. P. 3269/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Allah Jurrio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1801 Const. P. 2993/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Liaquat Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh Andothers (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1802 Const. P. 2926/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1803 Const. P. 32/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1804 Const. P. 917/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Jabbar Abid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1805 Const. P. 1084/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Khuda Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1806 Const. P. 3369/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1807 Const. P. 2360/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Yaqboob (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1808 Const. P. 3453/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Aachar& others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1809 I. A 13/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Lachman Das & others (Appellant) VS Tano Lal and Harji (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes The property in question being a public amenity cannot be encroached upon and as per the dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court, an area earmarked and reserved for an amenity like Massan/Graveyard and Aasaish, cannot be used for any other purposes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1810 Const. P. 635/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Akram & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1811 Const. P. 634/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Abdul Wahid & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
1812 Const. P. 19/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sikandar Ali Malah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-20 Yes In view of the foregoing discussion, the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue a retirement order of the petitioner in BPS-17/18 under the law and to pay his full pensionary benefits, from the date of attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 31.12.2011 as admissible to him under the law within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioners and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 31.12.2011 to date. Petition and pending applications are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1813 Const. P. 646/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Al-Kousar Drinking Water (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-21 Yes to direct the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board (KW&SB) to grant him license to continue his business for supplying Brackish water via Pipe Line from Subsoil/boring to National Refinery and other industries in Karachi--we are not inclined to subscribe to the request of the petitioner because no right of the petitioner to extract minerals/brackish water has been established and prima-facie under the garb of this petition he has attempted to continue such an activity illegally Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1814 Civil Revision 124/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khair Muhammad Brohi & others (Applicant) VS District Judge Matiari & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1815 Const. P. 456/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Khalil-Ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS PEPCO Wapda &ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1816 Const. P. 2881/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1817 Criminal Appeal 185/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1818 Const. P. 5649/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Ghulam Sugharan (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1819 Criminal Appeal 212/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: 1200 grams of charas 2019 Parvaiz (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-AUG-20 Yes 1200 grams of charas appeal allowed 1200 grams of charas appeal allowed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1820 Const. P. 455/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 HESCO (Petitioner) VS Qurban Ali & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1821 Const. P. 1301/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-20 Yes contempt applications in the case of Sindh Textbook Board contempt applications in the case of Sindh Textbook Board Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1290/2020 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1822 Civil Revision 184/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Bashir Ahmed (Applicant) VS Masood (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1823 Const. P. 2692/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahnawaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-20 Yes Seniority matter--SRP--Police Constables--Adverting to the point raised by learned counsel for the petitioners that they were appointed in SRP Karachi and posted in RRF Karachi since 2009, thus their seniority is liable to be maintained in Karachi range, suffice it to say that prima-facie, the RRF was / is not part of the Karachi range, but is a combination of different regions/units of the Sindh police, merely their appointment in SRP Karachi and posting in RRF Karachi does not support their case to the effect that they belonged to Karachi Range Police, for the reason that they never remained posted in the Karachi range police, therefore, their seniority cannot be ordered to be mixed with Karachi range police. The record further reflects that their recommendations for initial appointments by their regional head were made based on their respective place of domicile. Petitioners have failed to point out that their appointment was / is based on Karachi domicile, therefore they are precluded to claim vested right for seniority and promotion at Karachi Range on the aforesaid analogy--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1438-K/2020 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others,C.A.57-K/2021 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned
1824 2023 PLC Lab. Note 52 Const. P. 325/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Aijaz and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1825 Const. P. 7214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes regularization of their contingent service as computer Operator, Naib Qasid and Chowkidar in the Sindh Coal Authority (SCA) Government of Sindh---The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor fall within the ambit of Policy of the Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1826 Const. P. 855/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Waheed Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Nabi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1827 Const. P. 5585/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Fakhar un Nisa (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1828 M.A. 10/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Fatima (Appellant) VS Umar Hayat & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1829 Const. P. 2546/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS The Speaker Provincial Assembly and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-20 Yes Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1879/2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar v. Speaker Provincial Assembly of Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1830 Const. P. 6389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1831 Const. P. 7563/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Irshad Ahmed Siyal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1832 Const. P. 720/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Akbar Allauddin & another (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1833 Const. P. 1741/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Sadia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1834 Const. P. 4905/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-20 Yes The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1835 Const. P. 5663/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jawad Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sect: Ind & Production and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 Yes policy decision---Prima facie, the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV was/is a policy decision which has already been taken care of by the Secretary Ministry of Industries and Production, Government of Pakistan, whereby the request of PSMC was declined for delinking of the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme from the privatization process vide letter dated 13.04.2015. Besides the subject matter in these proceedings is a policy matter and Privatization Commission has already taken back the decision vide letter dated 16.02.2015 for the launching of aforesaid Society till the privatization of PSMC which is the policy decision of respondents; and, in the given circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the policy decision under its Constitutional jurisdiction, for the reasons already given hereinabove. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1836 Const. P. 4201/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-20 Yes The pivotal question involved in the present proceedings is whether a Civil / Government Servant who is found guilty of misconduct under The Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, and a minor penalty was imposed upon him could be considered for promotion? ---In our view, the promotion to a post depends upon several circumstances. To qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. An employee found guilty of misconduct cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion committee takes the penalties imposed upon the employee into consideration and denies him the promotion, such denial cannot be termed as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal or unjustified. In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee should not be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the DPC, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess every proposal for promotion, on case to case basis. In cases where disciplinary case / criminal prosecution against the Civil / Government servant is not concluded even after the expiry of two years from the date of the meeting of the first DPC which kept its findings in respect of the Government servant the appointing authority may consider the desirability of giving him an ad-hoc promotion--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.405-K/2021 Shamsuddin Dal v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1837 Const. P. 5650/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Reshma (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1838 Const. P. 8536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Riffat John (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-20 Yes Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1839 Const. P. 2690/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Wakeel (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1840 Civil Revision 28/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2008 Muhammad Naseer and others (Applicant) VS H.M.C. and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1841 Const. P. 4802/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mansoor Ahmed Rajput and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes Promotion to the post of Director Information BS-19, which has been deferred vide notification dated 29.9.2020 on account of pendency of NAB reference / proceedings--whether a Civil Servant can be promoted against whom prima facie involvement in the serious charges of misconduct was available in the shape of NAB reference / proceedings ? --we are of the view that the case of the petitioners for promotion was rightly deferred by the competent authority / Board, and such decision does not call for any interference by this Court. However, their deferment shall be subject to the final outcome of the NAB reference / proceedings presently pending against them. disposed of Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.786-K/2020 Mansoor Ahmed Rajput & another v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1842 Const. P. 5652/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ashiq Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1843 Const. P. 664/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Iqbal & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1844 Const. P. 244/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Lateefan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1845 Const. P. 5850/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zeeshan Usman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1754/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others,C.A.936/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.,Disposed Allowed
1846 Const. P. 2735/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Ravi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-20 Yes In view of the above, the competent authority of respondents is directed to consider the case of the petitioner-widow for her family pension if her deceased husband had a requisite length of service to claim pensionary benefits on account of family pension. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. By consent, this petition is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1847 Const. P. 6032/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Waqarullah Korejo Advocate (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1848 2022 PLC (CS) 481 Const. P. 4941/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-20 Yes PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine. we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1849 Cr.Misc. 16/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 P.C Nasir Hussain Arain (Applicant) VS Hasnain Shah & 3 Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
1850 2022 SBLR Sindh 949 Const. P. 2647/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-20 Yes relieving him from the post of Director Anti-Quackery Sindh Health Care Commission (`SHCC`)--In view of the above discussion, the petition is not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent- SHCC. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.104-K/2021 Dr.Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1851 Const. P. 4508/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.269-K/2021 Dr.Dilshad Ahmed v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1852 Const. P. 175/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1853 Cr.Misc. 307/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Muhammad Hassan Narejo & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
1854 Const. P. 735/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1855 Const. P. 2947/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1856 Const. P. 297/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Madam (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1857 Const. P. 3405/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nazim Inayat (Petitioner) VS National Command & Authority (NCA) and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1858 Const. P. 434/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ali Nawaz Umar (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1859 Const. P. 2644/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mir Imadad Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst Sajida & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1860 Criminal Appeal 51/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 ASGHAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1861 Const. P. 1633/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Munhadar Raza Shah (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1862 Const. P. 363/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Pir Muhammad Hassan Qadir (Petitioner) VS Muhammad S/O Amoon (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1863 Const. P. 16/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 General Secretary Fayaz Education Society Hyd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Javed Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1864 Const. P. 444/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mehbob Ali (Petitioner) VS D.C. Sanghar & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Prima-facie the subject land is reserved for Musafir khana which is for the people of area, legal title may vest in the Government, but such title, and the exercise of powers based thereon, is to be exercised in public interest, in accordance with the Constitution and the laws framed thereunder. Similarly, in the case reported as Ardeshir Cowasjee and 10 others v. Karachi Building Control Authority (KMC), Karachi and 4 others (1999 SCMR 2883) in somewhat similar facts in respect of a plot which was carved out within a park area, the Honble Supreme Court has held that an amenity plot cannot be used for any commercial purpose. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1865 Const. P. 3784/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Sakina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and 06 others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 Yes pension matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1866 Const. P. 6236/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Raza Muhammad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-20 Yes The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed in limine along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1867 Const. P. 2884/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sikandar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.381-K/2020 Sikandar Ali & others v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1868 Const. P. 298/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ali Gohar & another (Petitioner) VS Abdullah Mallah & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.727-K/2020 Ali Gohar & another v. Abdullah Mallah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1869 Const. P. 741/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Rustam Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1870 Cr.Tran 15/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Ilyas (Appellant) VS Ld. Additional Sessions Judge Shahdadpur & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1871 Const. P. 285/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Mustafa Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1872 Const. P. 3107/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ahsan H Khuwaja (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1873 Criminal Appeal 173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asad Ali Khaskheli (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1874 Const. P. 983/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 979,993,998/2020 2020 Kewal Ram (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1875 Const. P. 2634/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Islam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1876 Const. P. 176/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Akber Kharani (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1877 Const. P. 436/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Sultan Shah (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1878 Const. P. 882/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Ahmer Hameed S/o Syed Abdul Hameed @ Babar (Petitioner) VS Mst. Iqbal-un-Nisa Begum and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JAN-21 Yes civil dispute between the parties--I am not in agreement with the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner for the simple reason that the petitioner being a Head Constable in the Police Department is/was not required to indulge in such kind of disputes and take advantage of police uniform. Moreover, Petitioners prayer to direct the police officials not to entertain the complaint of the private respondent, prima facie is not maintainable as no ostensible evidence pertaining to any harassment being caused by the police officials to the petitioner has been substantiated to justify interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as the matter of a civil dispute between the parties is being tried by the competent civil Court.--Abdullah Memon, Superintendent of Police Madadgar 15 present in Court states that he will look into the matter and conduct an impartial inquiry. He is directed to hold an inquiry into the matter and if the petitioner is found involved in usurping the private property, he may proceed against him in accordance with law. The parties are at liberty to avail their remedy before the competent forum under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1879 Const. P. 5124/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Farkhunda Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS Secretary, M/o Interior & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes It is well-settled law that the service of temporary employees can be terminated on 14 days??? notice or pay in lieu thereof, whereas in the present case petitioner claims revival of the contract through reinstatement in service, which factum cannot be thrashed out in writ jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1880 Const. P. 2707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-21 Yes the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to award him incentive of timescale i.e. BPS-17 to BPS-19, from the date of his entitlement; and, other ancillary benefits, to bring him at par with the employees of other departments of Government of Sindh--whether the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of the timescale from BPS-17 to BPS-19 under the law or otherwise. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1881 Const. P. 1578/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Saqib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-21 Yes departmental proceedings initiated against him as contemplated under Section 3(b)(c) of the Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1988--as to how this petition is maintainable against departmental proceedings initiated against him and the final order for dismissal from service served upon him, which action of the respondent-department ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal (SST) at Karachi. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1882 Const. P. 391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Fayyaz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4118/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others,C.A.1563/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Pending
1883 Const. P. 4685/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Azhar Hussain Solangi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1884 Const. P. 4485/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Prof. Javed Ahmed Badvi & another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 Yes Petitioner No.2 has impugned the recruitment process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the position of Vice-Chancellor, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, (SMBBMU)---We are of the view the ground of awarding marks to the shortlisted candidates by the Search Committee was not their mandate under reference set forth by the competent authority. On the subject, unreported order dated 21.12.2017 passed by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Civil Petition No.655-K of 2017 (Re-Prof. Abdul Razak Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others) and Professor Dr. Razia Sultana supra is clear in its terms Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1885 Const. P. 2207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hafeez ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-21 Yes suspension from the service--SBCA--we are of the considered view that the Petitioner has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the disciplinary proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1886 Const. P. 3373/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abrar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 Yes proforma promotion Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1887 Const. P. 1242/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Shakoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 Yes termination from service--Baqai Cadet College, Karachi--It is a well-settled principle of law that the appointment on contract and its subsequent expiration on the aforesaid charges cannot be threshed out through these proceedings and the petitioner cannot be ordered to be reinstated in service in absence of statutory rules of service. Resultantly, this Petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1888 Const. P. 6909/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asadullah Shaikh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3521/2021 Asadullah Shaikh and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1920/2023 Asadullah Shaikh and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 3 months,Pending
1889 Const. P. 399/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghulam Mustafa Bugti (Petitioner) VS S.E Operation Circle SEPCO Larkana & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUL-21 Yes Transfer and Posting Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1890 Cr.Bail 2013/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Abdul Latif Kodrani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1891 Const. P. 3597/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Rauf Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1892 Const. P. 5657/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi (Petitioner) VS N.B.P (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-21 Yes NBP--Dismissal from service Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.467-K/2021 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi,C.A.17/2024 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1893 Const. P. 5020/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Irfan Mukhtar Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-21 Yes deferment of the Petitioners promotion on grounds of the pending disciplinary proceedings Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1894 Const. P. 1414/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ahemd Kaleem Usmani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1895 Cr.Bail 216/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Asghar Gahejo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1896 Cr.Rev 52/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Wali Muhammad @ Hajan and Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-AUG-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1897 Const. P. 4978/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 Yes It is pertinent to mention that petitioner is working in BPS-19 and his promotion will be due after one year hence at this juncture questioning direct appointment on BPS-20 cannot be termed justified and legal; hence instant petition is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1898 Cr.Bail 127/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Sabir Ali Khoso (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes For the aforesaid reasons, the instant bail application merits no consideration is dismissed. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the case; dispose of the same preferably within two months from the date of this Order; and, it is made clear that the direction given by this Court in bail matters may not be taken lightly and valid reasons are to be assigned if the same direction is not complied with as now it is well-settled law that to have a speedy trial is the fundamental right of the accused being universally acknowledged. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, a smooth methodology and Scheme for a speedy trial are provided whether it is held by the Sessions Court or Magistrate, in recognition of the said right of an accused person. This principle shall apply more vigorously to the trials before Special Courts, constituted under the CNS Act, or any other special law so that unnecessary delay, a much less shocking one in its conclusion is avoided in all circumstances. Any unreasonable or shocking delay in the conclusion of the trial, before Special Courts, would amount to the denial of justice, or to say, denial of fundamental rights to the accused, of speedy trial. On the aforesaid proposition. In this context, I am fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Imtiaz Ahmed vs. The State (2017 SCMR 1194). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1899 Const. P. 416/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Majid Hussain Khokhar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 Yes PCSIR Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.801-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Majid Hussain Khokhar,C.P.810-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Tariq Mateen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1900 Const. P. 4172/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sami Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1901 Const. P. 4485/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ashfaq Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-21 Yes the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1902 2023 SBLR Sindh 1193 Cr.Bail 279/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Badal Bariro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1903 Const. P. 1644/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Nawaz Murad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1904 Cr.Bail 770/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mashooque Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1905 Cr.Bail 875/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1906 Cr.Bail 926/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sajan Laghari (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1907 Cr.Misc. 660/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imran Ali (Applicant) VS SP Jamshoro (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1908 Const. P. 917/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Mukhtaran (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1909 Civil Revision 159/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 M/s Kotri Roller Flour Mills (Applicant) VS Bheru Mal (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1910 Const. P. 51/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Shahnaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1911 Const. P. 944/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1912 Const. P. 1518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1913 Const. P. 96/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C. P. No. D- 06 of 2020 [Muhammad Asif & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C. P. No. D- 96 of 2020 [Abdul Rasheed & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-111 of 2020 [Muhammad Anwar vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-126 of 2020 [Nizamuddin & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-244 of 2020 [Wali Muhammad & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] 2020 Abdul Rasheed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.4725/2021 Shahi Khan Jagirani v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Health Department, Larkana and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1914 Const. P. 1757/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Herlal and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1915 Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1916 Const. P. 594/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1917 Civil Revision 28/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Aziz (Applicant) VS Mst. Irshad Bibi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1918 Civil Revision 317/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Esso (Applicant) VS Zahid Hussain (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1919 Const. P. 203/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Saifal Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1920 Const. P. 1197/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Dr. Ali Murad Lajwani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1921 Const. P. 335/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1922 Const. P. 511/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sanullah (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ashraf alias Lala and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1923 First Appeal Against Order 66/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Umer Farooque (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shafique (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1924 Cr.Bail 1917/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAHZAD MASTOI S/O MUHAMAD RIAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-21 Yes seeking admission on post-arrest bail in FIR No.361/2021 for offenses under Section 324/34 PPC registered at PS Sukhan, Karachi Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1925 Const. P. 1181/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ms. Allah Bachai Soomro (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1926 Cr.Bail 1357/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD HUMAYUN QADRI S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes Applicant Muhammad Humayun Qadri has earlier been admitted to ad-interim pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order dated 14.7.2021. Now the matter is fixed for confirmation of pre-arrest bail or otherwise Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1927 Cr.Bail 1317/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 INTEKHAB ALAM QURESHI S/O MUHAMMAD YOUNUS QURESHI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes seeking pre-arrest bail in F.I.R No. 432 of 2021, for an offense under section 489-F P.P.C at Liaquatabad Police Station, Karachi Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1928 Const. P. 5067/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Akram Memon (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Civil Aviation Athority & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1929 Const. P. 1016/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Hafeez (Petitioner) VS G.O.S & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1930 Const. P. 413/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ms. Baby Hawa and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1931 Const. P. 3698/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nadeemuddin Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes The short question is whether compulsory retirement of the petitioner on the aforesaid grounds would be a valid exercise of the powers; and, whether such a purpose could be termed to be in the public interest? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1932 Const. P. 5819/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Kareem (Petitioner) VS M/s Trading Co. and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1933 Const. P. 5062/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Engr: Muharram Khan and Othes (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-22 Yes whether the private respondents are undertaking the work of professional engineers in terms of the Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975, being Diploma Holders. And whether their case falls within the ambit of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maula Bux Shaikh supra or otherwise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1934 Const. P. 3804/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Abdul Karim Channa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-22 Yes 7. The question involved in the present proceedings is whether Temporary and officiating service rendered by the petitioner on retenairship as Medical Officer with effect from 1992 till his purported regularization firstly in 2008 and secondly in 2012 shall count for pension. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1935 Const. P. 146/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Zafar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1936 Const. P. 7039/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mis Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pak Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Javaid and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1937 Const. P. 2085/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Employees Federation of Pakistan and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.35/2022 Phoenix Armour (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Employers Federation of Pakistan, Karachi and others,C.P.76/2022 Employers Federation of Pakistan, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1938 Const. P. 2954/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1939 Const. P. 3751/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naz Parveen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1940 Const. P. 806/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1941 Const. P. 3872/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1942 Const. P. 2157/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Mehran Bottlers and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1943 Const. P. 363/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1944 Const. P. 102/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1945 Const. P. 2084/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Agility Logistics Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.69/2022 Agility Logistics Private Limited Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1946 Const. P. 4219/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Mehran Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1947 Const. P. 6549/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Habibur Rehman Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1948 Const. P. 4769/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1949 Const. P. 7212/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Union Textile Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1950 Const. P. 3849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khadija Kausar (Petitioner) VS Sect: Worker Welfare Board & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1951 Const. P. 3052/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ayaz Ali Thahim (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-22 Yes suspension Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1952 R.A (Civil Revision) 3/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) VS Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1953 Const. P. 3559/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Tariq and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1954 II.A. 32/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Sachal thr LRs (Appellant) VS P.o Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 16-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1955 II.A. 47/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Housing and Land Development (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Noor Muhammad Qureshi thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1956 II.A. 48/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Housing and Land Development (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Noor Muhammad Qureshi thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1957 I. A 81/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Province of Sindh and Others (Appellant) VS Khairuddin and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1958 Const. P. 10/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mehmood Ali (Petitioner) VS Fedration of Pakisran & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1959 Const. P. 4744/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Majeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1960 2023 SBLR Sindh 633 Const. P. 3236/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mehrun Nisa Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1961 Const. P. 2856/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shakeel ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1962 Const. P. 4598/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NBP Officers Welfare Association and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.790/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi and another v. NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through Senior Vice President others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1963 Const. P. 141/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Yasmeen Nagori (Petitioner) VS Dy.Director (RCMHC) & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1964 Const. P. 1607/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani (Petitioner) VS President N.B.P & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-MAY-22 Yes The legal position of the case is that dispensing with the regular inquiry and awarding two punishments i.e. downgrading and major penalty of dismissal from service, ought not to have been imposed upon the Petitioner at the same time when the charges were denied by the Petitioner. The principle of natural justice demands that the petitioner ought to have been heard on the allegations leveled against him; however, the respondent had chosen not to conduct the regular inquiry and simply relied upon the purported admission of the petitioner which was not called for in the above circumstances. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1926/2022 The President, National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi and others v. Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1965 Criminal Appeal 30/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Asif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1966 Const. P. 1088/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1967 Const. P. 163/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Haji Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chairman WAPDA & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1968 Const. P. 633/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Asif Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Kamber and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
1969 Const. P. 7976/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 HRDO (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1970 Criminal Appeal 106/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1971 Const. P. 5636/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS DMC West Karachi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1972 Criminal Appeal 55/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Hassan @ Ali Hassan and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1973 Const. P. 861/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Aziz Ahmed Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1974 Const. P. 154/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Atteque Rehman Khuharo (Petitioner) VS The Chairman Sindh Higher Education Com. & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1975 H.C.A 387/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pak Maniar Investment Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS Salebhoy & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-MAR-23 Yes Against judgment and preliminary decree Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1976 Const. P. 2799/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Arab & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1977 Const. P. 3634/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Abdul Shakoor & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1978 Const. P. 3072/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1979 Const. P. 762/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Armughanullah & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAY-23 Yes Courts cannot grant equivalence of degree qualification for a particular advertisement. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1980 Criminal Appeal 158/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.A S 157 of 2022 2022 IRFAN ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-APR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1981 R.A (Civil Revision) 123/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Shahid Khan & another (Applicant) VS Mst. Sofia Bano & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1982 Const. P. 5468/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Ali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 Yes We reminded him that his service carries with it an obligation to serve the PSQCA, whichever place he is required to be posted in accordance with the exigencies of service or administrative requirements. It is for the PSQCA to take appropriate decision and such decision shall stand, unless it is vitiated either by mala fide or by extraneous consideration without any factual background or foundation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1983 Cr.Bail 1123/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HAIDER ALI S/O SHER ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1984 Const. P. 2701/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Abdul Shakoor Abro... (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-APR-24 Yes In this context, it may be observed that the writ jurisdiction of this Court is not meant to be exercised to compel the competent authority to promote a Civil Servant against whom prima facie involvement in serious charges of misconduct was available, for the reason that any such direction would be disharmonious to the principle of good governance and canons of service discipline causing undue interference to hamper the smooth functioning of the departmental authorities. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is a well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1985 R.A (Civil Revision) 139/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Agha Abid Majeed Khan Thr. Ghous Bakhsh Sahqani (Applicant) VS Idrees Ahmed and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1986 Const. P. 792/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 Yes contract employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1987 Const. P. 3598/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.254-K/2013 Muhammad Fareed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.202-K/2013 Muhammad Fareed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Allowed
1988 Const. P. 7004/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Umer Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1989 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1990 Const. P. 802/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Noman (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1991 2019 PLC (CS) 791 Const. P. 2377/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Atif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sect: Ministry of Textile Ind. and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1992 2019 PLC (CS) 1145 Const. P. 6911/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imtiaz Ahmed Barakzai (Petitioner) VS Federal Tax Ombudsman and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1993 Const. P. 1016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pehalwan Ali (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1994 2017 SBLR Sindh 1787 Const. P. 324/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Ali Hyder Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1995 Const. P. 2108/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Asim Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1996 2018 SCMR 2116 Const. P. 4428/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ahmed Ali Bhambro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.80-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others,C.P.440-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
1997 2019 CLC 85 Const. P. 1144/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amir S/o Abdul Zahoor (Petitioner) VS Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.533-K/2017 Amir v. Nasir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1998 2019 SBLR Sindh 1817 Const. P. 4268/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Rabbani (Petitioner) VS Governor, State Bank of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1999 Const. P. 1798/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Petitioner) VS D.G Ports & Shipping and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.526-K/2017 Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Guarantee) Ltd. v. D.G. (Port & Shipping) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted
2000 Const. P. 1415/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ghulam Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt.of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.571-K/2018 Umerdin Saand and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2001 Const. P. 1095/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2002 Const. P. 2226/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Wahid Bux Aajiz Leghari (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2003 Const. P. 3657/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ehsan Ali Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2004 Const. P. 1091/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Irshad Begum (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shamim and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2005 Const. P. 1800/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2006 Const. P. 2209/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Khan Muhammad and another (Petitioner) VS Rasheed Khan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2007 Const. P. 3171/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Azra Parveen Butt (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2008 Const. P. 3189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Captain (R) Javed Afzal & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.I.A.C.L & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.442-K/2019 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd.,C.A.22-K/2020 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
2009 Const. P. 3500/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Hijab Qazi (Petitioner) VS Chairman/CEO PIAC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2010 Const. P. 1932/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Saleem @ Muhammad Soomar (Petitioner) VS Senior Member Board of Revenue & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2011 Const. P. 4460/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Marvi Aslam & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2012 Const. P. 1094/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Irshad Begum (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shamim & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2013 Const. P. 2230/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Agha Asghar Ali Babar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2014 Const. P. 101/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Hasnain Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.426-K/2019 Syed Hasnain Raza v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: I.T & Telecom M/o Information Technology and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2015 Const. P. 61/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Bibi Muzammil (Petitioner) VS Accountant District Court MPS & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2016 Const. P. 3330/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2017 Const. P. 3263/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst, Zarka Bano (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2018 Const. P. 4510/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Irfan & 99 Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2019 Const. P. 3625/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sania & another (Petitioner) VS SSP Matiari & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2020 Const. P. 3580/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Humair Altaf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2021 Const. P. 102/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2022 Const. P. 319/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mahadev (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2023 Const. P. 1017/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Rashid and 93 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-APR-17 Yes Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.402-K/2017 Shahid Ali Khan v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.560-K/2017 Muhammad Zahid Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
2024 Const. P. 1035/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Sabir Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2025 Const. P. 1708/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Yousif Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2026 Const. P. 210/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Atam Mal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2027 Const. P. 141/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2028 Const. P. 2773/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Rafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Regional Director & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes petitioner, filed an application under Section 3 & 4 of the Contempt of Court)for initiation of contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnor on account of his willful, intentional and deliberate act of disobeying order passed by this Court . Mr. Rafique Ahmed Advocate, who is argued that despite clear directions the contemnors have not complied . respondent No. 4 has filed an application with a prayer to recall the order passed by this Court on the ground that she is owner of Plot and the petitioner who is her neighbor and is raising multistoried (3 storied) construction over his plot without approval of the competent authority i.e. Sindh Building Control Authority; that she has made several representations to the concerned authorities regarding the illegal construction put up by petitioner and has sent several reminders, drawing the attention of the SBCA, to the illegal constructions being put up in breach of the revised plan and the permission granted by the authorities, as well as the statutory provisions of the SBCA regulations-2018. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons all, we are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that substantial compliance of the order. Therefore, at this juncture, prima-facie, Petitioner has made out a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnor. Therefore, the office is directed to issue show cause notice under section 17 (1) of the Contempt of Court, why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the order dated order dated 26.06.2018passed by this Court. . Consequently the application CMANo.13080 of 2018 filed by the Respondent No.4 is dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2029 Cr.Bail 1085/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Chanessar Bheel (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2030 Const. P. 745/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ghulam Hussain Iqbalani and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2031 Const. P. 7319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Shamim Naqvi (Petitioner) VS P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.401-K/2019 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others,C.A.21-K/2020 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned
2032 Cr.Rev 55/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Muhammad Joyo (Applicant) VS Baggan @ Asghar and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAR-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.71-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Baggan @ Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
2033 Const. P. 776/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Qadratullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2034 Const. P. 6381/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Barkat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2035 Const. P. 1280/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Itrat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2036 Const. P. 5577/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3440/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1592/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2037 Const. P. 8356/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Qamar Shahid Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2038 Const. P. 6766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Fazal-e-Rabbi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2039 2019 PLC Lab. 19 Const. P. 7369/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Sindh Club (Petitioner) VS Nazar Hussain and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2040 Const. P. 2700/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2041 Const. P. 714/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Msr Mehfooza Bano (Petitioner) VS M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1480-K/2018 Mehfooz Bano v. M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial Dispensary & Meternity Home and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2042 2019 PLC (CS) 1217 Const. P. 1389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Anwar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2043 Const. P. 6825/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Akbar Ali Dero (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2044 Const. P. 3467/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Shaista Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 Yes At this juncture, counsel for College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan (CPSP) contends that this is their complete prerogative and within the line of guidelines provided by the then PMDC (PMC) and they have to select examiners as per criterion from all universities. At this juncture, learned counsel for contemnors by one voice contends that Dr. Naveed Ahmed has not been recommended since 2011 by the JPMC. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that contempt application is not maintainable, hence, same is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2045 2020 NLR Note 202020, 2020 PLC (CS) 268 Const. P. 333/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mian Syed Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1116-K/2018 Mian Syed Hussain v. Province of Sindh thr. Food Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2046 Const. P. 6291/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Capt: Abrar Arif (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Maritime Ministry & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2047 Const. P. 378/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Mubarik Ali Zaidi (Petitioner) VS The Finance Director HESCO (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2048 Const. P. 3889/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Waris and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.115-K/2019 Muhammad Waris and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2049 Const. P. 5626/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rizwan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3715/2017,C.P.585-K/2017,C.A.1598/2017,C.P.3660/2017,C.A.1607/2017,C.P.583-K/2017,C.P.587-K/2017,C.P.586-K/2017,C.P.584-K/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2050 Const. P. 5808/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Riaz Hussain Kanasoro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2051 Const. P. 8152/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2052 Const. P. 6131/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Moomal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman SPSC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2053 Const. P. 5613/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1603/2017 Abdul Qayoom v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.P.3668/2017 Abdul Qayoom v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2054 Const. P. 1740/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Ghafoor Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2055 Const. P. 6063/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2965/2018 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.68-K/2019 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2056 Const. P. 4947/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Askari Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.24-K/2019 Askari Bank Limited v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Labour & Human Resource Department and another,C.A.97-K/2019 Askari Bank Limited v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Labour & Human Resource Department and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2057 Const. P. 482/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2972/2018 M/s The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.75-K/2019 M/s The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.P.256-K/2020 Mst. Sabra v. Muhammad Jamil & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
2058 Const. P. 1340/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s S.M Trades (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2059 Const. P. 539/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Younus Textile Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2060 Const. P. 3000/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayum Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2061 Const. P. 1769/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ms. Lamika Zuberi (Petitioner) VS M/s Logo Guru (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2062 Const. P. 6440/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Kundal Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2063 2018 PLC (CS) Note 121 Const. P. 2798/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Arham Aziz Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2064 2019 CLC 1444 Const. P. 846/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted, Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed.
2065 Const. P. 5331/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shafqat Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2066 Const. P. 6198/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2067 2020 PLC (CS) 245 Const. P. 1595/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Fazl - e - Akbar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Defence Housing Authority and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2068 2018 YLR 360 Cr.Rev 154/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 ALI MUHAMMAD S/O LATE HAJI MOOSA (Applicant) VS SHAHZAD S/O ALI MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2069 2018 YLR 672 Cr.Bail 330/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 IFTIKHAR GADAR S/O ABDUL RAZZAQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2070 Const. P. 6825/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Kanwal Gul (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2071 Const. P. 3570/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Younus Textile Mills (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3589/2018 M/s Younas Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted
2072 Const. P. 1452/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mirza Muhammad Umar Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2073 2018 MLD 1389 Cr.Bail 667/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 FARHAN HASSAN S/O SAGHEER HASSAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2074 Const. P. 2438/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 P.P.L Officers and Associates & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.681-K/2017 Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association thr. its Chairman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2075 Const. P. 317/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Mst. Mehar Bano (Petitioner) VS The President Executive Board Defence Officer (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1-K/2019 Mst: Mehar Bano v. The President of Executive Board of Defence Housing Authority DHA thr. DirectoR (Education) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2076 2020 SCMR 98 Const. P. 5773/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Irfan Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1444-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others,C.A.86-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
2077 Const. P. 480/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Phoenix Armour (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2971/2018 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.74-K/2019 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2078 Const. P. 3017/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Buksh Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2079 Const. P. 3082/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 EPLA Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2963/2018 M/s ELPA Laboratories Pvt Ltd. v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.66-K/2019 M/s ELPA Laboratories Pvt Ltd. v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2080 Const. P. 3940/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Atlas Enterprises and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2081 H.C.A 42/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Rani (Appellant) VS Pakistan Internationial Airline Corporation & anor (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2082 Const. P. 1272/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Aga Khan Maternal & Child Care Health Centre (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2974/2018 M/s The Agha Khan Maternal & Child Care Centre Hyderabad, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.77-K/2019 M/s The Agha Khan Maternal & Child Care Centre Hyderabad, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2083 Const. P. 1274/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s J & P Coats Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2084 Const. P. 1740/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ismail Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2085 Const. P. 2076/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Abdul Hameed Pathan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2086 Const. P. 3525/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ghulam Rasool Saand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2087 2018 PLC Lab. 117 Const. P. 5362/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s Soneri Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Aurangzeb and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4308/2017 M/s Soneri Bank Ltd thr. its President, Karachi v. Aurangzeb & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed immediately after 3 months
2088 Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-19 Yes whether there is any violation of Statutory Law, compelling the Petitioner to invoke the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2089 2020 SBLR Sindh 913 Const. P. 628/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Rasool Bux Shar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-JAN-19 Yes Whether the Petitioner is entitled to payment of pensionary benefits of his 14 years??? service in PQA in addition to Contributory Provident Fund received by the Petitioner from KoFHA upon his retirement in the year 2008? pensionary benefits Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2090 Const. P. 5523/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Muhammad Iqbal Kazmi (Petitioner) VS Mayor Karachi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.500-K/2019 Syed Muhammad Iqbal Kazmi v. Mayor of Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2091 Const. P. 5495/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ismail Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2092 Const. P. 2071/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2093 2022 PLC (CS) Note 1 Const. P. 3123/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Rubina Bano and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2094 Const. P. 3273/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2095 Const. P. 2195/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Danish (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2096 Const. P. 449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Jabbar& another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2097 Const. P. 1767/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nabi Dost (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2098 Const. P. 2542/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 RaheemBux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2099 Const. P. 5714/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Qurban Ali (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Regularization of their service under Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--instant Petition clearly falls within the doctrine of laches as the Petitioner filed the instant Petition in the month of October 2016 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to them in the month of September 2013, i.e. approximately 3 years prior to the filing of the instant Petition. Those who slept over there cannot be given premium. The observations of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) is guiding principle on the issue of laches-- Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2100 Const. P. 1237/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ismail Narejo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2101 Const. P. 2449/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ali Bawani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2102 Const. P. 87/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2103 Const. P. 1814/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rana Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2104 Const. P. 572/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Pir Naveed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2105 Const. P. 1540/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Noor Ahmed &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2106 Const. P. 1822/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Peer Bux Khan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2107 Const. P. 125/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition stands disposed of directing Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh to consider the case of the Petitioner for his appointment on any post against deceased quota as per his qualification on the basis of Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and in accordance with the dicta laid down by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in C. P. No. 482-K & 503-K of 2016, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2108 Const. P. 310/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Hai (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2109 Const. P. 2628/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Wahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2110 Civil Revision 270/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad (Applicant) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2111 Const. P. 2715/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Yameen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.740-K/2019 Muhammad Yameen v. Chairman Sindh Irrigation & Drainage Authority (SDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2112 Const. P. 1142/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Naveed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2113 Const. P. 2041/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arsalan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2114 Const. P. 348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2115 Const. P. 3148/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2116 Const. P. 1727/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nadir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2117 Const. P. 1066/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahzeb Mughal (Petitioner) VS HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2118 Const. P. 2123/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2119 Const. P. 523/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2120 Const. P. 1709/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2121 Const. P. 7140/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muzaffar Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2122 Const. P. 2933/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dolat Khan (Petitioner) VS D.C. Tando Allahyar and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2123 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 261 Const. P. 144/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Leemon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2124 Const. P. 897/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Haji Anwar Ali &another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2125 Const. P. 2310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Qadir Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2126 Const. P. 3100/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2127 Const. P. 505/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2128 Const. P. 2060/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Murtaza & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2129 Const. P. 349/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Adeel Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2130 Const. P. 2063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Achar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2131 Const. P. 6051/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sohrab Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2132 Const. P. 1343/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Nek Muhammad (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.60-K/2020 Nek Muhammad v. The Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2133 Const. P. 2939/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nasir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2134 Const. P. 2680/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sachal Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2135 Const. P. 2087/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Shazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2136 2023 PLC Lab. Note 89 Const. P. 985/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2137 Const. P. 6071/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ashar Afaq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.525-K/2019 Muhammad Ashar Afaq v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2138 Const. P. 8578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tariq and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.694-K/2019 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.23-K/2022 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2139 Const. P. 729/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Fakhur din (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2140 Const. P. 2016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Pir Ali Dino Shah Jeelani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2141 Const. P. 224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Gul Bahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2142 Const. P. 990/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Mohiuddin (Petitioner) VS C.E.O. (NTDC) WAPDA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2143 2023 PLC CS Note 94 Const. P. 5859/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kamran Chandio (Petitioner) VS P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Inquiry proceedings against employee of PDHA. Employee of PDHA cannot approach this court in Constitutional Jurisdiction, as they are regulated by the Pakistan Defence Housing Authority Service Rules 2008, which are non-statutory. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2144 Const. P. 1511/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Jam Mitha Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Petitioner is seeking direction to the Respondents to issue notification of his post-retirement benefits, on the premise that he was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) BPS-17 in Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) ---the petitioner???s Counsel was directed to assist this Court more particularly regarding Article 187(2) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 that whether this Court can examine and or modify the Judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court or only to enforce it in accordance with the law--We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Sindh Government to pay all his perks and privileges to which he was entitled to on issuance of notification of his repatriation, inclusive of his entire pensionary benefits within [02] months and report compliance through MIT-II of this court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2145 Const. P. 2928/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2146 Const. P. 2588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2147 Const. P. 2656/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ali Nawaz Bagrani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2148 Const. P. 2835/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Baloch Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2149 Const. P. 2334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2150 Const. P. 2424/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2151 I. A 16/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Syed Muhammad Nadeem Shah Bukhari (Appellant) VS Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2152 Const. P. 2978/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Khalid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2153 Criminal Appeal 64/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sikandar Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2154 Const. P. 6499/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Mashhood-uz-Zafar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2155 Const. P. 408/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Mithal Lohach (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-20 Yes No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2156 Const. P. 998/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 983,993,979/2020 2020 Jalil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2157 Const. P. 2518/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Huma (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1795/2020 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills thr. its CEO/Chairman, Karachi v. Huma and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2158 Const. P. 813/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Koonj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2159 Const. P. 286/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Shahnaz & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2160 Const. P. 3234/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2161 Const. P. 317/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samina & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2162 Const. P. 3385/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Assadullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2163 Cr.Acq.A. 17/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 The State (ANF) Hyd (Appellant) VS Mumtaz Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2164 Const. P. 1753/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mazhar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2165 Const. P. 4327/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2166 Const. P. 864/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Matloob Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2167 I. A 31/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Government of Sindh & others (Appellant) VS M/S United Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-19 Yes Appeal was allowed with costs and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2168 Const. P. 241/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2169 Const. P. 447/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nazeer Ahmed & others. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2170 Const. P. 1304/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Arbab Zakaullah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2171 Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-20 Yes Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2172 Const. P. 361/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nadeem Ahmed Khan &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2173 Const. P. 1457/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aqeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2174 Const. P. 4789/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khizar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-20 Yes whether the petitioner can challenge the show cause notice issued against him and his suspension order in a Constitution Petition?--We are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, a final decision against the petitioner has yet to be taken by the respondent- Police Department and he has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the said proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2175 Const. P. 4646/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Z.A Quraishi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2176 2023 PLC CS 48 Const. P. 2406/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khairullah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.633-K/2020 Khairullah Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary of Universilies Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2177 Const. P. 869/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS M.D STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-20 Yes Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2178 Const. P. 721/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Manan (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2179 Const. P. 443/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2180 Civil Revision 157/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Nazeer (Applicant) VS PO SINDH (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2181 Civil Revision 185/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Yousuf (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2182 Const. P. 248/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faiz Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes Government accommodation in police department Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2183 Const. P. 359/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Annwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2184 Const. P. 544/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Shahid Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2185 2022 PLC (CS) Note 6 Const. P. 1970/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2553/2020 Prof. Dr. Shamsuddin Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariate, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2186 Const. P. 5580/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Javed Akhtar and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2187 Const. P. 5682/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-20 Yes Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2188 Const. P. 111/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Farzana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2189 Const. P. 34/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sitara (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2190 2022 PLC (CS) 150 Const. P. 1679/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mazhar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2191 Const. P. 5644/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Zain un Nisa (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2192 Const. P. 858/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Taqi Muhammad Rajper (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 Yes Government Accommodation Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2193 Const. P. 89/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Humera and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2194 Const. P. 618/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Aslam & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2195 Const. P. 2797/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mohammad Rashid (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1332-K/2020 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2196 Const. P. 6100/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2197 Const. P. 925/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ayaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2198 Const. P. 1827/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Qasim Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2199 Const. P. 3029/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Fakeer Manthar (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2200 Const. P. 6845/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Juanid Ahmed Sarki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-20 Yes Deceased quota-- Petitioner???s case if not approved by the competent authority may seek his remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. Deceased quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2201 Const. P. 178/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2202 Const. P. 1895/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Faiza Gul (Petitioner) VS Zubaid Gul and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Since the question of law has been answered accordingly; therefore, the above observation on the other points is tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the either party in their other family matter if any pending before the court of law which shall be decided independently in accordance with law. Disposed of. Since the question of law has been answered accordingly; therefore, the above observation on the other points is tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the either party in their other family matter if any pending before the court of law which shall be decided independently in accordance with law. Disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2203 Criminal Appeal 46/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Aijaz Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.147-K/2020 Aijaz Ali Rajpar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2204 Const. P. 3735/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Malik Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Contempt proceedings--CAA Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2205 Const. P. 5025/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imdad Ali Abro & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 Yes the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2206 Const. P. 3623/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Air Marshal Arshad Malik and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes the Petitioner seeks direction to the management of Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), to provide medicine to him and his family, either from PIA's Medical Store as per prescription prescribed by the specialist Doctors without any interruption. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5882/2021 Pakistan International Airlines through Chief Executive PIA, Karachi v. Javed Iqbal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2207 Cr.Bail 1737/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD KHAN KHOSO S/O KHAN MUHAMMAD KHOSO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-SEP-21 Yes Post-arrest bail--it appears that the applicant is Head Constable in Police Department and is bound to prevent the offenses in the area concerned; and, if he, from his acts or omissions, allows happening of the offense (s), or commits the offense, by escorting the vehicle, whereby he facilitated the co-accused to transport, the theft oil, thereby he breaches his official duties/obligations. The applicant, prima facie appears to be linked with the alleged offense of theft of a huge quantity of diesel oil, by allowing co-accused to tamper with the main Petroleum Pipe Line of PARCO-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2208 Const. P. 3310/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Asad ul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-21 Yes the petitioners are seeking regularization of their services against the quota reserved for deceased civil servants as provided under the Prime Ministers Assistance Package for the Families of Government Employees, on the premise that their parents were serving in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on different posts, who passed away during their service. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2209 Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2210 Const. P. 6313/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asadullah Lashari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 Yes quo warranto --maintainability of this petition on the ground that private respondents were appointed in the year 2013 in Lyari Development Authority.alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in the year 2013 when the aforesaid appointments were made by the Lyari Development Authority and now he has approached this Court on 09.12.2020 after a delay of approximately 07 years from the date of the alleged cause of action. Thus his case falls within the ambit of the doctrine of laches. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2211 Const. P. 4431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zaheeruddin Babar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2212 Const. P. 580/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Mansoob Ahmed Khatri and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 Yes principally the petitioners are seeking inclusion of `Orderly Allowance` in their pensionable emoluments in the light of Amendment No.19 in clause/regulation 46 of Chapter IV (Emoluments) of Civil Aviation Service Regulation-2014 (CSR-2014) and the decision of 179th meeting held on 1.8.2019 by Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA) Board Secretariat---Accordingly, while following the principle of law enunciated in I.A. Sherwani's case (ibid), and in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case while invoking the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, we hereby declare the impugned decision /action/order of the Respondent-CAA is in negation to the strict and prohibitory command contained in Article 25 of the Constitution, because the Petitioners have been treated with sheer discrimination, which cannot be approved on any premises whatsoever. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2213 Cr.J.A 29/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Azmat Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-JUL-21 Yes Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2214 Const. P. 2001/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mirza Anwer Mehmood Baig (Petitioner) VS DG C.A.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-21 Yes the petitioner has sought suspension of the operation of Show Cause Notice dated 25.2.2021 issued by the respondent-Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) on the accusation of production of a copy of the mark sheet No.00575 of BA (Pass) 1st and 2nd Year Examination of 1987, which was later on found fake, which amounts misconduct as provided under Civil Aviation Authority (Efficiency and Discipline) Regulations, 2014. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2215 Cr.Bail 322/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ashfaq Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2216 Const. P. 3603/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shanaz Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2217 Const. P. 161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Karim Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2218 Const. P. 6462/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Najam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2219 Const. P. 535/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M. Qasim Jakhar (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 Yes Enforcement of decision of SST---Besides above, the point of laches is also involved in this matter on the ground that the petitioner has approached this court in the year 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007 when he was purportedly terminated from his service, the reasoning assigned by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has approached this court based on decision passed by the learned SST in the year 2010; that a constitutional petition involving violation and infringement of fundamental rights of the citizens could not be thrown out on the ground of delay in filing the same. We do not concur with this assertion of the learned counsel for the Petitioner with his explanation of laches as rights of the petitioner were not dependent upon other petitioners in the referred petition. We are of the considered view that the instant Petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the Petitioner filed the instant Petition in January 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007, i.e. approximately 08 years before the filing of the instant Petition. It is well-settled law that those who slept over their rights cannot be given a premium of their own fault because such conduct does trigger the principle of waiver. The observations of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) is a guiding principle on the issue of laches. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2220 Const. P. 2966/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Raees Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS The Karachi Dock Labor and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-21 Yes enforcement of Board Resolution of Karachi Dock Labor Board Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.541-K/2021 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another,C.A.97-K/2023 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Appeal within 3 months ],Pending
2221 Const. P. 2388/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arifa Khatoon (Petitioner) VS The Governor of Sindh / Chancellor & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2222 Const. P. 1874/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ms. Shahid Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAR-21 Yes transfer and posting issue Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2223 Criminal Appeal 61/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Mir Hassan Bangwar and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.12/2021 Ali Akbar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2224 2022 SBLR Sindh 50 Const. P. 830/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sohail and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1112-K/2021 Muhammad Junaid v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Ports & Shipping & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2225 Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-21 Yes the petitioner is an educationist and has been serving in the Public Education Sector in Sindh since 1987. Per learned counsel the Universities and Boards Department, the Government of Sindh, Karachi invited application for the position of Chairman-Board and petitioner was one of the candidates for the aforesaid post-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2226 2023 SBLR Sindh 1117 Const. P. 6192/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes quo warranto Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2227 Const. P. 1041/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 Yes regularization Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2228 Const. P. 2191/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saeed Akhter (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-21 Yes Primarily, this petition has served its purpose, which is disposed of in the terms, whereby the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to issue posting and transfer orders of the petitioner and the private respondent, if no disciplinary proceedings are pending against them, strictly under the schedule of the establishment of law department KMC, with correct description/designation of their respective posts as per their entitlement under the law. The said exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks from the date of this order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2229 Const. P. 2395/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS The Secretary SWWB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 Yes The aforesaid petition is virtually against the transfer and posting order of the private respondent on Own Pay Scale basis. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2230 Const. P. 882/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Hameed & others (Petitioner) VS IV Addl DJ Hyd and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2231 Cr.Misc. 444/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2232 Cr.Bail 1731/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD AWAIS S/O SALAHUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes whether, the criminal prosecution in such a circumstances, as required under Section 195 Cr.P.C., could be initiated at the complaint of the said Court and not by the private person---Primarily, the entire case as put forward by the parties, depends upon the documentary evidence, which is available with the prosecution; and it is yet to be determined by the learned trial Court, whether Sections 420, 468, 471 PPC are attracted in the present crime or otherwise, which could only be done, after recording of the evidence; besides that there is a delay of almost two years in lodging the FIR, which is sufficient ground to confirm the pre-arrest bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2233 Cr.Misc. 717/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 MST.SHAHZADI (Applicant) VS MASHOOQ @ CHEEZ & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2234 Cr.Bail 626/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Hizbullah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2235 Const. P. 1931/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Vishandas (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2236 Cr.Misc. 689/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Pir Shoaib Ahmed Qureshi and others (Applicant) VS SHO PS Khadhar SBA and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2237 Cr.Bail 903/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 AMEERUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2238 Cr.Bail 1035/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ASGHAR S/O BAKHT KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in F.I.R No.199/2020, registered under Sections 393/302/34 PPC at PS Peerabad, Karachi-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2239 Cr.Bail 860/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 AMEER MAVIYA @ MAVIYA & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2240 Cr.Misc. 691/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 KHUDA BUX (Applicant) VS SAJJAD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2241 Civil Revision 199/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1999 Professor Muhammad Rahim & Others (Applicant) VS Municipal Committee Mirpurkhas (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2242 Const. P. 442/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2243 Const. P. 1343/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2244 Const. P. 2382/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Attaullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federal Secretary Ministry of Water and Power dev.... (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2245 Const. P. 182/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P.No.D-198 of 2021 [Qurban & another Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-435 of 2021 [Khalil Ahmed & anothervs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-479 of 2021 [Mushtaque Ali & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-509 of 2021 [Noorullah Dehraj vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-534 of 2021 [Nazar Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-668 of 2021 [Gul Mir vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-769 of 2021 [Mst. Razia & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-845 of 2021 [Abdul Majeed vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-914 of 2021 [Pir Bux & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1027 of 2021 [Ali Ahmed & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1070 of 2021 [Ayaz Ali & others vs. SHO PS Punhan Khan Chandio & another] C.P No.D-1198 of 2021 [Ali Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1277 of 2021 [Mukhtiar Ali & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1543 of 2021 [Behram Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1556 of 2021 [Khurram Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] -:2:- C.P No.D-182/2021 a/w connected petitions C.P No.D-1689 of 2021 [Muhammad Waris @ Suneel vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] 2021 Mevo Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2246 Const. P. 1523/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2247 Criminal Miscelleneous 619/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 NAZAKAT ABBAS (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE HYD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2248 Criminal Miscelleneous 793/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ABDUL GHANI S/O SOOBAL KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes the learned judge directed the police to register a case against the applicant-son under the Protection of Parents Ordinance 2021 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2249 Const. P. 2708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nazir Ahmed and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2250 Criminal Miscelleneous 763/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SYED MUHAMMAD AHMED RAZA & ORS (Applicant) VS IIIRD ADJ KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes Primarily, there is a trend to use false F.I.R. and fabricated complaints to take revenge from someone. It has become a strong mechanism for the attack on mental health, reputation, and the creation of fear. In criminal matters the procedure of registration of cases in courts is provided under sections 154, 154(3), 156(3), 190 CrPC, and Private Complaint made before Magistrate under section 200 Cr.P.C., false FIR and complaints mean making false allegations and lodging FIR or complaints based on conspired fabricated facts and circumstances to harass the other person by misuse of law and judicial proceedings. The police are obliged to register FIR for all cognizable offenses and to pursue the investigation with due process of law. Innocent people, who are implicated in false cases under a malicious FIR, face many problems due to these legal procedures. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2251 Const. P. 688/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imran (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2252 Const. P. 837/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mir Munawar Ali Talpur (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2253 Const. P. 2063/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Haji Dodo Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2254 Cr.Bail 827/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SHAHID ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2255 Criminal Miscelleneous 19/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) VS Senior Superintendent of Police (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2256 Const. P. 1564/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2257 Const. P. 1807/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mirza Fayyaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2258 Const. P. 202/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Ghulam Mustafa Shah and anothers (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2259 Const. P. 7330/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ahmed Tabba (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2260 Const. P. 3380/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mumtaz Ali Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-22 Yes proforma promotion Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2261 Const. P. 7902/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2262 Const. P. 3083/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pir Bux Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2263 Const. P. 5121/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s CSM Pakistan (Guarantee) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2264 Const. P. 6541/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Haji Asif S/o Haji Suleman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2265 Const. P. 5862/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Aslam Awan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.492/2022 Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (KW&SB), Karachi through its Chairman v. Muhammad Aslam Awan and others,C.P.285-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Aslam Awan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed
2266 Const. P. 1263/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Waheed Memon (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2267 Const. P. 5229/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Karachi Tax Bar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 Yes whether a probationer has the capability and potential to make a satisfactory career in the organization, and whether or not the organization/employer will have any benefit of his services. We are of the view that the period of probation provides equal opportunity to the employer and employee to decide whether they would like to continue with the engagement or not. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2268 Const. P. 5199/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sadullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2269 Const. P. 411/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Najaf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2270 Const. P. 2834/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Y.B Holdings Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2271 Const. P. 2805/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-22 Yes whether the impugned notification is, in conformity with the judgments passed by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Crl. Org. Petition No.89/2011, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and Gul Hassan Jatoi; and, whether IGP Sindh is competent to issue the impugned notification under Section 12 of the Police Act, 1861, or it is for the Government of Sindh to order the repatriation of the petitioners to the ICT Police, Baluchistan Police and Pakistan Railways Police; and, whether police establishment is indivisible one force; and inter se transfer and subsequent absorption from the Federal Capital Police, Railways Police or Baluchistan Police to Sindh Police is permissible under Rule 1.5 of Police Rules, 1934; and, whether the repatriation of the petitioners to ICT Police, Baluchistan Police, and Pakistan Railways after rendering service for a considerable period in Sindh Police, attracts the principle of locus poenitentia and the same are within the principles laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2266/2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2272 Const. P. 322/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sher Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2273 Const. P. 2122/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Artistic Millinners Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2274 Const. P. 2729/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Patel Foundation and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2275 Const. P. 3870/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Karachi Grain Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2276 Const. P. 4369/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Fine Towel and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2277 Const. P. 2160/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Ali Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2278 Const. P. 5505/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faheem Ali (Petitioner) VS The Chairman SIndh Service Tribunal (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-22 Yes we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.833-K/2022 Faheem Ali v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
2279 Const. P. 1707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rawal Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-22 Yes 7. To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2280 Const. P. 4291/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Younus and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2281 Const. P. 3024/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Qarora Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.403-K/2022 Dr. Qararo Shah v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of National Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2282 Const. P. 7663/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shafqat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2283 Const. P. 683/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muneer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
2284 Const. P. 1287/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2285 Const. P. 7523/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Atif Ghias (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2286 Const. P. 712/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Leela Kalpna Devi (Petitioner) VS Secretary Minority Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 Yes Hindu Panchayat, is not a 'person' in terms of Article 199(5), therefore no writ of Certiorari or Mandamus can be issued against its office holders, in terms of Article 199(1) (a) supra. Hindu Panchayat, has no status of a public body; therefore, Hindu Panchayat is not a person exercising functions in connection with the affairs of Federation / Province and Local Authority in terms of Article 199(1)(a)(i) and (ii) of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
2287 Const. P. 2608/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdullah Soomro (Petitioner) VS UBL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2288 Const. P. 2901/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Qazi Khalid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.147-K/2023 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned for Next Session
2289 Const. P. 686/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1995 Moule Dino and others (Petitioner) VS Matloob Hussain and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2290 Const. P. 286/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Asharaf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2291 Const. P. 3402/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Fazal Karim Mahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2292 Const. P. 5634/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-23 Yes The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2293 II.A. 57/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Iqbal (Appellant) VS Mehmood Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2294 Criminal Appeal 237/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 ALI DINO (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2295 Criminal Miscelleneous 243/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 AZHAR ALI (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD ACHAR & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2296 R.A (Civil Revision) 72/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Medical Superintendent P.M.C. (Applicant) VS Baksh Ali Jamali (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2297 Const. P. 1288/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Abdul Shakoor Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2298 II.A. 29/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Farah Naz & another (Appellant) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2299 Const. P. 3105/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Aadill Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2300 Const. P. 617/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sajjad Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
2301 Const. P. 602/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Ayesha Iftikhar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2302 Const. P. 5748/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr.Samreen Riaz Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS D.O.U.H.S and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2303 Cr.Acq.A. 245/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Saleem (Appellant) VS Naimat Ali @ Namat Ali and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2304 Const. P. 828/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Abdul Qadir Khoso & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-23 Yes No benefit can be claimed of a consent order in respect of another party even passed by the Supreme Court. The same is not covered by the dicta laid down in the case of Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996 SCMR 1185) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2305 Spl.Cr.Bail 38/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUSTAFA SIKANDAR S/O MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2306 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1355/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 1356 to 1447 of 2023, 1546 to 1557 of 2023 2023 The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. JW SEZ (Pvt) Ltd., Lahore (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-24 Yes Transactional value; identical goods method; Section 25(5) read with Rule 107 of Customs Rules 2001; at or about the same time; 90 days period Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2307 Const. P. 4972/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P Nos. 5173, 5966 & 5626 of 2023 2023 Shamim Ahmed & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-JAN-24 Yes No interim relief or provisional release can be granted by this Court when assessment has been made on Valuation Ruling under Section 25A of the Customs Act Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2308 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 47/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Driector, Dirc. Gen. Intell. & Invt. (Cus) Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. Internatioal Impex, Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 Yes Penalty on Custom Agent; cannot be sustained in undervaluation by Importer in absence of any material to that effect. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2309 Const. P. 8480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Hayat Kimya Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAR-24 Yes Fire Fighting Equipment is equipment as defined in SRO SRO 41(I)/2009 and SRO 1097(1)/2012: entitled for exemption Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2310 Cr.Bail 1623/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2311 Const. P. 1608/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Nizamuddin Kolachi V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-AUG-19 Yes whether the Petitioner can challenge his show cause notice, non- inclusion of his name in Upper School Course in a Constitution Petition Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2312 Const. P. 1847/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Yasin Ali Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS The Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2313 2020 PLC (CS) 360 Const. P. 5839/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Arshad Noor Khan (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2314 Const. P. 411/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Akhtar Hussain (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2315 2017 SBLR Sindh 1046 Const. P. 608/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Aijaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Director Bank Controller State Bank of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2316 2017 SBLR Sindh 1046, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1419 Const. P. 6234/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mehr Iqbal Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.86-K/2017 Mehar Iqbal Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2317 Cr.Bail 136/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 ASHRAF ASHFAQ S/O ASHFAQ AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2318 2019 PLC (CS) 1245 Const. P. 2598/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rashid Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2319 Const. P. 6202/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Abbas Imran Jafry (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.530-K/2017 Syed Abbas Imran Jafry v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan In Transit Dismissed
2320 2018 PLC (CS) Note 55 Const. P. 4323/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Shahid Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.534-K/2017 Syed Shahid Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2321 Cr.Bail 1730/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) VS the State (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2322 2017 PLC (CS) 1255 Const. P. 2543/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mansur-ul-Haque (Petitioner) VS Government of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.313-K/2017 Mansoor-ul-Haque v. Govt. of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Defence and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2323 Suit 614/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Muhammad Amin through LRs. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shamim Begum alias Lala (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2324 Const. P. 2162/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hanif and another (Petitioner) VS Rahim Bux & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2325 Const. P. 1092/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Hari Ram (Petitioner) VS Misri and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2326 Const. P. 1093/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Hari Ram (Petitioner) VS Misri and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2327 Const. P. 475/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2328 Const. P. 7998/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zain ul Abideen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2329 Const. P. 7088/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Wazir Gul & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2330 Const. P. 2250/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Rizwan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2331 2017 SBLR Sindh 443 Const. P. 5176/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Muhammad Shoaib (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.121-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Syed Muhammad Sohaib and others,C.P.599-K/2018 Syed Muhammad Shoaib and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2332 Const. P. 509/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Arif Khan and 31 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.412-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Arif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2333 Const. P. 320/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Aqil Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2334 Const. P. 1719/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zeeshan Ayoub Pathan, (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2335 Const. P. 384/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Qazi Nazimuddin & others (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.288-K/2019 Qazi Nasimuddin v. Syed Sabit Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2336 Const. P. 2216/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2337 Const. P. 550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2338 Cr.Bail 4/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MOHISIN ABBAS & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2339 Const. P. 7211/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2340 Const. P. 283/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2341 Const. P. 1865/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mst. Sadia & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 Yes Petitioner in Pursuance advertisement applied for the post of Oriental Teacher and Drawing Teacher .They claimed that on conducting the written test were declared Successful candidate. They approached for obtaining offer order but could not. State council informed that Since irregularities were found in the test no result of test was announced. However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and appointed .pursuant to an advertisement did not confer any right to be appointed to the posts in question to entitle the selectees to a writ of mandamus or any other writ compelling the authority to make the appointment, for the simple reason that the whole process has been scrapped and nothing is left to be filled up. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents Since the Government also has the right to cancel the recruitment process. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh & others (supra), Civil petition No 186k /2013 consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.281-K/2019 Miss Sadia and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2342 2017 PLC Lab. 122 Const. P. 1486/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Messrs Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Petitioner) VS Arif Aziz & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2343 2018 SBLR Sindh 524 Const. P. 1547/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Aamir Jamil (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.663-K/2017 Aamir Jamil v. University of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2344 Const. P. 808/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Bushra & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2345 2019 PLC (CS) 882 Const. P. 3408/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Zafar Iqbal Zahid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.554-K/2018,C.P.555-K/2018,C.P.559-K/2018,C.P.562-K/2018,C.P.560-K/2018,C.P.553-K/2018,C.P.557-K/2018,C.P.558-K/2018,C.P.556-K/2018,C.P.561-K/2018 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2346 Const. P. 4849/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Kausar Iqbal Malik (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.609/2019 Kausar Iqbal Malik v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Finance, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2347 Const. P. 6971/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2966/2018 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.69-K/2019 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2348 2020 PLC (CS) 101 Const. P. 2831/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Nazia Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2349 Const. P. 7035/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shahnawaz Babar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2350 2018 MLD 794 Cr.Bail 1373/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 LUTUFULLAH S/O MAVAZ KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2351 2020 PLC (CS) Note 3 Const. P. 5083/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS THe Chairman P.N.S.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2352 Const. P. 2722/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2353 Const. P. 1741/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ali Murad Brohi (Petitioner) VS Zarai Tarqiati Bank and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.126-K/2019 Ali Murad Brohi v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2354 2018 CLC 443 II.A. 98/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Saleh Muhammad (Appellant) VS Mst.Rahima Bai & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.85-K/2017 Mst: Rahima Bai and others v. Saleh Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2355 Const. P. 1580/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Abdul Majeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2356 Const. P. 7936/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Primer Minister of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.308/2019 Saeed Ahmed v. Prime Minister of Pakistan thr. Principal Secretary, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2357 Const. P. 251/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Javed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2358 Const. P. 7087/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Fahad (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2359 Const. P. 6384/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Engr. Jehanzaib (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2360 Const. P. 2821/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Fida Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.213-K/2020 The Trustees of the Port of Karachi thr. its Chairman v. Fida Muhammad Khan and others,C.A.47-K/2022 The Trustees of the Port of Karachi thr. its Chairman v. Fida Muhammad Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Session),Pending Adjourned (Next Session)
2361 Const. P. 5680/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Hyder Ali Liskani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4402/2017 Hyder Ali Liskani & others v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1610/2017 Hyder Ali Liskani & others v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2362 Const. P. 5960/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Raja Shoaib and Ors (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh Police and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2363 Const. P. 8018/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mirza Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Dow Univesity of Health Service & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1135-K/2018 Mirza Ghulam Sarwar v. Dow University of Health Sciences , Karachi thr. its Vice Chancellor and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2364 Const. P. 5776/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.582-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Imran Ali Hashmi & others,C.P.733-K/2021 Dr.Masooda Qadri v. The University of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
2365 Const. P. 1279/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Nikhat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2366 Const. P. 42/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Zulfiqar Shah (Petitioner) VS State (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2367 2019 PLC (CS) 1354 Const. P. 3238/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ghulam Ali Gopang (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2368 2018 CLC 1221 H.C.A 137/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Rahat & Company (Appellant) VS Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.649-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan,C.A.91-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2369 2020 PLC (CS) 24 Const. P. 562/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nabeela Ashfaq (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2370 2019 SCMR 984 Const. P. 6555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maj (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.514-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.26-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed
2371 Const. P. 7118/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Muhammad Yousuf Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2372 2018 PLC Lab. 219 Const. P. 1919/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.605-K/2017 Muhammad Saleem v. The National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2373 Const. P. 7964/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ashiq Ali Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.623-K/2018 Ashiq Ali Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2374 Const. P. 2774/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Khushnood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2375 Const. P. 2755/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Artistic Milliners (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1970/2019 Abdul Azeem Khan Pathan v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2376 Const. P. 4507/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nighat Munir (Petitioner) VS Madam Humera and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2377 Const. P. 6378/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2378 Const. P. 5483/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Papoo Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1158-K/2018 Papoo Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2379 Const. P. 8408/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nazir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.133-K/2019 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.71-K/2020 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2380 Const. P. 608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raheel & another (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2381 Cr.Bail 251/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Yar Muhammad son of Jan Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2382 Cr.Bail 316/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Ghulam Mujtaba son of Imam Din by caste Lakho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2383 Const. P. 5387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-AUG-19 Yes as to how the promotion of the Petitioner can be considered, when no Departmental Promotion Committee has been convened by the competent authority, besides that he is at the verge of retirement i.e. in the Month of September 2019 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2384 Const. P. 3756/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Anis-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.538-K/2019 Anis-ur-Rehman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2385 Const. P. 2681/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mazhar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2386 Const. P. 1339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2387 Const. P. 862/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Abdul Jabbar Qureshi (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2388 Const. P. 199/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Talib Hussain (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2389 Const. P. 1247/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Allah Bux (Petitioner) VS M.D (CEO) H.B.F.C Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.38-K/2020 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others,C.A.2-K/2021 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
2390 Const. P. 3078/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Aftab Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2391 Const. P. 2451/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahjehan Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2392 Const. P. 2979/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dost Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2393 Const. P. 3175/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahan Lakho & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2394 Const. P. 795/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2395 Const. P. 1122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 ManzoorHussain& another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2396 Const. P. 2183/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2397 Const. P. 2360/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muharram Ali Khaskheli & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2398 Const. P. 2922/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 GhulamRasool & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2399 Const. P. 370/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shahmeer (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2400 Const. P. 2962/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sadique Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2401 Const. P. 1497/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2402 Const. P. 135/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Rafiq & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2403 Const. P. 3360/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2404 Const. P. 1605/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Habib ullah Khan Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2405 Const. P. 898/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahbaz Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Mola Bux and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2406 Const. P. 761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ihsan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2407 Const. P. 511/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Farooque (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2408 Const. P. 637/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Manzoor Alam and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2409 Const. P. 5866/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Faisal Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-19 Yes The basic grievance of the Petitioner is with regard to his surrendering of look after charge for the post of Regional Director BPS-19 in Sindh Katchi Abbadis Authority (SKAA) --Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2410 Const. P. 3391/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Faisal Rajar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2411 Const. P. 1054/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Hakeem Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federal Ministry of Water & Power and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2412 Const. P. 1904/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sham Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2413 Const. P. 1951/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mohammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2414 Const. P. 2399/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Nusrat Phulphoto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2415 Const. P. 2009/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Essa Khan &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2416 Const. P. 1134/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2417 Const. P. 1449/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst, Nadia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2418 Const. P. 3193/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muneer Ahmed Shoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2419 Const. P. 676/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Abdul Salam and others (Petitioner) VS Jan Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2420 Const. P. 1882/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2421 Const. P. 5514/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Saif Shujaat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2422 Const. P. 3618/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2423 Const. P. 413/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sajjad Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2424 Const. P. 544/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nadeem and others (Petitioner) VS S.D.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2425 Const. P. 3739/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS NAB & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2426 Const. P. 872/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2427 Const. P. 696/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Altaf Hussain Khowaja (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2428 Const. P. 5783/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nazir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-19 Yes Adverse remarks ???Not Yet Fit??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2429 Const. P. 6572/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sumair Saeed (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Aviation & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-19 Yes whether the transfer and posting of private Respondents is the domain of the Competent Authority of CAA, if they found the private Respondents to be worthy of posting at the particular post on acting/additional charge basis, in our view, this Court cannot interfere in the service affair of the Respondent-Authority until and unless it is shown that the said posting and transfer orders negate basic provision of law and Constitution, which is lacking in the present case Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2430 2021 PLC (CS) 415 Const. P. 948/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Umer Yamin (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.621-K/2019 Umar Yameen v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deptt: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2431 Const. P. 8267/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.693-K/2019 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.22-K/2022 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2432 Const. P. 1137/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2433 Const. P. 1508/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Nasir Memon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2434 Const. P. 2125/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2435 Const. P. 969/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2436 Const. P. 1397/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abrar Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2437 Const. P. 3300/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jamshed Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2438 Const. P. 5162/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Raees Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-19 Yes Pakistan-Steel Mill--whether the instant petition is suffering from laches or otherwise--petitioner is not entitled for relief which he is asking for through the instant proceedings on the premise that this Court cannot entertain the grievance of the Petitioner under Article 199 of the Constitution, in view of the bar contained under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution, which ousts the jurisdiction of this Court. The ouster clause under Article 212 (3) and Article 185 of the Constitution is a Constitutional command, which restricts the jurisdiction of this Court on the subject, which squarely falls within the exclusive domain of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, being an Appellate Court in respect of the decisions of this Court and Service Tribunals. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.594-K/2019 Raees Ahmed Ansari v. Pakistan Steel Mills thr. Chairman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2439 Const. P. 231/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Associate Professor Saeeda Parveen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2440 Const. P. 3800/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ayoob and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2441 Const. P. 358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Noorunisa @ Fatima and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2442 Const. P. 3319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Suresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2443 Const. P. 301/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2444 Const. P. 93/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Rabani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2445 Const. P. 5479/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Kaleemullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2446 Const. P. 3879/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghausia Jehangir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2447 Const. P. 5330/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mujahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-SEP-19 Yes i) Whether the petitioner was non-suited by this Court vide judgment dated 30.3.2018 in earlier round of litigation and the same view was affirmed by the Honorable Supreme Court in Civil Petition No457-k of 2018, vide order dated 19.4.2018, therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings? ii) Whether Rule 12 of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1974 was amended vide Notification dated 14.9.2018 issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh, whereby relaxation up to maximum of fifteen (15) Years in the upper age limit to all the applicants applying for the vacancies in all the Departments of Government of Sindh were done away against the posts to be filled through Combined Competitive Examination by the Sindh Public Service Commission? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2448 Const. P. 308/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Rizwan Akbar Arain (Petitioner) VS Chairman NHA & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Contempt---that no appointment made on contract basis shall be regularized retrospectively and the contract/ad-hoc period of service cannot be counted in seniority of a Civil Servant as seniority can be reckoned from the date of regular appointment. Thus, the question of regularization from the date of contract employment is misconceived. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2449 Const. P. 3495/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.817/2017 Abdullah v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) thr. Its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2450 Const. P. 3020/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Manoj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2451 Const. P. 1708/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2452 Const. P. 2075/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aijaz Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2453 Const. P. 2276/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sadique Ali Sohani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2454 Const. P. 2340/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Noor Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2455 Const. P. 3274/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2456 Const. P. 507/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohsin Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2457 Const. P. 2/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Pokarlal and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2458 Const. P. 369/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr. Santosh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2459 Const. P. 10/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zafar Ali Khushk (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2460 Const. P. 1224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2461 Const. P. 495/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2462 Const. P. 6812/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2463 Const. P. 616/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Raees Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2464 Const. P. 3167/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Sad Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.407-K/2021 Syed Saad Ali & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
2465 Const. P. 2584/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Farzana Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1796/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Farzana Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2466 Const. P. 6385/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2467 Const. P. 6386/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Inam Hafiz Siddiqi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2468 Const. P. 550/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Amad Hussain Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2469 Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dad Muhammad Brohi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2470 Const. P. 405/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Dr. Nazia Iram & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2471 Const. P. 101/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Kazbano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2472 Const. P. 440/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mulla Idrees (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2473 Const. P. 2113/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Maryam Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2474 Const. P. 518/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Furqan Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2475 Const. P. 575/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2476 Const. P. 564/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Sarwar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2477 Const. P. 307/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Govind Ram (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2478 I. A 34/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Hyder (Appellant) VS Asif Ali Khyber (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2479 Const. P. 246/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sht. Kiran & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2480 Const. P. 770/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Atta Muhammad Shahani (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2481 Civil Revision 129/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Hans lal @ Hans lo and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail and an others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2482 Const. P. 218/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Miss Shanaz Anwar (Petitioner) VS D.I.G. Shaheed Benazirabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2483 Const. P. 468/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Qurban Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2484 2022 SBLR Sindh 1070 Const. P. 1480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Maryam Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Fed. Urdu University & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as ???University???), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as University), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2485 Const. P. 85/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2486 Const. P. 4932/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zakia Naz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes petitioner has impugned the Notice dated 04.09.2020 issued by the respondents for vacating the official accommodation i.e. Flat No. B-18, situated in Government Official Residence (GOR-II) Sindhi Muslim Co-operative Housing Society ---Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-4129 of 2020 and other connected petitions vide common Judgment dated 12.10.2020, therefore, the instant petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is dismissed accordingly, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust her remedy, if any, as provided under the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1442-K/2020 Zakia Naz v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2487 Const. P. 4976/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Naseer Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-20 Yes Petitioner has called in question the rejection of his candidature for the post of District Public Prosecutor (BS-19) in Law Department, Government of Sindh vide letter dated 18.10.2019 issued by Sindh Public Service Commission Hyderabad (SPSC) on the analogy that he did not possess ten (10) years' experience as an Advocate of High Court ---In our view, the submission of respondents will be counterproductive and would prevent good Advocates from accepting appointments in civil service if this analogy persists. The second limb of the argument of the respondents is that once an Advocate is appointed as a Law Officer in any department of the Government of Sindh, he cannot be appointed to the post of District Public Prosecutor has to be ruled out for the understanding that it does not appeal to logic--We, therefore, hold that ten (10) years' service experience includes a period of serving as a law officer, which counts active practice at the bar which petitioner possesses and therefore is qualified to appear for the subject test for the position of District Public Prosecutor--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of SPSC is directed to allow the petitioner to appear in the subject interview and after conducting his interview announce the result accordingly within two (02) weeks from today. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2488 Const. P. 5907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.228/2021 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation thr. its authorized Office, Karachi v. National Industrial Relations Commission(Full Bench) , Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2489 2022 PLC CS Note 24 Const. P. 8251/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Jamal Nasir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes STEVTA--promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA under Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--a civil/government servant is entitled for proforma promotion, once during his service his promotion is approved by the Competent Authority and in the meanwhile if he superannuates, he is entitled for all benefits as admissible under the law--we deem it appropriate to send the matter of the petitioner for the promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA to the Competent Authority of Sindh Government for consideration in accordance with law. STEVTA Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2490 Const. P. 2184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Humayoon (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2491 Const. P. 823/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS P.O SINDH and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2492 Const. P. 803/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 ALI HYDER (Petitioner) VS P.O SINDH & OTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2493 Const. P. 755/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2494 I. A 9/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mushtaque Ali (Appellant) VS UBL (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2495 Const. P. 5647/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghazala Mughal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2496 Const. P. 5651/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shabnam Magsi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2497 Const. P. 2666/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Saeed Habib (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-DEC-20 Yes NBP--We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-bank. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.305/2021 Saeed Habib v. National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2498 Const. P. 706/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2499 Const. P. 4210/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mumtaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-20 Yes Essentially in service jurisprudence, appointment, promotion is of utmost importance. If these are made on merit in accordance with definite rules, instructions, etc., and the same will rightly be considered and treated as part of the terms and conditions of service of a civil/government servant, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, besides that the petitioner has no vested right to claim promotion against the post which was meant for initial appointment, therefore, the petitioner is precluded to ask for the actualization of his alleged promotion made by DPC-II which was rightly cancelled. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2500 Const. P. 320/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Samina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2501 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 309 Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2502 Const. P. 382/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Pir Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Zakriya & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2503 2022 PLD Sindh 308 Const. P. 275/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Bakaullah Khan Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2504 Const. P. 1158/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Rehan Khalid (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2505 Const. P. 438/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2506 Const. P. 585/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Inayatullah & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2507 Const. P. 331/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqas Behlum (Petitioner) VS KPT and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-21 Yes KPT-fresh show cause notice--allegations of misconduct--It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During arguments, we have been informed that the petitioners service has not yet been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings, however, they are at liberty to conclude the disciplinary proceedings (if not earlier concluded) within a reasonable time under law after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2508 Const. P. 2012/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Faheem (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1231-K/2020 Abdul Faheem v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2509 Const. P. 6200/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Mehdi Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-20 Yes Prima-facie his matter on the subject issue is still subjudice before the learned FST, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioner. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct learned FST to decide the application under Rule 23-A of the Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules 1974 of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2510 Const. P. 913/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Muhammad and another (Petitioner) VS Mukaram Khan and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-21 Yes Habeas Corpus--custody of minors--In view of the statement of the parties, the petitioners are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs. 200,000/- before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose and in the meanwhile petitioners shall not take away the custody of minors out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights in the intervening period subject to tentative payment of maintenance of the minors @ Rs.3000/- per month for each minor and maintenance at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month for petitioner-mother till final adjudication by the learned trial Court. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2511 Const. P. 6031/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammads Ayub (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes appointment against son quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.427-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The Learned Member & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
2512 Const. P. 3652/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ali Murad Sipio (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2513 Const. P. 780/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Tehseen Ahmed H. Qureshi & others (Petitioner) VS Ld. Distt: & Session Judge MirpurKhas & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2514 Const. P. 127/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Nabi (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2515 Cr.Misc. 295/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Fouzia @ Waziran (Applicant) VS SSP District Jamshoro & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2516 2023 PLC CS Note 97 Const. P. 2293/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Noureen Naz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.230-K/2020 Noureen Naz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2517 Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-20 Yes Contempt proceedings--The explanation offered by the respondents, prima-facie, is tenable under the law as the petitioner was considered for the promotion in DPC in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 12.05.2020. It is noted that the representative of SGA&CD opined for deferment of the promotion of the petitioner and consideration of his case after finalization of the proceedings against him, in our view, this is the correct approach. Prima-facie such decision of the DPC to clear him for promotion during the pendency of criminal proceedings is erroneous. However, his deferment shall be subject to the outcome of the criminal proceedings presently pending against him. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2518 Const. P. 2434/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khan Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2519 Const. P. 865/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nazia & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2520 Const. P. 530/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Naseem (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2521 Const. P. 733/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Barkat Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2522 2022 PLC (CS) 1289 Const. P. 4077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-20 Yes Repatriation, from the appointment as Assistant Commissioner (BPS-17) in Ex-PCS Cadre by way of nomination, to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue, Sindh---we are not impressed with the grounds urged by the petitioner in his petition for the simple reason that the appointment of the petitioner in Ex-PCS cadre (BS-17) had already been declared as illegal by the Honorable Supreme Court and ordered his repatriation to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue--In our view, since the directions of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters are still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2523 Const. P. 6328/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Rashid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2524 Const. P. 4461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imtiaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-20 Yes Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceased???s first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Hon???ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceaseds first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Honble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2525 Const. P. 562/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Munawar & others (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2526 Const. P. 6319/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Naseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 Yes we are clear in our mind that the petitioner proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of actualization of up-gradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits. On the subject, we are guided by the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioner has been unable to make out a case for the actualization of upgradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits with retrospective effect, based on the office order dated 31.8.2018. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1600-K/2021 Naseem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Ministry of Local Bodies & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2527 2023 PLC CS 194 Const. P. 4462/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-21 Yes appointment for the post of Naib Qasid in respondent-School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Sindh--Rule 16 of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--The matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondents for afresh decision on the issue of appointment of Naib Qasid under law, and consider the case of the petitioner for the subject post within two months, from the date of receipt of the order of this Court and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2528 Const. P. 3590/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Water & Power Development & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.559-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi & others,C.P.656-K/2021 Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi v. Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2529 Const. P. 3228/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Misri Ladhani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-SEP-21 Yes prima-facie the claim of the Petitioner for proforma promotion is tenable under the law for the simple reason that CSB recommended his promotion in BS-21 during his tenure of service, in the meanwhile, he reached the age of superannuation, just after the recommendation made by SCB in his favour, as a consequence, the pay of the petitioner is required to be re-fixed and his post-retirement benefits will be re- calculated by allowing his proforma promotion in BS-21 and arrears shall be paid to him with 6% simple interest per annum--The competent authority of respondents is directed to notify the proforma promotion of the petitioner in BS-21 with effect from 13.02.2014 i.e. the date on which the CSB recommended his case for promotion in BS-21 and other ancillary benefits under the law, without discrimination, within 02 weeks Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5548/2021,C.A.21/2022,C.A.22/2022,C.P.5779/2021 SCP Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months
2530 Const. P. 4535/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Jamil Khan (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-22 Yes Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2531 Const. P. 3001/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2532 Const. P. 3314/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zeba Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2533 Const. P. 3736/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Noman Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2534 Const. P. 3288/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Muhammad Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2535 Const. P. 5659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Sajjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1324-K/2022 Muhammad Javed & others v. The Federation of Pakistan through & Secretary, Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2536 Const. P. 3028/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Umair Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 Yes The questions in the context are whether the petitioner has any enforceable right to seek direction to respondents to allow him to join 49th Common Training Program 2021, commencing in the ensuing month. And whether the respondents are required to act fairly, in a manner which is not arbitrary and in accordance with the established practice followed by it over a long period in making such deferments to other candidates namely Hamood-ur-Rehman, Taveer Shahoor Rana, Abraiz Ali Abbasi, Ahmed Saeed Manj and Ateeq-Ullah under the prevailing occupational groups and services (Probation, Training, and Seniority) Rules, 1990. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2537 2023 PLC CS 700 Const. P. 63/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Iqbal Naseem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-21 Yes Shaheed quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2538 Const. P. 7678/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 HBL (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAR-21 Yes HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (NIRC-FB) in Appeal No.12(18)/2015-K, whereby order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Commission, at Karachi (NIRC-SB), in Grievance Petition No.4B (187)/2012-K, filed by the private respondent, was allowed with the compensatory cost of Rs.100,000/- while granting salary and all admissible back benefits to him by treating him to be in service from the date of his dismissal from service i.e. 09.09.2003, till reaching the age of superannuation i.e. 12.12.2012; and, he was also declared to be entitled to have pensionary benefits with effect from 12.12.2012 in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-886 of 2011. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3062/2021 Habib Bank Limited, Karachi v. Full Bench, National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2539 Const. P. 162/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-21 Yes We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the respondent-university as well suggestion of Secretary Universities and Board to the competent authority for the appointment of Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University as discussed supra was without lawful authority; and, we do not appreciate the conduct of the respondents in the manner they have dealt with the matter of appointment of the Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University, in bypassing the senior professor working in grade 22 and got recommended the private respondents for the said position in violation of the principle of natural justice and seniority, which is a universal principle. It is well-settled law that if a civil/public servant is appointed in violation of any provision of law, the competent authority can look into the matter---Coming to the next point that interest of the petitioner is also being agitated in the petition, suffice it to say when we have found that every action of the respondents dubious to propose the competent authority, the names of the shortlisted candidates, in a cursory manner, thus prima facie the competent authority was not properly appraised on the subject issue, therefore, the matter needs to be looked into by the competent authority afresh, keeping in view the seniority-cum merit principle as law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court on the subject and take a fresh decision to appoint Dean of Faculty of Science of respondent-university. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1547-K/2021 Dr.Nasira Khatoon v. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2540 Const. P. 2795/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahana Bano (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 Yes the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to upgrade/re-designate the post of Senior Librarian BPS-18 to BPS-19 in Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), in terms of the policy decision of the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2541 Const. P. 8756/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Jawed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes the petitioner has assailed the vires of the office order No.42/2018 issued by respondent-Employees Old-age Benefits Institution (`EOBI`), whereby he was declared as Dead wood, consequently, he was forcibly sent on Early Retirement from the service of EOBI on the ground that his further retention in service would be of no benefit for the institution. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4249/2021 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2542 Const. P. 3788/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wazir Rehman (Petitioner) VS Trustees of the Port of Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1114-K/2021 Wazir Rehman v. Trustees of the Port of Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2543 2022 SBLR Sindh 957 Const. P. 4674/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pakistan Services Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-APR-21 Yes (i) Whether Petitioner-PSL has locus standi to approach this Court as an aggrieved party under Article 199 of the Constitution against the decisions of NIRC? (ii) Whether petitioner-PSL is a Trans-Provincial Organization and falls within the ambit of National Industrial Relations Act, 2012? (iii) Whether or not the registration of industry-wise trade unions by the Registrar, Trade Union NIRC, Islamabad is violative of the mandatory requirement of Section 8 of Act, 2012, based on strength of workforce; and, liable to be canceled, in view of mandate of Section 11 of the IRA-2012? (iv) Whether the registrar of trade unions and/or NIRC is competent to determine the registration of the respondent unions? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3497/2021 Pakistan Services Limitd, Islamabad through Director v. Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission, comprising three embers at Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2544 Const. P. 1202/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aftab Alam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAR-21 Yes SESSI Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.586-K/2021 Sindh Employees Social Security Institution v. Aftab Alam & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2545 Const. P. 5777/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Shaista Parveen (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.583-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Shaista Perveen & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2546 Const. P. 6238/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Huzaifa Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2547 Const. P. 6309/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Naeem Akhtar Khan (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAR-21 Yes we queried from the learned counsel for the Petitioner as to how this Petition is maintainable in its form against the National Command Authority (NCA) under the National Command Authority (Amendment) Act, 2016; besides that SUPARCO, comes under the definition of NCA as provided under clause (A) of Section 2 of the NCA Act, 2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2548 Const. P. 4356/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Arshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 Yes Without prejudice to above, since there is consent order, no review was preferred even that order was not assailed. In case, if there was no deduction by the department and they were sending salary directly to the account; that is not justification to withhold group insurance. Accordingly, Secretary Health, Government of Sindh shall ensure that group insurance amount is paid as per her entitlement to the nominee without any delay. While parting this order, learned AG Sindh shall ensure presence of any focal person of Accountant General Sindh (A.G. Sindh) to assist this Court that under what capacity complete salary was transferred and they failed to deduct the amount and who were responsible with regard to such irregularity, if any. This exercise shall be completed within 15 days. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2549 Const. P. 3184/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-21 Yes In the light of the above discussion, in our view, a deputationist could not be treated as an aggrieved person, because she has no vested right to remain on a post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period and can be repatriated at any time to her parent department more particularly in the light of aforesaid decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court. Reference is also made to the case of Dr. Shafi-ur-Rehman Afridi V/s CDA, Islamabad through Chairman and others (2010 SCMR 378). Even otherwise she cannot continue to serve on deputation in Sindh Government after her removal from service by the parent department, as discussed supra. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2550 Const. P. 4496/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Chairman EOBI and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-SEP-21 Yes With regard to length of service, counsel for the EOBI contends that the petitioner remained employee of the respondent for a period of four years, therefore, he is not entitled for any benefit. Needless to mention that decision/termination was challenged by the petitioner in referred grievance application which was allowed, hence, it cannot be said that length of service of the petitioner was only four years. That service would be treated as upto the age of superannuation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2551 Const. P. 2089/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jamshed Ali Bhutta (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Otherss (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAR-21 Yes Government accommodation--Police Department Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2552 Cr.Bail 165/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Azhar Ali Buledi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2553 Const. P. 6694/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Abdul Alim Zafar (Petitioner) VS The Education Sect: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2554 Const. P. 3803/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Suhaila Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAY-21 Yes whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of her previous service rendered with effect from 1971 till her reinstatement/re-employment in the year 1990 or not? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4282/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another,C.A.1423/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed
2555 Const. P. 152/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sat Bharai & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2556 Cr.Bail 890/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD ALI RAJPUT (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2557 Const. P. 503/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Vishandas (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2558 Const. P. 2648/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Neno (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2559 Const. P. 68/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Gulshan and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2560 Criminal Appeal 123/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: conf:Case No D 23 of 2019 2019 Hassan Alias Ali HASSAN (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-DEC-21 Yes The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2561 Cr.Bail 663/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SYED QURBAN ALI SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2562 Cr.Bail 840/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imdad Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2563 Conf.Case 23/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hassan @ Ali Hassan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-DEC-21 Yes The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2564 2022 SBLR Sindh 505 Const. P. 974/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Isra village Housing Scheme (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2565 Const. P. 1769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2566 Criminal Miscelleneous 769/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NOMAN MARWAT S/O KAISAF KHAN (Applicant) VS IVTH ADJ KHI MALIR & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes In principle, the offense under section 489-F PPC is punishable with imprisonment of three years, thus, does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr. P.C; and, the grounds for cancellation of bail are altogether different from the grant of bail; and once pre-arrest bail is confirmed, the exceptional and extraordinary grounds, as well as strong reasons, are required to recall the bail order granted earlier to the accused. The principles enunciated, governing for grant of bail and cancellation whereof has been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme court in the case of Sharif Khan V/S The State and another, 2021 SCMR 87 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2567 Const. P. 683/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Fawad Fatah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2568 Const. P. 2623/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2569 Civil Revision 240/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sarwar Ali (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2570 Const. P. 2608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Deepak (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2571 Cr.Bail 682/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Naqash and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2572 Cr.Tran 61/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 HAJI MIR HASSAN KHAN BHURGARI (Appellant) VS MUKHTIAR AHMED @ GUDO & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2573 Cr.Bail 2424/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Daro Khan S/o Naseer Ahmed Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes The proposal seems to be plausible and exceeded to, therefore, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed. Resultantly, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within four (4) months. In case the trial is not concluded, within the stipulated period, the Applicant will be at liberty to move fresh Bail Application before the learned Trial Court on fresh ground if any and the learned trial Court shall decide the same on merit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2574 Cr.Bail 2221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 REHAN NADIR ALI S/O NADIR ALI BAIG (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in F.I.R No.1401/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2575 Cr.Bail 2264/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD TARIQ S/O HABIBULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.646/2021, registered under Sections 420/468/471/470/489-F/34 PPC---Coming to the allegations of three cheques, which were later on dishonored, a question as to what constitutes an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. primarily, every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation; and, lastly the cheque in question is dishonored on presentation. Prima-facie, in the present case allegations are almost same, therefore, tentative assessment of record explicitly shows that the complainant has been defrauded by the applicant for the reasons discussed supra. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2576 Cr.Bail 912/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 DARYA KHAN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2577 Const. P. 1619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Shumaila & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2578 Const. P. 19/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Mushtaque Ahmed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2579 Const. P. 943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 S & Sons Contractor (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2580 Cr.Misc. 718/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Shah (Applicant) VS SP Complaint Cell (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2581 Const. P. 336/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Nawab (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2582 Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Razzaque (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2583 Const. P. 1160/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghous Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2584 Const. P. 1471/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Shahid Ahmed Khan Qaboolio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2585 Const. P. 656/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2586 Civil Revision 221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 P.O Sindh and others (Applicant) VS Ahmed Nawaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2587 Const. P. 1167/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Jalaluddin Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2588 Const. P. 1930/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2589 Const. P. 2296/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2590 Const. P. 1857/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Kulsoom (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 Yes official accommodation Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.68-K/2022 Mst.Kulsoom v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Railways & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2591 Const. P. 63/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Amin & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2592 Const. P. 477/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Fareed Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2593 Const. P. 1010/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Muhammas Aslam (Petitioner) VS P.I.A.C. & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2594 Const. P. 6752/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mukhtar Ahmed Mangia (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2595 Const. P. 567/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.2990/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Ahsan Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2596 Const. P. 3015/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2597 Const. P. 184/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Qadir Thebo (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes In our view, to qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. This is the minimum expectation to ensure a clean and efficient administration and to protect the public interest. An employee found not fit for promotion cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his / her case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his / her entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion denies him / her promotion, such denial would not be illegal or unjustified under the service jurisprudence. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2598 I. A 39/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Syed Ameer Ali & Ors. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-22 Yes The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside with direction to the learned Banking Court to decide the Suit expeditiously. Needless to say the Suit shall proceed ex-parte against appellants 2 and 3 as they did not file any application for leave to defend. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2599 Const. P. 849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mustafa Saeed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 Yes whether relaxation up to fifteen years in upper age limit, under sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 of the Sind Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974, applies to the appointments against the posts in BPS-16 and 17 to be filled through SPSC Competitive Examination-2021. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.183-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary Forest & Wildlife Department, Government of Sindh & others v. Mustafa Saeed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
2600 Const. P. 5391/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sajid Akbar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-22 Yes We, therefore, in absence of the exceptions as enunciated in the case-law cited above, cannot travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the instant case and interfere with any Order passed under the hierarchy of Pakistan Armed Forces in service-related matters according to their applicable laws. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2601 Const. P. 5016/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Memon and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2602 Const. P. 3972/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr.Rukhsana Iftikhar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2603 Const. P. 2837/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Tabba Heart Institute and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2604 Const. P. 7321/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Hyder (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2605 Const. P. 6788/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Zafar Iqbal Shams (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2606 Const. P. 2606/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/ Din Leather Pvt Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2607 Const. P. 839/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sarfaraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3038/2023 Ghulam Rasool v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Education Department, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2608 2023 SBLR Sindh 98 Const. P. 1584/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst, Saabi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2609 R.A (Civil Revision) 215/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 malook shah (Applicant) VS buxan & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2610 Const. P. 5635/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-23 Yes The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2611 I. A 36/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ashraf Ali Qureshi (Appellant) VS Qamaruddin Shaikh (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2612 Const. P. 690/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nazar Muhammad Jamali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2613 Const. P. 746/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Umeed Ali (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 Yes It is crystal clear that the respondentrevenue department/Government of Sindh has to make recruitment to every post applied by the candidates under the law as discussed supra as well as based on invalidated or incapacitated/minority/differently-abled and deceased quota reserved for those employees by issuing appointment order by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
2614 Const. P. 3191/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Shaista Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2615 Const. P. 4597/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rizwan Tahir & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.765-K/2022 The University of Karachi through its Registrar v. Province of Sindh through the Education Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2616 Const. P. 8295/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Tariq Mehmood & Os (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2617 Const. P. 5967/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ayub Alvi (Petitioner) VS Admin Incharge Pakistan Cotton and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2618 Const. P. 6118/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2619 Const. P. 6122/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2620 Const. P. 6121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2621 Const. P. 7028/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Najmul Kareem and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2622 Const. P. 5343/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khawaja Zakir uddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2623 Const. P. 2879/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D- 2939, 2980, 2991, 2992, 3046, 3066, 3075, 3076, 3077, 3084, 3095, 3096, 3275, 3306, 3318, 3454 of 2022 2022 Mir Muhammad khan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-23 Yes The petitioners have challenged imposition/charge of Fuel Price Adjustment (FPA) in their electricity bills issued by respective Electricity Distribution Companies. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2624 Criminal Appeal 157/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.A S 158 of 2022 2022 IRFAN ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-APR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2625 R.A (Civil Revision) 236/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Muhammad Luqman (Applicant) VS Muhammmad Usman (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2626 Const. P. 3022/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Eric Ghori & another (Petitioner) VS Learned Consumer Judge Hyd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2627 Const. P. 619/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Gulshan W/o Aashiq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-23 Yes Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cutoff social relations with the son or daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2628 Cr.Rev 139/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD AKHTAR S/O BASHIR AHMED (Applicant) VS VTH ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2629 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 119/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Kar. (Applicant) VS M/s. Chase Up, Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-24 Yes Time barred Order in Original. Collector cannot extend the time period under Section 179(3) of the Customs Act, 1969. In section 2(s) cases, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2630 Const. P. 877/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Darwais Hameed (Petitioner) VS M/s South Asia Pakistan Terminal Pvt Ltd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-24 Yes It is well settled that certiorari is available to quash a decision for an error of law. It will also be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction when an inferior Court or a tribunal acts without jurisdiction or over its jurisdiction or fails to exercise its jurisdiction or where the Court or a tribunal acts illegally in the exercise of its undoubted jurisdiction and it decides a matter in violation of the principle of natural justice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2631 Cr.Bail 851/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 GHULAM RASOOL @ RASOOLI S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STASE (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2632 Cr.Bail 982/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 WAQAR @ WAKKO S/O ASLAM & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)