Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan
Mr.Justice Yahya Afridi
Hon'ble Chief Justice
Sindh High Court
Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
1.Criminal Appeal 14/2026 (S.B.) Iqrar Ali Jakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCriminal appeal in offence punishable under Section 23(i)(a) of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013 allowed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
2.Const. P. 1094/2026 (D.B.) Safdar Masih V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 961Since the respondents themselves have acknowledged that the petitioner???s case has been duly processed and pre-audited, and have further undertaken before this Court to release the outstanding amount within a stipulated period, no further adjudication on merits is required. However, to safeguard the petitioner???s rights, the respondents are bound by their undertaking and are directed to ensure compliance within the stated timeframe, failing which the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
3.Const. P. 333/2026 (D.B.) Dr. Zehra Tahir Shairani V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 963Moreover, the position taken by the respondents, while acknowledging liability and requesting time for release, amounts to an implied admission of the petitioner???s entitlement. In such circumstances, the continued non-payment is not only unjustified but also contrary to principles of fairness, equity, and good governance. Public bodies are under a constitutional obligation to act reasonably and expeditiously in discharging financial obligations towards retired employees, who are often dependent on such income for their livelihood and dignity in post-retirement life. 7. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with pending application(s) and the the respondents are jointly directed to ensure expeditious release of all pensionary benefits already determined in favour of the petitioner. Any further delay would amount to continued deprivation of a lawful entitlement without lawful excuse, warranting appropriate consequential proceedings against the responsible authorities. A copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, Sindh Local Government Board for immediate compliance.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
4.Const. P. 2234/2026 (D.B.) Ali Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 964Since the respondents themselves have agreed to adjudicate the matter within a stipulated timeframe after affording hearing, and no final determination on merits has yet been made by the competent authority, this Court is of the considered view that premature adjudication would not be appropriate. The proper course, in the first instance, is to allow the statutory authority to determine the matter in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 7. Such an approach would not only ensure compliance with due process but also safeguard the rights of all stakeholders while maintaining adherence to statutory regulatory mechanisms governing construction activities. 8. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without touching the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to hear all concerned parties and pass a speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of two weeks. 9. The petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST CONSTRUCTION
5.Const. P. 5131/2025 (D.B.) Arif Masih V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 955In view of above statement, without touching the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties present in Court, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s) with directions to Respondent No.6 / Director Sanitation, TMC Mauripur, District Keamari, Karachi to remit the pension file of the petitioner within two days??? time and thereafter the case be processed and the pensionary benefits of the petitioner be released within three weeks??? time.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
6.Const. P. 297/2026 (D.B.) Faisal V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 965Accordingly, while reaffirming the earlier directions, this Court holds that if no adverse material exists against the petitioner, there remains no legal justification to curtail his fundamental rights. Therefore this petition needs to be disposed of with direction to the Review Committee so constituted to hear the petitioner and act fairly, expeditiously, and strictly in accordance with law, within three weeks??? time and any failure to do so shall entail legal consequences, as the petitioner, having already suffered undue hardship, is entitled to immediate and effective consideration of his case within three weeks??? time. However, it is made clear that if the case of the petitioner is not decided by the Review Committee his name shall be removed from the PCL without further deliberation. 8. This petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-BLACKLISTING
7.Const. P. 1522/2026 (D.B.) Rameez Ali V/S Secretary Health & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 960Even otherwise, the material placed on record does not demonstrate any procedural illegality in the acceptance of resignation. The plea of coercion remains unsubstantiated and uncorroborated by contemporaneous evidence. On the contrary, the acceptance of resignation followed by final settlement supports the inference of a concluded severance of employment on mutual and formal terms. 12. In view of the above, the petitioner has failed to establish a case of unlawful termination or violation of constitutional or legal rights warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The petition, therefore, appears to be misconceived and not maintainable, lacking merit in law as well as in facts. 13. Resultantly, the Constitutional Petition along with pending application(s) is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
8.Const. P. 2298/2026 (D.B.) Arshad Ali V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the apprehension of arrest and to enable the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and face proceedings in accordance with law, the request for protective per-arrest bail is found to be reasonable. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to protective bail for a period of seven (07) days, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 500,000/- wotj P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. It is further directed that the petitioner shall surrender before the competent trial court within the stipulated period, falling which this protective bail shall stand automatically withdrawn and the surety forfeited. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application.Read more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
9.Const. P. 86/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Rashid V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDuring proceedings, learned counsel for the parties stated that in view of the ongoing departmental action, the petition may be disposed of with directions to the authorities to proceed strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months. 5. In view of the above consensus and the steps already initiated by the SBCA, the petition is disposed of accordingly along with all pending applications, subject to just exceptions, with direction that the matter shall be processed and concluded in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
10.R.A (Civil Revision) 336/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Tayyab V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 936Suit under section 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 is titled based remedy; declaration is inherent. Dismissal under section 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 held misconceived; case remanded back.Read more
11.I. A 25/2026 (D.B.) NAJAMUDDIN V/S ZTBL MATLI Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
12.Const. P. 682/2026 (D.B.) Saeed Ahmed Jamali V/S P.O Sindh & 07 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPerson is not entitled who come before the Court with unclean hands.Read more
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
13.I. A 18/2026 (D.B.) ZUBAIR AMEER V/S BANK AL-FALAH LTD HYD Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
14.R.A (Civil Revision) 44/2025 (S.B.) Walji Ram & Others V/S Dodo & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasRejection of plaint of under VII Rule 11 C.P.C; disputed question of title, possession, and survey identification require evidence. Suit restored.Read more
15.I. A 8/2026 (D.B.) ZULFIQAR ALI V/S ZARAI TARAQUITI BANK LTD Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
16.I. A 9/2026 (D.B.) ABDUL WAHID V/S ZARAI TARAQUITI BANK LTD Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
17.I. A 26/2026 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD LAIQ V/S ZTBL MATLI Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
18.Const. P. 737/2026 (D.B.) Zahid Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 957It is also a settled principle of law that an order of promotion issued through a lawful departmental process carries a presumption of legality and validity unless it is lawfully set aside by a competent authority after due process. Interim interference with such an order, particularly without strong and legally sustainable reasons, not only disturbs settled service rights but also causes irreparable prejudice to the employee concerned. 12. Viewed in its entirety, the impugned order dated 12.01.2026 suffers from jurisdictional defects, procedural irregularity, and legal impropriety. The Tribunal has failed to exercise its discretion in accordance with settled judicial principles governing grant of interim relief, resulting in a manifest miscarriage of justice. 13. Accordingly, it is concluded that the impugned order and the consequent proceedings are without lawful authority, coram non judice, and is set aside. The Petitioner, therefore, is entitled to restoration of his lawful status, along with protection from any coercive action, pending final adjudication of the matter in accordance with law. 14. This petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
19.Const. P. 5649/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Jameela Khatoon V/S Federation of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 954In these circumstances, the mechanism devised by this Court requiring deposit of pensionary benefits with the Nazir and subsequent disbursement upon verification strikes a fair and equitable balance between safeguarding the petitioner???s rights and ensuring transparency in disbursement. This arrangement also prevents any further exploitation or interference by third parties, including family members, in the receipt of pension. 10. Accordingly, it is held that the petitioner is entitled to receive her pensionary benefits, and the amount already deposited with the Nazir shall be disbursed directly to her after proper verification, preferably at her residence, considering her age and condition. It is further directed that future pension shall also be routed through the Nazir, who shall ensure its disbursement to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law as per her entitlement. 11. With these observations, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
20.Const. P. 2025/2026 (D.B.) Syed Wamiq Abrar Bokhari V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 959In view of the above, the petitioner has successfully demonstrated that the continuation of his name on the ECL is devoid of legal basis, suffers from non-application of mind, and amounts to an unjustified restraint on his constitutional right to movement. 11. Resultantly, this petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority to recoil the impugned Memorandum dated 23.06.2023, which is set aside, and the respondents are required to forthwith remove the petitioner???s name from the Exit Control List and extend all consequential relief in accordance with law. All pending application(s) are also disposed of in the said terms.Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
21.Const. P. 1723/2026 (D.B.) Aurangzaib Khan Bungush & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 962In view of the foregoing, this Court finds no illegality, infirmity, or jurisdictional defect in the impugned actions of the respondents. On the contrary, the actions are found to be fully justified, lawful, and taken in the larger public interest to curb encroachments, regulate traffic, and enforce statutory provisions. 16. Before parting with this one judgment, we may also observe that primarily roadside encroachments and improper parking are causing congestion and public inconvenience, reflecting apathy on the part of the district administration. The Chief Secretary Sindh, DIG Traffics, and transport authorities are directed to immediately remove illegal roadside parking, failing which proceedings under Article 204 of the Constitution shall be initiated against the responsible officials upon report to this Court. 17. Resultantly, the instant petition, being devoid of merit and barred by earlier adjudication, is dismissed along with pending application(s). However, it is reiterated that the petitioners shall remain at liberty to conduct their transport business strictly from lawfully designated and approved terminals in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-DE-SEAL
22.Const. P. 1681/2016 (D.B.) Arsalan Ghous and Ors V/S Province of SIndh and ORs Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 956Furthermore, this Court has already adjudicated upon an identical controversy in the case of similarly placed employees, wherein it was held that such irregular appointees are not entitled to regularization. The petitioners, being similarly situated, cannot claim any better footing. 13. In these circumstances, the impugned circular dated 05.10.2015 and the consequential actions taken by the respondents cannot be termed as illegal or without lawful authority. Rather, the same were issued to rectify irregularities and ensure compliance with the governing rules and principles of transparency in public employment. 14. Consequently, these petitions, being devoid of merit, are hereby dismissed, along with all pending applications, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
23.Const. P. 2535/2016 (D.B.) Muhammad Zubair V/S Administrator KMC and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 958In response, learned counsel for the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) submitted that the petitioner???s case for grant of proforma promotion would be considered within a period of two weeks through issuance of an appropriate circular, and that the necessary process would be completed within the said timeframe. 4. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent, the instant petition stands disposed of with the direction that the aforesaid exercise be undertaken within two weeks and case of the petitioner shall be considered for proforma promotion accordingly without fail.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
24.Const. P. 1698/2026 (D.B.) Aman Ali & others V/S PMDC & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 910MDCAT eligibility criteria cannot be reduced by PMDC.Read more
Matter:-Result / Admission (MD-CAT)
25.Const. P. 718/2026 (D.B.) Deedar Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurInvestigation falling under exclusive domain of Investigating Officer.Read more
Matter:-Investigation
26.Const. P. 4611/2025 (D.B.) Masroor Ali Memon V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 941In light of the above legal position, the repeated supersession of the petitioner, despite judicial directions and absence of subsisting legal impediment, is arbitrary, mala fide in law, and violative of settled principles of due process and equality. 15. The impugned order dated 08.08.2025 to the extent of the petitioner cannot be sustained as it is based on redundant and previously adjudicated grounds, violates the binding judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 18.07.2024, and disregards settled principles laid down by the Supreme Court regarding promotion consideration, finality of judicial findings, and non-perpetuation of extinguished stigma. 16. Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to be considered for promotion from the date his juniors were promoted, along with all consequential benefits, by way of circulation and the impugned order to the extent of petitioner is set aside as being without lawful authority and of no legal effect. 17. This petition stands disposed of along with pending application(s) in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
27.Const. P. 2891/2024 (D.B.) Sajjad Ali & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 947During proceedings, this Court, vide order dated 19.11.2025, struck off the name of petitioner No. 2. however, the case of petitioner No. 1 was directed to be reconsidered by the respondent department, as he had already submitted a representation for regularization. The competent authority of the respondent is directed to decide the pending representation, or any fresh one, within three weeks in accordance with law. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without touching the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of along with any pending applications.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE / REGULARIZATION
28.Const. P. 5552/2021 (D.B.) Mst. Darakshan Ishaq V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 943Conversely, the learned AAG assisted by the learned counsel for respondents (DUHS) denied the petitioner???s claims and submit that the deceased initially served on a contractual basis and was regularized only on 16.05.2016 as Lecturer (BPS-18). They assert that only regular service counts toward gratuity, and since the deceased rendered 4 years and 7 months of regular service, he did not meet the minimum requirement of more than 5 years under the DUHS Pension Statutes, 2007. The respondents maintain that all other admissible benefits, including financial assistance, group insurance, and provident fund, have already been paid. They further contend that contractual service cannot be counted for gratuity, deny allegations of malafide, and state that the petitioner???s children did not apply for available posts, though he/she would be considered subject to eligibility and vacancy. The respondents conclude that the petition is misconceived and liable to be dismissed, when confronted the legal position of the case, both parties agreed in the terms that the competent authority shall hear the petitioner and pass speaking order on the plea taken by the petitioner in the present case, request seems to be reasonable and is acceded to. 4. Without touching the merits of the case, the competent authority of the respondent-University is directed to reconsider the matter on all aspect of the case and decide the petitioner???s case strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned (speaking) order within a period of three weeks with meaningful hearing. Insofar as the claim for appointment under the deceased quota is concerned, the same shall also be examined and decided in accordance with law. The petition along with pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
29.Const. P. 6045/2023 (D.B.) M/s Searle Pakistan Ltd V/S Nazim Ahmed Khan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 945After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is willing to conduct a de novo inquiry through a neutral person within one month, confront all allegations, and conclude proceedings by submitting recommendations to the competent authority, which shall pass a speaking order after hearing the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed to this proposal and sought the disposal of the petition on these terms. The proposal being reasonable is accepted. 6. In view of the above and with the consent of the parties, the petition is disposed of with directions to conduct a de novo inquiry through a neutral Inquiry Officer, who shall confront the respondents with all allegations by holding the regular inquiry and conclude the proceedings within one month. The competent authority shall thereafter pass a speaking order after hearing all concerned. The issue of back benefits shall remain subject to the outcome of the regular inquiry. Consequently, the orders of the learned Single Bench and Full Bench of NIRC are set aside, and the matter is remanded for de novo inquiry as discussed supra. All pending applications also stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
30.Const. P. 244/2026 (S.B.) Mst bakhtawar Shafique V/S Adnan Adil Mithwani and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadG&W Act, 1890, Dismissal of application u/s 25 does not bar application u/s 12Read more
Matter:-Family
31.Criminal Miscelleneous 693/2025 (S.B.) Noor Hussain & others V/S Assistant Executive Engineer /SDO & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 950
Matter:-561-A Cr.P.C
32.Const. P. 2837/2017 (D.B.) Afzal Hussain V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 851For the reasons set out hereinabove, it is held that the Board of Revenue, Sindh, was vested with lawful and statutory jurisdiction under Section 8 of the Sindh Board of Revenue Act, 1957, to entertain and adjudicate upon the review of its earlier order. The mere citation of Section 163 of the Sindh Land Revenue Act, 1967, in the initial review application does not, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, vitiate the proceedings or render them void ab initio, particularly when the power of review was otherwise available under Section 8 of the Act of 1957. The instant petition raises disputed questions of fact and title, for which an adequate and efficacious alternate remedy before the competent civil courts exists and is, in fact, already being pursued. Consequently, the matter does not warrant the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. The Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the grant of a declaration, writ of prohibition, or any other discretionary relief in the present circumstances. Accordingly, this Constitution Petition is dismissed, along with all pending applications, if any. It is, however, clarified that: (a) Any observations made herein are confined strictly to the question of maintainability and the jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue in relation to the impugned review proceedings; (b) Nothing contained in this judgment shall be deemed to constitute a final determination regarding title, ownership, possession, the validity of sale deeds, or the rights of any third parties; (c) The parties shall remain at liberty to agitate all permissible pleas before the competent civil court or any other forum of competent jurisdiction, which shall adjudicate the matter independently, strictly in accordance with law and on its own merits, without being influenced by any tentative observations recorded herein. The petitioner shall be at liberty to call in question the legality of the impugned order before the competent civil court, if he so desires.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
33.Const. P. 104/2026 (S.B.) Sofi Sajjad V/S Ayaz Ali Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 935Rejection of plaint treated as decree under section 2(2) CPC; failure to file Appeal under section 96 CPC renders writ incompetent. Petition dismissed.Read more
34.Const. P. 421/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ishaque Thr: his legal heirs & ot hers V/S Anwer Ali & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 949
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
35.Const. P. 104/2026 (S.B.) Sofi Sajjad V/S Ayaz Ali Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 934Rejection of plaint treated as decree under section 2(2) CPC; failure to file Appeal under section 96 CPC renders writ incompetent. Petition dismissed.Read more
36.Const. P. 582/2021 (S.B.) Irrigation Workars Union & Others V/S Province Of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 948
Matter:-Against Order
37.Cr.Bail 1354/2025 (S.B.) Shoaib Ahmed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadAlleged offences under PECA were bailable at relevant time. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
38.Cr.Bail 122/2026 (S.B.) Gulzar Lakhan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
39.Cr.Bail 167/2026 (S.B.) Ameer Bux Bugti V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSpecific role prescribed, bail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
40.Const. P. 116/2026 (S.B.) Province of Sindh & others V/S Ghulam Akbar & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
41.Const. P. 362/2025 (S.B.) Sajjad Ali Solangi V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Harasment
42.R.A (Civil Revision) 136/2024 (S.B.) Liaquat Mehmood & others V/S Mujeeb Ur Rehman & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasCivil Revision Application is dismissed; concurrent findings upheld and execution of the alleged sale agreement remained unproved under articles 79 and 82 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984.Read more
43.Cr.Acq.A. 135/2026 (S.B.) JAHANGIR AKBAR S/O ALI AKBAR V/S SOHAIL AHMED & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
44.Criminal Miscelleneous 172/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Azam Bozdar V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
45.Cr.Bail 56/2026 (S.B.) Mst: Dordana Fareed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
46.Const. P. 40/2022 (D.B.) M/s Al-Momin Packaging Ind Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 968Audit exemption clause 105 in second schedule ITO ??? effect of repeal.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
47.Const. P. 5833/2022 (D.B.) Murshid Builderes Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 967Audit exemption clause 105A in second schedule ITO, even if beneficial legislation, did not apply retrospectively to pending audits.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
48.Const. P. 1593/2019 (D.B.) Engro Eximp Agriproduct Pvt Ltd V/S The Deputy Commissioner (Audit) IR & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 966Audit exemption clause 105 in second schedule ITO, even if beneficial legislation, did not apply retrospectively to pending audits.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
49.Const. P. 1305/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Majid Sahito & another V/S Irum Bukhari & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 885In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the view that the Petitioners have failed to establish any legal infirmity, jurisdictional defect, or violation of fundamental rights in respect of the impugned promotions. The petition is found to be based on disputed questions of fact and service interpretation, which are not amenable to determination in constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 12. The petition, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed, along with pending applications. However, the parties are left to bear their own costs. 13. These are the reasons of our short order of even date whereby the instant petition along with pending application(s) were dismissed.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
50.Const. P. 5241/2022 (D.B.) Mukhtiar Ahmed and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 880In the present case, the respondents have demonstrated compliance by conducting a review and passing a speaking order, while maintaining that the petitioners were not entitled to appointment on merit and legal grounds. The action complained of, at best, reflects an adverse administrative conclusion rather than defiance of judicial command. It is also noteworthy that the underlying recruitment process has attained finality through prior judicial pronouncements, and the present proceedings, under the guise of contempt, effectively seek reconsideration of concluded adjudication, which is impermissible. 8. In these circumstances, the essential ingredients of contempt, namely willful and deliberate disobedience of a clear court order, are not made out. Accordingly, the contempt application appears to be misconceived and not maintainable, warranting dismissal. However the petitioners are at liberity to assail the legality of the speaking order before appropriate form which shall be decided on merits if filed subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
51.Const. P. 1070/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Latif Buriro V/S Chief Minister Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 944Today, in compliance of this Court???s order dated 15.04.2026, a statement has been filed on behalf of the Secretary, Health Department, Government of Sindh, wherein it has been stated that necessary steps for the release of the petitioner???s pension and gratuity have been initiated, and the payable amount shall be credited to his account within two weeks. the request seems to be reasonable and is acceded to. In view of the aforesaid assurance and statement, the instant contempt application is hereby disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
52.Const. P. 3460/2025 (D.B.) Mansoor Ahmed Khan V/S President, NBP & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 877For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional defect in the impugned judgment dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Full Bench, NIRC, warranting interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. 19. Accordingly, the instant constitutional petition is dismissed along with pending application(s), being not maintainable, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
53.Const. P. 6246/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Aasma Aziz V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 879Resultantly, without touching the merits of the case, as comments have not been filed. However, the petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the observation that the competent authority of respondents shall take a final and reasoned decision in the pending disciplinary proceedings, if any within three weeks??? time, strictly in accordance with law, rules, and principles of natural justice by providing meaningful hearing to the petitioner. In case no final decision is taken within the stipulated time, the disciplinary proceedings shall be deemed to have lost their legal efficacy, subject to further remedy available to the petitioner under the law.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
54.Const. P. 5956/2025 (D.B.) Yousaf V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 876Accordingly, this petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of with the direction that the case of the petitioner shall be placed before the competent Review Committee/Designation Authority under the Passport Rules, 2021 and applicable policy framework, which shall decide the matter within a period of two (02) weeks from the receipt of this order. The petitioner and /his attorney shall be afforded a proper opportunity of hearing, along with consideration of all documentary evidence relied upon by him, and the authority shall pass a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law. 8. It is further directed that the decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith and shall be amenable to legal challenge, if so advised, before the competent forum. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF NEW PASSPORT
55.Const. P. 5831/2023 (D.B.) Syeda Sakina Riaz & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 866During proceedings, Petitioners expressed willingness to surrender the alternate land subject to lawful compensation or equivalent land. However, due to a pending civil suit No.10352/2025 on the same subject, both parties agreed that the matter be decided by the trial court independently without being influenced by the observation of the SMBR and LU department. 8. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties present in Court, the petition along with all pending application(s) stand disposed of with directions that the learned IV Senior Civil Judge Karachi South shall decide the civil suit No.10352/2025 on its own merits, uninfluenced by observations of this Court or other revenue authorities.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
56.Const. P. 8499/2017 (D.B.) Haris Hamid V/S Port Qasim Authority and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 881In view of the above, it is held that no case of willful disobedience is made out against the alleged contemnors. The contempt application is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the speaking order passed by the Chairman, PQA, before the appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised. It is observed that this Court, while disposing of the main petition, had merely directed verification of the petitioner???s degrees through the Chairman, HEC, and consequential action by PQA on the basis of such report after due hearing. Since the HEC report has been submitted and the PQA has passed a speaking order declining reinstatement and affirming termination, the petitioner???s grievance, if still subsisting, may be agitated in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
57.Const. P. 50/2022 (D.B.) Syed Aftab Ahmed V/S NIRC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 882In view of the foregoing, this Court finds that the respondent has failed to demonstrate any legal or factual infirmity in the reasoning of the learned Single Member NIRC warranting complete reversal. The impugned judgment, to the extent it sets aside reinstatement, suffers from misapplication of principles of fair trial, improper appreciation of evidence, and failure to consider the doctrine of proportionality in service jurisprudence. 20. Consequently, petition is allowed and the impugned judgment dated 21.12.2021, cannot be sustained in law. The findings of the learned Single Member dated 04.08.2020 are based on proper appreciation of the record and settled legal principles and are accordingly affirmed, with modification that the denial of back benefits is set aside and the petitioner is held entitled to consequential monetary benefits in accordance with law. It is, however, noted that during the pendency of the present proceedings, the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation on 31.01.2025, therefore reinstatement shall be treated as having run its course for all legal and monetary purposes.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
58.Const. P. 577/2016 (D.B.) Ali Hyder Shah @ Dodo Shah V/S Syed Sajid Ali Shah & Ors. Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadPolicy of Government employment in lieu of land donation is unconstitutional.Read more
Matter:-Election Matter
59.Const. P. 5185/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Ali V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that the impugned Memorandum dated 12.09.2025 has been issued without hearing the petitioner lawful authority, in violation of the principles of natural justice, and in derogation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 4, 15, and 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 12. Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority that the impugned Memorandum dated 12.09.2025, whereby the name of the Petitioner has been placed on the Passport Control List needs to be reconsidered by hearing the petitioner and if no tangible material is availabl against the petitioner. The respondents shall remove the name of the Petitioner from the Passport Control List and restore his travel rights, subject to any lawful restriction imposed by law. 13. Needless to observe that this order shall not preclude the Respondents from taking any action strictly in accordance with law, after affording due process and opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner.Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
60.Const. P. 3351/2025 (D.B.) Andaleeb Cooperative Housing Society Ltd & Others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi(i). The Respondent Cooperative Department is directed to appoint a competent, independent, and neutral Election Officer for M/s Andaleeb Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. strictly in accordance with Section 12 of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020 read with Rule 9(5) of the Rules, within 15 days from the date of this Order. (ii). Upon such appointment, the Election Officer shall conduct elections of the Managing Committee of the Society strictly in accordance with law, rules, and bye-laws, ensuring transparency and fairness, and complete the entire election process within 30 days thereafter. (iii). The Election Officer shall ensure preparation/verification of the membership list, after providing opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, so that elections are conducted on the basis of a lawful and verified electoral roll. (iv). The Cooperative Department shall extend full assistance and support to the Election Officer for smooth conduct of elections and shall ensure that no unlawful interference is caused by any party. (v). Insofar as allegations regarding irregularities, mismanagement, and illegal acts are concerned, the competent authority is directed to conduct an inquiry strictly in accordance with law, after providing due opportunity of hearing to all concerned, and pass a reasoned order. (vi). Till completion of the election process, no coercive action shall be taken against the Society except strictly in accordance with law. (vii). The parties shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies available under the law, including Section 73 of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, if any grievance persists.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
61.Const. P. 617/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Umair V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 863
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
62.R.A (Civil Revision) 81/2015 (S.B.) Mahmood-ul-Hassan V/S Prof. Dr. Syed Misbah-uz-Zafar & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 848No Statutory Definition of Vakalatnama - Irregularities if any in Vakalatnama are curable - Subsequent ratification can restore validity of Counsel???s acts.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
63.Const. P. 1219/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Aliza & another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 839
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
64.Const. P. 1137/2023 (S.B.) Jamil Ahmed S/o Fazal Elahi V/S Muhammad Shoaib and Othes Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 854, 2026 SHC KHI 860??? scope of Constitutional Jurisdiction in rent matters is confined to ascertain whether the Courts below have flouted the statute or failed to follow the law relating thereto. ??? by conferring only one right of appeal under section 21 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 the legislature in its wisdom has shortened the span of litigation in rent cases. ??? interference by the Court under Article 199, merely on the ground that another view of the matter was also possible, would not serve any other purpose but would add to the misery of prolonged litigation for the parties, which defeats the spirit and object of the law. ??? Although this appears to be a fit case for the imposition of heavy costs against the petitioner for initiating this frivolous second round of litigation in these rent proceedings, despite finality of the ejectment Order and handing over possession three years ago, however purely out of forbearance and indulgence, costs are not being imposed, but the petitioner is only being put on caution to be careful in future.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
65.Cr.Misc. 66/2026 (S.B.) Dr. Muhammad Murtaza Shaikh and Another V/S SHO PS Dari and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 832Cr. Misc. Appln. was dismissed. SHO was directed to record the statement of the complainant U/s 154 Cr.P.C and proceed further in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-22 A-B
66.Const. P. 481/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Haroon Shaikh V/S Federation of Pakistan & 03 others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
67.Const. P. 879/2026 (D.B.) Syed Abdul Samad Jafri V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
68.Const. P. 621/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ibtehaj Kamal V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
69.Const. P. 619/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ifrahim V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
70.Const. P. 620/2026 (D.B.) Sheikh Muhammad Arsalan Ghani V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
71.Const. P. 4014/2025 (D.B.) Adnan Ghani Farid & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi(i). The Respondent Cooperative Department is directed to appoint a competent, independent, and neutral Election Officer for M/s Andaleeb Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. strictly in accordance with Section 12 of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020 read with Rule 9(5) of the Rules, within 15 days from the date of this Order. (ii). Upon such appointment, the Election Officer shall conduct elections of the Managing Committee of the Society strictly in accordance with law, rules, and bye-laws, ensuring transparency and fairness, and complete the entire election process within 30 days thereafter. (iii). The Election Officer shall ensure preparation/verification of the membership list, after providing opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, so that elections are conducted on the basis of a lawful and verified electoral roll. (iv). The Cooperative Department shall extend full assistance and support to the Election Officer for smooth conduct of elections and shall ensure that no unlawful interference is caused by any party. (v). Insofar as allegations regarding irregularities, mismanagement, and illegal acts are concerned, the competent authority is directed to conduct an inquiry strictly in accordance with law, after providing due opportunity of hearing to all concerned, and pass a reasoned order. (vi). Till completion of the election process, no coercive action shall be taken against the Society except strictly in accordance with law. (vii). The parties shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies available under the law, including Section 73 of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, if any grievance persists.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
72.Const. P. 622/2026 (D.B.) Hina Saghir V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
73.Const. P. 618/2026 (D.B.) Jalees ur Rehman V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
74.Cr.Bail 46/2026 (S.B.) Ghulam Muhammad @ Gullo Qambrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail disposed ofRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
75.Judicial Companies Misc. 13/2026 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD FARRUKH V/S UNITY FOODS LIMITED AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Disputes between Directors(Section 286 Companies Act'17)
76.Const. P. 5572/2025 (D.B.) Joshua Paul & Mst. Sameen Hasan V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 899At the very outset, learned Assistant Attorney General submits a statement with the narration that the Ministry of Interior has already removed the names of the petitioners from the Passport Control List (PCL) vide letter dated 24.11.2025. 4. When this position was confronted to learned counsel for the petitioners, he seeks disposal of this petition in terms of report so submitted on behalf of the Secretary, Ministry of Interior. 5. Without touching the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties Petition stands disposed of along with listed / pending applications in terms of the statement of learned AAG.Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
77.Const. P. 1274/2026 (D.B.) Sher Ahmed V/S Chairman NADRA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 905When confronted with the above position, learned counsel for the petitioner expressed satisfaction and sought disposal of the petition in the light of the statement made by the Assistant Director (Legal), NADRA. It is, however, observed that the aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks. 4. In view of the above, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, the petition is disposed of along with all pending applications in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
78.Const. P. 1663/2026 (D.B.) TRG Pakistan Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 911Consequently, by the consent of the parties and without touching upon the merits of the case, this Constitutional Petition, along with all pending applications, is disposed of with the direction that the competent authority shall decide the Petitioner???s rectification application filed under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, strictly in accordance with law and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of this order. Until such time as the aforesaid rectification application is decided, no coercive or adverse action shall be taken against the Petitioner pursuant to the impugned notice dated 09.03.2026 or in relation to the subject tax demand. In the event of an adverse decision, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to avail any remedy available under the law, and the Respondents shall thereafter be entitled to proceed strictly in accordance with law. It is, however, clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, and all questions of law and fact are left open to be determined by the competent authority.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
79.Const. P. 2086/2016 (D.B.) Muhammads Anis Khan and Ors V/S P.D.O.H.A and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 913At this stage, both parties have agreed to the disposal of the present petition in terms of an application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, whereby they have amicably settled their dispute on the following terms: 1. ???Settlement Agreement: The legal heirs of late Muhammad Anis Khan and the Defence Housing Authority, Karachi, have entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 02.04.2026, resolving all disputes between them amicably. 2. Undertaking to Withdraw Petition: In terms of Clause 2 of the Settlement Agreement, the legal heirs have undertaken to withdraw the above-captioned Constitutional Petition. 3. The withdrawal of the petition is conditional. In the event that the Defence Housing Authority, Karachi, fails to fulfill any of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement, the legal heirs shall retain the right to seek revival of these proceedings as well as to avail any other legal remedy available under the law.??? 3. In view of the above, and without touching upon the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of along with all pending applications in terms of the Settlement Agreement arrived at between the parties, as disclosed in the instant application bearing CMA No. 9040/2026. 4. The listed application stands disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
80.Const. P. 8151/2018 (D.B.) Iqbal Ahmed Khan V/S S.I.T.E and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 867In view of the foregoing, without the touching the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with directions to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to process and decide the petitioner???s application subject to his entitlement under the law two months from the date of receipt of this order by passing speaking order of he hearing the petitioner. The respondents shall, if necessary, obtain certified copies of the relevant record from the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) or reconstruct the file on the basis of available secondary evidence. If the petitioner is found to have fulfilled all legal and regulatory requirements.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
81.Const. P. 1356/2025 (D.B.) Gul Zada V/S NIRC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 942In view of the foregoing reasons, it is noticed that both impugned orders suffer from procedural impropriety, violation of natural justice, and failure to exercise jurisdiction in accordance with law. Consequently, the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, is rightly invoked. 20. Accordingly, this Constitutional Petition is allowed, and it is hereby ordered that the order dated 31.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Member, NIRC, dismissing the grievance petition of the petitioner, is declared illegal, unlawful, and of no legal effect for having been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. The order dated 20.02.2025 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC, is also unsustainable, as it failed to rectify the jurisdictional and procedural defects in the order of the Single Member. Both impugned orders are set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned Single Member of NIRC, for decision of Grievance Petition No. 48(139)/2024-K on merits, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties and, if necessary, after recording evidence regarding the petitioner???s date of birth. The learned Single Member is directed to decide the grievance petition expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Until the final decision of the grievance petition, the respondents No. 2 and 3 are restrained from taking any adverse action against the petitioner on the basis of the disputed date of birth. However, there shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
82.H.C.A 97/2002 (D.B.) Abdul qayyum Soomro V/S Mst. Gul Shahnaz and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 823Specific performance refused. High Court Appeal allowed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
83.Const. P. 5467/2019 (D.B.) Nooruddin Abro V/S EOBI and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 883For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality or arbitrariness in the decision of the Departmental Promotion Committee or the impugned order dated 02.05.2019. The deferment of his promotion was based on valid and lawful considerations, including non-availability of PERs, adverse remarks, and non-fulfillment of mandatory training requirements. The claim for retrospective promotion and consequential monetary and pensionary benefits is therefore untenable. The petition is also hit by delay and laches and lacks merit. 14. Consequently, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed, being devoid of merit, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
84.Const. P. 1712/2017 (D.B.) Mohammad Yaqoob V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadPetition suffering from laches and disputed questions of fact, dismissed.Read more
Matter:-ALLOTMENT OF PLOT
85.Const. P. 1296/2026 (D.B.) Khan Zaman V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiWhen confronted with the above position, learned counsel for the petitioner expressed satisfaction and sought disposal of the petition in terms of the statement made by the respondents. 5. In view of the above, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, the petition is disposed of along with all pending applications with a direction to the KMC to release any outstanding pensionary benefits of the petitioner, if found due and admissible, within a period of three weeks.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
86.Const. P. 389/2024 (D.B.) Dr Imamuddin & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurContempt ProceedingsRead more
Matter:-AGAINST FRESH APPOINTMENT
87.Const. P. 7369/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Bilal and Others V/S Govt.of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 826, 2026 SHC KHI 831Fake Domicile IssueRead more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
88.II.A. 133/2025 (S.B.) Shams Din HIngorjo V/S Kamaluddin & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 853, 2026 SHC MPK 859??? in a civil case where a party, who bears the burden of proving genetic relationship withholds consent for DNA testing, the Court may draw an adverse inference against such party under Article 129(g) of the Qanun-e-Shahdat Order 1984. ??? DNA Test is one of the best evidences to find out the truth or falsity of paternity without loss of time. ??? Legal decisions of the courts must fall within the boundaries of scientifically sound knowledge. ??? trial Court acts as a gatekeeper of the scientific evidence and must enjoy a good sense and understanding of science. ??? As science grows so will the forensic techniques, tools and devices. ??? Courts must be open to developments in forensic science and embrace new techniques and devices to resolve a dispute. ??? Such techniques and devices well established and widely accepted in the scientific community as a credible and reliable technique or device. ??? Once an appellate forum has given a clear and specific direction, trial court must carry out such direction as mandated.Read more
89.II.A. 52/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Mubina W/o Shah Mir Khan (Late) V/S Zeeshan Malik Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, LIMITATION
2026 SHC KHI 837Limitation condoned. Appeal allowed. Case remanded.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
90.Const. P. 1991/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Naveed V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-ILLEGAL TRANSPORTATION
91.Const. P. 799/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Faheem V/S Mir Fath Ali Khan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
92.Const. P. 2046/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shamsuddin Khan V/S President & CEO of PT&T and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-OUT STANDING DUES
93.Const. P. 102/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Azeem V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
94.Const. P. 587/2025 (D.B.) Dr Imamuddin V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSelection board is directed to pass a speaking and well reasoned order.Read more
Matter:-Against Notification / Office Order
95.Const. P. 1747/2023 (D.B.) Ava Ardeshir Cowasjee V/S KMC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 903In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, without touching the merits of the case, the petition, along with pending application(s), by consent with the direction that the case of the petitioner shall be forwarded to the Sindh Master Plan Authority, which shall decide the same within the stipulated period. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to all concerned for compliance.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
96.Const. P. 2169/2024 (D.B.) Shahid Ali Zaidi V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 846Accordingly, the Accountant General???s Office is directed to convene a joint meeting of all concerned parties, including representatives of the Board of Secondary Education, Karachi, within three (03) weeks from the date of this order, for the purpose of recalculating the petitioner???s pension strictly based on his retirement in BPS-18 and in accordance with the applicable rules and policies. A compliance report shall be submitted before this Court forthwith upon completion of the exercise. If the petitioner is found entitled to any enhanced pension or arrears, the same shall be released to him expeditiously, preferably within four (04) weeks thereafter. 10. It is further clarified that failure to comply with the directions of this Court within the stipulated period shall render the responsible officials liable to appropriate proceedings in accordance with law, including proceedings under the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003. 11. With these observations and directions, the instant Constitutional Petition, along with all pending applications, stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
97.Const. P. 1634/2026 (D.B.) Dr. Nazifa Mubashir V/S Pakistan Medical & Dental Council (PMDC) & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 900In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the tentative view that concludes that the Impugned Order dated 02.03.2026 cannot be sustained to the extent that it was passed without ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice. However, instead of setting aside the disciplinary proceedings altogether, it is appropriate to remand the matter to the Disciplinary Committee for a fresh determination in accordance with the law after providing a meaningful hearing to the petitioner and deciding the subject issue within three weeks. In case no hearing is provided to the Petitioner within three weeks, the license of the Petitioner shall be liable to be restored in accordance with the law. However the observation recorded hereinabove is tentative in nature shall not prejudice the case of the parties before statutory forum, which shall decide the case in accordance with law. 14. Petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-Against Proceedings
98.Const. P. 1958/2023 (D.B.) Hakimzadi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 912The Court observes that pensionary benefits are a vested and legal entitlement of a retired employee and, upon his demise, of his lawful heirs, and such benefits cannot be withheld or delayed on account of inter-departmental procedural formalities once the entitlement is otherwise established. The purpose of judicial intervention in such matters is to ensure that admitted dues are released without unnecessary delay and hardship to the legal heirs. 9. In the present case, since the requisite pension papers have already been prepared and transmitted to the competent Accounts Authority, no further factual controversy survives requiring adjudication. The remaining step is purely ministerial in nature, to be completed by the District Accounts Office, Hyderabad, in accordance with applicable rules and procedure, within three weeks. The NICL shall take steps when received the certain amount. 10. This petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
99.Const. P. 639/2026 (D.B.) Chanaisar Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadReopening selection process should not be ordered in routine.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
100.M.A. 124/2025 (S.B.) The Stillman V/S M/s. Shamim Akhtar & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 817Appeal allowed. Injunction granted.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
101.Const. P. 757/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Waheed S/o Abdul Hakeem V/S Shaikh Naeemullah Khan and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 855, 2026 SHC KHI 862??? under Section 19(2) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 Rent Controller has ample power to rescind an ex parte order on various grounds, one of which could be to allow the right of a fair trial under Article 10-A of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
102.Const. P. 306/2026 (S.B.) Siddiq Ullah V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 856, 2026 SHC KHI 861??? Constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 in Habeaus Corpus matters, especially in family disputes, is supervisory in nature. ??? It intervenes only where there is a jurisdictional error, a violation of fundamental rights, or a manifest illegality resulting in failure of justice. ??? Where the alleged detenue/ wife appeared and gave statement out of her own free will to live with her parents, in view of matrimonial disputes between spouses and pendency of family litigation, no case for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution was made out.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
103.Const. P. 969/2025 (D.B.) Dania V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThe petitioner's case for admission to the Community Midwifery Training Course, Batch-17 for the academic session 2025???2027 could not be proved, therefore, the petition was dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Admission
104.Const. P. 263/2026 (D.B.) M/S Shakeel Ahmed V/S Govt of sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst procurement process.Read more
Matter:-Issue Tender
105.Const. P. 202/2024 (D.B.) Syed Shoukat Ali shah Masoomi V/S Chairman NAB & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkuralternate remedy available petition is not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
106.Const. P. 367/2026 (D.B.) Muzaffar Hussain V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
107.Cr.Bail 17/2026 (D.B.) Aroosa Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in Sections 6 and 7 ATA allowed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
108.Const. P. 324/2026 (D.B.) Roshan Ali V/S P.O Sindh & 02 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPlot donor case.Read more
Matter:-Plot Donor
109.Const. P. 5640/2016 (D.B.) The Custom House Common Pool V/S SLAT and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 872For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
110.Const. P. 6504/2018 (D.B.) Hikmat Shah & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 933Learned counsel for the petitioner agreed to the proposal and seeks disposal of the petition in that term. However states that time frame be given to the commissioner for wages to take decision. 5. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, and with the consent of the parties, the petition stands disposed of along with all pending applications with direction to the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, South Division Karachi to decide the matter of the petitioners/legal heirs of deceased employee, if approached earlier on merit within three weeks.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
111.Const. P. 5641/2016 (D.B.) The Custom House Common Pool V/S SLAT and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 873For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
112.Const. P. 1461/2018 (D.B.) Deceased Abdul Karim and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 868For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
113.Const. P. 1552/2026 (D.B.) Danish Saeed V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 932In view of the above position, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction that the respondent department to forward the petitioner???s pension case to the office of the Accountant General within two weeks from the date of this order. Thereafter, a compliance report shall be submitted to this Court.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
114.Const. P. 1516/2026 (D.B.) Raza Mian V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 819Since the process for consideration of the petitioner???s case is already underway and his case admittedly forms part of the batch of eligible officers being processed for promotion, the appropriate course would be to ensure that his case is decided expeditiously and strictly in accordance with the applicable rules, policy, and seniority position, without any unnecessary delay, particularly keeping in view his approaching retirement. 10. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction that the competent authority shall consider the petitioner???s case for promotion to the rank of SP Legal/AIGP Legal (BPS-18) in accordance with law, rules, policy, and seniority, preferably before his date of retirement, if otherwise found eligible. It is further directed that the exercise be undertaken fairly, transparently, and without discrimination. In case it is not done before his retirement he shall be given proforma promotion accordingly. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the competent authority for strict compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-CLAIM FOR PROMOTION
115.Const. P. 5643/2016 (D.B.) The Custom House Common Pool V/S SLAT and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 875For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
116.Const. P. 5642/2016 (D.B.) The Custom House Common Pool V/S SLAT and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 874For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
117.Const. P. 3137/2016 (D.B.) The Custom House Common Pool V/S S.L.A.T and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 870For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
118.Const. P. 3138/2016 (D.B.) The Custom House Common Pool V/S S.L.A.T and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 871For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
119.Const. P. 3136/2016 (D.B.) The Custom House Common Pool V/S S.L.A.T and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 869For the foregoing reasons, the petitions filed by the Customs House Common Pool Trust are dismissed, being devoid of merit, while Constitution Petition No. D-1461 of 2018 is allowed. The respondents are directed to ensure the release of the petitioners??? lawful dues, including gratuity and other admissible benefits, from the amount already deposited with the Nazir of this Court, if not earlier released, in accordance with law and after due verification. Any pending recovery proceedings shall continue in accordance with the law, and the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit; in case of failure, consequences shall follow. However, with no order as to costs. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
120.Cr.Bail 1455/2025 (S.B.) Ali Murad & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTheft unwitnessed. Pre-arrest bail grantedRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
121.Cr.Bail 1048/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Jurial Mashori V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
122.R.A (Civil Revision) 176/2024 (S.B.) Mohsin Ameer V/S Mst. Rubina & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 852
Matter:-Against Judgment
123.II.A. 92/2021 (S.B.) M/s. Sofia Orient Security Services (Pvt) Ltd V/S Mst. Shehla Israr and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 812Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act not applicable. Second Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
124.R.A (Civil Revision) 237/2019 (S.B.) Hemant Kumar V/S Assaram & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 849Legal aid - Request by senior citizen for State-funded counsel - No indulgence can be granted in concluded proceedings having attained finality up to the Supreme Court.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
125.Cr.Bail 23/2026 (D.B.) Waqar Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in offences punishable under Section 9(1) read with Section 3(c) of the Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 2024 was allowed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
126.Cr.Rev 23/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Saleem V/S Abdul Khalil & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
127.Cr.Bail 1395/2025 (S.B.) Wali Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadSection 324 and 337F(iii) PPC. Pre-arrest bail deniedRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
128.Criminal Miscelleneous 748/2024 (S.B.) ALTAF HUSSAIN RIND V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
129.Criminal Miscelleneous 198/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Ghafoor Panhyar V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
130.Criminal Appeal 15/2026 (S.B.) Wali Muhammad Lakhan & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAcquitted in injury case.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 10 YEARS & ABOVE
131.Cr.Bail 1213/2025 (S.B.) Latif Khan Behan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail dismissed as specific role ascribed against the applicant.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
132.Cr.Bail 1217/2025 (S.B.) Tasleem Fariro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail allowed mere abscondance is no ground for refusal of bail.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
133.Const. P. 96/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Maryam and Another V/S SSP Naushahro Feroze & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAlternate remedy available petition is not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-PROTECTION
134.Cr.Bail 74/2026 (S.B.) Sajjad Ali @ Sajjad Chandio & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaInterim Bail under Sections 336, 337-Ai, 114, 504 and 34 disposed ofRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
135.Const. P. 1721/2026 (D.B.) Hayat Ullah & Others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiWithout expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is observed that allegations of such nature, particularly those affecting citizenship status, property rights, and lawful business activities, require careful examination based on the record and after hearing all concerned persons. The principles of natural justice, fair hearing, and due process mandate that no adverse action having civil consequences be taken without proper inquiry and reasoned determination. 9. In these circumstances, this petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of with the direction that the entire matter be remitted to the Commissioner, Karachi Division, who shall examine all relevant aspects of the case, including ownership of properties, family relationships, and citizenship status of the persons concerned, after providing proper opportunity of hearing to all stakeholders and examining the documentary evidence produced by the Petitioners as well as the respondents. The Commissioner shall pass a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. Till such a decision is made, the competent authority shall ensure that only lawful action is taken against the Petitioners??? properties.Read more
Matter:-CITIZENSHIP
136.R.A (Civil Revision) 82/2014 (S.B.) IZHAR UL HAQ V/S MS. WASEEM EJAZ & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 840Mere allegations of counsel negligence do not constitute sufficient cause - Continued non-appearance of counsel across several dates - Engagement of counsel does not absolve a litigant from obligation to monitor and pursue proceedings - Where counsel is negligent or irresponsible, litigant bears the consequences, not the opposing party - A power of attorney executed abroad must be attested by a Pakistani Consulate/High Commission to be legally effective - Unattested foreign power of attorney cannot confer authority to initiate proceedings.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
137.Const. P. 3144/2025 (D.B.) M/S MAK Garments (Pvt) Ltd & Another V/S SECP & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 801Investigation into affairs of Company.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
138.Const. P. 248/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shereen Wd/o Late Mehmood Khan V/S Sajjad Hussain Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 792, 2026 SHC KHI 793, 2026 SHC KHI 797The doctrine of judicial notice is confined to matters of common knowledge or facts capable of indisputable verification. It cannot be invoked as a substitute for adjudication of disputed questions of fact requiring appreciation of evidence. The reliance placed by the learned appellate Court upon "judicial notice" for determining the question of default, therefore, constitutes misapplication of law. Matter remanded to the appellate court for fresh decision. Petition disposed of.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
139.Cr.J.A 176/2019 (S.B.) Bashir @ Bashoo @ Bashan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Life Imprisonment
140.Cr.Bail 115/2026 (S.B.) Gulzar Chachar and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaInterim bail under Sections 462-B, 427, 379, 34 PPC confirmedRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
141.Const. P. 4790/2025 (D.B.) Shafaqat Ali & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
142.Const. P. 1599/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Tania & another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
143.Const. P. 1740/2026 (D.B.) Mst Nena & Nadeem V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
144.Cr.Bail 114/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Qasim Chachar and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPost arrest bail under Sections 462-b, 427, 379 and 34 allowedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
145.Const. P. 1881/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Rauf Kanhan and Others V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 803For the reasons recorded above, the instant constitutional petitions are not maintainable, being barred by Article 212 of the Constitution and the doctrine of laches. The promotions of the private respondents were made strictly in accordance with the applicable recruitment rules and do not suffer from any legal infirmity. The reliance placed on 2015 SCMR 456 is misconceived, as the said judgment pertains to appointments by transfer and not to intra-departmental promotions. Guided by the principles laid down in the Sahito case and subsequent judgments relating to the Sindh Prisons cadre, the petitions are dismissed along with all pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST PROMOTION
146.Const. P. 1908/2025 (D.B.) Naib Ali Bhanbhan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 802For the reasons recorded above, the instant constitutional petitions are not maintainable, being barred by Article 212 of the Constitution and the doctrine of laches. The promotions of the private respondents were made strictly in accordance with the applicable recruitment rules and do not suffer from any legal infirmity. The reliance placed on 2015 SCMR 456 is misconceived, as the said judgment pertains to appointments by transfer and not to intra-departmental promotions. Guided by the principles laid down in the Sahito case and subsequent judgments relating to the Sindh Prisons cadre, the petitions are dismissed along with all pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
147.Const. P. 5674/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Kashif Bin Zaheer & Dr. Amber Nehan Kashif V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 798Consequently, the impugned letters dated 24.02.2020, 04.08.2020, 27.10.2023, and 18.06.2025, to the extent of recovery and penalty, cannot be sustained in law. 15. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) whereby the impugned recovery proceedings are declared illegal and without lawful authority. The Respondents shall forthwith cease further deductions from the salaries of the Petitioners; Any amount already deducted shall be refunded or adjusted reasonably within a stipulated period; The cases of the Petitioners for grant of PhD allowance and annual increments shall be considered strictly in accordance with law; However, it is clarified that if any liability is to be determined, the same shall be done strictly after providing the Petitioners a fair opportunity of hearing through a transparent and reasoned process.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
148.Const. P. 5682/2023 (D.B.) Syed Moiz Hussain V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 892Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
149.Const. P. 1284/2026 (D.B.) Ghulam Ali Wassan & others V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 796In view of the foregoing, and following the analogy adopted in Constitutional Petition No. D-321 of 2025, this petition is disposed of with directions to the competent authority of the respondents to consider the petitioners??? cases strictly in accordance with law, if that all found eligible and entitled, their cases shall be placed before the relevant DPC for consideration, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law and a decision shall be made expeditiously, preferably within two months. 4. However, it is clarified that no opinion on the merits has been expressed, and all questions are left open to be decided by the competent forum, as discussed supra. 5. Petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
150.Const. P. 5684/2023 (D.B.) Mrs. Raana Hyder Zaiid V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 894Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
151.Const. P. 3510/2024 (D.B.) Samira Mahamadi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 896Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
152.Const. P. 6935/2021 (D.B.) Sajjad Khan V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 806In view of the above, if any grievance of the parties still subsists, requiring adjudication by the competent authority of SBCA under the SOPs, the same exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two weeks after hearing all concerned, including the petitioner in 4 in C.P No.D-6895 of 2021/ respondent No.5, by speaking order. 4. The petitioners are directed to approach SBCA, which shall decide the matter by way of a speaking order in accordance with the applicable S.O.Ps. 5. Without touching the merits of the case, the captioned petitions, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Head of the SBCA for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
153.Const. P. 961/2026 (D.B.) Fazal Jamal V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 926In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
154.Const. P. 487/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Yousuf Iqbal & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 925In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
155.Const. P. 5683/2023 (D.B.) Mrs. Raana Hyder Zaiid V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 893Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
156.Const. P. 2211/2023 (D.B.) Mrs. Samiah Zia V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 890Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-WATER CONNECTION
157.Const. P. 1024/2021 (D.B.) Amena Khan Sherwani and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 886Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
158.Const. P. 6962/2021 (D.B.) Naeem Sadiq & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 887Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
159.Const. P. 6131/2022 (D.B.) Roohi Rasheed & Another V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 889Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
160.Const. P. 1919/2025 (D.B.) Haroon Nisar & Ors V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 897Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
161.Const. P. 1241/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Amin & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 922In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
162.Const. P. 1294/2024 (D.B.) Mrs. Yasmin Sohail and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 895Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
163.Const. P. 962/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Gaffar V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 927In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
164.Const. P. 89/2026 (D.B.) Zeeshan & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 914In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
165.Const. P. 5001/2023 (D.B.) Qazi Khalid Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 891Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
166.Const. P. 1156/2022 (D.B.) Anwar Mansoor Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 888Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
167.Const. P. 2172/2024 (D.B.) Pakistan Legal United Society (DEPD) GOS V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 917In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
168.Const. P. 1859/2025 (D.B.) Noman Rasheed V/S Province of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 921In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
169.Const. P. 1857/2025 (D.B.) Sheeraz Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 919In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
170.Const. P. 8015/2022 (D.B.) Manthar Ali Zardari and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 794Be that as it may, considering the controversy involved and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to the Chief Secretary, Sindh. The Chief Secretary shall examine all aspects of the case, particularly the legality and genuineness of the petitioners??? appointment orders, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and all concerned parties. A reasoned decision shall be made strictly in accordance with law and in the light of the judgments of the Supreme Court and this Court in C.P. No. D-75 of 2021, within a period of one (01) month from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of, along with all pending applications, in the above terms. A copy of this order be communicated to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, for compliance.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
171.Const. P. 963/2026 (D.B.) Fazal Qadir V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 928In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
172.Const. P. 1858/2025 (D.B.) Irfan Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 920In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
173.Const. P. 206/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shehzad & Sameer V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 923In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
174.Const. P. 3427/2022 (D.B.) Izhar Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 915In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
175.Const. P. 940/2023 (D.B.) Sallah Uddin V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 916In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
176.Const. P. 1856/2025 (D.B.) Ikram Uddin V/S Province of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 918In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
177.Const. P. 1073/2019 (D.B.) Suhail Yousuf V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 795In view of the above, since the purpose of filing the instant petition challenging the show cause notice needs to be looked into by the competent authority of the SBCA in its SOPs, if any grievance still subsists, which requires adjudication by SBCA in its mechanism as discussed supra, the same shall be addressed by the competent authority within a period of two weeks, meanwhile the petitioner shall put his defence by submitting proper reply to the show cause notice if any. The petitioner is also directed to approach SBCA on the subject issue, which shall decide the matter by way of a speaking order by hearing all concerned in accordance with the applicable S.O.Ps. 5. Without touching the merits of the case, the petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Head of the SBCA for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
178.Const. P. 279/2026 (D.B.) Zeeshan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 924In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensure effective implementation of constitutional and legal obligations. Failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe shall entail consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution, including exposure to departmental proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders. 10. Resultantly, the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, with a clear mandate to the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to act expeditiously, fairly, and strictly in accordance with law and the binding dicta of the Supreme Court. The cases of all the petitioners / interveners shall be processed as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, within a period of two months, by following codal formalities. The pending applications in all petitions, along with application(s) for intervener(s), are also disposed of with directions to the parties to file an amended title within a week. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected matters.Read more
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
179.Const. P. 5602/2025 (D.B.) Nasir Ahmed Shaikh V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiAccordingly, the petition is disposed of with the directions to the Respondents to finalize the pension and pensionary benefits of the Petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months just after scrutiny as discussed supra; If any portion of pension is sought to be withheld on account of alleged misconduct, a speaking order shall be passed after providing an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner; The question of legality of dismissal order dated 05.04.2021 shall also be examined by the competent authority in accordance with law within two months. 15. With these observations, the petition along with pending applications) stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
180.Const. P. 453/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Shabana V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn order to assist the Court on the legal and constitutional issues involved, Malik Naeem Iqbal, learned Senior Advocate of this Court, is appointed as amicus curiae to render assistance on the interpretation of Rule 4.10 of the West Pakistan Civil Servants Pension Rules, 1963, as amended, and the impact of the judgment in Province of Sindh v. Mst. Sorath Fatima (PLD 2025 SC 865) on claims of surviving female dependents. Office is directed to provide copies of the memo of petition, annexures, order sheets, as well as comments, if any, filed by the respondents to the learned amicus curiae well before the next date of hearing. 11. The Finance Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General Sindh are directed to depute their respective authorized representatives to assist the Court on the next date of hearing. They shall also ensure that complete instructions are available for proper assistance of the Court. The office is further directed to issue notices to all concerned through all available modes including electronic means and WhatsApp application to ensure effective service for the next date of hearing. 12. In view of the above, the matter is adjourned to a date in the next two weeks, to be fixed by the office, for further proceedings and assistance of learned amicus curiae.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
181.Const. P. 2049/2026 (D.B.) Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (PSO) V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiLearned counsel for SBCA has no objection to the disposal of the petition in terms that the competent authority of SBCA shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with the applicable S.O.Ps within two weeks, and in the intervening period, no adverse action against the petitioner???s property shall be taken. 6. Without touching the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties present in Court, accordingly, the petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Head of the SBCA for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
182.Const. P. 3737/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiConsequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable water supply to the residents of DHA within its jurisdiction. The Karachi Water and Sewerage Corporation shall take all necessary measures to enhance bulk water supply to CBC and to eliminate illegal hydrants and leakages along the transmission lines, particularly the pipeline from Korangi Crossing to DHA. Until a sustainable piped water supply system is established, within three months by the CBS. CBC shall continue to provide water through bowsers to the residents strictly on a no-profit, no-loss basis, ensuring transparency and non-discriminatory distribution. A clear schedule of bowser supply shall be publicly notified and made accessible to all residents. The competent authority of CBC is directed to install proper metering and maintain audited accounts of water charges and expenditures incurred in the provision of water services to the petitioners. KW&SC shall submit quarterly progress reports before the Nazir of this Court regarding improvements in bulk supply and measures taken against illegal hydrants. Any Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) plants established within DHA, including those funded through public or foreign assistance, shall be utilized primarily for the benefit of the general residents without fail. Their operation and distribution mechanisms shall be subject to periodic audit. CBC shall place on record the relevant gazette notifications establishing its jurisdiction over DHA Phases VI, VII, and VIII within a period of four weeks. In the absence of such lawful notification, it shall refrain from levying municipal taxes in those areas. The Respondents are reminded that access to potable water is a fundamental right, and any failure to ensure its provision would expose the responsible officials of CBC to proceedings under the law, including contempt of Court. 22. The pending applications in all petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The Respondents shall ensure strict compliance with this order within a period of three months, and the office is directed to fix a compliance hearing thereafter. Office to place a copy of this order in the connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
183.Const. P. 1101/2024 (D.B.) Sibghatullah Bullo V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 847Deceased quota.Read more
Matter:-Son Quota
184.Cr.J.A 21/2025 (D.B.) Noor Kamal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 724
Matter:-Imprisonment(More than 10 years)
185.Const. P. 5428/2025 (D.B.) Abid Shah V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 708Registration of FIR in custodial deaths.Read more
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
186.Const. P. 219/2025 (D.B.) Mst Rafiqan & Others V/S Additional Commissioner II Suk & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPerson is not entitled who come before the Court with unclean hands.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
187.Const. P. 68/2025 (D.B.) Dhani Bux V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
188.Const. P. 1265/2024 (D.B.) Mumtaz Ali V/S Government of sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAppointment on deceased quota.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
189.Const. P. 2152/2025 (D.B.) Aatif Hussain Jiskani V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurCollecting of Entry Fee.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
190.R.A (Civil Revision) 18/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Naveed V/S Muzaffar Ahmed and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
191.Const. P. 5960/2025 (D.B.) Kainat V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
192.Const. P. 630/2026 (D.B.) Shahid Islam Ghouri V/S P.O Sindh & 02 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurQuashment of FIR. Dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
193.Const. P. 1236/2023 (D.B.) Shahjehan Manthar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
194.Judicial Companies Misc. 37/2003 (S.B.) Muhammad Laeeq & Ors V/S Sindh Alkalis Limited Sindh High Court, Karachi
195.Const. P. 1139/2025 (D.B.) M/s Faisal Corp V/S Muhammad Yousuf Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 727The Petitioner???s contentions are unsustainable. The Respondents were permanent employees; voluntary abandonment is unproven, and termination without due process was illegal. The Labour Court and Appellate Tribunal properly applied the law and appreciated the evidence. Their judgments are sound, and the Respondents??? reinstatement with full back benefits is fully justified. 8. In view of the above, these petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
196.Const. P. 4709/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Iqbal Khan & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 729Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with directions to the Registrar/competent authority to decide the petitioners??? complaint within one month from receipt of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The authority shall examine the legality of the re-registration 2023, renewal 2024, and subsequent Trust Deeds, as well as issues relating to the composition of trustees and financial management, and pass a speaking order in accordance with the Sindh Trust Act, 2020, and applicable rules. It is clarified that observations made herein shall not prejudice either party, and the petitioners may seek appropriate remedy, if aggrieved against the decision of the competent authority on the subject issue. All pending applications also stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
197.Const. P. 1140/2025 (D.B.) M/s Faisal Corp V/S Muhammad Aftab Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 728The Petitioner???s contentions are unsustainable. The Respondents were permanent employees; voluntary abandonment is unproven, and termination without due process was illegal. The Labour Court and Appellate Tribunal properly applied the law and appreciated the evidence. Their judgments are sound, and the Respondents??? reinstatement with full back benefits is fully justified. 8. In view of the above, these petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
198.Const. P. 8534/2017 (D.B.) Yasir Khursheed and Ors V/S Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 726The Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, is directed to convene a high-level meeting within two weeks of all relevant stakeholders, including but not limited to SSWMB, KMC, Cantonment Boards, DMCs, SEPA, Irrigation Department, and law enforcement agencies, to clearly delineate jurisdictional responsibilities, devise a coordinated and enforceable mechanism for solid waste management in the subject area, ensure that all waste is transported to designated landfill sites in accordance with law and submit a comprehensive report before this Court within four weeks. 12. The ban imposed herein shall remain in force and shall continue until a lawful, coordinated, and environmentally compliant mechanism is fully implemented to the satisfaction of this Court. It is clarified that administrative or jurisdictional disputes shall not be a ground to compromise public health, and all authorities shall act in aid of one another to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens. 13. After this arrangement, the petition is disposed of along with pending applications.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
199.Const. P. 1994/2025 (D.B.) Ghulam Murtaza Lahbar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 725In the circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that the appointment of Respondent No.2 as Vice Chancellor of respondent university was made through a lawful process under the applicable statutory framework, and no violation of mandatory eligibility criteria has been established. The requirement of a PhD degree was not an essential statutory condition at the relevant time and cannot be applied retrospectively. The appointment/continuation of Respondent No.3 as Registrar, being under consideration and subject to statutory processes, does not suffer from such patent illegality as to warrant interference under Quo Warranto jurisdiction. Prima facie no mala fide, illegality, or jurisdictional defect has been demonstrated which would justify the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. 15.???Consequently, the instant Constitutional Petition, being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s), with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
200.Const. P. 4436/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Sheikh Shahzada Kabir V/S DG Housing Directorate, GHQ & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 730Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with directions to the Registrar/competent authority to decide the petitioners??? complaint within one month from receipt of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The authority shall examine the legality of the re-registration 2023, renewal 2024, and subsequent Trust Deeds, as well as issues relating to the composition of trustees and financial management, and pass a speaking order in accordance with the Sindh Trust Act, 2020, and applicable rules. It is clarified that observations made herein shall not prejudice either party, and the petitioners may seek appropriate remedy, if aggrieved against the decision of the competent authority on the subject issue. All pending applications also stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
201.Const. P. 175/2025 (D.B.) Shahabuddin Mangi V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurUnblocking passport.Read more
Matter:-Un Block Passport
202.Const. P. 995/2010 (D.B.) Pakistan Refinery Ltd V/S Govt. of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, KarachiThis proposal, so put forward by the parties, seems to be reasonable and acceded to, and by consent of the parties, this petition stands disposed of in terms of the statement so made by the Officer of KW&SC present in Court along with his counsel.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
203.M.A. 49/2024 (S.B.) Atif Raza Saleh Thr. Attorney Muhammad Saleh Langa V/S Mst. Marium Anwar Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 813Courts will not interfere with dismissal for non-prosecution orders where the default is continuous and unexplained - Assertions of being busy before another Bench and stuck in traffic - Inconsistent explanations undermine credibility - Contradictory reasons for absence render the explanation unreliable and do not meet the threshold of sufficient cause.Read more
Matter:-DAMAGES FOR DEFAMATION
204.Const. P. 687/2020 (S.B.) Captain Muhammad Ahmed Faruqui S/o Jalees Ahmed V/S Xth ADJ, Karachi East and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 938
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
205.Const. P. 467/2026 (D.B.) M/S Waqar Enterprises & Company Govt. Contractors V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkure-bidding system.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Tender
206.Const. P. 331/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Nadeem V/S Waqar Ahmed & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
207.Const. P. 205/2026 (D.B.) M/S Ellahi Enterprises, Govt. Contractors thr V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkure-bidding system.Read more
Matter:-Tender Work
208.Cr.Rev 32/2025 (D.B.) Imam Bux V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-435 & 439 Cr.P.C
209.Const. P. 1350/2025 (D.B.) Irfan Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurCivil and criminal proceedings can run simultaneously.Read more
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
210.Const. P. 2098/2024 (D.B.) Zahoor Ahmed & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurDisable quota.Read more
Matter:-Disable Quota
211.Const. P. 1257/2026 (D.B.) Peerzada Muhammad Hazrat Agha Jee & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
212.Const. P. 508/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Dunia Khatoon & Another V/S Gul Bahar alias Zakir & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurLady being sui juris is entitled to live her life according to her free will.Read more
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
213.Const. P. 207/2026 (D.B.) M/S Ellahi Enterprises, Govt. Contractors thr V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkure-bidding system.Read more
Matter:-Tender Work
214.Const. P. 2441/2017 (D.B.) Mehrab & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAdequate and efficacious remedy is available under the law. Petition is not to be invoked.Read more
Matter:-Demarcation
215.Const. P. 206/2026 (D.B.) M/S Ellahi Enterprises, Govt. Contractors thr V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkure-bidding system.Read more
Matter:-Tender Work
216.Const. P. 120/2026 (D.B.) Ghulam Akbar Mughul & Another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkure-bidding system.Read more
Matter:-Tender Work
217.Const. P. 308/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Wafi Energy Pakistan Limited V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ENQUIRY
218.Const. P. 99/2026 (S.B.) Amjad Khan V/S Mst. Mehwish Anwar Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
219.Const. P. 7267/2021 (D.B.) Syeda Ambreen Faraz and Others V/S Board of Intermediate Education and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR CORRECTION
220.Const. P. 2338/2010 (D.B.) Mrs Nusrat Khan V/S C.D.G.K & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 715The impugned public notice/final notice for cancellation published in daily Dawn dated 19.11.1999 and the demand founded thereon in C.P. No. D-1958 of 2010 are also declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect to the extent they are based upon enhancement of NUF and/or occupancy value contrary to the original governing regime. The Respondents are restrained from acting upon the same. If any lawful determination of dues is to be undertaken, the same shall be made strictly in accordance with Regulation 25 and Clause 13 of Appendix ???A??? of the 1965 Regulations on the original occupancy value, after issuing notice to the persons presently affected/interested, adjusting prior payments, and keeping in view the subsequent transfer of the plot. The Respondents shall complete the above exercise, if they choose to do so, within three months from the receipt of this judgment. Till such lawful re-determination, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioners and/or the subject plots on the basis of the impugned demands/notices. These petitions stand allowed in the above terms; all pending application are also disposed of.Read more
221.Const. P. 1674/2026 (D.B.) Ahmed Shah V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 735Prima facie, no material has been placed on record to substantiate such a claim; therefore, the matter is remanded to the Commissioner, Karachi, to decide the issue of sealing of the subject property within two weeks by speaking order, with cogent reasons and supporting documents whether the DC is competent to seal the private premises based on the analogy that petitioner is Afghan National, however, after hearing the Petitioner. 5. The petition, along with pending applications, stands disposed of in these terms. A compliance report shall be submitted through MIT-II. Let a copy of the order be communicated to the Commissioner Karachi for compliance.Read more
Matter:-DE-SEAL
222.Cr.Bail 1383/2025 (S.B.) Munawar Shah @ Munawar @ Mano V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadAllegation of rape supported by DNA report. Pre-arrest bail dismissedRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
223.H.C.A 59/2017 (D.B.) Market Committee Karachi V/S Haji Shah Jehan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 705Public administration rests on continuity and legality - Institutional continuity bars arbitrary rescission of official acts - Official acts bind the office, not the individual - Successors cannot undo past lawful decisions at will - Any alleged illegality must be remedied through due process, not administrative whim or unilateral reversal.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
224.Cr.Rev 73/2023 (S.B.) Jamait Ali Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAcquitted in 489-F PPC.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
225.Const. P. 77/2026 (S.B.) Zahid Waseem Khan V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFirstly avail the remedy, petition is not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-Recovery
226.Cr.Bail 309/2026 (S.B.) Nazar Hussain jiskani & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
227.Criminal Miscelleneous 221/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Shabiran Abbasi V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurLady being sui juris is at liberty to live with her own free will.Read more
Matter:-Detention
228.Const. P. 5386/2025 (D.B.) K-Electrid Ltd V/S NEPRA & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 744At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
229.Const. P. 945/2026 (D.B.) Ahmed Shahid V/S Regional Director ANF & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 734In view of the above, the impugned order dated 28.11.2025 is set aside. The competent authority of respondents is directed to forthwith remove the petitioner???s name from the PCL, ECL, Blacklist, or any other stop list, restricting his travel outside Pakistan, subject to any restrictive order of the trial Court and if the petitioner???s passport is in the custody of any authority, the same shall be returned to him immediately.Read more
Matter:-Removing the name from PCL
230.Const. P. 5441/2025 (D.B.) Shan Paper Pvt Ltd V/S NEPRA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 747At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
231.Const. P. 5429/2025 (D.B.) M/s. Shan Paper Pvt Ltd & others V/S NAPRA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 741At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
232.Const. P. 5442/2025 (D.B.) Shan Paper Pvt Ltd V/S NEPRA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 748At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
233.Const. P. 5385/2025 (D.B.) K-Electrid Ltd V/S NEPRA & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 743At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
234.Const. P. 3670/2022 (D.B.) Pakistan Services Ltd V/S NIRC Full Bench & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 732In principle the remand is not to be ordered as a matter of course; rather, it is to be ordered only where the order is passed without jurisdiction, without hearing, or in violation of principles of natural justice. 11. In the present case, the petitioner was afforded full opportunity of hearing before both the forums below; therefore, the request for remand is misconceived. Resultantly, since the petitioner has failed to point out any jurisdictional defect, illegality, misreading or non-reading of evidence, or perversity in the impugned orders, and the request for remand is merely to fill the lacuna in the case, no case for remand is made out. Consequently, the constitutional petition is liable to be dismissed. 12. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed along with listed application(s).Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
235.Const. P. 5615/2025 (D.B.) Sher Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 738In view of the above discussion, it is held that the petitioner has failed to establish that he is an SCUG employee. The Chairman, being competent under Section 80(c) of the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013, lawfully exercised authority in issuing the impugned orders. No mala fide, illegality, or jurisdictional defect has been proved. The petition suffers from concealment of material facts and pertains to service matters not warranting interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently, the Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s), being devoid of merit. The impugned orders dated 05.11.2025 and 12.11.2025 are upheld. However with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
236.Const. P. 5384/2025 (D.B.) K-Electrid Ltd V/S Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 742At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
237.Const. P. 5387/2025 (D.B.) K-Electrid Ltd V/S NEPRA & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 745At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
238.Const. P. 5430/2025 (D.B.) M/s. Shan Paper Pvt Ltd & others V/S NEPRA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 746At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioners proposed that the pending appeals be heard and decided by the tribunal in accordance with law and, in the meantime, the Impugned Decision passed in the present petitions shall remain in abeyance. Learned DAG is of the same view, prima facie, this proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to it. Without touching the merits of the case, since the petitioners??? appeals before the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal is pending adjudication as such the same appeals needs to be decided by the Tribunal within three months positively. Meanwhile, the interim order of this Court shall remain in force, till final decision by the tribunal in the appeals so filed. These petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of accordingly, with a copy of this order to be communicated to the registrar of NEPRA Appellate Tribunal for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
239.Const. P. 3240/2014 (D.B.) Muhammad Yousuf Jamal V/S Govt Of Sindh and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 733The objection regarding maintainability has already been overruled by this Court, as it is well-settled in Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) that any resident of Karachi can maintain a petition for prevention or removal of encroachments on amenity plots. The plea of alternate remedy is not considered equally efficacious as a constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 8. From the official perspective, it appears that Amenity Plot ST-5/1 remains reserved for playground/park use.in such circumstances of the case, this court is left with no option but to direct the competent authority of the KMC, with law enforcement, to take pains to remove the encroachments as already ordered by this court vide order dated within three months. 9. The petition is disposed of along with all pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
240.Const. P. 480/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Jameelan Khatoon & Another V/S P.O sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPolice functionaries to provide protection to the petitioner.Read more
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
241.Const. P. 2153/2013 (D.B.) Sajid Hussain V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadNo writ can issue to SPSC for fresh interview of failed candidateRead more
Matter:-Service
242.Const. P. 130/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Shakarganj Limited & another V/S Special Judge Central-I & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 702Corum non judice orders of Ex officio justice of peaceRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
243.Cr.Bail 2740/2025 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD FAIZAN S/O M SHARIF KHAN (LATE) & ANOTHR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
244.R.A (Civil Revision) 16/2026 (S.B.) RAMEEZ AHMED KHAN V/S WAQAR AHMED KHATRI Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
245.Const. P. 1008/2026 (D.B.) Pirano Khan Sahal V/S NAB & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
246.Const. P. 68/2025 (D.B.) M/s Marvo Exports V/S Farman Khan & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 750In view of the above, the impugned judgment is not sustainable in law, as it is based on conjectures, improper presumptions, and misapplication of legal principles. The same has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 13. Accordingly, it is concluded that the impugned judgment dated 17.12.2024 passed by the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal is set aside, and the well-reasoned judgment of the learned Labour Court is restored.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
247.Const. P. 564/2026 (D.B.) Mohammad Yousuf Yasin V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 755The Respondent No. 3/ Directorate General Immigration & Passports submits that the Petitioner???s name is not placed on the Passport Control List (PCL) and his passport record is active in the passport database; however, his previous passport had expired on 05.11.2019 which is now under consideration for renewal. He, therefore, prays that the petition may be disposed of accordingly. 6. When confronted with this legal position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this petition in terms of the statement made by the learned A.A.G. and respondent No.3 7. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the petition stands disposed of along with all pending applications in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-Removing the name from PCL
248.Const. P. 2696/2024 (D.B.) M/s Asif Hussain Kanasiro & Another V/S Chief Sect: Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 752Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of by remanding the matter to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, to look into the case of the petitioners afresh. The Chief Secretary shall examine the petitioners??? claims strictly in accordance with law, particularly in light of the Scrutiny Committee report, relevant departmental record, and principles enunciated in the above judgment, including earlier decisions of this Court and Supreme Court, after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners. The competent authority shall pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of ninety (90) days. In case the petitioners are found to have managed the appointment letters in the beginning, appropriate disciplinary/penal action shall be taken against all delinquent officials involved in the scam in accordance with law. All pending application(s) are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
249.M.A. 212/2024 (S.B.) Adeel Mohammad Ahmed Thr. Aftab Ahmed Soomro V/S Public at Large Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 711Appeal partly allowed. Relinquishment request can be considered in SMA. In non-contentious inheritance matters, a pragmatic approach is required.Read more
Matter:-SUCESSION MATTERS
250.Const. P. 972/2024 (D.B.) Faqeer Muhammad & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 760Learned counsel for the Petitioners agreed with the aforesaid proposal; however, he requested that a decision be made by the competent authority within two weeks. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law and entitlement of the petitioners on the land if any, which shall be looked into by the committee by filling proper application if not earlier filed. 5. Accordingly, the Senior Member, Board of Revenue, is directed to refer the matter to the committee who shall hear the Petitioners and decide the matter within three weeks. 6. With the consent of the parties, the petition is disposed of in these terms along with pending applications.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
251.Const. P. 1890/2026 (D.B.) M/s. International Building Industries (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 767Since the matter is already pending before the competent forum, this Court is not inclined to delve into the factual controversies in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution, particularly when an adequate alternate remedy is available and has already been availed by the Petitioner. 5. However, without prejudice the rights of the parties on the subject issue, to meet the ends of justice, the learned Anti-Encroachment Tribunal is expected to decide all pending applications, including the interim and implementation of order/contempt applications, strictly in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of this order. 6. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, this petition along with all pending applications stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
252.Const. P. 96/2026 (D.B.) Kumail Abbas V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 754Without touching the merits of the case, this petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in terms that the decision shall be made by the Review Committee within one week positively. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned DAG for onward submission to the competent authority for compliance in time. In case of failure to comply with order by the Respondent No.1, appropriate proceeding shall be initiated against the delinquent officials. A copy of this order shall also be communicated to the Respondent No.1. for compliance to be served through electronic mode of service and WatsApp Application.Read more
Matter:-Removing the name from PCL
253.Const. P. 5371/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Hashim Khan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 757Consequently, the directions is issued to SBCA and Heritage Department shall jointly decide the fate of the building in accordance with law within two weeks and if the building is declared as heritage the appropriate precautionary steps shall be taken in accordance with law. The Petitioner shall be given reasonable time to vacate the premises. If the building is to be restored/strengthened, the Heritage Department may pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The dispute of tenancy/title shall be decided by the Rent Controller independently, without being influenced by this order. 13. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST SEALING ORDER
254.Const. P. 1320/2026 (D.B.) Asghar Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 761Learned A.A.G stated that the case concerns the construction of a petrol pump on Plot No.852, Pehlwan Goth, Gulistan-e-Jauhar, Karachi, without plan approval. He submitted that if the petitioner replies to the notice, a decision will be made by the competent authority within two weeks. 5. The petitioner agreed to respond to the notice and seeks the disposal of this petition in terms of the proposal so put forward by the learned AAG. 6. Without touching the merits of the case, accordingly, the petition is disposed of along with all pending applications, directing the competent authority of the Respondents to decide the matter within two weeks, however, after hearing the petitioner.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
255.Const. P. 2576/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Saiyid Khusro Iqbal through attorney V/S Government of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 756Prima facie, thus, there is no vacancy for the petitioner to claim, and no ground to question Respondent No.4???s legal authority to hold office. Therefore, the writ of quo warranto, which is remedial in nature and requires illegality or excess of authority, cannot be sustained at this stage under these circumstances. The petitioner???s counsel claims amount to a challenge on merit, which is not permissible in a quo warranto proceeding. 12. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that the petition filed by Dr. Saiyid Khusro Iqbal is devoid of merit, lacks any subsisting cause of action. The appointment of Respondent No.4 as Executive Member, PEMRA, is lawful, valid, and fully compliant with statutory requirements. 13. This petition along with pending application(s) is found not maintainable under article 199 of the Constitution which is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
256.Const. P. 1897/2025 (D.B.) Aaqib Rehman Shar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRemedy available under the law, same to be invoked first.Read more
Matter:-DECIDE THE APPLICATION
257.Const. P. 632/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Fatima V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 845Pension matter.Read more
Matter:-Pension
258.Const. P. 2230/2012 (D.B.) Muhammad Ajmal Khan V/S KMC & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 700Probono Public LitigationRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
259.Const. P. 6273/2019 (D.B.) Asrar Ahmed Khan and Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 714At this juncture, it is deemed appropriate to observe that, prima facie, an apparent conflict exists between the orders dated 21.01.2025 and 20.10.2025, particularly with regard to the conduct of elections and the continuity of the existing management of the society. However, this Court refrains from recording any definitive findings at this stage concerning the circumstances under which the aforementioned orders were obtained, as the matter requires adjudication after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, examination of the complete record, and recording of evidence. Nevertheless, it is hereby directed that, in future, the Incharge, Writ Branch of this Court shall ensure that where matters are ordered to be tagged and fixed together, all such connected matters are listed and heard simultaneously, so as to obviate the possibility of conflicting orders. Resultantly, all petitions stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
260.Const. P. 3592/2020 (D.B.) Engro Elengy Terminal Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 697
Matter:-INCOME TAX
261.Const. P. 2166/2024 (D.B.) Muharram Ali Malik V/S Chacellor through its secretary Governor & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 844Pension matter.Read more
Matter:-Pension
262.Const. P. 1805/2024 (D.B.) Mst Ghulam Sakina V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 843Pension matter.Read more
Matter:-Pension
263.Criminal Appeal 51/2024 (D.B.) Javed Makrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
264.Cr.Bail 22/2026 (D.B.) RASHEED AHMED SHAIKH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in narcotic case allowed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
265.Const. P. 94/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Hassan Jatoi V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurProbono public litigation cannot be undertaken to serve private or vested interest.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
266.Const. P. 129/2026 (S.B.) Kashif V/S Faryal Waseem & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 759Applying these principles, in the present case, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to reopen or revise interlocutory orders or proceedings where an adequate statutory remedy of appeal is available, and the petitioner has not demonstrated any patent illegality or ultra vires action by the lower forum. 12. In view of the above, the impugned order is well-reasoned and passed with strong justification considering the ground realities. The petitioner has failed to establish any grounds for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution, and for the aforesaid reasons, this petition is dismissed along with all pending applications. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
267.Const. P. 647/2026 (D.B.) Ashraf Ali V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 765In view of the above, since the principal relief regarding release of pensionary and retiral benefits has already been satisfied, the instant petition does not survive to that extent. As regards the grievance of the petitioner relating to fixation of pension on the basis of the post of Physiotherapist, the same requires determination by the competent forum/committee of the respondents upon approach by the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with direction to the concerned Committee/competent authority of the respondents to decide the petitioner???s claim regarding fixation of pension on the basis of the post of Physiotherapist, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of three (03) weeks after hearing him.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
268.Const. P. 1528/2025 (D.B.) Shaikh Jameel Gul thr Syed Shah Zaman Shah & Ors V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadSummons under Section 94 Cr.P.C. set aside as contrary to proviso (1)Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
269.Const. P. 932/2015 (D.B.) Zulfiqar V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 703Question to authenticity of promotion order cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-Service
270.Const. P. 4826/2025 (D.B.) Waheed Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 698Promotion is not a vested rightRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
271.Const. P. 1517/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Zainab & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 864
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
272.M.A. 25/2026 (S.B.) Imran Ahmed V/S In the matter of deceased Nilofer Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 704Section 261 of the Succession Act, 1925.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
273.Const. P. 502/2026 (D.B.) Mumtaz Ali Bullo V/S Federation of Pakistan & 04 others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurQuashment of departmental inquiry.Read more
Matter:-Against Show Cause Notice
274.Const. P. 273/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Sameer Ali & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ADMISSION MATTER
275.Cr.J.A 47/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Malook V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
276.Const. P. 3235/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Naeem Siddiqui V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
277.Const. P. 2003/2026 (D.B.) Pervez Sultan Rupani V/S Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
278.Const. P. 3/2026 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF LETTER
279.Const. P. 1746/2021 (D.B.) Sanaullah V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 774Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to gratuity for 30 years??? service, and this petition stands disposed of with the direction to the competent authority of respondents to pay the remaining gratuity amount to the petitioner with lawful interest, within one month; in case of failure, appropriate action shall be taken against the delinquent officials. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time. They be served through electronic modes of service and the WhatsApp application.Read more
Matter:-FOR GRATUITY
280.Const. P. 1649/2026 (D.B.) Usama V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 771It is also an established principle that after acquittal, all adverse consequences flowing from criminal proceedings must cease, and any continued restriction amounts to double jeopardy and continued punishment without conviction, which is not permissible under law. Therefore, the continued inclusion of the names of the petitioners in the ECL/PCL/PNIL, despite their acquittal and quashment of FIR, is illegal, unlawful, without jurisdiction, and of no legal effect, being violative of Articles 4, 9, 10-A and 15 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 10. Resultantly, these petitions are allowed, and the respondents are directed to forthwith remove the names of the petitioners from the Exit Control List (ECL), Passport Control List (PCL), PNIL, and any other restrictive list, and not to create any impediment in the petitioners??? travelling abroad, subject to any lawful restriction, if any, in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
281.Const. P. 1648/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Rizwan V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 770It is also an established principle that after acquittal, all adverse consequences flowing from criminal proceedings must cease, and any continued restriction amounts to double jeopardy and continued punishment without conviction, which is not permissible under law. Therefore, the continued inclusion of the names of the petitioners in the ECL/PCL/PNIL, despite their acquittal and quashment of FIR, is illegal, unlawful, without jurisdiction, and of no legal effect, being violative of Articles 4, 9, 10-A and 15 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 10. Resultantly, these petitions are allowed, and the respondents are directed to forthwith remove the names of the petitioners from the Exit Control List (ECL), Passport Control List (PCL), PNIL, and any other restrictive list, and not to create any impediment in the petitioners??? travelling abroad, subject to any lawful restriction, if any, in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
282.Const. P. 2232/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Sadaf Perveen Faraz V/S Province of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 772In the present case, the Petitioner had qualified the written test and was eligible for interview, and her non-appearance was not willful but appears to be due to non-communication by the Respondents. Denial of interview in such circumstances amounts to denial of fair opportunity and infringes the principle of fair competition in public employment. 13. Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play, this petition is disposed of with the direction to Respondent No.2 to constitute a committee and conduct the interview of the Petitioner within a stipulated period, and thereafter, if the Petitioner qualifies the interview on merit, her case shall be considered for appointment strictly in accordance with law and merit. However, this order shall not affect the appointments already made, if any, and the Petitioner shall only be considered against an available vacancy, if she qualifies on merit. 14. The petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-INTERVIEW
283.Const. P. 2845/2021 (D.B.) Maj (R) Syeda Qurat ul Ain V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 751In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that the respondents??? refusal to count the petitioner???s military service and resignation period for pension purposes is unlawful and arbitrary, and that decision is erroneous and is set aside. She is therefore entitled to directions to the competent authority of the respondents for calculation and release of her full pension in accordance with CSR and ESTA Notifications as well as in terms of the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Supreme court in the case Muhammad Usman as discussed in the preceding paragraphs, while her claims regarding housing plot may be pursued before a court of plenary jurisdiction subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. 13. This petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
284.Cr.Bail 1251/2025 (S.B.) Sheeraz V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadMedical Report relied upon did not constitute fresh ground for per-arrest.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
285.Cr.Bail 51/2026 (S.B.) Sayed Zubair Ali Shah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPost bail for offences punishable under Sections 302, 504, 120-B, 337-H(ii), 147, 148 and 149, P.P.C dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
286.I. A 26/1995 (D.B.) Bankers Equity Limited V/S M/S East West Insurance Company Limited & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 676, 2026 SHC KHI 683Insurance company issuing a guarantee - Neither the Insurance Company assumes status of a "customer" nor the Insurance Guarantee falls within the statutory definition of "finance" within meaning of Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984 - Rights and liabilities of parties to be determined in accordance with its stipulated terms - Scope cannot be expanded beyond its express terms - Terminal jurisdiction cannot be invoked by recharacterizing a commercial guarantee as a financing transaction.Read more
Matter:-BANKING
287.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 795/2024 (D.B.) M/s. Pak Suzuki Motors Company Ltd., Karachi V/S The Collector of Customs (PMBQ), Karachi & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Custom Act, 1969
2026 SHC KHI 671, 2026 SHC KHI 672, 2026 SHC KHI 6741. References allowed. 2. The sub-components, components, sub-assemblies and assemblies are the part of CKD Kit.Read more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
288.Const. P. 71/2026 (S.B.) Manzoor Ahmed Khaskheli V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurHarassment petition.Read more
Matter:-Harasment
289.Cr.Bail 392/2026 (S.B.) GHULAM KABIR @ SUNNY S/O DORAIZ KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
290.Cr.Bail 2528/2025 (S.B.) MST MARIYUM @ GHRIYA W/O MUHAMMAD AFTABUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
291.Criminal Miscelleneous 62/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Mithal Mahar V/S Badal Chandio and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaApplication for cancellation of bail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
292.Const. P. 95/2026 (S.B.) Mst Zahida Bhand V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetition is disposed of with directions to the official respondents to act strictly in accordance with law and provide protection to the petitioner.Read more
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
293.Criminal Miscelleneous 438/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Ghaffar Noonari and Another V/S The State and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanapolice let off accused on plea of alibi, Magistrate declined the same and accueed were ordered to be challaned. No illegality was found in the order. Accordingly Cr. Misc. Appln. dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
294.Const. P. 50/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Murad Khatoon V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetition is disposed of with directions to the official respondents to act strictly in accordance with law and provide protection to the petitioner.Read more
Matter:-Departmental Action
295.Cr.Bail 929/2025 (S.B.) Shahzad Nabi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
296.Criminal Miscelleneous 85/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Samad V/S The State and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaIN view of foregoing, no case for cancellation of bail is made out. Accordingly, this Criminal Misc. Application is dismissed in limine along with listed applications if any.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
297.Cr.Bail 52/2026 (S.B.) Khair Muhammad Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
298.Criminal Miscelleneous 374/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Salma Channa V/S SSP Jacobabad and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThe earlier application having been consciously not pressed, the applicant cannot re-agitate same issue through instant application. Accordingly, instant Criminal Misc. Application being not maintainable is hereby dismissed.Read more
Matter:-22 A-B
299.Cr.Bail 1143/2025 (S.B.) Allah Dino sanghar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur365-B PPC bail granted.Read more
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
300.Const. P. 5822/2024 (D.B.) SEPCO V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 788It is well settled that the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court is supervisory in nature and does not extend to re-appraisal or re-evaluation of evidence. The findings recorded by the learned NIRC are findings of fact based on evidence available on record and do not suffer from any perversity or illegality warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. 20.???In view of the above, the impugned Order dated 13-04-2022 passed by the learned Single Member, NIRC, and the Order dated 28-10-2024 passed by the learned Full Bench, NIRC, do not suffer from any illegality or jurisdictional defect, and the same are maintained. 21. ???Accordingly, this petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed, along with pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
301.Const. P. 5800/2023 (D.B.) Mehfooz ur Rehman V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 779At this stage, counsel for the SESSI submits that with the approval of Minster for Labour / Chairman Governing Body, SESSI and with the consent of all Governing Body members, the 176th meeting of the Governing Body, SESSI, which was scheduled on 31.03.2026 now has been rescheduled on 02.04.2026 at 11:00 a.m. at SESSI Head Office in that time the appeal of the petitioner if any shall be decided positively. 6. When confronted with the position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the disposal of the petition in terms of the statement so made by the counsel for the SESSI. The request so made seems to be reasonable and acceded to. 7. Petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. However, it is made clear that the decision on the representation/appeal of the petitioner shall be made positively at the meeting by considering all his grounds with justiciable reasons. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance. They are to be serviced through the electronic and WhatsApp applications.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
302.Const. P. 956/2026 (D.B.) Meerut Cooperative Housing Society Limited & Ors V/S Syed Javed Iqbal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 787Since both parties have agreed to resolve the dispute through a fresh, fair and transparent election, this Court, with the consent of the parties, deems it appropriate to dispose of this petition by appointing Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi as Election Officer to conduct the election of M/s Meerut Cooperative Housing Society Limited within a period of 45 days. The Election Officer shall exercise all powers conferred upon him under the Sindh Co-operative Societies Act, 2020 and the relevant Bye-laws of the Society for the purpose of election only. He shall prepare/finalize the voter list, scrutinize nomination papers, and shall also decide all objections of the genuine voters/plot holders/members, strictly in accordance with law, including the objections raised by the petitioners with regard to the eligibility of Respondent No.1 or any other contesting candidate. The decision of the Election Officer on such objections shall be reasoned and in accordance with law. The fee of the Election Officer is fixed Rs.300,000/- shall be paid from the Society funds. All the parties are directed to cooperate the election officer for smooth conducting of the election without creating bottlenecks. 7. With these directions, this petition stands disposed of along with pending applications.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
303.Const. P. 1544/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Nargis V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 791It is noted that the Finance Department, Government of Sindh, has not yet released the Special Grant-in-Aid of Rs.6,964.183/- million requested by the KMC for pension disbursement. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner agreed to disposal of the petition in terms of this statement so made by the counsel for the KMC. 6. With the consent of the parties, the Petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
304.Const. P. 3869/2025 (D.B.) Jawad Ali V/S (S.O) Public Health Engineering & Rural Dev. & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 778The Additional Secretary emphasized that the allocation of marks were adopted only for transparency and not as a legal requirement. It is well settled that once marks are awarded and used as the basis for selection, they become binding on the employer. A transparent criteria cannot be invoked selectively to justify non-selection. The Supreme Court also held that where selection is competitive and marks are assigned, the entire scheme becomes enforceable and the appointing authority cannot ignore higher marks unless there is a lawful reason. Merit and equality are core constitutional values; no recruitment can deny them on the basis that it is termed ???contractual.??? Primarily, a candidate scoring higher than others in a transparent process cannot be deprived of appointment arbitrarily. Failure to observe procedural safeguards, merit, and equitable representation is discriminatory under Article 4, 25 & 27 of the Constitution. Article 4 provides enforcement of fundamental rights. Article 25 guarantees equality before the law. Article 27 prohibits discrimination in public appointments. 12. In view of the above, Mr. Muhammad Aqil Awan, Senior Counsel of this Court, is appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court on the subject issues. Petitioner, AAG, and the Additional Secretary shall also assist on the next hearing.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST PRESS RELEASE
305.Const. P. 271/2026 (D.B.) Sardar Khan V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaContractual obligation cannot be enforced through Constitutional Petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed alongwith listed applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-Enquiry
306.Const. P. 362/2023 (D.B.) Akhtiar Ali Tunio & others V/S Vice Chancellor Sukkur IBA University & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaContempt application dismissedRead more
Matter:-Service
307.Cr.J.A 62/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Chohan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 665, 2026 SHC SUK 666Suspension of sentence.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 14 YEARS & ABOVE
308.Const. P. 3616/2025 (D.B.) Syed Salman Hussain V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 790In view of the above, this Court finds that the petitioner has highlighted illegality and procedural impropriety in the DPC???s decision dated 12-08-2024. The petitioner???s encadrement in PSP in 2012 was errioniouslt deferred and subsequent in 2016 followed completion of PERs, which were beyond his control. His eligibility was never in dispute, and he was deferred solely due to missing PERs. In fairness, he should have been treated like his batchmates, whose seniority was fixed with effect from 13-11-2012. Such treatment is reasonable and sustainable in law under Supreme Court precedent. 16. Accordingly, the petition and pending applications are disposed of, directing the competent authority of the respondents to reconsider their decision in accordance with law and the observations recorded herein above, within one months, and communicate the outcome to the petitioner, by way of circulation.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
309.Const. P. 2361/2022 (D.B.) Ms. Nazia Tariq V/S M/s K-Electric Ltd and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the above submissions, it is held that the Respondent has wrongly relied upon the designation, salary, and benefits of the Petitioner, whereas settled law mandates that the actual nature of duties is the decisive factor. The material on record clearly establishes that the Petitioner was performing technical, clerical, and operational functions without any managerial or administrative authority, thus falling within the definition of ???workman??? under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. The Respondent has failed to produce any evidence demonstrating that the Petitioner exercised powers such as hiring, firing, disciplinary control, policy-making, or financial authority. Accordingly, the burden of proof stands duly discharged by the Petitioner. Arguments relating to high salary, allowances, or non-membership of a union are legally irrelevant and misconceived. The reliance on the principle of Master and Servant is misplaced, as the same is inapplicable where an employee qualifies as a workman and is protected under labour laws. The case law cited by the Respondent is distinguishable on facts and does not apply to the present case. Furthermore, the findings of the NIRC suffer from misreading and non-reading of evidence, particularly regarding the actual nature of duties and absence of managerial powers, and are therefore liable to be set aside in constitutional jurisdiction. The Respondent???s stance regarding non-payment of end-of-service benefits is also untenable, as such benefits are a legal obligation and cannot be withheld on procedural pretexts. Therefore, it is held that the Petitioner is a ???workman??? within the meaning of law. The termination is illegal and violative of due process and natural justice. The principle of Master and Servant does not apply. The Petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits. Hence, the instant petition merits acceptance, consequently, the impugned orders passed by the learned Single Member and the Full Bench of NIRC appear to suffer from misreading and non-reading of evidence, non-application of mind, and failure to consider material questions of law, particularly the determining test of nature of duties and supervisory control. Therefore, the impugned orders cannot be sustained in the eye of law and are hereby set aside and consequences shall follow. 16. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
310.Const. P. 2973/2025 (D.B.) M/S Prime Brands DIstribution (Pvt) Ltd V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 818
Matter:-SALES TAX REGISTRATION
311.Const. P. 149/2026 (D.B.) Lal Bux Dayo V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaOrder passed by the Sindh Service Tribunal, Karachi, in Appeal No.L-04 of 2025, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground of limitation. Instant petition also dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Reinstate
312.Const. P. 515/2026 (D.B.) Pest Management Services (Private) Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiFIA has jurisdiction to investigate offences under the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
313.Const. P. 183/2026 (D.B.) Manzoor Ali Kalhoro V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaWe are of the considered opinion that instant petition is hopelessly time barred by laches. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-Joining
314.Const. P. 361/2025 (S.B.) Bhagiyal Khan chachar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 692Arrest of accused.Read more
Matter:-Arrest of Accused
315.Const. P. 376/2024 (D.B.) Asad Waqar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 639Consequently, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective claims of the parties, both the petitions are dismissed as not maintainable, with the observation that the petitioners, if so advised, may avail appropriate remedy before the competent civil court or any other forum available under the law. Needless to observe that any observations made in this order are purely tentative in nature and shall not prejudice the rights of the parties before any competent forum. The petitions along with all pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
316.R.A (Civil Revision) 23/2026 (S.B.) Dr. Bhagwano alias Bhagwandas V/S Mumtaz Ali Abbasi Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 663Any question requiring examination of disputed facts or determination of defence falls outside the scope of Order VII Rule 11 CPC and is to be adjudicated after recording evidence. Accordingly, Civil Revision is dismissed alongwith listed applications.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
317.Const. P. 7974/2022 (D.B.) Hafsa Binte Arshad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 638Consequently, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the respective claims of the parties, both the petitions are dismissed as not maintainable, with the observation that the petitioners, if so advised, may avail appropriate remedy before the competent civil court or any other forum available under the law. Needless to observe that any observations made in this order are purely tentative in nature and shall not prejudice the rights of the parties before any competent forum. The petitions along with all pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
318.Const. P. 274/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Shakeela Anjuman V/S Raja Rashid Asghar Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 677, 2026 SHC MPK 713CHILD RIGHTS. EFFECT OF PARENTAL DISPUTES ON CHILDREN. CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN. UN CONVENTION ON RIGHTS OF CHILD. EU???s PRINCIPLES OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITES. GUARDIAN & WARDS ACT. ??? Comprehensive Interim Meeting Schedule, between minors and non-custodial parent. ??? Studies confirm that in parental conflicts, which are not resolved privately and within a shorter period, the children suffer psychological distress, with increased risk of developing fear, anxiety, sadness, depression, insecurity, instability, emotional dysregulation, mood swings and impulsivity. ??? For expeditious disposal of family disputes, and to curtail unnecessary litigation in family disputes, writ jurisdiction under Article 199 may not be exercised routinely, since the legislature. ??? Need for harmonisation and transformation of child-related laws with the United Nation???s Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 [CRC], ??? while dealing with child-related laws, a fundamental shift in approach is needed, from ???welfare of the child??? to ???rights of the child???. ??? Section 12 of the Guardian & Wards Act needs to be regulated and formalised. ??? EU has also introduced 39 responsibilities of parents in its ???Principles of Parental Responsibilities???.Read more
319.Criminal Miscelleneous 209/2026 (S.B.) Dodo Phulpoto V/S S.S.P SUKKUR AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
320.Const. P. 449/2026 (D.B.) Sanaullah Shaikh V/S P.O Sindh & 05 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFree will affidavit.Read more
Matter:-Harasment
321.Criminal Appeal 87/2024 (S.B.) Saeed Jalbani & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSentence suspended.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
322.Const. P. 65/2026 (S.B.) Ghalib Hussain Jafferi V/S P.O Sindh & 10 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurHarassment petition.Read more
Matter:-PROTECTION
323.Criminal Appeal 86/2024 (S.B.) Saeed Jalbani & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSentence suspended.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
324.Criminal Appeal 82/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Hussain Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSentence suspended.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
325.Criminal Appeal 85/2024 (S.B.) Saeed Jalbani & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSentence suspended.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
326.Const. P. 5438/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Kubra Khatoon V/S Secretary Industries & Commerce & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 653Although the reinstatement order denied arrears for the period of absence, such denial does not extend to pensionary benefits lawfully accrued after retirement, nor does it authorize indefinite withholding of dues without adjudicated liability as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Pension is calculated on qualifying service and cannot be curtailed on unproven allegations. 11. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with directions to the competent authority of respondents to release the withheld amount forthwith, recalculate pensionary benefits in accordance with rules and parity, and ensure compliance within 30 days, failing which the amount shall carry markup/interest as per law.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
327.Const. P. 1544/2025 (D.B.) Jawed Akhtar Khichi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 654In view of the above, the impugned order is liable to be annulled as being arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of Articles 4 and 25 of the Constitution, and the petitioner/ interveners/similar employees are entitled to the same incentive time-scale benefit as granted to District Attorneys more particularly in terms of ratio of the judgments passed by this Court as discussed in the preceding paragraphs. 16. At the same time, it cannot be overlooked that the Petitioner and other similarly placed officers have remained stagnated for a considerable period due to the non-availability of a proper service structure, which prima facie calls for the attention of the competent authority. The recommendations of the Law Department and Prosecutor General Sindh also reflect acknowledgment of this structural deficiency. 17. In these circumstances, it is appropriate to direct the competent authority of the Respondents to expeditiously consider and finalize the matter of service structure and promotional avenues for the Criminal Prosecution Service, in light of this Court???s judgment dated 01.06.2021 passed in C.P. No. 1736/2013, and observation recorded hereinabove; and thereafter give meaningful consideration to the case of the Petitioner for all consequential benefits, including pensionary purposes on merits. 18. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of with the above directions.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
328.Const. P. 72/2026 (D.B.) Shakeela & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 652In the present case, the Respondent has failed to demonstrate any lawful basis or documented deficiency justifying refusal or delay in issuance. Mere reference to ???verification??? without any specific discrepancies communicated to the Petitioners does not constitute lawful justification under the NADRA Ordinance, Rules, or SOPs. 10. In view of settled legal principles and judicial precedents protecting identity rights, this petition is disposed of with directions that the Petitioners??? cases shall be processed within two weeks. The Petitioners shall appear before the concerned NADRA branch to complete the required formalities, and arbitrary denial of CNICs or other documents shall not be tolerated, subject to lawful exceptions.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
329.Const. P. 326/2025 (D.B.) Farooque Ahmed & others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 690, 2026 SHC SUK 691Teaching License Policy, 2023Read more
Matter:-EDUCATION
330.Const. P. 825/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Rasheed V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 642Quota recruitment cannot override transparency: selection of a candidate who never applied under the disabled quota, failed the written test and was preferred on undisclosed criteria is void for violating statutory rules, merit and constitutional fairness.Read more
331.Const. P. 1638/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Shazia V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 615
Matter:-GRANT OF REMISSION
332.Const. P. 894/2026 (D.B.) Elahi Bux V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-REMOVING THE NAME FROM C.R.O.
333.Const. P. 488/2026 (D.B.) Shoukat Ali Rind V/S P.O Sindh & 03 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurQuashment of FIR.Read more
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
334.Const. P. 6893/2019 (D.B.) Mst. Anfal Usman V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LODGING F.I.R
335.Const. P. 5874/2024 (D.B.) Syed Shahzad Ali V/S Sect: M/O Interior and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
336.Const. P. 728/2022 (D.B.) Zulfiqar Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HOUSE & CONSERVANCY TAX
337.Const. P. 54/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Sana & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFree will affidavit.Read more
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
338.Const. P. 69/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Samad V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTo approach before the competent forum.Read more
Matter:-Harasment
339.Cr.Bail 697/2025 (S.B.) Noor Khan Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in offences punishable under Sections 324, 337-A(i), 337-A(ii), 337-F(i), 337-F(v), 337-H(ii), 114, 148 and 149 P.P.C grantedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
340.Const. P. 6281/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Ehtesham Amin & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 805Accordingly, this petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the following terms: a. The impugned letter of election report dated 15.12.2025 and notification dated 16.12.2025 are hereby declared to be without lawful authority, illegal, and of no legal effect. The same are hereby set aside. b. It is declared that the Petitioners, being bona fide members of the Society, are entitled to participate in the election process, including the right to contest and vote. c. In order to ensure transparency and fairness, the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Sindh is directed to appoint Official Assignee of this court as Election Officer, within fifteen (15) days of this order. d. The newly appointed Election Officer shall obtain custody of the original record from the learned Nazir or concerned Court, prepare and publish a provisional voters??? list, decide objections and finalize the voters??? list, issue a proper election schedule strictly in accordance with law and Bye-Laws, ensure due publicity through widely circulated newspapers, and conduct free, fair, and transparent elections of the Managing Committee. e. The entire election process shall be completed within a period of three (03) months from the date of appointment of the Election Officer. The fee of the Election Officer is fixed at Rs. 30,000/- to be paid in advance from the saving funds. f. Till completion of the fresh election process, Respondents No. 6 to 15 are restrained from acting as office bearers or interfering in the affairs of the Society. g. The Official Assignee shall ensure compliance of this order and may, if necessary, seek assistance of the learned Nazir for safe custody and verification of record. Copy of this order shall be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
341.Const. P. 4863/2023 (D.B.) M/s Frontier Constabulary V/S Saleem ur Rehman & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 651The findings recorded by the learned Single Member and upheld by the learned Full Bench of NIRC are based on proper appreciation of evidence and are neither perverse nor arbitrary. No violation of principles of natural justice or mandatory provisions of law has been demonstrated. Rather, the conduct of the petitioner reflects negligence and an attempt to delay compliance with lawful orders. 12. In view of the foregoing, this Court finds that the impugned orders do not suffer from any illegality, jurisdictional defect, or material irregularity warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, the instant Constitutional Petition is found not maintainable against the concurrent findings of two fora therefore is dismissed along with pending application(s), with no order as to costs. .Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
342.Const. P. 923/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Shamim Siddiqui V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the above, this petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of with the following directions: i. The respondents are directed to process and finalize the case of the petitioner for grant of benefits under the Prime Minister???s Assistance Package strictly in accordance with the relevant Office Memorandums/policy within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order. ii. The respondents shall take up the matter with the competent authority, including the Prime Minister???s Office, for release of requisite funds, if not already done, and ensure that the petitioner is not discriminated against vis-??-vis other similarly placed beneficiaries. iii. The claim of the petitioner regarding cash benefits (including lump-sum grant, marriage grant, and payment in lieu of plot) shall be decided strictly in accordance with law and policy. iv. The case of appointment of the petitioner???s son under the Prime Minister???s Assistance Package shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, subject to fulfillment of eligibility criteria, within the same timeframe and law laid down by the learned Federal Constitutional Court and Supreme Court. v. In case of any delay or failure, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
343.Const. P. 8517/2018 (D.B.) Mahmood Zamir Farooqui V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiFor the foregoing reasons, this petition is allowed. It is declared that the petitioner is lawfully entitled to reimbursement of the medical expenses to the extent duly verified and approved by the competent forums under the applicable PQA Medical Policy and Regulations. The action of the respondents in withholding the remaining amount is held to be arbitrary, unlawful, and without legal authority. 13. Consequently, the respondents are directed to release and reimburse the outstanding amount of Rs.2,449,359/- to the petitioner within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of this judgment. 14. Petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-Re-Imbursement
344.Const. P. 5398/2025 (D.B.) Rafiullah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the foregoing submissions and the material available on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the grievance of the Petitioner primarily relates to non-consideration of his review application and alleged discriminatory treatment vis-??-vis similarly placed officials. 5. Without delving into the merits of the case, it would be appropriate that the matter is first examined by the competent authority in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the competent authority of the Respondents is directed to consider and decide the Petitioner???s pending review application strictly in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, and ensuring that no discrimination is made in comparison to other similarly placed officials. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken and concluded expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 7. With these observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of, however, without touching upon the merits of the case.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
345.Const. P. 4751/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Ibrahim Nadeem & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 637forum of appeal not exhausted under NAO, 1999 constitution petition against freezing of property order not maintainableRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
346.Const. P. 66/2025 (S.B.) M/s Philips Morris (Pak)Ltd Its attorney Zahir ... V/S Court of the Commissioner Workmen Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 616A claim for discretionary closure benefits lies outside the narrow wage-jurisdiction of the 2015 Act, where the worker is employed through contractors and no employer-employee nexus exists, the Authority acts without jurisdiction and its order is void.Read more
Matter:-Payment/Wages
347.Const. P. 357/2025 (S.B.) Nazeer Ahmed Baloch and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
348.I. A 42/2024 (S.B.) Mohammad Anwar V/S Ali Raza Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
349.Const. P. 555/2019 (D.B.) Mst. Mumtaz Bano V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
350.Const. P. 3493/2021 (D.B.) Asghar Ali V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
351.Const. P. 53/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Jannat & another V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
352.Const. P. 45/2026 (S.B.) Nisar Ahmed V/S Mst. Asma & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
353.Cr.Bail 10/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Usman V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
354.Const. P. 285/2025 (S.B.) Gyro Enterprises V/S Station House Officer Bahadurabad P.S. & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 617It is clarified that this Court has not examined or adjudicated upon the legality or otherwise of the construction being carried out on the subject property, the nature or status of the plot, or any alleged violation of building regulations, environmental laws or planning requirements. Any grievance with regard to the construction, alleged encroachment upon amenity land, violation of building regulations, or any other ancillary issue shall be raised before and decided by the competent authority, Court or forum in accordance with law. 6. The present proceedings are confined only to the issue of alleged harassment and interference raised in this petition. With the above observations, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT
355.Const. P. 266/2026 (S.B.) Cedar (Private) Limited V/S Sr.C.J/R.C-II, Karachi South & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 618Having considered the overall circumstances, including the operational nature of the Petitioner???s institution and the reasonable time already granted to vacate. However at this stage both parties have reached a consensual resolution to the effect that the Petitioner shall vacate and hand over peaceful, vacant, and physical possession of the premises bearing No. D-120, Block-4, Clifton, Karachi on or before 27.05.2026 to the respondent No.2. without fail upon payment of rent as determined by the rent controller In case of failure by the Petitioner to vacate the premises by the above date, the premises shall be repossessed through lawful means, including police assistance and break-open of locks, without further notice. However, the breach of this undertaking so given by the petitioner shall be treated as contemptuous if breached, and consequences shall follow. This petition stands disposed of along with pending application(s) in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
356.Const. P. 564/2025 (S.B.) Mukhtiar Ahmed V/S Ch. rasheed Ahmed Thr LRs and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 582A transferee pendente lite cannot invoke Section 12(2) CPC; absent proof of fraud on the Court, purchasers bound by lis pendency must pursue independent title claim rather than collaterally attack of subsisting decree.Read more
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
357.Const. P. 189/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Hamama Rizwan Thr. Muhammad Shaheer Rizwan V/S Major Muhammad Talha Zafar and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
358.Criminal Miscelleneous 61/2026 (S.B.) Ghulamullah Jokhio V/S Sarfraz @ Muno Dayo and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaIn view of the above circumstances, particularly the categorical statements of the alleged abductee recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., this Court does not find any illegality, impropriety, or infirmity in the order passed by the learned Special Judge, Anti-Rape Court, Larkana. Consequently, the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merit and is dismissed accordinglyRead more
Matter:-Against Order
359.Cr.Bail 47/2026 (S.B.) Nooral @ Manzoor Ali Totani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanabail under sections 365-B, 363, 148, 149 PPC grantedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
360.Cr.Bail 48/2026 (S.B.) Amolakh Das V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
361.Cr.Bail 64/2026 (S.B.) Parvaiz Ahmed Dodani Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanabail sections 324, 353, 402, 399, 148 and 149 ppc allowedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
362.Const. P. 180/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Saima Yousif V/S Muhammad Ismail Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
363.R.A (Civil Revision) 350/2024 (S.B.) Thardeep Microfinance Foundation thru President V/S Dadoo & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
364.Const. P. 84/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Aziz V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
365.Criminal Miscelleneous 687/2025 (S.B.) Nasrullah Chandio V/S 1st Civil Judge/J.M Naushahro feroze and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPrinciple of audi alteram partem defined.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
366.Criminal Appeal 5/2026 (S.B.) Niaz Hussain & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSuspension of sentence.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
367.Const. P. 165/2026 (S.B.) Adeel Ahmed Ansari V/S Mst. Hafsa Zahid & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
368.Cr.Bail 65/2026 (S.B.) Parvaiz Ahmed Dodani Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanabail in offence under section 25 of Sindh Arms Act, 2013 grantedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
369.Cr.Bail 110/2025 (S.B.) Niaz @ Nawazo Jafferi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanabail in offences punishable under Sections 302, 395, 396, 397, 337-H(2), 148 and 149, P.P.C allowedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
370.Cr.Bail 164/2026 (S.B.) Ali Raza shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail application dismissed in Section 377-B PPC.Read more
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
371.Cr.Tran 2/2026 (D.B.) Aakash V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
372.Cr.Rev 12/2026 (S.B.) Imdad Ali Samtio V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
373.R.A (Civil Revision) 489/2024 (S.B.) Yar Muhammad V/S Jan Alam & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
374.Cr.Bail 71/2026 (S.B.) Imam Din Jiskani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted in 489-F PPC.Read more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
375.Const. P. 46/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Amnat Thr. Special Attorney V/S Haji Muhammad & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
376.Cr.Acq.A. 59/2025 (S.B.) Shahid Ali Rajput V/S The State & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAcquitted in the offence u/s 489-F PPC.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
377.Const. P. 1060/2024 (D.B.) M/s International Industries Ltd V/S Jahangir Nawaz & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 622In the present case, Respondent No.1 performed core manufacturing work under the petitioner???s direct supervision, satisfying the legal test for employer control. Unlike the FCC NBP case, where workers had no substantive integration, here the Full Bench rightly relied on IRA 2012 to recognize an employer-employee relationship. The Full Bench???s partial allowance of appeals and remand for further evidence aligns with industrial justice, ensuring due process and protection of statutory rights. Thus, the petitioner???s plea to set aside NIRC orders lacks merit, and the Full Bench???s decision is legally sound and justified. 15. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, Respondent No.1 is effectively entitled to the relief under IRA 2012, and the Petitioner company cannot rely solely on contractor arrangements to avoid these obligations in terms of admissions of the Petitioner-company. 16. This petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
378.Const. P. 896/2025 (D.B.) Kamlesh Kumar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 630In view of the above discussion, it appears that the allocation process was carried out strictly in accordance with the requisition received from the administrative departments and the applicable quota rules. Since the only post reserved for the Rural Minority Quota stood filled by a candidate higher in merit and no vacancy remained available in that quota, the Petitioner, having secured a lower merit position, could not be allocated a post as a matter of right. The allegations of arbitrariness or mala fide action, therefore, remain unsubstantiated. 17. Consequently, no case for interference in constitutional jurisdiction is made out at this stage due to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 18. The petition is dismissed, along with any pending applications.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST PRESS RELEASE
379.Const. P. 5238/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Iqbal V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 635It is clarified that in case the petitioner has not already submitted a formal application before the competent authority for removal of his name from the Passport Control List and restoration of his passport, he shall be at liberty to file a fresh application, which shall be duly received and processed by the concerned authority. Upon receipt of such an application, the competent authority shall communicate with the petitioner, if required, for personal appearance or submission of any relevant material, and thereafter decide the matter in accordance with law within the stipulated period. 8. With these observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
380.Const. P. 3752/2014 (D.B.) Siddiqullah V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ORs Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 634Prime facie, the refusal to grant such encashment is therefore contrary to the CBA agreement and discriminatory. 13. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the respondents to reconsider the petitioner???s case within one month without fail after providing a meaningful hearing to him.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
381.Const. P. 3492/2024 (D.B.) Syed Abdul Rehman and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 629For these reasons, the appointment of a neutral Administrator/Commissioner/Election Officer as proposed by the parties to conduct elections is considered the most appropriate course to resolve the present controversy and to ensure compliance with the statutory framework governing cooperative societies. However, the parties shall extend full cooperation to the Commissioner/Election Officer and shall not interfere in the election process in any manner. Meanwhile, the election officer shall decide ancillary issues affecting the genuine voters/allotees of the society solely for the purpose of conducting the election and no transactions with regard to the sale and purchase of the plots shall take place. The fee of Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi is fixed at Rs. 300,000/-, payable in advance by the parties. 10. With these directions, these petitions, along with pending application(s) stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
382.Const. P. 6241/2016 (D.B.) Anjum Badar V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 804Regularization in serviceRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
383.Const. P. 5783/2023 (D.B.) Aslam Shakoor V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 627Nevertheless, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in terms of a common order dated 18.2.2026 passed in C.P. No. D-815 of 2023 and other connected petitions.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
384.Const. P. 5058/2023 (D.B.) M/s State Bank of Pakistan Class IV CHS V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 628For these reasons, the appointment of a neutral Administrator/Commissioner/Election Officer as proposed by the parties to conduct elections is considered the most appropriate course to resolve the present controversy and to ensure compliance with the statutory framework governing cooperative societies. However, the parties shall extend full cooperation to the Commissioner/Election Officer and shall not interfere in the election process in any manner. Meanwhile, the election officer shall decide ancillary issues affecting the genuine voters/allotees of the society solely for the purpose of conducting the election and no transactions with regard to the sale and purchase of the plots shall take place. The fee of Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi is fixed at Rs. 300,000/-, payable in advance by the parties. 10. With these directions, these petitions, along with pending application(s) stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
385.Const. P. 4073/2025 (D.B.) Fareed Ahmed V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 631Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner shall be entitled to release of his pensionary benefits in accordance with law and no further recovery shall be effected from his pension. In case any amount has already been recovered, the petitioner may approach the competent authority for its refund. The respondents shall constitute a committee to hear the petitioner and the officials of the Audit Department and, after providing them an opportunity of hearing, decide the matter within three months in accordance with law and the observations made herein. 20. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
386.Const. P. 340/2026 (D.B.) Zeeshan Ali Jatoi V/S Ministry of Interior & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 632Needless to observe that while deciding the matter, the competent authority shall independently assess the necessity of retaining the petitioner???s name on the PCL and shall not treat the mere pendency of investigation as the sole ground to deny the petitioner relief unless supported by cogent and legally sustainable reasons. However, the observation recorded in the preceding paragraph shall not be ignored at all. 13. With the above directions, this petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for immediate compliance, and they shall also be served through electronic and WhatsApp applications.Read more
Matter:-Removing the name from PCL
387.Const. P. 161/2024 (D.B.) Syed Farhan Ahmed Shah V/S Federal Ombudsman Secretariat For protection Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 577
Matter:-Against Order
388.I. A 1/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Muhammad & others V/S Jan Ali Khan Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 680Without seeking permission of the Court under rule 2 of Order XXIII CPC., a subsequent suit is barred under its rule 3, and section 12 CPC. Even addition of a new party, or non-impleading of a previous party, will not change the nature of the suit, if it is based upon the same cause of action. A Cheque issued as security for an agreement, cannot be automatically used as security in another agreement, without express permission from the drawer. A cheque from a ???photo account???, cannot be encashed or dishonured in the absence of the account holder. ???Read more
389.Const. P. 1305/2025 (D.B.) Haji Muhammad Fazal Siddique V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFactual controversy cannot be resolved in constitutional jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-Issue Sale Certificate
390.Const. P. 2024/2025 (D.B.) Mst.Sawera Saeed V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPensionary benefits by adopted daughter.Read more
Matter:-Pension
391.Const. P. 191/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Rauf V/S Saeeduddin Khan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
392.Const. P. 153/2024 (D.B.) Nasrullah Pahnwar V/S Govt Of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaFailing interview before SPSC, no interference in writ jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-Appointment
393.Const. P. 1151/2024 (D.B.) Ali Bux Laghari V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
394.Const. P. 4435/2016 (D.B.) Security Printin Corp. of Pakistan V/S Mehmood Salahuddin and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 596After examining the impugned judgment, we do not find that the discretion exercised by the Tribunal suffers from any jurisdictional defect, misreading of evidence, or violation of law warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The Tribunal has attempted to strike a balance between the competing claims of the parties and has granted partial back benefits in the circumstances of the case. 16. Consequently, C.P. No. D-5229 of 2016 filed by the employee seeking full back benefits is dismissed, while C.P. No. D-4435 of 2016 filed by the employer challenging the reinstatement and partial back benefits is also dismissed. The impugned judgment dated 26.05.2016 passed by the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal is maintained. 17. Both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, along with all pending applications, if any. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
395.Const. P. 5229/2016 (D.B.) Mehmood Salahuddin V/S S.L.A.T & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 595After examining the impugned judgment, we do not find that the discretion exercised by the Tribunal suffers from any jurisdictional defect, misreading of evidence, or violation of law warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The Tribunal has attempted to strike a balance between the competing claims of the parties and has granted partial back benefits in the circumstances of the case. 16. Consequently, C.P. No. D-5229 of 2016 filed by the employee seeking full back benefits is dismissed, while C.P. No. D-4435 of 2016 filed by the employer challenging the reinstatement and partial back benefits is also dismissed. The impugned judgment dated 26.05.2016 passed by the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal is maintained. 17. Both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, along with all pending applications, if any. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
396.Const. P. 4992/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Nuzhat V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 598In view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in 2025 SCMR 168, and keeping in view the undisputed fact that the petitioner has rendered about fifteen years of continuous service with the respondent institution, this Court is of the considered view that the respondents were not justified in excluding the contractual period from the computation of qualifying service for pensionary purposes. 14. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to count the petitioner???s contractual service from 16-06-2009 to 14-08-2015 along with her regular service for the purpose of determining qualifying service for pension and thereafter calculate and release the petitioner???s pensionary benefits in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
397.Const. P. 795/2026 (D.B.) Mustafa Fuzail Merchant & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 585In these circumstances, while taking note of the statement made by the learned Assistant Attorney General that petitioner No.2 is not on any stop list and is free to travel abroad on valid documents, this petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioners shall not be subjected to any unlawful obstruction in future, provided they fulfill all legal requirements for international travel. 13. Furthermore, the Director General, Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) is directed to conduct a proper inquiry through a competent officer into the allegations raised in the petition regarding the conduct of the concerned immigration officials and, if any misconduct, abuse of authority or harassment of the petitioners is found to have been committed, appropriate disciplinary action shall be taken against the delinquent officials strictly in accordance with law and the applicable service rules. 14. With the above observations and directions, the instant constitutional petition stands disposed of along with any pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
398.Const. P. 4259/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Majeed Awan and Another V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 599In view of the said commitment and without entering into the merits of the present case, the petition is disposed of with directions to the competent authority of the respondent Bank that the case of the petitioners be considered in accordance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the aforementioned matter. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within one month. 6. This petition, along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
399.Const. P. 346/2026 (D.B.) Khalid Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 592Accordingly, the competent authority of respondents are directed to issue the retirement notification of the petitioner and finalize his pension and other retirement benefits forthwith in accordance with law. the petition stands disposed of along with pending application(s) in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
400.Const. P. 11/2026 (D.B.) Sindh Engro Coal Mining, Thr. Qazafi V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 567Where no reference lies under Section 18 and no appeal exists under Section 54 LAA, constitutional jurisdiction remains available to enforce the Collector???s mandatory duty under Section 31(2) to deposit compensation once tender fails.Read more
401.Const. P. 264/2026 (D.B.) Saeed Jahan alias Lala Asad & Another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 570Establishment of trauma center -- is essential requirement.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
402.Const. P. 170/2025 (D.B.) Pakistan International Airline (PIA) Ltd V/S Saima Hafeez Soomro and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 574inquiry proceedings initiated beyond statutory period one month, without jurisdiction concurrent findings for reinstatement in service with back benefits upheldRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
403.Const. P. 1040/2024 (D.B.) Director Anti Encroachment SMC Sukkur Thr Attorney V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 572Encroachment over public property and public property used for commercial activities.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
404.Const. P. 3991/2024 (D.B.) Sohail Ahmed and Others V/S The State and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 564corum non judice orders against company FIR & Proceedings quashedRead more
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
405.Const. P. 1039/2024 (D.B.) Director Anti Encroachment SMC Sukkur Thr Attorney V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 571Encroachment over public property and public property used for commercial activies.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
406.Const. P. 1041/2024 (D.B.) Director Anti Encroachment SMC Sukkur Thr Attorney V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 573Encroachment over public property and public property used for commercial activities.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
407.Const. P. 1081/2026 (D.B.) Bank Alfalah Limited V/S President of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 696
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
408.Const. P. 7717/2018 (D.B.) Aijaz Ali V/S Chairman NAB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 575Properties subject matter of crime proceed, forfeited by accountability Court Sale held illegal and Petition for release of property dismissedRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
409.Const. P. 464/2025 (D.B.) Meer Khan & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurContempt Application dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against cancellation of shops
410.Const. P. 410/2025 (D.B.) Ibrar Hussain & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurContempt Application dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against cancellation of shops
411.Const. P. 103/2022 (D.B.) Kiran Balmiki V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRegularization can only be under statute or policy. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Regular Service
412.Const. P. 5192/2024 (D.B.) Lt: Commander (Retd) P.N V/S KPT and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiConsequently, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents, particularly Respondent No.1, to examine the petitioner???s claim regarding pension, gratuity, leave encashment and other post-retirement benefits by taking into account the entire service record of the petitioner, the orders passed by this Court in earlier proceedings, and the relevant statutory rules governing such benefits. A speaking order shall be passed by the competent authority within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to any service benefits in accordance with law, the same shall be calculated and paid to him expeditiously.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
413.Const. P. 1088/2025 (D.B.) Muharam Ali Shaikh V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaProgress for implementing disabled quotaRead more
Matter:-Disable Quota
414.Const. P. 177/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Irtaza V/S Arsalan Ahmed Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
415.Const. P. 1070/2025 (D.B.) Azeem Daud Masih V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetition for appointment on deceased quota not maintainable, dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Deceased Quota
416.Const. P. 6801/2015 (D.B.) P.D.O.H.A V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 695DHA in terms of article 21 - A of the President's order is exempted from payment of income taxRead more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
417.Const. P. 1730/2025 (D.B.) Sajad Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadCancellation of a disabled-quota appointment based on the 40???mark restriction is ultra vires, the Sukkur Bench???s restraint applied only to hard-area candidates and appointments meeting the 33% disability threshold cannot be withdrawn on a misreading of judicial orders.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
418.Const. P. 403/2023 (S.B.) Pakistan Kaimkhani Education Trust Hyd V/S Muhammad Jahangir & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 583, 2026 SHC HYD 584
Matter:-Rent Matter
419.Const. P. 721/2026 (D.B.) Sobia Nadeem V/S Chairman, SPSC & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 563High Court cannot interfere into the discretion of the department to frame recruitment rulesRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
420.R.A (Civil Revision) 20/2024 (S.B.) Habibullah thru LRs. V/S Muhammad Aslam & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 562
421.Const. P. 203/2025 (S.B.) M/S Rab Razi Cotton Gining V/S M/S Cotton Export Corporation & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 679compound interest is not permissible in Islam Decree follows the Judgment. It cannot include a relief which was not allowed in the Judgment. It is the duty of the Court to draw a decree in consonance with the A Party should not be prejudiced because of an act of the Court in drawing the decree. Mistake in decree can be rectified under section 152, 151, 153 CPC., or even suo motu by the court. Limitation will not apply. Executing Court can direct the parties to get the decree modified. ???Read more
422.Const. P. 703/2019 (D.B.) Zahoor Ahmed Buriro and others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRegularization can only be under statute or policyRead more
Matter:-Regular Service
423.Const. P. 21/2026 (S.B.) Rao Mohammad Zafariyab V/S Waliahad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
424.Const. P. 2305/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Ali@Ali Wazir V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
425.Const. P. 212/2026 (D.B.) Prof. Dr. Muhammad Hanif Shaikh V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaChallenge to on-going inquiry of sexual harassment, petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Restrain
426.Const. P. 455/2026 (D.B.) Shahid Hussain Tunio V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
427.Const. P. 67/2020 (D.B.) Suhbat Ali Awan V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetitioner terminated from service due to mis-conduct. No question of regularization.Read more
Matter:-Regular Service
428.Const. P. 228/2025 (S.B.) Shaud @ Saud Ali V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
429.Cr.Bail 34/2026 (S.B.) Naik Wali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
430.Const. P. 576/2026 (D.B.) Waqar Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
431.Cr.Bail 127/2025 (D.B.) Ali Haider @ Haidroo Bakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanapost arrest bail under Sections 302, 324, 353, 395, 148 and 149, P.P.C., read with Sections 6 and 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 allowedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
432.Cr.Bail 83/2025 (D.B.) Bilal @ Bilawal Dero V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanapost arrest bail under Section 9(i),3(c) of the Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 2024 allowedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
433.Cr.Bail 8/2026 (D.B.) Khan Muhammad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaSafe custody of narcotic doubtful, foisting cannot be ruled out, bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
434.R.A (Civil Revision) 72/2025 (S.B.) Arbab Ali & Others V/S Muhammad Khan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
435.Const. P. 4907/2025 (D.B.) Eijaz Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 594In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that he appointment of Respondent No.4 as Inspector General Prisons (BS-21) vide Notification dated 05.06.2025 has been made in accordance with the Sindh Prisons and Corrections Services (Amendment) Act, 2025, which expressly authorizes the Chief Minister to appoint the IG from officers of BS-21/20 belonging to the Police Service of Pakistan, Pakistan Administrative Service, Executive Provincial Civil Service, Provincial Management Service, or the Sindh Prisons and Corrections Service. Respondent No.4, being a BS-20 officer of the Police Service of Pakistan, prima facie fulfills the statutory eligibility criteria for the post. The Amendment Act enlarges the pool of eligible candidates and grants the Government discretion in appointments, and such statutory discretion cannot be questioned through a writ of quo warranto unless a clear illegality is established. The procedural requirements under the APT Rules, 1974, including PSB recommendation, do not override the specific statutory authority granted by the Amendment Act. Reliance on general service rules or prior notifications cannot invalidate a statutory appointment made in accordance with a special law. There is no evidence of mala fide or unlawful exercise of discretion, and the appointment does not violate any statutory provision. 15. In view of the above, the petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto against Respondent No.4 is dismissed along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
436.Const. P. 5136/2025 (D.B.) Ameeruddin V/S Appellate Authority Board of Trustee of EOBI & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 590The authority shall verify the employment record, take effective steps for recovery of outstanding contributions from the employer in accordance with law, and thereafter decide the entitlement of the petitioners to old-age or invalidity pension, as the case may be, strictly under the provisions of the Act. Such exercise shall preferably be completed within a reasonable period of two months. However the claim of the petitioners shall not be rejected on the premise that contribution could not be deposited by the employer as it was the duty of EOBI, to recover the contribution from employer and petitioners cannot be saddled with such non compliance on the part of the employer. 13. Both petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
437.Const. P. 5050/2025 (D.B.) Shah Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 586In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the Respondent No.2 / Law Department to place the case of the petitioner for grant of incentive of higher grade on time-scale basis before the Chief Executive of the Province in accordance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Kaneez Zehra Kazmi v. Syed Hassan Naqvi, as well as the directive issued by the Chief Minister Sindh dated 28.11.2024. The said exercise shall be undertaken within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 15. Needless to observe that if the petitioner is found entitled under the applicable policy decision of the Chief Executive of Sindh, he shall be granted the consequential benefits strictly in accordance with such policy.Read more
Matter:-IMPLEMENTATION
438.Const. P. 5137/2025 (D.B.) Muslim Khan V/S Appellate Authority Board of Trustee of EOBI & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 589The authority shall verify the employment record, take effective steps for recovery of outstanding contributions from the employer in accordance with law, and thereafter decide the entitlement of the petitioners to old-age or invalidity pension, as the case may be, strictly under the provisions of the Act. Such exercise shall preferably be completed within a reasonable period of two months. However the claim of the petitioners shall not be rejected on the premise that contribution could not be deposited by the employer as it was the duty of EOBI, to recover the contribution from employer and petitioners cannot be saddled with such non compliance on the part of the employer. 13. Both petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
439.Cr.Acq.A. 25/2025 (S.B.) Shafqat Ali V/S The State & Anothers Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPresumption of innocence lies in favour of accusedRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
440.Criminal Miscelleneous 745/2025 (S.B.) Munwar Ali Behleem V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the orderRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
441.Criminal Miscelleneous 730/2025 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Narejo V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
442.H.C.A 83/2014 (D.B.) Province of Sindh & others V/S Muhammad Faisal Ahmed & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 542, 2026 SHC KHI 545, 2026 SHC KHI 548Order XII Rule 6 CPC - Principles - Admission by non-contesting Defendants cannot form sole basis of a decree where contesting co-Defendants have raised substantial legal and factual disputes regarding rights in the Suit Property - Such disputes constitute triable issues requiring adjudication on evidence - Decree passed on such admissions, while disregarding objections of contesting Defendants, amounts to improper exercise of judicial discretion - May result in an ineffective decree leaving substantive controversies unresolved.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
443.R.A (Civil Revision) 270/2024 (S.B.) Ch: Abid Farooque V/S Wali Muhammad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 937, 2026 SHC MPK 940For the purposes of Order VII rule 11 CPC., the contents of the plaint are to be considered as true. A plaint which contains allegations of fraud, cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. and evidence is to be recorded in such cases. Inquiry and calling of witnesses is not permissible at the stage of hearing of an application under order VII rule 11 CPC. Declaring a document as forged by the trial Court, at the stage of Order VII rule 11 CPC., is not permissible.Read more
444.Cr.Acq.A. 68/2025 (S.B.) Ashique Ali Ghouri V/S The State & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAccquitted in the offence u/s 489-F PPC.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
445.R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2025 (S.B.) Jairam V/S Chairman NADRA & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
446.Const. P. 77/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Touba Rajpot & Another V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
447.Cr.Acq.A. 60/2025 (S.B.) Mushtaque Ahmed Wagho V/S Karamuddin Wagho & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the judgment u/s 489-F PPC.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
448.Criminal Miscelleneous 4/2026 (S.B.) Malhar Changar V/S the state and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
449.Const. P. 1223/2026 (D.B.) Safia Lakho V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiNHA Road Accidents Case.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
450.Cr.Bail 44/2026 (S.B.) Khan Muhammad V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
451.Const. P. 568/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Sindhi Momin CHS Limited V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 610In light of these findings, and to ensure compliance with the statutory scheme under the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Rules, 2020, this Court deems it fit and proper to direct the appointment of an Official Assignee as Election Officer. The Official Assignee shall, assume full authority to supervise and conduct the election process of the society in accordance with the law; Exercise all powers necessary under the cooperative statutes to ensure free, fair, and transparent elections; Restore the society records seized on 29-01-2026 and maintain full control over the election proceedings; Complete the election process within two months from the date of assumption of charge; and Fix his fee in consultation with the parties. However, the Official Assignee may proceed with the existing election process or make such modifications as he deems fit and proper, consistent with the law, to ensure that the elections are conducted fairly, transparently, and within the stipulated period. He shall aslo deal with all ancillary issues releted to election of the petitioner society. 18. The petition, along with pending applications, is disposed of in these terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance to be served through electronic and watsup application.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
452.Const. P. 868/2026 (D.B.) Maula Bux Sahito & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 603So far as the issue of seniority is concerned, it is well settled that disputes relating to seniority, promotion, or other service matters of civil servants are to be agitated before the competent Service Tribunal constituted under Article 212 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and ordinarily, the constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 is not invoked where an adequate statutory remedy is available. Since the competent authority has now passed a speaking order deciding the representations of the petitioners, a fresh cause of action, if any, has accrued to them to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 11. Consequently, the present petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of with the observation that if the petitioners feel aggrieved by the speaking order passed by the competent authority dated 04.03.2026 or the determination of seniority made therein, they may avail the remedy available to them under the law before the appropriate Service Tribunal. All questions of law and fact are left open to be agitated before the said forum if approached.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
453.Const. P. 4546/2025 (D.B.) Roshan Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 605Accordingly, these petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of with directions to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to reconsider the petitioner???s candidature for the subject post. However their candidature shall not be rejected based on the subject cases, the process shall be completed within two months, and compliance reported to this Court in line with the Supreme Court???s decision dated 22.10.2024.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
454.Const. P. 1228/2025 (D.B.) Waheed Ahmed & Others V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 475Staff Appoited on daily_wages at Corona Vaccination Centers can not be Regularized in serviceRead more
Matter:-Regular Service
455.Const. P. 4547/2025 (D.B.) Muhram Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 606Accordingly, these petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of with directions to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to reconsider the petitioner???s candidature for the subject post. However their candidature shall not be rejected based on the subject cases, the process shall be completed within two months, and compliance reported to this Court in line with the Supreme Court???s decision dated 22.10.2024.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
456.Const. P. 5165/2020 (D.B.) Junaid Sikandar Junejo V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiThe Sindh Service Tribunal, clarified that the fact-finding inquiry conducted was solely to assist the Supreme Court and did not amount to a declaration of illegality. The remand order of the Supreme Court under Article 185(3) was for collection of facts, and cannot be interpreted as conferring a substantive right on the petitioner to challenge appointments via quo warranto. 14. In view of the above, the essential ingredients for issuance of a writ of quo warranto are not satisfied. The petition is further barred by laches and prior litigation on the same subject. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan. All pending application(s) are also disposed of.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
457.Const. P. 614/2023 (D.B.) Aijaz Ali Mahesar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPublic functionaries are under mandate in view of Setion 24(a) of General Clauses Act.Read more
Matter:-Encroachment
458.Const. P. 2357/2011 (D.B.) Akhtar Ali Shaikh and others V/S Deputy Controller Civil Defence Kamber and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 488, 2026 SHC LAR 552, 2026 SHC LAR 553, 2026 SHC LAR 554Staff appointed on daily-wages cannot be regularized unless provided by statute or policy.Read more
Matter:-Service
459.Const. P. 1225/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Mehrun Nisa V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 569Recruitment process of childhood teacher.Read more
Matter:-Recruitment
460.Const. P. 232/2014 (D.B.) Niaz Hussain and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 493Staff appointed on daily-wages cannot be regularized unless provided by statue or policy.Read more
Matter:-Regular Service
461.Const. P. 2417/2011 (D.B.) Ayaz Ali Wadho and another V/S D.C.O Larkana and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 490, 2026 SHC LAR 555Staff appointed on daily-wages cannot be regularized unless provided by statue or policy.Read more
Matter:-Service
462.Const. P. 5483/2024 (D.B.) M/s Mall Developers Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 57617. For the foregoing reasons, this Court is of the considered view that the controversy regarding the land measuring 3,600 square yards has already been conclusively determined through earlier judicial proceedings; the present petition amounts to re-litigation of matters that have attained finality; and the relief claimed cannot be granted within the scope of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 18. Consequently, the present Constitutional Petition is dismissed as not maintainable, along with the pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
463.Const. P. 122/2016 (D.B.) Nooruddin Jatoi V/S Deputy Controller Civ: Def: Kamber & ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 492Staff appointed on daily-wages cannot be regularized unless provided by statue or policy.Read more
Matter:-Service
464.Const. P. 4194/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Talha Hassan V/S Chairman SPSC & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 482eligibility criteria - cut off dateRead more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
465.Const. P. 2312/2011 (D.B.) Talib Hussain Junejo V/S P.O Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 491Staff appointed on daily-wages cannot be regularized unless provided by statue or policy.Read more
Matter:-Service
466.Const. P. 1204/2011 (D.B.) Akbar Ali Gaad and others V/S PO Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 489Staff appointed on daily-wages cannot be regularized unless provided by statue or policy.Read more
Matter:-Service
467.Const. P. 5634/2025 (D.B.) Sindh Grower Alliance & another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachifixation of sugarcane priceRead more
Matter:-SUGAR PRICE
468.Const. P. 6334/2023 (D.B.) Erum Izhaar & another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BACHAT BAZAR
469.Cr.J.A 2/2025 (D.B.) Loung Khan V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
470.R.A (Civil Revision) 22/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Jabbar V/S Taluka Municipal Administrator Jhudo & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
471.Cr.Bail 30/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
472.Const. P. 377/2026 (D.B.) Shahzad Ameen Bhutto V/S P.O Sindh & 06 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurDemarcation of land to approach before the competent forum.Read more
Matter:-DECIDE THE APPLICATION
473.Const. P. 317/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Zohra Bibi & Another V/S The SHO Ubauro & 10 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFree will marriage.Read more
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
474.Const. P. 1387/2018 (D.B.) Ms. Asma and Ors V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachiseniority is reckoned from the date of confirmation in serviceRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
475.Const. P. 4251/2025 (D.B.) Safina Bibi V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 499However, in light of the categorical statement made by learned counsel for KMC before this Court that the remaining pensionary benefits, as disclosed in the comments, shall be released within one week, and the petitioner???s counsel having consented to disposal on that basis, the matter does not call for further adjudication on merits. 11. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the direction that the competent authority of respondents shall ensure release of the outstanding commuted pension amount. In case of default, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
476.Const. P. 777/2026 (D.B.) Farhan Muhammad Qureshi V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 498Consequently, while the petition, is disposed of, with direction to the petitioner to approach the Ministry of Interior by filing a representation along with a certified copy of this order within fifteen (15) days. Upon receipt of such representation, the Ministry of Interior shall decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the concerned department, and shall pass a reasoned order within a stipulated period, preferably within thirty (30) days. Till such decision, if the petitioner arrives in Pakistan, no bottleneck shall be created to enter into Pakistan, solely on the basis of his name appearing on the ECL in connection with the present matter, unless required in any other criminal case in accordance with law. 11. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned including learned AAG Sindh for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
477.Const. P. 4349/2025 (D.B.) Siddiq Masih V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 503The KMC counsel assured the Court that the outstanding pensionary benefits would be released within one week, subject to his entitlement under the law. 6. With the respondents??? counsel consenting to disposal on this basis, this Court, without touching the merits of the case, directs the competent authority to ensure payment subject to his entitlement under the law, allowing the petitioner to seek legal remedies in case of default.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
478.Const. P. 6452/2020 (D.B.) Arshad Iqbal V/S National Cement Employees C.H.S & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 504In these circumstances, we are of the considered view that the Award dated 04.05.2020 in ABN Case No.08/2020 is still valid, subsisting and binding. The plea of non-availability of land, being a self-created or administrative constraint, cannot defeat execution of the Award. The executing authority is obligated to proceed in accordance with law and cannot decline execution unless compliance is shown to be legally impossible, not merely inconvenient. 15. Accordingly, the objections raised by Respondent No.1 are not sustainable. The competent authority is directed to proceed with execution of the Award strictly in accordance with law after hearing all concerned and to ensure that the petitioner???s lawful allotment is enforced without discrimination. 16. The petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
479.Const. P. 421/2026 (D.B.) M/S Syed & Company & Brother thr: Attorney & Anoth V/S Federation of Pakistan & 02 others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurNIT process challengedRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
480.Const. P. 5403/2025 (D.B.) Tofique Ahmed & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 479Shopping center over plots of police station not permissible under the law petition dismissedRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
481.Const. P. 1829/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Fatah kalwar & another V/S President / CEO ZTBL & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 469, 2026 SHC SUK 470, 2026 SHC SUK 473Jurisdiction, functions and power of Wafaqi Mohtasib and Banking Mohtasib are defined.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
482.Const. P. 157/2026 (D.B.) Teerath & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
483.Const. P. 253/2026 (D.B.) Shoukat Ali Soomro V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst NIT process.Read more
Matter:-Tender Work
484.Cr.Bail 22/2026 (S.B.) Baqar Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
485.Const. P. 1012/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Sattar & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
486.Const. P. 956/2025 (D.B.) Zahid V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
487.Cr.Bail 51/2026 (S.B.) Arif V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
488.Const. P. 73/2026 (D.B.) Riaz Ali Buriro V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTo approach before grievance cell.Read more
Matter:-Demarcation
489.Const. P. 219/2026 (D.B.) Ram Jee V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
490.Cr.Bail 387/2025 (S.B.) Dhani Bux & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
491.Const. P. 2773/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Shamim Akhtar & Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 538We are not satisfied with such deduction from the service benefits of deceased at this stage and reject the PSM???s request to deduct utility and rent costs from the settlement. The Nazir is directed to recalculate the deceased???s total service benefits and after that exercise, these funds, if deposited, must be released to the legal heirs of deceased as per their entitlement without any deductions for rent or electricity. However, the release of payment is subject to proper identification and verification of the legal heirs and the legal heirs should be at liberty to challenge the validity of the orders passed by the learned Labour Court before legal forum under the law subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. 5. With these directions, the Constitutional Petition and all pending applications are disposed of. We are not satisfied with such deduction from the service benefits of deceased at this stage and reject the PSM???s request to deduct utility and rent costs from the settlement. The Nazir is directed to recalculate the deceased???s total service benefits and after that exercise, these funds, if deposited, must be released to the legal heirs of deceased as per their entitlement without any deductions for rent or electricity. However, the release of payment is subject to proper identification and verification of the legal heirs and the legal heirs should be at liberty to challenge the validity of the orders passed by the learned Labour Court before legal forum under the law subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. 5. With these directions, the Constitutional Petition and all pending applications are disposed of.Read more
Matter:-FOR GRATUITY
492.Const. P. 131/2025 (D.B.) Hafiz Moinuddin Chisti V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachimerit and transparency in recruitment processRead more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
493.Const. P. 6002/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Moosa V/S SSP Sujawal & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 461provisions of 22 A CrPC cannot be used to victimize the innocent soulsRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
494.Const. P. 242/2026 (D.B.) Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 474SPRA Rules, 2010 regarding bidding process are elaborated.Read more
Matter:-Tender Work
495.H.C.A 182/1997 (D.B.) Kamaluddin Qureshi V/S M/s.Ali International Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 478, 2026 SHC KHI 481Orders in post winding up proceeding, challengeable before the Honourable Supreme Court.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
496.Const. P. 769/2023 (D.B.) Afzal Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 550
Matter:-SERVICE
497.Const. P. 636/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Saqib Saghir V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 476Summary punishment without a regular inquiry violates mandatory disciplinary procedure; compulsory retirement set aside and reinstatement ordered.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
498.Cr.Rev 34/2022 (S.B.) ABDUL SALAM S/O HAJI DILAWAR KHAN V/S THE LD IIND ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
499.Const. P. 1468/2024 (D.B.) Nilofer Iqbal Shajani Thr Hassan Ashfaq & another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
500.Const. P. 57/2026 (S.B.) Zubair Ahmed V/S Mst. Naghma & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
501.R.A (Civil Revision) 159/2025 (S.B.) Willayat Ali and another V/S Pir Abdullah Jan Sarhandi and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
502.Const. P. 56/2026 (S.B.) Willayat Ali & another V/S Pir Abdullah Jan Sarhandi & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
503.Const. P. 1012/2025 (D.B.) Zamir Hussain & another V/S Federation of Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRemedy available before Gas Utility Court under the Act of 2016, petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-REMOVING OF OLD METER
504.Const. P. 139/2026 (D.B.) Mst Saira & Another V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetition for quashment of FIR disposed ofRead more
Matter:-Quashement of F.I.R.
505.Const. P. 430/2026 (D.B.) Shafqat Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
506.Const. P. 653/2025 (S.B.) Mir Adil V/S Mst. Sugra another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 457Order VII Rule 11 cannot defeat a guardianship claim where parentage and welfare are disputed, such matters require evidence not threshold rejection.Read more
Matter:-Family
507.Const. P. 480/2025 (S.B.) Shoaib V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 455Trial court retains jurisdiction to work out a compromise based preliminary decree, inherent powers may be invoked to implement partition until a final decree is drawn.Read more
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
508.Judicial Companies Misc. 37/2024 (S.B.) SHAHBAZ GARMENTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND OTHERS V/S SECP on Court Notice Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 472Merger sanctioned. Company Court need not probe whether Competition Act attracted.Read more
Matter:-MERGER
509.Cr.Bail 43/2026 (S.B.) Ubaidullah @ Ubaid Awan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
510.Cr.Bail 22/2026 (S.B.) Rais Chhutto @ Chhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in offence punishable under Section 23(i)(b) of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013 and Sections 155-C & 155-D of the Police Order, 2002 (Amendment 2019) was granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
511.Cr.Bail 502/2025 (S.B.) HUZOOR BUX LASHARI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail granted in offences punishable under Sections 302, 337-A(i), 337-F(i), 337-H(ii), 147, 148, and 149 P.P.CRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
512.Const. P. 5004/2025 (D.B.) Jaffar Abdul Majeed & Ors V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 514In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
513.Const. P. 4109/2025 (D.B.) Syed Abdul Qadeem Agha & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 513In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
514.Const. P. 2006/2025 (D.B.) Ehsan ur Rehman & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 512In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
515.Const. P. 5909/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Qayoom Bhutto V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 537In view of the above discussion, the refusal of the Respondents to consider and include the Petitioner???s adhoc service towards qualifying service for pension, despite extending similar benefits to other similarly placed officers, appears to be arbitrary and discriminatory, and not sustainable in law. 14. Consequently, the impugned order dated 23.09.2024 is declared to be without lawful justification and of no legal effect, and the competent authority of Respondents is directed to recompute the pension and pensionary benefits of the Petitioner by counting his adhoc service from 22.10.1996 to 30.04.2001 as regular service for all intents and purposes, including consequential benefits, strictly in accordance with law. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks without fail. 15. The petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
516.Const. P. 1959/2025 (D.B.) Abid Abdullah V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 511In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST CONSTRUCTION
517.Const. P. 1524/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Qadoos Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 510In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
518.Const. P. 6352/2023 (D.B.) Haji Abdul Raziq V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 509In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
519.Const. P. 6307/2024 (D.B.) M. Ramzan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 414Petitioner not an aggrieved person cannot bring writ against the decision of KPT BoardRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
520.Const. P. 5169/2023 (D.B.) Mumtaz Majeed V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 508In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
521.Const. P. 5129/2022 (D.B.) Anjuman E Tajiran & Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 506, 2026 SHC KHI 624In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
522.Const. P. 8006/2022 (D.B.) Meer Sajjad Ahmed Shahwani V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 507In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discussed in paragraph No.23. 2. If private land is required for highway purposes, acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be initiated before utilization. 3. No construction shall be carried out outside the legally notified ROW. Any encroachment upon public green belts or service roads shall be removed forthwith. 4. The Commissioner Karachi shall ensure restoration of drainage infrastructure and removal of unauthorized structures, as per law. 5. SEPA shall verify environmental approvals for ancillary facilities. 6. Until demarcation, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession of privately owned land. 7. The Implementation Committee already constituted by the Chief Secretary Sindh shall monitor compliance and submit quarterly reports to the Registrar of this Court. 28. Needless to observe, NHA and its concessionaire are empowered to develop ancillary facilities within lawfully vested ROW; however, such authority is circumscribed by constitutional guarantees, statutory mandates, environmental safeguards, and binding judicial precedents. 29. All the above petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
523.H.C.A 422/2017 (D.B.) Mst. Hajani Sherbano & others V/S Qazi Muhammad Fareed & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, LIMITATION, Specific Relief Act,
2026 SHC KHI 411, 2026 SHC KHI 412Continuous and overlapping litigation, Plaint cannot be rejected.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
524.Const. P. 6832/2020 (D.B.) UBL V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 417banking mohtasib jurisdiction to entertain online fraud complaintRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
525.H.C.A 72/1990 (D.B.) Mohamed Bana & Others V/S Provincial of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 442, 2026 SHC KHI 494, 2026 SHC KHI 495Appellants claim to immovable property based on possessory right (Haq Qabza) - Documentary manipulation of revenue record - Limits of Compromise Decree in conferring rights to immovable property in absence of copy of plaint - Evaluation of the title claims exceeding the express terms of conveyance deeds.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
526.Const. P. 5049/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Raheed V/S Chairman NAB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 460retrospective amendment in NAO 1999 actions taken under omitted provisions of Section 23 NAO, 1999 became non est petition allowedRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
527.Const. P. 2436/2022 (D.B.) M/s Super Long Route Bus Owners Association V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 458
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
528.II.A. 61/2024 (S.B.) Mubarak & others V/S Baracho & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
529.Cr.Bail 106/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Shakoor Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
530.Const. P. 6276/2025 (D.B.) Faiyaz Ahmed & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 524Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
531.Const. P. 2954/2025 (D.B.) Zahid Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 536In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case we are of the considered view that the Petitioner???s service is legally valid and continuous from 02.02.1982 attaining 18 years to 02.02.2024 the age of superannuation. Pensionary benefits including commutation, GP Fund final bill, leave encashment, and arrears must be released in full, and any delay or withholding is inconsistent with. Accordingly, the Respondents??? objection based on age at the time of appointment is legally untenable, and the Petitioner is entitled to full pensionary benefit. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
532.Const. P. 4458/2025 (D.B.) M/s Darul Aman Cooperative Housing Society V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 516Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
533.Const. P. 6267/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Naeem & Maqbool CHS Limited V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 519Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
534.Const. P. 561/2026 (D.B.) Shazia Arif Butt V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 531In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we intend to dispose of the petition with direction to the competent authorities of the respondents, including Respondents No. 2, 4, and 5, who are hereby directed to activate the Petitioner???s passport in all relevant systems and to remove her name from all watchlists, blacklists, and travel restrictions, unless a specific legal bar exists with cogent material and not without such material. Prima facie, the Petitioner is entitled to freedom of travel and needs to be allowed to proceed abroad without any administrative obstruction/restriction. 9. In such circumstances, this petition, along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms. Copies of this order shall be communicated to all relevant authorities, including the Director Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), and Directorate of Immigration, and relevant airline authorities, for strict compliance.Read more
Matter:-Removing the Name from PNIL
535.Const. P. 5184/2025 (D.B.) Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 517Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
536.Const. P. 1078/2023 (D.B.) Dr. Khushnood Akhtar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 533In view thereof, this Court is satisfied that the Petitioner???s case warrants consideration. Accordingly, the competent authority of the Respondents is directed to actualize the promotion of the Petitioner to BPS-19 with effect from the date of recommendation of the DPC held on 08.11.2012, subject to there being no legal impediment, and thereafter recalculate and release her retiral benefits on such basis within a reasonable time, if not earlier paid. 6. The petition along with pending application(s) if any stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
537.Const. P. 6266/2025 (D.B.) Bihar Muslim Cooperative Housing Society Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 518Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
538.Const. P. 4648/2025 (D.B.) Ashfaq Ahmed & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 419Consequently, the Petitioners, having been appointed against sanctioned posts through due process and having completed the requisite period of satisfactory service, are entitled to be considered for regularization strictly in terms of Regulation 21-A of the PQA Employees Service Regulations, 2011 (Revised), in parity with other similarly placed employees. 16. Accordingly, the Respondents are directed to place the cases of the Petitioners before the competent authority for consideration of their regularization in accordance with the applicable statutory Regulations, within three weeks, and no adverse action shall be taken against them in the meanwhile solely on account of their contractual status as they were appointed through a competitive process. 17. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-REGULARIZATION
539.Const. P. 129/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Naeem & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 526Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
540.Const. P. 6271/2025 (D.B.) Nasim Cooperative Housing Society Limited V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 520Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
541.Const. P. 6274/2025 (D.B.) M.S.G.P (School) Coop. H. Society Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 522Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
542.Const. P. 6277/2025 (D.B.) Abid Hussain Marvi & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 525Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
543.Const. P. 6273/2025 (D.B.) Ashraf Godil & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 521Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
544.Const. P. 787/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Naeem & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 515Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
545.Const. P. 3123/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Muttalib & Others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 420Consequently, the Petitioners, having been appointed against sanctioned posts through due process and having completed the requisite period of satisfactory service, are entitled to be considered for regularization strictly in terms of Regulation 21-A of the PQA Employees Service Regulations, 2011 (Revised), in parity with other similarly placed employees. 16. Accordingly, the Respondents are directed to place the cases of the Petitioners before the competent authority for consideration of their regularization in accordance with the applicable statutory Regulations, within three weeks, and no adverse action shall be taken against them in the meanwhile solely on account of their contractual status as they were appointed through a competitive process. 17. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE / REGULARIZATION
546.Const. P. 2365/2025 (D.B.) Mumtaz Begum V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 418Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent authority of NADRA to examine the case of the petitioner afresh, provide her an opportunity of hearing, and pass a speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of this order and if the order goes against the petitioner, she may avail the remedy as per law, as suggested for adjudication of the mater by producing the documentary evidence. 8. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
547.Const. P. 6275/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Younus & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 523Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law, including revival or fresh invocation of jurisdiction, if so advised. 20.???Needless to observe that the disposal of these petitions shall not prejudice the rights and contentions of any party on merits, which are left open to be agitated before the appropriate forum at the appropriate stage.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
548.Const. P. 5617/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Yaseen V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiThe petitioner???s allegation that junior staff have been promoted while he was ignored does not, prima facie, demonstrate discrimination unless it can be shown that the respondents violated clear service rules, or acted arbitrarily or mala fide. Without such proofs and where seniority computation is in accordance with rule a mere delay or differential treatment does not suffice to establish discrimination under the Constitution. 10. It is also a sound legal position that when a petitioner has alternative efficacious remedies under service rules, departmental grievance procedures, or tribunal jurisdictions, a constitutional petition can be held premature. If no final adverse order regarding seniority or promotion has been communicated, courts often decline interference on the ground of absence of a settled controversy. 11. The petitioner???s claim is therefore without legal merit and the petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) with costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
549.Const. P. 787/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Naeem & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 464
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
550.Const. P. 6285/2025 (D.B.) Ameer Hamza V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
551.Criminal Miscelleneous 35/2026 (S.B.) Anam Mariyam V/S Ghazeen Khan & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
552.Criminal Miscelleneous 31/2026 (S.B.) Liaquat Ali V/S Muhammad Yousuf & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
553.Const. P. 523/2023 (D.B.) Sajid Tunio & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThe petitioners have failed to establish any violation of law or infringement of a vested legal right warranting Constitutional Intervention. Accordingly, petition is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Appointment of P.C
554.Const. P. 726/2026 (D.B.) Shammi Mumtaz Mughal V/S Director FIA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
555.Const. P. 6236/2025 (D.B.) Protector & Gamble Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-W.W.F
556.Criminal Miscelleneous 30/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Qaima V/S SSP Tando Allahyar & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
557.Criminal Miscelleneous 33/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Aslam V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
558.Cr.Bail 131/2025 (D.B.) Nisar @ Nisar Ahmed Sakhani Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in case of Sindh Arms Act dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
559.Cr.Bail 130/2025 (D.B.) Nisar @ Nisar Ahmed Sakhani Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in ATA case dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
560.Const. P. 846/2025 (D.B.) Qurban Ali Chahwan V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaIn view of the above facts and circumstances, this Court finds no illegality, procedural impropriety, or jurisdictional defect in the recruitment process warranting interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.Read more
Matter:-Appointment of P.C
561.Const. P. 59/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Mushtaque & another V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
562.Const. P. 537/2024 (D.B.) Kareem Bux Brohi V/S Federation Of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPersons evading authorities in Saudi Arabia, are not "missing persons". Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Missing Person
563.Criminal Appeal 32/2024 (D.B.) Bahar Ali Pathan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAppellant was convicted and sentenced by trial Court. It is well settled that where mandatory provisions of Section 342 Cr.P.C have not been complied with, the conviction cannot be sustained and the proper course is to remand the matter to the trial Court for recording statement afresh and deciding the case thereafter in accordance with law, hence appeal is allowed and matter is remanded.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life)
564.Cr.Bail 28/2025 (D.B.) Shahmeer Khan Bugti V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
565.R.A (Civil Revision) 157/2024 (S.B.) Province of Sindh & others V/S Kamal Khan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
566.Const. P. 2195/2024 (D.B.) Rollins Industries (Pvt) Ltd V/S Learned SLAT and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 428Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
567.Const. P. 4470/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Siddiq V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 434At this stage, learned AAG points out that the case of the petitioners is covered under Notification dated 21.04.2024 and submits that earlier petitions have been dealt with and disposed of in light thereof. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks disposal of these petitions in terms of Notification dated 21.04.2024. Let the same be processed and decided in accordance with law within 30 days. By consent, both petitions are disposed of in the terms of negotiation without touching the merits of the case entitlement of the petitioner on the subject land.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
568.Const. P. 2194/2024 (D.B.) Rollins Industries (Pvt) Ltd V/S Learned SLAT and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 427Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
569.Const. P. 1621/2025 (D.B.) K-Electric Ltd V/S NIRC and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 450In the present case, while issuance of a charge sheet per se does not constitute unfair labour practice, the allegation of procedural impropriety and victimization if specifically pleaded and proved could bring the matter within the ambit of Section 31 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. Since the Commission has neither finally assumed jurisdiction conclusively nor granted final relief but has merely directed recording of evidence, the orders cannot be termed coram non judice at this stage, as portrayed by the petitioner. 14. In view of the settled legal position, the impugned orders being interlocutory and evidentiary in nature do not warrant interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The proper course would be to allow the Commission to determine, on the basis of evidence, whether the disciplinary proceedings amount to unfair labour practice. The petition, therefore, is dismissed along with pending application(s) as premature, subject to the petitioner???s right to assail the final order, if adverse, in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF ELECTION TRIBUNAL
570.Const. P. 3795/2025 (D.B.) Nazir Masih V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 436Learned counsel for KMC stated that all benefits have now been disbursed to Muhammad Javed Khan???s and Nazir Masih???s account. In such circumstances, the petitioner counsel seeks disposal of the petitions accordingly. Both petitions are disposed of in view of this Statement.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
571.Const. P. 3362/2021 (D.B.) Imdad Ali Soho V/S G.M (Thermal) PEPCO and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 451The delay in filing the grievance petition and subsequent appeal before the NIRC arose due to circumstances beyond his control and, therefore, falls within the scope of condonation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The impugned orders dated 13-10-2020 and 17-02-2021, which dismissed the Petitioner???s grievance petition and appeal solely on the technical ground of limitation without considering the merits of the case, are legally unsustainable and unjust. The period spent by the Petitioner in obtaining certified copies of earlier orders cannot be counted for the purposes of limitation. 10. In the interest of justice, procedural bars of limitation must yield to the Petitioner???s fundamental right to service and livelihood. Accordingly, the impugned orders are set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned Bench of the NIRC for a fresh decision on the merits within one month.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
572.Const. P. 2196/2024 (D.B.) Rollins Industries (Pvt) Ltd V/S Learned SLAT and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 429Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
573.Const. P. 4655/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Amir Hameed V/S Rollins Industries Pvt Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 426Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
574.Const. P. 4653/2024 (D.B.) Saqib V/S Rollins Industries Pvt Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 425Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
575.Const. P. 1942/2025 (D.B.) Sheeraz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 452The Court finds this approach to be both appropriate and in accordance with the law, ensuring that the petitioners??? grievances are addressed through the statutory mechanism without undermining the subjectivity and discretion of the interview process. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the direction that the memo of petition shall be treated as a Representation under Regulation 161, and the Chairman, Sindh Public Service Commission or Appellate committee shall decide the same strictly in accordance with law within fourteen (14) days. A copy of this Order along with memo of petition shall be forwarded and communicated to the Chairman, SPSC, for compliance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
576.Const. P. 1826/2025 (D.B.) M. Tariq Mansoor (Advocate) V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 421Despite opportunity, nothing has been brought on record by the Petitioner to controvert the stance of the Respondents in this regard. In the absence of any specific challenge to an action taken under the repealed Notification, this Court is not inclined to proceed on mere presumptions or conjectures. 10. Accordingly, the instant Petition, having served its purpose upon repeal of the impugned Notification dated 13.03.2025, is dismissed as having become infructuous, along with all pending applications. However, the Petitioner may seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law against any specific action taken under the repealed Notification.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
577.Const. P. 2351/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Javeed Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 435Learned counsel for KMC stated that all benefits have now been disbursed to Muhammad Javed Khan???s and Nazir Masih???s account. In such circumstances, the petitioner counsel seeks disposal of the petitions accordingly. Both petitions are disposed of in view of this Statement.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
578.Const. P. 4654/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Asim V/S Rollins Industries Pvt Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiAccordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity and warrants interference by this Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 17. Consequently, the Petitioners, having been unlawfully deprived of their livelihood due to an illegal termination subsequently found to be unsustainable in law, are entitled to reinstatement with full back benefits, including salary, increments, seniority and all other consequential service advantages, for the entire intervening period from the date of termination till their actual reinstatement. Resultantly, All petitions are disposed of along with all pending application(s), in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
579.Const. P. 830/2015 (D.B.) Shahid Muhammad Jalbani V/S Commissioner Larkana and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRegularization of service can only be under statute or policy.Read more
Matter:-Regular Service
580.Const. P. 1088/2025 (D.B.) Muharam Ali Shaikh V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaImplementation of disabled quota.Read more
Matter:-Disable Quota
581.H.C.A 51/2023 (D.B.) Syed Farrukh Ghani V/S Bank of Punjab and & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 433Dismissal Order received in Karachi, Courts in Karachi have jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
582.Const. P. 91/2026 (D.B.) Ghulam Qadir Abro V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 471Jurisdiction, function and powers of Wafaqi Mohtasib and Banking Mohtasib are defined.Read more
Matter:-DECIDE THE APPLICATION
583.Const. P. 5633/2021 (D.B.) Aijaz Ali Bhayo and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 407
Matter:-SERVICE
584.Const. P. 1333/2020 (D.B.) Riaz Jafar V/S The President / CEO PTCL & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 399selection gradeRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
585.Const. P. 1007/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Ashraf V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
586.Const. P. 942/2025 (D.B.) Kanbhu Khan V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
587.Const. P. 625/2025 (D.B.) Madad Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
588.Const. P. 58/2026 (D.B.) Nisar Ahmed Channo V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThe petitioner seeks direction for mutation of agricultural land. Constitutional petition is not maintainable and was dismissed in limineRead more
Matter:-Revenue
589.Const. P. 1207/2026 (D.B.) Baseer Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
590.Cr.Bail 27/2026 (S.B.) Sahil V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
591.Const. P. 181/2023 (D.B.) Ashraf Ali Bajkani & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetitioners seek release of their full salaries, payment of arrears, declaration against alleged illegal deductions, and other ancillary relief. Determination of the petitioners??? entitlement necessarily involves resolution of disputed and controversial questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution without recording evidence. Petition is dismissed as not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
592.Const. P. 311/2026 (D.B.) Ghulam Fareed V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
593.Const. P. 1245/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Younus Farooqui V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
594.Criminal Miscelleneous 19/2026 (S.B.) Sht. Walahyan V/S SSP Umerkot & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
595.Cr.Bail 302/2025 (S.B.) Lakhmir V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
596.Cr.Bail 33/2026 (S.B.) Akram V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
597.Const. P. 107/2026 (D.B.) Irshad Ali Mirani V/S Govt. of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaWrit petition for membership of press club not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-AWARD
598.Const. P. 1492/2011 (D.B.) Ghulam Shabir Gopang V/S P.O Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetitioner not entitled to regularization under any statute or policy. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Service
599.Const. P. 4722/2025 (D.B.) Sarfraz & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 431
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
600.Const. P. 1540/2025 (D.B.) Pentagon Fumigation Service V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 432inaction on the part of departmentRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
601.Const. P. 4880/2025 (D.B.) Syed Tahir Ali V/S KW & SC & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 398The promotion is the right of the employee since the date of accrualRead more
Matter:-CLAIM FOR PROMOTION
602.Cr.Bail 138/2025 (D.B.) Pawan Kumar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaSCNS Act. Foisting cannot be ruled out. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
603.Const. P. 111/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Asif & Mst. Fatima (Manisha) V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
604.I.T.R.A 192/2023 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S FINE ENTERPRISES TRADERS Sindh High Court, KarachiRetrospective effect of judicial interpretation of law; state as habitual litigant.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
605.Const. P. 543/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Mustaqeem V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
606.Const. P. 220/2026 (D.B.) Dost Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Ramzan Ordinance
607.Cr.Bail 10/2026 (S.B.) Hussain Bux V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
608.Const. P. 507/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Kaz Bano & Mohsin V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
609.Const. P. 1012/2023 (S.B.) A. Tahir Thr. Abbas Bandukwala Thr. Adnan Abbas V/S Xth ADJ, Karachi South and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 423Lastly, the findings recorded by the learned Appellate Court are findings of fact arrived at after remand, examination of the postman, and scrutiny of documentary evidence based on the cross-examination of the witness. In these circumstances, the authorities cited by learned counsel for the petitioners are distinguishable and do not advance the petitioners??? case. The conclusion of willful default recorded by the learned Appellate Court is based on proper appreciation of evidence and correct application of law. 19. The constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is extraordinary and discretionary, meant to correct orders passed in violation of law or without lawful authority. It does not extend to reappraisal of evidence or substitution of findings of fact recorded by the Courts below after proper appreciation of evidence, unless such findings of Appellate Court suffer from a jurisdictional defect, misreading, non-reading of material evidence, perversity, or patent illegality. Therefore, the petitioners were rightly held to be willful defaulters, attracting eviction under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. 20. Accordingly, the instant Constitutional Petitions, being devoid of merit, are dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
610.Const. P. 1011/2023 (S.B.) Ebrahim Abdul Ali Thr. Fatima Abbas V/S Xth ADJ, Karachi South and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 422Lastly, the findings recorded by the learned Appellate Court are findings of fact arrived at after remand, examination of the postman, and scrutiny of documentary evidence based on the cross-examination of the witness. In these circumstances, the authorities cited by learned counsel for the petitioners are distinguishable and do not advance the petitioners??? case. The conclusion of willful default recorded by the learned Appellate Court is based on proper appreciation of evidence and correct application of law. 19. The constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is extraordinary and discretionary, meant to correct orders passed in violation of law or without lawful authority. It does not extend to reappraisal of evidence or substitution of findings of fact recorded by the Courts below after proper appreciation of evidence, unless such findings of Appellate Court suffer from a jurisdictional defect, misreading, non-reading of material evidence, perversity, or patent illegality. Therefore, the petitioners were rightly held to be willful defaulters, attracting eviction under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. 20. Accordingly, the instant Constitutional Petitions, being devoid of merit, are dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
611.Const. P. 4849/2024 (D.B.) Late Freni Shahpur Shroff V/S Federation of Pakistan & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 439In view of the above and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any, with the direction that the Petitioners shall appear before the Grievance Redressal Committee constituted by the Karachi Port Trust within one week from today. Upon their appearance, the Grievance Redressal Committee shall afford the Petitioners a fair and meaningful opportunity of hearing, consider their reply and all supporting documents in accordance with law, and thereafter place its recommendations before the Competent Authority for a final decision strictly in accordance with law after observing due process. It is clarified that till the final decision by the Competent Authority, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioners in respect of the Subject Property. 5. The petition, along with listed application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SHOW CAUSE NOTICE
612.Const. P. 442/2021 (S.B.) Mst. Nimra and Another V/S IXth ADJ, Karachi East and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 440No jurisdictional error, illegality, perversity or misapplication of law has been pointed out in the impugned judgment which may justify interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The findings recorded by the learned appellate court represent a balanced and reasoned determination of the respective claims of the parties after proper appraisal of the evidence, and are thus prima facie immune from interference under Article 199 of the Constitution under such circumstances of the case. 17. Consequently, both constitutional petitions along with pending application(s) being devoid of merit are dismissed, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
613.Const. P. 621/2021 (S.B.) Zameer-ul-Islam S/o Qamar-ul-Islam V/S Nimra Anwaar and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 441No jurisdictional error, illegality, perversity or misapplication of law has been pointed out in the impugned judgment which may justify interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The findings recorded by the learned appellate court represent a balanced and reasoned determination of the respective claims of the parties after proper appraisal of the evidence, and are thus prima facie immune from interference under Article 199 of the Constitution under such circumstances of the case. 17. Consequently, both constitutional petitions along with pending application(s) being devoid of merit are dismissed, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
614.Cr.Bail 531/2025 (S.B.) Nazeer Shah Syed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAlleged abduction. Applicant implicated by supplementary statement. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
615.Const. P. 351/2025 (S.B.) Hazoor Bux Narejo V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTrial court directed to pass order on supplementary report.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
616.Const. P. 243/2025 (S.B.) Shakir Mehmood Shaikh V/S Govt of sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 468Against the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
617.Execution First Appeal 11/2025 (S.B.) Pak Oman Company Ltd V/S M/s Chase department Store & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 396Can a banking court enforce an interim decree against the defendant before the final decree under the FIO, 2001Read more
Matter:-IMPLEMENTATION OF DECREE
618.Const. P. 4923/2025 (D.B.) Ayesha Asif V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 466
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
619.Const. P. 899/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Naseer S/o Haji Muhammad Hussain V/S Muhammad Rahim Shaikh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 413rent controllers powers to adjudicate the claims of lawful claimant under section 22 SRPO in execution proceedingsRead more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
620.Judicial Companies Misc. 6/1990 (S.B.) Ali International Ltd......In Liquidation V/S Suparco Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 406Company Court cannot make declaration under section 326 of Companies Act.Read more
621.Const. P. 1370/2025 (S.B.) Hassan Ali V/S Tehseen Furqan Siddiqui & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
622.Criminal Miscelleneous 48/2026 (S.B.) Mian Bux Brohi V/S Nek Muhammad Brohi and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaIt is well settled that consideration for cancellation of bail are entirely different from those of granting bail. Impugned order of grant of bail does not suffer from any illegality or perversity. Application for cancellation of bail is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
623.Cr.Bail 19/2026 (S.B.) Mumtaz & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
624.Const. P. 893/2025 (S.B.) Bank Islami Pakistan Ltd. V/S XII ADJ, Karachi South & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
625.Const. P. 2082/2024 (D.B.) M. Tariq Mansoor Advocate V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 448In view of the above, the appointment of a Deputy Prime Minister under Notification No. 2-4/2012-Min. I dated 28th April 2024, and the subsequent SRO 2062(I)/2024 dated 18th December 2024, prima facie, seems to be a policy decision of the cabinet. However, since the Deputy Prime Minister is not currently a party to these proceedings, and inclusion of the same at this stage may alter the status of the present petition under Article 199 of the Constitution to issue the Writ of Mandamus or quo warranto when the petitioner was confronted with the legal position, intends to withdraw the petition with permission to file a fresh one. Be that as it may, without touching the merits of the case, the petition, along with pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, while granting the Petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition, which is subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law and without prejudice to the rights of the respondents.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
626.Const. P. 5476/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Imtiaz Khan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 449The petitioner is drawing monthly pension from HBL Branch regularly. As far as the commutation of Rs.1,412,813/- is required to be paid and in this regard a cheque of the said amount bearing No.25361610 dated 19,.02.2026 has already been issued in favour of the petitioner. 4. When confronted with the above position, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this petition on the statement filed by the counsel for the Respondent/KMC. 5. Since purpose of this petition has been served, the petition stands disposed of accordingly along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
627.Const. P. 1351/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Aqeel V/S Dr. Uzma Ghazanfar & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 390
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
628.Const. P. 362/2023 (S.B.) PTCL Islamabad V/S Islamuddin & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 459
Matter:-Payment/Wages
629.Const. P. 362/2025 (S.B.) Sajjad Ali Solangi V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurJustice of Peace cannot assume the function of Investigating Officer.Read more
Matter:-Harasment
630.Const. P. 3943/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Khalique Panhyar V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 446Consequently, the petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction to the competent authority of the Respondents to withdraw the aforesaid Notification and to reconsider the matter strictly in accordance with law, after affording a meaningful opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including the Petitioner. The authority shall decide the matter independently, on its own merits, without being influenced by any tentative observations made herein. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within one month from the date of receipt of this order.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
631.Const. P. 2700/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Kalique Panhyar V/S The Sect. Board of Investment & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 445The Competent Authority shall also examine the Petitioner???s grievance of discriminatory treatment vis-??-vis similarly placed officers in the light of Articles 25, 27 and 37 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and pass a reasoned and speaking order after affording a meaningful opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including the Petitioner. 10. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken independently, on its own merits, without being influenced by any tentative observations made herein or in earlier proceedings, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 11. The petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
632.Const. P. 4983/2025 (D.B.) M/s Sarim Burney Welfare Trust V/S Fed. of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 443In view of the above, both petitions are allowed and Respondent No.1 NADRA, in coordination with the concerned Union Councils and the Social Welfare Department, is directed to devise and implement a uniform and child-sensitive mechanism for the registration of orphaned and abandoned children of unknown parentage residing in registered orphanage institutions in the Province of Sindh, without insisting upon parental particulars, upon verification by the head of the institution in accordance with law and policy. Necessary steps shall also be taken to facilitate issuance of birth certificates and CNICs / Child Registration Certificates to such children within a reasonable time, so as to ensure that they are not deprived of their fundamental rights to legal identity, education, healthcare, and social protection. Compliance report in this regard shall be submitted before the MIT within a period of eight (08) weeks.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE
633.Const. P. 5500/2025 (D.B.) Legal Aid Society V/S NADRA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 444In view of the above, both petitions are allowed and Respondent No.1 NADRA, in coordination with the concerned Union Councils and the Social Welfare Department, is directed to devise and implement a uniform and child-sensitive mechanism for the registration of orphaned and abandoned children of unknown parentage residing in registered orphanage institutions in the Province of Sindh, without insisting upon parental particulars, upon verification by the head of the institution in accordance with law and policy. Necessary steps shall also be taken to facilitate issuance of birth certificates and CNICs / Child Registration Certificates to such children within a reasonable time, so as to ensure that they are not deprived of their fundamental rights to legal identity, education, healthcare, and social protection. Compliance report in this regard shall be submitted before the MIT within a period of eight (08) weeks.Read more
Matter:-CITIZENSHIP
634.Const. P. 3474/2024 (D.B.) Shoukat Ali Khawaja and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 385Pensionary benefits are vested/legal rights and cannot be curtailed through executive transfer or financial constraints. The denial of Revised Pay Scales 2017 and 2022 to PMTF retirees, while granting the same to employees of Heavy Mechanical Complex and Heavy Electrical Complex under State Engineering Corporation, amounts to discrimination in violation of Articles 9 and 25 of the Constitution. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in the following terms: i) The competent authority of PMTF is directed to grant the benefit of Revised Pay Scales 2017 and 2022, along with all admissible Adhoc Relief Allowances, to the Petitioners notionally from the respective dates of their enforcement by the Federal Government, policy decision. ii) Upon such notional fixation, competent authority, Respondents PMTF and SEC shall recalculate the pension and commutation benefits of the Petitioners based on the revised last pay drawn. iii) The State Engineering Corporation Management Pension Fund is also directed to release revised pensionary benefits, including arrears, to the Petitioners within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order, if not earlier paid. iv) Any outstanding arrears accruing on account of such revision shall also be paid to the Petitioners within the aforesaid period.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
635.Const. P. 1197/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman Soomro V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRule NisiRead more
Matter:-Rule Nisi
636.Const. P. 31/2026 (D.B.) Mst Son pari & Another V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaQuashmentRead more
Matter:-Quashement of F.I.R.
637.Const. P. 1309/2025 (D.B.) Mujahid Ali Soomro V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRegularization can only be under statute or policyRead more
Matter:-Regular Service
638.Const. P. 1400/2025 (S.B.) M/s. S.S. Enterprises V/S Muhammad Ahmed Ahsan Ullah & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 370, 2026 SHC KHI 372For the foregoing reasons, it is held that the First Rent Appeal was maintainable; that consolidation of a civil suit for specific performance with a rent application under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 is neither contemplated nor permissible in law. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
639.Const. P. 145/2025 (S.B.) Aqsa V/S Irfan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 678, 2026 SHC MPK 712???CHILD RIGHTS. EFFECT OF PARENTAL DISPUTES ON CHILDREN. CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN. UN CONVENTION ON RIGHTS OF CHILD. EU???s PRINCIPLES OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITES. GUARDIAN & WARDS ACT. ??? Comprehensive Interim Meeting Schedule, between minors and non-custodial parent. ??? Studies confirm that in parental conflicts, which are not resolved privately and within a shorter period, the children suffer psychological distress, with increased risk of developing fear, anxiety, sadness, depression, insecurity, instability, emotional dysregulation, mood swings and impulsivity. ??? For expeditious disposal of family disputes, and to curtail unnecessary litigation in family disputes, writ jurisdiction under Article 199 may not be exercised routinely, since the legislature. ??? Need for harmonisation and transformation of child-related laws with the United Nation???s Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 [CRC], ??? while dealing with child-related laws, a fundamental shift in approach is needed, from ???welfare of the child??? to ???rights of the child???. ??? Section 12 of the Guardian & Wards Act needs to be regulated and formalised. ??? EU has also introduced 39 responsibilities of parents in its ???Principles of Parental Responsibilities???.Read more
640.Const. P. 313/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Shabbir V/S Syed Hanif Shah & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 369, 2026 SHC KHI 371It is a settled principle of law that the landlord is the best judge of his personal bona fide requirement, and neither the tenant nor the Court can dictate how and in what manner the landlord should utilize his property, so long as such requirement is genuine. No illegality or perversity has been pointed out in the judgment of the appellate Court. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
641.Const. P. 318/2026 (D.B.) Pawar Dino V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 496
Matter:-Against Notificiation
642.Const. P. 5773/2025 (D.B.) Awab Alvi V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 401
Matter:-Removing the Name from PNIL
643.Cr.Bail 3216/2025 (S.B.) MAAZ ALI S/O ISHRAT ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
644.Cr.Bail 129/2025 (D.B.) Ali Bux and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPrima facie, it appears the allegations against the present applicants are general in nature and no specific role of causing injury attributed to them. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
645.Cr.Bail 125/2025 (D.B.) Gul Hassan Brohi and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPrima facie, it appears the allegations against the present applicants are general in nature and no specific role of causing injury attributed to them. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
646.Const. P. 276/2026 (D.B.) Aamir Augustin V/S Diocese of Hyd The Secretary Revenue & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadPrivate employment disputes are not amenable to writ jurisdiction, remedies lie exclusively before the civil court.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
647.Cr.Bail 413/2025 (S.B.) Altaf V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
648.Cr.Bail 361/2026 (S.B.) ZOHAIB AZAM S/O MUHAMMAD AZAM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
649.Const. P. 6509/2019 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Hussain Hashmi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 340It is clarified that in case of any resistance or obstruction by the occupants or any person claiming through respondents Nos. 4, 5 & 6, the law enforcement agencies shall take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law. 8. With these directions, the instant petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
650.Const. P. 7507/2021 (D.B.) Mst Uzma Aamir V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 386Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 30.04.2015 is set aside, and the Petitioner shall be deemed to have continued in service as a regular employee of Jinnah University for Women with continuity of service up to the age of superannuation, i.e., 60 years, until and unless she is subject to any disciplinary proceedings, if any. The Respondents are directed to restore all withheld annual increments and to release the outstanding salary payable to the Petitioner from 01.06.2020 onwards, along with all ancillary benefits, within a period of two months from receipt of this order.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
651.Const. P. 4488/2025 (D.B.) Manzoor Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 368It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
652.Const. P. 6024/2023 (D.B.) Khaliq uz Zaman V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 362It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
653.Const. P. 6025/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Arif Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 363It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
654.Const. P. 4491/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Javeria Mobashir V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 365It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
655.Const. P. 4493/2025 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Sohail V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 367It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
656.Const. P. 5335/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 378In light of the foregoing discussion, we hold that the Respondent, i.e., the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board, is under a legal as well as constitutional obligation to ensure the regular supply of potable water to the affected locality through a properly maintained and functional pipeline system in accordance with its statutory mandate under the Sindh Water & Sewerage Board Act, 1996. The Respondent/Karachi Water & Sewerage Board is directed to take all necessary measures for the replacement and/or rehabilitation of the damaged and corroded transmission and distribution pipelines in Warsia Colony, Orangi Town, Karachi, either from its own resources or by submitting the requisite development scheme to the Government of Sindh for its inclusion in the Annual Development Programme (ADP). Until the development works are completed and a regular piped water supply is restored, the Respondent shall ensure the provision of a weekly water tanker of 1,000 gallons to the Petitioner as well as other similarly placed residents of the affected area. Furthermore, the Respondent-Board shall adopt effective administrative and regulatory measures to discourage and prevent the illegal extraction, pilferage, and unauthorized sale of water by tanker operators within its jurisdiction. All concerned law enforcement agencies, including the local administration, are hereby directed to extend full cooperation and assistance to the Respondent-Board in ensuring equitable distribution of water and in taking action against unauthorized hydrants and illegal water tankers strictly in accordance with law. 12. Accordingly, the instant Petition is allowed in the above terms with directions to the Respondent to ensure compliance in letter and spirit to safeguard the fundamental rights of the Petitioner and other residents of the locality.Read more
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
657.Const. P. 5344/2025 (D.B.) Saleem Akhter V/S Secretary Finance Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 364It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
658.Const. P. 1701/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Maliha Muhammad Ali Hasan Patel V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 381The ends of justice would therefore be met by directing a change of supervisor strictly in accordance with CPSP regulations, without penalizing the Petitioner for circumstances not established through lawful proceedings. 9. Consequently, the petition is disposed of in the following terms: 1. The Respondents are directed to restore the Petitioner???s training status forthwith and permit her to continue and complete her FCPS-II (Internal Medicine) residency programme at Abbasi Shaheed Hospital. 2. The hospital administration shall, within a reasonable period, process and finalize the change of supervisor in accordance with the applicable rules and guidelines of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, ensuring transparency and due process. 3. CPSP shall not raise any technical objection on account of the intervening dispute and shall facilitate the Petitioner in completing her remaining training period, subject to fulfillment of academic requirements. 4. The Petitioner shall be allowed to complete her subject course without hindrance, and no coercive or punitive action shall be taken against her except strictly in accordance with law and after due process. 5. In case any allegation of misconduct is to be pursued, the same shall be proceeded with through a proper show-cause notice and reasoned order, affording full opportunity of hearing.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
659.Const. P. 4492/2025 (D.B.) Syed Obaid Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 366It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
660.Const. P. 815/2023 (D.B.) Qazi Muhammad Abdul Qadir V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 361It is also well-settled that the financial hardship of a public authority cannot override constitutional and statutory obligations towards its retired employees. Failure to implement the lawful orders of this Court prima facie attracts the provisions of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, rendering the delinquent officers liable for contempt of Court. 5. However, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement dues to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. In case of failure, the petitioners shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the responsible officers, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these petitions, along with all pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
661.Const. P. 5015/2025 (D.B.) Kiran Chanzeb & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 373Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with directions to the petitioners to approach the competent/concerned NADRA office for correction of the marital status of the deceased spouse, and the respondent Authority is also directed to process the case of the minor petitioner for issuance of Juvenile Card expeditiously and without creating any bottlenecks.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
662.Const. P. 650/2021 (D.B.) Sikandar Ali Sial and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 375After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that, pursuant to the Order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan dated 21.06.2012, passed in C.P. No. 2523 of 2011, the Petitioners were directed to avail the remedy before the Court of competent jurisdiction and intend to do so. However, counsel for the Respondent opposed this stance on the ground that a Suit filed by the Petitioners is already pending adjudication. Be that as it may, if no such remedy has been availed, the Petitioners may do so, or seek impleadment in the Suit already filed by their colleagues for decision on merits, as the issue of remaining GHS payment requires evidence which cannot be examined under Article 199 of the Constitution, preferably within three months, as considerable time has elapsed since 2012. 6. Without touching the merits of the case, this petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
663.Const. P. 147/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Rukhsana Perveen V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCompetent authority for changing police investigatorRead more
Matter:-CHANGE OF INVESTIGATION
664.Const. P. 1265/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Arif V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 415High Court cannot interfere into inquiry proceedings of NABRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ENQUIRY
665.Cr.Bail 370/2025 (S.B.) Azam @ Astoo & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
666.Cr.Bail 55/2026 (S.B.) Shahmir V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
667.Cr.Bail 392/2025 (S.B.) Dharmoon & others V/S The State & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
668.Cr.Bail 53/2026 (S.B.) Ali Ahmed & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
669.Const. P. 5493/2025 (D.B.) Amir V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachithere is no distinction in a professional engineer and registered engineerRead more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
670.Const. P. 972/2025 (D.B.) Ali Anwer Shah & other V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
671.Cr.Bail 401/2025 (S.B.) Sikander V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
672.Cr.Bail 29/2026 (S.B.) Naeem Shah Pathan & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
673.Const. P. 76/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya & another V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
674.Const. P. 744/2025 (D.B.) Nazirullah Mehsood Advocate V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 382To ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance with the law, this Court with the consent of the parties present in Court considers it appropriate to appoint the Nazir of this Court as Commissioner to supervise the elections of the President and the Managing Committee in accordance with the society???s bylaws and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020. The Registrar is directed to provide complete society records to the Commissioner for verification and preparation of a valid voters??? list. The elections shall be conducted within two months or as per direction of the Nazir, after which the records shall be handed over to the newly elected management. All parties are directed to fully cooperate and refrain from interfering with the election process. The Commissioner???s fee of Rs. 300,000 shall be paid in advance by the society from its funds. The Commissioner is also empowered to hear and decide all legitimate questions or objections related to the election process including voter lists, and genuine plot owners/members, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The Commissioner is empowered to take all necessary steps for conducting the election in accordance with law. 9. The petitions along with all pending application(s) are disposed of accordinglyRead more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
675.H.C.A 451/2024 (D.B.) M/s. Industrial Managment and Investment Co. Ltd V/S Port Qasim Authority Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 337Directions given to Port Qasim Authority.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
676.Const. P. 572/2025 (D.B.) Khadim Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 376In the present case, not only has the Petitioner been acquitted prior to such period, but no adverse material has been brought on record to demonstrate that the acquittal was not honorable or that the Petitioner suffers from any disqualification rendering him unsuitable for police service. Thus, withholding issuance of appointment letter in the peculiar facts of the case is neither supported by law nor by the governing recruitment policy and is violative of the Petitioner???s vested legal right accrued pursuant to his lawful recommendation for appointment by the SPSC. 9. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to implement the recommendation of the SPSC and issue offer letter to the Petitioner, subject to verification of his credentials an medical test in accordance with law if he is found fit for the subject post. However, the aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks. In the present case, not only has the Petitioner been acquitted prior to such period, but no adverse material has been brought on record to demonstrate that the acquittal was not honorable or that the Petitioner suffers from any disqualification rendering him unsuitable for police service. Thus, withholding issuance of appointment letter in the peculiar facts of the case is neither supported by law nor by the governing recruitment policy and is violative of the Petitioner???s vested legal right accrued pursuant to his lawful recommendation for appointment by the SPSC. 9. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to implement the recommendation of the SPSC and issue offer letter to the Petitioner, subject to verification of his credentials an medical test in accordance with law if he is found fit for the subject post. However, the aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
677.Const. P. 2509/2025 (D.B.) Ali Asghar & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 388In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it would meet the ends of justice if the matter relating to the interview performance of the petitioners is reconsidered by the competent authority, namely the office of the Sindh Police, through the Inspector General of Police, Sindh. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions: a) The rejection of the petitioners??? candidature based on the aforesaid criminal case, which has already been disposed of in their acquittal, is declared to be unlawful and of no legal that effect. b) The Inspector General of Police, Sindh, is directed to cause re-interview of the petitioners through a duly constituted Recruitment Committee or DIGP of good reputation so nominated by the IGP Sindh strictly in accordance with the Sindh Police Recruitment Policy-2022. c) In case the petitioners are found to have secured the minimum qualifying marks and are otherwise suitable for appointment, to the subject post, their candidature shall be considered afresh on merit for the post of Police Constable (BPS-07) in District Sujawal.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
678.Const. P. 1922/2025 (D.B.) Qadeer Ahmed & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 379Accordingly, in view of the law laid down by this Court in the judgment reported as 2023 PLC (CS) 447, as affirmed by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan, these petitions are disposed of along with pending applications. i. The Respondents are directed to treat the Petitioners at par with their colleagues who were regularized pursuant to the aforesaid judgment and to regularize their services as Data Processing Assistants (BS-14) from the date of their initial appointment, subject to fulfillment of codal formalities; ii. The Respondents are further directed not to subject the Petitioners to any fresh or selective process for regularization; iii. The Respondents shall ensure that the salaries and other admissible benefits payable to the Petitioners are released forthwith in accordance with law if not earlier released; iv. Till issuance of the requisite notification regarding regularization, the services of the Petitioners shall not be terminated or dispensed with except in accordance with law. 12. It is expected from the respondents that they will implement the ratio of the judgment passed by this court reported in 2023 PLC (C.S) 447 in its letter and sprit without fail.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE / REGULARIZATION
679.Const. P. 5566/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Humayyun Bakht V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 377It is well settled that inclusion of a person???s name in the PNIL without any legal basis or due process violated Article 15 and other fundamental rights, and keeping the name of petitioner on the PNIL has no statutory backing and cannot override constitutional freedoms. Similarly, when the procedure lacked due process and cogent legal justification, the freedom of movement cannot be curtailed arbitrarily and must adhere to statutory safeguards as authorities must provide written reasons and afford an affected person a meaningful opportunity to be heard before placing names on restrictive lists, failing which such acts violate fundamental rights and are liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a declaration that the respondents are duty bound to remove the petitioner???s name from the PNIL and restore his right to travel unless a lawful basis supported by due process and clear legal authority is shown.Read more
Matter:-Removing the Name from PNIL
680.Const. P. 2736/2024 (D.B.) Farhan Sheikh & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 380Accordingly, in view of the law laid down by this Court in the judgment reported as 2023 PLC (CS) 447, as affirmed by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan, these petitions are disposed of along with pending applications. i. The Respondents are directed to treat the Petitioners at par with their colleagues who were regularized pursuant to the aforesaid judgment and to regularize their services as Data Processing Assistants (BS-14) from the date of their initial appointment, subject to fulfillment of codal formalities; ii. The Respondents are further directed not to subject the Petitioners to any fresh or selective process for regularization; iii. The Respondents shall ensure that the salaries and other admissible benefits payable to the Petitioners are released forthwith in accordance with law if not earlier released; iv. Till issuance of the requisite notification regarding regularization, the services of the Petitioners shall not be terminated or dispensed with except in accordance with law. 12. It is expected from the respondents that they will implement the ratio of the judgment passed by this court reported in 2023 PLC (C.S) 447 in its letter and sprit without fail.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
681.Const. P. 194/2026 (D.B.) Ruqia Taufeeq Mohiuddin V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 333In view of the above, it is held that Respondent No.2 has no legal authority, statutory mandate, or jurisdiction to interfere in the affairs of Respondent No.3 Society, including but not limited to deployment of private guards, regulation of access, collection of maintenance charges, or management of funds from residents. Such interference, being without lawful sanction, is illegal and is hereby required to be halted forthwith. 12. Accordingly, the competent authorities are directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law to ensure that Respondent No.2 ceases to exercise any administrative or financial control within the limits of Respondent No.3 Society, and to safeguard the lawful governance framework envisaged under the applicable cooperative laws. 13. The Petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
682.Const. P. 2243/2024 (D.B.) Quetta Town CHS Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 383To ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance with the law, this Court with the consent of the parties present in Court considers it appropriate to appoint the Nazir of this Court as Commissioner to supervise the elections of the President and the Managing Committee in accordance with the society???s bylaws and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020. The Registrar is directed to provide complete society records to the Commissioner for verification and preparation of a valid voters??? list. The elections shall be conducted within two months or as per direction of the Nazir, after which the records shall be handed over to the newly elected management. All parties are directed to fully cooperate and refrain from interfering with the election process. The Commissioner???s fee of Rs. 300,000 shall be paid in advance by the society from its funds. The Commissioner is also empowered to hear and decide all legitimate questions or objections related to the election process including voter lists, and genuine plot owners/members, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The Commissioner is empowered to take all necessary steps for conducting the election in accordance with law. 9. The petitions along with all pending application(s) are disposed of accordinglyRead more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
683.Const. P. 1575/2025 (D.B.) Shabana Begum and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 348Accordingly, the respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioners??? claim under the Prime Minister???s Assistance Package and pass a reasoned order after hearing them within 60 days. If found entitled, the amount shall be released promptly, in line with payments already made to other similarly placed pensioners, without any discrimination. 8. With these directions, the instant petition stands disposed of along with pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-BACK BENEFIT
684.Const. P. 3591/2025 (D.B.) Sameer V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 359Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh, to conduct a fair, transparent, and impartial enquiry into the subject land, examine the relevant revenue record, including Village Form-II and Village Form-VII-B entries, and determine the lawful entitlement of the parties strictly in accordance with law. The Senior Member shall decide the matter after hearing all stakeholders and pass a reasoned order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Till such time, status quo with regard to the subject property shall be maintained, and the Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh, shall ensure protective custody of the land so as to safeguard the rights of the parties during the pendency of enquiry. 8. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
685.Const. P. 374/2025 (D.B.) Nazirullah Mehsood V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 384To ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance with the law, this Court with the consent of the parties present in Court considers it appropriate to appoint the Nazir of this Court as Commissioner to supervise the elections of the President and the Managing Committee in accordance with the society???s bylaws and the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020. The Registrar is directed to provide complete society records to the Commissioner for verification and preparation of a valid voters??? list. The elections shall be conducted within two months or as per direction of the Nazir, after which the records shall be handed over to the newly elected management. All parties are directed to fully cooperate and refrain from interfering with the election process. The Commissioner???s fee of Rs. 300,000 shall be paid in advance by the society from its funds. The Commissioner is also empowered to hear and decide all legitimate questions or objections related to the election process including voter lists, and genuine plot owners/members, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The Commissioner is empowered to take all necessary steps for conducting the election in accordance with law. 9. The petitions along with all pending application(s) are disposed of accordinglyRead more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
686.Const. P. 330/2014 (D.B.) Altaf Hussain Gad and others V/S PO Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetitioners not entitled to regularization under any statute or policy. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Regular Service
687.Const. P. 14/2026 (D.B.) Ashraf Ali Shah & Others V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetitioners not entitled to regularization under any statute or policy. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Regular Service
688.Const. P. 128/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Aarab Chandio & Ors V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetitioners not entitled to regularization under any statute or policy. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Regular Service
689.Const. P. 4039/2023 (D.B.) Bheru Lal V/S PTCL & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 330
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
690.Const. P. 2945/2025 (D.B.) Syeda Zareen Naz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
691.Const. P. 272/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Aslam V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadA notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. is not harassment, writ jurisdiction cannot pre-empt inquiries or adjudicate disputed allegations of misconduct.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
692.Const. P. 275/2026 (D.B.) Shahbaz Khan and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
693.Const. P. 274/2026 (D.B.) Darya Khan Laghari V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
694.Const. P. 5453/2025 (D.B.) M/s. Suleman Roshan Medical Collage Pvt Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ADMISSION MATTER
695.Const. P. 73/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Samina & another V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
696.Const. P. 224/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shahid V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadMedico-legal findings cannot be quashed nor a Super Medical Board constituted in writ jurisdiction; disputed injuries require evidentiary determination before competent forums.Read more
Matter:-Against Order/Cr.Misc.A
697.Cr.Bail 276/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Hassan & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
698.Const. P. 690/2025 (S.B.) M/s. Khas Trading Through Attorney M. Rafiq Nizami V/S Habib Ismail Lotia & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 356In view of the foregoing and after arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the parties have mutually agreed to the disposal of the instant petition on the undertaking that the Petitioner/Tenant shall vacate the demised premises on or before 30.06.2026, subject to payment of usual rend. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the instant Constitutional Petition stands disposed of in the above terms, with the direction that the Petitioner shall hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the demised premises to the Respondents within the stipulated period, failing which the Respondents shall be at liberty to seek enforcement of this order in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
699.Const. P. 2668/2024 (D.B.) SBP Banking Services Corp V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 345The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL case (2020 PLC 153), Moulvi Aziz-ur-Rehman v. Ahmad Khan (2004 SCMR 1622), and Pak Telecom Mobile Limited v. Muhammad Atif Bilal (2024 SCMR 719) has consistently held that workers performing permanent duties under an establishment cannot be deprived of their rights based on a contractor arrangement. Similarly, the objection regarding NIRC???s jurisdiction is without merit. SBP-BSC is a trans-provincial, federal establishment, and the grievance petition was properly entertained under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, as discussed supra. 11. In view of the above, both Constitutional Petitions are dismissed. The impugned orders of the Single and Full Bench of NIRC are hereby maintained. However, with no order as to costs. JUDGERead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
700.Const. P. 986/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Kaleem Khan V/S Moiz Shahzad & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 347In view of the above, it is concluded that the Petitioner in CP No. D-5248/2025 has undertaken all necessary remedial measures to restore the Subject Property to its original residential use in accordance with the sanctioned building plan and prevailing law, without altering the lawful structure or usage. The undertaking includes completing these measures within three (3) weeks from the date of the order, after which the property shall be de-sealed. 13. Accordingly, in light of the Petitioner???s statement in CP No. D-5248/2025 and compliance in time, both the Petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case of breach the undertaking the law will take its own course .Read more
Matter:-AGAINST CONVERSION OF PLOT
701.Const. P. 2667/2024 (D.B.) State Bank of Pakistan V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 344The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL case (2020 PLC 153), Moulvi Aziz-ur-Rehman v. Ahmad Khan (2004 SCMR 1622), and Pak Telecom Mobile Limited v. Muhammad Atif Bilal (2024 SCMR 719) has consistently held that workers performing permanent duties under an establishment cannot be deprived of their rights based on a contractor arrangement. Similarly, the objection regarding NIRC???s jurisdiction is without merit. SBP-BSC is a trans-provincial, federal establishment, and the grievance petition was properly entertained under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, as discussed supra. 11. In view of the above, both Constitutional Petitions are dismissed. The impugned orders of the Single and Full Bench of NIRC are hereby maintained. However, with no order as to costs. JUDGERead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
702.Const. P. 803/2026 (D.B.) Faisal Hameed V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 353However, it is made clear that the official Respondents shall ensure that no such hazardous or dangerous material is stored within any residential area in future. In case any such inflammable material is found, the concerned authorities, in collaboration with the owner of the material, shall take immediate steps to have the same removed to a safe location so as to avert any untoward incident. The Inspector General of Police, Sindh, along with the local administration, shall also ensure that all necessary precautionary and preventive measures are undertaken in this regard to safeguard public life and property. This direction shall be strictly complied with by all concerned; failing which, appropriate proceedings shall be initiated against the delinquent officials in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution. 13. The Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
703.Const. P. 5248/2025 (D.B.) Moiz Shahzad V/S Federation of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 346In view of the above, it is concluded that the Petitioner in CP No. D-5248/2025 has undertaken all necessary remedial measures to restore the Subject Property to its original residential use in accordance with the sanctioned building plan and prevailing law, without altering the lawful structure or usage. The undertaking includes completing these measures within three (3) weeks from the date of the order, after which the property shall be de-sealed. 13. Accordingly, in light of the Petitioner???s statement in CP No. D-5248/2025 and compliance in time, both the Petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case of breach the undertaking the law will take its own course .Read more
Matter:-DE-SEAL
704.Const. P. 5071/2025 (D.B.) Taj Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 349In the event that the Petitioner???s credentials are found to be correct and in order, the competent authority shall pass an appropriate speaking order within a period of two (02) weeks, after affording the Petitioner an opportunity of meaningful hearing, in terms of the directions already issued by this Court in C.P. No. D-3964/2013. 9. Without touching the merits of the case, this petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
705.Const. P. 556/2026 (D.B.) Sarang & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 350In view of the above, the petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. 14. In light of the foregoing, the instant petition challenging the seniority list dated 02.01.2026 is dismissed on the grounds of maintainability. The Petitioners, if so advised, are to seek any grievance regarding seniority before the competent Service Tribunal as provided under Article 212 of the Constitution. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST PROMOTION
706.Const. P. 709/2024 (S.B.) Mrs. Pinky Perwani Thr. Attorney Vikram V/S Additional Controller of Rent Clifton Cant. & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 374It is a settled principle that the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship is a jurisdictional requirement for a Rent Controller. If such a relationship is specifically denied, the Rent Controller must determine it as a preliminary issue before assuming jurisdiction. In its absence, any order, including a tentative rent order, would be subject to final determination on the subject issue. 7. In the present case, the learned Rent Controller has not examined whether a landlord-tenant relationship exists between the parties. 8. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, the impugned tentative rent order shall remain in abeyance. The learned Rent Controller is directed to first frame and decide the preliminary issue regarding the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship strictly in accordance with law before proceeding further. 9. The petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in these terms.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
707.Const. P. 136/2026 (D.B.) Shoaib Ahmed Butt V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 360Accordingly, it is held that the Respondents may proceed in accordance with law regarding the subject accommodation if the same is not allocable to the Petitioner under the Accommodation Policy applicable to his service cadre; However, the Petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the presently occupied quarter except after being considered for and, if available, allotted alternate official accommodation commensurate with his entitlement under the relevant policy; In case no such alternate accommodation is presently available, the Petitioner shall be allowed reasonable time/three months to retain possession of the subject premises until suitable accommodation is provided in accordance with the rule and /or he may obtain private accommodation in the intervening period, which is subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. however this observation is tentative and shall not prejudice the case of either party. 11. Without touching the merits of the case, the captioned Petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ACCOMODATION
708.Cr.Bail 11/2026 (S.B.) Ghulam Mohammad @ Yaseen Bughio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaOffence under Section 4 & 5 of FERA, 1947 does not fall in prohibitory clause. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
709.Const. P. 631/2025 (S.B.) Malik Muhammad Zubair Thr Attorney Malik M Zubair V/S Jinnah Cooperative Housing Society & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 314Findings concurrently recorded by the learned lower fora cannot be disturbed in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
710.Const. P. 2013/2025 (D.B.) Shabbir Jokhia & another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 313Remedy available. GRC.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
711.Const. P. 923/2025 (S.B.) Amna Jatoi V/S Jahanzaib Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 328the entries relating to dower in Nikahnama--the wife shall return the dower amonunt if she dissolves the marriage on the ground of KhulaRead more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
712.Const. P. 1228/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Ghaffar S/o Muhammad Ismail V/S Mustafa and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 308
Matter:-RENT MATTER
713.Const. P. 711/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Afraz and Others V/S Muhammad Yousuf and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 315Writ jurisdiction is not amenable for de novo appreciation of evidence.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
714.Const. P. 104/2026 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROTECTION
715.Const. P. 1033/2025 (S.B.) Amna Jatoi V/S Jehanzeb Khan Shahani Sindh High Court, Karachimaintenance allowance of minors with regard to educationRead more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
716.Cr.Bail 384/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Majeed alias Maju V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
717.Const. P. 281/2025 (S.B.) Dr. Ahson Qavi Siddiqi Thr: Authroized Officer V/S Abdul Rab Shaikh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRent matter.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
718.Cr.Bail 383/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Majeed alias Maju V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
719.Cr.Bail 13/2026 (S.B.) Khursheed & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
720.Const. P. 109/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Ismail Panhwar V/S Learned District Judge Dadu and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
721.Const. P. 20/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zainab and others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
722.Const. P. 242/2025 (S.B.) Dr. Ahson Qavi Siddiqi Thr: Authroized Officer V/S Abdul Rab Shaikh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRent matter.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
723.Cr.Bail 326/2025 (S.B.) Zubair V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
724.Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 355Pleas of unfair labor practice & individual grievance under IRA, 2012. Referee opinion.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
725.Const. P. 792/2026 (D.B.) Justice (R) Aftab Ahmed V/S Government of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 352It is well settled that judicial review does not extend to re-evaluating executive policy decisions unless such decisions are arbitrary, without lawful authority, or offend fundamental rights. Accordingly, in the absence of any demonstrable violation of Articles 4, 9, 10-A, 25, or 175(3) of the Constitution, no case for interference is made out to invoke constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 23. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned Notification dated 06.02.2026 does not suffer from any legal infirmity. Accordingly, the instant Constitutional Petition, being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed along with any pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
726.Const. P. 1593/2020 (D.B.) Tariq Khan & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 343It is, however, clarified that the Committee shall summon all candidates who have availed appointments under the said quota, obtain their replies, and after affording them an opportunity of meaningful hearing, decide the matter and make appropriate recommendations to the competent authority in accordance with law and the law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of three (03) months positively, and a compliance report shall thereafter be submitted before this Court through MIT-II for its perusal. 10. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this petition stands disposed of accordingly. The office is directed to communicate this order to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, and Mr. Azad Khan, Additional Inspector General of Police, Karachi, via email and WhatsApp for immediate compliance.Read more
Matter:-SHAHEED QUOTA
727.R.A (Civil Revision) 143/2025 (S.B.) M/s IS Builders & Developers & Others V/S Ammar Shahid & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 307In a summary suit while determining the quantum of the solvent security the trial Court should include claim based on negotiable instrument and exclude claim for settlement of accounts and damages.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
728.Const. P. 4039/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Jawed Iqbal & Shunaid Qureshi V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 351It is a settled principle of law that where a special statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal of grievances and regulation of matters falling within its domain, the same must be resorted to before invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Since the Act ibid envisages the constitution of a Committee under Section 8 thereof to examine and grant approval in respect of any alteration, renovation, or development concerning a protected heritage property, the Petitioners are required to approach the said forum for appropriate permission, strictly in accordance with law and just upon approach the committee shall take final decision in accordance with law within reasonable time. 9. Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the case, the instant Petition along with pending application(s), is disposed of with the direction that the Petitioners may avail the remedy available under the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act, 1994 and other applicable laws, whereafter any development activity shall be subject to approval granted by the competent authority in terms of the said Act.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
729.Const. P. 1618/2024 (D.B.) M/s SSGC V/S Mr. Bakht Zada Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 312complainant not examined during inquiry proceedingsRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
730.Const. P. 771/2023 (D.B.) Amjad Ali and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 215SPSC cannot order for reallocation of seats once the recommended candidates join serviceRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
731.Const. P. 400/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Saleem & another V/S Mst.Shakeela Begum & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 311Revision dismissed as time???barred; Section 12(2) decree???setting aside upheld since special limitation under Section 115 CPC excludes condonation.Read more
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
732.Const. P. 192/2025 (S.B.) Shah Nawaz V/S Shabir Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRent matter.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
733.Const. P. 191/2025 (S.B.) Shah Nawaz Memon V/S Imtiaz Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRent matter.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
734.Const. P. 190/2025 (S.B.) Shah Nawaz V/S Zahid Hussain & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRent matter.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
735.Const. P. 189/2025 (S.B.) Shah Nawaz & Another V/S Shabir Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRent matter.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
736.Const. P. 188/2025 (S.B.) Shah Nawaz Memon V/S Shabir Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRent Matter.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
737.Const. P. 497/2025 (S.B.) Sikander V/S Mst. Sana Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadConcurrent family court findings on custody, maintenance and dowry are binding in writ jurisdiction; Article 199 cannot be used as a second appeal.Read more
Matter:-Family
738.Const. P. 496/2025 (S.B.) Sikander Ali V/S Mst Sana Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadConcurrent family court findings on custody, maintenance and dowry are binding in writ jurisdiction; Article 199 cannot be used as a second appeal.Read more
Matter:-Family
739.Const. P. 7/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Saleem Lakho V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Arrest of Accused
740.Const. P. 367/2025 (S.B.) Allah Jiwayo Chachar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Harasment
741.Const. P. 115/2026 (S.B.) Akbar Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTenant???s plea of purchase cannot defeat eviction, concurrent findings on tenancy and bona fide need bind in writ jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
742.Const. P. 1976/2024 (D.B.) Majlis-Tib-Wa-Adab Pakistan V/S Sect: Auqaf and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 223Accordingly, as the petitioner has failed to establish a lawful, subsisting right in the property, and the alleged allotment appears prima facie without jurisdiction and contrary to the public purpose attached to the land, the petition is devoid of merit. 9. Consequently, the petition along with pending application(s) stands dismissed.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
743.Const. P. 5782/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Ibrahim & others V/S DC Malir & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 227Based on the foregoing settled principles, the Petitioners were prima facie necessary parties to the suit under Order 1, Rule 10(2), CPC. The learned Tribunal???s order dismissing their application was therefore unsustainable in law. 15. Accordingly, the Impugned Order dated 15.11.2025 is set aside. The Petitioners shall be impleaded as parties in Suit No.07 of 2024 before the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal, Karachi, and the proceedings shall continue in accordance with law within a reasonable time period. 16. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
744.Const. P. 490/2026 (D.B.) Azhar Ali Shaikh & others V/S Vth Sr.Civil Judge & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 232The Respondents filed a counter affidavit stating that the interim order has merged into the final impugned order and agreed that the suit be decided within one month. 5. The learned AAG also supported expeditious disposal. 6. By consent of parties, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to conclude the suit within one month. In the meantime, status quo shall be maintained.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
745.Const. P. 2418/2017 (D.B.) S.M. Kaleem Makki V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 342In view of the above legal position, we are of the considered opinion that the withdrawal of the Petitioner???s absorption in the PSS cadre was lawful and in compliance with the judgment of the Supreme Court. The promotion to BPS-20, being consequential to such absorption, could not survive after the absorption was declared void ab initio. The Petitioner cannot claim a vested or accrued right in BPS-20 in the absence of a lawful substantive position in that cadre or under the recruitment rules. The impugned notification treating the Petitioner as a BPS-19 officer does not suffer from illegality or lack of lawful authority. 15. Accordingly, the Constitutional Petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed along with pending application(s), with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
746.Const. P. 2157/2008 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Shaikh. V/S Prov. of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 209Petitioners cannot claim appointment in absence of recommendation of Sindh Public Service CommissionRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
747.Const. P. 1266/2020 (D.B.) Usman Ghani V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 214Per FCC's scope of Article 199Read more
Matter:-AGAINST CONSTRUCTION
748.Const. P. 5020/2025 (D.B.) Saqlain Mushtaq V/S The Learned D.J (East) & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 208Domicile issue for appointment in grade 16 and aboveRead more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
749.Const. P. 2021/2025 (D.B.) Fatima Ahmed V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadMandatory attendance thresholds leave no room for equitable relaxation, courts cannot compel universities to bypass statutory academic regulations.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
750.Criminal Appeal 197/2024 (S.B.) Hussain Bux V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
751.Cr.J.A 12/2024 (S.B.) Devo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
752.Const. P. 7529/2021 (D.B.) Mumtaz Shah V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 228While pensionary benefits constitute a recurring cause of action, such a principle does not dispense with the requirement of establishing entitlement under the governing rules. Since the petitioner was granted the promotion increment admissible to him and did not opt for alteration of his promotion date, denial of the additional annual increment cannot be termed illegal or discriminatory, as agitated by the petitioner after his retirement from service in the year 2021. 14. For the foregoing reasons, the petitioner has failed to make out a case of violation of law or constitutional right warranting interference by this Court in the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, the petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
753.Const. P. 6802/2015 (D.B.) Phoenix Amour Pvt Ltd V/S Muhammad Usman and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 229It is well settled that this Court does not sit as a court of appeal over findings of a statutory forum unless there is a lack of jurisdiction, coram non judice proceedings, or a violation of law apparent on the face of the record, none of which has been demonstrated in the present case. 14. The plea of the petitioner that there exists no authoritative judgment recognizing NIRC???s jurisdiction in matters arising under Standing Order 12(3) is contrary to the law laid down in the above-referred precedents. The statutory scheme of the IRA, 2012, read with Standing Order 12(3), clearly provides a complete mechanism for redress of individual grievances before the NIRC in cases of trans-provincial establishments. 15. For the foregoing reasons, the captioned petitions are devoid of merit and are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
754.Const. P. 2226/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Jalila Khaton V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 242It is settled that in case of death during service, the family is entitled to 75% of gross pension, along with admissible gratuity and commutation benefits, whereas in case of death after retirement, family pension is regulated in terms of the relevant pension rules, with restoration of the commuted portion after the prescribed period. 4. The officer present in court states that the recovery has already been effected and nothing remains outstanding against the Petitioner; hence, the matter has become infructuous. 5. In view of the above statement, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, it is directed that no further deduction shall be made from the Petitioner???s pensionary benefits in future, in line with the settled principle that pension is a vested right and cannot be withheld or reduced except in accordance with laRead more
Matter:-PENSION
755.Const. P. 6804/2015 (D.B.) Phoenix Amour Pvt Ltd V/S Gul Faraz and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 231It is well settled that this Court does not sit as a court of appeal over findings of a statutory forum unless there is a lack of jurisdiction, coram non judice proceedings, or a violation of law apparent on the face of the record, none of which has been demonstrated in the present case. 14. The plea of the petitioner that there exists no authoritative judgment recognizing NIRC???s jurisdiction in matters arising under Standing Order 12(3) is contrary to the law laid down in the above-referred precedents. The statutory scheme of the IRA, 2012, read with Standing Order 12(3), clearly provides a complete mechanism for redress of individual grievances before the NIRC in cases of trans-provincial establishments. 15. For the foregoing reasons, the captioned petitions are devoid of merit and are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
756.Const. P. 4027/2025 (D.B.) Amir Suleman V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 226In view of the above, the continued non-reinstatement of the petitioner, despite setting aside of the General Order dated 11.03.2024, is without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits strictly in accordance with law within a period of one week from the date of receipt of this order. However with no order as to costs. All pending application(s) are disposed of.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
757.Const. P. 6803/2015 (D.B.) Phoenix Amour and Ors V/S Muhammad Ishaque and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 230It is well settled that this Court does not sit as a court of appeal over findings of a statutory forum unless there is a lack of jurisdiction, coram non judice proceedings, or a violation of law apparent on the face of the record, none of which has been demonstrated in the present case. 14. The plea of the petitioner that there exists no authoritative judgment recognizing NIRC???s jurisdiction in matters arising under Standing Order 12(3) is contrary to the law laid down in the above-referred precedents. The statutory scheme of the IRA, 2012, read with Standing Order 12(3), clearly provides a complete mechanism for redress of individual grievances before the NIRC in cases of trans-provincial establishments. 15. For the foregoing reasons, the captioned petitions are devoid of merit and are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
758.Const. P. 5770/2022 (D.B.) Feroze 1888 Mills Ltd and Others V/S Board of Revenue and Othes Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 225Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority/respondents to re-examine the alignment and placement of the transmission line in consultation with all stakeholders to ensure that the effective width of the road ,and complies with statutory safety standards and lawful access of the Petitioners to their plots is not materially obstructed, subject to the entitlement under the law. 13. It is clarified that the Respondents No. 2 and 4 may proceed with the project if any in accordance with law and after ensuring that no unlawful encroachment or obstruction of access occurs. However that is subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
759.Cr.Bail 124/2025 (D.B.) Nawaz Ali Qambrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAllegation of foisting narcotic has force. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
760.Cr.Bail 123/2025 (D.B.) Shah Nawaz Qambrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAllegation of foisting narcotic has force. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
761.Const. P. 135/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Farzana Anwar K.K V/S The Chairman Union Committee No: 3, Mpk City & oth Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 857, 2026 SHC MPK 858??? The words ???not being an interim order??? used in section 21 SRPO confirm that the legislature did not intend to make an interim order as challengeable. ??? A writ petition under Article 199, against an interim order under SRPO, would not be maintainable per se, except where basic jurisdiction under the Ordinance and landlord-tenant relationship is challenged, with arguable justification.Read more
762.Const. P. 6229/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Murad V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 210the remission earned by the convictee cannot shorten the substantive period of fifteen years of sentence for lifeRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
763.Criminal Appeal 11/2025 (S.B.) Sikandar & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
764.Cr.J.A 11/2025 (S.B.) Waqar Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
765.Cr.Bail 135/2025 (D.B.) Arif Odhano V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCase of the applicant requires further inquiry. Bail Granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
766.Const. P. 3687/2014 (D.B.) Syed Ayaz Ali Shah Sheerazi And ors V/S Province Of Sindh and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
767.Const. P. 769/2025 (D.B.) Akber Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasRecruitment challenge dismissed, interview assessment cannot be judicially re???evaluated absent proof of mala fide or illegality.Read more
768.Cr.Bail 410/2025 (S.B.) Farman Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
769.Cr.Bail 2755/2025 (S.B.) TAHA YOUNUS VIRANI S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF VIRANI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
770.Const. P. 5696/2023 (D.B.) Fasihuddin Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 246Furthermore, the Petitioner???s claim is hit by the doctrine of laches. Having remained silent throughout his service tenure and having availed pensionary benefits as calculated by the Respondents, the Petitioner cannot be permitted to reopen settled matters after retirement. The courts have consistently discouraged such belated claims, particularly where third-party rights and administrative finality are involved. 10. In view of the above discussion, this Court finds that the petition is not maintainable due to the absence of statutory service rules. The Petitioner is bound by the terms of absorption accepted by him. The claim for counting past service rendered in PETROMAN lacks legal foundation, and the petition is barred by laches. 11. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, being not maintainable and without merit. No order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
771.Const. P. 5884/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 341In view of the above discussion, this Court finds that the petitioner has failed to establish a legal right to lifelong family pension under the applicable rules of the respondent company. The action of the respondent in discontinuing the pension, upon discovering that it was granted in violation of Rule 14(b), cannot be termed as arbitrary or unlawful. The reliance placed on Federal Government pension rules is misconceived, and no case of maladministration or violation of law is made out for invoking constitutional jurisdiction. However keeping in view the precarious condition of Muhammad Asif we deem it proper to dispose of the petition by considering the peculiar circumstances of the case and the disability of Muhammad Asif. The competent authority/ respondent company may examine the matter for any compassionate relief or policy-based assistance as may be permissible under law.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
772.Const. P. 71/2026 (D.B.) Zulfiqar Ali V/S SBCA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 249The learned counsel for the SBCA lastly submitted that the site will be inspected, and if any irregularities are found, appropriate action will be taken in accordance with the law. Without prejudice to the rights of private respondents as they are not in attendance. However the statement of SBCA is being considered for disposal of this petition. 6. The request of SBCA seems to be reasonable is acceded to subject to all just exceptions, as such this petition is disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
773.Const. P. 6603/2021 (D.B.) M. Tariq Mansoor Advocate V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the above, and without expressing any final opinion on the merits of the proposed rules or policy decisions to be taken by the Government of Sindh, we are of the considered view that the statutory obligation to frame and notify the rules cannot be deferred indefinitely, and a time-bound direction is warranted to ensure compliance with the mandate of law, the binding judgments of the Supreme Court, and the constitutional rights of the citizens. 15.???Accordingly, this petition is disposed of along with all pending application(s) with the following directions: i.???Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 shall finalize, frame, and notify the Sindh Building Planning, Construction, Control, Demolition and Disposal Rules, as contemplated under Section 21 of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979, in the Official Gazette within a period of ninety (90) days from the date of this order. ii.???While framing the aforesaid rules, the respondents shall ensure that the same are strictly in consonance with the parent statute, the binding judgments and directions of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, including those relating to unlawful commercialization and change of land use, and the objectives and mandatory provisions of the KSDP-2020, to the extent applicable. iii. ???The respondents shall also examine and address, in accordance with law, the issue of uniformity, harmonization, and consistency among the existing regulations, by-laws, policies, and notifications framed under the Ordinance, and the Regional Building Regulations, so as to avoid arbitrariness and discriminatory application of the law.Read more
Matter:-FRAMING OF RULES
774.Const. P. 4532/2018 (D.B.) Mohsina Khanum V/S Rizwan Coop Housing Society & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the above legal position, any grievance regarding validity of allotment, transfer, gift, or lease of the subject plot can only be resolved by a competent civil court through a properly instituted suit or cooperative society suit. The fate of the subject plot shall, therefore, be determined by the trial court after recording evidence and deciding the matter on merits within a reasonable time, just upon approach by the aggrieved party. 10. Accordingly, to safeguard the interests of all parties and to prevent multiplicity of proceedings, it is directed that the subject plot shall remain subject to the custody and control of the trial court, just upon approach and no coercive action, including dispossession or cancellation of documents, shall be taken by the official respondents till final adjudication by the civil court. 11. This Constitutional Petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
775.Const. P. 292/2024 (D.B.) Mst Razia V/S Syed Kaleem Imam IG Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 219The constitutional framework comprising Supreme Court, Federal Constitutional Court and High Court each functioning within their constitutional domain. Police department being lawful custodian is entitled to recover their police line for policing purposes.Read more
Matter:-Implementation on Order
776.Const. P. 5202/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Sabiha Subhan & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 199Scope of 199 by FCCRead more
Matter:-AGAINST DEMOLITION
777.Criminal Appeal 436/2021 (D.B.) SHAHID HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 405
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
778.Const. P. 6321/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Yasmeen Arif V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
779.Const. P. 197/2026 (D.B.) Aziz ur Rehman Zahid Soomro V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
780.Const. P. 196/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Ruqiya Khatoon V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
781.Cr.Bail 28/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Ghaffar & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
782.Const. P. 1088/2025 (D.B.) Muharam Ali Shaikh V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetitions for Jobs on Disable QuotaRead more
Matter:-Disable Quota
783.I. A 114/2025 (D.B.) M/s. Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Ltd. V/S Muhammad Azeemuddin Khan Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance XLVI of 2001
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
784.Cr.Bail 24/2026 (S.B.) MST NAZ @ SAIMA NAZ W/O MUHAMMAD SHARIF V/S THE STATE THR ADNAN HAYAT ANSARI Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
785.Const. P. 5664/2025 (D.B.) M/s Inchauli Cooperative Housing Society V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 252It is well settled that once elections have been ordered under court supervision, subsequent petitions seeking the same relief become academic or infructuous. It is also well settled that once the relief sought has been overtaken by events or already complied with under judicial direction, the petition cannot be maintained and is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. It is also a settled principle of law that intervention in matters where an election process is underway under judicial supervision may disrupt the lawful process and is not ordinarily warranted. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No further orders are required in view of the prior directions contained in CP No. D-6317/2025, and the Nazir shall continue to supervise the conduct of the elections, as per earlier directions. The petitioners are at liberty to raise grievances, including the legal grounds before the concerned officer, as agitated before this Court, if any, which shall also be entertained and decision be made in accordance with the law. 11. These petition along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
786.Const. P. 2571/2025 (D.B.) Jamal yousuf V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 256Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
787.Const. P. 2570/2025 (D.B.) Shahzore Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 255Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
788.Const. P. 4710/2025 (D.B.) Muzaffar Rasool & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 247In such circumstances, the competing claims and the presence of disputed questions of fact regarding the lawfulness of disciplinary actions, suspension of licenses, and eviction notices, the Court finds that these issues require detailed examination of records, service rules, and administrative procedures, which cannot be conclusively determined at the constitutional petition stage. 8. In view of the above The petition raises serious allegations but also involves disputed facts relating to service and administrative matters of PIACL. The petitioners are not precluded from availing of alternate remedies available under PIACL service regulations and applicable laws. 9. The petition is disposed of with directions that the petitioners may pursue available remedies under PIACL service and disciplinary rules. The respondents shall ensure that any actions taken against the petitioners strictly comply with the law, rules, and principles of natural justice.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
789.Const. P. 2566/2025 (D.B.) Nadeem Akhter Siddiqui V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 253Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
790.Const. P. 4817/2025 (D.B.) Tanveer Islam & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 251It is well settled that once elections have been ordered under court supervision, subsequent petitions seeking the same relief become academic or infructuous. It is also well settled that once the relief sought has been overtaken by events or already complied with under judicial direction, the petition cannot be maintained and is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. It is also a settled principle of law that intervention in matters where an election process is underway under judicial supervision may disrupt the lawful process and is not ordinarily warranted. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No further orders are required in view of the prior directions contained in CP No. D-6317/2025, and the Nazir shall continue to supervise the conduct of the elections, as per earlier directions. The petitioners are at liberty to raise grievances, including the legal grounds before the concerned officer, as agitated before this Court, if any, which shall also be entertained and decision be made in accordance with the law. 11. These petition along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
791.Const. P. 2569/2025 (D.B.) Syed Habib ur Rehman V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 254Accordingly, the competent authority of the respondents is directed to immediately release all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the Petitioners without any further delay. Compliance with this direction should be reported to this Court within a period of two (2) weeks, in line with the timelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon???s case. Any failure to comply shall be viewed as contempt of court. 6. The petitions, along with pending application(s), are therefore allowed in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
792.Const. P. 1557/2025 (D.B.) M/s Inchauli CHS Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 250It is well settled that once elections have been ordered under court supervision, subsequent petitions seeking the same relief become academic or infructuous. It is also well settled that once the relief sought has been overtaken by events or already complied with under judicial direction, the petition cannot be maintained and is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. It is also a settled principle of law that intervention in matters where an election process is underway under judicial supervision may disrupt the lawful process and is not ordinarily warranted. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No further orders are required in view of the prior directions contained in CP No. D-6317/2025, and the Nazir shall continue to supervise the conduct of the elections, as per earlier directions. The petitioners are at liberty to raise grievances, including the legal grounds before the concerned officer, as agitated before this Court, if any, which shall also be entertained and decision be made in accordance with the law. 11. These petition along with pending application(s), are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
793.I. A 110/2023 (D.B.) United Bank Limited V/S Eng. Syed Mubashir H. Kirmani & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiExecution Court Power.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
794.R.A (Civil Revision) 114/2024 (S.B.) Rizwan Sadiq and another V/S Zohaib Hussain and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 211Criteria for plausible defence in summary suitRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
795.R.A (Civil Revision) 155/2021 (S.B.) Moula Bux S/o Khuda Bux V/S Noor Hassan Ali and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 196In summary suits, the burden to raise a plausible case for defence is on the defendant, and the leave-granting Order must articulate the same when leave is granted.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
796.Const. P. 637/2025 (S.B.) Mehtabuddin s/o Kamaluddin V/S Addeb Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 195mere filing of Suit for specific performance will not be sufficient to deny ownership rightsRead more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
797.II.A. 246/2024 (S.B.) Zeeshan Aziz Thr. Attorney Khurram Suleman V/S Malik Tauseef Ahsan Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 200The appellant/defendant could not sustain a contradictory defence. He could not, on the one hand, deny the contract and, on the other hand, withhold the partial sale consideration admittedly paid to him by the respondent/plaintiff under the very same agreement he denied. In the circumstances, he took a chance. The trial Court's directions to refund the partial sale consideration plus mark-up to the plaintiff/respondent are not arbitrary even though the suit for specific performance was ultimately dismissed. IInd Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
798.Const. P. 7595/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Azmat Ali V/S Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 465
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
799.Const. P. 1105/2012 (S.B.) Muhammad Haroon V/S Haji Muhammad Siddiq Hamid Trust & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 207payment of rent default not establishedRead more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
800.Const. P. 234/2024 (D.B.) Mansoor Ahmed Shaikh V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
801.Cr.Bail 24/2026 (S.B.) Mehboob Ali Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThrowing a wider net and foisting firearm cannot be ruled out in the facts, bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
802.Cr.Bail 23/2026 (S.B.) Mehboob Ali Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThrowing a wider net and foisting firearm cannot be ruled out in the facts, bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
803.Const. P. 41/2026 (D.B.) Nisar Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurOnce remedy is available, then constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
804.Cr.Bail 355/2025 (S.B.) Mehboob Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
805.Cr.Bail 21/2026 (S.B.) Ali Asghar & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
806.Const. P. 310/2025 (S.B.) Goggi Shar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DECIDE THE APPLICATION
807.Cr.Bail 647/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Nabi Dayo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in Section 462-B P.P.C granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
808.Cr.Bail 364/2025 (S.B.) Azad Khan V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
809.Const. P. 124/2026 (S.B.) Zulfiqar Ali Through Attorney Zahoor Alam V/S Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 295The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
810.Const. P. 121/2026 (S.B.) Moin-ud-Din V/S Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 292The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
811.Const. P. 123/2026 (S.B.) Zulfiqar Ali Through Attorney Zahoor Alam V/S Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 294The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
812.Const. P. 125/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Akram V/S Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 296The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
813.Const. P. 122/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Wahid V/S Mst. Gulnar Liaquat & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 293The impugned order does not suffer from illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional defect warranting interference under constitutional jurisdiction. The learned Rent Controller has exercised jurisdiction vested in him by law, applied settled legal principles, and passed a reasoned order. No case of non-application of judicial mind or miscarriage of justice has been made out. 11. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed in limine along with listed applications, being devoid of merit, with the observation that the learned Rent Controller shall proceed with the rent proceedings strictly in accordance with law and decide the same expeditiously on merits, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 12. These are the reasons for the short order of even date, whereby the instant petitions were dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
814.R.A (Civil Revision) 242/2004 (S.B.) Samina and other V/S Mst:Dilshad Begum and other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 185Concurrent finding overruled.Read more
Matter:-Against Judgment
815.Criminal Miscelleneous 238/2025 (S.B.) Chandiyo V/S Bheeru & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 198
816.Cr.Rev 54/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Shakeel & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
817.Const. P. 3891/2025 (D.B.) Sharafat Hussain V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 285In these circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the continued placement of the petitioner???s name on the PCL/PNIL and the retention of his passport, based merely on suspicion and unsubstantiated intelligence input, is arbitrary, unlawful, and violative of Articles 4 and 15 of the Constitution. In the absence of concrete material establishing any involvement of the petitioner in activities prejudicial to the security or interest of Pakistan, the impugned restriction cannot be sustained under the Passport Rules, 2021. 17. In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents/competent authority to forthwith remove the name of the petitioner from the Passport Control List (PCL), the Provisional National Identification List (PNIL) and the Exit Control List (ECL, if any. The respondents are further directed to act strictly in accordance with law and shall not create any impediment in the petitioner???s travel abroad, subject to lawful exceptions, if any as discussed supra. The petitioner???s passport, if presently in the custody of the Immigration authorities, shall be released immediately. 18. The petition, along with all pending applications, stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time; failure whereof consequences in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution will follow.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
818.Const. P. 147/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Pir Illahi Bux Cooperative Housing Society Lt V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 263In view of the foregoing discussion, this Court is persuaded to hold that the impugned order dated 26-12-2025 has been passed without lawful authority and jurisdiction, in violation of Section 55(1) of the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020, and is therefore void ab initio. 15.???Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The impugned order bearing No. RCS/KYC/424/2025 dated 26-12-2025 is hereby set aside. However, it is clarified that this shall not preclude the Registrar Cooperative Societies from taking action strictly in accordance with law, if the statutory conditions prescribed under Section 55 are duly fulfilled in the future. 16. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
819.Const. P. 13/2025 (D.B.) Asif Ali Chandio & another V/S Vice Chancellor SMBBMU Larkana & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRegularization of service can only be under statute or policy. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
820.Const. P. 862/2020 (D.B.) Altaf Hussain Buriro & another V/S Chairman NAB & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 216Accountability Courts cannot direct re-investigation or compel supplementary references, Section 9(c) of NAO confines them to approving or refusing closure applications.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
821.Const. P. 1392/2025 (D.B.) Ali Nawaz V/S Oil and Gas Development Comp. Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 217NIRC Full Bench's finding on fraud upheld, employment obtained on bogus matriculation certificate confers no constitutional equity or reinstatement right.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
822.Const. P. 4289/2025 (D.B.) Khadim Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 187appointment of prosecutor generalRead more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
823.Const. P. 958/2025 (D.B.) Zahid Ali Khan V/S Assistant Director FIA, MPK & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 403The constitutional petition under Article 199 is converted into a Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 561-A Cr.P.C., to be heard by the appropriate Single Bench, reaffirming that challenges to orders under Section 22-A(6) Cr.P.C. should ordinarily proceed through inherent criminal jurisdiction rather than constitutional jurisdiction, except in exceptional circumstances.Read more
824.Const. P. 1542/2024 (D.B.) Kirshan Lal and others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasDaily wage municipal workers have no vested right to regularisation, long service cannot cure appointments made dehors the rules.Read more
825.Const. P. 100/2026 (D.B.) Zubair Khan V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasChallenge to police dismissal barred under Article 212, disciplinary and appellate orders fall exclusively within Service Tribunal jurisdiction.Read more
826.Const. P. 653/2024 (D.B.) Karimdad V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasSubstantial compliance established; contempt cannot lie where official demarcation and anti???encroachment actions satisfy the Court???s mandate.Read more
827.Const. P. 1598/2024 (D.B.) Ameer Bux & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasDaily wage municipal workers have no vested right to regularisation, long service cannot cure appointments made dehors the rules.Read more
828.Const. P. 153/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Shafique V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 238When confronted with this legal position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be disposed of with the direction that he be allowed to appear before the DLC Central and that respondents facilitate processing of his case in accordance with law within two weeks. The request seems to be reasonable and is acceded to; however, the respondent, NADRA, shall create bottlenecks in such a process in terms of the latest view of the superior courts. 5. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, even without touching the merits of the case, this petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
829.Criminal Appeal 136/2025 (D.B.) SHAHID S/O HAJMEEN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 829
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
830.Const. P. 1004/2013 (D.B.) Abdul Ghafoor and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 179It is a well-settled principle of constitutional jurisprudence that disputed questions of fact, particularly those requiring evidence, examination of documents, and determination of title or possession, cannot be adjudicated in constitutional jurisdiction. Accordingly, petition is dismissed along with listed applications.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
831.Cr.Bail 1/2026 (S.B.) Zubair Hussain V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
832.Const. P. 23/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Rasheed V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadBelated attempt to alter date of birth rejected. Service entry record final and petition dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-Against Notificiation
833.Const. P. 1358/2023 (S.B.) Syed Javed Raza S/o Syed Taqi Raza V/S Ali Hassan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachidispute over title of the demised premisesRead more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
834.Const. P. 130/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ameen V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadNo vested right to public employment arises from land donation, promises or assurances cannot override statutory recruitment rules.Read more
Matter:-Deceased Quota
835.Const. P. 6296/2025 (D.B.) Zafar Ghouri V/S Higer Education Commission Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
836.Const. P. 6010/2025 (D.B.) Syed Kamran Ali Shah & Others V/S Proivnce of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DISABLE QUOTA
837.Const. P. 201/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Raahim Laliwala V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ADMISSION MATTER
838.Const. P. 6024/2025 (D.B.) Syed Khalid Mahmud & Ors V/S Muhammad Yaseen & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 244For the reasons above, the Trial Court did not misread the law it applied settled principles governing the appointment of a receiver. There was/is no clear evidence of waste, mismanagement, or imminent loss that would justify appointing a receiver. The petitioners??? failed to show a strong prima facie case for the aforesaid purpose. The discretionary relief of appointing a receiver was refused based on certain reasons. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 26 03 2025 is legally sound, and the petition seeking its setting aside is dismissed along with pending application(s). However the trial Court shall expedite the proceedings to its logical conclusion as per law.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
839.Const. P. 6089/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Majeed (Thr. Attorney M. Faisal) V/S Javed Hameed & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 283In the present case, the trial was conducted by a learned V-Senior Civil Judge, Karachi (West) / Special Court for Co-operative Societies exercising judicial powers under statutory notification; therefore, the impugned Judgment and Decree are valid, binding, and enforceable, subject to the final say of the appellate court. 13. In view of the above, the petitioner has failed to make out any legal or factual ground to set aside the impugned judgment and decree. The petition is thus devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed. 14. The petition is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s), if any. The impugned Judgment and Decree dated 07.12.2023 passed by the learned V-Senior Civil Judge, Karachi (West) / Special Court for Co-operative Societies, is hereby upheld with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
840.Const. P. 824/2025 (D.B.) Raheela Noor V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 234In view of the above, this Court finds that the impugned letter dated 26.12.2023 is without lawful justification, suffers from misreading of the Pension Rules, and is the result of an arbitrary exercise of discretion. The same is hereby declared illegal, void ab initio, and of no legal effect. 11. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The Respondents are directed to restore and release the family pension in favour of the Petitioner forthwith, along with all admissible arrears from the date of its unlawful stoppage, within a period of 30 days from receipt of a certified copy of this order. Failure to comply shall entail consequences in accordance with the law.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
841.Const. P. 78/2026 (S.B.) Hascol Petroleum V/S Shahzaib Rind & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 269It is well settled that Constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to short-circuit the statutory process merely on the basis of an arbitration clause which, in the facts of the case, does not govern the dispute in question. 15. For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds that the learned Rent Controller committed no illegality or jurisdictional error in dismissing the Petitioner???s application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The arbitration clause does not override the statutory jurisdiction of the Rent Controller in matters of rent and ejectment. Consequently, the petition is devoid of merit and does not warrant interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. 16. This petition is accordingly dismissed with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
842.Const. P. 608/2025 (S.B.) Haroon Rasheed Through Attorney Muhammad Sohail V/S Abdul Raheem & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 279The principle of concurrent findings applies where both the trial and appellate Courts have reached a similar conclusion on fair rent after evaluating the evidence. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that such concurrent factual findings should not be interfered with unless shown to be wholly unjustified. 16. On the facts and law, the learned Rent Controller and the Appellate Court acted within the statutory scheme of Section???8, SRPO, 1979. Their consideration of prevailing market rent, evidence of comparable premises, and evaluation of costs and taxes was a lawful exercise of judicial discretion. The Petitioner???s objections regarding the age and condition of the premises go to the weight of evidence, not to jurisdiction or legal validity of the fixation order. Enhancement of fair rent on cross objection, and refusal to accept unsubstantiated comparisons offered by the tenant, do not amount to misreading of facts or illegal exercise of discretion. On established rent jurisprudence, concurrent findings affirmed on appeal deserve deference absent clear legal error. Therefore, the impugned orders dated 10.03.2025 and 24.05.2025 are legally sustainable, factually supported, and do not exhibit any jurisdictional error, perversity, or misapplication of law warranting interference. The petition seeking to set aside these judgments lacks merit and is dismissed along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
843.Criminal Miscelleneous 299/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Naila Mughal V/S SSP Jacobabad and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaApplication dismissed against order of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace under Section 22-A Cr.P.C.Read more
Matter:-22 A-B
844.Cr.Tran 12/2026 (S.B.) Zameeruddin Chandio V/S The State and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaVague allegations of bias. Transfer Application dismissed.Read more
Matter:-For Case Transfer
845.Const. P. 45/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Bashiran & another V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaRemedy under Section 22-A Cr.P.C., not availed. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
846.Cr.Acq.A. 11/2023 (S.B.) Aijaz Ahmed Bhatti V/S Mushtaque Ahmed Meerani and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaScope of Appeal u/s 8-A Illegal Dispossession Act, 2025. Converted to Revision.Read more
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
847.Cr.Acq.A. 123/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Rasool V/S Muhammad Azam & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 181
848.Const. P. 249/2025 (S.B.) Salim Marwari V/S Darshan Marwari & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Arrest of Accused
849.Const. P. 176/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Sabique Kalwar V/S Mst. Tanzeela Kalwar Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
850.Const. P. 154/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Razaque Abro V/S Mst. Rimsha Batool and an other Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
851.Criminal Miscelleneous 257/2025 (S.B.) Amanullah S/o Abdul Rehman V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
852.Cr.Acq.A. 20/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Ishaque V/S Dr Ramesh Kumar & ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
853.Const. P. 91/2026 (S.B.) Noshad Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadAdministrative reallocation of territorial jurisdiction does not divest a seized Family Court; amendment for subsequent events is interlocutory and not appealable under Section 14(3)Read more
Matter:-Family
854.Const. P. 93/2025 (S.B.) Basheer Ahmed Chandio V/S Mst Reehana & aother Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
855.Const. P. 337/2024 (D.B.) The State Through Chairman NAB V/S Ijlal Mustafa & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurConstitutional Petitions No.D ??? 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 345, 346, 347, 463, 464, 465, 467, 468, 469 of 2024 and Cr. Misc. Application No.D ??? 46 and 47 of 2024Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
856.R.A (Civil Revision) 127/2024 (S.B.) Gul Muhammad Jamali & others V/S Ramesh Lal & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
857.Const. P. 307/2025 (S.B.) Maqbool Ahmed Behan V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Arrest of Accused
858.Const. P. 288/2025 (S.B.) Fahad Ahsan Pirzado V/S Mst. Tooba Malik & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
859.Const. P. 413/2013 (D.B.) Alpha Engineering V/S E.O.B.I & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 299Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
860.Const. P. 412/2013 (D.B.) Die Caster V/S E.O.B.I & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 298Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
861.Const. P. 416/2013 (D.B.) Muhammad Hayat V/S E.O.B.I & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 302Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
862.Const. P. 417/2013 (D.B.) Gold Star Enterprises V/S E.O.B.I & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 303Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
863.Const. P. 2506/2019 (D.B.) Kamaluddin Mangejo V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 158Accordingly, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction to the competent authority of the respondents to reconsider and decide the case of the petitioner afresh, strictly in line with the treatment accorded to his similarly placed colleagues if any, after affording an opportunity of meaningful hearing to the petitioner as well as the concerned departments. 11. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed expeditiously, preferably within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled, consequential benefits shall be extended in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
864.Const. P. 414/2013 (D.B.) Welcome Industrial Service V/S E.O.B.I & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 300Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
865.Const. P. 411/2013 (D.B.) Balochistan Engineering Work Ltd V/S E.O.B.I & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 297Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
866.Const. P. 415/2013 (D.B.) R.H.M Enterprises V/S E.O.B.I & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 301Even if the Petitioners' grievances were accepted on technical grounds, EOB Act g compulsory social insurance and contributions, which are fundamentally beneficial and welfare-oriented legislation enacted for the 6 protection of employees, a principle consistently recognized by courts when interpreting welfare statutes in favour of employees. 11. For these reasons, the Petitioners' case is wholly misconceived and legally untenable. The impugned orders were passed in accordance with law and procedure. The Petitioners have not demonstrated any arguable constitutional violation that would warrant interference. 12. Accordingly, the captioned Petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
867.Const. P. 55/2023 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad alias Babu Bhai Thr. Iftikharuddin V/S Mst. Farzana Ghulam Nabi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 144It is settled law that constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 cannot be invoked as a substitute for appeal. Accordingly, Petitions are dismissed along with listed applications if any.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
868.Const. P. 142/2025 (S.B.) Syed Zafar Mohiudin S/o Syed Azhar Mohiudin V/S Mst. Syeda Chand Qadri and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 143Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court have passed well-reasoned judgments based on proper appreciation of law and evidence, which call for no interference in constitutional jurisdiction. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
869.Const. P. 5622/2024 (D.B.) Quratulan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 176Relevancy of Subject is material for deciding eligibility of the candidateRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
870.Const. P. 1360/2025 (S.B.) Sahib Ullah Through Attorney Yousuf Ullah V/S Mst. Shireen Bano & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 142The petitioner has failed to point out any jurisdictional error, material irregularity, or perversity warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, petition merits no consideration is hereby dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
871.Const. P. 98/2026 (S.B.) Sajid Rasheed V/S XVIth Civil & Family Judge, Khi Central & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 171, 2026 SHC KHI 180It is well-settled that where a specific remedy is provided by statute, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to bypass such remedy. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
872.Cr.Tran 146/2025 (S.B.) ASHOK KUMAR S/O RAJU MAL V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiThe applicant/accused alleged assault by the complainant, an advocate, and apprehended danger; considering the rival versions, the Court ordered transfer of the case to the Jail Court to ensure safety of the parties and preserve judicial dignity.Read more
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
873.Const. P. 482/2025 (S.B.) Manzoor Ali Kalhoro V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 138Directly invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction despite availability of alternate remedies is depreciated by the Superior Courts.Read more
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
874.Const. P. 1773/2024 (D.B.) Makli Coop Housing Society Ltd & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 163The Administrator/Election Officer shall have all such powers as are necessary and incidental for the purpose of holding free, fair, and transparent elections, including but not limited to issuing election schedules, scrutinizing nominations, resolving electoral objections, and declaring election results. The entire election process shall be completed within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order and handing over the affairs to the newly elected body just after nominations. The fee of Mr. Justice (Retd.) Nadeem Azhar Siddique is fixed at Rs. 300,000/- (Rupees Three Hundred Thousand only), which shall be paid in advance by the Petitioner Society. 6. With these observations and directions and with the consent of the parties present in court, the petition stands disposed of in the above terms. A copy of this order shall be communicated to Mr. Justice (Retd.) Nadeem Azhar Siddique at his address through all modes, including electronic and WhatsApp applications.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
875.Const. P. 1938/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Kiran V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiHe further points out that the Petitioner also claimed to be the spouce of Muhammad Shakeel, but as per record of NADRA, the spouce name of Muhammad Shakeel is Zoya not Kiran which is disputed of the case, however, after arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner will approach the NADRA Office at Sakhi Hassan for further process of her unblocking of the CNIC and further information so far as. Learned counsel for NADRA has no objection to the aforesaid proposition, in such circumstances without touching the merits of the case, the competent authority of NADRA is directed to facilitate to the Petitioner, for their aforesaid relief. Her cases shall be processed in accordance with the law within two weeks, without creating bottleneck subject to all just exception as provided under the law. 4. This Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
876.Const. P. 5694/2023 (D.B.) Nazeer Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 136
Matter:-SERVICE
877.Const. P. 495/2025 (D.B.) Asad Ali Mirani and Another V/S Sindh Public Service Commission & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 175fresh interview High Cort cannot direct for conducting a fresh interview of a failed candidates on mere assertionsRead more
Matter:-DISQUALIFICATION
878.Const. P. 863/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Aslam V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadHighly disputed tenancy and possession claims dismissed as factual controversies unsuitable for writ jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
879.Const. P. 118/2026 (D.B.) Nazir Ahmed Thr Attorney Noman Akhtar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DEMARCATION
880.Const. P. 862/2024 (D.B.) Kashif and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadHighly disputed tenancy and possession claims dismissed as factual controversies unsuitable for writ jurisdictionRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
881.Cr.Bail 2319/2025 (S.B.) ZAFAR IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
882.Const. P. 82/2026 (D.B.) Mst Qurrat-Tul-Ain Ali Shaikh V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadAdditional charge creates no vested right, stopgap postings may be withdrawn by the competent authority at any time.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
883.Const. P. 115/2026 (D.B.) Sarfaraz Ali Bhatti V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
884.Const. P. 2654/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Akram & Others V/S The Chairman NADRA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 155After arguing the matter at some length, both parties agreed that Petitioners shall appear before the V&R Branch, Awami Markaz, on any working day with supporting documents, including pre-1979 documents, for processing by NADRA authorities in accordance with law. The request so made seems to be reasonable and acceded to. 7. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-BLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
885.Const. P. 5927/2024 (D.B.) Shamshad Coop Agricultural Marketing & Credit Soci V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 305Accordingly, with consent of the parties, Justice (R) Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui is hereby appointed as Commissioner/Election Officer to conduct and supervise the election of the petitioner society strictly in accordance with the Sindh Cooperative Societies Act, 2020 and the Rules framed thereunder, including finalizing the voters??? list as per bylaws of the society and law, and completing the entire election process within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. He is further authorized to conduct the election at his convenience, to receive and decide objections, if any, in the interest of the society. He may also take financial decisions strictly limited to day-to-day affairs necessary for the completion of the election process. The parties shall extend full cooperation to the Commissioner/Election Officer and shall not interfere in the election process in any manner. The fee of Justice (R) Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui is fixed at Rs.200,000/-, which shall be paid by the petitioner society in advance. 7. With these directions, the petition, along with pending application(s) stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
886.Const. P. 2555/2024 (D.B.) Taimoor & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 154In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners have failed to establish any legal right presently infringed, nor any corresponding legal duty breached by the respondents. Consequently, the constitutional petition is not maintainable and does not call for the exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 11. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded hereinabove, the petition is dismissed, along with all pending applications. No with costs. 12. These are the reasons for our short order of even date whereby the captioned petition was dismissed.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
887.Const. P. 5875/2025 (D.B.) Alliance Sugar Mill Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 157In view of the above, we are of the considered view that the Petitioner is entitled to continue its lawful operations without hindrance, and the Respondents are restrained from any arbitrary action against the Petitioner, subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law . All directions of this Court concerning protection of the Petitioner???s rights and disciplinary action against delinquent officials shall remain in effect. 11. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST SEALING ORDER
888.Const. P. 1680/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Haleema V/S Chairman NADRA & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 153Accordingly, the Petitioners are directed to appear before the V&R Branch of NADRA for submission of any outstanding documents and to facilitate the verification process. Upon compliance, NADRA shall process the case in accordance with law and unblock the CNICs without undue delay. 8. The petition is disposed of with the above directions, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.Read more
Matter:-UNBLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
889.Const. P. 791/2025 (D.B.) Obaisa Mangrio V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 174Pension and post retirement benefits cannot be withdrawn on un-proving allegations; departmental appellate exoneration binds sub-ordinate authorities.Read more
890.Criminal Appeal 11/2025 (D.B.) Irshad Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaSafe custody and safe transmission is mandatory requirement in narcotic cases.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
891.Const. P. 84/2026 (D.B.) Junaid Saeed & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasConstitutional petition dismissed as barred under Article 212. Transfer/posting disputes fall within exclusive jurisdiction of Service Tribunal.Read more
892.Const. P. 746/2025 (D.B.) Inayatullah V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasSalary cannot be withheld indefinitely on mere allegations, disciplinary proceedings must conclude through a prompt, reasoned order.Read more
893.Const. P. 6232/2025 (D.B.) Syed M. Hamid Kazim Alvi V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 162It is clarified that in case the petitioner remains aggrieved by the order so passed by the competent authority, he shall be at liberty to avail the remedy available to him under the law. 9. Without touching the merits of the case and the above observations and directions, the present Constitutional Petition, along with pending application(s) stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY
894.Const. P. 465/2026 (D.B.) Syed Imtiaz Ali Shah V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 160In these circumstances, learned counsel seeks the disposal of the present petition in terms of the aforesaid order. 4. Without touching the merits of the case, this petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the terms of the ratio of the order dated 23.01.2026, passed in C.P. No. D-6210 of 2025.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
895.Const. P. 4945/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Shehla Kazmi V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 156For the foregoing reasons, the impugned refusal letters are without lawful authority and are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to meaningfully reconsider the petitioner???s case for grant of pension and pensionary benefits in light of the notification dated 13-06-2014 and the judgments of the Supreme Court. Upon such consideration, pension shall be awarded to the petitioner strictly in accordance with her entitlement, after adjusting any service benefits already received, if any. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within three weeks, without fail.15. 14. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
896.Const. P. 68/2026 (D.B.) M/S Three Star & Company V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaC.P for enforcing money decree, not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-Outstanding Amount
897.Const. P. 20/2026 (D.B.) Aamir Ali Khoso V/S PO Sindh & Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaNo writ can issue for appointment on Son QuotaRead more
Matter:-Appointment
898.Const. P. 38/2026 (D.B.) Aizaz Hussain Soomro V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaNo writ can issue for appointment on Deceased QuotaRead more
Matter:-Deceased Quota
899.Const. P. 19/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman Dayo V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaNo writ can issue for appointment on deceased quota.Read more
Matter:-Deceased Quota
900.Const. P. 5818/2014 (D.B.) Abdul Nasir V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 137For appointment --date of announcement of result is relevant but not the issuance of any certificateRead more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
901.M.A. 18/2023 (S.B.) Maqsood Ahmed s/o Muhammad Nazir V/S S.E.C.P of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 127, 2026 SHC KHI 130, 2026 SHC KHI 131, 2026 SHC KHI 132Appellate provisions in the SECP Act, 1997 and Companies Act, 2017. .Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
902.Const. P. 596/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Aziz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 319, 2026 SHC HYD 325Internal issue of the department on OZT shares/funds.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
903.Const. P. 4744/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Tasleem un Nisa V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 151, 2026 SHC KHI 167In view of the above, with the consent of the parties, even without touching the merits of the case, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the respondents for compliance.Read more
Matter:-G.P FUND
904.Cr.Bail 353/2025 (S.B.) Dr. Khursheed & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
905.Const. P. 5118/2020 (D.B.) Sultan Ahmed Hussain V/S Fed. Ministry of Info: & Broadcasting and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR PAYMENT
906.Const. P. 276/2023 (D.B.) Sajjan Ali & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadSelection Committee recommendations create no vested right to appointment. Cabinet policy governs the recruitment process.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
907.Const. P. 2170/2024 (D.B.) Nasir Javed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ACCOMODATION
908.Const. P. 293/2016 (D.B.) Waheed Ali Kalhoro V/S SHO PS Waleed & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaClassification of F.I.R in 'A' Class does not mean abandonment of investigation.Read more
Matter:-Re-Investigation
909.Cr.Bail 388/2025 (S.B.) Tayyab Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
910.Cr.Tran 1/2025 (D.B.) Kashif & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
911.Cr.Bail 359/2025 (S.B.) Rahim Bux & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
912.Const. P. 587/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Anis V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
913.Cr.Bail 352/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Shoaib V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
914.Const. P. 786/2025 (S.B.) M/s AA Joyland (Pvt)Ltd Thr Malik Amjad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 134Constitutional petition dismissed, tenant barred from invoking Article 199 after failing to pursue statutory remedy, eviction upheld on concurrent findings of default.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
915.Const. P. 445/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Naseema Dahri V/S Karam Ali Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 173The obligation to maintain a daughter until marriage is not an abstract, absolute liability detached from factual context. It is conditioned by dependency and incapacity to maintain herself.Read more
Matter:-Family
916.Criminal Miscelleneous 27/2026 (S.B.) Ali Ahmed Ogahi V/S Ahmed @ Ahmed Ali Ogahi and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPlea for cancelling bail, dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
917.Const. P. 5633/2021 (D.B.) Aijaz Ali Bhayo and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
918.Const. P. 1780/2023 (D.B.) Nisar Ahmed Shaikh V/S Government of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
919.II.A. 91/2020 (S.B.) Ezaz Farooq S/o. Abid Hussain V/S Muhammad Aslam S/o. Karim Bux Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 182It is now well accepted that in a case of malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must show that the criminal action taken against him was decided in his favour and reasons such as clear judicial observation and/or determination in that judgment that the FIR was found fake, or it was lodged with malice, is not mandatory and will have no effect on the outcome of the subsequent claim of the plaintiff based on the tort of malicious prosecution.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
920.Const. P. 76/2026 (D.B.) Ali Raza Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadSuspension is an interim administrative measure; writ barred by Article 212. Petition dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
921.Const. P. 6301/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Kinza & Zohaib V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
922.Const. P. 69/2026 (D.B.) Nusrat & Tuqeer V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
923.Const. P. 68/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Sumaira Azam & Asif Ali V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
924.Const. P. 2348/2017 (D.B.) Jawad Ali & anothers V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-SALARY
925.Const. P. 6256/2025 (D.B.) Nisar Ahmed Korai V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 80Residential Flat cannot be used or temporary rentals Petition dismissedRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
926.Const. P. 200/2024 (D.B.) Bheerji V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
927.Const. P. 4455/2025 (D.B.) Syed Zawar Hussain Shah & Others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
928.Const. P. 6143/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Moneeba Naz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
929.Const. P. 5963/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Sohail Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 69
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
930.Const. P. 611/2017 (D.B.) Ms. Sajida Khanzada V/S Chief Executive Officer NBP and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
931.Const. P. 750/2025 (S.B.) Niaz Ali V/S Mst Shazia and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Family
932.Const. P. 298/2024 (S.B.) Sajeel Ahmed V/S Learned ADJ-I, Kotri & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 83Striking off defence under Section 17-A applies only to maintenance, yet decree upheld due to petitioner???s failure to lead evidence.Read more
Matter:-Family
933.Const. P. 647/2025 (S.B.) Waseem Akram V/S Mst Asma and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Family
934.Const. P. 47/2026 (S.B.) Aizaz Waseem Through Attorney Sumair Ali V/S Mst. Shah Taj Waheed & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
935.Const. P. 355/2025 (S.B.) Abrar Ahmed and others V/S Muhammad Akram and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
936.I. A 133/2025 (D.B.) Faisal Masroor Siddiqui V/S Muslim Commercial Bank Limited and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 51Since Appellant's offer was less than the sale price, Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
937.Const. P. 38/2026 (D.B.) Syed Shahid Hussain Shah V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 84Public interest petition dismissed in limine, socio-economic policy and resource allocation lie beyond constitutional writ jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
938.Criminal Miscelleneous 325/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Shakeela V/S SSP Sanghar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
939.Const. P. 474/2025 (D.B.) Amjad Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-TRANSPORT
940.II.A. 117/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Janul and others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
941.I. A 16/2024 (S.B.) Suneel Kumar V/S Ghulam Hussain @ Lala Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
942.R.A (Civil Revision) 80/2024 (S.B.) Vinjhraj & Others V/S Sardar Singh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
943.R.A (Civil Revision) 407/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Hashim V/S The District & Sessions Judge, Tharparkar Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
944.R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2024 (S.B.) Gul Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
945.R.A (Civil Revision) 203/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Mithan & another V/S Muhammad Hayat & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
946.Const. P. 1391/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Sharfeen Romeel V/S Sheeran Ansari & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
947.Cr.Rev 4/2026 (S.B.) Barak Din Khan & another V/S Khuda Bux & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
948.Criminal Miscelleneous 8/2026 (S.B.) Sht. Teejo V/S SSP Tharparkar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
949.I. A 19/2024 (S.B.) Ramesh Kumar V/S Madan Lal Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
950.Const. P. 1438/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ubaid Khan V/S Mst. Rehmat Jamali & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
951.I. A 15/2025 (D.B.) Takhaht Singh Thakur V/S Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limeted Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
952.I. A 2/2023 (S.B.) Waseem Qadir Memon V/S Mst. Zubaida Begum & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
953.I. A 4/2024 (S.B.) Salman Ahmed V/S Rehan Ahmed Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
954.Criminal Miscelleneous 4/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Anam V/S SSP Sanghar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
955.Cr.Bail 7/2026 (S.B.) Sahibzada Yaqoob Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
956.Cr.Bail 338/2025 (S.B.) Qasim V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
957.I. A 1/2025 (S.B.) Irshad Ali V/S Muhammad Ramzan Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
958.Criminal Miscelleneous 303/2025 (S.B.) Suleman V/S I.O PS Shahdadpur and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
959.Cr.Rev 59/2025 (S.B.) Hyder Bux @ Hydro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
960.Criminal Miscelleneous 328/2025 (S.B.) Ayaz Ali V/S DIG Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
961.Criminal Miscelleneous 247/2025 (S.B.) Chatro V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
962.Cr.Bail 1738/2025 (S.B.) YOUSUF @ MITHOO S/O ZARIN KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 40, 2026 SHC KHI 41, 2026 SHC KHI 43
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
963.Criminal Miscelleneous 279/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Nasir V/S Learned ADJ- Shahdadpur Distt Sanghar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
964.Cr.Bail 200/2025 (D.B.) Saleem Ahmed Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 565The rule of consistency is not applicable since, the applicant is a holder of public office; none of the accused involved in this specific transaction has been granted bail; and the role of the applicant is different from those granted bail in other transactions.Read more
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
965.Const. P. 776/2025 (D.B.) Mumtaz Ali & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
966.Const. P. 945/2025 (D.B.) Akbar Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
967.Cr.Bail 344/2025 (S.B.) Aijaz @ Ajjo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
968.Const. P. 948/2025 (D.B.) Salma & another V/S Fed of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
969.Const. P. 598/2025 (S.B.) Syed Liaquat Ali S/o Muhammad Ali V/S Muhammad Jehanzaib s/o Dawood Bhai Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
970.Criminal Appeal 58/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Majeed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
971.Criminal Miscelleneous 330/2025 (S.B.) Nabi Bux V/S SSP Tharparkar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
972.Const. P. 532/2025 (S.B.) Samiullah s/o Noor ullah Khan V/S Authority under Payment of Wages Act & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
973.Const. P. 1419/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Saqib Khan V/S Mst. Ismat Saira Gillani Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
974.II.A. 76/2018 (S.B.) Shahabuddin V/S Shah Nawaz & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 5661. To establish entitlement to ???mesne profits???, the dates of illegal possession till recovery of possession are relevant, whereas its quantum is to be ascertained based upon evidence or under Order XX Rule 12(2) CPC. 2. Failure to cross-examine a witness on a specific plea or document, such plea or document would be deemed to have been accepted. 3. Decision based upon non-reading of evidence could neither be considered sacrosanct nor immune to interference.Read more
Matter:-OTHER
975.Const. P. 3013/2018 (D.B.) Mst, Venus Bibi V/S P.O Sindh & Other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-PENSION
976.Cr.J.A 5/2024 (S.B.) Khuda Dino & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
977.Cr.Rev 111/2024 (S.B.) Qazi V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
978.Const. P. 1899/2025 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain Channa V/S The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
979.Const. P. 1986/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Hamza Muneer V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Harasment
980.Cr.Rev 50/2025 (S.B.) Arshad Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
981.Const. P. 5367/2025 (D.B.) Himat Ali V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 334Scope of Vested rights.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST RESULT
982.Criminal Appeal 15/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Razia V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
983.Const. P. 737/2025 (S.B.) M. Rizwan Yasin S/o Mohammad Yasin V/S Dr. Faisa Mushtaque & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
984.Const. P. 5814/2025 (D.B.) Imran V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiBe that as it may, since the Tribunal has not stayed the goods and further detention of the goods is contrary to CGO No.2/2024, the petition is allowed by directing the respondent No.2 to release the petitioner???s goods in accordance with law without prejudice to recovery under section 202 of the Customs Act in the event the Customs eventually prevails.Read more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
985.Const. P. 897/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Anum Thanvi Through Attorney Imran V/S Muhammad Munir & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
986.Cr.Bail 381/2025 (S.B.) Usama & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
987.I. A 37/2025 (S.B.) Noman Hyder V/S Abid Hussain Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3513
Matter:-Against Order
988.Const. P. 575/2025 (D.B.) Ahmedi Shazia Shaikh V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
989.Const. P. 735/2025 (D.B.) Noor Ali V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
990.Cr.Rev 26/2023 (S.B.) ISRAR UL EBAD KHAN S/O LATE FAKHARUL EBAD KHAN V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
991.Const. P. 519/2025 (S.B.) Akhtar Hussain & Another V/S Mst. Tooba Irshad Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
992.Cr.Bail 281/2025 (S.B.) Lal Bux V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
993.Const. P. 509/2020 (D.B.) Nisar Ahmed Burdi V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 3486Group insurance under the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund is a risk???cover payable to legal heirs on death during service or within five years post???retirement; compulsory deductions do not create a vested maturity right on retirement, petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Payment
994.Const. P. 1216/2025 (D.B.) Adil Shah V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 3487, 2026 PLJ 13Student cleared Second Year on third attempt and is entitled to promotion to Third Year MBBS, but simultaneous advancement to Fourth Year is impermissible; alleged ???Term Back??? not substantiated and petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-SMBBMU
995.Cr.Bail 350/2025 (S.B.) Fida Husain Lakho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
996.Const. P. 1129/2023 (S.B.) Shehzad Ghulam Hussain S/o Ghulam Hussain V/S Ayesha and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
997.I. A 14/2023 (S.B.) Abid Khan. V/S Naveed Akhtar Lodhi. Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (summary suit under section 37 Rules 1 and 2)
2025 SHC HYD 3463In the circumstances, as the cheque had already bounced before the settlement agreement was executed, no case could be made out that the dishonoured cheque was for security purposes.Read more
Matter:-Against Judgment
998.Const. P. 1167/2025 (S.B.) Nazeer Ahmed (since deceased) through his LRs V/S Kareem Dhedhi & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 3490Rent proceedings eviction held illegal possession restored to tenantRead more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
999.Const. P. 1612/2025 (D.B.) Riaz Ahmed Soomro V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3570
Matter:-Against Order
1000.Const. P. 2005/2025 (D.B.) Aatiqa Rehman V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3565
Matter:-DIRECTION
1001.Const. P. 1991/2017 (S.B.) Zeeshan Sharif S/o Sharif Ahmed Khan (Late) V/S Court of IVth ADJ Khi West & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1002.Const. P. 1457/2024 (S.B.) Syed Muhammad Huzaifa V/S Mst. Noor ul Ain and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1003.Cr.Bail 348/2025 (S.B.) Bashir Ahmed Kaloi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1004.Const. P. 74/2020 (D.B.) Abdul Qadir Jeho V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Deceased Quota
1005.Const. P. 479/2025 (D.B.) Farhan Ali V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Deceased Quota
1006.Const. P. 742/2025 (S.B.) Kashif S/o Najamuddin V/S Faryal Waseem & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1007.Const. P. 789/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Noor Jehan & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1008.Const. P. 783/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Saima & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1009.Const. P. 745/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Haseena & another V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1010.Const. P. 695/2025 (D.B.) Sht Kaveeta & another V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1011.Const. P. 1363/2025 (S.B.) Amjad Javed V/S Fazeel Ahmed Sarwar & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
1012.Const. P. 782/2025 (S.B.) Malik Muhammad Younus V/S Malik Muhammad Kamran & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
1013.Const. P. 570/2025 (D.B.) Anchlo V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1014.Const. P. 749/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Sobia V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1015.Const. P. 479/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Hanif V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1016.Const. P. 1100/2024 (D.B.) Aijaz Ahmed Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1017.Const. P. 225/2025 (S.B.) Khalid Baloch Thr. Attorney Umair Baloch V/S Mst. Habiba and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1018.Const. P. 499/2016 (S.B.) Mst.Ruksana Ramzan Ali V/S Asif Karim Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1019.Const. P. 719/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Naseema & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1020.Cr.Bail 273/2025 (S.B.) Mumtaz Ali & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1021.Const. P. 1302/2025 (S.B.) Eduljee Dinshaw (Private) Limited V/S M/s. Syed Abbas Hassan Bilgrami & Co. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1022.Criminal Appeal 67/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Malik & another V/S The State131 Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Criminal Procedure Code (Compromise )
2025 SHC HYD 3512Contours of compromise in non-compoundable offences - Section 436 CrPCRead more
Matter:-Imprisonment(Upto 5 years)
1023.Const. P. 708/2025 (S.B.) Syed Zeeshan Akhter Jafari V/S Rehan Jaleel Siddiqui Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3566
Matter:-Rent Matter
1024.Const. P. 1281/2024 (S.B.) Najmuddin Thr. Abdul Qadir Mandviwala V/S Muhammad Naeem and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1025.Const. P. 38/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Mukhtiar Begum Thr Attorney Nasim Ahmed V/S Noshad Raza & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3567
Matter:-Rent Matter
1026.I. A 47/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Razia Khanum V/S Rabia & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3514
Matter:-Against Order
1027.Const. P. 839/2024 (D.B.) Abdullah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Encroachment
1028.Criminal Miscelleneous 557/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Yasir V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1029.Criminal Miscelleneous 279/2024 (S.B.) Aamir Farooque V/S Ld Ist ADJ Umerkot & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1030.Const. P. 1791/2023 (D.B.) Darya Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Encroachment
1031.Const. P. 652/2025 (D.B.) Syed Mutahar Ali Shah V/S PO Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Appointment of P.C
1032.Const. P. 1170/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Shakeel V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Service
1033.Const. P. 1836/2023 (D.B.) Bilal Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Regularization of Service
1034.Const. P. 1401/2023 (D.B.) Dr. Hamid Ahmed Qureshi & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Regularization of Service
1035.Criminal Miscelleneous 262/2025 (S.B.) Jahangir V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1036.Civil Tran 12/2024 (S.B.) Hameed Zaman Khan V/S Rafi-u-Zaman & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1037.Const. P. 653/2021 (D.B.) Aftab Ahmed & Other V/S FED Of Pakistan & Other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1038.Const. P. 750/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Satbai & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1039.Const. P. 739/2025 (D.B.) Sht. Premka & another V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1040.Const. P. 586/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Kainat & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1041.Const. P. 752/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Hunsa @ Unsa @ another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1042.Const. P. 761/2025 (D.B.) Haresh Kumar V/S P.O of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1043.Const. P. 381/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Fatima Zehra D/o Zahid Abbas V/S Muhammad Sheroz and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1044.Const. P. 1552/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Bilawal V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3563
Matter:-Against Order
1045.Const. P. 34/2024 (D.B.) Haji Muhammad Iqbal V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3562
Matter:-Against Order
1046.Const. P. 1318/2024 (S.B.) (Late) Muhammad Rafiq since deceased thr LRs V/S Malik Abdul Majeed and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 3379
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1047.Const. P. 1053/2024 (D.B.) Rajab Ali Panhwar and Others V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3564
Matter:-DIRECTION
1048.Const. P. 1255/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Sania V/S SHO, P.S Saeedabad & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
1049.Const. P. 1119/2024 (S.B.) Arslan Khan S/o Muhammad Israr Khan V/S Mst. Sidra and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
1050.R.A (Civil Revision) 56/2025 (S.B.) Ashfaque Hussain & another V/S Rahib & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1051.R.A (Civil Revision) 71/2025 (S.B.) Jameel Ahmed & others V/S Adhal Shar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAppellate remand affirmed, holding that civil Court possess plenary jurisdiction over the land title dispute arising from registered sale deed, while Revenue Officer lack authority to extinguish proprietary right; Order VII, Rule 11, CPC rejection deemed premature.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
1052.R.A (Civil Revision) 212/2024 (S.B.) Makoro V/S P.O. Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1053.Criminal Miscelleneous 24/2025 (S.B.) Parbhoo Lal V/S Muhammad Jean Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1054.Criminal Miscelleneous 434/2025 (S.B.) HAQ DAD KHAN S/O ANAR GUL & ANOTHER V/S ANAR GUL S/O KHULGI KHAN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 3381When information is provided after the incident took place, it cannot be discarded summarily by the Ex-Officio Justice of PeaceRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1055.Const. P. 565/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Sidratul Muntaha V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3343
Matter:-DIRECTION
1056.Cr.Acq.A. 52/2024 (S.B.) Ramzan V/S M.Aslam & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1057.Const. P. 1015/2024 (S.B.) Aurangzeb S/o Muhammad Aslam V/S Mst. Nasreen and another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1058.R.A (Civil Revision) 10/2025 (S.B.) Anwar Ali Phulpoto V/S Mst Hazooran Khatoon and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaConcurrent rejection of plaint upheld; Sanad exceeding 02 ghunta limit under The Sindh Goth-Abad Act, 1987 declared void ab initio.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
1059.Cr.Bail 1137/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Shareef V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1060.R.A (Civil Revision) 87/2023 (S.B.) Zahid V/S Muhammad Umar & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1061.R.A (Civil Revision) 110/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Ismail Through LRs V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1062.R.A (Civil Revision) 208/2024 (S.B.) Rafique Ahmed Chadhar V/S Dr. Allah Dino and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1063.Const. P. 1671/2025 (D.B.) Iqra Channa attorney Moiz Shakoor Jatoi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-SPSC Matter
1064.Criminal Miscelleneous 32/2025 (S.B.) Jumoon V/S Mansingh Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1065.Const. P. 1307/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Khan Through Attorney Muhammad Nabi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROTECTION
1066.Const. P. 1697/2025 (D.B.) Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Conduct Enquiry / Investigation
1067.Const. P. 288/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Yusra Rafi Thr. Attorney Hammad V/S Qaid Johar Marvi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1068.Const. P. 1836/2023 (D.B.) Bilal Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Regularization of Service
1069.Const. P. 1388/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Nasir and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1070.Criminal Miscelleneous 242/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Wasandi V/S Incharge Darul Aman & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1071.Cr.Bail 619/2025 (S.B.) Waheed Murad alias Waheed & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1072.Const. P. 1979/2022 (D.B.) Farooq Khaskheli V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1073.Const. P. 503/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Arab Thaheem and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Regularization of Service
1074.Const. P. 274/2025 (D.B.) Eido V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1075.Const. P. 2068/2017 (S.B.) Faisal Mustafa Ahmed Thr Attorney Suleman Murad V/S Mst. Zubaida & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1076.Civil Revision 2/2023 (S.B.) Chander Bhan V/S Shahabul Haq Ansari & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1077.R.A (Civil Revision) 13/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Akbar V/S Allah Bux Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1078.Const. P. 1766/2024 (D.B.) Mst Noor Khatoon V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1079.Const. P. 692/2025 (D.B.) Nek Muhammad V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1080.Const. P. 650/2025 (D.B.) Hussain Bux & Others V/S Chairman UC 05 Mirpurkhas & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1081.Const. P. 697/2025 (D.B.) Ranjhan & Others V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1082.Const. P. 767/2024 (D.B.) Allah Warayo V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1083.Const. P. 634/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Basheeran V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1084.Cr.Bail 476/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Majeed Kandhro & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurCrl.B.A. No.S-477 and 478 of 2025Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
1085.Const. P. 658/2025 (D.B.) Jan Muhammad & Others V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1086.Const. P. 572/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Arif V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1087.Const. P. 774/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman V/S P.O Sindh Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1088.R.A (Civil Revision) 33/2025 (S.B.) P. O Sindh thr: Health Department Govt of Sindh V/S Shabir Ahmed Abbasi Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 3546
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
1089.R.A (Civil Revision) 104/2025 (S.B.) Sukkur IBA V/S Mst. Bakhtawar & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1090.Criminal Miscelleneous 380/2025 (S.B.) Shamsuddin @ Shaman Gopang and Others V/S SHO PS Badeh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
1091.Const. P. 1305/2025 (S.B.) Irfan Khan V/S Mst. Seema Bibi & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1092.Const. P. 473/2023 (S.B.) Saleem Akhtar Qureshi S/o Atta Muhammad Qureshi V/S VIIth Additional District Judge, Khi East & Anothe Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1093.Const. P. 723/2025 (S.B.) Ahsan Iftikhar Ahmed V/S XIII Family / Civil Judge Karachi Central & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1094.Const. P. 1416/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Yousuf S/o Muhammad Ahmed V/S Khalid Mahmood Chaudhry and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1095.Criminal Miscelleneous 408/2025 (S.B.) Ali Ahmed Ogahi V/S SHO PS Ghouspur and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
1096.Const. P. 1010/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Salman Rafiq V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
1097.Const. P. 157/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Kazim S/o Anwar Abbas V/S Mst. Noor Ul Ain Zahra and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
1098.R.A (Civil Revision) 45/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Younis V/S Ghulam Farooque and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1099.Cr.Bail 1082/2025 (S.B.) Ramzan Kharos V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1100.Const. P. 1133/2023 (D.B.) Farhan Ahmed Shaikh and Others V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3569
Matter:-Disable Quota
1101.Cr.Acq.A. 206/2021 (S.B.) IMAM ALI SHAH V/S INDERYAS MASIH Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3350
Matter:-417 Cr.P.C
1102.Const. P. 3946/2015 (D.B.) Muhammad Abid V/S Province Of Sindh and ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
2025 SHC KHI 3277Up-gradation held to be valid.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
1103.Cr.Bail 290/2025 (S.B.) Aju @ Ajay @ Arjun V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1104.I. A 74/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Latif V/S Haji Khilawat Khan Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1105.Const. P. 623/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Sanam Khatoon & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1106.Const. P. 358/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Rauf V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1107.Const. P. 714/2025 (D.B.) Pir Bux & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1108.Const. P. 624/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Samreen & anothers V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1109.Const. P. 326/2025 (D.B.) MCB Bank Ld thru its Attorney V/S Ghulam Mustafa & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1110.Const. P. 1794/2024 (D.B.) Nalimitho V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1111.Const. P. 612/2025 (D.B.) Shrimati Radha & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1112.Const. P. 705/2025 (D.B.) Zahoor Ahmed & another V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1113.Criminal Miscelleneous 382/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Shabbir V/S SSP Distt. Hyd & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3267Contours for considering when video recording constitute information for triggering directions to Police Authorities to record Statement of Complainant-ApplicantRead more
Matter:-561-A Cr.P.C
1114.Const. P. 970/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Jabbar and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3568
Matter:-Land Matters
1115.Const. P. 197/2025 (S.B.) Inamullah V/S Mst. Kashmala & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3269Non-payment of maintenance at the appellate stage, that the judgment-debtor-husband is not financially sound to pay the lump-sum amount, is not a valid argument. The husband should have kept up with the monthly maintenance payments to avoid the lump-sum payment at the end of the trial.Read more
Matter:-Family
1116.R.A (Civil Revision) 70/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Wahab Mandan V/S Abdul Ghafoor Shar Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1117.Const. P. 334/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Yousuf Zaman V/S Mst. Mehwish & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3318
Matter:-Family
1118.Const. P. 1928/2023 (D.B.) Shaukat Ali Shaikh V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 578
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
1119.Cr.Bail 545/2025 (S.B.) Hub Ali Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1120.R.A (Civil Revision) 219/2022 (S.B.) Munir Ahmed Chadhar V/S Abdul Ghani Pitafi Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1121.R.A (Civil Revision) 72/2021 (S.B.) Gulsher & Others V/S Luqman Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1122.Const. P. 206/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Arifa & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1123.Civil Revision 72/2021 (S.B.) Gulsher & Others V/S Luqman Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1124.Const. P. 211/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Riaz V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1125.Const. P. 205/2025 (S.B.) Ahsun & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1126.Const. P. 197/2025 (S.B.) Gul Muhammad V/S S.S.P Tharparkar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1127.Cr.Rev 4/2024 (S.B.) Adnan Iqbal and another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1128.Cr.Bail 1068/2025 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad @ Ali bozdar & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1129.Criminal Miscelleneous 248/2024 (S.B.) Hussain Khan V/S Hidayatullah & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1130.Cr.Rev 70/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Hassan & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1131.Cr.Bail 550/2025 (S.B.) Dilawar Bhanbhro Othes V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1132.Cr.Bail 215/2025 (S.B.) Syed Shahbaz Ali Shah & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1133.Criminal Miscelleneous 705/2025 (S.B.) Arshad Hussain Mangi V/S Sajiad Ali & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
1134.Cr.Bail 669/2025 (S.B.) Moor Solangi & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1135.Const. P. 687/2025 (D.B.) Tayyab Ali V/S S.S.P Sanghar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1136.Const. P. 686/2025 (D.B.) Tayyab Ali V/S S.S.P Sanghar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1137.Const. P. 201/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Aslam V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1138.Const. P. 956/2025 (D.B.) Nadeem and others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Disable Quota
1139.Criminal Miscelleneous 590/2024 (S.B.) Mushtaque Ali Khoso V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1140.Const. P. 148/2012 (D.B.) Shahid Mehmood V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3187The recruitment process is an internal mechanism of the administrative department. The recruitment process must demonstrate self-accountability and transparency, which in the case of petitioner was found missing for reasons best known to the Respondents.Read more
Matter:-Service
1141.Const. P. 639/2023 (D.B.) Ali Dino Abbasi V/S MS CMCH Larkana and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 3184
Matter:-Against Order
1142.Cr.Bail 908/2025 (S.B.) Yaqoob @ Loto @ Dhando Gopang V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1143.Criminal Miscelleneous 674/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Sharif Kamboh V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1144.Cr.Bail 909/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Ghani ludhar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1145.I. A 35/2024 (S.B.) Sajjad Ali Odhano V/S Ayaz Ali Kanasiro Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1146.Criminal Miscelleneous 385/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Farooque Khaskheli V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1147.Criminal Miscelleneous 92/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ibrahim V/S Roopo & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1148.Const. P. 440/2014 (D.B.) Mst Alweena Khalid V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Service
1149.Criminal Miscelleneous 224/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ayoub V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1150.Criminal Miscelleneous 225/2025 (S.B.) Ghulamullah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1151.Criminal Miscelleneous 237/2025 (S.B.) Sharimati Neelan V/S S.S.P Umerkot & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1152.Const. P. 1269/2017 (D.B.) Mohammad Ahsan & another V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
1153.Criminal Miscelleneous 439/2025 (S.B.) GHULAM YASEEN ALIAS YASEEN MAHAR V/S The State and another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
1154.Const. P. 1491/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1155.Const. P. 2246/2014 (D.B.) NTDCL V/S Province Of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Land Matters
1156.Const. P. 140/2025 (D.B.) Ashfaque Ali V/S District and Sessions Judge Kamber SDKT & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 3137, 2026 PLC CS 29Constitutional Petition challenging Final Show-Cause Notice dismissed as premature; Prior administrative closure not a Bar to fresh inquiry; Doctrine of functus officio held inapplicable; Registrar, High Court of Sindh found neither necessary nor proper Party.Read more
Matter:-Departmental Action
1157.Cr.Bail 540/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Ghafoor & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1158.Const. P. 1131/2021 (D.B.) Ghulam Nabi V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DECLARATION
1159.Const. P. 1231/2024 (D.B.) Ramzan & another V/S Bhoro Khan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1160.Cr.Bail 425/2025 (S.B.) Najeeb ur Rehman @ Najeebullah Kalwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1161.Criminal Miscelleneous 195/2025 (S.B.) Dr. Ghulam Mujtaba V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1162.Const. P. 1517/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Hassan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Disable Quota
1163.Criminal Miscelleneous 230/2025 (S.B.) Awais V/S S.S.P Sanghar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1164.Const. P. 1362/2025 (D.B.) Mst Rashdan and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1165.Const. P. 1700/2025 (D.B.) Mst Zaib-u-Nisa@Zaiboo and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1166.Const. P. 1702/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Khalique and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1167.Criminal Miscelleneous 625/2025 (S.B.) Bahadur Ali Bhutto V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1168.Const. P. 1811/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Javeed Ghori and another V/S Dr.Farah Naz and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1169.Const. P. 1890/2025 (D.B.) Nadeem V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1170.Criminal Miscelleneous 226/2025 (S.B.) Siddique V/S Piyaro & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1171.Criminal Appeal 41/2024 (S.B.) Gul Bahar & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1172.Cr.Tran 73/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Shabana Soomro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1173.I. A 22/2022 (S.B.) Hakim Ali V/S Rustam Ali Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1174.Cr.Bail 766/2025 (S.B.) Zaheer Ahmed Katpar Kori V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1175.Const. P. 237/1998 (D.B.) Silver cotton Mills Workers Union V/S Silver Cotton Mills ltd and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 2763
Matter:-OTHER
1176.Cr.Bail 961/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Sarwar Chachar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1177.Cr.Bail 260/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1178.R.A (Civil Revision) 271/2024 (S.B.) Lal Bux V/S Mst. Sania and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1179.R.A (Civil Revision) 257/2024 (S.B.) Lal Bux V/S Mst. Sania and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1180.Cr.Rev 78/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed Malik & others V/S Mst. Saima Malik & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1181.Const. P. 952/2025 (D.B.) Tofique @ Tofique Ahmed & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAcquittal restores eligibility, denial of police appointments to exonerated candidates held ultra vires, discriminatory, and violative of constitutional guarantees.Read more
Matter:-Appointment
1182.R.A (Civil Revision) 164/2020 (S.B.) Hassan Mangrio & others V/S Kando Faqeer Mahar & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1183.Const. P. 1484/2025 (D.B.) Khadim Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1184.Const. P. 1586/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Ramzan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1185.Cr.Bail 955/2025 (S.B.) Lakhmeer Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1186.Const. P. 289/2007 (D.B.) Choudhry Shafqat Raza V/S E.D.O. Revenue Mirpurkhas and Others. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Land Matters
1187.Civil Tran 24/2025 (S.B.) Arif Ali V/S Mst. Sobia & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1188.Cr.Bail 256/2025 (S.B.) Piyar Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1189.Const. P. 1777/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Adnan Qureshi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1190.Const. P. 184/2025 (S.B.) Shahbuddin V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1191.R.A (Civil Revision) 64/2022 (S.B.) Arbab Ali and Others V/S Anwar Ali and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1192.Cr.Tran 13/2025 (S.B.) Barkat Ali Bhutto & Others V/S The State & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1193.R.A (Civil Revision) 221/2024 (S.B.) Mir Muhammad Laghari V/S Fayyaz Ahmed and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1194.Civil Revision 70/2020 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ASHRAF & OTHERS V/S Province Of Sindh & Other Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1195.Cr.Bail 418/2025 (S.B.) Mehrab Ali Shambani & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1196.Cr.Bail 1225/2025 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ALI S/O ABDUL MAJEED ARBI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
1197.Cr.Acq.A. 52/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Hussain Tagar V/S SHO PS MORO Mehboob Kalhoro & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1198.Cr.Acq.A. 31/2025 (S.B.) Karam Ali Narejo V/S Bakhat Ali Narejo & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1199.Criminal Miscelleneous 459/2025 (S.B.) GHULAM SARWAR SODHRO V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1200.Cr.Rev 20/2025 (S.B.) Rizwan Ali Pirzada V/S The State Through SHO Halani & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1201.Civil Revision 147/2025 (S.B.) Aziz Ahmed Korai V/S Bahadur Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1202.I. A 42/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Asghar V/S Muhammad Nawaz Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1203.Criminal Miscelleneous 320/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Bibi Aisha V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1204.Cr.Bail 245/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Jabbar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1205.Criminal Appeal 180/2024 (S.B.) Gul Hassan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1206.R.A (Civil Revision) 208/2018 (S.B.) Abdul Malik Soomro V/S Faiz Mohammad (decd), thr: L.Rs: & ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1207.R.A (Civil Revision) 66/2017 (S.B.) Mst. Rabia and others V/S Mohammad Ismail and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1208.Cr.J.A 245/2019 (S.B.) Ali Hassan V/S The State. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3438
Matter:-Life Imprisonment
1209.R.A (Civil Revision) 331/2024 (S.B.) Yar Muhammad & Others V/S Noor Ahmed through his LRS & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3427
Matter:-Against Order
1210.Criminal Miscelleneous 97/2025 (S.B.) Noor Hassan Dool V/S Azad and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
1211.Cr.Tran 110/2024 (S.B.) `Muhammad Sabir Malik V/S The State & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1212.Criminal Miscelleneous 111/2024 (S.B.) Sohno Khan Meerani V/S SHO P.S Sarhad District Ghotki & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1213.Cr.Bail 617/2025 (S.B.) Gulsher Laghari & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
1214.R.A (Civil Revision) 163/2016 (S.B.) Naseer Khan & ors. V/S Executive Engineer & Ors. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 2664
Matter:-Against Judgment
1215.Cr.Bail 1537/2025 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD UMER S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Bail Matters (Bail Granted after arrest U/S 395 PPC )
2025 SHC KHI 2666When can an identification parade lead to further inquiry in a post-custody bail application? Concession of bail grantedRead more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1216.Criminal Appeal 51/2024 (S.B.) Nazar Muhammad & others V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1217.R.A (Civil Revision) 37/2025 (S.B.) Shahana Bibi V/S Syed Munawar Ali Shah & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1218.Cr.Tran 55/2025 (S.B.) Saleem Ahmed Mangi V/S Nizakat Ali Mangi & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1219.Criminal Miscelleneous 502/2024 (S.B.) Masood Ahmed V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1220.Cr.Acq.A. 135/2024 (S.B.) Syed Nasir Hussain Zaidi V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1221.Cr.Bail 250/2025 (S.B.) Roshan Ul Din & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 2639
1222.Cr.Bail 252/2025 (S.B.) Akhtar Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1223.Criminal Miscelleneous 472/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Hussain Kandhro V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1224.Cr.Bail 251/2025 (S.B.) Akhtar Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1225.R.A (Civil Revision) 148/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Hassan V/S P.O. Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1226.Cr.J.A 36/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1227.Cr.J.A 37/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Ashraf V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1228.Criminal Miscelleneous 304/2025 (S.B.) Ali Gul V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1229.Cr.Bail 715/2025 (S.B.) Ali Gul Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1230.Cr.Tran 37/2025 (S.B.) Kamran Ali Khand V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1231.Cr.Bail 780/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Muhammad Phulpoto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1232.Cr.Bail 644/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Muavia @ Saheem Gadehi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1233.Cr.Bail 776/2025 (S.B.) Shahid @ Delo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1234.Criminal Appeal 58/2024 (D.B.) Noor Muhammad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1235.R.A (Civil Revision) 141/2021 (S.B.) Mst .Farzana V/S P.O Sindh Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1236.Criminal Miscelleneous 337/2025 (S.B.) BAKSH ALI MAHAR V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1237.R.A (Civil Revision) 65/2023 (S.B.) Gul Hassan V/S Gul Bahar and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1238.Criminal Miscelleneous 105/2025 (S.B.) Miskeen Gurgulo and another V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1239.R.A (Civil Revision) 298/2024 (S.B.) Muneer Ahmed Mammar and others V/S Niaz Ali Mammar and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1240.Cr.Bail 1912/2025 (S.B.) NAJEEBULLAH S/O ALLAH MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CNS Act, 1997 (Post Arrest Bail U/S 6/9 C)
2025 SHC KHI 2592How much is "noticeable absconsion" by a proclaimed offender as one of several factors that come into play in 2025 when lined up in the context of other factors of bail consideration articulated in the last 5 years by the Supreme CourtRead more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1241.Cr.Rev 132/2024 (S.B.) Jhaman Das V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1242.Cr.Bail 238/2025 (S.B.) Nomi @ Allah Dino & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1243.Cr.Rev 38/2025 (S.B.) Faiz Muhammad & others V/S Kanji Singh & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1244.Cr.Misc. 85/2024 (S.B.) Anwar Kareem & others V/S Aleemuddin & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1245.Cr.Bail 233/2025 (S.B.) Gulab V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1246.Cr.Bail 933/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Asif Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1247.Criminal Miscelleneous 413/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Abbas Keerio V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1248.Cr.Bail 242/2025 (S.B.) Ranjhan V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1249.Cr.Bail 244/2025 (S.B.) Jumma & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1250.Cr.Acq.A. 27/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Essa V/S Muhammad Essa Khan & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1251.Cr.Acq.A. 19/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Shabbir Khanzada V/S Syed Bhooral Shah & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1252.Criminal Miscelleneous 217/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Shazia D/o Manzoor V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1253.Cr.Acq.A. 10/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ali V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1254.Cr.Acq.A. 36/2025 (S.B.) Khalid Ahmed Dhondho V/S Qaloo Malik & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1255.Const. P. 213/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Sohni Khatoon V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1256.Cr.Acq.A. 80/2024 (S.B.) Mst Samina V/S Hyder Ali & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1257.Cr.Acq.A. 28/2025 (S.B.) Raheem Bux Shaikh V/S Ali Hassan Kori & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1258.Cr.J.A 9/2024 (S.B.) Allah Bux V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1259.Cr.Bail 598/2025 (S.B.) Faqeer Muhammad @ Baban V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1260.Cr.Acq.A. 10/2024 (D.B.) Tajoo Bheel V/S Har Lal and another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1261.Const. P. 201/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Hassan V/S Ghulam Rasool & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1262.Cr.Bail 771/2025 (S.B.) Allah Bahacyo Kanassro V/S The State & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1263.Const. P. 172/2025 (S.B.) Annus Ali V/S Mst. Amreen & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3431
Matter:-Family
1264.Cr.Tran 59/2024 (S.B.) Rahib Ali Kalhoro & Ors V/S Saeed Ali Kalhoro & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1265.Const. P. 275/2021 (S.B.) Mst Benazir Solangi V/S P.O Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-G & W
1266.Criminal Appeal 19/2024 (S.B.) Walho & others V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1267.Cr.Acq.A. 18/2023 (S.B.) Bheero V/S Ramesh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1268.Cr.Acq.A. 7/2025 (S.B.) Shahabuddin V/S Dodo & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1269.Cr.Rev 130/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Hashim & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1270.Cr.Bail 439/2025 (S.B.) Bahram Hussain Hisbani & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1271.Cr.J.A 55/2024 (S.B.) Meer Hassan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1272.Cr.Bail 642/2025 (S.B.) Yasin @ Ghulam Yasin Shar & Anothers V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1273.Cr.Bail 232/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Saleem V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1274.Cr.Bail 918/2025 (S.B.) Raz Muhammad Durrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1275.Cr.Bail 123/2025 (S.B.) Iqtidar Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1276.Criminal Miscelleneous 341/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Wahab Mandan V/S SHO PS Mirwah and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1277.Criminal Miscelleneous 342/2025 (S.B.) Rab Dino Joyo V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1278.Cr.Acq.A. 30/2025 (S.B.) Abdullah Khan Burghari V/S Ishfaque Burghari & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1279.Criminal Miscelleneous 423/2025 (S.B.) Faiz Muhammad Jhulan V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
1280.Civil Tran 20/2025 (S.B.) Shahnawaz & Others V/S Rukhsar & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1281.R.A (Civil Revision) 192/2024 (S.B.) Zahid Ali and others V/S Nisar and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1282.Criminal Miscelleneous 424/2025 (S.B.) Faiz Muhammad Jhulan V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
1283.Cr.Rev 68/2024 (S.B.) Hoat V/S Ld CJ & JM Tando Adam Thr. Rdr & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1284.Civil Revision 90/2025 (S.B.) Nisar Ahmed & Others V/S Sikandar & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1285.Cr.Rev 34/2025 (S.B.) Fakir Zakir Hussain Hisbani V/S The State & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1286.Cr.Rev 8/2024 (S.B.) Pehlaj V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1287.Execution 25/2012 (S.B.) Askari Bank Ltd. V/S A.H. International (Pvt) Ltd. & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2590, 2026 SHC KHI 723??? BLOCKING OF CNIC. ORDER BY COURT AGAINST DEFENDANT OR JUDGMENT DEBTOR. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS. RIGHT TO LIFE. CIVIL RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS. NADRA. ??? Suspension or blocking of CNIC of a citizen carries severe implications. It virtually brings life of the affected citizen to a halt; his right of employment and access to bank accounts is affected; his right to engage in trade, business or profession is affected. His access to education, health, etc. is also denied. His family members are also affected. Ultimately, his Right to Life, as guaranteed under Article 9 of the Constitution, is virtually taken away, and the citizen is denied the exercise of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of Pakistan. ??? No provision exists in CPC. or the Financial Institutions Ordinance 2001 for blocking of CNIC of a Judgment Debtor. ??? Even a warrant of arrest under section 51 CPC. cannot be issued routinely, without fulfilling certain mandatory pre-requisites.Read more
1288.R.A (Civil Revision) 30/2025 (S.B.) Saira Naz V/S P.O. Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1289.Civil Revision 59/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Naseem & others V/S Ali Khan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1290.Cr.Appeal 201/2024 (S.B.) Allah Bachayo V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1291.Criminal Appeal 201/2024 (S.B.) Allah Bachayo V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1292.Criminal Miscelleneous 133/2025 (S.B.) Chanisar & Others V/S S.S.P Mirpurkhas & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1293.Civil Revision 128/2025 (S.B.) Arbelo through his LRS V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1294.Civil Revision 30/2025 (S.B.) Saira Naz V/S P.O. Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1295.Cr.Bail 1817/2025 (S.B.) IMRAN S/O MUHAMMAD SALEEM & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2419The accused had a previous criminal record in Gutka Mawa matters. Bail exceptions discussed. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1296.Cr.Bail 519/2025 (S.B.) Ajmed Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1297.Const. P. 486/2021 (S.B.) Syed Zaman Shah V/S II.nd A.D.J Sanghar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3433
Matter:-Family
1298.Const. P. 292/2025 (S.B.) Javed Hyder V/S Mst Malook Zadi Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3432
Matter:-Family
1299.Const. P. 2326/2017 (S.B.) Haider Zaman & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Payment of Wages Act, 1936
2025 SHC KHI 2406Directions passed by Authority under 15(3) and (4) for recovery against occupier of factory not subsequently implemented under 15(5) - no explanation provided to petitioner - remanded to Authority to articulate its reason for non-enforcement. Petition allowedRead more
Matter:-IMPLEMENTATION
1300.R.A (Civil Revision) 183/2013 (S.B.) Nadir Hassan Arain V/S Prov of Sind & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 2591
Matter:-OTHER
1301.Civil Tran 16/2024 (S.B.) Shahnawaz & Ors V/S Mst. Sanam Sadaf & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-FAMILY TRANSFER APPLICATION
1302.Cr.Bail 168/2025 (S.B.) Bux Ali @ Bushal V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1303.Cr.Bail 649/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Farooq Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1304.Criminal Miscelleneous 778/2025 (S.B.) MADIHA HASHIM D/O MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN V/S UMER KHALID & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 7, 8 and 25)
2025 SHC KHI 2390Islamabad Guardian Judge decided the terms of custody, now minor presently in Karachi with father - High Court and Civil Court, should refrain from interferenceRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1305.Cr.Rev 15/2024 (S.B.) Leemon V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1306.Cr.Bail 431/2025 (S.B.) Sajid Ali Mohail V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1307.Cr.J.A 22/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Ayoub V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1308.Cr.J.A 15/2024 (S.B.) Khushi Muhammad V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1309.Cr.Rev 27/2024 (S.B.) Hayat V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1310.Cr.J.A 28/2024 (S.B.) Nawaz Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1311.Criminal Appeal 156/2024 (S.B.) Bhagwan Das V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1312.Civil Revision 123/2023 (S.B.) Abdula Hafeez Qureshi V/S Muhammad Akram & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1313.Cr.Bail 117/2025 (S.B.) Imran Ali Mahar & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1314.Cr.Bail 675/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Naeem Khilji V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1315.R.A (Civil Revision) 123/2023 (S.B.) Abdula Hafeez Qureshi V/S Muhammad Akram & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1316.R.A (Civil Revision) 287/2024 (S.B.) sajid hussain shah V/S rahzan alias rahzan ali Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1317.Civil Revision 295/2024 (S.B.) Amir Ali V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1318.Cr.Bail 933/2024 (S.B.) Fida Hussain Korai V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1319.Criminal Miscelleneous 69/2025 (S.B.) Altaf Hussain & another V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1320.Civil Revision 128/2023 (S.B.) M/s Sambara Builders & Developers Pvt..Ltd V/S Ashfaq Ahmed & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1321.I. A 38/2022 (S.B.) Thardeep Microfinance foundation V/S KHair Muhammad & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1322.Civil Revision 287/2024 (S.B.) sajid hussain shah V/S rahzan alias rahzan ali Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1323.I. A 41/2022 (S.B.) Advans Pakiatan V/S The Learned 4th Additional District Judge & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1324.R.A (Civil Revision) 295/2024 (S.B.) Amir Ali V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1325.R.A (Civil Revision) 128/2023 (S.B.) M/s Sambara Builders & Developers Pvt..Ltd V/S Ashfaq Ahmed & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1326.Cr.Bail 1630/2025 (S.B.) Niaz Muhammad S/o Khudai Raheem V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2369Pakistan citizen, co-accused Pak nationals, flight risk not made out, US dollars purchased using PKRs. Electronic evidence. No complaint from the Central Bank to the FIA to cause arrest, etc., under the framework of the FERA 2002. Bail grantedRead more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1327.Cr.Bail 231/2025 (S.B.) Ameen & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1328.R.A (Civil Revision) 190/2025 (S.B.) Mazhar Ali Shaikh & others V/S Federation of Pak. & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1329.Civil Revision 190/2025 (S.B.) Mazhar Ali Shaikh & others V/S Federation of Pak. & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1330.Cr.Tran 54/2025 (S.B.) Gul Hassan Hyderani V/S Rabnawaz Hyderani & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
1331.Criminal Miscelleneous 658/2024 (S.B.) BAHADAR KHAN ALIAS BAHADUR MALIK V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1332.R.A (Civil Revision) 3/2022 (S.B.) Ali Hassan thorugh LR V/S Iqbal & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1333.Cr.Bail 820/2024 (S.B.) Zahoor Ahmed Chachar & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1334.Cr.Bail 284/2025 (S.B.) Zahid @ Zahid Hussain Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 2387
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
1335.Criminal Miscelleneous 734/2025 (S.B.) ZAHID HASSAN KHADO S/O MUHAMMAD HASSAN KHADO V/S THE STATE THR PG SINDH & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2368The Magistrate dropped the section from the final report u/s 173 of the Cr. P.C. after applying his mind. No defect in order. 2021 P.Cr.L.J. 242 applied.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1336.Const. P. 673/2024 (D.B.) Walidad & Others V/S Muhammad Hayat & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 2628
1337.I. A 15/2022 (S.B.) Waqar Ali V/S Zulfiqar Ali Shah Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1338.Cr.Bail 703/2025 (S.B.) Nazar Hussain Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1339.Const. P. 1175/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Karim S/o Ali Khan V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2257A habeas corpus under Article 199(1)(b) of the 1973 Constitution cannot last forever. After 25 years, the corpus was exhumed twice, and DNA tests carried out twice, as well. The court must balance efficiency with the administration of justice. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-COMPLIANCE OF ORDER
1340.Criminal Miscelleneous 127/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Waheed V/S S.S.P Mirpurkhas & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1341.Const. P. 142/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Khatija V/S Muhammad Umair & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1342.II.A. 26/2025 (S.B.) Mano & Others V/S Muhammad Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1343.Cr.Acq.A. 167/2024 (S.B.) Niaz Ahmed V/S Ali Nawaz & Another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1344.Criminal Miscelleneous 594/2025 (S.B.) WAQAS AHMED ABBASI S/O FARZAND ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Procedure Code (Section 561-A)
Application for superdari filed by the Lessee for the crime property/leased-trailer truck involved in the death of the rickshaw driver - declinedRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1345.Cr.Bail 768/2025 (S.B.) Fazal @ Loung V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
1346.Const. P. 125/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Qurat -ul Ain V/S Muhammad Afan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1347.Cr.Acq.A. 25/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Moosa V/S Jumoon @ Muhammad Juman & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1348.Const. P. 61/2025 (S.B.) Nar Singh Das Malhi V/S Khetaram Malhi Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1349.Criminal Miscelleneous 598/2025 (S.B.) Arshad Ullah S/o Mir Bahadur V/S The State & another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Bail Cancellation (Bail Order cancelled)
2025 SHC KHI 2237Head Constable taken into custody by IO in Court - Sessions Court could not grant bail of Rs.4 million under Sec 319 PPC when HC was booked under Sec 302 PPC in the FIR and Magistrate had not accepted the Final ChallanRead more
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
1350.Criminal Appeal 158/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Raffique V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1351.Cr.Bail 337/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar Machi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1352.Cr.Bail 157/2025 (S.B.) Wazeer & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1353.Cr.Bail 163/2025 (S.B.) Rajab V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1354.Cr.Bail 75/2025 (S.B.) Mukhtiar Ali Mangnejo & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1355.Const. P. 604/2025 (S.B.) Areeb ur Rehman Baqai & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Harassment and Protection)
Transfer to Constitutional Bench - Harassment Petition has overlapping issuesRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
1356.Criminal Miscelleneous 503/2025 (S.B.) UMER WAHID KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD WAHID KHAN & OTHERS V/S IRFAN S/O ZARNOSH & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTwo distinct matters, Ex Officio Justice of Peace order to police authorities to record statement did not suffer from any defectsRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1357.Cr.Rev 97/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Iqbal V/S Muhammad Yaseen & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1358.Cr.Acq.A. 92/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Rehman V/S Ali Nawaz Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1359.Cr.Bail 911/2025 (S.B.) Allah Jurio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
1360.Cr.Bail 949/2025 (S.B.) SHEHZAD IFTIKHAR S/O IFTIKHAR AHMED KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (offence under section 420, 468 PPC)
2025 SHC KHI 2180Where the charging section in the final challan was bailable as opposed to when the FIR was registered, it had both bailable and non-bailable sections mentioned therein, a pre-arrest bail, depending on the facts and circumstances of the case, may be confirmed based on the stand-alone section which was bailable left in the final challan accepted by the trial Court.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
1361.Cr.Rev 53/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Warryam Rind V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1362.Cr.Bail 799/2025 (S.B.) Manzoor Ahmed Bhutto V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1363.Cr.Bail 683/2025 (S.B.) Lal Dino @ Lalo Lakho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1364.Const. P. 1155/2024 (D.B.) Mst Hina & another V/S Mst Akbari & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1365.Cr.Bail 200/2025 (S.B.) Gulzar Ahmed Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1366.Const. P. 285/2025 (S.B.) Syed Mansoor Ahmed Shah V/S Honorable 2nd CJ & JM Hyd & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3435
Matter:-Family
1367.Cr.Bail 71/2025 (D.B.) Naveed Zardari & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1368.Cr.Acq.A. 28/2025 (S.B.) Changon Khan V/S Mushtaque & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1369.Criminal Appeal 109/2024 (S.B.) Leemon Kolhi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1370.Const. P. 101/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Mariam V/S Muhammad Rizwan Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1371.Cr.Bail 41/2025 (D.B.) Zulfiqar Ali Alias Nazim Wagon V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1372.Cr.Rev 22/2024 (D.B.) Bhai Khan & others V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1373.Cr.Acq.A. 63/2024 (D.B.) Nabi Bux V/S Arbaz & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1374.Criminal Miscelleneous 361/2025 (S.B.) SHEIKH FARZAN AHMED MAHMOOD S/O SHEIKH AMIR MAHMOD V/S MOHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MOHAMMAD YAQOOB & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Procedure Code (Section 190 Cr Pc R/W 173 Cr Pc )
2025 SHC KHI 2125No grounds for quashment can be made out where the charge framed is suffering from defects. Case remanded to the trial Court.Read more
Matter:-QUAHSMENT OF PROCEDING
1375.Criminal Miscelleneous 617/2025 (S.B.) MST SHAGUFTA D/O SHEEREN KHAN V/S ABDUL HAFEEZ & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Procedure Code (Section 491)
2025 SHC KHI 2133Matters about paternity and custody cannot be decided under Section 491 Cr. P.C.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1376.Cr.Acq.A. 20/2023 (S.B.) Bharat Kumar V/S Sajid Hussain & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1377.Cr.Bail 2029/2025 (S.B.) PEER MUHAMAMD S/O BASEER KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Pakistan Penal Code
2025 SHC KHI 2116Points to consider when considering post-arrest bail of a foreign nationalRead more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1378.Cr.Bail 847/2025 (S.B.) Imtiaz Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
1379.Cr.Bail 70/2025 (S.B.) Faisal Iqbal V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1380.Cr.Bail 181/2025 (S.B.) Aftab Malik V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1381.Cr.Bail 183/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Bilal Malik V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1382.Cr.Bail 182/2025 (S.B.) Allauddin V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1383.Criminal Miscelleneous 611/2024 (S.B.) Raja Ishtiaque V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1384.Cr.Rev 76/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Shakoor Arain V/S Bashir Ahmed Naz & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-435 & 439 Cr.P.C
1385.R.A (Civil Revision) 40/2024 (S.B.) Lakho & another V/S Ghamoon & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1386.Cr.Acq.A. 18/2024 (S.B.) Suleman V/S Abdul Razzaque and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1387.Cr.Bail 466/2025 (S.B.) Siraj Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1388.Const. P. 290/2025 (S.B.) Mst Gul Wazeeran V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Detention
1389.Const. P. 1601/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Waheed Chohan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 2222
Matter:-Against Order
1390.Criminal Miscelleneous 690/2025 (S.B.) HASSAN SAEED S/O MUHAMMAD SAEED V/S THE STATE & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2102Application to cancel bail extended to the accused on a bail-granting order passed by the trial court based on a no-objection affidavit of the complainant, when the terms of no-objection are breached, is in the first instance to be decided by the same Court which passed such Order and not by the High Court.Read more
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
1391.Cr.Bail 69/2025 (D.B.) Sardar Ahmed Abbasi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1392.Cr.Rev 131/2024 (S.B.) Naseer Mehmood Shar Baloch V/S Faiz Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1393.Cr.Bail 36/2025 (S.B.) Kalash V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1394.Cr.Rev 105/2024 (S.B.) Khuda Bux V/S Purkho & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1395.Cr.Bail 121/2025 (S.B.) Allah Dino & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1396.Const. P. 597/2025 (S.B.) Intersys Limited V/S Federal Investigation Authority & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: The Constitution (26th Amendment) Act, 2024 (Article 199 & 202A - Constitutional High Court Powers & Constitutional Benches Roster)
Matter:-HARASSMENT
1397.Criminal Miscelleneous 735/2024 (S.B.) ABDUL GHAFFAR MANDHAI V/S ZOHABI MAGSI & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2096Information relied upon by the Complainant-applicant of events which took place during the public procurement proceedings, in particular, the alleged conduct of certain officers present at the complaint redressal committee, did not make out a cognizable offence, especially when the applicant-complainant had also initiated civil litigation against the procurement agency to declare the bidding a misprocurement. Ex-Justice of Peace rightly rejected the application under Section 22-A and B Cr.Pc.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1398.Criminal Miscelleneous 336/2025 (S.B.) Waheed Ali Gaho V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1399.Const. P. 72/2025 (S.B.) Arman Ali & Others through L.rs V/S Shazia Irfan Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
1400.Criminal Miscelleneous 727/2025 (S.B.) GUL ZADA S/O SHAH BAHADUR V/S LD IIIRD ADJ KHI MALIR & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2094Order by Ex-Justice Officio order after issuing notice to respondents-proposed accused on first date, dismissed the suit for non-prosecution on second date, applicant-complainant alleged on oath in affidavit that advocates removed him from the Court room, order silent, in the circumstances, case remanded to be decided afresh, on merits.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1401.R.A (Civil Revision) 65/2021 (S.B.) Molvi Ubedullah and Others V/S Mst.Zareena and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1402.I. A 16/2023 (S.B.) Rafique Ahmed V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1403.Criminal Miscelleneous 508/2025 (S.B.) Imran Ahmed Magsi V/S SSP Sukkur and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1404.Const. P. 171/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Irtaza V/S Arslan Ahmed Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1405.Criminal Miscelleneous 507/2025 (S.B.) Sabir Ali and another V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1406.Cr.Bail 522/2025 (S.B.) Israf Phulpoto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1407.Const. P. 278/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Shabir V/S Mst. Sana and another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1408.Cr.Bail 370/2025 (S.B.) Ajeeb Shah @ Adeeb V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
1409.Const. P. 110/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Saima V/S S.S.P Tharparkar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1410.Criminal Miscelleneous 148/2025 (S.B.) Shah Nawaz V/S Zubair Ahmed & other Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1411.Cr.Acq.A. 29/2025 (S.B.) Shahzad Ahmed V/S Nand Lal & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1412.Criminal Miscelleneous 183/2025 (S.B.) Sht. Misran V/S Balam & Othres Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1413.Criminal Miscelleneous 158/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Usman & others V/S Hamza and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1414.Cr.Acq.A. 24/2025 (S.B.) Manzoor Hussain Jalbani V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1415.Cr.Bail 132/2025 (S.B.) Waqar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1416.Cr.Bail 139/2025 (S.B.) Fajurddin & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1417.Cr.Bail 424/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Adnan Memon V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1418.Criminal Miscelleneous 10/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Feroza Sarwar V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1419.Criminal Appeal 13/2024 (S.B.) Abdullah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1420.Cr.Bail 207/2025 (S.B.) Bhagwano @ Bhagwano V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1421.Cr.Bail 116/2025 (S.B.) Umed Ali & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1422.Cr.Bail 424/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Adnan Memon V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1423.Cr.Bail 713/2025 (S.B.) Ayaz @ Zahoor Solangi & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1424.Cr.Bail 397/2025 (S.B.) Abid Hussain Soomro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1425.Cr.Bail 105/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Isha & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1426.Cr.Bail 130/2025 (S.B.) Allah Rakhio & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1427.Criminal Miscelleneous 596/2024 (S.B.) Murtaza V/S SSP Umerkot & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1428.Criminal Miscelleneous 691/2025 (S.B.) MST ALIA RANI D/O REHMATULLAH V/S THE SSP COMPLAINT CELL DIST: WEST KHI & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016
2025 SHC KHI 2049Where the Applicant alleges a crime to fall under the provisions of PPC, and no cognizable offence is/was made out before the Police and-or the Ex Officio Justice of Peace, the Applicant may have recourse under the PECA, 2016, as amended by PECA 2025, to approach the Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (CCIA) which has replaced the FIA Cyber Crime Division.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1429.Criminal Miscelleneous 521/2025 (S.B.) Riaz Ahmed & others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 3437
Matter:-561-A Cr.P.C
1430.Const. P. 3147/2025 (D.B.) Sindh Public Service Commission & Another V/S NAB & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2047NAB, Inquiry Quashed Matter falling outside the ambit of NAO, 1999Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
1431.Const. P. 560/2025 (D.B.) Reva Chand & others V/S Bheem Raj & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 2354
1432.Const. P. 1574/2024 (D.B.) Farhad Anwar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1433.Const. P. 292/2025 (D.B.) Saifal V/S Badal & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1434.Const. P. 1229/2024 (D.B.) Kewal V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1435.Cr.Bail 9/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Ghafoor V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1436.Cr.Bail 1/2025 (D.B.) Ashique V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1437.Cr.Acq.A. 21/2024 (D.B.) The State Thr. P.G. Sindh V/S Khalid Mehmood and another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1438.Cr.Bail 698/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Anas Bhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1439.Cr.Bail 81/2024 (D.B.) Barkat Ali Golo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1440.Cr.Bail 120/2025 (S.B.) Jumoon V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 2058
1441.Cr.Acq.A. 67/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Qadir V/S Muhannad Hassan Chachar Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1442.Cr.Bail 202/2025 (S.B.) Shahzad Bhatti V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1443.Cr.Bail 694/2025 (S.B.) Mukhtiar Ahmed Bozdar & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1444.Criminal Miscelleneous 625/2024 (S.B.) Nawaz Ali V/S Hamir & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1445.Criminal Miscelleneous 225/2025 (S.B.) Jitendar Kumar V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1446.Cr.Bail 510/2025 (S.B.) Siraj Ahmed Brohi & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1447.Cr.Bail 693/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Aslam Shar & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1448.Cr.Rev 23/2025 (S.B.) Aurangzeb Wangani V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1449.Criminal Miscelleneous 74/2025 (S.B.) Bin Yameen & others V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1450.Const. P. 162/2025 (S.B.) Aslam Ibrahim V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1451.Criminal Miscelleneous 89/2025 (S.B.) Mohan V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1452.Cr.Bail 2080/2025 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AZAM S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2038Under what extremely narrow and thin circumstances, may a pre-arrest bail filed in the first instance to the High Court be maintainable? In the circumstances, the High Court may carve out an option for the applicant/accused to join the trial while leaving future options available.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
1453.Cr.Bail 670/2025 (S.B.) Noor Nabi Ansari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1454.Cr.Bail 174/2025 (S.B.) Uris V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1455.Criminal Miscelleneous 432/2025 (S.B.) Habibullah Shaikh V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1456.Criminal Miscelleneous 482/2025 (S.B.) QAMARUDDIN AND OTHERS V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1457.Criminal Miscelleneous 723/2023 (S.B.) ABID BASHIR S/O MUHAMMAD BASHIR V/S SSP COMPLAINT CELL KHI EAST & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2040Impact of triggering the recording of a statement when the applicant-complainant submits/produces electronic evidence gathered digitally, documenting a potential criminal activity recorded by a smartphone. Given the description of the event, surprisingly, no such corroborative evidence was available with the Ex Officio Justice of Peace to pass an order in favor of the complainant. Section 562-A challenge dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1458.Criminal Appeal 74/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Younus V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1459.Criminal Miscelleneous 160/2025 (S.B.) Gaboori V/S SSP Mirpurkhas and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1460.Const. P. 108/2024 (S.B.) Mst Asia Nisar Through Attorney V/S Muhammad Rahmatullah Arain Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
1461.Criminal Miscelleneous 162/2025 (S.B.) Parkhan V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1462.Criminal Miscelleneous 601/2024 (S.B.) Luxman & others V/S Learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Umerkot Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1463.Cr.Bail 686/2025 (S.B.) Rohit Kumar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1464.Const. P. 265/2025 (S.B.) Mst Laiba & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Harassment
1465.Criminal Miscelleneous 182/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zainab V/S S.S.P Sanghar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1466.Cr.Rev 56/2025 (S.B.) Nadeem Saeed V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1467.Cr.Acq.A. 26/2023 (S.B.) Mooro V/S Dhero & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1468.Criminal Miscelleneous 181/2025 (S.B.) Khadim Hussain V/S S.H.O P.S Ghulam Muhammad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1469.Criminal Miscelleneous 602/2024 (S.B.) Luxman & Others V/S Learned 2nd Addl. Session Judge & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1470.Cr.Bail 201/2025 (S.B.) Rehmatullah V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1471.Criminal Miscelleneous 313/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad V/S Ld 1st ADJ/Ex-Offecio J.P Umerkot & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1472.Criminal Miscelleneous 142/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ameen V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1473.Criminal Miscelleneous 173/2025 (S.B.) Muhamamad Akhtar V/S The state & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1474.Criminal Miscelleneous 620/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Mustafa Bullo V/S SSP Sukkur & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1475.Cr.Rev 32/2025 (S.B.) Manzoor Junejo V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1476.Cr.Rev 110/2024 (S.B.) Barkat Ali V/S Walidino & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1477.Criminal Miscelleneous 163/2025 (S.B.) Meer Muhammad V/S Incharge Public Complaint & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1478.Criminal Miscelleneous 125/2024 (S.B.) Gresh Kumar V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1479.Cr.Acq.A. 44/2024 (S.B.) Teekam Das V/S Moula Bux @ Molu & other Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1480.Criminal Miscelleneous 176/2025 (S.B.) Yasir Arfat V/S S.S.P Mirpurkhas & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1481.Criminal Miscelleneous 179/2025 (S.B.) Sadam Hussain V/S Umar & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1482.Criminal Miscelleneous 180/2025 (S.B.) Amar Singh V/S S,S,P Tharparkar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1483.Criminal Miscelleneous 554/2025 (S.B.) IMRAN S/O ARWAN V/S SHO PS AZIZABAD & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 2039Where the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace dismissed the application as a dispute between the private parties, essentially involved a civil matter, in the circumstances, mediation could also have been suggested to the parties as an appropriate dispute resolution mechanismRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1484.Cr.Bail 66/2025 (S.B.) Rab Dino & others V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1485.R.A (Civil Revision) 243/2024 (S.B.) Mohandas & others V/S Chairman Municipal Committee Sanghar Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1486.Criminal Miscelleneous 423/2024 (S.B.) Dharam Das V/S SSP Sanghar and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1487.Civil Revision 243/2024 (S.B.) Mohandas & others V/S Chairman Municipal Committee Sanghar Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1488.Cr.Bail 83/2025 (S.B.) Fareed Ahmed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1489.Criminal Miscelleneous 164/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Imran V/S Mir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1490.Criminal Miscelleneous 58/2025 (S.B.) Photo V/S P O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1491.Cr.Bail 185/2025 (S.B.) Rincho & anothers V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1492.R.A (Civil Revision) 66/2023 (S.B.) Riaz Ahmed V/S Iftikhar Ahmed and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1493.Cr.Bail 434/2025 (S.B.) Zain ul Abiden Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1494.Cr.Bail 177/2024 (S.B.) Zulfiqar Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1495.Civil Revision 66/2023 (S.B.) Riaz Ahmed V/S Iftikhar Ahmed and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1496.Criminal Miscelleneous 431/2025 (S.B.) Sameer Ali Channa V/S SSP Sukkur & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1497.Const. P. 635/2025 (S.B.) Laxmee D/o Harjee V/S SSP Complaint Cell District South Karachi & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1986Mother cannot be deprived of right of custody of minors if she converts faithRead more
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
1498.Const. P. 2741/2025 (D.B.) Mushtaq Ahmed V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1992placing the name on Passport Control List declared illegal directions issued to remove the nameRead more
Matter:-E.C.L.
1499.Const. P. 3428/2025 (D.B.) Noman Liaqat V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1969mere filing of Appeal does not operate as stay. Customs authority directed to release goodsRead more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
1500.Const. P. 153/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Shahnaz V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1501.Cr.Bail 21/2025 (S.B.) Muhib Ali V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1502.Criminal Miscelleneous 169/2025 (S.B.) Sadam Hussain V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1503.Const. P. 3036/2025 (D.B.) Faraz Ahmed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1963accused a police official involved in contraband drug peddling not entitled for grant of bailRead more
Matter:-Bail (CNS)
1504.Criminal Miscelleneous 359/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Khalique Buriro V/S SSP Sukkur & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 2044Ex-Officio Justice of Peace to consider audio/video recorded by smartphone, even TikTok, Whatsapp, and Instagram/Insta recordingsRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1505.Const. P. 578/2025 (S.B.) Fahad Junaid s/o Junaid Jalal V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1965police cannot be bound to record FIR after obtaining permission from the CourtRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
1506.Const. P. 3024/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Hanif V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1962drug menace bail refusedRead more
Matter:-Bail (CNS)
1507.Const. P. 3495/2025 (D.B.) Azizuddin V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1974Res Judicata second petition on the same subject not maintainableRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
1508.Cr.Bail 20/2023 (S.B.) Gulzar Ahmed Maitlo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1966Suggested Protocol for withdrawal of surety and P.R. bond when the trial Court orders keeping the case in abeyance ("stop proceedings") without pronouncing the judgment of acquittal or convictionRead more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1509.Criminal Miscelleneous 138/2025 (S.B.) Imran V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1510.Cr.J.A 61/2024 (S.B.) Irshad Ali V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 1959
1511.Criminal Appeal 6/2024 (S.B.) Mohammad Hanif V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 1961
1512.Cr.Bail 124/2025 (S.B.) Ranmal & others V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1513.Const. P. 2303/2025 (D.B.) Ubed ur Rehman V/S Province of SIndh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1940offence falling under prohibitory clause bail refusedRead more
Matter:-Bail (CNS)
1514.Const. P. 3340/2025 (D.B.) M/s Loreal Pakistan Private Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1938, 2025 SHC KHI 1939, 2025 SHC KHI 1941, 2025 SHC KHI 1942Section 39 of Customs Act recovery of duty and taxRead more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
1515.Const. P. 534/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Gulnar Tanoli & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
1516.Const. P. 563/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Khairan w/o Jamoo V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
1517.Const. P. 3446/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Mateen V/S Chief Secretary Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1957Reinvestigation in the case cannot be ordered, lacking mala fide or colorful exercise of powersRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
1518.Const. P. 150/2025 (S.B.) Javed Ali Bozdar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: The Constitution (26th Amendment) Act, 2024 (Article 199 & 202A - Constitutional High Court Powers & Constitutional Benches Roster)
2025 SHC SUK 1902Overlapping issues - Constitutional Bench or Regular Bench? Range of reliefs prayed for habeas corpus - Sec. 491 Cr.P.C. - certiorari - mandamus - Principles laid down in Full Bench Judgment of the Sindh High Court in the Syed Sahir Hasan caseRead more
Matter:-Detention
1519.Const. P. 595/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Asma alias Uzma & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
1520.Cr.Bail 173/2025 (S.B.) Jairam Das V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1521.Const. P. 1214/2025 (D.B.) Mst Mumtaz Bibi and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1522.Const. P. 1198/2025 (D.B.) Mst Rindo Khatoon and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1523.Const. P. 3234/2025 (D.B.) Liaquat Ali Fazlani V/S General Manager SSGCL & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1933Relationship of employee Governed under principle of Master and Servant Petition not maintainableRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
1524.Const. P. 3243/2025 (D.B.) M/s PSRM Pvt Ltd V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1927Recovery of Liability by Officers of Customs DepartmentRead more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
1525.Cr.Acq.A. 191/2023 (S.B.) AZIZ DAMJI S/O NAZAR ALI V/S RANA SHAHID JAMIL & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1987, 2025 SHC KHI 2043
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1526.Const. P. 3085/2025 (D.B.) Kainat V/S Province of SIndh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
1527.Const. P. 1243/2025 (D.B.) Roman Ali Khowaja and others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1528.Const. P. 3286/2025 (D.B.) Nisar Ahmed for Master Pipe Industries V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1905
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
1529.Const. P. 2167/2025 (D.B.) Khadim Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1935Concession of bail is not available to a habitual offender involved in narcotics casesRead more
Matter:-Bail (CNS)
1530.Const. P. 2668/2025 (D.B.) Saghar Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1958ICE & WEED POSING POTENTIAL THREATS TO LIVES OF YOUTH BAIL DECLINEDRead more
Matter:-Bail (CNS)
1531.Cr.Appeal 30/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Qadir Machhi and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
1532.Cr.Bail 8/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Majeed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1533.Criminal Appeal 114/2024 (S.B.) Sodhal @ Sodho Khan & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1876
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1534.Const. P. 1201/2025 (D.B.) Mst Mehak and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1535.Cr.Rev 48/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Abbass Dehraj V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Revision
2025 SHC SUK 1850To transfer (case) or not to transfer (case), that is/was the question before the Sessions Court?Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1536.Criminal Appeal 39/2020 (S.B.) Allah Dino Lakhan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1874
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1537.Cr.Rev 71/2025 (S.B.) Marvi Khatoon Patafi V/S The State & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 2041Regular bench exercising criminal jurisdiction cannot carve out a relief in criminal revision which falls within the roster of the Constitutional bench by way of a constitutional petition seeking directions from the State.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1538.Criminal Miscelleneous 498/2024 (S.B.) Mulazim Sajjad V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1539.Criminal Miscelleneous 135/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Maryam V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1540.Criminal Miscelleneous 90/2025 (S.B.) Rehan Sarwar V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1541.Const. P. 3166/2025 (D.B.) Omer Farooq Khan & another V/S SHO PS KIA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1923Petition for Quashment of FIR not Maintainable when case is pending TrialRead more
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
1542.Criminal Appeal 16/2024 (D.B.) Sadique Ali & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 1868
1543.Const. P. 3167/2025 (D.B.) Omer Farooq Khan & another V/S SHO PS KIA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1924Petition for Quashment of FIR not maintainable when case is pending trialRead more
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
1544.Cr.Misc. 73/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali V/S A.D.J Mirpurkhas & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1545.Const. P. 1127/2025 (D.B.) Mst.Samreen another V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1546.Const. P. 279/2018 (D.B.) Jawaid Akhtar V/S S.L.A.T & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Constitution of Pakistan (Labour Law)
2025 SHC KHI 1848, 2025 SHC KHI 1849While the Sindh Labour Court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate the petitioners grievance, at the same time, as per the law in force at the material time, the petitioner could have sought his remedy in writ jurisdiction. Now that it has undisputedly come on record that the petitioner was removed from service contrary to fair trial and due process on the part of the Competent Authority/HESCO, the petitioner is fully entitled to relief in constitutional jurisdiction. Petition allowed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1547.Criminal Miscelleneous 131/2025 (S.B.) Tamachi Bheel & Others V/S Manjhi Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1548.Criminal Appeal 101/2024 (S.B.) Rafique V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 3 YEARS & ABOVE
1549.Const. P. 1097/2025 (D.B.) Mst Husna another V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1550.Const. P. 1002/2025 (D.B.) Mst.Allah Rakhi and another V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1551.Criminal Miscelleneous 130/2025 (S.B.) Tamachi Bheel & Others V/S Sht. Honjjo & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1552.Criminal Appeal 50/2023 (S.B.) Nazar Ali Narejo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1553.Const. P. 6071/2024 (D.B.) Major (R) Tariq Lodhi V/S Mst. Asma Burney and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1847Legal controversies that were settled during the first round of litigation up to the Supreme Court cannot be reagitated with modifications in execution.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
1554.Cr.J.A 11/2023 (S.B.) Moula Bux Chachar & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1873
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1555.Const. P. 1114/2025 (D.B.) Mst Tatheer Zehra another V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1556.Cr.Appeal 106/2023 (S.B.) Niaz Hussain Siyal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 1891
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
1557.Criminal Appeal 106/2023 (S.B.) Niaz Hussain Siyal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 1841
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
1558.Criminal Appeal 5/2025 (S.B.) Riaz Korai V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1872
Matter:-R.I FOR 6 YEARS & ABOVE
1559.Criminal Appeal 16/2025 (S.B.) Bakhshal Bozdar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1882
Matter:-R.I FOR 7 YEARS & ABOVE
1560.Cr.Acctt.A 1/2018 (D.B.) HUSSAIN BUX BALOCH S/O KAREEM BUX V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1842, 2025 SHC KHI 1843
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1561.Cr.Acctt.A 1/2018 (D.B.) HUSSAIN BUX BALOCH S/O KAREEM BUX V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1844
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1562.Const. P. 141/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Siddique Panhwar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1880
Matter:-Custody of Minor
1563.Const. P. 71/2020 (D.B.) Pfizer Pakistan Ltd V/S Full Bench NIRC & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1564.R.A (Civil Revision) 97/2024 (S.B.) Ali Sher Sahito & Others V/S Ghulam Murtaza & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1565.Const. P. 718/2025 (D.B.) Sumair V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Narcotic Bail(Post Arrest)
1566.Const. P. 946/2025 (D.B.) Ali Nawaz V/S The State and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Narcotic Bail(Post Arrest)
1567.Const. P. 1054/2025 (D.B.) Mehran V/S The State and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Narcotic Bail(Post Arrest)
1568.Const. P. 1034/2025 (D.B.) Mukhtiar Ali @ Badal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Narcotic Bail(Post Arrest)
1569.Spl.Cr.J.A 34/2024 (D.B.) Akhtiar Ali Metlo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1881
Matter:-R.I FOR 14 YEARS & ABOVE
1570.Criminal Miscelleneous 540/2024 (S.B.) Veerji V/S Kastooro & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1571.Criminal Appeal 46/2024 (D.B.) Barkat Bakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 1761
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
1572.Cr.Bail 125/2025 (S.B.) Tayab Khan V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1573.Cr.Bail 126/2025 (S.B.) Tayab Khan V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1574.Cr.Rev 30/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Haneef V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1575.Const. P. 884/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Qadir V/S Raza Muhammad Soomro,Sub Inspector PS.Naseem Nagar Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Narcotic Bail(Post Arrest)
1576.Cr.Rev 97/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Hashim Rind V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1577.Cr.Bail 150/2025 (S.B.) Ahmed Khan & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1578.Cr.Bail 48/2025 (S.B.) Sharif V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1579.Cr.Rev 10/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ashraf V/S Ld. ADJ-I Sanghar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 1886
1580.Criminal Appeal 14/2024 (S.B.) Khano & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1581.Criminal Appeal 195/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Rasool & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 1991
1582.R.A (Civil Revision) 159/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Qadir V/S Athar Hussain Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 2007
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1583.Const. P. 1638/2022 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Jamshed & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1721Regularization to seek regularization initial contract appointment must be in accordance with lawRead more
Matter:-SERVICE / REGULARIZATION
1584.Cr.Bail 128/2025 (S.B.) Perm Chand V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1585.Cr.Bail 95/2025 (S.B.) Shanker & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1586.Const. P. 4962/2019 (D.B.) Altaf Hussain Abro and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1703discrimination in service safeguarded under article 27 of the Constitution discrimination in service safeguarded under article 27 of the Constitution Petitioners be given equal treatment as given to readers of Federal Service TribunaRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
1587.I. A 6/2023 (D.B.) M/S Sehawani Cotton Ginners & Others V/S M/S National Bank of Pakistan anotthes Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1869
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1588.Cr.Rev 42/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Latif & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1760
Matter:-R.I FOR 2 YEARS & ABOVE
1589.Cr.Bail 199/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Sijawal @ Sijawal Bullo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1765
Matter:-CUSTODY
1590.Criminal Miscelleneous 206/2025 (S.B.) Musadiq Mujtaba Kolachi Baloch V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1764
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1591.Spl.Cr.J.A 96/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Muqeem Bandhani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1767
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
1592.Const. P. 729/2024 (D.B.) Anees ul Rehman & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Sindh Education Recruitment Policy 2021
1593.Cr.Bail 32/2025 (S.B.) Rehan Sarwar V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1594.Cr.Bail 76/2025 (S.B.) Arbab Ali & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1595.Cr.Bail 278/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Shakoor Lakho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1762
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1596.Cr.Bail 134/2025 (S.B.) Atta Muhammad @ Atto Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1763
Matter:-CUSTODY
1597.Criminal Miscelleneous 99/2025 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Lund V/S DSP complaint Cell N/Feroze and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1766
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1598.Const. P. 949/2023 (D.B.) Mohammad Idrees V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Disable Quota
1599.Criminal Appeal 26/2024 (S.B.) Umair Ahmed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1600.Criminal Appeal 46/2024 (D.B.) Muzaffar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1601.II.A. 94/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Sonnan throgh LRS V/S Lat Allah Warray & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
1602.Cr.Bail 357/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Yousif V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1623
Matter:-CUSTODY
1603.Criminal Appeal 32/2020 (D.B.) Naveed-ul-Rehman & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life)
1604.Const. P. 1716/2024 (D.B.) Noor Muhammad & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1605.Criminal Miscelleneous 740/2024 (S.B.) NAZAR MUHAMMAD JOKHIO V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1500Points to consider when issuing directions to register FIR (for Ex-Officio Justice of Peace)Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1606.Cr.Bail 283/2025 (S.B.) Aijaz & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1620
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1607.Cr.Bail 152/2025 (S.B.) Chanessar & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1627
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1608.Const. P. 1548/2024 (D.B.) Allah Warayo and others V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1609.Criminal Miscelleneous 295/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Muhammad Sahito & Another V/S SHO PS Halani District Naushahro Feroze & (04) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1639
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1610.Cr.Bail 327/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Qadir @ Jaro Rind V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1630
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1611.Cr.Bail 668/2024 (S.B.) Zafarullah @ Ali Raza V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1638
Matter:-CUSTODY
1612.Cr.Rev 90/2024 (D.B.) IMITIAZ AHMED S/O ABDUL HAMID V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1325
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1613.Const. P. 1808/2020 (D.B.) Mst Razia Bibi V/S P.T.C.L & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 PLC CS 1204Pension declined. Benevolent Fund and Group Insurance allowed.Read more
Matter:-INSURANCE
1614.Const. P. 1720/2024 (D.B.) Sajan V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1615.Const. P. 1335/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Jannat V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1616.Cr.J.A 44/2019 (D.B.) Bakhat @ Bakho Lolai V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 1887
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
1617.II.A. 64/2024 (S.B.) Pirshotam V/S Sht. Seeta & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 1215
1618.Cr.J.A 70/2019 (D.B.) Aijaz Ali Babar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 1888
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
1619.II.A. 15/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Haneef V/S Mst. Marvi & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1620.Cr.Rev 94/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Ishaque V/S The State and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1633
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1621.Cr.Bail 288/2025 (S.B.) Aqeel Mahar V/S The State & another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1635
Matter:-CUSTODY
1622.Cr.Bail 143/2025 (S.B.) Waheed Ali Abbasi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1618
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1623.Const. P. 1062/2023 (D.B.) Aziz Ahmed V/S Abdul Jalil Zubedi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 853
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
1624.Cr.Bail 192/2025 (S.B.) Muhbat Ali Kalery V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1628
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1625.Const. P. 615/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Touseef & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 852
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
1626.Const. P. 193/2024 (D.B.) M/s Huffaz Seamless Pipe Industries Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
1627.Const. P. 765/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Mehboob Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 784, 2025 SBLR Sindh 1528Ensuring equal treatment and Merit-Based Regularization: Upholding legislative intent and Constitutional mandates for contractual Doctors under the Doctors Regularization Act, 2018.Read more
1628.Const. P. 2922/2024 (D.B.) Saleem Akhtar Siddiqi V/S Sultan Ahmed Qureshi & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Resjudicata (Petition dismissed)
2025 SHC KHI 782Judgment-Debtor Tenant's Petition dismissed. Still the Executing Court cannot attach the pension account of the alleged Government Officer/Advocate in execution proceedings arising from the enforcement of the recovery of arrears of rent from the alleged tenant-judgment-debtorRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
1629.Const. P. 1707/2024 (D.B.) Naveed Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1630.Const. P. 1791/2024 (D.B.) Jawaid Ali Shah V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1631.Const. P. 62/2025 (D.B.) Zahid Ahmed V/S P.O. SINDH & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1632.Const. P. 599/2025 (D.B.) Chibhar V/S Province of Sindh & and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Disable Quota
1633.Cr.Bail 314/2025 (S.B.) Shahban Burdi & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1629
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1634.R.A (Civil Revision) 339/2023 (S.B.) Ali Mihammad through LRS V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 695Jurisdictional bounds of Civil Courts: Revenue remedies must precede Judicial Intervention. Revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 C.P.C: A limited scope of intervention against concurrent findings.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
1635.Cr.Bail 119/2025 (S.B.) Awais & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1636
Matter:-CUSTODY
1636.Cr.Bail 791/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Malik Munhano V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1626
Matter:-CUSTODY
1637.Cr.Bail 239/2025 (S.B.) Amjad Hussain Sahito V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1625
Matter:-CUSTODY
1638.Cr.Bail 259/2025 (S.B.) Allah Bux Mangrio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1634
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1639.Cr.Bail 330/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Waheed Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1617
Matter:-CUSTODY
1640.Cr.Bail 167/2025 (S.B.) Ali Murad Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1624
Matter:-CUSTODY
1641.Cr.Acq.A. 18/2018 (D.B.) Riaz Hussain V/S Imran Mazari & An other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
1642.Criminal Miscelleneous 791/2024 (S.B.) Mastoi Bhutto V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1631
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1643.Cr.Bail 315/2024 (S.B.) Fateh Muhammad Mari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1637
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1644.Criminal Miscelleneous 121/2025 (S.B.) Miandad Chachar V/S SHO PS A-Section Ghotki & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1632
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1645.II.A. 74/2018 (S.B.) Brig (Rtd) Raja M. Saleem Khan V/S Mrs. Nabeela Azam Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 394The learned counsel for the Appellant has failed to identity any substantial error in the Impugned Judgement. In light of what has been held above no case for interference in the Impugned Judgment(s) and decree(s) is made out. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1646.Const. P. 1457/2025 (D.B.) Iqbal Hussain V/S Tasawar Hussain & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Resjudicata , Resjudicata (Petition dismissed)
2025 SHC KHI 386Petition hit by constructive res judicata. Costs imposed on the petitioner for filing a second petition on the same subject matter decided two weeks earlier by this bench by substituting the Respondent in the second petition (impleading his blood brother residing at the same address) and impugning afresh trial and revisional Courts Orders in the second petition passed much earlier in time which although not impugned in the first petition were discussed and observed in the first petition dismissed by this bench to be hit by laches, limitation and irrelevant for adjudication of the subject-matter dispute.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
1647.Suit 113/2024 (S.B.) M/S PENG V/S THE PURPLE PINK & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Rejection of Plaint or transfer to IP tribunal or Continuing hearing by High Court)
2025 SHC KHI 137A claim seeking enforcement of contractual rights arising from a Franchise Agreement, which regulates Intellectual Property rights between parties and prays for the ancillary relief of damages/compensation, can only be instituted before the Intellectual Property Tribunal under the IPOP Act, 2012.Read more
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
1648.R.A (Civil Revision) 64/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Ali S/o Muhammad Rafiq V/S Asif Ali Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1649.Spl. Cr. A. 71/2023 (D.B.) Yousif Khan Pathan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 1643
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
1650.Cr.Bail 90/2025 (S.B.) Attur Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1651.Criminal Miscelleneous 229/2025 (S.B.) Ali Gul Bozdar V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1652.Cr.Bail 267/2025 (S.B.) Amanullah Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1653.Const. P. 1159/2024 (S.B.) M/s. Wah Brands (Pvt.) Ltd V/S Additional District Judge, Karachi (East) & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1654.Cr.Bail 241/2025 (S.B.) Khadim Hussain Almani & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1655.I. A 7/2025 (D.B.) Khan Muhammad through Attorney V/S Habib Bank Limited & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1656.Cr.Bail 865/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Safar Khoso & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1657.Const. P. 63/2025 (D.B.) Wali Muhammad V/S Muhammad Nadeem Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1658.Const. P. 220/2025 (D.B.) Haji & Others V/S Mst. Nasreen Akhtar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1659.Criminal Appeal 39/2024 (D.B.) Mubarak Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1660.Criminal Miscelleneous 786/2023 (S.B.) Kashif Ali V/S The SSP N/Feroze & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1661.Criminal Miscelleneous 169/2025 (S.B.) Naeem Ahmed Rind V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 550
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1662.Cr.Bail 64/2025 (S.B.) Asghar Ali Gadani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1663.Criminal Miscelleneous 219/2025 (S.B.) Khushal Bozdar V/S Mst. Wazeeran & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1664.Cr.Bail 245/2025 (S.B.) Muhib Ali Ujjan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1665.II.A. 325/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Irshadunisa (deceased) and another V/S Mst. Zahida Begum and another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1666.R.A (Civil Revision) 274/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Ghaffar V/S Yasir & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 494
1667.II.A. 8/2025 (S.B.) Irfanullah V/S Inam & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 189
1668.Const. P. 404/2025 (D.B.) Jazib Jamal Through Attorney V/S Genetics Pharmaceutical & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1669.Cr.Bail 332/2024 (S.B.) Qadir Malik & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1670.Criminal Miscelleneous 156/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Safar Lodro V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1671.Cr.Bail 100/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Faisal Khalidi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1672.I. A 93/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Muzammil through attorney Muhammad Shoaib V/S Umer Farooq Khan Durrani Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 181
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1673.Cr.Bail 225/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Panjal Mahar V/S Mst. Shazia Shaikh & antoher Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 421
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1674.Cr.Bail 120/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Hafeez Gurgage & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 522
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1675.Cr.Bail 249/2025 (S.B.) Ali Murad Channa V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 408
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1676.Criminal Appeal 613/2022 (D.B.) QADIR S/O MUHAMMAD ALAM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1554
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1677.R.A (Civil Revision) 9/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Shahid Iqbal S/o Dilbar Hussain V/S Gopal Das Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 173
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1678.II.A. 12/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Iqbal V/S Muhammad Shakir Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 104
1679.R.A (Civil Revision) 29/2024 (S.B.) Mitho & others V/S Manthar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 430
1680.Cr.Bail 173/2025 (D.B.) QASIM LIAQUAT ALI S/O LIAQUAT ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1681.Cr.Bail 54/2025 (S.B.) Chhemraj V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1682.Criminal Miscelleneous 137/2025 (S.B.) MUNIR AHMED GILAL V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 347
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1683.Cr.Bail 201/2025 (S.B.) Ghazi & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 352
Matter:-CUSTODY
1684.Cr.Bail 24/2025 (S.B.) Kamal Fakeer @ Kamal Phulpoto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 323
Matter:-CUSTODY
1685.Const. P. 15/2025 (S.B.) Dr. Hassan Fatima Thr. Dr. Munawar Hussain V/S Pakistan Red Crescent Society and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1686.Cr.Bail 58/2025 (S.B.) Sht. Rani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 470
1687.Const. P. 1315/2014 (D.B.) Syed Asif Raza and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 640Regularization of Employees of Private concerned.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
1688.Criminal Miscelleneous 116/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Qadir V/S SSP Sukkur and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 549
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1689.Const. P. 519/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Adnan V/S PTCL and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 369Group Insurance EntitlementRead more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
1690.Criminal Appeal 117/2024 (S.B.) Fazul Bharo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 536
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
1691.Criminal Appeal 104/2024 (S.B.) Qaimuddin Kobhar & Ohers V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 398
Matter:-R.I FOR 7 YEARS & ABOVE
1692.Cr.Bail 94/2025 (S.B.) Intizar @ Dara Malak V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 176
Matter:-CUSTODY
1693.Const. P. 3141/2024 (D.B.) M/s Pak Sun Green (Pvt) Ltd & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 269FIA InquiryRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
1694.Cr.J.A 6/2024 (S.B.) Wazir Ali Vistro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1695.II.A. 10/2025 (S.B.) Wali Muhammad & others V/S Mst. Wazeeran & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1696.Const. P. 1637/2024 (D.B.) Ghulam Ghous Miani V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SBLR Sindh 1350Relieving OrderRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
1697.Cr.Misc. 273/2024 (S.B.) Khadim Hussain V/S Lateef Ahmed Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1698.Criminal Miscelleneous 273/2024 (S.B.) Khadim Hussain V/S Lateef Ahmed Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1699.Const. P. 199/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Faheem Khan and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 339This Court cannot exercise its writ jurisdiction conferred by article 199 in view of the bar contained in article 212 of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
1700.Const. P. 193/2023 (S.B.) Haroon Rasheed S/o Muhammad Rasheed V/S Mst. Mehar Un Nisa Thr. Jawed Ali and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 295
Matter:-RENT MATTER
1701.Execution First Appeal 47/2019 (S.B.) A. QUTUBUDDIN KHAN V/S CHEC MILLWALA DREDGING CO. (PVT.) LTD Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Companies Act, 2017 (Section 425 (5) Director's personal liability)
2025 SHC KHI 109Under what situation can the company's directors/shareholders/officers be held personally liable? Separate Legal Entity - Piercing the Corporate Veil - Company Easy Exit SchemeRead more
Matter:-IMPLEMENTATION OF DECREE
1702.Criminal Appeal 77/2019 (D.B.) Ferozdin Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Life)
1703.Spl. Cr. A. 25/2024 (D.B.) Jinsar Ali Kanhar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 3 YEARS & ABOVE
1704.Cr.J.A 38/2023 (D.B.) Ahsan Ali Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
1705.Criminal Miscelleneous 37/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Siddique & others V/S Mst. Zulikhan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1706.Criminal Appeal 58/2019 (D.B.) Tarique Ali Mangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
1707.Cr.Bail 40/2025 (S.B.) Paresh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 568
1708.Cr.Bail 104/2025 (S.B.) Hubdar Ali Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 219
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1709.Const. P. 511/2025 (D.B.) Meer Shahnawaz Khoso V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 469
Matter:-SERVICE
1710.Criminal Miscelleneous 372/2024 (S.B.) Liaquat Ali Bhutto V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 377
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1711.Cr.Bail 127/2025 (S.B.) Mehbob Ali Korai Khaskheli V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 138
Matter:-CUSTODY
1712.Criminal Miscelleneous 119/2024 (S.B.) MUMTAZ JUTT V/S S.S.P SUKKUR AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1713.Cr.Bail 986/2024 (S.B.) Bilal Mujahid Baloch & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 313
Matter:-CUSTODY
1714.Cr.Bail 136/2025 (S.B.) Gulzar Hussain Makrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 236
Matter:-CUSTODY
1715.Criminal Miscelleneous 558/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Siddique Kandhro V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 642
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1716.Criminal Appeal 136/2024 (S.B.) Sikander Ali & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 163
1717.Cr.Bail 53/2025 (S.B.) Nadeem V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1718.Const. P. 6685/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Khan Naich V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 165
Matter:-SERVICE
1719.Const. P. 1276/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Muzzamil V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1720.Spl.Cr.J.A 66/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Jabbar Ujjan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
1721.Cr.Bail 20/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Asif V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1722.Cr.Bail 4/2024 (D.B.) Zubair V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1723.Const. P. 200/2014 (D.B.) Habib Abdul Qadir and Ors V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 636
Matter:-SERVICE
1724.Spl. Cr. A. 74/2023 (D.B.) Muneer Ahmed @ Nisar Channa V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
1725.Const. P. 978/2025 (D.B.) Maqbool Ashfaq V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
1726.Criminal Miscelleneous 1/2024 (S.B.) Qalandar Bux Mirani V/S SSP Sukkur & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 130
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1727.Cr.Bail 57/2025 (S.B.) Imtaiz Khatoon & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 150
Matter:-CUSTODY
1728.Const. P. 2662/2024 (D.B.) Sidra Ghaffar & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
1729.Criminal Appeal 407/2022 (S.B.) MST. BEENA W/O LATE MUHAMMAD SHAHID V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1730.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 186/2023 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD SHAFI S/O NOOR MUHAMMAD & 02 ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1476
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
1731.Cr.Bail 897/2024 (S.B.) Ashique Gopang & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 615
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1732.R.A (Civil Revision) 60/2024 (S.B.) Khamiso & another V/S Mansigno & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 548
1733.Criminal Appeal 8/2024 (D.B.) Iftikar and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 110
1734.M.A. 136/2024 (S.B.) Rubina Lewis Thr. Attorney Naeem Khan V/S Public at Large Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 187
Matter:-SUCESSION MATTERS
1735.II.A. 383/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Asma Nasir Thr. Attorney Nasir Kamal V/S Syeda Rana Kazmi Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1736.I.T.R.A 73/2025 (D.B.) Nazim Ahmed V/S The Commissioner I.R. (Appeals-VII) CTO, Kar.& anr Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
2025 SHC KHI 404Time barred Reference; no ground for condonation is made out; Reference dismissed as time barred.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
1737.Const. P. 512/2014 (D.B.) Imran Khan and others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Service
1738.Cr.Bail 491/2024 (S.B.) Roshan @ Zahid Ail & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 341
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1739.Cr.Bail 79/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 342
Matter:-CUSTODY
1740.Cr.Bail 704/2024 (S.B.) Gulo @ Gul Muhammad Rind V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1741.Cr.Bail 1941/2024 (D.B.) ASAD AFTAB S/O AFTAB V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1742.Suit 275/2019 (S.B.) Syed Zafar Iqbal V/S Sardar Wali Khan & another. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 666
Matter:-POSSESSION
1743.Suit 242/2020 (S.B.) M/s. Malik Textile Industries (Pvt.) Ltd V/S S. Mohammad Hanif Jaffery Deceased thr L/H Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 553
Matter:-Land Dispute
1744.Cr.Bail 2816/2024 (D.B.) Syed Sadiq S/o Syed Sabir Alil V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 223
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1745.Cr.Rev 146/2024 (S.B.) Yasir Iqbal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-435 & 439 Cr.P.C
1746.Const. P. 131/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Hanif V/S P.O Sindh & Other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-DIRECTION
1747.Suit 739/2024 (S.B.) SALMAN SAEED SIDDIQUI V/S SHEEBA AHMED KAPADIA Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XVIII Rule 18)
2025 SHC KHI 113Under what circumstances and categories of information can the Nazir inspect in 2025 in the case of a partnership that ended in 2021?Read more
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
1748.Cr.Appeal 155/2024 (S.B.) Pervaiz Iqbal & others V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1749.II.A. 317/2024 (S.B.) Dr. Munir Ahmed Sharer Thr. Attorney Azhar Muneer V/S Muhammad Asad Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act 1940 - Award)
2025 SHC KHI 283What will be the fate of an Arbitral Award where the award creditor has not paid the Court Fee?Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1750.Criminal Appeal 24/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Kashif V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 663
1751.Cr.Bail 2622/2024 (S.B.) ARYAN AFRIDI S/O YAQOOB KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CNS Act, 1997 (Post Arrest Bail U/S 6/9 C)
2025 SHC KHI 655In what cases does the saying "A case to err in granting bail is better than a case to err in declining bail" not hold true?Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1752.Const. P. 965/2024 (D.B.) Ali Akber V/S Abdul Jabbar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 141
1753.Criminal Appeal 258/2024 (D.B.) HAFEEZ MURAD S/O MURAD BUX V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 1145, 2025 SHC KHI 1146
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1754.Suit 831/2020 (S.B.) Allied Engineering and Services (Pvt.) Ltd V/S Berger Paints Pakistan Limited & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Suit for Specific Performance
1755.Cr.Bail 37/2025 (S.B.) Mohammad Aumb Manganhar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1756.Cr.J.A 3/2023 (S.B.) Shahid V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1757.Suit 1936/2017 (S.B.) Orient Communication (Pvt) Ltd. V/S Sher Afzal. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RECOVERY
1758.Cr.Misc. 22/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Ambreen V/S SSP Umerkot & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1759.Suit 2653/2017 (S.B.) Muhammad Rafi Ansari. V/S Mst. Talaat Parveen & Others. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 416
Matter:-RECOVERY
1760.Suit 1475/2020 (S.B.) M/S ALMOIZ INDUSTRIES LIMITED V/S AMIR RIFFAT SIDDIQUI Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 672
Matter:-RECOVERY
1761.II.A. 424/2024 (S.B.) Kamal Ahmed S/o Muhammad Ahmed V/S Federation of Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, KarachiWhen Government Defendant/Respondents took the position in the application for rejection of plaint in one paragraph that the Services Tribunal had to hear the matter and in the next paragraph took the defence that the Plaintiffs were hired on contract basis and rendered services on pro-bono basis for over two years, the issue of jurisdiction became a mixed question of fact and law. The plaint could not be rejected by trial court at the preliminary stage. Plaintiffs claims required evidence. IInd Appeal allowed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1762.Const. P. 1605/2014 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain & others V/S VC University of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Service
1763.Cr.Bail 92/2024 (S.B.) Jahazaib Khilji V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 554
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1764.H.C.A 289/2024 (D.B.) Perwaiz Ahmed Shaikh and Others V/S Muhammad Tahir and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Sec.18 and TMO, 2021, S.80(4) - High Court Jurisdiction)
2025 SHC KHI 604In a J. Misc. filed in High Court under Section 84(3) and 14(4) read with Section 116 of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001, which was instituted prior to the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2023, enacted on 16.08.2023, which forum should hear the lis: the High Court or under Section 18 of IPOP, 2012, the IP Tribunal, alone?Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1765.Cr.Bail 18/2025 (S.B.) Israr Lund V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
1766.Criminal Appeal 2/2023 (S.B.) Irshad Ali Kalhoro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 667
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
1767.Criminal Miscelleneous 562/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Sharif V/S Consumer Court, Civil Judge/J.M & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 425
1768.Cr.Misc. 562/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Sharif V/S Consumer Court, Civil Judge/J.M & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1769.Cr.J.A 16/2023 (S.B.) Hazaro Jakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1770.Cr.Rev 1/2025 (D.B.) Jeendal Shah V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 412
1771.Suit 776/2019 (S.B.) Abdul Alim Quadri V/S Rauf Ahmed Rufi & another. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 179
Matter:-Suit for Specific Performance
1772.Criminal Appeal 42/2024 (D.B.) Irfan @ Jalal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 135
1773.Cr.Appeal 42/2024 (D.B.) Irfan @ Jalal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1774.H.C.A 336/2024 (D.B.) Federation of Pakistan & Another V/S Premium Textile Mills Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: OGRA Ordinance 2002 (Sec.8 - Notification - Mustafa Impex)
2025 SHC KHI 4What are the exceptional situations when the principles of Mustafa Impex disapply - Discussed in the context of OGRA Ordinance, 2002Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1775.Suit 878/2020 (S.B.) Mst. Bushra Hamid & others V/S Mst. Farzana Nizam & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 267Benami Transactions status as a resulting trust under Section 102 of the Sindh Trusts Act, 2020 and whether a claim can be maintained by legal heirs of a person who is contended to be the real owner of a property but who didn't claim the property to being held benami in his lifetime in terms of Article 120 of the Limitation Act,1908 and Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877Read more
Matter:-Land Dispute
1776.Const. P. 1724/2024 (D.B.) Mir Mazhar Talpur V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 575, 2026 CLC 40
1777.Const. P. 4413/2023 (D.B.) Imran Muhammad Khan and Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 368
Matter:-SERVICE
1778.Const. P. 3920/2019 (D.B.) Abdul Hafeez Siddiqui V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 401
Matter:-SERVICE
1779.Const. P. 5340/2024 (D.B.) IQ Properties Pvt Ltd V/S Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Specific Relief Act, , Specific Relief Act, (Forms 47 & 48 Appendix A of CPC 1908)
2025 SHC KHI 596In a suit for specific performance, is the omission of Forms 47 and 48 of Appendix A of CPC, 1908, fatal to the case?Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
1780.I. A 54/2023 (D.B.) Taha Bin Abu Talha V/S Ahsaan Yousuf & Another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
2025 SHC KHI 395When can a diary sheet extend or condone the limitation period prescribed for filing leave to defend application in a summary suitRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1781.Const. P. 6148/2024 (D.B.) Ghuran ul Haq V/S Anjuman Jamia Masjid Khulfa e Rashieen & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Constitution of Pakistan (199)
2024 SHC KHI 157The Imam and his family's accommodation in the residential quarters of the Masjid was tied to his employment. Once his services were severed, his continuing overstay was contrary to the law.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
1782.I. A 156/2024 (D.B.) Atif V/S Muhammad Danish Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXXVII Rule 3 Leave to Defend)
2024 SHC KHI 1242Appellant/Defendant did not answer how only one leaf, which was ultimately dishonoured, was stolen from the chequebook or why the crime was reported to the Police belatedly after filing a summary suit against him. The first appeal was dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1783.H.C.A 507/2024 (D.B.) Dawood Ahmed Salar V/S Saud Ahmed Salar and Another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
2024 SHC KHI 1211Correction in a Judgment cannot be made a basis to challenge the said Judgment on merits in appeal. The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to the Judgment within time.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1784.H.C.A 465/2024 (D.B.) M/s. National Telecommunication Corporation V/S M/s. Zahra Communications Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Arbitration Law (Arbitration Act 1940 - Award)
2024 SHC KHI 1303No grounds were made out to set-aside the Judgment, making the arbitral award rule of the courtRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1785.H.C.A 414/2023 (D.B.) Karachi International Container Terminal Limited V/S Brig [Retd] Arif Mahmud Malik Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 152 - corrections to judgment challenged in appeal)
2024 SHC KHI 854The Respondent/Decree-Holder cannot agitate his claim for the company car in the Appellant/KICTL appeal. Further, the Respondent has challenged this aspect neither in judgment nor during execution proceedings, nor is it the subject matter of the impugned Order arising out of an arithmetical correction to the learned Single Judge's impugned Order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1786.Const. P. 5732/2024 (D.B.) Trade Smart Securities Pvt Ltd V/S SECP and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Arbitration Law (Judicial review not maintainable)
2024 SHC KHI 276No judicial review is made out against the Pakistan Stock Exchange under Article 199(1)(a)(ii) of the 1973 Constitution when an arbitration is ongoing and PSX has not done any act or proceeding in connection with the functions and affairs of the Federal GovernmentRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1787.Const. P. 1238/2023 (D.B.) Shahid Hussain Siming V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Recruitment
1788.Const. P. 6807/2015 (D.B.) Imam Bux V/S M/s Sea Board Service Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 706Primarily, resignation is characteristically the voluntary surrender of a position by the one resigning, made freely and not under duress, here petitioner moved an application to the competent authority of the respondent company for withdrawal of his resignation on 07.08.2004, however before the subject application, the respondent company accepted the resignation of the petitioner on 10.07.2004 (page No. 305 of memo of petition) and it was accepted, but the petitioner remained mum and waited for 27 days to move the application to the respondent company for withdrawal of resignation. Prima facie, the petitioner was/is responsible for such delay, failure thereof, and the respondent company could not be held responsible.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1789.H.C.A 323/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Qutub-ul-Arefeen and Others V/S Muhammad Younus Qureshi and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
2024 SHC KHI 610Court documents relied on Suit "Alpha" to evidence fraud played in Suit "Beta" and required no further inquiry on the part of the Court deciding Section 12(2) CPC proceedings. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1790.Const. P. 1754/2023 (D.B.) Gulab Sahito V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 1302
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
1791.H.C.A 492/2024 (D.B.) M/s. Kababjees Group V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
2024 SHC KHI 828Essential documents to build a case that an "Association of Person" (AoP) is a legal personRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1792.R.A (Civil Revision) 135/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Sami Kehar V/S Amanullah Dasti & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 SHC LAR 842, 2025 CLC 1083Suit for Specific Performance of Contract: Oral Agreements: Detailed Proof Required in Legal ClaimsDiscussion: Proving an oral agreement to sell requires the plaintiff to specify the date, time, place, and witnesses, outline all terms, and explain the lack of written documentation. Inconsistent witness testimonies and missing details can undermine the claim's credibility, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence and precise articulation.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
1793.Cr.Acq.A. 43/2021 (D.B.) Shamshad Begum Bhatti V/S Muhammad Ali @ Ahmed Ali @ Papan and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
1794.H.C.A 177/2019 (D.B.) Nazar Mohammad Bozdar V/S Muhammad Ishrat & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 693Section 5(3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 also states that ???In the case of a contempt having been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the responsibility thereof shall extend to the persons in the company, directly or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be punished accordingly.??? Therefore, in our view, before the matter could be fixed for framing charge, there had to be some discussion as to which of the alleged contemnors was prima facie responsible. It is the case of some of the Appellants that they were posted to SITE for brief periods and could not be held responsible for acts committed before or after their posting, which aspect has not been considered in the impugned order.Read more
Matter:-RECOVERY OF AMOUNT / DAMAGES
1795.R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2015 (S.B.) Imdad Hussain Brohi V/S Mohammad Suhail Mugheri Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana(1) The applicant's attempt to introduce the plea of limitation at this revisional stage is impermissible, as it was not raised earlier in the written statement or appellate court. (2)Costs from previous litigation should be addressed within the original proceedings as per Sections 35, 35-A, and 35-B of the C.P.C., and cannot justify a separate suit for damages or malicious prosecution. Allowing such practices could deter legitimate legal actions and impede access to justice.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
1796.Cr.Bail 425/2024 (S.B.) Umed Ali Mazari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
1797.R.A (Civil Revision) 43/2023 (S.B.) Akhtiar Ali Bhutto V/S Allah Dino Bhutto & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana"Ensuring Justice: Precision in Plaint Review and Contract Enforcement". Courts must scrutinize plaint carefully under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. If a plaint shows no cause of action, legal preclusion, or unpaid court fees, it can be rejected. In a notable case, a trial court's rejection and an appellate court's support raised questions about the representation and authorization of legal heirs in a sale agreement. The enforceability of such contracts hinges on thorough trials, reflecting the court's discretion in granting specific performance.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
1798.Criminal Miscelleneous 643/2024 (S.B.) Taj Muhammad Bhanbhro V/S SSP Sukkur & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1799.Criminal Miscelleneous 560/2024 (S.B.) Zameer Hussain Brohi V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1800.R.A (Civil Revision) 13/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Ghafar Chann V/S Bashir Ahmed Chann and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 SHC LAR 513(1) The suit's compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, hinges on whether the respondents can substantiate their rightful possession and unlawful dispossession claims. (2)pari delicto principle prevents either party from benefiting due to equal fault, barring exceptional third-party claims.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
1801.R.A (Civil Revision) 58/2011 (S.B.) Santosh Kumar and another V/S Nazir Ahmed Tunio and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana(1) Presumption of Correctness: Legal presumption under Section 52 of the Sindh Land Revenue Act, 1967 regarding the accuracy of official land records. (2) Revenue Authority's Role: Remedy for boundary disputes lies with Revenue authorities under Rule 67-A of the Sindh Land Revenue Rules, 1968 and Section 117 of the Sindh Land Revenue Act, 1967. (3) Declaratory Relief: Discretionary nature of declaratory relief under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act of 1877. (4)Judicial Scrutiny: Emphasized no irregularity or non-consideration of evidence by the lower courts. (5)Concurrent Findings: Lower courts' findings based on thorough evidence review are not subject to alteration.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
1802.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 35/2024 (D.B.) WASEEM ABBASS & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1803.Const. P. 2488/2016 (D.B.) Mst. Rukhsana Begum V/S Province of Sindh and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
1804.Const. P. 2499/2015 (D.B.) Shahid Masood V/S Mohammad Imran Latif and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
1805.I. A 5/2022 (S.B.) Prof. Dr. Kheo Ram V/S M/s. Changan Mehran Motors & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 CLC 393(1) The Consumer Court improperly used its powers under the Code of Civil Procedure, given the matter was a complaint and not a plaint.(2)Consumer Court's Authority under Section 36 of the 2014 Act overlooks proper use of Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C.(3)Meticulous analysis of Section 29 of the Consumer Protection Act of 2014 confirms timeliness of the Appellant's Complaint. (4) The key requirement of establishing consumer status is to invoke the jurisdiction of the Consumer Court.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
1806.Spl.H.C.A 320/2024 (D.B.) Zahida Ashraf and Others V/S The Bank of Punjab Limited Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Rules, 2018)
2024 SHC KHI 915Appellant-Customer/Borrower, without any documentary evidence to support its objections, attempted to challenge the mode, method and conduct of ongoing auction proceedings for the sale of mortgaged properties without the intervention of the Court after passing of a decree under Section 19 of FIO, 2001. Appeals dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
1807.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 82/2023 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD NOMAN @ MOTA S/O LIAQUAT ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
1808.Criminal Miscelleneous 630/2024 (S.B.) Allah Bux Jiskani V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1809.Const. P. 2649/2020 (D.B.) Power Station (Pvt) Ltd V/S NEPRA and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Determination without reasons - Section 24-A - General Clauses Act 1897)
2024 SHC KHI 404Determination by NEPRA without reasons cannot be sustained. Mere reference to litigation and conclusion does not constitute "reason". Respondent did not deny the date contended by petitioner when it received the copy of determination by NEPRA by TCS courier. The petition was filed within the statutory time for filing an appeal, but the NEPRA Appellate Tribunal, although established, was not functional at material time as per the observation of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Petition maintainable. Matter remanded to the Authority for denovo proceedings.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
1810.R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2020 (S.B.) Ghulam Shabir Noonari and an Other. V/S Ali Sher Sario and Others. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 YLR 373(1)Illegality of Foundational Entry (2)Subsequent Transactions Nullified, transactions from foundation entry declared null and void (3) Role of Revenue Officers, emphasis on maintaining accurate records (4) Audi Alteram Partem Principle, applicants afforded opportunity to be heard (5)Lack of jurisdictional infirmity, orders within Revenue hierarchy's authority (6)Discretionary Nature of Declaratory Relief, Court discretion under Section 42 of Specific Relief Act, (7)Lack of Cause of Action, fraudulent entry provides no cause for declaratory suit, (8) Incompetent Suit Dismissal, principle of early dismissal of meritless suits.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
1811.Criminal Miscelleneous 601/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Mustafa Bhurgari V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1812.Cr.Bail 488/2024 (S.B.) Parwez Ahmed and another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
1813.Criminal Miscelleneous 362/2024 (S.B.) Muhrram Janwery V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1814.Cr.Bail 612/2024 (S.B.) Zahidullah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1815.Cr.Bail 475/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Alam Chandio & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
1816.Const. P. 4449/2021 (D.B.) Pakistan Stock Brokers Association V/S Pakistan Stock Exchange Ltd and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Securities Act, 2015 (PSX Regulations Futures Eligibity Criteria)
2024 SHC KHI 499When SECP introduced an amendment to the Futures Eligibility Criteria (FEC) of the PSX Regulations proposed by PSX, it could not have directed PSX to proceed straightaway to publish the amended Regulations in the Official Gazette without subjecting SECP's amendments to the process mandated by the Legislature, i.e. to have such amended Regulations placed before the public. Hence, the amended Regulations pertaining to the Futures Market (both DFC & CSF) are declared illegal. Even otherwise, SECP's proposed Criteria 4(i) of the FEC providing that even if a company obtains a stay order against an inquiry/investigation of the Commission, such stay order will not make the securities of such company on the Futures Market eligible to trade inspite of the Court's stay order is held to be unconstitutional. Petition allowed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
1817.Cr.Bail 851/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Mohsin V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1818.Const. P. 5064/2023 (D.B.) Mirza Shujaat Baig V/S Shakeel and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
1819.Cr.Bail 416/2024 (S.B.) Arslan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1820.Const. P. 228/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Murtaza V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1821.Cr.Bail 378/2024 (S.B.) Sher Muhammad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1822.Cr.Bail 650/2024 (S.B.) Asif Ali Khokhar & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1823.Criminal Miscelleneous 12/2024 (D.B.) Shabir Ahmed Bhangwar V/S Incharge Presiding Officer ATC-II Sukkur Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1824.Const. P. 2736/2022 (D.B.) Hafiz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
1825.Const. P. 1145/2024 (D.B.) Mst Fouzia & another V/S Mir Hassan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1826.Cr.Bail 276/2024 (S.B.) Nazar Ali Sarwari & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1827.Criminal Miscelleneous 338/2024 (S.B.) Nawab Khan Mari V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1828.Cr.Bail 467/2024 (S.B.) Yaseen @ Ghulam Yaseen V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1829.Const. P. 1614/2023 (D.B.) Sumeri Shah V/S SSP Larkana & 08 others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1830.Const. P. 1186/2024 (D.B.) Zakir Hussain & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1831.Const. P. 1809/2023 (D.B.) Mst Waseema & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Investigation of F.I.R
1832.I.T.R.A 210/2012 (D.B.) Commissioner Inland Revenue. V/S K.E.S.C Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 113 (3) - tariff adjustment subsidy availed by DISCO part of turnover)
2024 SHC KHI 1327Subsidy/tariff adjustment availed by DISCO (and shown in its books of account) as a receivable from the Government of Pakistan constitutes turnover under Section 113(3) is leviable to charge of minimum tax under section 113 of ITO, 2001Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
1833.Const. P. 1205/2024 (D.B.) Mst Marvi Chadhar V/S Govt of sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1834.Criminal Miscelleneous 313/2024 (S.B.) Faizan Shoban and others V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1835.Cr.Bail 503/2024 (S.B.) Ali Hassan Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1836.Cr.Bail 353/2024 (S.B.) Rajab Ali Mahar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1837.Const. P. 128/2024 (S.B.) Mst Noor Khatoon Khaskheli V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTION
1838.Criminal Miscelleneous 482/2024 (S.B.) SHER MUHAMMD @ GHULABI SAMEJO V/S SHO P.S BAIJI SHARIFF, PANO AKIL & ORS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1839.Cr.Rev 55/2021 (S.B.) Ali Mardan Soomro V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1840.Cr.Rev 41/2024 (S.B.) Hussain Bakhsh & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1841.Criminal Miscelleneous 480/2024 (S.B.) Ishtiaque Ahmed V/S SSP Mpk & other Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1842.Cr.Bail 157/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Asad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1843.Cr.Bail 123/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Haque V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1844.R.A (Civil Revision) 225/2024 (S.B.) Kamal Din V/S Abdul Hameed & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1845.Criminal Miscelleneous 486/2024 (S.B.) Shrimati Warju V/S SSP Complaint Cell MPK & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1846.Const. P. 204/2024 (S.B.) Haji Sher Khan V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1847.Criminal Miscelleneous 483/2024 (S.B.) IRFAN AHMED JAGIRANI V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1848.Cr.Bail 439/2024 (S.B.) Muneer Hussain V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1849.Const. P. 1257/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Hakim V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1850.Const. P. 1258/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Asma Sheikh V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1851.Const. P. 1265/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Sonia V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1852.Cr.Bail 450/2024 (S.B.) Ghalam Qadir & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1853.Const. P. 6552/2016 (D.B.) ARY Communications Ltd V/S Muhammad Tahir & another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 (Section 31(2) - Uplinking Facilities & 2012 Uplinking Guidelines - SCN)
2024 SHC KHI 1038The annual fee for Landing Permission Rights, Uplinking, and application process fees are separate heads under PEMRA. No waiver or promissory estoppel is applicable. The Impugned Notices/Letters did not set out the details of the outstanding dues for uplinking facilities from Pakistan for the three TV satellite channels, HBO, Nickelodean, and The Music. PEMRA directed to provide an opportunity of hearing to ARY Communication. Appeal disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
1854.Cr.Bail 350/2024 (S.B.) Nazeer Ahmed Bhayo & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1855.Cr.Bail 466/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Abbas Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1856.Cr.Bail 652/2024 (S.B.) Jawahir Lal & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1857.Const. P. 1286/2024 (D.B.) Ahmed Khan Khoso & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1858.Cr.Bail 379/2024 (S.B.) Shafi Muhammad Dahri & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1859.Criminal Miscelleneous 434/2024 (S.B.) Prem Kumar V/S SSP Tharpakar @ Mithi & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1860.Const. P. 165/2024 (S.B.) Ali Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1861.Const. P. 345/2024 (D.B.) Ibrahim V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1862.Criminal Miscelleneous 664/2023 (S.B.) Syed Khalid Mehmood V/S SHO PS Site Sukkur & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1863.Const. P. 769/2024 (D.B.) Rashid Ali & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1864.Cr.Acq.A. 90/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Muhammad Balouch V/S Muhammad Khan Gadani & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1865.Cr.Acq.A. 94/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Raza Soomro V/S Muhammad Aslam Phuloto & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1866.Cr.Acq.A. 80/2024 (S.B.) Imtiaz Ali Shaikh V/S Syed Zahoor Hussain Shah & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1867.Cr.Bail 84/2024 (D.B.) Zameer Ahmed & ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Suspend the NBW
1868.Const. P. 1161/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Kareem Mahar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1869.Cr.Bail 49/2023 (D.B.) Ghulam Asghar Kandhro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1870.Cr.Bail 457/2024 (S.B.) Aamir Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1871.Const. P. 1053/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Naeem V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1872.Const. P. 703/2024 (D.B.) Neemchand V/S Nangodhar @ Loung & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1873.Const. P. 704/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Imran & others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1874.Cr.Bail 51/2024 (S.B.) Liaquat Ali Shar & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1875.Const. P. 768/2024 (D.B.) Ghazala Yousuf V/S Commissioner Mpk & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1876.Const. P. 1052/2024 (D.B.) Sandhi Kumari V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1877.Const. P. 1211/2024 (D.B.) Shrimati Seeta & others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1878.H.C.A 283/2022 (D.B.) Pakistan Telecommunication Co. Ltd & Another V/S Rasheed Ahmed Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Companies Ordinance, 1984
2024 SHC KHI 652A Board of Directors Resolution comes into force when it is passed/resolved and not when management cross-references it in an Office Memo. The trial court passed a Judgment and Decree in favor of Plaintiff based on the officer's competency (authority to issue and communicate show-cause notice/charge sheet) relating to an unamended version of the PTCL Service Regulations, 2001, without discussing the BoD Resolution. The trial Court did not address the remaining issues settled by the Court. The Court cannot examine documents in the appellate stage which were neither filed nor relied upon by the party in the suit/trial proceedings..Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
1879.I.T.R.A 205/2023 (D.B.) M/S ELAHEE BUKSH & COMPANY PVT. LTD V/S ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Interpreting Section 18(1)(d) r/w Anti-avoidance Sections 108 & 109)
2024 SHC KHI 1460Profit accrued on loan advanced by Associate Company is liable to tax under Section 18(1)(d) read in the light of Chapter VIII of the ITO, 2001, dealing with Anti-avoidance with specific provisions on transactions between Associates and recharacterization. ITRA Dismissed. Division Bench Judgments of this Court and Lahore High Court dealing with loans advanced by the Director of the Taxpayer Company to the company based on fiduciary duty are distinguished.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
1880.Criminal Miscelleneous 169/2024 (S.B.) ABDUL GHAFFAR ABRO V/S THE STATE AND OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1881.Cr.Bail 364/2023 (S.B.) Maira Khurram Sheikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1882.Criminal Miscelleneous 266/2024 (S.B.) Lal Bux V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1883.Const. P. 1179/2024 (D.B.) Mst Sughran Bibi & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1884.Cr.Bail 606/2024 (S.B.) Yaseen Bheri V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1885.Const. P. 1193/2024 (D.B.) Rahul V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1886.Criminal Miscelleneous 40/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Nabi Mangriyo V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1887.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 15/2023 (D.B.) SHOUQEEN ALI S/O MOSAM ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1888.Criminal Miscelleneous 138/2024 (S.B.) Shamshad Ali V/S SHO PS Mirpurkhas and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1889.Criminal Miscelleneous 422/2024 (S.B.) Chehno V/S The state & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1890.R.A (Civil Revision) 86/2023 (S.B.) Azam khan and others V/S Siddique and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1891.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 175/2023 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR S/O DARYA KHAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1892.Const. P. 992/2024 (D.B.) Mst Sarjan Maitlo V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1893.Cr.Bail 385/2024 (S.B.) Mumtaz Lar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
1894.Const. P. 183/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Marvi V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1895.Cr.Bail 173/2024 (S.B.) Narain @ Narain Das & others V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1896.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 26/2024 (D.B.) ALI S/O AKBAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1897.Const. P. 1127/2024 (D.B.) Mujeeb ul Rehman V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1898.Const. P. 1018/2024 (D.B.) Mst Sania & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
1899.Const. P. 12/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Kainat V/S Suhail Asghar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1900.Const. P. 594/2024 (D.B.) Manzoor Ahmed V/S DHO Mpk & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1901.Criminal Miscelleneous 260/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Akmal @ Akmal V/S Mai Haleema and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1902.Const. P. 226/2024 (D.B.) Lachman Das V/S Seth Harchand Rai and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1903.Const. P. 1056/2024 (D.B.) Sht. Kousar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1904.Cr.Bail 27/2024 (D.B.) Badar @ Badroo Vessar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
1905.Const. P. 667/2024 (D.B.) Ubedullah & others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1906.Const. P. 630/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Irshad Khan thru LRs V/S Mst. Rukhsana Shazi Rajput Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1907.Const. P. 657/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Murad V/S Akber Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1908.Const. P. 879/2024 (D.B.) Hafiza Imrana Maqsood V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1909.Const. P. 109/2024 (D.B.) Agha Irfan Ali & others V/S POS & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1910.Const. P. 746/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Salik & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1911.Const. P. 985/2024 (D.B.) Mohammad Yousif V/S Province of sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1912.Const. P. 75/2024 (D.B.) Mohammad Shahid & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1913.Cr.Bail 346/2024 (S.B.) Zulfiqar Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1914.Const. P. 125/2024 (S.B.) Shahnawaz Waseer V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Harasment
1915.Const. P. 325/2024 (D.B.) Kamil V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1916.Criminal Appeal 176/2024 (S.B.) Irshad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1917.Criminal Miscelleneous 316/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Faheem Rind V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
1918.Cr.Bail 572/2024 (S.B.) Aneeulrehman Khoso V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1919.Const. P. 124/2024 (S.B.) Mst Sanam & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Harasment
1920.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 120/2023 (D.B.) DANIYAL S/O SARDAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
1921.R.A (Civil Revision) 294/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Usman V/S M. Kashif Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1922.Cr.Acq.A. 130/2024 (S.B.) Khamoon V/S Zahid and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1923.Cr.Bail 179/2024 (S.B.) Noman Haneef V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1924.Cr.Bail 140/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Akram V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1925.Cr.Bail 82/2024 (D.B.) Manzoor Ahmed Mahar & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1926.Cr.Bail 557/2024 (S.B.) manzoor ahmed and another V/S the state Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1927.Cr.Bail 187/2024 (S.B.) Nehal V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1928.Cr.Bail 279/2024 (S.B.) Irfan Ali Dahar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1929.Const. P. 835/2024 (D.B.) Darhoon & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1930.Const. P. 605/2024 (D.B.) Amir Niaz V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasRule 10-A of the Appointment Rules, 1974 was originally introduced vide notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/2002 dated 2.9.2002 and started with a non-obstante clause thereby overriding all other provisions in the appointment rules. A perusal of the above-reproduced rule reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008.in conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died during service whereas the substituted rule included the children of the civil servant who were declared invalidated or incapacitated for further service and the post against which such category of persons could be appointed, was curtailed to BS-16-17 only instead of BS 11-20.Read more
1931.Cr.Bail 1287/2024 (S.B.) IRFAN @ DAIRH FITYA V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Bail (Accused not nominated in the FIR)
The complainant is not an eyewitness to the actual death of the deceased. The FIR of the incident has been lodged with a delay of more than one day, yet it does not contain the name of the applicant; it was disclosed on the investigation with the allegation of abetment /conspiracy leading to the incident; such allegation could only be determined at trial.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
1932.Const. P. 699/2024 (D.B.) Ahsan Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1933.Const. P. 701/2024 (D.B.) Haresh Kumar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1934.Const. P. 805/2024 (D.B.) Imam Bux V/S Secretary Public Health & Rural Dev & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1935.Judicial Companies Misc. 42/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Sohail & Abdul Wahab V/S M/s. Union Cargo (Private) Limited & 4 ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1439Whether an agreement in respect of the transfer of shares can be repudiated in the Company jurisdictionRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
1936.Criminal Appeal 246/2022 (D.B.) RAJAB ALI S/O ABDUL REHMAN SOOMRO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1937.Cr.Bail 80/2024 (D.B.) Ghulam Asghar Kandhro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
1938.Spl.Cr.J.A 187/2017 (D.B.) Saeed Alam Pathan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1939.Criminal Miscelleneous 454/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Aziz V/S SSP Mirpurkhas and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1940.Cr.Bail 176/2024 (S.B.) Shaikh Muhammad Bilal V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasSection 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation. In that newly inserted Section 489-F of P.P.C., the maximum relief for the complainant of the case is the conviction of the responsible person and punishment as a result thereof, which may extend up to 3 years or with a fine or both. The cheque amount involved in the offense under such a section is never considered stolen property. Had this been treated as stolen property, the Investigating Agency would certainly have been equipped with the power to recover the amount also as is provided in Chapter XVII of P.P.C. relating to offenses against property. The offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. is not made part of the said Chapter providing the offenses and punishments of offenses against property, rather in fact the same has been inserted in Chapter XVIII of P.P.C., regarding offenses relating to documents and to trade of property marks. Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored.Read more
1941.Cr.Bail 183/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Kalsoom & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khasthat the second part of Section 497(1) CrPC provides that an accused shall not be released on bail if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that he/she has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. This part of Section 497(1) CrPC which prohibits the grant of bail in certain offences is popularly known as the prohibitory clause of Section 497(1) CrPC. It is further held that the first proviso to Section 497(1) CrPC provides that the Court may direct that any person under the age of sixteen years or any woman or any sick or infirm person accused of such an offense be released on bail. The Supreme Court further dilated upon the subject issue with the observation that the expression ???such an offense??? used in this proviso refers to the offense mentioned in the second part (prohibitory clause) of Section 497(1) CrPC, as for all other non-bailable offenses the Court is already empowered to release the accused on bail under the first part of Section 497(1) CrPC. The first proviso has thus made equal the power of the Court to grant bail in the offenses of prohibitory clause alleged against an accused under the age of sixteen years, a woman accused, and a sick or infirm accused, to its power under the first part of Section 497(1) CrPC. This means that in cases of women, etc., as mentioned in the first proviso to Section 497(1), irrespective of the category of the offense, bail is to be granted as a rule and refusal as an exception in the same manner as it is granted or refused in offenses that do not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497(1) CrPC. These exceptions are well settled by several judgments of the Supreme Court. They are the likelihood that the accused: (a) abscond to escape trial; (b) tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence the prosecution witnesses to obstruct the course of justice; or (c) repeat the offense keeping in view his previous criminal record, nature of the offense or the desperate manner in which he has prima facie acted in the commission of the offense.Read more
1942.R.A (Civil Revision) 181/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Hyder V/S Chhagan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasIn principle, the provision of Order XVII, Rule 3 CPC, is penal and as per the settled law such provisions should be strictly construed and applied, therefore, once the case of delinquent litigant squarely falls within the purview and mischief of the law, then neither any concession should be shown to such litigant nor a lenient favoring him should be resorted to; this should not be permissible done on the touchstone of exercise of the discretionary power of the court and/or on the approach that technicalities of procedure should not be allowed to impede the interest of justice; and/or that litigants should not be knocked out on technical grounds and that adversarial lis should be settled on merits. If such an approach is liberally followed and resorted to there shall be no discipline in the adjudication of civil litigation and the delinquent whose case though is squarely hit and covered by penal provisions of Order XVII Rule 3 CPC would be given a chance to his advantage and the disadvantage of his opposite side. This is not the spirit of the law at all. It may not be out of place to mention here that to apply and to adhere to the law is not a mere technicality, rather it is a duty cast upon the court as per Article 4 of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 to do so. Thus, where the order XVII rule 3, CPC is duly attracted, the court has no option except to take action under it. It is settled law that where the last opportunity to produce evidence is granted and the party has been warned of the consequences, the court must enforce its order unfailingly and unscrupulously without exception. Such order in my opinion not only put the system back on track and reaffirm the majesty of the law, but also put a check on the trend of seeking multiple adjournments on frivolous grounds to prolong and delay proceedings without any valid or legitimate rhyme or reason. Similarly, where the court has passed an order granting the last opportunity, it has not only passed a judicial order but also made a promise to the lis that no further adjournments will be granted for any reason, and in such eventuality, the court must enforce its order and honor its promise.Read more
1943.Criminal Miscelleneous 432/2024 (S.B.) M. Sarfraz & others V/S SHO PS Kot Ghulam Muhammad & ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1944.Cr.Bail 98/2024 (S.B.) Waseem @ Joni V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasAdditionally, the law would require that after the arrest of the accused, who is not nominated in the FIR but is alleged to have been seen by the complainant or other witnesses, his identification parade shall be immediately held so that the chances of his exposure to the complainant and witnesses before identification parade are excluded and sanctity of the identification parade is kept reliable. however this factum is missing in the present case based on the analogy that the name of the applicant is mentioned in the F.I.R, prima-facie this not the essence of law that when the accused commits the offense and his identity has already been shown in the F.I.R just after his arrest his identification parade shall not be conducted, this is a misconceived approach for the simple reason that Article 22 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 provides mechanics to enable the witnesses to establish the identity of unacquainted assailants, a dilemma increasingly confronting prosecution in the detection of culprits in expanded urban neighborhoods.Read more
1945.Const. P. 1100/2024 (D.B.) mst Iqra V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1946.Cr.Bail 23/2024 (D.B.) Jam Khan Mari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1947.Spl. Cr. A. 65/2023 (D.B.) Rashid Ali Rajper V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 3 YEARS & ABOVE
1948.Const. P. 1103/2024 (D.B.) Zakia V/S SHO Ps A Section Ghotki & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Reinvestigation
1949.Const. P. 1096/2024 (D.B.) Ameer Bux Ujjan V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Investigation of F.I.R
1950.Criminal Miscelleneous 473/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Shakoor V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khassuffice it to say that the offenses under the Sindh Child Marriages Restrained Act, 2014 and the Rules 2016 framed thereunder explicitly provide that cognizance of offenses under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act 2014 can be taken by the Judicial Magistrate of the first class and the police has not been set free to take cognizance of the offenses and lodge First Information Report without permission of the Magistrate as the complaint is to be made before the Magistrate under Section 5 of the Sindh Child Marriages Restraint Rules, 2016. 7. Besides, the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939 recognizes such age as sixteen years (which earlier was 15 years but was substituted as sixteen years by the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (VIII of 1961), which finds a place as Section 13 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 and reads as under:- (13. Amendment of the dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939).In the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939) in section 2:- 1. After clause (ii) the following new clause (ii-a) shall be inserted, namely:- ???(ii-a) that the husband has taken any additional wife??? (b) In clause (vii), for the word ???fifteen??? the word ???sixteen??? shall be substituted) 8. Further, per Section 271 and 272 of Mulla???s Principles of Muhammadan Law a marriage of a minor (who has not attained puberty) is not invalid for the simple reason that it was brought about by the father or grand-father and continues to be valid unless same is repudiated by that girl before attaining the age of 18 years. Therefore, such act of the father and grandfather is protected by Muslim Laws unless the same is established or proved to be in manifest disadvantage of the minor. Besides, Section 273 of the Mulla???s Principles of Muhammadan Law, provides that the marriage brought about by other guardians is also not invalid unless she, resorted to her operation to repudiate the marriage on attaining puberty.Read more
1951.Spl.Cr.J.A 154/2017 (D.B.) Hakeem Khan Pathan & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
1952.Const. P. 133/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Jabbar @ Papu V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Harassment and Protection)
1953.Criminal Miscelleneous 468/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Kaneez Fatima V/S I.G Karachi & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
1954.Cr.Bail 104/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Hayat & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Murder Bail (Undetermined cause of death )
1955.Criminal Appeal 151/2024 (S.B.) Bilawal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1956.Const. P. 174/2024 (S.B.) Raheel Ali V/S POS & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Habeas Corpus U/S 491 for wrongful Confinement
1957.Cr.Bail 127/2024 (S.B.) Sooran Singh @ Soorio V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse ), Criminal After Arrest Bail (Dying declaration Statement)
1958.Cr.Bail 172/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Yousif V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: CNS Act, 1997 (Failure to record video or or photograph at the time of arrest and seizure )
1959.Criminal Appeal 185/2024 (S.B.) Pretam @ Vinod & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal Trial (Suspension of Sentence under section 426 Cr.P.C)
1960.Const. P. 173/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shaheen Mukhtiar & another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Harassment and Protection)
1961.Criminal Miscelleneous 478/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasreen V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Habeas Corpus U/S 491 for wrongful Confinement (Jurisdiction : Avail proper remedy by approaching concerned court )
1962.Cr.Bail 119/2024 (S.B.) Saifullah & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Murder Bail (Accused nominated in the FIR with specific role), Murder Bail (Sharing of common intention)
1963.Criminal Miscelleneous 458/2024 (S.B.) Raheel Ali V/S DIG Mirpurkhas and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Habeas Corpus U/S 491 for wrongful Confinement
1964.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 110/2023 (D.B.) AMJAD ALI S/O GHULAM NABI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
1965.Cr.Bail 34/2024 (D.B.) Syed Deedar Hussain Shah @ Makhan Shah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
1966.Const. P. 38/2024 (D.B.) Mohammad Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1967.Const. P. 685/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleh V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1968.Const. P. 348/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Nasir Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1969.Cr.Acq.A. 117/2021 (S.B.) Nisar Ahmed Chachar V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1970.Const. P. 721/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Yaqoob Anjum V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1971.Const. P. 710/2024 (D.B.) Ghulam Murtaza V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasIt is a settled principle of law that merely qualifying for the test/interview does not create any vested right for appointment to a specific post in favor of the candidate. In principle, an interview is inherently a subjective evaluation, and a Court of law does not have jurisdiction to substitute its opinion with that of the testing/selection Board to provide relief to anyone. The role of the testing/selection Board is to evaluate candidates based on a variety of subjective criteria, which may include interpersonal skills, presentation, and other intangible qualities that are difficult to measure objectively. These assessments are inherently qualitative and depend on the opinion of interviewers, who are appointed for their expertise and ability to make such evaluations. However, this does not mean that the decisions of the Selection Board are beyond scrutiny. If there were any indications of malafides, bias, or significant errors in opinion that are apparent from the record, the Court would certainly be compelled to intervene.Read more
1972.Const. P. 824/2024 (D.B.) Shagan Lal V/S Ex. Engr. HESCO & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1973.Const. P. 634/2024 (D.B.) Asad Habib and others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1974.Const. P. 1049/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Iqbal V/S Mst. Hawa & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1975.Const. P. 352/2024 (D.B.) Imam Bux V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1976.Cr.Bail 9/2024 (D.B.) Shahnawaz & others V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1977.Cr.Bail 252/2024 (S.B.) Lal Bux @ Lal Shar & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1978.Cr.Bail 434/2024 (S.B.) Liaqat Ali Almani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
1979.Criminal Miscelleneous 447/2024 (S.B.) Yar Muhammad & another V/S SSP Umerkot & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1980.Cr.Bail 343/2024 (S.B.) Sabir Hussain & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1981.Cr.Bail 191/2024 (S.B.) Asghar Ali Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
1982.Cr.Rev 12/2024 (S.B.) Sultan V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal Procedure Code (Compromise )
A High Court acting in the exercise of its powers of revision under section 439 (and a Court of Sessions so acting under section 439-A), may allow any person to compound any offence which he is competent to compound under subsection 5A of Section 345 of the CodeRead more
1983.Cr.Bail 165/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Lateefuddin V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Offence not falling with in prohibitory clause of section 497 (2))
The delay per se in lodging the F.I.R. is also one of the grounds for bail in such circumstances of the case. That being so, one of the foundational elements of Section 489-F P.P.C. is prima facie missing due to peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, however, the ingredients of the same are yet to be proved before the trial Court. The invocation of penal provision would, therefore, remain a moot point. The ground that prosecution is motivated by malice may not in these circumstances be ill-founded for the reason that the complainant waited for a considerable period and lodged an FIR which factum needs a thorough probe by the trial Court.Read more
1984.Criminal Miscelleneous 471/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Khalique V/S SSP Complaint cell Mpk & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
1985.Cr.Bail 134/2024 (S.B.) Jaindo @ Dado @ Porho V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
It is well settled that while examining the question of bail, the Court has to consider the minimum aspect of the sentence provided for the alleged offense. Courts, even at the bail stage, are not bound by the provisions of law applied in the FIR rather have to see the offence applicable from the contents of the prosecution case. Additionally, it is also a well-settled principle of law that mere heinousness of offense is no ground to reject the bail plea. The basic concept of bail is that no innocent person's liberty is to be curtailed until and unless proven otherwise.Read more
1986.Criminal Miscelleneous 126/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Qadir V/S Learned Sessions Judge, Umerkot and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1987.Cr.Bail 106/2024 (S.B.) Imtiaz and another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1988.Criminal Miscelleneous 2/2023 (D.B.) Ali Hassan Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1989.Criminal Miscelleneous 370/2024 (S.B.) Somji Mal V/S SSP Umerkot & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasDisposed of as not pressedRead more
1990.Cr.Bail 174/2024 (S.B.) Malook V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Offence not falling with in prohibitory clause of section 497 (2))
The offense charged does not fall within the prohibitory clause. There is a shake in the prosecution story, therefore, a question of further inquiry arises and further, in the light of the above circumstances, the involvement of the applicant in this case with malafide intention of the complainant also cannot be ruled out.Read more
1991.Criminal Appeal 194/2024 (S.B.) Ashfaque & others V/S Wali Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Compromise under section 345 Cr.P.C )
The criminal complaint is governed by the scheme of the Criminal Procedure Code; and section 345 Cr.P.C. is applicable and this is the reason that offense related to the property, which being of civil nature, is compoundable; therefore, offenses in terms of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 are compoundable and High Court can entertain the request of the complainant to compromise the matter with the appellants, at the appellate stage, as section 9 of the Act, 2005 provides that unless provided in the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 the provisions contained under the scheme of Criminal Procedure Code shall apply to all the proceedings under the Act.Read more
1992.Criminal Miscelleneous 387/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Ghani V/S Abdul Wahid @ Wahidu & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1993.Cr.Rev 21/2024 (D.B.) Bakhat Ali Kalhoro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
1994.Criminal Miscelleneous 467/2024 (S.B.) Vidhya V/S The province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1995.Criminal Miscelleneous 462/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Hyder and another V/S SSP Mirpurkhas and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1996.Cr.Bail 111/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Nabi @ Gullam V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1997.Criminal Miscelleneous 101/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nazeeran V/S SSP Complaint Cell MPK & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1998.Criminal Miscelleneous 461/2024 (S.B.) Mohib V/S DIG Mirpurkhas and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
1999.Cr.Bail 135/2024 (S.B.) Sarfraz @ Gujar V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2000.Criminal Miscelleneous 441/2024 (S.B.) Mushtaque Hussain & another V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2001.Cr.Bail 155/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Qazafi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khasthere appeared a remarkable difference between the gross weight i.e. 2200, and the net weight of charas which weighs 2194 grams; the applicant has been shown to have been arrested from a car alongwith shopper bag containing purported chars; whereas the car movement record/tracker report with the narration that the car does not show presence of car at the alleged place of incident; in all cases about Narcotics, modern device is required to be used in future cases without fail in terms of the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Zahid Sarfaraz Gill. Bail grantedRead more
2002.Cr.Bail 260/2024 (S.B.) Ahsan @ Ahsanullah Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2003.Cr.Bail 414/2024 (S.B.) Rasool Bux Siyal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2004.Const. P. 682/2024 (D.B.) Manmohan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2005.Cr.Bail 331/2024 (S.B.) Ali Mured Khoso & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2006.Criminal Appeal 68/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Saleem V/S Meraj ud Din and another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 SHC MPK 1118
2007.Criminal Appeal 15/2024 (S.B.) Aslam @ Ghaloo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2008.Const. P. 721/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Yaqoob Anjum V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2009.Const. P. 178/2024 (D.B.) Mohammad yaqoob V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2010.Cr.Bail 103/2024 (S.B.) Anopo @ Anopchand V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 SHC MPK 506
2011.Cr.Bail 108/2024 (S.B.) Jurail Shah V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 SHC MPK 681
2012.Cr.Rev 117/2024 (S.B.) Soomar & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2013.Criminal Appeal 125/2024 (S.B.) Juned V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2014.Cr.J.A 13/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad usman V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 SHC MPK 1488
2015.Const. P. 251/2019 (S.B.) U. K Educational Society Thr. Mrs. Farida Fasihi V/S IIIrd ADJ Central Karachi & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiThe court dealt with administrative issues in the Education Department, including reshuffling, vacancies, and policy adherence. It issued a show cause notice to the Secretary for policy violations, ordered investigations, and ensured protocol adherence.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2016.II.A. 111/2022 (S.B.) Mir Abdul Qayoom V/S Muhammad Aslam & Ors. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2024 SHC HYD 724
Matter:-Against Judgment
2017.Criminal Appeal 609/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SARWAR S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2018.Criminal Appeal 610/2023 (S.B.) AKHTAR S/O KHALIL V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2019.Cr.Bail 722/2024 (S.B.) ZUBAIR AHMED S/O ABDUL KAREEM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2020.Criminal Appeal 623/2023 (S.B.) HAROON ALI @ SAJJAD S/O NAZEER @ SARWAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Arms Act, 2013 (Modification in sentence )
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2021.Criminal Miscelleneous 551/2024 (S.B.) MST. JAN PAROZA WD/O ABDUL HAKEEM V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2022.Criminal Miscelleneous 566/2024 (S.B.) Bashir Ahmed S/o Muhammad Ashique V/S Shaikh Noman Amjad & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
2023.Criminal Miscelleneous 175/2022 (S.B.) MIR LAIQ ALI S/O SHABBIR ALI & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2024.Criminal Miscelleneous 456/2024 (S.B.) ABID ALI S/O SIKANDAR ALI V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2025.Criminal Miscelleneous 59/2024 (S.B.) MUSHTAQUE RAHEEM S/O ABDUL RAHEEM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2026.Criminal Appeal 297/2024 (S.B.) JUMMA KHAN S/O SHER ALAM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2027.Criminal Miscelleneous 53/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD UMER NAHIYO V/S LEARNED CJ/JM MIRPUR SAKRO & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2028.Cr.Rev 81/2024 (S.B.) SHEIKH FAISAL AZIZ S/O AZIZ AHMED V/S MUHAMMAD HANIF & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2029.Cr.Rev 82/2024 (S.B.) MASOOD AHMED S/O AZIZ AHMED V/S MUHAMMAD HANIF & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2030.Criminal Miscelleneous 1007/2023 (S.B.) Allah Dino Holani S/o Muhammad Saleh V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2031.Cr.Rev 217/2022 (S.B.) SHAMIM AHMED KHAN S/O HABIBULLAH KHAN V/S SHAIKH ADIL HUSAIN SIDDIQUI & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2032.Cr.Bail 844/2024 (S.B.) NOUMAN AHMED S/O OBAIDULLAH MEMON V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2033.Criminal Miscelleneous 2/2023 (S.B.) MST. BISMA NOREEN / AMEER JEHAN V/S THE I.G SINDH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2034.Cr.Bail 652/2024 (S.B.) Saqib Mateen Saddiqui S/o Farrukh Mateen Siddiqui V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
2035.Cr.Bail 773/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD GUL KHALID S/O MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2036.Cr.Rev 97/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SHAHID S/O IRSHAD AHMED V/S MUHAMMAD FAROOQ SHAIKH S/O TANVEER SHAIKH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2037.Criminal Miscelleneous 220/2021 (S.B.) ASADULLAH KHAN S/O AZIZULLAH KHAN V/S THE STATE & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2038.Cr.Bail 2858/2023 (S.B.) SHAHZAD @ KALLI S/O ABDUL MALIK V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2039.Criminal Miscelleneous 387/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD NOMAN KHAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
2040.Cr.Rev 10/2024 (S.B.) GULBERG JAMIA MASJID V/S OSAMA ALI & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2041.H.C.A 202/2024 (D.B.) M/s. Titan Two Builders & Developers & others V/S M/s. Zulekhabai V.M. Gany Rangoonwala Trust & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 779
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2042.Cr.Bail 960/2024 (S.B.) NOOR MUHAMMAD @ NOORA @ AFZAL S/O UMER MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2043.Criminal Appeal 595/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ADEEL S/O RIAZUDDIN V/S THE SHO P.S TAIMORIA & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2044.Criminal Miscelleneous 386/2024 (S.B.) FAISAL VOHRA S/O AHMED VOHRA V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2045.Cr.Bail 688/2024 (S.B.) ABDUL REHMAN S/O WALI KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2046.Cr.Bail 828/2024 (S.B.) AIJAZ-UR-REHMAN S/O INAYAT-UR-REHMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Delay in registration of FIR)
The FIR of the incident has been lodged with a delay of about ten months; such delay could not be overlooked. The offence alleged against the applicant does not fall within the prohibitory clause. The case has finally been challaned and there is no likelihood of absconsion or tampering with the evidence on the part of the applicant who is said to be in custody for more than three months without effective progress in the trial of his caseRead more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2047.Cr.Bail 810/2024 (S.B.) TAHA S/O SAIFUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Delay in registration of FIR)
The FIR of the incident has been lodged with a delay of about five months; such delay could not be overlooked. The offence alleged against the applicant does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C. The punishment which the alleged offence entails is imprisonment up to three years or a fine; if the applicant after the due trial is awarded the punishment of fine only then the imprisonment which he is undergoing would be somewhat extra.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2048.Cr.Bail 811/2024 (S.B.) AIJAZ ALI S/O MUHAMMAD HASSAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Accused specifically nominated in the FIR with specific role)
The applicant is named in FIR with the specific allegation that on arrest from him has been secured 1510 grams of charas with a positive report from the Chemical Examiner. In that situation, it would be premature to say that the applicant is innocent and has been involved in this case falsely by the Police. Of course, there is no independent witness to the incident but for this reason, the police officials could not be disbelieved by this Court at this stage when no malafide is apparent with them to have involved the applicant in this case falselyRead more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2049.Cr.Bail 2843/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD NOMAN S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2050.Criminal Miscelleneous 518/2024 (S.B.) MST. NANCY EMANUEL WD/O ROBERT YAQOOB V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2051.Criminal Miscelleneous 519/2024 (S.B.) MST. SABAL WD/O MANZOOR AHMED V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2052.Cr.Bail 572/2024 (S.B.) SYED IBRAHIM ALI KAZMI & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Bail (Accused nominated in the FIR with specific role)
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2053.Criminal Appeal 520/2019 (S.B.) RAB NAWAZ S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiThe NBW issued against the appellant has been repeatedly returned by the concerned SHO for one or other reason which prima facie suggests that there is no likelihood of arrest of the appellant in the near future, therefore, no useful purpose would be served to keep this appeal pending on file of this court indefinitely for want of the appellant. Consequent to the above, while relying upon the case of Ikramullah and others v. the State (2015 SCMR 1002), the instant appeal is directed to be kept in a dormant file with the issuance of the perpetual Non-bailable warrant of arrest of the appellant.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2054.Const. P. 22/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Razzaq Bozdar V/S Mst Saba Gul & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 167
Matter:-Family Matter
2055.Criminal Miscelleneous 325/2024 (S.B.) MST. TALAT PARVEEN S/O MUHAMMAD NAUSHAD AKHTAR V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2056.Criminal Miscelleneous 527/2024 (S.B.) Syed Anis Haider S/o Syed Moazziz Hussain V/S SSP Karachi East & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2057.Cr.Bail 980/2024 (S.B.) USAMA S/O SALAHUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2058.Cr.Bail 601/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2059.Cr.Bail 2844/2023 (S.B.) WAQAR AHMED S/O ABDUL GHAFFAR & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2060.Cr.Rev 57/2023 (S.B.) DR SHAHID MASOOD V/S SAEED GHANI & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2061.Cr.Bail 648/2024 (S.B.) MUAHMMAD ARFEEN S/O MUHAMMAD SAMI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2062.Criminal Miscelleneous 21/2023 (S.B.) HUSSAIN BUX SOOMRO V/S THE IST ADJ MALIR KHI & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2063.Cr.Acq.A. 360/2024 (S.B.) NOORUL AMEEN S/O QARI MUHAMMAD AMEEN V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2064.Cr.Acq.A. 371/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Maria W/o Gulzar V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2065.Const. P. 1235/2024 (D.B.) Sunni Ittehad Concil V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 163
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2066.Criminal Miscelleneous 977/2023 (S.B.) WALEED MUGHAL S/O KHALID MEER V/S SSP COMPLAINT CELL & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2067.Cr.Rev 130/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S/O MUHAMMAD SHARIF V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2068.Cr.Rev 34/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Sharif Mahtam V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 833
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2069.Const. P. 1162/2021 (D.B.) Azizullah Phulpoto V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 649In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74],Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
2070.Const. P. 938/2021 (D.B.) Rashid Ali Pitafi V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 1215In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74],Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
2071.Criminal Appeal 405/2023 (S.B.) SHOUKAT ALI S/O AMEER ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2072.Cr.J.A 214/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Adil S/o Muhammad Shamshad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2073.Cr.Bail 548/2024 (S.B.) SHEHZOR NASIR @ SHERI S/O MUHAMMAD NASIR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2074.Cr.Bail 839/2024 (S.B.) SYLVESTER S/O SAMUEL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2075.Cr.Bail 870/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O MUHAMMAD ESSA V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2076.Cr.J.A 616/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Arsalan S/o Muhammad Javeed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2077.Cr.Bail 845/2024 (S.B.) AKHTAR HUSSAIN S/O HADIER ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2078.Const. P. 176/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Majeed Talani V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 PLD Sindh 19
Matter:-Quashment of Proceedings
2079.Const. P. 1071/2022 (S.B.) Jahangeer Mustafa S/o Ghulam Mustafa V/S Mst. Swaleha Khalid Petiwala and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 884
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2080.Const. P. 491/2022 (S.B.) S. M. Kamal Shamim Thr. Attorney Syed Shamim Alam V/S Mrs. Rubab and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2081.Criminal Miscelleneous 942/2023 (S.B.) QARI M. ASLAM SAIM CHISHTI V/S THE VIII TH ADJ KHI EAST & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2082.Criminal Appeal 86/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ZOHAIB S/O ABDUL RASHEED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2083.Cr.Bail 65/2024 (S.B.) WAJID ALI S/O SHAMRAIZ KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2084.Criminal Miscelleneous 700/2021 (S.B.) SYEDA MARIA RAZA W/O MUHAMMAD TAHIR HASHMI V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2085.Const. P. 158/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Amna Khatoon W/o Shah Alam V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
2086.Criminal Miscelleneous 253/2024 (S.B.) GHULAM NABI S/O GHANWAR V/S ALLAHDINO S/O RAMAZAN & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2087.Cr.Bail 765/2024 (S.B.) GHULAM ISHAQUE MAGSI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2088.Cr.Bail 692/2024 (S.B.) HASSAN S/O M. KAMRAN NAQI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2089.Const. P. 263/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Kiran and Others V/S Muhammad Moeez and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 581
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2090.Const. P. 1695/2024 (D.B.) Ali Ahmed Palh V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2091.Const. P. 120/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Hiba D/o Muhammad Nasir V/S Muhammad Rizwan Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2092.Cr.Bail 2621/2023 (S.B.) NIAZ MUHAMMAD S/O TAJ MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2093.Const. P. 394/2023 (S.B.) Shahid Anwar and Another V/S Mrs. Sardar Begum (deceased thr LRs) and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2094.Cr.Bail 453/2024 (S.B.) MUMTAZ S/O MEHMOOD ALI CHANDIO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2095.Criminal Miscelleneous 976/2023 (S.B.) MST. NOUSHEEN SULEMAN V/S SULEMAN AHMED KHAN & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
2096.Cr.Bail 265/2024 (S.B.) Gulsher Gabole & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2097.Cr.Bail 2829/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD HASEEB S/O MUHAMMAD JAVED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2098.R.A (Civil Revision) 67/2024 (S.B.) Zari Gul V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
2099.Cr.Bail 2751/2023 (S.B.) SIKANDAR NAZIR S/O LATE NAZIR AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2100.Cr.Bail 2340/2023 (S.B.) HASSAN ZAFAR S/O ZAFAR IQBAL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2101.Const. P. 1308/2023 (S.B.) Ayeza D/o Khawaja Kaleem Ahmed V/S Junaid-ul-Haq and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2102.Cr.Bail 170/2024 (S.B.) Ali Hassan Laghari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 1456
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2103.Criminal Miscelleneous 198/2024 (S.B.) Asadullah Almani V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2104.Criminal Miscelleneous 152/2024 (S.B.) Abdullah el Muttaqi S/o Abdul Qawi Ahmed & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2105.Cr.Bail 71/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S/O ZAR WALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2106.Cr.Acq.A. 554/2022 (S.B.) MEHMOOD UR REHMAN S/O ABDUL REHMAN V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2107.Criminal Miscelleneous 479/2024 (S.B.) SHOIB S/O USMAN V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2108.Cr.Bail 559/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SHAKEE S/O MUHAMMAD KALEEM V/S TH STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2109.Criminal Miscelleneous 60/2022 (S.B.) THE STATE THROUGH PG SINDH V/S THE BANK MANAGER BANK AL HABIB LTD Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ACCOUNTS
2110.Criminal Miscelleneous 1036/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Ali S/o Aurangzeb V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2111.Cr.Bail 2309/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ISMAIL S/O KUNJI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2112.Criminal Miscelleneous 521/2023 (S.B.) THE STATE THROUGH PG SINDH V/S MEEZAN BANK LTD & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR INFORMATION
2113.Cr.Bail 819/2024 (S.B.) SHARIFULLAH S/O MUHAMMADULLAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2114.Cr.Tran 42/2024 (S.B.) SYED UBED @ UBED K2 S/O KHURSHEED GHANI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
2115.Cr.Bail 102/2024 (S.B.) AZIZ-UR-REHMAN S/O KHALIL-UR-REHMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
2116.Cr.Bail 586/2024 (S.B.) Taj Muhammad S/o Jamroz Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2117.Cr.Bail 818/2024 (S.B.) SHARIFULLAH S/O MUHAMMADULLAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2118.Const. P. 1809/2024 (D.B.) Mukesh & Others V/S KMC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2119.Const. P. 6240/2019 (D.B.) Eastern Construction Co. V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-OUT STANDING DUES
2120.Criminal Miscelleneous 894/2023 (S.B.) THE STATE THROUGH PG SINDH V/S HABIBI METROPOLITAN BANK LTD & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR INFORMATION
2121.Cr.Bail 148/2024 (S.B.) Rashid Ali Dahar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 776
Matter:-CUSTODY
2122.Const. P. 407/2024 (S.B.) Zahid Ali S/o Arab V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1091
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
2123.Const. P. 927/2014 (D.B.) Ghulam Sarwar Sahto V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Foti Khata
2124.Const. P. 1225/2024 (D.B.) M/s Samina & Moazzam Overseas V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 201
Matter:-DIRECTION
2125.Criminal Miscelleneous 58/2024 (S.B.) Nadeem Jat V/S Manager HBL Chandi Chock Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2126.Cr.Tran 29/2024 (S.B.) MST. BISMA NOREEN / AMEER JEHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
2127.Cr.Acq.A. 66/2021 (S.B.) Shakeel Ahmed Lodhi V/S Khursheed Soomro & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2128.Const. P. 2057/2024 (D.B.) Plastic World Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INFRASTRUCTURE CESS
2129.Const. P. 2066/2024 (D.B.) Hur Hassan V/S MT Al Maha Vessel and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2130.Criminal Appeal 436/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD YASEEN S/O HAFIZ RAZIUDDIN V/S XIVTH ADJ KHI EAST & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2131.Cr.Bail 489/2024 (S.B.) BAIZAD S/O PIR MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 229
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2132.I. A 8/2022 (S.B.) Amad Saeed V/S Muhammad Asif & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 1018
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2133.I. A 37/2017 (S.B.) Imdad Ali Malah V/S Najeebullah Jatoi Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 333
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2134.Criminal Miscelleneous 728/2021 (S.B.) NAEEM KHALID S/O KHALID ISHAQUE V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2135.Cr.Bail 837/2024 (S.B.) SAMIULLAH S/O MALLAH HUDDO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2136.Cr.Rev 181/2023 (S.B.) GHULAM RASHOOL S/O NAYYAB MIRZA V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2137.Criminal Miscelleneous 458/2024 (S.B.) SHAHMIR IQBAL S/O IQBAL AHMED SHAIKH SODAGAR V/S THE SSP POLICE THATTA & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2138.Cr.Bail 858/2024 (S.B.) SHER KHAN S/O ABDULLAH KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 107Speedy trial is an alienable right of every person.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2139.Cr.Bail 2527/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD KHALIL S/O MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 338
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2140.Cr.Bail 497/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD OWAIS S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2141.Const. P. 1569/2023 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Muneer Shah & another V/S M/S Shah Abdul latif University & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Implementation on Order
2142.Criminal Appeal 214/2024 (S.B.) ORANGZAIB S/O WAZIR KHAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2143.Cr.J.A 184/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IMRAN MOEED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2144.Cr.Bail 703/2024 (S.B.) SALMAN KHAN S/O KARAM KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2145.Cr.Bail 879/2024 (S.B.) ARSALAN S/O NASIR KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2146.Const. P. 1701/2023 (D.B.) Amjad Ali Shaikh V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
2147.Cr.Bail 809/2024 (S.B.) NAVEED AHMED S/O JAFFER HUSSAIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2148.Cr.Bail 823/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD QASIM S/O BASHIR AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2149.Cr.J.A 615/2023 (S.B.) Mehmood Raza S/o Khurram Butt V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2150.Criminal Miscelleneous 56/2024 (S.B.) Zafar Ali S/o Dil Murad V/S DJ Thatta & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2151.II.A. 179/2021 (S.B.) Syed Pervaiz Hussain and another V/S Zikr-ur-Rehman and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2152.Cr.Bail 595/2024 (S.B.) SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O ABDUL RASHEED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2153.Const. P. 1813/2024 (D.B.) Fatima Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 88
Matter:-ADMISSION MATTER
2154.Const. P. 1337/2023 (D.B.) Mst Humera & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
2155.Cr.J.A 505/2021 (S.B.) SAJJAD AHMED @ SHEHZAD S/O NAZEER AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2156.Cr.Bail 566/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IMRAN S/O IKRAMUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2157.Criminal Miscelleneous 809/2023 (S.B.) NASIR HUSSAIN S/O AZIZULLAH SHAR V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2158.Cr.Rev 52/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Mughera Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2159.Const. P. 381/2024 (S.B.) Molana Muhammad Umair and Another V/S SHO, PS Paposh Nagar and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
2160.Cr.Bail 629/2024 (S.B.) MATEEN AHMED KHAN S/O MOBEEN AHMED KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2161.Criminal Miscelleneous 433/2024 (S.B.) YASIN MEHDI SIDDIQUE V/S SAQIB KAVED S/O JAWAID SALMAN & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
2162.Criminal Miscelleneous 181/2021 (S.B.) ANWAR FAIZ MALIK S/O AKHTAR HUSSAIN V/S IVTH ADJ MALIR KARACHI & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2163.R.A (Civil Revision) 97/2023 (S.B.) Fed: of Pakistan & Others V/S Syed Shafkat Ali Shah & Other Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 890
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2164.Const. P. 5851/2023 (D.B.) Faysal Bank Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
2165.Criminal Miscelleneous 330/2024 (S.B.) SYED ISHRAT REHAN S/O KHURSHEED AHMED V/S THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ANTOHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2166.Criminal Miscelleneous 582/2023 (S.B.) PROF. SYED MUHAMMAD AHSAN IQBAL ZAIDI V/S IIIRD ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2167.Cr.Bail 684/2024 (S.B.) WAQAS S/O ABDUL RASHEED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2168.Criminal Miscelleneous 434/2024 (S.B.) MOHIUDDIN PEER S/O MUHAMMAD MASTAN V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Disposal of F.I.R under ???C??? class)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2169.Cr.Bail 354/2024 (S.B.) SYED MUHAMMAD KHALID RIZVI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2170.Const. P. 1595/2024 (D.B.) Shahmir V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 454
Matter:-DIRECTION
2171.Cr.Rev 66/2024 (S.B.) SOHAIL MEHMOOD S/O FATEH KHAN V/S SHAZIA SOHAIL & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2172.Cr.Bail 183/2024 (S.B.) SHAHBAZ KHAN @ MACHHLI S/O JAVED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2173.Cr.Rev 87/2022 (S.B.) Mst. Rubina Wahid W/o Abdul Wahid V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2174.Cr.Bail 674/2024 (S.B.) SHAFIQ-UR-REHMAN S/O ABDUL HAKEEM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2175.Suit 110/2022 (S.B.) M/S POPULAR INTERNATIONAL (PVT) LTD V/S M/S ETISALAT GROUP Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1041
Matter:-RECOVERY
2176.Cr.J.A 268/2020 (S.B.) ABDULLAH S/O AMIN NAHIYO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2177.Const. P. 2404/2023 (D.B.) Arif Hussain Khan and Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PARKING FEES
2178.Cr.J.A 636/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SAMI S/O LIAQUAT ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2179.Cr.Bail 680/2024 (S.B.) ZAMIR AHMED KHOKHAR & 10 ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2180.Criminal Appeal 483/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD MOHSIN S/O NASIR AHMED V/S IIRD ADJ KHI SOUTH & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2181.Cr.Bail 325/2024 (S.B.) Faisal S/o Gul Dad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2182.Cr.Bail 432/2024 (S.B.) ARSALAN KHALID S/O KHALID YASEEN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2183.Cr.Bail 465/2024 (S.B.) AHMED KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD MOOSA V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2184.Const. P. 1845/2024 (D.B.) Shoukat Abbas Naqvi Niazi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1325
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2185.Cr.Bail 166/2024 (S.B.) Karam Ali Golato and another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2186.Cr.Bail 136/2024 (S.B.) Qabool @ Lamboo Chijjan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2187.Const. P. 1829/2024 (D.B.) M/S Kohisar Enterprises V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 825
Matter:-TENDER
2188.Const. P. 6108/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Masood V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 185
Matter:-DIRECTION
2189.Cr.Bail 489/2023 (S.B.) Fozia Naz Buriro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2190.Cr.Bail 155/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Abbas Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2191.Cr.Bail 156/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Yousif Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2192.Const. P. 1728/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Zubair V/S Asif Abbasi & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 880
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2193.Const. P. 5332/2023 (D.B.) Sawar Shah V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Gas Supply
2194.Cr.Bail 37/2024 (S.B.) Guhram Khan Ratar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2195.Const. P. 1791/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Zubair V/S Lal Hussain & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 141
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2196.Cr.Bail 153/2024 (S.B.) Niaz Hussain Brohi and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2197.Const. P. 4805/2023 (D.B.) The Modern Hospital V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2198.Const. P. 7827/2019 (D.B.) Agha Syed Attaullah Shah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1275
Matter:-DECLARATION
2199.Cr.Bail 178/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Razzak Kalhoro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2200.Criminal Miscelleneous 183/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shareefan V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2201.Const. P. 373/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Salma D/o Akhtar Hussain Shaikh V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
2202.Cr.J.A 2/2024 (S.B.) Altaf @ Raheeman Dashti V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
2203.Cr.Tran 4/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Jabbar Dayo V/S The State and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2025 SHC LAR 43
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2204.Cr.Bail 9/2024 (D.B.) Jumo Buriro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2205.Const. P. 1664/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Sufia Tabbasum V/S Habib Metropolitan Bank Ltd & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1344
Matter:-BANKING
2206.Const. P. 1545/2024 (D.B.) Zaheer Alam & Others V/S Provincial Asstt: Registrar Joint Stock Co. & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
2207.Const. P. 304/2024 (S.B.) Shakeel Ahmed S/o Jaffar Ali V/S Mst. Khalidah and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1292
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2208.Const. P. 1651/2024 (D.B.) Bushra Begum V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1182
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2209.Criminal Miscelleneous 112/2024 (S.B.) Rashid Ali V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2210.Cr.Bail 126/2024 (S.B.) Sanaullah Bhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Ocular evidence is corroborated by medical evidence)
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2211.Criminal Appeal 37/2022 (D.B.) Rahzan Sabzoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(A.T.C Above 7 years)
2212.Criminal Miscelleneous 133/2023 (S.B.) Ali Akbar Almani V/S The State & (02) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2213.Const. P. 1636/2024 (D.B.) Ali Ahmed Turabi Advocate V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST AMENDMENT
2214.Criminal Miscelleneous 312/2023 (S.B.) Waheed & Abdul Waheed Kolachi V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2215.Criminal Miscelleneous 74/2024 (S.B.) Mushtaque Ahmed Memon V/S Haneefullah Memon & another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Suspecsion of sentence under section 426 Cr.P.C)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2216.I. A 7/2021 (S.B.) Roshan Ali Mahar V/S Ghulam Ali Dahar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Defamation Ordinance, 2002.
2024 SHC LAR 451Filing of an FIR, false or otherwise, neither constitutes ???publication??? nor in itself meets any of the ingredients of defamation. The Appellant has, at best, framed a suit for alleged malicious prosecution in his plaint, but such an action cannot be maintained under the special law, i.e., the Defamation Ordinance, 2002. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2217.Const. P. 7666/2022 (D.B.) Waqef Shah V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 717
Matter:-DIRECTION
2218.Const. P. 1295/2024 (D.B.) M/s Helix Pharma V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 79
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2219.Cr.Acq.A. 34/2023 (S.B.) Mumtaz Ahmed Abro V/S Nabi Bux & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2220.Cr.Bail 475/2023 (S.B.) Abdullah Channa V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2221.Cr.Bail 919/2023 (S.B.) Mst: Sapna Maitlo & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Bail Confirmed)
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2222.Cr.Bail 392/2023 (S.B.) Khadim @ Basar Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2223.Const. P. 5618/2023 (D.B.) Mst. Sadaf Athar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF B-FORM
2224.Cr.Bail 76/2024 (S.B.) Mohammad Alam Pitafi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Accused nominated in further statement under section 162 Cr.P.C)
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2225.Cr.J.A 7/2020 (S.B.) Ali Sher Jatoi & Other V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Murder Trial (Compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C)
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2226.Cr.Tran 31/2024 (S.B.) ASAD ABBASS S/O MUHAMMAD AYOUB V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Transfer Application (Self Procured Convenience)
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
2227.R.A (Civil Revision) 5/2020 (S.B.) Mir Nisar Ali V/S Abdul Rasheed through L.Rs and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 377
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2228.R.A (Civil Revision) 49/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Latif Siyal & others V/S Imtiaz Buriro & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Civil Revision
2024 SHC LAR 1301The courts below acted with material irregularity when they rejected the Applicant-Plaintiff's Plaint seeking a declaration of Suit Land in its entirety after acknowledging prima facie Plaintiff had title in part of the Suit Land. Revision allowed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2229.R.A (Civil Revision) 22/2016 (S.B.) Shah Mohammad Tarat V/S Deen Mohammad & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 1172
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2230.Criminal Appeal 1/2023 (S.B.) Mumtaz Kalhoro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2231.Cr.J.A 8/2018 (S.B.) Barkat Ali Chano & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2232.Cr.Bail 78/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Wahab Bhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2233.H.C.A 124/2024 (D.B.) Shahzad Riaz V/S M/s.Millat Tractors Limited and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2234.Cr.Bail 158/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Khair Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2235.Cr.Bail 902/2023 (S.B.) Zaffar @ Zafarullah Gabol V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2236.Cr.Bail 621/2023 (S.B.) Khan Muhammad Gadehi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2237.Const. P. 41/2024 (S.B.) Mst Qamar-u-Nisa Junejo V/S Mst Bushra Junejo & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Detention
2238.Cr.Bail 506/2023 (S.B.) Wahid Bux Junejo and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2239.I. A 4/2020 (S.B.) Saleem Ali Chandio V/S Syed Abid Hussain Shah & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Summary Suit under Order XXXVIII , Summary Suit under Order XXXVIII (Iqrarnama)
The Appellant-Defendant had no ground to rely on an October 2018 payment mentioned in the Iqrarnama executed in November 2019, when the said payment was found not mentioned in the compromise Order recorded by the trial court in December 2018. Iqrarnama was reduced to a cipher in the face of the Decree passed on the basis of the Compromise Order. The unrecorded payment was not challenged in either appeal or review. The order attained finality. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2240.Const. P. 982/2023 (S.B.) Latifullah S/o Abdul Salam V/S Muhammad Sabir and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 485
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2241.Const. P. 998/2024 (D.B.) Sawab Noor V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1014
Matter:-BID
2242.Const. P. 3606/2022 (D.B.) Imdad Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 60
Matter:-ADMISSION MATTER
2243.Const. P. 1181/2024 (D.B.) Nusratullah Khan V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 841
Matter:-DIRECTION
2244.Criminal Miscelleneous 101/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Mour Narejo V/S SHO PS Keti Mumtaz & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Suspension of NBWs
2245.Cr.Ref 1/2023 (D.B.) The State (Ref. by ATC Judge Shikarpur) V/S Abdul Nabi and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2246.I. A 4/2016 (S.B.) Dr. Bhagwandas and another V/S Mashooq Ali Jatoi and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Defamation Ordinance, 2002. (Non-compliance of Section 8)
2024 SHC LAR 126Defamation suits are regulated by special law. The non-compliance of the statutory requirement under Section 8 meant that the defamation claim could not be maintained. The first Appeal was dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2247.Cr.Bail 754/2023 (S.B.) Haji Panjo Mazari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2248.Const. P. 4818/2023 (D.B.) Fakhar Shabbir & Others V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 491
Matter:-DIRECTION
2249.Const. P. 5939/2023 (D.B.) M/s Sabeel Paper Cone Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 824
Matter:-SALES TAX.
2250.Const. P. 5931/2023 (D.B.) Syed Irfan Ahmed V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 559
Matter:-BACHAT BAZAR
2251.Criminal Miscelleneous 107/2023 (S.B.) Hurmat Khatoon Khoso V/S SSP Kashmore@Kandhkot & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
2252.Criminal Appeal 91/2023 (S.B.) Ayaz Ahmed Buriro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
2253.Cr.Bail 142/2024 (S.B.) Waqar Ahmed Ghanghro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2254.Const. P. 305/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Abdullah S/o Muhammad Khan V/S District Judge, Karachi East and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1077
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2255.Cr.Bail 734/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Hyder @ Pachhe Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2256.Cr.J.A 38/2022 (D.B.) Abdullah Jamali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
2257.Const. P. 1398/2024 (D.B.) Waheed Khan V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CORRECTION IN CNIC
2258.Spl.H.C.A 183/2011 (D.B.) Batool Begum & Others V/S National Bank of Pakistan Sindh High Court, KarachiAppellant-Customer, in his Leave to Defend Application in terms of Section 10-4 of FIO, 2001, admitted a certain amount as outstanding and payable by him and in the same breathe also alleged another (notional) sum should be set off. The Banking Court passed a decree in the suit in terms of the admission and granted conditional leave for the balance amount, was well within the powers of the Banking Court. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2259.Cr.Rev 41/2024 (S.B.) KHUDA BUX S/O MUHAMMAD SULEMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1370
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2260.Const. P. 1152/2023 (S.B.) Zohaib Bin Arif S/o M. Arif Suleman V/S Xth Addl. District Judge, Karachi East & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 668
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2261.Const. P. 1387/2023 (S.B.) Deedar Hussain Shah S/o Pir Nawab Shah V/S Mst. Riffat Shaheen and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1036
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2262.Criminal Miscelleneous 944/2023 (S.B.) Muneer Ahmed Rind V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Magistrate has no jurisdiction to disagree with the positive final report submitted by I.O )
The law has now been settled that in a positive report of Investigation Officer in investigation referring the accused to a trial, the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to disagree with the said report by disposing of the case or deleting a particular section. When the investigation Officer drawn his conclusion after collecting the material during the investigation that a particular offence or the case as reported has been made out for the Court to hold a trial thereon then the Magistrate is not competent to discard the same as it requires examination of witnesses.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2263.Const. P. 981/2023 (S.B.) Irfan Bashir S/o Bashir Ahmed V/S Learned XXIIth ADJ, Karachi South and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1480
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2264.Const. P. 1351/2024 (D.B.) Dilshad Ahmed Zia & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1263
Matter:-DIRECTION
2265.Const. P. 247/2024 (S.B.) Shah Ata Qadri S/o Shah Zia Qadri V/S Mst. Faiza Ambreen and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 123
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2266.Const. P. 1090/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Rizwan S/o Babo Uddin V/S The Learned DJ, Malir, Karachi & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1138
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2267.Cr.Bail 19/2024 (S.B.) Syed Qurban Ali Shah V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 SHC MPK 29
2268.Cr.Tran 29/2024 (S.B.) MST. BISMA NOREEN / AMEER JEHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Transfer Application (Allegation against presiding officer )
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
2269.Cr.Bail 519/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Ali Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2270.Const. P. 706/2022 (S.B.) Suffiyan Ahmed Qureshi S/o Mushtaq Ahmed Qureshi V/S Mst. Iqra @ Fariha and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 43
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2271.Suit 248/2008 (S.B.) GULZAR AHMED & ORS. V/S MUHAMMAD ZAMAN & ORS. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 409The plaintiffs paid the full price of the Suit Land under the Sale Agreement and then paid off the Defendant Seller's 75% of the outstanding loan amount to Zarai Tarkiati Bank Ltd. The Bank acknowledged the funds deposited by the Plaintiffs and Defendant. Defendant Seller still denied the Agreement of Sale on the ground that he never signed the said Agreement and Plaintiffs were his tenant. Defendant produced no evidence in support of his defence. Suit for Specific Performance granted. Suit decreed.Read more
Matter:-Land Dispute
2272.Const. P. 286/2024 (D.B.) Sajid Mehmood V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRANSFER OF VEHICLE
2273.Const. P. 1332/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Syeda Saleha Khalid V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2274.Const. P. 450/2024 (D.B.) Shahid Rasool V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-E.C.L.
2275.R.A (Civil Revision) 51/2018 (S.B.) Mst. Almas Khatoon and an Other V/S P.O Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Companies Act, 2017 (Section 310 - Prior permission from Winding-Up Court)
2024 SHC LAR 1001
Matter:-Against Order
2276.Cr.Bail 741/2023 (S.B.) Ameer Ali Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2277.Cr.Bail 741/2023 (S.B.) Ameer Ali Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2278.Cr.Bail 8/2024 (S.B.) Ameer Ali Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2279.Cr.Rev 9/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Ayub Pathan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2280.I. A 1/2024 (D.B.) Ali Raza Mugheri V/S Ghulam Rasool Abro and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Leave to Defend)
2024 SHC LAR 1399Banking Court assessed whether the Customer had any cause of action based on facts alleged and documents filed by the Financial Institution with its application for leave to defend. The Banking Court did not decide the leave to defend application and dismissed the suit based on finding no cause of action. The Banking Court had to assess the issue of cause of action based on the Plaint filed by the Customer. The customer's Appeal was allowed. The Banking Court to decide the leave to defend application first which may well include the issue of cause of action.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2281.Const. P. 1288/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Ruqaya and Another V/S Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 639
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2282.Const. P. 6609/2022 (D.B.) M/s Sea Liners V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 131
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2283.Const. P. 1337/2023 (S.B.) Syed Abbas Ali s/o Syed Irshad Ali V/S XXIFamily Judge,East Karachi & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1441
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2284.Spl. Cr. A. 33/2023 (D.B.) Sagar Baboo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CRIMINAL CASE
2285.Const. P. 663/2024 (D.B.) Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi V/S Banking Court No. 5 Karachi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 957
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2286.Cr.Bail 502/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Qadeer @ Qadeer Sethar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2287.Cr.Bail 10/2024 (D.B.) Zain @ Aitbar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2288.Const. P. 5624/2023 (D.B.) Naila V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2289.Cr.J.A 9/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman Kamboh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
2290.Const. P. 322/2017 (S.B.) Sana Ashraf & Another V/S IIIrd ADJ Karachi Central & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1008
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2291.Cr.Bail 457/2023 (S.B.) Fateh Din Nindwani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2292.Const. P. 1228/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Sameena Rizwan and Others V/S Arts Council of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2293.Const. P. 1225/2024 (D.B.) M/s Samina & Moazzam Overseas V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2294.R.A (Civil Revision) 94/2021 (S.B.) Wazeer Hussain Brohi V/S Syed Sabir Shah & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaNon-filing of material documents need not be fatal to the Revision. Depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Dismissing one Revision on the ground of non-filing of relevant documents, especially when the opposing parties have each preferred Civil Revisions arising from the same disputed subject-matter may be too harsh an approach. Civil Revisions should be decided on merits. Even otherwise, the records and documents the parties rely on in the two cases are similar, and the lis appears to have been listed together for the last several dates of hearing, although it has not been tagged. Consistency demands that both Revisions be decided together. The interlocutory challenge to the filing of Revision dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2295.R.A (Civil Revision) 194/2023 (S.B.) Rev; Munwar Masih & Ohthers V/S Bishop of the Diocese (Churcuh of Pakistan ) Other Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 508
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2296.Cr.Rev 82/2023 (S.B.) Asghar Ali Chandio V/S Additional Sessions Judge-II, Mehar and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2297.Const. P. 1642/2023 (D.B.) mst Suriya & another V/S P.O SIndh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
2298.Const. P. 1762/2023 (D.B.) Mumtaz Hussain Sirohi V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Pension
2299.Const. P. 1763/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Wahid Shaikh V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Pension
2300.Const. P. 1764/2023 (D.B.) Ghulam Abbas Panhwar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Pension
2301.Const. P. 1591/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Shakoor Gabol V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Transfer (Posting)
2302.Cr.Bail 23/2024 (S.B.) Sanjay Kumar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Matter:-CUSTODY
2303.Const. P. 1659/2023 (D.B.) Noor un Nisa Khalidi & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
2304.Const. P. 1685/2023 (D.B.) Mst Sawaira Bibi & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
2305.Const. P. 1163/2024 (D.B.) Indus University V/S Sindh & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST BLOCKING
2306.Criminal Appeal 153/2023 (S.B.) Barkat Ali & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 7 YEARS & ABOVE
2307.Const. P. 28/2024 (S.B.) Mst Parveen Begum Rind & another V/S Aala Hussain & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
2308.Cr.Bail 13/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Akbar Jhangli Bhatti V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Murder Bail (No Specific Role and Mere Presence)
Matter:-CUSTODY
2309.Const. P. 1050/2024 (D.B.) Sohail Hameed V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2310.Cr.Tran 2/2024 (S.B.) Mansoor Ahmed Morio V/S Darban Ali Abro and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2311.Cr.Rev 2/2020 (S.B.) Ramz Ali Shar V/S Rahim Bux & 8 Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2312.Const. P. 9/2024 (S.B.) Allahwasayo metlo V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 468
Matter:-Detention
2313.H.C.A 82/2024 (D.B.) Ms. ScheherazeAsad Ali & another V/S Ms. Ambreen Bashir& others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2314.Cr.Tran 40/2023 (S.B.) Galib Khan Lashari and Others V/S Ghulam Qadir Lashari and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2315.Cr.Rev 43/2022 (S.B.) Ahmed Sufiyan Goraya Through Attornney V/S Ghulam Nabi Junejo & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2316.I. A 3/2023 (D.B.) Late Ghulam Muhammad & Others V/S Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 SHC LAR 158The Bank did not implead all the legal heirs in the banking suit. Only those legal heirs of the deceased Customer known to the bank were impleaded. The suit was decreed against the Bank. It was held that the decree is enforceable against the mortgaged property of the deceased Customer. The Bank has priority over the legal heirs shares in the said mortgaged property. The fact that the Bank discovered in appellate proceedings that it had not impleaded all the legal heirs is of no consequence. The Judgment-Debtors/Legal Heirs of the deceased customer's challenge to the Banking Court???s decree was dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
2317.Const. P. 1032/2024 (D.B.) Kemat Sarwar & Others V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1308
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
2318.Const. P. 6269/2023 (D.B.) Syed Firdous Shamim Naqvi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 90
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2319.Cr.Bail 763/2023 (S.B.) Hashim @ Khadim Hussain Shahani Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2320.Civil Tran 16/2023 (S.B.) Ishrat Parvez Langah V/S Daim Langah and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2321.Cr.Bail 89/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Majeed and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2322.Cr.Bail 695/2023 (S.B.) Mujeeb @ Mujahid Hussain and another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2323.Cr.Bail 668/2023 (S.B.) Najamuddin Pahore and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2324.Const. P. 890/2021 (D.B.) Ayaz Ali Solangi V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
2325.Const. P. 241/2024 (S.B.) Mrs. Misbah Zainab W/o Turab Ali V/S Turab Ali and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 608
Matter:-PROTECTION
2326.Const. P. 448/2022 (S.B.) Ms. Rubina Shamshad & others Thr Shamshad Ali Khan V/S Shamsher Khan and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 464
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2327.Const. P. 976/2023 (D.B.) Hasham and Co. V/S SSGC & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 490
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2328.I. A 3/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Rasheed Arain. V/S ZTBL Warah Branch and Others. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2329.Const. P. 5876/2023 (D.B.) Rameez Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 168Overlap between Regulation 25-2 and 25.9 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002 explainedRead more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2330.Cr.Rev 4/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Farooque Tumrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2025 SHC SUK 41
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2331.Const. P. 33/2024 (S.B.) Rasool Bux Brohi & another V/S Mst Tabbasum Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Rent Matter
2332.Const. P. 34/2024 (S.B.) Rasool Bux Brohi & another V/S Mst Tabbasum Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Rent Matter
2333.Const. P. 35/2024 (S.B.) Rasool Bux Brohi & another V/S Mst Tabbasum Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Rent Matter
2334.Const. P. 31/2024 (S.B.) Rasool Bux Brohi & another V/S Mst Tabbasum Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Rent Matter
2335.Const. P. 30/2024 (S.B.) Rasool Bux Brohi & another V/S Mst Tabbasum Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Rent Matter
2336.Const. P. 6001/2023 (D.B.) Paidar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1234
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2337.R.A (Civil Revision) 198/2022 (S.B.) Ramesh Lal V/S Gul Hassan Through Legal heir Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 272
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2338.Const. P. 398/2024 (D.B.) Fahad ul Islam V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 710
Matter:-DIRECTION
2339.Const. P. 4927/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Mumtaz Khan V/S Muhammad Ahmed Khan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 542
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2340.Const. P. 7456/2022 (D.B.) Faruukh Zaheer V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BID
2341.Const. P. 195/2024 (D.B.) Province of Sindh & others V/S Usman & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2342.Criminal Miscelleneous 845/2023 (S.B.) Raja Nazar Ali Samo V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2343.Const. P. 726/2024 (D.B.) Sanjey Perwani V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1278
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2344.R.A (Civil Revision) 10/2024 (S.B.) Arslan Habib Buriro V/S Rustam Ali Tunio Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Civil Revision
2024 SHC LAR 969After the recording of evidence, the trial court was operating in the second stage of the summary suit and had to dig deeper into the evidence to decide the suit. The evidence brought on record required greater scrutiny, and the threshold of the burden of proof was on a higher pedestal based on the general principles of the law of evidence. Yet the trial court decided against the applicant/defendant on the assumption that the production of the cheque was sufficient and/or no further proof was required as the cheque was a negotiable instrument. This may be one of the considerations in deciding an application for leave to defend, but it was not proper for the trial court to overlook the circumstantial evidence produced by the applicant-defendant-Arslan Buriro and available in the suit file surrounding the alleged loan and the cheque issuance. Revision against the Execution allowed.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
2345.Criminal Miscelleneous 202/2023 (S.B.) Mehar Hussain Sahito V/S The State & (06) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2346.Cr.Bail 496/2023 (S.B.) Barkat Ali Khakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2347.R.A (Civil Revision) 25/2023 (S.B.) Anweruddin & Others V/S Muhammad Moosa Thru LRs & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2348.Cr.Bail 129/2023 (S.B.) Mubeen & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2349.Const. P. 796/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Razia Bibi V/S Dilawar Qadir and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 892
Matter:-DIRECTION
2350.Const. P. 786/2024 (D.B.) Irfan Ullah Khan Marwat V/S The R.O PS-105 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 653
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2351.Const. P. 790/2024 (D.B.) Mansoor Feroz V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1237
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2352.Const. P. 789/2024 (D.B.) Arshad Hussain V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 203
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2353.Const. P. 798/2024 (D.B.) Malk Muhammad Arif Awan V/S R.O NA-246 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 848
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2354.Const. P. 792/2024 (D.B.) Fahad Shafiq V/S R.O and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1098
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2355.Const. P. 779/2024 (D.B.) Salman V/S R.O and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 35
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2356.Criminal Appeal 38/2020 (S.B.) Asif Ali Jagirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
2357.R.A (Civil Revision) 5/2022 (S.B.) Sher Khan Jakhrani V/S Deputy Assistant Manager NADRA, Kashmore & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 SHC LAR 583If the date mentioned on the Primary School Certificate was to be believed by the Applicant/Plaintiff when he applied for CNIC and furnished his information on Form A submitted to NADRA, he would be underage at the time of issuance of his CNIC (less than 18 years). Further, the Applicant/Plaintiff filed the same claim twice, first in 2015 and then again in 2020. Each application to NADRA does not constitute a fresh cause of action. Revision dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2358.Const. P. 6115/2023 (D.B.) Saad Aqil V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 682The rights of tenants in Buildings declared as Dangerous by the SBCA under Section 14 of the SBCO, 1979Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2359.Cr.Bail 505/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Nabi Buriro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2360.Cr.Bail 2/2024 (S.B.) Tario @ Tara Chand V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2025 SHC MPK 32
2361.Const. P. 6346/2023 (D.B.) M/s Parekh Impex V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1233
Matter:-AGAINST PROCEEDINGS
2362.Const. P. 737/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Akber V/S R.O PS-123 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2363.Const. P. 746/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Asif Khan V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2364.Const. P. 698/2024 (D.B.) Javaid Ahmed Chhatari V/S R.O NA-241 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2365.Const. P. 705/2024 (D.B.) Atta Ullah V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2366.Const. P. 724/2024 (D.B.) Ali Ahmed Palh V/S R.O P.S 103 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2367.Const. P. 704/2024 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Taha V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2368.Const. P. 699/2024 (D.B.) Ghulam Qadir V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2369.Const. P. 687/2024 (D.B.) Haleem Adil Shaikh V/S R.O NA-238 & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2370.Const. P. 725/2024 (D.B.) Zahooruddin V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2371.Const. P. 700/2024 (D.B.) Dawa Khan V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2372.Const. P. 732/2024 (D.B.) Jansher Junejo V/S R.O PS-98 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2373.Const. P. 734/2024 (D.B.) Arslan Khalid V/S R.O NA-248 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2374.Const. P. 742/2024 (D.B.) Saeed Ahmed V/S PEC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2375.Const. P. 744/2024 (D.B.) Bashir Ahmed V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2376.Const. P. 706/2024 (D.B.) Salh Zada V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2377.Const. P. 745/2024 (D.B.) Uzair Ali Khan Ghori and Another V/S R.O NA-249 & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2378.Const. P. 740/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Fauzia Siddiqui V/S R.O PS-125 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2379.Const. P. 708/2024 (D.B.) Faheem Ali V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2380.Const. P. 703/2024 (D.B.) Zain Pervez V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2381.Const. P. 712/2024 (D.B.) Shujaat Ali V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2382.Const. P. 743/2024 (D.B.) Imran Ali Mithani V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2383.Const. P. 741/2024 (D.B.) Amjad Iqbal Afridi V/S PEC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2384.Const. P. 748/2024 (D.B.) Farhan Saleem V/S R.O PS-122 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2385.Const. P. 719/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Yasir V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2386.Const. P. 701/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Alamgir Khan V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2387.Const. P. 702/2024 (D.B.) Saif ur Rehman V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2388.Const. P. 721/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Jabbar Khan V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2389.Const. P. 688/2024 (D.B.) Khurram Sher Zaman V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2390.Const. P. 707/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Qadeem V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2391.Const. P. 718/2024 (D.B.) Shakil Ahmed V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2392.Const. P. 714/2024 (D.B.) Aftab Jehangir V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2393.Const. P. 717/2024 (D.B.) Bashir Ahmed Sodar V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2394.Const. P. 716/2024 (D.B.) Rabistan Khan V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2395.Const. P. 710/2024 (D.B.) Ramzan V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2396.Const. P. 711/2024 (D.B.) Murad Shaikh V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2397.Const. P. 715/2024 (D.B.) Tariq Hussain V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2398.Const. P. 720/2024 (D.B.) Syed Shafiq V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2399.Const. P. 709/2024 (D.B.) Syed Faisal Ali V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2400.Const. P. 735/2024 (D.B.) Agha Arsallan Khan V/S R.O PS-101 and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2401.R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2019 (S.B.) Syed Muzafar Ahmed Ashraf through his L.Rs.& ors. V/S Anwar Ali Janwri and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Civil Revision (All issues not decided)
2024 SHC LAR 447The onus was on the Plaintiff to prove his claim to succeed in his suit. A prayer clause has no place in the Written Statement, and the trial court should have ignored it. Instead, the trial court copied and pasted the prayer clause from Defendant/Respondent No.1???s Written Statement as an issue on which parties were at variance when this was clearly not the case. Issue No.5, framed by the trial court, was wholly alien and did not arise from the pleadings. As such, it was rightly ignored by the trial court in its judgment. The trial court correctly decided the suit on the sole issue of maintainability, and for the reasons discussed hereinabove, there was no need to examine the other issues framed by the trial court. Revision dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2402.Const. P. 52/2024 (S.B.) Mst Nihal Khatoon V/S SHO PS Mahota & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
2403.Const. P. 537/2024 (D.B.) M. Ishaq Memon V/S Mst. Asma Maria and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR ENQUIRY
2404.I. A 1/2015 (D.B.) Hafiz Khair Mohammad Choliani V/S Z.T.B Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2024 SHC LAR 943Appellant-Customer, after having availed finance from Respondent-Bank, had no legs to stand, pleading that the Bank did not ask him for his CNIC and disbursed the loan on NIC. Documents available on record confimed Appellant-Customer's ID and obligation to the Respondent-Bank. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2405.Const. P. 648/2024 (D.B.) Fossil Energy (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST SECTION
2406.Const. P. 105/2024 (D.B.) Muzafar Ali Brohi & Another V/S Returning Officer & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Elections Act, 2017
Matter:-Election Matter
2407.Const. P. 628/2024 (D.B.) M/s Cnergyico Pk Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
2408.Criminal Appeal 34/2023 (S.B.) Soorasingh and another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2409.Const. P. 6026/2023 (D.B.) Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui V/S SBCA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 759
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
2410.H.C.A 39/2016 (D.B.) Mohammad Qasim & another V/S M/s. Gulshan-e-Faisal & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: H.C.A
2024 SHC KHI 1307Notarized Oral Gift Deed could not be proved. Representative of Society filed a vague Written Statement and did not step into the witness box. The subsequent chain of registered sale deeds, including the Appellant-Defendant proving the registration of the sale deed, could not rescue them once the entire superstructure of sale deeds collapsed. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2411.Const. P. 5549/2022 (D.B.) Syed Mohsin Mahzar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1251Scope of Deemed Approval, Alteration and Regularisation under the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations , 2002 and the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979Read more
Matter:-DEMOLITION
2412.Const. P. 4392/2017 (D.B.) PHA Maymar JV Company (Pvt) Ltd V/S Masood Razzaq Qureshi & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1479
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2413.Const. P. 595/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Shoaib Jamil V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2414.R.A (Civil Revision) 33/2023 (S.B.) Chakar Bijarani & others V/S Abdul Rasool Bijarani & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision under section 115 CPC)
As per Written Statement filed by Applicant-Defendants, they purchased suit land from co-sharer knowing fully well the risks associated with such purchase. They never had consent to the sale of the remaining co-sharers (2/3rd share). Suit partially decreed, Applicant-Defendants claim over property declined by trial court. Appellate Court upheld Judgment and Decree. No case for Revision made out.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2415.Cr.Bail 50/2024 (S.B.) Niaz Ali Maitlo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2416.Const. P. 87/2024 (D.B.) M/s Crown International V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST PROCEEDINGS
2417.Cr.Bail 334/2024 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SHOAIB SHAHID & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 337
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
2418.Const. P. 1211/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Ramsha and Another V/S Family Judge, Karachi East and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1421
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2419.Const. P. 612/2021 (S.B.) Syed Bibi W/o Saeed Muhammad V/S IXth ADJ, Karachi West and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 834
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2420.Cr.Acq.A. 98/2023 (S.B.) Sik Ali Jagirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2421.Cr.Bail 711/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Mustafa Chandio & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2422.H.C.A 128/2017 (D.B.) Rifat Saeed & another V/S Zahid Saeed & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Injunction Granted. )
2024 SHC KHI 16Plaintiffs prayed for a restraining order, which is a form of equitable and discretionary relief that is to be invoked in the aid of justice and not to aid injustice and favor one party over another. If we do not grant relief, then the subject matter of the suit, which is essentially a family dispute, may well become complicated and potentially frustrate the decree, if any. While a case for stay is made out, which is allowed however the trial court correctly dismissed the Receiver's appointment because receivership is the harshest remedy in civil lawRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2423.Const. P. 549/2024 (D.B.) Taufeequddin Siddiqi V/S Election Commissioner of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 926
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2424.I. A 7/2023 (S.B.) S.S.G.C. L V/S Irshad Ali Bhutto and antoher Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Gas (Theft, Control and Recoverey) Act, 2016 (Section 6 -Complaints and Suits), Gas (Theft, Control and Recoverey) Act, 2016
2024 SHC LAR 1385The suit filed by SSGC was hopelessly time-barred. Gas Utility Court is not obliged to decide the question of maintainability after its decision on the leave to defend application. Gas Company's allegation that the Defendant-Customer was involved in the theft of gas, no ground to condone limitation..Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2425.Cr.Bail 657/2023 (S.B.) Rehan Khan Jalbani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2426.Cr.Bail 683/2023 (S.B.) Gul Muhammad & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2427.Const. P. 6020/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Nawaz Khan Niazi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2428.Cr.Bail 676/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Jabbar and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2429.Const. P. 549/2024 (D.B.) Taufeequddin Siddiqi V/S Election Commissioner of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2430.Cr.Bail 766/2023 (S.B.) Altaf Ali Gadehi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2431.Cr.Bail 241/2023 (S.B.) Fahad Siyal & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2432.Const. P. 3592/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Fahad & Ors V/S Provincial Higher Education Commission & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1372
Matter:-APPEARANCE IN EXAMINATION
2433.Const. P. 176/2022 (S.B.) Mst. Shazia Begum D/o Muhammad Aslam V/S Sami Ali and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 350
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2434.Const. P. 3354/2023 (D.B.) Syed Wajiha Jilani V/S Province of Sindh & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 893
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF MARKSHEET
2435.Const. P. 6933/2022 (D.B.) Shafqat Zaman V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 253
Matter:-REGISTRATION OF SALE DEED
2436.Const. P. 2661/2011 (D.B.) Jinsar Ali Bhutto V/S PO Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Service
2437.Const. P. 507/2024 (D.B.) Hasan Baig and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2438.Cr.Acq.A. 134/2023 (S.B.) The State through Prosecutor General Sindh V/S Anwar Mari Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Sindh Arms Act, 2013 (Contradiction in evidence)
It is observed that the presumption of innocence applies doubly upon acquittal, and that such a finding is not to be disturbed unless there is some discernible perversity in the determination of the trial Court that can be said to have caused miscarriage of justice. The judgment of acquittal should not be interjected until the, findings are perverse, arbitrary, foolish, artificial, speculative and ridiculous.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2439.Const. P. 791/2023 (S.B.) Syed Muhammad Farhan S/o Absar Hussain V/S Mst. Safia Fatima and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1255
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2440.Const. P. 285/2020 (S.B.) KHURRAM BAIG V/S MST. SAIMA & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 795
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2441.Cr.Bail 34/2024 (S.B.) Jalal Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2442.Cr.Bail 33/2024 (S.B.) Rafique & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2443.Const. P. 972/2023 (S.B.) Fawad Khalid S/o Khalid Bin Rasheed Zahid V/S VIth ADJ, Karachi Central and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 386
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2444.Cr.Bail 443/2023 (S.B.) Asif Ali Korai V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Rule of Consistency)
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2445.Criminal Miscelleneous 782/2023 (S.B.) Ayaz Hussain & another V/S SSP N/Feroze & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2446.Cr.Bail 736/2023 (S.B.) Rashid @ Muhammad Ali another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2447.Cr.Bail 319/2023 (S.B.) Yahya Jafferi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2448.Cr.Bail 738/2023 (S.B.) Imdad Jalbani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2449.Const. P. 406/2024 (D.B.) Major (R) Shahid Mehmood Awan V/S M/s Karwan-e-Royal Karachi and Ohters Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2450.Const. P. 448/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Ameen & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 505
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
2451.Const. P. 6266/2021 (D.B.) The Technical Education Society of Pakistan V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1254
Matter:-DIRECTION
2452.R.A (Civil Revision) 78/2023 (S.B.) Dur Muhammad Malik V/S Zafarullah Malik & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Paternity of child questioned )
2024 SHC LAR 164Respondent/Zafarullah, born in the year 2000, claimed paternity from Applicant/Dur Muhammad, except that his father, Dur Muhammad, took the position that he divorced Zafarullah's mother, Zulekhan, in 1998. Zafarullah's mother, his phuppi and step-father, all gave oral testimony that Zafarullah's mother was divorced in 2002. Dur Muhammad produced no evidence under DMMA in support dissolution of marriage that he divorced his first wife (Zafarullah's mother) in 1998. DNA testing would not come to his aid in the facts and circumstances of the case. Presumption of Article 128 of Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984, presumption of marriage and his evidence did not support Dur Muhammad's cause. Revision Dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
2453.R.A (Civil Revision) 12/2023 (S.B.) Basit Ahmed V/S Shakeel and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2454.Civil Tran 17/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Aziz Tagar V/S Mst. Noor-e-Saba Tagar Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2455.Const. P. 5818/2023 (D.B.) Shahbaz Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2456.Cr.Bail 730/2023 (S.B.) Saddam Hussain Mirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2457.Const. P. 5188/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Khan Katio V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 215
Matter:-DIRECTION
2458.Const. P. 4231/2021 (D.B.) Dr. Pervez Hashmi V/S The Sindh HealthCare Commission and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2459.Cr.Bail 436/2023 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Kalhoro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2460.Cr.Bail 757/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Zahida @ Mouran V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2461.Cr.Bail 756/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Sakina Khatoon V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2462.Cr.Tran 52/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed and Others V/S The State and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2463.Const. P. 1585/2023 (D.B.) Hamid Mehmood & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 439Interpretation of Regulation No.18-4.1 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in respect of the conversion of amenity plots.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2464.Const. P. 166/2020 (S.B.) ABU TALIB V/S MST. ABIDA ZAREEN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 507
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2465.Const. P. 2241/2023 (D.B.) Syed Kamran Yonus and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiRights of allottees in illegally constructed buildings and the right to regularise under the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2466.II.A. 3/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Rasheed V/S Shah Muhammad and others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
2467.Const. P. 356/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Mohsin Khan V/S Presiding Office Dist..Judge South & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST CIRCULAR
2468.Const. P. 955/2021 (S.B.) Mst. Shawana Hussain D/o Iftikhar Hussain V/S Shahzaib and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1311
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2469.Const. P. 1344/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Fahad Karimi s/o Muhammad Faheem Karimi V/S Narmeen Rehan D/o Muhammad Rehan Siddiqui & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 534
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2470.Const. P. 4101/2023 (D.B.) Shahid Bajaria Dawood V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1407
Matter:-REMOVAL OF NAME
2471.Const. P. 584/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Ghani S/o Muhammad Bachoo V/S Mst. Farida Bano and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1107
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2472.Cr.Bail 737/2023 (S.B.) Ahmeduddin Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2473.Cr.J.A 12/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Ismail Pathan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: CNS Act, 1997 (Reduction in sentence as Undergone )
It is a well-established principle of law that in special circumstances, the Court at its discretion can divert from the norms and standards prescribed in terms of sentencing after assigning cogent reasons.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
2474.Criminal Miscelleneous 111/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Khaliqe & Another V/S The State & (02) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2475.Cr.Bail 869/2023 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Mazari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2476.Const. P. 4187/2023 (D.B.) Aurangzaib Khan Bangash V/S Mst. Abida & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1491
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2477.Civil Tran 7/2023 (S.B.) Miss. Firdous V/S Mst. Rubina Parveen Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Transfer Application (Allowed)
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2478.Cr.Bail 872/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Sabir Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2479.Cr.Bail 678/2023 (S.B.) Riaz Ali Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2480.Const. P. 165/2024 (D.B.) Syed Ayaz Ali Shah V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2481.Cr.Bail 602/2023 (S.B.) Hazoor Bux Sanjrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Bail (Trial at the verge of conclusion)
It is reflected from the progress report dated 28th October, 2023, furnished by the learned trial Court that the charge in the case has been framed and trial has commenced. However, today learned Advocate for complainant placed on record certified copies of depositions of complainant Mst. Hazooran and PW Budhal. He states at the Bar that rest of the witnesses of the complainant have also been examined and now there remain only official witnesses to be examined and that case is at the verge of finality. Since, only official witnesses remain to be examined and case is at the verge of conclusion, therefore it would not be appropriate to grant or reject bail plea of the applicant/ accused.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2482.Const. P. 54/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Zohaib Shaikh V/S Deedar Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 103
Matter:-Election Matter
2483.Cr.Bail 41/2023 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Jagirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2484.Const. P. 50/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Khan Jessar V/S Masroor Ahmed Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 1054
Matter:-Election Matter
2485.Const. P. 7900/2022 (D.B.) Syed Arif Raza Rizvi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1099
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2486.Cr.Acq.A. 4/2024 (S.B.) Nadeem Khan Solangi V/S Noor Muhammad & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Trial ( Contradictions )
It is observed that the presumption of innocence applies doubly upon acquittal, and that such a finding is not to be disturbed unless there is some discernible perversity in the determination of the trial Court that can be said to have caused miscarriage of justice. The judgment of acquittal should not be interjected until the, findings are perverse, arbitrary, foolish, artificial, speculative and ridiculous.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2487.Const. P. 198/2024 (D.B.) Sirajudding V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF ELECTION TRIBUNAL
2488.Cr.Acq.A. 127/2023 (S.B.) Fareed Ahmed Khokhar V/S Manosh Kumar & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Trial ( Contradictions )
The judgment of acquittal should not be interjected until the, findings are perverse, arbitrary, foolish, artificial, speculative and ridiculous. The Court of appeal should not interfere simply for the reason that on the reappraisal of the evidence a different conclusion could possibly be arrived, the factual conclusion could possibly be arrived at, the factual conclusion should not upset, except when palpably perverse, suffering from serious and material factual infirmities.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2489.Const. P. 1051/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Nayab D/o Shoukat Ali V/S Nawaz Ali and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 620. It is an established position adhered by Courts that fair trial is a fundamental right as envisaged under Article 10-A of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (???Constitution???) where cross-examination is an integral part of it aimed to check the credibility of witnesses, to elicit truth or expose falsehood as when the statement of a witness is not subjected to the cross-examination, as cross-examination???s evidentiary value cannot be equated and that cross-examination is not a mere formality, but a valuable right to bring the truth out.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2490.Const. P. 52/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Suleman Depar V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 SHC SUK 195
Matter:-Election Matter
2491.Const. P. 164/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Rizwan Chandna V/S Provincial Election Commission & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2492.Const. P. 169/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Anwar Khan Tareen V/S Provincial Election Commission & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF ELECTION TRIBUNAL
2493.Const. P. 173/2024 (D.B.) Faisal Mujeeb V/S Provincial Election Commissioner & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF ELECTION TRIBUNAL
2494.Criminal Appeal 71/2020 (S.B.) Manzoor Ahmed Lohar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Murder Trial (Unseen incident)
In my view even when taking the prosecution case as a whole, and at its best, in terms of un-seen and un-witnessed incident. A murder case, should be like a well-knit chain, one end of which touches the dead body of the deceased and the other the neck of the accused. No link in chain of the circumstances should be broken and the circumstances should be such as cannot be explained away on any reasonable hypothesis other than guilt of accused person. Chain of such facts and circumstances has to be completed to establish guilt of the accused person beyond reasonable doubt and to make the plea of his being innocent incompatible with the weight of evidence against him.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2495.Const. P. 200/2024 (D.B.) United Bank Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
2496.Const. P. 331/2023 (D.B.) CNERGYICO PK LTD V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1471
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2497.Const. P. 4363/2022 (D.B.) Shahab Abbas V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 975Validity of Regulation No. 3-2.14.3 of the Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations, 2002 in the context Section 6 and 7D of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance, 1979Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2498.Const. P. 167/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Anees Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2499.Const. P. 189/2024 (D.B.) Mst. Sakina Anwar V/S The Learned RO and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2500.Criminal Miscelleneous 955/2023 (S.B.) Syed Abid Hussain Shah V/S Jaffar Syed & another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
2501.Const. P. 194/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Farooq V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2502.Const. P. 157/2024 (D.B.) Ameer Gul Khan V/S Chief Election Commissioner & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2503.Const. P. 126/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Jabbar Arain V/S R.O PS-76 & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2504.Const. P. 190/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Amin Khan V/S The Learned RO and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
2505.Const. P. 943/2019 (S.B.) Abdul Khaliq S/o Late Abdul Majeed V/S Amir Ali and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2506.Const. P. 43/2024 (S.B.) Malik Aleem Ali S/o Farukh Hussain V/S Muhammad Yasir Amin Merchant Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1455
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2507.Const. P. 1200/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Ambreena Munir D/o Munir Ahmed Faridi V/S Muhammad Umair Siddiqui and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 676
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2508.Cr.Tran 39/2023 (S.B.) Samiullah Surhio V/S Zafarullah Surhio and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2509.Cr.Rev 65/2023 (S.B.) Riaz Ahmed Kaladi V/S Allah Rakhyo Kaladi & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2510.Cr.Acq.A. 108/2023 (S.B.) Mst.Naseeran Phulpoto V/S Muhammad Sadiq & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2511.Cr.Bail 930/2023 (S.B.) Ali Ahmed Jagirani & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2512.Criminal Miscelleneous 850/2023 (S.B.) Ahmed Uddin Pitafi V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2513.Criminal Miscelleneous 954/2023 (S.B.) Syed Abid Hussain Shah V/S Syed Anwar Ali Shah & another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
2514.Cr.Bail 661/2023 (S.B.) Bachal Narejo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2515.Const. P. 632/2019 (S.B.) Qari Hafiz Mohammad Sajid S/o (Late) Abdul Khaliq V/S IX Civil & Family Judge Khi Central and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 985
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2516.Cr.Rev 36/2023 (S.B.) Nawab Khan Khoso V/S Mukhtiarkar Revenue, Kashmore & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2517.Cr.Bail 670/2023 (S.B.) Shafique-u-Rehman Almani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2518.Suit 200/2020 (S.B.) M/s Sadiq & Suharwardy V/S Ismail Industries Limited Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Intellectual Propoerty Organization of Pakistan Act 2012 (Rejection of Plaint or transfer to IP tribunal or Continuing hearing by High Court)
2024 SHC KHI 433These ten trademark suits currently pending in the High Court are disposed of in three different manner following the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Muhammad Multazam Raza v. Muhammad Ayub Khan, 2022 SCMR 979 in paragraph 12 and the enactment of the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2023, on 11.08.2023. The three actions on the part of the High Court depend on the category of trademark dispute: Category A - Suits for infringement currently pending in the High Court and filed prior to 29.12.2015 may be transferred to the IP Tribunal forthwith (Category ???A???). Category B - trademarks suits filed after 29.12.2015, currently pending in the High Court, the Plaint in such suits must be returned (Category ???B???) as High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the same. Finally, in cases involving a Suit connected with a J. Misc. Application involving either Section 73(4) [an application for revocation], Section 80(4) [an application for declaration of invalidity], Section 96(2) [an application for rectification], etc, the High Court may retain jurisdiction and proceed with deciding both Suit and J. Misc.Read more
Matter:-INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
2519.Const. P. 2867/2021 (D.B.) Zaid Amin Akhai V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1430
Matter:-DIRECTION
2520.Const. P. 5466/2023 (D.B.) The Federation of Pak, Chambers of Commerce & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 927
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
2521.Const. P. 524/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Abid S/o Muhammad Yaqoob V/S Mst. Rukhsar and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHC KHI 1174
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2522.Election Appeal 22/2024 (S.B.) Riaz Ahmed Behan V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2523.Election Appeal 44/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Zohaib Shaikh V/S Deedar Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2524.Election Appeal 11/2024 (S.B.) Saadat Ali Dahari V/S Shah Nawaz Jatoi & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2525.Election Appeal 15/2024 (S.B.) Mohammad KHan Jessar V/S Masroor Ahmed Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2526.Election Appeal 45/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Mubeen Memon V/S Deedar Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2527.Election Appeal 42/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Zohaib Shaikh V/S Mubeen Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2528.Const. P. 6178/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Subhan V/S Board of Secondary Education & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE
2529.Election Appeal 46/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Mubeen Memon V/S Mubeen Ahmed jatoi & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2530.Election Appeal 43/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Zohaib Shaikh V/S Deedar Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2531.Election Appeal 41/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Zohaib Shaikh V/S Mubeen Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2532.Election Appeal 25/2024 (S.B.) Riaz Ahmed Behan V/S Masroor Ahmed & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2533.Election Appeal 37/2024 (S.B.) Ali Murtaza Rehman Thaheem V/S Mohammad Bux Khaskheli & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2534.Election Appeal 29/2024 (S.B.) Gul Hassan V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2535.Election Appeal 28/2024 (S.B.) Gul Hassan V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2536.Election Appeal 5/2024 (S.B.) Samiullah Abro V/S A.D.C-II Larkana & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Election Matter
2537.Election Appeal 7/2024 (S.B.) Samiullah Abro V/S A.C. Bakrani / R.O Larkana & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Election Matter
2538.Election Appeal 38/2024 (S.B.) Ali Murtaza Rehman Thaheem V/S Mohammad Bux Khaskheli & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2539.Election Appeal 39/2024 (S.B.) Ali Murtaza Rehman Thaheem V/S Mohammad Bux Khaskheli & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2540.Election Appeal 14/2024 (S.B.) Imam Bux Phulpoto V/S Returning Officer PS-26 Khairpur & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2541.Election Appeal 9/2024 (S.B.) Imam Bux Phulpoto V/S Returning Officer NA 202 Khairpur & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2542.Election Appeal 23/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Suleman Depar V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2543.Cr.Bail 607/2023 (S.B.) Niaz Hussain Khaskheli and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2544.Election Appeal 7/2024 (S.B.) Syed Amir Ali Shah Jeelani V/S Assistant Commissioner/RO & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2545.Election Appeal 26/2024 (S.B.) Wazir Ali Umrani V/S Returning Officer, PS-12 Larkana and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Election Matter
2546.Election Appeal 28/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Naheed V/S R.O PS-14 Kamber-Shahdadkot and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Election Matter
2547.Election Appeal 27/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Naheed V/S R.O, NA-196 Kamber-Shahdadkot and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Election Matter
2548.Election Appeal 17/2024 (S.B.) Naeem Ul Arfeen Rao V/S Federal of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2549.Election Appeal 4/2024 (S.B.) Mukhashin Raza V/S Federal of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2550.Election Appeal 3/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Rauf Korai V/S A.C Larkana / R.O Larkana & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Election Matter
2551.Cr.Bail 874/2023 (S.B.) Feroz Ali Mirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2552.Election Appeal 12/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Uris Khokhar V/S Returning Officer Larkana & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Election Matter
2553.Election Appeal 19/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed Jogi V/S Federal of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2554.Election Appeal 16/2024 (S.B.) Hafiz Muhammad Shahmir Khan V/S Federal of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2555.Election Appeal 18/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Bilal V/S Federal of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Election Matter
2556.H.C.A 397/2023 (D.B.) Amir Khan through Attorney M. Feroze V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Appeal (dismissed as impugned Order ad-interim - Parties right of appeal when applications finally decided)
2024 SHC KHI 918Appeal filed against an ad-interim Order, parties will have a right of appeal when the applications are finally decided. At the moment, Pink Residency obtained an injunction when no final decree could be passed which issue is yet to be finally decided. Parties (Appellant, Intervener/Pink Residency/Official Government) chain of title in Suit Property yet to be decided? Intervener/Pink Residency is yet to explain how it obtained possession after Nazir presumably handed it over to the Appellant. Several issues are yet to be decided, Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2557.H.C.A 471/2023 (D.B.) Sohail Illahi and Others V/S Mariam Kamran & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2558.I. A 92/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Khalid V/S M/s. Habib Bank Limted & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Auction Proceedings)
2024 CLD 338All the legal heirs of Judgment-Debtor were not taken on record by the Banking Court. Further none of those (LRs) who were taken on record were issued notice leading to the sale proclamation. Auction proceedings set aside with directions to add all the legal heirs in the execution proceedings and issue a fresh proclamation after issuing fresh notice to all the legal heirs. The Auction Purchaser is at liberty to either match the proposed bid, enhance it, or claim re-payment of his deposited amount along with profit accrued thereon. Appeal disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2559.Const. P. 8194/2022 (D.B.) Imran Razi Ahmed Hashmi V/S Muhammad Arshad Awan & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Constitution of Pakistan (CP Dismissed against Auction proceedings - Sale Deed Unregistered)
2023 SHC KHI 527Petitioner-Intervener relying on an unregistered sale deed objecting to auction proceedings has no legs to stand. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
2560.Cr.Bail 708/2023 (S.B.) Habib-U-Rehman Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2561.Const. P. 5937/2023 (D.B.) Aziz Khalid and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 909
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
2562.Const. P. 6212/2023 (D.B.) Ali Hyder & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2563.Suit 161/2014 (S.B.) V/S Sindh High Court, KarachiThe Plaintiff's claim for relief was partly in tort. On the plaintiff's demise, this claim for damages under tort died with the Plaintiff, and the right to agitate this claim (Issue No.2) did not survive to his legal heirs. Additionally, the head of this claim does not fall within the said exception in Order XXII Rule 6 CPC. Reliance placed on Zahid Hussain Awan v. United Bank Limited, 2018 MLD 1369. Even otherwise the Plaintiffs have failed to prove their claim. It was incumbent upon the Plaintiffs to show as to and under which head of account and how such damages have been sustained against Government Officers. In the absence of such proof, special damages cannot be allowed. General damages are loss or injury sustained or caused as the direct or proximate consequence of the wrongful act. No loss or injury was proved. Claim for damages may fail, but Plaintiff proved by evidence suit for declaration of title, cancellation of registered power of attorney and permanent injunction not to disturb in the exercise of his rights. Suit decreed.Read more
2564.Cr.Bail 667/2023 (S.B.) Mevo Khan Mazari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2565.Cr.Bail 666/2023 (S.B.) Mevo Khan Mazari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2566.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 35/2023 (D.B.) Wazir @ Waziro Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Murder Trial (Evidence to be recorded in presence of accused (353 Cr.P.C))
Matter:-R.I FOR 25 YEARS & ABOVE
2567.Const. P. 6181/2023 (D.B.) Abid Hussain Chandio V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2568.Const. P. 6162/2023 (D.B.) Javed Ahmed Kalwar V/S Muhammad Hasan Akbar, AG Sindh and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2569.Criminal Appeal 38/2023 (D.B.) Noor Zaman Golato V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
2570.Suit 466/2023 (S.B.) CYNERGYICO PK LIMITED V/S TRAFIGURA PTE LIMITED Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Recognition & Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements & Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011 (Section 7 and Article V(2) New York Convention)
2023 SHC KHI 374Plaintiff (Award-Debtor) filed suit against Defendant (Award-Creditor) for declaration and mandatory injunction. pleading grounds of public policy under Article V(2) of the New York Convention read with Sections 6 and 7 of the REA, 2011. The pro-enforcement bias of the NY Convention discussed in the CNAN Group SpA case reported in PLD 2014 Sindh 349 in respect of Article V(1) is equally applicable to the Foreign Arbitral Award under challenge in this lis by Plaintiff. There has to be an action initiated by the Award-Creditor, first, in whose favor the Award has been made before the Award-Debtor raises a challenge in the domestic court. The suit is dismissed as not maintainable under Article V (2) of the New York Convention. Office is directed to draw up a decree in terms of the Judgment.Read more
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
2571.Suit 919/2022 (S.B.) SYED TAHIR IMAM RIZVI V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiThe plaintiff contested not being awarded a contract for 16,000 desks in Mirpurkhas, prompting the court to order an inspection of the desks supplied by another contractor. This inspection, involving various educational officials and a Civil Judge, aimed to assess the furniture quality in Umarkot District. Additionally, the court highlighted the issue of 8 million students outside the Sindh Government education system, urging measures to enhance educational quality and capacity. Reports from educational directors were submitted, and a focal person was appointed for future updates.Read more
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF DOCUMENTS
2572.Cr.Bail 736/2023 (S.B.) Saleem Laghari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Accused specifically nominated in the FIR with specific role)
Matter:-CUSTODY
2573.II.A. 32/2017 (S.B.) Mrs. Irshad Begum Abbasi V/S Ms. Mubina Qureshi & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiThe Court examined interim report on improving library facilities in Sindh, granting a one-month extension for establishing a Directorate of Libraries. An Amicus Curiae was appointed for assistance. The court addressed non-compliance issues, particularly from the Social Welfare and Energy Departments, regarding library facilities and solar installations. The Court directed speedy filling of vacancies in the education sector and set specific directives for restoring certain libraries. .Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2574.I. A 76/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Karim Momnani & Another V/S M/S. Habib Bank Limited Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Section 12(2) CPC)
2023 SHC KHI 625Appellant-Customer challenged the Banking Court judgment and decree not in appeal but by filing an Application under Section 12(2) CPC alleging that the branch manager had misappropriated funds from the Appellant-Customer's running finance account. Appellant-Customer grounds for alleged fraud and misrepresentation focussed on entries in the Statement of Accounts. No case was made out under Section 12(2) CPC. Appeal dismissed,Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2575.Criminal Appeal 24/2021 (S.B.) Rasheed Ahmed Khakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2576.Spl.H.C.A 137/2023 (D.B.) National Tiles and Ceramics Ltd & Another V/S Sindh Bank Limited & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXI Rule 89& 26 CPC), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 21 Rule 86)
2024 CLD 264Judgment-Debtor did not take any action under Order 21 Rules 89 or 90 CPC during the hearing of the appeal against the impugned Order passed by the learned Single Judge on Order 21 Rule 86 CPC, Division Bench passed. ad-interim Order beyond the scope of Order 21 Rule 89. Such an interim Order was a provisional measure subject to hearing the Auction-Purchaser; it was not final, did not meet the procedural requirements of CPC, and was barred by limitation. No grounds were agitated by the Judgment-Dector under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC. The period of 30 days under the Limitation Act of 1908 commenced from the date of sale (i.e. when the Court approved the sale pursuant to Order 21 Rule 86 CPC. Valuable rights had accrued to the Auction-Purchaser which could not be taken lightly. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2577.H.C.A 447/2023 (D.B.) M/s. Abdullah Engineering Works V/S K-Electric Limited & Another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Tender (Setoff)
2023 SHC KHI 761The Plaintiff filed suit in relation to Tender A and subsequently withdrew the suit; earnest money deposited with Nazir was in connection with Tender A. Earnest money deposited by the bidder in Tender B could not be setoff with Tender A. Plaintiff could not plead return of earnest money under Tender B in Appeal when suit filed was in relation to Tender A.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2578.Const. P. 834/2023 (D.B.) Majid Anwar V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Blockage of CNIC)
Matter:-Un-Block C.N.I.C
2579.Spl.Cr.J.A 106/2016 (D.B.) Sajid Ali Bhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2580.Cr.J.A 48/2020 (D.B.) Shah Muhammad Morio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Murder Trial (Modification in Sentence)
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
2581.Const. P. 1759/2023 (D.B.) Ashique Ali & others V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Theft of Water
2582.Const. P. 1758/2023 (D.B.) Peerano Dharejo V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTION
2583.Const. P. 3031/2019 (D.B.) Javed Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 561
Matter:-SERVICE
2584.R.A (Civil Revision) 3/2018 (S.B.) Ch: Tanveer Ahmed Arain V/S Wasand @ Wasiullah & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 143
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2585.Const. P. 5943/2023 (D.B.) Nasim Ahmed Memon V/S Governor of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 960
Matter:-DIRECTION
2586.Const. P. 5833/2023 (D.B.) Abid Hussain Chandio V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2587.Cr.Rev 17/2022 (S.B.) Akhtar Hussain Rajper V/S Amanullah Rajper & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2588.Const. P. 26/2023 (D.B.) Sajjad Ali Ghunio V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Service matters (Upgradation)
Matter:-Promotion
2589.Cr.Rev 1/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Hayat Mangrio V/S Nadeem Jagirani & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2590.Const. P. 339/2015 (D.B.) Raja Ishtiaque V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
2591.Const. P. 1771/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Usman & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before proper forum)
Matter:-Election Matter
2592.Const. P. 95/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Malik Khuhro V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Service matters (Upgradation)
Matter:-Promotion
2593.H.C.A 145/2018 (D.B.) Cantonment Board Clifton V/S Nadim Ahmed Ansari Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Cantonments Act 1924 (Section 273-Notice of Suits)
2023 SHC KHI 1000Section 273 of the Cantonments Act requiring a notice to be given to CBC before filing a suit against CBC is not unfettered and unqualified. A suit for either declaration or injunctions, etc., are well-regulated under the said provision so long as the civil action is in pursuance of the Act. NAA Consulting Engineers had filed a suit against CBC for compensation for services rendered to CBC which was not in pursuance to the Act. Those civil actions beyond the Act's parameters could not be eclipsed by the bar on suits under Section 273. In the circumstances, Section 273 was not applicable. The In-house Counsel of CBC stepped into the witness box. kept responding to questions put to him in the cross-examination, claiming a lack of awareness of NAA's documents exhibited, including his own documents. In the circumstances, he accepted NAA Consulting Engineers claim against CBC. Appeal allowed and Judgment and Decree confirmed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2594.Const. P. 5686/2023 (D.B.) Mohammad V/S Sect: Revenue and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2595.Const. P. 1005/2023 (D.B.) Jumo Chachar V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
2596.Const. P. 5354/2023 (D.B.) Rahim Sher Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2597.Const. P. 1054/2022 (D.B.) Ghulam Shabir Chandio V/S PO Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2598.Spl.Cr.J.A 21/2023 (D.B.) Saeed Kambooh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 10 YEARS & ABOVE
2599.Const. P. 205/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Nawaz Shaikh and others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Reinstate
2600.Const. P. 1098/2023 (D.B.) Bahadur Chachar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before proper forum)
Matter:-Demarcation
2601.Cr.Bail 485/2023 (S.B.) Nasrullah Bakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2602.Const. P. 5423/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2603.Cr.Acq.A. 10/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Hassan Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2604.Cr.Bail 499/2023 (S.B.) Nazar Mohammad Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2605.Const. P. 5726/2023 (D.B.) Israr Ahmed Sheikh V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-OUT STANDING DUES
2606.Const. P. 5802/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Hanif Ansari & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1020
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
2607.Const. P. 5753/2023 (D.B.) M/s Zaman Textile Mills Ltd V/S Govt of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2608.Const. P. 480/2018 (D.B.) Fida Hussain Halepoto V/S P O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Medical Bill Reimbursment)
Matter:-Service
2609.Criminal Appeal 70/2023 (D.B.) Ahmed Ali Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
2610.Const. P. 5712/2023 (D.B.) Haleem Adil Shaikh & Another V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2611.Const. P. 2278/2018 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Asif V/S Muhammad Ayub and Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Interpretation , Interpretation (Interpretation of document)
2023 SHC KHI 600The syntax concerning the slash (/) sign repeatedly used in the General Power of Attorney has, context and deeper meaning, is a tool of interpretation and provides a signpost to the person relying on it to plead his rights. Therefore, there is merit in spending some time with the slash (/) sign to decide this Petition. The Orders of the trial court and the District Court, both forums have not given importance to the slash ( / ) sign appearing in the General Power of Attorney.???. The use of slash (/) meant that the word ???case??? and ???property??? should be read interchangeably. As discussed hereinabove as ???case and/or property???. This meant that all the powers set out in the General Power of Attorney related to both the Suit and the Subject Property. A restrictive meaning could not be read into the General Power of Attorney. A power of attorney, which is related to the accretion of the right to the properties and assets of the principal, has to be interpreted liberally and not in a restrictive and stringent manner. Petition allowed. Application under Section 12(2) remanded to the trial court.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2612.R.A (Civil Revision) 123/2021 (S.B.) Ali Gohar & another V/S Mst. Bhaunbhen and Ohters Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 1002
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2613.Criminal Miscelleneous 377/2023 (S.B.) Major (R) Adnan Kayani & (03) Ors V/S SHO PS Dad leghari & (02) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2614.Cr.Bail 648/2023 (S.B.) Arz Muhammad Chachar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2615.Cr.Bail 193/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Dangli @ Shahzadi Khoso and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2616.Criminal Miscelleneous 654/2023 (S.B.) Mst: Shabana Soomro V/S Imran Khan Lodhi & (03) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF BAIL
2617.Const. P. 25/2023 (S.B.) Saeedullah Pirzado V/S Ali Asghar Pirzado Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Rent Matter
2618.Cr.Rev 56/2023 (S.B.) Gul Muhammad Brohi V/S Manzoor Hussain Brohi & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2619.R.A (Civil Revision) 212/2022 (S.B.) Sodha Khan Lashari and another V/S Gul Muhammad and Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 1051
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2620.Const. P. 5236/2023 (D.B.) Wasiullah Bhatti V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2621.Cr.Bail 690/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Rehman Mahar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2622.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 81/2023 (D.B.) FAYYAZ KHAN S/O ZAHID KHAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST TRIAL COURT
2623.Cr.Bail 646/2023 (S.B.) Manzoor Ahmed Chachar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2624.Const. P. 265/2023 (D.B.) Nazeer Hussain Maitlo V/S Senior General Manager (HR & MS ) SSGC & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Reinstate of Service
2625.Cr.Bail 647/2023 (S.B.) Farooque Ahmed Chachar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2626.Cr.Bail 637/2023 (S.B.) Aftab Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2627.H.C.A 180/2020 (D.B.) Mst. Bhalan & others V/S Muhammad Asif Sakaria & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: LIMITATION (Limitation Act 1908)
2024 MLD 1160The ???embezzlement??? alleged by the Appellants/Plaintiffs in 2003 would have been in relation to the registered conveyance deeds of 1992, and still, Mohammad did not take any positive action to safeguard his rights up to the time of his death (he passed away on 13.01.2005). The second point is that the next conveyance of the Suit Properties took place through sale deeds duly registered in the years 2005 and 2007. The sale was registered after the death of Muhammad. This time, it was the onus of the legal heirs of Muhammad to remain vigilant, especially when apparently they had knowledge of the ???embezzlement??? in the year 2003. There is nothing on record to show that Muhammad and the legal heirs of Muhammad were not indolent. Nothing on record demonstrates their vigilance. The admission made by the legal heirs of Muhammad in clear terms in the Plaint disentitles the Appellants/Plaintiffs from raising any challenge to the Impugned Order of the trial court. The Appellants/Plaintiffs were well aware of the presumption of truth associated with a sale/conveyance deed that is duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908. The Appellants/Plaintiffs neither produced nor relied upon any document which prima facie could be deemed or interpreted to rebut such a presumption. This aspect of the matter did not and does not help the cause of the Appellants/Plaintiffs. In the circumstances, Appeal is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2628.Cr.Bail 419/2023 (S.B.) Jinsar Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2629.Cr.J.A 20/2023 (D.B.) Guhram Pahore V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
2630.Const. P. 5583/2023 (D.B.) Nazir Ahmed V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST CHARGES
2631.Spl.Cr.A.A 37/2023 (D.B.) The State Through P.G Sindh V/S Ali Bux Korai Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2632.Const. P. 5584/2023 (D.B.) Mst. Samina Abbas Zardari V/S NIRC & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2633.Criminal Miscelleneous 42/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Latif Arain V/S The State & another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Suspension of NBWs)
Counsel for the applicant not furnished any explanation as to why he remained fugitive from the proceedings for a long period. Even the applicant has not availed the remedy available to him u/s 75 (2) Cr.P.C, which provides that the warrant shall remain in force until cancelled by the Court which issued it, or until it is executed. Keeping in view of the above circumstances the application in hand is dismissed in limini. However the applicant is at liberty to avail remedy provided to him under section 75 (2) Cr.P.C before the banking court.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2634.Cr.J.A 13/2023 (D.B.) Akbar Khan Pathan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
2635.Const. P. 5550/2023 (D.B.) SSGC V/S Muhammad Ali Mangi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2636.Const. P. 5630/2023 (D.B.) Shuja ur Rehman Chaudhary V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2637.Const. P. 1673/2023 (D.B.) Aftab Hussain Farooqi & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Against Show Cause Notice
2638.Const. P. 84/2022 (S.B.) Mumtaz Hussain & Others V/S Allah Wadhayo Through L.Rs & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 YLR 1043
Matter:-Rent Matter
2639.Cr.Tran 38/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AMJAD KHAN S/O M. ZAMAN V/S BADAR UR ZAMAN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
2640.Const. P. 5556/2023 (D.B.) Imran Razi Hashmi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RESTORATION OF ELECTRICITY
2641.Const. P. 4846/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Rafiq V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTRICITY BILL
2642.Const. P. 5563/2023 (D.B.) Ali Gohar V/S I.G Sindh Police & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ACCOMODATION
2643.Const. P. 5036/2023 (D.B.) Ismail Bawany V/S The MIT-II and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR ENQUIRY
2644.H.C.A 171/2021 (D.B.) New Dadu Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd. V/S Sindh Sugar Corporation Limited & Another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Article 10-A )
2024 CLD 525Article 10A serves as a safeguard for individuals condemned without a fair hearing, ensuring that actions taken against such individuals adhere to the principles of due process of law. In the instant case, Article 10A of the Constitution guaranteed the right to a free trial, and as auction purchasers, this right was unmistakably infringed upon when the Court failed to provide them with notice. A thorough examination of the appeal file reveals a glaring absence of notice to the auction purchaser, a procedural step that the Court should have diligently observed. The Appellants filed their appeals without delay as soon as they received notice from the Official Assignee as Provisional Manager about passing the Order dated 07.09.2021. A breach of Article 10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan is evident. The Appellants were not present before the learned Single Judge to assist the Court in the proceedings. Appeal allowed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2645.Cr.Bail 63/2023 (D.B.) Izhar Ali Kaleri V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2646.Const. P. 1316/2014 (D.B.) Muhammad Usman Ghani Qureshi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2647.Const. P. 1599/2023 (D.B.) Sain Dino Mahar V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Supply of Water
2648.Cr.Rev 43/2023 (D.B.) Pakistan Railways Through its Assistant Director V/S Abdul Rahim Dayo Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2649.Cr.Acq.A. 28/2023 (D.B.) Dil Murad Jatoi V/S The State & another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2650.Cr.J.A 61/2021 (D.B.) Nawab @ Tharo Gadani & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
2651.Const. P. 5476/2023 (D.B.) Samira Mahamadi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2652.Const. P. 5475/2023 (D.B.) M/s SSGC Ltd V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2653.Civil Tran 30/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Wajiha Warsia D/o M. Masood Akmal Qadri V/S XIVth Civil/Family Judge, Khi Central and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 520
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
2654.Criminal Appeal 66/2023 (S.B.) Irfan Ali Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
2655.Criminal Appeal 65/2023 (S.B.) Muneer Ahmed Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
2656.Cr.Tran 30/2023 (S.B.) QARI MUHAMMAD JAWED & ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
2657.I. A 88/2016 (D.B.) House Building Finance Company Ltd. V/S Major Muhammad Abdul Aziz & another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Section 3 (Cost of funds))
2023 SHC KHI 473The learned Judge has correctly granted HBFC cost of funds from 2010 onwards in the Judgment, which, according to Respondent No.1-Customer???s admission, was the date of default, yet there is no explanation why the learned Judge proceeded to apply a varying rate of cost of funds as already discussed. Therefore, HBFC???s claim that the learned Judge of the Banking Court has not granted the cost of funds from the date of default is incorrect. In fact, the Banking Court granted costs of funds but did not grant HBFC the cost of funds as certified by the State Bank of Pakistan from time to time from 2010 till the date of Judgment in May 2016. The case is remanded to the Banking Court to determine the cost of funds amount payable to HBFC in terms of section 3(2) of the FIO, 2001. There shall be no change in the already decreed principal outstanding amount of Rs.1,771,340 and the costs of the suit of Rs.31,425, which will remain the same. The Respondent No.1-Customer has already paid HBFC through the Banking Court a total sum of Rs.3,057,486, which comprised of the old decretal (i) principal outstanding amount, (ii) the disputed cost of funds amount, and (iii) the costs of the suit. The Banking Court shall adjust the payment already made by Respondent No.1-Customer to HBFC of Rs.3,057,486 against the fresh cost of funds to be determined by it and pass an amended Decree, accordingly. All the other terms and conditions of the Decree dated 05.05.2016 shall remain intact.Read more
Matter:-BANKING
2658.Const. P. 5344/2023 (D.B.) Afiniti Software Solution Pvt Ltd V/s V/S Muhammad Jamil Lodhi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2659.Const. P. 2112/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Ilyas V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 313
Matter:-PENSION
2660.Const. P. 1270/2016 (D.B.) Liaquat Ali Bohio V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
2661.Const. P. 6464/2022 (D.B.) Abdul Sattar Baloch V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 82
Matter:-IRRIGATION
2662.H.C.A 162/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Masuma Hasan V/S Imtiaz Ali Khan Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1117Factors regarding whether a dispute or objection of an objector, other than the legal heir of the deceased, as to ownership of property could be adjudicated within the framework of a suit for administration. Muhammad Zahid v. Mst. Ghazala Zakir and Others, PLD 2011 Karachi 83 followed along with updating and cross-referencing the several Judgments/Orders of the Division and Single Bench of this Court from 2015 onwards applying the principles laid down in the Ghazala Zakir case.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2663.Cr.Bail 443/2023 (S.B.) Asif Ali Korai V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2664.Const. P. 5228/2023 (D.B.) Shafqat Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
2665.Const. P. 2962/2023 (D.B.) Ghulam Rasool Shah V/S C.M Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2666.Const. P. 409/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
2667.Const. P. 6464/2022 (D.B.) Abdul Sattar Baloch V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IRRIGATION
2668.Const. P. 133/2023 (S.B.) Taj Muhammad Mangi V/S Mst Tanzeela & another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 506
Matter:-Family Matter
2669.H.C.A 377/2023 (D.B.) Syed Raza Ali Zaidi and Another V/S Syed Ziauddin and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Respondent No.1/Syed Ziauddin???s civil suit for compensation and damages has alleged negligence and breach of law by the Appellant brothers and Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Respondent No.1/Syed Ziauddin has identified and set out valid causes of action in support of his claim. The onus is on Syed Ziauddin (the Plaintiff) to show that he is entitled to the relief as prayed. The issues raised by him are mixed questions of law and fact. The claim is not based on purely legal grounds, which can be decided at the initial stage without recording evidence. No case is made out for rejection of the Plaint and/or dismissal of the suit. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2670.Const. P. 856/2023 (D.B.) Ratti Lal V/S Mr. Abdul Razzaq and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2671.Const. P. 1811/2023 (D.B.) Chandool Lal V/S Abdul Razzaq & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
2672.Criminal Appeal 57/2023 (D.B.) Khursheed Ahmed Kori V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
2673.Const. P. 5251/2023 (D.B.) Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1025
Matter:-QUAHSMENT OF PROCEDING
2674.Spl.Cr.A.A 6/2023 (D.B.) The State Through P.G Sindh V/S Faheem Ali Jamali Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2675.Const. P. 193/2022 (D.B.) Sanjar Khan V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Up gradation
2676.Const. P. 1537/2023 (D.B.) Wajid Ali Phull V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Utilization of Fund
2677.Const. P. 1511/2023 (D.B.) Atif Ali Khoso & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Mutation
2678.Const. P. 5288/2023 (D.B.) Raja Arif Sultan Minhas V/S ECP and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
2679.Suit 16/2020 (S.B.) Mohammad Ahmed Kausar V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
2023 SHC KHI 711I am unswayed with the submission of the learned counsel on the ground that the plaintiffs employees have not been terminated hitherto which is an admitted position and are seeking enforcement of their fundamental right of fair trial and due process hence the principle of master and servant is not attracted at this stage of the case at hand.Read more
Matter:-RECOVERY
2680.Const. P. 4902/2023 (D.B.) Alsons Industries Pvt Ltd P.E.U & Others V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2681.Const. P. 5209/2024 (D.B.) Nadeem Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 975
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
2682.Suit 273/2023 (S.B.) ISMAIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Pakistan Plant Quarantine Act, 1976 (Pakistan Quarantine Rules, 2019)
2023 SHC KHI 315Plaintiff is seeking the release of a consignment of imported raw peanuts after court-tested Lab Reports observed levels of aflatoxin exceeded the permissible limit of 20 ppb enforced by the Department of Plant Protection. Pleadings sought relief based on errors in gathering samples for testing of aflatoxin levels sent to different Labs across Pakistan. Plaint did not impugn the testing standards of PPD, challenged sampling only (applying plant standards to food items), USDA procedure for aflatoxin thought adopted by DPP, not properly applied and pest (fungi) causing aflatoxin not codified. Plaintiff could not plead a different case. Challenge not set up in Plaint, argued orally, cannot help Plaintiff's cause when seeking discretionary relief. Single Judge Order not binding, distinguishable on facts, prima facie case not made out as Court-ordered Report confirming higher than allowable levels of aflatoxin in consignment not appealed or challenged.Read more
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
2683.Const. P. 1369/2022 (D.B.) The State Through Chairman NAB V/S Ziaullah & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2684.Criminal Appeal 224/2020 (S.B.) DIL NAZEER S/O MAROOF V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Trial (Circumstantial evidence supported by Medical Evidence)
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2685.Const. P. 4526/2023 (D.B.) Khalid Usman V/S The Registrar Sindh Sub-Ordinate Judiciary Service Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2686.Criminal Miscelleneous 618/2023 (S.B.) Taj Muhammad Lakhan & (05) Ors V/S Rafique Ahmed Sanghar & (02) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 985
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2687.Cr.Bail 448/2023 (S.B.) Suhbat Ali Rind & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
2688.Cr.Bail 179/2023 (S.B.) Jahangir Kalwar & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2689.Cr.Acq.A. 17/2023 (S.B.) Qeemat V/S Mooso & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal Trial (Delay in recording statement of witnesses under section 161 Cr.P.C)
2690.Cr.Bail 676/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Razzaq Pahore V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2691.Cr.Bail 566/2022 (S.B.) Shahzada Toufique Ansari & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2692.I. A 55/2023 (D.B.) Fida Muhammad V/S Shahnawaz Khan & Another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Administration of Justice (.)
The trial court Judge rightly observed that the presumption regarding the cheques in question under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is to be admitted. Fida has not raised any material grounds in this First Appeal to negate such inference. The trial court even took the more conservative and cautious approach in a summary suit, by not immediately announcing judgment and decree. Instead, the trial court ordered Shahnawaz Khan to file an affidavit in evidence of ex-parte proof before passing judgment and decree. This enabled the trial court to satisfy itself further as to the veracity of Shahnawaz Khan???s claim against Fida. Handing over KIA Sportage , no proof of payment for the Court to assume the negotiable instrument ought to be returned to Appellant/Defendant. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2693.Spl.Cr.A.A 20/2023 (D.B.) The State through P.G Sindh V/S Zameer @ Zamoo Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 855
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2694.Cr.Acq.A. 28/2022 (D.B.) Ahsan Ali Mari V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2695.Cr.Acq.A. 149/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Sachal Rajpar V/S Bakhat Ali Lund & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2696.Cr.J.A 8/2022 (S.B.) Anees Rahujo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2697.I. A 80/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Shahzad V/S Faisal Bank Limited and Another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (Limitation)
Appellant-Customer pleaded lack of knowledge of banking suit and filed application u/s 12(2) CPC belatedly against Judgment, challenged banking court decree under Section 22 of FIO, 2001 after six years from the date of banking decree. Challenges by Appellant-Customer dismissed. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2698.Cr.Bail 80/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Sarwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Compromise )
2699.Cr.Acq.A. 32/2019 (D.B.) The State V/S Ali Hyder Kalhoro Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2700.Spl.Cr.J.A 11/2020 (D.B.) Sajjan Khan Sahito V/S The Sate Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2701.Cr.Rev 33/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Qadir Mirani V/S Nazir Ahmed Lakhan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2702.Const. P. 8061/2022 (D.B.) Azeem Ahmed Siddiqui V/S Syed A. Mohiuddin and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order II Rule 2 CPC)
2023 SHC KHI 256Respondent/Plaintiff's First Application was dismissed under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 CPC by the trial court, Without pleading any change of circumstances, Respondent/Plaintiff's Second Application seeking exact same relief under Section 151 CPC allowed by same trial court. the trial court should not have hesitated to dismiss the subsequent (second) application in its Second Order based on the principles of res judicata and of equity enunciated by Order II Rule 2 CPC, that if any of the grounds that existed and could have been taken and not taken cannot form part of subsequent application.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
2703.Const. P. 5139/2023 (D.B.) Al-Saeed Service & CNG V/S M/s K-Electric Ltd and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-EXCESS BILLING
2704.Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A 154/2016 (D.B.) Wali Muhammad V/S Special Judge ATC Khairpur Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2705.Cr.Bail 622/2023 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad @ Ali Bozdar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2706.Cr.Bail 609/2023 (S.B.) Sadam Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2707.Cr.Bail 489/2023 (S.B.) Bashir Ahmed Solangi & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2708.Cr.Bail 553/2023 (S.B.) Saleh Muhammad Bhutto & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2709.I. A 34/2017 (D.B.) Irfan Sharuddin V/S Yousuf Sadiq Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Summary Suit under Order XXXVIII
Title of Plaint listed three different addresses of Defendant. In the circumstances, whether the Appellant/Defendant was affected service on all three addresses mentioned in the title of the Plaint by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due was irrelevant. Validly served by bailiff, process server by pasting, and publication in the newspaper under Order 37 Rule 1(2). Yet the Appellant/Defendant did not file leave to defend application within time. Trial Court has not fallen under any error. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2710.Const. P. 27/2022 (D.B.) Naimat Khan V/S M/s Agro Process and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 429
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2711.Criminal Miscelleneous 299/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Fatah Jhatiyal V/S The State & (02) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 648
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2712.Const. P. 5062/2023 (D.B.) Arshad Ali V/S Furqan uddin Usmani and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973
2023 SHC KHI 270Petitioner did not file a List of Witnesses under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC at the appropriate stage of the trial. Application to introduce material witnesses to Sale Agreement as Defendant Witnesses dismissed (by trial court???s Order dated 11.01.2022). Subsequently, an Application to summon Government Officers as Court witnesses was also dismissed (by trial court???s order dated 28.05.2022). In Civil Revision and, again in Petition, the Court cannot consider the trial court???s Order dated 11.01.2022 in a Petition/Revision, which challenges the trial court???s order dated 28.05.2022 and vice versa as pleaded in a separate Petition. Court ability to mould relief in writ jurisdiction constrained under Article 199 of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
2713.Const. P. 5061/2023 (D.B.) Arshad Ali V/S Furqan uddin Usmani and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision )
2023 SHC KHI 254Scope of Writ Jurisdiction in hearing revisions arising from interlocutory orders passed during trial about civil procedure matters. Petition challenging trial court's order relating to Petitioner/Defendant application to examine witnesses under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC., Exercise of writ jurisdiction against revisional order has to be exercised in rare and exceptional circumstances only when it could be said that the order passed by the revisional Court has been passed without lawful authority, beyond jurisdiction and vested rights were curtailed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
2714.Cr.Bail 41/2023 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Jagirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2715.Const. P. 5046/2023 (D.B.) M/s Mega Enterprises V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 129
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2716.Const. P. 5045/2023 (D.B.) Sharjeel Jhangir V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 833
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2717.Const. P. 4996/2023 (D.B.) Ahmed Ali Baloch V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 917
Matter:-SERVICE
2718.Const. P. 4795/2023 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Ghous V/S Mst. Najma & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Petitioner can now neither take benefit of proviso to Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, nor has he been able to establish to be a bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration without notice under section 27(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1877. Lastly, the Petitioner/Applicant did not act prudently. He had remedies available to him for the redressal of his grievance, including filing a suit for specific performance, yet he took the path less travelled by attempting to prove his title by filing a 12(2) CPC application. Petition dismissed. Trial court and district court impugned orders dismissing the Petitioner's Application under Section 12(2) are upheld. No disturbance is required.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
2719.Criminal Miscelleneous 84/2023 (S.B.) Riaz Raheem Mahar & (04) Ors V/S Abdul Ghani Mahar & (02) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2720.Cr.Bail 614/2023 (S.B.) Noor Muhammad Bhutto & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2721.I. A 38/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Aslam V/S Muhammad Hasan Khan & Another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order XXXVII Rule 3 Leave to Defend)
Summary Suit. Order 37 CPC. Leave Granting Order not averred in the Appeal filed by Appellant/Defendant. Appellant/Defendant aggrieved in High Court appeal only with the Trial Court's Conditional Order seeking a reduction in the quantum of the surety to be deposited with the Court within 15 days as ordered in the leave granting order and passing Judgment and Decree. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2722.Cr.Bail 462/2023 (S.B.) Attur Khaskheli & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2723.Suit 997/2007 (S.B.) HASHAM ALIIBHAI V/S NEW JUBILLEE INSURANCE CO. Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Companies matters (Companies Ordinance, 1984)
2023 SHC KHI 629As a rule, Articles of Association normally exclude any interest claim on unpaid dividends. The Defendant Company had withheld payment of unpaid dividends to Plaintiff even though Articles 6, 5 and 14 of the Articles of Association of 1953, 1986 and 2007 provided an exception to the rule. The relationship between Plaintiff and Defendant Company from 1970 to 2005 was not governed by the Articles of Association but was crystallised by the Order of the Court. Defendant Company liable to compensate Plaintiff in the sum of Rs.154,110,753 (net of taxes) being the equalizer profit on the dividend income retained and utilized by the Defendant Company based on principles of equity and in the alternative, unjust enrichment, read in the light of Articles 6, 5 and 14 of the series of Defendant Company's Articles of Association. Bar of Order 2 Rule 2 CPC not applicable to the two rounds of litigation of 1978 and 1993 culminating in Judgment of 07.08.2003 (2007 CLC 1448) amended by a Compromise Application allowing Plaintiff to claim interest on dividends recorded by Division Bench Order dated 20.12.2005 involving, Counsel for Defendant/Respondent Company who fully participated in the final order even though the Defendant/Respondent Company had not signed the Compromise Application.Read more
Matter:-RECOVERY
2724.H.C.A 363/2023 (D.B.) Shoaib Khalid Tabba V/S Mehreen Shoaib Baghpatee & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2725.Cr.J.A 37/2022 (S.B.) Aijaz Jagirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
2726.Criminal Appeal 511/2019 (S.B.) IBRAR MALIK @ GOGI S/O MUHAMMAD TAJ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Trial (Modification in Sentence)
Prima facie suggests that the incident was result of sudden flare up without illwill or premeditation, which constitutes an offence punishable u/s 302(c) PPC, therefore, the conviction awarded to the appellant for the said offence is modified with one u/s 302(c) PPC.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2727.Cr.J.A 309/2020 (S.B.) MANZOOR AHMED S/O FEROZUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Trial (Delay in recording confessional statement may not be treated fatal to the case of prosecution)
The delay in recording judicial confession of the appellant, if any, may not be treated fatal to the case of prosecution. Neither any of the police officials who have conducted the investigation of the present case nor the Judicial Magistrate who has recorded the judicial confession of the appellant were having any enmity with the appellant to have involved him in this case falsely.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2728.Cr.Acq.A. 174/2022 (S.B.) HAKIM ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ISMAI V/S CJ & JM VTH KHI SOUTH & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Acquittal Appeal . (Section 182 Cr.P.C)
2023 SHC KHI 151
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2729.Const. P. 4178/2023 (D.B.) Engro Corp Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 274
Matter:-INCOME TAX
2730.Const. P. 4178/2023 (D.B.) Engro Corp Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 425
Matter:-INCOME TAX
2731.Criminal Miscelleneous 624/2023 (S.B.) Shahid Hussain Panhwar V/S The State & (04) Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2732.Cr.Bail 118/2023 (S.B.) Qasim Jaferi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2733.Const. P. 1543/2018 (D.B.) Sajid Ali Gahloo V/S Govt; Of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
2734.Const. P. 4699/2023 (D.B.) Ikhlas Ahmed V/S DG SBCA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2735.Cr.Bail 2049/2023 (S.B.) BABU AMRO S/O IBRAHIM AMRO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Offence not falling with in prohibitory clause of section 497 (2))
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2736.Const. P. 4730/2023 (D.B.) Govt.Teachers Coop. Housing Society Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2737.Cr.J.A 731/2019 (S.B.) MASHOOQ S/O MUHAMMAD AYOUB KHUSHIK V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Trial (Discrepancies in evidence of prosecution case)
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2738.Const. P. 4701/2023 (D.B.) Noushad Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 147
Matter:-ELECTRICITY BILL
2739.Const. P. 4722/2023 (D.B.) Ashgar Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 57
Matter:-Land Matters
2740.Const. P. 4565/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
2741.Const. P. 4564/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Areeb V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
2742.Const. P. 4563/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Jibran Nasir V/S NEPRA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DISCONNECTION OF ELECTRICITY
2743.Const. P. 4550/2023 (D.B.) Awal Khan and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2744.Const. P. 4240/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Kashif V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Harassment and Protection)
Matter:-Land Matters
2745.Const. P. 2161/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Imran Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2746.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 135/2022 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD ASIF @ BHAYA S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 499
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
2747.Criminal Appeal 262/2020 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ANNAS S/O MUHAMMAD ALTAF V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2748.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 1151/2023 (D.B.) K-Electric Limited V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-V Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
2749.Cr.J.A 5/2023 (S.B.) SYED INAYAT S/O SYED NAWAB V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2750.Criminal Appeal 807/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ARIF S/O TAR MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2751.Criminal Appeal 714/2019 (S.B.) KASHIF KHAN S/O RAEES AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2752.Criminal Appeal 10/2023 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Kolachi and others V/S The State and another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2023 SHC MPK 390
2753.Cr.J.A 853/2019 (S.B.) SIRAJUL ISLAM S/O WASIUR REHMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2754.Criminal Appeal 576/2019 (S.B.) SYED WASI HAIDER S/O SYED QAISER HUSSAIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2755.Criminal Appeal 19/2023 (D.B.) Huzoor Bux Sheikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
2756.Const. P. 2869/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Aziz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
2757.Cr.J.A 233/2019 (S.B.) BARKAT @ SHEESHO S/O MUHAMMAD USMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2758.Const. P. 1328/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Anwer & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
2759.Criminal Appeal 298/2018 (S.B.) ABDUL HAMEED SHAH S/O RUSTAM SHAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2760.Const. P. 2813/2022 (D.B.) Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 168
Matter:-IMPLEMENTATION
2761.Cr.Bail 340/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Wahab Bhutto & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2762.Const. P. 4348/2023 (D.B.) Mrs. Nafees V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
2763.Cr.Bail 462/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Rasheed Khoso V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2764.Const. P. 4337/2023 (D.B.) Ghulam Shabbir V/S Secretary of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
2765.H.C.A 302/2023 (D.B.) Kinjo SeaFood Pvt Limited V/S Collector of Customs and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2766.Criminal Appeal 680/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD NASEERUDDIN S/O MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2767.Const. P. 5858/2021 (D.B.) International Ind Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
2768.Const. P. 633/2022 (D.B.) International Ind Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
2769.Const. P. 4983/2022 (D.B.) International Ind Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
2770.Const. P. 3790/2022 (D.B.) Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2771.Const. P. 3794/2022 (D.B.) Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2772.Criminal Appeal 732/2019 (S.B.) TANVEER HASSAN S/O HASSAN MEHMOOD BUKHARI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2773.Cr.J.A 377/2019 (S.B.) SAJID S/O QABIL SHAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2774.Const. P. 3836/2023 (D.B.) Dr. Sheikh Shahzada Kabir Aftab & Ors V/S DG KDA & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
2775.Suit 1171/2003 (S.B.) ABDUL KHALIL V/S AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Tort Law (Recovery of Damages)
Matter:-RECOVERY
2776.Criminal Appeal 803/2019 (S.B.) ABDUL REHMAN @ KASHIF & ANTOHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2777.Const. P. 2980/2021 (D.B.) Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
2778.Const. P. 4017/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Yousuf V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2779.Cr.Bail 335/2023 (S.B.) Sohrab Khoso & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2780.Const. P. 680/2023 (D.B.) Sajjad Ali Khokhar & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 792
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
2781.Cr.Bail 458/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Nabi Bhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2782.Cr.J.A 100/2022 (S.B.) NAEEM AHMED S/O NIZAMUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Modification in Sentence)
Be that as it may, the appellant is said to be sole bread earner of his family; by not pressing disposal of his appeal on merits, has shown remorse, as such, there is likelihood of his reformation. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant u/s 376(i) PPC is reduced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for one month.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2783.Cr.J.A 248/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD USAMA S/O ABU BAKAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Arms Act, 2013 (Modification in sentence )
Appellant is a young man of 23 years of the age, said to be sole bread earner of his family, by not pressing disposal of his appeal on merits has shown remorse as such there is likelihood of his reformation. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant for the above offence is reduced to one which he has already undergone, which includes the sentence which he is likely to undergo on account of his failure to make payment of fine.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2784.Criminal Appeal 510/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR S/O MUHAMMAD USMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2785.Suit 1276/2001 (S.B.) VIRGIN ENTERPRIES LTD. V/S VIRGIN EXPRESS INT. PVT. LTD. & ORS. Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: TRADE MARK
2023 SHC KHI 27Following the establishment of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of Sindh at Karachi, even if the Companies Act, 2017, provides a framework to change/rectify a company's name, where, in the opinion of the Registrar, the name of the Company is identical to or resembles or is similar to the name of a company, the High Court cannot transfer the suit partly relating to Trade Marks and Passing off while retaining the suit regarding injunctive relief under the Companies Act, 2017. The entire suit has to be transferred to the Intellectual Property Tribunal and left to the Plaintiff to take appropriate steps to seek such relief in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
2786.Const. P. 3311/2023 (D.B.) Syed Fazil Shah Kazmi and Another V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2787.Cr.J.A 43/2018 (S.B.) SHER ALI S/O SHER MUHAMMAD KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2788.Const. P. 2986/2023 (D.B.) Imran Zaffar Arain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2789.H.C.A 43/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Rafique & Others V/S Muhammad Iqbal & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2790.Criminal Appeal 135/2023 (S.B.) AAMIR ALI SHEHZAD S/O ABID ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2791.Suit 645/2003 (S.B.) VOLGA INTERNATIONAL LTD. V/S SHAHEEN AIR CAROG Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: LIMITATION (Limitation Act 1908)
2023 SHC KHI 1072Plaintiff filed suit for recovery five years from the date when the amount became due. Acknowledgement of liability by Defendant addressed to an unrelated third party, accepting part-liability on the part of Defendant covered by Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Extended the period of limitation. Defendant accepted part-claim. Suit partly decreed to the extent of acknowledgement of liability coupled with 1% simple markup. Court's discretion to award lower markup as banks in Pakistan currently offering much lower markup on US$ deposits compared to what banks are currently offering on PKR deposits.Read more
Matter:-RECOVERY
2792.Criminal Appeal 881/2019 (S.B.) MASHAL GHANI S/O SHUMAL GHANI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2793.Const. P. 1382/2013 (D.B.) United Human Right Commission V/S S.B.C.A & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2794.Const. P. 3776/2020 (D.B.) Ruqaya V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2795.Cr.J.A 393/2022 (S.B.) SHANKAR S/O TARA CHAND V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2796.Const. P. 6136/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Waqas V/S The SBCA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2797.Const. P. 3780/2020 (D.B.) Ruqaya V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2798.Criminal Appeal 320/2022 (S.B.) AHMED RAZA S/O ABDUL MALIK V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2799.Const. P. 1382/2023 (D.B.) Waqaruddin & Ors V/S SBCA & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2800.Cr.Bail 359/2023 (S.B.) Amjad Ali Jagirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2801.Suit 1040/2009 (S.B.) NASIR ALI V/S SYED QAMAR HUSSAIN Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Specific Relief Act, (Agreement )
2023 SHC KHI 115Plaintiff Buyer, within the time prescribed in the contract, made part payment of the Sale Price, whereafter Defendant Seller handed over the first floor of the bungalow on the suit property to Plaintiff. Plaintiff Buyer did not pay the outstanding balance sale price when he found out the suit property was mortgaged. Blamed Defendant Buyer for not executing the sale deed, expressed willingness and readiness to pay and filed suit for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act as well as claimed part performance under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. Interpretation of where time is of the essence, proving readiness and willingness, criterion for curating discretionary relief where the cause of action accrued in 2005 and the case decided in 2023. Suit dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Land Dispute
2802.Criminal Appeal 409/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IKRAM KHAN REHMANI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2803.Const. P. 4065/2023 (D.B.) M/s Pakistan Mobile Communication V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SINDH SALES TAX
2804.Cr.Bail 1727/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AYUB S/O JEHAN KHAN & ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Once the Supreme Court has held in categorical terms that grant of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of Section 497 Cr.P.C. shall be a rule and refusal shall be an exception then, the subordinate Courts should follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by the Supreme Court under Article 189 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 has binding effect on all subordinate Courts.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2805.Const. P. 1009/2023 (D.B.) Mai Ghufrana Khoso V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 48
Matter:-Election Matter
2806.Cr.Bail 1291/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AZAM S/O DILAWAR KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Prohibition under section 51 of the CNS Act, 1997)
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2807.Suit 200/2020 (S.B.) M/s Sadiq & Suharwardy V/S Ismail Industries Limited Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: TRADE MARK
Transfer of Intellectual Property Law cases to IP Tribunal of Sindh at KarachiRead more
Matter:-INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
2808.Cr.J.A 806/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ARABI S/O ABDUL KARIM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Trial (Unseen incident)
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2809.Criminal Appeal 90/2023 (S.B.) ASIF AHMED S/O SALMAN AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Modification in Sentence)
The allegation against the appellant is to the extent that he while committing robbery caused hurt to the complainant on his head; such allegation obviously constitutes an offence punishable under Section 394 PPC, therefore, the punishment awarded to the appellant under Section 397 PPC is modified with one under Section 394 PPC; consequently, he for the said offence/penal section is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 04 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days with benefit of Section 382(b) Cr.P.CRead more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2810.Const. P. 3981/2023 (D.B.) Karachi Human Right Society V/S SBCA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2811.Cr.J.A 551/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD JUMAN S/O RANO CHANDIO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Arms Act, 2013 (Modification in sentence )
The appellant is at the verge of completion of his jail term in present case. By not pressing the disposal of his appeal on merits he has shown remorse. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant for the above offence is reduced to one which he has already undergone, it includes the sentence which he is likely to undergo on account of his failure to make payment of fineRead more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2812.Cr.Bail 1587/2023 (S.B.) SHAHZAIB S/O ABDUL KHALIQ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2813.I. A 34/2020 (D.B.) ZTBL Pano Akil V/S Abdul Kareem and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 666
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2814.Suit 319/2023 (S.B.) MAXCO (PVT.) LIMITED V/S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Companies matters
2023 SHC KHI 593Justice demands that rights in the physical world and the digital/virtual world should be the same and at par with each other. Yet currently, SECP appears to be maintaining two different sets of standards for qualifications/remarks. It is clear that the Registrar of Companies, SECP is not empowered to publish qualifications/remarks on its dashboard and/or its digital platform for banks relating to the Plaintiff Company that ???Currently Company is under DISPUTE CASES??? as the same is contrary to law and SECP???s regulations framed under the Companies Act, 2017. Consequently, SECP is directed to immediately remove the said remarks from its dashboard/digital portal accessed by banks or other entities and replace such qualifications/remarks with any of the qualifications/remarks that may be assigned to the Plaintiff Company under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018.Read more
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
2815.Cr.Bail 1207/2023 (S.B.) NAIK MUHAMMAD S/O MIRA GUL KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2816.Suit 300/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN V/S THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC)
Glaring interpolation in the official record. Inquiry should be held. This ground reality cannot be ignored that recent surge in property related litigation is due to the collusion and dishonest acts of Government Officials; many of them are even involved in land grabbing. The Chief Secretary should take immediate notice of this alarming situation, which can lead to deterioration of law and order situation in the City of Karachi.Read more
Matter:-Land Dispute
2817.Suit 1246/2023 (S.B.) Sarfaraz Khamisani & others V/S The Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
Massive land grabbing in the City of Karachi by Local Administration.Read more
Matter:-Land Dispute
2818.Suit.B 45/2022 (S.B.) THE BANK OF PUNJAB V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 (section 9(2))
2023 SHC KHI 1042Condonation Application to allow Defendant Customer to file leave to defend application in Banking Suit allowed. Summons were defective, as Plaintiff Bank did not include the registered address of the Defendant Company in the title of the Plaint. Plaintiff relied on Musharaka Agreement which mentioned the previously registered address. Subsequently, Defendant Company notified the change of registered address to PSX, SECP and updated its website page. Defendant Customer did not notify Plaintiff Bank. Order 29 CPC mandatory. Registered Post Acknowledgment and Delivery Report of summons were not available. Bailiff, on his own volition, reached the registered address of Defendant Company. Publication of Summons alleged by Defendant was not in its knowledge. In the circumstances and based on case law, Defendant Condonation Application allowed and Leave to Defend taken on record with the same to be decided in accordance with law, including Plaintiff's right to file replication, if so desired.Read more
Matter:-BANKING
2819.Const. P. 624/2021 (S.B.) Mst. Maryam D/o (Late) Dr. Fazlullah Yousufani V/S Muhammad Ayub Jatoi and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1023
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2820.Cr.Bail 267/2023 (S.B.) Usman @ Muhammad Usman Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Bail (No Specific Role and Mere Presence)
It is matter of the record that, though the applicant has been nominated in the F.I.R, but no active role of making any fire upon any of the member of complainant party including the deceased is assigned to him. The applicant was allegedly armed with pistol at the time of incident, but it is not alleged against him that he used the pistol in the commission of offence; but he has acted as instigator only as alleged by the prosecution.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2821.Cr.J.A 410/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD KASHIF S/O MUHAMMAD MURAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Modification in Sentence)
The appellant is young man of 30 years of the age, said to be sole bread earner of his family, by not pressing disposal of his appeal on merits he has shown remorse as such there is likelihood of his reformation. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant for the above offence is reduced to one which he has already undergone it includes the sentence which he is likely to undergo on account of his failure to make payment of fine.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2822.Cr.Bail 324/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Bail (Rule of consistency)
The record reflects that, there is delay of one day in lodging of F.I.R without proper explanation and it cannot be ruled out that in background of murderous enmity the F.I.R has been lodged after due deliberation and consultation. It further appears from the record that applicant and co-accused Khan Muhammad have been assigned role of causing ???danda??? blows to complainant on his head and such injury on person of complainant has been declared as ???Shajjah-e-???Khafifah???, whereas co-accused Mst. Rasheeda was also assigned role of causing ???danda??? blow to PW Ayaz Ali and that injury was also declared as ???Shajjah-e-???Khafifah???. And, it is matter of record that, co-accused Mst. Rasheeda has been granted bail by this Court vide Order dated 17.01.2022 passed in Crl. Bail Appln. No. S- 502 of 2021 and case of the applicant appears to be on same footingsRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2823.Suit 348/2014 (S.B.) Syed Shafaat Ali & another. V/S Syed Farhat Ali & Others. Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Malicious prosecution
2023 SHC KHI 894Plaintiff filed suit for recovery of damages for Malicious Civil Proceedings and Malicious Prosecution against Defendants. Whereas the Supreme Court of Pakistan had recognised malicious civil proceedings by the 1990s, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has only recently held that a claim in malicious prosecution could also be brought in relation to civil proceedings in Willers v. Joyce, [2016] UK SC44 (reported in 2016 SCMR 1841). Plaintiff was unable to establish through evidence the five (5) elements that form the basis for accepting or rejecting a suit for recovery of damages for malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in the case of Niaz and Others v. Abdul Sattar and Others, PLD 2006 SC 432. In the circumstances, proving the six (6) principles for granting and/or refusing damages with regards to malicious prosecution/malicious civil proceedings as laid down in Muhammad Akram v. Mst Farman Bi, 1990 SC 28 is irrelevant. Suit dismissed.Read more
Matter:-RECOVERY
2824.Criminal Appeal 358/2023 (S.B.) AMJAD ALI S/O BACHA KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Arms Act, 2013 (Modification in sentence )
The appellant is young man of 24 years of the age, said to be sole bread earner of his family, by not pressing disposal of his appeal on merits he has shown remorse as such there is likelihood of his reformation. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant for the above offence is reduced to one which he has already undergone it includes the sentence which he is likely to undergo on account of his failure to make payment of fine.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2825.Const. P. 189/2023 (D.B.) M/s Zain Packaging Ind. V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2826.Cr.J.A 558/2022 (S.B.) SHAN RAZA @ SHANI S/O ABDUL RAHIM & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Modification in Sentence)
Apparently, no weapon was used by either of the appellants while committing the alleged offence, which obviously constitutes an offence punishable under Section 392 PPC, therefore, the punishment awarded to the appellants is modified with one under Section 392 PPC; consequently, they for the said offence are sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 03 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days with benefit of Section 382(b) Cr.P.C.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2827.Cr.J.A 559/2022 (S.B.) SHAN RAZA @ SHANI S/O ABDUL RAHIM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Modification in Sentence)
The appellant is young man of 26 years of the age, said to be sole bread earner of his family, by not pressing disposal of his appeal on merits he has shown remorse as such there is likelihood of his reformation. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant for the above offence is reduced to rigorous imprisonment for 02 years with fine of Rs.10, 000/- and in default whereof he would undergo simple imprisonment for 01 week with benefit of Section 382(b) Cr.P.CRead more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2828.Criminal Appeal 359/2023 (S.B.) HAMZA S/OI REHMAT SADIQ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Arms Act, 2013 (Modification in sentence )
The appellant is young man of 21 years of the age, said to be sole bread earner of his family, by not pressing disposal of his appeal on merits he has shown remorse as such there is likelihood of his reformation. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant for the above offence is reduced to one which he has already undergone it includes the sentence which he is likely to undergo on account of his failure to make payment of fine.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2829.Civil Tran 1/2023 (S.B.) Khan Muhammad Brohi V/S Town Committee Kashmore & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2830.Cr.J.A 668/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ASHIQ S/O NOOR DIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Modification in Sentence)
The FIR has been lodged with delay of about 01 year; the appellant is old man of 50 years of the age, said to be sole bread earner of his family, by not pressing disposal of his appeal on merits he has shown remorse as such there is likelihood of his reformation. By considering all these factors as mitigating circumstances, the sentence awarded to the appellant for the above offence is reduced to one which he has already undergone, which includes the sentence which he is likely to undergo on account of his failure to make payment of fineRead more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2831.Cr.J.A 409/2018 (S.B.) ASIF S/O ABDULLAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2832.Cr.J.A 888/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD TAQI S/O MUHAMMAD ISMAIL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Trial (Mitigating Circumstances)
There was no motive of the incident, which occurred on account of sudden flare up which constitutes an offence punishable u/s 302(c) PPC, therefore, the conviction awarded to the appellant for offence punishable u/s 302(b) PPC is modified with one u/s 302(c) PPC, consequently, he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 14 years and to pay compensation of Rs.100,000/- to the legal heirs of the deceased and in default whereof would undergo simple imprisonment for 01 month with benefit of section 382(b) Cr.P.C.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2833.Criminal Appeal 363/2019 (S.B.) ALI HASSAN BROHI S/O GHULAM NABI BROHI V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2834.Const. P. 5385/2014 (D.B.) Dr. Mazhar Naeem V/S P.D.O.H.A Sindh High Court, Karachi
2835.Suit 579/2006 (S.B.) RAIS JAFRY V/S TALAT AFROZE & OTHER Sindh High Court, KarachiSuit for Declaration involving Pre-lease Suit Property. Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 had competing Allotment Orders issued by Defendant No.2. Issues were framed as to who was the real owner: Plaintiff or Defendant. Ordinarily, the onus of proof was on Plaintiff; . In the present case the burden of proof was on Plaintiff to prove his title in the suit property. However, when the Court framed issues, it acknowledged Defendant No. 1's assertion of her title in the said property and framed the issue accordingly. Defendant No.2 produced documents establishing chain of title. Plaintiff did not confront the genuineness of the title document in favour of Plaintiff issued by Defendant No.2. He did not adduce evidence to corroborate the payment vouchers/challans through witness of the bank. Plaintiff failed to prove his case. Suit dismissed.Read more
Matter:-RECOVERY
2836.Cr.J.A 15/2023 (S.B.) AJAY PREM S/O PREM & 02 ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial
Apparently, no weapon was used by either of the appellants while committing the alleged offence, which obviously constitutes an offence punishable under Section 392 PPC, therefore, the punishment awarded to the appellants is modified with one under Section 392 PPC; consequently, they for the said offence are sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 03 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days with benefit of Section 382(b) Cr.P.C.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2837.Criminal Appeal 11/2021 (D.B.) Altaf Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
2838.Cr.J.A 921/2019 (S.B.) MUSHTAQ AHMED S/O HAJI ALLAH BUX & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Denovo Trial)
The provisions of Section 396 PPC could only be attracted when offence is committed by five or more persons conjointly. In the instant matter, the number of culprits involved is only three, therefore, not only the charge framed against the appellants but conviction recorded against them for offence punishable under Section 396 PPC was misplaced; such omission being incurable in terms of Section 537 Cr.P.C has occasioned in failure of justice.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2839.Cr.J.A 48/2019 (S.B.) ASADUDDIN @ LAHOTI S/O MAIRAJUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Murder Trial (Modification in Sentence)
At the very outset, it is stated by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is at the verge of completion of his jail terms, therefore, under instructions he would not press the disposal of the instant Crl. Jail Appeal before this Court on merits, provided simple imprisonment of 01 year, which the appellant is likely to undergo on account of his failure to make payment of fine is reduced to simple imprisonment for 01 month, which is not opposed by learned DDPP.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2840.Cr.J.A 315/2019 (S.B.) ROSHAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 SHC HYD 1157
Matter:-Imprisonment(More than 10 years)
2841.Const. P. 151/2023 (S.B.) Aftab Ahmed Chachar V/S Mst kalsoom Chachar Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 377
Matter:-Family Matter
2842.Cr.Bail 26/2023 (S.B.) Khadim Bhatti V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2843.Criminal Appeal 663/2019 (S.B.) SOHAIB AZHAR BUTT S/O AZHAR UL HAQ BUTT V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2844.Cr.J.A 595/2017 (S.B.) ABDUL KAREEM S/O MUHAMMAD UMAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2845.Cr.Bail 349/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed Jafri V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2846.Criminal Appeal 296/2023 (S.B.) SHAHZAD SALEEM S/O MUHAMMAD SALEEM V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2847.Criminal Appeal 23/2023 (S.B.) JAHANZAIB ALI @ ALI BABA S/O ASHRAF ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2848.Criminal Appeal 802/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SAMI S/O SYED MUNEERUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2849.Criminal Appeal 161/2023 (S.B.) RAMESH @ RAJU S/O AMRO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
2850.Cr.J.A 906/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD QASIM S/O ALI MUHAMMAD BARAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2851.Criminal Appeal 2/2023 (S.B.) Junaid S/o Khalid V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2852.Cr.J.A 110/2023 (S.B.) IRFAN ALI S/O BAKHT TAJ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
2853.Cr.Bail 216/2023 (S.B.) Mehmood Mahar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2854.Cr.Bail 1495/2023 (S.B.) SHAHROZE S/O MEHTAB HUSSAIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2855.Criminal Appeal 504/2022 (S.B.) ALI SHAH KHAN S/O NAFASAT ALI KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
2856.Cr.J.A 504/2018 (S.B.) MALIK SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O SOOFI JAN MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2857.Cr.J.A 5/2020 (S.B.) Nazir Hussain Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
2858.Cr.Bail 299/2023 (S.B.) Toufeeq Ahmed Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2859.Cr.Bail 1622/2023 (S.B.) SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 137
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2860.Cr.Bail 1623/2023 (S.B.) SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 652
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2861.Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Abdul Ghaffar V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 101
Matter:-SERVICE
2862.Const. P. 654/2023 (S.B.) Shahzia Bibi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiThe petition sought to retain the custody of the petitioner's husband at Landhi Prison, Karachi, as he had been convicted and was facing trial in two other criminal cases within the Karachi territory. The respondents had no objection to this, and the court ordered the custody to be retained at Karachi for the convenience of the parties involvedRead more
Matter:-HARASSMENT
2863.R.A (Civil Revision) 139/2022 (S.B.) Agha Abid Majeed Khan Thr. Ghous Bakhsh Sahqani V/S Idrees Ahmed and another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 809
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2864.Cr.Bail 416/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Ramzan Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (False implication by complianant not proved)
Ofcourse Sections applied in the F.I.R do not fall within prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C., but on this score only, the accused cannot claim bail as a matter of right.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2865.Criminal Miscelleneous 242/2023 (S.B.) Maqsood Ali Jatoi V/S The State and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Direction for Registration of FIR)
Matter:-22 A-B
2866.Cr.Bail 1494/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ALI S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 195
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2867.Criminal Miscelleneous 457/2023 (S.B.) ASIF ALI SOLANGI V/S MST. ASMA ABDULLAH & & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1085
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2868.Cr.Bail 262/2023 (S.B.) Hubdar Ali Kalhoro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2869.Cr.Bail 301/2023 (S.B.) Shoukat Gorar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2870.Cr.Bail 2491/2022 (S.B.) BABAR ALI S/O MUHAMMAD SALEH CHANDIO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiThe applicant filed his fourth bail application, claiming statutory delay in concluding the trial as grounds for release. The prosecution refuted the delay, stating the trial was near conclusion with only four witnesses left to be examined. The Court observed that both the defense and prosecution responsible for the delay due to counsel absences. Bail was denied, but the trial court was ordered to conclude the case within two months.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2871.Cr.Rev 139/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AKHTAR S/O BASHIR AHMED V/S VTH ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1075
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2872.Cr.Rev 37/2023 (S.B.) Habibullah Jhatial V/S Learned 4th Addl. Sessions Judge Dadu & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
2873.Cr.Bail 1123/2023 (S.B.) HAIDER ALI S/O SHER ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 861
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2874.Criminal Miscelleneous 52/2022 (S.B.) Imtiaz Ahmed Bhatti V/S SHO PS Civil Lines, Larkana and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
2875.Cr.Bail 510/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ABID S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 132
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2876.Cr.Bail 1114/2023 (S.B.) MOAZAM S/O ABDUL BARI & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1080
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2877.Cr.Bail 851/2023 (S.B.) GHULAM RASOOL @ RASOOLI S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD V/S THE STASE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 990
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2878.Const. P. 619/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Gulshan W/o Aashiq Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Harassment and Protection)
2023 SHC KHI 875Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cutoff social relations with the son or daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY OF MINOR
2879.Const. P. 1042/2012 (S.B.) Muhammad Raheel Kamran V/S Muhammad Shoaib & another Sindh High Court, KarachiPetitioner's contention regarding the illegal construction lacks substantiation. The purported basement in question had been in existence prior to the execution of the tenancy agreement, and no credible evidence was presented to support the petitioner's claim of damage or impairment to the premises. Consequently, this Court, in adherence to the principles of law, dismisses the petition, thereby affirming the judgments rendered by the lower courts.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2880.Cr.Bail 1350/2023 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad S/o Moin Uddin V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 948
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2881.Cr.Bail 1353/2023 (S.B.) AHSAN BILAL S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 881
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2882.Criminal Miscelleneous 404/2022 (S.B.) SHAHBAZ S/O ABDUL GHANI V/S THE SHO P.S AZIZ BHATTI & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 659
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2883.Criminal Miscelleneous 157/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD TARIQUE V/S PROVINCE OF SINDH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 71
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2884.Cr.Bail 220/2023 (S.B.) SAKHI MUHAMMAD S/O NAWAB KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 479
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2885.Cr.Bail 734/2022 (S.B.) ATEEQ AHMED KHAN S/O SHAMIM AHMED KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1213
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2886.Cr.Bail 2301/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE DURRANI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 130
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2887.Cr.Bail 1434/2023 (S.B.) IRFAN AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD HAYAT V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
2888.Cr.Bail 1437/2023 (S.B.) ABDUL JABBAR S/O MUHAMMAD ILYAS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 108
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2889.Cr.Bail 351/2023 (S.B.) ABIZAR S/O ABID HUSSAIN & ANOTHER V/S THE STAT Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 105
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2890.Cr.Bail 1364/2023 (S.B.) SOHAIL S/O SHAFI MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 141
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2891.Cr.Bail 968/2023 (S.B.) SHAHZAIB KHAN S/O SHAH JAHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1162
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2892.Cr.Bail 205/2023 (S.B.) Sanaullah Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2893.Cr.Bail 146/2023 (S.B.) Bashir Ahmed Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2894.Cr.Bail 334/2023 (S.B.) Ali Asghar Panhwar & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2895.Suit 368/2023 (S.B.) ZEDCO V/S TERUMO BCT ASIA PTE LTD & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT, 2012
2023 SHC KHI 441No interim relief can be granted, which is not prayed for in the main suit. The prayer clause in the main suit seeks orders to restrain Defendants from transferring the Plaintiff???s licence to another person. But the impugned decision of Defendant No.2 does not relate to the transfer of the import license. The impugned decision is for the cancellation of the import license of Plaintiff and not transfer. Thus, the interim relief sought by Plaintiff in CMA No.9885/2023 is not pleaded in the main suit. Further, Court proceedings will take their own time, whereas the medical devices of Defendant No.1 in circulation have a limited shelf life. A court should be mindful that when granting discretionary relief, its decision may not create a potential risk to the public. Therefore, this Court should avoid creating a new situation from a public health perspective too and is not inclined to withdraw the impugned decision on this score too. CMA No.9885/2023 is dismissed with directions to the Appellate Board of the Authority that if the Plaintiff prefers an appeal to the impugned decision before the Board, then the Board will give the Plaintiff an opportunity to be heard, including a personal hearing before passing any final order in the appeal.Read more
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
2896.Cr.Bail 1090/2023 (S.B.) BABUL ALI S/O IQBAL & ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 262
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2897.Cr.Bail 969/2023 (S.B.) ABDUL SAMAD SULTAN ASHRAFI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 198
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2898.Suit 767/2023 (S.B.) HASCOL LUBRICANTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED V/S SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAK (SECP) & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 394Once costs are paid to SECP for obtaining certified copies of statutory forms, SECP cannot deny such requests made by the company. Under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018, SECP may insert certain qualifications/remark on such statutory forms.Read more
Matter:-Others
2899.Cr.Bail 1119/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ASHRAF S/O MUHAMMAD JAMIL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 365
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2900.Cr.Bail 1064/2023 (S.B.) USMAN GHANI S/O FAZAL HAQANI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 486
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
2901.Cr.Acq.A. 606/2022 (S.B.) MALIK FURQAN AHMED V/S THE STATE & ANOHTER Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 266
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2902.Cr.Bail 1321/2023 (S.B.) ZOHAIB HUSSAIN S/O ASGHAR HUSSAIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 686
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2903.Cr.Bail 998/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IRFAN S/O MUSHTAQ AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 396
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2904.Cr.Bail 982/2023 (S.B.) WAQAR @ WAKKO S/O ASLAM & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 269
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2905.Cr.Bail 1447/2023 (S.B.) AHSAN ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 333
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
2906.Cr.Bail 802/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ASLAM S/O NAWAB ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 931
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2907.Criminal Miscelleneous 271/2023 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD YOUNUS S/O ABDUL HAFEEZ V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 698
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2908.Cr.Bail 1058/2023 (S.B.) DUR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1123
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2909.Cr.Bail 159/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Samad @ Sono Tunio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Bail (Unseen incident), Murder Bail (Granted)
There appears to be no direct evidence against the applicant except the last seen evidence, extra-judicial confession by the accused before the complainant party and the recovery of the deceased's motorcycle. The last seen evidence is presumed to be weak, and it seems to need more confidence to inspire. At the same time, an extra-judicial confession by accused persons also seems to be concocted, as there is nothing on record to show the compelling circumstances which led the accused to confess their guilt before the complainant party.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2910.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 46/2022 (D.B.) Shafiq-ur-Rehman Malkani & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Jail Appeal
2023 SHC SUK 497Re-appraisal of evidence in light of the delay in lodging the Crime Report, uncertainties in recording Statements, last seen together witnesses, retracted confessions, recoveries made and weak investigation leading to acquittal.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
2911.Cr.Bail 134/2023 (S.B.) Mumtaz Hussain Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Delay in registration of FIR), Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Negligence of Police)
2023 SHC SUK 786The criminal bail application of police officials concerning the escape of a lifer jail convict from Sukkur Central JailRead more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
2912.Spl.Cr.J.A 7/2020 (D.B.) Lal Bux Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: CNS Act, 1997 (Acquittal (Delay in safe custody and transmission to chemical examiner))
2023 SHC SUK 200Establishing the chain of safe custody under the Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997Read more
Matter:-Model Court (Against Order)
2913.Const. P. 479/2023 (S.B.) Syed Mustafa Ali S/o Syed Abid Ali V/S Mst. Afsheen Fatima and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Family Courts Act, 1964 (Limitation Act, 1908)
2023 SHC KHI 81Application of Section 29 (2) of the Limitation Act,1908 to the Family Courts Act, 1964 and Family Court Rules 1965.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2914.Cr.Bail 255/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Yousif Jakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2915.Election Appeal 10/2023 (S.B.) Nazim Uddin S/o Allah Dino V/S The Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Local Government Act, 2013 (Jurisdiction under section 47)
2023 SHC KHI 1226
Matter:-Local Govt
2916.H.C.A 162/2023 (D.B.) Pakistan International Container Terminal Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Administration Suits (conversion of administration suit into civil suit)
2023 SHC KHI 689
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2917.Election Appeal 11/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Sajida Memon W/o Abdul Jabbar Meerani V/S The Election Commission of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Local Government Act, 2013 (Jurisdiction under section 47)
Matter:-Local Govt
2918.Const. P. 541/2023 (S.B.) Jawad ur Rehman S/o Khalil-ur-Rehman V/S Mst. Samrah Sehar Rafeequi and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 12)
Interim Custody of Minors in Family CasesRead more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2919.Cr.J.A 10/2020 (S.B.) Mahoot @ Fayaz Khan Jakhrani & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Corroboration of ocular evidence with medical evidence)
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
2920.Criminal Miscelleneous 333/2022 (S.B.) The State V/S Circle Officer PS ACE Larkana and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Disposal of F.I.R under ???C??? class)
Matter:-Against Order
2921.Cr.Acq.A. 62/2022 (S.B.) The State V/S Ahsan Sanjrani Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Trial ( Discrepancies and contradictions )
Matter:-Against Order
2922.Criminal Miscelleneous 303/2023 (S.B.) GHULAM SHABBIR KUBBAR V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Cognizance on police report)
2023 SHC KHI 556
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2923.Const. P. 3987/2013 (D.B.) Muhammad Tufail V/S Administrator (CDGK) and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 154
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
2924.Cr.J.A 3/2021 (S.B.) Hazoor Bux Magsi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Circumstantial evidence supported by Medical Evidence)
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
2925.Cr.Tran 21/2023 (S.B.) Mohammad Adam Sundrani V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Transfer Application (Allegation against staff memebers of court)
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2926.Cr.Tran 22/2023 (S.B.) Nizamuddin Sundrani V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Transfer Application (Allegation against staff memebers of court)
Matter:-For Case Transfer
2927.Cr.Bail 720/2023 (S.B.) SHAHID MEHMOOD S/O SHAIKH SALAHUDDIDN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
2023 SHC KHI 338
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2928.H.C.A 64/2023 (D.B.) Ansari Sugar Mills Limited & Others V/S JDW Sugar Mills Limited & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 886
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2929.Cr.Rev 2/2020 (S.B.) Abdul Qadir Giancho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Trial (Absence of evidence in respect of payment)
Matter:-Against Order
2930.Const. P. 2655/2023 (D.B.) Daily Veer Times V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Enforcement of Contractual Rights), CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973 (Jurisdiction: Remedy before Civil Court )
Matter:-FOR PAYMENT
2931.Const. P. 270/2023 (S.B.) Kashif Naeem S/o Muhammad Naeem Butt V/S Malaika Kashif and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Family Courts Act, 1964 (Section 7)
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
2932.II.A. 119/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Yasmeen D/o Niamat Masih V/S Mst. Mukhtiar Begum and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
2933.Criminal Appeal 15/2021 (S.B.) Kambeer Suhandro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Corroboration of ocular evidence with medical evidence)
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
2934.Const. P. 144/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Latif Lashari V/S Muhammad Isa Bangulani & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Habeas Corpus U/S 491 for wrongful Confinement (Recovery beyond territorial jurisdiction)
Matter:-Detention
2935.Cr.J.A 41/2019 (S.B.) Imtiaz @ Shaman @ Shamoo Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Corroboration of ocular evidence with medical evidence)
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
2936.Cr.Bail 232/2023 (S.B.) Allah Bux Bhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Prohibition under section 51 of the CNS Act, 1997)
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2937.Cr.Bail 1027/2023 (S.B.) Furqan Saeed Siddiqui S/o Abdul Saeed Siddiqui V/S The State Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence not falling under prohibitory caluse )
The quantity of the alleged recovered substance does not exceed 500 grams, which carries a maximum punishment of five (05) years under Section 6/9(2)4 of the Amended CNSA-2022. Accordingly, the offence did not fall within prohibitory clause of Section 497(1) Cr.P.C.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
2938.Cr.Rev 77/2022 (S.B.) Ali Gohar Memon V/S Abdul Hakeem and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Demarcation)
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
2939.Criminal Miscelleneous 138/2023 (S.B.) Aashique Hussain Kalhoro V/S SHO PS Waleed Larkana & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Duty and Power of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace (Direction for registration of FIR)
Matter:-22 A-B
2940.Cr.J.A 3/2023 (S.B.) Dodo Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Trial (Police / official witnesses are as good witnesses as Civilian )
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
2941.Const. P. 2257/2023 (D.B.) Muzaffar Ali Khan V/S Deputy Commissioner Central & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR SEALING
2942.Const. P. 2233/2023 (D.B.) Irfan Shamim V/S Khurram Ghulam Hussain and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2943.Cr.Acq.A. 19/2023 (S.B.) Pir Ahsan Shah Rashidi V/S Miratul-Haq Shah & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Trial (Section 249-A Cr.PC)
Matter:-Against Order
2944.Cr.Acq.A. 114/2022 (S.B.) Piyaro V/S Sikander Pahore and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Trial ( Discrepancies and contradictions )
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
2945.Cr.Bail 211/2023 (S.B.) Babal Brohi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Prohibition under section 51 of the CNS Act, 1997)
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2946.Cr.Acq.A. 60/2022 (S.B.) Imdad Hussain Brohi V/S Ghulam Rasool @ Ghulam Hussain Jagirani & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Trial ( Discrepancies and contradictions )
Matter:-Against Order
2947.Const. P. 1994/2023 (D.B.) Mehmood Josaf V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 788
Matter:-ELECTRICITY MATTER
2948.Const. P. 4140/2022 (D.B.) Danish V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2949.Const. P. 2442/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Rasheed V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
2950.Const. P. 3772/2020 (D.B.) Ruqaya V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2951.Cr.Acq.A. 32/2023 (S.B.) Moula Bux Bahalkani V/S Muhammad Rahim @ Dhila & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2952.Const. P. 431/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Nasirah Kanwal and others V/S Muhammad Sajjd Uddin and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2953.Const. P. 2242/2017 (D.B.) Tashkeel Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 920
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
2954.Const. P. 8075/2019 (D.B.) Pakistan Railways Employees C.H.S V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 77
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
2955.Const. P. 1760/2023 (D.B.) Fareed Khan V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
2956.Const. P. 98/2017 (S.B.) Mansoor-ul-Haque Solangi V/S PIDC & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 890
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2957.Const. P. 5106/2016 (D.B.) Zaheer Ahmed V/S Zafar Abbas & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 86
Matter:-Land Matters
2958.Cr.Misc. 284/2018 (S.B.) MURTAZA ALI S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR V/S THE DISTT & S.J KHI EAST & ORS Sindh High Court, KarachiThis is a continuation of a legal matter regarding the handling of investigation reports and Jirga practices in Sindh, Pakistan. The court has ordered the IGP Sindh to provide details of absconding accused persons and directed MIT-II to call for reports from all criminal courts with regard to dormant file cases and details of witnesses who have failed to appear in heinous crimes. The court also reminded the SSPs and SHOs that any Jirga conducted in any part of Sindh would lead to criminal prosecution and departmental proceedings. The court also discussed the introduction of technical education in schools, particularly in the subject of the Internet of Things, and the possibility of adding Artificial Intelligence (AI) to matriculation level. The University of Karachi has been given time to submit a fresh report on the establishment of technical forensic labs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2959.Const. P. 2038/2023 (D.B.) Shahzad Hanif V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2960.Criminal Miscelleneous 95/2022 (S.B.) Saeed Ahmed Bhayo Ors V/S Ali Sher Bahrani & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 SHC SUK 941
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2961.Const. P. 1529/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Imran & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2962.Cr.Bail 5/2023 (S.B.) Azizullah Banglani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2963.Const. P. 307/2023 (S.B.) Ghayas Muhammad S/o Ghos Muhammad V/S Shaikh Muhammad Khalid and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiThe case involved a dispute between the petitioner and respondents No.1 to 3 over the ownership and tenancy of a shop. The respondents produced a registered Gift Deed to establish their ownership, while the petitioner claimed to have been inducted as a tenant by the father of the respondents. The petitioner failed to provide evidence of his tenancy, and the courts below found in favor of the respondents. The petitioner's request to bring additional evidence was also denied. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was given three months to vacate the shop.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
2964.Cr.Bail 167/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Manzooran Seelro & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2965.Cr.Bail 134/2023 (S.B.) Amir Ali Lakho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2966.Const. P. 1625/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Amir Aziz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
2967.Const. P. 1245/2023 (D.B.) Asad Mehmood Hashmi V/S DG SBCA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2968.Const. P. 1178/2023 (D.B.) Shehroz Waheed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2969.H.C.A 299/2021 (D.B.) Asif Siddik Adam V/S Siddiki Fun Trust & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 549
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
2970.Const. P. 1761/2023 (D.B.) Ali Akber V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
2971.Const. P. 1737/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Haroon Shaikh V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2972.Criminal Appeal 10/2022 (S.B.) Imtiaz Ali Khoonharo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
2973.Const. P. 1736/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Naveed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
2974.Const. P. 1757/2023 (D.B.) Allah Jewayo V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
2975.Const. P. 2164/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Farooq and Others V/S KMC and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
2976.Const. P. 1501/2023 (D.B.) Irfan Nazar V/S KDA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
2977.Const. P. 1543/2023 (D.B.) Farhan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
2978.Cr.Acq.A. 25/2023 (S.B.) Imam Bux Jafferi V/S Pir Jan Jafferi & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
2979.Criminal Miscelleneous 57/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Rafique Magsi V/S The State & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
2980.Const. P. 1434/2023 (D.B.) Gazain Zafar Magsi Adv and Another V/S Karachi Bar Association and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 173
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
2981.Criminal Appeal 22/2020 (S.B.) Ghulam Mustafa Khaskheli V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
2982.Const. P. 1027/2023 (D.B.) Mst. Mehmooda Khanam V/S CEO Cantonment Board Clifton and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY TAX
2983.Const. P. 1227/2023 (D.B.) Syed Renata V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2984.Const. P. 1460/2023 (D.B.) Shahzad Maqbool V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2985.Cr.Bail 97/2023 (S.B.) Naeem Ahmed Bahrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2986.Cr.Bail 627/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Ghafoor Bangulani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2987.Cr.Misc. 284/2018 (S.B.) MURTAZA ALI S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR V/S THE DISTT & S.J KHI EAST & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
2988.Const. P. 589/2023 (D.B.) Iqbal Ahmed V/S Mukhtiarkar Scheme 33 & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
2989.Const. P. 6126/2020 (D.B.) M/s Tapal Energy Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
2990.Cr.Bail 365/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Ismail Umrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2991.Cr.Bail 89/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Arbeli Barhmani Jatoi & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2992.Const. P. 71/2023 (S.B.) Aneel Kumar V/S SSP Kashmore @ Kandhkot & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
2993.Const. P. 1029/2021 (D.B.) Shaikh Muhammad Aslam V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
2994.Cr.Bail 73/2023 (S.B.) Hidayatullah Samejo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
2995.Criminal Appeal 19/2016 (S.B.) Qasim Khoso V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
2996.Const. P. 1396/2023 (D.B.) M/s Aisha Hareem Enterprises V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
2997.Cr.Bail 193/2022 (S.B.) Qurban Ali Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
2998.Cr.Bail 617/2022 (S.B.) Amjad Ali Siyal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
2999.Criminal Appeal 24/2016 (S.B.) Irfan Ali Pirzada V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3000.Const. P. 1447/2023 (D.B.) Mst. Ayesha and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
3001.Cr.J.A 6/2017 (S.B.) Bashir Ahmed Sanjrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3002.Const. P. 3987/2013 (D.B.) Muhammad Tufail V/S Administrator (CDGK) and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
3003.Cr.Bail 106/2023 (S.B.) Nasrullah Bhatti & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3004.Criminal Miscelleneous 293/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Rehman Khoso V/S Imran Ali Khoso & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
3005.Criminal Miscelleneous 269/2022 (S.B.) Syed Tufail Hussain Naqvi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
3006.Const. P. 5779/2018 (D.B.) Nizamuddin Larik & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3007.Const. P. 1403/2023 (D.B.) Imran Hassan V/S Shamsuddin & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DEMOLITION
3008.Const. P. 659/2022 (D.B.) Inayat Hussain V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Disable Quota
3009.Const. P. 5550/2022 (D.B.) Imtiaz Ahmed Mangi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3010.Const. P. 4106/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Inam and Others V/S The Sect: Local Govt. and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 541
Matter:-SERVICE
3011.Const. P. 1238/2023 (D.B.) SESSI Staff Union Sindh V/S Registrar Trade Union and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
3012.Const. P. 236/2023 (D.B.) Javed Iqbal Burqi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 817
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
3013.R.A (Civil Revision) 57/2020 (S.B.) Tehreek Jadeed Anjuman Ahmedia V/S Muhammad Ishaque thr: L.Rs & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 SHC HYD 642
Matter:-Against Judgment
3014.Cr.Rev 5/2017 (S.B.) Budho Chachar V/S Addl: Sessions Judge, Kashmore & Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3015.Const. P. 1367/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Imran & Ors V/S SBCA & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3016.Const. P. 5705/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Ahmed and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 883
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
3017.Const. P. 160/2023 (D.B.) Riaz Ahmed Jokhio V/S Auditor General of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 153
Matter:-SERVICE
3018.Cr.J.A 47/2019 (S.B.) Qutubddin Jakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3019.Cr.Rev 57/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Saifal Kumbhar V/S The State and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3020.Const. P. 3038/2022 (D.B.) Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
3021.Const. P. 462/2022 (D.B.) Mst. Shahar Bano V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 923
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3022.Const. P. 5703/2022 (D.B.) Ali Haider and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 491
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
3023.Criminal Miscelleneous 368/2021 (S.B.) Ahmed Ali Chandio V/S SHO PS PP Dost Ali Of PS Drigh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
3024.Cr.Bail 15/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Nawaz Rind V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3025.Cr.Tran 45/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Waheed Panhwaar V/S Ghulam Ali Kakro Abro and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-For Case Transfer
3026.H.C.A 339/2022 (D.B.) Hassan Farid Khan V/S Muhammad Aslam Siddiqui & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1146
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3027.Cr.J.A 23/2020 (D.B.) Zahid Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
3028.Const. P. 187/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Ashraf Khan and Others V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 796
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
3029.Const. P. 3251/2022 (D.B.) Ghulam Muhammad V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3030.Cr.Rev 26/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Rasool V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3031.Const. P. 1229/2023 (D.B.) Ahsanullah @ Pir Ahsanullah V/S Deputy Commissioner Malir and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DISPOSSESSION
3032.Const. P. 1268/2023 (D.B.) Khalid Ali Baig V/S Sajid Ali Baig and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3033.Const. P. 7366/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Ghaffar & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FOR ALLOWANCE
3034.Const. P. 6939/2021 (D.B.) Faraz Hussain V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 899
Matter:-SON QUOTA
3035.Const. P. 5343/2021 (D.B.) Khawaja Zakir uddin and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 206
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
3036.Const. P. 1269/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Faisal Abdul Aziz and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
3037.Const. P. 2388/2020 (D.B.) Arifa Khatoon V/S The Governor of Sindh / Chancellor & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3038.Criminal Appeal 19/2023 (S.B.) Noor Muhammad Pathan and Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3039.Const. P. 3993/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Butt V/S D.H.A and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3040.Cr.Bail 60/2023 (S.B.) Ayaz Sethar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3041.Criminal Appeal 18/2023 (S.B.) Abdullah Moosakhel Pathan & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3042.Cr.J.A 54/2018 (S.B.) Muhammad Siddique @ Ladho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3043.Const. P. 1140/2022 (D.B.) Ghulam Sakina V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PENSION
3044.Cr.Bail 552/2022 (S.B.) Basit Ali Magsi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3045.Const. P. 528/2023 (D.B.) Naeem V/S I.G of Police Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 257
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
3046.Criminal Appeal 53/2022 (S.B.) Uzair @ Zubair Bhutto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
3047.Cr.J.A 50/2018 (S.B.) Shafqat Hussain Detho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3048.Cr.Rev 28/2022 (S.B.) Mohammad Saleem Khan Baloch V/S Tarique Baloch and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
3049.Cr.Bail 30/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Yousif Mazari and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3050.Cr.Bail 2/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Ismail and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3051.Criminal Appeal 17/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Yaseen Sabzoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
3052.Const. P. 1161/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Haleem Khan Ghouri and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
3053.Cr.Rev 15/2020 (D.B.) Assadullah Chijjan V/S Muhammad Ayoub & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Enhancement of Sentence
3054.Const. P. 125/2023 (D.B.) M/S United Cargo Good Transport Co. V/S The Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCustoms. release of smuggled goods.Read more
Matter:-Custom Matter
3055.Const. P. 1159/2023 (D.B.) Mst. Nasira Shah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
3056.Const. P. 7084/2022 (D.B.) Ahmed Gul & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 455
Matter:-SERVICE
3057.Const. P. 3844/2020 (D.B.) Pir Ghulam Akbar Qureshi V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3058.Const. P. 7385/2022 (D.B.) Faheem Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST TRANSFER
3059.Criminal Appeal 28/2022 (S.B.) Khan @ Patai @ Muhammad Saffar Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3060.Const. P. 8033/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 482
Matter:-SERVICE
3061.Criminal Appeal 10/2017 (S.B.) Nizakat Abbasi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3062.Cr.Bail 618/2022 (S.B.) Fayaz Hussain Mugheri V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3063.Const. P. 4427/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Naseem V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3064.Const. P. 2514/2017 (D.B.) Qutabuddin V/S College of Physician & Surgeons and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3065.Cr.Bail 507/2022 (S.B.) Shoaib Ahmed Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3066.Cr.Bail 7/2023 (S.B.) Amjad Hussain Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3067.Criminal Appeal 48/2022 (D.B.) Ali Gul Magsi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years)
3068.H.C.A 317/2022 (D.B.) USUF Pakistan Private Limited V/S M/s. Muhammad Sabir Chippa & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3069.Cr.Acq.A. 19/2019 (D.B.) Sikandar Ali Shah V/S Noor Ul Haque Abro & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3070.Cr.J.A 40/2019 (D.B.) Adnan Khan Pathan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
3071.Const. P. 2949/2022 (D.B.) Wamiq Abrar Siddiqui V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3072.Const. P. 579/2023 (D.B.) Faheemuddin Memon & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 223
Matter:-SERVICE
3073.Const. P. 3191/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Shaista Shoukat Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 982
Matter:-SERVICE
3074.Criminal Appeal 15/2019 (S.B.) Ali Jan and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3075.Const. P. 26/2023 (S.B.) Sarfaraz Hussain Sianch V/S SHO PS Ratodero & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3076.Criminal Miscelleneous 142/2022 (S.B.) Khalid Hussain Bugti V/S SSP Larkana and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
3077.Cr.Bail 516/2022 (S.B.) Safdar Ali Noonari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3078.Criminal Miscelleneous 37/2023 (S.B.) Dilber Khoso and Another V/S The State and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
3079.Criminal Miscelleneous 46/2023 (S.B.) Mushtaq Luhur V/S Muzafar Ali Lashari and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
3080.Criminal Miscelleneous 122/2022 (S.B.) Bhajan Lal @ Anil Kumar V/S SSP District Jacobabad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-22 A-B
3081.Const. P. 2606/2022 (D.B.) Saiqa Imdad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 14
Matter:-SERVICE
3082.Cr.Rev 6/2020 (S.B.) Mukesh Kumar Hindu V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3083.Const. P. 8446/2018 (D.B.) Gul Faraz V/S Member S.L.A.T and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3084.Cr.Acq.A. 18/2023 (S.B.) Mumtaz Ali Ogahi V/S Hafeezullah @ Abdul Hafeez and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3085.Cr.Acq.A. 98/2022 (S.B.) Mst. Hakeeman Panhwar V/S Nazir Ahmed Panhwar and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3086.Const. P. 4354/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Nadeem Alam V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3087.Criminal Appeal 94/2017 (S.B.) Imdad Ali Zangejo and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3088.Cr.Acq.A. 18/2023 (S.B.) Mumtaz Ali Ogahi V/S Hafeezullah @ Abdul Hafeez and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3089.Const. P. 5975/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Toufiq Khan V/S Pakistan Atomic Energy and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 322
Matter:-SERVICE
3090.Const. P. 839/2023 (D.B.) Sarfaraz Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 746
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
3091.Const. P. 862/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Naveed Uddin Qadri and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 230
Matter:-SERVICE
3092.Const. P. 861/2023 (D.B.) Aziz Ahmed Khan and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 356
Matter:-SERVICE
3093.Cr.J.A 13/2020 (D.B.) Assadullah Magsi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
3094.Const. P. 838/2023 (D.B.) Farhan Khan Abbasi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 882
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
3095.Criminal Appeal 120/2016 (S.B.) Muhammad Ilyas Hajano V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3096.R.A (Civil Revision) 190/2016 (S.B.) Dilmurad V/S Province of Sindh &ors. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
3097.Const. P. 5164/2022 (D.B.) Khurram Fiazuddin and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SUPPLY OF WATER
3098.Criminal Miscelleneous 285/2022 (S.B.) Shahid Seeru V/S Mubeen Soomro & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Opinion of police has no binding effect on the Courts)
It is well established law that the police opinion is not binding upon the Court and Magistrate is not bound to agree with the police report and he is at liberty under the law, either to agree or disagree with the conclusion drawn by the Investigation Officer.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
3099.Criminal Appeal 7/2019 (S.B.) Barkat Ali Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Supplementary Statement of Pws), Murder Trial
Supplementary statements of the complainant and witnesses have no legal value and is inadmissible in evidence.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3100.Criminal Miscelleneous 6/2023 (S.B.) Fareedan Baloch V/S SHO PS Allahabad District Larkana & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Duty and Power of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace (Direction for registration of FIR)
When version of complainant is negated by police with regard to happening of the incident, what would be expected from police, if the F.I.R is registered as such availing adequate remedy in shape of direct complaint is available.Read more
Matter:-22 A-B
3101.Cr.Rev 6/2022 (S.B.) Mst. Razia Sultana Shaikh V/S Fida Hussain Magsi and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3102.Cr.Rev 2/2016 (S.B.) Dr. Bhagwandas & another V/S Haji Meehal Khan Jatoi and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005
The contoversy between co-owners upon un-partitioned land could not be decided under Illegal Dispossession Act.Read more
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
3103.Criminal Miscelleneous 7/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Hussain Shah @ Raja Shah V/S Syed Mohammad Fazal Shah and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Opinion of police has no binding effect on the Courts)
Police opinion is not binding upon the Court and Magistrate is not bound to agree with the police report. Court is at liberty under the law, either to agree or disagree with the conclusion drawn by the Investigation Officer.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
3104.Cr.Bail 600/2022 (S.B.) Azam and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (No repetition of injury does not constitue intetion of murder )
No repetition of the injuries do not constitute intention of murder, hence question of application of Section 324 P.P.C would be determined at the time of trial after recording evidence of prosecution witnesses.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3105.Cr.Rev 6/2023 (S.B.) Syed Mujtaba Hassan Shah V/S Arz Mohammad and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Title and possession disputed )
No one can be the the owner of the land by virtue of purchase through un-registered oral agreement and an un-registered agreement to sale does not confer any right in favor of its beneficiary/ buyerRead more
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
3106.Const. P. 1489/2022 (D.B.) Mst Shabnam V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Disable Quota
3107.Cr.Acq.A. 48/2021 (D.B.) Ali Akbar Mugheri V/S Sadam Hussain Mugheri and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Double presumption of innocence)
Courts generally do not interfere with double presumption of innocence unless find the reasoning in the impugned judgment to be perverse, arbitrary, foolish, artificial, speculative and ridiculous.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
3108.Const. P. 5634/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Service matters (Article 474 (b) of Civil Service Regulations)
2023 SHC KHI 399The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
3109.Const. P. 6360/2019 (D.B.) Kamran Shamshad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 709
Matter:-SERVICE
3110.Const. P. 5635/2022 (D.B.) Habib ur Rehman V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Service matters (Article 474 (b) of Civil Service Regulations)
2023 SHC KHI 1008The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
3111.Const. P. 273/2023 (D.B.) Inspector Rukhsana Leghari and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 308
Matter:-SERVICE
3112.Const. P. 6149/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Zeba Irfanullah V/S KMC through Administrator and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 552
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
3113.Const. P. 120/2022 (D.B.) Mrs. Aseem Khalid V/S Secretary Schools Education & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 63
Matter:-SERVICE
3114.Cr.Bail 6/2023 (S.B.) Sheenh @ Shaheen Khan Seelro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Bail (Unseen incident)
Indirect evidence or unseen incident is weak type of evidence.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3115.Criminal Miscelleneous 146/2022 (S.B.) Miss Naheed Khuhawar V/S The State and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3116.Criminal Appeal 8/2023 (S.B.) Abdul Wali and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3117.Cr.Bail 589/2022 (S.B.) Tarique Hussain Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3118.Const. P. 1494/2013 (D.B.) Ashiq Ali Narejo V/S Province of Sindh and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 226
Matter:-SERVICE
3119.Const. P. 3402/2017 (D.B.) Fazal Karim Mahar V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 89
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
3120.Const. P. 3965/2020 (D.B.) Faisal V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 40
Matter:-SERVICE
3121.Criminal Miscelleneous 35/2023 (S.B.) Nazeer Hussain Maitlo and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Suspension of NBWs
3122.Cr.J.A 56/2019 (S.B.) Muhkumuddin Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Article 4 of Constitution of Pakistan )
The right of individual to be dealt with in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3123.Const. P. 4193/2022 (D.B.) Mst. Farzana V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 900
Matter:-PENSION
3124.Const. P. 3236/2022 (D.B.) Mehrun Nisa Khaskheli V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SBLR Sindh 633
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
3125.R.A (Civil Revision) 21/2014 (S.B.) Madadullah Alias Bakhshan Ahmadani V/S Nisar Ahmed Ansari and Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (12 (2) CPC)
Article 181 of the Limitation Act is applicable to application under section 12(2) C.P.C.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
3126.Cr.J.A 49/2019 (S.B.) Qamaruddin Babar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Article 4 of Constitution of Pakistan )
The right of individual to be dealt with in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3127.Criminal Miscelleneous 17/2023 (S.B.) Fakhurdin Daud Poto V/S Ayaz Ahmed Noonari and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Duty and Power of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace (Direction for registration of FIR)
Where there is no allegation/ accusation against proposed accused, no purpose would be served, if the F.I.R is registered against him, but it would only be unnecessary hardship for him.Read more
Matter:-22 A-B
3128.Const. P. 637/2023 (D.B.) Shehroz Waheed V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3129.Const. P. 6760/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Abdullah Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3130.Const. P. 1134/2022 (D.B.) M/s Trio Ind V/S Babo Sher and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 610
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3131.Const. P. 647/2023 (D.B.) Shahid Habib V/S FUUAST & Othres Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 904
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
3132.Const. P. 1673/2018 (D.B.) Khalil Ahmed Kandhro & another V/S P O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
3133.Criminal Miscelleneous 27/2023 (S.B.) Muhammad Ibrahim Soomro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Suspension of NBWs), Application under section 561-A Cr.PC
Issuance of NBWs in first instance is against judicial principles.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
3134.Const. P. 1236/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Nawaz Kalhoro V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Recruitment
3135.Const. P. 1171/2018 (D.B.) Dr. Muhammad Javaid Iqbal & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 348
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
3136.R.A (Civil Revision) 46/2012 (S.B.) EDO Roads Kashmore @ Kandhkot & others V/S Abdul Hafeez Chachar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Moulding of relief )
2023 SHC LAR 852The courts can mould the relief within the scope of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ("C.P.C."), and are empowered to grant such relief as the justice may demand in the facts and circumstances of the case.Read more
Matter:-Construction
3137.Const. P. 5967/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Ayub Alvi V/S Admin Incharge Pakistan Cotton and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 1166
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
3138.Const. P. 5552/2022 (D.B.) Mansoor Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SBLR Sindh 952
Matter:-SERVICE
3139.Cr.J.A 32/2019 (S.B.) Abdullah Katohar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3140.Cr.Bail 631/2022 (S.B.) Haji Nooruddin Maganhar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3141.Const. P. 549/2023 (D.B.) Syed Qaiser Mehmood V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
3142.Cr.Acq.A. 94/2021 (S.B.) MST. ZARA BHATTI @ FARHAT PARVEEN D/O ALLAH DITTA V/S KAUSAR AMIR W/O AMIR MAJEED & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3143.Const. P. 690/2022 (D.B.) Nazar Muhammad Jamali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 827
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
3144.Const. P. 5636/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Sattar V/S DMC West Karachi and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 211
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
3145.Const. P. 335/2023 (D.B.) Dr. Muhammad Masood V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 193
Matter:-SERVICE
3146.Const. P. 6311/2020 (D.B.) Sheikh Nusrat and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 297
Matter:-SERVICE
3147.Const. P. 1316/2022 (D.B.) Bilawal Kalwar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
3148.Const. P. 1315/2022 (D.B.) Abdul Shakoor Shar V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
3149.Criminal Appeal 20/2019 (S.B.) Ashique Ali Kalhoro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Murder Trial (Article 4 of Constitution of Pakistan )
The careful re-assessment of the case diary dated 10.09.2015 reflects that the proceedings of recording examination-in-chief of complainant Shoukat Ali and PWs Manzoor Ali and Ghulam Rasool was held by learned trial Judge in his Chamber that too in absence of learned defence counsel which has prejudiced the appellant in his defence and such practice obviously is mockery with law. Further, the above illegality committed by learned trial Court has also vitiated the trial which is contrary to the mandate contained by Article 4 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, which prescribes that the right of individual to be dealt with in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3150.Const. P. 1354/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Nadeem Alam V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 29
Matter:-SERVICE
3151.Cr.J.A 90/2019 (S.B.) Muhammad Jaro @ Mando Veesar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3152.Cr.Bail 545/2022 (S.B.) Ali Dost Mugheri V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3153.Cr.Acq.A. 6/2023 (S.B.) Irshad Ahmed Brohi V/S Jahangir Kakepoto and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
3154.Const. P. 1743/2016 (D.B.) Azhar Hussain V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
3155.Const. P. 473/2023 (D.B.) M/s Oil World (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3156.Const. P. 730/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Ibrahim V/S M.D Korangi Fisheries Harbour & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 433
Matter:-SERVICE
3157.Const. P. 7523/2022 (D.B.) Atif Ghias V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 655
Matter:-AGAINST POSTING
3158.Const. P. 1827/2014 (D.B.) Muhammad Ilyas V/S C.A.A and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 483
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
3159.Const. P. 1901/2014 (D.B.) Qalandar Bux & Ors V/S Province of Sindh and ORs Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3160.Const. P. 366/2023 (D.B.) Samiullah Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 459Be that as it may, it is admitted position that the petitioner is not enrolled as an advocate under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, and/ or a practicing lawyer and has no standing at the bar at all.Read more
Matter:-INTERVIEW
3161.Const. P. 2699/2021 (D.B.) Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
3162.Const. P. 7797/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Ahsan Raza V/S The D.G SBCA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3163.Const. P. 7450/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Akbar Ali and Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3164.Const. P. 3707/2021 (D.B.) Mst. Shereen Javed V/S The State Thru Governor and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 669
Matter:-AGAINST DECISION
3165.Const. P. 2103/2019 (D.B.) Volks Coop Housing Society V/S M.D.A and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
3166.Const. P. 2581/2013 (D.B.) Dr. Shahnaz V/S S.B.C.A. & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3167.Cr.Bail 2448/2022 (S.B.) TANVER @ TANO S/O HUSSAIN BUX V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3168.Const. P. 1481/2020 (D.B.) Sajjad Hussain and others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 SHC HYD 955
Matter:-OTHER
3169.Const. P. 3652/2012 (D.B.) Sabir Hussain & Others V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 351
Matter:-SERVICE
3170.Const. P. 6766/2018 (D.B.) Fazal-e-Rabbi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 92
Matter:-SERVICE
3171.Const. P. 6164/2022 (D.B.) Afaq Ahmed Qureshie V/S The Chief Secretariat, Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 770
Matter:-SERVICE
3172.Cr.J.A 16/2021 (D.B.) Punhal Khan Kundrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
3173.Const. P. 1332/2022 (D.B.) Asif Nawaz Chandio V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
3174.Const. P. 7976/2022 (D.B.) HRDO V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 654
Matter:-DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY
3175.Const. P. 6291/2021 (D.B.) Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan V/S Port Qasim Authority and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 398
Matter:-SERVICE
3176.Cr.Bail 513/2022 (S.B.) Dr. Iqrar Jakhrani and Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3177.Criminal Appeal 67/2022 (S.B.) Dadan Sundrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
3178.Cr.Acq.A. 119/2022 (S.B.) Noor Hassan Bhangwar V/S Khathoor @ Khathoor Khan and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3179.Cr.Bail 318/2022 (S.B.) Nasrullah Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
3180.Const. P. 6587/2015 (D.B.) Mst. Zahoori V/S Province of Sindh & ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 878
Matter:-SHAHEED QUOTA
3181.Const. P. 161/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Karim Khan and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 474
Matter:-SERVICE
3182.Cr.Bail 343/2022 (S.B.) Khalid Tunio & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3183.Cr.Bail 2324/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SHAREEF S/O MUHAMMAD RAHEEM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3184.Cr.Acq.A. 130/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Hanif Khoso V/S Rahim Bux Brohi & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Illegal Dispossession Act
3185.Cr.Acq.A. 127/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Munawar Soomro V/S Tajuddin Waqar Shaikh and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3186.Const. P. 174/2023 (D.B.) Rehmatullah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
3187.Const. P. 3585/2022 (D.B.) Kanwar Naveed Jameel and Others V/S The Chief Election Commissioner & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
3188.Const. P. 1693/2022 (D.B.) Amanullah Lakheer V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHC KHI 169
Matter:-SERVICE
3189.Cr.Bail 2470/2022 (S.B.) FAHAD S/O SHAKEEL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3190.Cr.Acq.A. 822/2019 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD KHAN S/O BAHRAN KHAN V/S MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQUE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3191.Cr.Bail 1305/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SULTAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3192.Cr.J.A 246/2019 (D.B.) Abdul Raheem @ Raheem Chachar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
3193.H.C.A 424/2022 (D.B.) Mst. Hawa Bai & Others V/S Mst. Kulsoom & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3194.H.C.A 425/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad & Another V/S Abdullah Elyas & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3195.H.C.A 413/2022 (D.B.) Province of Sindh & another V/S Sindh Valley Safari & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 873
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3196.I. A 67/2021 (D.B.) M/s Legend Developers/Property Legends & Another V/S Muhammad Sarfaraz Ali Metlo & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3197.I. A 104/2021 (D.B.) Noman Abdul Razzaq V/S Asif Ahmed Farooqi Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3198.Cr.Bail 2211/2022 (S.B.) SYED ABDUL REHMAN S/O SYED RASHID ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3199.Cr.Bail 1039/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD MOHSIN KHAN S/O SALEEM KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3200.Spl.H.C.A 333/2014 (D.B.) M/s. Polygon Developers & another V/S M/s. Pair Inevestment Company Ltd. & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3201.H.C.A 465/2018 (D.B.) Murtaza Baig & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3202.H.C.A 74/2015 (D.B.) Imtiaz Hussain V/S Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3203.H.C.A 299/2022 (D.B.) Emmar Karachi Limited V/S Shahid Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3204.I. A 91/2000 (D.B.) Mrs. Mehrunnisa Bawany & another V/S Bank Al-Falah Ltd & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BANKING
3205.I. A 38/2021 (D.B.) M/s MICO Company V/S Muhammad Zada & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3206.Cr.Bail 2186/2022 (S.B.) ALAMGIR S/O ABDUL RAZZAQ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3207.Cr.Rev 270/2022 (S.B.) SAFDAR KHAN S/O ABDUL MUGHNI V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3208.R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2011 (S.B.) Syed Mazahir Hussain V/S Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 931
Matter:-OTHER
3209.H.C.A 407/2022 (D.B.) Advocate General Sindh & Others V/S Mrs. Shahida Aftab and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3210.Cr.Bail 936/2022 (S.B.) SANAULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3211.Cr.Bail 1671/2022 (S.B.) YOUSUF ALI S/O MUHAMMAD SARWAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3212.Const. P. 221/2020 (S.B.) MST. FAREEHA AHMAREEN & ANOTHER V/S AFTAB JAMEEL ABBASI & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
3213.Const. P. 443/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Sami @ Shabrati S/o Allah Noor V/S MCAC/ DJ Malir, Karachi and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 803
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3214.R.A (Civil Revision) 40/2006 (S.B.) Mir Muhammad and Others V/S Abdul Qadir and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
3215.H.C.A 399/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Hashim Khan V/S Babrak Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3216.F.R.A 37/2021 (S.B.) Fazal Mehmood Thr. Attorney Mansoor Malik V/S Faisal Imran Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 401
Matter:-CANTONMENT
3217.R.A (Civil Revision) 38/2001 (S.B.) Wali Muhammad V/S Secretary Health Depatt:and other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 724
Matter:-Against Order
3218.R.A (Civil Revision) 95/2007 (S.B.) Sain Dino and others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 826
Matter:-Against Order
3219.H.C.A 386/2022 (D.B.) Aamir Hameed & Another V/S M/s. Alloo & Minchoer Dinshaw & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3220.H.C.A 106/2019 (D.B.) Jehanzeb Anwar V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority & anor Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3221.H.C.A 366/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Nadeem V/S Sumaira Nadeem Sulemani and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3222.R.A (Civil Revision) 215/2022 (S.B.) Syed Munawar Ali Shah. V/S DFO, Sanghar @ Khipro & Ors. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 324
Matter:-Against Judgment
3223.Const. P. 757/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Razzaq S/o (Late) Abdul Jabbar V/S Irfan Ahmed and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3224.Cr.Bail 436/2022 (S.B.) Orangzaib jatio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
3225.Cr.Bail 363/2023 (S.B.) Suleman Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3226.I. A 64/2022 (D.B.) M/s. Grace Refinery Limited V/S The Learned 3rd ADJ Karachi West Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3227.H.C.A 97/2021 (D.B.) Alpha College Pvt Ltd V/S Globe Management Pvt Ltd & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3228.Cr.Bail 177/2022 (S.B.) Nazeer Kalhoro & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3229.Cr.Bail 440/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Aziz @ Azizullah Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3230.I. A 34/1985 (D.B.) Feroz Ali & Ors V/S United Bank Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BANKING
3231.H.C.A 5/2010 (D.B.) Mrs.Bushra Saeed V/S Saeeduddin Qureshi & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
3232.H.C.A 371/2022 (D.B.) Navaid Yamin V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3233.Cr.Bail 1430/2022 (S.B.) ABDUL JALIL S/O ABDUL AZIZ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3234.R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2006 (S.B.) Mst: Begum and Others V/S Irshad Ahmed Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 210
Matter:-OTHER
3235.H.C.A 129/2021 (D.B.) Mst. Raeesa Begum V/S Mst. Zubaida Idress Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 807
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3236.R.A (Civil Revision) 228/2017 (S.B.) Civil Aviation Authority V/S Afzal ur Rehman Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 SBLR Sindh 672
Matter:-OTHER
3237.H.C.A 214/2019 (D.B.) M/s. Emfore Corporation V/S M/s. OTIS Elevator Company & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 310
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3238.R.A (Civil Revision) 284/2000 (S.B.) WAPDA & Other V/S Muhammad Ashraf Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 583
Matter:-OTHER
3239.R.A (Civil Revision) 105/1998 (S.B.) Muhammad Saleem V/S Syed Bashir Ahmed and other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-AGAINST DEMOLITION OF MOSQUE
3240.R.A (Civil Revision) 113/2018 (S.B.) Muhammad Yaseen V/S Folad Khan Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-OTHER
3241.H.C.A 344/2022 (D.B.) Mst. Nasreen Qaiser & Another V/S Irfan Qaiser Saigol & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 167
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3242.Cr.Bail 312/2022 (S.B.) Abdul Ghaffar Chand V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3243.R.A (Civil Revision) 64/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar Kashmiri V/S Province of Sindh & Others. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
3244.Cr.Bail 1987/2022 (S.B.) AQEEL AHMED S/O GHULAM AKBAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3245.Const. P. 6939/2018 (D.B.) Adnan Hussain V/S CEO Cantonment Board Clifton and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3246.H.C.A 258/2009 (D.B.) Muhammad Liaquat Arain V/S M/s.Qamaran Construction Pvt.,Ltd., & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3247.Adm.A 2/2019 (D.B.) GLOBAL MARINE SERVICE ANOTHER V/S SELAT MARINE SERVICES CO. LLC ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RECOVERY
3248.M.A. 29/2022 (S.B.) Dildar. V/S Faizan Hanif Soomro & Another. Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Against Order
3249.R.A (Civil Revision) 157/2017 (S.B.) Hamzo Khan V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-OTHER
3250.Cr.Bail 978/2022 (S.B.) Rustam & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
3251.Cr.Bail 288/2022 (S.B.) Fakhrullah Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3252.Criminal Miscelleneous 649/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE V/S MST NAJMA & AN OTHERS Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-561-A Cr.P.C
3253.Cr.J.A 429/2017 (S.B.) ABDUL SATTAR @ GAMA @ DHOBI S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
3254.Const. P. 4469/2019 (D.B.) Nestle Pakistan Ltd V/S Full Bench NIRC & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 PLC Lab. 95
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3255.Const. P. 627/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Nizamuddin S/o Naseeruddin V/S Vth ADJ, Karachi West and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3256.Criminal Miscelleneous 85/2021 (S.B.) MST. ROZEENA RAZZAQ D/O ABDUL RAZZAQ V/S MIRZA MOHSIN ALI JAH & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 821
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3257.Adm.A 1/2015 (D.B.) TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN V/S MV HAN ZHONG MEN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 730
3258.H.C.A 282/2022 (D.B.) Karachi Gym Khana V/S Adeel Javed & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3259.I. A 11/2022 (D.B.) Zafar Hussain V/S Karim Bakhsh & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3260.H.C.A 313/2022 (D.B.) Galaxy Pharma Private Limited V/S AGP Limited & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 721
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3261.H.C.A 343/2018 (D.B.) Abida Tufail Palijo & another V/S Ambreen Bashir & (18) others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 786
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3262.Const. P. 5734/2022 (D.B.) Martin Dow Ltd V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 832
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3263.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 26/2015 (D.B.) Javed Iqbal Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-A.T.C.
3264.Const. P. 5772/2022 (D.B.) Naveed Yameen V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3265.H.C.A 318/2022 (D.B.) M/s. Askari General Insurance Co. Ltd V/S M/s. Tracking World Pvt. Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 731
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3266.Const. P. 5729/2022 (D.B.) Ayesha Shoaib Shaikh V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3267.Const. P. 5554/2022 (D.B.) Waheed ur Rehman and Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
3268.R.A (Civil Revision) 151/2011 (S.B.) Abdul Hayee, thr:L.Rs: &ors V/S Ghulam Mehdi and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3269.H.C.A 304/2022 (D.B.) M/s. Paramount Associates V/S Abdul Basit Godil & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3270.Const. P. 5572/2022 (D.B.) Martin Dow Ltd V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 568
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3271.Const. P. 2012/2015 (D.B.) Malik Ayaz A. Khan V/S KMC and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3272.H.C.A 315/2022 (D.B.) M/s. SK Enterprises and another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3273.H.C.A 159/2021 (D.B.) Sindhi Muslim Cooperative Housing Society V/S Mrs. Yasmeen Abdul Rehman Khan Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 672
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3274.Const. P. 5492/2022 (D.B.) HBL V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3275.Const. P. 5525/2022 (D.B.) M/s AMIA Energy V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3276.H.C.A 314/2022 (D.B.) Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority V/S ARY Communication Ltd & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3277.H.C.A 313/2022 (D.B.) Galaxy Pharma Private Limited V/S AGP Limited & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3278.Const. P. 2165/2016 (D.B.) Khursheed Khan & Associates V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 132
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3279.Const. P. 1944/2016 (D.B.) Bharucha & Co. V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 847
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3280.Const. P. 1910/2016 (D.B.) Vellani & Vellani V/S Province of SIndh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 265
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3281.I. A 50/1985 (D.B.) The Muslim Commercial Bank Ltd. V/S M/s. Aziz Brothers Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3282.Const. P. 2507/2022 (D.B.) Standard Chartered Bank Ltd V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 849
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3283.Const. P. 2508/2022 (D.B.) Standard Chartered Bank Ltd V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 735
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3284.Cr.Rev 57/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Murad Bhutto V/S Lal Bux Kosh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Application under section 561-A Cr.PC (Offence falling under two different enactments)
2022 SHC SUK 626The offences committed by the accused persons fall under two different enactments i.e. one under the Pakistan Penal Code and other under the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, therefore, there seems to be no bar in taking cognizance under the provisions of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3285.H.C.A 306/2022 (D.B.) Ghulam Muhammad and Others V/S Muhammad Mursaleen and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3286.H.C.A 178/2022 (D.B.) Sultan Ahmed Hashmani V/S M/s. Thatta Cement Company & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3287.Const. P. 5267/2022 (D.B.) Navaid Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 30
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF FIR/CUSTOM
3288.Spl. Federal Excise Reference Application 260/2013 (D.B.) Oxfor University Press Pakistan V/S Commissioner Inland Revenue & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 385
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3289.H.C.A 215/2022 (D.B.) Ishrat Swaleh V/S Mst. Farzana Shaikh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 588
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3290.Criminal Miscelleneous 462/2022 (S.B.) JAMAL SHAIKH S/O BILAL SHAIKH V/S IIIRD ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 312
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3291.H.C.A 270/2022 (D.B.) Al Haj Automotive Pvt Ltd. V/S Ali Wahid & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 600
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3292.Const. P. 4305/2013 (D.B.) Haji Bahadur V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3293.I.T.R.A 237/2019 (D.B.) JS GLOBAL CAPITAL LIMITED V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE+ Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3294.Const. P. 5063/2022 (D.B.) M/s Nishat Dairy Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 272
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3295.Const. P. 5062/2022 (D.B.) M/s Eastern Dairies Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 776
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3296.I. A 2/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Altaf Aziz & another V/S Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 228
Matter:-BANKING
3297.Const. P. 3305/2018 (D.B.) Shahrukh Ul Hassan & Other V/S P.O Sindh & Other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 220
Matter:-DIRECTION
3298.H.C.A 300/2022 (D.B.) Habib Bank Limited V/S Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 266
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3299.Const. P. 1584/2019 (D.B.) Mst, Saabi V/S P.O Sindh & Other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 SBLR Sindh 98
Matter:-PENSION
3300.H.C.A 225/2022 (D.B.) Junaid Akhtar Farooqi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 447
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3301.H.C.A 230/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Shafi Paracha V/S Muhammad Asmat Paracha & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3302.I. A 72/2022 (D.B.) Abid Mehmood V/S Taj Muhammad Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3303.H.C.A 242/2017 (D.B.) Muhammad Faisal V/S Syed Aamir Abbas Fazil & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 444
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3304.I. A 103/1994 (D.B.) Habib Bank Ltd V/S Sheer Pak, Ltd & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3305.Spl.H.C.A 180/2015 (D.B.) Navaid Abrar V/S National Bank of Pakistan and Others. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3306.H.C.A 279/2022 (D.B.) M/s Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. V/S Shahbaz Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3307.I. A 199/2017 (D.B.) Fairdeal Textiles (Pvt) Ltd. & others V/S Faysal Bank Ltd. & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BANKING
3308.R.A (Civil Revision) 60/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Irfan V/S Qadeer Muhammad Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-OTHER
3309.Const. P. 1019/2016 (D.B.) Anjuman-e-Imamia Sindh V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 4
Matter:-DIRECTION
3310.H.C.A 263/2017 (D.B.) Shaikh Muhammad Anwar & others V/S Rehmat Khan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3311.Cr.J.A 268/2012 (S.B.) Rizwanullah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3312.Cr.Bail 779/2025 (S.B.) Raza Ali @ Raza Muhammad Ramejo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3313.I. A 7/2021 (D.B.) Ellahi Bux Ansari V/S Gul Muhammad Soomro Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3314.Const. P. 1765/2022 (D.B.) Central Depository Co. of Pakistan Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 841
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3315.Const. P. 1763/2022 (D.B.) M/s Dolmen Real Estate Management Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 240
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3316.Const. P. 1766/2022 (D.B.) Central Depository Co. of Pakistan Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 331
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3317.Const. P. 1764/2022 (D.B.) M/s Dolmen Real Estate Management Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 100
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3318.Const. P. 4942/2022 (D.B.) Irfan Hussain Halai & Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3319.H.C.A 280/2022 (D.B.) Mst. Sarwari Khatoon through Attorney V/S Syed Imtiaz Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3320.I. A 56/2020 (D.B.) Rashid Hussain & another V/S Tausif Ahmed & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 364
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3321.H.C.A 10/2022 (D.B.) Haji Liaquat Hussain & Others V/S Mehmood Memon & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 897
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3322.H.C.A 258/2022 (D.B.) Abdul Kadar Hussain & Others V/S Shamrez Khan Mughal Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3323.H.C.A 262/2022 (D.B.) Pakistan Electronic Media Regulator Authority&Ors V/S ARY Communication Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 891
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3324.I. A 67/2022 (D.B.) Ali Asghar Hashim Ali V/S Shabbir Hussain & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3325.I. A 18/2021 (D.B.) Kishwar Naheed Bukhari V/S House Building Finance Corporation & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BANKING
3326.H.C.A 266/2022 (D.B.) Government of Sindh & Others V/S Muhammad Shahu & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3327.Const. P. 4358/2022 (D.B.) Muzammil Waqar V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
3328.I. A 66/2022 (D.B.) Ch. Ghulam Ali V/S Standard Chartered Bank Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3329.H.C.A 265/2022 (D.B.) Isra University & Others V/S Isra Islamic Foundation Guarntee Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 196
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3330.H.C.A 264/2022 (D.B.) Prof. Dr. Nazir Ashraf Laghari V/S Isra Islamic Foundation Guarntee Ltd & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 646
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3331.Const. P. 3612/2022 (D.B.) Dr. Ayesha Sameen V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3332.Const. P. 2599/2022 (D.B.) Ali Bux Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3333.Const. P. 4776/2022 (D.B.) Agriauto Stamping Co. Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 712
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3334.Const. P. 633/2016 (D.B.) Intikhab A. Syed V/S Chairman NAB and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
3335.H.C.A 260/2022 (D.B.) Toyota Port Qasim Motors V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3336.Const. P. 14/2020 (D.B.) Khalid Ubaid Siddiqui V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3337.H.C.A 242/2022 (D.B.) Competition Commission of Pakistan V/S Pakistan Sugar Mills Association Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3338.Const. P. 4697/2022 (D.B.) Lucky Motor Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3339.H.C.A 247/2022 (D.B.) Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd V/S Syed Qadir Dad Shah & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3340.H.C.A 250/2022 (D.B.) Shahabuddin & Others V/S Sammi & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 752
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3341.H.C.A 251/2022 (D.B.) Shahabuddin & Others V/S Khalil Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 522
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3342.H.C.A 249/2022 (D.B.) Shahabuddin & Others V/S Muhammad Shafi & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 478
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3343.H.C.A 213/2022 (D.B.) Mirza Naeem Ahmed Mughal V/S Soorty Enterprises (Private) LTD Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 695
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3344.H.C.A 223/2022 (D.B.) M/s. Popular Cement Industries Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 120
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3345.H.C.A 248/2022 (D.B.) East Rice Company Pvt Ltd & Others V/S Moon Rice Corporation & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3346.H.C.A 222/2022 (D.B.) M/s. Brisk Service Company and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3347.Cr.Bail 245/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Yaseen Sabzoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3348.Cr.Bail 220/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Hussain Tunio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3349.Cr.Bail 269/2022 (S.B.) Riaz Ali Mirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3350.Const. P. 684/2022 (D.B.) Ali Hassan and others V/S Returning Officer and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Elections Act, 2017 (Jurisdiction)
2022 SHC LAR 418It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted.Read more
3351.Const. P. 636/2022 (D.B.) Ali Hassan and others V/S Returning Officer of Union Council Jacobabad and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 SHC LAR 716
3352.Const. P. 2647/2022 (D.B.) Zakir Hussain Khokhar V/S Assistant Commissioner T.A.Yar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 606Election MatterRead more
Matter:-Nomination Paper
3353.Cr.Bail 1112/2022 (S.B.) ABDUL REHMAN GANDARO V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Delay in registration of FIR)
The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about eight months, such delay having not been explained plausibly could not be overlooked; the offence alleged against applicant is not falling within prohibitory clauseRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3354.Cr.Bail 893/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SAIF S/O MUHAMMAD JAVED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Delay in registration of FIR)
No rape has taken place; the delay of mere hours in lodgment of FIR could not be overlooked; the case has finally been challaned and there is no apprehension of tempering with the evidence on the part of applicantRead more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3355.Cr.Bail 734/2022 (S.B.) Masood Alam & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Protective Bail)
It is inter-alia contended that a false case has been registered against the applicants/accused due to enmity. It is further contended that applicants/accused are prepared to surrender before trial Court but the police at the behest of the complainant party had cordoned off the premises of the Court, as such, they are unable to appear before trial Court. Serious malafides on the part of the complainant and the police have been allegedRead more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3356.Cr.Bail 730/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Ishaque & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Protective Bail)
It is inter-alia contended that a false case has been registered against the applicants/accused due to enmity. It is further contended that applicants/accused are prepared to surrender before trial Court but the police at the behest of the complainant party had cordoned off the premises of the Court, as such, they are unable to appear before trial Court. Serious malafides on the part of the complainant and the police have been allegedRead more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3357.Cr.Bail 1981/2021 (S.B.) Tariq Ali Khan S/o Ahmed Ali Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Delay in registration of FIR)
The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about three months, such delay having not been explained plausibly could not be overlookedRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3358.Cr.Bail 739/2022 (S.B.) SYED AMINULLAH D/O SYED JAR UL HAQ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Rule of Consistency)
The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about four days, such delay could not be overlooked; the case has finally been challaned, the applicant has joined the trial; there is no allegation of misusing of concession of interim pre arrest bail on the part of applicant, more so co-accused Shah Bux and Muhammad Sheeraz have already been admitted to bail by learned trial Magistrate.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3359.Cr.Acq.A. 518/2021 (S.B.) HAJI GUL S/O ABDUL HAKEEM V/S MUHAMMAD JAMEEL & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3360.Const. P. 2361/2022 (D.B.) Arshad Hussain V/S Federation of Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Sindh Local Government (Election) Rules 2015
The remedy for challenging the order of the returning officer is available under section 18 (5) of the Sindh Local Government (Election) Rules 2015, before Election Appellate Authority by filing appeal.Read more
Matter:-Election Matter
3361.Const. P. 196/2022 (S.B.) Mst Balqees Khatoon V/S SHO PS Qubo Saeed Khan and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 SHC LAR 114
3362.Criminal Miscelleneous 453/2022 (S.B.) MISS.ASMA V/S IMRAN KHOKHAR & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-491 Cr.P.C
3363.Cr.Bail 708/2022 (S.B.) Iftikhar Hussain V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3364.Cr.Bail 676/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Murtaza & anothers V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BAIL
3365.Const. P. 4068/2022 (D.B.) Mushtaq Ahmed V/S The R.O and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
3366.Const. P. 4067/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Sohail V/S The R.O and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
3367.Const. P. 4066/2022 (D.B.) Kamran V/S The R.O and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (ECP)
3368.Const. P. 3072/2022 (D.B.) M/s Royal Textile V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3369.Cr.Bail 761/2022 (S.B.) JAWWAD S/O MUHAMMAD ZAMEEN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3370.Cr.Bail 153/2022 (S.B.) HASSAN ALI S/O MOR KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3371.Cr.Bail 784/2022 (S.B.) Daniyal Shahid S/o Shahid Rizwan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3372.Const. P. 379/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Kamran and Others V/S Assistant Provincial Registrar and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
3373.F.R.A 31/2019 (S.B.) Mrs. Zainab Adavi Thr. Ashfaque Ahmed Pathan V/S Major (R) Zakiauddin Khan Thr. his LRs and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CANTONMENT
3374.Cr.Bail 877/2022 (S.B.) SUFYAN S/O TUFAIL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3375.H.C.A 204/2021 (D.B.) Mst. Yasmeen Saleem & Others V/S Muhammad Azam Baig & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 637
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3376.I. A 30/2018 (D.B.) Muhammad Ameen V/S Director H.R. Department Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 150
Matter:-BANKING
3377.Const. P. 3077/2021 (D.B.) Prof: Dr. Arshad Aazmi V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3378.H.C.A 141/2015 (D.B.) Syed Ahmed Moin-ud-din & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 360
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3379.H.C.A 321/2021 (D.B.) Manzoor Ahmed Daudpota V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 576
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3380.H.C.A 176/2022 (D.B.) Mrs. Samina Yaqub & others V/S Jalil Ahmed Kapoor & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 123
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3381.Const. P. 1926/2018 (D.B.) Bushane Petroleum (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 12
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3382.H.C.A 291/2017 (D.B.) Civil Aviation Authority & another V/S Tahir Omer Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3383.I. A 87/2017 (D.B.) Muhammad Amir Qureshi V/S Shahid Ahmed & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3384.Const. P. 284/2019 (S.B.) Ramesh Kumar S/o Sitram Das V/S Hussain Ali and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3385.Const. P. 68/2022 (S.B.) M/S Fauji Fertilization Company V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DECLARATION
3386.Cr.Bail 78/2022 (S.B.) NASRUDDIN S/O MAHKUMUDDIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3387.Cr.Bail 791/2022 (S.B.) Shahid S/o Noor-ul-Haq V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3388.H.C.A 194/2020 (D.B.) Zeeshan Pervez V/S Muhammad Nasir Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3389.H.C.A 230/2017 (D.B.) K-Electric Limited V/S Muhammad Razi & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 923
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3390.H.C.A 418/2018 (D.B.) M/s. Rabia Construction Company & others V/S Muhammad Rais & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 651
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3391.H.C.A 14/2022 (D.B.) Abdul Sattar Khan Wajihi through attorney V/S All Pakistan Womens Association Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 848
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3392.Cr.Bail 790/2022 (S.B.) Samiullah S/o Sargand Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3393.Criminal Miscelleneous 245/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ABID S/O SAADULLAH V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3394.Const. P. 3531/2020 (D.B.) Faisal Manzoor Ansari V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 640
Matter:-SERVICE
3395.H.C.A 290/2009 (D.B.) M/s.Kazmia Trust Regd V/S M/s Kaz International Pvt.,& Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 459
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3396.R.A (Civil Revision) 42/2012 (S.B.) Ali Bux and others V/S Mst. Naziran and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3397.Const. P. 2633/2019 (D.B.) Owais Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
3398.Civil Revision 42/2012 (S.B.) Ali Bux and others V/S Mst. Naziran and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3399.Cr.J.A 80/2019 (S.B.) Hussain Bux Zangejo & 4 ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
3400.Cr.Bail 1302/2021 (S.B.) IMRAN AHMED S/O AHMED DIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3401.H.C.A 157/2016 (D.B.) Mst. Rasheeda Khatoon & others V/S United Bank Ltd. & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 748
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3402.F.R.A 1/2014 (S.B.) Faqir Muhammad V/S Mst Sakina and an Other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-OTHER
3403.Const. P. 399/2022 (D.B.) Aikta Kumari Hindu & Another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
3404.Const. P. 415/2022 (D.B.) Irfan Ali & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
3405.Const. P. 379/2022 (D.B.) Mst Wakeelan & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
3406.Const. P. 400/2022 (D.B.) Mst. Saba @ Sheena & another V/S S.S.P Sukkur & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
3407.Const. P. 3146/2018 (D.B.) Hassan Abbas V/S Khalid Abbas and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 690
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3408.H.C.A 289/2018 (D.B.) Hamza Hanif Awan & others V/S Sher Ali Mengal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3409.Criminal Appeal 295/2012 (S.B.) KHURRAM ARIF S/O IBNE ALI RIZVI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3410.Cr.Bail 755/2022 (S.B.) AKBER ALI S/O JUMMA V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3411.Cr.Acq.A. 142/2019 (S.B.) Muhammad Saleem Rajput V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3412.Const. P. 10/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Sarwar sahito V/S Mst Rabel & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
3413.Cr.Bail 769/2022 (S.B.) Saleem Ali S/o Tilu Chandio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3414.Criminal Miscelleneous 203/2022 (S.B.) Asif Ali Malik & Others V/S The State through APG Sukkur & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3415.H.C.A 79/2017 (D.B.) Mst. Khajida Begum & others V/S Altaf Hussain Abid & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3416.Cr.Rev 86/2022 (S.B.) GEORGE MASIH S/O SARDAR MASIH V/S ARSHAD MASIH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3417.Criminal Miscelleneous 20/2022 (S.B.) Jan Muhammad Jhullan V/S Sheerin Agha & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Miscellaneous Application .
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3418.Cr.Bail 307/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IRFAN BURNI S/O ABDUL AZIZ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3419.H.C.A 66/2021 (D.B.) Nadira Izhar V/S Karachi Development Authority Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3420.Const. P. 798/2020 (D.B.) Mst Rabia Chohan V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Detention
3421.Const. P. 1008/2019 (D.B.) Ghulam Hyder V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Inquiry
3422.I. A 40/2018 (D.B.) Aftab Ahmed V/S Umar Khan Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3423.I. A 30/2020 (D.B.) Dewan Farooq Spinning Mills Limited V/S M/s. Pak Libya Holding Co. (Pvt) Ltd. & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BANKING
3424.H.C.A 38/2022 (D.B.) Muhammad Nisar V/S Mst. Parveen Akhter and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3425.H.C.A 140/2022 (D.B.) Riaz Hussain V/S Shahid Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3426.Civil Revision 45/2019 (S.B.) Ameen Ullah V/S Mujeeb Ullah and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3427.R.A (Civil Revision) 45/2019 (S.B.) Ameen Ullah V/S Mujeeb Ullah and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3428.Const. P. 283/2021 (S.B.) Saeedullah Pirzada V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Rent Matter
3429.H.C.A 136/2022 (D.B.) Suit Southern Gas Company Limited V/S Madni Ahmed Ali Arfat Siddiqui & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3430.Const. P. 372/2017 (D.B.) Muhammad Nasir V/S SBCA & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3431.Cr.Bail 89/2022 (S.B.) AMIR SHAIKH @ BOBY S/O SAMAD SHAIKH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3432.Criminal Miscelleneous 173/2022 (S.B.) Khadim Hussain Bhatti V/S The State through APG Sukkur & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3433.I. A 78/2000 (D.B.) Fida Hussain V/S Khuram Shahzad Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3434.Const. P. 1269/2009 (D.B.) Agha S. Attaullah Shah S/o Agha S. Gul Hassan Sha V/S C.D.G.K., thr: DCO, Civic Centre, Karachi Sindh High Court, Karachi
3435.Cr.Bail 174/2022 (S.B.) SAEED KAMAL SHAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3436.Civil Revision 211/2019 (S.B.) Rano and others V/S Abdul Ghaffar and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3437.R.A (Civil Revision) 211/2019 (S.B.) Rano and others V/S Abdul Ghaffar and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3438.H.C.A 173/2020 (D.B.) Mst. Asma Tariq & another V/S Khalid Aftab & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3439.H.C.A 91/2022 (D.B.) Zafar Sayeed V/S Mst. Anjum Rehman & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3440.Cr.Bail 352/2022 (S.B.) NOMAN S/O ELAHI BUX & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3441.H.C.A 75/2012 (D.B.) Shaikh Muhammad Sabir V/S M/s. K.K Builders (Pvt) Ltd., and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
2022 SHC KHI 115
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3442.Civil Revision 8/2020 (S.B.) Ali Akbar deceased through his L.Rs. and others V/S Ali Anwar and another Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3443.R.A (Civil Revision) 8/2020 (S.B.) Ali Akbar deceased through his L.Rs. and others V/S Ali Anwar and another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and possession ), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Declaration and Injunction ), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Civil Revision under section 115 CPC), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Suit for Possession & Mesne Profit)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3444.Cr.Rev 127/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Ghafoor Mangi V/S Imtiaz Hussain & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3445.Cr.Bail 84/2022 (S.B.) Mst: Fatima Soomro & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3446.H.C.A 107/2022 (D.B.) Abdul Razzak Aghar V/S Dawood Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3447.H.C.A 119/2022 (D.B.) East Rice Company (Pvt) Ltd. & others V/S Moon Rice Corporation & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3448.Cr.Bail 19/2022 (D.B.) Abdul Shakoor Soomro V/S DG NAB Sukkur Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
3449.Const. P. 85/2012 (D.B.) Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 407
3450.Const. P. 44/2022 (D.B.) Economic Engineering Co. (Pvt) Ltd V/S KPT Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3451.Cr.Acq.A. 73/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Razzaque Gabol V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3452.Cr.Bail 78/2022 (S.B.) Zulfiqar Ali Kalwar & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3453.Cr.Bail 100/2022 (S.B.) Sagheer Ahmed Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3454.Const. P. 123/2022 (S.B.) M/s. Muhammad Ali & Company (Deceased) Thr. LRs V/S Ali Akbar and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3455.Const. P. 123/2022 (S.B.) M/s. Muhammad Ali & Company (Deceased) Thr. LRs V/S Ali Akbar and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3456.Civil Revision 2/2022 (S.B.) Karim Bux through his Lrs & Others V/S Manohar Lal Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3457.R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2022 (S.B.) Karim Bux through his Lrs & Others V/S Manohar Lal Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3458.H.C.A 22/2016 (D.B.) Khalil Mughal V/S Pakistan International Airline Corporation Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3459.Suit 1979/2019 (S.B.) Syed Sulaiman Jafri V/S United Bank Limited & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 836
Matter:-SUIT FOR DECLERATION
3460.H.C.A 138/2015 (D.B.) Karachi Municipal Corporation V/S Dilawar Hussain & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 558
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3461.H.C.A 40/2022 (D.B.) M/s. Metro International School Pvt Ltd & Others V/S The S.B.C.A & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3462.Criminal Miscelleneous 884/2021 (S.B.) Ghulam Sarwar Mashori V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3463.H.C.A 60/2020 (D.B.) Military Estate Officer V/S Ardeshir Cowasjee & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
3464.H.C.A 208/2019 (D.B.) Paramount Communications (Pvt) Ltd. & another V/S Ministry of Communications & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ARBITRATION
3465.Cr.Bail 110/2022 (S.B.) Ali Gul Jaffery V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3466.H.C.A 114/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Ashfaq V/S Tanzeem Ahmed Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3467.H.C.A 234/2016 (D.B.) Attaullah & others V/S Sanaullah & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 508
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3468.Criminal Miscelleneous 736/2021 (S.B.) NAWAB ALI S/O HASHIM KHAN V/S XTH ADJ KARACHI SOUTH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3469.Criminal Miscelleneous 172/2021 (S.B.) SALEEM S/O MUHAMMAD HANEEF V/S THE STATE & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3470.Const. P. 1639/2022 (D.B.) Akhtar Alam & another V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF FIR/CUSTOM
3471.H.C.A 48/2022 (D.B.) National Bank of Pakistan V/S M/s Shabbir Enterprises Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3472.H.C.A 332/2021 (D.B.) M/s. Reign Pharmaceuticals PCSIR KLC Pvt Ltd V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 328
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3473.Civil Revision 74/2020 (S.B.) Ameer Ahmed Jagirani V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 SHC SUK 840
3474.Cr.Bail 89/2022 (S.B.) Shah Faisal and another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
3475.Cr.Bail 2406/2021 (S.B.) ABDULLAH @ YAQOOB S/O AMEER JAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3476.Suit 2260/2017 (S.B.) Muhammad Hassan Keerio V/S Province of Sindh & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECLARATION
3477.Const. P. 7270/2017 (D.B.) Syed Basit Abbas V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SHAHEED BENEFIT
3478.Suit 1598/2013 (S.B.) M/S. SHAHEED SHAH INAYAT VILLAGE RES.WELF. V/S ASHIQ HUSSAIN VIGHIO & OTHERS. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECLARATION
3479.Cr.Bail 399/2022 (S.B.) SYED WISAL HAIDER NAQVI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3480.I. A 25/2020 (D.B.) Dewan Salman Fiber Limited V/S M/s. Saudi Pak Industrial & Agricultural Inv. Co. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BANKING
3481.Cr.Bail 780/2021 (S.B.) Ali Murad Sundrani & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3482.Const. P. 85/2022 (S.B.) Khurram Khan S/o Mohammad Saleem Khan V/S Learned XXI Family Judge, Khi South and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
3483.Criminal Miscelleneous 159/2022 (S.B.) FAZAL MEHMOOD S/O MUHAMMAD TARIQ V/S MST. AROMA MEHWISH KHAN ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3484.H.C.A 166/2021 (D.B.) Mrs. Parveen Mahmood V/S Thai Airways International Public Co. Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3485.Cr.Rev 20/2016 (S.B.) Noor Habib V/S Said Wali & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3486.Const. P. 149/2022 (D.B.) Mir Ghulam Abbas Jakhrani V/S DG NAB Sukkur & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
3487.Adm.A 2/2014 (D.B.) KARADENIZ POWERSHIP KAYA BEY V/S LAKHRA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3488.Const. P. 8/2022 (S.B.) Mohammad Nadeem Khoso V/S M/S Ali Akbar Enterrises & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3489.Const. P. 9/2022 (S.B.) Zafar Gul Khan Pathan V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3490.I. A 10/2003 (D.B.) Shabbir Ahmed Abbasi V/S M/s. U.B.L and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3491.Spl.H.C.A 250/2001 (D.B.) National Bank of Pakistan V/S Shahyar Textile Mills Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3492.Cr.Bail 80/2022 (S.B.) HANIFULLAH S/O ABDUL WAHAB V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3493.Cr.Bail 91/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Rasool Panhyar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3494.H.C.A 225/2020 (D.B.) Shahnawaz Dakhan through Attorney Muhammad Hassan V/S Wieb Rosemarie Dakhan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 560
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3495.Criminal Miscelleneous 683/2020 (S.B.) Moulana Shahzado Dreho V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3496.Const. P. 183/2022 (S.B.) Faqir Muhammad S/o Suleman V/S IInd Rent Controller/SCJ, Khi East and another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3497.Cr.Rev 44/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD KHAN S/O HABIBULLAH V/S MUSAWIR HUSSAIN & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3498.Criminal Miscelleneous 136/2022 (S.B.) LIAQUAT ALI S/O HAIDER CHANDIO & ORS V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3499.Const. P. 171/2022 (S.B.) Muhammad Nadeem S/o Ghulam Mohiuddin V/S Hammad Ahmed and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-COMPLIANCE OF ORDER
3500.Cr.Acq.A. 120/2022 (S.B.) MST. REHANA BEGUM W/O MUHAMMAD HANIF V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3501.Cr.Bail 813/2021 (S.B.) Jan Muhammad @ Jan & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3502.Criminal Miscelleneous 513/2020 (S.B.) BAKHT M SAHIBZADA S/O USMAN GHANI V/S THE SHO P.S SURJANI TOWN & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3503.Cr.Rev 21/2020 (S.B.) RIZWAN AHMED S/O MAQBOOL AHMED V/S SHAH NAWAZ JOKHIO & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3504.Criminal Appeal 112/2022 (S.B.) NOOR MUHAMMAD S/O KHORMI V/S SAEED AHMED & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3505.Const. P. 1497/2020 (D.B.) Nasir Kamal V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 31
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
3506.Const. P. 1/2020 (D.B.) Muhib Hussain Pirzado V/S Federation of Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
3507.Const. P. 541/2017 (D.B.) Mst. Rafia Bano Khokhar & another V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
3508.Criminal Appeal 7/2022 (S.B.) Wazeer Lund V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 831
3509.Criminal Appeal 3/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Murtaza @ Ali Gul V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 121
3510.Criminal Appeal 2/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Murtaza @ Ali Gul V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 371
3511.Criminal Appeal 245/2021 (S.B.) Gulzar & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SHC HYD 688
3512.Cr.Bail 601/2021 (S.B.) Syed Mujahid Hussain Shah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3513.Cr.Bail 317/2022 (S.B.) Ghulam Hyder Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3514.H.C.A 13/2022 (D.B.) Muhammmad Sadiq V/S Dawood Jan Muhammad & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 845
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3515.H.C.A 227/2020 (D.B.) Umar Baig & others V/S M. Aslam Suleman Toberia & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 446
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3516.Cr.Bail 271/2021 (D.B.) Kamaluddin V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3517.Cr.Bail 88/2022 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AKBAR MAGSI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3518.Const. P. 6644/2017 (D.B.) ARY Communication (Pvt) Ltd & another V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
3519.Cr.Bail 14/2022 (S.B.) Jinsar Ali Ujjan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3520.Cr.Bail 828/2021 (S.B.) Haresh Hindu V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3521.Cr.J.A 34/2021 (S.B.) Waqas Qayoom Arain V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-R.I FOR 15 YEARS & ABOVE
3522.Const. P. 7400/2022 (D.B.) LHYWA Medical Store V/S Administrator Karachi & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 233
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
3523.Const. P. 5359/2019 (D.B.) I.G General Trading (L.L.C) & Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
3524.I.T.C 483/2004 (D.B.) Commissioner(Legal Division) V/S M/s.Pakistan Petroleum Ltd., Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Income-tax (Adhoc Additions)
2022 SHC KHI 278We, therefore, under the circumstances are of the view that the income tax department does not have the authority or jurisdiction to make ad hoc additions to the income of an assessee though they do possess the authority under the law to make additions to the income of the appellant/assessee which in their opinion either not in accordance with law or after giving valid and cogent reasons for the same.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3525.Cr.Bail 681/2021 (S.B.) Shabban Sohu V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3526.Cr.Bail 835/2021 (S.B.) Qambar Ali Soomro V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3527.H.C.A 23/2022 (D.B.) Haroon Abdullah V/S PALPA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 414
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3528.H.C.A 325/2021 (D.B.) Adnan Aziz Ahmed V/S Rakil Ahmed Zaman & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 208
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3529.Cr.Acq.A. 156/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Ghani V/S Muhammad Azam Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3530.Cr.Bail 789/2021 (S.B.) Zeeghamuddin V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3531.Cr.Bail 705/2021 (S.B.) Sharafuddin V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3532.Cr.Rev 132/2021 (S.B.) Muzaffar Ali Phulpoto V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3533.Cr.Bail 755/2021 (S.B.) Syed Hassan Ali Shah V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3534.Cr.Rev 25/2021 (S.B.) Akhtiar Ali Khan V/S State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3535.Cr.Acq.A. 147/2021 (S.B.) State through P.G V/S Haleem Adil Shaikh Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3536.Cr.Acq.A. 154/2021 (S.B.) Taufique Ahmed Mastoi V/S Muhammad Ayoob Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3537.Cr.Acq.A. 145/2021 (S.B.) Altaf Hussain Sahito V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3538.Cr.Acq.A. 41/2021 (S.B.) SSGC Sukkur V/S Amanullah Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3539.H.C.A 356/2021 (D.B.) Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. V/S United Energy Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHC KHI 671
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3540.Cr.Bail 2138/2021 (S.B.) SABIR ALI S/O NABI BUKSH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3541.Cr.Misc. 859/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Mithal Lakho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3542.H.C.A 340/2021 (D.B.) Adnan Saleem & Others V/S Mst. Shazia & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 347
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3543.H.C.A 168/2021 (D.B.) Shaikh Waseem Ahmed & Another V/S Pir Muhammad Qasim Quraishi & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1433
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3544.H.C.A 341/2021 (D.B.) Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan Limited V/S Iqbal Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 355
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3545.H.C.A 317/2021 (D.B.) Waseem Ahmed & Another V/S Parveen Rahim Niaz & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 330
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3546.Cr.Bail 1970/2021 (S.B.) SULEMAN KHAN S/O HAYATULLAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3547.Cr.Bail 826/2021 (S.B.) MASHOOQ ALI CHANDIO S/O NAWAZ ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3548.Cr.Bail 2248/2021 (S.B.) IMRAN NASEER S/O NASEER AHMED V/S THE STATE THROUGH DAG Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3549.Cr.Bail 2281/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SABIR S/O MUHAMMAD ASHRAF V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3550.Cr.Bail 2109/2021 (S.B.) MST. MAFIA @ SOHAIL ANJUM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3551.Cr.Bail 2031/2021 (S.B.) ATIF SHAKEEL @ RAJA SHAKEEL & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3552.Cr.Bail 2282/2021 (S.B.) GHULAM HAIDER S/O RASOOL BUX V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3553.Cr.Bail 2086/2021 (S.B.) MEHBOOB S/O ABDUL BARI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3554.Cr.Bail 662/2021 (S.B.) SYED FAIZ BUKHARI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3555.Cr.Bail 549/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Ismail and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3556.Suit 1243/2015 (S.B.) M/s. Mashal Welfare Foundation V/S The Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECLARATION
3557.Cr.Bail 2147/2021 (S.B.) SYED ABID ALI S/O SYED SAJJAD ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3558.Civil Revision 221/2021 (S.B.) P.O Sindh and others V/S Ahmed Nawaz and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SHC HYD 1001
3559.H.C.A 67/2007 (D.B.) Muhammad Hussain Qureshi V/S Mrs Mumtaz Muzakkir & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 702
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3560.H.C.A 319/2021 (D.B.) Creek Marina Singapore PTE Ltd and Others V/S Siddiqsons Private Limited and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1130
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3561.Suit 2578/2014 (S.B.) Muhammad Ali Barry. V/S Kaybee Snacks & Others. Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Jurisdiction (Plaint Retuned U/Order 7 rule 11 CPC. definition of ???Intellectual Property Act, 2012??? is barred)
2021 SHC KHI 1029
Matter:-DECLARATION
3562.H.C.A 303/2021 (D.B.) Defence Housing Authority V/S Muhammad Farhan Wazir & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 918
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3563.Cr.Bail 9/2021 (S.B.) ALI WAQAS S/O AMEER HUSSAIN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3564.Suit 551/2019 (S.B.) Aqeel Karim Dedhi. V/S Surror Investment Ltd., & Others. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Suit for Specific Performance
3565.Suit 184/2012 (S.B.) SYED MUHAMMAD IQBAL HUSSAIN V/S MRS.TASNEEM KAUSAR ALVI & ORS. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Dispute
3566.Suit 2551/2014 (S.B.) M. Najeeb Usman. V/S Sharik Affandi. Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: PLAINT RETURNED U O 7 RULE 10
2021 SHC KHI 1026In view of what has been discussed above, leave me with no option but to conclude that instant suit is not maintainable before this Court and is liable to be returned for its presentation before the Court within whose local territorial jurisdiction the property is situated. Accordingly, the plaint of the plaintiff be returned; plaintiff is at liberty to file plaint in the Court having jurisdiction. CMA No.8009/2013 is allowed.Read more
Matter:-DECLARATION
3567.Cr.Bail 1502/2021 (S.B.) MST. ZAHIDA W/O FAIZ ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3568.Cr.Bail 2074/2021 (S.B.) DANISH HUSSAIN @ KUBRA S/O GHULAM HAIDER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3569.Cr.Bail 1992/2021 (S.B.) FARHAN S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3570.Cr.Bail 2204/2021 (S.B.) PERVAIZ AKHTAR S/O TALIB HUSSAIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3571.Cr.Rev 261/2021 (S.B.) MRS. SHABANA W/O SYED MUNAWAR HUSSAIN V/S RUSTAM & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3572.Criminal Appeal 465/2020 (S.B.) ALTAF HUSSAIN S/O FAZAL MEHMOOD V/S HABIB UR REHMAN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3573.Cr.Bail 1758/2021 (S.B.) ABDUL GHANI S/O GHULAM RASOOL & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3574.Cr.Bail 1968/2021 (S.B.) ABDUL MAJEED S/O ABDUL HAMEED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3575.Cr.Bail 2351/2021 (S.B.) NOMAN QURESHI S/O FAROOQ QURESHI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3576.Const. P. 2/2021 (D.B.) Ghulam Murtaza Mehar and Others V/S Chairman NAB and Others Sindh High Court, Karachiprotective bail grantedRead more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3577.Civil Revision 159/2019 (S.B.) Manu and others V/S Haji Sardar Khan Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
3578.Const. P. 80/2021 (D.B.) Lucky Landmark (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiIO has also been directed to use the modern technology for further investigation in the matter.Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, shall collect the reports from all the internment centres well before the next date of hearing and submit the same before this Court, else appeRead more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3579.Cr.Bail 1533/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD MUNEER S/O BILAL & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3580.I. A 96/2018 (D.B.) Mehmood Alam & others V/S Muhammad Sultan Salahuddin & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1275
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3581.Cr.Bail 1894/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD IQBAL S/O NOOR MUHAMMAD ISMAIL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3582.Cr.Bail 1886/2021 (S.B.) DADULLAH S/O ATTA MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3583.R.A (Civil Revision) 115/2003 (S.B.) Ismail & Ors V/S Allahdino & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
3584.Cr.Bail 1780/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD JAWED S/O ARSHAD IQBAL & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3585.Cr.Bail 1736/2021 (S.B.) REHMAN KALEEM S/O KALEEM NASIR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3586.Cr.Bail 2060/2021 (S.B.) ALLAH RAKHA S/O KHUSHI MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3587.Cr.Bail 1951/2021 (S.B.) NASEER AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD HANEEF V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3588.Cr.Bail 730/2021 (S.B.) Jinsar Ali Lund V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 SHC SUK 1198
3589.Cr.Bail 2033/2021 (S.B.) SHAHID HUSSAIN S/O GHAFFAR ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Sindh Prohibition, Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and use of Gutka and Manpuri Act, 2019)
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3590.Cr.Bail 1608/2021 (S.B.) MST. NAZ BIBI W/O ZUBAIR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3591.Cr.Bail 2009/2021 (S.B.) SHAHNAWAZ REHMAN S/O ABDUL REHMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3592.R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2003 (S.B.) The Islamic Repubilec Of Pakistan V/S Rahim Bux & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SHC HYD 246
3593.Cr.Bail 1831/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AJAAN KHAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3594.Cr.Bail 1544/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD SHAHID S/O ABDUL RAZAQUE V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3595.Cr.Bail 1913/2021 (S.B.) IMTIAZ ALI S/O MEHBOOB ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3596.Cr.Bail 1662/2021 (S.B.) ATTA FAROOQ S/O MALIK RASOOL BUX V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3597.Cr.Bail 1955/2021 (S.B.) MST. HAJRA W/O ZOHAIB V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3598.Criminal Appeal 47/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Siddique & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 SHC SUK 612
3599.H.C.A 246/2021 (D.B.) M/s. United Bank Limited V/S Mukhtar Ahmed Shah Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 760
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3600.Cr.Bail 47/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Siddique & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 SHC SUK 875
3601.Cr.Bail 672/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: CNS Act, 1997 (Non-association of private witness)
The place of incident is public thoroughfare as it is a transport Ada where so many people including the transporter used to remain available; however, none from them was associated as witness in this case. No doubt, applicability of Section 103 Cr.P.C is ousted under the Act, yet Police Officer went to charge a person for the offence which carries punishment in shape of his detention then it was incumbent upon the Police Officer to associate independent person for witnessing the recovery proceedings.Read more
3602.Const. P. 438/2015 (D.B.) Shahnaz Akhtar V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
3603.Const. P. 506/2021 (D.B.) Shadia Jaffer V/S NAB and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiSection 7, powers to deal with the bail matters have been conferred upon the Courts having been established under NAO 1999.constitution petition is converted to protective bail and protective bail granted to apear before administrative JudgeRead more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3604.Const. P. 681/2015 (D.B.) Aftab Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
3605.Cr.Bail 1046/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AZEEM S/O ABDUL HAMEED & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3606.Cr.Bail 1633/2021 (S.B.) ABU TAHIR S/O MUMTAZ AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3607.H.C.A 171/2006 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Asar & Ors V/S Karachi Building Control Authority & Or Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 534
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3608.Cr.Bail 1959/2021 (S.B.) FAZAL UR REHMAN S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD MUGHAL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3609.Cr.Bail 322/2021 (S.B.) AShfaque Mangno & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3610.Cr.Bail 1746/2020 (S.B.) ABDUL LATIF S/O MEERAL NAREJO & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3611.Cr.Bail 1746/2021 (S.B.) ABDUL RAB BABAR S/O ABDUL QAYYUM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3612.Cr.Bail 641/2021 (S.B.) Nizamuddin Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Bail Matters (Bail After Arrest---497- Under S. 302 PPC)
Accused seeks post-arrest bail in the offence punishably 302, 148, 149, 504, 337H(ii) PPC. The dispute between applicant and complainant party is over matrimonial enmity. Even otherwise, the role attributed against present applicant is of mere presence at the place of wardat and no specific role is assigned to him. No active role has been assigned to the present applicant in causing death of deceased . on merits he has prima facie got good case for grant of bail .Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Election Matter
3613.Cr.Bail 589/2021 (S.B.) Jam Khushhahl V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Procedure Code Cr.P.C Bail After Arrest---497 (Reasonable grounds - further enquiry CaseLaw)
Applicant seeks bail in U/S 336,324PPC.Complaint inspite of Service failed to appear. Name of Applicant is not mentioned in FIR but same was disclosed by Complainant after five months as further Statement. Bail granted on the ground that further statement may not be equated with FIR nor it could be believed in totoRead more
3614.Cr.Acq.A. 130/2019 (D.B.) Mst. Wazeeran Solangi V/S Abdullah Khan and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Procedure Code (Acquittal Appeal )
Appeal filed against Acquittal U/S 265 k Crpc involved in Crime U/S 302, 364, 457, 344, 343 PPC. allegations of abduction as well as of murdering the son of appellant / complainant are leveled against respondents, therefore, it was mandatory for the trial Court to record evidence of the parties after framing of charge impugned order is unjustified and cannot be maintained. Accordingly, same is hereby set aside. Consequently, this appeal against acquittal is hereby allowed.Read more
3615.Const. P. 6075/2021 (D.B.) Nishat Sutas Dairy Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INFRASTRUCTURE CESS
3616.Const. P. 6140/2021 (D.B.) Hiba Weaving Mills Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INFRASTRUCTURE CESS
3617.Const. P. 8056/2017 (D.B.) Saddam Hussain & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Appointment of differently abled persons on quota
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
3618.Const. P. 6078/2021 (D.B.) Saya Weaving Mills Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INFRASTRUCTURE CESS
3619.Cr.Bail 579/2021 (S.B.) Razi Khan Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3620.Cr.Bail 575/2021 (S.B.) Shabbir Ahmed Magsi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3621.Cr.Bail 621/2021 (S.B.) Nazeer Ahmed Kosh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3622.Const. P. 2805/2019 (D.B.) Syed Sami ur Rehman V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3623.Const. P. 5112/2020 (D.B.) Habibullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Employees Old Age Benefits Act, 1976
Matter:-PENSION
3624.Const. P. 2835/2021 (D.B.) Immaduddin Langah V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
3625.Const. P. 3172/2016 (D.B.) Cyrus Cowasjee and Ors V/S V/S KMC and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 183
3626.Const. P. 5098/2020 (D.B.) Imtiaz Ali Chandio V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Deceased Son Quota
2021 SHC KHI 486
Matter:-SERVICE
3627.Const. P. 4816/2021 (D.B.) Hubdar Ali Khaki V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Education Foundation Act, 1992
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
3628.Const. P. 3288/2013 (D.B.) Syed Muhammad Shah and Ors V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Challenging Recruitment Process
2021 SHC KHI 593
Matter:-SERVICE
3629.Const. P. 1955/2018 (D.B.) Naeem Shah V/S Clifton Cantonment Board and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3630.Cr.J.A 233/2019 (S.B.) Imdad Ali Bozdar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Appeal (Appeal)
Appeals separately filed by the appellants Imdad Ali and Muhammad Nawaz against conviction and sentenced to suffer R.I for life as Tazir and to pay Rs.200,000/- each. complainant Amir Bux Bozdar lodged the FIR on 17-07-2010 alleging therein that there was matrimonial dispute between him. Complainant along with his brothers were going from their village in their Mehran Car for treatment. When they reached Lund Miner .where they saw and identified accused had made straight fires upon them with intention to commit their murder Mst. Shakeelan had sustained one firearm injury on back side of her head, then died. mere relationship of these eye-witnesses with the deceased alone is not enough to discard the testimony of complainant and his witnesses. direct evidence also finds corroboration from the medical evidence with regard to cause of death of deceased. The evidence of eye witnesses/injured was consistent ,truthful and confidence inspiringRead more
3631.Cr.Misc. 509/2021 (S.B.) Mst.Iqbal Rid V/S The State Through ADG Sukkur & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Procedure Code
Crl. Misc. Application, applicant Mst. Iqbal Rid seeking direction for SHO PS Kotdiji to register the FIR against the proposed accused. Applicant in order to pressurize her opponents, has filed this application to falsely implicate them to take revenge, Application is dismissed.Read more
3632.Const. P. 3518/2018 (D.B.) Henkel Industrial Adhesive Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Custom Act, 1969
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3633.Const. P. 5874/2018 (D.B.) Muhammad Hashim Khan & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Custom Act, 1969
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3634.Const. P. 1732/2019 (D.B.) M/s Bilal Brothers Ind and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Custom Act, 1969
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3635.Const. P. 1316/2019 (D.B.) M/s Dua Ind & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Custom Act, 1969
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3636.R.A (Civil Revision) 96/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Ali & Others V/S Mashooque Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3637.Const. P. 2963/2019 (D.B.) Syed Yousuf Ali Shah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-Land Matters
3638.Const. P. 1256/2019 (D.B.) Mrs. Farida Mansoor V/S S.B.C.A and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
3639.Const. P. 3337/2019 (D.B.) M/s GBM Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3640.Const. P. 9020/2018 (D.B.) M/s Talha Enterprises V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3641.Const. P. 8094/2018 (D.B.) M/s Waseem Enterprises and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Custom Act, 1969
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3642.Cr.Misc. 610/2020 (S.B.) Anwar Ali Chandio V/S The State through D.P.G Sukkur & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurApplicant has impugned the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge for registration of FIR, which was allowed. FIR u/s 420, 489-F PPC has been registered. Application has become infructuous and dismissed .Read more
3643.R.A (Civil Revision) 68/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Hassan V/S Muhammad Aslam & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3644.Cr.Misc. 547/2020 (S.B.) Lal Khan Katpar V/S Gul Muhammad Katpar and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Procedure Code
Applicant has impugned the order passed by learned Sessions Judge for registration of FIR, which was allowed . FIR bearing Crime No. 123/2020 has been registered at police station. Application has become infructuous, therefore the same is dismissed being in-fructuous.Read more
3645.Cr.Bail 511/2021 (S.B.) Noor Hussan Bhayo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3646.Cr.Misc. 550/2021 (S.B.) Khair Muhannad V/S The State & 43 Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurApplicant has impugned the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge for registration of FIR, which was dismissed, Record reflects that report was also called from DSP Complaint Cell Khairpur about the incident, who submitted in his report that the allegations leveled by the application could not be proved and proposed accused have vacated. e impugned order passed by learned Ex Officio Justice of Peace Khairpur is speaking one and within the four corners of law, no illegally or irregularity found in the said order, Crl. Misc. Application is dismissed.Read more
3647.Cr.Misc. 89/2021 (S.B.) Shakeel Ahmed Rajper & Ors V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurApplicants have impugned the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge for registration of FIR, which was allowed . Record shows that respondent No. 3 has alleged that the applicants have demanded Bhatta from him, but he has failed to produce any such documentary proof in order to strengthen his case, therefore the impugned order is set-aside and instant Crl. Misc. Application is allowed.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
3648.Cr.Misc. 518/2020 (S.B.) Aftab Hussain Chachar V/S SHO Belo Mirpur Mathelo and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Criminal Procedure Code
Misc. Application, filed by applicant on the ground that Ex-Officio Justice was allowed, for registration of FIR. actually respondent No.3 is legally wedded wife of the applicant, applicant is husband of respondentNo.3 and the sister of the applicant is wife of brother of respondent No.3, and the family suit for maintenance filed by the sister of the applicant has been decreed, which shows that there is dispute between the parties over the matrimonial affairs. Application is allowed and order learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge is set aside.Read more
3649.Const. P. 1734/2020 (D.B.) Mst. Irum & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Employees Social Security Act, 2016 (Sindh Workers Welfare Board)
Matter:-DIRECTION
3650.Criminal Miscelleneous 273/2021 (S.B.) MST. SEEMA D/O LATE NOOR MUHAMMAD V/S WAJID ALI SHAH & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1173Applicant filed this Crl, Msic. Application, impugned the order dated 06.04.2021 passed by learned 6th A.D.J Karachi South whereby her Cr. Rev. Application No.23/2021 filed against order dated 09.02.2021 of 7th Judicial Magistrate Karachi South in Cr. Case No.1794/2017, was dismissed. The respondent lodged FIR against her ex-wife on the ground of committing fraud and cheating in obtaining Pakistani passport for her personal gain by showing her wrong date of birth. It has been held that the present petitioner was/is not said to be a civil servant or employed in some institution where the date of birth was/is material for some advantage or gains. I am conscious that for such a civil servant/employee the alteration/change in the date of birth has been discouraged but for ordinary person the same was/is not strictly prohibited because an ordinary person normally was/is not likely to take any advantage/benefit with change of such date of birth unless otherwise, so is proved/established. Cr. MA was allowed. Cr.Misc. Appln. No.319/2020; Cr.Rev. No.135/2020 and CP No.S-445/2020 was referred in support of above as well PLD 1959 Lahore 566 and 2020 SCMR 316.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3651.H.C.A 258/2017 (D.B.) Ameer Ali V/S Syeda Fazle Fatima Fazli & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Limitation )
2021 SHC KHI 1263
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3652.Const. P. 5171/2021 (D.B.) Shabbir Aslam V/S The Sect: Defence and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Jurisdiction (Issue attained finality)
Matter:-PENSION
3653.Const. P. 250/2021 (S.B.) Faiz Muhammad Gabol V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Harasment
3654.Civil Revision 88/2018 (S.B.) Muhammad Ghazi Bhutto V/S Mian Manzoor Ahmed Samejo Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurApplicant herein filed a civil suit against the respondent for declaration and permanent injunction alleging therein that he had purchased a plot, from one Muhammad Sharif . respondent along with some unknown persons came at the plot and showed that he had obtained a general power of attorney from Muhammad Sharif and claimed to be the owner of the suit plot. The inconsistent position taken by the applicant in his pleadings and evidence leads to irritable inference that he himself is not sure about the exact survey number and location of his plot. instant civil revision application is dismissed.Read more
3655.Const. P. 204/2021 (S.B.) Mumtaz Ali Kalwar V/S Inspector General Police Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CRIMINAL CASE
3656.Cr.Bail 289/2021 (S.B.) Imtiaz Banglani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3657.Cr.Misc. 643/2021 (S.B.) Muhammad Aurangzeb V/S Senior Superintendent, Sukkur &2 others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3658.Const. P. 5343/2013 (D.B.) Nawab Zadi V/S Govt. of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Judgment in rem / personam
Matter:-SERVICE
3659.Cr.Bail 528/2021 (S.B.) Zulfiqar Kori V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Bail Matters (Arms Act cases )
Applicant seeks the bail from this Court, under sections 24, Sindh Arms Act, 2013. applicant was nominated in aforesaid Crime with role of causing firearm injury to one Ghulam Yaseen on his left leg causing fracture of lower end of the tibia. After recovering the pistol from the possession of the applicant, police sent the same to ballistic expert along with crime empties and the report of the ballistic expert has received as positive .Hence, instant application is dismissed.Read more
3660.Cr.Bail 529/2021 (S.B.) Zulfiqar Kori V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3661.Cr.Bail 519/2021 (S.B.) Imamuddin V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3662.Cr.Bail 463/2021 (S.B.) Shafique Ahmed Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3663.Cr.Bail 447/2021 (S.B.) Badal Khan Gaho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3664.Cr.Acq.A. 17/2021 (D.B.) Ghulam Shabir Abro V/S Amjad Ali Shahani & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3665.Const. P. 5472/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Arif V/S Sect: Education and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Challenging Recruitment Process (Grievance Redressal Committee)
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
3666.Const. P. 3935/2016 (D.B.) M/s Al-Zarina Glass Bangle and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
3667.Cr.Acq.A. 17/2020 (D.B.) Ghulam Shabir Abro V/S Amjad Ali Shahani & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3668.Cr.Bail 162/2021 (S.B.) Jawed Khan & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3669.Cr.Bail 374/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Hakeem Mirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3670.Suit 1243/2015 (S.B.) M/s. Mashal Welfare Foundation V/S The Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECLARATION
3671.Cr.Bail 430/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Ghaffar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3672.Criminal Miscelleneous 291/2021 (S.B.) Ali Akber Lashari V/S Hussain Bux @ Wadero Khan Jamali and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
3673.Criminal Miscelleneous 13/2021 (D.B.) Feroz Ahmed Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3674.Cr.Bail 284/2021 (S.B.) Wazir Ali Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3675.Cr.Bail 393/2021 (S.B.) Ashique Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3676.Cr.Misc. 345/2021 (S.B.) Aneel V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Bail Cancellation (Bail order Maintained)
3677.Cr.Bail 4/2021 (S.B.) Imam Bux Khoso V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3678.Cr.Bail 384/2021 (S.B.) Qazi Akther Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3679.Cr.Bail 334/2021 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ASALM & OTHERS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Bail Matters (Offence under section 376 )
Prima facie, there appear reasonable grounds for believing that applicants/accused have committed the alleged offences. Grant of pre-arrest bail is extraordinary remedy in criminal jurisdiction. It is diversion of usual course of law, arrest in cognizable cases; a protection to the innocent being hounded on trump up charges through abuse of process of law, therefore applicants seeking judicial protection are required to reasonably demonstrate that intended arrest is calculated to humiliate them with taints of mala fide. It may be observed that it is not a substitute for post arrest bail in every run of the mill criminal case as it seriously hampers the course of investigation as held in the case of RANA ABDUL KHALIQ v. The STATE and others (2019 SCMR 1129).Read more
3680.H.C.A 328/2018 (D.B.) Farrukh Afzal Munif V/S Muhammad Afzal Munif & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 97
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3681.Cr.Bail 79/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar Sarki V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3682.Cr.J.A 69/2015 (S.B.) Ghulam Nabi Lashari V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
3683.Const. P. 4668/2015 (D.B.) Lucky Cement Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Employee Old Age Benefits Act, 1976 (Payment of contribution under EOBI Act 1976)
2021 SHC KHI 1239Petitioner employers sought declaration that demand of contributions by the Federal EOBI under EOBI Act 1976 is illegal as EOBI became federal subject after 18th Amendment and subsequent Sindh EOBI Act 2014; Sindh Province did enact the Act 2014 but could not establish the Institution; CCI resolved EOBI shall remain with Federal Government. Held petitioners cant take benefit of dispute between the Federation and Province; priority must be given to the employees as the Old Age Benefit law is a beneficial law, aimed for the benefit of the employees therefore in case contribution amount is not received by the EOBI ultimately it is the employees who will suffer. Hence these petitions are disposed of in terms that petitioners shall deposit the contributions and other dues according to EOBI Act 1976; all amount deposited with the Nazir shall be returned in favour of the EOBI established under the EOBI Act 1976.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
3684.Cr.Bail 50/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Zaman Oghai V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3685.Cr.Rev 14/2021 (D.B.) Imdad Ali Khoso V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3686.Cr.Bail 421/2021 (S.B.) Roshan Ali @Roshan Lund V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
3687.Const. P. 4243/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Mustafa V/S M/s AGE & Sons (Pvt) Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3688.Const. P. 4247/2020 (D.B.) Umar Siddique V/S M/s AGE & Sons Pvt Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3689.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 132/2015 (D.B.) The Collector of Customs V/S M/s. General Food Corporation, Karachi. Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Custom Act, 1969 (Section 80), Custom Act, 1969 (Section 32), Sale Tax Act 1990 ( section 38), Sale Tax Act 1990 ( Sixth Schedule of Sales Tax Act, 1990), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Section 230)
Once the assessment order is passed and clearance of the goods under Section 80 is made, the consignment then is out of charge and then such assessment is not liable to be intervened unless the recourse as available under law is invoked before a Collector Appeals for reopening of the assessment etc. In addition to this the amended section 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and insertion of Section 230 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the customs officials including respondent No.1 cannot be deemed to have been appointed as officer of Inland Revenue. Thus the contravention so prepared is without jurisdiction and the authority. The Collectorate of Customs does not enjoy the authority of collecting sales tax and income tax of the regime under discussion, once the goods are out of charge. They do the act as an agent at import stage in the capacity of collecting agent and can recover the avoided or short paid customs duty and other taxes levied but not once the goods are out of charge.Read more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3690.Cr.Bail 369/2021 (S.B.) Shahbaz Ali Sipra V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3691.Cr.Bail 460/2021 (S.B.) Sikandar Raza Jafferi & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3692.Criminal Appeal 37/2013 (S.B.) Zakir Ali Gondal V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 SHC SUK 11
3693.Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Amanullah and Ors V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPLEMENTATION
3694.Cr.J.A 32/2019 (D.B.) Saddam Hussain Lohar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
3695.Const. P. 5168/2021 (D.B.) Urooba Ayman and Others V/S PMC and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiMedical and Dental College Admissions Test (MDCAT)Read more
Matter:-EXAMINATION
3696.Cr.Bail 355/2021 (S.B.) Abid Bhatti and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
3697.Suit 1499/2008 (S.B.) Muhammad Asif Saranur & Others V/S Yousuf Shaikh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Dismissed for non-prosecution)
In the given circumstances, where this suit is marred by absences of the respective counsel, as well as for the above-mentioned purposes the parties probably would have agitated their grievance before the appropriate forum, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecutionRead more
Matter:-MANDATORY INJUNCTION
3698.Cr.Bail 40/2021 (D.B.) Abdul Khalique @ Gulzar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3699.Suit 583/2021 (S.B.) SICPA SA V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII Rule 10)
2021 SHC KHI 1115
Matter:-SUIT FOR DECLERATION
3700.Cr.Bail 358/2021 (S.B.) Jehangir Bozdar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3701.Cr.Misc. 342/2021 (S.B.) Rafique Ahmed Panhyar V/S The State through DPG Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3702.Cr.Bail 482/2021 (S.B.) Shafi Muhammad Kalhoro & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3703.Cr.Bail 287/2021 (S.B.) Sher Muhammad & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3704.Cr.Bail 428/2021 (S.B.) Waqar Ali Bughio V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CUSTODY
3705.Cr.Bail 222/2021 (S.B.) Ihsan Ali @ Ihsan chachar and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3706.Const. P. 3886/2019 (D.B.) The Stillman (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDisposed of Dismissed as infructuousRead more
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3707.Const. P. 4883/2019 (D.B.) M/s I.T Services V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDimissed in Non ProsecutionRead more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3708.Cr.Bail 696/2020 (S.B.) Irshad Ahmed Awan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3709.Const. P. 4153/2018 (D.B.) M/s Deems Ind V/S The Chairman F.B.R andOrs Sindh High Court, KarachiApeal is pending before the Tribunal , the petition is disposed of with direction that till such decision is made by the Tribunal, no coercive action on .Read more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3710.Const. P. 343/2021 (D.B.) Akhtar Peer Sarhandi V/S Executive Engineer Provincial Highways Dadu Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
3711.Cr.J.A 13/2016 (D.B.) Turab Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
3712.Cr.Rev 36/2021 (S.B.) Goro @ Gajan V/S Shahnoor Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Revision (Accused Convicted. Sentenced Suspended and Accused released on bail .)
3713.Cr.Bail 259/2021 (S.B.) Mandost Malik V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
3714.Cr.Bail 274/2021 (S.B.) Shamshad Ali Jakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
3715.Cr.Rev 32/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar son of Jamaluddin Solangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal Revision (Magistrate Convicted for the offence 342,506,511 PPC ADJ Upheld. Accused granted bail U/S426 CRPC . )
3716.Cr.Bail 284/2021 (S.B.) Asghar Khan son of Abdul Manan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Sindh Prohibition, Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and use of Gutka and Manpuri Act, 2019)
The Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and Use of Gutka and Manpuri Act 2019Read more
3717.Const. P. 3268/2021 (D.B.) Rehan Arif V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 13Import of vehicle under personal baggage and payment of duty and taxes under Para 6 of Appendix E of the Import Policy order 2020Read more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3718.Const. P. 429/2021 (S.B.) Mst. Hira Imam Thr. Nawabzada Kamran Hussain Mugha V/S Hasan Khurshid Hashmi and another Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 25)
Prima facie, it was an application by the father (respondent) hence the same never included the factual controversy regarding place of residence of minor or petitioner as at Tando Adam, therefore, she cant be entitled to reopen the question before this Court which, already, was left open for Guardians Court alone while deciding her earlier CP No. S-326 of 2021. Further, since the petitioner never claimed any harm to welfare of minors if passport of minor is deposited, as ordered by Guardians Court. Absence of any such plea, backed by reasoning, itself renders such plea to be not of any help to question such condition, so imposed by the Guardians Court, which (Guardians Court) is, otherwise, competent to impose any legal condition assuring right of visitation which, admittedly, not challenged.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
3719.Const. P. 3140/2021 (D.B.) Pir Muhammad Sadiq V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 12
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3720.Const. P. 154/2021 (S.B.) TARIQ MASOOD V/S SHER MUHAMMAD DIN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachicase remanded with Direction of rehear expeditouslyRead more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3721.Cr.Bail 942/2021 (S.B.) NADEEM ASIF S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3722.Spl. Cr. A. 2/2019 (S.B.) ASMATULLAH S/O JANAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3723.Const. P. 1717/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Abdul Aleem V/S C.A.A Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3724.I. A 53/2018 (D.B.) Mst. Shama Parveen V/S Banking Court No. V & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1085
Matter:-BANKING
3725.H.C.A 189/2020 (D.B.) Sababat Ali Khan & others V/S Muhammad Naveed Alam Khan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 348
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3726.Const. P. 2805/2021 (D.B.) Dr. Shamim Qureshi V/S J.S.M.U and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1414
Matter:-SERVICE
3727.Const. P. 2129/2018 (S.B.) Muhammad Akram V/S M/s. Jamia Imamia Trust & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979, Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Order First Appeal is Maintained.)
2023 MLD 522It is immaterial for the tenant as towho are the trustees and how those trustees were/are being replaced. It is indoor/internal management of the trustees and trust which has nothing to do with the relationship of landlord and tenant between Jamia ImamiaTrust and thepetitioner. None of thealleged trustees who were deprived of any benefit of being a trustee was cited as a witness or summoned by the petitioner.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3728.Const. P. 2328/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Tanveer V/S M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 421
Matter:-SERVICE
3729.Const. P. 242/2021 (S.B.) Uzma Bibi W/o Shabar Khan V/S Bakht Roman and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3730.II.A. 61/2021 (S.B.) Kamran Zafar S/o Shams ul Zafar V/S Muhammad Idrees and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3731.R.A (Civil Revision) 36/2020 (S.B.) SYED IMRAN V/S SYED SOHAIL HASAN & OTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3732.Const. P. 308/2021 (S.B.) Mst. Saima D/o Fareed ul Hassan V/S Mst. Marium Bibi and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
3733.II.A. 63/2021 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed S/o (Late) Abdul Majeed V/S Malik Haq Nawaz and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3734.Suit 1468/2020 (S.B.) Muhammad Arif Khalil V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECLARATION
3735.Cr.Bail 1445/2020 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ASIF-UR-REHMAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (offence under section 420, 468 PPC)
Perusal of record shows that applicant presented himself as owner of the flat, which he sold out to the complainant after taking a huge amount as advance. Muhammad Asif, the real owner of the flat has also filed his statement before this Court wherein he categorically stated that applicant illegally and unlawfully sold out his flat to complainant while using his name and the applicant has also filed fake documents before the police. It is settled principles of law that grant of pre-arrest bail is an extraordinary remedy, rooted into equity, to protect the honour and freedom of the innocent in criminal cases actuated by abuse of process of lawRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3736.Cr.Bail 167/2021 (S.B.) QAZI JAVED KHALIQ S/O QAZI ABDUL KHALIQ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Pre Arrest Bail (Under Section 489-F)
It is well settled that grant of pre-arrest bail is an extra-ordinary remedy in criminal jurisdiction; it is diversion of usual course of law, arrest in cognizable cases; a protection to the innocent being hounded on trump up charges through abuse of process of law, therefore an accused seeking judicial protection is required to reasonably demonstrate that intended arrest is calculated to humiliate him with taints of mala fide; it is not a substitute for post arrest bail in every run of the mill criminal case as it seriously hampers the course of investigation. Reliance is placed upon the cases reported as Rana Abdul Khaliq vs. The State (2019 SCMR 1129). In the present case the essential requirement for grant of pre-arrest bail i.e. mala fide, ulterior motive or abuse of process of law, situations wherein Court must not hesitate to rescue innocent citizens are conspicuously missing.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
3737.Const. P. 2124/2021 (D.B.) M/s Star Denim Pvt Ltd V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 982petitioner-M/s. Star Denim Pvt. Ltd. is asking for setting aside of the impugned letter dated 10.03.2021, whereby Audit Officers of the Sindh Employees Social Security Institution (`SESSI`) attempted to visit the establishment of the petitioner to verify the Secured Workers engaged by for issuing the R-5 cards so they could get the financial / Medical care facility--Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
3738.II.A. 74/2019 (S.B.) Shaukat Islam V/S Learned District Judge Tharparkar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Compensation for malicious prosecution
As a matter of fact it could be seen that after having even been declared exparte, the trial court gave an opportunity to the Defendants counsel and considered his arguments. It is an admitted fact that the Sessions Court acquitted the accused on merits and for the reasons narrated in the trial court Judgment the case of malicious prosecution was established. In the given circumstances, I do not see any veracity in the impugned Judgment which has rendered the entire litigation to a nullity hence appeal is allowed and the impugned Judgment dated 23.10.2019 passed by learned District Judge / Model Civil Appellate Court, Tharparkar at Mithi is set-aside.Read more
3739.Const. P. 1202/2021 (D.B.) Aftab Alam V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 609SESSIRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
3740.Const. P. 6694/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Abdul Alim Zafar V/S The Education Sect: & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 806
Matter:-SERVICE
3741.Const. P. 688/2018 (D.B.) Faiz Aslam V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3742.Spl. Federal Excise Reference Application 257/2018 (D.B.) Commissioner I-R Zone-III V/S M/s. Kiran Sugar Mills Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 248
Matter:-FED. EXCISE
3743.Cr.Rev 15/2020 (S.B.) ADEEL ZAHOOR MALIK & ANOTHER V/S ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 (Section 3)
2021 SHC KHI 1238There can be no denial to the fact that learned Official Assignee was directed by a competent court of law for taking re-possession of subject matter. The legality of competence of the Civil Court in issuing such directions cant be discussed by this Court while exercising Criminal Jurisdiction but what can safely be said is that such action of re-possession was, undeniably, under a lawful authority hence no offence within meaning of Illegal Dispossession Act 2005.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3744.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 237/2017 (D.B.) Collector of Customs V/S Khurshid Sons Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 72
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3745.Criminal Appeal 91/2021 (S.B.) IRFAN HAIDER JAFFERY V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Sindh Arms Act, 2013 (Non-production of recovered weapon during trial)
Perusal of record reflects that admittedly recovered pistol was not produced before the trial court on the plea that property destroyed as malkhana was set ablaze, hence, neither the property was shown to the appellant as recovered from him nor such article was exhibited as produced. Besides, no mark of identification of weapon was shown; though recovery was affected near a public place but no independent person was joined as witness. Non-production of weapon at trial is not disputed. Since weapon was neither produced nor confronted to the appellant as recovered from him, which has made the recovery memo and testimony of the recovery witnesses without any credence and has also destroyed the entire case of the prosecution.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3746.Const. P. 5552/2020 (D.B.) Yunus Textile Mills Ltd V/S Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Anti-Dumping Act, 2015 (Amendment of Anti-Dumping Duties Act 2015 through section 15 of Finance Act 2019)
2021 PTD 1055It is hereby declared that amendment made through section 15 of the Finance Act, 2019 in the Anti-Dumping Duties Act, 2015, passed through Money Bill (and not through an Act of Parliament) does not fall within the parameters prescribed under Article 73 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, hence, is ultra vires to the Constitution, and is hereby struck downRead more
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3747.Cr.J.A 1/2013 (S.B.) Abdullah Junejo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Appeal (Judgment Sataside ,Appeal allowed.Accused Acquitted .)
2021 SHC LAR 836
3748.Cr.Bail 617/2020 (S.B.) Kohyaro Teghani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 SHC LAR 985
3749.Cr.Bail 80/2021 (S.B.) LIAQUAT ALI KHAN S/O ABDULLAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal After Arrest Bail (Offence under section 395)
None I would take an exception to the fact that such like offence does fall within the category of offence against society. Normally, bail is not to be granted to an accused for an ordinary offence even if such offence attracts the bar of Section 497(i) Cr.P.C unless he successfully brings his case within meaning of Section 497(ii) Cr.PC. However, when the bail plea is in respect of an offence which falls both under category of offence against society as well attracts the bar, provided by prohibitory clause of section 497(i) Cr.PC then criterion to examine such a case would not be similar to examine an ordinary offence, falling within prohibitory clause. Reference may be made to the case of Imtiaz Ahmed v. State PLD 1997 SC 545.Read more
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3750.Const. P. 6142/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Ahmed Manna V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1388
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3751.Criminal Appeal 562/2018 (S.B.) IMRAN HAYAT S/O ROSHAN ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial (Report of DNA Negative in Rape case)
The above shows that the medical evidence was not sure to support the prosecution allegation rather absence of hymen was admitted to be a possible result of cycling running or jumping. No laceration or tear was found which, normally, is inevitable in such like case. Further, the DNA also came in negative therefore, the version of victim that her stepfather was sexually abusing her in routine was never safe to be accepted for holding the conviction which (conviction) legally cant sustain when there exists a slightest reasonable doubt. Accordingly, this is not a case free from doubt, hence, impugned judgment is set aside, appellant shall be released forthwith if not required in any other custody caseRead more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3752.Const. P. 81/2021 (D.B.) Faisal Cantonment V/S Mehboob Hussain and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1179
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER U/S 21
3753.Cr.J.A 869/2019 (D.B.) KHALID AHMED S/O ABDUL REHMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1442Father killed his daughter on the suspicion of being unchaste. No mitigating circumstance in favour of appellant was found for awarding lesser punishment. Death sentence confirmedRead more
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
3754.Spl. Federal Excise Reference Application 311/2018 (D.B.) Commissioner I-R Zone-II V/S M/s. Ranipur Sugar Mills Limited Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 576
Matter:-TAX MATTER
3755.I.T.R.A 104/2018 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S PAKISTAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1016
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3756.I.T.R.A 677/2010 (D.B.) The Comm, InlandRevenue V/S M/s Karachi Port Trust Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 144
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3757.I.T.R.A 162/2018 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S MR. ASIF BASHIR PROP: M/S ASIF BROTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 858
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3758.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 162/2018 (D.B.) Commissioner I-R Zone-I V/S M/s. Saqib Enterprises Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1214
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3759.Spl.H.C.A 23/2016 (D.B.) M/s. Muslim Cotton Mills (Pvt) Ltd. & others V/S Allied Bank Ltd. & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 110
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3760.Suit 1995/2020 (S.B.) XIAMEN GOLDEN DRAGON BUS COMPANY LTD & ANOTHER V/S SINDH INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMP. LTD & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1037
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
3761.Const. P. 6444/2020 (D.B.) Hussain Trading Agencies Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 709
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3762.Const. P. 6448/2020 (D.B.) Console Shipping Services Pakistan Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 931
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3763.Const. P. 6443/2020 (D.B.) Asia Marine (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 221
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3764.Const. P. 6445/2020 (D.B.) Globelink Pakistan Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 838
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3765.Const. P. 6442/2020 (D.B.) General Shipping Agencies V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1306
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3766.I.T.R.A 366/2017 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S FAZAL TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1437
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3767.Suit 1494/2020 (S.B.) Pak Airlift Aviation Services V/S Gulf Air B.S.C (c) & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHC KHI 1117
Matter:-Commercial Cases/Suits as per Circular dated: 30-10-2013
3768.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 229/2019 (D.B.) SHAHID @ DARINDA S/O ABDULLAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3769.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 58/2020 (D.B.) BABAR @ BILK S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3770.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 113/2020 (D.B.) SALEEM AHMED S/O FEROZE AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Criminal Trial ( Discrepancies and contradictions )
In view of the above facts and evidence, we have no hesitation to hold that there are several circumstances/infirmities in the prosecution case as highlighted above, which have created reasonable doubt about the guilt of accused. By now it is settled law that for giving benefit of doubt to an accused, it is not necessary that there should be many circumstances creating doubts. If there is a circumstance, which creates reasonable doubt in a prudent mind about the guilt of the accused, then the accused will be entitled to the benefit not as a matter of grace and concession but as a matter of right.Read more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3771.I.T.R.A 25/2018 (D.B.) M/S AZIZ TABBA FOUNDATION V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1826
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3772.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 2/2020 (D.B.) SHABBIR SHAH @ WAQAS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
3773.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 139/2020 (D.B.) WASEEM UR RAZA S/O AHSAN UR RAZA V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3774.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 275/2019 (D.B.) SYED AHMED HASSAN S/O SYED MUHAMMAD HASSAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
3775.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 8/2019 (D.B.) ABDUL HASHIM S/O GHULAM MIAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
3776.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 101/2018 (D.B.) AZIZ @ KAMAL S/O NADEEM & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3777.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 36/2020 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD NOMAN @CHIKNA@BABAL S/O ABDUL RASHEED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3778.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 57/2019 (D.B.) JAHANGIR S/O ASHRAF V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
3779.I.T.R.A 385/2016 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S MEHMOOD TRADERS KHI Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 548
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3780.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 21/2019 (D.B.) AZAM S/O MUHAMMAD UBAID V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3781.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 83/2020 (D.B.) IMAM BUX S/O KALOO & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3782.Const. P. 1904/2010 (D.B.) Province Of Sindh & Others V/S Shabbir Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Suit for Recovery (Deduction of amount as Government policy )
2020 SHC HYD 43The amount allegedly deducted as government policy as 25% was held to be unlawful. The petitioner intend to travel beyond the judgment and decree wherein neither such defence was taken nor the deduction of the amount of Rs.1,78,415/- being 25% of the entire amount of respondent was held as lawful deduction in terms of the government policy. The petitioner cannot travel beyond decree which was neither challenged by the petitioner nor it is otherwise unlawful.Read more
3783.Const. P. 6069/2020 (D.B.) M/s China Harbour Engineering Corp V/S The Addl: Comiissioner IR (LTO) and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3784.Const. P. 1782/2019 (D.B.) Tarique Hussain Khonharo V/S N.T.S. Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3785.Const. P. 1608/2005 (D.B.) Ms. Talat Ejaz V/S City District Govt. Karachi Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1853
Matter:-Land Matters
3786.Const. P. 7159/2016 (D.B.) Irfan Ahmed Faridi V/S Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1852
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3787.I.T.R.A 106/2016 (D.B.) The Commissioner Inland Revenue V/S M/s International Leather(pvt) Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1850
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3788.I.T.R.A 28/2018 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S MAPAK EDIBLE OIL (PVT) LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2078
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3789.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 120/2020 (D.B.) Commissioner I-R Zone-I V/S M/s. Indus Dyeing Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1970
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3790.H.C.A 113/2019 (D.B.) Multinet Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1968
Matter:-RECOVERY OF AMOUNT
3791.Const. P. 3330/2020 (D.B.) M/s Mahmood Enterprises V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
3792.Const. P. 2097/2018 (D.B.) Safeer Hussain Shar & others V/S P.O. Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3793.I.T.R.A 362/2017 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S CYAN LIMITED (OLD CENTRAL INSURANCE CO: LIMITE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 382
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3794.I.T.R.A 22/2017 (D.B.) M/S EYE TELEVISION NETWORK LIMITED V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 564
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3795.I.T.R.A 290/2019 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/s Agha Steel Industries Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1225
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3796.Const. P. 835/2020 (D.B.) Shafique Ahmed Bhutto V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3797.I.T.R.A 108/2017 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PVT) LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1317
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3798.I.T.R.A 274/2019 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S SIEMENS PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 169
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3799.I.T.R.A 382/2018 (D.B.) Commissioner Inland Revenue V/S M/S Empact Activation Services Ptv. Ltd Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 431
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3800.I.T.R.A 177/2018 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S ARTISTIC DENIM (PVT) LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1271
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3801.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 577/2016 (D.B.) Collector of Customs V/S M/s. Ceramic City Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 703
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3802.Const. P. 4406/2020 (D.B.) M/s Al-Hammd Intl. V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 824
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3803.Const. P. 3738/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Shah Kakar V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 30
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3804.Cr.Bail 600/2020 (S.B.) Abdul Khalique V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
3805.I.T.R.A 58/2018 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S RAINBOW HI-TECH ENGINEERING CO: (PVT) LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2172
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3806.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 16/2016 (D.B.) M/s. Shadab Engineering Industries (Pvt) Ltd. V/S The Customs Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1255
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3807.Const. P. 543/2019 (S.B.) Ali Jan Barijo and another V/S Mohammad Mithal Qureshi & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 SHC LAR 1406
3808.I.T.R.A 141/2016 (D.B.) ALLIED ENGINEERING & SECERVICE LTD V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2336
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3809.Const. P. 5391/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Amir and Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 527
Matter:-FOR ALLOWANCE
3810.Const. P. 6357/2017 (D.B.) Muhammad Taqui Nayani V/S Fed. Of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 491
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3811.Const. P. 5405/2017 (D.B.) Shaheen Pervaiz and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1685
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3812.Const. P. 6546/2017 (D.B.) Frahim Ali Khan \ V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2048
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3813.Const. P. 6972/2017 (D.B.) Amanullah Zubair and Ors V/S FBR and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1577
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3814.Const. P. 7368/2017 (D.B.) Akbarali Pesnani V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1299
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3815.Const. P. 5391/2017 (D.B.) Syed Tariq Sohail and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1562
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3816.Const. P. 4368/2019 (D.B.) M/s Kohisar Enterprises V/S Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1630
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3817.Const. P. 4996/2017 (D.B.) Muhammad Asad V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 813
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3818.I. A 39/2020 (D.B.) Nusran Bibi V/S Judge Banking Court No. 1 & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1368
Matter:-BANKING
3819.R.A (Civil Revision) 26/2020 (S.B.) Muhammad Iyas & others V/S VS Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Land Revenue Act, 1967
2020 SHC HYD 8A first question which comes to mind is that Defence Quota must have been based on a criteria that a person or a beneficiary of this Defence Quota must have performed any act of gallantry or bravery for the State of Pakistan.Read more
3820.Const. P. 1428/2019 (D.B.) M/s M & P Express Logistics V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1377
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3821.Const. P. 2812/2019 (D.B.) M/s Chen One Store V/S Asstt: Commissioner SRB and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 830
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3822.Const. P. 3776/2019 (D.B.) Ms. Ratna Gul Thadani V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2264
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3823.Const. P. 1078/2019 (D.B.) Binery Vibes (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 291
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3824.Const. P. 2739/2019 (D.B.) M/s International Traders V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 586
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3825.Const. P. 2738/2019 (D.B.) M/s Meerab Enterprises V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2419
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3826.Const. P. 8454/2019 (D.B.) M/s Hum Network Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1361
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3827.Const. P. 1463/2019 (D.B.) M/s Marketing Works (Pvt) Ltd V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 181
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3828.Const. P. 1275/2019 (D.B.) M/s Independent Media Corp Ltd V/S The Commissioner -1 SRB and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 206
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3829.Const. P. 1451/2019 (D.B.) M/s Sabre Travel Networks Pakistan V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2040
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3830.Const. P. 6990/2019 (D.B.) M/s Burma Oil Mills Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1631
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3831.Const. P. 1548/2019 (D.B.) M/s Kausar Ghee Mills V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1525
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3832.Const. P. 1928/2019 (D.B.) M/s Khushhali Bank Ltd V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1567
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3833.Const. P. 2732/2019 (D.B.) National Investment Trust Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1280
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3834.Const. P. 4427/2019 (D.B.) M/s Airwaves Media (Pvt) Ltd V/S The Chief Commissioner I.R and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1666
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3835.Const. P. 4663/2019 (D.B.) Damco Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1061
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3836.Const. P. 25/2019 (D.B.) Ora-Tech System (Pvt) Ltd V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1413
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3837.Const. P. 1092/2019 (D.B.) Falcon I (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1178
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3838.Const. P. 2269/2019 (D.B.) Engro Elergy Terminal (Pvt) Ltd V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1790
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3839.Const. P. 2639/2019 (D.B.) M/s Acces Security Services (Pvt) Ltd V/S The Sect: Revenue Board and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 338
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3840.Const. P. 2689/2019 (D.B.) M/s Icon Securities (Pvt) Ltd V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1081
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3841.Const. P. 2726/2019 (D.B.) Takaful Pakistan Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2340
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3842.Const. P. 2737/2019 (D.B.) M/s M.N International Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 270
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3843.Const. P. 3881/2019 (D.B.) M/s HESCO V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1897
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3844.Const. P. 4142/2019 (D.B.) M/s M.D Production (Pvt) Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1136
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3845.Const. P. 6518/2019 (D.B.) M/.s Al Buraq Engineering V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 45
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3846.Const. P. 8311/2019 (D.B.) M/s Paksitan Mineral Development Corp Pvt Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 417
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3847.Const. P. 2341/2019 (D.B.) Wazir Ali Ind V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1353
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3848.Const. P. 4007/2019 (D.B.) M/s SEPCO Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1799
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3849.Const. P. 3593/2019 (D.B.) Soneri Bank Ltd V/S Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 275
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3850.Const. P. 357/2019 (D.B.) M/s LaGuardia (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2387
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3851.Const. P. 1243/2019 (D.B.) M/s D.S Motors (Pvt) Ltd V/S The Commissioner IV SRB and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 264
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3852.Const. P. 2680/2019 (D.B.) Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 822
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3853.Const. P. 3636/2019 (D.B.) M/s Bridge Con Inc V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 858
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3854.Const. P. 2001/2019 (D.B.) M/s Al Raee Construction Co. Pvt Ltd V/S The Commissioner -IV SRB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 12
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3855.Const. P. 4549/2019 (D.B.) MCB (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2443
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3856.Const. P. 5010/2019 (D.B.) M/s HSBC Bank Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2140
Matter:-LEVY TAX
3857.Const. P. 725/2019 (D.B.) Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan V/S Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 216
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3858.Const. P. 5019/2019 (D.B.) M/s Kaybee Constructors (AOP) V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1745
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3859.Const. P. 5974/2019 (D.B.) M/s Steady Lift Pakistan V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 509
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3860.Const. P. 6335/2019 (D.B.) M/s Hadid International Services FZE V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 719
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3861.Const. P. 2853/2019 (D.B.) M/s Gateway Express Shipping Pvt Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 851
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3862.Const. P. 1694/2019 (D.B.) Habib Insurance Co. Ltd V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 194
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3863.Const. P. 4191/2019 (D.B.) M/s TCS Logistics Pvt Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1145
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3864.Const. P. 3667/2019 (D.B.) M/s Pakistan Minerals & Development Corp Pvt Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2331
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3865.Const. P. 2000/2019 (D.B.) M/s Pizza Track / The Burger House V/S The Commissioner IV SRB & ORs Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 743
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3866.Const. P. 3571/2019 (D.B.) Ameer Chand V/S S.B.C.A and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1315
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
3867.Const. P. 8316/2019 (D.B.) M.I Overseas Ltd V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1118
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3868.Const. P. 785/2019 (D.B.) Standard Chartered Bank (Pvt) Ltd V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2468
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3869.Const. P. 2736/2019 (D.B.) M/s M.N International V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1044
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3870.Const. P. 1216/2019 (D.B.) M/s Noor Distributors V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 424
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3871.Const. P. 4199/2019 (D.B.) Sea & Land Drilling Constrctors Ind V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 731
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3872.Const. P. 3326/2019 (D.B.) M/s Tracking World (Pvt) Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2253
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3873.Const. P. 2945/2019 (D.B.) M/s Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pakistan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 9
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3874.Const. P. 4420/2019 (D.B.) M/s Khan Afzal & Sons V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2185
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3875.Const. P. 6576/2019 (D.B.) M/s SEPO III Electric Power Co. Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 394
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3876.Const. P. 312/2019 (D.B.) Meezan Bank Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 407
Matter:-SALE DEED
3877.Const. P. 2740/2019 (D.B.) M/s HESCO Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2435
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3878.Const. P. 4315/2019 (D.B.) M/s Orient Energy System (Pvt) Ltd V/S The Commissioner (SRB) & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1292
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3879.Const. P. 2929/2019 (D.B.) M/s Crescent Carriers Pakistan V/S Asstt: Commissioner (Unit 23) SRB and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1492
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3880.Const. P. 3947/2019 (D.B.) M/s Hafiz Transport Co. V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 732
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3881.Const. P. 274/2020 (D.B.) MCB (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1096
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3882.Const. P. 4548/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Yar Malik V/S Chairman SRB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2043
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3883.Const. P. 2053/2019 (D.B.) M/s Hadid International Services FZE V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 658
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3884.Const. P. 4098/2019 (D.B.) Dowell Schlumberger (Western) S.A V/S Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 161
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3885.Const. P. 5936/2019 (D.B.) M/s Fauji Meat Ltd V/S S.R.B and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1939
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3886.H.C.A 4/2015 (D.B.) M/s. Ali & Co. V/S M/s. Skyword (Pvt) Ltd. & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
3887.Const. P. 6362/2018 (D.B.) Ghulam Hussain Memon V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3888.Const. P. 1879/2017 (D.B.) Vohra Traders V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3889.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 62/2016 (D.B.) Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-I V/S M/s. Shujabad Agro Industries (Pvt) Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 1893
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3890.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 152/2018 (D.B.) Collector of Customs MCC Hyderabad V/S M/s. Javed Chandio Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2327
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3891.Const. P. 4597/2015 (D.B.) V/S Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SHC KHI 2361
3892.Const. P. 361/2019 (D.B.) Akhtar Hussain Dodhoo V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3893.Const. P. 1029/2013 (D.B.) Muhammad Muqeet Khalid V/S Fed of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3894.Const. P. 1565/2019 (D.B.) Faiz Muhammad Memon Thru His Attorny V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3895.Const. P. 5593/2019 (D.B.) M/s Farid Asif Ltd and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3896.R.A (Civil Revision) 46/2005 (S.B.) Mrs. Ghulshan Afroze & Others V/S Muhammad Jamal & others Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3897.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 125/2016 (D.B.) Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-II V/S M/s. Habib ADM Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3898.Criminal Appeal 149/2019 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3899.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 440/2017 (D.B.) M/s Chaudhry Steel Re-Rolling Mills (Pvt) Ltd V/S The Customs Appellate Tribunal & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3900.Const. P. 2869/2014 (D.B.) Munir ul Haque V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ENQUIRY
3901.Const. P. 2703/2010 (D.B.) Rahib Ali and another V/S P.O. Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3902.I.T.R.A 316/2019 (D.B.) DR. IMDADULLAH MEMON V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3903.Const. P. 399/2019 (D.B.) Rasool Bux Shambani & others V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3904.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 705/2019 (D.B.) Collector of Customs V/S M/s. Mehtab Exports Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3905.Const. P. 391/2012 (D.B.) Rozina and others V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3906.Const. P. 1490/2019 (D.B.) Amanullah Jagirani & others V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3907.Const. P. 6036/2015 (D.B.) Riaz Hussain and Ors V/S Election Commission of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION MATTER
3908.Const. P. 638/2019 (S.B.) Ghulam Qadir Khoso V/S SHO PS Nasirabad Dist: Kamber Shahdadkot and ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3909.Const. P. 678/2019 (S.B.) Mst. Zameeran Katohar V/S SHO PS Jahanpur and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3910.Const. P. 681/2019 (S.B.) Mutahar Sadiq V/S SHO PS Radhan Station & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3911.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 21/2018 (D.B.) Commissioner I-R Zone-II V/S M/s. Aluminum Processing Ind. Int. (Pvt) Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3912.Const. P. 641/2019 (S.B.) Mst. Shabana Khoso V/S SHO PS Mehar and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3913.Const. P. 644/2019 (S.B.) Sartaj Ahmed Chandio V/S SHO PS Warrah Dist: Kamber-Shahdadkot and ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3914.Const. P. 643/2019 (S.B.) Hidayatullah Lashari V/S SHO PS Rasheed Waggan, Dist: Larkana and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3915.I.T.R.A 23/2018 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S CENTRAL DEPOSITORY COMPANY PAKISTAN LIMITED Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3916.I.T.R.A 297/2019 (D.B.) Mr. Muhammad Irfan V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3917.Const. P. 565/2019 (S.B.) Ghanwar Khan Magsi V/S Ahsan Ali Mirani, PSO To SSP Kmber-Sdkt and ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3918.Const. P. 143/2019 (S.B.) Abdul Sattar Meer Jat V/S Mst. Samina Meer Jat Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
3919.Const. P. 4698/2014 (D.B.) Creek Marina and Ors V/S NAB Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ENQUIRY
3920.Const. P. 594/2019 (S.B.) Nawab Khan Brohi V/S SSP Kamber-Shahdadkot and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3921.Const. P. 187/2019 (S.B.) Mst. Aasya and another V/S SHO PS Waleed Larkana and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3922.Const. P. 529/2019 (S.B.) Abid Hussain Magsi V/S SHO P.S A-Section Shahdadkot & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3923.Const. P. 561/2019 (S.B.) Bakhtawar Khatoon Samo V/S SHO PS A-Section Shahdadkot and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3924.Const. P. 5264/2019 (D.B.) Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Ltd V/S Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3925.Const. P. 3917/2019 (D.B.) Mst. Sajida Nazeer V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachialleged missing person is under arrest at P.S. Quaidabad in Crime No.150 of 2019 under sections 4/5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 read with section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. petition dispose ofRead more
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3926.Const. P. 3981/2019 (D.B.) Ashfaq Ahmed Mallah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
3927.Const. P. 454/2019 (S.B.) Mst. Zaheeran Khatoon & another V/S SHO PS Rehmatpur and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3928.Const. P. 417/2019 (S.B.) Raza Hussain Chandio V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3929.Const. P. 4076/2019 (D.B.) Suresh Kumar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
3930.Const. P. 268/2019 (S.B.) Mst. Saira Shaikh V/S SHO PS Mehar and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Detention
3931.Const. P. 433/2019 (S.B.) Abbas Ali Bhutto and others V/S SSP Shikarpur and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3932.Const. P. 320/2019 (S.B.) Mst. Saima Gopang and another V/S SHO PS Setharja and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3933.Const. P. 441/2019 (S.B.) Mst. Naz Banu Jamali V/S SHO PS Shahpur Chakar and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Harassment & Protection
3934.Suit 1079/2011 (S.B.) MAKRAN COMM. &ORS V/S CHINA MOBILE PAK Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC (Damages), Tort Law (Recovery of Damages)
In my considered view, the rule laid down in the two well-known Judgments of the Honourable Supreme Court, that is, Abdul Majeed Case and Ishaque Case [P L D 1996 Supreme Court page-737], applies to the present case. In the first one (as already stated), the principle, inter alia, with regard to general damages has been discussed in detail; whereas, in second reported decision, the rule with regard to grant of damages on account of mental anguish has been explained, because the Plaintiffs have also claimed a sum of Rs.15 Million towards mental torture in paragraphs-50 and 54 of the Plaint and paragraphs-61 and 63 of the Affidavit-in-Evidence / Examination-in-Chief, which, remained uncontroverted.Read more
Matter:-DAMAGES
3935.Const. P. 972/2019 (D.B.) M/s A.N Enterprises V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3936.Const. P. 168/2015 (D.B.) Moins Abdullah and another V/S Fed: of Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
3937.Const. P. 7210/2018 (D.B.) M/s Sahara Public Rights Welfare V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3938.Const. P. 2873/2019 (D.B.) M/s Tex Marks V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3939.Const. P. 2482/2019 (D.B.) M/s Hilton Pharma (Pvt) Ltd V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3940.Const. P. 8485/2017 (D.B.) M/s Lucky Electric Power Co. Ltd V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3941.Const. P. 5058/2019 (D.B.) M/s Liberty Mills Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3942.Const. P. 6386/2018 (D.B.) K-Electric Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3943.I.T.R.A 369/2010 (D.B.) The Commisssioner Inland Revenue V/S Muhammad Afzal Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3944.Const. P. 607/2017 (D.B.) Mst. Ameer Jahan / Bisma Noreen V/S Prime Minister of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST TERRORISM
3945.Const. P. 1486/2018 (D.B.) Talib Hussain Siyal V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3946.Const. P. 3539/2017 (D.B.) M/s Trump Management V/S Fasial Cantonment Board and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
3947.Const. P. 4432/2018 (D.B.) M/s Al-Saudia V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3948.Const. P. 7112/2016 (D.B.) M/s Bronx International V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3949.Const. P. 6629/2017 (D.B.) M/s Gulf Plastic Industries V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
3950.Const. P. 4329/2018 (D.B.) Dewan Motor (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3951.Const. P. 736/2018 (D.B.) M/s Power Steel Foundry V/S FOP & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3952.Const. P. 2599/2014 (D.B.) Amity International V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CANCELLATION OF LICENCE
3953.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 2502/2015 (D.B.) Collector, Model Customs Collectorate V/S The Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench-I & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3954.Const. P. 2430/2016 (D.B.) Air Travel Shop V/S Faisal Cantonment Board and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY TAX
3955.Const. P. 8023/2018 (D.B.) M/s Abdullah (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3956.Const. P. 939/2012 (D.B.) President Poors Welfares V/S Regional Police Officer and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3957.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 74/2016 (D.B.) M/s. Nasir Khan & Sons V/S Sindh Revenue Board Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3958.Const. P. 188/2019 (D.B.) Ali Muhammad Dharejo & others V/S P.O. Sindh & others. Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3959.Const. P. 4136/2011 (D.B.) Tanveer Ahmed V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3960.Const. P. 2863/2018 (D.B.) M/s Pakistan Steel Imports Co. & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3961.Const. P. 6342/2018 (D.B.) Ihsan & Sons V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3962.Cr.Bail 1546/2018 (S.B.) MURAD ALI S/O JUMAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3963.Const. P. 1691/2018 (D.B.) Sultan Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
3964.Const. P. 722/2018 (D.B.) Munib Abdul Rauf V/S FOP & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
3965.Cr.Bail 1181/2018 (D.B.) ABDUL QADIR S/O ABDUL HAKEEM V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3966.Const. P. 2404/2017 (D.B.) Saleemullah V/S Muhammad Rafiq and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INVESTIGATION
3967.Const. P. 6034/2018 (D.B.) Mst. Latifa V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3968.Const. P. 5716/2018 (D.B.) Mrs.Nusrat Rziwan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3969.Const. P. 6122/2017 (D.B.) Mudassir V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
3970.Const. P. 261/2018 (D.B.) Abdul Hakeem V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3971.Const. P. 1360/2018 (D.B.) Tajuddin Pathan V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
The subject matter of this petition is a detection bill, which was apparently issued by Sukkur Electric Power Company. When inquired from the counsel for SEPCO as to under which authority such detection bill was issued, the counsel showed his ignorance. In pursuance of SubSection 6 of Section 26 of the Electricity Act, 1910, it is a discretion and mandate of the Electric Inspector to look into the matter on an application by an aggrieved party. Sukkur Electric Power Company was aggrieved of the consumption of electricity by illegal means and an application ought to have been preferred by them to the Electric Inspector, who then adjudge such complaintRead more
3972.Const. P. 1292/2018 (D.B.) Shahbaz Ali V/S Federation of Pakistan Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3973.Const. P. 11253/2018 (D.B.) Umar Khan Shar V/S Federation of Pakistan Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3974.Const. P. 1251/2018 (D.B.) Mumtaz Ali Shar V/S Federation of Pakistan Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3975.Const. P. 1283/2018 (D.B.) Mir Shahnawaz Khan Talpur V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
3976.Const. P. 1285/2018 (D.B.) Manzoor Hussain Wassan V/S Learned Election Tribunal Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3977.Const. P. 1279/2018 (D.B.) Muhammad Ismaeel Khoso V/S Federation of Pakistan Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
3978.Cr.Acq.A. 226/2018 (S.B.) V/S Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
It appears that Investigation officer did not conduct site inspection of the incident place; he also did not prepare site sketch / map of the incident place to show the structure of premises. It appears that incident place i.e. industry building is comprised of three to four flours. Only one floor is used by the plastic industry while remaining portions i.e. floors are used by the tenants for residential purpose. It is not in clear in charge sheet that which floor of the premises used the kunda/hook of electricity for theft purposeRead more
3979.Const. P. 421/2016 (D.B.) Amir Khursheed V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
3980.Const. P. 536/2017 (S.B.) Basheer Ahmed V/S Mst. Rabia & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
3981.Cr.Bail 328/2018 (D.B.) M. KASHAN S/O MUHAMMAD AMIN @ MUHAMMAD YAMIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3982.Criminal Appeal 347/2016 (D.B.) SHOIB AHMED SHAIKH S/O LATE BASHIR AHMED & ANOTHER V/S THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE SOUTH KHI & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3983.Cr.Bail 1978/2017 (D.B.) IMRAN MATEEN S/O RAJA ABDUL MATEEN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3984.Cr.Bail 1581/2017 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD NAWAZ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3985.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 20/2017 (D.B.) Aqil Abbas & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
3986.Cr.Bail 55/2018 (D.B.) SAJJAD S/O NASIR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3987.Cr.Bail 124/2018 (D.B.) Ghulam Murtaza V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
3988.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 19/2017 (D.B.) AQIL ABBASS S/O ALI ABBASS & 02 ORS V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
3989.Cr.Bail 1580/2017 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD NAWAZ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3990.Cr.Acq.A. 390/2016 (D.B.) THE STATE THROUGH DAG PAKISTAN KHI V/S SHOIB AHMED SHAIKH & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
3991.Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A 107/2017 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD HASHIM S/O MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE V/S PUNNOO S/O ABDUL LATEEF BALOCH & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
3992.Cr.Bail 631/2017 (D.B.) SUNNY S/O RAFIQ AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
3993.Const. P. 7567/2015 (D.B.) Jama Masjid Al Hilal V/S Province of SIndh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
3994.Const. P. 6030/2016 (D.B.) Mst Shahana Parveen V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3995.Const. P. 6029/2016 (D.B.) Muhammad Anas Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3996.Const. P. 157/2018 (D.B.) Mst Rukhsana V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3997.Const. P. 5277/2017 (D.B.) Mehboob Khan V/S Province Of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
3998.Cr.Bail 1564/2017 (D.B.) MUBASHIR S/O MUNEER HUSSAIN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3999.Criminal Miscelleneous 118/2017 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
4000.Const. P. 7114/2017 (D.B.) Naseeb Ahmed Dhoon and Ors V/S The Vice Chancellor, University of Karachi and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
4001.Const. P. 5202/2017 (D.B.) M/s D.M Roller Flour Mills V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4002.Const. P. 1129/2015 (D.B.) M/s i2 Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
4003.Const. P. 1423/2013 (D.B.) Abdul Shakoor V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4004.Const. P. 4399/2015 (D.B.) Humair Shoukat & another V/S Chairman Anticorruption & Others. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4005.Const. P. 2421/2016 (D.B.) Young???s (Private) Limited & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4006.Cr.Bail 492/2017 (S.B.) RAZA MUHAMMAD SHAIKH S/O MUHAMMAD BUX V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
4007.S.M.A 230/2016 (S.B.) In the matter of Letter of Administration of deceased Tahir Ahmed Khan V/S Nil Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: International Law, Civil Procedure Law (UAE), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 13.), Civil Procedure Code CPC (Section 44.)
2019 PLD Sindh 130, 2017 SBLR Sindh 2034It would be an inconvenience, rather a hardship for the present Petitioner and her siblings to file the proceeding in respect of properties of her deceased father in three different Countries; Pakistan for moveable property, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates for the immoveable properties, particularly, when instant Proceeding is a noncontentious in nature. Proprietary rights are mentioned in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and hence they can neither be ignored nor their significance can be lessened.Read more
4008.Const. P. 2482/2017 (D.B.) M/s Fecto Cement Ltd V/S Commissoner I.R and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4009.H.C.A 268/2017 (D.B.) Shakir Ahmed Shamsi V/S State Bank of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
4010.Const. P. 1201/2016 (D.B.) Jamaluddin Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4011.Const. P. 3132/2017 (D.B.) M/s Pemcon Logistics V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4012.Suit 727/2012 (S.B.) IQBAL RASHEED V/S BABAR MIRZA CHUGTAI & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Civil Procedure Code CPC
It is apparent from the record that no arbitration proceeding under the Arbitration Act, 1940 took place. To a query, learned counsel for the plaintiff did not deny this fact that the said arbitration decision which in fact is a Compromise Agreement, which is a result of mediation done by two persons, namely Zaheer H. Minhas, Advocate and Wazeerzada Afridi; the latter has also testified about the authenticity of the above document.Read more
Matter:-RECOVERY OF AMOUNT / DAMAGES
4013.I.T.R.A 146/2015 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S. AHMED OIL GHEE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4014.Const. P. 6300/2016 (D.B.) Mst Shahnaz Begum V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Missing Person
SHO PS New Town, respondent No.6, has filed comments through Additional SHO, in which it is stated that alleged detenue Muhammad Yousuf is confined in Central Prison, Karachi, in Crime No.275/16 lodged under section 6/9-C CNS Act of PS Tipu Sultan. He has also attached Certificate duly signed by Senior Superintendent, Central Prison, Karachi. On this report, question of missing person is over as alleged detenue is confined in Central Prison, Karachi, in some crime though learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in the case, for which, the petitioner has to avail appropriate remedy in the trial court.Read more
4015.Const. P. 252/2016 (D.B.) Irshad V/S WAPDA and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
After arguing at some length learned counsel for petitioner agrees to approach the Electric Inspector but she requests that some time may be fixed in which application/complaint of the petitioner may be decided by the Electric Inspector. Let proper application/complaint be filed by the petitioner to Electric Inspector incorporating his grievances and if any such application and or complaint is filed to Electric Inspector in accordance with law, the same shall be decided within three months.Read more
4016.Const. P. 3040/2013 (D.B.) ASGHAR ALI V/S CHIEF SEPCO THERMAL Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
The learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to satisfy to satisfy the court as to maintainability of instant petition in view of alternative remedy U/S 26 of the Electricity Act, before the Electric Inspector, thereafter the petitioner and his counsel have not come forward to assist the court regarding the objection, who appears to have lost interest.Read more
4017.Const. P. 3095/2012 (D.B.) Ali Nawaz V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
The petitioner has expressed his grievance regarding electricity bill issued by the SEPCO authorities. However, record shows that after having filed instant petition, the petitioner and his Counsel have not remained vigilant to proceed with the matter. According to learned Counsel for respondents the petition is misconceived as the alternate remedy is available to the petitioner under the Electricity Act, which has already been availed by the petitioner who has filed a complaint before Electric Inspector, Sukkur in respect of subject bill.Read more
4018.Criminal Appeal 105/2015 (D.B.) Saifullah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4019.Const. P. 1810/2014 (D.B.) Eshwar Kumar V/S Federation of Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Electricity Act, 1910 (Quashment of FIR)
Apparently this matter is involving disputed questions of fact which cannot be decided in these proceedings under article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and it needs no reiteration that the Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court is conditional upon non-availability of other remedy(ies). Learned counsel for the petitioner has also not been able to satisfy the Court as to how this petition is maintainableRead more
4020.I.T.R.A 20/2013 (D.B.) The Commissioner Inland Revenue. V/S Pakistan Re-Insurance Co Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4021.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 234/2010 (D.B.) M/s Tulip Tower Industries (Pvt) Ltd V/S Additional Collector of Customs & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4022.Const. P. 925/2013 (D.B.) Muhammad Ali V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
To a simple glimpse to the prayer clauses made by the petitioner there are various factual controversies and disputed question of facts which cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction. It is also a fact that the petitioner has not approached to the Electric Inspector appointed under the Electricity Act. The petitioner has also raised the grievance regarding the per unit price, meter reading, excessive amount of bill and its adjustment, restoration of electricity and the cost of the petitionRead more
4023.Const. P. 4326/2012 (D.B.) P.T.C.L V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
4024.Const. P. 612/2013 (D.B.) Ghulam Sarwar V/S Chief Executive HESCO & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
After considering the prayer of the petitioner it is clear that such type of disputes can be resolved easily on making proper application to the Electric Inspector which is the competent authority in this case appointed under the Electricity Act.Read more
4025.Criminal Miscelleneous 79/2014 (D.B.) M/s.Abid S. Zuberi and others through M/s. Arshad Tayebaly, Abdul Hafeez Lakho, Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah, Faisal Siddiqui, Abdur Rehman and Amanullah Khan, Advocates. : V/S M/s. Khawaja Shams-ul-Islam and Khawaja Saif-ul-Islam, advocates. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4026.Criminal Miscelleneous 79/2014 (D.B.) M/s.Abid S. Zuberi and others through M/s. Arshad Tayebaly, Abdul Hafeez Lakho, Syed Ghulam Shabbir Shah, Faisal Siddiqui, Abdur Rehman and Amanullah Khan, Advocates. : V/S M/s. Khawaja Shams-ul-Islam and Khawaja Saif-ul-Islam, advocates. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4027.Cr.Bail 349/2014 (S.B.) Riaz Hussain Sangi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4028.Cr.Tran 70/2014 (S.B.) Syed Muhammad Athar Hussain V/S Affan Shah and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4029.Criminal Miscelleneous 484/2014 (S.B.) Riaz Hussain Sahito V/S S.S.P District Khairpur and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4030.Const. P. 766/2014 (S.B.) Lal Mohammad Channa V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4031.Criminal Miscelleneous 538/2014 (S.B.) Mst.Samina @ Lalo V/S Mst.Shabiran and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4032.Cr.Bail 605/2013 (S.B.) Abdul Razzak Mahar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4033.Const. P. 1599/2014 (S.B.) Mst: Nabiat Khatoon V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4034.Const. P. 1237/2010 (S.B.) M/s. Ford Rhods Sidat Hyder & Company V/S James Finlay Ltd & Ord Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
4035.Cr.J.A 28/2013 (D.B.) Salman V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4036.Const. P. 2305/2011 (D.B.) Feroze Khan and others V/S District Officer Roads Ghotki and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4037.Const. P. 1362/2011 (D.B.) Hazoor Bux Ujjan V/S EDO Health Khairpur and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
4038.Const. P. 245/2011 (D.B.) Muhammad Yameen Bandhani V/S Government of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4039.Const. P. 2124/2012 (D.B.) Roshan Ali Bozdar V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD/BRIDGE
4040.Const. P. 534/2012 (D.B.) Majid Hussain V/S Regional Director Colleges Sukkur and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4041.Const. P. 1501/2013 (D.B.) Ghulam Bashir V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-SERVICE EDUCATION
4042.Const. P. 1195/2012 (D.B.) Zulifiqar Ali V/S Assistant Manager SDO SEPCO Sub Div Suk & ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-WAPDA
4043.Const. P. 1283/2013 (D.B.) Muhammad Rafique V/S Director General NAB and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-EDUCATION
4044.Const. P. 3224/2012 (D.B.) Sikandar Ali Kalhoro and others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4045.Const. P. 3016/2012 (D.B.) Mohammad Ramzan V/S Govt. of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-ADMINISTRATION
4046.Const. P. 1141/2013 (D.B.) Ali Murad and others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4047.Const. P. 572/2011 (D.B.) Umed Ali Solangi V/S DCO District Khairpur and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4048.Const. P. 495/2011 (F.B.) Hasan Ali Rice V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4049.Const. P. 1084/2011 (D.B.) Adamjee Enterprises and ors V/S Pakistan and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4050.Const. P. 857/2011 (F.B.) Tata Textile Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4051.Const. P. 115/2011 (D.B.) Bulk Management Pak Pvt Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4052.Const. P. 2753/2009 (F.B.) M/S Shahbaz Garments Pvt Ltd V/S Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4053.Const. P. 3484/2011 (D.B.) M/S Nagina Cotton Mills Ltd V/S Federation of pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4054.Const. P. 439/2011 (D.B.) Qasim Rice Mills V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4055.Const. P. 3490/2011 (D.B.) M/S Sapphire Finishing Mills Ltd V/S Federation of pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4056.Const. P. 3491/2011 (D.B.) M/S Sapphire Fibres Ltd V/S Federation of pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4057.Const. P. 359/2011 (F.B.) Ihsan Industries (PVT) Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4058.Const. P. 3483/2011 (D.B.) M/S Bhanero Testile mills ltd V/S Federation of pakistan pvt ltd & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4059.Const. P. 2877/2011 (D.B.) M/S Imran Ship Breaking Co. V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4060.Const. P. 3913/2011 (F.B.) M/S QST Naveena Pvt. Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4061.Const. P. 1619/2011 (D.B.) Yunus Textile V/S Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4062.Const. P. 4119/2011 (F.B.) M/S Sindh Abadgar Sugar Mills Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4063.Const. P. 4120/2011 (F.B.) M/S Mirza Sugar Mills Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4064.Const. P. 3618/2010 (D.B.) M/s.Naveena Exports Ltd., V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4065.Const. P. 2688/2010 (F.B.) Dewan Steel Mills V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4066.Const. P. 3488/2011 (D.B.) M/S FAISAL DPINNING MILLS LTD V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4067.Const. P. 590/2011 (F.B.) Asian Food Industry Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4068.Const. P. 680/2011 (F.B.) North Star Textile Mills V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4069.Const. P. 3521/2010 (D.B.) Lucky Cement Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4070.Const. P. 589/2011 (F.B.) Mayfair Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4071.Const. P. 679/2011 (F.B.) The Paracha Textile Mills Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4072.Const. P. 605/2011 (F.B.) Dalda Food Pvt Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4073.Const. P. 360/2011 (F.B.) Pakiatan Housing PVT Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4074.Const. P. 440/2011 (F.B.) M/s.Amir Rice Trading Co., V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4075.Const. P. 856/2011 (F.B.) Salfi Textile Mills Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4076.Const. P. 699/2011 (F.B.) Indus Dyeing & Manufacturing Co Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
4077.Const. P. 6/2010 (F.B.) M/s.Afzal Motors V/S Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4078.Const. P. 367/2011 (D.B.) M/s.Gul Ahmed Textile V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4079.Const. P. 1483/2011 (D.B.) Agar International Pvt.,Ltd., V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4080.Const. P. 3912/2011 (F.B.) M/S Naveena Industries Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4081.Const. P. 3492/2011 (D.B.) M/S Reliance Cotton Spinning Mills Ltd V/S Federation of pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4082.Const. P. 2878/2011 (D.B.) M/S Sadaf Enterprises V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4083.Const. P. 1394/2010 (F.B.) M/S Pakistan gum Industries V/S Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4084.Const. P. 2700/2011 (D.B.) M/S Sitara Energy V/S Pakistan and ros Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4085.Const. P. 2876/2011 (D.B.) M/S Abdul Sattar Noor Mohammad & Co V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
4086.Const. P. 3489/2011 (D.B.) M/S SAPPHIRE TEXTILE MILLS LTD V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4087.Const. P. 3494/2011 (D.B.) M/S DIMOND FABRICS LTD V/S Federation of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4088.Const. P. 3493/2011 (D.B.) M/S AMER COTTON MILLS PVT LTD V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4089.Const. P. 452/2010 (F.B.) Yunus Textile Mills Limited V/S Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4090.Const. P. 358/2011 (F.B.) H. Nizam Din & Sons (Pvt) Ltd. V/S Pakistan through Secretary & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
4091.Const. P. 4121/2011 (D.B.) M/S Pangrio Sugar Mills Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4092.Const. P. 2755/2009 (F.B.) M/S Eastern Garments Pvt Ltd V/S Pakistan and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
4093.Const. P. 356/2011 (D.B.) Unibro Industries Ltd V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
4094.Const. P. 3914/2011 (F.B.) M/S Ahmed Oriental Textile Mills Ltd. V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi
4095.Const. P. 2754/2009 (F.B.) M/S Convenience food Industries Pvt Ltd V/S Pakistan and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TAX MATTER
4096.Const. P. 3240/2012 (D.B.) Ahsan Ali and others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4097.Const. P. 1665/2012 (D.B.) Mir Israr Hussain V/S Govt of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Foti Khata
4098.Const. P. 599/2013 (D.B.) Wajahat Hussain V/S Muhammad Akram (TMA) & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4099.Const. P. 604/2013 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Ahmed V/S SSP Ghotki and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4100.Const. P. 863/2012 (D.B.) Shahnawaz V/S P.O Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-EDUCATION
4101.Const. P. 425/2013 (D.B.) Mujeebuddin Mailk V/S K.E.S.C and Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
It may be observed that under section 26(6) of the Electricity Act the Electricity Inspector is competent to examine and adjudicate such controversy. The petitioner may avail of such remedy before the authority concerned. If the petitioner needs assistance, President/ General Secretary Sindh High Court Bar Association may provide him pro bono lawyer to avail the remedy in accordance with law.Read more
4102.Const. P. 2158/2012 (D.B.) Mst. Naziran Bibi V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
On 07.08.2012 attention of the learned counsel for the petitioner was drawn that the controversy could be resolved by the Electricity Inspector in terms of section 26 of the Electricity Act, 1910 and the petitioner was directed to approach the Electricity Inspector within ten days therefrom. The matter has come up on 20.11.2012 when none was in attendance for the petitioner. Today also the position remains the same. It appears that the petitioner has approached and availed the remedy in accordance with lawRead more
4103.Const. P. 1748/2010 (D.B.) Ali Akbar Shar and others V/S Govt of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Foti Khata
4104.Const. P. 2758/2011 (D.B.) Javeed Hussain and others V/S EDO Health Ghotki and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4105.Const. P. 3030/2011 (D.B.) Sabit Ali Shah V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4106.Const. P. 2241/2011 (D.B.) Lal Khan V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-SERVICE EDUCATION
4107.Const. P. 2820/2011 (D.B.) Muhammad Hussain and others V/S EDO Health and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4108.Const. P. 484/2011 (D.B.) Allah Wadhayo Jamali V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
4109.Const. P. 344/2011 (D.B.) Muhammad Ashraf Ghanghro V/S P.O.Sindh and an other Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4110.Const. P. 2821/2011 (D.B.) Abdul Ghani Channa V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-EDUCATION
4111.Cr.Bail 391/2012 (D.B.) Abdul Jabbar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
4112.Cr.Bail 1143/2011 (D.B.) Kamran Lakho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
4113.Criminal Miscelleneous 200/2012 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman Kori V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4114.Const. P. 699/2010 (D.B.) Mansaf Ali Gabol V/S EDO Education and an other Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
4115.Const. P. 2670/2010 (D.B.) Shahid Hussain and others V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
4116.Const. P. 2167/2012 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, KarachiTopic: Missing Person
The SSP Karachi West is directed to submit his progress reportregarding efforts made by law enforcement agencies for recovery of missing person.If the missing person is involved in any criminal case, the details of the case will also be placed on record on or before the next date of hearing. To come up on 07.08.2012.Read more
4117.Const. P. 1442/2012 (D.B.) Mst.Shama V/S S.S.P Sukkur and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Land Matters
4118.Const. P. 1507/2012 (D.B.) Gul Bahar Bano and another V/S SSP Ghotki & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4119.Const. P. 2965/2011 (D.B.) Jam Khan Katohar V/S E.D.O (Revenue) Khairpur & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
4120.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 335/2010 (D.B.) M/s. FFK Construction Co. V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4121.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 332/2010 (D.B.) Niaz Muhammad V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4122.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 331/2010 (D.B.) Niaz Muhammad V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4123.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 329/2010 (D.B.) Niaz Muhammad V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4124.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 343/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
4125.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 334/2010 (D.B.) M/s. FFK Construction Co V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4126.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 337/2010 (D.B.) M/s. FFK Construction Co V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4127.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 340/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4128.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 349/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4129.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 342/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4130.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 344/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4131.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 348/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4132.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 346/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4133.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 341/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4134.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 347/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4135.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 345/2010 (D.B.) M/s. Al Sadat Engineering & Construction V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4136.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 339/2010 (D.B.) M/s. FFK & Construction Co. Karachi V/S Customs Excise & Sales Tax Appellant Tribunal &Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
4137.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 333/2010 (D.B.) M/s. FFK Construction Co V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4138.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 336/2010 (D.B.) M/s. FFK Construction Co V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4139.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 338/2010 (D.B.) M/s. FFK Construction Co. V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4140.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 330/2010 (D.B.) Niaz Muhammad V/S Custom Excise & Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
4141.Const. P. 1594/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Adnan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-INCOME TAX
4142.Const. P. 188/2010 (D.B.) Haji Wasil Khan V/S Cheif Executive HESCO and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadIf there is any defect in the meter, the Hesco should resort to the provisions of Section 26 of the Electricity Act, to remove and or cure such defects. In case if the average bills are continued to be issued by the meter readers and or by the Revenue Officer, after the stipulated period we will hold the Chief Executive of the HESCO personally responsible. The defiance of the order of this Court will expose the officer guilty to contempt proceedings.Read more
4143.Cr.Misc. 442/2009 (S.B.) Jago S/o Aju Arisar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTopic: Missing Person
In the statement it has been stated that Mano Khan s/o Aju Arisar who has been involved in espionage was arrested on 08-09-2009 from Khipro City District Sanghar and thereafter his statement under section 164 Cr.P.C was recorded on 17-10-2009 before Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate-V, Hyderabad. His custody is with the 51-Brigade 34-FF Chhore Cantonment, awaiting finalization of his trial in the offences under the official Secrete Act, 1923 and as such, he cannot be termed as missing person. The statement has been annexed which was given by Mano Khan and same is placed on record.Read more
4144.Const. P. 71/2010 (S.B.) Hazaro Marwai V/S SPO Investigation & ors Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurTopic: Missing Person
This application has been opposed by learned A.A.G. as according to him the prayer clause of the application has become infructuous. While missing person was disclosed by the respondent No.1 and 2 and presently he is sent to jail by the trial court. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that he will avail the remedy whatsoever available to him in accordance with law before the learned trial court, therefore, he does not press this petition, accordingly this petition is disposed as not pressedRead more
4145.Const. P. 324/2006 (D.B.) Niaz Muhammad V/S The Chief Exect: HESCO & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaTopic: Electricity Act, 1910
U/S 24 and 26 of the Electricity Act 1910, the Electric Inspector Government of Sindh of the area is competent officer to adjudicate the matter under dispute therefore, the Electric Inspector Government of Sindh Sukkur is directed to decide the matter in accordance with the law within a period of 90 daysRead more
4146.H.C.A 107/2012 (D.B.) Sher Asfandyar Khan V/S Neelofar Shah & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER