Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan
Mr.Justice Yahya Afridi
Hon'ble Chief Justice
Sindh High Court
Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput
1.II.A. 20/2025 (S.B.) Ghulam Rasool & Others V/S Safaiullah Khalid & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1090Concurrent rejection of plaint set-aside; disputed issues of title, inheritance and alleged waqf require trial. Suit restored.Read more
2.Const. P. 4537/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Syed Muhammad Abbas Rizvi & another V/S Federation of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1088wedlock policy does not confer indefinite right for posting at one stationRead more
Matter:-SERVICE
3.Const. P. 1266/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Shaila Ahmed and Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1086
Matter:-Land Matters
4.Const. P. 1266/2026 (D.B.) Malik Muhammad Iqbal Nadeem & another V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1085Disputed Questions of Fact Petition DismissedRead more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
5.I. A 18/2024 (D.B.) Aleem Thr: Attorney V/S Mst Lanjan & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1089Referee Court cannot reject Collector's reference on limitation. Section 30 disputes must be decided on merits. Appeals allowed.Read more
6.Const. P. 931/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Shamim Akmal Khan & others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1087PIA employees rights protected change in medical policy of retired employees set asideRead more
Matter:-PENSION
7.Cr.Bail 123/2026 (S.B.) Parvez Ali Unar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPost arrest bail in offence under Sections 409, 161, 477-A and 120-B, P.P.C. read with Section 5(2) of Act II of 1947 has been granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
8.Criminal Appeal 168/2026 (D.B.) ABDULLAH S/O SHER MUHAMMAD V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
9.Criminal Miscelleneous 103/2026 (S.B.) Mushtaque Ahmed Brohi V/S Bashir Ahmed Brohi and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCr. Misc. Appln for cancellation of bail has been dismissed in limine.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
10.Const. P. 202/2026 (D.B.) Usama V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
11.Cr.Bail 35/2026 (S.B.) Bashir Ahmed Lashari V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in offences punishable under Sections 452 and 365-B, P.P.C and Section 3 of the Sindh Trafficking in Persons Act, 2018, has been allowed.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
12.R.A (Civil Revision) 468/2024 (S.B.) Abdul Hameed & Others V/S Abdul Hakeem Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasAgreement void in prior litigation; no declaratory relief sought. Suit for possession and compensation rightly dismissed.Read more
13.Const. P. 372/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Natasha V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
14.Cr.Bail 116/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Mithal Magsi V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPost arrest bail in offence under Sections 409, 161, 477-A and 120-B, P.P.C. read with Section 5(2) of Act II of 1947 has been granted.Read more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
15.Const. P. 1259/2026 (D.B.) Asif V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1103Petitioner is directed accordingly to approach the concerned Office for evaluation of his case and thereafter the Respondents shall process in accordance with the law. However, if the case of Petitioner is found genuine, same shall be processed without creating any hindrance. Let intimation notice be issued to the Petitioner for such purpose. 4. The instant petition by consent of NADRA counsel, stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-UNBLOCKING OF C.N.I.C
16.Const. P. 1386/2026 (D.B.) Ms. Fateh Mubeen Nizam V/S Accountant General Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1105Learned AAG appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 filed comments stating that the amount of leave encashment amounting to Rs.2,679,795/- had already been paid to the Petitioner on 05.05.2026 through the Office of the Accountant General, Sindh, and submitted that in view thereof the petition had served its purpose. 4. In view of the statement made on behalf of Respondent No.1, without touching the merits of the case, the petition, by consent of the learned AAG, is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
17.Const. P. 5788/2025 (D.B.) Nazar-ul-Hassan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1101For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
18.Const. P. 1746/2023 (D.B.) Shahid Ghani V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1106Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. The respondents, jointly, particularly the successor authorities of erstwhile DMC South/TMC concerned along with Sindh Local Government Board, are directed to ensure release of the petitioner???s outstanding salary, difference of pay, and admissible allowances for the aforesaid period within a period of sixty (60) days from receipt of this order. However, in the circumstances of the case, the claim of markup/interest is declined. 15. Needless to observe that inter se adjustment of liability amongst the respondents shall be resolved by the Government independently and shall not impede compliance with this order. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms. However, it is made clear that if in the intervening period the subject benefits are not disbursed by the respondent, appropriate action in terms of section 17 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance shall follow by the office.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
19.Const. P. 5787/2025 (D.B.) Noman Muzaffar V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1100For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
20.Const. P. 2818/2026 (D.B.) Naveed Ahmed Abro V/S Syed Kamran Sabir & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1107It is further clarified that any person, authority or official creating obstruction, withholding record, delaying compliance, or interfering in the election process in any manner whatsoever shall render himself liable to strict action under Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, read with the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003, in addition to such departmental proceedings as may be warranted under the law. 14. The learned MIT-I shall continue to monitor compliance of the orders passed by this Court and submit report, if necessary. Office is directed to communicate this order to all concerned authorities forthwith for immediate and strict compliance. 15. With the above observations and directions, this petition along with pending application(s) stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
21.Const. P. 6370/2024 (D.B.) Saeed Ahmed V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1108The petition is therefore allowed in the terms that the continued inclusion of the petitioner???s name in the PNIL is declared to be illegal, without lawful authority, and of no legal effect. Respondent No. 2/FIA is directed to forthwith remove the petitioner???s name from the PNIL, if not already removed. The respondents are directed to ensure strict compliance with Standing Order No. 2/2018 in future, and no person shall be retained in PNIL beyond the prescribed period without lawful extension or due process. In case of any future placement affecting fundamental rights, the respondents shall ensure recorded reasons, lawful authority, and adherence to due process requirements. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The office shall communicate this order to DG FIA for compliance and necessary administrative action.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
22.Const. P. 2038/2026 (D.B.) Zafran V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1102Until the culmination of disciplinary proceedings, the matter of the petitioner???s salary and admissibility of pay for the relevant period shall be decided strictly in accordance with the relevant service rules and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. However, it is made clear that if any adverse order is passed, the petitioner may have a remedy under the law to avail before a competent forum. 8. Consequently, without touching the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the understanding that the respondents will conclude the disciplinary proceedings, if any, strictly in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of meaningful hearing/including regular inquiry proceedings. All pending applications are also disposed of.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
23.Const. P. 5786/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Nadeem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1099For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
24.Const. P. 5286/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Bibi Naseema V/S Federal Government of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1110In view of the above and without touching the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to approach V&R Branch located at Awami Markaz, Main Shahrah-e-Faisal Karachi along with all documents as required under the law for evaluation of her case. However, it is made clear that no bottleneck shall be created in the intervening period, and if the petitioner???s case is found to be genuine, the same shall be processed without any hindrance. 5. With the consent of counsel for NADRA, petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Let intimation notice be issued to the petitioner to appear before V&R Branch, Awami Markaz, Main Shahrah-e-Faisal, Karachi as discussed supra.Read more
Matter:-RENEWAL OF CNIC
25.Const. P. 5785/2025 (D.B.) Shoaibullah Khan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1098For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with their entitlement and seniority, through the mechanism already operating pursuant to the orders passed in C.P. No. D-1051/2019 and connected matters, preferably within a period of two months. In case the payment is not made within the stipulated period without lawful justification, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 12. So far as the claim of markup at the rate of 18% is concerned, since the delay appears to be attributable to the overall financial crisis being faced by KDA and not on account of any mala fide or discriminatory conduct specifically directed against the petitioners, we are not inclined at this stage to grant the said relief. However, the respondents are expected to act diligently and expeditiously in clearing the admitted dues of retired employees, who should not be made to suffer endlessly after rendering long years of service. 13. These petitions, along with pending applications, stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
26.Cr.Bail 1507/2025 (S.B.) Khan Muhammad Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadOffence of dacoity. Applicant nominated with specific role. Pre-arrest bail declinedRead more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
27.Const. P. 4840/2024 (D.B.) Haji Khan and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1080
Matter:-SERVICE
28.Const. P. 355/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Zaman V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
29.Const. P. 450/2026 (D.B.) Rehmatullah V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
30.Const. P. 94/2026 (D.B.) Adnan Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
31.Const. P. 454/2026 (D.B.) Asadullah Khan V/S Fed of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
32.Const. P. 469/2026 (D.B.) Sanjay Kumar V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
33.Const. P. 2094/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Mateen V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
34.Const. P. 98/2026 (D.B.) Pooja Bai V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
35.Const. P. 216/2026 (D.B.) Bilal Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
36.Const. P. 465/2026 (D.B.) Nadeem Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
37.Const. P. 470/2026 (D.B.) Hamza Khan V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
38.Const. P. 95/2026 (D.B.) Mahar Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
39.Const. P. 357/2026 (D.B.) Waqar Ali & Ors V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
40.Const. P. 223/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Hamza V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
41.Const. P. 963/2025 (D.B.) Yasir Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
42.Const. P. 964/2025 (D.B.) Umair Ali V/S P.O Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
43.Const. P. 3116/2023 (D.B.) Karachi Catholic Coop Housing Society V/S SBCA and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1094Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the rival claims and contentions of the parties, and with their consent, the instant petition along with all pending application(s) is disposed of with the direction that the respondents shall de-seal the subject premises forthwith, if not already de-sealed, subject to the petitioner strictly adhering to its undertaking that the premises shall not be used for any commercial purpose including as a marriage hall, or banquet facility for commercial uses however they can use the subject premises for social and communal needs of the Christian community, activities relating to lawful, cultural and religious gatherings. However, in case of any future violation of the undertaking or breach of applicable laws, the respondents shall be at liberty to proceed strictly in accordance with law after providing due process to the petitioner???s society.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
44.Const. P. 3858/2016 (D.B.) K.U.E.C.H.S V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1104Moreover, the record reflects that Respondent No.4 had made substantial payments towards the plot and had expressed willingness to clear any lawful outstanding dues; therefore, outright cancellation without proper adjudication was unjustified. The appellate authority also failed to determine the core issue regarding the legality of cancellation and mainly relied upon alleged third-party rights, which remained unsubstantiated as no subsequent allottee was impleaded in the proceedings. The learned Revisional Authority rightly exercised jurisdiction under Section 64 of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925, to correct the misreading and non-reading of evidence committed by the appellate forum. The revisional order is a reasoned and lawful exercise of jurisdiction, balancing equities by directing Respondent No.4 to clear any lawful dues before restoration of allotment. Thus, no patent illegality or jurisdictional defect has been shown in the impugned revisional order dated 23.05.2016, warranting interference by this Court. 16. For the foregoing reasons, we are not persuaded to interfere with the impugned revisional order dated 23.05.2016 passed by Respondent No.1. Consequently, this petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed, along with pending applications, if any. The petitioner-Society shall comply with the directions issued by the Revisional Authority forthwith strictly in accordance with law. However, no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
45.Const. P. 1920/2026 (D.B.) Said Alam V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1091In view of the statement made by the representative of KMC regarding finalization and readiness to release the admitted amount of pensionary benefits, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition further and seeks its disposal in terms of the said statement. 6. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
46.Const. P. 1290/2026 (D.B.) Iqbal Rehmat V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1093In view of the statement made by the representative of KMC regarding finalization and readiness to release the admitted amount of pensionary benefits, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition further and seeks its disposal in terms of the said statement. 6. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
47.Const. P. 5954/2018 (D.B.) Shah Masih V/S I.G of Police & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1092In view of the above, it is held that while the offer of appointment was conditional, the subsequent rejection of the petitioner???s candidature, based solely on acquitted criminal cases without any independent adverse material or reasoned justification, cannot be sustained in law. The impugned decision to the extent that the petitioner suffers from arbitrariness, lack of fair consideration, and violates the constitutional guarantees of equality, non-discrimination, and fair treatment in public employment. 12. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The competent authority of respondents is directed to issue the appointment order in his favour forthwith strictly in accordance with law, treating his acquittal as a neutral factor unless any other lawful impediment exists. All pending application(s) stand disposed of in the avode terms. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
48.Const. P. 1633/2025 (D.B.) Mr. Saif Uddin V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1081
Matter:-ENCROACHMENT
49.Criminal Miscelleneous 322/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Ismail Kamboh V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
50.Const. P. 1479/2025 (D.B.) Syed Zeeshan Rizvi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiAppointment against deceased quota. Mutatis mutandis application of reasoning and exposition of law.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
51.Const. P. 2552/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Saeed V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-FREEZING OF ACCOUNT
52.Const. P. 4717/2024 (D.B.) M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd V/S Muhammad Nadeem and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1097In these circumstances, discussed supra, no case for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution is made out, and the petition is liable to be dismissed. 20. For the foregoing reasons, we are of the considered view that the learned Sindh Labour Court and the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal committed no illegality, jurisdictional error, or material irregularity in concluding that the termination of respondent No.1 was not a bona fide discharge simplicitor but an unlawful termination cloaked under the vague plea of reorganization. The impugned judgments are well-reasoned, based upon proper appreciation of evidence, and fully consistent with the settled principles of labour jurisprudence and constitutional guarantees of due process. 21. Consequently, this Constitutional Petition is also devoid of merit and is dismissed along with pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
53.Const. P. 67/2026 (S.B.) Sultan V/S Hina Shaikh & Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1095Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the rival claims and contentions of the parties, and with their consent, the instant petition along with all pending application(s) is disposed of with the direction that the respondents shall de-seal the subject premises forthwith, if not already de-sealed, subject to the petitioner strictly adhering to its undertaking that the premises shall not be used for any commercial purpose including as a marriage hall, or banquet facility for commercial uses however they can use the subject premises for social and communal needs of the Christian community, activities relating to lawful, cultural and religious gatherings. However, in case of any future violation of the undertaking or breach of applicable laws, the respondents shall be at liberty to proceed strictly in accordance with law after providing due process to the petitioner???s society.Read more
Matter:-FAMILY MATTER
54.Criminal Appeal 872/2025 (S.B.) ASAD ALI SHAH S/O ANWER SHAH V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1079
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
55.Const. P. 1251/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Mah Noor Junaid V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1071Nil.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
56.Const. P. 5900/2025 (D.B.) Ramz Ali V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1072
Matter:-DECEASED QUOTA
57.Const. P. 165/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Sajida Chandio V/S Habib ur Rehman Chandio & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Matter:-Against Order
58.Cr.Bail 237/2026 (S.B.) Aqeel Ahmed Chohan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail dismissed u/s 302 and 377 PPC.Read more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
59.Criminal Appeal 592/2023 (D.B.) AAMIR ALI S/O ABDUL SAMAD & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
60.Cr.Bail 377/2026 (S.B.) Ali Akbar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
61.Cr.Bail 378/2026 (S.B.) Salman Khan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
62.Cr.J.A 454/2025 (D.B.) ASHOK S/O RAMJI V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
63.Cr.Bail 183/2026 (S.B.) Altaf V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
64.Const. P. 1253/2025 (D.B.) Waqar Ahmed Khan V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SERVICE
65.Const. P. 4898/2022 (D.B.) Hafeez Ullah V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1062Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and laches, the petitioner having failed to furnish any plausible explanation for not assailing such appointment within a reasonable period; the respondent, having rendered service for several decades and undergone subsequent service-related developments, cannot now be unsettled in the absence of a timely challenge and complete foundational facts relating to the office presently held, and thus no writ of quo warranto is maintainable on this ground; furthermore, the petitioners have failed to place sufficient material on record to demonstrate that the private respondents are presently holding public offices without lawful authority, as mere allegations regarding entry into Voluntary Return arrangements are inadequate, particularly when the law applicable at the relevant time did not entail automatic disqualification and where, in certain instances, departmental proceedings were duly conducted; consequently, it is held that the petitions, insofar as they seek adjudication of transfers, postings, promotions, departmental penalties, service benefits and pensionary consequences, are not maintainable under the prevailing constitutional and statutory framework governing service matters, that a writ of quo warranto cannot be issued on generalized and omnibus allegations without establishing, in respect of each individual office holder, a present lack of lawful authority, that Voluntary Return under Section 25(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (as it stood prior to the 2022 amendment) did not amount to conviction or statutory disqualification under Section 15, that the 2022 amendment cannot be applied retrospectively to impose penal or disqualifying consequences upon concluded Voluntary Return arrangements, that departmental proceedings already conducted and penalties imposed by competent authorities cannot be reopened in quo warranto jurisdiction, and that the petitions are further vitiated, where applicable, by delay, laches, lack of bona fides and repetitive litigation on substantially identical grounds; accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, all listed constitutional petitions along with pending applications stand dismissed, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
66.Const. P. 3898/2013 (D.B.) M/s Karimjee Ibrahimjee and Sons V/S C.D.G.k and Os Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1057The findings recorded by the learned trial Court as well as the learned appellate Court are based upon proper appraisal of the pleadings and evidence available on record and do not suffer from any jurisdictional defect, illegality, misreading or non-reading of evidence warranting interference by this Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. It is a settled proposition of law that concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Courts below are not to be lightly disturbed unless shown to be perverse, arbitrary or wholly unsupported by evidence, which is not the case here. 13. For the foregoing reasons, we do not find any merit in the present Constitutional Petition, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending applications, if any. However with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
67.Const. P. 1422/2023 (D.B.) Asad Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1063Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and laches, the petitioner having failed to furnish any plausible explanation for not assailing such appointment within a reasonable period; the respondent, having rendered service for several decades and undergone subsequent service-related developments, cannot now be unsettled in the absence of a timely challenge and complete foundational facts relating to the office presently held, and thus no writ of quo warranto is maintainable on this ground; furthermore, the petitioners have failed to place sufficient material on record to demonstrate that the private respondents are presently holding public offices without lawful authority, as mere allegations regarding entry into Voluntary Return arrangements are inadequate, particularly when the law applicable at the relevant time did not entail automatic disqualification and where, in certain instances, departmental proceedings were duly conducted; consequently, it is held that the petitions, insofar as they seek adjudication of transfers, postings, promotions, departmental penalties, service benefits and pensionary consequences, are not maintainable under the prevailing constitutional and statutory framework governing service matters, that a writ of quo warranto cannot be issued on generalized and omnibus allegations without establishing, in respect of each individual office holder, a present lack of lawful authority, that Voluntary Return under Section 25(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (as it stood prior to the 2022 amendment) did not amount to conviction or statutory disqualification under Section 15, that the 2022 amendment cannot be applied retrospectively to impose penal or disqualifying consequences upon concluded Voluntary Return arrangements, that departmental proceedings already conducted and penalties imposed by competent authorities cannot be reopened in quo warranto jurisdiction, and that the petitions are further vitiated, where applicable, by delay, laches, lack of bona fides and repetitive litigation on substantially identical grounds; accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, all listed constitutional petitions along with pending applications stand dismissed, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
68.Const. P. 2483/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Moazzam V/S MD SSGC & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1051
Matter:-SERVICE
69.Const. P. 2448/2026 (D.B.) Saeed Iqbal V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1052
Matter:-SERVICE
70.Const. P. 260/2026 (D.B.) Anwer Aleem V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 1069, 2026 SHC MPK 1070Employees of BISE being public servants; ACE enquiry lawful despite prior departmental enquiry. Constitutional challenge rejected.Read more
71.Const. P. 3154/2025 (D.B.) Naimatullah Khan V/S SHO PS ANF Clifton & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1049Federal Government powers to amend schedule in CNS ActRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
72.II.A. 203/2024 (S.B.) Shahid Iqbal Khan S/o Muhammad Iqbal Khan V/S Mst. Rashida and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1064, 2026 SHC KHI 1067, 2026 SHC KHI 1068Article 79 Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 - Applies only upon a specific denial of execution of a document - In the absence of such denial, Article 79 is inapplicable. Order 8 Rule 5 CPC - Allegation of fact in plaint - Denial by necessary implication arises where a defendant pleads facts or an alternative version of events so directly and irreconcilably inconsistent with the plaintiff's allegation that, if accepted as true, the plaintiff's case cannot possibly stand.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
73.Const. P. 6001/2024 (D.B.) Akbar Ali & Another V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1050federal government powers to amend schedule in CNS ActRead more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTIFICATION
74.Const. P. 6129/2025 (D.B.) Janib V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1061Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and laches, the petitioner having failed to furnish any plausible explanation for not assailing such appointment within a reasonable period; the respondent, having rendered service for several decades and undergone subsequent service-related developments, cannot now be unsettled in the absence of a timely challenge and complete foundational facts relating to the office presently held, and thus no writ of quo warranto is maintainable on this ground; furthermore, the petitioners have failed to place sufficient material on record to demonstrate that the private respondents are presently holding public offices without lawful authority, as mere allegations regarding entry into Voluntary Return arrangements are inadequate, particularly when the law applicable at the relevant time did not entail automatic disqualification and where, in certain instances, departmental proceedings were duly conducted; consequently, it is held that the petitions, insofar as they seek adjudication of transfers, postings, promotions, departmental penalties, service benefits and pensionary consequences, are not maintainable under the prevailing constitutional and statutory framework governing service matters, that a writ of quo warranto cannot be issued on generalized and omnibus allegations without establishing, in respect of each individual office holder, a present lack of lawful authority, that Voluntary Return under Section 25(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (as it stood prior to the 2022 amendment) did not amount to conviction or statutory disqualification under Section 15, that the 2022 amendment cannot be applied retrospectively to impose penal or disqualifying consequences upon concluded Voluntary Return arrangements, that departmental proceedings already conducted and penalties imposed by competent authorities cannot be reopened in quo warranto jurisdiction, and that the petitions are further vitiated, where applicable, by delay, laches, lack of bona fides and repetitive litigation on substantially identical grounds; accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, all listed constitutional petitions along with pending applications stand dismissed, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
75.Const. P. 620/2025 (D.B.) Feroz Khashkheli V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
76.Criminal Miscelleneous 841/2025 (S.B.) Danish Mahmood V/S Aamir Munir & others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
77.Const. P. 501/2025 (S.B.) Ali Hyder Jokhio V/S Mst. Minahel Ansari Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaPetition in family matter disposed of with certain directions.Read more
Matter:-Impugned Judgement
78.Const. P. 661/2026 (D.B.) Ali Raza Unar V/S P.O Sindh & 3 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Issue Appointment Order
79.Const. P. 2473/2026 (D.B.) AM Associates & Another V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-DE-SEAL
80.Criminal Miscelleneous 89/2026 (S.B.) Nazeer Ahmed Kalhoro V/S SHO PS Nabi Shah Waggan and Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThrough this Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 561-A, Cr.P.C, the applicant has sought setting aside of the order passed by the learned Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, whereby the concerned S.H.O was directed to record the statement of respondent No.3 under Section 154, Cr.P.C and thereafter proceed in accordance with law. This court dismissed the said criminal misc. application.Read more
Matter:-22 A-B
81.Criminal Miscelleneous 99/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Dur Bibi Lolai V/S Nadir Khan Lolai and Another Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaThrough this Criminal Miscellaneous Application, the applicant sought cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to accused/respondent No.1, for offences punishable under Sections 302, 337-F(i), 504 and 34, P.P.C, by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratodero, vide order dated 17.03.2026. the High Court dismissed the instant criminal misc. application.Read more
Matter:-Cancellation of Bail
82.Const. P. 590/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Lubna & Another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
83.Cr.J.A 666/2022 (S.B.) CHANESAR S/O JUMOO @ BILAL V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachibenefit of doubt appeal allowedRead more
Matter:-IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
84.Const. P. 295/2026 (D.B.) Najamuddin Qureshi V/S Federation of Pakistan & 5 others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
85.Const. P. 1924/2026 (D.B.) Abdullah V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1055When confronted with the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of in terms of the statement made by the Finance & Accounts Department, KMC. 5. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, the petition stands disposed of along with all pending applications in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
86.Const. P. 797/2026 (D.B.) Syed Javeed Shah V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1058Since the respondents themselves admit the petitioner???s entitlement and submit that his pension case has already been finalized, no justifiable reason remains for withholding the remaining retirement benefits, particularly pension commutation, which is a vested and accrued right of a retired employee. It is settled law that pensionary and retirement benefits are not a bounty but a lawful entitlement earned by an employee after serving the department for a considerable length of time, and the same cannot be withheld without lawful justification. 6. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondents, which is taken on record, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to ensure release/payment of the petitioner???s remaining retirement dues, including pension commutation and other admissible benefits, strictly in accordance with law subject to his entitlement and preferably within three weeks from today. In case the amount is not released within the stipulated period, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
87.Const. P. 3790/2025 (D.B.) Saeeda Burhani V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1054Accordingly, the SBCA is directed to take all necessary steps without delay to address the situation in accordance with the law. This includes formally declaring the building as dangerous within a period of two weeks, ensuring that all occupants are safely evacuated, and initiating the demolition process after obtaining requisite permissions from the local administration. The authorities are further obligated to coordinate effectively to prevent any procedural bottlenecks that may hinder urgent action. 8. Without prejudice to the proprietary rights of the parties and with the consent of the parties, occupants of the building shall be shifted to a safe place if in occupation by the local administration. The petition is disposed of along with pending applications in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
88.Const. P. 2730/2026 (D.B.) Rajab Uddin Gugo V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1059Prima facie, no violation of any statutory rule or constitutional guarantee, including Articles 4 or 25 of the Constitution, has been prima facie established so as to warrant interference in the exercise of constitutional/judicial discretion. 8. In view of the above, prima facie the impugned notification does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect, illegality, or constitutional infirmity. 9. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is dismissed in limine being devoid of merit. 10. These are the reasons of our short order of even date.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
89.Const. P. 1925/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Hanief V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1056When confronted with this legal position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this petition in terms of statement so made by the counsel for the KMC. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of along with all pending applications in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
90.Const. P. 452/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Farah Naz V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, KarachiAccordingly, with the consent of the parties and without touching the merits of the case, the Secretary, Education Department, is directed to conduct a comprehensive scrutiny of the petitioner???s service record, including the dismissal order, appellate order, and regularization of absence period, and to decide the petitioner???s claims strictly in accordance with law after providing an opportunity of hearing to her. Such exercise shall be completed within two (02) weeks from receipt of this order. 6. The petition is disposed of in the above terms along with pending application(s), if any.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
91.Const. P. 281/2024 (D.B.) Ali Muhammad V/S The PMDC and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1066
Matter:-DIRECTION
92.Const. P. 815/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Basit Langah V/S P.O Sindh & 26 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 1045Against appointment of Additional Advocate General and Assistant Advocate General.Read more
Matter:-Illegal Appointment
93.Const. P. 2082/2025 (D.B.) Suhail Latif Memon & Another V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkurlaptop scheme.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
94.Const. P. 1293/2026 (D.B.) Mrs. Fatima V/S NAB & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
95.Const. P. 195/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Faisal V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
96.Const. P. 282/2026 (D.B.) Sanwal Ali V/S P.O Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
97.Const. P. 945/2020 (D.B.) Syed Muzamil Abbas Shah V/S Sindh Workers Welfare Board & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
98.Const. P. 2132/2024 (D.B.) Dr Noor Hussain Chandio V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Inquiry
99.Const. P. 570/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Nazia & Another V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
100.Const. P. 1656/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Shamim Bano V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1043In view of the foregoing submissions and by consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant Constitution Petition is disposed of in terms of the directions already laid down by this Court in C.P No.D-923/2023 vide order dated 17.03.2026. 5. The respondents are directed to process and finalize the petitioner???s claim strictly in accordance with law and applicable policy, including the Prime Minister???s Assistance Package, within the stipulated timeframe. It is clarified that the benefits, being subject to availability of funds and approval by the competent authority, shall be released upon receipt of requisite funds from the concerned quarters. The competent authorities shall ensure that the petitioner is not subjected to any discrimination and that her claims, including those pertaining to lump-sum grant, marriage grant, and payment in lieu of plot, are decided in accordance with law and policy. 6. Petition stands disposed of along with pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-FOR GRATUITY
101.Const. P. 1370/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Neelofar Shakeel V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1042The petitioner, being an elderly person aged over 72 years, is further entitled to expeditious relief, and any delay in release of pension and gratuity would amount to undue hardship and denial of her lawful sustenance. The request for grant/restoration of double pension, if admissible under the applicable rules, also falls within her legal entitlement and must be examined and implemented strictly in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the disposal of the petition in terms of the statement made by Respondent-KMC is legally sound, as it binds the respondents to fulfill their admitted obligation within the stipulated timeframe. Failure to do so would expose the respondents to appropriate legal consequences, including enforcement and contempt proceedings, as the petitioner cannot be deprived of her accrued rights on account of administrative delay or inaction.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
102.Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 71/2024 (D.B.) ABDUL HASEEB S/O MUHAMMAD NADIR V/S THE STATE Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-LIFE IMPRISONMENT
103.Const. P. 1804/2025 (D.B.) Ali Nawaz Chandio & Anothe V/S M/S Shah Abdul Latif University & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-DIRECTION
104.Const. P. 128/2026 (D.B.) Haji Naik Muhammad Chijjan V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Restore Electricity
105.Const. P. 761/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Punhal Balouch V/S P.O Sindh & 03 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Reinstate of Service
106.Const. P. 1716/2026 (D.B.) Zain Zafar V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi10. We also do not find any substance in the contention regarding violation of Article 25 of the Constitution. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate that any other similarly placed person, whose death had occurred prior to the enactment of the law, has been granted posthumous promotion in identical circumstances. In absence of such material, the plea of discrimination is misconceived. 11. Furthermore, it is evident from the record that the petitioner has already approached the competent authority by way of appeal before the Chief Minister, which is stated to be pending. Without awaiting the outcome of the said statutory/administrative remedy, invocation of constitutional jurisdiction is premature. It is a settled principle that where an adequate alternate remedy is available, this Court ordinarily refrains from exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 12. In view of the foregoing, we are of the considered opinion that the petitioner has failed to make out any case of illegality, jurisdictional defect, or violation of fundamental rights warranting interference by this Court. The impugned decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II appears to have been taken within the framework of law and after due consideration of the relevant facts. 13. Consequently, this petition, being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed, along with all pending applications.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
107.Const. P. 597/2026 (D.B.) Nadir Vistro V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPoint of jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-Service
108.Const. P. 59/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Zubaida V/S Inspector General of Police, Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1031The allegations and counter-allegations raised by the parties primarily relate to disputed questions of fact, which do not warrant interference in constitutional jurisdiction in the absence of any mala fide or patent illegality being established on record. The respondents have also undertaken to act in accordance with law and to avoid any unlawful interference. 6. Accordingly, while reiterating that the police shall remain at liberty to proceed in accordance with law in respect of any cognizable offence, it is directed that no harassment, unlawful pressure, or coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioner or her family members beyond the scope of law. 7. With these observations, the instant Constitutional Petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of. However with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT
109.Const. P. 941/2026 (D.B.) Mst. Iqbal Bano V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1044In these circumstances, a balanced and legally sustainable approach is warranted to protect the petitioner???s rights if any without infringing upon the lawful entitlements of Respondent No.3. Accordingly, while declining the reliefs sought in terms of restraining or withholding retirement benefits, this Court observes and directs that the learned Family Court, where the petitioner???s maintenance suit is pending, shall proceed to decide the matter expeditiously, preferably within a stipulated period, strictly in accordance with law. Respondent No.3 is under a continuing legal and moral obligation to provide maintenance to the petitioner/dependents, and failure to do so shall entail legal consequences under the relevant family laws. The petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate interim maintenance or any other relief, including attachment in accordance with law, before the competent forum. Any amount received by Respondent No.3 as retirement benefits shall remain subject to the outcome of the proceedings before the Family Court, and the petitioner???s lawful share, if determined, shall be enforceable in accordance with law. 11. Resultantly, the instant petition is disposed of in the above terms, along with pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
110.Const. P. 5064/2024 (D.B.) Naseer Ahmed Chandio & Others V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1041In view of the above, it is held that the petitioners fall within the ambit of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, and subsequent Rules 2015, their exclusion based on federal origin is misconceived and unlawful. Their long, continuous, and satisfactory service entitles them to consideration for regularization, which cannot be defeated by administrative lapses. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 05.06.2024 is arbitrary, discriminatory, non-speaking, and unsustainable in law, and is set aside to the extent of the petitioners. 16. Accordingly, the serving petitionrers who lower grade persons, are entitled to regularization under the law with all consequential benefits from the date of their initial appointment, and the impugned order dated 05.06.2024 is set aside. 17. This petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
111.Const. P. 1713/2026 (D.B.) Rashid Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1046Resultantly, the interim bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 17.03.2026 is recalled due to his absence from Court coupled with allegations levelled against him, which are of serious nature requires his invigilation and failure of the surety to produce him in Court today as required. Notice be issued to the surety to show cause as to why the surety should not be forfeited. Meanwhile, the Investigating Officer is directed to proceed in accordance with law and produce the accused before the trial Court for further proceedings. The applicant shall surrender to police for investigation. 14. The bail application/petition stands dismissed along with pending applications. Let a copy of this order be communicated to IGP Sindh and Additional IGP Karachi to look into the conduct of police personnel in such state of affairs.Read more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
112.Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 60/2025 (D.B.) Sindh Revenue Board, Karachi V/S M/s. Pakistan Synthetic Ltd., Karachi Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 996Revenue as a habitual litigant.Read more
Matter:-SINDH SALES TAX
113.Cr.Tran 7/2026 (S.B.) Qurban Ali Laghari V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
114.Cr.Bail 233/2026 (S.B.) Altaf Hussain & another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadMalafides not demonstrated. Pre-arrest bail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
115.Criminal Miscelleneous 233/2022 (S.B.) AHMED ALI KHAN & ANOTHER V/S THE STATE & ORS Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
116.Cr.Bail 62/2026 (S.B.) Awal Khan Teghani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
117.Cr.Bail 331/2026 (S.B.) Amjad Hussain @ Amjad Gapang V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
118.Const. P. 81/2026 (S.B.) Meharban Ali Abro V/S P.O Sindh & 03 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Family Matter
119.Cr.Bail 247/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Eidal Khokhar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
120.Cr.Bail 260/2026 (S.B.) Mataro Khan @ Mataro Panhwar V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
121.Const. P. 989/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Abdullah V/S Pakistan International Airlines & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1011Furthermore, no mala fide, favoritism, or abuse of authority has been specifically pleaded with supporting particulars, nor has any material been produced to demonstrate that the process was conducted in a manner contrary to law. 14. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Petitioners have failed to establish any violation of law or fundamental rights warranting interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. 15. Before parting with this order we may observe that in the interest of transparency, Respondent No. 1 is expected to ensure that, in future recruitment processes, greater clarity and disclosure of criteria and results are maintained to avoid unnecessary litigation. 16. Consequently, both petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s). However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
122.Const. P. 504/2026 (D.B.) Fazan Liaqat & others V/S Pakistan International Airlines & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1012Furthermore, no mala fide, favoritism, or abuse of authority has been specifically pleaded with supporting particulars, nor has any material been produced to demonstrate that the process was conducted in a manner contrary to law. 14. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Petitioners have failed to establish any violation of law or fundamental rights warranting interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. 15. Before parting with this order we may observe that in the interest of transparency, Respondent No. 1 is expected to ensure that, in future recruitment processes, greater clarity and disclosure of criteria and results are maintained to avoid unnecessary litigation. 16. Consequently, both petitions are dismissed along with pending application(s). However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST APPOINTMENT
123.Const. P. 6182/2025 (D.B.) Farazana Cheema V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1016In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the impugned order dated 11.03.2024 is not sustainable in law, being violative of the principles of natural justice, beyond jurisdiction, and based on a misconstruction of Rule 13(b) of the 1988 Rules. The same is set aside to the extent of the petitioner???s late husband. 15. Consequently, the petitioner, being the widow of the deceased employee, is entitled to restoration of pensionary benefits/compulsorily retirement pension, arising out of the order dated 29.08.2023, along with all consequential benefits in accordance with law, which shall be released forthwith. 16. This petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
124.Const. P. 6481/2024 (D.B.) Shahnawaz Abro V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1014The reliance placed on parity with Secondary School Teachers is also misconceived, as each cadre is governed by its own distinct policy framework. Equality under the Constitution does not mandate identical treatment of dissimilar service structures, especially where financial and policy considerations differ and fall within the exclusive domain of the executive authority. 13. The judgment relied upon by the petitioner is distinguishable on the facts and does not advance his case in the absence of a corresponding legal entitlement under the applicable rules. 14. In view of the above discussion, we find no illegality, arbitrariness, or constitutional infirmity in the impugned policy or the actions of the respondents. The petition, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s). However, in the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
125.Const. P. 852/2025 (D.B.) Bashir Ahmed Sabir and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1013In view of the above statement, without touching the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties this petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioners may file/press their applications before the competent authority, which shall decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law and entitlement of the petitioners and after providing an opportunity of hearing to all concern. A copy of this order be sent to the Senior Member, Board of Revenue and Secretary, Land Utilization Department, Government of Sindh for compliance.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
126.Const. P. 2047/2026 (D.B.) Tariq Mehmood V/S Director FIA & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1005However, it was noted that the respondents assert the existence of adverse material against the petitioner, thereby justifying continuation of restrictions. In view of the competing contentions, the matter is directed to be placed before the competent Review Committee for expeditious consideration of the petitioner???s case in accordance with law within one week, keeping in view his request for Hajj travel. 9. It is further observed that in case the Review Committee fails to decide within the stipulated period, the trial Court may regulate the petitioner???s travel subject to appropriate safeguards, including security or surety for his return. 10. The petition is accordingly disposed of along with pending applications, with directions for compliance to all concerned authorities, including the learned AAG.Read more
Matter:-Removing the name from PCL
127.Const. P. 4574/2024 (D.B.) Javed Rehmat V/S Auditor General of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1010In view of the above analysis, it is held that the petitioner???s service in the Utility Stores Corporation does not qualify as government service under the Civil Servants Pension Rules or CSR. The said service was rendered under a separate corporate entity governed by non-statutory rules, and no legal provision exists for its inclusion in federal pension. The petitioner???s contractual appointment in 2006 was explicitly non-pensionable, and only service after regularization in 2012 qualifies for pension. The provisions of CSR regarding counting of past service and condonation of interruption are inapplicable as the essential requirement of qualifying government service is not met. Accordingly, the refusal by the competent authority to include the petitioner???s USC service in pension calculation is found to be lawful, justified, and in accordance with the governing rules. 17. The petition, being devoid of legal merit, is dismissed, along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
128.Const. P. 569/2026 (D.B.) Shayan Anjum & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1009In view of the above findings, instead of striking down the entire process in a disruptive manner, this Court deems it appropriate to issue a corrective direction rather than annulment, in the interest of administrative continuity. It is therefore recommended and directed that the competent authority Director General, Anti-Encroachment Force / Board of Revenue shall revisit and reframe the seniority list strictly in accordance with Rule 10 of the 2010 Rules, and Rule 12.2 of the Police Rules, 1934. Such exercise shall be completed after hearing all affected officials and ensuring transparency. Upon finalization of corrected seniority, consequential matters including the Upper School Course selection shall be re-evaluated accordingly, within three weeks??? time. 18. For the foregoing reasons, the petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms with directions for reconsideration of seniority in accordance with law, rather than outright invalidation of the entire administrative process. Meanwhile, the issue of uniform of the force as well as the service related issues shall also be firmly decided once for all by the competent authority. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three months??? time accordingly.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
129.Const. P. 648/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Razzak V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1047Prima-facie, it is apathy on the part of the respondents not to release the amount in time. Today, counsel for the respondent-KMC has put appearance and submits that the petitioner was retired from service on 18.04.2024 as he was working as Ex-Office Superintendent at Municipal Services Department KMC. Now the case regarding pension has been received to his office vide inward No.56055 dated 03.07.2024 and subsequently the pension case has been finalized on 16.08.2024 amounting to Rs.3,421,330/-. A cheque bearing No.26542512 amounting to Rs.1,710,665/- dated 22.04.2026 being 50% payment has been issued in favour of the petitioner and the balance 50% pension commutation Rs.1,711,000/- is being deposited and same shall be paid within 45 days. 4. In view of the above, counsel seeks disposal of the instant petition in the terms of the statement so made by counsel for the respondent-KMC. However, it is made clear that within the aforesaid period the remaining pensionary benefits shall be released without fail. 5. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
130.R.A (Civil Revision) 351/2024 (S.B.) Ghulam Nabi V/S Muhammad Mithal & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasLand Grant Policy 1989 does not confer a legitimate entitlement. The Court finds illegality in the grant: revision fails.Read more
131.Const. P. 971/2026 (D.B.) Komal Nadeem Mughal & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-QUASHMENT OF F.I.R / FREE-WILL
132.Const. P. 1096/2025 (D.B.) Ferozuddin V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAllotment of shops, petition dismissed.Read more
Matter:-Allotment of shops
133.R.A (Civil Revision) 253/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Afzal V/S Naeemullah & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasPlaint rejected. No concluded contract applied; the lease -cum-sale not held impossible under section 2 of the Contract Act.Read more
134.Criminal Miscelleneous 302/2026 (S.B.) Irfan Ali and an other V/S The State and others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
135.Const. P. 622/2021 (D.B.) Yasir Ali Phulpoto V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurDeceased quota.Read more
Matter:-DECEASED SON QUOTA
136.Const. P. 207/2026 (D.B.) Naseer Ali V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1024It is further observed that, in the event it is found that similarly placed candidates were granted relaxation in age or otherwise treated differently, the Commission shall examine the Petitioner???s case strictly on the touchstone of equality and non-discrimination, so as to ensure adherence to the constitutional mandate of fairness, merit, and transparency in public employment. However, it is clarified that this Court has reservations with regard to the question of age relaxation, by the SPSC, if any, as the same does not fall within the domain of the Sindh Public Service Commission as per legal analogy, which is required to be determined by the competent Government authority in accordance with the applicable rules and policy. Nonetheless, since the Petitioner is already in litigation on this very issue, the Commission shall also take into consideration the said aspect while examining his case and strictly in accordance with law. This entire exercise shall be concluded within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 10. It is clarified that the observations made herein are confined to the peculiar facts of the present case and shall not be treated as a precedent for other cases. 11. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
137.Const. P. 4355/2025 (D.B.) Muhammad Zakria V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1008Prima facie, the petitioner???s citizenship has been consistently recognized as evidenced by his CNIC and Pakistani passports issued and renewed since 1989. Even when a doubt arose in 2009, it was duly verified through official channels, including the Consulate General and Special Branch, Karachi, resulting in reissuance of his passport. Such recognition, attained after due verification, carries legal sanctity and cannot be arbitrarily withdrawn in the absence of any allegation or proof of fraud. Under Section 4 of the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951, the petitioner???s children, being born to a recognized Pakistani citizen, are entitled to citizenship by descent as a matter of right. The respondents??? insistence on repeated verification despite complete documentary proof is therefore without lawful basis. Their reliance on the alleged issuance of BM-series documents is misplaced, as any prior administrative classification stands overridden by subsequent verification and continued recognition by competent authorities. Moreover, the plea that the matter is subject to a pending policy is no justification to withhold vested rights, as fundamental rights cannot be kept in abeyance. Likewise, directing the petitioner to seek a civil declaration is unwarranted where his citizenship is already established through official records. The respondents??? conduct in singling out the petitioner???s children for such treatment, while granting similar documents to other family members, is arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of the principle of equality before law. 8. In view of the above, the petitioner has established a right for hearing by the competent authority on the subject issue and corresponding failure of statutory duty on the part of the respondents. The refusal or delay in issuance of CNICs and passports to his children is violative of his rights subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by the law. Therefore, a writ in the nature of mandamus is warranted, directing the respondents to consider his request for issuance of CNICs and machine-readable passports to the petitioner???s children after hearing him, however no bottlenecks shall be created based on repeated and redundant verification in the absence of any concrete evidence of fraud or misrepresentation. Disposed of accordingly.Read more
Matter:-ACTIVATION OF CNIC
138.Const. P. 6315/2025 (D.B.) Vinod Kumar V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1028Accordingly, we are of the considered view that the petitioner cannot be made to suffer for internal administrative deficiencies of the department. The respondents are required to regularize and process the matter in accordance with law by issuing the requisite DRC approval or any equivalent document necessary for his induction by issuing him appointment order, so that the petitioner is not deprived of his lawful employment. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three weeks. 10. The petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance in time.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
139.Const. P. 338/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Rashid Zaheen V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1033In the circumstances, without dilating upon the merits of the controversy, and in order to ensure an expeditious, fair, and administrative resolution of the grievance at the departmental level, it would be appropriate to direct the Respondents to consider and decide the Petitioner???s representation, if filed, strictly in accordance with law, rules, and policy, through a reasoned and speaking order within a reasonable time. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn at this stage, with the observation that the Petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation before the competent authority within one week, whereupon the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law, without being influenced by any observation made herein. 7. It is clarified that in case the Petitioner remains aggrieved by the decision of the competent authority, he shall be at liberty to avail such remedy as is available to him under the law.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
140.Const. P. 5052/2025 (D.B.) Ghulam Sarwar V/S Province of Sindh & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1034It is an admitted position that the petitioner claims to have been cleared by the department through office order dated 05.05.2023, whereas the respondents dispute the procedural regularity of such clearance. In matters relating to salary and livelihood of a public servant, the State is under a continuing obligation to act fairly, transparently, and in accordance with law, and any ambiguity in administrative processing cannot be allowed to prejudice a serving employee, if his application is found genuine indefinitely. 7. In view of the foregoing, it is directed that the Education Department along with the Accounts Officer shall jointly re-examine the petitioner???s entire record, including his selection, scrutiny process, and eligibility, and pass a proper speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of one (01) month. If the petitioner is found to have been duly cleared and eligible, his salary shall be released forthwith along with admissible arrears without unnecessary delay or technical obstruction. 8. With these observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of along with all pending application(s), if any.Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
141.Const. P. 3332/2024 (D.B.) Maqsood Masih and Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1037It is the case of the Petitioners that they were employed in various Town Municipal Corporations (TMCs), Karachi, and after rendering due service, retired from their respective posts; however, their post-retirement dues remain unpaid. Learned counsel for KMC submitted that the cases of the Petitioners are required to be processed by the concerned TMCs and to be forwarded to KMC, whereafter the same would be examined and processed for grant of pensionary benefits in accordance with law, subject to their entitlement under the law. 3. This Court finds the said submission reasonable and disposing of the petition, without touching the merits of the case, with directions to the Respondents (TMCs) to forward the cases of the Petitioners to KMC for pension processing. The competent authority of KMC is directed to process the same in accordance with law and release pensionary benefits, if found admissible. The entire exercise is ordered to be completed within one month.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
142.Const. P. 5581/2024 (D.B.) Ahmed Nawaz Muri V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1027It is reiterated that the State is constitutionally bound under Article 25-A of the Constitution to provide free and compulsory education and to ensure that public institutions function effectively with dignity and safety. The neglect of infrastructure and administrative inefficiencies cannot be permitted to frustrate the fundamental rights of children residing in the area. 14. In view of the foregoing, and subject to the above observations and directions, this Constitutional Petition stands disposed of along with all pending application(s), if any.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
143.Const. P. 2597/2026 (D.B.) Ali Hassan V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1032In view of the above, this Court holds that the impugned order dated 10.04.2026 suffers from jurisdictional infirmity. The Election Officer re-adjudicated membership issues, which is the function of the competent authority under the cooperative law. The action is vitiated due to violation of principles of natural justice and constitutional guarantees under Articles 4 and 10-A; and the reasoning adopted by the Election Officer is legally unsustainable and based on misinterpretation of Section 24 of the Act, 2020. 14. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside, and the stance taken by the petitioner is upheld to the extent that his removal from the membership list and consequent disenfranchisement cannot be sustained in law. The respondents are directed to restore his status in accordance with law and proceed with the electoral process strictly in compliance with statutory provisions and principles of fairness, transparency, and due process. The petition along with pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
144.Const. P. 2533/2026 (D.B.) Syed Javed Iqbal & Another V/S Meerut Coop. Housing Society & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1021In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the impugned order dated 19.04.2026 is unsustainable in law, being based on misinterpretation of Section 24 of the Act, 2020. The Election Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by reopening a settled issue of membership. However, the best course for the election officer was to refer the matter to the Court for determination. The order suffers from violation of principles of natural justice; and the reasoning advanced by the Election Officer is legally flawed and cannot be upheld. 16. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside, and the stance taken by the petitioner is upheld to the extent that his removal from the membership list and consequent disenfranchisement cannot be sustained in law. The respondents are directed to restore his status in accordance with law and proceed with the electoral process strictly in compliance with statutory provisions and principles of fairness, transparency, and due process. The petition along with pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
145.Const. P. 4903/2020 (D.B.) Shabbir Ahmed and Ors V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1004In these circumstances, it is obvious that the impugned office orders, to the extent they exclude the petitioners??? past service, are contrary to the governing regulations, Civil Service framework, and binding judicial precedents. Such exclusion amounts to arbitrary deprivation of lawful pensionary rights and cannot be sustained. 14. Accordingly, the petition merits acceptance, which is hereby disposed of along with pending application(s) in terms that the impugned office orders are set aside, and the competent authority of the respondents is directed to count the petitioners??? entire continuous service, including the period served on daily wages, towards qualifying service for pension and allied benefits. The CAA/respondents shall recalculate and release all pensionary dues accordingly, preferably within a period of two months, along with all consequential benefits as admissible under law.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
146.Const. P. 1480/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S P.M of Pakistan thru Principal Sect: & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1006Thus, in view of the law laid down in PLD 2024 SC 1276, read with the undisputed factual position that the petitioner???s offer of appointment was issued prior to the said judgment, it is held that the petitioner???s case squarely falls within the protected category of appointments. The impugned correspondence dated 23.01.2025, being contrary to the express protective intent of the Supreme Court judgment and the clarification issued by the Establishment Division, cannot sustain in the eyes of law. 11. Accordingly, the petitioner???s offer of appointment is held to be protected, lawful, and enforceable, and the respondents are under a constitutional and legal obligation to give effect to the same offer appointment by issuing appointment letter within two weeks??? time.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
147.Const. P. 1404/2018 (D.B.) Abdul Waheed V/S M/s Movenpick Hotel KHI & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1025The authorities relied upon by the respondent are distinguishable on the facts. Those cases relate to situations where delay was unexplained, proceedings were not pursued bona fide, or dismissal orders were duly communicated. In the present case, the petitioner continuously pursued his remedy, the employer acted mala fide, and the dismissal order was never served. Hence, the cited precedents do not advance the respondent???s case. In view of the above, the objections raised by the respondent are legally unsustainable. The learned Labour Court rightly exercised jurisdiction, correctly appreciated evidence, and passed a lawful order of reinstatement with back benefits. The impugned modification by the Labour Appellate Tribunal, substituting reinstatement with compensation, is not supported by law and warrants interference. 9. In these circumstances, the learned Labour Court correctly ordered reinstatement with full back benefits, and the same reflects a proper exercise of jurisdiction in accordance with law and evidence. The impugned judgment of the learned Labour Appellate Tribunal, to the extent it denies reinstatement and substitutes it with compensation, suffers from legal infirmity and is set aside. 10. Consequently, both petitions are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
148.Const. P. 1747/2018 (D.B.) Movenpick Hotek Karachi V/S S.L.A.T & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1026The authorities relied upon by the respondent are distinguishable on the facts. Those cases relate to situations where delay was unexplained, proceedings were not pursued bona fide, or dismissal orders were duly communicated. In the present case, the petitioner continuously pursued his remedy, the employer acted mala fide, and the dismissal order was never served. Hence, the cited precedents do not advance the respondent???s case. In view of the above, the objections raised by the respondent are legally unsustainable. The learned Labour Court rightly exercised jurisdiction, correctly appreciated evidence, and passed a lawful order of reinstatement with back benefits. The impugned modification by the Labour Appellate Tribunal, substituting reinstatement with compensation, is not supported by law and warrants interference. 9. In these circumstances, the learned Labour Court correctly ordered reinstatement with full back benefits, and the same reflects a proper exercise of jurisdiction in accordance with law and evidence. The impugned judgment of the learned Labour Appellate Tribunal, to the extent it denies reinstatement and substitutes it with compensation, suffers from legal infirmity and is set aside. 10. Consequently, both petitions are disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
149.Const. P. 161/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Ahsan V/S Secretary M/o Interior & others Sindh High Court, KarachiAccordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction that, if not already done, the Petitioner shall approach the competent authority for consideration of his case regarding surrender of CNIC, determination of his status, and issuance of necessary facilitation/NOC, whereupon the same shall be decided by the authority concerned through a speaking order strictly in accordance with law, rules, and policy, after providing due opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner. However if the case of the petitioner is found to be genuine, his request must be considered without creating trouble for him. 8. It is clarified that all such proceedings shall be undertaken independently by the competent authority without being influenced by any observation made herein, which are purely tentative in nature and confined to the disposal of this petition. 9. The petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
150.Const. P. 346/2021 (D.B.) Dr. Abdul Ghani Soomro V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 999Proforma promotion. Petition allowed.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
151.Const. P. 1618/2025 (D.B.) Qureshi Coop. Housing Society Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
152.Const. P. 983/2024 (D.B.) Mehdi Hassan & others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurRecruitment process in BPS-01 to BPS-04)Read more
Matter:-RELEASING OF SALARY
153.Cr.Bail 54/2026 (D.B.) Kamran @ Wadhayo Abro V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaBail in offence punishable under Section 9(1) 3(c) of the Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 2024 (Amendment 2025) grantedRead more
Matter:-Post Arrest Bail
154.Const. P. 663/2026 (D.B.) Abdullah V/S P.O Sindh & 04 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAppointment of internal / external.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
155.Const. P. 769/2026 (D.B.) Shafqat Ali Kalhoro V/S P.O Sindh & 06 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Against Notification / Office Order
156.Const. P. 17/2026 (D.B.) M/s. KDA Officer CHS Limited V/S Abdul Rauf Tabani & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1039In these circumstances, and particularly in view of the consensus between the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds a fresh adjudication/decision by the learned trial Court is needed, based on the existing evidence and in accordance with law, would ensure a fair, comprehensive, and legally sound determination of the rights of the parties. 11. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and decree are set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned Special Court for Cooperative Societies, Karachi Division, with direction to decide the suit afresh, strictly on merits, after proper appraisal of pleadings and evidence already on record, and without being influenced by the observations contained in the impugned judgment. The learned Trial Court shall also ensure that all material issues, including title, alleged fraud, validity of the lease/sub-lease, and entitlement of the parties, are determined through a reasoned and issue-wise judgment. The learned Trial Court is further directed to conclude the proceedings expeditiously, preferably within one month, to avoid further delay in adjudication. 12. Both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, along with all pending applications.Read more
Matter:-SOCIETY MATTER
157.Const. P. 924/2026 (D.B.) Abdul Rauf Tabani & others V/S Special Court for Co-operative Societies & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1038In these circumstances, and particularly in view of the consensus between the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds a fresh adjudication/decision by the learned trial Court is needed, based on the existing evidence and in accordance with law, would ensure a fair, comprehensive, and legally sound determination of the rights of the parties. 11. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and decree are set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned Special Court for Cooperative Societies, Karachi Division, with direction to decide the suit afresh, strictly on merits, after proper appraisal of pleadings and evidence already on record, and without being influenced by the observations contained in the impugned judgment. The learned Trial Court shall also ensure that all material issues, including title, alleged fraud, validity of the lease/sub-lease, and entitlement of the parties, are determined through a reasoned and issue-wise judgment. The learned Trial Court is further directed to conclude the proceedings expeditiously, preferably within one month, to avoid further delay in adjudication. 12. Both petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, along with all pending applications.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
158.Const. P. 1127/2024 (D.B.) Noor Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1040Subsequently, a progress report was submitted following a joint site visit. It stated that mining operations had already been stopped, no Ratti Bajri was found at the site, and the permits were limited to limestone and mouram. However, it also confirmed that both permit holders were in violation of lease conditions, including failure to submit monthly reports and install boundary markers, rendering them liable for action under the relevant mining laws. 5. Upon hearing the parties, this Court accepts the request of the Additional Advocate General to refer the matter to the competent authority. The case is remanded to the Director General, Mines and Minerals Development, to provide an opportunity of hearing to all concerned and to take appropriate legal action in case of established violations. However, it is made clear that the order dated 20.01.2026 shall remain intact. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in these terms.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
159.Const. P. 1654/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Yaseen Sharif V/S Rani Naz & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1035Consequently, with the consent of the parties present in court, the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 06.03.2026 cannot be allowed to stand and are set aside, with directions for fresh adjudication/decision strictly in accordance with law, after properly determining the competing claims of title in light of the principles governing priority of registered instruments and absence of lawful cancellation. The matter shall be decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of two month. In the meantime, the interim order already operating in the petition shall continue till final decision by the trial Court. 13. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
160.Const. P. 1510/2025 (D.B.) Miss Sabra Rajput V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 986Time scale.Read more
Matter:-Promotion
161.Const. P. 1943/2024 (D.B.) SAJJAD AHMED KHUHRO V/S P.O SINDH & OTHERS Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 980Matter referred to Sindh Public Service Commission to consider the case of the petitioner.Read more
Matter:-Disable Quota
162.Const. P. 987/2026 (D.B.) Syed Ali Raza Gilani V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1000No case is made out for change of the date of birth in the service record in exercise of writ jurisdiction; petition is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
163.Const. P. 1648/2023 (D.B.) Waheed Ahmed & Others V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurUpgradation of post.Read more
Matter:-Up gradation
164.Const. P. 479/2025 (D.B.) Dr Azhar Ali shah V/S M/S S.M.B.B.M.U Larkana & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Illegal Appointment
165.Const. P. 1719/2026 (D.B.) Surge Education (Pvt) Limited V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
166.Const. P. 780/2026 (D.B.) MDA & another V/S Muhammad Ramzan Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1019Resultantly, the impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the learned Anti-Encroachment Tribunal, Karachi, for fresh decision strictly in accordance with law. The Tribunal shall confine itself to its statutory jurisdiction, frame proper issues, allow both parties full opportunity to lead evidence, and decide the matter after examining all relevant documents, including the status of land, legality of the Gothabad sanction, and applicability of relevant notifications by obtaining necessary documents from Senior Member Board of Revenue and Land Utilization department even by summoning them to produce the record of the subject land, though officer of the Board of Revenue. Even the Tribunal can inspect the site. 16. It is clarified that the findings recorded hereinabove is tentative and shall not prejudice the case of either party, and all questions, including that of title and legality of possession, shall be decided afresh on merits by the competent civil Court in accordance with law where the Civil Suit No.3812 of 2025 filed by the respondent No.1 as a attorney of the villagers for Declaration and Permeant Injunction is pending adjudication. Besides the observation recorded in the preceding paragraph for fresh decision the learned Anti-Encroachment Tribunal, Karachi on merits within one month after providing meaningful hearing to all concerned. 17. These are the reasons for our short order whereby the captioned petition was allowed and the judgment of the learned tribunal was set aside.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
167.Const. P. 5004/2024 (D.B.) Mrs. Jameela Begum V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1015Consequently, respondent No. 2/Sub-Registrar-I, Clifton Town, Karachi shall, upon receipt of verified data and successful identification of the petitioner through NADRA???s system or any legally permissible alternative mode, proceed to entertain, process, and finalize the registration of the Declaration and Confirmation of the oral gift strictly in accordance with law, without raising any objection which has already been addressed through the aforesaid process. However, the aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks positively. 15. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the validity or legality of the alleged oral gift itself, which shall be examined by the registering authority in accordance with the law at the time of registration. 16. With the above directions, the instant petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
168.Const. P. 291/2026 (S.B.) Azam Mirza V/S The XII Sr. Civil Judge Khi Central & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1018As regards future rent, the Rent Controller has adopted a balanced and equitable approach by directing the deposit of rent subject to the outcome of civil litigation. This ensures protection of both parties??? interests preserving the petitioner???s right in Civil proceedings while simultaneously preventing unjust enrichment through continued occupation without payment. 12. The impugned order is therefore neither without jurisdiction nor contrary to law. It is based on settled principles that rent jurisdiction can be invoked where a prima facie tenancy exists, even if ancillary civil disputes are pending. No exceptional circumstance has been shown warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction, which is discretionary and not meant to convert this Court into a court of appeal against findings of fact properly recorded by the Rent Controller. 13. Accordingly, the constitutional petition is dismissed, and the impugned order dated 12.03.2026 is upheld as lawful, justified, and in accordance with the settled principles governing rent jurisdiction. However, there shall be no order as to costs. However, it is made clear that the observation recorded hereinabove is tentative for just decision of the rent case only, and shall not prejudice the case of either party before the competent Civil Court, when the matter is pending, which shall be decided on its own merits.Read more
Matter:-RENT MATTER
169.Const. P. 4861/2025 (D.B.) Dr. Zahra Gauhar V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1020In view of the above, the position that emerges is that while the petitioner has been able to raise a substantial legal question regarding the source and scope of SECP???s authority, and has highlighted potential regulatory inconsistencies, the matter requires structured examination by the regulator itself within the framework of law rather than immediate drastic intervention. 13. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to direct Respondent No.2 SECP to examine the issue afresh, specifically addressing the legal basis, if any, for permitting banking-related names or abbreviations for NBFCs/AMCs; consistency of such practice with the Companies Act, 2017, and its own regulatory guidelines; and whether such usage is capable of creating public confusion or misrepresentation. Respondent No.2 shall pass a reasoned order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a stipulated period. Respondent No.1, being the controlling Ministry, shall ensure that such exercise is undertaken in accordance with the law. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within three weeks. 14. This petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
170.Const. P. 184/2026 (S.B.) Budho Khan Thr LRs and others V/S S.M Hamid and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadOrder remanding application u.s 12(2) CPC does not call for interferenceRead more
Matter:-Against Order / Civil Rev:
171.Const. P. 2405/2026 (D.B.) Muhammad Khalid V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, KarachiWithout touching upon the merits of the case, petitioner Muhammad Khalid son of Muhammad Ismail is granted protective bail in FIR No.02/2022 registered under the Customs Act, 1969 read with the Import and Export Control Act, 1950, for a period of ten (10) days from today to enable him to surrender before the learned trial Court, subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.200,000/- (Rupees two lac only) and a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. It is clarified that this order shall remain in force till 06.04.2026 or until the petitioner surrenders before the concerned trial Court, whichever occurs earlier. Meanwhile, the NADRA shall take steps for unblocking the CNIC of the petitioner enabling him to surrender before the trial Court. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
172.Const. P. 1589/2026 (D.B.) Zakir Hussain V/S M/s. Delhi Raiyan Cooperative Housing Society & Or Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 997For the foregoing reasons, and in view of the settled legal position, this petition is hereby allowed. Consequently, the impugned order dated 23.12.2023 is set aside in its entirety. The application filed under Order VII Rule 11, C.P.C., stands dismissed, and the plaint is restored to its original position, to be proceeded with in accordance with law. The trial Court is further directed to resume the proceedings from the appropriate stage, to frame the necessary issues arising out of the pleadings of the parties, and to afford them full opportunity to adduce their respective evidence. The matter shall thereafter be decided strictly on merits, uninfluenced by any observations made in the impugned order. In the interest of expeditious disposal, the trial Court is directed to conclude the proceedings, as far as practicable, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of this order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
173.Cr.Bail 209/2026 (S.B.) Himat Ali V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadNo evidence to tie applicant to crime scene, bail granted.Read more
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
174.Cr.Bail 1141/2025 (S.B.) Roshan & Another V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadPost arrest bail to co-accused not sufficient to confirm pre-arrest bail.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
175.Cr.Bail 1256/2025 (S.B.) Sikandar Ali Shah @ Sajjad Ali Shah V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSuspension of NBWs.Read more
Matter:-PRE ARREST BAIL
176.Criminal Miscelleneous 832/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Imran V/S Riaz & another Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-561-A Cr.P.C
177.R.A (Civil Revision) 231/2010 (S.B.) Abdul Razzak Shaikh Kaloo V/S Pakistan Railway & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-OTHER
178.Cr.Bail 992/2025 (S.B.) Zameer Hussain V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
179.Const. P. 331/2025 (S.B.) Bahawaluddin Jatoi V/S Ghulam Nabi & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst revisional order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
180.Cr.Tran 8/2026 (S.B.) Rano V/S Halam Singh & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
181.Criminal Miscelleneous 50/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Kashif V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-561-A Cr.P.C
182.Criminal Miscelleneous 196/2026 (S.B.) WHC Khaliq-ur-Rehman & others V/S Umair Sahito & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst order of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
183.Const. P. 103/2026 (S.B.) Mst. Sumera & Another V/S P.O Sindh & 13 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAdequate remedy available under the law.Read more
Matter:-Harasment
184.Const. P. 2549/2024 (D.B.) M. Tariq Mansoor Advocate V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1053In view of the above, the petition needs to be disposed of along with all pending application(s) with directions to the competent authorities of respondents to strictly comply with the order dated 10.02.2026 passed in CP No. D-6603 of 2021, particularly regarding timely framing of rules, consistency of regulatory framework, ad adherence of KSDP-2020 in line with binding Supreme Court judgments. Until any new plan, including the proposed Greater Karachi Regional Plan, 2047, is lawfully approved and notified, the KSDP-2020 shall remain operative, and any deviation therefrom shall entail legal consequences in accordance with law subject to the final policy decisions of the Government of Sindh on the subject issue. 9. As regards the contempt application, since compliance of he earlier orders is intrinsically linked with the ongoing process directed in CP. D-6603 of 2021, the same does not warrant independent proceedings of this stage. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law, in case of any clear and willful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 10.02.2026 is made out. 10. With these observations of the contempt/review application and all pending applications, stands disposed of. However, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
185.Const. P. 5857/2021 (D.B.) Nafees Ahmed Khan V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 982In view of the above statutory framework, settled principles of law, and factual matrix, it is evident that the impugned order dated 17.09.2020 does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or illegality warranting interference under Article 199 of the Constitution. Rather, it reflects a correct exercise of appellate jurisdiction aimed at ensuring compliance with the fundamental principle of fair hearing and due process of law under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 and the Constitution. 17. Accordingly, the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. The petition, therefore, appears to be misconceived, lacking merit, and is dismissed, leaving the parties to pursue their remedies before the competent forum for proper adjudication of title and possession issues, if so advised.Read more
Matter:-COOP. HOUSING SOCIETIES
186.Const. P. 5653/2025 (D.B.) Irfan Qazi V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 985In light of the foregoing discussion, this Court is of the considered view that the present petition, being in the nature of a writ of quo warranto, is maintainable and cannot be defeated by objections relating to locus standi or the availability of alternate remedies. Besides, the grant of proforma promotion to Respondent No. 8, in the peculiar facts of the case, was/is legally unsustainable, as it operates to circumvent binding judicial directions and is therefore void. Likewise, the impugned reinstatement order, having been passed through a process in the nature of a ???review upon review??? without any justiciable reason is without lawful jurisdiction and thus coram non judice, even order the review jurisdiction. Consequently, the continuance of Respondent No. 8 in public office on the basis of such legally flawed actions cannot be sustained under the law. 18. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with the understanding that the impugned orders relating to proforma promotion and reinstatement of Respondent No. 8 are without lawful justification and are hereby annulled. The respondents are directed to proceed strictly in accordance with law. All pending application(s) stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.Read more
Matter:-QUO WARRANTO
187.Const. P. 5071/2014 (D.B.) Muhammad Farooq Kasmani and Ors V/S KMC and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 984In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and by consent, the instant Constitutional Petition is disposed of in the terms that the impugned notice/challan issued by the Respondent shall be revisited and re-determined by the competent authority of the Karachi Municipal Corporation in accordance with law. For this purpose, the concerned Deputy Director, Anti-Encroachment, KMC shall carry out a proper inspection of the site after issuing due notice to the Petitioners, and complete the entire exercise within a period of three (03) weeks from receipt of this order. 5. It is, however, clarified that the demand of Rs. 6.300 million shall remain suspended and shall not be enforced against the Petitioners until a final decision is taken by the competent authority strictly in accordance with law and after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners. 6. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with listed and pending applications, if any.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST NOTICE
188.Const. P. 5819/2016 (D.B.) Abdul Kareem V/S M/s Trading Co. and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 983The present petition essentially seeks re-examination of factual controversies already adjudicated upon by multiple forums, which is impermissible in constitutional jurisdiction. The scope of interference under Article 199 is limited to jurisdictional errors and patent illegality, none of which is made out in the present case. 9. For the foregoing reasons, this Court holds that the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment of the Labour Appellate Tribunal more particularly after receiving the report from NADRA, in terms of order dated 07.02.2022 no further action in favour of the petitioner is required as the report is clear in its terms as the petition was already been disposed of vide order dated 07.02.2022. All pending application(s) if any except the application moved by the respondent for seeking release of the amount deposited with the Nazir in terms of earlier orders passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-1715 of 2014. Office is directed to take necessary steps.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
189.Const. P. 2088/2024 (D.B.) Dehli Hakiman CHS Ltd V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1060It is observed that while property rights are protected under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution, the present matter involves disputed questions of fact, including alleged cancellation of lease in 1994 and lack of prior notice thereof, which can appropriately be adjudicated by the civil court. The question of limitation, raised, shall also be considered by the trial court on its own merits keeping in mid the background of the case. Accordingly, this Court cannot, in ??? exercise of jurisdiction under Article 199, declare the petitioner as exclusive lawful owner or grant possession. The petitioner is, therefore, at liberty to seek appropriate remedies before the competent civil court, which shall decide the matter independently in accordance with law. 12. Accordingly, while leaving all questions of fact and law open, and without touching the merits of the case, the petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of with the consent of parties, with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court/any other legal forum for appropriate relief.Read more
Matter:-PROPERTY MATTER
190.Const. P. 6789/2018 (D.B.) Shaukat Ali & Ors V/S S.B.P & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 981In view of the foregoing discussion, it becomes obvious that the petitioners are, in substance, seeking extension of a benefit which was neither available nor legally recognized at the time of their retirement. Such a claim does not give rise to any enforceable fundamental right, nor does it fall within the scope of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 18. However, without prejudice the rights of the parties, the exclusion of AMI from their pensionary benefits, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is a policy decision of the respondent Bank. 19. Accordingly, the petition is held to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with pending application(s).Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
191.Criminal Miscelleneous 277/2026 (S.B.) Shoukat Ail Thebo V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
192.Criminal Miscelleneous 20/2026 (S.B.) Khan Muhammad V/S SSP Mirpurkhas & Ors Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
193.Criminal Appeal 14/2026 (S.B.) Iqrar Ali Jakhrani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at LarkanaCriminal appeal in offence punishable under Section 23(i)(a) of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013 allowed.Read more
Matter:-Against Order of Trial Court(Above 7 Years)
194.Const. P. 150/2026 (D.B.) Ali Nawaz & Others V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurFactual controversy cannot be resolved in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction.Read more
Matter:-Construction
195.Const. P. 1403/2026 (D.B.) Parveen Akhtar V/S Federation of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 970When confronted with the legal position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to appear Zonal Office Korangi No. 04 along with all documents as discussed supra for re-evaluation of the case and passing of the speaking order in due course of time in law. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to. The petition stands disposed of in the terms of the statement so made by the counsel for the NADRA. Meanwhile, petitioner is directed willing to appear Zonal Office Korangi No. 04 along with all documents. However, in the intervening period no bottlenecks shall be created so far as the issue involved in this case is concerned subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks??? time. 5. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
196.Const. P. 5131/2025 (D.B.) Arif Masih V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 955In view of above statement, without touching the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties present in Court, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s) with directions to Respondent No.6 / Director Sanitation, TMC Mauripur, District Keamari, Karachi to remit the pension file of the petitioner within two days??? time and thereafter the case be processed and the pensionary benefits of the petitioner be released within three weeks??? time.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
197.Const. P. 953/2025 (D.B.) Irfan Ali Memon V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 1017In these circumstances, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to the competent authority for fresh consideration on the subject issue. The competent authority shall examine the petitioner???s case, after affording him a meaningful hearing, and determine his entitlement to pensionary/service benefits for the relevant period, including issuance of formal retirement notification, in accordance with law and the observations made above. 7. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed strictly within a period of one (01) month from the date of receipt of this order, and a reasoned decision shall be communicated to the petitioner in the said period. 8. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms, along with pending applications. Let a copy of this order be communicated to all concerned for compliance within the stipulated period, failing which appropriate proceedings under Article 204 of the Constitution shall follow against the delinquent officials for non compliance.Read more
Matter:-RETIREMENT BENEFIT
198.Const. P. 1522/2026 (D.B.) Rameez Ali V/S Secretary Health & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 960Even otherwise, the material placed on record does not demonstrate any procedural illegality in the acceptance of resignation. The plea of coercion remains unsubstantiated and uncorroborated by contemporaneous evidence. On the contrary, the acceptance of resignation followed by final settlement supports the inference of a concluded severance of employment on mutual and formal terms. 12. In view of the above, the petitioner has failed to establish a case of unlawful termination or violation of constitutional or legal rights warranting interference in constitutional jurisdiction. The petition, therefore, appears to be misconceived and not maintainable, lacking merit in law as well as in facts. 13. Resultantly, the Constitutional Petition along with pending application(s) is dismissed.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
199.Const. P. 1402/2026 (D.B.) Syed Tauseef Hussain V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 969When confronted with the legal position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to appear Zonal Office Korangi No. 04 along with all documents as discussed supra for re-evaluation of the case and passing of the speaking order in due course of time in law. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to. The petition stands disposed of in the terms of the statement so made by the counsel for the NADRA. Meanwhile, petitioner is directed willing to appear Zonal Office Korangi No. 04 along with all documents. However, in the intervening period no bottlenecks shall be created so far as the issue involved in this case is concerned subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks??? time. 5. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-ISSUANCE OF N.I.C.
200.Const. P. 2844/2011 (D.B.) Mohammad Babar Baloch V/S Dawood College of Engineering Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 973In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the considered opinion that the impugned order suffers from procedural illegality, violation of due process, non-observance of principles of natural justice, and is also disproportionate to the alleged misconduct. The same, therefore, cannot be allowed to sustain. 12. Resultantly, the petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 20.11.2002 is set aside. The petitioner shall be treated as reinstated for all legal purposes and shall be entitled to all consequential benefits, including back benefits in accordance with law; however, since he has attained the age of superannuation during pendency of the proceedings, his pensionary benefits shall be computed by treating his entire service as continuous up to the date of superannuation and shall be released forthwith by the respondents. 13. These are the reasons for our short order of even date, whereby the petition was allowed.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
201.Const. P. 333/2026 (D.B.) Dr. Zehra Tahir Shairani V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 963Moreover, the position taken by the respondents, while acknowledging liability and requesting time for release, amounts to an implied admission of the petitioner???s entitlement. In such circumstances, the continued non-payment is not only unjustified but also contrary to principles of fairness, equity, and good governance. Public bodies are under a constitutional obligation to act reasonably and expeditiously in discharging financial obligations towards retired employees, who are often dependent on such income for their livelihood and dignity in post-retirement life. 7. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with pending application(s) and the the respondents are jointly directed to ensure expeditious release of all pensionary benefits already determined in favour of the petitioner. Any further delay would amount to continued deprivation of a lawful entitlement without lawful excuse, warranting appropriate consequential proceedings against the responsible authorities. A copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, Sindh Local Government Board for immediate compliance.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
202.Const. P. 2234/2026 (D.B.) Ali Muhammad V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 964Since the respondents themselves have agreed to adjudicate the matter within a stipulated timeframe after affording hearing, and no final determination on merits has yet been made by the competent authority, this Court is of the considered view that premature adjudication would not be appropriate. The proper course, in the first instance, is to allow the statutory authority to determine the matter in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 7. Such an approach would not only ensure compliance with due process but also safeguard the rights of all stakeholders while maintaining adherence to statutory regulatory mechanisms governing construction activities. 8. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without touching the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to hear all concerned parties and pass a speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of two weeks. 9. The petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST CONSTRUCTION
203.Const. P. 297/2026 (D.B.) Faisal V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 965Accordingly, while reaffirming the earlier directions, this Court holds that if no adverse material exists against the petitioner, there remains no legal justification to curtail his fundamental rights. Therefore this petition needs to be disposed of with direction to the Review Committee so constituted to hear the petitioner and act fairly, expeditiously, and strictly in accordance with law, within three weeks??? time and any failure to do so shall entail legal consequences, as the petitioner, having already suffered undue hardship, is entitled to immediate and effective consideration of his case within three weeks??? time. However, it is made clear that if the case of the petitioner is not decided by the Review Committee his name shall be removed from the PCL without further deliberation. 8. This petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-BLACKLISTING
204.Const. P. 5060/2021 (D.B.) Mst. Shaista Khan & another V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 971In view of the above, the petition is liable to be disposed of with directions to the competent authority to reconsider the case of Petitioner No.2 for issuance of POC strictly in accordance with law. The petitioners shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing and to submit any required material. The respondents may obtain security clearance; however, any adverse decision shall be reasoned and communicated through a speaking order. The exercise shall be completed preferably within sixty (60) days. 12. With these observations and directions, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION
205.Const. P. 1558/2026 (D.B.) Adnan Hadi V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 972For the foregoing reasons, this Court is of the considered view that the decision of the Sindh Police Recruitment Board, whereby the candidature of the petitioner for appointment as Police Constable was rejected solely on the basis of registration of FIRs, is not sustainable in law and falls outside the scope of lawful authority, thus warranting interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. 8. Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent authority of the respondents to reconsider the candidature of the petitioner for appointment as Police Constable, and if he is found otherwise eligible in all respects, to proceed accordingly within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this order. All pending applications also stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-APPOINTMENT
206.Const. P. 1094/2026 (D.B.) Safdar Masih V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 961Since the respondents themselves have acknowledged that the petitioner???s case has been duly processed and pre-audited, and have further undertaken before this Court to release the outstanding amount within a stipulated period, no further adjudication on merits is required. However, to safeguard the petitioner???s rights, the respondents are bound by their undertaking and are directed to ensure compliance within the stated timeframe, failing which the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSIONARY BENEFITS
207.Const. P. 86/2024 (D.B.) Muhammad Rashid V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiDuring proceedings, learned counsel for the parties stated that in view of the ongoing departmental action, the petition may be disposed of with directions to the authorities to proceed strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months. 5. In view of the above consensus and the steps already initiated by the SBCA, the petition is disposed of accordingly along with all pending applications, subject to just exceptions, with direction that the matter shall be processed and concluded in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION
208.Const. P. 2298/2026 (D.B.) Arshad Ali V/S Government of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, KarachiIn view of the apprehension of arrest and to enable the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and face proceedings in accordance with law, the request for protective per-arrest bail is found to be reasonable. Accordingly, without touching the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to protective bail for a period of seven (07) days, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 500,000/- wotj P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. It is further directed that the petitioner shall surrender before the competent trial court within the stipulated period, falling which this protective bail shall stand automatically withdrawn and the surety forfeited. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application.Read more
Matter:-PROTECTIVE BAIL
209.F.R.A 36/2025 (S.B.) Peera Jee Anad Dada V/S Retd. Lt. Col. Zia Hussain Kizilbash Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 976Appeal dismissed with costs. Advocate's duty towards Court. Mala fide acts increasing backlog of cases.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
210.R.A (Civil Revision) 336/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Tayyab V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 936Suit under section 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 is titled based remedy; declaration is inherent. Dismissal under section 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 held misconceived; case remanded back.Read more
211.I. A 18/2026 (D.B.) ZUBAIR AMEER V/S BANK AL-FALAH LTD HYD Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
212.I. A 26/2026 (D.B.) MUHAMMAD LAIQ V/S ZTBL MATLI Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
213.R.A (Civil Revision) 44/2025 (S.B.) Walji Ram & Others V/S Dodo & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasRejection of plaint of under VII Rule 11 C.P.C; disputed question of title, possession, and survey identification require evidence. Suit restored.Read more
214.Const. P. 682/2026 (D.B.) Saeed Ahmed Jamali V/S P.O Sindh & 07 Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurPerson is not entitled who come before the Court with unclean hands.Read more
Matter:-Free Will/Quashment of FIR
215.I. A 9/2026 (D.B.) ABDUL WAHID V/S ZARAI TARAQUITI BANK LTD Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
216.Const. P. 2432/2026 (D.B.) Dr. Mudassir Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-ELECTION (DEPARTMENTAL / ASSOCIATION)
217.I. A 25/2026 (D.B.) NAJAMUDDIN V/S ZTBL MATLI Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
218.I. A 8/2026 (D.B.) ZULFIQAR ALI V/S ZARAI TARAQUITI BANK LTD Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
219.Const. P. 2025/2026 (D.B.) Syed Wamiq Abrar Bokhari V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 959In view of the above, the petitioner has successfully demonstrated that the continuation of his name on the ECL is devoid of legal basis, suffers from non-application of mind, and amounts to an unjustified restraint on his constitutional right to movement. 11. Resultantly, this petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority to recoil the impugned Memorandum dated 23.06.2023, which is set aside, and the respondents are required to forthwith remove the petitioner???s name from the Exit Control List and extend all consequential relief in accordance with law. All pending application(s) are also disposed of in the said terms.Read more
Matter:-E.C.L.
220.Const. P. 2535/2016 (D.B.) Muhammad Zubair V/S Administrator KMC and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 958In response, learned counsel for the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) submitted that the petitioner???s case for grant of proforma promotion would be considered within a period of two weeks through issuance of an appropriate circular, and that the necessary process would be completed within the said timeframe. 4. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent, the instant petition stands disposed of with the direction that the aforesaid exercise be undertaken within two weeks and case of the petitioner shall be considered for proforma promotion accordingly without fail.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
221.Const. P. 737/2026 (D.B.) Zahid Hussain V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 957It is also a settled principle of law that an order of promotion issued through a lawful departmental process carries a presumption of legality and validity unless it is lawfully set aside by a competent authority after due process. Interim interference with such an order, particularly without strong and legally sustainable reasons, not only disturbs settled service rights but also causes irreparable prejudice to the employee concerned. 12. Viewed in its entirety, the impugned order dated 12.01.2026 suffers from jurisdictional defects, procedural irregularity, and legal impropriety. The Tribunal has failed to exercise its discretion in accordance with settled judicial principles governing grant of interim relief, resulting in a manifest miscarriage of justice. 13. Accordingly, it is concluded that the impugned order and the consequent proceedings are without lawful authority, coram non judice, and is set aside. The Petitioner, therefore, is entitled to restoration of his lawful status, along with protection from any coercive action, pending final adjudication of the matter in accordance with law. 14. This petition along with pending application(s) is disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER
222.Const. P. 1681/2016 (D.B.) Arsalan Ghous and Ors V/S Province of SIndh and ORs Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 956Furthermore, this Court has already adjudicated upon an identical controversy in the case of similarly placed employees, wherein it was held that such irregular appointees are not entitled to regularization. The petitioners, being similarly situated, cannot claim any better footing. 13. In these circumstances, the impugned circular dated 05.10.2015 and the consequential actions taken by the respondents cannot be termed as illegal or without lawful authority. Rather, the same were issued to rectify irregularities and ensure compliance with the governing rules and principles of transparency in public employment. 14. Consequently, these petitions, being devoid of merit, are hereby dismissed, along with all pending applications, with no order as to costs.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
223.Const. P. 1723/2026 (D.B.) Aurangzaib Khan Bungush & others V/S Province of Sindh & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 962In view of the foregoing, this Court finds no illegality, infirmity, or jurisdictional defect in the impugned actions of the respondents. On the contrary, the actions are found to be fully justified, lawful, and taken in the larger public interest to curb encroachments, regulate traffic, and enforce statutory provisions. 16. Before parting with this one judgment, we may also observe that primarily roadside encroachments and improper parking are causing congestion and public inconvenience, reflecting apathy on the part of the district administration. The Chief Secretary Sindh, DIG Traffics, and transport authorities are directed to immediately remove illegal roadside parking, failing which proceedings under Article 204 of the Constitution shall be initiated against the responsible officials upon report to this Court. 17. Resultantly, the instant petition, being devoid of merit and barred by earlier adjudication, is dismissed along with pending application(s). However, it is reiterated that the petitioners shall remain at liberty to conduct their transport business strictly from lawfully designated and approved terminals in accordance with law.Read more
Matter:-DE-SEAL
224.Const. P. 5649/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Jameela Khatoon V/S Federation of Pakistan & another Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 954In these circumstances, the mechanism devised by this Court requiring deposit of pensionary benefits with the Nazir and subsequent disbursement upon verification strikes a fair and equitable balance between safeguarding the petitioner???s rights and ensuring transparency in disbursement. This arrangement also prevents any further exploitation or interference by third parties, including family members, in the receipt of pension. 10. Accordingly, it is held that the petitioner is entitled to receive her pensionary benefits, and the amount already deposited with the Nazir shall be disbursed directly to her after proper verification, preferably at her residence, considering her age and condition. It is further directed that future pension shall also be routed through the Nazir, who shall ensure its disbursement to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law as per her entitlement. 11. With these observations, the petition along with pending application(s) stands disposed of.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
225.Const. P. 1243/2025 (S.B.) Muhammad Rashid & Another V/S Muhammad Moin Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 994
Matter:-AGAINST ORDER OF CIVIL REVISION (CR)
226.Const. P. 1698/2026 (D.B.) Aman Ali & others V/S PMDC & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 910MDCAT eligibility criteria cannot be reduced by PMDC.Read more
Matter:-Result / Admission (MD-CAT)
227.Criminal Appeal 65/2024 (D.B.) Qasim & another V/S The state Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas
228.I. A 11/2026 (D.B.) RAWAL ALI MEMON V/S ALLIED BANK LIMITED Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-BANKING
229.Const. P. 718/2026 (D.B.) Deedar Ahmed V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurInvestigation falling under exclusive domain of Investigating Officer.Read more
Matter:-Investigation
230.Const. P. 6045/2023 (D.B.) M/s Searle Pakistan Ltd V/S Nazim Ahmed Khan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 945After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is willing to conduct a de novo inquiry through a neutral person within one month, confront all allegations, and conclude proceedings by submitting recommendations to the competent authority, which shall pass a speaking order after hearing the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed to this proposal and sought the disposal of the petition on these terms. The proposal being reasonable is accepted. 6. In view of the above and with the consent of the parties, the petition is disposed of with directions to conduct a de novo inquiry through a neutral Inquiry Officer, who shall confront the respondents with all allegations by holding the regular inquiry and conclude the proceedings within one month. The competent authority shall thereafter pass a speaking order after hearing all concerned. The issue of back benefits shall remain subject to the outcome of the regular inquiry. Consequently, the orders of the learned Single Bench and Full Bench of NIRC are set aside, and the matter is remanded for de novo inquiry as discussed supra. All pending applications also stand disposed of.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
231.Const. P. 4611/2025 (D.B.) Masroor Ali Memon V/S Federation of Pakistan & others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 941In light of the above legal position, the repeated supersession of the petitioner, despite judicial directions and absence of subsisting legal impediment, is arbitrary, mala fide in law, and violative of settled principles of due process and equality. 15. The impugned order dated 08.08.2025 to the extent of the petitioner cannot be sustained as it is based on redundant and previously adjudicated grounds, violates the binding judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 18.07.2024, and disregards settled principles laid down by the Supreme Court regarding promotion consideration, finality of judicial findings, and non-perpetuation of extinguished stigma. 16. Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to be considered for promotion from the date his juniors were promoted, along with all consequential benefits, by way of circulation and the impugned order to the extent of petitioner is set aside as being without lawful authority and of no legal effect. 17. This petition stands disposed of along with pending application(s) in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE
232.Const. P. 2891/2024 (D.B.) Sajjad Ali & Another V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 947During proceedings, this Court, vide order dated 19.11.2025, struck off the name of petitioner No. 2. however, the case of petitioner No. 1 was directed to be reconsidered by the respondent department, as he had already submitted a representation for regularization. The competent authority of the respondent is directed to decide the pending representation, or any fresh one, within three weeks in accordance with law. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without touching the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of along with any pending applications.Read more
Matter:-SERVICE / REGULARIZATION
233.Const. P. 5552/2021 (D.B.) Mst. Darakshan Ishaq V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 943Conversely, the learned AAG assisted by the learned counsel for respondents (DUHS) denied the petitioner???s claims and submit that the deceased initially served on a contractual basis and was regularized only on 16.05.2016 as Lecturer (BPS-18). They assert that only regular service counts toward gratuity, and since the deceased rendered 4 years and 7 months of regular service, he did not meet the minimum requirement of more than 5 years under the DUHS Pension Statutes, 2007. The respondents maintain that all other admissible benefits, including financial assistance, group insurance, and provident fund, have already been paid. They further contend that contractual service cannot be counted for gratuity, deny allegations of malafide, and state that the petitioner???s children did not apply for available posts, though he/she would be considered subject to eligibility and vacancy. The respondents conclude that the petition is misconceived and liable to be dismissed, when confronted the legal position of the case, both parties agreed in the terms that the competent authority shall hear the petitioner and pass speaking order on the plea taken by the petitioner in the present case, request seems to be reasonable and is acceded to. 4. Without touching the merits of the case, the competent authority of the respondent-University is directed to reconsider the matter on all aspect of the case and decide the petitioner???s case strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned (speaking) order within a period of three weeks with meaningful hearing. Insofar as the claim for appointment under the deceased quota is concerned, the same shall also be examined and decided in accordance with law. The petition along with pending application(s) stand disposed of in the above terms.Read more
Matter:-PENSION
234.Const. P. 244/2026 (S.B.) Mst bakhtawar Shafique V/S Adnan Adil Mithwani and others Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadG&W Act, 1890, Dismissal of application u/s 25 does not bar application u/s 12Read more
Matter:-Family
235.Const. P. 2837/2017 (D.B.) Afzal Hussain V/S Province of Sindh and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 851For the reasons set out hereinabove, it is held that the Board of Revenue, Sindh, was vested with lawful and statutory jurisdiction under Section 8 of the Sindh Board of Revenue Act, 1957, to entertain and adjudicate upon the review of its earlier order. The mere citation of Section 163 of the Sindh Land Revenue Act, 1967, in the initial review application does not, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, vitiate the proceedings or render them void ab initio, particularly when the power of review was otherwise available under Section 8 of the Act of 1957. The instant petition raises disputed questions of fact and title, for which an adequate and efficacious alternate remedy before the competent civil courts exists and is, in fact, already being pursued. Consequently, the matter does not warrant the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. The Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the grant of a declaration, writ of prohibition, or any other discretionary relief in the present circumstances. Accordingly, this Constitution Petition is dismissed, along with all pending applications, if any. It is, however, clarified that: (a) Any observations made herein are confined strictly to the question of maintainability and the jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue in relation to the impugned review proceedings; (b) Nothing contained in this judgment shall be deemed to constitute a final determination regarding title, ownership, possession, the validity of sale deeds, or the rights of any third parties; (c) The parties shall remain at liberty to agitate all permissible pleas before the competent civil court or any other forum of competent jurisdiction, which shall adjudicate the matter independently, strictly in accordance with law and on its own merits, without being influenced by any tentative observations recorded herein. The petitioner shall be at liberty to call in question the legality of the impugned order before the competent civil court, if he so desires.Read more
Matter:-Land Matters
236.Const. P. 104/2026 (S.B.) Sofi Sajjad V/S Ayaz Ali Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 934Rejection of plaint treated as decree under section 2(2) CPC; failure to file Appeal under section 96 CPC renders writ incompetent. Petition dismissed.Read more
237.II.A. 44/2024 (S.B.) Talib Hussain Fareedi S/o Ghulam Hussain Fareedi V/S Abdul Ghani and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 977Where bar of limitation is evident, suit may be dismissed without recording evidence - Property Tax Form-1 (PT-1) entries neither confer nor constitute title to immovable property - PT-1 entry reflect fiscal liability, not proprietary rights - A time-barred challenge cannot be received through ancillary reliefs - Ancillary reliefs do not alter the true nature of the lis.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
238.Const. P. 104/2026 (S.B.) Sofi Sajjad V/S Ayaz Ali Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2026 SHC MPK 935Rejection of plaint treated as decree under section 2(2) CPC; failure to file Appeal under section 96 CPC renders writ incompetent. Petition dismissed.Read more
239.Cr.Bail 188/2026 (S.B.) Wajahad Almani V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2026 SHC SUK 988Bail application dismissed in case of honour killing.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
240.Cr.Acq.A. 135/2026 (S.B.) JAHANGIR AKBAR S/O ALI AKBAR V/S SOHAIL AHMED & ANOTHER Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
241.R.A (Civil Revision) 136/2024 (S.B.) Liaquat Mehmood & others V/S Mujeeb Ur Rehman & others Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur KhasCivil Revision Application is dismissed; concurrent findings upheld and execution of the alleged sale agreement remained unproved under articles 79 and 82 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984.Read more
242.Cr.Bail 122/2026 (S.B.) Gulzar Lakhan V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurBail granted.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
243.Cr.Bail 167/2026 (S.B.) Ameer Bux Bugti V/S The State Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurSpecific role prescribed, bail dismissed.Read more
Matter:-CUSTODY
244.Cr.Bail 1354/2025 (S.B.) Shoaib Ahmed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at HyderabadAlleged offences under PECA were bailable at relevant time. Bail granted.Read more
Matter:-BAIL BEFORE ARREST
245.Cr.Bail 56/2026 (S.B.) Mst: Dordana Fareed V/S The State Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:-Bail After Arrest
246.Criminal Miscelleneous 172/2026 (S.B.) Muhammad Azam Bozdar V/S The State & others Sindh High Court, Bench at SukkurAgainst the order.Read more
Matter:-AGAINST THE ORDER
247.Const. P. 362/2025 (S.B.) Sajjad Ali Solangi V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Matter:-Harasment
248.Const. P. 40/2022 (D.B.) M/s Al-Momin Packaging Ind Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 968Audit exemption clause 105 in second schedule ITO ??? effect of repeal.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
249.Const. P. 5833/2022 (D.B.) Murshid Builderes Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 967Audit exemption clause 105A in second schedule ITO, even if beneficial legislation, did not apply retrospectively to pending audits.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX
250.Const. P. 1593/2019 (D.B.) Engro Eximp Agriproduct Pvt Ltd V/S The Deputy Commissioner (Audit) IR & Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi 2026 SHC KHI 966Audit exemption clause 105 in second schedule ITO, even if beneficial legislation, did not apply retrospectively to pending audits.Read more
Matter:-INCOME TAX