Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan
Mr.Justice Yahya Afridi
Hon'ble Chief Justice
Sindh High Court
Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
1.Criminal Appeal 22/2026 (S.B.) Hassan Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1991, 2026 SHC MPK 2132
2.Const. P. 7204/2026 (D.B.) Ameer Hamza Shah V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiProtective/Transitory Bail ??? Sections 5 and 23 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, read with Sections 34 and 109, PPC ??? Petitioner residing abroad and willing to surrender before the competent Court ??? Protective/Transitory Bail granted for fifteen days to enable surrender before the trial Court, subject to solvent surety and P.R. bond.Read more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
3.Const. P. 230/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Basheeran V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2180
4.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 180/2018 (D.B.) M/s. Apna TV Channel (Pvt) Ltd. V/S The Commissioner (Appeals) SRB & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2173
Matter:-SALES TAX.
5.Const. P. 444/2026 (D.B.) Bilawal V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
6.Const. P. 968/2026 (D.B.) Zohaib Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurApplications for appointment on the deceased quota where the right had accrued prior to Muhammad Jalal???s case are now being examined and scrutinized by a Scrutiny Committee constituted by the Secretary of the concerned Department. The petitioner may approach the Secretary or the Scrutiny Committee constituted by him under notification dated 30.04.2026.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
7.Spl.Cr.J.A 140/2016 (D.B.) Siraj Khan Arain V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurControl of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, S.9(c): Safe custody and safe transmission of samples (480 kg charas) not proved: benefit of doubt. Register No. XIX entry not produced, and neither the Malkhana Incharge nor the carrier constable was examined. A positive Chemical Examiner???s report cannot cure the break in the chain of custody (2025 SCMR 923). Appeal allowed; acquitted.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
8.Spl.Cr.J.A 214/2016 (D.B.) Islam Shaikh V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurControl of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, S.9(c): Safe custody and safe transmission of the charas (40 kg), not established: benefit of doubt. The prosecution did not produce the Malkhana Register No. XIX entry, did not examine the Malkhana Incharge, and did not examine the Excise Constable through whom the property was sent to the Chemical Examiner. The evidence of PW-1 and PW-2 also differed on who held the charas and on the sequence of sealing. A break in the chain of custody is not cured by a positive Chemical Examiner???s report recording intact seals, and the conviction (life imprisonment) was set aside. Appeal allowed; appellant acquitted.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
9.Const. P. 991/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Syeda Muniba V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
10.Const. P. 605/2026 (D.B.) Aziz Ullah V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
11.Const. P. 2115/2025 (D.B.) Manzar Hussain V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurApplications for appointment on the deceased quota where the right had accrued prior to Muhammad Jalal???s case are now being examined and scrutinized by a Scrutiny Committee constituted by the Secretary of the concerned Department. The petitioner may approach the Secretary or the Scrutiny Committee constituted by him under notification dated 30.04.2026.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
12.Const. P. 3311/2023 (D.B.) Syed Fazil Shah Kazmi and Another V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
13.Const. P. 504/2026 (D.B.) Aftab V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
14.I.T.R.A 63/2019 (D.B.) Commissioner Inland Revenue V/S M/S PREMIER OIL PAKISTAN (KIRTHAR B.V) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2167
Matter:-INCOME TAX
15.Const. P. 406/2026 (D.B.) Jalaluddin Chandio V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 2181The Petitioner has challenged the FIR, which was filed against him under section 462-I of the P.P.C. The petition has been allowed.Read more
Matter:-Quashement of F.I.R.
16.I.T.R.A 111/2018 (D.B.) M/S MACKINNON MACKENZIE & CO: OF PAKISTAN (PVT) LT V/S THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2169
Matter:-INCOME TAX
17.I.T.R.A 90/2021 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S. MAPAK EDIBLE OILS PVT. LTD. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2168
Matter:-INCOME TAX
18.Cr.Rev 59/2025 (S.B.) Javed Dahri & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurOffences under sections 337-A(ii), 337-L(ii), 147 and 148 PPC, for which the Applicants have been convicted, are compoundable under section 345(2) Cr.P.C.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
19.Cr.Rev 58/2023 (D.B.) Asadullah V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur**Tagline:** Criminal Revision for enhancement of sentence from life imprisonment to death under ss. 302(b)/149 PPC dismissed. Enhancement is an exceptional power, exercised only on gross misreading of evidence or grave miscarriage of justice; proof of the charge alone does not require death. As the roles of the nine respondents were not identical and the injuries were caused by butts and blunt weapons, life imprisonment was not manifestly inadequate. Pending appeal against conviction (Crl. Appeal No.S-76 of 2023) to be decided on its own merits, uninfluenced by this order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
20.Const. P. 7346/2026 (D.B.) Agha Muhammad Naeem Khan V/S Project Manager DHA Valley (JV) & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ALLOTMENT OF PLOT
21.Const. P. 985/2026 (D.B.) Abdullah & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
22.Const. P. 1788/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Fahmeeda Imdad Sahito V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurA contract employee has no vested right to regularization merely on the basis of long contractual service in the absence of a statutory provision or applicable Government policy. No writ of mandamus can be issued under Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution for regularization. Petition dismissed as not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
23.Const. P. 3844/2023 (D.B.) Dr. Muhammad Shahnawaz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
24.Const. P. 185/2026 (D.B.) Aftab Ahmed Soomro V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Deceased Quota
25.Const. P. 7075/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Uzair V/S Province of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
26.Const. P. 997/2025 (D.B.) Sagar Sarwar V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Deceased Quota
27.Const. P. 795/2025 (D.B.) Samiullah Bhutto V/S PO Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Deceased Quota
28.Const. P. 945/2025 (D.B.) Mazhar Ali Abro V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Deceased Quota
29.Const. P. 1243/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Rashid & Another V/S Muhammad Moin Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
30.Const. P. 2492/2026 (D.B.) Chanda Begum V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CORRECTION IN NAME
31.Const. P. 1312/2025 (S.B.) Nadeem Sultan V/S Asif Feroze & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi20. For the foregoing reasons, I am of the considered view that the petitioner has failed to make out a case for interference by this Court in the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, the instant constitutional petition, being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed, along with the pending applications, if any. The judgment dated 06.10.2025 passed by the learned IIIrd Additional District Judge, Karachi East, in First Rent Appeal No.41 of 2025, and the order dated 26.02.2025 passed by the learned Rent Controller-XIII, Karachi East, in Rent Case No.359 of 2019, are maintained. Needless to observe that the petitioner shall comply with the directions contained in the order of ejectment, subject to any lawful protection available to him under the applicable law. 21. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
32.Const. P. 5999/2023 (D.B.) Mst. Kehkashan Bano V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PENSION
33.Const. P. 862/2026 (D.B.) Aashan Ali Khoso V/S P.O Sindh & 3 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurApplications for appointment on the deceased quota where the right had accrued prior to Muhammad Jalal???s case are now being examined and scrutinized by a Scrutiny Committee constituted by the Secretary of the concerned Department. The petitioner may approach the Secretary or the Scrutiny Committee constituted by him under notification dated 30.04.2026.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
34.Const. P. 999/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Saira Kumbhar V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Deceased Quota
35.Spl. Cr. A. 85/2025 (D.B.) Allah Dino @ Dino Machi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRecovery of 5,010 grams of charas in six separate pieces-Sample drawn from only one piece and found positive for charas- No separate sampling and chemical examination of the remaining pieces - Principle laid down in Ameer Zeb v. The State (PLD 2012 SC 380) applied - Proved quantity restricted to 500 grams - Conviction altered from Section 9(1)3(d) to Section 9(1)3(b) of the CNSA, 1997 - Sentence reduced from fourteen years to five years- rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.40,000/-.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 14 YEARS & ABOVE
36.Cr.J.A 21/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Ashraf @ Ashraf Golo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 2153Criminal Jail Appeal in Murder Case has been allowed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
37.M.A. 112/2025 (S.B.) Salman Masud V/S Institute of Chartered Accounts of Pakistan (ICAP) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2166Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961 - Disciplinary proceedings and imposition of penalty by Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) - Failure to record reasons justifying imposition of severest category of penalty - Non-consideration of mitigating circumstances - Proportionality of sanction to be assessed with reference to misconduct actually established and not on the entire range of allegations originally levelled - One-year removal from Register of Members held disproportionate - High Court sets aside penalty and imposes formal reprimand.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
38.Cr.Rev 24/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Uris & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2174
39.Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 11/2026 (D.B.) The Collector of Customs (Enforcement), Karachi V/S Muhammad Kamran s/o Akhtar Muhammad & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2155
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
40.Const. P. 1126/2026 (S.B.) UMAR JAMSHED S/O LATE JAMSHED IQBAL V/S MISHAL JAWAID & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2157
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
41.Criminal Appeal 103/2024 (S.B.) Loung Khan & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2175, 2026 SHC MPK 2178
42.Const. P. 78/2022 (S.B.) Cutchi Memon Markzi Jammat Karachi V/S Ashraf Banothia and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
43.Const. P. 569/2011 (S.B.) Muhammad Shafi V/S Hassan Ali & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
44.Const. P. 1200/2024 (D.B.) Talib Hussain Channa V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurMere issuance of a show-cause notice does not warrant interference under constitutional jurisdiction unless issued without jurisdiction. Departmental proceedings must ordinarily be allowed to conclude, with the remedy of appeal available against any adverse order. Suspension pending disciplinary proceedings authorized under Rule 5(1) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973. Constitutional petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Show Cause Notice
45.Criminal Appeal 44/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Abbas V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2162
46.Criminal Appeal 1/2026 (S.B.) Khan Muhammad @ Aburo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2150
47.Criminal Miscelleneous 287/2026 (S.B.) Syed Yaqoob Shah V/S Syed Usama Shah & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2160
48.Spl. Federal Excise Reference Application 53/2017 (D.B.) Paxar Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. V/S Deputy Commissioner I-R Zone-II & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2149
Matter:-FED. EXCISE
49.Cr.Acq.A. 24/2025 (S.B.) Dr. Ghulam Murtaza V/S Nawab Ali & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
50.Const. P. 640/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Hassan Lohar V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaConditional offer letter, neither accepted nor acted upon, does not created vested right or enforceable right. Where the genuineness of the recruitment process and offer letter involves seriously disputed questions of fact, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to establish such a right; however, candidates cannot be non-suited outright where the issuance of the offer letter is affirmed by the officers who signed them. Independent departmental verification of the original recruitment record directed.Read more
Matter:-Appointment
51.Const. P. 74/2026 (D.B.) Ghulam Rasool Gorar & Others V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaConditional offer letter, neither accepted nor acted upon, does not created vested right or enforceable right. Where the genuineness of the recruitment process and offer letter involves seriously disputed questions of fact, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to establish such a right; however, candidates cannot be non-suited outright where the issuance of the offer letter is affirmed by the officers who signed them. Independent departmental verification of the original recruitment record directed.Read more
Matter:-Joining
52.Cr.Bail 537/2026 (S.B.) Sohail @ Zeeshan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
53.Const. P. 1691/2026 (D.B.) Meer Khan Sahito V/S P.O Sindh & 09 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurWrit jurisdiction is not intended to probe into title to immovable property. The question whether any public property has been encroached, falls within the domain of the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
54.Const. P. 564/2026 (D.B.) Yasir Mumtaz Soomro V/S Federation of Pak & 03 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurOnce the petitioner has withdrawn his appeal from the FST, he cannot be entertained in writ jurisdiction in view of the bar contained under Article 212 of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-Reinstate of Service
55.Cr.Bail 532/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Aftab V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
56.Cr.Bail 385/2026 (S.B.) Shahid Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
57.Const. P. 700/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar Ahmed Siddiqi V/S Mst. Izza Fakhri & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2141Petition dismissed. However,the petitioner shall remain at liberty to approach the competent Guardian Court for appropriate modification or enlargement of the visitation schedule, including meetings of the minor with his paternal grandparents and visitation on special occasions, which application, if so filed, shall be decided strictly in accordance with law, independently and keeping in view the paramount welfare and best interests of the minor. The competent Court shall also ensure that the visitation arrangements already in force are implemented in their true letter and spirit.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
58.Cr.J.A 194/2022 (S.B.) Niaz Hussain @ Muhammad Arshad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 2165
Matter:-Life Imprisonment
59.R.A (Civil Revision) 9/2006 (S.B.) Muhammad Bachal V/S Khawand Dino and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 2144The Board of Revenue has no power of suo motu review: an order reopening its own final decision on the Colonization Officer???s report, without an application by an aggrieved person and beyond time, is without lawful authority. Notice and hearing supply no power the law withholds, and the ouster of civil jurisdiction does not protect it. A revision out of time does not oust the Court???s suo motu power under section 115 CPC where such a jurisdictional error appears.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
60.Criminal Miscelleneous 248/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Hassan & others V/S Jan Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2159
61.Criminal Appeal 13/2024 (S.B.) Abdullah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2179
62.I.T.R.A 449/2022 (D.B.) THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S HYDERABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2133
Matter:-INCOME TAX
63.Cr.Rev 6/2026 (S.B.) Karimdad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
64.Cr.Bail 367/2026 (S.B.) Masti Khan Jagirani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
65.Const. P. 345/2026 (S.B.) Pakistan Petroleum Limited V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaWhere two public bodies hold rival claims over the suit land, the body whose allotment and entries are in question is, at least, a proper party, and no decree can bind it in its absence. An application under Order I, Rule 10(2), C.P.C., cannot be decided against the plaint as it stands. Sub-rule (4) provides for amendment nor against the Plaintiff???s own title and the Court may add a party of its own motion. Delay apart, interference lies where the Court below applies the wrong test.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
66.Cr.Rev 45/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Samina Tahir Hussain & Others V/S Muhammad Maroof & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
67.R.A (Civil Revision) 58/2026 (S.B.) Ghulam Ali Lashari V/S Irshad Ahmed Sadhayo & Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaExecution of decree ??? judgment debtor has no right under Section 39 of C.P.C. to seek transfer of execution proceedings to another Court; choice of forum for execution rests with the decree-holder. Mere convenience or residence of judgment-decree affords no ground for transfer. Revision dismissed in Limine.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
68.Criminal Miscelleneous 79/2026 (S.B.) Sohrab Ali Jagirani and Others V/S SHO PS PP Saddar Kamber and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaJustice of Peace has no jurisdiction to constitute a JIT or prescribe its composition of investigating team under Section 22-A(6) Cr.P.C., accused has no right to choose his investigator; transfer of investigation requires cogent material establishing choice or mala fide. Application dismissed.Read more
Matter:-22 A-B
69.Const. P. 1016/2026 (S.B.) Naveed Shahid Siddiqui & another V/S Sahar Iftikhar Qureshi & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
70.Const. P. 1258/2023 (S.B.) Zain Arshad Khan S/o Muhammad Arshad Khan V/S Mst. Raeesa Usmani and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi12. It is clarified that the findings of the learned appellate Court regarding entitlement of the minor to maintenance and the quantum thereof shall remain undisturbed. The learned appellate Court shall endeavour to decide the matter expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from receipt of this order. Needless to observe that the observations made herein are confined to the controversy under consideration and shall not prejudice the independent determination of the matter by the learned appellate Court. 13. As regards the execution proceedings, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the competent Court for appropriate orders in accordance with law. No automatic suspension of the execution proceedings shall follow from this order. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
71.Cr.Bail 441/2026 (S.B.) Sardar Ahmed Chandio & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
72.Const. P. 1125/2026 (S.B.) Anum D/o Zahid Ahmed Gharib V/S Salman Ahmed Tabba & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
73.Const. P. 1184/2026 (S.B.) Mairaj Milk Shop V/S Shahid Hussain & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENT MATTER
74.Cr.Bail 432/2026 (S.B.) Meharram & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
75.Cr.Bail 488/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Razia Begum Mastoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
76.II.A. 12/2026 (S.B.) Rasool Bux and others V/S Mst. Kalsoom Babar and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaState land under running harap grant. Agreement to sale does not create any right, title or interest in the immovable property; where property rights have not yet been conferred upon the grantee. Such agreement is at best contingent and becomes enforceable only upon conferment of those rights. Mere occupation of State land without grant creates no right against the lawful allottee. Second Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
77.Cr.Bail 374/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Ghafoor & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
78.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 168/2018 (D.B.) Khalil Ahmed @ Sikandar @ Asghar Ali Brohi & ors. V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 2140, 2026 SHC SUK 2145Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 - Shrine bombing (4 killed, 16 injured) - Eyewitness identification found reliable despite absence of formal identification parade, corroborated by medical and technical evidence - Plea of false implication unsupported - Khalil Ahmed specifically identified as carrying and placing the explosive device; conviction and death sentence maintained - Abdul Rehman identified as accompanying him, without any specific act of placing or activating the device attributed to him - Conviction maintained, but lesser role treated as mitigating circumstance warranting commutation of death sentence to imprisonment for life - Khalil Ahmed???s appeal dismissed; Abdul Rehman???s appeal partly allowed to the extent of sentence - Murder Reference answered accordingly.Read more
Matter:-DEATH SENTENCE
79.Const. P. 215/2026 (S.B.) Ali Dino Burdi deceased through Lrs V/S P.O Sindh & 09 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPrevious proceedings against other co-owners did not constitute res judicata against the petitioner, who was not a party to the earlier suit. Dismissal of earlier suit for permanent injunction did not determine title to property. Rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC set aside.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
80.Const. P. 5535/2026 (D.B.) Friend Shipping & Forwarding Services & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST TEST
81.Cr.Rev 12/2025 (S.B.) Khuda Bux Junejo V/S SHO/SIP Rehmatullah Solangi PS Lashari & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAt preliminary enquiry stage, Court is only to ascertain whether sufficient grounds exist for proceeding and cannot conduct a meticulous appraisal or determine the complaint on merits. Where police officials are accused of custodial / encounter killing, enquiry by officer of the same police force defeat the object of an impartial enquiry. Police cannot be investigator of their own cause. Dismissal of Direct Complaint set aside and matter remanded for fresh enquiry.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
82.Const. P. 847/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Hanif Ansari V/S Muhammad Haseeb Ansari & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 210018. In the present case, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the learned trial Court or either of the revisional Courts exercised jurisdiction not vested in it, failed to exercise jurisdiction vested by law, or acted in a manner resulting in a patent illegality requiring correction under Article 199 of the Constitution. The impugned orders disclose consideration of the earlier litigation, the relevant documents, the timing of the transfer and the legal provisions relied upon by the parties. The petitioner's disagreement with the conclusions reached by the Courts below does not furnish sufficient justification for this Court to reopen the matter in its constitutional jurisdiction. For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds that the petitioner has failed to make out a case for interference with the order dated 20.08.2020, as maintained by the learned Vth Additional District Judge, Karachi West, through order dated 22.01.2022, or with the order dated 14.01.2023, as maintained by the learned IXth Additional District Judge, Karachi West, through order dated 29.11.2023. No sufficient jurisdictional defect, patent illegality or material irregularity has been established to warrant setting aside the impugned orders. 19. Accordingly, the instant constitutional petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed. The impugned orders dated 20.08.2020, 22.01.2022, 14.01.2023 and 29.11.2023 are maintained. There shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
83.Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 270/2019 (D.B.) Ghulam Rasool @ Baba Brohi & Anor V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 2139, 2026 SHC SUK 2146Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997- Imam Bargah suicide bombing (63 killed, 73 injured)- Convictions maintained -Reliable identification by injured eyewitness - Absence of formal identification parade not fatal in the circumstances - Omission under Section 342, Cr.P.C., not fatal in the absence of prejudice - Recovery of concealed explosives at appellants??? pointation - Custodial disclosure admissible only to the extent of discovery under Article 40, Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 - Non-association of private mashirs not fatal where recovery evidence is trustworthy - Conscious possession of explosives established - Presumption under Section 27-A, ATA, attracted - Appeals dismissed.Read more
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
84.Const. P. 556/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Yousuf V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
85.Const. P. 888/2026 (D.B.) Qaim V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
86.Const. P. 4486/2026 (D.B.) Khalid Ahmed Baig V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
87.Cr.Bail 145/2026 (D.B.) Sajid Ali @ Sajoo @ Sajan Ali Phulpoto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
88.Const. P. 955/2026 (D.B.) Sadam Hussain V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
89.Const. P. 909/2026 (D.B.) Haji Sathi V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
90.Cr.Bail 166/2026 (D.B.) Liaquat Ali Khokhar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
91.Criminal Appeal 45/2024 (D.B.) Punhal Sarki V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaSafe custody is proved by producing every hand that held the parcel with its contemporaneous entry, and a difference over who carried the already sealed parcels on a short joint journey leaves no gap in the chain. Where a portion is drawn and tested from each slab separately, the whole quantity is proved, and a conviction recorded under the wrong clause of the Table, the accused having been charged and tried under the right one, is a curable slip.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
92.Const. P. 155/2025 (S.B.) Allah Rakha @ Irshad Malak V/S P.O Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurMaintenance of Minor???Liability of Paternal Grandfather??? Grandfather???s liability to pay monthly maintenance upheld in the absence of evidence establishing his incapacity. P.R. Bond executed by the mother undertaking to bear the minor???s expenses held relevant to assessment of past maintenance under section 370(3) of Muhammadan Law.Read more
Matter:-Family Matter
93.Const. P. 829/2026 (D.B.) Shahjahan V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
94.Cr.Bail 40/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ibrahim V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
95.Const. P. 6699/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Quba Babar & Shahzado V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
96.Const. P. 942/2023 (S.B.) Shaikh Muhammad Ameen S/o Shaikh Abdul Mateen V/S Mst. Noor Bano and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi20. For the foregoing reasons, I am of the considered view that the petitioner has failed to make out a case warranting interference with the judgment dated 25.08.2023 passed by the learned IVth Additional District Judge, Karachi Central, in First Rent Appeal No.167 of 2022, or the order dated 25.03.2022 passed by the learned Rent Controller-IV, Karachi Central, in Rent Case No.224 of 2020. No jurisdictional defect, material illegality, procedural irregularity or perversity sufficient to attract the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution has been established. 21. Consequently, the instant constitutional petition is dismissed. The impugned judgment dated 25.08.2023 and the order dated 25.03.2022 are maintained. There shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
97.R.A (Civil Revision) 145/2026 (S.B.) Kando & Others V/S Ameen & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 2047
Matter:-Against Judgment
98.Cr.J.A 33/2024 (S.B.) Shagan Kohli V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2044
99.Const. P. 1088/2026 (D.B.) Javed Ahmed Channa V/S P.O Sindh & 4 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurWhile exercising writ jurisdiction Court cannot revive or renew expired contracts. In the absence of a statute or Government policy to the effect, a writ cannot issue for regularization of service.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
100.Const. P. 129/2021 (D.B.) Ata Muhammad Shah V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAmenity land can be used for no other purpose, and any grant of it is void, but only once the plot is shown to be amenity land; absent any plan or notification, and with rival entries held by strangers to the record, title is a disputed fact for the Tribunal. Article 199 yields no more than a direction to decide the pending application by a speaking order after notice to every claimant.Read more
Matter:-AMENITY PLOT
101.Const. P. 6839/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Jahangir V/S Government of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
102.Const. P. 6751/2026 (D.B.) Riaz Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
103.Const. P. 6753/2026 (D.B.) Hamza Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
104.Const. P. 6729/2026 (D.B.) Shamsu Zir Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDetenue released; detention order under Section 3(1) of the Sindh Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, withdrawn; petition disposed of as infructuousRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
105.Const. P. 11/2025 (D.B.) Sindh Engro Coal Mining Co. Ltd V/S Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
106.Const. P. 6339/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Nadia & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
107.Const. P. 424/2025 (D.B.) Niaz Hussain Tunio V/S Govt Of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaA member of the Sindh Councils Unified Grades is not a civil servant, and his service rests on statutory rules. Article 199 applies. Only the Government may move him between Councils, so a Chairman???s relieving letter effects nothing. Where the arrears turn on records the authority itself holds, the Court directs it to verify, hear and decide rather than decree or dismiss.Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
108.Const. P. 283/2021 (D.B.) Mukhtiar Ahmed Jhatial V/S P.O Anti Encoachment, Tribunal, Larkana & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThe Tribunal alone decides whether land is public property, and a private person may move it where officials do not act. Having accepted a demarcation report that part of the land belongs to the village, it could not dismiss the suit without framing issues or recording evidence; the remedy is remand, not a declaration of encroachment by this Court.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Order/ Anti Encroachment
109.Const. P. 6838/2026 (D.B.) Fazal Sharif V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
110.Const. P. 6843/2026 (D.B.) Munir Usman V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
111.Const. P. 6842/2026 (D.B.) Sayed Irfan Shah V/S Government of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
112.Const. P. 6747/2026 (D.B.) Mohsin Shah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
113.Const. P. 6845/2026 (D.B.) Naik Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
114.Const. P. 6844/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Iqbal V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
115.Const. P. 6898/2026 (D.B.) Salman V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDetenue released; detention order under Section 3(1) of the Sindh Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, withdrawn; petition disposed of as infructuousRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
116.Const. P. 6841/2026 (D.B.) Fazal Hameed V/S Government of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
117.Const. P. 6897/2026 (D.B.) Hameed Ullah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDetenue released; detention order under Section 3(1) of the Sindh Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, withdrawn; petition disposed of as infructuousRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
118.Const. P. 1671/2023 (D.B.) Khurram Ahmed Bhatti & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurThe petitioners do not rely on a statute or Government policy for regularization of service. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
119.Const. P. 6754/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ayub V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
120.Const. P. 874/2024 (D.B.) Syed Khadim Hussain Shah V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurIn the absence of a statute or Government policy enabling regularization of service, no writ can issue under Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
121.Const. P. 6745/2026 (D.B.) Umer Shareef V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
122.Const. P. 6681/2026 (D.B.) Abdullah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DETENTION
123.Const. P. 6744/2026 (D.B.) Sajjad Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDetenue released; detention order under Section 3(1) of the Sindh Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, withdrawn; petition disposed of as infructuousRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
124.Const. P. 2980/2024 (D.B.) Azhar Hussain Bajwa and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDeceased quotaRead more
Matter:-INTERVIEW
125.Const. P. 6858/2026 (D.B.) Zaffar V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
126.Const. P. 6748/2026 (D.B.) Umer Shareef V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
127.Const. P. 6752/2026 (D.B.) Shahbaz Haider V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
128.Const. P. 6749/2026 (D.B.) Akbar Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
129.Const. P. 6896/2026 (D.B.) Asif Aziz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
130.Const. P. 6725/2026 (D.B.) Khadija Imran V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDetenue released; detention order under Section 3(1) of the Sindh Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, withdrawn; petition disposed of as infructuousRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
131.Const. P. 6840/2026 (D.B.) Fazal Sharif V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
132.Const. P. 6750/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Asif V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
133.Const. P. 986/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Kaneez Syeda Rizvi & others V/S VIth ADJ, Karachi Central & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2101
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
134.Cr.Bail 389/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Arif V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2032, 2026 SHC MPK 2033, 2026 SHC MPK 2034
135.Cr.Bail 344/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Qayoom V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2020, 2026 SHC MPK 2021, 2026 SHC MPK 2022, 2026 SHC MPK 2023, 2026 SHC MPK 2024, 2026 SHC MPK 2025, 2026 SHC MPK 2026
136.Const. P. 7097/2015 (D.B.) Pakistan Railways and Ors V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2102, 2026 SHC KHI 2103, 2026 SHC KHI 2109, 2026 SHC KHI 2131The question of wages fully elaboratedRead more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
137.Const. P. 794/2025 (S.B.) Abdullah Raja V/S Sultan Rehman & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 204312. I am, therefore, of the considered view that no case has been made out for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The impugned order dated 17.02.2025 passed by the learned Vth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karachi South, in Civil Revision No.146/2024, does not call for interference in the circumstances of the present case. Consequently, the order dated 03.10.2024 passed by the learned VIIIth Senior Civil Judge, Karachi South, dismissing the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11, CPC, also remains undisturbed. Accordingly, the instant constitutional petition is dismissed. The orders passed by the learned Courts below are maintained. 13. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are confined to the controversy arising out of the present constitutional petition and shall not prejudice either party at the trial of Civil Suit No.842/2023. The learned trial Court shall proceed with the suit in accordance with law and determine all questions arising therein, including the issue of limitation, on the basis of the pleadings, applicable law, and evidence, wherever required, without being influenced by any observation herein beyond what is necessary for disposal of this petition. 14. There shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
138.Const. P. 6945/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Hai Khan V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
139.Const. P. 6946/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Saffron Textiles V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
140.Const. P. 382/2025 (D.B.) Allah Dino Bhutto & others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurThere is no applicable statute or Government policy mandating or enabling respondents to regularize the petitioners??? temporary/contractual engagements. Consequently, no writ can issue under Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
141.Const. P. 1096/2026 (S.B.) SHIRAZ AHMED S/O KHURRAM IQBAL V/S MST. MUSK D/O SHIRAZ AHMED & OTHER Sindh High Court, KarachiThe impugned order dated 01-10-2026 being an interim order, this petition under Article 199 is not maintainable and is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s). However, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the learned Trial Court, which shall decide the matter finally on merits after recording evidence and hearing the parties. Nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the suit independently and strictly in accordance with law, uninfluenced by any observation herein.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
142.Const. P. 582/2026 (D.B.) Shahid Hussain Arain & 136 Others V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurIn the absence of a statute or Government policy applicable to the Respondents requiring or enabling them to regularize the Petitioners, no writ can issue to do so under Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
143.Const. P. 735/2026 (D.B.) Shahzad V/S P.O Sindh & 02 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurThere is no statute or Government policy applicable to the respondents requiring or enabling them to regularize the petitioner. Therefore, no writ can issue to do so under Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
144.Const. P. 6623/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Growmore Energy / Trading V/S The Secretary Revenue (Federal) & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX.
145.Const. P. 6833/2026 (D.B.) Ihsan Ullah V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
146.Criminal Appeal 39/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Qahar V/S The State and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaAs no Special Court has been established under the Act of 2024, only the District and Sessions Judge, as the competent court under section 2(qq), may deal with such a trial; an order of an Additional Sessions Judge is without jurisdiction and void. As the appeal under section 32 lies only against a Special Court???s order, an interlocutory order under section 516-A Cr.P.C. is examinable in revision, and the appeal may be converted ex debito justitiae.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
147.Const. P. 6722/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Pioneer Amusement Services (Pvt) Limited V/S PDOHA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
148.Const. P. 578/2015 (D.B.) Irfan Jillani V/S Governor Of Sindh and ors Sindh High Court, KarachiThe Ombudsman did not have jurisdiction and his decision was coram non judice.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
149.Const. P. 269/2025 (D.B.) Aijaz Ali & others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSince the petition for regularization is not premised on any statute or Government policy to that effect, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
150.Const. P. 6167/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Amna & Shoukat Ali Laghari V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
151.Const. P. 6746/2026 (D.B.) Jaan Zada V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
152.Const. P. 7055/2026 (D.B.) Shaikh Irfan Khalid V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SALES TAX REGISTRATION
153.Cr.Acq.A. 42/2026 (S.B.) Mir Jan V/S Waqar Ali & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
154.Const. P. 6128/2026 (D.B.) The Salim Habib Educational Foundation. V/S Securities and Echange Commission & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
155.Const. P. 6166/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Erum & Adil V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiConstitutional Petition ??? Free-will marriage -- Protection of life, liberty, honour and property --Direction to official respondents to provide legal protection to the petitioners and their family members; petitioner No.2 not to be arrested except in accordance with law; Investigating Officer directed to proceed strictly in accordance with law and submit the requisite report before the concerned Magistrate.Read more
Matter:-QUASHEMENT OF F.I.R.
156.Const. P. 2018/2024 (D.B.) Naeem Ali & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurIn the absence of a statute or Government policy applicable to the Respondents requiring or enabling them to regularize the Petitioners, no writ can issue to do so under Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
157.R.A (Civil Revision) 53/2003 (S.B.) Govt: of Sindh and others V/S Rasool Bux Chandio and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 2156Civil Revision dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
158.R.A (Civil Revision) 242/2024 (S.B.) abdull haque V/S raza muhammad Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurResponsibility of First Appellate Court. Remand Order in exception circumstance.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
159.Const. P. 1111/2026 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD AFZAL S/O HAIDER ALI V/S MARIA TARIQ D/O MUHAMMAD TARIQ & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiAdmittedly, the Petitioner contested the suit in full before the Family Court by filing his written statement and evidence and appearing as a witness and the decree was passed on merits after hearing both sides. The Petitioner???s application under Section 12(2) CPC did not identify any fraud, misrepresentation or concealment of the kind the provision requires and the Family Court rightly dismissed it. Further, the Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, 1964 prescribes a strict limitation period for appeals. A party seeking condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act must explain each day of delay with sufficient cause. A bare assertion that the previous counsel did not disclose the limitation period is not sufficient cause. Such a plea, by itself, does not automatically entitle a litigant to condonation, which remains subject to the applicable law and the facts and circumstances of the case. The Appellate Court???s order dismissing the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and the time-barred appeal is therefore well within the law. It discloses no illegality, jurisdictional defect, misreading or non-reading of evidence, or other infirmity warranting interference by this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. The Petitioner has attempted through successive proceedings to reopen a decree that was passed on merits after full contest. Accordingly, the petition is without merit and is dismissed in limine, along with pending application(s), if any.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
160.I. A 26/2023 (S.B.) Ghulam Rasool V/S Manzoor Hussain Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSummary suit scope. Leave refused. Decree to follow.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
161.Cr.Bail 288/2026 (S.B.) Mola Bux & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2013
162.Const. P. 674/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Kaneez Fatima wd/o Syed Mukhtar Hussain V/S Syed Muhammad Taufiq and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2018The deficiency lies in the appellate adjudication, where the material evidence and the findings under challenge have not received the consideration required by law. This Court is not called upon to decide whether the Rent Controller???s appreciation of evidence was preferable to that of the Rent Appellate Court. Rather, the question is whether the learned appellate Court performed the judicial exercise necessary for reversing the finding concerning the foundational relationship of landlord and tenant. For the reasons already discussed, the impugned judgment does not disclose such an exercise. Accordingly, the rent appeal is remanded to the learned appellate Court for fresh decision in accordance with law, subject to the certain directions.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
163.R.A (Civil Revision) 53/2003 (S.B.) Govt: of Sindh and others V/S Rasool Bux Chandio and another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 2154Civil Revision was dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
164.R.A (Civil Revision) 83/2023 (S.B.) Mst. Kaneez Fatima wd/o Syed Mukhtar Hussain V/S Syed Muhammad Taufiq and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2017The failure to adequately determine the applicable starting point of limitation, which materially influenced the impugned appellate judgment, constitutes an error warranting interference in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction. In the circumstances, the appropriate course is to remit the appeal to the learned first appellate Court for a reasoned determination in accordance with law. Accordingly, the appeal is remanded to the learned first appellate Court for fresh decision, subject to the certain directions.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
165.Criminal Appeal 17/2026 (S.B.) Noor Ahmed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2147, 2026 SHC MPK 2161
166.Cr.Acq.A. 4/2026 (S.B.) Maha Singh V/S Khet Singh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
167.Const. P. 195/2026 (S.B.) Abaan thr. his Attorney V/S Learned Civil Judge & J.M, MPK & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
168.Const. P. 221/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Marvi V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
169.Const. P. 196/2024 (D.B.) Khair Muhammad Kasi Pathan V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFor recovery of workan???s wages, remedy is under Section 15 of the Sindh Payment of Wages Act, 2015, not under the Sindh Industrial Relations Act.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
170.Const. P. 286/2025 (S.B.) Syed Zulfiqar Ali Rizvi S/o S. A. Zia Rizvi V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-HARASSMENT
171.Cr.Bail 558/2026 (S.B.) Salman V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
172.Const. P. 941/2023 (D.B.) Mst Asia & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurCandidates who were given appointment orders had secured far more marks than the petitioners. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Recruitment
173.Const. P. 690/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Munaf V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER (MPO)
174.R.A (Civil Revision) 4/2007 (S.B.) Moula Bux Kalhoro V/S Colonization Officer Sukkur and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCivil Revision dismissed being time barred.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
175.Const. P. 1767/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ramzan Chohan V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurIt is acknowledged by the learned counsel that the investigation in said FIR is still underway. The petitioner does not bring forth any exceptional circumstance for interfering with police investigation at this stage.Read more
Matter:-Quashment of F.I.R.
176.Cr.Acq.A. 13/2023 (S.B.) Mahesh Kumar V/S Poonjo Mal and another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
177.Cr.Bail 538/2026 (S.B.) Mukesh & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
178.Const. P. 213/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Shazia & another V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
179.Const. P. 3724/2026 (D.B.) M/s. H.H.K Oil Industries (Pvt) Ltd V/S Govt of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF CHALLAN
180.Criminal Miscelleneous 296/2025 (S.B.) Anwar Ali V/S Nadeem & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
181.Const. P. 315/2026 (S.B.) Juma Khan & Others V/S Mukhtiarkar Revenue Dokri & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaImpugned Order passed by the Additional District Judge ??? IV Larkana, in Civil Revision Application was set asideRead more
Matter:-Against Order
182.Criminal Miscelleneous 124/2025 (S.B.) Munawar Hussain V/S Sho Ps Nabisar & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
183.Const. P. 1752/2026 (D.B.) Masroor Ahmed & Another V/S P.O Sindh & 03 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurIf the Petitioners were dissatisfied with the order passed in appeal by the Sindh Service Tribunal, their remedy was before the Supreme Court of Pakistan, not by way of a constitution petition.Read more
Matter:-Reinstate of Service
184.Const. P. 910/2026 (S.B.) Nazar Gul S/o Roshay Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DIRECTION
185.Const. P. 185/2026 (S.B.) Sadam Hussain Shaikh V/S Mst. Shahneela & 02 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurDigital Copy obtained through CFMS does not serve as certified copy for filing an appeal under section 14 of the Family Courts Act, 1964.Read more
Matter:-G & W
186.Cr.Bail 557/2026 (S.B.) Salman V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
187.Const. P. 240/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Tagul (dec) through LRs &^ Another V/S Late Allah Bux (dec) through LRs & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurQuestion whether the summons of the suit was suppressed, did not require evidence for deciding 12(2) CPC application.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
188.Const. P. 1245/2025 (S.B.) Sofia Awan V/S Ammad Bakash Awan & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
189.Const. P. 1845/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman Abdul Azeem V/S P.O SIndh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurThe petitioner does not acquire any right for appointment in service merely on an entry test.Read more
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
190.Const. P. 1781/2026 (D.B.) Mufti Muhammad Awais Bandhani V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurA mere recommendation by an officer of the Department in the petitioner???s favour does not entitle him to appointment in Government Service. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
191.Cr.Bail 165/2026 (S.B.) Azhar Hussain V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
192.Const. P. 1306/2026 (D.B.) Ihsan Ali Shaikh V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2039
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
193.Cr.Bail 503/2026 (S.B.) Umeed Ali @ Waqar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
194.Const. P. 284/2026 (S.B.) Nazeeb Khan Pathan V/S Mst. Bibi Rubina & 02 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurUnder Section 12(2) CPC, burden to prove the alleged fraud and/or misrepresentation is on the applicant.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
195.Const. P. 5944/2026 (D.B.) Afaq Ahmed Khan V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
196.Cr.Bail 504/2026 (S.B.) Umeed Ali @ Waqar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
197.Const. P. 5422/2026 (D.B.) Mugheera V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiAvailability of alternative remedy under Section 143 of the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013, read with Rule 4 of the Sindh Councils (Appeals) Rules, 1982 ??? Constitutional petition dismissed as not maintainable ??? Appellate Tribunal directed to decide the appeal expeditiously and strictly in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
198.Const. P. 1471/2025 (S.B.) M/s. ABM Investment V/S Civil Aviation Club & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 201113. For the foregoing reasons, the instant Constitution Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the orders dated 16.10.2024, passed by the learned IVth Senior Civil Judge, Malir, Karachi, in Civil Suit No.1039/2023, and dated 22.10.2025, passed by the learned District Judge, Malir, Karachi, in Civil Revision Application No.03/2025, are maintained. 14. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are confined to the controversy relating to the stay of proceedings and shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the respective claims, the entitlement to the advance amount, or the ownership and return of the disputed inventory items. The competent Court shall adjudicate the respective rights and liabilities of the parties strictly in accordance with law, on the basis of the pleadings and evidence legally brought on record. 15. There shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
199.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 179/2018 (D.B.) Sindh Revenue Board V/S M/s. Media 5ive Holding, Karachi Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2012, 2026 SHC KHI 2086Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011; s.43 Serial 13 (repeat offence, twice the penalty); successive non-filing of returns are separate offences, not one continuous offence; succession alone is not repetition; first default is not a repetition; penal entry construed in favour of subject; wilfulness/mens rea to be established; doubling per repeated default, not on aggregate; repetition and culpability remitted to Tribunal (s.63(5)).Read more
Matter:-SALES TAX.
200.Const. P. 86/2018 (D.B.) Mst Wazeeran Jatoi V/S Managing Director PODB Islamabad and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 2004Service under a corporation is not service under Government, and absorption into a Government post carries past service across only if the instrument of absorption so provides. Condonation under the CSR meets a minor shortfall, not one of eight years, and an approval granted "as admissible under the rules" raises no estoppel, for no authority can confer by sanction what the law withholds.Read more
Matter:-Pension
201.Const. P. 1181/2026 (D.B.) Sui Southern Gas Company ltd thr: Authrorized V/S Federation of Pakistan & 02 others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurLeave granting order of Gas Utility Court is not perverse and cannot be challenged by way of constitution petition when statute does not allow an appeal from such order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
202.Const. P. 1824/2026 (D.B.) Mujeeb u Rehman V/S Shafqat Ali Kalwar & 02 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurCNIC blocked by executing court???appeal against decree pending???remedy is therefore before the appellate court???constitutional petition not maintainable.Read more
Matter:-Un-Block C.N.I.C
203.Cr.Bail 37/2026 (D.B.) Jani @ Janro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
204.Const. P. 5421/2026 (D.B.) Noman Ali Siddiqui V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiAvailability of alternative remedy under Section 143 of the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013, read with Rule 4 of the Sindh Councils (Appeals) Rules, 1982; constitutional petition dismissed as not maintainable; Appellate Tribunal directed to decide the appeal expeditiously and strictly in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
205.Const. P. 6404/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shahroz Khan V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
206.Cr.Bail 31/2026 (D.B.) Niaz Muhammad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
207.Const. P. 6617/2026 (D.B.) Mudassir Fida & Mst. Saira Fida V/S Government of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2009The petitioners have an appropriate remedy before the competent Civil Court, where proceedings concerning the subject property are already pending, and no exceptional circumstances have been established warranting the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, petition is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DEMOLITION
208.Const. P. 6667/2026 (D.B.) Shamim Ahmed V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
209.Const. P. 5418/2024 (D.B.) Abdul Hafeez V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiAvailability of Smart Complaint Redressal Mechanism (SCRM) - Petitioner permitted to approach the competent authority for redressal of grievance - Direction to decide the complaint through a reasoned order within sixty days - Petition disposed of without touching the merits of the case.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
210.Cr.Bail 480/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Waseem V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
211.Cr.Bail 529/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Arif V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
212.Cr.Bail 488/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Qadeer & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
213.Const. P. 1746/2025 (D.B.) Bank Alflah, through Authorized officer V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurGrievance against SEPCO. Remedy available before NEPRA under Section 39 NEPRA Act, 1997 read with NEPRA Complaint Handling Rules, 2015. Petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Electricity Supply
214.Cr.Bail 222/2026 (S.B.) Sajjad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
215.Const. P. 2976/2026 (D.B.) Mahboob Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiCancellation of route permit without prior notice or opportunity of hearing - Violation of principles of natural justice - Availability of alternate remedy - Impugned order set aside - Matter remanded to the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority (RTA), for fresh consideration and decision strictly in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
216.Const. P. 1626/2024 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST WARRANT
217.Const. P. 6668/2026 (D.B.) Shamim Ahmed V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
218.Const. P. 924/2026 (D.B.) Syed Muzammil Abbas Shah V/S P.O Sindh & 07 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurIn the absence of a statute or Government policy requiring or enabling the employer to regularize a contract employee, no writ can issue to do so under Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution of Pakistan.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
219.Const. P. 3685/2026 (D.B.) M/s Metal Engineering Works (Pvt) Ltd V/S SRB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SINDH SALES TAX
220.Cr.Bail 456/2026 (S.B.) Nafees Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
221.Const. P. 229/2026 (D.B.) Javed Ali Malik V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaDeceased QuotaRead more
Matter:-Deceased Quota
222.Cr.Bail 533/2026 (S.B.) Allah Bux @ Illahi Bux V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2008
223.Const. P. 3471/2026 (D.B.) Eman Gulzar V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2105, 2026 SHC KHI 2107, 2026 SHC KHI 2108, 2026 SHC KHI 2126, 2026 SHC KHI 2127, 2026 SHC KHI 2128, 2026 SHC KHI 2129The offer of appointment issued in favour of the petitioner was withdrawn through an email, which has been set aside. The matter is remanded to the competent authority for a fresh assessment and final decision in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
224.Cr.Acq.A. 144/2024 (S.B.) Bhamro V/S Om Parkash & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2037
225.Cr.Acq.A. 23/2023 (S.B.) Nabi Bux V/S Lal Muhammad and another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2029
226.Const. P. 62/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Jamila through her Legal Heirs V/S Mst. Batoon & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2019, 2026 SHC MPK 2027, 2026 SHC MPK 2028
227.Criminal Appeal 144/2024 (S.B.) Heero and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2002
228.Cr.Bail 507/2026 (S.B.) Anwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
229.Cr.Bail 406/2025 (S.B.) Munawar Nazeer Sagar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
230.Cr.Bail 347/2026 (S.B.) Souraj V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
231.Cr.Bail 508/2026 (S.B.) Anwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
232.Cr.Acq.A. 155/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Rafique V/S Muhammad Raheem & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
233.Cr.Bail 205/2026 (S.B.) Rao Ali Hyder V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
234.Const. P. 1325/2025 (S.B.) Rabia Aslam V/S Muhammad Aslam & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi5. However, counsel for the parties after advancing arguments at length have mutually agreed to the disposal of the instant petition by directing the Executing Court to demarcate Plot No.292 measuring 161.33 Sq. Yards., situated at Model Village Safari Park (Hussain Hazara Goth), Deh Okewari, Taluka, Karachi (East) and upon due identification thereof, ensure delivery of possession of the said plot to Respondent No.1, namely Muhammad Aslam (since deceased), through his legal heirs, in accordance with the judgment and decree dated 05-03-2011. It is clarified that no execution process shall be undertaken in respect of Plot No.293 or any other property not covered by the said judgment and decree. 6. With the consent of counsel for both the parties, the instant petition stands disposed of in the above termsRead more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
235.Criminal Miscelleneous 272/2026 (S.B.) Doulat Meer Afridi Pathan and Another V/S The State and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 1997A Magistrate acting on a report under section 173 Cr.P.C is not a criminal court, so no revision lies, even if section 561-A applies to an abuse of process. He must apply his own mind to cognisance, and if the offences are exclusively triable by a Special Judge, record reasons, decline cognizance, and return the report. He may neither choose the investigating agency nor direct how it shall proceed, and custody of an accused passes only by order of a competent court.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
236.Const. P. 337/2026 (S.B.) Manzoor Ahmed & Others V/S Jameel Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 1995Order I Rule 10(2) CPC vests the power in the court to reach an effective decision. It gives a defendant no right to compel the plaintiff, dominus litis, to sue strangers from whom he claims nothing. If he leaves them out, the loss is his own, and the decree binds none but the parties before the court.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
237.Criminal Miscelleneous 335/2026 (S.B.) Rasheed Khan & Others V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 1996A Magistrate acting on a report under section 173 Cr.P.C is not a criminal court, so no revision lies, even if section 561-A applies to an abuse of process. He must apply his own mind to cognisance, and if the offences are exclusively triable by a Special Judge, record reasons, decline cognizance, and return the report. He may neither choose the investigating agency nor direct how it shall proceed, and custody of an accused passes only by order of a competent court.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL SEIZURE OFVEHICLE
238.Cr.Bail 501/2026 (S.B.) Ghulam Fareed Jakhrani and Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 1993Where the FIR describes the assailants as strangers to be identified on sight, their nomination eleven days later, through identical statements of related witnesses, without an identification parade, is weak evidence and brings the case within section 497(2) Cr.P.C. The recovery of commonplace articles, unsupported by any forensic link, furnishes no corroboration. For pre-arrest bail, the record of a failed earlier prosecution over the same land and a role of armed presence alone supply the inference of mala fide.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
239.Const. P. 982/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Farah D/o Mukhtiyar Ahmed Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1985The welfare of the minor remaining the paramount consideration. Custody of baby Alisha to remain with the petitioner/mother as a purely provisional arrangement, subject to any order passed by the competent Guardian Court.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY MATTER
240.R.A (Civil Revision) 150/2017 (S.B.) Aaloo Mal V/S Mukhtiarkar (Revenue) Thatta & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2010Order 17 Rules 2 and 3 CPC - Dismissal for non-prosecution - Applicability at evidence stage - Restoration of Suit - Order 9 Rule 9 CPC - Previous conduct relevant to diligence but not a substitute for independent assessment of sufficient cause for non-appearance on relevant date - Limitation under Article 163 of Limitation Act, 1908 - Effect of an unchallenged order refusing condonation of delay.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
241.I.T.R.A 393/2024 (D.B.) MR. FAROOQ E AZAM CHEEMA V/S COMMISSIONER (APPEAL-I) & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1982, 2026 SHC KHI 2093Income Tax Ordinance 2001; s.182(1) Serial 1AAA penalty; s.116A foreign income and assets statement; Explanation to s.182(2) (Finance Act 2021), mens rea not necessary; operates prospectively, date of default decides (after 01.07.2021); Khadim Hussain distinguished; department must show requirement and failure on objective material; disclosure in wealth statement (s.116) is not compliance; reference dismissed.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
242.Cr.Bail 170/2026 (S.B.) Zameer Hussain Jakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 1994Where the FIR describes the assailants as strangers to be identified on sight, their nomination eleven days later, through identical statements of related witnesses, without an identification parade, is weak evidence and brings the case within section 497(2) Cr.P.C. The recovery of commonplace articles, unsupported by any forensic link, furnishes no corroboration. For pre-arrest bail, the record of a failed earlier prosecution over the same land and a role of armed presence alone supply the inference of mala fide.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
243.Const. P. 6721/2017 (D.B.) Munawar Zaman V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-POSSESSION
244.Const. P. 6369/2026 (D.B.) Mst Rashida & Others V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRAVELLING TO BANGLADESH
245.Const. P. 6632/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Popular International (Pvt) Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
246.Const. P. 352/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Farah Deeba Balouch & Another V/S Mst. Hussan Bano & Another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurUntil the tenant obtains a decree against the landlord from the Civil Court for specific performance of the sale agreement, the relationship between the parties continues to be of landlord and tenant, and is regulated by the terms of tenancy.Read more
Matter:-Rent Matter
247.Const. P. 234/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Ibrahim Nizami Steel Wire Ind. (Pvt) Ltd V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-CUSTOM MATTER
248.Const. P. 1061/2026 (S.B.) Ali Adil Muhammadi V/S Yaqoob Ghazi Pura & others Sindh High Court, KarachiThe mere fact that no interim order has yet been passed does not furnish an independent cause for invoking the extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
249.Const. P. 675/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Raqeeb & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurCase remanded to the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal to decide the question whether the graveyard is over public property after recording evidence under the summary procedure provided in Section 14(3) of the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 2010.Read more
Matter:-Encroachment
250.Const. P. 6285/2026 (D.B.) Muzzamil Khan & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTRICITY MATTER
251.R.A (Civil Revision) 69/2017 (S.B.) Jawaharlal Hindu V/S Abdul Khalique and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurExecution Proceeding. Limitation. Three years from the date of decree unless restraining.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
252.R.A (Civil Revision) 85/2023 (S.B.) Fayaz Hussain Jatoi V/S Muhib Ali Gopang & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThe Applicant's Suit for Malicious Prosecution was dismissed by the Trial Court, which was upheld by the Appellate Court. This court dismissed the Civil Revision Application of the applicant.Read more
Matter:-Against Order
253.Const. P. 6370/2026 (D.B.) MD Alamgir Howlader & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRAVELLING TO BANGLADESH
254.Const. P. 1033/2026 (S.B.) JAWAD AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD ALI V/S MST SALMA D/O FAREED AHMED & OTHERS Sindh High Court, KarachiMere disagreement with the appreciation of evidence or the conclusions reached by the Courts below does not furnish a ground for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. The Honourable Supreme Court has consistently emphasized that the legislative scheme governing family disputes must be respected and that constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to circumvent the statutory restriction on further appeals. Consequently, the petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed in limineRead more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
255.Const. P. 811/2020 (D.B.) Muhammad Irfan V/S S.B.C.A and Others Sindh High Court, KarachiExercise of powers under enactment by public functionariesRead more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
256.Const. P. 676/2023 (D.B.) Abdul Raqeeb & others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurCase remanded to the Anti-Encroachment Tribunal to decide the question whether the graveyard is over public property after recording evidence under the summary procedure provided in Section 14(3) of the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 2010.Read more
Matter:-Encroachment
257.Const. P. 777/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Khalique V/S Munir Ahmed & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi10. For the foregoing reasons, I find that the petitioner has failed to establish any jurisdictional defect, material illegality, or other exceptional circumstance warranting interference under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The impugned judgment and decree dated 07.03.2024 and the revisional order dated 03.12.2024, therefore, do not call for interference in the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. 11. Consequently, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed in limine. There shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
258.Const. P. 5334/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Waqas Azhar V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2048The constitutional jurisdiction is not intended to substitute the High Court???s opinion for that of the subordinate forum merely because another view of the matter is possible.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
259.Cr.Bail 526/2026 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
260.Const. P. 6736/2026 (D.B.) Altaf Karim & others V/S Idrees Sattar Agar & others Sindh High Court, KarachiIt is well settled that availability of an alternate remedy does not constitute an absolute bar to constitutional jurisdiction; nevertheless, where an adequate and efficacious remedy exists before the competent forum, constitutional jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercised unless exceptional circumstances, such as patent want of jurisdiction, manifest illegality or infringement of a fundamental right incapable of adequate redress through the ordinary remedy, are demonstrated. No such exceptional circumstance has been shown in the present case. Consequently, the Constitution Petition, being misconceived in the present form, is dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT
261.Cr.Bail 528/2026 (S.B.) Noor Muhammad @ Noor Hassan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
262.Cr.Bail 527/2026 (S.B.) Noor Muhammad @ Noor Hassan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
263.Cr.Bail 400/2025 (S.B.) Neno & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1943
264.Cr.Acq.A. 173/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Muhammad V/S Nawaz & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1990
265.Cr.Acctt.A 173/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Muhammad V/S Nawaz & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 2040
266.II.A. 3/2024 (S.B.) Fasih-ur-Rehman Alvi V/S Dr. Tasneem Aslam Tariq Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1936Scope of Order 17 Rule 3 CPC - Closure of defence evidence - Repeated failure to adduce evidence despite final opportunities - Consequences of default O 8 Rule 1 CPC - Evidentiary value of pleadings - Written Statement not a substitute of evidence - Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 - Suit for recovery of rent arrears maintainable - Termination of tenancy does not extinguish accrued claim for rent arrears.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
267.Cr.Bail 519/2026 (S.B.) Gulzar Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1992
268.Const. P. 5866/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Saima Khalid V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
269.Const. P. 5121/2026 (D.B.) Essa Jan & others V/S Ministry of Interior & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-UNBLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
270.Criminal Miscelleneous 34/2026 (S.B.) Shams-U-Din V/S Director Nara Canal n& Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
271.Const. P. 6154/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Aamir V/S Government of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-MISSING PERSONS
272.Cr.Acq.A. 1/2025 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad V/S Qadir Bux & another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
273.Const. P. 168/2026 (S.B.) Harji V/S Kanji & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
274.Cr.Acq.A. 19/2025 (S.B.) Dr. Pirbhu Lal V/S Dodo & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
275.Const. P. 2808/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Hakim & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-RENEWAL OF PASSPORT
276.Cr.Bail 111/2026 (D.B.) Deen Muhammad Unar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
277.Const. P. 186/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Waseem Mangi V/S PO Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaDeceased QuotaRead more
Matter:-Deceased Quota
278.Const. P. 326/2026 (D.B.) Irshad Khatoon V/S The P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 1941Every limb of section 2(f) of the Act of 2014, as it stood in 2015, is tied to terrorism, and a constable killed by negligent driving, though on duty, falls outside it; the substitution of 2023 enlarges the class of beneficiaries, is substantive and prospective, and its "act of violence" imports intentional force. Entitlement crystallises on the date of death, and declarations wrongly made in other cases found no claim, Article 25 knowing no negative equality.Read more
Matter:-Shaheed Quota
279.Const. P. 78/2017 (D.B.) Asadullah & others V/S SSP Jacobabad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2026 SHC LAR 1940Passing the written test confers no vested right; the merit list is the aggregate of both stages, and an interview result is not reopened save for bias apparent on the record. A pending criminal case warrants abeyance, not rejection; conviction alone disqualifies. Where the department's own record is self-contradictory, the candidate is sent back for a reasoned decision, not non-suited.Read more
Matter:-Appointment
280.Const. P. 799/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Jaleel Noonari V/S P.O Sindh & 02 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurDisputed DRC. Matter referred to Secretary for inquiry.Read more
Matter:-Join their service
281.Const. P. 1280/2024 (D.B.) Ghulam Safdar Korai & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurEncroacher has no locus standi to stay in possession of Government land.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
282.Const. P. 126/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Majid V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurNo writ can issue for regularization of service in absence of policy or statute to enable same.Read more
Matter:-Service Regularization
283.Cr.Bail 295/2026 (S.B.) Ali Muhammad V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1937
284.Const. P. 1249/2017 (D.B.) Faisal Bengali and Ors V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 2104, 2026 SHC KHI 2130The Government shall formulate a Master Plan for Transport and Traffic ManagementRead more
Matter:-DIRECTION
285.Cr.Rev 83/2024 (S.B.) Dawood V/S Muzaffar Hussain @ Muzaffar & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1942, 2026 SHC MPK 1948
286.Const. P. 167/2026 (D.B.) Syed Imran Ali Jillani V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPrayer for appointment on deceased quota. Petitioner may approach concerned Secretary under Notification dated 30.04.2026.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
287.Const. P. 1773/2026 (D.B.) Wajid Hussain Buriro V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurOmbudsman has power to implement his own order.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
288.Cr.Acq.A. 69/2024 (S.B.) Umer Farooque V/S Muhammad Shafique Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
289.Cr.Bail 518/2026 (S.B.) Dilsher V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
290.Cr.Bail 430/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Irfan @ Sheri & Farhan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
291.Cr.Bail 517/2026 (S.B.) Dilsher V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas