Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan

Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan
Mr.Justice Gulzar Ahmed

Cinque Terre

Honourable Chief Justice
Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh

Cinque Terre

Honourable Chairman I.T. Committe
Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar

Latest Case Law (Approved For Reporting)
1 . Cr.J.A 115/2015 Vijay Kumar & Other V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Appellants were convicted by trial court based on his findings/judgment on circumstantial evidence and the mitigating circumstances for life imprisonment. It cannot be confidently said that the victim was subjected to humiliation of sodomy by the accused since no such report of sperm test is available. Furthermore, there is no eye witness of the incident as to how the victim was beaten and how he was kept in a gunny bag and thrown in Channel Wah. The incident allegedly took place on 20.04.2013 whereas the FIR was lodged on 23.04.2013. What happened in between is a mystery as even the lost seen incident was not corroborated to award life imprisonment. Even the alleged motive of ransom is not confidence inspiring as the Complainant???s family was a poor one. The trial Court determined point No.1 on the basis of mitigating circumstances and the act of terrorism was also found in terms of point No.2. The trial Court based his findings/judgment on circumstantial evidence and the mitigating circumstances. There is no eye witness at all and even the story of the prosecution is not confidence inspiring as the boy who was allegedly abducted belongs to a poor class and it does not inspire confidence that somebody could abduct a child who belongs to a family from whom there are remote chances of any financial benefit. The conclusion, which could be drawn by the above discussion, would be that the prosecution has not been able to prove its case against the appellants beyond shadow of doubt and to such benefit they are entitled. In view of the facts and reason discussed above, the conviction and sentence recorded against the appellants by way of impugned Judgment are set-aside;
Read more

2 . Const. P. 4035/2019 Bashir Ahmed Kalwar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151131 ]
Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment?
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

3 . Const. P. 3310/2018 Muhammad Asad ul Rehman V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151229 ]
the petitioners are seeking regularization of their services against the quota reserved for deceased civil servants as provided under the Prime Minister???s Assistance Package for the Families of Government Employees, on the premise that their parents were serving in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on different posts, who passed away during their service.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

4 . Const. P. 5332/2018 Fahad Arshad & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

5 . Const. P. 4361/2020 Syed Samar Abbas V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

6 . Const. P. 5273/2020 Asia Kausar Ali V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

7 . Const. P. 5999/2020 Muhammad Arif and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

8 . Const. P. 4015/2020 Asif Soomro V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

9 . Const. P. 1604/2021 Qayyum and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

10 . Const. P. 317/2020 Shoukatullah V/S The State through Chairman NAB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST

11 . Const. P. 3429/2020 Allah Warayo and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

12 . Const. P. 1892/2021 Muhammad Akhtar & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

13 . Const. P. 3428/2020 Hakim Ali Khokhar and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

14 . Const. P. 6676/2018 Attaullah Sirohi & Ors V/S G.M Human Resources SSGC & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:APPOINTMENT

15 . Const. P. 1923/2020 Rao Muhammad kamran & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

16 . Const. P. 6526/2020 Aftab Mahmood and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

17 . Const. P. 4577/2020 Syed Muhammasd Younus and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

18 . Const. P. 645/2020 Imran & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

19 . Const. P. 1253/2020 Sadam Hussain & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

20 . Const. P. 5027/2020 Mushk Mona Ayaz V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

21 . Const. P. 1355/2020 Syed Yasir Shabbir and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

22 . Const. P. 875/2020 Muhammad Arif and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
........... We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

23 . Const. P. 1366/2021 Naeem Faisal Saleem & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

24 . Const. P. 1863/2020 Muhammad Bashir & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

25 . Const. P. 5073/2020 Sartaj Ahmed & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

26 . Const. P. 1087/2020 Muhammad Qaiser Alam and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

27 . Const. P. 6047/2018 Asif Mehmood & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

28 . Const. P. 1441/2020 Rashid Azeem & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

29 . Const. P. 5420/2020 Wahid Bux Bhutto and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:REGULARIZATION

30 . Const. P. 6182/2020 Ahsan Nisar Siddiqui V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- ???22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court.??? We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months??? time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

31 . Const. P. 4662/2017 M/s Quality Steel Re-Rolling V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151323 ]
SRO 583(I)/2017 struck down.
Read more

Matter:SALES TAX

32 . Const. P. 4609/2019 Asadullah & Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151335 ]
Regularization
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

33 . Suit 1710/2018 Mrs. Tahera Iqbal Kazi & another V/S Mrs. Naseem Abid Khan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Time of essence of contract. Judgment on admission.
Read more

Matter:SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

34 . Const. P. 3985/2020 Aurangzaib V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151287 ]
the major penalty of ???removal from service???--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

35 . Suit 3/2019 Amsons Textile Mills (Pvt) Limited V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151267 ]
res judicata in suit after decision in constitution petition.
Read more

Matter:SUIT FOR DECLERATION

36 . Const. P. 4485/2020 Ashfaq Ahmed Memon V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151288 ]
the major penalty of ???removal from service???--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

37 . Const. P. 971/2020 Habib Bank Ltd. V/S Mst. Neelofar Awan and others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 18), Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 16)

In view of above I am of the view that tentative rent order should have been complied and for the period of March and April, the tenant/petitioner could have asked for adjustment of half of the rent but this was only possible after compliance and not after defiance. The rent of May/June 2020 was alsonot deposited in time. I do not find any portion of the order to be unlawful and hence the principle that since some portion of the order is not lawful, entire order is to be set aside, is not applicable here.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

38 . Const. P. 8756/2018 Jawed Qureshi V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151289 ]
the petitioner has assailed the vires of the office order No.42/2018 issued by respondent-Employees Old-age Benefits Institution (`EOBI`), whereby he was declared as ???Dead wood???, consequently, he was forcibly sent on Early Retirement from the service of EOBI on the ground that his further retention in service would be of no benefit for the institution.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

39 . Const. P. 887/2018 Hassan Zada & Ors V/S FOP & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151269 ]
that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

40 . Const. P. 391/2018 Fayyaz Khan and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151268 ]
that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

41 . Const. P. 343/2020 M/s Mateen Shopping Galaxy V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151272 ]
Matter:ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)

42 . Const. P. 2116/2018 Mst Benish Liaquat V/S The SHO PS Aram Bagh & Other Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:HARASSMENT

43 . Const. P. 2116/2018 Mst Benish Liaquat V/S The SHO PS Aram Bagh & Other Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:HARASSMENT

44 . Const. P. 4970/2017 Sapphire Textile Mills Ltd V/S Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151155 ]
Section 5A ITO 2001 struck down.
Read more

Matter:INCOME TAX

45 . Const. P. 2844/2021 Muneer Ahmed & Ors V/S Health Department Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151227 ]
The petitioners have called in question, their suspension from the service order dated 01.04.2020 and subsequent order dated 18.08.2020, whereby their reinstatement in service order dated 22.7.2020 was cancelled/withdrawn by the respondent-Secretary, Health Department, Government of Sindh.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

46 . Const. P. 3852/2018 Total Parco Pakistan Ltd V/S Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151153 ]
Matter:SALES TAX

47 . II.A. 205/2019 Ms. Qaiser Jehan Begum Thr. Salman Hussain Memon V/S Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Specific Relief Act, , Civil Procedure Code CPC (Order VII R.11)

[SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151207 ]
the provisions of Section 42 were misconstrued by Courts below. A plaint could only be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC if it is barred by law. None of the provisions of law was cited by respondent???s counsel and/or find mention in the orders/judgment of two Courts below whereby a plaint of the suit of the appellant could be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC. The appellant had a cause of action on account of a threat to her property in view of alleged unlawful and illegal construction beingraised on the adjacent plot.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE JUDGMENT

48 . Const. P. 3100/2016 Ms. Surriya Kanwal V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151138 ]
whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards?
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

49 . Const. P. 5025/2016 Imdad Ali Abro & Ors V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151130 ]
the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

50 . Const. P. 5205/2020 Prof: Dr. Muhammad Zahid V/S Chancellor of Fed: Urdu University & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151150 ]
Judgment passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan in C.P. No.D-5205 of 2020 challenging the appointment of Search Committee and its members for the appointment of Vice Chancellor of Federal Urdu University of Arts, Sciences and Technology (FUUAST).
Read more

Matter:DIRECTION

51 . Const. P. 5144/2015 Dr. Iltaf Hussain and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151154 ]
they have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments/services be regularized in respondent-Water and Power Development Authority (`WAPDA`) without discrimination, with a further assertion that they have already served in WAPDA for a considerable period and they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis rather than joining fresh process with other candidates--
Read more

Matter:APPOINTMENT

52 . M.A. 1/2017 Show Time Cable & Datacom Pvt Limited V/S PEMRA & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Television Broadcast Station Operations) Regulations, 2012, Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules, 2009 (Rule 5), PEMRA Ordinance, 2002 (section 13), PEMRA Ordinance, 2002

[SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151117 ]
Two propositions/counts are as under: (i) That for the impugned decision an opinion was sought from the Regional Council of Complaints which had no jurisdiction under the ibid Ordinance to comment and/or recommend any opinion ,as far as dispute is concerned; (ii) That even if such recommendations are ignored to have been forwarded by the Council of Complaints and the impugned order be seen as an independent decision of PEMRA then again, the details of the outstanding dues does not seems to generate from PEMRA Ordinance 2002, Regulations 2011-12 and PEMRA Rules 2009, and hence are/were illegal and unlawful, and could be struck down by this Court on merit. -So far as the first question as raised by the appellant is concerned, is answered in affirmative that the Council of Complaints had no jurisdiction for rendering opinion/recommendation to PEMRA ???under the Ordinance??? and its role in this regard and the advice sought is of no avail and merits no consideration; it should have been an independent order of PEMRA in view of provisions of PEMRA Ordinance. - Schedule-B attached to these rules enables PEMRA to recover in-house channel fee for cable TV. Table VI provides licence fee of Rs.175,000/-upto10,000 subscribers as B-5 category which category appellant is enjoying followed by annual renewal of Rs.87,500/-. This amount is being paid by the appellant in terms of said rules as reflected in the outstanding dues chart hereinabove. It also enable the licensor PEMRA to recover Rs.24/-per subscriber per year which is a subscriber fee(Table VI), disclosed in horizontal column 2 in the subject chart incorporated in the impugned order. Table IX deals with in-house channel licence fee and is chargeable to all categories from B-1 to B-10. -Thus, in view of aforesaid rules and regulations, the claim is legitimate and I do not see any transgression of the PEMRA authority in claiming the amount mentioned in the impugned decision. -.It is pertinent to point out that rationale and vires of such levy and charge were argued by appellant???s counsel as the fee and other claims are claimed to be disproportionate. Perhaps these arguments could have served better had it been a case of challenging the vires of regulations and rules.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST DECISION OF PEMRA

53 . Const. P. 5779/2019 Nisar Ahmed Baloch V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151092 ]
the petitioner has prayed for issuance of the writ of quo warranto against respondents 4 to 11, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not fit, eligible and qualified to hold the office of Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, and Senior Registrar in Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, (???SMBBMC???) and their future appointments in SMBBMC on contract are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973.
Read more

Matter:QUO WARRANTO

54 . Const. P. 2694/2019 Human Resources Solution (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151087 ]
Matter:INCOME TAX

55 . Const. P. 4674/2018 Pakistan Services Ltd V/S Full Bench NIRC & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151091 ]
(i) Whether Petitioner-PSL has locus standi to approach this Court as an aggrieved party under Article 199 of the Constitution against the decisions of NIRC? (ii) Whether petitioner-PSL is a Trans-Provincial Organization and falls within the ambit of National Industrial Relations Act, 2012? (iii) Whether or not the registration of industry-wise trade unions by the Registrar, Trade Union NIRC, Islamabad is violative of the mandatory requirement of Section 8 of Act, 2012, based on strength of workforce; and, liable to be canceled, in view of mandate of Section 11 of the IRA-2012? (iv) Whether the registrar of trade unions and/or NIRC is competent to determine the registration of the respondent unions?
Read more

Matter:AGAINST ORDER

56 . Const. P. 1914/2020 Amir Akbar Khan V/S NAB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151070 ]
Applicability of the regime of sections 204 and 91 Cr.P.C. to a Reference under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999.
Read more

Matter:BAIL

57 . Const. P. 985/2020 Muhammad Irfan S/o Muhammad Yousuf Nagori V/S Zahid Hussain and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Rent: Default and personal need.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

58 . Const. P. 984/2020 Muhammad Saleem Nagori S/o Muhammad Yousuf Nagori V/S Zahid Hussain and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Rent: Default and personal need.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

59 . Const. P. 983/2020 Muhammad Iqbal Yousuf S/o Muhammad Yousuf Nagori V/S Zahid Hussain and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Rent: Default and personal need.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

60 . Const. P. 2623/2021 Nabeel Rashid V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Short order passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito in C.P. No.D-2526 and 2623 of 2021 challenging the physical examinations of A, AS and O levels. The petitions have been disposed of with certain directions.
Read more

Matter:EXAMINATION

61 . Const. P. 2805/2021 Dr. Shamim Qureshi V/S J.S.M.U and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151036 ]
Matter:SERVICE

62 . Const. P. 3585/2018 Misri V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151032 ]
termination--Sindh Madressatul Islam University
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

63 . Const. P. 4896/2020 Muzaffar Hussain Katpar V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151069 ]
suspension order
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

64 . Const. P. 2526/2021 Shumaila Salman Shah & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakisan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Short order passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito in C.P. No.D-2526 and 2623 of 2021 challenging the physical examinations of A, AS and O levels. The petitions have been disposed of with certain directions.
Read more

Matter:EXAMINATION

65 . Cr.Rev 5/2019 Chatto Khan Suhandro V/S Ghulam Nabi Suhandro and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 151018 ]
Against Order of Trial Court
Read more

66 . Const. P. 6462/2019 Muhammad Najam V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151035 ]
deceased quota
Read more

Matter:DECEASED QUOTA

67 . Const. P. 6192/2020 Imtiaz Hussain V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151030 ]
quo warranto
Read more

Matter:DIRECTION

68 . Const. P. 7700/2019 Husnain Ali and Ors V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151033 ]
Health Department, Government of Sindh, whereby the petitioners may be allowed to pursue their academic medical career subject to extraordinary leave (without pay) for the required period--At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners in substance has pleaded discrimination as they were not sent for training within time, however, he has seriously submitted that their other batch mates on the same consideration were considered and were sent for training and the petitioners were left out except petitioners No.6, 9, 10, and 14.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

69 . Const. P. 4003/2019 Munaza Yasmeen and Ors V/S Learned / Hon Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151011 ]
the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakistan International Airline Company to allow joining period to them till 13.06.2019.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

70 . Const. P. 200/1989 Wazir Ali Industries V/S Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh High Court, Karachi
applicant Muhammad Javed Khan, who is the son of late Abdul Wahid Khan/surety, has prayed that the surety documents submitted by his above named late father with the Nazir of this Court be returned to him.
Read more

Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED

71 . Const. P. 2395/2021 Abdul Basit V/S The Secretary SWWB & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150970 ]
The aforesaid petition is virtually against the transfer and posting order of the private respondent on Own Pay Scale basis.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

72 . Const. P. 2410/2021 Abdul Basit V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150974 ]
promotion issue
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

73 . Const. P. 4287/2020 Sahib Khan Lund Baloch V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150949 ]
Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`)
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

74 . Cr.Acq.A. 506/2020 MUHAMMAD ILYAS S/O ABDUL REHMAN V/S UMER HAYAT S/O ABDUL HAQ & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151348 ]
Matter:AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT

75 . Const. P. 2129/2018 Muhammad Akram V/S M/s. Jamia Imamia Trust & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979

It is immaterial for the tenant as towho are the trustees and how those trustees were/are being replaced. It is indoor/internal management of the trustees and trust which has nothing to do with the relationship of landlord and tenant between Jamia ImamiaTrust and thepetitioner. None of thealleged trustees who were deprived of any benefit of being a trustee was cited as a witness or summoned by the petitioner.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

76 . Const. P. 1028/2019 Raees Baig and others V/S Hameed Baig (since deceased) thr. LRs & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
The petitioner in the earlier round of litigation has made an attempt that in the absence of any title of the property in question the solitary statement of the cross-examination of the applicant/respondent should not be a decisive factor. Rightly so and for that matter the case was remanded to the trial court/Rent Controller so that the petitioners may support their pleadings on the strength of their evidence but they have failed. None of the petitioners stood in the witness box to rebut the contents of the application or the affidavit/statement made on oath and the cross-examination as observed earlier. In the cross-examination this burden of proving the relationship was diluted by the petitioner/opponent himself by raising a question that the rent of the demise premises was paid upto December 2002, which suggestion was denied by landlord/respondent. The counsel also inquired the applicant/respondent as to rent of which period was paid, which was replied that the rent was paid for the years 1966 to 1975. Thus in absence of any evidence on the part of Petitioner and on the strength of the affidavit-in-evidence of the respondent and the cross-examination conducted, the two courts below held the relationship of landlord and tenant in the second round as well.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

77 . Const. P. 1002/2018 Mohsin Raffan Khan V/S XIVth Civil & Family Judge, & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Although it was an independent burden on the respondent No.2, which ought to have been discharged independently butthe burden was diluted when petitioner???s/defendant???scounsel herself suggested in the cross-examination that when they shifted at the rented house, they took all the dowry articles from her mother in law???s house. By this question the dowry articles, list of which is independently attached, were conceded
Read more

Matter:FAMILY MATTER

78 . Const. P. 1761/2020 Abu Hashim & another V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150925 ]
Judgment in NADRA case passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan whereby the show cause notices issued under Section 18 of NADRA Ordinance, 2000 are quashed. The blocking of CNICs of the petitioners was declared illegal.
Read more

Matter:RESTORATION OF C.N.I.C

79 . Const. P. 848/2020 M/S. ADAMJEE IMPEX V/S SHAIKH MUHAMMAD KHALID & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 16)

In view of above, I found that the orders passed under section 16(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was harsh inasmuch as it struck off the defence without a proper scrutiny of ledgers ofthe rent that has already been deposited in MRC, interestingly in the name of same landlord and there could have been no inconvenience to the respondent/landlord for the recovery of amount from such MRC.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

80 . Const. P. 1028/2020 Allah Rakha V/S Abdul Rehman Sindh High Court, Karachi
The petitioner was tenant of the subject premises of the respondent. Statutory notice under Section 18 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was served on the petitioner on 15.12.2017. It is claimed that the rent upto February 2018 was deposited in Suit No.1153/2008 in terms of order of court, however, notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, was issued to the petitioner who, despite receipt of the notice, has not tendered the rent of March, 2018 till 17th October, 2018, when for the first time it is contended that the money order was sent. By that time the default of March to July, 2018 has already been committed, even if the rent was required to be deposited in 60 days of its becoming due.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

81 . M.A. 24/2021 Muhammad Rameez Dar S/o Liaquat Dar (Late) V/S Learned IXth ADJ, Karachi (South) Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Succession Act

There is nothing on record to ascertain as to how learned Additional District Judge came up with the valuation of immovable property at Rs.1,50,00,000/-as schedule of property discloses it at Rs.10 Million. Unless otherwise evidence and material is available,such statement/schedule which is filed along with memo of petition should not have been discarded or ignored.
Read more

Matter:SUCESSION MATTERS

82 . R.A (Civil Revision) 68/2021 Mst. Naseem Kausar and others Thr. Junaid Safdar V/S Sardar Abdul Rehman Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Civil Procedure Code CPC, LIMITATION (Limitation Act 1908)

Reader and even for that matter court had no jurisdiction to extend time for filing leave application against statutory period and that too without any justified reason. By that time the service has already been effected at least by publication on 06.12.2020. In terms of Order XXXVII Rule 3, CPC, the leave to defend application is supposed to have been filed within the period prescribed therein.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER

83 . R.A (Civil Revision) 74/2021 Ziauddin Gabol S/o Amin Gabol V/S Nabi Bukhsh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
n application for leave to defend was filed by applicant in a summary suit filed for recovery of Rs.14,915,000/-.While considering the leave to defend application,the Court granted the leave to the effect that only 1/3 of the total claim was required to be submitted in terms of surety, which order is impugned in this revision application. Prima facie it appears that a fair discretion was exercised by the trial Court. This is no defence that he (applicant) has no financial means for submitting surety in terms of Order XXXVII CPC.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER

84 . Const. P. 2191/2021 Saeed Akhter V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150903 ]
Primarily, this petition has served its purpose, which is disposed of in the terms, whereby the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to issue posting and transfer orders of the petitioner and the private respondent, if no disciplinary proceedings are pending against them, strictly under the schedule of the establishment of law department KMC, with correct description/designation of their respective posts as per their entitlement under the law. The said exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks from the date of this order.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

85 . Const. P. 427/2021 Ghulam Farooq V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150904 ]
In our view, no candidate shall be appointed to a post unless after such medical examination as Government may prescribe such candidate is found medically fit to discharge the duties of the post. In the present case, the petitioner was relieved from the duties on medical grounds and his appeal was rejected on the same analogy. Besides above, the assertion of the petitioner is misconceived on the premise that he obtained a medical examination fitness test certificate on 02.12.2019 after the rejection of his appeal, on 14.5.2019, thus this document could not be taken into consideration, besides the respondents have relied upon the documents which prima facie show adverse inference against him. Thus, at this stage, we cannot declare him medically fit or otherwise for the subject post, which was a contractual position and by efflux of time expired.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

86 . Const. P. 6300/2020 Bashir Ahmed Abbasi Kalhoro V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150902 ]
Prima facie under the Sindh Rules of Business, 1986, the Chief Minister is the Chief Executive of the Province; and, has no direct role whatsoever in the matter of a Junior School Teacher, about his appointment, posting, transfer, promotion, and disciplinary issues. On the aforesaid proposition, the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of The STATE v. ANWAR SAIF ULLAH KHAN (PLD 2016 Supreme Court 276)
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

87 . Const. P. 315/2021 Waqas Ahmed S/o Waqar Ahmed V/S Mst. Maryam Hafeez and others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890

Though under section 14 of the Family Court Act, 1964a decision is appealable however considering the facts and circumstances when interim meeting was ordered to be arranged in terms of the order ofthe trial Court theorder was not interfered by the appellate Court. Trial Court has exercised their right and maintained by appellate Court and such discretion being rightly exercised cannot be interfered. There is nothing to interfere in the interim arrangement,which seems to be lawful and justified.
Read more

Matter:FAMILY MATTER

88 . R.A (Civil Revision) 71/2021 Shakeel Abu Bakar S/o Abu Bakar V/S Muhammad Bilal Lakhani and another Sindh High Court, Karachi
In a summary suit pending in the Court of XI-AdditionalDistrict Judge Karachi East,conditional leave was grantedto the applicant who admitted the signatures on the dishonored cheques. Irrespective of the amount involvedand irrespective of the fact whether applicant could furnish surety of the amount, as directedby the trial Court, thereis no justificationin interfering in the order of the trial Courtwhich has exercised its jurisdiction/discretion by extending the leave subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.7.5 Million,which amount is equivalent to the amount of dishonored cheques involved in the summary suit.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER

89 . Const. P. 321/2021 Shafiq Ahmed S/o Shabbir Ahmed V/S Iftikhar Hussain Qureshi and others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 16), Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 18)

Petitioner was inducted in the premises as tenant. He claimed to be in relation with the brother of respondent No.1 Iftikhar Hussain Qureshi as landlord/ tenant who sold this property to his brother. The status of the petitionerwith regard to premises in question would thus remain as a tenant. Petitioner has claimed that no notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was served however he concedes that despite receipt of notice of eviction application and the documents,he did not tender the rent to the new landlordi.e. respondent No.1.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

90 . Const. P. 948/2020 Muhammad Khalid S/o Wazir Ahmed Khan V/S The Court of IVth ADJ, Karachi Central and others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Family Courts Act, 1964, Sindh Civil Court Rules

The objections were to the extent that in a family suit the plaintiff seeking Khulla cannot be represented by her attorney. Learned counsel in support of this contention has cited Rule 85 of the Sindh Civil Court Rules and Section 18 of the Family Courts Act, 1964. So far as the earlier Rule of Sindh Chief Court is concerned, the same is not applicable to the proceedings in hand as they are governed by the Family Courts Act, 1964 and perhaps there is no applicability of such rule even on merit. Similarly, so far as Section 18 of the Family Court Act is concerned, it enables a Pardah Nasheen lady to be permitted and represented by an authorized agent. This is an enabling provision and does not restrict the right of a plaintiff who intends to proceed the matter through an attorney to represent her in the court of law including a family suit for the dissolution of marriage.
Read more

Matter:FAMILY MATTER

91 . Const. P. 2328/2021 Muhammad Tanveer V/S M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150905 ]
Matter:SERVICE

92 . II.A. 35/2017 Syed Fasih Iqbal Thr. his Legal Heirs & Others V/S Hassan Sardar & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Perhaps deciding issue No.1 afresh in this third tier of litigation would be harsh as any party aggrieved of it would be deprived of right of appeal. A fair judicial proceedings includes a right of appeal and only then the spirit of fair trial could be materialized. In my humble view this issue ought to have been decided on merit by the Courts below so that it could be decided conclusively whether any rights in the property were delegated by defendant No.1/applicant to defendant No.2/respondent No.2as only then attorney could delegate such rights further to the plaintiff i.e. respondent No.1 herein as his sub-attorney and a decree of lawful purchaser could be passed in favour of respondent No.1
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT

93 . M.A. 5/2021 Jaag Broadcasting Systems (Private) Limited V/S Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: PEMRA Ordinance, 2002

-Once a decision was taken for the withdrawal of the complaint and to refer it to Council of Complaints, Karachi (Sindh) there should be some logical reasons for not referring it to the Council of Complaints, Karachi (Sindh). Logic and reason existed when it was withdrawn from Council of Complaints, KPK to Council of Complaints, Sindh. It was exclusive prerogative of PEMRA and not Council of Complaints, KPK.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST DECISION OF PEMRA

94 . Const. P. 6604/2020 Nasim Ahmed Memon V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150847 ]
the petitioner is an educationist and has been serving in the Public Education Sector in Sindh since 1987. Per learned counsel the Universities and Boards Department, the Government of Sindh, Karachi invited application for the position of ???Chairman-Board??? and petitioner was one of the candidates for the aforesaid post--
Read more

Matter:APPOINTMENT

95 . R.A (Civil Revision) 55/2019 Muhammad Tobria S/o Ismail V/S The Board of Trustee KPT and others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Karachi Port Trust Act, 1886 (Section 87)

- The licences on which respondents were relying were expired somewhere in 2013. After the expiry of the alleged licences the Karachi Port Trust started receiving amount as being ???lease money??? and a period of lease was also disclosed in the challans issued by Karachi Port Trust to applicants though separately describing them as licensee as well. - In this primary examination perhaps the respondents have not demonstrated to have passed the criteria and test to adjudge them (applicants) as licencees. Since the rental receipts were issued for a lease period, as available on record, therefore, notice under section 87 of the KPT Act for the eviction cannot be read to have been issued in pursuance of the aforesaid Act as a lessee cannot be evicted without due process of law. Hence, such action is not deemed to have been taken or purported to have been taken under the ibid Act. - When an action was not deemed to have been taken under the Act, the barring provision of Section 87 would not apply and plaint in this regard for a colourable exercise of powers by official of KPT cannot be rejected under order VII rule 11 CPC. It requires a trial as to whether action was in accordance with law or otherwise. The appeal preferred by the applicants met the same fate as it was dismissed. - I am of the firm view that the issue of notice of eviction to an occupant of the nature as described above is not warranted under the law and on such threat of eviction he cannot wait for a period mentioned in the barring section i.e. Section 87 of KPT Act and is not covered by any of the provisions of Act when status of applicants is adjudged as lessee in the last challan issued. It needs trial for a conclusive determination. When the applicants claimed to have been in occupation as lessee by virtue of challan issued to them the status of licencee was not carried forward and altered to a status of lessee by virtue of such challan and the descriptions provided therein. This is at least tentative view which should have been formed
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE JUDGMENT

96 . I.T.R.A 13/2018 THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE V/S M/S MSC SWITZERLAND GENEVA Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150784 ]
Implication of double taxation treaties upon super tax.
Read more

Matter:INCOME TAX

97 . Const. P. 4112/2019 Muhammad Imran V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150783 ]
Petitioner seeks appointment in the Karachi University as Adhoc Teacher, based on differently-abled quota on the premise that he was/is a qualified and fit person to be considered for the subject post.
Read more

Matter:APPOINTMENT

98 . II.A. 99/2012 Abdul Rahim Memon V/S Mst. Amna Shaikh & ors Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984

Whatever is deposed by the attorney, he deposed it on behalf of the principal on instruction and hence nothing could be taken away on the count that it was hearsay -Plaintiff/respondent has also examined one of the witnesses of the agreement whereas the other had expired and hence according to Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, it was otherwise proved through the evidence available on record. On the other hand the appellant examined himself only without corroboration of any other witnesses. Even defendants No.2 and 3 did not turn up to examine themselves and/or to support the appellant/defendant No.1.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST ORDER

99 . Cr.Bail 99/2021 Ameer Bux Khoso & others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Read more

100 . Const. P. 2513/2021 Asif Ali Unar and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150781 ]
posting and transfer of District Food Controllers (DFCs) and Assistant District Food Controllers (ADFCs) in Food Department, Government of Sindh--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the transfer and posting is the prerogative of the respondent department as provided under Section 10 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973. However, the petitioners have raised the hue and cry in the matter with the assertion that their transfer and posting is based on malafide intention to accommodate the beneficiaries to usurp the huge amount or kickbacks in the disbursement of wheat in their respective area. If this is the factual position of the case, the Chief Secretary, Sindh, and Secretary Food Department, Government of Sindh, are directed to look into the affairs of disbursement of wheat in the Province of Sindh personally and ensure that the wheat is disbursed strictly under the law.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

101 . Const. P. 154/2021 TARIQ MASOOD V/S SHER MUHAMMAD DIN & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979

The respondent may have proved the ownership of the property but then the relationship of landlord and tenant has to be established independently. It has to be proved through reliable evidence and documents that applicant/respondent apart from being owner of property was also the landlord of the occupant.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

102 . Const. P. 242/2021 Uzma Bibi W/o Shabar Khan V/S Bakht Roman and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RENT MATTER

103 . Const. P. 2695/2017 Syed Muhammad S/o Muhammad Anwar V/S Noorullah & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150697 ]
-The petitioner while making such statement of alleged purchase has not realized the burden he took over. There is a marked difference in the probative value of entering into possession for the first time as tenant, and continuing in possession with claim of change in its nomenclature. Where occupant claiming his continuous possession as other than original character, it is expected that some trustworthy evidence in furtherance of his subsequently claimed character would be shown, failing whereof his admitted character would concur (Reliance2). -This PT-1 was then followed by another PT-1, which is claimed by the respondent No.1. This PT-1 then followed by notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. While recovering taxes in terms of the gross annual rental value, as assessed by authority under ibid Act, constructive possession of the respondent No.1 had been identified and regulated. It may not constitute the ownership but it does authorize the one who was found in constructive possession, to regulate his possession as required under the law. This was thus a jura possession recognized by Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act and rules framed thereunder of 1958. Thus having constructive jura possession with reference to property in question, an authoritative recognition in the shape of PT-1 was issued. -This PT-1 would enable the respondent No.1 to deal with his possession as deem fit and proper under the law. It is not in dispute that respondent No.1 was and is responsible for payment of annual gross rental value and it is not in dispute that in terms of Section 14 of Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958, the tax recoverable from any person on account of any building or land, if found in arrears, it shall be lawful for the proscribed authority to serve upon any person paying rent in respect of that building or land or any part thereof to the person from whom the arrears are due, a notice for the recovery of such taxes may be issued to the tenants or one from whom such taxes are required in terms of PT-1. It also enables the authority that if a person willfully fails or neglects to comply with the notice, the authority may after giving him an opportunity of being heard proceed against him as it could have proceeded under the provisions of this act against the defaulter of the tax. -Thus, in my view this PT-1 authorizes respondent No.1 to deal with this property as deem fit and proper and a lawful notice under section 18 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was issued to the petitioner to apprise him about the current situation as to the change of PT-1 and authority of new landlord.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

104 . Const. P. 8065/2019 Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors V/S E.O.B.I and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150765 ]
we asked the learned counsel for respondent-Institution under what law and authority they attempted to nullify the effect of the judgment passed by this Court, maintained by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

105 . Const. P. 6241/2016 Anjum Badar V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Service matters (Contract appointments)

[SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150727 ]
petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employees appointed on contract in BS 16 and above can be deemed to have been validly appointed on regular basis, without going through the competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, merely in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the mandatory requirement of competitive process of selection only through the Sindh Public Service Commission for appointments in BS 16 and above, which is the command of the Constitution and specific direction to the Government of Sindh by the Hon???ble Supreme Court, can be waived, relaxed, done away with, exempted and or bypassed in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the petitioners have any vested right for regular appointment, or to claim regularization, or to approach this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction to seek redressal of their grievance relating to regularization ; and, is there any corresponding legal duty cast on the Government of Sindh to appoint them on regular basis ? If no, then can a writ of mandamus to this effect be issued against the Government of Sindh ? --Whether Section 3 of the Act of 2013, to the extent of regularization / appointment in BS 16, 17 and 18 without the mandatory competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, is ultra vires the Constitution and against the law laid down and the direction given by the Hon???ble Supreme Court to the Government of Sindh in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and others V/S Province of Sindh and others, 2015 SCMR 456.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

106 . II.A. 70/2016 Muhammad Farooq V/S Ranomal and others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Contract Act

I have reached to the conclusion that perhaps these power of attorney and sub-power of attorney are to be read with the sale agreement and sale consideration and the contents of the power of attorney which may be looked into in terms of Section 200 and 202 of the Contract Act and some view had to be formed whether it coupled with interest. In that case if the property was not enjoyed by Safari Construction (Pvt.) Limited it was surely enjoyed by one of the Directors i.e. Allah Dino Behan and at one point of time the widow of Allah Dino Behan i.e. Mominat Behan, may be as chief executive of Safari Construction (Pvt.) Limited, entered into agreement of sale, having share in it. The sale consideration for plot was paid by Allah Dino Behan. If at all for any technical reason the performance could not be sought against Safari Construction (Pvt.) Limited, it could well be asked against an individual Allah Dino Behan and/or widow Mominat who acquired share in it when she entered into agreement.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT

107 . R.A (Civil Revision) 36/2020 SYED IMRAN V/S SYED SOHAIL HASAN & OTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER

108 . II.A. 61/2021 Kamran Zafar S/o Shams ul Zafar V/S Muhammad Idrees and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER

109 . Const. P. 308/2021 Mst. Saima D/o Fareed ul Hassan V/S Mst. Marium Bibi and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RENT MATTER

110 . II.A. 63/2021 Abdul Hameed S/o (Late) Abdul Majeed V/S Malik Haq Nawaz and others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER

111 . Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 417/2018 Collector of Customs V/S Niaz Muhammad & another Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150672 ]
Exclusion in SRO 499 of 2009.
Read more

Matter:CUSTOM MATTER

112 . Suit 701/2021 Shakir Ahmed Khan V/S Nishat Akhtar Khan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Latest report be called from learned XXIInd Judicial Magistrate Karachi East in Criminal Case No.1344/2019. Also issue notice to the SSP and SHO concerned to produce defendants 1, 2 and 3 before this Court on the next date of hearing. To be listed on 24.05.2021 at 11:00 am.
Read more

Matter:DECLARATION

113 . Const. P. 1074/2018 Mst. Parveen Ara V/S Muhammad Hanif & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance,1979 (Section 15 )

Evidence available does not fulfill the requirement of Section 15-A of the SRPO as it has to be proved independently that the premises was re-let. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to prove its contention through evidence that it was a misuse of section 15 of the SRPO whereby the eviction of the petitioner was acquired through a mala fide attempt.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

114 . Const. P. 2001/2021 Mirza Anwer Mehmood Baig V/S DG C.A.A and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150668 ]
the petitioner has sought suspension of the operation of Show Cause Notice dated 25.2.2021 issued by the respondent-Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (???CAA???) on the accusation of production of a copy of the mark sheet No.00575 of BA (Pass) 1st and 2nd Year Examination of 1987, which was later on found fake, which amounts misconduct as provided under Civil Aviation Authority (Efficiency and Discipline) Regulations, 2014.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

115 . Const. P. 310/2021 Habib Bank Limited V/S IXth Rent Controller, Khi (Central) & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
-Since statute does not provide remedy of appeal, this petition has been filed to invoke jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. By dismissal of an application under order VII rule 11 CPC, none of the fundamental right of the petitioner was violated to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. -The whole gummit of the lis is yet to be decided and hence if an appeal against such order could not be maintained, how this alternate recourse be made available, when no fundamental right of the petitioner seems to have been violated.
Read more

Matter:RENT MATTER

116 . Cr.Rev 71/2011 Shabir Khoso and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 150817 ]
Against Order of Trial Court
Read more

117 . Const. P. 4452/2013 Mir Hassan V/S Province of Sindh and ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150632 ]
Son Quota
Read more

Matter:SON QUOTA

118 . Cr.Acq.A. 39/2020 Nazir Ahmed Lakhair V/S Abdul Qadir And Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 150670 ]
Against Order of Trial Court
Read more

119 . Cr.Rev 38/2020 Pir Bux Brohi & another V/S The State & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 150667 ]
Against Order of Trial Court
Read more

120 . Const. P. 2186/2021 Zabardast Khan Mehar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150769 ]
NAB Petition for Reduction of Surety Amount
Read more

Matter:DIRECTION

121 . Const. P. 1578/2021 Muhammad Saqib V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150609 ]
departmental proceedings initiated against him as contemplated under Section 3(b)(c) of the Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1988--as to how this petition is maintainable against departmental proceedings initiated against him and the final order for dismissal from service served upon him, which action of the respondent-department ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal (SST) at Karachi.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

122 . Const. P. 2707/2019 Shah Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150567 ]
the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to award him incentive of timescale i.e. BPS-17 to BPS-19, from the date of his entitlement; and, other ancillary benefits, to bring him at par with the employees of other departments of Government of Sindh--whether the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of the timescale from BPS-17 to BPS-19 under the law or otherwise.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

123 . Const. P. 2217/2021 Zeeshan Anjum and Others V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150566 ]
The main grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been declined without announcing the final merit list i.e. written test and interview--Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no offer of appointment order had been issued in their favor, thus no vested right had/has accrued in favor of the petitioners.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

124 . Const. P. 6162/2020 Ghulam Shabbir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150553 ]
reinstatement in service as Staff SDO (B&R)--immoral activities--Article 199(3) of the Constitution--Dismissed.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

125 . Suit 1468/2020 Muhammad Arif Khalil V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DECLARATION

126 . Cr.Bail 1445/2020 MUHAMMAD ASIF-UR-REHMAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST

127 . Const. P. 4462/2020 Ghulam Hussain V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150537 ]
appointment for the post of Naib Qasid in respondent-School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Sindh--Rule 16 of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--The matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondents for afresh decision on the issue of appointment of Naib Qasid under law, and consider the case of the petitioner for the subject post within two months, from the date of receipt of the order of this Court and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court.
Read more

Matter:APPOINTMENT

128 . Const. P. 2169/2021 Arsalan Saleem Khan & another V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Order passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito in C.P. No.D-2169 of 2021 for extension in the date of online registration for the LAW-GAT test.
Read more

Matter:DIRECTION

129 . Cr.Bail 167/2021 QAZI JAVED KHALIQ S/O QAZI ABDUL KHALIQ V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST

130 . Const. P. 147/2020 M/s Sahib Din Logistics V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150486 ]
Challenge to a s.37 STA notice couched in quo warranto.
Read more

Matter:SALES TAX

131 . Const. P. 2135/2021 Noman Ali Bhatti V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150510 ]
Sindh Education Foundation --we conclude that there is no illegality, infirmity, or material irregularity in the impugned letters dated 06.02.2020 & 30.11.2020 issued by the respondent-SEF. Besides, the issue of continue in service, since he is facing the NAB reference based on moral turpitude, thus we cannot order the competent authority to continue his service.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

132 . Const. P. 1862/2021 Rao Muhammad Azeem V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150528 ]
disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Police Department--Rule 3(a) (b) of the Sindh Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rule, 1988--disciplinary proceedings initiated against him which falls within the ambit of Section 3(2) of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1974 which provides that the tribunal shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of civil servants including the disciplinary matters.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

133 . Const. P. 1427/2018 Muhammad Rafiq V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150511 ]
seeking appointment as Primary School Teacher (PST) on the premise that he secured 94 marks in National Testing Service (NTS) test and his credentials were duly verified by the competent authority--we are not in a position to say for and against the documents attached with the memo of the petition and on this scope alone this petition fails on the ground of disputed question of facts. No case is made out for interfering with the impugned order dated 21.3.2017 passed by Director School Education (Primary) Sukkur Region, Sukkur (Chairman DRC
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

134 . Const. P. 2124/2021 M/s Star Denim Pvt Ltd V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150448 ]
petitioner-M/s. Star Denim Pvt. Ltd. is asking for setting aside of the impugned letter dated 10.03.2021, whereby Audit Officers of the Sindh Employees??? Social Security Institution (`SESSI`) attempted to visit the establishment of the petitioner to verify the Secured Workers engaged by for issuing the R-5 cards so they could get the financial / Medical care facility--
Read more

Matter:AGAINST NOTICE

135 . Const. P. 2207/2021 Hafeez ur Rehman V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150452 ]
suspension from the service--SBCA--we are of the considered view that the Petitioner has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the disciplinary proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

136 . Const. P. 1874/2021 Ms. Shahid Begum V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150420 ]
transfer and posting issue
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

137 . Const. P. 6309/2018 Muhammad Naeem Akhtar Khan V/S NIRC & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150419 ]
we queried from the learned counsel for the Petitioner as to how this Petition is maintainable in its form against the National Command Authority (NCA) under the National Command Authority (Amendment) Act, 2016; besides that SUPARCO, comes under the definition of NCA as provided under clause (A) of Section 2 of the NCA Act, 2010.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST ORDER

138 . Const. P. 7678/2015 HBL V/S Full Bench NIRC and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150416 ]
HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (NIRC-FB) in Appeal No.12(18)/2015-K, whereby order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Commission, at Karachi (NIRC-SB), in Grievance Petition No.4B (187)/2012-K, filed by the private respondent, was allowed with the compensatory cost of Rs.100,000/- while granting salary and all admissible back benefits to him by treating him to be in service from the date of his dismissal from service i.e. 09.09.2003, till reaching the age of superannuation i.e. 12.12.2012; and, he was also declared to be entitled to have pensionary benefits with effect from 12.12.2012 in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-886 of 2011.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST ORDER

139 . Const. P. 6920/2019 Aache Garments (Pvt) Ltd and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150415 ]
s.37 STA summons/notice sans underlying inquiry.
Read more

Matter:SALES TAX

140 . Const. P. 2089/2021 Jamshed Ali Bhutta V/S Province of Sindh and Otherss Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150400 ]
Government accommodation--Police Department
Read more

Matter:ACCOMODATION

141 . Const. P. 1202/2021 Aftab Alam V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150393 ]
SESSI
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

142 . Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 700/2019 Director DG I&I (Customs) V/S Aurangzaib & another Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150403 ]
Release of tampered / smuggled vehicle carrying smuggled items.
Read more

Matter:CUSTOM MATTER

143 . Const. P. 38/2019 Muhammad Shahid Hussain V/S Province Of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Against Order
Read more

144 . H.C.A 284/2018 Famous Brands (Private) Limited V/S Samsonite IP Holdings S.A.R.L & another Sindh High Court, Karachi
By moving an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant does not surrender to the jurisdiction of the Court. The jurisdiction is conferred by law based on facts. A litigant may be right or wrong in asserting that the Court had no jurisdiction or that the suit is barred by law. But, this act of litigant would neither confer and/or bestow nor take away any jurisdiction which in fact is conferred by law. Actions of parties prior to litigation leads to constitution of a cause to initiate proceedings in Court of competent jurisdiction. - If the two applications were not moved simultaneously and would have been filed one after the other, will a litigant still be debarred from filing the other application such as Order VII Rule 10 CPC.A simple answer to this proposition is ???No??? as rejection of plaint has its own reasons whereas return of plaint has its own. In an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant has only to show that it does not disclose a cause of action; the relief claimed is undervalued or is not properly valued and that the suit appears to be barred by law. None of these rational is available while entertaining an application under order VII rule 10 CPC, which is for return of plaint on numerous counts including but not limited to pecuniary jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. Courts when plaint is presented are required to see whether they are bestowed with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction whereas under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Courts are required to see whether it is barred by law. The Court had to apply law to decide the issue of jurisdiction; it is the law that confers or takes away the jurisdiction of the Court and not based on moving of application under the aforesaid provision of law. Another proposition is that while entertaining and hearing application under order VII rule 11 CPC Court is empowered to return the plaint if the circumstances so warrants as required under the law. -Section 86(3) of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 provides that owner of the trademark which is entitled to protection under the Paris Convention as a well-known trademark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Pakistan of a trademark which, or the essential part of which, is identical or deceptively similar to the well-known trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services, where the use is likely to cause confusion or where such use cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the well-known trademark. - At the very outset there is nothing in the instant case which could attract Section 81 of Trademark Ordinance, 2001. The proprietor of the mark never gave up their right or it has not been demonstrated that for continuous period of five years from the date of alleged registration (in favour of user) in the use of registered mark in Pakistan, the proprietor was aware of it and that the proprietor ceased to be entitled on the basis of that earlier trademark or other rights. The engagement of the appellant with the respondent itself is enough to understand that there was no case of acquiescence at all. In fact the appellant conceded when they assumed the role of a distributor. -The appellate Court normally avoid interfering in the orders of the interlocutory nature involving exercise of discretion as the appellate Court cannot substitute its own discretion unless when the discretion has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, perversely or where the Court has ignored certain principles regulating grant or refusal of injunction. The appellate Court is not required to reassess the material to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the trial Court/learned Single Judge on the consideration that another view is possible.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER

145 . Suit 1560/2008 M/S.ISLAMIC EDUCATIONAL INST. V/S MUHAMMAD SADIQ Sindh High Court, Karachi
Bar to fresh suit under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC
Read more

Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED

146 . Const. P. 5868/2016 Muhammad Salman & Ors V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150356 ]
In view of the above discussion, we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore, and others Vs. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS and 29 others and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, NORTHERN REGION, ISLAMABAD, and another Vs. Syed MUNAWAR ALI and others (2017 P L C (C.S.) 1030). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts as Inland Revenue Audit Officer (BPS-18) with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

147 . Const. P. 7997/2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd V/S Full Bench NIRC & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150346 ]
Regional Manager Askari Guards (Pvt.) Ltd--NIRC--back benefits --
Read more

Matter:AGAINST ORDER

148 . Const. P. 6694/2020 Muhammad Abdul Alim Zafar V/S The Education Sect: & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150358 ]
Matter:SERVICE

149 . Suit 2206/2017 M/s. Chhipa Corporation V/S Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & another Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150449 ]
Explanation clause to Order II Rule 2 CPC
Read more

Matter:DECLARATION

150 . Const. P. 416/2019 Majid Hussain Khokhar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150359 ]
PCSIR
Read more

Matter:PENSION

151 . Const. P. 336/2021 Irshad Ali Jesar V/S FED Of Pakistan & Other Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
NAB-426 Cr.P.C
Read more

152 . Const. P. 1869/2021 Talat Mehmood and Others V/S Bahria Univeristy and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150232 ]
Bahria university Karachi--release order
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

153 . Const. P. 687/2018 Faizan Khan V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150174 ]
deceased quota
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

154 . Const. P. 8948/2017 Muhammad Sajid V/S Govt. of Pakistan and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150184 ]
Member of the Armed Forces--review petition pending before respondent No.1 may be ordered to be decided under the law.
Read more

Matter:DIRECTION

155 . Const. P. 2028/2020 Muhammad Abid & Ors V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150186 ]
Matter:APPOINTMENT

156 . Const. P. 1528/2020 Aijaz Hussain Jakhrani V/S National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-SUK - 150399 ]
National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Read more

157 . Const. P. 2643/2020 Muhammad Nabi and Ors V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150185 ]
appointment as Police-commandos (BPS-05) in SSU--whether a waiting list candidate, not declared successful, can be recommended for appointment against any vacancy occurring due to non-joining of any successful candidate.
Read more

Matter:APPOINTMENT

158 . Const. P. 689/2018 Mst Inayat Jabeen V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE

159 . Const. P. 688/2018 Faiz Aslam V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE

160 . Cr.Acctt.A 74/2018 MUMTAZ ALI NIZAMANI S/O LAL DINO NIZAMANI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Appeal against conviction - Corruption and corrupt practices and misuse of authority
Read more

Matter:IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS

161 . Cr.Acctt.A 76/2018 MOHAMMAD ASIF S/O ABDUL JABBAR V/S THE STATE THROUGH NAB Sindh High Court, Karachi
Appeal against conviction - Corruption and corrupt practices and misuse of authority
Read more

Matter:IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS

162 . Const. P. 478/2019 Muhammad Asif V/S The State & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi
Appeal against conviction - Corruption and corrupt practices and misuse of authority
Read more

Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST

163 . Cr.Acctt.A 1/2019 MUHAMMAD ADIL ASHRAF S/O MUHAMMAD ASHRAF V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Appeal against conviction - Corruption and corrupt practices and misuse of authority
Read more

Matter:IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS

164 . Const. P. 3735/2020 Malik Abid Hussain V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150148 ]
Contempt proceedings--CAA
Read more

Matter:AGAINST LETTER

165 . Cr.Rev 15/2020 ADEEL ZAHOOR MALIK & ANOTHER V/S ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150291 ]
Matter:AGAINST ORDER

166 . Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 237/2017 Collector of Customs V/S Khurshid Sons Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 151076 ]
Matter:CUSTOM MATTER

167 . Const. P. 5657/2019 Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi V/S N.B.P Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150094 ]
NBP--Dismissal from service
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

168 . Const. P. 792/2013 V/S Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150082 ]
contract employees
Read more

169 . Const. P. 6167/2020 Al - Ghazi Traders Ltd V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150098 ]
whether the Sindh Human Rights Commission was/is empowered under Section 4 of the Sindh Protection of Human Rights Act, 2011, (Act, 2011) to entertain service-related issues and direct the reinstatement of the private respondents.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST ORDER

170 . Criminal Appeal 91/2021 IRFAN HAIDER JAFFERY V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS

171 . Const. P. 5552/2020 Yunus Textile Mills Ltd V/S Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:CUSTOM MATTER

172 . Const. P. 852/2019 Naeem Sadiq and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150095 ]
CBC janitorial staff-- minimum wage
Read more

Matter:DIRECTION

173 . Const. P. 7042/2018 M/s Karachi Golf Club (Pvt) Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150021 ]
Doctrine of Mutuality.
Read more

Matter:SALES TAX

174 . Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 311/2020 Collector of Customs V/S M/s. Super Star Company Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150024 ]
Retrospective effect of beneficial notification.
Read more

Matter:CUSTOM MATTER

175 . Const. P. 1720/2021 Noor Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150034 ]
alteration in date of Birth
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

176 . Const. P. 5776/2018 Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi V/S The University of Karachi & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 150027 ]
University of Karachi--we deem it appropriate to set aside the findings of the Selection Board dated 28.06.2018 to the extent of petitioners and private respondents. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondent-University to determine afresh as to whether the candidates i.e. petitioners and private respondents were having requisite academic qualifications duly recognized under the law for the subject posts in respondent-University, at the time of the cutoff date provided in the public notice dated 26.12.2014.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

177 . Suit 2249/2018 Saeed Ibrahim Veera . V/S Muhammad Iqbal & Others. Sindh High Court, Karachi
Section 202 Contract Act, 1872. Power of Attorney coupled with a sale agreement. Effect of.
Read more

Matter:SUIT FOR DECLERATION

178 . Criminal Appeal 6/2021 Zahid Ali Mastoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149970 ]
Against Order of Trial Court(Upto 7 Years)
Read more

179 . Cr.Bail 637/2020 Shoukat Ali Memon V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149971 ]
BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Read more

180 . Cr.Misc. 9/2021 SIP Munwar Ali & others V/S Fazal Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149969 ]
22 A-B
Read more

181 . Cr.Bail 36/2021 Jahanzeb @ Shahzeb @ Jaani & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Read more

182 . Cr.Bail 58/2021 Muhammad Shafiue @ Shafi Jatoi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Read more

183 . Cr.Bail 617/2020 Kohyaro Teghani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 150018 ]

184 . Cr.J.A 1/2013 Abdullah Junejo V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 150016 ]

185 . Const. P. 6145/2018 M/s Korea Marine Transport Co. Ltd & Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi

Topic: Custom Act (Section 14A)

[SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 149959 ]
Custom Act (Section 14A)
Read more

Matter:CUSTOM MATTER

186 . Cr.Bail 80/2021 LIAQUAT ALI KHAN S/O ABDULLAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST

187 . Cr.J.A 33/2018 Gulzar Sanghro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149955 ]
Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
Read more

188 . Cr.J.A 33/2018 Gulzar Sanghro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149904 ]
Against Order of Trial Court (Death Sentence)
Read more

189 . Criminal Appeal 562/2018 IMRAN HAYAT S/O ROSHAN ALI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS

190 . Const. P. 1662/2019 Muhammad Nawaz Soomro V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 149881 ]
disposed of in the terms of paragraph 35(iii) of the judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by learned Sindh Service Tribunal maintained by the Honorable Supreme Court vide order dated 26.03.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.266-K and 1074 of 2016, resultantly the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA is directed to comply with the ratio of the aforesaid judgments in its letter and spirit and allow them joining from the date of their repatriation by the Sindh Government vide notification dated 5.7.2018 and the issue of their salary, for the intervening period, shall be decided by the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA accordingly within one month
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

191 . Const. P. 3271/2020 Bilqees V/S The Sect: Wafaqi Mohtasib and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 149884 ]
whether Wafaqi Mohtasib is competent to absorb any deputationist by appointing her/him by transfer in the Establishment of the Wafaqi Mohtasib, Islamabad?
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

192 . Const. P. 1661/2019 Syed Noor Hussain Shah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 149880 ]
WAPDA--Sindh Government--absorption--repatriation--since, he has been reported to have retired from service, during litigation; and, he has not joined WAPDA. Besides the notification of his repatriation has not been given effect. We may also notice that judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court does not apply to the retired employees as on retirement; as they do not affect the seniority, promotion, or any other benefit of the serving employees.
Read more

Matter:SERVICE

193 . Const. P. 691/2021 Pasban Pakistan V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Order passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito in PSL Matches Road Blockage Case (C.P. No.D-691 of 2021)
Read more

Matter:DIRECTION

194 . Cr.J.A 72/2018 Nazeer Ahmed & an other V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149877 ]
Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Read more

195 . Cr.J.A 98/2018 Allah Dino Phulpoto V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149844 ]
Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Read more

196 . Criminal Appeal 371/2020 SHAHZAD ASLAM KHAN @ AZNA & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2018, b) Establishment of separate prisons, jails, confinement cells, etc. for the Transgender persons involved in any kind of offence or offences; Sindh Prisons Rules and Correction Services Act 2019.
Read more

Matter:LIFE IMPRISONMENT

197 . Suit 989/2018 Reliance Petrochemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. V/S F.B.R., & others. Sindh High Court, Karachi [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-KHI - 149813 ]
After repeal of proviso to section 40B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the posting order passed thereunder by the Commissioner is not saved under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Read more

Matter:SUIT FOR DECLERATION

198 . Const. P. 1447/2021 Muhammad Aquib Rajpar & Others V/S RO/ Provincial Election Commission Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Order passed by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito in C.P. No.D-1447 of 2021 challenging the nomination papers of Ms. Palwasha Muhammad Khan Zai of Senate Elections-2021.
Read more

Matter:AGAINST ORDER OF ELECTION TRIBUNAL

199 . Criminal Appeal 37/2014 Ashique Ali Panhwar and others V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149843 ]
Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Read more

200 . Cr.J.A 91/2011 Jan Mohammad Chachar & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana [SHC Citation: 2021- SHC-LRK - 149818 ]
Against Order of Trial Court(Life)
Read more