Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan
Mr.Justice Yahya Afridi
Hon'ble Chief Justice
Sindh High Court
Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
1.Const. P. 6067/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Rabia V/S Chief Secretary & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1249, 2026 SHC KHI 1250, 2026 SHC KHI 1251Nil:Read more
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
2.Cr.Bail 1370/2026 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ALI BAIG S/O M.S IBRAHIM BAIG V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
3.Const. P. 2394/2026 (D.B.) Dr. Faryal V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
4.Spl. Cr. A. 6/2026 (S.B.) MUHAMMAD ATIQ S/O MUHAMMAD AHMED V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
5.Const. P. 1088/2026 (D.B.) M/s. Pioneer Tobacco & Trading Company V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1190Customs matter; proceedings under section 40 of STA and 163 of Customs Act declared illegal.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
6.Const. P. 880/2025 (S.B.) Sikandar Khan V/S Munawar Khan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1233
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
7.Const. P. 953/2023 (S.B.) Abdullah S/o Muhammad Iqbal V/S Samra and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1256
Matter:-RENT MATTER
8.Const. P. 988/2022 (S.B.) Shumaila D/o Rafiq V/S The SIndh Labour Court No. V, Karachi and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1230
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
9.Const. P. 1191/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Asim Zafar Soleja V/S Muhammad Jawid & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1258
Matter:-RENT MATTER
10.Const. P. 2045/2025 (D.B.) Asif Razak Deenar V/S FBR & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1182, 2026 SHC KHI 1188, 2026 SHC KHI 1189
Matter:-AGAINST FALSE F.I.R
11.Const. P. 273/2011 (S.B.) Bilal Hussain Khan V/S Dr. Saadia Farooqui & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1253
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
12.Const. P. 2261/2026 (D.B.) Imtiaz Group (Private) Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1183
Matter:-INCOME TAX
13.Const. P. 880/2013 (S.B.) M/S SPUTNIK FOOTWEAR V/S DIVAN METHRAM DHARAMDA TRUST & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1254
Matter:-RENT MATTER
14.Const. P. 924/2025 (S.B.) Syed Muhammad Sadiq V/S District & Sessions Judge, Karachi East & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1257
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
15.Const. P. 2316/2018 (S.B.) Mohammad Aslam V/S IIIrd ADJ Karachi Central & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1255
Matter:-RENT MATTER
16.II.A. 46/2024 (S.B.) Pahlaj V/S Bahadur & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1180Strict proof required for oral sale of immovable property. absence of particulars fatal; concurrent dismissal maintained.Read more
17.Const. P. 10/2008 (S.B.) State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan V/S M/S. British Medical Stores Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1252
Matter:-RENT MATTER
18.Cr.J.A 9/2025 (S.B.) Javed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 1184
Matter:-Life Imprisonment
19.R.A (Civil Revision) 211/2024 (S.B.) Mataro & others V/S Muhammad Qasim Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1179Permissive occupants cannot claim Gaucher land. plaintiff???s chain of title unshaken; limitation and revenue???bar pleas rejected; revision fails.Read more
20.Cr.J.A 8/2024 (D.B.) Nasreen V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Imprisonment(More than 10 years)
21.Cr.Rev 264/2025 (D.B.) HASSAN ALI @ KHAN S/O BADAR ZAMAN V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-TRANSFER OF CASE
22.Cr.Bail 603/2026 (S.B.) Naeem Ghouri V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
23.Cr.Bail 414/2026 (S.B.) Shahzado & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
24.Cr.Bail 446/2026 (S.B.) Mohammad Jameel Soomro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
25.Cr.Bail 133/2026 (S.B.) Adam Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
26.Criminal Appeal 549/2023 (D.B.) NABI BAKHSH BALOUCH & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
27.Criminal Appeal 49/2026 (S.B.) Gul Hassan Gopang & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur426 Cr.PC allowed.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 4 YEARS & ABOVE
28.Cr.Bail 219/2026 (S.B.) Jani alias Yousif Syed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
29.Criminal Appeal 112/2023 (D.B.) Ibrahim V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Imprisonment(More than 5 Upto 10 years)
30.Cr.Bail 226/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Hayat V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
31.Const. P. 2255/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Arif Sitai & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1218In view of the foregoing, the impugned denial based on the 2016 Gazette notification and alleged structural differences is legally unsustainable. The petitioners are entitled to consideration for promotion and/or time-scale benefit strictly in accordance with Rule 10 of the 2006 Rules, along with all consequential benefits. The respondents??? inaction is arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of Articles 4 and 25 of the Constitution, and the petitioners cannot be deprived of their lawful promotional rights due to administrative delay or absence of policy finalization. 22. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority of respondents to convene the Departmental Promotion Committee within three weeks and consider the petitioners' case for promotion from BPS-18 onwards strictly in accordance with law. In case the DPC is not convened within three weeks, the petitioners shall be extended time-scale/incentive benefits on parity with similarly placed officers in terms of judgment dated 01.06.2021, and orders passed in C.P. No. D-1736 of 2013, C.P. Nos. D-3377 of 2022 and D-1544 of 2025, along with all consequential service benefits. The impugned order dated 16.02.2026 is accordingly declared to be contrary to settled principles of service jurisprudence and the ratio of the judgments of this Court in C.P. No. D-1736 of 2013 and C.P. No. D-1544 of 2025. 23. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
32.Const. P. 27/2026 (D.B.) M/s. SSS Corporation V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1207Nevertheless, it is equally well-settled that public procurement and management of public assets must strictly conform to the principles of transparency, fairness, equality of opportunity, and compliance with Articles 4, 18, and 25 of the Constitution. Any continued arrangement beyond contractual expiry, if not strictly backed by lawful authority, must be regularized through a transparent and reasoned decision, ensuring that no party is arbitrarily excluded and that public revenue and interest are safeguarded. Accordingly, while declining to grant the substantive reliefs sought by the Petitioner at this stage, this petition is disposed of with the directions to The Respondent No.2/competent authority shall, within a period of two months, positively finalize its decision regarding the conduct of fresh auction or any lawful interim arrangement strictly in accordance with applicable rules and policy. Such a decision shall be taken after providing a proper opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner and all concerned stakeholders, ensuring transparency and fairness in the process. A speaking order shall be passed, clearly reflecting reasons addressing the issues of transparency, continuation of arrangements, and future bidding process. It is clarified that until such final decision is taken, the matter shall remain within the domain of the competent authority; however, the same shall not be construed as approval of any arrangement found to be contrary to law. 9. The petition, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-TENDER
33.Const. P. 2833/2026 (D.B.) Sohail Shahzad Shahid V/S National Bank of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1209In view of the above discussion, this petition needs to be disposed of with directions to Respondent No.2/President, National Bank of Pakistan, to consider and decide the petitioner???s case regarding renewal of contract strictly in accordance with law, the applicable policy framework, and the governing Bye-laws, without discrimination and uninfluenced by any extraneous consideration, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order and preferably before expiry of the petitioner???s existing contractual term. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. In the event any adverse decision is contemplated against the petitioner based on any material relating to his conduct, suitability, or performance, the petitioner shall first be afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing in accordance with the principles of natural justice. If the decision is not made within time, the petitioner may continue to serve the Bank till decision is made by the competent authority in accordance with the law. 14. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application(s). Let a copy of this order be communicated to the President, National Bank of Pakistan, for compliance within the stipulated time.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
34.Const. P. 4499/2019 (D.B.) Adil Khan & Ors (Vide Order dt: 01.01.2021) V/S NBP and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 113830. For the foregoing reasons, we are of the considered view that the petitioners, having admittedly been engaged through third-party contractors or outsourcing agencies and not directly appointed by the respondent Bank through any lawful recruitment process, possess no vested legal right to seek regularization, absorption, or permanent appointment in the service of the respondent institution. Their engagement through outsourced arrangements neither creates any employer-employee relationship with the Bank nor confers any enforceable constitutional or statutory entitlement in their favour. Consequently, the instant petitions, being devoid of merit and unsupported by any lawful entitlement, are hereby dismissed along with all pending applications. The petitioners, if so advised, may avail any remedy otherwise available to them under the relevant labour laws, contractual arrangements, or other forums of competent jurisdiction against their respective contractors or service providers strictly in accordance with law. However, such grievances cannot be transformed into a claim for regular appointment in the service of the National Bank of Pakistan in the absence of lawful induction through prescribed procedure. 31. Before parting with this judgment, it may be observed that dismissal of the present petitions shall not preclude the petitioners from availing any remedy otherwise available to them under the relevant labour laws or contractual arrangements against their respective employers, contractors, or service providers strictly in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
35.Const. P. 4489/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Moosa V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1213In these circumstances, the respondents are under a legal obligation to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already devised and being followed in C.P. No. D-1051 of 2019 and connected matters, and preferably within a period of two months. 10. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above directions. It is, however, observed that in the event the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail such remedy as may be available to him under the law.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
36.Const. P. 1954/2026 (D.B.) Aziz Hanif Soorty & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1208In the present case, since the Evacuee Trust Property Board has not only verified the petitioners??? documents but has also categorically stated that the property is not under its domain, and further in view of the concession recorded from the learned DAG that no subsisting dispute remains regarding the status of the property after 1994, the continuation of FIA proceedings loses its legal efficacy and becomes unnecessary and unwarranted. 10. Accordingly, by consent of the learned counsel for the parties and without touching the merits of the case, and in the peculiar circumstances of the case, this petition is disposed of with the observation that the FIA shall not interfere in the petitioners??? peaceful enjoyment and possession of the subject property based on the impugned enquiry. However, it is clarified that this order shall not prejudice the rights of any competent authority to proceed strictly in accordance with law if any fresh, independent, and lawful material is available in future. 11. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
37.Const. P. 2188/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Zulekha V/S Chairman NADRA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1206Accordingly, the respondents are directed to re-examine the petitioner???s claim along with all relevant records, particularly family-based identity documents, and determine the matter through a reasoned and speaking order. Such a course not only ensures compliance with statutory requirements but also safeguards against any possible administrative irregularity, while preserving the petitioner???s right to fair consideration under the law. 8. It is expected that the Zonal Office, DHA Nisar Shaheed Park, Karachi, shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity to the petitioner, and pass a speaking order within two weeks, ensuring transparency, legality, and adherence to NADRA???s regulatory framework. 9. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms, being a consent matter, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
38.Const. P. 4393/2025 (D.B.) Tahir Mehmood V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1211In view of the foregoing, this Court finds that the impugned order dated 21.03.2023 cannot be sustained, being contrary to the settled position already declared by this Court in earlier judgments. Consequently, the same is set aside. The Petitioner is held entitled to reinstatement in service in accordance with law, along with all consequential benefits, if otherwise admissible. 13. The petition, along with pending application (s), is accordingly allowed in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
39.Const. P. 5587/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Nuzhat Shamim V/S KMC & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1210At the same time, verification of entitlement through production of CNIC, Heirship Certificate, FRC, and No-Marriage Certificate is a necessary procedural requirement to safeguard public funds and ascertain the lawful beneficiary of family pension. Since the petitioner has expressed willingness to furnish the requisite documents, no legal impediment remains for the respondents to process and release the claim expeditiously. The respondents, being public functionaries, are expected to act diligently and cannot withhold pensionary benefits on account of avoidable departmental delays once the formal requirements are fulfilled. 5. Accordingly, with the directions contained hereinabove for submission and verification of documents and release of pensionary benefits within the stipulated period, the grievance of the petitioner stands adequately addressed. 6. The petition, along with pending application(s), is therefore disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
40.Const. P. 1494/2025 (D.B.) Abubakar Hasan V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1212In these circumstances, the impugned action suffers from multiple legal infirmities: lack of statutory authority, absence of jurisdictional foundation under Section 18, violation of Article 10-A, and reliance on undisclosed and untested material. Consequently, it amounts to an arbitrary exercise of power, abuse of process, and a measure beyond the lawful competence of NADRA. 13. Accordingly, the blocking/digital impounding of the petitioner???s CNIC cannot be sustained in law and is liable to be declared without lawful authority. The petitioner is, therefore, entitled to relief under Article 199 of the Constitution, with a direction to the respondents to restore and renew the CNIC in accordance with law. The petitioner shall approach the Verification & Revocation Branch, Awami Markaz, NADRA, for the aforesaid purpose, without prejudice to any lawful inquiry strictly conducted under the relevant statutory framework, if so warranted. The aforementioned exercise shall be completed within two weeks. However, the respondents shall not create any bottlenecks in such legal process. 14. This petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RENEWAL OF CNIC
41.Const. P. 1930/2026 (D.B.) Ms. Rakhshanda V/S Member L.U BOR SIndh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1215Accordingly, by consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with directions to the L.U Department to re-hear the petitioner and all concerned stakeholders and pass a speaking order within three (03) weeks from receipt of this order. The authority shall ensure compliance with due process and pass a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with the law. 11. It is further directed that till the decision is taken afresh, no third-party interest shall be created in respect of the subject property to protect the rights of the parties and to avoid further complications. 12. The petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
42.Const. P. 5289/2023 (D.B.) M/s Shaheen Airport Services (SAPS) V/S Riaz Ahmed Khan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1214Applying these principles, the present case reveals no jurisdictional error. The NIRC exercised jurisdiction expressly conferred under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. The findings regarding the status of the respondent as a permanent workman and the illegality of termination are findings of fact based on settled law under the Standing Orders Ordinance. No perversity, misreading of evidence, or excess of jurisdiction has been demonstrated by the petitioner. 15. In such circumstances of the case, the petition is found to be without merit and is accordingly dismissed. The impugned judgments dated 07.04.2022 and 14.09.2023 are maintained, and no case is made out for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. 16. All pending application(s), if any stand disposed of in the above terms; there shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
43.Const. P. 6228/2025 (D.B.) Shamim Khan V/S Cantonment Board Clifton & another Sindh High Court, KarachiAccordingly, both Respondents are directed to convene a joint meeting of their competent authorities, consider the Petitioner???s claim in its entirety, hear the Petitioner or his representative, examine all relevant service records, and pass a speaking and reasoned order within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. It is further observed that upon completion of the aforesaid exercise and passing of a speaking order, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to avail his remedies in accordance with law, if still aggrieved. 12. In view of the above, the instant Constitution Petition, along with all pending applications, stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
44.Const. P. 2473/2026 (D.B.) AM Associates & Another V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1140BRT - University Road caseRead more
Matter:-DE-SEAL
45.R.A (Civil Revision) 347/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Rasheed V/S Sakhawat Ali Raza & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasNo jurisdictional defect or perversity shown. allocation of road???facing frontage based on revenue evidence affirmed in revisionRead more
46.Cr.Bail 167/2026 (S.B.) Mohsin V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
47.Const. P. 476/2026 (D.B.) Sitara Sapra & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
48.Const. P. 296/2026 (D.B.) Mashooque Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
49.Const. P. 369/2026 (D.B.) Mehtab Ali & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
50.II.A. 67/2024 (S.B.) Province of Sindh & Others V/S Riaz Hussain & Another Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasRegistered sale deeds and mutation entries upheld; an inconclusive demarcation cannot defeat a proven title. Concurrent decrees are maintained.Read more
51.Cr.J.A 69/2025 (S.B.) Murad & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Life Imprisonment
52.Const. P. 33/2026 (S.B.) Govt. of sindh, secratary Board of Revenue V/S Laiqdino & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasDecree not void; civil court???s findings on title and grant stand. Section 12(2) cannot reopen concluded adjudication absent proven fraud.Read more
53.Const. P. 5040/2024 (D.B.) Hari Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1142In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of with the following directions:- i. The competent authority of the Directorate General (Antiquities & Archaeology), Government of Sindh, shall examine and finalize, strictly in accordance with law, the status of Plot No. SR-7/26 and the structure known as ???Alavi Building??? about its proposed/protected heritage status under the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act, 1994, after providing an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, preferably within a period of 60 days. ii. Till the final decision by the competent authority regarding Plot No. SR-7/26, respondent Nos. 5 and 6 shall not demolish, alter, or create any third-party interest in the existing structure situated upon Plot No. SR-7/26. iii. Since Plot No. SR-7/27 already stands demolished pursuant to demolition permission granted by SBCA, and the same is not presently declared or recommended as protected heritage; no restraint order is warranted about the said plot. However, this order shall not prejudice the rights of the petitioner or any other aggrieved person to seek appropriate remedy before the competent civil court/forum concerning tenancy, possession, easementary rights, compensation, or any other independent claim permissible under law. However, the possession of the subject property shall remain with the owners forthwith. iv. The parties shall cooperate with the concerned authorities during inspection/survey proceedings, and the competent department shall pass a speaking order independently without being influenced by any observation made herein, which are tentative in nature. 13. With the above observations and directions, this Constitution Petition stands disposed of along with all pending applications.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST DEMOLITION
54.Const. P. 4191/2025 (D.B.) Shabir Ahmed & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1155Since the respondents themselves have acknowledged the existence of service records of the petitioners and the learned AAG has fairly opined that the matter requires verification by the competent authority, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the Secretary, Local Government Department, Government of Sindh, shall constitute a committee headed by himself and comprising the Chairman, Municipal Committee Thatta, along with such other officer(s) as may be nominated by him, for scrutinizing and verifying the service profiles, appointment records, and entitlement of the petitioners. Upon such examination, if the appointments and service claims of the petitioners are found genuine and lawful, their unpaid salaries, along with all consequential service benefits, shall be released strictly in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed through a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 10. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, this petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
55.Const. P. 5950/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Saeed Khan Sabri & Ors V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1144The Director General, FIA, is further directed to examine the conduct of the all delinquent officers, particularly regarding the issuance of communications and coercive measures without lawful sanction, reasonable grounds, or approval from the competent authority, and to initiate appropriate departmental/disciplinary proceedings, if any misuse of powers, mala fide, or unlawful harassment of citizens is found, strictly in accordance with law. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three months; those officers shall not be given operational duties. The Director General, FIA, shall ensure that no officer of FIA misuses powers or authority in excess of law, and in case any such misconduct is brought before this Court in future proceedings, appropriate action may be initiated in accordance with Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 15. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-UNBLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
56.Const. P. 1079/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Yaseen & others V/S SBCA & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1145In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that no equitable or constitutional relief regarding restoration of possession can presently be granted to any party in respect of a building which is structurally unsafe and dangerous for occupation. Since the dispute regarding ownership and possession requires proper adjudication before the competent civil forum or any other authority having jurisdiction, the parties are at liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law for the determination of their respective rights, title, and interest in the property. However, until such determination, public safety and enforcement of building regulations cannot be compromised. 9. Consequently, SBCA is directed to forthwith reseal the subject property and ensure that no person is allowed to enter, occupy, or use the premises in any manner whatsoever. SBCA shall also proceed strictly in accordance with the law regarding demolition or any further action required in respect of the dangerous structure. In case any person attempts to break the seal, interfere with the process of law, or unlawfully occupy the premises, the concerned SHO shall take immediate action in accordance with law, including proceedings under Section 154 Cr.P.C. 10. Without touching the merits of the case about claim and counterclaim of the parties on the subject premises, the petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST SEALING ORDER
57.Const. P. 5533/2022 (D.B.) Karachi High Court Employees C.H.S & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1149Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the understanding that the petitioner-society may submit a proper application to the Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh, and the Land Utilization Department, within two weeks, who shall examine the matter jointly in accordance with law and, if deemed appropriate, place it before the Worthy Chief Minister, Sindh, for decision, if any, within a reasonable time. In case allotment is considered barred under the order dated 28.11.2012 and subsequent orders of the Hon???ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Case No.16 of 2011, a clear, reasoned, and speaking order shall be passed indicating the precise legal impediment, scope of restriction, and reasons for any differential treatment vis-??-vis similarly placed cases. 6. All pending applications were also disposed of in the same terms.Read more
Matter:-ALLOTMENT
58.Const. P. 2578/2026 (D.B.) Shahid Hussain & another V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1204Upon submission of the necessary documents and fulfilment of all codal formalities, the competent authority shall consider and decide the Petitioners??? request strictly in accordance with law, rules, and policy, and without unnecessary delay. It is further expected that if the Petitioners satisfy all legal requirements and obtain the requisite clearances from the concerned departments, their case shall not be denied on arbitrary or extraneous grounds. 11. Needless to observe that any issue relating to encroachments, public access, traffic management, law and order, or use of the amenity area shall also be dealt with by the concerned authorities in accordance with law and within their respective jurisdictions. 12. The petition, along with all pending applications, stands disposed of in the above terms. However with no order as to costs. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-BACHAT BAZAR
59.Const. P. 2655/2022 (D.B.) Mst. Shamim V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1154In these circumstances, until the petitioner???s marital status is set aside by a competent court or the documents relied upon are declared invalid, the presumption of validity attaches to the official record produced by her. Consequently, for the limited purpose of release of service benefits, the petitioner???s entitlement as a widow cannot be disregarded based on unsubstantiated allegations alone. 12. Accordingly, the applications filed by the intervener seeking impleadment, recall of the main order under Section 12(2), C.P.C., are dismissed for being devoid of merit. The petitioner???s entitlement to a widow's pension and service shall be released upon proper verification and identification by the Nazir and the respondent department. However, the Nazir shall obtain an undertaking/bond from the petitioner to the effect that in case of any contrary final determination by a competent court in appropriate proceedings, she shall refund the amount so received.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
60.Const. P. 4597/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Amir Baloch & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1143Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The impugned deferment of the petitioners for promotion to the rank of Sub-Inspector is declared illegal and set aside. The respondents are directed to consider and process the cases of the petitioners for promotion to the rank of Sub-Inspector strictly in accordance with their seniority and eligibility, with effect from the date their batch-mates of the 2004 batch were promoted, along with all consequential benefits under the law. However, a necessary course shall also be undertaken if required under the police rules and law. The necessary exercise shall be completed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 15. All Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
61.Const. P. 1743/2017 (D.B.) National Insurance Co. Ltd V/S Karachi Cantonment Board and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1147In view of the statements made by the parties and the compromise arrived at between them, this petition no longer survives for adjudication on merits. Since the compromise has been voluntarily entered into by competent representatives of both sides, it seems to be lawful in nature and does not offend any provision of law or public policy; the same squarely falls within the ambit of Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Accordingly, the application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC is allowed, and the petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The office is directed to assign the CMA number and take necessary steps accordingly.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST LETTER
62.I. A 4/1999 (D.B.) Abdul Ghafoor V/S Assistant Commissioner L.A.O & anothers Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadParameters for-sufficient cause- to restore a 1st Appeal in land acquisition mattersRead more
Matter:-Against Judgment
63.Const. P. 2293/2026 (D.B.) Ghulam Akbar V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiThis Court is also mindful of the settled legal position that no writ can ordinarily be issued against a private person unless it is shown that such person is performing statutory functions or acting in connection with affairs of the Federation or Province. 11. In the present case, Respondent No.16 is admittedly a private individual, against whom no specific statutory duty or enforceable public obligation has been demonstrated. The allegations levelled against private Respondent are merely accusatory in nature and unsupported by any cogent or legally admissible material warranting the invocation of constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, no case for issuance of writ against the private Respondents is made out. 12. For the foregoing reasons, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
64.Const. P. 4879/2023 (D.B.) Danish Aziz V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
65.Const. P. 2383/2011 (D.B.) Niaz Hussain and an other V/S P.O.Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurContempt Application dismissed.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
66.Const. P. 743/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Hadi V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
67.Criminal Appeal 19/2025 (S.B.) Gulzar @ Supari Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCriminal appeal filed by appellant in offences U/s 25 S.A.A was allowed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
68.Criminal Appeal 15/2025 (D.B.) Gulzar @ Supari Shar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCriminal Appeals, filed by appellants in Sessions Case No.470 of 2022 for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 311, P.P.C., were allowed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
69.Const. P. 946/2025 (D.B.) Shakeel Ahmed Mirani V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurElectricity falls within the ambit of fundamental rights.Read more
Matter:-Restore Electricity
70.Criminal Appeal 21/2026 (S.B.) Sajid Ali Zangejo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur426 Cr.PC allowed.Read more
Matter:-R.I FOR 5 YEARS & ABOVE
71.Criminal Appeal 69/2023 (D.B.) Javed Ahmed Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkanacriminal appeal, the appellant filed by appellant in Special CNS Case No.114 of 2022, for an offence punishable under Section 9(1)3(c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2022, was allowed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
72.Const. P. 2208/2026 (D.B.) Iftikhar Ahmed V/S Zahid Aziz & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1148In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that blocking or suspension of a CNIC of a judgment-debtor is unlawful in the absence of any express provision in the C.P.C., Financial Institutions Ordinance, 2001, or Section 18 of the NADRA Ordinance, 2000 authorizing such action in execution proceedings. Section 51 C.P.C. does not empower Courts to block CNICs. Since the blockage of CNIC seriously affects fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 9 of the Constitution, it cannot be used as a coercive mode of recovery without lawful authority. Consequently, NADRA is directed to immediately unblock and restore the CNICs of the judgment debtor/petitioner. 9. Consequently, without touching the merits or legality of the decree passed by the learned Trial Court, which needs to be enforced under the law subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. 10. With the above observations and directions, this Constitutional Petition stands disposed of along with all pending applications.Read more
Matter:-UNBLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
73.Const. P. 559/2014 (D.B.) Abdul Shakoor Khan V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1161In view of the above, the petitioner???s claim for a direct writ of appointment against the post of Police Constable cannot be sustained in law. The deceased quota provides a preferential opportunity, not an enforceable right of automatic employment. Since the petitioner failed to satisfy the mandatory requirements of the recruitment process, no legal or constitutional infirmity is found in the respondents??? actions. However, in the interest of fairness and the benevolent object of the quota policy, if it exists, it is appropriate that the respondents ensure that the petitioner is not excluded from consideration in future recruitment processes under the deceased quota, and his case be assessed strictly in accordance with law, along with other eligible candidates, if he fulfills the requisite criteria against the civilian post. 13. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application(s), appears to be without merit and is dismissed, subject to the above observation for future consideration in accordance with the law.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
74.Const. P. 1881/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Jawairia Juman V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1152In view of the above discussion, these petitions are disposed of with directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to finalize and release all admitted retirement benefits of the petitioner within a period of thirty (30) days from receipt of this order. The competent authority is further directed to reconsider the petitioner???s claim for proforma promotion to the post of Senior Reservation Supervisor (BS-16) by taking into account her seniority position, the circumstances under which exemption from the P-15 course was initially granted and subsequently withdrawn, her disability, and the delay attributable to the department in concluding the promotional process before her retirement. A speaking order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law within sixty (60) days after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. In the event the petitioner is found entitled to proforma promotion, consequential retirement benefits shall also be extended to her in accordance with the law. In case the meeting is not convened in the intervening period, the petitioner shall be granted proforma promotion by way of circulation just after the expiry period. 19. All pending application(s) in both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
75.Const. P. 6171/2023 (D.B.) Afsar Khan V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1159In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties, without touching the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the instant petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of with the direction that the petitioner shall appear before the Regional Verification Board, Awami Markaz, Karachi, which shall re-analyse the petitioner???s case and pass a speaking order strictly in accordance with law within two weeks. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance.Read more
Matter:-BLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
76.Const. P. 5607/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Arab Mahar & Nazeer Ahmed Kurd V/S Federation of Pakistan Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1160For the foregoing reasons, we are of the considered view that the Petitioners were unlawfully deprived of fair consideration for promotion due to administrative delay attributable solely to the Respondent authorities. Consequently, the instant petition is allowed in the following terms:- i. The competent authority of the Respondents is directed to place the cases of the Petitioners before the competent forum/CSB for consideration for proforma promotion to BS-20 with effect from the date their immediate juniors were promoted; ii. Such consideration shall be undertaken strictly in accordance with law, applicable rules, and the criteria governing promotion to BS-20 and the law laid down by the Supreme Court on the subject proforma promotion; iii. In the event the Petitioners are found fit and suitable, they shall be granted proforma promotion with all consequential service and pensionary benefits, including revised pension, arrears of pay, and fixation of benefits in accordance with law; iv. The entire exercise shall be completed expeditiously, preferably within a period of ninety (90) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. v. In case the CSB meeting is not convened in the intervening period, the petitioners shall be granted proforma promotion by way of circulation just after the expiry period.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
77.Const. P. 1406/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Jawaria Juman V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1153In view of the above discussion, these petitions are disposed of with directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to finalize and release all admitted retirement benefits of the petitioner within a period of thirty (30) days from receipt of this order. The competent authority is further directed to reconsider the petitioner???s claim for proforma promotion to the post of Senior Reservation Supervisor (BS-16) by taking into account her seniority position, the circumstances under which exemption from the P-15 course was initially granted and subsequently withdrawn, her disability, and the delay attributable to the department in concluding the promotional process before her retirement. A speaking order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law within sixty (60) days after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. In the event the petitioner is found entitled to proforma promotion, consequential retirement benefits shall also be extended to her in accordance with the law. In case the meeting is not convened in the intervening period, the petitioner shall be granted proforma promotion by way of circulation just after the expiry period. 19. All pending application(s) in both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
78.Const. P. 354/2025 (D.B.) Safiulah Jokhio V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1162Accordingly, the petition is allowed with the direction that the competent authority of the respondents shall treat the petitioner as having been validly promoted to the post of Director (BPS-20) in terms of Notification dated 24.08.2023, along with his batchmates, for all legal and pensionary purposes, subject to completion of codal formalities. The retirement notification dated 12.08.2025, to the extent it reflects the petitioner???s retirement in BPS-19, is hereby of no consequence, and the petitioner shall be deemed to have retired in BPS-20 in accordance with the aforesaid promotion notification. The respondents are further directed to immediately process and release all retirement dues and pensionary benefits of the petitioner based on his promoted pay scale (BPS-20), and to complete the same within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this judgment, if not earlier released. It is further observed that the departmental inquiries, if any, initiated against the petitioner, after his retirement in 2024, shall not be permitted to impede, delay, or affect the release of his lawful pensionary benefits, which shall be processed independently in accordance with his status as a retired officer of BPS-20. 14. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
79.Const. P. 3419/2023 (D.B.) Muhammad Zahir & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1216Since the liability of the respondent is not disputed and only the disbursement of the remaining admitted amount is pending, no further adjudication on merits is required from this Court. The matter essentially pertains to execution and timely release of already acknowledged service benefits, which the respondent department is under a legal obligation to disburse without unnecessary delay. 6. Accordingly, in order to ensure expeditious final settlement of the petitioners??? lawful dues and to avoid any further prejudice to them, the respondent is directed to release the remaining amount within the stipulated period as assured. Failure to comply shall render the petitioners at liberty to seek appropriate legal remedy in accordance with law. 7. The petition along with pending application(s) is, therefore, disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
80.Const. P. 1056/2023 (D.B.) Qaiser Jamil Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1146In view of the above facts and circumstances, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the entitlement claimed by the petitioner, it is observed that the issue raised involves questions relating to policy applicability, financial constraints, and administrative adoption of pensionary increases by the respondent KMC, which are not amenable to conclusive determination in constitutional jurisdiction. However, it is clarified that if the benefit of pension increases @ 15% w.e.f. 01.07.2019 and @ 10% w.e.f. 01.07.2020 has been or is hereafter extended to employees of similarly placed autonomous bodies or provincial/local government entities, the petitioner shall also be entitled to the same benefits, to be considered and granted by the competent authority in accordance with law, rules, and policy. 9. The petition, along with pending application(s) is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
81.Const. P. 4311/2025 (D.B.) Ikram Uddin V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1163Since the allegations raised by the respondent pertain to factual determination of ownership status as well as compliance with building regulations, which cannot be effectively adjudicated without affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, principles of due process and fair trial necessitate that the matter be examined afresh by the regulatory authority. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the head of the SBCA is directed to afford the respondent a meaningful opportunity of hearing, consider all relevant material, and pass a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months. The authority shall also ensure that its decision is based on a proper evaluation of factual and legal aspects, including the nature of ownership and the applicability of building regulations. The listed review application is, therefore, disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
82.Cr.J.A 84/2025 (D.B.) Imtiaz Ali @ Mircho V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabadu/s 426 CrPCRead more
Matter:-Imprisonment(Upto 5 years)
83.Const. P. 5167/2024 (D.B.) Farhan Hanif and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1139willful defaultRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
84.Const. P. 419/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Salma V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
85.Const. P. 250/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Awais V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
86.Cr.Bail 227/2026 (S.B.) Sawai @ Sooraj V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
87.Const. P. 345/2026 (D.B.) Ubaid Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
88.Const. P. 89/2026 (D.B.) Saith V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
89.Const. P. 445/2026 (D.B.) Dileep Kumar V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
90.Const. P. 986/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Rehman V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
91.Const. P. 987/2025 (D.B.) Mashooque Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
92.Const. P. 122/2026 (D.B.) Junaid V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
93.Const. P. 488/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Waqar Qadri V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
94.Const. P. 184/2026 (D.B.) Zafar Hameedullah V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
95.Const. P. 455/2026 (D.B.) Kelash V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
96.Const. P. 430/2026 (D.B.) Shaman Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
97.Const. P. 75/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shayan V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
98.Const. P. 35/2026 (D.B.) Benazir V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
99.Const. P. 467/2026 (D.B.) Naseer Khan V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
100.Const. P. 278/2026 (D.B.) Sanaullah & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
101.Const. P. 340/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Siddique V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
102.Const. P. 438/2026 (D.B.) Sooraj Kumar V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
103.Const. P. 277/2026 (D.B.) Allah Warayo & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
104.Const. P. 5/2026 (D.B.) Qurban Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
105.Criminal Appeal 47/2024 (D.B.) Ali Raza Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThe judgment dated 05.07.2024 passed by the learned Sessions/Special Judge (CNSA), Jacobabad, whereby he has convicted and sentenced the appellant for offence punishable under Section 9-3(d) CNS Act (Second Amendment Bill 2022 of CNS Act-1997) to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for twenty (20) years and to pay fine of Rs.8,00,000/-. Consequently Criminal Appeal was allowed, the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant through the impugned judgment dated 05.07.2024 were set aside, and he was acquitted of the charge. He shall be released forthwith, if not required in any other custody caseRead more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Above 7 Years)
106.Const. P. 226/2026 (D.B.) Rajab Ali & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
107.Const. P. 485/2026 (S.B.) Wahaj Ahmed Siddiqui V/S Mst. Uzma Aziz Sindh High Court, Karachi7. It is further well-settled that while exercising constitutional jurisdiction, this Court does not sit as a Court of appeal to reappraise findings on factual controversies or to substitute its own discretion for that exercised by the subordinate Court, particularly where the impugned order neither determines substantive rights of the parties finally nor causes irreparable prejudice to the petitioner. In the present matter, the learned Family Court has exercised its discretion judiciously and within the bounds of law while safeguarding the welfare interest of the minor child. No illegality, jurisdictional defect, misreading or non-reading of evidence, or material irregularity has been pointed out warranting interference by this Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 8. For the foregoing reasons, this petition being devoid of any merit is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s), if any. The impugned order dated 16.04.2026 passed by the learned XVIth Judge, Family Court, Karachi Central, is maintained.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
108.Const. P. 228/2026 (D.B.) Liaquat Ali & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
109.Const. P. 306/2026 (D.B.) Kewal Ram & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
110.Const. P. 343/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Latif & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
111.Const. P. 4/2026 (D.B.) Shafique Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
112.Const. P. 414/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shahab Deen V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
113.Const. P. 638/2025 (D.B.) Ali Raza V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
114.Const. P. 303/2026 (D.B.) Amanullah V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
115.Const. P. 279/2026 (D.B.) Shafique Rehman & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
116.Const. P. 280/2026 (D.B.) Ali Muhammad & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
117.Const. P. 281/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Mehnaz Thr. Sp. attorney V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
118.Const. P. 3/2026 (D.B.) Shahid Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
119.Const. P. 406/2026 (D.B.) Noor Zaman V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
120.Const. P. 251/2026 (D.B.) Aijaz Ali Shar V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
121.Const. P. 291/2026 (D.B.) Parwez Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
122.Const. P. 238/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Rahim & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
123.Const. P. 252/2026 (D.B.) Ashok Kumar V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
124.Const. P. 272/2026 (D.B.) Ali Muhammad & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
125.Const. P. 256/2026 (D.B.) Ghulam Rasool V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
126.Const. P. 318/2026 (D.B.) Shoban & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
127.Const. P. 341/2026 (D.B.) Shahab Ul Din & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
128.Const. P. 337/2026 (D.B.) Bherji Mal & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
129.Const. P. 427/2026 (D.B.) Javed V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
130.Const. P. 330/2026 (D.B.) Shahnawaz & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
131.Const. P. 436/2026 (D.B.) Fahad Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
132.Const. P. 405/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ahmed Raza V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
133.Const. P. 26/2026 (D.B.) Gul Hassan V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
134.Const. P. 363/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Mubeen V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
135.Const. P. 275/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Azeem & others V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
136.Const. P. 347/2026 (D.B.) Jalal-U-Din V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
137.Const. P. 354/2026 (D.B.) Almas Hyder Shah V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
138.Const. P. 412/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Saira V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
139.Const. P. 79/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Mehtab V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
140.Const. P. 413/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Rehana Kousar V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
141.Const. P. 301/2026 (D.B.) Mr. Akbar Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
142.Const. P. 2161/2024 (D.B.) Ali Khan & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurExercise of powers by public functionaries is circumscribed not only by the constitutional mandate contained in Article 4 which guarantees that every citizen shall be dealt with in accordance with the law.Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
143.Const. P. 4283/2025 (D.B.) Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union & Ors V/S SBCA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1176It is a settled principle that where parties arrive at an agreed arrangement capable of resolving the lis, the Court, while avoiding unnecessary adjudication, may dispose of the matter in terms of such consensus, provided the same is not contrary to law or public policy. Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the case, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition, along with all pending application(s), is disposed of with the observation that the Respondents shall pay lawful dues and liabilities, if payable, relating to Karachi Cooperative Housing Societies Union Ltd.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
144.Const. P. 2552/2026 (D.B.) Hafiz Ziauddin Sultan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1175In view of the above, without touching the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the respondents to consider the petitioner???s case for promotion strictly in accordance with law and policy, and if found eligible in all respects, to place this matter before the Departmental Promotion Committee for appropriate consideration. 9. Pending application(s) stand disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-CLAIM FOR PROMOTION
145.Const. P. 351/2025 (D.B.) Qazi Tariq Ali V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1170The reliance on Articles 4, 9, and 25 of the Constitution is also misplaced. No arbitrariness or mala fide has been shown in the decision-making process. The record reflects that the matter was duly placed before the competent forum, considered in accordance with law, and decided within its jurisdiction. It is now well-settled, including by consistent constitutional jurisprudence of the superior courts, including the Honorable Federal Constitutional Court in service and university governance matters, that where a decision is taken by a statutory body of a public university within its lawful domain, the Constitutional Court will exercise restraint unless the decision is shown to be without jurisdiction, malicious, or in violation of an express statutory provision. None of these exceptions is applicable in the present case. 13. In view of the above, we find no illegality, procedural irregularity, or constitutional infirmity in the impugned decision of the Syndicate. The Petitioner, having retired from service, cannot claim promotion/upgradation as a matter of right, particularly when the competent authority has expressly held that such a benefit is not admissible post-retirement under the governing framework. 14. For the foregoing reasons, this petition, being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed along with pending applications, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
146.Const. P. 1549/2026 (D.B.) Yaqoob Ali & others V/S Province of Sindh & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1177Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the Respondents to convene the meeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee within a period of sixty (60) days and consider the cases of the Petitioners for promotion to the post of Assistant Director Fisheries (BS-17) strictly in accordance with the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974, against available vacancies and based on their seniority and eligibility. In case the Petitioners are found fit and eligible, consequential benefits shall follow in accordance with law from the date vacancies became available. The Respondents are further restrained from taking any adverse action against the Petitioners merely on account of the filing of the present petition. All pending application(s) if any, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
147.Const. P. 2227/2026 (D.B.) Noman Raisi V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1166This Court is mindful that constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is discretionary and equitable in nature and cannot ordinarily be invoked to interfere in matters involving immigration control and security assessments unless the impugned action is shown to be patently without jurisdiction, mala fide, coram non judice, or in violation of mandatory statutory provisions. No such exceptional circumstance has been established in the present matter. On the contrary, the official record produced before this Court discloses a valid and subsisting basis for continuation of the petitioner???s name on the Stop List. 12. In view of the foregoing reasons, this Court finds no illegality, arbitrariness, or jurisdictional defect in the action of the respondents warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. Consequently, the instant Constitutional Petition is disposed of along with all pending applications, leaving the petitioner at liberty to approach the competent authority, namely the Directorate General, Immigration & Passports, Government of Pakistan, for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law, and if such representation is filed within one week, the same shall be decided strictly on its own merits and in accordance with law within three weeks with speaking order after hearing the petitioner.Read more
Matter:-Removing the name from PCL
148.Const. P. 1056/2024 (D.B.) Syed Zahid Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1169In these circumstances, the refusal of the respondents to grant service benefits to the petitioner, which action is found to be without lawful authority and not sustainable in law. This petition is disposed of with the directions that the Chief Secretary, Sindh, shall personally constitute a committee comprising senior officers of the concerned departments, including the Board of Revenue, Commissioner Karachi, Karachi Development Authority, and Accountant General Sindh, for immediate resolution of the matter. The said committee shall determine, within a period of thirty (30) days, the department legally responsible for settlement of the Petitioner???s pensionary and retiral benefits and shall ensure issuance of retirement notification, finalization of pension papers, release of pension, gratuity, leave encashment and all other admissible retiral benefits of the Petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a further period of thirty (30) days thereafter. 12. The Chief Secretary, Sindh, is further directed to conduct an inquiry and fix responsibility upon the delinquent officials/officers whose lethargic, negligent, and indifferent conduct caused extraordinary delay and immense hardship to the Petitioner since his retirement in the year 2013. Appropriate departmental action shall be initiated against such responsible officials in accordance with the law. The compliance report shall be submitted to the Nazir of this Court within the stipulated period.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
149.Const. P. 2220/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Javaid & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1164In the instant matter, the petitioners have specifically challenged the jurisdictional legality of the impugned order and the discriminatory denial of relief already granted by this Court to similarly placed employees. Moreover, the earlier connected petitions arising out of the same order were entertained and allowed by this Court. Therefore, the respondents cannot now raise a contrary objection in respect of identically situated petitioners. 12. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned order dated 11.03.2024, insofar as it relates to the present petitioners, is declared to be illegal, without lawful authority, and of no legal effect. Consequently, the same is set aside. The reinstatement orders earlier passed in favour of the petitioners under Rule 12(i) of the Sindh Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1988 shall stand restored with all consequential benefits, strictly in accordance with law. The respondents are directed to give effect to this judgment within a stipulated period to be fixed by this Court. 13. Accordingly, the instant Constitutional Petition stands allowed in the above terms, along with all pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
150.Const. P. 2194/2023 (D.B.) Mst. Samina Naz V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1171Today, the officers present in Court have undertaken that the petitioner???s pensionary benefits shall be processed and credited into her account within a period of two weeks. It has further been assured that all formalities, including coordination with the relevant departments, shall be completed without delay. 6. In case of non-compliance within the stipulated time, the consequences already provided in the order dated 11.05.2026 shall follow in accordance with law. 7. In view of the above undertaking and assurance of compliance, nothing further survives in the matter. Accordingly, the petition stands along with pending application(s) disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
151.Const. P. 1144/2025 (D.B.) Kathiawar Coop Housing Society V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1172As far as the issue of remaining encroachments is concerned, since the matter involves disputed questions of fact and requires continued administrative and possibly enforcement action, the Petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent forum/authority in accordance with law for redressal of any surviving grievance regarding removal of encroachments from the subject land. 10. Accordingly, with the above observations and directions, and since the purpose of filing this petition stands substantially achieved to the extent noted above, the instant petition, without touching the merits of the case, and with the consent of the parties, along with pending application(s), is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
152.Const. P. 1413/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Sadiq V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1174In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the considered view the petitioner???s grievance primarily relates to the processing of his revised pension case, which requires formal forwarding by the Education Department to the Accountant General???s office rather than adjudication in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. 5. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without touching the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with directions to the concerned Department to forward the petitioner???s revised pension case to the Accountant General???s office within four weeks for consideration and decision in accordance with law. Pending applications are also being disposed of.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
153.Const. P. 6268/2024 (D.B.) Luke Victor V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1150Consequently, the instant petition bearing No. 6268 of 2024 is allowed to the extent that the absorption of Respondent No.5 into the Ministry of National Food Security & Research, along with all consequential benefits accruing solely based on such absorption, is declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to take necessary steps for the repatriation of Respondent No.5 to his parent department in accordance with law within a period of sixty days from the date of this judgment. However, it is clarified that this judgment shall not preclude the competent authorities from considering Respondent No.5 for any appointment through a lawful and transparent process strictly in accordance with the applicable recruitment rules. All pending application(s) stand disposed of with no order as to costs. 23. Consequently, Constitutional Petition No. D-4498 of 2017 filed by Masood Ahmed and others stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
154.H.C.A 17/2014 (D.B.) Nasreen Yousuf V/S Aijaz Safdar Kiyani & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1114Best Rule evidence. Gift valid because not challenged by the Principal. Appeal dismissed.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
155.Const. P. 6013/2021 (D.B.) Habibullah Khaskheli and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1141In the event the respondents are of the view that execution of conveyance deeds is still barred on account of the order dated 28.11.2012 and subsequent orders passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Case No.16 of 2011, they shall pass a clear, reasoned and speaking order specifying the precise legal impediment, the nature and extent of the restriction and the reasons for treating the case of the petitioners differently from other cases wherein leases/allotments have allegedly been processed after the said order. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of this order. 12. It is clarified that in case the respondents maintain their position regarding the subsistence of the restriction imposed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy or file appropriate application before the Hon???ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Case No.16 of 2011 or before any other competent forum in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
156.Const. P. 2296/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Karim V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1165Accordingly, without expressing any final opinion on the merits of the procurement process itself, it is observed that the impugned decision of the Review Committee suffers from non-consideration of relevant issues and appears to have been founded on unrelated matters to the subject dispute. In such circumstances, the matter warrants reconsideration by the competent forum in accordance with the law after addressing all grounds raised by the Petitioner. 12. Resultantly, the impugned decision is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the Review Committee for fresh consideration on merits strictly in accordance with the Sindh Public Procurement Rules, 2010, after providing a proper opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The Review Committee shall decide the appeal expeditiously, preferably within two weeks period. 13. The captioned petition stands disposed of with all pending application(s) in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-TENDER
157.Const. P. 4498/2017 (D.B.) Masood Ahmed V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1151Consequently, the instant petition bearing No. 6268 of 2024 is allowed to the extent that the absorption of Respondent No.5 into the Ministry of National Food Security & Research, along with all consequential benefits accruing solely based on such absorption, is declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to take necessary steps for the repatriation of Respondent No.5 to his parent department in accordance with law within a period of sixty days from the date of this judgment. However, it is clarified that this judgment shall not preclude the competent authorities from considering Respondent No.5 for any appointment through a lawful and transparent process strictly in accordance with the applicable recruitment rules. All pending application(s) stand disposed of with no order as to costs. 23. Consequently, Constitutional Petition No. D-4498 of 2017 filed by Masood Ahmed and others stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
158.Const. P. 2438/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Akram Bhutto V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1173Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, the matter is remitted to the competent authority to reconsider and decide the case of the Petitioner afresh, strictly in accordance with law and applicable policy, within a period of three weeks. It is further observed that any remarks made in the comments filed by the Respondents shall not prejudice the Petitioner and shall not influence the competent authority while deciding the matter on its own merits. 12. The petition, along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
159.M.A. 7/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Khalid V/S Muhammad Sabir & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1125Section 4 MFLO cannot be extended to collateral heirs. Children of pre???deceased nephew excluded; succession devolves solely upon surviving nephews as residuaries.Read more
160.I. A 30/2025 (S.B.) Sawai Singh V/S Hemraj & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1133Plaint rejected; defamation suit failed to plead any specific defamatory statement; vague allegations held insufficient under Defamation Ordinance, 2002.Read more
161.Spl.Cr.Bail 26/2026 (S.B.) HAZIZ ULLAH S/O IRFANULLAH V/S THE STATE THR ASSIST COLLECTOR CUSTOMS JIAP KHI Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-BAIL AFTER ARREST
162.Const. P. 57/2026 (S.B.) Mehtab Ahmed Soomro V/S Mst. Maryam & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFamily matter.Read more
Matter:-Family Matter
163.Const. P. 529/2025 (S.B.) Abdul Samad Qureshi and others V/S Sher Muhammad and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadOrder I Rule 10(2) CPC for striking-off a party, is not a provision for summary dismissal of the suitRead more
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
164.Cr.Bail 262/2026 (S.B.) Abdul Hafeez chachar & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
165.Const. P. 269/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Israr V/S Muhammad Waseem & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadTenant cannot deny relationship of tenancy on basis of sale agreement with landlordRead more
Matter:-Rent Matter
166.Cr.Bail 115/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Aftab & Ors V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
167.Cr.Bail 351/2026 (S.B.) Ali Asghar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
168.Cr.Bail 416/2026 (S.B.) Sultan Shah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur376 PPC bail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-POST ARREST BAIL
169.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 32/2025 (D.B.) RAFAQAT HUSSAIN S/O ASHRAF HUSSAIN V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
170.Const. P. 4100/2025 (D.B.) Abbas Ali V/S The Registrar Federal Urdu University Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1158In the totality of circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 suffers from procedural impropriety, non-application of mind, and failure to observe the constitutional and statutory obligations relating to reasonable accommodation of a disabled employee. The Respondent University failed to establish through cogent and legally sustainable material that the Petitioner had become wholly incapable of performing any useful service or that no alternate placement or accommodation was possible. The impugned action, therefore, appears disproportionate, arbitrary, and inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of dignity, equality, and protection against discrimination. Consequently, the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 is declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect and is hereby set aside. The Respondent University is directed to reinstate the Petitioner in service forthwith, with continuity of service and all consequential service benefits. The Respondent University shall further examine and provide reasonable accommodation or adjustment against a suitable post compatible with the Petitioner???s medical condition strictly in accordance with the law, and he shall not be harassed by the officials of the Respondent University due to his medical condition, i.e., visual impairment. 16. This petition is allowed in the above terms. All pending applications stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
171.Const. P. 931/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shamim Akmal Khan & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1087PIA employees rights protected change in medical policy of retired employees set asideRead more
Matter:-PENSION
172.I. A 18/2024 (D.B.) Aleem Thr: Attorney V/S Mst Lanjan & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1089Referee Court cannot reject Collector's reference on limitation. Section 30 disputes must be decided on merits. Appeals allowed.Read more
173.Const. P. 1266/2026 (D.B.) Malik Muhammad Iqbal Nadeem & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1085Disputed Questions of Fact Petition DismissedRead more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
174.Criminal Appeal 12/2026 (S.B.) Ghulam Qadir Gopang & Others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 1123Whether a convict who did not surrender before the trial Court and avoided being taken into custody is entitled to seek suspension of sentence before the appellate forum under Section 426 Cr.P.C., without undergoing the sentence first, by surrendering before the appellate Court?Read more
Matter:-Imprisonment(More than 5 Upto 10 years)
175.Const. P. 1266/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Shaila Ahmed and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1086
Matter:-Land Matters
176.Const. P. 4537/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Syed Muhammad Abbas Rizvi & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1088wedlock policy does not confer indefinite right for posting at one stationRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
177.II.A. 20/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Rasool & Others V/S Safaiullah Khalid & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1090Concurrent rejection of plaint set-aside; disputed issues of title, inheritance and alleged waqf require trial. Suit restored.Read more
178.I. A 28/2024 (D.B.) Mst Khatijan V/S Jadeen & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1116Referee Court cannot reject Collector's reference on limitation. Section 30 disputes must be decided on merits; appeals allowed.Read more
179.I. A 29/2024 (D.B.) Jalal & Ors V/S Luqman & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1117Referee Court cannot reject Collector's reference on limitation. Section 30 disputes must be decided on merits; appeals allowed.Read more
180.Const. P. 2838/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Junaid Siddiqui V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
181.Const. P. 2953/2026 (D.B.) Saqib Aziz Khan V/S Ahmed Naazer Minhaj & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
182.Cr.Bail 116/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Mithal Magsi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPost arrest bail in offence under Sections 409, 161, 477-A and 120-B, P.P.C. read with Section 5(2) of Act II of 1947 has been granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
183.Const. P. 202/2026 (D.B.) Usama V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
184.Criminal Miscelleneous 103/2026 (S.B.) Mushtaque Ahmed Brohi V/S Bashir Ahmed Brohi and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCr. Misc. Appln for cancellation of bail has been dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
185.R.A (Civil Revision) 468/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed & Others V/S Abdul Hakeem Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasAgreement void in prior litigation; no declaratory relief sought. Suit for possession and compensation rightly dismissed.Read more
186.Cr.Bail 123/2026 (S.B.) Parvez Ali Unar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPost arrest bail in offence under Sections 409, 161, 477-A and 120-B, P.P.C. read with Section 5(2) of Act II of 1947 has been granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
187.Cr.Bail 35/2026 (S.B.) Bashir Ahmed Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in offences punishable under Sections 452 and 365-B, P.P.C and Section 3 of the Sindh Trafficking in Persons Act, 2018, has been allowed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
188.Const. P. 447/2026 (D.B.) Javed Hussain Mahar V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurForest matter.Read more
Matter:-Against Notification / Office Order
189.Const. P. 372/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Natasha V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
190.Criminal Appeal 168/2026 (D.B.) ABDULLAH S/O SHER MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
191.Const. P. 2038/2026 (D.B.) Zafran V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1102Until the culmination of disciplinary proceedings, the matter of the petitioner???s salary and admissibility of pay for the relevant period shall be decided strictly in accordance with the relevant service rules and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. However, it is made clear that if any adverse order is passed, the petitioner may have a remedy under the law to avail before a competent forum. 8. Consequently, without touching the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the understanding that the respondents will conclude the disciplinary proceedings, if any, strictly in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of meaningful hearing/including regular inquiry proceedings. All pending applications are also disposed of.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
192.Const. P. 1259/2026 (D.B.) Asif V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1103Petitioner is directed accordingly to approach the concerned Office for evaluation of his case and thereafter the Respondents shall process in accordance with the law. However, if the case of Petitioner is found genuine, same shall be processed without creating any hindrance. Let intimation notice be issued to the Petitioner for such purpose. 4. The instant petition by consent of NADRA counsel, stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-UNBLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
193.Const. P. 1386/2026 (D.B.) Ms. Fateh Mubeen Nizam V/S Accountant General Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1105Learned AAG appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 filed comments stating that the amount of leave encashment amounting to Rs.2,679,795/- had already been paid to the Petitioner on 05.05.2026 through the Office of the Accountant General, Sindh, and submitted that in view thereof the petition had served its purpose. 4. In view of the statement made on behalf of Respondent No.1, without touching the merits of the case, the petition, by consent of the learned AAG, is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
194.Const. P. 5787/2025 (D.B.) Noman Muzaffar V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1100For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
195.Const. P. 2818/2026 (D.B.) Naveed Ahmed Abro V/S Syed Kamran Sabir & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1107It is further clarified that any person, authority or official creating obstruction, withholding record, delaying compliance, or interfering in the election process in any manner whatsoever shall render himself liable to strict action under Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, read with the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003, in addition to such departmental proceedings as may be warranted under the law. 14. The learned MIT-I shall continue to monitor compliance of the orders passed by this Court and submit report, if necessary. Office is directed to communicate this order to all concerned authorities forthwith for immediate and strict compliance. 15. With the above observations and directions, this petition along with pending application(s) stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
196.Const. P. 1746/2023 (D.B.) Shahid Ghani V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1106Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. The respondents, jointly, particularly the successor authorities of erstwhile DMC South/TMC concerned along with Sindh Local Government Board, are directed to ensure release of the petitioner???s outstanding salary, difference of pay, and admissible allowances for the aforesaid period within a period of sixty (60) days from receipt of this order. However, in the circumstances of the case, the claim of markup/interest is declined. 15. Needless to observe that inter se adjustment of liability amongst the respondents shall be resolved by the Government independently and shall not impede compliance with this order. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms. However, it is made clear that if in the intervening period the subject benefits are not disbursed by the respondent, appropriate action in terms of section 17 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance shall follow by the office.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
197.Const. P. 5788/2025 (D.B.) Nazar-ul-Hassan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1101For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
198.Const. P. 6370/2024 (D.B.) Saeed Ahmed V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1108The petition is therefore allowed in the terms that the continued inclusion of the petitioner???s name in the PNIL is declared to be illegal, without lawful authority, and of no legal effect. Respondent No. 2/FIA is directed to forthwith remove the petitioner???s name from the PNIL, if not already removed. The respondents are directed to ensure strict compliance with Standing Order No. 2/2018 in future, and no person shall be retained in PNIL beyond the prescribed period without lawful extension or due process. In case of any future placement affecting fundamental rights, the respondents shall ensure recorded reasons, lawful authority, and adherence to due process requirements. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The office shall communicate this order to DG FIA for compliance and necessary administrative action.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
199.Const. P. 5786/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Nadeem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1099For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
200.Const. P. 5286/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Bibi Naseema V/S Federal Government of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1110In view of the above and without touching the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to approach V&R Branch located at Awami Markaz, Main Shahrah-e-Faisal Karachi along with all documents as required under the law for evaluation of her case. However, it is made clear that no bottleneck shall be created in the intervening period, and if the petitioner???s case is found to be genuine, the same shall be processed without any hindrance. 5. With the consent of counsel for NADRA, petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Let intimation notice be issued to the petitioner to appear before V&R Branch, Awami Markaz, Main Shahrah-e-Faisal, Karachi as discussed supra.Read more
Matter:-RENEWAL OF CNIC
201.Const. P. 5785/2025 (D.B.) Shoaibullah Khan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1098For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
202.Cr.Bail 1507/2025 (S.B.) Khan Muhammad Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadOffence of dacoity. Applicant nominated with specific role. Pre-arrest bail declinedRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
203.Const. P. 846/2026 (D.B.) Ahmed Saeed Jan Sirhindi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2026 SHC HYD 1118Permit granted by District Council for organizing cattle market was not heritable property.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
204.II.A. 118/2026 (S.B.) Slag Cement Industries Ltd. V/S M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd. Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1119, 2026 SHC KHI 1121Delay condonation cannot rest on vague or unverified allegations against counsel - Failure to disclose identity of alleged negligent advocate or steps taken against him renders explanation devoid of credibility - Law of limitation creates valuable vested rights in favour of opposite party - Each day of delay must be satisfactorily explained.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
205.Const. P. 4840/2024 (D.B.) Haji Khan and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1080
Matter:-SERVICE
206.R.A (Civil Revision) 55/2026 (S.B.) Mir Ali Nawaz & Ors V/S Mst. Hameeda Begum & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasConcurrent findings upheld. Oral sale of 1973 not proved; forged statement and fraudulent mutations declared void.Read more
207.Const. P. 964/2025 (D.B.) Umair Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
208.Const. P. 963/2025 (D.B.) Yasir Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
209.Const. P. 454/2026 (D.B.) Asadullah Khan V/S Fed of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
210.Const. P. 469/2026 (D.B.) Sanjay Kumar V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
211.Const. P. 465/2026 (D.B.) Nadeem Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
212.Const. P. 470/2026 (D.B.) Hamza Khan V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
213.Const. P. 95/2026 (D.B.) Mahar Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
214.Const. P. 357/2026 (D.B.) Waqar Ali & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
215.Const. P. 223/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Hamza V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
216.Const. P. 98/2026 (D.B.) Pooja Bai V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
217.Const. P. 94/2026 (D.B.) Adnan Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
218.Const. P. 450/2026 (D.B.) Rehmatullah V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
219.Const. P. 355/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Zaman V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
220.R.A (Civil Revision) 56/2026 (S.B.) Mir Muhammad Hassan & Ors V/S Mir Allah Bachayo & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasConcurrent findings upheld. 1973 oral sale statement proved forged; defendants failed to discharge the burden revision dismissed in limine.Read more
221.Const. P. 216/2026 (D.B.) Bilal Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
222.Const. P. 2094/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Mateen V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
223.Const. P. 3858/2016 (D.B.) K.U.E.C.H.S V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1104Moreover, the record reflects that Respondent No.4 had made substantial payments towards the plot and had expressed willingness to clear any lawful outstanding dues; therefore, outright cancellation without proper adjudication was unjustified. The appellate authority also failed to determine the core issue regarding the legality of cancellation and mainly relied upon alleged third-party rights, which remained unsubstantiated as no subsequent allottee was impleaded in the proceedings. The learned Revisional Authority rightly exercised jurisdiction under Section 64 of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, to correct the misreading and non-reading of evidence committed by the appellate forum. The revisional order is a reasoned and lawful exercise of jurisdiction, balancing equities by directing Respondent No.4 to clear any lawful dues before restoration of allotment. Thus, no patent illegality or jurisdictional defect has been shown in the impugned revisional order dated 23.05.2016, warranting interference by this Court. 16. For the foregoing reasons, we are not persuaded to interfere with the impugned revisional order dated 23.05.2016 passed by Respondent No.1. Consequently, this petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed, along with pending applications, if any. The petitioner-Society shall comply with the directions issued by the Revisional Authority forthwith strictly in accordance with law. However, no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
224.Const. P. 5954/2018 (D.B.) Shah Masih V/S I.G of Police & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1092In view of the above, it is held that while the offer of appointment was conditional, the subsequent rejection of the petitioner???s candidature, based solely on acquitted criminal cases without any independent adverse material or reasoned justification, cannot be sustained in law. The impugned decision to the extent that the petitioner suffers from arbitrariness, lack of fair consideration, and violates the constitutional guarantees of equality, non-discrimination, and fair treatment in public employment. 12. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The competent authority of respondents is directed to issue the appointment order in his favour forthwith strictly in accordance with law, treating his acquittal as a neutral factor unless any other lawful impediment exists. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the avode terms. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
225.Const. P. 1920/2026 (D.B.) Said Alam V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1091In view of the statement made by the representative of KMC regarding finalization and readiness to release the admitted amount of pensionary benefits, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition further and seeks its disposal in terms of the said statement. 6. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
226.Const. P. 3116/2023 (D.B.) Karachi Catholic Coop Housing Society V/S SBCA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1094Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the rival claims and contentions of the parties, and with their consent, the instant petition along with all pending application(s) is disposed of with the direction that the respondents shall de-seal the subject premises forthwith, if not already de-sealed, subject to the petitioner strictly adhering to its undertaking that the premises shall not be used for any commercial purpose including as a marriage hall, or banquet facility for commercial uses however they can use the subject premises for social and communal needs of the Christian community, activities relating to lawful, cultural and religious gatherings. However, in case of any future violation of the undertaking or breach of applicable laws, the respondents shall be at liberty to proceed strictly in accordance with law after providing due process to the petitioner???s society.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
227.Const. P. 1290/2026 (D.B.) Iqbal Rehmat V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1093In view of the statement made by the representative of KMC regarding finalization and readiness to release the admitted amount of pensionary benefits, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition further and seeks its disposal in terms of the said statement. 6. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
228.Const. P. 1633/2025 (D.B.) Mr. Saif Uddin V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1081
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
229.Const. P. 1479/2025 (D.B.) Syed Zeeshan Rizvi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiAppointment against deceased quota. Mutatis mutandis application of reasoning and exposition of law.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
230.Const. P. 2552/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Saeed V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FREEZING OF ACCOUNT
231.Const. P. 4717/2024 (D.B.) M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd V/S Muhammad Nadeem and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1097In these circumstances, discussed supra, no case for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution is made out, and the petition is liable to be dismissed. 20. For the foregoing reasons, we are of the considered view that the learned Sindh Labour Court and the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal committed no illegality, jurisdictional error, or material irregularity in concluding that the termination of respondent No.1 was not a bona fide discharge simplicitor but an unlawful termination cloaked under the vague plea of reorganization. The impugned judgments are well-reasoned, based upon proper appreciation of evidence, and fully consistent with the settled principles of labour jurisprudence and constitutional guarantees of due process. 21. Consequently, this Constitutional Petition is also devoid of merit and is dismissed along with pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
232.Const. P. 67/2026 (S.B.) Sultan V/S Hina Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1095Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the rival claims and contentions of the parties, and with their consent, the instant petition along with all pending application(s) is disposed of with the direction that the respondents shall de-seal the subject premises forthwith, if not already de-sealed, subject to the petitioner strictly adhering to its undertaking that the premises shall not be used for any commercial purpose including as a marriage hall, or banquet facility for commercial uses however they can use the subject premises for social and communal needs of the Christian community, activities relating to lawful, cultural and religious gatherings. However, in case of any future violation of the undertaking or breach of applicable laws, the respondents shall be at liberty to proceed strictly in accordance with law after providing due process to the petitioner???s society.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
233.Criminal Appeal 872/2025 (S.B.) ASAD ALI SHAH S/O ANWER SHAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1079
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
234.Const. P. 1251/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Mah Noor Junaid V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1071Nil.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
235.Const. P. 5900/2025 (D.B.) Ramz Ali V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1072
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
236.Cr.Appeal 93/2024 (S.B.) Rehamtullah & others V/S The State & another Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the JudgementRead more
Matter:-R.I FOR 1 YEAR & ABOVE
237.Cr.Bail 237/2026 (S.B.) Aqeel Ahmed Chohan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail dismissed u/s 302 and 377 PPC.Read more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
238.Criminal Appeal 592/2023 (D.B.) AAMIR ALI S/O ABDUL SAMAD & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
239.Cr.Bail 378/2026 (S.B.) Salman Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
240.Cr.Bail 377/2026 (S.B.) Ali Akbar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
241.Cr.Bail 183/2026 (S.B.) Altaf V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
242.Cr.Bail 427/2026 (S.B.) Bashir V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadProhibition Order, foisting cannot be ruled out, bail grantedRead more
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
243.Const. P. 1253/2025 (D.B.) Waqar Ahmed Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
244.Criminal Miscelleneous 169/2026 (S.B.) Hafeezullah Mashori V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
245.Const. P. 2448/2026 (D.B.) Saeed Iqbal V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1052
Matter:-SERVICE
246.Const. P. 6129/2025 (D.B.) Janib V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1061Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and laches, the petitioner having failed to furnish any plausible explanation for not assailing such appointment within a reasonable period; the respondent, having rendered service for several decades and undergone subsequent service-related developments, cannot now be unsettled in the absence of a timely challenge and complete foundational facts relating to the office presently held, and thus no writ of quo warranto is maintainable on this ground; furthermore, the petitioners have failed to place sufficient material on record to demonstrate that the private respondents are presently holding public offices without lawful authority, as mere allegations regarding entry into Voluntary Return arrangements are inadequate, particularly when the law applicable at the relevant time did not entail automatic disqualification and where, in certain instances, departmental proceedings were duly conducted; consequently, it is held that the petitions, insofar as they seek adjudication of transfers, postings, promotions, departmental penalties, service benefits and pensionary consequences, are not maintainable under the prevailing constitutional and statutory framework governing service matters, that a writ of quo warranto cannot be issued on generalized and omnibus allegations without establishing, in respect of each individual office holder, a present lack of lawful authority, that Voluntary Return under Section 25(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (as it stood prior to the 2022 amendment) did not amount to conviction or statutory disqualification under Section 15, that the 2022 amendment cannot be applied retrospectively to impose penal or disqualifying consequences upon concluded Voluntary Return arrangements, that departmental proceedings already conducted and penalties imposed by competent authorities cannot be reopened in quo warranto jurisdiction, and that the petitions are further vitiated, where applicable, by delay, laches, lack of bona fides and repetitive litigation on substantially identical grounds; accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, all listed constitutional petitions along with pending applications stand dismissed, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
247.Const. P. 2483/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Moazzam V/S MD SSGC & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1051
Matter:-SERVICE
248.Const. P. 3154/2025 (D.B.) Naimatullah Khan V/S SHO PS ANF Clifton & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1049Federal Government powers to amend schedule in CNS ActRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
249.Const. P. 260/2026 (D.B.) Anwer Aleem V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1069, 2026 SHC MPK 1070Employees of BISE being public servants; ACE enquiry lawful despite prior departmental enquiry. Constitutional challenge rejected.Read more
250.Cr.J.A 666/2022 (S.B.) CHANESAR S/O JUMOO @ BILAL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachibenefit of doubt appeal allowedRead more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
251.Const. P. 620/2025 (D.B.) Feroz Khashkheli V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
252.Criminal Miscelleneous 841/2025 (S.B.) Danish Mahmood V/S Aamir Munir & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
253.Const. P. 352/2026 (D.B.) Ali Asghar Samoon V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
254.Const. P. 2473/2026 (D.B.) AM Associates & Another V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DE-SEAL